<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>ChrisWeigant.com &#187; The Vice President</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.chrisweigant.com/category/the-vice-president/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com</link>
	<description>Reality-based political commentary</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 01:22:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>More Biden, Please</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/07/19/more-biden-please/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/07/19/more-biden-please/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jul 2010 00:29:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Vice President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=2412</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The White House is, quite obviously, getting back into campaign mode.  This is a good thing for Democrats, because it means putting the last spadeful of dirt on the carcass of President Obama's hopes of bipartisanship in Washington during his term of office.  But while Obama has recently begun to make the case to voters why electing Democrats this November is a good idea, Vice President Joe Biden has apparently been doing a much better job in terms of framing the debate on Democratic terms.  Which means the smartest thing Obama could do right now is to send the Vice President out in front of the media and in front of campaign events to make the case a lot more strongly than Obama could (or should).  In other words: more Biden, please.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/07/19/more-biden-please/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>32</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [130] -- Who Is This &quot;They&quot; Obama Speaks Of?</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/07/09/ftp130/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/07/09/ftp130/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jul 2010 00:17:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Talking Points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Vice President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=2374</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>My biggest problem with both Obama's speech and Emanuel's interview is that neither one of them truly seems to understand that an election is underway.  The word "Republican" is not uttered once by President Obama.  Rahm only uses the word four times, and only two of those are really drawing distinctions between what Democrats want to do, and what Republicans want to do (or, more to the point, not to do).  And <em>neither one of them</em> uses the word "Democrat" (or "Democrats" or "Democratic") <em>once</em>.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/07/09/ftp130/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>75</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Good News From Iraq</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/06/30/good-news-from-iraq/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/06/30/good-news-from-iraq/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jun 2010 21:36:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Vice President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=2328</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>So while I go out and celebrate my patriotism this weekend, my thoughts will be with the soldiers returning home safely to their loved ones, as we wind at least one of our wars down.  And with the ones who didn't make it home, and with the ones who haven't made it home yet.  But no matter how you feel about America's involvement in Iraq or Afghanistan, I think everyone can agree that seeing soldiers coming home is good news indeed.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/06/30/good-news-from-iraq/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Separating Enforcement From Permission</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/05/26/separating-enforcement-from-permission/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/05/26/separating-enforcement-from-permission/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 May 2010 23:45:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Vice President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=2144</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>This, it should be easy to see, is a conflict of interest.  If an agency's main purpose is to make money off of an industry (by the granting of oil drilling leases, for example), but also to police that industry, then there is an inherent, built-in conflict.  When one part of the agency does its job better, the other part of the agency can't do its job as well.  These jobs may not be mutually exclusive, but they're definitely working at cross purposes.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/05/26/separating-enforcement-from-permission/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [117] -- Piece Of Cake</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/03/26/ftp117/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/03/26/ftp117/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Mar 2010 23:36:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Talking Points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Vice President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=1738</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>No matter how you slice it, President Obama and the Democrats in Congress have achieved a stunning legislative accomplishment -- one which had been pronounced dead over and over again for the past year by the punditocracy.  Obama has now delivered upon one of his signature campaign issues, and (by doing so) dramatically improved his party's chances in the upcoming midterm elections.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/03/26/ftp117/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [106] -- Election Season Begins</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/01/08/ftp106/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/01/08/ftp106/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Jan 2010 01:01:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Talking Points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Vice President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2010/01/08/friday-talking-points-106-election-season-begins/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Which is why I'm actually feeling pretty good about Democrats' chances in the upcoming election.  We think we can energize our base, and convince swing voters that we are the ones offering good ideas for moving the country forward.  And, with Republicans offering nothing more than a vision of moving this country backwards, we think our chances are actually pretty good this year -- especially since it looks like Republicans will be defending more open seats than Democrats.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/01/08/ftp106/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>My 2009 &quot;McLaughlin Awards&quot; [Part 2]</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/01/01/my-2009-mclaughlin-awards-part-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/01/01/my-2009-mclaughlin-awards-part-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Jan 2010 02:47:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Free Speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Bill of Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Vice President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2010/01/01/my-2009-mclaughlin-awards-part-2/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Welcome back to my annual outright theft of <em>The McLaughlin Group</em>'s awards categories for the past year in politics.  What's that?  We're sorry, but out lawyers insist we instead use the phrase "my annual legally-allowable constitutionally-protected parody" instead.  So sorry.  For those of you who missed it, <a href="http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2009/12/25/my-2009-mclaughlin-awards-part-1-2/">Part 1</a> of this column ran last week, on Christmas.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/01/01/my-2009-mclaughlin-awards-part-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>My 2009 &quot;McLaughlin Awards&quot; [Part 1]</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/12/25/my-2009-mclaughlin-awards-part-1-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/12/25/my-2009-mclaughlin-awards-part-1-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Dec 2009 04:19:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Free Speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Humor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Name-dropping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Vice President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2009/12/25/my-2008-mclaughlin-awards-part-1-2/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Welcome once again to our year-end wrapup and awards ceremony.  Honesty dictates that I immediately genuflect to <em>The McLaughlin Group</em>, from whom I have stolen all these award categories.  We will begin this week with <strong>Part 1</strong> of these annual awards, and then next Friday on New Year's Day, we will present <strong>Part 2</strong>, with reduced volume levels (for those who are nursing hangovers... ahem).</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/12/25/my-2009-mclaughlin-awards-part-1-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Talking About Afghanistan</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/10/08/talking-about-afghanistan/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/10/08/talking-about-afghanistan/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 23:29:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iran]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pakistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Vice President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2009/10/08/talking-about-afghanistan/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Still, the image remains.  The media has apparently discovered that we have troops in Afghanistan.  This may come as a shock to some, since the mainstream media (at least on television) have pretty much ignored this fact for around seven years now (so much so that Afghanistan became known as "the forgotten war" for a while).  But the reporting on what President Obama is going to do next in Afghanistan has been so over-the-top in the past few weeks, it has astonished me (and I do not astonish easily, especially when it comes to the idiocy of the evening news).  More stories have run on Afghanistan, I would be willing to venture, in the past two weeks than have run in the past two years.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/10/08/talking-about-afghanistan/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [95] -- A Call To Action</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/09/25/friday-talking-points-95-a-call-to-action/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/09/25/friday-talking-points-95-a-call-to-action/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Sep 2009 00:29:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Talking Points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Bill of Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Vice President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2009/09/25/friday-talking-points-95-a-call-to-action/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["Now is the time for all good men to come to the aid of the party."
