<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>ChrisWeigant.com</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.chrisweigant.com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com</link>
	<description>Reality-based political commentary</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 06:17:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [196] -- Poor Mitt?</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/02/03/ftp196/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/02/03/ftp196/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 00:10:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign Ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Free Speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Talking Points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Bill of Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Vice President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=5146</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Mitt Romney, frontrunner for the Republican nomination, announced he wasn't too worried about poor people.  Maybe it would be fun to see Romney debate Joe Biden, just because nobody would know what to expect from either of them.  Heh.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/02/03/ftp196/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>GOP PUMAs?</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/02/02/gop-pumas/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/02/02/gop-pumas/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 01:17:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=5141</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The thought which keeps flitting through my mind is whether the Republicans are going to face their own "PUMA" problem this fall.  For those who don't remember the term from 2008, PUMA stood for "Party Unity, My Ass!" and was the rallying cry of the non-existent hordes of pro-Hillary Democrats who were reportedly going to cause major disruption at the Democratic National Convention, and then throw the election to John McCain in the fall.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/02/02/gop-pumas/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama Poll Watch -- January, 2012</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/02/01/opw1201/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/02/01/opw1201/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 22:34:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama Poll Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=5135</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>President Barack Obama continued a three-month upward swing in the polls in January, with his average job approval rating for the month ticking up 1.2 points, and his disapproval rate falling by exactly the same amount.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/02/01/opw1201/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mittmentum!</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/01/31/mittmentum/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/01/31/mittmentum/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 02:57:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=5127</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>All in all, it's looking like whether Newt Gingrich wants to admit it yet or not, by Super Tuesday this race will likely be pretty much over.  Of course, this year, predictions of such a nature have certainly had a way of turning out wrong, but it's safe to say that Mitt Romney is feeling pretty good about things right about now.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/01/31/mittmentum/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Predicting Florida: Newt&#039;s Petard</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/01/30/predicting-florida-newts-petard/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/01/30/predicting-florida-newts-petard/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 01:03:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign Ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=5121</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>As we wend our way through the Republican primary season, at times predicting the outcome of a single state's race is very hard to do.  At other times, it is actually pretty easy.  Florida looks to be one of the latter.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/01/30/predicting-florida-newts-petard/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [195] -- SOTU Review</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/01/27/ftp195/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/01/27/ftp195/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jan 2012 00:27:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign Ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Libya]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=5112</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Well, that was an eventful week in politics, wasn't it?</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/01/27/ftp195/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>33</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Conservative Establishment Piles On Newt</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/01/26/conservative-establishment-piles-on-newt/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/01/26/conservative-establishment-piles-on-newt/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 00:54:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=5107</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Newt Gingrich may win the Florida Republican primary.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/01/26/conservative-establishment-piles-on-newt/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Alternative Millionaires&#039; Minimum Tax</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/01/25/the-alternative-millionaires-minimum-tax/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/01/25/the-alternative-millionaires-minimum-tax/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 00:01:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=5103</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>President Obama last night unveiled a new twist on an old idea in his State Of The Union address to Congress -- limit the loopholes and tax giveaways that very wealthy people use to reduce their taxes far below the rate honest workers pay.  Obama called for a minimum tax rate of 30 percent on income over one million dollars.  To some, this sounds like a radical idea, but it really isn't.  It is merely a refinement of a part of the tax code that has been with us for decades: the Alternative Minimum Tax.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/01/25/the-alternative-millionaires-minimum-tax/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>18</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The State Of The Union</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/01/24/the-state-of-the-union/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/01/24/the-state-of-the-union/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 05:43:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iran]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Libya]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pakistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=5098</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>I haven't written one of these snap-judgment reactions to a speech in a while, so forgive me if this is a bit choppy and disorganized.  As always, I am writing this before looking at other opinions of President Obama's just-completed State Of The Union speech.  I feel this keeps my opinion unsullied by any sort of "groupthink" effect.  Sometimes I read other speech reviews the next day and find I agree with them, sometimes not, but this way at least you know I'm not just regurgitating others' thoughts.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/01/24/the-state-of-the-union/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>28</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pure Newtonium</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/01/23/pure-newtonium/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/01/23/pure-newtonium/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 23:32:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=5093</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>What a difference a week makes, at least in the Republican primary contest.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/01/23/pure-newtonium/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>77</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [194] -- Out Of Touch</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/01/20/ftp194/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/01/20/ftp194/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jan 2012 00:31:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign Ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Talking Points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=5081</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[OK, to be completely honest, we just felt like beating up on some Republicans today.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/01/20/ftp194/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>48</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Economic Optimism?</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/01/19/economic-optimism/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/01/19/economic-optimism/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 00:19:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=5077</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>It's still early days to even know if the economy is truly about to enter a strong recovery or not.  A few data points on a graph do not always a trend line make, to put it another way.  But from what I have personally seen in previous recessions, there always seems to be a real "tipping point" where American businesses collectively decide that things are going to be better soon -- and then they start hiring people and fulfilling their own prophecy.  This could indeed be such a turning point.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/01/19/economic-optimism/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>43</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Not-Romney Race Killing Not-Romney&#039;s Chances</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/01/18/not-romney-race-killing-not-romneys-chances/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/01/18/not-romney-race-killing-not-romneys-chances/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 00:42:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=5072</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>If either Gingrich or Santorum (or even Perry) had managed to cement their status as the alpha "not-Romney" in the race at this point, they might have had a chance in that fabled "two-man race" (or, more properly, "two-man-plus-Ron-Paul race").  Adding Gingrich and Santorum's support in South Carolina easily shows that Romney could have been defeated here, if the field had narrowed.  Florida would even be in play, likely.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/01/18/not-romney-race-killing-not-romneys-chances/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>23</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Governor O&#039;Malley Is Right</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/01/17/governor-omalley-is-right/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/01/17/governor-omalley-is-right/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 00:50:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign Ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=5067</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>O'Malley makes a good point.  President Obama's re-election team should heed it.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/01/17/governor-omalley-is-right/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>King&#039;s &quot;Drum Major Instinct&quot; Speech</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/01/16/kings-drum-major-instinct-speech/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/01/16/kings-drum-major-instinct-speech/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2012 01:07:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guest Authors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Name-dropping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religion]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=5065</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[Program Note: I am taking the day off today.  But I did want to post this link to a transcript of Martin Luther King Junior's "Drum Major Instinct" speech.  