ChrisWeigant.com

Inflation's Political Deadweight

[ Posted Tuesday, April 12th, 2022 – 16:00 UTC ]

There are two major political storms on the horizon that will both break long before the midterm congressional elections, but as it looks now there is one overriding issue in domestic politics that will likely be one of the core issues in the race no matter what. Yes, it's time once again to dust off the 30-year old quip from James Carville: "It's the economy, stupid." This time around, it could be narrowed to: "It's the inflation, stupid."

Before we get to that, though, let's touch upon the two major issues aren't yet on most voters' radars. Keen political observers and base Democrats who long for accountability are both anxiously awaiting the start of public hearings for the House Select January 6th Committee. They're about to publicly lay out their narrative of the events leading up to that fateful day, as well as a microscopic view of the day itself and the immediate aftermath. This is going to be a compelling political story -- much of it new and unrevealed -- and it has the potential to focus the American electorate on the complicity of certain Republicans back then as well as the party almost as a whole since then to dodge the hard reality of what happened. Which could be a motivating force this November. Or maybe not -- many people at this point might like to just put the entire issue behind them, so even after dramatic revelations it is an open question whether the subject will be on the minds of many when they enter the voting booth.

The second major issue will appear in June, when the Supreme Court rules on an abortion case. They could either strongly uphold Roe v. Wade, entirely overturn Roe, or leave it technically intact while functionally gutting it of all meaning. My money is on the third of those options, personally. Almost no one expects them to uphold Roe, but those who want to see Roe completely tossed out may be in for a disappointment. Because it would be politically easier for the court to leave the decision intact while removing all protections for abortion and for women in much the same way they have eviscerated the Voting Rights Act -- carving major chunks out of the law or simply rewriting it from scratch (so much for denouncements of "legislating from the bench," eh?). They can then piously state that the law still remains on the books while ensuring that it actually doesn't do what it used to do at all. Gutting Roe in a similar fashion would achieve the same political goal (and if you don't think John Roberts considers such things, I have a bridge I'd like to sell you). They could then say: "But we didn't overturn Roe v. Wade," while leaving it legally meaningless in all the red states.

No matter how Roe is dismantled, though, it is going to cause a firestorm of political blowback. There are a whole lot of young women (and, to be fair, young men) out there who don't follow politics at all who are going to be shocked to learn that abortion is no longer a guaranteed right everywhere in America. There are going to be a lot of older women who have fought for decades to preserve the right who will be absolutely incensed that a conservative court tossed all their hard-fought victories out the window. And that is going to lead to a surge in enthusiasm for the Democratic Party, most likely. But again, other than those who pay close attention to politics, few now see this coming.

Inflation, on the other hand, is something seen by everyone. Not just "seen," but experienced, on a daily basis. Prices are up. And they keep going up, with no apparent end in sight. The official inflation rate hit 8.5 percent last month (measured as an increase over the same month last year). And people's impressions about the economy are becoming set in their minds. In politics, even a sharp uptick in the economy doesn't do the party in power any good if it happens too close to an election -- and "too close" is generally understood to be "within three months." So people's attitudes are going to have solidified by the beginning of August. Which really isn't that far away. There is a very small window when any improvement will help Democrats, but so far the numbers keep going in the wrong direction.

That's the bad news. But the news isn't universally bad. The March numbers were especially bad due to one big factor: the price of gas. When Russia invaded Ukraine in late February, the price of gas here spiked a whopping 80 cents per gallon within a period of about three weeks -- a breathtaking hit on the economy at large, and everyone's wallets and pocketbooks in specific. But since that high point, the price has come back down by over 25 cents per gallon, and is likely going to continue falling, even as the war rages on. The national average stood at over $4.30 a gallon at the peak, but it has now fallen below $4.10, and will likely continue to fall for weeks. The price of crude oil spiked right at the start of the war (which drove the gasoline price spike) but since then has completely recovered -- the price of a barrel of oil today is almost exactly where it was before Putin invaded. Of course, you can see the disparity here, since the price at the pump for gas has not mirrored this reduction in crude prices, but there's a fancy economy model that explains this: the "rocket/feather" concept. Gas prices rocket up, but then slowly come down like a feather floating on air. This is a rather imaginative and lyrical way of saying: "We're all being screwed over by the oil companies" (for those not well-versed in poetic economic metaphors).

