In one of their stunning (but regular) "up is down" leaps of illogic, the Republican Party is charging President Obama with "court-packing." In reality, they're just miffed that a Democrat is going to exercise his constitutional authority to appoint judges in the regular order of things. To call such actions "court-packing" is nothing short of laughable, to be blunt. In fact, the only hinkey business afoot is coming from Republicans themselves on the issue.

Let's "unpack" the situation a bit, shall we? The D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals is the most important appellate court in the country, for two reasons. The first is that it is seen as a sort of minor-league farm team from which presidents (from both parties) routinely choose Supreme Court justices. The second reason is the really important one, however -- this is the appeals court where many cases which are on the fast track to the Supreme Court normally get decided. Meaning the political makeup of such a court is more important than other circuit courts.

The court is supposed to have eleven judges on it. It currently has eight. President Obama is rumored to be about to announce three nominations to fill the three vacancies. He finally got one of his nominees, Sri Srinivasan, approved last week by the Senate. But there are three more vacancies to fill, and the Constitution allows whoever is president to name replacements. Much to Republicans' dismay.

Continue Reading »

[Program Note: Hope everyone's enjoying their Memorial Day! This column ran back in 2009, but I thought it would be appropriate to run here today, which is another way of saying I was having too much fun to write a new column. Anyway, enjoy, and hope everyone had a good holiday weekend.]

This column originally ran May 25, 2009

On a lonely hill outside the small town of Cobh, Ireland (pronounced: "cove"), is a mass grave marked by three somber headstones. As mass graves go, it's a fairly small one; holding not tens of thousands or even thousands, but merely a few hundred bodies. But the relative size of the grave on the scale of human misery is beside the point -- because while few, their deaths had monumental consequences for America. The dead were civilians, not soldiers (more on them in a minute). But their deaths deserve memorializing today just as much as those we remember who wore the uniform of our country. Because this is the final resting place of the people onboard the Lusitania.

Continue Reading »

Some weeks, not much happens in political news, and other weeks it seems like almost too much happens. This was one of the latter types of week.

While last week was a week of scandals on the television news, this week most of them faded into the background a bit. Benghazi, of course, is going to be Republicans' backup "scandal" right through the 2016 election, since they're not even really targeting Barack Obama anymore, but rather Hillary Clinton. The IRS scandal was briefly in the news as one woman refused to answer Congress' questions and then was put on administrative leave. But the scandal still hasn't touched the White House in any meaningful way, so it appears Republicans are somewhat losing interest in it, other than as a dandy way to raise campaign cash from their base, of course. The AP and Fox News scandal actually did get more scandalous this week, but Republicans aren't really interested in pushing this scandal, leaving it up to the media to protect one of their own.

President Obama gave a major speech yesterday, the timing of which was assumably chosen to "pivot" off of all the scandals (and the non-scandals). He spoke on foreign policy, war, drones, and Guantanamo Bay. This was enough to enrage a few Republicans, which meant it certainly worked as a political distraction. It was also enough to enrage the co-founder of Code Pink, who made her displeasure known while Obama was trying to speak.

Continue Reading »

Boy Scouts, traditionally, have been associated with the tying of knots. Knot-tying has always been a part of scouting, and even today just about any Boy Scout would be able to tell you the difference between a square knot and a granny knot. But today, the Boy Scouts seem to be attempting to unravel a Gordian knot, instead.

Continue Reading »

A comprehensive immigration reform bill has been approved by the Senate committee responsible for immigration laws, and the bill will now move to the Senate floor. This is good news for people who want to see immigration reform, obviously, but the bill’s still got quite a ways to go before it reaches President Obama’s desk for his signature. There are, in fact, six more hurdles the bill will likely face, and some of them are dauntingly high.

The next step will take place on the Senate floor. If the Senate approves a bill, the House will likely have both a committee vote and a floor vote on a bill. But nobody expects the House to vote on the Senate bill the first time around, meaning what the two houses pass will be different. This leads to the next hurdle, the conference committee composed of members of the House and Senate. They will have to hammer out some deal, and then both houses get to vote one last time on the finished product. That's a lot of hurdles to clear, and there is no guarantee that any bill will wind up on Obama's desk any time soon.

Continue Reading »

I hesitate to even write this column, because the disaster in Oklahoma is so fresh. And I will start by admitting my own complete ignorance on the subject at hand. This isn't a political column out to score points, and it should not be read in any way as insensitive to the victims of natural disaster.

