That YOU posted this is so rich that it has to be fattening! You worship at the zipper of the biggest liar to ever hold public office. You, yourself, lie about your own work history and only got caught because you could not keep your lies straight. So by your own reasoning here, we should simply ignore ANYTHING you post!

HUNDREDS of cops were willing to testify that it was Congressional leadership and their unpreparedness and incompetence that actually was the cause of the 6 Jan riot..

You are claiming that those officers who stood up to the failed insurrection on January 6th believe that it was their own unpreparedness and incompetence that actually was the cause of the 6 Jan riot ?!?!

REALLY? The police caused the crowds to storm the Capitol and try to stop the EC count from being finalized? I would have thought that you’d blame BLM for causing the riots before you would try to blame the police; but clearly your subservience to Trump is worse than I originally believed.

Which simply PROVES beyond ANY doubt..

The entire 6JC is NOTHING but *ONE* side of the story...

You sure are proud of yourself for coming up with the whole Cardassian Show Trial analogy…but it makes absolutely no sense! This 6JC is not a trial court. They are presenting their investigations’ findings to the public… of course it is one sided! They are presenting their findings. You do not seem to understand the difference between a “trial” and a “hearing”.

Again, NOT FACTUALLY ACCURATE...

Secret Service Is Reportedly Prepared to Testify Trump Didn’t Try to Commandeer Limo on Jan. 6, Despite Hutchinson Account

Of course they will testify that Trump did not try to commandeer his limo on January 6…they were in an SUV. Whoever came up with that headline did so very intentionally.

Soo desperate, ain'tcha... :D

you speak from hate... Pure and simple, you speak from HATE.. And your hate blinds ya'all to the FACTS.. And to reality.. **

Yer not going to succeed.. I simply will not allow it.

Ya'all hate SOOO much and WANT SOOO MUCH to believe that you'll swallow ANY BS story without even a SEMBLANCE of critical thinking... **

But by all means.. Continue to try....

Your response is so much bullshit..

I get it.. yer embarrassed that you got taken AGAIN. Your hate blinded yo to REALITY..

I understand and I pity you... **

It really is funny.... :D

But this lame and inane attempt to equivocate and mitigate just makes it all worse..

Admit ya scroo'ed up.. Ya hate and hoped so much and it blew up in your face...

That's the long and short of those whole sad debacle..

Ya'all hate SOOO much and ya'all wanted to to be factually SOOOO much...

And it blew up in yer faces...

Pure and simple.. **

_______________________

** These responses to your perpetual whining were brought to you by YOU... copied from the same page (see above). If you're going to dish it out, then quit your crying and man up and prepare to take it... with the exception of persons who can spell simple English words, compose sentences that aren't fragments, form sentences into paragraphs, and aren't a perpetual mewling pussy like you.

mewl
[myo?ol]

VERB
(especially of a baby) cry feebly or querulously; whimper:
"a baby boy softly mewls"
synonyms: whimper * cry * whine * squall * pule

* (of a cat or bird) make a high-pitched crying noise; mew:
"a forlorn cat mewled pathetically"
synonyms: meow * yowl * cry

I love it. :)

this t-shirt

shouldn't get you in too much trouble with your customers.

Yer not going to succeed.. I simply will not allow it.

But by all means.. Continue to try....

It really is funny.... :D

Hope my flight isn't cancelled. :)

You are SOOOO desperate to bring flame wars back to Weigantia, ain't ya Kick... :D

Said the commenter who hasn't stopped hurling insults toward others individually and never ceased spewing disparaging remarks toward everyone here preceded by the word "ya'all"... as if it's some kind of magic word that causes the prattling aspersions toward the group as a whole to somehow not have occurred.

Yer desperation is SOOO pathetic and obvious... :D

Nice bit of introspective projection from the commenter who keeps getting caught in his own loop.

It amuses me to see you grovel soo much... :D

So you're saying you're amused and therefore the anecdotal evidence of your divertissement means that neither Bashi nor anyone else could possibly be bored? Duh.

So, to recap:

If you break your leg, don't come running to me. :)

Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez criticized the Supreme Court decision
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/aoc-supreme-court-epa-ruling-power-plant-emissions-catastrophic

Awwwww... Poor lil Occasional Cortex has her knickers in a twist..

Sorry kid.. You hysterical and ludicrous Global Warming agenda is on the trash heap.. Right with Roe v Wade and Democrat Eugenics v Casey and yer "assault rifle" ban...

Waaaaa Waaaaaa.... :D

Keep trying.. It cracks me up... :D

Love the continued name-checks.. :D

Field of battle.. :D

I make a simple comment about infants, and guess who whines and mewls in response? :)

BBBWWAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA :D

Yer desperation is SOOO pathetic and obvious... :D

It amuses me to see you grovel soo much... :D

Your being here puts lie to the claim that you're bored..

So you actually believe that somebody can't be here and be bored simultaneously? Well then, you must not be reading your own comments.

"I hate it when I have to spell it out.."

It can be definitely infinitely boring to watch your flailing attempts at spelling. :)

Uh...so? I was also here when you went in to a pout and took your ball else where.

Crying is an important way for infants to communicate. :)

Yep Yep yep....

I read my post at [22] again and need to clarify what I was trying to say because it's as clear as mud.