But eventually that feather will come down, albeit more slowly than we'd all like to see. It already has begun descending and it has a lot further to go to reach parity with the price of oil. Added in the mix here are the actions President Joe Biden has been taking -- the unprecedented release of a million gallons per day from the Strategic Petroleum Reserve for six straight months, as well as today's announcement that the EPA will relax pollution requirements for this summer so higher-ethanol blends can be sold. Also, the oil companies are beginning to feel some heat from both the public and the politicians, and the last thing they want is for everyone to be pointing the finger at them, so they might squelch their greed in reaction, which could show up as soon as next month's numbers. All of these could be contributing factors to falling prices at the pump.

There was actually some good news in the March inflation report, although you had to dig to see it. Used vehicles, which (along with energy prices) have been a major driver of inflation since last summer, finally went down in a big way last month. Taken together with falling gas prices, this could mean that March was "the cruellest month" (apologies to T.S. Eliot, of course). Price increases for everything except food and energy are already falling, in fact. There was still a small increase in March, but a much smaller increase than in the previous months (this rate has been falling for two months, in fact).

Some economists are already predicting that the March inflation number could have reached "peak inflation." Used vehicle prices falling, gas prices dropping, and supply chain problems receding all add in to their calculations, as does the Federal Reserve increasing interest rates (which should cool the economy as a whole, which should help fight inflation). Of course, the experts could be wrong -- they often are. In fact, there is such a wide range of economic expert opinion out there at any given moment that this is pretty much guaranteed to be true no matter what happens -- some experts will be proven right and some will be proven wrong. It's not even "an art more than a science," it is in fact trying to predict the future -- or "metaphysics versus physical reality."

Nobody really knows what the future will bring, of course. Oil's price per barrel may go back up again due to changing conditions in the Ukraine invasion or any other factor. Used car prices could also increase rather than continue to decrease. Nobody really knows.

But while the overall number from March was sobering indeed, it's still only March. If inflation numbers do start to calm down then Biden and his Democrats can brag that they've "turned the corner" and things are moving in the right direction again (due to their efforts). Republicans using the economy as a bludgeon won't be as effective if the public does believe things are getting better, for obvious reasons.

We'll never know where the economy would be right now if Putin hadn't invaded Ukraine. But it looks like March was when the economy shuddered, then took the new geopolitical reality in step and (hopefully) moved on. If that turns out to be true, then it will all be a fading blip in the rearview mirror, come November. But, as I began with, the window for this to happen is closing rather fast. If the inflation numbers don't dramatically improve by the start of the summer, then Democrats might be toast in the midterms no matter what else happens in the meantime. But if things do turn around and people can feel the relief in their own daily lives, then they might still have a chance at the old "don't change horses in midstream" campaign idea. But whether it is the dominant issue this fall or just a background thing that seems to be fading, it could indeed be another "it's the economy, stupid" election.

-- Chris Weigant

 

Follow Chris on Twitter: @ChrisWeigant

 

35 Comments on “Inflation's Political Deadweight”

  1. [1] 
    andygaus wrote:

    One ongoing economic issue that I think could have weight at the polls is the price of insulin. If Democrats could be diligent about saying, "My opponent voted against capping the price of insulin because he thinks that people who have diabetes should simply die if they can't pay top dollar," that might change a few votes. Red states have a lot of overweight people, and a fairly large percentage of voters, I would guess, at least know someone who is diabetic and needs insulin. When it comes to voting, visceral responses matter, and you should be able to call up a visceral response by painting the Republicans (accurately) as people who just want your friend or relative to pay up or die.

  2. [2] 
    MtnCaddy wrote:

    I take this entire column with a boulder of salt.

    If Bernie Sanders and Donald Trump proved only one thing it's that the old rules of politics don't all apply as they did before.

    This example jumped off from the page at me,

    In politics, even a sharp uptick in the economy doesn't do the party in power any good if it happens too close to an election -- and "too close" is generally understood to be "within three months."

    The war and NATO, Covid, inflation and job/wage growth, the J6 Committee public hearings, indictments and convictions by DOJ...

    And whether dumb fuck Democrats once again tack to the right in November -- or whether they prove to be a true alternative to the cult of economic failure that Republicans offer.

  3. [3] 
    MtnCaddy wrote:

    MSM cannot help but replay their tired political memes.

    But I don't think we're in Kansas anymore, Toto. Things are going to get wild.

  4. [4] 
    MtnCaddy wrote:

    [4]
    [5]

    Dude, for the record we are in complete agreement about the problem. And in the couple-three years I've been hanging out in Weigantia I cannot recall even once anyone arguing otherwise. Why do you keep belaboring the point? Do you feel that defining the problem accurately somehow makes OD the solution? I'm sincerely curious about why you do this.