This is the speech that was misquoted on his new memorial in Washington D.C., and you really have to read the speech itself to [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/01/16/kings-drum-major-instinct-speech/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [193] -- Run It Up The Flagpole</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/01/13/ftp193/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/01/13/ftp193/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2012 23:50:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign Ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Talking Points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iran]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Libya]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=5055</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Not a whole lot has been happening in Washington, due to Congress being out on one of their countless month-long vacations.  Not a whole lot of Democrats have been in the news, either, since the Republican primary season is sucking all the oxygen out of the political arena right now.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/01/13/ftp193/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>81</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mitt&#039;s Tax Returns</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/01/12/mitts-tax-returns/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/01/12/mitts-tax-returns/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2012 00:19:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=5051</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>What is hiding in Mitt Romney's tax returns?</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/01/12/mitts-tax-returns/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>74</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Happy Birthday, Common Sense</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/01/11/happy-birthday-common-sense/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/01/11/happy-birthday-common-sense/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2012 01:09:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Name-dropping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=5046</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Two hundred and thirty-six years ago this week, a pamphlet was published in Philadelphia.  There is some disagreement among historians over the exact date (variously given as January 9th or 10th), and the pamphlet's title page itself only lists the year, 1776.  Whatever the actual date, though, Thomas Paine's <em>Common Sense</em> hit the American consciousness like a bombshell -- one which would reverberate for years to come.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/01/11/happy-birthday-common-sense/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Old-School Editorializing</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/01/10/old-school-editorializing/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/01/10/old-school-editorializing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2012 01:55:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=5042</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>What struck me about New Hampshire's contest, being in the midst of historical research into such things, was the old-school nature of the <em>Union Leader</em>, a very conservative New Hampshire newspaper.  It struck a lot of the media as interesting as well, but I didn't see anyone else commenting on such historical context.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/01/10/old-school-editorializing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Calling New Hampshire&#039;s Primary</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/01/09/calling-new-hampshires-primary/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/01/09/calling-new-hampshires-primary/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2012 23:11:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=5036</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Tomorrow, New Hampshire voters will go to their first-in-the-nation (don't-mention-Iowa-to-us-that's-a-caucus-dammit!) primary, and cast their votes in the Republican nominating contest.  Which means it's time to haul out the old crystal ball and attempt to predict what's going to happen.  If you hate these types of speculative wonktastic articles, then I strongly advise you to just close this article right now, and start a game of Angry Birds or something.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/01/09/calling-new-hampshires-primary/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [192] -- Obama Picking His Fights</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/01/06/ftp192/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/01/06/ftp192/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2012 22:56:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Talking Points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=5026</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>I have to say, while the Republicans have been having their three-ring primary circus, President Obama has been looking better and better.  Both in comparison to the Republican field (of nightmares, so to speak), and also because Obama's been making progress on his own.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/01/06/ftp192/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>160</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Recess!</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/01/05/recess/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/01/05/recess/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2012 02:54:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Humor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=5022</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>When we were all kids, "recess" was one of the happiest words in the English language, because it meant escaping the schoolroom for a while, and (on nice days) getting outside and running around and playing with our friends.  The bell would ring, and we would all cry "Recess!" and run outside.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/01/05/recess/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>54</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama Poll Watch -- December, 2011</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/01/04/opw1112/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/01/04/opw1112/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2012 23:07:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama Poll Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pakistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=5016</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>President Obama had a pretty good month last month in the job approval polls, bettering his standing in both approval and disapproval by roughly three-fourths of percentage point.  This may not sound like that big a deal, but it was the second straight month of solid gains for the president in both categories.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/01/04/opw1112/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>62</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Romney Inevitable?</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/01/03/romney-inevitable/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/01/03/romney-inevitable/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2012 04:48:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign Ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=5009</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>I thought I'd wait to write today until the Iowa results were in, because I haven't done one of these "snap judgment" sorts of things for a while.  As I begin, roughly 85 percent of the votes have been reported.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/01/03/romney-inevitable/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>18</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Predicting Iowa</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/01/02/predicting-iowa/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/01/02/predicting-iowa/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jan 2012 23:20:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign Ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=5001</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>I realize everyone is probably already sick of hearing predictions about the Iowa Republican caucuses, and if this does indeed describe you then you should probably go watch a football game or something -- because that's exactly what we're going to do today: throw prognosticatory Hawkeye darts at the wall, and take our chances as we may.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/01/02/predicting-iowa/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Amazing, Ginormous List Of Official Banished Words Of The Year</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/12/30/the-amazing-ginormous-list-of-official-banished-words-of-the-year/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/12/30/the-amazing-ginormous-list-of-official-banished-words-of-the-year/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Dec 2011 00:25:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Humor]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4996</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>It's that time of year again -- when we turn our eyes to Lake Superior State University (in beautiful Sault Ste. Marie, Michigan), and their official list of this year's banished words.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/12/30/the-amazing-ginormous-list-of-official-banished-words-of-the-year/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Question Of The Day</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/12/28/question-of-the-day/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/12/28/question-of-the-day/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Dec 2011 00:41:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4992</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[Program Note: Only a few days left in our Holiday Fundraising Drive!  If you're sending your donation in by "snail mail," drop me an email and let me know the amount, and I will add it to our total.  We're very close to reaching the goal we set, so get those last-minute donations [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/12/28/question-of-the-day/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>83</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Merry Politically-Correct-mas?</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/12/26/merry-politically-correct-mas/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/12/26/merry-politically-correct-mas/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Dec 2011 00:29:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cartoons]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4990</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[Program Note: We're going to have a week of frivolity here at CW.com this week.  Partly, this is so I can work on other projects, and partly it's because nobody's in the mood for politics this time of year anyway (Iowans aside...).  To start us off, here's a blast from the past, a [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/12/26/merry-politically-correct-mas/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>69</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>My 2011 &quot;McLaughlin Awards&quot; [Part 2]</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/12/23/my-2011-mclaughlin-awards-part-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/12/23/my-2011-mclaughlin-awards-part-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Dec 2011 22:08:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Libya]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Name-dropping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4982</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Her campaign so far has been the populist model for every other Democrat to mimic if they want to catch the wave of anger at Wall Street, and use it to their benefit.  Without question, Elizabeth Warren is Destined For Political Stardom.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/12/23/my-2011-mclaughlin-awards-part-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>43</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama Looking Stronger</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/12/22/obama-looking-stronger/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/12/22/obama-looking-stronger/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Dec 2011 23:58:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4978</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>President Obama is looking a lot stronger these days.  Today, especially, the president emerges as the big winner in the showdown with John Boehner and the House Republicans.  But Obama's been looking better and better all month, so Boehner caving should be seen as just the icing on the cake for Obama.