<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>ChrisWeigant.com &#187; The Bill of Rights</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.chrisweigant.com/category/the-constitution/the-bill-of-rights/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com</link>
	<description>Reality-based political commentary</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Sep 2010 00:25:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Obama Poll Watch -- August, 2010</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/09/01/opw1008/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/09/01/opw1008/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Sep 2010 20:25:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama Poll Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Bill of Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=2635</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Augusts, to be frank, are not President Obama's friend.  The past month was no different, at least as measured by public opinion polling.  Obama was on a downswing heading into the month, and his numbers reflect this in a stark way.  In other words, it was a bad month for Obama.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/09/01/opw1008/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>17</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tea Party&#039;s GOP Hostile Takeover Continues</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/08/25/tea-partys-gop-hostile-takeover-continues/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/08/25/tea-partys-gop-hostile-takeover-continues/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Aug 2010 00:03:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Bill of Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=2593</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The answer, as with all things Tea Party, is (once again): "it's hard to be sure."  We won't really know until after the midterm elections, and at that point so much "spin" will be on the airwaves one might (if one grew up in Kansas, for the sake of argument) be excused the immediate impulse to run for the tornado shelter in the backyard.  In other words, even <em>after</em> the elections, the answer is going to depend on who is doing the answering.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/08/25/tea-partys-gop-hostile-takeover-continues/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>27</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>To Lefties: How Does Obama Disappoint?</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/08/23/to-lefties-how-does-obama-disappoint/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/08/23/to-lefties-how-does-obama-disappoint/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Aug 2010 23:42:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Bill of Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=2581</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Since it's Monday, meaning this column will appear in <em>Huffington Post</em> as well as on my own website, I thought I'd do the courtesy of actually asking a fairly large, fairly Lefty audience what they thought, instead of just offering up my own explanations for the phenomenon.  So, what do you think?  I promise I'll tally everyone's comments in an effort to try to qualify what the Left (or at least, the portion of it reading this) really thinks about their disappointment with the president.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/08/23/to-lefties-how-does-obama-disappoint/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>34</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [135] -- The Sky Is Falling!</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/08/20/ftp135/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/08/20/ftp135/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Aug 2010 00:08:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Free Speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Talking Points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Bill of Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=2568</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The media, quite obviously, has lost any capacity it once may have had for self-examination, to say nothing of its sense of irony.  Every so often, this is proven beyond doubt by a single story.  This, sadly, is one of those times.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/08/20/ftp135/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>72</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama Reframes Mosque Debate</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/08/16/obama-reframes-mosque-debate/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/08/16/obama-reframes-mosque-debate/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Aug 2010 00:21:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Free Speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Bill of Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=2544</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>President Barack Obama, in a White House Ramadan address last Friday, expressed his thoughts on the "Ground Zero mosque" debate, and in doing so not only got it exactly right, but also managed to change the debate in a considerable way which few have noticed yet.  Because in his comments Friday (and in his off-the-cuff comment the next day), the president refocused the debate from the notion of "should be allowed" to the question of "should."  In doing so, Obama elevated the level of the debate for both him and the project's detractors.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/08/16/obama-reframes-mosque-debate/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>252</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>If Gay Marriage Wins...</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/08/09/if-gay-marriage-wins/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/08/09/if-gay-marriage-wins/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Aug 2010 23:36:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Bill of Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=2508</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Last week, a federal judge handed down his decision in the case  <em>Perry v. Schwarzenegger</em>, which said (in no uncertain terms) that gay marriage was a civil right, and should be guaranteed to all -- no matter what voters thought about it -- in much the same way that interracial marriage is a constitutional right guaranteed to all (which happened via a similarly-contentious federal court ruling in the 1960s).  While this ruling was rightfully hailed by gay rights supporters, everyone knows that there is still a long road ahead until it reaches the Supreme Court, where the matter may be fundamentally decided.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/08/09/if-gay-marriage-wins/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>20</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [133] -- The Silly Season Begins</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/08/06/ftp133/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/08/06/ftp133/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Aug 2010 00:45:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign Ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Talking Points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Bill of Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=2500</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>August in Washington means the beginning of the official "silly season" of politics.  This is because Congress takes the whole month off, and political news stories become rather thin on the ground.  Intrepid political reporters, wishing to be on vacation themselves, get lazy and start going crazy over non-stories hyped into political wildfires seemingly overnight -- over the silliest of subjects.  But these fun and games have not quite yet begun, because the Senate wrapped up work this week, and a few legal decisions of great moment were in the news.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/08/06/ftp133/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>160</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Perry v. Schwarzenegger</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/08/05/perry-v-schwarzenegger/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/08/05/perry-v-schwarzenegger/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Aug 2010 23:40:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Bill of Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=2495</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>There are certain court cases everyone schooled in America at least recognizes the names of: <em>Marbury v. Madison, Plessy v. Ferguson, Brown v. Board of Education</em>, and, most recently, <em>Roe v. Wade</em>.  Even if you don't remember the particular details in these cases, chances are you'll at least have heard all of these names before.  And we could be on the brink of another landmark case entering this pantheon of pivotal legal decisions: <em>Perry v. Schwarzenegger</em>.  Yes, California's "Governator" may go down in history as being on the wrong side of this case (even though he personally supports overturning Proposition 8).</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/08/05/perry-v-schwarzenegger/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Conservative Mosque Hypocrisy</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/08/03/conservative-mosque-hypocrisy/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/08/03/conservative-mosque-hypocrisy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Aug 2010 22:41:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Free Speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Bill of Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=2474</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Instead, I am amazed once again (even though I really shouldn't be by this point) at how adept Republicans and conservatives (but not hardcore Libertarians, I have to admit, who generally put their political philosophy above pandering to the public) are at suddenly throwing large parts of their core ideology over the side of the boat whenever something is happening (or about to happen) that they just don't agree with on a gut level.  "Get the government off everyone's back!" very quickly becomes: "Get the government into your bedroom, your end-of-life decisions, or what chemicals you choose to ingest in the privacy of your own home -- and do it in a manner which we agree with!"</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/08/03/conservative-mosque-hypocrisy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>67</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://www.nyc.gov/html/om/html/2010b/media/pc080310_govisland512k.asx" length="471" type="video/x-ms-asf" />
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bear-ing Arms</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/07/05/bear-ing-arms/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/07/05/bear-ing-arms/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jul 2010 02:40:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cartoons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Humor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Bill of Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=2349</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Instead, as a surprise, we welcome back our in-house cartoonist who has been held captive by a roving band of wild secretaries. Ransom is being asked on the order of seven dollars and 42 cents, but so far, no takers. He managed to get this cartoon smuggled out with the aid of a trained squirrel.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/07/05/bear-ing-arms/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Supreme Court Helps Out Kagan</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/06/28/supreme-court-helps-out-kagan/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/06/28/supreme-court-helps-out-kagan/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jun 2010 00:50:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Free Speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Bill of Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=2319</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>A Supreme Court ruling just out may serve to blunt Republican criticism of Elena Kagan, who started her confirmation hearings today in the Senate.  So far, Republicans haven't come up with much of any substance to attack Kagan on (although I admit, I haven't watched any of today's confirmation hearings yet), but they all pretty much agree upon one issue -- the fact that Kagan, as dean of the Harvard law school, upheld a school policy of barring military recruiters from campus due to the fact that the military discriminates against gays.  But the ruling in <em>Christian Legal Society v. Martinez</em> seems to give the high court's imprimatur to universities not allowing groups that practice such discrimination on campus -- which Kagan can now point to in defense of her position.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/06/28/supreme-court-helps-out-kagan/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Memorializing Second-Class Soldiers</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/05/31/memorializing-second-class-soldiers/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/05/31/memorializing-second-class-soldiers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jun 2010 00:16:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Bill of Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=2169</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Memorial Day is the time to memorialize all the brave individuals who served our country throughout its history, and sometimes paid the ultimate price for doing so.  But, in particular, this year I'd like to focus on all those who did their duty for their country, and fought for the American ideal of equality for all citizens -- even while they did not enjoy such rights themselves, either in the military or in American life at the time.  These second-class citizens, one would think, would have even less reason than citizens accorded full rights under the law to risk death on a foreign battlefield, and therefore would not have volunteered to do so.  One would be wrong in thinking this, however.