    Also, I don't automatically scroll through you because I don't want to miss it when you lay your comedic talents upon us.

  5. [5] 
    MtnCaddy wrote:

    [1]

    Dems should keep trying to pass Insulin legislation and relentlessly hammer the Repugs over it.

  6. [6] 
    Michale wrote:

    Even the BIRDS are shitting on Biden!! :D

    POOTUS Bird POOPS on Joe Biden during infrastructure speech today in Iowa as president trolled for ‘talking ‘shit’ on Twitter
    https://www.the-sun.com/news/5111480/bird-poops-joe-biden-during-infrastructure-speech-today-iowa/

  7. [7] 
    Michale wrote:

    From Previous...

    Russ,

    Are you STILL banging on that dead horse about it not really being Hunter Biden's laptop??

    It's conclusive, dood... Even Democrat Water Carriers have confirmed it's Hunter Biden..

    Give it a rest...

    Yer boys are going down.. :D

  8. [8] 
    Michale wrote:

    MC,

    Yer track record on predictions is pretty bad.. :D

    Anyone with more than 2 brain cells to rub together knows Democrats are going to get creamed in November..

    The FACTS are all there...

    But there are none so blind as those who will not see... :D

  9. [9] 
    Michale wrote:

    Looks like we have a broad range of discussion topics today..

    Abortion...

    6 Jan Kangaroo Committee...

    Democrats getting creamed in November...

    Should keep me busy today.. :D

  10. [10] 
    Michale wrote:

    And now for a bit of comic interlude..

    http://mfccfl.us/believe.jpg

    :D

  11. [11] 
    Michale wrote:

    Interesting note..

    This was the biggest jump in inflation since ANOTHER Democrat, Carter, ruined this country...

    What *IS* it about Democrats that they simply cannot govern???

  12. [12] 
    Michale wrote:

    No discussion of 2022 would be complete without discussing the election fraud that took place in 2020...

    Mark Zuckerberg’s ‘donations’ rigged the 2020 election
    These donations have to stop in order to have free and fair elections

    The 2020 presidential election was decided by just 42,000 votes in three states. If the 37 electoral votes in Wisconsin, Arizona and Georgia had flipped the other way, President Biden would not be president right now. During the toss-up election we experienced in 2020, both sides were looking for innovative ways to gain an advantage over their opponent due to the challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic. A major adjustment or a minor tweak to the allocation of campaign resources could make all the difference because it came down to mere thousands of votes out of over 150 million cast to decide the next leader of the free world.

    That brings us to Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg’s “donation” of nearly $400 million during the 2020 election. “Rigged: The Zuckerberg Funded Plot to Defeat Donald Trump” investigates why Zuckerberg made the unprecedented investment in the election, follows the money through official tax documents and seeks to set the record straight about exactly what happened.
    https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2022/apr/12/mark-zuckerbergs-donations-rigged-the-2020-electio/

    It's funny how Democrats bought ENTIRE election boards in Red Counties....

    RED Counties that went Blue in 2020....

    What a coinky-dink, eh?? :^/

    One only has to look at the gloom and doom of election night 2020 here in Weigantia to know that the 2020 election was rigged in favor of Biden..

  13. [13] 
    Michale wrote:

    Zuck is running scared..

    Zuckerberg millions won't be part of mid-term elections, says it was a 'one-time' thing
    A representative for Mark Zuckerberg confirmed the Facebook CEO will not make another multi-million dollar donation to aid this year’s elections, which comes after fierce pushback that Zuckerberg’s 2020 contributions tilted the outcome of the presidential race toward President Biden.

    "As Mark and Priscilla made clear previously, their election infrastructure donation to help ensure that Americans could vote during the height of the pandemic was a one-time donation given the unprecedented nature of the crisis," Ben LaBolt, a spokesperson for Zuckerberg and his wife Priscilla Chan, said. "They have no plans to repeat that donation."

    Zuckerberg and Chan donated at least $350 million to the nonprofit Center for Technology and Civic Life ahead of the 2020 election, which was distributed to local election offices. The nonprofit said that this year, it will instead launch a different program dubbed the U.S. Alliance for Election Excellence.
    https://news.yahoo.com/zuckerberg-millions-won-apos-t-133525761.html

    Of course Zuck won't be repeating his purchase of entire Election Boards in 2022...

