It's that time of year again -- when we turn our eyes to Lake Superior State University (in beautiful Sault Ste. Marie, Michigan), and their official list of this year's banished words.

It's really not all that amazing or ginormous, truth be told, but since both are on this year's list, we thought it only fitting to throw them into this article's title. The word "amazing" actually had what looks like an organized ballot-box-stuffing effort which successfully put it at the top of the list this year. Which is (sorry, I just have to...) truly amazing.

One other notable entry was "Winning The Future," which (as the folks at L.S.S.U. helpfully point out) has already been used by both Barack Obama and Newt Gingrich on the campaign trail. I think it was the only time last year I agreed with Sarah Palin, in fact, when she (also very helpfully) pointed out that "WTF" has another meaning in the initial-speak of today's plugged-in youth. Ahem.

But enough delay, let's get on with the list! You can view the whole thing (with commentary) at the official page for the "Lake Superior State University's 37th annual List of Words Banished from the Queen's English for Misuse, Overuse and General Uselessness" as it's worth reading in its entirety. This year's banished words and phrases:

Continue Reading »

[Program Note: Only a few days left in our Holiday Fundraising Drive! If you're sending your donation in by "snail mail," drop me an email and let me know the amount, and I will add it to our total. We're very close to reaching the goal we set, so get those last-minute donations in, folks!]

In lieu of a column today, we're going to throw the conversation open, with a question to get the ball rolling.

If Ron Paul wins the Iowa caucuses, what will the mainstream, inside-the-Beltway media do?

(A.) They'll suddenly discover Ron Paul, and give him the coverage and seriousness he deserves after winning the first Republican primary season contest.

(B.) They'll trot out the storylines they've been warming up all week to explain why "Ron Paul winning Iowa doesn't matter," and blame his win on (take your pick) the weather, the youth vote, the caucus system, the price of corn, or perhaps marijuana smokers.

(C.) They will totally and completely ignore Ron Paul and his victory, and go back to the Romney-versus-Gingrich storyline immediately.

-- Chris Weigant

Follow Chris on Twitter: @ChrisWeigant

[Program Note: We're going to have a week of frivolity here at CW.com this week. Partly, this is so I can work on other projects, and partly it's because nobody's in the mood for politics this time of year anyway (Iowans aside...). To start us off, here's a blast from the past, a cartoon from December of 2007. Hope everyone had a great... um... celebration day! Yeah, that's it....

About the Cartoonist | Reprint Policy

Welcome back to our annual year-end awards column!

In case you missed it, Part 1 of our "McLaughlin Awards" (named for the television show where we get these categories, of course) ran last week, so check it out.

Also for your convenience, here are all the previous years of these columns as well:

2010 -- [Part 1] [Part 2]
2009 -- [Part 1] [Part 2]
2008 -- [Part 1] [Part 2]
2007 -- [Part 1] [Part 2]
2006 -- [Part 1] [Part 2]

   Destined For Political Stardom

From the Republican side of the aisle, Chris Christie springs to mind this year. So does Marco Rubio, but then we gave him this award last year (and we're still betting he's on top of every list of vice presidential running mates out there in RepublicanLand later this year).

This year, instead, we turn to the Democrats to find the winner of Destined For Political Stardom. If Elizabeth Warren manages to wrest Teddy Kennedy's old Senate seat away from the Republican usurper, she will indeed be on the road to Democratic stardom. So far, she's been extraordinarily effective on the campaign trail, and she seems to have a backbone of solid titanium.

Warren is the best the Democrats have seen since Bill Clinton at the ability to make complicated subjects easy to understand to average voters. She doesn't talk down to people, but she does talk in language just about everyone can understand.

Her campaign so far has been the populist model for every other Democrat to mimic if they want to catch the wave of anger at Wall Street, and use it to their benefit. Without question, Elizabeth Warren is Destined For Political Stardom.

Continue Reading »

President Obama is looking a lot stronger these days. Today, especially, the president emerges as the big winner in the showdown with John Boehner and the House Republicans. But Obama's been looking better and better all month, so Boehner caving should be seen as just the icing on the cake for Obama.

Of course, a big part of the reason why Obama is looking better and better politically is the fact that Republicans are looking worse and worse. The Republicans could easily have claimed the passage of the payroll tax holiday and unemployment insurance payments as their own victory -- if only they had played their cards right. This is no longer feasible for them to even attempt. Republicans, after all, successfully forced Obama to rescind a veto threat -- which nearly always weakens a president (especially when veto threats have been as rare as they have been under Obama's leadership). Forcing a president to eat his own words on a veto threat is usually considered a win for the opposition party.

Not this time. The entire pipeline poison pill part of the bill has been all but ignored by the media, since there was a much more entertaining story to cover: Republican-on-Republican cage-match fighting. Republicans in the Senate passed the bill with an overwhelming 89-10 vote -- far beyond "veto-proof." But because of this show of strength, it only made the House Republicans look small and petty when they refused to go along with the deal cut by Mitch McConnell. As the crisis dragged on, the House Republicans looked more and more like the gang who couldn't shoot straight. One assumes that after they returned to their home districts, they all got an earful from their constituents about their intransigence. Today, Boehner caved to the inevitable as a direct result.

Continue Reading »

[The Scene: A cozy room lit with a roaring fireplace. Santa sits at his desk, looking over his paperwork, a smoking pipe and a cup of hot chocolate at his elbow. Head Elf enters the room, and speaks to Mr. Claus.]

"OK, big guy, you keep putting it off, but we have got to get to the Washington naughty/nice list. It's almost time to load the sleigh, and we've got to issue orders to the Toy Room."

