<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>ChrisWeigant.com</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.chrisweigant.com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com</link>
	<description>Reality-based political commentary</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 23:59:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Borderline Truthiness</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/09/02/borderline-truthiness/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/09/02/borderline-truthiness/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 23:57:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=2643</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>But politics isn't social science, where causality must be rigorously proven.  Politics is, to be blunt, whatever you can get away with saying to the voters.  Think not B.F. Skinner, but rather P.T. Barnum, in other words.  "Event X happened because party Y passed legislation Z" is an <em>expected</em> statement from a politician, on any subject under the sun.  Call it "spin" if you will, but a large part of it lies in convincing the American public that you have a right to claim credit because of your policies.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/09/02/borderline-truthiness/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama Poll Watch -- August, 2010</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/09/01/opw1008/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/09/01/opw1008/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Sep 2010 20:25:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama Poll Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Bill of Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=2635</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Augusts, to be frank, are not President Obama's friend.  The past month was no different, at least as measured by public opinion polling.  Obama was on a downswing heading into the month, and his numbers reflect this in a stark way.  In other words, it was a bad month for Obama.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/09/01/opw1008/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Turning The Page On Iraq</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/08/31/turning-the-page-on-iraq/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/08/31/turning-the-page-on-iraq/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Sep 2010 01:53:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=2626</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Obama struck a rather humble tone in his remarks, which seemed just about right for the situation.  He didn't go out of his way to either claim personal credit, or point the finger of blame.  He even included President Bush, by name, in his remarks, after phoning him earlier today.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/08/31/turning-the-page-on-iraq/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How About A Press Conference, Mister President?</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/08/30/how-about-a-press-conference-mister-president/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/08/30/how-about-a-press-conference-mister-president/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2010 00:45:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=2620</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>So, while I'll watch tomorrow's Oval Office address, I will be thinking about the question I'd like to ask Obama right now: "Mr. President, when are you going to hold your next press conference?"</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/08/30/how-about-a-press-conference-mister-president/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>88</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [136] -- Girding For Battle</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/08/27/ftp136/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/08/27/ftp136/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Aug 2010 23:36:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Free Speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Talking Points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Name-dropping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=2609</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The big fight this election season hasn't really dawned yet.  And all the issues in the past will likely pale in comparison to the big fight that's just ahead of us.  Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (to his credit) set up this fight, right before the midterm election's homestretch.  The big fight this year is going to be over extending the Bush tax cuts to the wealthiest two percent of American workers, and to the top three percent of American small businesses.  On the other side are, respectively, <em>ninety-eight percent</em> of American workers, and <em>ninety-seven percent</em> of American small businesses.  Not bad odds, even for Democrats.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/08/27/ftp136/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>46</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rinse And Repeat</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/08/26/rinse-and-repeat/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/08/26/rinse-and-repeat/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Aug 2010 00:23:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cartoons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Humor]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=2606</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#160;

About the Cartoonist  &#124;  Reprint Policy
&#160;
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/08/26/rinse-and-repeat/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cartoon Thursday</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/08/26/cartoon-thursday/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/08/26/cartoon-thursday/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Aug 2010 00:21:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cartoons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Humor]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=2601</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#160;
We're going to take a cartoon break today, because I have not just one but actually two cartoons waiting in the wings from C.W. Cunningham.  I'm going to post them separately here, because the second one needs its own title.  The first shows a different perspective of an earlier cartoon.
Enjoy!
-- Chris Weigant
&#160;

About the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/08/26/cartoon-thursday/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tea Party&#039;s GOP Hostile Takeover Continues</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/08/25/tea-partys-gop-hostile-takeover-continues/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/08/25/tea-partys-gop-hostile-takeover-continues/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Aug 2010 00:03:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Bill of Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=2593</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The answer, as with all things Tea Party, is (once again): "it's hard to be sure."  We won't really know until after the midterm elections, and at that point so much "spin" will be on the airwaves one might (if one grew up in Kansas, for the sake of argument) be excused the immediate impulse to run for the tornado shelter in the backyard.  In other words, even <em>after</em> the elections, the answer is going to depend on who is doing the answering.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/08/25/tea-partys-gop-hostile-takeover-continues/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>27</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Disappointing Poll Results</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/08/24/disappointing-poll-results/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/08/24/disappointing-poll-results/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Aug 2010 00:53:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=2587</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Yesterday we <a href="http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/08/23/to-lefties-how-does-obama-disappoint/">ran a poll here</a> on why, exactly, Obama has disappointed so many Lefties (and other people who voted for him).  Today we present the results of this poll, which (so far) has garnered exactly 100 entries, a statistically nice round number.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/08/24/disappointing-poll-results/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>16</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>To Lefties: How Does Obama Disappoint?</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/08/23/to-lefties-how-does-obama-disappoint/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/08/23/to-lefties-how-does-obama-disappoint/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Aug 2010 23:42:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Bill of Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=2581</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Since it's Monday, meaning this column will appear in <em>Huffington Post</em> as well as on my own website, I thought I'd do the courtesy of actually asking a fairly large, fairly Lefty audience what they thought, instead of just offering up my own explanations for the phenomenon.  So, what do you think?  I promise I'll tally everyone's comments in an effort to try to qualify what the Left (or at least, the portion of it reading this) really thinks about their disappointment with the president.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/08/23/to-lefties-how-does-obama-disappoint/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>34</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [135] -- The Sky Is Falling!</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/08/20/ftp135/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/08/20/ftp135/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Aug 2010 00:08:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Free Speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Talking Points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Bill of Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=2568</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The media, quite obviously, has lost any capacity it once may have had for self-examination, to say nothing of its sense of irony.  Every so often, this is proven beyond doubt by a single story.  This, sadly, is one of those times.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/08/20/ftp135/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>72</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Media Blows Another Story</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/08/19/media-blows-another-story/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/08/19/media-blows-another-story/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Aug 2010 01:30:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=2563</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>There's a mini-tizzy in the media world today after a new poll was released which stated that eighteen percent of Americans think President Obama is a Muslim.  "Golly gee!  How could they think that?" is the overwhelming tone of most of this media tizziness.  Only one article I've seen (so far), though, correctly points the finger where it belongs: at the media themselves.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/08/19/media-blows-another-story/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Senate Midterm Election Overview</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/08/18/senate-midterm-election-overview/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/08/18/senate-midterm-election-overview/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Aug 2010 00:04:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=2556</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>I should say, up front, that I think Democrats are going to lose a few seats in the Senate, but that they will regain control of the chamber after the votes are counted.  But while the House remains volatile in this respect, the landscape for the Senate has noticeably improved for the Democrats.  So there's a little good news and a little bad news for everyone.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/08/18/senate-midterm-election-overview/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>16</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Question For Regular Readers</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/08/17/a-question-for-regular-readers/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/08/17/a-question-for-regular-readers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Aug 2010 02:51:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=2550</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Since we've had quite a number of very contentious columns for the past few weeks, I thought we could all use a break, so that I may present a totally and utterly self-serving column.<p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/08/17/a-question-for-regular-readers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>24</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama Reframes Mosque Debate</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/08/16/obama-reframes-mosque-debate/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/08/16/obama-reframes-mosque-debate/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Aug 2010 00:21:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Free Speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Bill of Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=2544</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>President Barack Obama, in a White House Ramadan address last Friday, expressed his thoughts on the "Ground Zero mosque" debate, and in doing so not only got it exactly right, but also managed to change the debate in a considerable way which few have noticed yet.  Because in his comments Friday (and in his off-the-cuff comment the next day), the president refocused the debate from the notion of "should be allowed" to the question of "should."  In doing so, Obama elevated the level of the debate for both him and the project's detractors.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/08/16/obama-reframes-mosque-debate/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>252</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [134] -- Some Reality For Gibbs</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/08/13/ftp134/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/08/13/ftp134/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Aug 2010 00:36:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign Ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Talking Points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Name-dropping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=2534</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Because before we get to that, we simply must begin our column the way we do every week here, which is to call for the abolition of the Pentagon.  