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/12/22/obama-looking-stronger/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>29</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Making A List, Checking It Twice...</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/12/21/making-a-list-checking-it-twice/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/12/21/making-a-list-checking-it-twice/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Dec 2011 00:32:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Humor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Name-dropping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4972</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The Head Elf turns back to his iPad.  "Mitch McConnell says he wants some media attention.  He complains they all ignore him and run to John Boehner instead.  Boehner, on the other hand, wants <em>less</em> attention paid to the fact that he can't control his own caucus."</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/12/21/making-a-list-checking-it-twice/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>25</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>More Award Suggestions?</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/12/20/more-award-suggestions/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/12/20/more-award-suggestions/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2011 01:11:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Contests]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4968</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Once again, we're tying something new with our annual awards columns, by asking for your nominees in advance.  We got plenty of good suggestions last week, and we're hoping to get a few more this week.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/12/20/more-award-suggestions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>War Is Over.  What Next?</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/12/19/war-is-over-what-next/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/12/19/war-is-over-what-next/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Dec 2011 00:20:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iran]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Libya]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4962</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>American troops are, finally, out of Iraq.  The war is technically over.  Our men and women in uniform will be home for the holidays.  This is all good news, and is worth celebrating by a nation weary of decade-long wars.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/12/19/war-is-over-what-next/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>My 2011 &quot;McLaughlin Awards&quot; [Part 1]</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/12/16/my-2011-mclaughlin-awards-part-1/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/12/16/my-2011-mclaughlin-awards-part-1/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Dec 2011 01:36:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign Ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Free Speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iran]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Libya]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Name-dropping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pakistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4954</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>As always, if you disagree with any (or all) of my picks, feel free to make your own in the comments.  The categories are completely open to interpretation, and don't forget that there will be a "Part 2" column next week, so I can likely squeeze things I forgot in there.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/12/16/my-2011-mclaughlin-awards-part-1/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>33</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Happy Bill Of Rights Day</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/12/15/happy-bill-of-rights-day/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/12/15/happy-bill-of-rights-day/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Dec 2011 01:03:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Free Speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Bill of Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Vice President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4950</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Instead, I'd like to gently point out that the same Founding Fathers that achieved this monumental milestone in government (some of them, at least) were the same ones who tried to eviscerate these same basic protections -- within seven years of the Bill of Rights' ratification.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/12/15/happy-bill-of-rights-day/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Real &quot;War On Christmas&quot;</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/12/14/the-real-war-on-christmas/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/12/14/the-real-war-on-christmas/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Dec 2011 00:05:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religion]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4943</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>But just because the modern-day "War on Christmas" may not, in fact, exist does not mean that such a war never existed in America.  The subject of Christmas was indeed at the heart of a previous bitter political dispute, but you've got to go pretty far back in time to find it.  All the way back to the New England Puritans.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/12/14/the-real-war-on-christmas/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>93</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Year-End Award Suggestions?</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/12/13/year-end-award-suggestions/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/12/13/year-end-award-suggestions/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2011 01:55:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Contests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Name-dropping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4938</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Feel free to suggest anyone or anything you'd like.  The only rules of interpretation for what the categories mean are your own.  If I think they're the best suggestion I've heard, I may use some of your suggestions in this Friday's column.  We'll be returning to this subject next week, for part two, with a whole new set of categories.  For now, who would you select for any or all of the following?  Post your choices in the comments!</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/12/13/year-end-award-suggestions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>32</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Call The Newtsplosion Contest</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/12/12/call-the-newtsplosion-contest/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/12/12/call-the-newtsplosion-contest/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Dec 2011 23:17:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Contests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Humor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4932</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Peggy Noonan, a consummate Washington insider with impeccable conservative credentials, recently came up with a <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970203413304577086824255350642.html?mod=WSJ_latestheadlines">nice turn of phrase</a> to describe Newt Gingrich: "He is a human hand grenade who walks around with his hand on the pin, saying, 'Watch this!' "  Back in Newt's heyday, the comic strip <em>Doonesbury</em> portrayed Gingrich as a lit bomb with a short fuse, who would occasionally explode with a bang.  Right and Left seem to be in agreement on Newt's resemblance to trinitrotoluene, in other words (or, maybe, "Newtroglycerine"?).  Which leaves only one key question to be answered: When, exactly, will this "Newtsplosion" take place?</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/12/12/call-the-newtsplosion-contest/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>57</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [191] -- The White Knight Is Talking Backwards...</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/12/09/ftp191/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/12/09/ftp191/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Dec 2011 00:01:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign Ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Talking Points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Name-dropping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4921</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>You know, it strikes me that this week may be one politics-watchers look back on when proving the thesis: "Anything can happen in politics, and usually does."  I can picture seeing some wise pundit a few years down the road making the historical reference: "Yeah, but remember when Newt Gingrich and Ron Paul were leading the polls in the Iowa caucuses?  Anything can happen... just <em>any</em>thing..."</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/12/09/ftp191/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>58</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>From The Archives -- Question For Obama: How About A Science-Based Drug Policy?</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/12/08/from-the-archives-question-for-obama-how-about-a-science-based-drug-policy/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/12/08/from-the-archives-question-for-obama-how-about-a-science-based-drug-policy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Dec 2011 00:26:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4917</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Two-and-a-half years ago, I wrote the following column, hoping that the Obama administration was going to live up to its promise to have a "science-based" drug policy.  I spoke of two examples: medical marijuana, and the "morning after" pill.  Today seemed a real good day to re-run this column.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/12/08/from-the-archives-question-for-obama-how-about-a-science-based-drug-policy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Two Ron Paul Winning Scenarios</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/12/07/two-ron-paul-winning-scenarios/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/12/07/two-ron-paul-winning-scenarios/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2011 00:05:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign Ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4911</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Since the 2012 Republican nomination fight has, so far been marked by its "anything could happen" nature, and since Ron Paul is still very much in the race in places like Iowa, let's explore how he could actually win the Republican nomination.  This scenario is unthinkable for many inside-the-Beltway types and mainstream media types alike, but since it is the height of speculation season, a winning Paul scenario is worth considering.  Two of them, in fact.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/12/07/two-ron-paul-winning-scenarios/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Teddy Roosevelt&#039;s &quot;The New Nationalism&quot; Speech</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/12/06/teddy-roosevelts-the-new-nationalism-speech/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/12/06/teddy-roosevelts-the-new-nationalism-speech/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Dec 2011 00:53:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guest Authors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Name-dropping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4903</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[President Barack Obama gave a speech today in a small town in Kansas.  The reason he chose this venue for this speech was to draw historical comparisons with a speech given there by Teddy Roosevelt, over one hundred years ago.  While you may see some clips of Obama's speech in the news, few will bother to look up the original speech.  Which is a shame, and which is why we present it today.  We leave comparisons with Obama's speech to others, for now, mostly because the speech itself is a long one.  But it is worth reading to the end, to see where the real (capital-P) Progressives stand in American history.