ChrisWeigant.com

Friday Talking Points [484] -- House GOP Is Revolting!

[ Posted Friday, May 11th, 2018 – 18:03 PDT ]

Before we get to all the Trumpy news of the week, we had to headline what is going on in Paul Ryan's House, since it hasn't been getting enough attention yet. Because the House Republicans are revolting!

OK, we fully admit that we love to phrase such events using this pun, and we will even give proper credit here for where we first heard it. As a kid, we bought a book of "The Wizard Of Id" comics entitled The Peasants Are Revolting! (to which the king replies in an aside: "You can say that again!"). Since then, we love to use it whenever applicable. This week, it's Paul Ryan's turn (and there's even royalty involved!).

As of this writing, seventeen Republicans in the House have now signed a "discharge petition" to force Speaker of the House Paul Ryan to hold a floor vote on legislation to deal with immigration reform. After the push to either extend DACA or even pass a new DREAM Act failed earlier this year, most considered the issue dead until after the next election. However, there are quite a few Republicans in districts with many DACA kids who are apparently worried about their re-election prospects if nothing gets done. So they've mounted an effort to force Ryan to hold some votes.

That's plural, because if the petition is successful it will mean a process known as "Queen of the Hill" (there's that royalty we promised), where multiple bills are voted upon and the one with the most votes over a majority is the one that passes. This would likely mean at least four bills would be voted on, from a new DREAM Act to a very conservative bill that would deny the DREAMers any future path to citizenship. Ryan could even introduce his own bill, if he chooses to.

Ryan's excuse for fighting back against this open revolt is downright laughable. Just last month, when asked about the possibility of passing immigration reform through the House, Ryan responded that he didn't want to "spend our time bringing something through that I know is going to get vetoed." He's also said, in a similar vein: "Going down a path and having some kind of a spectacle on the floor that just results in a veto doesn't solve the problem." This might have been even a tiny bit believable except for, you know, those 60 or 70 times that Ryan held votes to kill Obamacare, back when Barack Obama was president. He wasn't too concerned about vetoes back then, was he? "Sending a political message" was just fine with Ryan, at the time.

As things stand, the discharge petition needs at least another seven or eight Republicans to sign it before it has a chance of working. Assuming that every Democrat signs up after the crucial number of Republicans is hit, this would force Ryan to hold such a vote within the next few weeks. If a bipartisan bill made it out of the House, the Senate would likely rally around it as well (since the Senate is a lot more moderate on the issue). And if President Trump actually vetoed such a bill, it would plainly show -- right before the election -- who is on the side of fixing DACA, and who is the one responsible for it not happening. Which is precisely what Ryan really fears, when it comes down to it.

Other Republicans in the House are reportedly considering signing on to the effort, so this will be fascinating to watch for the next week or so. If it succeeds, then the revolt will have worked like a charm.

Moving along to the Trumpian news, the president buried his long-awaited announcement on prescription drug prices late on a Friday, in the hopes that his own voters wouldn't notice that it fell far short of what he had promised them on the campaign trail. Instead of freeing Medicare to use the massive leverage of being the largest drug customer in the country to bargain for better prices, Trump punted. He rolled out a wishy-washy list of possible policy ideas, all of which fell short of his previous promises. There was no deadline attached to any of these items, and most can be expected to be soon forgotten. None of his agenda items would have directly tackled the high price of drugs in any meaningful way.

Trump made more news this week on the international front, though. He announced the United States would begin violating the Iran nuclear deal (thanks to Fox News personality Shep Smith for pointing out that Trump is not "withdrawing" from the deal, but in fact "violating" it) and reinstituting sanctions. Europe, Russia, and China will not be following Trump's lead, to put it mildly, since the deal was working exactly as designed and Iran has never been found to be out of compliance with its provisions. The only countries that cheered the move were Israel and Saudi Arabia. Other than those two, Trump's move was pretty universally condemned. The State Department fully admitted that the Trump administration has no earthly idea what to do next. From a briefing this week to the media:

QUESTION: But you don't know at this point? You don't know? You didn't get to that in your discussions, what’s going to happen?

SENIOR STATE DEPARTMENT OFFICIAL: We did not talk about a Plan B in our discussions because we were focused on negotiating a supplemental agreement, so we did not -- we did not talk about Plan B.

This supplemental agreement never appeared. The Washington Post article this appeared in was rather extraordinary, for using a citation we have used in the past on a number of occasions (such as FTP [373] and FTP [420], to name just two). We have to admit we never thought we'd see this particular South Park reference in a mainstream media article, but Trump's action on Iran this week proved us wrong:

Here Plan B begins to bear more than a passing resemblance to the Underpants Gnomes Theory of Profit. Step 1 is terminating the Iran deal. Step 3 is Iran complying with all U.S. demands. Step 2? Step 2 is a wee bit hazy.

