ChrisWeigant.com

Weathering The Storms

[ Posted Thursday, May 16th, 2013 – 17:06 UTC ]

There are several metaphors to describe the week President Obama is having. Firefighting. Damage control. Playing defense. Today, however, I went with "weathering the storms" because of the unfortunate optics of Obama giving an outdoor press conference today under an umbrella, as the skies dripped down. Into each president's life some rain must fall, in other words.

While Obama had Marines handy to provide umbrella cover during the presser, the bigger question is how he's weathering the metaphorical storms blowing through Washington this week. There are really four of these, although the media seems fixated on only three.

Continue Reading »

Is It Time For Holder To Go?

[ Posted Wednesday, May 15th, 2013 – 16:05 UTC ]

Is it time for Attorney General Eric Holder to (as is frequently said in politics) "spend some more time with his family"?

I must admit, it's hard for me to be impartial and unbiased in suggesting that it might be time for Holder to step down. One of my biggest disappointments with President Obama's transition to his second term was the announcement that Holder would be staying on, instead of turning the Justice Department over to someone else. I don't personally dislike Holder (I've never met the man), but I do strongly question his priorities during his time as the nation's Attorney General. To give just one example: there are no bankers currently in jail because they illegally contributed to the wrecking of the American economy, even though it happened almost five years ago. Holder's "too big to jail" legacy of backing down to Wall Street is enough, in my opinion, to begin the search for a fresh face at the Justice Department.

Since I've admitted my own bias, allow me to first make the case for Holder staying where he is. Holder does not have a central role in any of the three scandals currently swirling around Washington. The Benghazi talking points issue was a tug-of-war between the CIA and the State Department. The IRS is a division of the Treasury Department. Although the third scandal does emanate from the Justice Department, Holder has stated that he recused himself from the whole process of investigating the leaks and in getting the Associated Press' phone records -- which would seem to let him off that particular hook. Holder may now become involved in the IRS scandal, as part of a criminal probe into whether any federal laws were broken by anyone at the agency, but that's in the future, and had nothing whatsoever to do with whatever happened there in the past.

Continue Reading »

Good News On The Deficit

[ Posted Tuesday, May 14th, 2013 – 17:17 UTC ]

Looks like I spoke too soon. Last Thursday, I posted an article about the expected good news on the federal budget deficit for 2013. Today, the actual numbers were released. They are even better than expected.

After churning the data for the first two quarters of fiscal year 2013, the Congressional Budget Office is now predicting a deficit of $642 billion this year. This is down over $200 billion from their first-quarter estimate, mind you. They are also projecting a deficit of only $378 billion for next year.

As is my wont, I decided to put this into chart form, so here you go:

Federal Budget Deficits

[Click on graph to see larger-scale version.]

Continue Reading »

The IRS Scandal, and Hoover's Brutalist Legacy

[ Posted Monday, May 13th, 2013 – 17:29 UTC ]

The scandal currently unfolding at the Internal Revenue Service is actually being downplayed by some who feel that tax investigations into groups advocating an anti-tax attitude is more than justified on the face of it. Admittedly, all the facts are not yet in, but the scandal started when the IRS itself actually publicly admitted wrongdoing. So while there's a question of who knew about it (and who should be fired), the fact that scandalous behavior was happening isn't really even in question. Because it was, indeed, scandalous behavior. Any time a federal agency decides to intimidate those in the political arena in any way, large or small, it should be seen as a scandal by everyone -- no matter your political leanings. Because we've seen what happens when this sort of thing is allowed and encouraged, and it isn't a pretty sight.

The power to use the legal and police services of the federal government as leverage against your political opponents is a tempting one indeed, which is why both parties have done so in the past when they thought they could get away with such blatant violations of the Constitution. We've even lived through a very long period when this power got so out of control that one man held blackmailable material on United States presidents, Supreme Court justices, and too many members of Congress to count. This information was gathered systematically, by illegally wiretapping phone lines and bugging hotel rooms, as well as plenty of other underhanded (and, again, unconstitutional) methods. The man behind this effort was none other than J. Edgar Hoover.

Continue Reading »

Friday Talking Points [257] -- Wedgies For All!

[ Posted Friday, May 10th, 2013 – 16:25 UTC ]

Being a student of the political lexicon, I would like to propose a new definition for an old term -- a term we've all used since roughly the second grade. I refer, of course, to the "wedgie." For those who are astoundingly unaware of what this term literally means, I would refer you to your local second-grader (pick any boy age 7 or 8 and ask him... and after he rolls around the floor screaming with laughter for awhile, he'll explain and even demonstrate the "wedgie" for you, I'm sure). Ahem.