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/12/06/teddy-roosevelts-the-new-nationalism-speech/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama Poll Watch -- November, 2011</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/12/05/opw1111/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/12/05/opw1111/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2011 22:34:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Contests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama Poll Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4892</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>This month Obama poll watchers got some good news, and some bad news.  This was capped off, at the end of the month, by the Washington punditocracy making an incredibly stupid comparison between polling for Barack Obama and Jimmy Carter -- which we will address at the end of the column (complete with a "guess the president" graph quiz, for your amusement).</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/12/05/opw1111/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>25</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [190] -- Fine With Me!</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/12/02/ftp190/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/12/02/ftp190/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2011 23:47:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Campaign Ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Talking Points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4871</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>So here's my proposal: Congress should pass a new schedule of fines.  Each would be worded thusly: "the fine shall be $10 million, or 10 percent of the profits the company reported on its annual shareholders' report last year, <strong>whichever is larger</strong>."  That'd be for a minor fine, of course, like a parking ticket.  A bigger infraction would lead to, say, "50 percent," or "100 percent," or even higher.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/12/02/ftp190/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>203</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Three-Dot Thursday</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/12/01/three-dot-thursday-5/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/12/01/three-dot-thursday-5/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2011 01:14:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Libya]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4867</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Collins is, I remind everyone, nominally a member of the Republican Party.  She's right -- this could defuse a major talking point for Republicans, and do it in a very elegant way.  As I said, Democrats should be beating a path to her office door, to quickly work this idea up into legislation that Democrats can support.  It is one of the best ideas I've heard all year, and it deserves serious consideration not only because the idea itself is so workable, but also for the sheer politics of it all -- this could take away a big GOP talking point, right before election season begins.  Democrats: take note!  Please....</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/12/01/three-dot-thursday-5/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>15</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Newt?  Really?</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/11/30/newt-really/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/11/30/newt-really/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2011 23:15:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign Ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4860</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>To put this another way: it is time to start taking Newt Gingrich seriously, folks.  Because he's got a solid chance of denying the Republican nomination from Mitt Romney.  For better or worse, the possibility of Newt pulling this feat off is becoming a lot more concrete.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/11/30/newt-really/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>47</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Our Holiday Fundraiser Kicks Off!</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/11/29/our-holiday-fundraiser-kicks-off-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/11/29/our-holiday-fundraiser-kicks-off-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2011 00:36:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4838</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Because last year's fundraising drive was so overwhelmingly successful, we have decided not to mess with a good thing.  In other words, to be blunt, there will again be kittens.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/11/29/our-holiday-fundraiser-kicks-off-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>21</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Republicans&#039; Tax Dilemma</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/11/28/republicans-tax-dilemma/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/11/28/republicans-tax-dilemma/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Nov 2011 21:46:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4832</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Have the Republicans in Congress painted themselves into a corner on taxes?  They seem to be in the position of choosing between a number of courses of action, most of which would normally be seen as going against their principles.  They may have dealt themselves a losing hand, to put it another way.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/11/28/republicans-tax-dilemma/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>43</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Pentagon&#039;s First Bake Sale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/11/23/the-pentagons-first-bake-sale/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/11/23/the-pentagons-first-bake-sale/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Nov 2011 21:26:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Humor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4826</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>I'm told we still have a few hundred raffle tickets left, so please, folks, get to the raffle booths soon or they'll all be gone!  Only a million bucks a ticket -- mere pocket change!</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/11/23/the-pentagons-first-bake-sale/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Historic Interlude -- Guess The Decade</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/11/22/historic-interlude-guess-the-decade/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/11/22/historic-interlude-guess-the-decade/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Nov 2011 00:33:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4822</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>It's all bunkum, of course.  America has always enjoyed a rousing good political fight, and our media has almost always reflected this (to their profit).  Read the following excerpt, if you have a problem believing this, and see if you can put it in context.  When, in other words, was the following written?</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/11/22/historic-interlude-guess-the-decade/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Republican Field Approaches Iowa And New Hampshire</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/11/21/republican-field-approaches-iowa-and-new-hampshire/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/11/21/republican-field-approaches-iowa-and-new-hampshire/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2011 23:55:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign Ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4817</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The race for the Republican presidential nomination has certainly been anything but dull this year.  Every time you turn around, it seems another name pops up as the alternative to Mitt Romney.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/11/21/republican-field-approaches-iowa-and-new-hampshire/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [189] -- Cut Congress&#039; Pay!</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/11/18/ftp189/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/11/18/ftp189/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Nov 2011 23:40:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Talking Points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4807</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The last time Members of Congress took a cut in pay was on April 1, 1933 -- the midst of a Great Depression.  At a time of similar economic turmoil and record deficits, Congress should not require sacrifices of others without tightening its own belt.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/11/18/ftp189/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>42</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Deficit Committee&#039;s Trigger Lock</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/11/17/deficit-committees-trigger-lock/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/11/17/deficit-committees-trigger-lock/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Nov 2011 00:51:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4803</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>If the committee fails, though, there are supposed to be "triggers" pulled -- automatic cuts to both domestic spending and military budgets.  But you know what?  I am confident that these triggers will never be pulled.  To put it another way, these automatic cuts are never going to happen.  Oh, sure, there may be some noise about them, accompanied by handwringing and teeth-gnashing inside the Beltway, but I remain confident that the actual budget cuts will never take place.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/11/17/deficit-committees-trigger-lock/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Two Suggestions For Occupy Wall Street</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/11/16/two-suggestions-for-occupy-wall-street/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/11/16/two-suggestions-for-occupy-wall-street/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Nov 2011 00:39:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Free Speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4798</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The big question for the Occupy protests has now become: What next?  With the multiple evictions across the country, the Occupiers have been given an ultimatum of sorts by the powers-that-be: protest and rally all you want, but you can't "occupy" these places any longer by erecting tents and making them your residences.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/11/16/two-suggestions-for-occupy-wall-street/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>64</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>From The Archives: Occupy Crossroads</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/11/15/from-the-archives-occupy-crossroads/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/11/15/from-the-archives-occupy-crossroads/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Nov 2011 01:26:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Free Speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4794</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The "Occupy Wall Street" movement seems to be at a crossroads.  The path it chooses to take next may be the deciding moment for whether it declines into irrelevance or grows beyond its current boundaries into something larger.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/11/15/from-the-archives-occupy-crossroads/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>24</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&quot;Anybody But Romney, Inc.&quot; Announces Presidential Bid</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/11/14/anybody-but-romney-inc-announces-presidential-bid/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/11/14/anybody-but-romney-inc-announces-presidential-bid/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 22:56:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Humor]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4786</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>In a surprise move today, the seven major Republican candidates for president (who are not named "Mitt Romney") decided to merge their campaigns, and run as a single corporate "person" they are now calling "Anybody But Romney, Incorporated."</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/11/14/anybody-but-romney-inc-announces-presidential-bid/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>49</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Program Note</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/11/11/program-note-23/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/11/11/program-note-23/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Nov 2011 00:51:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4784</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There will be no Friday Talking Points column today.