Trump is making more progress when it comes to North Korea, but not nearly as much as he thinks. Kim Jong Un, as a good-faith measure, released three American prisoners this week. Even before this had happened, Trump was already coveting a Nobel Peace Prize for his diplomacy. Talk about putting the cart before the horse! Trump did finally announce the date and place of the upcoming summit between the two leaders, but they don't give out Nobels just for scheduling a meeting, to put it mildly. Trump, meeting the freed prisoners on the tarmac, bizarrely claimed that Kim Jong Un "really was excellent" to the prisoners he had been holding on bogus charges. Maybe Trump should have asked them if their treatment was in any way excellent before making such a strange claim?

There's one international story that hasn't gotten anywhere near the attention it deserves, and that is the strange tale of "aides to Donald Trump" who -- while he was president, mind you -- orchestrated a "dirty ops" campaign "against key individuals from the Obama administration who helped negotiate the Iran nuclear deal." The entire story is still somewhat vague (nobody knows if "aides" means official Trump administration personnel or just Trump friends, for instance), but it is more than just a little disconcerting. Let's hope some further details are revealed soon, because if true this is a blockbuster of a scandal.

Speaking of dirty ops, Gina Haspel was grilled by a Senate committee this week. She's been nominated to run the C.I.A., but has a rather dark past involving black site secret C.I.A. prisons, waterboarding and other torture, and covering up said torture by ordering the evidence (92 video tapes) destroyed even though Congress was interested in finding out what had gone on. She reportedly even offered to withdraw her nomination late last week rather than go through the nomination process, but Trump apparently talked her into continuing. She was right to be wary, as Code Pink protesters chanting "Bloody Gina!" and "Stop the torture" had to be removed from the hearing room. The hearing was indeed eye-opening (more on this later), as Haspel proved she has no moral compass whatsoever. So, assumably, she'll fit right in the Trump cabinet. Even if she won't be getting John McCain's vote.

Speaking of McCain, the Trump White House further showed its inherently classy nature this week when a communications staffer dismissed McCain's scathing takedown of Haspel by saying in a closed meeting: "It doesn't matter, he's dying anyway." Thankfully, this talking point wasn't repeated by anyone else, but it leaked out anyway.

In other cabinet follies, the head of the Department of Homeland Security reportedly almost quit this week (reports differ as to whether she actually penned a resignation letter or not) after being berated "for over 30 minutes" by Trump in a cabinet meeting. Trump's upset that she hasn't been able to wave a magic wand and close the southern border. Here's just one small part of Trump's tirade: "Why don't you have solutions? How is this still happening? We need to shut it down. We're closed."

OK, this is running way too long, so just a final few things. Michael Avenatti, lawyer to Stormy Daniels, released a bombshell this week with documents proving that Michael Cohen, lawyer/fixer to Donald Trump, used the same slush fund that paid the $130,000 to Daniels to cash in on his proximity to Trump. He nakedly sold his influence, and even though he could not deliver in the slightest, got corporations (AT&T being the most notable) to pay him millions of dollars for his false promises. Nice work if you can get it, eh?

A few more notes to close on. The "National Popular Vote" movement scored another victory this week, as Connecticut became the most recent state to legally pledge to direct all its Electoral College electors to vote for the presidential candidate who wins the nationwide popular vote. This scheme will not kick in until enough states pass the same pledge to equal the 270 Electoral College votes necessary to win. With Connecticut, they've now got 172 votes and counting. Well done, N.P.V.!

Also in the "well done" category were the citizens of Ohio who passed a redistricting ballot initiative this week (four states held primaries on Tuesday) which partially takes the mapmaking process out of the hands of the legislature and attempts to inject some fairness into the whole process to defeat gerrymandering attempts.

And best of all, we'll close with the news that for the first time ever, there is now a fast food Union. So far, it's small -- it only applies to a chain called Burgerville -- but you've got to start somewhere. Their efforts were supported by the Industrial Workers of the World, or the "Wobblies." We have to admit, we weren't even aware the Wobblies were still around, but we do heartily congratulate them and the newly-unionized fast food workers in the Pacific Northwest. Maybe they'll start a trend... one can only hope!

 

Most Impressive Democrat Of The Week

It's looking more and more like the midterms of 2018 will usher in the "Year Of The Woman 2.0" (the first one was in 1992, for those who have forgotten). During this week's primary elections, Politico notes that: "There were 20 open Democratic House primaries with women on the ballot Tuesday night, and voters selected a female nominee in 17 of them." So Honorable Mentions all around for all Democratic women who were brave enough to toss their hat in the congressional ring! So far, they seem to be having an astounding rate of success.