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/05/31/memorializing-second-class-soldiers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Straight-Up, No-Chaser Libertarianism</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/05/20/straight-up-no-chaser-libertarianism/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/05/20/straight-up-no-chaser-libertarianism/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 May 2010 23:30:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Bill of Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=2114</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Rand Paul, who just clinched the Republican Party nomination for the Senate race in Kentucky, is apparently not quite ready for primetime.  His recent remarks on the Civil Rights Act painfully show why being a politician is not as easy as some people think.  The problem for Paul, son of Ron Paul, is that even if he somehow survives this flap, it is almost guaranteed that there are going to be plenty more of them during the campaign.  Because both Pauls, father and son, are (at heart) libertarians.  Which requires some explanation, because many folks have never come into contact with the concept of libertarianism.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/05/20/straight-up-no-chaser-libertarianism/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>17</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Arizona&#039;s Forbidding Landscape</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/05/13/arizonas-forbidding-landscape/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/05/13/arizonas-forbidding-landscape/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 May 2010 02:02:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Bill of Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=2082</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Arizona is a truly beautiful state.  It has many spectacular sights, of which the Grand Canyon is the most awe-inspiring.  But Arizona is also a state of forbidding landscapes -- much of the state is desert or near-desert, where the heat of the midday sun is a force of nature to be heavily respected, if not downright feared.  But what has put Arizona into the news recently is its "forbidding" political landscape.  Specifically, on immigration.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/05/13/arizonas-forbidding-landscape/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>32</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [122] -- Bikini Bottom Update</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/05/07/ftp122/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/05/07/ftp122/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 May 2010 01:00:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign Ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Talking Points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Name-dropping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pakistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Bill of Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=2039</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Since it's the Friday after month's-end, the new monthly unemployment numbers were released today.  Which adds another bar to the "bikini bottom" chart.  Now, the measure of how many people know exactly what this means is exactly the measure of how well Democrats are getting the "jobs" message out.  Because, as I've said previously, this chart should be front and center in the Democrats' campaigns this year.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/05/07/ftp122/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>47</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [120] -- Republicans Chicken Out</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/04/23/ftp120/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/04/23/ftp120/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Apr 2010 08:53:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Talking Points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Bill of Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=1931</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Democrats had a pretty good week last week.  As attention shifts away from unpronounceable volcanoes (more on them in a moment) to the struggle in the Senate over Wall Street reform, the two parties almost seem to have changed their normal methods of playing the political game.  The Republicans are all over the map on the issue, and extremely worried about the impression by angry voters that they are doing Wall Street's bidding -- as well they should be.  Republicans are, one day, loudly denouncing the reform bill, using their standard Big Lie technique... and then, the next day, saying a deal is very close, and even voting for strong reform in committees.  Republicans (some of them, at least) are chickening out of the upcoming partisan battle the Republican leadership seems to want over the issue (more on chickens later on, too). Democrats have, so far, managed both to admirably stay on message and showed an amazing amount of backbone in countering specious Republican arguments.  And, so far, polls show the voters are solidly on the Democrats' side on this one, and just <em>not buying</em> what Republicans are telling them.  As I said, we seem to have entered BackwardsLand, or something.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/04/23/ftp120/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>62</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>In (Partial) Defense Of Michele Bachmann</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/04/08/in-partial-defense-of-michele-bachmann/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/04/08/in-partial-defense-of-michele-bachmann/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Apr 2010 23:56:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Bill of Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=1843</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>I've written here before <a href="http://www.chrisweigant.com/2008/09/29/in-defense-of-sarah-palin/">in defense of Sarah Palin</a>, and since the two just recently shared a campaign rally stage, I thought it'd be timely to write at least a partial defense of Michele Bachmann today.  Because a recent comment by the Minnesota Representative has gotten a lot of ridicule from the left side of the blogosphere, but nobody bothers to point out that she's actually right in what she says about the U.S. Census Bureau and Japanese internment during World War II.  This is intellectually dishonest, I feel, which is why I have to make the attempt to defend her words.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/04/08/in-partial-defense-of-michele-bachmann/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fred Phelps&#039; Hatemongering And The First Amendment</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/03/08/fred-phelps-hatemongering-and-the-first-amendment/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/03/08/fred-phelps-hatemongering-and-the-first-amendment/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 01:33:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Free Speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Bill of Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=1637</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Phelps is in the news today because a Maryland family brought a lawsuit against Phelps, seeking damages for Phelps' actions at their son's funeral, and the U.S. Supreme Court has announced it will hear the case's appeal.  By doing so, they open up the door to refining what is and what is not acceptable speech allowed under the First Amendment to the Constitution.  While the Supreme Court may instead rule much more narrowly (on the case itself, without addressing the free speech issue), the question is worth discussing: should what Phelps does be legal?</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/03/08/fred-phelps-hatemongering-and-the-first-amendment/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Legal Odds And Ends</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/02/25/legal-odds-and-ends/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/02/25/legal-odds-and-ends/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 01:12:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Free Speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Bill of Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=1577</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The first privacy issue comes from an <a href="http://salon.com/wires/us/2010/02/23/D9E24D6O2_us_911_calls_privacy/index.html">interesting story</a> earlier this week about how some states are considering banning the release of recorded 911 emergency calls to the public (or -- more to the point -- to the press).  This is an interesting First Amendment hair to split, because a reasonable case can be made both ways.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/02/25/legal-odds-and-ends/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hidden Dangers Of Citizens United Ruling</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/02/08/hidden-dangers-of-citizens-united-ruling/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/02/08/hidden-dangers-of-citizens-united-ruling/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 00:55:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign Ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FCC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Free Speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Bill of Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=1486</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>But what really worries me about the new rules for corporations and unions is what could happen out of sight of the voting public.  I can foresee two ways for such invisible influence to happen, although there may be others I have not thought of as well, I admit.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/02/08/hidden-dangers-of-citizens-united-ruling/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>53</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>My 2009 &quot;McLaughlin Awards&quot; [Part 2]</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/01/01/my-2009-mclaughlin-awards-part-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/01/01/my-2009-mclaughlin-awards-part-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Jan 2010 02:47:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Free Speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Bill of Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Vice President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2010/01/01/my-2009-mclaughlin-awards-part-2/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Welcome back to my annual outright theft of <em>The McLaughlin Group</em>'s awards categories for the past year in politics.  What's that?  We're sorry, but out lawyers insist we instead use the phrase "my annual legally-allowable constitutionally-protected parody" instead.  So sorry.  For those of you who missed it, <a href="http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2009/12/25/my-2009-mclaughlin-awards-part-1-2/">Part 1</a> of this column ran last week, on Christmas.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/01/01/my-2009-mclaughlin-awards-part-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Khalid Sheikh Mohammed And An Independent Department Of Justice</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/11/18/khalid-sheikh-mohammed-and-an-independent-department-of-justice/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/11/18/khalid-sheikh-mohammed-and-an-independent-department-of-justice/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 00:56:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Bill of Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2009/11/18/khalid-sheikh-mohammed-and-an-independent-department-of-justice/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>This column is really a second installment to yesterday's (<a href="http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2009/11/17/how-to-not-give-khalid-sheikh-mohammed-what-he-wants/">"How To Not Give Khalid Sheikh Mohammed What He Wants"</a>), where I took a look at two of the criticism's against Attorney General Eric Holder's decision to try the accused mastermind of the 9/11 attacks, Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, in federal civilian court rather than in a military tribunal.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/11/18/khalid-sheikh-mohammed-and-an-independent-department-of-justice/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>20</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How To Not Give Khalid Sheikh Mohammed What He Wants</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/11/17/how-to-not-give-khalid-sheikh-mohammed-what-he-wants/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/11/17/how-to-not-give-khalid-sheikh-mohammed-what-he-wants/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 01:58:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Bill of Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2009/11/17/how-to-not-give-khalid-sheikh-mohammed-what-he-wants/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Attorney General Eric Holder has caused an uproar in some circles over his announcement that the self-confessed "mastermind" of the 9/11 attacks, Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, will be tried in federal court in New York City, mere blocks from where the World Trade Center's twin towers once stood.  To be honest, I was surprised this was even controversial, for a number of reasons most people (on either side of the issue) have largely ignored.  Today I will examine two of these, and tomorrow I will take on the biggest elephant everyone seems to be missing in this particular room.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/11/17/how-to-not-give-khalid-sheikh-mohammed-what-he-wants/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>20</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [95] -- A Call To Action</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/09/25/friday-talking-points-95-a-call-to-action/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/09/25/friday-talking-points-95-a-call-to-action/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Sep 2009 00:29:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Talking Points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Bill of Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Vice President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2009/09/25/friday-talking-points-95-a-call-to-action/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["Now is the time for all good men to come to the aid of the party."