Happy Veterans' Day to all, and have yourselves a good weekend.
-- Chris Weigant
&#160;
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/11/11/program-note-23/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>30</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cain&#039;s Ridiculous Lefty Conspiracy Theory</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/11/10/cains-ridiculous-lefty-conspiracy-theory/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/11/10/cains-ridiculous-lefty-conspiracy-theory/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Nov 2011 01:30:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4780</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Herman Cain is, if he can be believed, convinced that a conspiracy from the Left is responsible for the accusations of sexual harassment against him.  This is, not to put too fine a point on it, ridiculous.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/11/10/cains-ridiculous-lefty-conspiracy-theory/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>48</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Guest Column: Occupy Wall Street is Not the Tea Party of the Left</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/11/09/guest-column-occupy-wall-street-is-not-the-tea-party-of-the-left/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/11/09/guest-column-occupy-wall-street-is-not-the-tea-party-of-the-left/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Nov 2011 21:35:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Free Speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guest Authors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Bill of Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4776</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Every so often, I am so impressed by a comment to one of my columns that I offer to just turn my column over to the author, and let them have my soapbox.  This doesn't happen often, usually around once per year.
I've written a few columns so far about the Occupy Wall Street protest, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/11/09/guest-column-occupy-wall-street-is-not-the-tea-party-of-the-left/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>82</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Red State Pessimism?</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/11/08/red-state-pessimism/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/11/08/red-state-pessimism/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Nov 2011 23:10:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4773</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The author's basic premise is that Romney is a flip-flopper who can't be trusted by conservatives.  He'll win the Republican nomination, and then go on to lose to Obama next year.  The article (and the hundreds of comments) make fascinating reading.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/11/08/red-state-pessimism/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>15</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>America&#039;s First Political Sex Scandal: The Reynolds/Hamilton Affair</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/11/07/americas-first-political-sex-scandal-the-reynoldshamilton-affair/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/11/07/americas-first-political-sex-scandal-the-reynoldshamilton-affair/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Nov 2011 23:33:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Name-dropping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4768</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>While the subject of which American politician's sex scandal came first is a debatable one (such as: did Benjamin Franklin's dalliances in Paris count?), most agree that the sex-and-blackmail scandal of Alexander Hamilton was the first with any impact, from George Washington's time onwards.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/11/07/americas-first-political-sex-scandal-the-reynoldshamilton-affair/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [188] -- Why Not Occupy The Media?</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/11/04/ftp188/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/11/04/ftp188/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Nov 2011 23:50:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Free Speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Talking Points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4759</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Like many Americans, I watched the events unfold in Oakland this week with some trepidation.  Occupy Oakland tried two new tactics in protesting, and both were very successful at achieving a key goal -- that of getting your message across.  Both the general strike and the temporary port shutdown were successful, in this regard.  Later in the night, however, a group of jerks came close to ruining all this, by their criminal behavior.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/11/04/ftp188/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>138</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama Poll Watch -- October, 2011</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/11/03/opw1110/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/11/03/opw1110/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Nov 2011 22:06:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama Poll Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4750</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Barack Obama's job approval poll numbers in October were flat.  Very flat.  So flat, in fact, that he tied his own "flattest month ever" record, which he initially set back in November of last year.  Obama's change in approval and disapproval <em>combined</em> last month totaled only a single tenth of a percent -- which is almost as flat as numerically possible.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/11/03/opw1110/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Championing Rapists&#039; Fatherhood Rights</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/11/02/championing-rapists-fatherhood-rights/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/11/02/championing-rapists-fatherhood-rights/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Nov 2011 22:33:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4745</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>This was, to put it mildly, completely unacceptable to a large swath of the Republican base.  Cain hastily backtracked, and is now as "pro-life" as he can humanly be, stating that abortion should be illegal in every single case -- no matter what the extenuating circumstances.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/11/02/championing-rapists-fatherhood-rights/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>24</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bank Of America Backs Down</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/11/01/bank-of-america-backs-down/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/11/01/bank-of-america-backs-down/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Nov 2011 22:58:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4741</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>This is not only a victory for consumers (and the Occupy Wall Street folks, incidentally), but a triumph of mathematics and economics.  Because it is ridiculous that big banks should even <em>contemplate</em> these fees in the first place.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/11/01/bank-of-america-backs-down/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>19</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Horrifying Hallowe&#039;en Tales, Left And Right</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/10/31/horrifying-halloween-tales-left-and-right/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/10/31/horrifying-halloween-tales-left-and-right/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Oct 2011 22:07:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Humor]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4736</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>[<em>Cue: Rattling chains and spooky organ music, topped off with a terrifying high-pitched scream...</em>]</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/10/31/horrifying-halloween-tales-left-and-right/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [187] -- GOP&#039;s 22-Week Work Year</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/10/28/ftp187/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/10/28/ftp187/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2011 23:13:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Talking Points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guest Authors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Name-dropping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4724</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>We'd like to begin today with an issue that we regularly get incensed about here, mostly because it flies under the radar of just about everyone -- including the entire media universe.  Because for once, Democrats are making the attempt to use the issue to make some political hay (even though, in this regard, they're admittedly almost as bad as the Republicans).</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/10/28/ftp187/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>32</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Occupy Crossroads</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/10/27/occupy-crossroads/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/10/27/occupy-crossroads/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2011 22:18:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Free Speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Libya]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4720</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The "Occupy Wall Street" movement seems to be at a crossroads.  The path it chooses to take next may be the deciding moment for whether it declines into irrelevance or grows beyond its current boundaries into something larger.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/10/27/occupy-crossroads/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>35</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Program Note</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/10/26/program-note-22/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/10/26/program-note-22/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2011 00:02:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4718</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Due to a mixup in scheduling, there will be no column today.  Our apologies, but hey, Monday's column should really have been a two-parter, and we've got pumpkins to carve for next Monday, so it's a busy week all around even without the snafu.