One particular race caught our eye, in a primary for a state legislative seat in Ohio. Rachel Crooks won the Democratic nomination in what could be a winnable district outside Toledo. Crooks is "one of at least 19 women who have publicly accused Trump of sexual assault." So she deserves an Honorable Mention just for that.

One male candidate did very well this week, as Richard Cordray beat out Dennis Kucinich for the Democratic nomination in the Ohio governor's race. This race was projected to be a lot closer than it turned out to be, so Cordray deserves his own Honorable Mention for his strong finish.

But this week's Most Impressive Democrat Of The Week award goes to Senator Kamala Harris of California, for asking the toughest questions in the Gina Haspel hearing. Time and time again, Harris pressed Haspel on whether the so-called "enhanced interrogation techniques" (otherwise known as "torture") she was involved in were immoral. Haspel flat-out refused to answer. Here is just one of these exchanges, right after Haspel tried to move on with "Senator, I think I've answered."

SENATOR KAMALA HARRIS: No, you have not. Do you believe the previous techniques, now armed with hindsight, do you believe they were immoral? Yes, or no?

GINA HASPEL: Senator, I believe that we should hold ourselves to the moral standard outlined in the Army Field Manual.

This, from a woman who claimed: "My moral compass is strong," and: "My parents raised me right -- I know the difference between right and wrong." Except, you know, when asked about it under oath.

While other Democrats (and even a few Republicans) tried to get Haspel to admit to any wrongdoing or second thoughts whatsoever, none exposed her absolute lack of an actual moral compass more than Kamala Harris.

As icing on the cake, this week Harris also became the fourth senator to cosponsor Cory Booker's "Marijuana Justice Act," which would be a giant leap forward in forever ending the federal War On Weed.

But it was really her performance in the hearing room this week that earned Senator Kamala Harris this week's Most Impressive Democrat Of The Week award. Her aggressive questioning style should really be a model for all Democrats in these contentious hearings. We admit that when we catch hearings from her committee, we always pay close attention when her turn at the microphone approaches. Because she's consistently the best questioner on the Democratic side.

[Congratulate Senator Kamala Harris on her Senate contact page, to let her know you appreciate her efforts.]

 

Most Disappointing Democrat Of The Week

We have two (Dis-)Honorable Mention awards to hand out this week, before we get to the main award. The first goes to House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi for dropping the ball on a question she got this week at an event hosted by Politico.

When asked to respond to Republican talking points that she would push single-payer healthcare and "raise taxes" by "roll[ing] back the tax cuts they passed this year," Pelosi was much too abrupt in her response: "The second part there is accurate."

She could easily have qualified this a bit by saying something like: "We will be looking at rolling back the 83 percent of those tax cuts that went to Wall Street, corporations, and the wealthiest of the wealthy, you can be sure of that." But she didn't, which will just give ammo to all the Republican candidates who are already attacking her in their congressional campaign ads.

But that was fairly mild, since our other awards are much more visceral this week. The second (Dis-)Honorable Mention award goes to a former press secretary for Hillary Clinton in her last presidential run. Philippe Reines decided to heap shame on Donald Trump Jr. during his divorce from Vanessa Trump, but wound up only heaping shame upon himself. Here's what Reines tweeted, referring to a high school relationship Vanessa reportedly had with a former gang member:

Vanessa being with a Latin King must've driven you insanely jealous. The machismo, the passion. Tough act to follow. Did you wonder if she fantasized about Valentin Rivera when intimate with you? She did. Every time.

This prompted a terse response from Chelsea Clinton, which we find we cannot improve upon. Clinton responded to the tweet with: "It's vile." Can't argue with that.

But, obviously, there was an even worse choice this week. The Most Disappointing Democrat Of The Week goes to the former attorney general of New York, Eric Schneiderman. Schneiderman was accused in an article published by The New Yorker of sexually assaulting (or just plain assaulting) at least four women, two of whom went on the record using their real names. Schneiderman "repeatedly hit them," choked them, and abused them in other ways without their consent.

This was all the more shocking since Schneiderman had been seen as being out front on the whole #MeToo movement -- he was the one who brought a case against Harvey Weinstein, for instance. He was seen as a champion of women's rights, but apparently that only applied to his public persona.

Schneiderman, to his credit, realized far faster than most politicians that his goose was cooked. He resigned mere hours after the story broke, while still insisting that he was innocent of all the allegations. By week's end, he was under criminal investigation himself.

Schneiderman is the clear pick for this week's Most Disappointing Democrat Of The Week, which is made even worse by his obvious hypocrisy. When an obvious misogynist is caught in a sexual scandal, that's one thing, but when such a scandal hits someone seen as a champion of women's rights, somehow it's even more painful.

[Former New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman is now a private citizen, and we as a rule do not post contact information for such persons. However, if you've got a similar story to tell, the state cops in New York would appreciate it if you'd give them a call.]