Yes, as we've done consistently for the past 133 weeks, we demand that the Defense Department's budget be zeroed out entirely.  Oh, and also that we immediately adopt a Canadian-style health care system.  Can't forget that, as we've been railing about it for ever since Friday Talking Points, Volume One.  And lest we forget, President Obama is nothing more than George W. Bush's third term.  As I said, none of this will come as any surprise to faithful readers, since we've been saying this sort of thing all along, ever since we were massively disappointed that Dennis Kucinich didn't win the presidency.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/08/13/ftp134/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>120</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Colorado&#039;s Senate Race</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/08/12/colorados-senate-race/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/08/12/colorados-senate-race/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Aug 2010 00:15:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=2530</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>But those are just the lessons of the primary.  You could draw facile conclusions from them -- "Tea Party Ascendant, Progressive Defeated" -- but the real question is what it all means for the general election.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/08/12/colorados-senate-race/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>With Friends Like These...</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/08/11/with-friends-like-these/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/08/11/with-friends-like-these/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Aug 2010 00:32:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=2524</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>White House press secretary Robert Gibbs recently expressed his frustration with what he called the "professional left," in <a href="http://www.salon.com/news/opinion/glenn_greenwald/index.html?story=/opinion/greenwald/2010/08/10/gibbs">no uncertain terms</a>.  Which, ironically, means the White House and the "professional left" have now achieved parity in that both sides express withering contempt for the other.  The irony lies in the fact that both are probably thinking the exact same thing about each other: "With friends like these, who needs enemies?"</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/08/11/with-friends-like-these/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>79</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Good News And Bad News</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/08/10/good-news-and-bad-news/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/08/10/good-news-and-bad-news/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Aug 2010 00:55:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cartoons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Humor]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=2522</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
About the Cartoonist  &#124;  Reprint Policy
&#160;
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/08/10/good-news-and-bad-news/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>If Gay Marriage Wins...</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/08/09/if-gay-marriage-wins/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/08/09/if-gay-marriage-wins/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Aug 2010 23:36:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Bill of Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=2508</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Last week, a federal judge handed down his decision in the case  <em>Perry v. Schwarzenegger</em>, which said (in no uncertain terms) that gay marriage was a civil right, and should be guaranteed to all -- no matter what voters thought about it -- in much the same way that interracial marriage is a constitutional right guaranteed to all (which happened via a similarly-contentious federal court ruling in the 1960s).  While this ruling was rightfully hailed by gay rights supporters, everyone knows that there is still a long road ahead until it reaches the Supreme Court, where the matter may be fundamentally decided.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/08/09/if-gay-marriage-wins/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>20</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [133] -- The Silly Season Begins</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/08/06/ftp133/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/08/06/ftp133/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Aug 2010 00:45:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign Ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Talking Points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Bill of Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=2500</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>August in Washington means the beginning of the official "silly season" of politics.  This is because Congress takes the whole month off, and political news stories become rather thin on the ground.  Intrepid political reporters, wishing to be on vacation themselves, get lazy and start going crazy over non-stories hyped into political wildfires seemingly overnight -- over the silliest of subjects.  But these fun and games have not quite yet begun, because the Senate wrapped up work this week, and a few legal decisions of great moment were in the news.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/08/06/ftp133/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>160</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Perry v. Schwarzenegger</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/08/05/perry-v-schwarzenegger/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/08/05/perry-v-schwarzenegger/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Aug 2010 23:40:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Bill of Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=2495</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>There are certain court cases everyone schooled in America at least recognizes the names of: <em>Marbury v. Madison, Plessy v. Ferguson, Brown v. Board of Education</em>, and, most recently, <em>Roe v. Wade</em>.  Even if you don't remember the particular details in these cases, chances are you'll at least have heard all of these names before.  And we could be on the brink of another landmark case entering this pantheon of pivotal legal decisions: <em>Perry v. Schwarzenegger</em>.  Yes, California's "Governator" may go down in history as being on the wrong side of this case (even though he personally supports overturning Proposition 8).</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/08/05/perry-v-schwarzenegger/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama Poll Watch -- July, 2010</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/08/04/opw1007/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/08/04/opw1007/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Aug 2010 21:32:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama Poll Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=2485</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>President Barack Obama has reached the first crossover point of his presidency, where his job approval numbers with the public are lower than his disapproval numbers.  This is not exactly good news for Obama fans, especially heading into a midterm election.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/08/04/opw1007/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Conservative Mosque Hypocrisy</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/08/03/conservative-mosque-hypocrisy/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/08/03/conservative-mosque-hypocrisy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Aug 2010 22:41:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Free Speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Bill of Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=2474</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Instead, I am amazed once again (even though I really shouldn't be by this point) at how adept Republicans and conservatives (but not hardcore Libertarians, I have to admit, who generally put their political philosophy above pandering to the public) are at suddenly throwing large parts of their core ideology over the side of the boat whenever something is happening (or about to happen) that they just don't agree with on a gut level.  "Get the government off everyone's back!" very quickly becomes: "Get the government into your bedroom, your end-of-life decisions, or what chemicals you choose to ingest in the privacy of your own home -- and do it in a manner which we agree with!"</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/08/03/conservative-mosque-hypocrisy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>67</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://www.nyc.gov/html/om/html/2010b/media/pc080310_govisland512k.asx" length="471" type="video/x-ms-asf" />
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama&#039;s Iraq Withdrawal Timeline</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/08/02/obamas-iraq-withdrawal-timeline/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/08/02/obamas-iraq-withdrawal-timeline/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Aug 2010 23:28:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=2464</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>But in all the media reports I've seen yet on the Iraq withdrawal part of the speech (considered by the media to be the most newsworthy part), very little attention is being paid to how exactly we got where we are today -- President Obama announcing he's meeting an important milestone on the timetable for American military withdrawal from Iraq.  So I thought it'd be worth a look back at what preceded today's speech.  Because, as I said, the mainstream media so far have fallen down on the job of providing any sort of context or perspective (or, even, "a timeline") to Obama's Iraq withdrawal whatsoever -- or, even worse than omitting things, getting them factually wrong.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/08/02/obamas-iraq-withdrawal-timeline/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [132] -- The DMV?  Really?</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/07/30/ftp132/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/07/30/ftp132/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 23:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign Ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Talking Points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=2453</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Whoops!  Looks like the first thing that's been going on is that the region <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/07/29/AR2010072905868.html">now has a new nickname</a> -- the "DMV" -- amongst the hipster set (note: I fully understand that that use of "hipster" automatically disqualifies me from judging what is cool and what is not among today's youth).  This moniker comes from the hip-hop music scene, and it stands for "District (of Columbia), Maryland, and Virginia."</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/07/30/ftp132/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>29</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Netroots Nation Musings</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/07/29/netroots-nation-musings/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/07/29/netroots-nation-musings/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 01:20:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Name-dropping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=2448</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>So I have arrived back home from the big Netroots Nation conference in Las Vegas.  Since it was the first one I've been to, I thought I'd share some random impressions.  Now, I know this sort of thing doesn't appeal to everyone (which is why I didn't even attempt to "liveblog" the conference), because quite frankly if you weren't there then you probably don't want to hear about it.  For those readers, I apologize, and swear we'll be right back to normal columns here starting tomorrow.  This is also why I posted a column very late yesterday as well, to give you something else to read, just in case this sort of thing bores you.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/07/29/netroots-nation-musings/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>20</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cocaine Sentencing Injustice Slightly Lessened</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/07/29/cocaine-sentencing-injustice-slightly-lessened/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/07/29/cocaine-sentencing-injustice-slightly-lessened/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 07:34:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=2442</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Crack cocaine, it is widely known, causes irrational behavior.  I speak not of irrational behavior among the drug's users, but rather among politicians.  It has done so ever since crack appeared on the scene in America during the 1980s.  Today it was announced that Congress has approved a bill (which will now head for President Obama's desk) which will scale back the worst of the irrational legislation which passed in the Reagan era.  Somewhat.  In true incrementalist fashion, Democrats have now made things <em>slightly less unfair</em>, but fell far short of actual fairness.  It's as if, right after the Civil War, Congress announced that black people would now count as <em>four</em>-fifths of a person, instead of the previous three-fifths -- in other words, a step towards equality, but not exactly the giant leap of the Thirteenth and Fourteenth Amendments.  Which makes it rather hard to praise such an effort, even though it does represent (some) progress.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/07/29/cocaine-sentencing-injustice-slightly-lessened/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Program Note</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/07/28/program-note-13/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/07/28/program-note-13/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 11:23:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=2438</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We are back at home base, as is the car... to which I can only respond: "don't ask."