Call today a rare "open thread" here.  I'll even toss [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/10/26/program-note-22/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Rise And Fall Of Rick Perry</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/10/25/the-rise-and-fall-of-rick-perry/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/10/25/the-rise-and-fall-of-rick-perry/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Oct 2011 22:36:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign Ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4714</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Two months ago, Perry led the field with 23 percent (to Romney's 16 percent second-place).  Two months ago, Herman Cain was at five percent.  Cain is now, to be blunt, eating Perry's lunch (insert your own pizza joke here).  Even the Tea Party has all but abandoned Perry in favor of Cain, at this point.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/10/25/the-rise-and-fall-of-rick-perry/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Republicans Disrespect Iraqi Democracy</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/10/24/republicans-disrespect-iraqi-democracy/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/10/24/republicans-disrespect-iraqi-democracy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Oct 2011 00:28:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iran]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4709</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>While predictable, this reaction is absolutely ridiculous.  Every single talking point the Republicans came up with on the subject shows their almost complete lack of understanding of the basic concepts of democracy -- both here at home, and abroad.  Which is why these points need refuting, one by one.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/10/24/republicans-disrespect-iraqi-democracy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>17</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [186] -- Foreign Policy Issues Reappear</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/10/21/ftp186/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/10/21/ftp186/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Oct 2011 22:46:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign Ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Talking Points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Libya]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4698</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>It has been a big week on the foreign policy front, with the death of Libya's dictator and President Obama's announcement today that all U.S. troops would be out of Iraq by the end of this year (leaving roughly 150 to guard the embassy).  But before we get to all of that, I've got some domestic advice for the president's re-election team.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/10/21/ftp186/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>16</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>From The Archives -- Obama&#039;s Libya Strategy Proves His Critics Wrong</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/10/20/from-the-archives-obamas-libya-strategy-proves-his-critics-wrong/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/10/20/from-the-archives-obamas-libya-strategy-proves-his-critics-wrong/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Oct 2011 00:29:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Libya]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4693</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Too busy researching today to write, even though it is a momentous day in Libya.  I'll be commenting on this in the near future, most likely, but for now this will have to do.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/10/20/from-the-archives-obamas-libya-strategy-proves-his-critics-wrong/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Republicans Attack Cain&#039;s 9-9-9 Plan</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/10/19/republicans-attack-cains-9-9-9-plan/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/10/19/republicans-attack-cains-9-9-9-plan/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Oct 2011 00:10:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign Ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4688</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Last night, at yet another Republican presidential candidate debate, Herman Cain was roundly criticized for his simplistic 9-9-9 tax plan by his fellow Republicans.  I have to admit, it was a little bizarre (in a "Nixon goes to China" sort of way) to see Republicans disparaging a tax plan for being "regressive."  Ron Paul was unafraid to actually use this word, and while several other candidates avoided the term they in essence leveled the same charge: 9-9-9 would wind up <em>increasing</em> taxes on the poor and the middle class.  Being Republicans, though, they didn't also speak of the other side of this coin -- the fact that 9-9-9 would lower taxes on the wealthy and <em>really</em> lower them on the ultra-wealthy.  But still, it was odd enough to see candidate after candidate speak of their concern for the tax burden of the lower-class and middle-class, since this is usually a Democratic argument.  Perhaps all those 99 Percenters out there demonstrating in the streets are getting through to the Republican politicians?  Stranger things have happened.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/10/19/republicans-attack-cains-9-9-9-plan/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>23</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Quick Separation-Of-Powers Historical Footnote</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/10/18/a-quick-separation-of-powers-historical-footnote/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/10/18/a-quick-separation-of-powers-historical-footnote/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Oct 2011 00:07:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4684</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The issue of what, exactly, "three co-equal branches" means in American government -- and, more importantly, what happens when two of them disagree -- goes back a long way.  Further than Franklin Roosevelt, further even than Abraham Lincoln.  The first president to truly tangle with the Supreme Court was actually Andrew Jackson, who fought the court on two separate issues: Jackson's policy of "Indian removal," and the Second Bank of the United States.  The first one is where Jackson responded (according to legend -- he may not have actually said this) to a court ruling against him: "John Marshall has made his decision; now let him enforce it!"  By doing so, Jackson was stating his open defiance of a Supreme Court decision, and pointing out that the Executive Branch actually controlled the levers of federal power, and not the Judicial Branch.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/10/18/a-quick-separation-of-powers-historical-footnote/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The End Of The Iraq War Is In Sight</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/10/17/the-end-of-the-iraq-war-is-in-sight/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/10/17/the-end-of-the-iraq-war-is-in-sight/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2011 22:50:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4676</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The end of the American military's involvement in Iraq is almost upon us.  Someone in the White House recently leaked what should have been apparent to everyone all along -- that the Pentagon is preparing to withdraw <em>all</em> our remaining troops from Iraq, by the end of this year.  Less than 200 will remain, to guard the embassy, but all our other brave men and women in uniform will be home to celebrate the dawning of a new year.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/10/17/the-end-of-the-iraq-war-is-in-sight/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>17</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [185] -- I Am A 99 Percenter</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/10/14/ftp185/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/10/14/ftp185/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Oct 2011 23:30:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Talking Points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4664</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>But, having said all of that, I'm going to make a suggestion anyway, on one particular facet of the movement: its name.  Because I truly think that if the protest wants to grow and expand into a forceful movement for change, it should consider a bit of rebranding.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/10/14/ftp185/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>109</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>From The Archives -- Church And State Revisited: The Story Of Smoot</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/10/13/from-the-archives-church-and-state-revisited-the-story-of-smoot-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/10/13/from-the-archives-church-and-state-revisited-the-story-of-smoot-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Oct 2011 23:57:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Bill of Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4660</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Because Mormonism is in the news again, due to a Rick Perry supporter calling it a "cult," I thought it was high time to re-run the following column.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/10/13/from-the-archives-church-and-state-revisited-the-story-of-smoot-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Surveying GOP Field</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/10/12/surveying-gop-field/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/10/12/surveying-gop-field/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Oct 2011 23:24:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign Ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4653</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The last time we wrote, Rick Perry had just jumped in the race.  Since then, nobody else has gotten in, while two prominent names decided to sit this one out.  Several candidates caught fire, and several also burned out (at least, poll-wise).  So it goes, on the campaign merry-go-round.