But when viewing the wreckage of the Oklahoma tornado I am struck by the same question that always comes to mind when seeing post-tornado footage on the news: Where are the storm cellars? This question, in slightly different form, also springs to mind when watching people board up their windows with plywood in anticipation of a hurricane: Where are the storm shutters? Why, in places prone to such disasters, don't the building codes specify such things, as prudent preparation for Mother Nature's wrath?

Continue Reading »

Is Barack Obama our nation's second "Teflon President"? The question has occurred to me before, but it became impossible to ignore after the last week of "Scandalgate." Even after multiple scandals all vying for the top headline throughout the week, over the weekend CNN reported poll numbers showing Obama currently enjoys 53 percent of the public's approval for the job he's doing. His numbers actually rose from the last time the poll was taken, when Obama was at 51 percent approval. That's pretty stunning news, after the week the president just had. Which is why it's now time to ask the question -- does Obama have the "Teflon" quality of having nothing stick to him, no matter what?

Continue Reading »

Things have gotten so bad in Washington that both pundits and Republicans are beginning to use the "N-word" to describe the president. No, no... not that N-word! Instead, Obama is now actively being compared to Nixon. This comparison is patently...

...WE INTERRUPT THIS COLUMN FOR BREAKING NEWS -- We here at FTP News Network have obtained exclusive before-and-after photos of Angelina Jolie's breasts! In these side-by-side shots, the viewer can easily see the transformation of two of the most famous breasts on the planet. As the camera zooms in and pans around our 3-D representation, we will utter pious thoughts on cancer screening which you won't pay the slightest attention to. Later, we'll have our resident nipple expert in to discuss what you're seeing now...

Sheesh. Now, before anyone gets too irate, allow me to state that the preceding paragraph is (1) entirely fictional -- we have no exclusive shots of anyone's breasts, sorry; and (2) intended to satirize the media's take on any news item with the word "breast" in it -- and not Angelina Jolie, Angelina Jolie's breasts, breast cancer, any cancer, cancer screening, or medical decisions by anyone.

Seriously, consider that there is one medical procedure which gets shown on television in pretty much any breast story: mammogram images. Are pale silhouettes of any other body part ever routinely shown on television news, for any reason? I don't recall any testicular cancer or prostate cancer stories with such graphics, personally. Nor X-rays displayed after a story about someone getting injured. Not only are the mammogram images seemingly mandatory, but television news will also gratuitously throw in an image of a woman undergoing the procedure, just for kicks. What woman really wants a video of her boobs getting squashed by a machine to be on the news, after all? This was all on full display this week with the Angelina Jolie story, complete with CGI shots of (you just can't make this stuff up) how "the nipples were saved."

Am I the only one who has noticed this? Seems like there'd be a cries of "blatant sexism!" but if there have been, I guess I haven't noticed.

Continue Reading »

There are several metaphors to describe the week President Obama is having. Firefighting. Damage control. Playing defense. Today, however, I went with "weathering the storms" because of the unfortunate optics of Obama giving an outdoor press conference today under an umbrella, as the skies dripped down. Into each president's life some rain must fall, in other words.

While Obama had Marines handy to provide umbrella cover during the presser, the bigger question is how he's weathering the metaphorical storms blowing through Washington this week. There are really four of these, although the media seems fixated on only three.

Continue Reading »

Is it time for Attorney General Eric Holder to (as is frequently said in politics) "spend some more time with his family"?

I must admit, it's hard for me to be impartial and unbiased in suggesting that it might be time for Holder to step down. One of my biggest disappointments with President Obama's transition to his second term was the announcement that Holder would be staying on, instead of turning the Justice Department over to someone else. I don't personally dislike Holder (I've never met the man), but I do strongly question his priorities during his time as the nation's Attorney General. To give just one example: there are no bankers currently in jail because they illegally contributed to the wrecking of the American economy, even though it happened almost five years ago. Holder's "too big to jail" legacy of backing down to Wall Street is enough, in my opinion, to begin the search for a fresh face at the Justice Department.

Since I've admitted my own bias, allow me to first make the case for Holder staying where he is. Holder does not have a central role in any of the three scandals currently swirling around Washington. The Benghazi talking points issue was a tug-of-war between the CIA and the State Department. The IRS is a division of the Treasury Department. Although the third scandal does emanate from the Justice Department, Holder has stated that he recused himself from the whole process of investigating the leaks and in getting the Associated Press' phone records -- which would seem to let him off that particular hook. Holder may now become involved in the IRS scandal, as part of a criminal probe into whether any federal laws were broken by anyone at the agency, but that's in the future, and had nothing whatsoever to do with whatever happened there in the past.

Continue Reading »