 

Friday Talking Points

Volume 484 (5/11/18)

OK, before we begin with the Democratic talking points, we have a rather rare occurrence, because we have to salute a Republican for his use of political humor. We love a good talking point (or just a good burn) as much as the next guy, so we do try to give credit where it is due, even across the aisle at times.

The really shocking thing is that we're talking about Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, whose name usually doesn't come up in the same sentence as the word "humor." Even his biggest fans would easily admit he's not much of a comedian even on his best days. But this week he knocked it out of the park.

After wild card Senate candidate Don Blankenship was defeated in the Republican GOP primary this week, Mitch took a bit of a victory lap. After being accused of Blankenship of essentially being a cocaine dealer, McConnell began answering his phone (to his closest friends, reportedly) using the same term Blankenship dubbed him with in his campaign ads. So if you were a buddy of McConnell's and called him up this week, he would answer the phone with: "Cocaine Mitch."

If this weren't funny enough, he tweeted out a Photoshopped image of himself with the caption "Thanks for playing, Don." The image showed McConnell surrounded by cocaine flakes, and was borrowed from the Netflix series Narcos. The show's Twitter account tweeted back: "Low blow, Mitch."

Again, McConnell and humor don't usually go hand in hand, but we've got to hand it to Cocaine Mitch, he was pretty funny this week!

OK, enough of this silliness, let's get to the talking points for Democrats, shall we?

 

1
   Rudy fading fast

In case you missed it, this interview from last Sunday is absolutely jaw-dropping.

"Did you see Rudy Giuliani on George Stephanopoulos's show last week? It was stunningly bad -- far worse than all the other interviews he's yet done. Trapped at the bottom of a very deep hole, every time Rudy opened his mouth he did nothing so much as dig himself in deeper. He admitted that Trump might take the Fifth Amendment, he speculated that there might be more women paid off by Michael Cohen's slush fund, and he did everything he could to further muddy the waters over the hush money Donald Trump paid to Stormy Daniels. Interviewed immediately afterwards, Stormy's lawyer Michael Avenatti responded: 'Did that interview just happen? I'm not being spoofed, right?' before going on to characterize Rudy's performance as: 'an absolute, unmitigated disaster for Rudy Giuliani and the president. I can't believe that that actually just happened. I mean, what we witnessed by Rudy Giuliani may be one of the worst TV appearances by any attorney on behalf of a client in modern times.' I'd have to agree with his characterization -- it truly was that bad. By week's end, Rudy's law firm had shown him the door, because they were so embarrassed to be associated with Giuliani. Last time I checked, he was still Trump's lawyer, but things might have changed since then. I'm not one to offer Trump legal advice, but in this case I'll make an exception -- Trump should immediately fire Rudy Giuliani, for his own good."

 

2
   Avenatti races ahead

It's hard to believe this fact isn't more widely known, by now. I mean, he's been all over television, you'd think someone would bring it up in passing....

"Do you know what Stormy Daniels lawyer Michael Avenatti does in his spare time? Competes as a professional race car driver on the Le Mans circuit. This is the guy that Trump and Michael Cohen think they can intimidate? So far, Avenatti seems to be exactly the lawyer needed to take on Trump -- he's out front, he's bold, he's selectively releasing bits and pieces of his legal strategy to great effect in the media, and he's always one step ahead. In fact, Avenatti, by so successfully trying his client's case in the media, is actually beating Trump at his own game. His record dump this week exposed Cohen's naked influence peddling, using the same slush fund he used to pay off Stormy. That's just sloppy, even for a corrupt lawyer. When it comes to manipulating the media and public opinion for your client, Avenatti is running rings around Team Trump. He's precisely the lawyer that was needed to take on Trump, in fact. Can't wait to see him cross the finish line!"

 

3
   Trump screws his voters over, once again

The president gave a much-ballyhooed speech today, but fell far short of what he had promised.

"Donald Trump promised over and over again on the campaign trail that he'd take on the pharmaceutical industry. He swore up and down he'd allow Medicare to bargain for better prices with the drug companies, which would have reduced the cost of drugs almost across the board. Today, he finally delivered his long-awaited plan. Missing was any mention of allowing Medicare to bargain for better drug prices. Nancy Pelosi reacted with a statement: 'This weak plan abandons the millions of hard-working families struggling with the crisis of surging drug prices. The President's proposals are yet another giveaway to Big Pharma, and do nothing to hold wealthy drug companies accountable for their unconscionable price gouging.' Yet another case of Trump making sweeping promises, but failing to deliver. Trump chickened out, plain and simple. By doing so, he screwed over the very people who voted for him. Sooner or later, you'd think they'd figure it out."

 

4
   No moral compass

If it spins around when times get stressful, it is not a moral compass, period.