Of course, this really should be (in today's inclusive society): "Now is the time for all good men and women to come to the aid of the party."  But what it really should say is something more like: "Now [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/09/25/friday-talking-points-95-a-call-to-action/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [94] -- Two Years Of FTP</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/09/18/friday-talking-points-94-two-years-of-ftp/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/09/18/friday-talking-points-94-two-years-of-ftp/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Sep 2009 00:04:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Talking Points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iran]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Vice President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2009/09/18/friday-talking-points-94-two-years-of-ftp/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>How time flies.  This column marks its second anniversary today, by the calendar if not the Volume number.  For the second straight year, we only produced 47 columns, but by the calendar we've gone two full years and a few odd days.  Actually, now that I think of it, more than just a <em>few</em> odd days.  Ahem.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/09/18/friday-talking-points-94-two-years-of-ftp/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>23</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Emerging GOP Theme: Nullification</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/09/14/emerging-gop-theme-nullification/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/09/14/emerging-gop-theme-nullification/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2009 23:46:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Bill of Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Vice President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2009/09/14/emerging-gop-theme-nullification/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/09/14/emerging-gop-theme-nullification/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>I&#039;m Sick Of Hearing About The Poor, Poor Millionaires</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/07/20/im-sick-of-hearing-about-the-poor-poor-millionaires/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/07/20/im-sick-of-hearing-about-the-poor-poor-millionaires/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2009 23:50:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Vice President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2009/07/20/im-sick-of-hearing-about-the-poor-poor-millionaires/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Conservatives and corporate-owned Democrats are in a tizzy.  The House is moving its version of healthcare reform forward, and it (gasp!) raises money by (double-gasp!) <em>taxing rich folks</em>.  Not by very much, as these things go -- but you certainly wouldn't know that from hearing Republican politicians and their enablers in the news media.  As far as they're concerned, Democrats are going to raise everyone's tax rates (yes, even YOURS!) until they rival Denmark's (complete with Fox News graphics, in case you missed the point).  While the tactic is new, the strategy is an old one, and can be summed up as: "Who will stand up for the poor, poor millionaires and billionaires?"</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/07/20/im-sick-of-hearing-about-the-poor-poor-millionaires/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>34</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama&#039;s &quot;Drip, Drip, Drip...&quot; Intelligence Problem</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/07/13/obamas-drip-drip-drip-intelligence-problem/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/07/13/obamas-drip-drip-drip-intelligence-problem/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 23:23:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Vice President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2009/07/13/obamas-drip-drip-drip-intelligence-problem/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>President Obama has always said he wants to look forward, not backward.  This, when it comes to the actions of the previous administration, means Obama is content to just identify any problems with George Bush's (and Dick Cheney's) methods on security and intelligence matters, rectify any abuses and correct any mistakes, promise we'll never do it again, and move on.  Obama has never advocated -- and, indeed, done what he could to discourage -- any sort of investigation into Bush's actions in response to 9/11 (some of which continued throughout Bush's two terms).  Obama's opposition to such investigations has been steadfast and unwavering.  He has even (now that he leads the executive branch himself) strongly argued in the courts against any examination of how executive branch power was used under Bush.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/07/13/obamas-drip-drip-drip-intelligence-problem/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [75] -- Monster Raving Loony Party</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/05/01/friday-talking-points-75-monster-raving-loony-party/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/05/01/friday-talking-points-75-monster-raving-loony-party/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2009 00:46:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Campaign Ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Talking Points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Humor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Interviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Name-dropping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Bill of Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Vice President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2009/05/01/friday-talking-points-75-monster-raving-loony-party/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>OK, with that out of the way, we must (sadly) turn our eyes to the Republican Party.  Because they appear to be losing all touch with reality, so it's best to keep an eye on them at this point.  For starters, they are calling a special Republican National Committee meeting in the next month to vote on (as if they could) forcing their opposition to change their name to what is variously described as the "Socialist Democratic Party" or the "Democratic Socialist Party" (as well as variations where they intentionally leave out the "-ic" just to twist the knife).</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/05/01/friday-talking-points-75-monster-raving-loony-party/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://www.eastvillageradio.com/newspageshows/First100DaysofObama14.mp3.m3u" length="73" type="audio/x-mpegurl" />
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>In Support Of Dick Cheney</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/04/21/in-support-of-dick-cheney/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/04/21/in-support-of-dick-cheney/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 23:48:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Vice President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2009/04/21/in-support-of-dick-cheney/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>OK, I fully admit that's a provocative title for me to write.  To be more accurate (and a <em>lot</em> less sensationalistic) it should probably read: "In Support Of Dick Cheney's Call To Declassify The Evidence To Prove Whether Torture Worked Or Not."  Call me biased towards openness and knowing what was done in the American public's name, but I support Cheney's recent call for more (not less) disclosure in this case.  Whether it makes logical sense to anyone's argument about the subject or not.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/04/21/in-support-of-dick-cheney/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>35</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