I apologize for the interruption in our normal column service, and promise everyone that a Wednesday column will appear at least pretty close to normal posting time.
I just drove 500+ miles, and for the first time in a [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/07/28/program-note-13/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>From The Archives -- Taxing Marijuana</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/07/23/from-the-archives-taxing-marijuana/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/07/23/from-the-archives-taxing-marijuana/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Jul 2010 00:00:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=2433</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[Program Note: Sorry, no Friday Talking Points column today.  The good news is that this will be our final "encore presentation" of an old column, and new columns will begin again on Monday.  This column ran approximately a year ago, and was rather prophetic, since a report just out by the folks at [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/07/23/from-the-archives-taxing-marijuana/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Reaganomics Today</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/07/22/reaganomics-today/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/07/22/reaganomics-today/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2010 00:00:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cartoons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Humor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=2428</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Another dispatch from our resident cartoonist, C.W. Cunningham.  And you thought there would be nothing here but a reprint of an old column today... surprise!
&#160;

About the Cartoonist  &#124;  Reprint Policy
&#160;
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/07/22/reaganomics-today/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>From The Archives -- For Michael Collins</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/07/21/from-the-archives-for-michael-collins/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/07/21/from-the-archives-for-michael-collins/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2010 00:00:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=2423</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Quick -- who was Michael Collins?</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/07/21/from-the-archives-for-michael-collins/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>From The Archives -- Tea And Sympathy</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/07/20/from-the-archives-tea-and-sympathy-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/07/20/from-the-archives-tea-and-sympathy-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jul 2010 23:29:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=2418</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Tea doesn't get much respect in America.  This historical snubbing will continue Wednesday, with protests across America meant to evoke the Boston Tea Party, a seminal event in the foundation of our county.  How effective these protests will be is going to be open to interpretation, however.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/07/20/from-the-archives-tea-and-sympathy-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>238</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>More Biden, Please</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/07/19/more-biden-please/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/07/19/more-biden-please/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jul 2010 00:29:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Vice President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=2412</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The White House is, quite obviously, getting back into campaign mode.  This is a good thing for Democrats, because it means putting the last spadeful of dirt on the carcass of President Obama's hopes of bipartisanship in Washington during his term of office.  But while Obama has recently begun to make the case to voters why electing Democrats this November is a good idea, Vice President Joe Biden has apparently been doing a much better job in terms of framing the debate on Democratic terms.  Which means the smartest thing Obama could do right now is to send the Vice President out in front of the media and in front of campaign events to make the case a lot more strongly than Obama could (or should).  In other words: more Biden, please.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/07/19/more-biden-please/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>32</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [131] -- Democratic Campaign Advice</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/07/16/ftp131/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/07/16/ftp131/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jul 2010 23:14:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Talking Points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=2403</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>This week, Congress -- moving with its usual less-than-blinding speed -- passed a Wall Street reform bill, a mere two years after the crisis hit.  Wall Street responded by pulling a secret lever which caused the biggest earthquake Washington has ever felt.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/07/16/ftp131/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>37</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Some Good News For Obama</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/07/15/some-good-news-for-obama/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/07/15/some-good-news-for-obama/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jul 2010 23:32:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=2398</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>President Obama got two pieces of good news today: the Senate passed Wall Street reform, and the volcano of oil on the seabed of the Gulf of Mexico may finally have been brought under control.  Whether this does him any good with the public remains to be seen, however.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/07/15/some-good-news-for-obama/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>18</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Fall Political Schedule</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/07/13/the-fall-political-schedule/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/07/13/the-fall-political-schedule/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jul 2010 23:11:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign Ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=2393</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The next few weeks could turn out to be the most important politically in the remainder of this year.  Because this may be the last chance Congress has of passing any big or contentious legislation, before politics consumes everything (even more than at the current time).  This is due to a combination of factors, but mostly boils down to the congressional calendar and the midterm election season.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/07/13/the-fall-political-schedule/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>68</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How Democrats Should Respond To Jon Kyl</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/07/12/how-democrats-should-respond-to-jon-kyl/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/07/12/how-democrats-should-respond-to-jon-kyl/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jul 2010 23:57:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=2386</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>But this blade cuts both ways.  If Republicans are going to stop a bill to extend unemployment which costs less than $40 billion, then how can they turn around and advocate extending the Bush tax cuts on the rich which would cost almost <em>seven hundred billion dollars</em> and still say with a straight face that they're some sort of "deficit hawks"?</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/07/12/how-democrats-should-respond-to-jon-kyl/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>17</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [130] -- Who Is This &quot;They&quot; Obama Speaks Of?</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/07/09/ftp130/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/07/09/ftp130/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jul 2010 00:17:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Talking Points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Vice President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=2374</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>My biggest problem with both Obama's speech and Emanuel's interview is that neither one of them truly seems to understand that an election is underway.  The word "Republican" is not uttered once by President Obama.  Rahm only uses the word four times, and only two of those are really drawing distinctions between what Democrats want to do, and what Republicans want to do (or, more to the point, not to do).  And <em>neither one of them</em> uses the word "Democrat" (or "Democrats" or "Democratic") <em>once</em>.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/07/09/ftp130/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>75</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What Is Jerry Brown Smoking?</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/07/08/what-is-jerry-brown-smoking/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/07/08/what-is-jerry-brown-smoking/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jul 2010 23:46:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=2369</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>I have to apologize right away for that headline.  But it is hard to resist the urge to use the "what have you been smoking?" joke when discussing California Attorney General Jerry Brown's recent comments on marijuana, since Brown is talking such patent nonsense.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/07/08/what-is-jerry-brown-smoking/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama Poll Watch -- June, 2010</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/07/07/opw1006/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/07/07/opw1006/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jul 2010 22:29:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama Poll Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=2360</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Obama, after gaining a bit in his average approval ratings in May, slipped back in June.  But the reversal was slight, continuing a five-month streak of amazingly stable numbers.  Since February, Obama's approval rating has stayed within one half of one percentage point, which is pretty remarkable.  