Of course, this really should be (in today's inclusive society): "Now is the time for all good men and women to come to the aid of the party."  But what it really should say is something more like: "Now [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/09/25/friday-talking-points-95-a-call-to-action/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Emerging GOP Theme: Nullification</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/09/14/emerging-gop-theme-nullification/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/09/14/emerging-gop-theme-nullification/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2009 23:46:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Bill of Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Vice President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2009/09/14/emerging-gop-theme-nullification/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/09/14/emerging-gop-theme-nullification/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [89] -- Fighting Crazy</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/08/14/friday-talking-points-89-fighting-crazy/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/08/14/friday-talking-points-89-fighting-crazy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Aug 2009 00:15:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Free Speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Talking Points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Bill of Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2009/08/14/friday-talking-points-89-fighting-crazy/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The healthcare reform fracas has gotten so bad, it has forced some in the media to actually do their jobs.  This statement will come as a shock to anyone who has become accustomed to the way these <em>soi-disant</em> "journalists" present just about any issue these days -- by having a center-left politician and a hard-right politician on to "debate," and then fanning the flames by refusing to referee and provide actual facts to the discussion.  But I think now (maybe) the "journalists" have finally gotten to the point of embarrassment, leading them to actually report on what is true and what is not in the entire debate.  In other words, as I said, to do their actual jobs.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/08/14/friday-talking-points-89-fighting-crazy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama&#039;s Second Hundred Days</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/08/07/obamas-second-hundred-days/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/08/07/obamas-second-hundred-days/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2009 16:00:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Campaign Ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FCC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iran]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Name-dropping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Other]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Bill of Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2009/08/07/obamas-second-hundred-days/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>I've always been confused why the media goes berserk about rating a president's "first 100 days," but then just <em>stops counting</em> after the first milestone.  This, to a statistician, would be known as a "zero dimensional data array" -- one data point, to be exact.  If you don't re-test the sample on a regular schedule, how are you supposed to compare it to anything?</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/08/07/obamas-second-hundred-days/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The JusticeBot 9000</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/07/15/the-justicebot-9000/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/07/15/the-justicebot-9000/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 00:27:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Bill of Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2009/07/15/the-justicebot-9000/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>"But that's just the problem!" interjects Dr. Frank, in frustration.  "Following the law sounds easy, but the law has changed over the years.  The things the Constitution did <em>not</em> address come before judges <em>all the time</em>.  Life has changed since 1787!  And the law has changed as well."</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/07/15/the-justicebot-9000/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tea Bag Day (Part Two) Could Be A Dud</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/07/02/tea-bag-day-part-two-could-be-a-dud/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/07/02/tea-bag-day-part-two-could-be-a-dud/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 20:46:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Bill of Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2009/07/02/tea-bag-day-part-two-could-be-a-dud/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>This Saturday is, of course, Independence Day.  It was also scheduled to be "Round Two" of the tea bag protests.  But their planned protest seems to be fizzling like a wet firecracker.  At least in the media's view, so far.  Perhaps scheduling protests on one of the worst news days in the year is responsible for this inattention?</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/07/02/tea-bag-day-part-two-could-be-a-dud/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Question For Dick Cheney: Should We Now Waterboard Tiller&#039;s Murderer?</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/06/08/a-question-for-dick-cheney-should-we-now-waterboard-tillers-murderer/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/06/08/a-question-for-dick-cheney-should-we-now-waterboard-tillers-murderer/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 22:36:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Bill of Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2009/06/08/a-question-for-dick-cheney-should-we-now-waterboard-tillers-murderer/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>I have a question for former Vice President Dick Cheney, who has been staunchly defending the Bush administration's use of waterboarding and other torture against prisoners in our care.  My question: Should Scott Roeder, accused murderer of abortion doctor George Tiller, now be waterboarded?  Roeder has just gone on the record stating that further violence is coming, in "many similar events planned around the country as long as abortion remains legal."  In other words, Roeder is claiming the now-infamous "ticking time bomb" scenario of what can only be termed domestic terrorism.  So, Mr. Cheney, doesn't this mean (following your own "logic") that Roeder should immediately be waterboarded to tell us what he knows?  Anything less, by your standards, would be hypocritically picking and choosing which terrorists get a pass, and which don't.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/06/08/a-question-for-dick-cheney-should-we-now-waterboard-tillers-murderer/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>19</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Addressing Sotomayor&#039;s Critics</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/06/02/addressing-sotomayors-critics/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/06/02/addressing-sotomayors-critics/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 01:13:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Free Speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Bill of Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2009/06/02/addressing-sotomayors-critics/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Senator Dianne Feinstein finally said what I've been waiting for someone to say about the whole "reverse racism" charge now being levied by Republicans against President Barack Obama's first Supreme Court pick, Judge Sonia Sotomayor.  From this weekend's Face The Nation, Feinstein summed the entire controversy up in her first response to moderator Bob [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/06/02/addressing-sotomayors-critics/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>46</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [78] -- A Mixed Week</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/05/22/friday-talking-points-78-a-mixed-week/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/05/22/friday-talking-points-78-a-mixed-week/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 May 2009 00:38:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign Ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Talking Points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Bill of Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2009/05/22/friday-talking-points-78-a-mixed-week/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>President Obama and the congressional Democrats just had their first spat.  While others have more-than-adequately delved into the fracas of Obama's national security speech and Harry Reid stripping out funding to close Guantanamo, what I was struck by this week was how Obama is better defining his character as president.  This is going to be important later this year, when energy plans and health care reform legislation become protracted fights in Congress.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/05/22/friday-talking-points-78-a-mixed-week/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>46</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pelosi, Part Two</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/05/19/pelosi-part-two/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/05/19/pelosi-part-two/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 00:18:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Bill of Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2009/05/19/pelosi-part-two/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>When I wrote yesterday's column (<a href="http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2009/05/18/what-exactly-was-pelosi-supposed-to-do/">"What, Exactly, Was Pelosi Supposed To Do?"</a>) I expected a certain amount of debate, but I had no idea what direction it would take (which is the whole fun of the blogosphere).  To be perfectly honest, I thought some Pelosi defenders would take me to task for being too hard on her.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/05/19/pelosi-part-two/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What, Exactly, Was Pelosi Supposed To Do?</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/05/18/what-exactly-was-pelosi-supposed-to-do/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/05/18/what-exactly-was-pelosi-supposed-to-do/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2009 23:37:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2006 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Bill of Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2009/05/18/what-exactly-was-pelosi-supposed-to-do/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Listening to the news over the past week, it would be easy to come to the conclusion that Nancy Pelosi was personally responsible for torturing prisoners.  Because that's how the storyline seemed, if you had just beamed in from Mars and didn't know anything else about the debate on prisoner interrogation.  The problem is, we have not just arrived on this planet, and Nancy Pelosi will ultimately wind up in the history books with a footnote (if that) in the description of what took place under George W. Bush and Dick Cheney.  But her critics in the past few days have remarkably failed to answer a very basic question (not that the media is really asking, but maybe they'll get around to it) -- what, exactly, was Nancy Pelosi <em>supposed</em> to do?</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/05/18/what-exactly-was-pelosi-supposed-to-do/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [77] -- There&#039;s Always Next Week...</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/05/15/friday-talking-points-77-theres-always-next-week/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/05/15/friday-talking-points-77-theres-always-next-week/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 May 2009 00:44:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Talking Points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Bill of Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2009/05/15/friday-talking-points-77-theres-always-next-week/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>I have to start by saying that in all honesty, President Obama and the Democrats didn't have a great week.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/05/15/friday-talking-points-77-theres-always-next-week/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [75] -- Monster Raving Loony Party</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/05/01/friday-talking-points-75-monster-raving-loony-party/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/05/01/friday-talking-points-75-monster-raving-loony-party/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2009 00:46:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Campaign Ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Talking Points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Humor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Interviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Name-dropping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Bill of Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Vice President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2009/05/01/friday-talking-points-75-monster-raving-loony-party/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>OK, with that out of the way, we must (sadly) turn our eyes to the Republican Party.  Because they appear to be losing all touch with reality, so it's best to keep an eye on them at this point.  For starters, they are calling a special Republican National Committee meeting in the next month to vote on (as if they could) forcing their opposition to change their name to what is variously described as the "Socialist Democratic Party" or the "Democratic Socialist Party" (as well as variations where they intentionally leave out the "-ic" just to twist the knife).</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/05/01/friday-talking-points-75-monster-raving-loony-party/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://www.eastvillageradio.com/newspageshows/First100DaysofObama14.mp3.m3u" length="73" type="audio/x-mpegurl" />