    Because a plethora of states has OUTLAWED the practice..

    Let's see how Democrats ACTUALLY fare in a FAIR election, eh??

    I am betting that when the election is actually FAIR and LEGAL and above board, Democrats get trounced...

  14. [14] 
    Michale wrote:

    Oklahoma Gov. Stitt signs near-total abortion ban into law
    https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/policy/oklahoma-gov-stitt-signs-near-total-abortion-ban-into-law

    No more baby killing in Oklahoma...

    Too bad Democrat states are still enacting Casey Anthony laws...

  15. [15] 
    Michale wrote:

    If only Democrats had not fought the plan to put more MTA cops in New York Subways..

    Brooklyn shooting: AOC, other New York Democrats slammed 2019 proposal to put more MTA cops in NYC subways

    The lawmakers said the plan impacted people living in poverty
    https://www.foxnews.com/politics/brooklyn-shooting-aoc-other-new-york-lawmakers-slammed-2019-proposal-more-mta-cops-nyc-subways

    Perhaps those people shot in the Subway yesterday morning would be all right today.. :^/

    What IS it about Democrats that they are so pro-criminal??

    Bring back Broken Windows Policing and Stop & Frisk.. It would prevent or help prevent gun violence like the Brooklyn Subway Shooting..

  16. [16] 
    Michale wrote:

    Before we were talking about how Democrats (you KNOW who you are) change definitions and meanings and "facts" to fit their agenda.

    This is in the form of an email, so it might be a bit long..

    On the plus side, there are no copyright issues, as it is a personal email..

    How Feminism Got Hijacked

    The movement that once declared “I am woman, hear me roar” can no longer define what a woman is. What happened?

    “Pregnant people at much higher risk of breakthrough Covid,” The Washington Post recently declared. This was in keeping with the newspaper’s official new language policy: “If we say pregnant women, we exclude those who are transgender and nonbinary.”

    “I’m not a biologist,” Ketanji Brown Jackson, the next Supreme Court justice and a formerly pregnant person herself, told her Senate inquisitors while trying to explain why she couldn’t define “woman.”

    “It’s a very contested space at the moment,” explained Australian Health Secretary Brendan Murphy—a nephrologist, a doctor of medicine—when he was asked the same question at a hearing in Melbourne. “We’re happy to provide our working definition.”

    The meaning of “woman,” the Labor Party’s Anneliese Dodds, in Britain, observed, “depended on context.” (Never mind that Dodds oversees the party’s women’s agenda.)

    “I think people get themselves down rabbit holes on this one,” Labor’s Yvette Cooper added the next day, March 8, International Women’s Day. She declined to follow suit.

    What were normal people—those who did not have any trouble defining woman, those who found talk of “pregnant people” and “contested spaces” and “rabbit holes” baffling—to make of this obvious discomfort with “women”?

    Jackson, Dodds and Cooper—and, no doubt, every individual formerly or currently capable of becoming pregnant on the masthead at The Washington Post—would call themselves feminists. Champions of women’s rights. (So, too, one imagines, would Dr. Murphy.) Once upon a time, it was women like them who proudly declared, I am woman, hear me roar. It was women like them who stood up for women and womanhood.

    It's hilarious to hear Democrats go on and on about "WOMAN'S RIGHTS" yet their agenda doesn't ALLOW them to even define what a WOMAN is!!!

    BBBWWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

    Leave it to the Democrats to paint themselves into such a corner!!

    They are hysterical about "womans rights" but they can't even define what a woman is!!! :D

    But now these exemplars of female empowerment—educated, sophisticated, wielding enormous influence—seemed to have forgotten what “woman” meant. Or whether it was okay to say “woman.” Or whether “woman” was a dirty word.

    It wasn’t simply about language. It was about how we think about and treat women. For nearly 2,500 years—from Aristophanes’ “Lysistrata” to Seneca Falls to Anita Hill to #MeToo—women had been fighting, clawing their way out of an ancient, deeply repressive, often violent misogyny. But now that they were finally on the cusp of the Promised Land, they were turning their backs on all that progress. They were erasing themselves.

    Women are shooting themselves in the foot by ignoring all the progress in favor of Democrat groupthink... :^/

  17. [17] 
    Michale wrote:

    First Texas bus drops off migrants blocks from US Capitol in Washington, DC

    The buses are part of Gov. Greg Abbott's plan to counter the Biden administration's approach to illegal immigration
    https://www.foxnews.com/politics/texas-migrant-bus-arrives-washington-d-c

    Promise kept!!!