"Gina Haspel, nominated to be the next head of the C.I.A., stated that she has a firm moral code, while under oath: 'My moral compass is strong.... My parents raised me right. I know the difference between right and wrong.... I would not allow CIA to undertake activity that is immoral, even if it is technically legal.' There's only one big thing wrong with that statement, and that is the fact that she already did allow the C.I.A. to do so, and then when proof of such immorality might have been made public, she ordered the evidence destroyed. Torture is torture, and it is morally wrong. Period. It is not 'sometimes right, when public opinion thinks so' -- it is always immoral. Haspel refused to state this simple fact, due to her own sordid history with secret interrogation sites and waterboarding. Senator John McCain -- a man who knows more about torture than anyone else in Washington -- put it best in his statement explaining why he would not vote for Haspel's confirmation: 'Ms. Haspel's role in overseeing the use of torture by Americans is disturbing. Her refusal to acknowledge torture's immorality is disqualifying. I believe the Senate should exercise its duty of advice and consent and reject this nomination.' That is what real a moral compass looks like, folks."

 

5
   Know-Nothingism

Of course, Haspel wasn't the only Trump insider to show a lack of morality this week.

"White House chief of staff John Kelly had some rather odious things to say about immigrants this week. Here is the transcript of what he had to say:"

Let me step back and tell you that the vast majority of the people that move illegally into the United States are not bad people. They're not criminals. They're not MS-13.... But they're also not people that would easily assimilate into the United States, into our modern society. They're overwhelmingly rural people. In the countries they come from, fourth-, fifth-, sixth-grade educations are kind of the norm. They don't speak English; obviously that's a big thing.... They don't integrate well; they don't have skills.

"This is rather extraordinary, because these arguments are precisely the same ones used over a century ago against Kelly's own ancestors. The Irish, we were told, would not assimilate (because they were Catholic). They were rural, uneducated, and didn't speak the language. They didn't have skills, and were undesirables. These arguments were previously made by the anti-Catholic Know-Nothings, in the nineteenth century. Against the Irish. Kelly should really learn some history before making the exact same arguments that were made by bigots against his own people."

 

6
   Be Best!

Seriously? That's the best you can come up with?

"First Lady Melania Trump unveiled her campaign against bullying this week, under the slogan 'Be Best.' Seriously? Be best? In the first place, that sound you heard when the slogan was unveiled was the collective cringing of English teachers across the land, since 'be best' is a long cry from correct English. It is, to be blunt, not the best way to be. 'Be The Best' or 'Be Your Best' or even 'Be The Best You Can Be' all would have worked fine, but 'Be Best' is just pathetic. Hope they didn't spend too many tens of thousands of taxpayer dollars coming up with that slogan. In the second place, Melania plagiarized a pamphlet for her pet project from the Obama era, and then refused to even admit it. And finally, this is already backfiring on the White House, as Chuck Schumer responded to yet another Twitter tirade from Melania's husband with a simple message: '#BeBest.' You've got to love that -- more people should respond to Trump tweets with exactly the same thing, and include Melania's Twitter account to boot, each and every time Trump uses Twitter to bully anyone he chooses. Maybe it'll wind up being a trending subject -- against Donald Trump. Not exactly what she had in mind, I'd guess."

 

7
   The first, but not the last

A milestone was reached this week.

"This week, Alex van der Zwaan became the first person to go to prison as a direct result of the investigation run by Bob Mueller. He got off fairly light for lying to the F.B.I., as he'll only be serving a month in jail. But while he is the first to get locked up for what he did as a result of Mueller, he certainly won't be the last. And the others will probably not be doing just '30 days in the hole,' either."

-- Chris Weigant

 

All-time award winners leaderboard, by rank
Follow Chris on Twitter: @ChrisWeigant

Cross-posted at: Democratic Underground

 

51 Comments on “Friday Talking Points [484] -- House GOP Is Revolting!”

  1. [1] 
    Paula wrote:

    Remember all the fuss about Michelle Wolf's comedy routine? Seems like a lifetime ago, doesn't it?

    The best thing this week was Richard Cordray/Betty Sutton winning the Dem primary in Ohio + the Redistricting win. Well, AND all the wins by other Dems.

    The next best thing was the story breaking about Michael Cohen getting money for access to Blotus. Now the work starts putting the pieces together about just what Blotus did in return and/or who else in the administration did what in return. Also who else has been paying up and, especially, from outside the country.

    In addition to the slow-rolling trainwreck that is every day under DT the week's darker moments included Dick Cheney emerging from his crypt to tell us he's still all for torture while Torture-Lady-Evidence-Destroyer Gina Haspel disgraced the halls of Congress by not-being-in-jail-WITH-Dick-Cheney for war crimes. And we had the misfortune of having to hear from Sarah-we-didn't-miss-you-Palin again. Hopefully she will recede quickly.