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [74] -- Pirates And Torture</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/04/17/friday-talking-points-74-pirates-and-torture/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/04/17/friday-talking-points-74-pirates-and-torture/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 23:57:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Talking Points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Bill of Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2009/04/17/friday-talking-points-74-pirates-and-torture/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>What a strange set of sentences that is to begin an article about the twenty-first century world we live in.  But pirates are attacking ships with regularity off the coast of Somalia.  This has been going on for years, but Americans just realized it is happening (because an American ship was just attacked).  And, while the two are not connected (and I am not advocating for their connection, sorry for the slightly-misleading headline), people are finally talking about torture after President Obama released the Bush torture memos to the public.  We'll get to the Bush torture memos in a bit, but I'd like to begin with a proposed solution to the pirate problem first.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/04/17/friday-talking-points-74-pirates-and-torture/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>33</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>American Violet A Powerful Movie With A Powerful Message On Race And The Drug War</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/04/15/american-violet-a-powerful-movie-with-a-powerful-message-on-race-and-the-drug-war/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/04/15/american-violet-a-powerful-movie-with-a-powerful-message-on-race-and-the-drug-war/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 23:44:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Bill of Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2009/04/15/american-violet-a-powerful-movie-with-a-powerful-message-on-race-and-the-drug-war/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><em>American Violet</em> is not a "horror movie."  It has no monsters, zombies, or mass murderers in it.  Just people.  But the movie's powerful message on the role racism plays in the Drug War will likely horrify you just the same.  So while <em>American Violet</em> is about as far from the "horror" genre in moviemaking as you can get, audiences may indeed be horrified (or perhaps outraged) at the injustice displayed by one district attorney in Texas.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/04/15/american-violet-a-powerful-movie-with-a-powerful-message-on-race-and-the-drug-war/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tea And Sympathy</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/04/13/tea-and-sympathy/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/04/13/tea-and-sympathy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 23:15:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Bill of Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2009/04/13/tea-and-sympathy/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Tea doesn't get much respect in America.  This historical snubbing will continue Wednesday, with protests across America meant to evoke the Boston Tea Party, a seminal event in the foundation of our county.  How effective these protests will be is going to be open to interpretation, however.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/04/13/tea-and-sympathy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [73] --  &quot;Good Grief!&quot; Friday</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/04/10/friday-talking-points-73-good-grief-friday/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/04/10/friday-talking-points-73-good-grief-friday/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2009 23:38:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Talking Points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Bill of Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2009/04/10/friday-talking-points-73-good-grief-friday/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>A bumpersticker seen in more liberal areas of the country reads: "Jesus save me from your followers."  Now, that may not be a very "Christian" way to open a column which falls on the Christian Good Friday, but I was reminded of it by yet another episode of Catholic leaders denouncing liberal politicians.  To these leaders, I have to say, isn't there something about beams and dust motes and eyes which you could be more productively teaching about?  Or perhaps that one about throwing the first stone?</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/04/10/friday-talking-points-73-good-grief-friday/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>C.W. Cunningham Honored By Jefferson Center</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/04/07/cw-cunningham-honored-by-jefferson-center/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/04/07/cw-cunningham-honored-by-jefferson-center/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 23:44:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cartoons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Free Speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Humor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Bill of Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2009/04/07/cw-cunningham-honored-by-jefferson-center/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>ChrisWeigant.com is proud to announce that our much-beloved resident cartoonist C.W.&#160;Cunningham has been honored by the Thomas Jefferson Center for the Protection of Free Expression, by being featured in their "Jefferson Muzzles" awards column.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/04/07/cw-cunningham-honored-by-jefferson-center/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Constitutionally-Protected Spam</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/03/31/constitutionally-protected-spam/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/03/31/constitutionally-protected-spam/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 23:33:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Free Speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Bill of Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2009/03/31/constitutionally-protected-spam/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps I am just being alarmist here.  Perhaps I am wrong about all of this.  Or perhaps we will look back at <em>Jaynes</em> in the future with horror, as our inboxes fill up with mudslinging about the candidates.  I truly hope I am mistaken about this, and not prophetic.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/03/31/constitutionally-protected-spam/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Oh, The Humanity!  Godless Huffington Post Commenters Wickedly Destroying Conservatism</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/03/30/oh-the-humanity-godless-huffington-post-commenters-wickedly-destroying-conservatism/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/03/30/oh-the-humanity-godless-huffington-post-commenters-wickedly-destroying-conservatism/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 23:24:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Free Speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Humor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Bill of Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2009/03/30/oh-the-humanity-godless-huffington-post-commenters-wickedly-destroying-conservatism/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>In the era of Michael Steele, Sarah Palin, and Bobby Jindal, it's pretty hard to stand out in the world of conservative lunatic ravings.  But Andrew Breitbart's recent opinion piece in the <em>Washington Times</em> truly raises (lowers?) the bar for the rest of the field in right-wing Crazytown.  His thesis is that liberal blog commenters are ruining things for the conservatives' attempts to have a nice online chat.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/03/30/oh-the-humanity-godless-huffington-post-commenters-wickedly-destroying-conservatism/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Guest Author: Why I Decided To Become An American</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/03/22/guest-author-why-i-decided-to-become-an-american/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/03/22/guest-author-why-i-decided-to-become-an-american/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Mar 2009 22:02:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Guest Authors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Bill of Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2009/03/22/guest-author-why-i-decided-to-become-an-american/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>I am an American citizen.  Now, I truly belong.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/03/22/guest-author-why-i-decided-to-become-an-american/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Seriously Annoying News From Michigan</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/02/19/seriously-annoying-news-from-michigan/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/02/19/seriously-annoying-news-from-michigan/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 00:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Bill of Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2009/02/19/seriously-annoying-news-from-michigan/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>I find plenty of local elected officials seriously annoying, too, I should mention.  As a matter of fact, I find the politics of a large segment of the population seriously annoying.  Boy, they better stock up on blank citations, as they're going to have to write a lot of tickets for that one.  I find certain movies seriously annoying.  And don't even get me started on how seriously annoying television is (starting with "the news").</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/02/19/seriously-annoying-news-from-michigan/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [62] -- Obama&#039;s Inaugural Speech</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/01/23/friday-talking-points-62-obamas-inaugural-speech/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/01/23/friday-talking-points-62-obamas-inaugural-speech/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Jan 2009 01:13:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Talking Points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iran]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Bill of Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2009/01/23/friday-talking-points-62-obamas-inaugural-speech/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Because Obama's Inaugural speech was indeed masterful.  When he started speaking, I was thinking "which line will be the one everyone focuses on?"  In other words, which line will be the "nothing to fear but fear itself" or "ask not what your country can do for you, ask what you can do for your country" moment?  Both of those lines are from previous inaugurations, so what would be remembered from Obama's speech?</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/01/23/friday-talking-points-62-obamas-inaugural-speech/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Support John Conyers&#039; Truth Commission</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/01/14/support-john-conyers-truth-commission/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/01/14/support-john-conyers-truth-commission/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2009 00:12:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Bill of Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2009/01/14/support-john-conyers-truth-commission/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Are you one of those people who wants to see what has been done in your name by the outgoing Bush administration?  Are you frustrated by all the "we need to look forward, not backward" language from Barack Obama and other Democratic leaders?  Well, now you can do something about it, by <a href="http://clerk.house.gov/member_info/mcapdir.html">calling up your House member</a> today and telling them to support John Conyers' H.R.104, a bill to "establish a national commission on presidential war powers and civil liberties."</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/01/14/support-john-conyers-truth-commission/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>My 2008 &quot;McLaughlin Awards&quot; [Part 2]</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2008/12/26/my-2008-mclaughlin-awards-part-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2008/12/26/my-2008-mclaughlin-awards-part-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Dec 2008 01:05:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Name-dropping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Bill of Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2008/12/26/my-2008-mclaughlin-awards-part-2/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Three names suggest themselves in this category.  The first, sad to say, is Sarah Palin.  While some dismiss her with the term (which she herself uttered on <em>Saturday Night Live</em>) "Caribou Barbie," my educated guess is that we have not seen the last of Alaska's governor on the national stage.  Because while the list of things Palin lacks is long and daunting, she has one star quality which may prove to be strong enough to cancel all the rest out -- charisma.  A politician can learn about such mundane things as world events and how to speak with political finesse, but charisma can't really be learned -- it's more of an innate quality.  And Palin's got it.  For those laughing at the prospect of Sarah Palin ever reappearing, I caution that when Ronald Reagan first ran for president, we all laughed at him, too.  An actor becoming president?  Pre-<em>pos</em>-terous!  So don't underestimate charisma, or Palin's ambition.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2008/12/26/my-2008-mclaughlin-awards-part-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Spam, Free Speech, And Anonymity (continued...)</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2008/11/13/spam-free-speech-and-anonymity-continued/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2008/11/13/spam-free-speech-and-anonymity-continued/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 01:15:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Campaign Ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Free Speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Bill of Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2008/11/13/spam-free-speech-and-anonymity-continued/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>As I see it, the issue breaks down in a number of ways.  The first question is anonymity -- do Americans have an absolute right to anonymity in political messages?  The second question is technological -- is anonymity a right, no matter what the medium?  And the third question seems to be political, and deal with campaign and election law -- what kinds of rules on speech are constitutionally allowable in politics?</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2008/11/13/spam-free-speech-and-anonymity-continued/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Anonymity Of &quot;Obama Is A Muslim&quot; Emails Constitutionally-Protected?</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2008/11/12/anonymity-of-obama-is-a-muslim-emails-constitutionally-protected/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2008/11/12/anonymity-of-obama-is-a-muslim-emails-constitutionally-protected/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2008 00:31:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Free Speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Bill of Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2008/11/12/anonymity-of-obama-is-a-muslim-emails-constitutionally-protected/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>One of the more scurrilous 2008 campaign tactics (in a campaign seemingly full of them) had to have been those insidious "Have you heard... Barack Obama is a secret Muslim?!?" emails.  These bounced hither and yon on the internet almost from the beginning of the campaign itself (or at the very least, since when it looked like Obama had a chance at the nomination).  This sort of activity would likely fall into most people's "there ought to be a law" list -- a list of things worth changing in our election process.  Unfortunately, the state Supreme Court of Virginia handed down a ruling in the midst of the campaign which may ultimately make <em>any</em> sort of limits on this sort of anonymous political (and technological) mudslinging actually <em>unconstitutional</em>.  Meaning it would be impossible to pass any sort of laws against the practice at all.