    Stick it, Biden!!! :D

  18. [18] 
    Michale wrote:

    Do the math


    x = \frac{ { - b \pm \sqrt {b^2 - 4ac} } } { {2a} }
    y = {-b +- sqrt(b^2 – 4ac)} over {2a}
    z =(-b +- sqrt(b^2 – 4ac))/(2a)
    = (-b - SQRT(b^2 - 4*a*c) / (2 * a)
    ["Equal", "x", [
    "Divide",
    ["PlusMinus", ["Negate", "b"], ["Sqrt", ["Minus", ["Power", "b", 2], ["Multiply", 4, "a", "c"]]]],
    ["Multiplpy", 2, "a"]
    = (-b - SQRT(b^2 - 4*a*c) / (2 * a)

    = MALARKEY

  19. [19] 
    nypoet22 wrote:

    @m,

    LOL! Now calculate pie

    JL

  20. [20] 
    Michale wrote:


    3.1415926535 8979323846 2643383279 5028841971 6939937510 5820974944 5923078164 0628620899 8628034825 3421170679 8214808651 3282306647 0938446095 5058223172 5359408128 4811174502 8410270193 8521105559 6446229489 5493038196 4428810975 6659334461 2847564823 3786783165 2712019091 4564856692 3460348610 4543266482 1339360726 0249141273 7245870066 0631558817 4881520920 9628292540 9171536436 7892590360 0113305305 4882046652 1384146951 9415116094 3305727036 5759591953 0921861173 8193261179 3105118548 0744623799 6274956735 1885752724 8912279381 8301194912 9833673362 4406566430 8602139494 6395224737 1907021798 6094370277 0539217176 2931767523 8467481846 7669405132 0005681271 4526356082 7785771342 7577896091 7363717872 1468440901 2249534301 4654958537 1050792279 6892589235 4201995611 2129021960 8640344181 5981362977 4771309960 5187072113 4999999837 2978049951 0597317328 1609631859 5024459455 3469083026 4252230825 3344685035 2619311881 7101000313 7838752886 5875332083 8142061717 7669147303 5982534904 2875546873 1159562863 8823537875 9375195778 1857780532 1712268066 1300192787 6611195909 2164201989

  21. [21] 
    nypoet22 wrote:
  22. [22] 
    Michale wrote:

    "Police say the suspect is a male Black. Damn. Damn. Damn."
    -MSNBC Pundit Touré Neblett

    When yer a hammer.. Everything looks like a nail..

    When yer a racist.... :^/

  23. [23] 
    Michale wrote:

    "Calling things by their names is essential to stand up to evil."
    -Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy

    Hear that, Democrats??

    Only those with an evil agenda changes the definitions of things to fit their agenda...

  24. [24] 
    Michale wrote:

    Why Democrats in general and California Democrats in particular really really suck..

    California's Vanished Dream, by the Numbers

    Even today amid a mounting exodus among those who can afford it, and with its appeal diminished to businesses and newcomers, California, legendary state of American dreams, continues to inspire optimism among progressive boosters.

    Laura Tyson, the longtime Democratic economist now at the University of California at Berkeley, praises the state for creating “the way forward” to a more enlightened “market capitalism.” Like-minded analysts tout Silicon Valley’s massive wealth generation as evidence of progressivism’s promise. The Los Angeles Times suggested approvingly that the Biden administration’s goal is to “make America California again.” And, despite dark prospects in November’s midterm elections, the President and his party still seem intent on proving it.

    But most Californians, according to recent surveys, see things differently. They point to rising poverty and inequality, believe the state is in recession and that it is headed in the wrong direction. Parting with the state’s cheerleaders, the New York Times’ Ezra Klein, a reliable progressive and native Californian, says the Golden State’s failures are “making liberals squirm.”
    https://www.realclearinvestigations.com/articles/2022/04/13/californias_vanished_dream_by_the_numbers_826300.html

    Democrats!! :( What have you done to my hometown state!!! :(

  25. [25] 
    Michale wrote:

    From Democrats in California to Democrats in New York..

    After latest bloodbath, time is running out for Hochul and Adams to save NYC

    ‘Who wants to live in a city like this?” a Sunset Park man asked a TV reporter Tuesday, then answered his own question: “Nobody wants to live like this no more.”

    Indeed. Nobody wants to live in the city New York is becoming.

    Another nail in the coffin — that’s what the Brooklyn subway attack was. Crime, crime and more crime, and now this.