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/10/12/surveying-gop-field/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>When The People Lead</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/10/11/when-the-people-lead/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/10/11/when-the-people-lead/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Oct 2011 23:34:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4649</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The idea behind that title is: "When the People lead, the leaders will follow."  I read this on a bumpersticker a few decades ago, although I must admit I haven't bothered to research the phrase's origins.  Wherever it came from, the idea is a simple (and amusing) one: when the so-called "leaders" aren't leading, then the People will step in and do it for them.  Eventually, the "leaders" will wake up to what is going on and get on board themselves, pretending to have led the movement all along.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/10/11/when-the-people-lead/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Marijuana Prohibition&#039;s Legal Insanity Continues</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/10/10/marijuana-prohibitions-legal-insanity-continues/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/10/10/marijuana-prohibitions-legal-insanity-continues/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Oct 2011 22:54:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4643</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Like many other Americans, I thoroughly enjoyed watching historical documentarian Ken Burns' recent <em>Prohibition</em> series, on PBS.  But I was disappointed by its abrupt end.  Burns took the easy way out and didn't point out that right around the same time the legal federal prohibition on alcohol ended, the prohibition of marijuana was ramping up in a big way.  And, while the alcohol-targeted Prohibition ended, this prohibition remains.  In, fact, it is getting worse, as the Obama administration is continuing a crackdown on anyone who is approaching the problem in any sort of sane or rational manner -- including local and state government officials.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/10/10/marijuana-prohibitions-legal-insanity-continues/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [184] -- Long Live Steve Jobs</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/10/07/ftp184/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/10/07/ftp184/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Oct 2011 23:39:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Talking Points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Name-dropping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4629</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>A corporate leader passed away this week, and millions mourned his passing and celebrated his life.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/10/07/ftp184/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>17</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama Poll Watch -- September, 2011</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/10/06/opw1109/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/10/06/opw1109/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Oct 2011 22:49:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama Poll Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4622</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Barack Obama's poll numbers in September were not good.  In fact, they were pretty bad.  Obama fans looking for good news will have to be content with the fact that at least Obama seems to be slowing the trend of his dropping numbers somewhat.  This isn't exactly a turnaround for him, but September was a lot less of a drastic change than the three months which preceded it.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/10/06/opw1109/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mad As Hell</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/10/05/mad-as-hell/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/10/05/mad-as-hell/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Oct 2011 23:05:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Name-dropping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4615</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The protesters in the Occupy Wall Street movement have been getting criticized for not being focused enough, or not providing a list of demands, or not having leaders, or any number of other things by the media.  But this can be forgiven, because the media are now at least paying attention, rather than just completely ignoring the protest.  What surprises me is that the media (at least so far) haven't realized the frustration the protesters feel is the real story here.  Call it free-floating rage, if you will.  Or, even better, call it an updated Howard Beale moment.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/10/05/mad-as-hell/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>17</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>And Then There Was One...</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/10/04/and-then-there-was-one/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/10/04/and-then-there-was-one/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Oct 2011 22:49:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4611</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The media, of course, likely won't believe Christie -- at least until he says "No" several more times.  Last week he gave a speech that created a media frenzy, and in the question-and-answer period responded to the twenty-millionth time he was asked exactly the same question that there was a "mashup" video available online of him saying "No" <em>over and freakin' over again</em>, and anyone who was interested in the answer should just go review this video.  The media forgot to report this, and instead focused on what they decided was a more ambivalent answer to being asked the same question for the twenty-million-and-one-th time.  "Christie Might Run!" was the headline they decided to go with.  They were bored, quite obviously, and attacked with the ferocity of a shark pack with chum in the water.  The fact that there actually <em>was no actual chum</em> didn't even seem to faze them.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/10/04/and-then-there-was-one/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>26</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Wall Street Protest, Circa 1967</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/10/03/wall-street-protest-circa-1967/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/10/03/wall-street-protest-circa-1967/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Oct 2011 23:51:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4605</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Forty-four years ago, Abbie Hoffman and a few friends made a statement on Wall Street.  His merry band of pranksters took a tour of the New York Stock Exchange on August 24, 1967.  The tour ended at a gallery overlooking the actual trading floor.  Hoffman and his friends rushed to the railing, and began throwing money onto the heads of the traders below.  The stock ticker (at the time, the sacred heartbeat of the American financial system) was halted for six minutes, while the crowd grubbed for the money on the floor.  Hoffman's group was then escorted out, where they spoke to a crowd of reporters.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/10/03/wall-street-protest-circa-1967/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [183] -- What I&#039;d Call &quot;Class Warfare&quot;</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/09/30/ftp183/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/09/30/ftp183/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2011 23:26:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Talking Points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Humor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4590</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Last week (as with this week) the subject <em>de semaine</em> was "class warfare."  The comment which inspired this week's mini-rants contained a simple, repetitive concept: "When [something outrageous pushed by Republicans happens], nobody calls it 'class warfare'.  Maybe we should."</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/09/30/ftp183/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>62</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>GOP Field Wide Open?</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/09/29/gop-field-wide-open/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/09/29/gop-field-wide-open/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2011 23:34:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4585</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The Republican presidential field continues to defy the expectations and easy story lines from the political media and the rest of the inside-the-Beltway crowd.  Just last week, this was supposed to now be "a two-man race," but in a week's time the story has shifted to almost utter chaos.  A new Fox News poll out shows that the easy read of the electorate the media was pushing last week is now completely wrong.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/09/29/gop-field-wide-open/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Republican Primary Scheduling Headaches</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/09/28/republican-primary-scheduling-headaches/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/09/28/republican-primary-scheduling-headaches/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2011 23:27:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4579</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Instead I'd like to talk about the backroom struggling within the Republican Party this week which is a lot more interesting and will likely be a lot more germane to the race -- the question of who goes first (or, more to the point, who goes <em>fifth</em>) in the Republican primary calendar.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/09/28/republican-primary-scheduling-headaches/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Death Before Philately!</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/09/27/death-before-philately/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/09/27/death-before-philately/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Sep 2011 23:22:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4574</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The United States Postal Service very quietly changed one of their bedrock rules this week.  Up until this point, in America, you had to be dead to be on a stamp.  