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2008/11/12/anonymity-of-obama-is-a-muslim-emails-constitutionally-protected/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Election 2008 Odds And Ends -- Waiting For Missouri And Alaska, Pro-Marijuana Initiatives And More...</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2008/11/10/election-2008-odds-and-ends-waiting-for-missouri-and-alaska-pro-marijuana-initiatives-and-more/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2008/11/10/election-2008-odds-and-ends-waiting-for-missouri-and-alaska-pro-marijuana-initiatives-and-more/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2008 00:02:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Bill of Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2008/11/10/election-2008-odds-and-ends-waiting-for-missouri-and-alaska-pro-marijuana-initiatives-and-more/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>First, though, I got tired of endlessly downloading various "election results" webpages, in the hopes of getting some final results.  And I also got tired of waiting for the mainstream media to do its job and inform the public what is going on with the remaining states, whose election results have not yet been reported.  So I called up the state election officials myself, and thought I would share with you what I found.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2008/11/10/election-2008-odds-and-ends-waiting-for-missouri-and-alaska-pro-marijuana-initiatives-and-more/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Free Speech Restored In Berkeley</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2008/10/28/free-speech-restored-in-berkeley/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2008/10/28/free-speech-restored-in-berkeley/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 21:56:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Free Speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Bill of Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2008/10/28/free-speech-restored-in-berkeley/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Good news for the Bill of Rights out of Berkeley -- they've restored free speech.  The really astounding thing, and the reason this is a "man bites dog" story and not a "dog bites man" bit of non-news, is that they updated their laws in support of those voicing extreme right-wing positions.  Since Berkeley is charmingly known in the Bay Area as "The People's Republic Of Berkeley," this is news indeed.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2008/10/28/free-speech-restored-in-berkeley/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [51] -- Some Positivity</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2008/10/10/friday-talking-points-51-some-positivity/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2008/10/10/friday-talking-points-51-some-positivity/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 23:44:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign Ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Talking Points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Bill of Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2008/10/10/friday-talking-points-51-some-positivity/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Things are getting pretty nasty out on the McCain campaign trail, it seems.  Not much talk of "reaching across the aisle" these days.  Now, while anyone with a halfway-decent brain saw this coming, this obviously doesn't include most of the mainstream media.  Of <em>course</em> the end of the campaign was going to be nasty.  Of <em>course</em> McCain and his minions were going to throw everything they could at Obama.  Barack Obama himself knew this was coming.  Democrats should have known it was coming.  It's the old story of the <a href="http://allaboutfrogs.org/stories/scorpion.html">scorpion and the frog</a> -- McCain is getting nasty because he's a Republican candidate for president.  "I'm a Republican, it's my nature," in other words.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2008/10/10/friday-talking-points-51-some-positivity/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>51</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Surveillance Powers Abused</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2008/10/09/surveillance-powers-abused/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2008/10/09/surveillance-powers-abused/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 01:11:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Free Speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Bill of Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2008/10/09/surveillance-powers-abused/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Two stories from the "power corrupts" department appeared this week, one on the state level and one on the federal level.  Both just go to show, once again, that whenever sweeping surveillance powers are granted to those in authority the end result is almost always the same -- widespread abuse of such power to go after anyone the government takes a dislike to, rather than the "terrorists" who are the supposed targets of the law.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2008/10/09/surveillance-powers-abused/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [48] -- Throwing Out The Rulebook</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2008/09/19/friday-talking-points-48-throwing-out-the-rulebook/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2008/09/19/friday-talking-points-48-throwing-out-the-rulebook/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2008 23:52:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign Ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Talking Points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Name-dropping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Bill of Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2008/09/19/friday-talking-points-48-throwing-out-the-rulebook/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Back in <a href="http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2008/06/20/friday-talking-points-36-end-the-medias-pro-mccain-bias-now/">Volume 36</a> of this <strong>Friday Talking Points</strong> column, I pointed out what seemed to me to be an obvious observation -- that the media was going a lot lighter on John McCain than they were on Barack Obama.  This earned me a fair amount of ridicule at the time (and also some support, I should say).  Now, however, I can definitively say that this situation has been rectified.  Whether it was McCain's campaign cutting off virtually all access to McCain (and literally <em>any</em> access to Palin), whether it was McCain's mudslinging and lies in his ads, or perhaps whether it was McCain manipulating the media after his running mate choice, and then savagely attacking them -- for whatever reason, the mainstream media are now closely examining everything McCain says.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2008/09/19/friday-talking-points-48-throwing-out-the-rulebook/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Convention Thoughts -- Day Three (Some Red Meat)</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2008/08/28/convention-thoughts-day-three-some-red-meat/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2008/08/28/convention-thoughts-day-three-some-red-meat/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 23:45:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iran]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Name-dropping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Bill of Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2008/08/28/convention-thoughts-day-three-some-red-meat/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>As I've said, this convention is being directed by a maestro -- slow and warm at first, then a big resounding call for unity, and now, on Day 3, some red meat to the crowd.  Tonight should be absolutely stunning, that's all I can say, because the "build" has gone swimmingly well.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2008/08/28/convention-thoughts-day-three-some-red-meat/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Historical Perspective On Divided Democratic Conventions</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2008/08/25/a-historical-perspective-on-divided-democratic-conventions/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2008/08/25/a-historical-perspective-on-divided-democratic-conventions/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Aug 2008 11:54:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Bill of Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2008/08/25/a-historical-perspective-on-divided-democratic-conventions/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Today begins the 2008 Democratic National Convention.  The media (or some sections of it, I should say) have been pushing for a big rousing fight on the floor of the convention in Denver -- the Hillary Clinton supporters staging some sort of scene for the cameras -- so they can continue their "look how [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2008/08/25/a-historical-perspective-on-divided-democratic-conventions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [40] -- Obama Shines, McCain Whines</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2008/07/25/friday-talking-points-40-obama-shines-mccain-whines/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2008/07/25/friday-talking-points-40-obama-shines-mccain-whines/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 23:17:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Talking Points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iran]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Bill of Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2008/07/25/friday-talking-points-40-obama-shines-mccain-whines/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Be careful what you wish for, John.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2008/07/25/friday-talking-points-40-obama-shines-mccain-whines/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [38] -- Whiners And Cheeseheads</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2008/07/11/friday-talking-points-38-whiners-and-cheeseheads/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2008/07/11/friday-talking-points-38-whiners-and-cheeseheads/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jul 2008 23:46:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Talking Points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Bill of Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2008/07/11/friday-talking-points-38-whiners-and-cheeseheads/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>While plenty has happened in the past two weeks which bears close and careful analysis, I'd like to begin by focusing on one event.  Barack Obama announced a masterstroke of political tactics last week, and I don't think everyone has appreciated fully what it is going to mean.  I say this not as an "Obamamaniac," or as some starry-eyed follower who has been caught up in his "personality cult," but rather as a political observer (with an admitted left-wing bias) applauding a Democratic candidate on a monumentally brilliant decision.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2008/07/11/friday-talking-points-38-whiners-and-cheeseheads/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>19</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>So Is Torturing A Daughter OK?</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2008/07/07/so-is-torturing-a-daughter-ok-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2008/07/07/so-is-torturing-a-daughter-ok-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 22:06:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Bill of Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2008/07/07/so-is-torturing-a-daughter-ok-2/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Think about that for a moment -- a former Justice Department legal counsel couldn't answer whether the President of the United States of America could legally order a prisoner <em>buried alive</em>.  These were the people who were responsible for drawing the lines on what was (in their opinion) legally allowable, and what wasn't, and they can't even publicly state whether the president ordering someone buried alive is legal or not.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2008/07/07/so-is-torturing-a-daughter-ok-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What Would Abbie Hoffman Have Thought Of The Flag Lapel Pin Debate?</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2008/07/04/what-would-abbie-hoffman-have-thought-of-the-flag-lapel-pin-debate/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2008/07/04/what-would-abbie-hoffman-have-thought-of-the-flag-lapel-pin-debate/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 20:09:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Free Speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Bill of Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2008/07/04/what-would-abbie-hoffman-have-thought-of-the-flag-lapel-pin-debate/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>I'd like to address, in as patriotic spirit as can be mustered, the wearing of United States flag lapel pins, and the inherent silliness this debate represents.  Flag lapel pins are all the rage these days, but the battle over wearing the flag is older than you may have thought.  Older than the battles in Congress over flag-desecration amendments to the Constitution (which stretch back to the 1980s... and which even Democrats who should know better still occasionally vote for in Congress... ahem).</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2008/07/04/what-would-abbie-hoffman-have-thought-of-the-flag-lapel-pin-debate/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [37] -- Welcome, New Readers</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2008/06/27/friday-talking-points-37-welcome-new-readers/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2008/06/27/friday-talking-points-37-welcome-new-readers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jun 2008 00:14:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign Ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Talking Points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Bill of Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2008/06/27/friday-talking-points-37-welcome-new-readers/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>This column was born out of my frustration with the seeming inability of many Democrats to perform well in the Sunday morning interview shows on television.  It's often been said that Democrats have an inherent "herding cats" problem, so I set out to do my tiny part to help.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2008/06/27/friday-talking-points-37-welcome-new-readers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Precedent George Bush</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2008/06/25/precedent-george-bush/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2008/06/25/precedent-george-bush/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 22:22:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Bill of Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2008/06/25/precedent-george-bush/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>George Bush's term in office will be remembered for the precedents it set, particularly in relation to the power of the presidency, and the separation of powers between the three branches of American government.  Vice President Dick Cheney has been at the forefront of this effort to "restore power" to the presidency, which he believes was unjustly taken from the office in the aftermath of Richard Nixon and Watergate.