Unfortunately, this trend may be at an end, and his numbers may be headed even further downwards in July.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/07/07/opw1006/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>31</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Media&#039;s Tea Party</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/07/06/the-medias-tea-party/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/07/06/the-medias-tea-party/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jul 2010 23:58:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Other]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=2354</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The Tea Party movement could possibly be generalized as a group of people who are proud of (and sometimes revel in) being impossible to generalize.  This, of course, doesn't stop the media from trying.  In today's sad state of American journalism, everything's got to have a simplistic narrative that fits within a 15-second soundbite, at the very maximum.  Nuances and subtleties are out.  Strong statements beginning with phrases like: "The Tea Partiers are..." (or "...believe...", or "....as a group...") are what is in.  But even given this reduction in critical thinking, what's amazing is how wrong the media has gotten the Tea Partiers (or, at the least, a goodly portion of them).</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/07/06/the-medias-tea-party/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bear-ing Arms</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/07/05/bear-ing-arms/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/07/05/bear-ing-arms/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jul 2010 02:40:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cartoons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Humor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Bill of Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=2349</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Instead, as a surprise, we welcome back our in-house cartoonist who has been held captive by a roving band of wild secretaries. Ransom is being asked on the order of seven dollars and 42 cents, but so far, no takers. He managed to get this cartoon smuggled out with the aid of a trained squirrel.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/07/05/bear-ing-arms/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Forgotten Battle Which Won The American Revolution</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/07/02/the-forgotten-battle-which-won-the-american-revolution/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/07/02/the-forgotten-battle-which-won-the-american-revolution/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jul 2010 23:32:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=2340</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Which is why, this Independence Day, I will personally be lifting my glass in a toast to a French admiral, and the French sailors who served under him.  Because without Admiral Compte de Grasse's efforts, we might not even have an Independence Day to be celebrating.  The Battle of the Chesapeake deserves to be remembered.  This military triumph deserves a bit of celebration.  By all Americans.  So, I hope you'll join me in honoring the good French admiral this Sunday.  Lift a glass and give grateful thanks to his bravery and his heroic efforts on behalf of our own revolution -- whose successful end he made possible:</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/07/02/the-forgotten-battle-which-won-the-american-revolution/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pessimism On Immigration Reform</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/07/01/pessimism-on-immigration-reform/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/07/01/pessimism-on-immigration-reform/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jul 2010 00:59:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=2334</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>President Obama gave a speech today on immigration reform.  He made his case, and pleaded with Congress to deliver up a comprehensive legislative package on the issue.  But chances of this happening, as the old saw goes, are somewhere between "slim" and "none."  Perhaps President Obama will achieve immigration reform at some point in his presidency, but I personally just don't see it happening any time soon.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/07/01/pessimism-on-immigration-reform/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Good News From Iraq</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/06/30/good-news-from-iraq/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/06/30/good-news-from-iraq/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jun 2010 21:36:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Vice President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=2328</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>So while I go out and celebrate my patriotism this weekend, my thoughts will be with the soldiers returning home safely to their loved ones, as we wind at least one of our wars down.  And with the ones who didn't make it home, and with the ones who haven't made it home yet.  But no matter how you feel about America's involvement in Iraq or Afghanistan, I think everyone can agree that seeing soldiers coming home is good news indeed.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/06/30/good-news-from-iraq/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Republicans Fighting To Increase Deficit</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/06/29/republicans-fighting-to-increase-deficit/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/06/29/republicans-fighting-to-increase-deficit/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jun 2010 05:03:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=2323</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The Wall Street reform bill, now christened Dodd-Frank, is entering its final stretch this week.  The House/Senate conference committee is finishing up work on the bill, and the goal is to get it through both houses of Congress and on the president's desk by July Fourth.  A quick look at a calendar shows that this is a very tight schedule.  To complicate matters, the death of Senator Robert Byrd now means the Democrats are short a vote they had been counting on.  Which means they need some Republicans to vote with them, or the bill won't survive the inevitable filibuster attempt.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/06/29/republicans-fighting-to-increase-deficit/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Supreme Court Helps Out Kagan</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/06/28/supreme-court-helps-out-kagan/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/06/28/supreme-court-helps-out-kagan/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jun 2010 00:50:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Free Speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Bill of Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=2319</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>A Supreme Court ruling just out may serve to blunt Republican criticism of Elena Kagan, who started her confirmation hearings today in the Senate.  So far, Republicans haven't come up with much of any substance to attack Kagan on (although I admit, I haven't watched any of today's confirmation hearings yet), but they all pretty much agree upon one issue -- the fact that Kagan, as dean of the Harvard law school, upheld a school policy of barring military recruiters from campus due to the fact that the military discriminates against gays.  But the ruling in <em>Christian Legal Society v. Martinez</em> seems to give the high court's imprimatur to universities not allowing groups that practice such discrimination on campus -- which Kagan can now point to in defense of her position.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/06/28/supreme-court-helps-out-kagan/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [129] -- Incrementalism Wins Big</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/06/25/ftp129/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/06/25/ftp129/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jun 2010 23:52:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Talking Points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=2308</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>We're going to begin today with the news that a popular New Jersey beach is considering allowing women to sunbathe topless.  And then move right on to the financial reform bill, by way of a neck-snapping segue.  Just to warn you up front.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/06/25/ftp129/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Texas&#039; Tipping Point?</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/06/24/texas-tipping-point/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/06/24/texas-tipping-point/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jun 2010 02:03:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=2304</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Is Texas about to reach a tipping point from a solid red Republican state to a bright blue Democratic one?  Well, probably not, but it's an interesting concept to kick around on a Thursday (when I am, admittedly, behind schedule), so here goes.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/06/24/texas-tipping-point/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>We&#039;re All Terrorist Supporters</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/06/23/were-all-terrorist-supporters/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/06/23/were-all-terrorist-supporters/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jun 2010 00:13:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pakistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=2297</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The Supreme Court recently ruled that the post-9/11 laws against "materially supporting" terrorist groups should be very broadly interpreted.  Even counseling any group on the official list of terrorist organizations about peaceful topics is now to be considered "supporting terrorism."  Which leads me to wonder what they'd say about actually paying a terrorist organization tens of millions of dollars.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/06/23/were-all-terrorist-supporters/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Program Note</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/06/21/program-note-12/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/06/21/program-note-12/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jun 2010 06:05:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=2295</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sorry, folks, too sick to type today, and likely Tuesday as well.  Got some sort of flu or something.  Again, my apologies...