Santa sighs deeply. "You're right, I've been procrastinating too long. Well, draw nigh and let's see what they've asked for this year."

Head Elf whips out an iPad. Santa leans over to take a look. "Hey is that the new model?"

"Yeah, Steve Jobs got me a beta unit to play with... nice, eh?"

"Steve's been the greatest help this year, I have to admit. The North Pole is indeed Heaven for Steve, coming up with insanely great ideas for new toys for all the girls and boys. But let's get to it... who's on the list?"

"Barack Obama asked for..."

"Let me guess: a second term?"

"No, no, he asked for a quickly-falling unemployment rate for America. In his letter, he says he wants America back to work, and he figures the re-election will take care of itself if we can get unemployment below 7.5 percent by the election."

"How the heck am I supposed to wrap something like that, much less get it down the chimney? Never mind... who's next?"

Continue Reading »

Once again, we're tying something new with our annual awards columns, by asking for your nominees in advance. We got plenty of good suggestions last week, and we're hoping to get a few more this week.

Here are the categories for the second installment of our year-end awards. The column will run this Friday, instead of our usual talking points of the week. So put on your thinking caps, review the year that was, and let everyone know who (or what) you'd nominate for the following awards.

Continue Reading »

American troops are, finally, out of Iraq. The war is technically over. Our men and women in uniform will be home for the holidays. This is all good news, and is worth celebrating by a nation weary of decade-long wars.

As with everything to do with Iraq, the end of the war isn't without its own controversy. Voices from the left ominously warn that with thousands of security contractors remaining behind, the war isn't really over. Voices from the right ominously warn that the war is being "lost" even though most Americans are beyond caring how they're exactly defining a win or a loss at this advanced date.

I'm going to set these arguments to one side, however, since I don't think either one is immediately resolvable at this point (more time will be needed to see whose predictions come true, to put it another way). I'm also going to set aside the emotional question of whether Iraq was "worth it" or not (which is highly subjective, depending on how you personally define "worth it"). Instead, to mark the milestone of the last American troops to leave Iraq, I'd like to take a wider view and look at the entire region, post-Saddam and post-Arab Spring.

Continue Reading »

For the next two Fridays, instead of our usual nonsense here, we bring you instead our year-end awards columns. The categories for these awards are presented as an homage to the television show The McLaughlin Group, because they thought them up in the first place.

At this point, it seems 2011 was the "year of the primary debate," since the precedent set by Republicans this year for seemingly having a debate every week for six months will likely be followed for every election cycle to come. But that's just because it is fresh in everyone's mind -- a lot of other things happened this year which bear mentioning, so let's get right to the awards.

As always, if you disagree with any (or all) of my picks, feel free to make your own in the comments. The categories are completely open to interpretation, and don't forget that there will be a "Part 2" column next week, so I can likely squeeze things I forgot in there.

For reference, before I begin, here are the previous iterations of this column, should you want to go even further back upon Memory Lane:

2010 -- [Part 1] [Part 2]
2009 -- [Part 1] [Part 2]
2008 -- [Part 1] [Part 2]
2007 -- [Part 1] [Part 2]
2006 -- [Part 1] [Part 2]

   Biggest Winner Of 2011

As always, we're tempted to just hand the award to Wall Street and be done with it. Seems like they emerge winners no matter what else is happening (sigh).

We could also give it as a generic, for the idea of "running for president as self-promotion" -- an idea whose time has obviously come. The list of characters who used a run for the president as a clever method to sell books or television shows is quite impressive this year, in fact, and includes Donald Trump and Sarah Palin (even though neither one actually ran), as well as Herman Cain and Newt Gingrich who both shoehorned a run for the Oval Office into their pre-scheduled book tours.

Or we could define the award category as "the biggest absolute value of a win" and hand the award to Representative Kathy Hochul, who captured a seat in the House of Representatives (NY-26) that had been held by Republicans since the Civil War.

But instead we're going to interpret it more literally, and not politically. Militarily, in fact. The Biggest Winner Of 2011 was a combination of the Libyan rebels and N.A.T.O. airpower. You won't hear the line "airpower alone never wins wars" much in Washington anymore, one assumes, after the spectacularly quick victory by an untrained group of rebels in combination with high-tech precision bombing by the allies. No matter what happens to the actual government of Libyan in the future, the victory of the rebels, taken alone, has to be seen as the biggest winner of the year. From our point of view, this was about as good as war gets -- no American boots on the ground, no American fatalities, and the entire cost was nothing more than a rounding error in either Iraq or Afghanistan. Win-win, all around. Except for Ghaddafi, of course.

Continue Reading »

Two hundred and twenty years ago today (perhaps I should say "eleven score years ago...") America ratified the Bill of Rights -- the first ten amendments to our Constitution. Today we're all supposed to celebrate this achievement in American politics by making full use of our First Amendment rights of free speech (and, for me, the press).

Instead, I'd like to gently point out that the same Founding Fathers that achieved this monumental milestone in government (some of them, at least) were the same ones who tried to eviscerate these same basic protections -- within seven years of the Bill of Rights' ratification.

I speak, of course, of the notorious Alien and Sedition Acts. Within the first decade of Americans enjoying the Bill of Rights, one political faction tried to silence its opposition by instituting severe government censorship on newspapers and printers. "The press" is the only industry specifically mentioned in the Bill of Rights. It was the only private enterprise to be singled out as a basic human right. And -- in peacetime, no less -- it was the first to be attacked politically. In times of war, America almost always throws a large portion of the Bill of Rights out the window (see: every war we've ever fought, pretty much), but the Alien and Sedition Acts of 1798 were passed when America was, technically at least, at peace.

Continue Reading »