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2008/06/25/precedent-george-bush/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>In Honor Of George Carlin, Examining Nipplephobia And Buttcrackphobia In America</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2008/06/23/in-honor-of-george-carlin-examining-nipplephobia-and-buttcrackphobia-in-america/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2008/06/23/in-honor-of-george-carlin-examining-nipplephobia-and-buttcrackphobia-in-america/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 01:17:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[FCC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Free Speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Humor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Other]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Bill of Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2008/06/23/in-honor-of-george-carlin-examining-nipplephobia-and-buttcrackphobia-in-america/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Rest In Peace, Mr. Carlin.  You leave behind you a void that will be hard to fill.  Because, unfortunately, silliness is still rampant in America.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2008/06/23/in-honor-of-george-carlin-examining-nipplephobia-and-buttcrackphobia-in-america/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [36] -- End The Media&#039;s Pro-McCain Bias!  Now!!</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2008/06/20/friday-talking-points-36-end-the-medias-pro-mccain-bias-now/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2008/06/20/friday-talking-points-36-end-the-medias-pro-mccain-bias-now/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2008 22:53:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign Ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Talking Points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iran]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Bill of Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2008/06/20/friday-talking-points-36-end-the-medias-pro-mccain-bias-now/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Anyone who thinks that the treatment Barack Obama has gotten from the media during this campaign is remotely the same as the treatment John McCain has received just <em>has not</em> been paying much attention.  Because this pro-McCain prejudice has been both pervasive and unremarked-upon throughout almost the entire news media during the entire campaign season.  McCain has even joked that the media is "his base" of support.  It was a funny line, but there is an enormous truth at its core: the media has been hard on Obama but unbelievably light on John McCain.  And this has to stop.  Now.  Because the election might just hinge on the media's portrayal of the two, so now is the time to point out the uneven nature of the press coverage to date on the two candidates.  In time for the mainstream media to correct itself before the general election season really heats up.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2008/06/20/friday-talking-points-36-end-the-medias-pro-mccain-bias-now/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>30</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Three Dot Thursday</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2008/06/19/three-dot-thursday-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2008/06/19/three-dot-thursday-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 23:50:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Bill of Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2008/06/19/three-dot-thursday-2/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Come to think of it, if <em>anything</em> in Cindy's past were part of Michelle's life history, I would bet my bottom dollar that we'd have heard about it by now.  Over and over and over again.  This is called "media bias," and it deserves to be spotlighted immediately.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2008/06/19/three-dot-thursday-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>15</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Republican Doom And Gloom</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2008/06/12/republican-doom-and-gloom/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2008/06/12/republican-doom-and-gloom/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2008 00:59:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Bill of Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2008/06/12/republican-doom-and-gloom/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The cloud of growing doom hanging over Republicans as they skulk the corridors of power in Washington, D.C. is becoming more and more visible as the 2008 elections stumble down the campaign trail.  It may break in a cloudburst of Democratic landslides this November, which Republicans are beginning to fully realize.  Because the bad news for the Republicans is coming so fast and furious, I (once again) pay homage to the late great Herb Caen, and offer them up to you in a return of the Three-Dot Thursday format.  Without further ado...</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2008/06/12/republican-doom-and-gloom/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>47</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama&#039;s First 100 Days Checklist</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2008/05/29/obamas-first-100-days-checklist/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2008/05/29/obamas-first-100-days-checklist/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2008 19:16:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Bill of Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2008/05/29/obamas-first-100-days-checklist/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>"I would call my attorney general in and review every single executive order issued by George Bush and overturn those laws or executive decisions that I feel violate the constitution," said Obama.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2008/05/29/obamas-first-100-days-checklist/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>In Defense Of 527s</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2008/05/20/in-defense-of-527s/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2008/05/20/in-defense-of-527s/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 23:02:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign Ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Bill of Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2008/05/20/in-defense-of-527s/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>I personally am of the opinion that more free speech is better than less.  Which is why I like the concept of 527s, and why I support their right to speak.  It's also interested to see who else is against 527s -- both political parties.  Because before 527s were around, these "advocacy ads" came from the party machine, and were coordinated with the candidates.  Meaning centralized control over the message.  But I don't consider that a good thing at all -- I like the concept of free citizens being able to have their own voices heard in the political debate.  Sure, it's messier (with a lot of mud being flung), but true freedom is always a little messy.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2008/05/20/in-defense-of-527s/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [30] -- &quot;Mainstream Media Out To Lunch&quot; Edition</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2008/05/02/friday-talking-points-30-mainstream-media-out-to-lunch-edition/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2008/05/02/friday-talking-points-30-mainstream-media-out-to-lunch-edition/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 23:22:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Talking Points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Name-dropping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Bill of Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2008/05/02/friday-talking-points-30-mainstream-media-out-to-lunch-edition/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Yesterday, all 29 cargo ports on the West Coast <a href="http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2008/05/01/happy-may-day/">were shut down</a>, although it wasn't terrorism that did it.  It was the longshoremen, in a one-day strike.  Media coverage, beyond some local newspapers, was almost completely non-existent.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2008/05/02/friday-talking-points-30-mainstream-media-out-to-lunch-edition/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Debate Questions I&#039;d (Still) Like To Ask</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2008/04/16/debate-questions-id-still-like-to-ask/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2008/04/16/debate-questions-id-still-like-to-ask/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 21:02:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Free Speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Other]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Bill of Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2008/04/16/debate-questions-id-still-like-to-ask/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Back in the dim and distant past of this presidential campaign (i.e., February), I wrote a pre-debate column <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/chris-weigant/debate-questions-id-like_b_88389.html">listing questions</a> I would like to hear both Democratic candidates answer.  Today's column is a revision of this original.  Many of the questions I have are the same, for which I apologize.  I don't normally recycle my own material in this fashion, but unfortunately these questions remain largely unanswered, almost two months after the last debate.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2008/04/16/debate-questions-id-still-like-to-ask/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [26]</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2008/04/04/friday-talking-points-26/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2008/04/04/friday-talking-points-26/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 23:26:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign Ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Talking Points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iran]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Bill of Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2008/04/04/friday-talking-points-26/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Since the campaigns of both Senator Hillary Clinton and Senator Barack Obama have seemingly taken <a href="http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2008/03/31/campaign-to-beat-mccain/">my advice earlier this week</a>, and are both concentrating on attacking Senator John McCain rather than each other, we have the luxury of getting away from the campaign trail this week and focusing on a few other things -- the biggest of which is the upcoming testimony before Congress by General Petraeus and Ambassador Crocker on the situation in Iraq.  More on that in a moment.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2008/04/04/friday-talking-points-26/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Another Secret Yoo Memo</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2008/04/03/another-secret-yoo-memo/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2008/04/03/another-secret-yoo-memo/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 23:01:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Bill of Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2008/04/03/another-secret-yoo-memo/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>While much attention has been paid to the newly-released 81-page memo written by John Yoo which defines torturing prisoners in U.S. custody as "self-defense," within the memo is reference to <em>another</em> secret Yoo memo, one with even further-reaching consequences for the Constitution.  According to Yoo (and the Bush administration in general), because we're "at war," the United States military is allowed to <em>completely ignore</em> the Fourth Amendment -- <em>on U.S. soil</em>.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2008/04/03/another-secret-yoo-memo/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>42</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [25] -- Place Your Bets On The Democratic Race!</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2008/03/28/friday-talking-points-25-place-your-bets-on-the-democratic-race/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2008/03/28/friday-talking-points-25-place-your-bets-on-the-democratic-race/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 23:08:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Talking Points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Name-dropping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Bill of Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2008/03/28/friday-talking-points-25-place-your-bets-on-the-democratic-race/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>We haven't done a contest here in a while, so I'm going to open the betting window today on the outcome of the Democratic race.  To play, just post a comment with the date and the outcome you predict will happen.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2008/03/28/friday-talking-points-25-place-your-bets-on-the-democratic-race/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [23]</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2008/03/14/friday-talking-points-23/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2008/03/14/friday-talking-points-23/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Mar 2008 00:13:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Talking Points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iran]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Name-dropping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Bill of Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2008/03/14/friday-talking-points-23/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>As Robert Anton Wilson pointed out (or William S. Burroughs, if you prefer), hexagram 23 of the I Ching is "breaking apart."  Anyone who subscribes to his "<a href="http://forteantimes.com/features/commentary/396/the_23_phenomenon.html">23 enigma</a>" theory will note that this is the twenty-third installment of this column.  If you throw hexagram 23, the I Ching cautions: "the roof is shattered, the house collapses." I leave you, dear reader, to draw your own conclusions as to how this relates to Democratic politics for this particular week.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2008/03/14/friday-talking-points-23/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Wiretapping Update</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2008/03/13/wiretapping-update/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2008/03/13/wiretapping-update/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2008 23:58:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Bill of Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2008/03/13/wiretapping-update/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>...The <em>New York Times</em> has <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/us/13fbi.html?ex=1363060800&#038;en=5bee4aabc4fe2421&#038;ei=5088&#038;partner=rssnyt&#038;emc=rss">a piece</a> this week on exactly why letting the government powers that stretch the Fourth Amendment beyond recognition is always a bad idea -- because what is introduced as "emergency, extraordinary" powers <em>always</em> devolves in the blink of an eye into just a standard tool for law enforcement (to use for whatever reason they see fit).  National Security Letters (or, in the original <a href="http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2007/03/14/whose-head-will-roll-next/">Louis XVI French</a>, <em>lettres de cachet</em>) are an outright insult to the Constitution and should be stopped.  