-CW
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/06/21/program-note-12/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [128] -- Merry Bartonmas!</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/06/18/ftp128/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/06/18/ftp128/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jun 2010 00:27:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Talking Points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=2285</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Christmas has come in June for the Democratic Party.  Republican Joe Barton just delivered a huge, nicely wrapped present to Democrats.  The only question is whether they'll open it and make use of it, or halfheartedly play with it once and then throw it in a corner (since the Democratic Party is kind of fickle about using such free gifts from Republicans, for no explicable reason whatsoever).  But more on the flailing Joe Barton in a bit.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/06/18/ftp128/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>38</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fixing My Own Leak</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/06/17/fixing-my-own-leak/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/06/17/fixing-my-own-leak/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jun 2010 02:49:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=2283</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is really nothing more than a glorified "Program Note," just to warn everyone.  The wife's car, which she totally depends on, had its own blowout two days ago.  Yesterday, many hours were spent diagnosing the leak.  Today, many hours were spent beneath the engine of the car, actually fixing the leak.

This [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/06/17/fixing-my-own-leak/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sunday Bloody Sunday</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/06/16/sunday-bloody-sunday/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/06/16/sunday-bloody-sunday/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jun 2010 00:20:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Name-dropping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=2276</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Most Americans know U2's song "Sunday Bloody Sunday."  It's a highly recognizable piece of music, and the song's been popular ever since they wrote it.  But most people in this country who at least can sing along with the chorus simply have no idea what the song's about.  If they've seen a live performance of the anthem, they may be dimly aware that frontman Bono is adamant that "this is <em>not</em> a rebel song," without truly grasping what he's talking about.  Not a rebel song?  Um, OK, Bono, sure, just sing it for us, OK?</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/06/16/sunday-bloody-sunday/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama Seizes The Moment?</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/06/15/obama-seizes-the-moment/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/06/15/obama-seizes-the-moment/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jun 2010 04:38:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=2270</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>President Obama, in his first-ever primetime address from the Oval Office, did not mince words.  He didn't have time to -- the speech was one of the shortest I think I've ever seen from Barack Obama, clocking in at 17 or 18 minutes.  But although he didn't take a lot of time, he covered a lot.  Of particular note was the directness of his language, which at times could even be described as "forceful."</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/06/15/obama-seizes-the-moment/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>32</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama&#039;s Pivotal Week</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/06/14/obamas-pivotal-week/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/06/14/obamas-pivotal-week/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jun 2010 00:30:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=2260</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>All this activity is welcome, because up until now the White House has seemed a bit adrift in their response to the tragedy.  They may have been on top of the entire situation from Day One, as they claim, but it wasn't readily apparent to the public, meaning they either were actually adrift, or they have been having a communication and press relations problem.  This must be frustrating to the White House, since the press has been somewhat lacking in their own response and coverage.  Case in point, after obsessing for a solid week that the president needed to "show some rage" over the situation, the press immediately pounced when Obama did show a bit of annoyance, immediately proclaiming that he was "too angry," or the press just giggled in true Beavis and Butthead fashion: "heh heh heh... the president said <em>ass</em>... heh heh."</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/06/14/obamas-pivotal-week/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [127] -- Letting A Crisis Go To Waste</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/06/11/ftp127/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/06/11/ftp127/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jun 2010 00:28:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Talking Points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=2248</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>President Barack Obama's administration was supposed to follow a basic premise: never let a crisis go to waste.  That was according to one of his own advisors, shortly after Obama took office.  But so far, their track record on doing so has been decidedly mixed.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/06/11/ftp127/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>35</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>South Carolina&#039;s Swampy Politics</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/06/10/south-carolinas-swampy-politics/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/06/10/south-carolinas-swampy-politics/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jun 2010 23:48:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=2242</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Many areas of the country take perverse pride in being "the worst" when it comes to politics, in much the same way most people take perverse pride in the fact that their local drivers are, quite obviously, the worst in the country.  Perhaps it's just human nature.  But in some places, the politics is noticeably more hardball than in others, even to outsiders.  Which brings us to South Carolina.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/06/10/south-carolinas-swampy-politics/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Wall Street Reform Conference Committee Membership Announced</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/06/09/wall-street-reform-conference-committee-membership-announced/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/06/09/wall-street-reform-conference-committee-membership-announced/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jun 2010 00:50:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=2228</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The Wall Street reform effort in Congress will enter a new phase tomorrow, as the conference committee between the House and Senate will meet to begin hashing out the differences between the House and Senate versions which have already passed.  The membership of this conference committee was announced today, and the committee will hold its first meeting tomorrow.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/06/09/wall-street-reform-conference-committee-membership-announced/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Have A Super Tuesday</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/06/08/have-a-super-tuesday/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/06/08/have-a-super-tuesday/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jun 2010 04:04:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=2222</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Gosh, here's hoping everyone is having a <em>super</em> Tuesday today!</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/06/08/have-a-super-tuesday/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>California Primary Preview</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/06/07/california-primary-preview/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/06/07/california-primary-preview/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jun 2010 01:01:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign Ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=2215</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Several states hold primaries this Tuesday, many of which may have implications beyond their state.  For instance, the primary runoff election in Arkansas will likely be the closest-watched race (at least by Democrats), to see if challenger Bill Halter can pull an upset against sitting Senator Blanche Lincoln, who enraged many by her corporate-friendly work on the health reform.  Other states will also have interesting races to watch, but today I'm going to concentrate on California's primary.  Call me parochial if you will (I live in the Golden State), but there are a few California races worth watching tomorrow.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/06/07/california-primary-preview/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [126] -- We&#039;d Like Our Gulf Back</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/06/04/ftp126/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/06/04/ftp126/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jun 2010 00:04:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Talking Points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=2199</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The mainstream media, led by the intrepid White House press corps, closely followed by the inside-the-Beltway punditocracy, has declared what must happen for the oil to stop flowing into the Gulf of Mexico: President Obama needs to get angry at the oil.