Now, <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2011/09/27/us/postal-service-will-begin-honoring-living-people-on-stamps.html">anything goes</a> -- the living will get their chance to be immortalized on an American stamp alongside the dead.  This is a <em>very</em> bad idea, and Congress should really step in and put a stop to it as soon as possible.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/09/27/death-before-philately/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Memo To Rick Perry</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/09/26/memo-to-rick-perry/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/09/26/memo-to-rick-perry/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Sep 2011 22:38:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign Ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Humor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4569</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Well, it's been great fun and all, but we are sorry to inform you that your viable candidacy for the Republican presidential nomination is hereby over.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/09/26/memo-to-rick-perry/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>15</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [182] -- Class Warfare?  Hardly.</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/09/23/ftp182/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/09/23/ftp182/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Sep 2011 23:12:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Talking Points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4556</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>A satellite is falling out of the sky, but it probably won't hit anybody.  Probably.  I personally got over this fear by listening to Creedence Clearwater Revival's "It Came Out Of The Sky" (which I heartily recommend, just on general principles).</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/09/23/ftp182/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>27</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Thinning The Debate Herd</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/09/22/thinning-the-debate-herd/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/09/22/thinning-the-debate-herd/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Sep 2011 22:03:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4553</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>At some point, television is going to have to start limiting which Republican candidates get invited to the debates.  The herd of hopefuls must be thinned.  This may happen soon, and tonight may be the last of the mega-debates of the season.  One can only hope.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/09/22/thinning-the-debate-herd/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Elizabeth Warren&#039;s Campaign Takes Off</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/09/21/elizabeth-warrens-campaign-takes-off/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/09/21/elizabeth-warrens-campaign-takes-off/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Sep 2011 23:27:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4545</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Elizabeth Warren is a polarizing figure.  Liberals love her with a fierce passion.  Republicans hate her with a fiery passion.  What this means is that lots and lots of money from outside the state will be pumped into this race.  The reason why Democrats are going to be watching this race closer than any other Senate race next year is easy to see: this may be the only state Democrats have a good chance to pick up a seat from the Republicans.  The math isn't good for Democrats this time around in the Senate, and they are in danger of losing control of the chamber next year.  Warren may be the sole bright spot in this environment for Democrats.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/09/21/elizabeth-warrens-campaign-takes-off/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>18</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Our Gay Revolutionary War Hero</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/09/20/our-gay-revolutionary-war-hero/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/09/20/our-gay-revolutionary-war-hero/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Sep 2011 23:32:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4542</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Today marks the end of the "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" policy of not allowing gay servicemembers to openly do their duty in the American military.  There are plenty of other columns out there celebrating this fact, so instead of going into details, I'd like to offer an excerpt from a book I recently read.  The book is <em>One Nation Under Sex</em>, by Larry Flynt and David Eisenbach, Ph.D.  Whatever you may think of Flynt for his other activities, his books are always a good read and always exhaustively researched and annotated.  Which is why his telling of this particular story is the best I've yet come across.  Gay people have been in the United States military from the very beginning.  They've always served, the only change now is that they'll be able to do so without having to hide who they are.  Which is why this is such a good lesson to ponder on today of all days.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/09/20/our-gay-revolutionary-war-hero/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>22</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama Redefines Populism</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/09/19/obama-redefines-populism/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/09/19/obama-redefines-populism/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Sep 2011 23:57:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4535</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>"Populism" is a word that gets thrown around with abandon by folks masquerading as journalists on television these days.  Sarah Palin had the word used to describe her, and later, the entire Tea Party movement was labeled "populist" by the chattering classes.  Today, President Obama unveiled a truly populist agenda, by proposing to tax millionaires at the same tax rate that middle-class Americans pay.  By doing so, Obama will (hopefully) redefine the term "populism" in the political conversation.  Or, to be technical, he will re-redefine the word back to what it originally meant.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/09/19/obama-redefines-populism/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [181] -- Ads Obama Should Run</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/09/16/ftp181/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/09/16/ftp181/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Sep 2011 23:08:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign Ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Talking Points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Name-dropping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4524</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Since the president is not facing a primary challenger, and since the president has raised a whopping big pile of money already, and (most importantly) since the president has rediscovered the joys of speaking directly to the American people about his agenda -- why not buy some political ads, now?</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/09/16/ftp181/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>39</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Merkley&#039;s Right: CBO Should Score Jobs</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/09/14/merkleys-right-cbo-should-score-jobs/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/09/14/merkleys-right-cbo-should-score-jobs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Sep 2011 22:52:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4518</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Senator Jeff Merkley of Oregon has just proposed a stunningly good idea: for all legislation which emerges from the joint committee charged with lowering the deficit, direct the congressional "scoring" referee not only to provide the numbers for the impact on the federal budget, but also to provide data on the impact on the unemployment rate and the jobs situation.  This is such an excellent idea, both on its merits and politically, that it should immediately be supported by all Democrats.  Because it would force the public debate to cover the entire scope of the proposals being offered up, and it would do so by providing the data the public most cares about right now: how will this create or destroy jobs?</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/09/14/merkleys-right-cbo-should-score-jobs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>17</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Will Palin Go Rogue?</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/09/12/will-palin-go-rogue/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/09/12/will-palin-go-rogue/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Sep 2011 22:17:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Name-dropping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4511</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>"What will Sarah do?" has been a question on the minds of many in the run-up to the Republican primary season next year.  Definitively figuring out the answer to this question is a fool's game, however, because Sarah Palin continually shows the ability to surprise the punditocracy, the public, and the Republican establishment.  Only Palin herself is ever confident of knowing what Sarah will do next, in other words.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/09/12/will-palin-go-rogue/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>28</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [180] -- Give &#039;Em Hell, Barry!</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/09/09/ftp180/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/09/09/ftp180/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Sep 2011 00:02:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign Ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Talking Points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4503</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>President Barack Obama opened his re-election campaign last night with a wowzer of a speech to a joint session of Congress.  But we'll get to that in detail in a minute.  First, we must mark an important anniversary this week.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/09/09/ftp180/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>22</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