I'm still waiting for a hard promise from either Senator Clinton or Senator Obama that this practice will end, on Day One.  Or for that matter, a speech in the Senate right now from either of them.  They're running to be leader of our country, so how about showing some leadership when it counts?</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2008/03/13/wiretapping-update/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>25</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [21] -- Bash Bush Edition</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2008/02/29/friday-talking-points-21-bash-bush-edition/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2008/02/29/friday-talking-points-21-bash-bush-edition/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 23:52:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Talking Points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Bill of Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2008/02/29/friday-talking-points-21-bash-bush-edition/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><strong>Happy Leap Day!</strong>  Because we are given an extra day this year, I would like to spend it in a good old fashioned Bush-bash.  Maybe it's because everyone's focused on the election, or maybe the entire country just doesn't want to think about President Bush anymore, but I feel that he hasn't been getting the attention he deserves of late.  And what better way to spend the extra day we get this leap year?</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2008/02/29/friday-talking-points-21-bash-bush-edition/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Washington&#039;s Positive Feedback Money Loop</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2008/02/28/washingtons-positive-feedback-money-loop/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2008/02/28/washingtons-positive-feedback-money-loop/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 00:38:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Bill of Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2008/02/28/washingtons-positive-feedback-money-loop/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>A strange thing is going on in the flow of money into Washington politicians' coffers these days -- most of it is going to the Democrats.  While Democrats and Republicans alike have noticed this effect (to their respective joy and horror), nobody ever points out that the system itself is designed around a fundamentally flawed principle: positive feedback.  This may be part of the inherent nature of the system, meaning any proposals to fix it are going to be a radical re-thinking of the whole campaign donation system.  But the process itself needs more attention, I think.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2008/02/28/washingtons-positive-feedback-money-loop/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Debate Questions I&#039;d Like To Ask</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2008/02/25/debate-questions-id-like-to-ask/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2008/02/25/debate-questions-id-like-to-ask/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 22:41:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Bill of Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2008/02/25/debate-questions-id-like-to-ask/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Because watching a televised debate is really the only chance most voters have to see the candidates answer questions and have to think on their feet in a live format.  Which means that the more debates that happen, the more people get to see the candidates.  And that is indeed a good thing, because it informs the electorate about the candidates to a certain degree.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2008/02/25/debate-questions-id-like-to-ask/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Born Again, Or Born Democrat?</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2008/02/19/born-again-or-born-democrat/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2008/02/19/born-again-or-born-democrat/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2008 22:26:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Bill of Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2008/02/19/born-again-or-born-democrat/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>There are two different aspects of voter demographics and the media worth commenting on in the presidential race this year.  The first, about the Republicans, the media has so far largely ignored (but may pick up on later); and the second, about the Democrats, where the media itself seems to be the problem.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2008/02/19/born-again-or-born-democrat/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [19] -- A &quot;Rare Uprising&quot; Of Democrats</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2008/02/15/friday-talking-points-19-a-rare-uprising-of-democrats/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2008/02/15/friday-talking-points-19-a-rare-uprising-of-democrats/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2008 23:41:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign Ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Talking Points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Bill of Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2008/02/15/friday-talking-points-19-a-rare-uprising-of-democrats/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>It's been a busy week for Democrats, with a lot to cover.  There has been good news and bad, but on a whole I'd have to judge the week a success for Democrats in general.  Led by what the <em>Washington Post</em> reports as a "<a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/02/14/AR2008021403940.html">rare uprising</a>" of House Democrats.  But before I get to that, I'd like to offer one observation from the campaign trail.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2008/02/15/friday-talking-points-19-a-rare-uprising-of-democrats/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pathetic Senate Democrats</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2008/02/12/pathetic-senate-democrats/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2008/02/12/pathetic-senate-democrats/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2008 00:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Bill of Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2008/02/12/pathetic-senate-democrats/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>All hope is not lost, though.  Because the House passed a version of the bill which did not include the retroactive amnesty for lawbreaking telecommunications companies.  Because the Senate bill is different, it now goes to conference committee.  What gets voted out of committee will be voted on again by both the House and Senate.  It's a slim reed to cling to at this point, but hopefully House Democrats will stand firm against Bush and the GOP.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2008/02/12/pathetic-senate-democrats/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>54</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [18]</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2008/02/08/friday-talking-points-18/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2008/02/08/friday-talking-points-18/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2008 23:57:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Talking Points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Bill of Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2008/02/08/friday-talking-points-18/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>And one more thing to drive a wedge between McCain and his party -- both Clinton and Obama should begin questioning John McCain's position on torture.  This backs him into a corner, because he's (obviously, and with good reason) against it, but his base feels differently about it.  Forcing him to talk about it, after the Bush administration this week admitted that it had waterboarded prisoners, is an excellent way to weaken him even further with the GOP base right now.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2008/02/08/friday-talking-points-18/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>18</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [17]</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2008/02/01/friday-talking-points-17/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2008/02/01/friday-talking-points-17/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Feb 2008 01:18:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign Ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Talking Points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Bill of Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2008/02/01/friday-talking-points-17/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>This column is dedicated to the idea that Democrats can learn to use talking points as effectively as Republicans often do.  This idea annoys many who feel that Democrats using talking points is degrading, and stoops to Republican tactics; a position I don't agree with, but still respect.  But sometimes even I have to take Democrats to task for not backing up such talking points with action, or at the very least a plan of action.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2008/02/01/friday-talking-points-17/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Edwards Leads, Clinton And Obama Are Absent</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2008/01/24/edwards-leads-clinton-and-obama-are-absent/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2008/01/24/edwards-leads-clinton-and-obama-are-absent/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2008 00:46:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Bill of Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2008/01/24/edwards-leads-clinton-and-obama-are-absent/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>John Edwards today came out strongly in support of <a href="http://www.salon.com/opinion/greenwald/2008/01/24/rockefeller/index.html">Chris Dodd's fight</a> against Harry Reid in the Senate over giving telecommunications companies immunity for breaking the wiretapping laws.  To be fair, Dodd is the one leading on the issue, but he has dropped out of the race for president, so he deserves the leadership honors on the issue.  But among the three leading candidates for the Democratic nomination, only Edwards is even speaking about the issue.  Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama, as of this writing, don't have any press releases up on their web pages on the issue, one way or the other.  Both of them are out on the campaign trail rather than in the Senate to cast votes on the issue.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2008/01/24/edwards-leads-clinton-and-obama-are-absent/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [15] -- De-Bushification</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2008/01/18/friday-talking-points-15-de-bushification/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2008/01/18/friday-talking-points-15-de-bushification/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jan 2008 01:00:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cartoons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Talking Points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Humor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Name-dropping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Bill of Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2008/01/18/friday-talking-points-15-de-bushification/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>I apologize in advance for the disjointed nature of this week's column.  There are a lot of odds and ends to cover, including tomorrow's primary picks, a cartoon, and the usual awards and talking points.</p>
<p>But the first of these ends is definitely odd: is it just my imagination, or did Charles Krauthammer (of all people) read <a href="http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2008/01/16/framing-mlk-and-lbj/">my earlier column</a> before writing <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/01/17/AR2008011702239.html?hpid=opinionsbox1">his own</a>?  You be the judge.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2008/01/18/friday-talking-points-15-de-bushification/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Waiting For Leadership From Clinton And Obama</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2008/01/17/waiting-for-leadership-from-clinton-and-obama/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2008/01/17/waiting-for-leadership-from-clinton-and-obama/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2008 00:21:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Bill of Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2008/01/17/waiting-for-leadership-from-clinton-and-obama/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>So.  The question is: will Hillary Clinton and/or Barack Obama stand up for Dodd?  Will they filibuster right alongside him?  Will they show leadership within their own party (all the players except Bush in this fight are Democrats)?  Or will they wait until they see which way the political winds are blowing and sneak in during the last minutes of a roll call to cast a "safe" vote?  Hillary?  Do you support telecom immunity for illegally wiretapping American citizens?  How about you, Barack?  Do you support this?  You are both still in the Senate.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2008/01/17/waiting-for-leadership-from-clinton-and-obama/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bursting Bush&#039;s Bubble, One ACLU Case At A Time</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2008/01/15/bursting-bushs-bubble-one-aclu-case-at-a-time/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2008/01/15/bursting-bushs-bubble-one-aclu-case-at-a-time/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2008 16:05:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Free Speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Bill of Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2008/01/15/bursting-bushs-bubble-one-aclu-case-at-a-time/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Immediately after being sworn in for his first term as president, Bush got into his limousine for the inaugural parade from the Capitol to the White House.  This is traditionally a triumphant event, complete with cheering crowds.  Some presidents even walk the route, since it is not that great a distance.  But in January of 2001, the sidewalks of Pennsylvania Avenue were lined with 20,000 protesters who were angry with the outcome of the election.  Even from within his speeding limo, Bush doubtlessly heard people screaming at him and saw the obscene gestures made... and he could not have failed to notice that at least one person hit his vehicle with a well-thrown egg.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2008/01/15/bursting-bushs-bubble-one-aclu-case-at-a-time/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [14]</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2008/01/11/friday-talking-points-14/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2008/01/11/friday-talking-points-14/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jan 2008 00:01:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Talking Points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Name-dropping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Bill of Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2008/01/11/friday-talking-points-14/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Now, you may think me delusional for suggesting this, but perhaps Hillary Clinton's advisers are fans of this column.  Maybe she herself was browsing <em>Huffington Post</em> last Friday.  You be the judge.  The following is the advice I offered Hillary in <a href="http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2008/01/04/friday-talking-points-vol-13-all-election-edition/">last week's column</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>The whole inevitability thing didn't work out the way it was supposed to.  Likewise the electability thing.  "Change" may gain ground, now that it's the official buzzword of '08, but the change Clinton really needs to make is in her style.  The campaign is now about emotion, and Hillary needs to get back to the point where she was earlier in the contest, when she was actually showing a decent amount of emotion and connecting with her crowds on a personal level.  The wonky "I'll be ready on day one," and reciting lists of <em>reasons</em> why she should be nominated needs to change to actually connecting with people <em>emotionally</em> in the final stretch.</p></blockquote>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2008/01/11/friday-talking-points-14/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Republican Realignment In 2008?</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2007/12/27/republican-realignment-in-2008/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2007/12/27/republican-realignment-in-2008/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Dec 2007 01:22:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Name-dropping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Bill of Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2007/12/27/republican-realignment-in-2008/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>While predicting the future of the Democratic Party is usually a futile exercise due to the inherent "herding cats" nature of the party, predicting the future of the Republican Party is usually pretty easy to do.  So easy, it's boring.  Which is why I normally shy away from the subject.</p>