I wish I were kidding, but sadly, I am not.  This is the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/06/04/ftp126/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>21</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Swampiness</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/06/03/swampiness/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/06/03/swampiness/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jun 2010 05:12:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=2195</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Washington, before it became a city, was a swamp.  You can put fancy neoclassical buildings up everywhere, but it seems you can never get rid of the inherent swampiness of the town.  Sigh.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/06/03/swampiness/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>20</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama Poll Watch -- May, 2010</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/06/02/opw1005/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/06/02/opw1005/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jun 2010 08:27:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign Ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama Poll Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=2183</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>While I would immediately caution everyone not to get overly optimistic about what I'm about to say, President Obama's approval rating was looking up in April.  Gains were modest, but were pretty much across the board.  Although, as I said, the end of the month saw a slight reversal to this trend, likely the result of the drip, drip, drip nature (or, more properly, "gush, gush, gush") of the BP oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/06/02/opw1005/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Before And After The Fact</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/06/01/before-and-after-the-fact/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/06/01/before-and-after-the-fact/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jun 2010 00:13:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=2177</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>It is a great temptation for people in government to mete out harsh punishment after something happens which they do not agree with or support.  Whenever some incident bursts onto the public consciousness and raises an outcry, government officials almost always feel the urge to use their power to explicitly punish whoever is responsible.  The BP oil spill is just the most recent (and most glaring) example of this right now.  But there's one problem with national politicians elbowing each other out of the way to punish individuals or companies in such a fashion -- it's not only illegal, it's downright unconstitutional to do so.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/06/01/before-and-after-the-fact/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Memorializing Second-Class Soldiers</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/05/31/memorializing-second-class-soldiers/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/05/31/memorializing-second-class-soldiers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jun 2010 00:16:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Bill of Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=2169</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Memorial Day is the time to memorialize all the brave individuals who served our country throughout its history, and sometimes paid the ultimate price for doing so.  But, in particular, this year I'd like to focus on all those who did their duty for their country, and fought for the American ideal of equality for all citizens -- even while they did not enjoy such rights themselves, either in the military or in American life at the time.  These second-class citizens, one would think, would have even less reason than citizens accorded full rights under the law to risk death on a foreign battlefield, and therefore would not have volunteered to do so.  One would be wrong in thinking this, however.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/05/31/memorializing-second-class-soldiers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [125] -- Ask!  Tell!</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/05/28/ftp125/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/05/28/ftp125/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 May 2010 23:11:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Talking Points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=2156</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Our headline today quite obviously references the legislative progress this week on banning the military's "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" policy (of not allowing gay people to openly serve their country)... but we've got another asking-and-telling issue which we simply <em>must</em> deal with first, before we get to any of that.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/05/28/ftp125/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>21</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>White House Not Looking So Good On Sestak Question</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/05/27/white-house-not-looking-so-good-on-sestak-question/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/05/27/white-house-not-looking-so-good-on-sestak-question/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 May 2010 00:02:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=2150</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>President Barack Obama, as expected, was asked at today's press conference about the assertation by Representative Joe Sestak, who is running for the Senate from Pennsylvania, that the White House offered him a job in order to sideline him from the primary race against Arlen Specter (which Sestak then won).  Obama's answer was to kick the can down the road a bit.  This is not too surprising, since this is what his White House has been doing with the issue for three months now.  Here is Obama's response to the question:</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/05/27/white-house-not-looking-so-good-on-sestak-question/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>25</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Separating Enforcement From Permission</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/05/26/separating-enforcement-from-permission/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/05/26/separating-enforcement-from-permission/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 May 2010 23:45:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Vice President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=2144</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>This, it should be easy to see, is a conflict of interest.  If an agency's main purpose is to make money off of an industry (by the granting of oil drilling leases, for example), but also to police that industry, then there is an inherent, built-in conflict.  When one part of the agency does its job better, the other part of the agency can't do its job as well.  These jobs may not be mutually exclusive, but they're definitely working at cross purposes.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/05/26/separating-enforcement-from-permission/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&quot;Don&#039;t Ask, Don&#039;t Tell&quot; Repeal Optimism</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/05/25/dont-ask-dont-tell-repeal-optimism/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/05/25/dont-ask-dont-tell-repeal-optimism/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 May 2010 01:00:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=2139</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Optimism is growing this week that Congress will repeal the "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" (DADT) policy of not allowing gays to serve openly in the United States military.  To be more accurate, what Congress is proposing is a watered-down version of a full repeal.  Which is ironic, because the purpose of their "compromise" is to fix DADT -- which itself was the original compromise on the issue that President Clinton signed.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/05/25/dont-ask-dont-tell-repeal-optimism/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ask Rand Paul What He Would Cut</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/05/24/ask-rand-paul-what-he-would-cut/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/05/24/ask-rand-paul-what-he-would-cut/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 May 2010 01:08:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=2133</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The recent controversy over Republican senatorial nominee Rand Paul's comments and views on civil rights (and on the role of the federal government versus private business and private individuals in general), is certainly entertaining and quite possibly damaging to his candidacy (or possibly not, this is Kentucky we're talking about, after all), but at the same time it is probably not going to be the key issue that decides Kentucky voters this November.  It's a pretty safe assumption that most people for whom civil rights are a top voting issue have already made up their minds not to vote for Paul anyway.  But there's a much more fundamental argument to have with Tea Party candidates like Paul (and Republican candidates in general) which, so far, has been missing in the media debate.  The real question that should be asked is: "What, exactly, in the federal budget will you cut to 'rein in Washington spending' and attack the deficit?"  Because the answers to that are going to be the most effective argument to make against the Tea Party movement's surge within the Republican Party -- because my guess is that no matter what they answer, the voters are not going to like it.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/05/24/ask-rand-paul-what-he-would-cut/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Program Note</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/05/21/program-note-11/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/05/21/program-note-11/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 May 2010 06:23:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=2130</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[New ads are coming.  They're likely going to be annoying.  Sorry about that, but I feel it's better to take the advertisers' money than to beg for donations, personally.
This weekend, we'll be playing around with the ad layouts.  If anything looks horrendous to you, or breaks your browser, let me know.
We're starting [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/05/21/program-note-11/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>16</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [124] -- How&#039;s That Libertarian Thingie Workin&#039; Out For Ya?</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/05/21/ftp124/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/05/21/ftp124/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 May 2010 00:02:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2008 Electoral Math]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign Ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Talking Points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=2119</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The new media narrative, which is exactly what the White House was pushing just <em>before</em> the primaries happened, coincidentally (for once, Democratic framing actually worked -- the media snapped it up like a cheese puff at cocktail hour) is now: "it's an anti-incumbent year."  The White House was pushing this, because it is a lot better sounding than what the media was using previously, which was: "it's an anti-Democrat year," or even: "it's an anti-Obama-agenda year."  Of course, even if it is just an "anti-incumbent" year, Democrats still have more incumbencies to defend, so it's not like the party's out of the woods yet in regards to November.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/05/21/ftp124/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Straight-Up, No-Chaser Libertarianism</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/05/20/straight-up-no-chaser-libertarianism/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/05/20/straight-up-no-chaser-libertarianism/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 May 2010 23:30:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Bill of Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=2114</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Rand Paul, who just clinched the Republican Party nomination for the Senate race in Kentucky, is apparently not quite ready for primetime.  His recent remarks on the Civil Rights Act painfully show why being a politician is not as easy as some people think.  The problem for Paul, son of Ron Paul, is that even if he somehow survives this flap, it is almost guaranteed that there are going to be plenty more of them during the campaign.  Because both Pauls, father and son, are (at heart) libertarians.  Which requires some explanation, because many folks have never come into contact with the concept of libertarianism.