But I propose a new definition for the wedgie, one in the adult political realm which has nothing to do with underwear (to clarify: the definition has nothing to do with underwear -- the adult political realm often has all too much to do with underwear). My new proposed definition:

Wedgie: When a political party's "wedge" issue turns on them and instead of dividing the other party, begins to divide their own.

Usage: "Boy, the Republicans are really getting a giant wedgie on immigration, aren't they?"

Continue Reading »

Deficit Paradigm Shift Approaching

[ Posted Thursday, May 9th, 2013 – 16:04 UTC ]

The arguments over the federal budget deficit may be about to turn a corner, of sorts. Republicans have been expecting a gigantic budget fight to happen anywhere from now to the middle of the summer, forced by the deadline of the debt ceiling. This fight may not actually happen, though, and it's for a fairly stunning reason: earlier projections of when we would hit the debt ceiling are proving pessimistically wrong, and we may not actually hit it until October -- which is into next year, in budgeting terms (the federal fiscal year starts on the first of October). This could shift the entire paradigm of the political battle over the deficit and debt from one of pointing fingers of blame to one of scrambling to claim credit for policies that "are now working." Which will -- if it happens as now predicted -- make for an interesting change in the debate's dynamic, to say the least.

Continue Reading »

A Forgotten Battle's Anniversary

[ Posted Wednesday, May 8th, 2013 – 16:18 UTC ]

No matter the definitions used, the United States of America has not been directly attacked by an enemy's military very often throughout its history. The biggest attack wasn't even on a state, since Hawai'i was only a territory at the time of Pearl Harbor. There's an even shorter list of times and places where American soil has been occupied by a foreign army. Roughly 200 years ago, the British held parts of the New England coastline in the War of 1812 and they burned down Washington, DC. Closer in time -- exactly 70 years ago this month -- American forces fought a mostly-forgotten battle to retake two of the Aleutian Islands from the Japanese. Starting on May 11, 1943 and lasting more than two weeks, the Battle of Attu Island was successfully fought on what is now the westernmost point of the United States. Though not often mentioned in the list of famous World War II battles in the Pacific, it was indeed an important strategic victory for America and deserves to be remembered.

Continue Reading »

Democrats Shouldn't Get Hopes Up Too High Tonight

[ Posted Tuesday, May 7th, 2013 – 17:18 UTC ]

I tried to wait to write this until the election returns for South Carolina's special House election were in, but it looks like it's going to take awhile. Currently, only four percent of precincts are in, and the numbers have been bouncing wildly around, so it's too soon to tell what's going to happen in the race between Mark Sanford (R -- Appalachian Trail) and Democrat Elizabeth Colbert Busch, sister to Stephen Colbert.

But I have to say, my expectations for this House seat are pretty low. Even should Busch pull out the victory, the chances of her retaining her seat in 2014 are not all that great. This is a district which voted for Mitt Romney to the tune of 6-in-10 in the 2012 election, after all.

Continue Reading »

Obama Poll Watch -- April, 2013

[ Posted Monday, May 6th, 2013 – 15:00 UTC ]

Leveling Out

Welcome back once again to our monthly examination of President Barack Obama's job approval polling numbers. In April, Obama's numbers returned to a normal level, after experiencing a very short post-election "honeymoon period" with the public which bounced his numbers up to a peak, and then bounced them right back down again. You can plainly see this effect in this month's chart:

Obama Approval -- April 2013

[Click on graph to see larger-scale version.]

April, 2013

Continue Reading »

Friday Talking Points [256] -- Most Disappointing Plan B

[ Posted Friday, May 3rd, 2013 – 16:00 UTC ]

Before I get into our main subject, allow me a moment of frivolity. I'd like to be the first (because I'm a day early) to wish everyone a Happy Star Wars Day! Yes, tomorrow is unofficially known as Star Wars Day, because (get ready to groan if you haven't heard this one before) it is the fourth of May. Put another way, "May the 4th," as in (I'm warning you, this is pretty cringeworthy) "May the fourth be with you."

But this year's Star Wars Day is a big one, because the original film ("Episode IV" to be fully accurate) is going to be dubbed into Navajo. They're having casting calls today and tomorrow to fill the parts, and they've already translated the script. That's pretty cool, I have to say. The people behind the effort did this to raise awareness of their language especially among their youth. Which, as I said, is a pretty great idea. I might just get a copy of the Navajo Star Wars when it comes out, just to hear what it sounds like. I have driven through the Southwest and tuned my radio into Navajo stations just for the novelty of hearing a Native American language spoken on the airwaves, so I could see sitting through a movie (where I pretty much know all the dialog anyway) just to hear it in such a unique and interesting format. So, more power to the people who put this together, or (more properly) "May the Force be with them!

Continue Reading »