<p>But 2008 is going to be a watershed year for the Republican Party, because they seem to be having their own set of factionalist problems.  Which means the fortunes of the GOP will be a lot more interesting than usual next year.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2007/12/27/republican-realignment-in-2008/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>My &quot;McLaughlin Awards&quot; For 2007 [Part 1]</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2007/12/21/my-mclaughlin-awards-for-2007-part-1/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2007/12/21/my-mclaughlin-awards-for-2007-part-1/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2007 22:41:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2006 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Humor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iran]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Name-dropping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Bill of Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2007/12/21/my-mclaughlin-awards-for-2007-part-1/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>For those of you who have been reading this column long enough, you may remember a fun set of columns (<a href="http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2006/12/27/my-mclaughlin-awards-for-2006-part-1/">Part 1</a> and <a href="http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2006/12/28/my-mclaughlin-awards-for-2006-part-2/">Part 2</a>) I wrote last year, giving my picks for the annual tongue-in-cheek awards handed out by the <a href="http://www.mclaughlin.com/"><em>McLaughlin Group</em></a> television show.</p>
<p>Because I had so much fun doing it last year, I present for your amusement, agreement, and/or rage my selections for this year's awards.  This is a two-week event, so check back here next Friday for Part 2.</p>
<p>As always when this column hands out awards, our eminent jury consists of me, my wife, and our cat (who breaks ties with her vote).  So I wouldn't take it too seriously.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2007/12/21/my-mclaughlin-awards-for-2007-part-1/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [Vol. 12]</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2007/12/14/friday-talking-points-vol-12/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2007/12/14/friday-talking-points-vol-12/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Dec 2007 01:48:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Talking Points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Name-dropping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Bill of Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2007/12/14/friday-talking-points-vol-12/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>It's been a busy week, so forgive me if I don't get to everything today.  Part of the reason is the absolute congressional snowstorm of bills moving on the Hill both this week and next, as Congress prepares to scarper off on yet another extended vacation.</p>
<p>I'll do a better tally of all these last-minute efforts when the dust settles next week, I promise.  But for now, I'd like to pause for a minute to reflect on the past year of Democratic majority rule in Congress.  Putting aside legislative issues, and even putting aside the war for the moment, one thing many partisan Democrats were hoping for this year was some scalps nailed to the wall.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2007/12/14/friday-talking-points-vol-12/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Church And State Revisited: The Story Of Smoot</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2007/12/10/church-and-state-revisited-the-story-of-smoot/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2007/12/10/church-and-state-revisited-the-story-of-smoot/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2007 02:10:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Bill of Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2007/12/10/church-and-state-revisited-the-story-of-smoot/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>It's only from the outside looking in that "religion" is funny.  Members of that religion consider their own rites normal and proper.  We'd all do well to remember that, presidential candidates included.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2007/12/10/church-and-state-revisited-the-story-of-smoot/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&quot;Anti-Terror&quot; Centers&#039; Mission Creep</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2007/11/29/anti-terror-centers-mission-creep/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2007/11/29/anti-terror-centers-mission-creep/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2007 00:35:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Bill of Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2007/11/29/anti-terror-centers-mission-creep/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Eileen Sullivan of the Associated Press wrote a shocking story this week, to which little attention is being paid.  That's a shame, because it details how the effort to fight "terrorism" in America is being morphed into something else entirely.  Federal dollars which are supposed to go to anti-terrorism are being used by the states pretty much any way they feel.  The Bush administration gave the money to the states with no guidelines as to how to spend it, so it's really not even the states' fault that they decided to use the money how they saw fit.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2007/11/29/anti-terror-centers-mission-creep/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ministry Of Truth Helpfully Redefines Privacy</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2007/11/12/ministry-of-truth-helpfully-redefines-privacy/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2007/11/12/ministry-of-truth-helpfully-redefines-privacy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2007 23:54:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Bill of Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2007/11/12/ministry-of-truth-helpfully-redefines-privacy/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>A United States Ministry of Truth spokesman proudly unveiled the new official definition of "privacy" today, on the heels of their successful campaign to redefine "torture."  The new meaning of the word "privacy" will now be (according to MiniTru): "the secure feeling citizens get by knowing that their government is collecting <em>and protecting</em> their personal data."  Old definitions of privacy will no longer be operative.</p>
<p>The MiniTru spokesman was quite enthusiastic about the definition rollout.  "For generations Americans have been burdened by the responsibility of guarding their own privacy," he said. "This was too great a task for the public to adequately control, so the logical answer was to have the government take over this onerous work, to better serve each citizen's private life.  No longer will Americans have to worry about their own privacy, because now Big Brother will take care of it for them."</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2007/11/12/ministry-of-truth-helpfully-redefines-privacy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [Vol. 8]</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2007/11/02/friday-talking-points-vol-8/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2007/11/02/friday-talking-points-vol-8/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Nov 2007 00:18:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Talking Points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Bill of Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2007/11/02/friday-talking-points-vol-8/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>So, according to Bush, you're a Nazi appeaser if you refuse to confirm someone as our highest law enforcement officer who will use Nazi tactics against our prisoners.  Or something.  Let me try again -- you're not against Nazis strongly enough if you don't allow me to behave like a Nazi and torture anyone I want.  Boggles the mind, doesn't it?  Like I said, it's hard to tell what he's thinking these days.</p>
<p>Anyway, remember you heard it here first: the <strong>Bush Doublethink Corollary to Godwin's Law</strong>.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2007/11/02/friday-talking-points-vol-8/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Two National Security Anomalies</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2007/11/01/two-national-security-anomalies/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2007/11/01/two-national-security-anomalies/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 01:04:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Bill of Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2007/11/01/two-national-security-anomalies/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The Bush administration is pushing a narrative on national security issues (and has been for some time now) which can be summed up as: "Trust us, we know what we're doing -- and we're doing it to keep you safe."  Two facets of this issue are on the front burner this week: warrantless wiretapping and torture (or as they put it "extraordinary interrogation techniques," one of many euphemisms they've trotted out).  But what seems to be lost in the debate are two data points that just don't fit in with their pre-packaged narrative.  And, once again, the mainstream media are largely ignoring these points since they'd have to... you know... commit an act of journalism to confront them squarely.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2007/11/01/two-national-security-anomalies/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>D&#039;oh!  House GOP Website Pirates Simpsons Images?</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2007/10/24/doh-house-gop-website-pirates-simpsons-images/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2007/10/24/doh-house-gop-website-pirates-simpsons-images/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2007 10:47:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cartoons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Free Speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Humor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Name-dropping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Other]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Bill of Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2007/10/24/doh-house-gop-website-pirates-simpsons-images/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p align="center"><img src='http://www.chrisweigant.com/blog/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2007/10/quimby.jpg' alt='Quimby' />&#160;&#160;&#160;<img src='http://www.chrisweigant.com/blog/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2007/10/mrburns.jpg' alt='CMBurns' />
<br /><strong>[<em>Mayor "Diamond" Joe Quimby and tycoon C. Montgomery Burns</em>]</strong></p>
<p>You may well wonder why I, a (mostly) serious political analyst, begin my weekly Wednesday column with the images of two <em>Simpsons</em> characters.  The answer is: these two images <em>are</em> the story.  More on that in a bit.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2007/10/24/doh-house-gop-website-pirates-simpsons-images/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [Vol. 6]</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2007/10/19/friday-talking-points-vol-6/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2007/10/19/friday-talking-points-vol-6/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Oct 2007 00:15:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Talking Points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iran]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Name-dropping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Bill of Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2007/10/19/friday-talking-points-vol-6/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Senator Chris Dodd wins the inaugural MIDOTW award for showing <a href="http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2007/10/18/chris-dodd-shows-some-spine/">how Democrats are supposed to behave</a>.  He has tossed down the gauntlet on the wiretapping bill working its way through the Senate, and will put a "hold" on any bill which comes out of committee that provides amnesty for telecommunications companies which have broken wiretapping laws in the past by cooperating with Big Brother and just meekly handing over data without a warrant to compel them.</p>
<p>Well done Senator Dodd!  The first ever Golden Backbone is yours in a landslide!</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2007/10/19/friday-talking-points-vol-6/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>15</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Chris Dodd Shows Some Spine</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2007/10/18/chris-dodd-shows-some-spine/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2007/10/18/chris-dodd-shows-some-spine/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2007 00:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Bill of Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2007/10/18/chris-dodd-shows-some-spine/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Senator Chris Dodd doesn't get a lot of press attention even though he's running for the Democratic nomination for president.  This may be about to change, as Senator Dodd has just announced he is putting a "hold" on the FISA bill being considered by various Senate committees.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2007/10/18/chris-dodd-shows-some-spine/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