    Subway terror is the stuff of nightmares — and a banner day for the owners of moving companies. Helping people get out of Dodge already is a booming business, and nothing spreads the determination to escape New York faster than the fear of being trapped in the subway with a madman with a gun and a sack full of explosives and smoke cannisters.

    The 40 or 50 people actually in the attacker’s N-train car are stand-ins for the other 8.8 million people who are now terrified themselves. Everyone is realizing that they or someone they love could have been there. Just to imagine the possibility makes the heart beat faster.
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eFTLKWw542g&list=RDGMEMQ1dJ7wXfLlqCjwV0xfSNbAVMC2cMG33mWVY&index=30

    All Democrats know how to do is destroy.... :^/

  26. [26] 
    Michale wrote:

    The afore comments pertain to the mid-terms and why Democrats are going to get creamed..

    Therefore, it's on topic to the commentary...

    Just so yuus know...

  27. [27] 
    MtnCaddy wrote:

    [25]

    Kewell! And because we are talking about Pi(e) in this case the boldification is entirely acceptable.

    Copying it for me records.

  28. [28] 
    Michale wrote:

    Kewell! And because we are talking about Pi(e) in this case the boldification is entirely acceptable.

    Copying it for me records.

    52 decimal points. That's the largest text-based PI I could find.. :D

  29. [29] 
    Michale wrote:

    If the governor and mayor sincerely want to crush the crime epidemic, they must think and act like wartime commanders. This is a war for the survival of New York and there are no partial victories. It’s win or lose.

    To have a chance, the pols must speak to two audiences. The cops must know the governor and mayor have their backs and the criminal class must know that the days of kid gloves and sympathy are over. Only when both things are clear to both groups will there be hope for sustained progress.

    If they REALLY want to save New York City....

    Beyond the people arming themselves and taking matters into their own hands the ONLY way to save New York City is...??? You guessed it..

    Stop & Frisk and Broken Windows Policing..

  30. [30] 
    nypoet22 wrote:

    NYC doesn't need "saving" - this shooter came from Wisconsin. So why don't they send all those reformers to Milwaukee?

  31. [31] 
    Michale wrote:

    NYC doesn't need "saving" -

    Really???

    You know there was a mass shooting mere hours after the Subway shooting.. 3 people killed..

    this shooter came from Wisconsin.

    And ended up in New York City because that's where violent gun crime is acceptable and tolerated.. :^/

    Funny how it's all DEMOCRAT towns that are 3rd world shitholes for gun violence, eh? :^/

    Like I said..

    Only 2 things will save NYC...

    Armed citizens taking matters into their OWN hands..

    Or Stop&Frisk and Broken Windows Policing..

    Anything else and NYC will continue to be a Democrat run 3rd world shithole..

  32. [32] 
    Michale wrote:

    NJ Gov. Murphy distances himself from 2nd graders learning gender identity, calls for age-appropriate content

    NJ governor walks back defense of second-grade gender education
    https://www.foxnews.com/politics/nj-gov-murphy-reacts-2nd-graders-learning-gender-identity-age-appropriate-content

    So now NJ Dem Gov walks back his pro-groomer comments and now agrees with Governor DeSantis about age appropriate education...

  33. [33] 
    Michale wrote:

    Durham probe: Judge denies Sussmann motion to dismiss case; trial to begin next month

    The trial for former Clinton campaign lawyer Michael Sussman is set to begin on May 16
    https://www.foxnews.com/politics/durham-probe-judge-denies-sussmann-motion-to-dismiss-case-trial-to-begin-next-month

    Oh!! WHAT FUN WE'LL HAVE!!! :D

    20 bucks says Sussman dies by suicide before trial.. Lead poisoning..

    2 shots to the back of the head...

  34. [34] 
    Michale wrote:

    What a tic!!!

    This whole commentary is about how bad inflation has gotten and how bad it will be for Democrats in November..

    But!! But!!! But!!!!

    Inflation is "TRANSITORY"!!! It won't be bad at all!!!

    Biden and the Democrats SAID SO!!!!

    What the hell!!?????

  35. [35] 
    BashiBazouk wrote:

    Only 2 things will save NYC...

    Armed citizens taking matters into their OWN hands..

    Or Stop&Frisk and Broken Windows Policing..

    Anything else and NYC will continue to be a Democrat run 3rd world shithole..

    That's moronic. Statistically New York City is way, way down the list on all crime categories, violent and property...

Comments for this article are closed.