  2. [2] 
    Kick wrote:

    Did you see Rudy Giuliani on George Stephanopoulos's show last week?

    * "I mean, at some point, yes, but it could have been recently, it could have been a while back. Those are the facts that we're still working on."

    * "Well, it depends on kind of what you mean by met her."

  3. [3] 
    Kick wrote:

    Paula
    1

    Remember all the fuss about Michelle Wolf's comedy routine? Seems like a lifetime ago, doesn't it?

    Yep. Too true.

    Speaking of Michelle Wolf, reminds me of Michael Wolff and his book that ratted out Hope Hicks and Donald Trump conspiring to fabricate a lying press release over the objections of lawyers who wanted to respond with the facts about the June 2016 meeting at Trump Tower with multiple various assorted Russians, them deciding it would be okay to lie about it because no one would ever see the email (oops), and then Mark Corallo quitting because he witnessed obstruction of justice... then fast forward to Mueller questioning them both and the White House losing Hope shortly thereafter. Seems like years ago, doesn't it? ;)

    When a few more shoes drop... and they will drop... the GOP will switch their rhetoric to "Trump didn't know about that; none of that has anything to do with Trump" as they simultaneously roll, roll, roll the bus over Gates, Flynn, Cohen, and Jared "expendable" Kushner multiple times in rapid succession... each of them a "fine man" because Trump hires the "best people."

    As we already know from past events, Benedict Donald is a hands on type of con artist. Trump knew.

  4. [4] 
    TheStig wrote:

    The Wizard of ID reference brings to mind Johnny Carson's Karnak the Magnificent bit from roughly the same era.

    Divined Answer: Zwaan Song

    Hidden Question: What do you call the low moan coming from a soon-to-be-disbarred lawyer's prison cell?

    This could be a thing.

    A: The Trump Tower

    Q: What does Bob Mueller call the mountain of evidence gathered in the Cohen raid?

  5. [5] 
    TheStig wrote:

    Dept. of ooh ooh another:

    A: Eh..what's up doc.

    Q: What medical professional typically prescribes Propecia?

    May Melania frost your drink with her glance!

  6. [6] 
    Kick wrote:

    TS
    4

    *wipes coffee off screen*

    This could be a thing.

    More, please! *LOL* :)

  7. [7] 
    Kick wrote:

    A: Be best.

  8. [8] 
    Kick wrote:

    A: Be best.

    Q: Faced with two options, what do you choose: (a) life in prison? or (b) flip?

  9. [9] 
    Don Harris wrote:

    Hope you're sitting down while you read this.

    I am NOT going to complain about the MIDOTW even though I am not a fan of Kamala Harris.

    Instead I will commend you for acknowledging someone that refuses to accept a non-answer as an answer.

    And I will refer the other commenters to this FTP when they complain about me when I refuse to accept a non-answer to my comments on One Demand (for example, last week's FTP comments and Ohio Redistricting comments) or for aggressive questioning in such situations which you are saying is a good thing.

  10. [10] 
    nypoet22 wrote:

    Here Plan B begins to bear more than a passing resemblance to the Underpants Gnomes Theory of Profit.

    Q: What other idea currently bears a striking resemblance to the underpants gnomes business model?

    JL

  11. [11] 
    TheStig wrote:

    A: Pay to play

    Q: What do a Trump Golf Course and Stormy Daniels have in common?

    May Rudy Giuliani be your public defender.

  12. [12] 
    nypoet22 wrote:

    As a kid, we bought a book of "The Wizard Of Id" comics entitled The Peasants Are Revolting! (to which the king replies in an aside: "You can say that again!").

    here's my first exposure to the pun:

    https://youtu.be/h0iAcQVIokg?t=10s

  13. [13] 
    TheStig wrote:

    A: Cold Dead Hands

    Q: What does the President consistently find attached to the First Lady's wrists?

    May your fixer keep a collection of burner phones.

  14. [14] 
    C. R. Stucki wrote:

    I too first encountered the "Revolting" pun as a kid, and I'm betting my kid days preceded all of your kid days.

    Mine was a cartoon of a stereotypical "Pancho Villa" type Mexican and his ragtag crew of likewise stereotypical Mexican followers, announcing to a stereotypical "Mrs. Villa", "WE'RE REVOLTING", eliciting the standard pun-type response from her.

    That by itself dates the experience to 'pre-historic' (or at least pre-PC ) days, seeing as how stereotying is now forbidden by Dems/Libs.

  15. [15] 
    James T Canuck wrote:

    [4]

    A: Camouflage.

    Q: Why is Rudy Giuliani effortlessly integrating into the Trump administration, despite his many gaffes and disastrous press encounters?