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/05/20/straight-up-no-chaser-libertarianism/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>17</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Primary Victory Over Conventional Wisdom</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/05/19/primary-victory-over-conventional-wisdom/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/05/19/primary-victory-over-conventional-wisdom/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 May 2010 00:24:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=2107</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>A lot of conventional wisdom about the 2010 elections died an ignoble death last night, as voters once again proved that even though the inside-the-Beltway crowd loves to attempt to pigeonhole them one way or another, when the election rolls around the voters have the final say.  The breadth of such conventional wisdom's demise is rather staggering in its scope, too.  So today, rather than dissecting yesterday's primaries (plenty of time for that in the days to come), I'd like instead to dissect a few themes which proved to be either partially or absolutely wrong last night.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/05/19/primary-victory-over-conventional-wisdom/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Election Projection</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/05/18/election-projection/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/05/18/election-projection/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 May 2010 23:48:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=2100</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>So there are a few interesting primaries happening today.  But, since we're all sitting around waiting for the returns, I'd like instead to talk about a generic idea, rather than specifics of individual races, and what it all means.  Actually, that's the idea I want to talk about right there -- "what it all means."  Because, as in all election seasons, 2010 so far looks to be just like every other election for the past twenty or thirty years (or even longer), in one basic respect -- the media is going to oversimplify what "the public is thinking" and likely draw some very wrong conclusions that will become accepted history in due time.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/05/18/election-projection/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>17</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Religion, Bigotry, And Political Hypocrisy</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/05/17/religion-bigotry-and-political-hypocrisy/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/05/17/religion-bigotry-and-political-hypocrisy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 May 2010 01:18:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=2095</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Pat Buchanan, in his usual less-than-charming manner, <a href="http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&#038;pageId=153417">brought up a point</a> last week about the religious diversity (or lack thereof) of the Supreme Court.  Buchanan pointed out that, if Elena Kagan is confirmed to the highest court (as seems likely), there will be only two religions represented on the court -- Judaism and Catholicism.  He further points out that the court will be one-third Jewish, when Jews account for only two percent of the American population.  Now, aside from the highly amusing spectacle of right-wingers advocating some sort of quota system, I think there's a deeper point here than Buchanan's "pity the unrepresented Protestant majority" theme.  Because, even though virtually no politician would ever admit it, there is indeed a widespread (but unacknowledged) religious bigotry in America.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/05/17/religion-bigotry-and-political-hypocrisy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [123] -- A Working Senate</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/05/14/ftp123/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/05/14/ftp123/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 May 2010 00:59:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Talking Points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=2087</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Now, you can take this as a joke in one of two ways.  The first, of course, pokes fun at the fact that the Senate takes an absolutely <em>gargantuan</em> amount of vacation time every year, when they are instead supposed to be doing "The People's Business."  The second, of course, refers to the fact that the Senate is somewhat of a broken mechanism these days, notorious for not getting much done, ever, on anything.  Compare, for instance, the amount of bills the House passes to the glacial pace of "work" in the Senate, of late.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/05/14/ftp123/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Arizona&#039;s Forbidding Landscape</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/05/13/arizonas-forbidding-landscape/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/05/13/arizonas-forbidding-landscape/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 May 2010 02:02:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Bill of Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=2082</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Arizona is a truly beautiful state.  It has many spectacular sights, of which the Grand Canyon is the most awe-inspiring.  But Arizona is also a state of forbidding landscapes -- much of the state is desert or near-desert, where the heat of the midday sun is a force of nature to be heavily respected, if not downright feared.  But what has put Arizona into the news recently is its "forbidding" political landscape.  Specifically, on immigration.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/05/13/arizonas-forbidding-landscape/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>32</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Republicans Boycott Arizona?</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/05/12/republicans-boycott-arizona/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/05/12/republicans-boycott-arizona/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 May 2010 00:15:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=2076</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>It was <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/05/12/AR2010051203317.html?hpid=topnews">just announced</a> that the 2012 Republican National Convention will be held in Tampa, Florida, rather than Salt Lake City, Utah or Phoenix, Arizona, the other two cities that were in the running.  Now, it's pretty easy to see why Utah would be contentious, seeing as how Mitt Romney may be the party's nominee.  Holding the GOP convention in the heart of Mormonism would seem to be some sort of tacit party endorsement of Romney, in other words.  Or perhaps it's just that the conventioneers want to have more fun (and more bars) available to them while they go about the sober (ahem) business of nominating their presidential candidate.  But Phoenix is another story entirely.  Because I can't help but think that the Republican Party just imposed their own <em>de facto</em> boycott of Arizona, due to the state's recent legislative anti-immigrant fervor.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/05/12/republicans-boycott-arizona/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>18</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>In Memoriam, Frank Frazetta</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/05/12/in-memoriam-frank-frazetta/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/05/12/in-memoriam-frank-frazetta/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 May 2010 13:07:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=2058</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Frank Frazetta recently passed away.  You may not immediately recognize his name, but it is likely you have seen his artwork at least once in your life, especially if you recognize the name of the southern rock band "Molly Hatchet."  Frazetta's artwork occupied a certain niche, where it was wildly popular.  This niche is hard to define, as it actually ranges over a wide realm of what might be called the "Kingdom of Geekiness" -- science fiction, fantasy, and even (gasp!) <em>comic books</em>.  Naturally, as a result, Frazetta was sneered at by the "real" art world.  This matters not a whit to fans of his artwork, who are legion.  As, indeed, it should not.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/05/12/in-memoriam-frank-frazetta/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Democratic Primary Overview</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/05/10/democratic-primary-overview/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/05/10/democratic-primary-overview/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 May 2010 01:43:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign Ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=2051</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>While the Tea Party folks have gotten a lot of attention from the media in the Republican primaries so far, there are a few Democratic primary races which may have just as interesting an impact on the Democrats as the Tea Party challenges are having for Republicans.  And since last week <a href="http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/05/05/tea-partys-midterm-influence/">I took a look</a> at the effect of the Tea Partiers in Republican races, today I thought it would be worth paying some attention to the Democratic side of the aisle.  Because the anti-incumbent "throw the bums out" feeling seems to be happening to some degree in both parties this year.  What it all means for the general election remains to be seen, of course.  For now, let's take a look at a handful of these upcoming primary races.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/05/10/democratic-primary-overview/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [122] -- Bikini Bottom Update</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/05/07/ftp122/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/05/07/ftp122/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 May 2010 01:00:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign Ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Talking Points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Name-dropping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pakistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Bill of Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=2039</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Since it's the Friday after month's-end, the new monthly unemployment numbers were released today.  Which adds another bar to the "bikini bottom" chart.  Now, the measure of how many people know exactly what this means is exactly the measure of how well Democrats are getting the "jobs" message out.  Because, as I've said previously, this chart should be front and center in the Democrats' campaigns this year.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/05/07/ftp122/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>47</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Program Note: Playing Hooky</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/05/06/program-note-playing-hooky/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/05/06/program-note-playing-hooky/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 May 2010 23:37:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=2034</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Just a short note to inform everyone that I'm "playing hooky" today, and there will be no column.  One, it's been a really nice spring day, and two, I was up late doing some behind-the-scenes work here at the site, fixing bugs and whatnot, so I think I deserve a day off.  [Note: [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/05/06/program-note-playing-hooky/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tea Party&#039;s Midterm Influence</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/05/05/tea-partys-midterm-influence/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/05/05/tea-partys-midterm-influence/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 May 2010 23:57:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=2004</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Three states held Republican primary elections yesterday, which makes it a good time to check in on the Tea Party and their preferred candidates, to see how things now stand (as well as where they could head), as we get closer to the midterm elections in November.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/05/05/tea-partys-midterm-influence/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>35</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Kent State Legacy</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/05/04/a-kent-state-legacy/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/05/04/a-kent-state-legacy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 May 2010 01:03:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=1999</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Forty years ago on this day, Jeffrey Miller, Allison Krause, William Schroeder, and Sandra Scheuer were shot and killed on the campus of Kent State University in Ohio.  The bullets which killed them (and wounded nine others) were fired by the Ohio National Guard.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/05/04/a-kent-state-legacy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama Poll Watch -- April, 2010</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/05/03/opw1004/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/05/03/opw1004/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 May 2010 09:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama Poll Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=1989</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>I'm starting to feel a little like Martin's character, I have to admit.  Because President Barack Obama seems to have hit a plateau in his approval ratings, which have remained largely unchanged for the past three months now, and not significantly changed since last November.  Could it be that we've all just made up our minds about the job the president is doing?  Should I just end this with "next Obama Poll Watch column in three months...?"</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/05/03/opw1004/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>25</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Program Note</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/04/30/program-note-10/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/04/30/program-note-10/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 May 2010 05:50:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=1979</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We are in the process of changing our advertising here on ChrisWeigant.com.  This may lead to bugs in the layout in the immediate future, and may lead to days without ads.  I know, I know, it'll be hard to view our site without the wonderfulness of advertising to enhance your viewing pleasure, but [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/04/30/program-note-10/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [121] -- Swampy Muck</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/04/30/ftp121/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/04/30/ftp121/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Apr 2010 22:57:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Talking Points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=1969</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Boy, Louisiana just can't seem to catch a break, can it?  If it isn't Mother Nature walloping it with hurricanes, its a man-made disaster of enormous proportions about to bury its bayous and waterways under a blanket of foul-smelling muck.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/04/30/ftp121/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>With Which Party Would Crist Caucus?</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/04/29/with-which-party-would-crist-caucus/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/04/29/with-which-party-would-crist-caucus/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Apr 2010 00:54:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign Ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=1964</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Charlie Crist just made the Florida Senate race a whole lot more interesting, by announcing he will run as an independent candidate, making it a real three-way race.  This will make the election more interesting for political reporters, because it's always more fun to cover a three-horse race than a two-horse race (as it were).  But the most interesting question to me is what happens if Crist actually wins and goes to the Senate -- with which party would he caucus?</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/04/29/with-which-party-would-crist-caucus/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Reid Leads</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/04/28/reid-leads/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/04/28/reid-leads/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Apr 2010 23:08:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=1958</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid just showed Democrats what real leadership (and what bargaining from a position of strength) looks like.  After three days of repeated cloture votes to bring Chris Dodd's Wall Street reform bill to the floor of the Senate for debate, it appears the Republicans are ready to blink.  The Republicans successfully managed to block the debate, in three successive votes, but they know they're paying a political price for doing so.  At this point, the only question is how many of them will jump the aisle and vote with the Democrats in the next vote.<p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/04/28/reid-leads/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ben Nelson Twists In The Wind</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/04/27/ben-nelson-twists-in-the-wind/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/04/27/ben-nelson-twists-in-the-wind/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Apr 2010 00:48:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=1953</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid held a second vote today on whether to begin debate on the Wall Street reform bill put forth by Senator Chris Dodd.  As expected, all the Republicans voted against openly debating the bill once again.  Also as expected, all the Democrats voted to move forward.  Except one.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/04/27/ben-nelson-twists-in-the-wind/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Reid Calls Republicans&#039; Bluff</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/04/26/reid-calls-republicans-bluff/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/04/26/reid-calls-republicans-bluff/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Apr 2010 00:54:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=1946</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid just scored a political victory by <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/04/26/AR2010042601969.html?hpid=topnews">losing a vote</a>.  That sounds counterintuitive, but it's true.  By failing to bring the Wall Street reform bill written by Chris Dodd to the floor for debate, and by losing a cloture vote on the issue to Republican opposition, Reid has shown that the Democrats (and the White House) have learned a few lessons from the health reform debate.  Because by refusing to back down, and refusing to "compromise" (read: water the bill down and add loopholes for Wall Street) with Republicans, Reid is showing real strength, and real leadership.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/04/26/reid-calls-republicans-bluff/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [120] -- Republicans Chicken Out</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/04/23/ftp120/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/04/23/ftp120/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Apr 2010 08:53:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Talking Points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Bill of Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=1931</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Democrats had a pretty good week last week.  As attention shifts away from unpronounceable volcanoes (more on them in a moment) to the struggle in the Senate over Wall Street reform, the two parties almost seem to have changed their normal methods of playing the political game.  The Republicans are all over the map on the issue, and extremely worried about the impression by angry voters that they are doing Wall Street's bidding -- as well they should be.  Republicans are, one day, loudly denouncing the reform bill, using their standard Big Lie technique... and then, the next day, saying a deal is very close, and even voting for strong reform in committees.  Republicans (some of them, at least) are chickening out of the upcoming partisan battle the Republican leadership seems to want over the issue (more on chickens later on, too). Democrats have, so far, managed both to admirably stay on message and showed an amazing amount of backbone in countering specious Republican arguments.  And, so far, polls show the voters are solidly on the Democrats' side on this one, and just <em>not buying</em> what Republicans are telling them.  As I said, we seem to have entered BackwardsLand, or something.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/04/23/ftp120/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>62</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>EPA Moves To End Mountaintop-Removal Mining</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/04/22/epa-moves-to-end-mountaintop-removal-mining/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/04/22/epa-moves-to-end-mountaintop-removal-mining/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Apr 2010 23:08:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=1926</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Instead, I'd like to highlight some good environmentalist news from a few weeks ago, which didn't really get much media attention at the time.  Perhaps if they had delayed the announcement, it would have made a bigger splash today, being Earth Day and all.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/04/22/epa-moves-to-end-mountaintop-removal-mining/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Where Tea Partiers Live</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/04/21/where-tea-partiers-live/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/04/21/where-tea-partiers-live/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Apr 2010 00:21:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=1920</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Ever wondered where the Tea Partiers actually live?  The PBS <em>NewsHour</em> website has now helpfully mapped it out as part of their "<a href="http://www.pbs.org/newshour/patchworknation/">Patchwork Nation</a>" project (in partnership with the <em>Christian Science Monitor</em>), for anyone interested to see.  This map isn't exactly surprising, as it shows Tea Partiers are more concentrated in traditional Republican areas.  But it is interesting to see such a level of detail, measured as concentration of Tea Party members for every county across America.<p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/04/21/where-tea-partiers-live/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>15</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>D.C. Legalizes Medical Marijuana</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/04/20/d-c-legalizes-medical-marijuana/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/04/20/d-c-legalizes-medical-marijuana/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Apr 2010 01:17:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Humor]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=1914</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The Washington, D.C. Council voted today to legalize medicinal marijuana.  The <em>Washington Post</em> <a href="http://voices.washingtonpost.com/local-breaking-news/dc/dc-council-approves-medical-ma.html?hpid=topnews">reported the story</a> in a straightforward manner, which failed to note the amusing part of the story:</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/04/20/d-c-legalizes-medical-marijuana/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>26</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Big VAT Lie</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/04/19/a-big-vat-lie/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/04/19/a-big-vat-lie/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Apr 2010 23:56:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=1906</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>I speak of the "value-added tax," or "VAT."  Republicans are horrified that President Obama has a secret plan to pass this tax, and are shouting from the rooftops (of the nearest Fox News building) how strongly they're going to oppose it.  The facts that Obama himself has come out against the idea, and it seems to have <em>virtually no support</em> in Congress, have not gotten in the way of Republicans doing so, either.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/04/19/a-big-vat-lie/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [119] -- Democrats, Sell Yourselves!</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/04/16/ftp119/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/04/16/ftp119/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Apr 2010 23:43:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Talking Points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=1894</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>There was <a href="http://www.salon.com/news/feature/story/index.html?story=/news/feature/2010/04/15/us_odd_beer_bust">an amusing story</a> in the news recently about some folks who got word that a beer company had sent hundreds of cases of beer to the local dump, because it was past its expiration date.  Finding this a shame, these enterprising folks "liberated" themselves 50 cases of free beer, presumably to drink it forthwith.  The most amusing part was the closing quote in the article, from the beer company's president: "Beer is a popular product."</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/04/16/ftp119/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>17</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