    Poor old Rudy...seems every time he sits for interview, he lands himself in more neck-deep sewage while others hope he makes no waves. Failing at failing is one thing, but the wretched thing just can't help making things worse with each attempt to make things right...I'm getting the feeling that being completely incompetent and wholly inadequate for the given task is the first of many 'low bars' Trump appointees have to overcome. It seems to be a thread that binds most of Trump's appointees and their ability to be such colossal disasters, the mainstream media salivates in anticipation that their evisceration at the altar of congressional examination will be a simple matter and somehow newsworthy. All by cunning design (Trump might be as thick as a Whale sandwich, but he's been running circles around the media for years with his antics,) Trump knows the art of distraction. The only laugh I got this week was a wonderful 'super-trolling' of Trump by Ayatollah Ali Khamenei...

    http://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-44090848

    When you live by the sabre, don't get rattled when you get slain by it.

    Happy (S)mothers day, fellow Canuckleheads. As per usual, my kids both made me cards celebrating the event, such is the life of the single parent.

    LL&P

  16. [16] 
    TheStig wrote:

    A: Peter Principal

    Q: What is the technical term for money put into a President's sexual slush fund.

    May Jared Kushner be your son in law.

  17. [17] 
    goode trickle wrote:

    Stig 16-

    I Dunno about that one...

    I prefer Dick Duckets

  18. [18] 
    TheStig wrote:

    A: Ass in a sling

    Q: What system best describes Michael Cohen's meteoric rise and precipitous fall?

    May Sarah Saunders be your care giver in old age.

  19. [19] 
    TheStig wrote:

    Goode Trickle-

    May you realize that most of the fast food french fries you have eaten are 2% spittle. :)

  20. [20] 
    TheStig wrote:

    A: High Ho Silver!

    Q: What was Donald Trump's first thought when he learned he was President.

    May your insanely long tie get caught in an escalator.

    Kick-be careful what you wish for. :)

  21. [21] 
    nypoet22 wrote:

    @ts [20],

    i give that answer three out of five buttafuocos

    JL

  22. [22] 
    Paula wrote:

    TS: you are on fire!

  23. [23] 
    nypoet22 wrote:

    in other news, israeli media are reporting that a private intelligence company there was hired by the trump administration to gather dirt on members of the obama administration who had been involved in the iran deal. weird.

  24. [24] 
    TheStig wrote:

    A: A bridge too far

    Q: What is the only remotely plausible reason why Trump hasn't thrown Rudy off a bridge yet.

    May the papparazzi enlighten you about size of your rear end.

  25. [25] 
    ListenWhenYouHear wrote:

    TheStig,

    You made my morning with those Karnak lines! Johnny would approve!

  26. [26] 
    ListenWhenYouHear wrote:

    May your priest offer to sell you a tape of your last confession.

  27. [27] 
    Kick wrote:

    JL
    10

    Q: What other idea currently bears a striking resemblance to the underpants gnomes business model?

    Elon Musk and Space X mission to Mars. :)

  28. [28] 
    Kick wrote:

    TS

    Kick-be careful what you wish for. :)

    We're not worthy. Oh, who am I kidding? Of course we are!

    Please feel free to just toss those out whenever they come to you. *LOL*

    Truly well done, sir. :)

  29. [29] 
    TheStig wrote:

    A: Dime a dozen.

    Q: What is the monetary value of a degree from Trump University?

    May your breakfast be steaming bowl of Carly Fiorina.

  30. [30] 
    TheStig wrote:

    A: House on fire!

    Q: What fear is lurking in the mind of most Trump Tower Condo owners.

    May an NYC pumper deliver your next high colonic you cheap bastard.

    Paula: Thanks for the set up line.

  31. [31] 
    TheStig wrote:

    A: Quicksilver Messenger Service

    Q: What was the motivation for AT&T contacting Michael Cohen?

    May the FBI get a warrant to tap your phone.

  32. [32] 
    TheStig wrote:

    A: Westward Hoe!

    Q: What directions does The Trump Organization typically give to one of Trump's one night sex "partners?"

    May your rash behavior result in a fulminating rash.

  33. [33] 
    Paula wrote:

    Hey TS: I have answers but no questions. What (if you feel like it) can you do with these song titles?

    A. I fought the law and the law won

    A. You ain't seen nothing yet

    A. Gimme Dat Ding!

    A. Sounds of Silence

  34. [34] 
    nypoet22 wrote:

    @paula,

    let me play too!

    Q: What does a dyslexic say after punching a wall?

    Q: How does a man wearing only briefs respond to complaints of public nudity?

    Q: How does one politely ask a brooklyn native to pass the salt?

    Q: What is the smartest thing Donald Trump has ever said?

    JL

  35. [35] 
    TheStig wrote:

    A: The Huffington Post

    Q: Where does POTUS fantasize being chained, naked, while Ariana beats him with a rolled up electronic magazine, shrieking "YOU FILTHY, FILTHY, FILTHY LITTLE MAN!"?

    May your dongle be a cause for snickering and snide derision leading to unhealthy forms of overcompensation in public and private life.

    Paula-33: Your answers have been placed in a Mayonnaise Jar and will be allowed to ferment on my porch. Any questions and curses that write themselves will be collected and posted. Thank you for your continued support. :)

  36. [36] 
    Paula wrote:

    [34] nypoet: Good ones!

    [35] TS: You're welcome!

  37. [37] 
    nypoet22 wrote:

    @kick

    good one... but the answer is supposed to come before the question ;p

    JL

  38. [38] 
    James T Canuck wrote:

    A: Wanksy

    Q: What American infrastructure might need, but surely doesn't understand.

    LL&Peepee

  39. [39] 
    Kick wrote:

    JL

    Q: How does a man wearing only briefs respond to complaints of public nudity?

    Depends.

    good one... but the answer is supposed to come before the question ;p

    Oops... ;)

  40. [40] 
    nypoet22 wrote:

    A: Depends.

    Q: what article of clothing is least conducive to being beadazzled

    JL

  41. [41] 
    nypoet22 wrote:

    alternate question: what garment do the underpants gnomes reject?

    ;p

  42. [42] 
    TheStig wrote:

    Paula-33

    A. Sounds of Silence....(touch temple, repeat softly)

    Q. What warm-up exercise does Kelly Sadler's voice coach recommend?

    May your resume spontaneously combust.

    -----------------------------------------

    A. Gimme Dat Ding!

    Q. What does a 6 year old say when he steals your Ding.

    May children steal your ding.

    ------------------------------------------

    A. You ain't seen nothing yet

    Q. What was Stormy thinking when she first saw "Little Donald?"

    May your Viagra be adulterated

    ------------------------------------------

    A. I fought the law and the law won

    Q What does Michael Cohen murmur over and over in his sleep.

    May your slush fund melt as snow in the desert.

  43. [43] 
    TheStig wrote:

    A. Bitch Schlapp!

    Q. What do you call the stinging rebuke that Kelly Sadler received from the White House Director of Strategic Communications.

    May you be laid low by your boss's Mercedes!

    Note to White House. Thanks for the softball!

  44. [44] 
    TheStig wrote:

    A. Tough to swallow.

    Q. What do call shamelessly asking $1037 for a Trump Steak Gift Card?

    May your rump roast on a flat rock in the mid-day sun.

    OOH - OOH another Karnak that was quantum entangled with the previous one.

    A. Sour grapes.

    Q. What do you call a Trump whine about "fake news?"

    Trump wine...ehhh! May your pre-nup have an egregious behavior clause.

    Q. Is it Karnak or Carnak?

    This is an actual question about the original Carson act. I've seen it spelled both ways.

    Q. Soup to nuts

    A. What is a typical Trump Tweet?

    May Hannity give you a deep Shih Tzu massage.

  45. [45] 
    Paula wrote:

    [42, 43, 44] TS: Applause!

  46. [46] 
    Kick wrote:

    JL
    40-41

    A: Depends.

    Q: what article of clothing is least conducive to being beadazzled

    *LOL*

    alternate question: what garment do the underpants gnomes reject?

    The stinkers. ;p

  47. [47] 
    Kick wrote:

    James T Canuck
    38

    A: Wanksy

    Q: What American infrastructure might need, but surely doesn't understand.

    LL&Peepee

    I had to look this one up. OMG! :)

  48. [48] 
    Kick wrote:

    TS
    42-43-44

    *ROTFLMAO*

    You have outdone yourself, sir. Bravo. :)

  49. [49] 
    nypoet22 wrote:

    @ts,

    everywhere i've seen it written, carnac starts and ends with a C...

    ...but it not as good as a cookie!

    https://youtu.be/Ye8mB6VsUHw

    JL

  50. [50] 
    TheStig wrote:

    nypoet22-

    Right you are -

    It's Karnak the great Egyptian temple complex and Carnac the great seer, soothsayer, and sage.

    "Sis boom bah." "Describe the sound made when a sheep explodes."

  51. [51] 
    TheStig wrote:

    Sis boom bah is a JC original....and one of his best.

Leave a Reply

[If you have questions as to how to register or log in, to be able to post comments here, or if you'd like advanced commenting and formatting tips, please visit our "Commenting Tips" page, for further details.]

You must be logged in to post a comment.
If you are a new user, please register so you can post comments here.

[The first time you post a comment (after creating your user name and logging in), it will be held for approval. Please be patient (as it may take awhile). After your first comment has been approved, you will be able to post further comments instantly and automatically.]