Not refuted at the time by the person who was actually in the vehicle who was actually there when it was relayed to her a short time after the incident: Tony Ornato.

This should read (edits in bold):

Not refuted at the time by the person who was actually in the vehicle who was actually there when it was relayed to her a short time after the incident by Tony Ornato.

And to clarify:

But back to the incident in the vehicle, perhaps the story was embellished when it was relayed to Cassidy by the SS, but Agent Tony Ornato (eyewitness) was right there at the time and didn't dispute a single word of it.

Edits in bold:

But back to the incident in the vehicle, perhaps the story was embellished when it was relayed to Cassidy by the SS Agent Tony Ornato but Engle (eyewitness) was right there at the time and didn't dispute a single word of it.

So, to recap and clarify:

(1) Ornato relayed the story to Hutchinson.

(2) Engle was the eyewitness who was in the vehicle and didn't dispute a single word of what Ornato relayed to Hutchinson (per her testimony).

_____________

That's what I get for speaking swiftly and then posting without proofreading.

Caffeine is calling my name. :)

https://www.foxnews.com/media/biden-hastily-ends-press-conference-reporters-shout-questions-im-out-here

What a lame-assed leader Biden is..

It's no wonder the Democrat Party is going down in flames.... :eyeroll:

Yep yep yep..

Would that be The Black Knight school of rhetoric?

Heh. :)

Say something that proves without doubt that you're not the Jack Reacher-type super cop you keep claiming to be.

52

Field of battle.. :D

You obviously haven't read any of Kick's comments to and about me, eh?? :D

Cry more. :)

Say something that proves without doubt that you're not the Jack Reacher-type super cop you keep claiming to be.

The USSS agents have publicly stated that they are willing to testify to the Cardassian Show Trial AKA the 6JC...

But the question is, will the Cardassians SEAT the witnesses??

Thank you for your cooperation.

Ornato and Engle have already testified under penalty of perjury to the Committee. You don't suppose the Committee would like to give them a chance to come back in order to clear up some discrepancies in their sworn testimony and to maybe confirm some other big details that are not so minor as the vehicle incident, do you? Rhetorical question. They were practically begging them, you know. :)

No.. That's what YA'ALL are saying about President Trump..

I am simply applying YA'ALL's standards to this Hutichison bimbo...

See how that works?? :eyeroll:

If she lied about the big things (which it's documented she did) she has no credibility for ANY of it..

So you're saying Trump has no credibility for "ANY of it" since it's documented under oath that Trump lied about winning the 2020 election after being informed repeatedly by multiple persons and in multiple different ways that he lost... you know, the "BIG LIE."

It's so cute to watch y'all chase your tails about that vehicle incident when it's been proven under penalty of perjury Trump was involved in a conspiracy to delay the certification of Biden (illegal), strong-arm state officials to "find" votes (Georgia, taped conversation) and to put forth their own slates of fake electors (multiple states, illegal) and send fake certificates to the National Archives (illegal), conspire with others to summon a mob to Washington on a specific date in order to direct them toward the capitol to impede the mandated constitutional work of Congress (illegal) in order to undermine America's democracy... and you actually just claimed the incident in the vehicle is "big." :)

Yep.. yep... yep...

Of course she didn't try to corroborate..

Cheney KNEW it was a bullshit claim...

Your being here puts lie to the claim that you're bored..

"I hate it when I have to spell it out.."

For the life of me I can't recall what that's from..

I picture Alan Rickman, but can't recall the movie...

It's gonna drive me batty

You truly are the Black Knight of rhetoric. Yawn.

Non-seditionists...

Bullshit.. She claimed FIRST PERSON eyewitness status... The moderator here STATED such...

I see you are still confused regarding the simple English verbiage. Here, let me help you:

Hutchinson then reported a conversation she had had with a Secret Service agent after everyone got back to the White House.

~ Chris Weigant (see yesterday's blog post)

*
Reading is fundamental.

It appears you're spending hour upon hour and are still confused about this. The very least I could do is help you out. You're welcome.

Also (from yesterday's commentary):

It appears you missed the part where she also testified that the person who was in the vehicle with Trump (eyewitness) was present at the time and did not dispute a single word of what she was told.

IE Hearsay....

Not refuted at the time by the person who was actually in the vehicle who was actually there when it was relayed to her a short time after the incident: Tony Ornato.

Anthony "Tony" Ornato worked as Trump's security detail leader, the number one guy protecting him. Trump liked this Secret Service agent Ornato so much that he gave him a political job in the White House... which broke every Secret Service tradition in the book about fraternizing. Ornato remained a Secret Service employee while Trump also employed him politically to direct the Secret Service at Trump's campaign events, political rallies, and photo opportunities, including the forcible clearing of peaceful protesters from Lafayette Square.

Ornato denied that Lafayette Square was cleared of peaceful protesters for a preplanned photo op; this is a lie. Anyone who thinks Ivanka carries around a very large Bible in her purse all the time and just so happened to have it on hand for Daddy to foist into the air (upside down like a fool)... I got a bridge to sell you. Ornato was at the center of the planning of that Trump photo op at the church.

But back to the incident in the vehicle, perhaps the story was embellished when it was relayed to Cassidy by the SS, but Agent Tony Ornato (eyewitness) was right there at the time and didn't dispute a single word of it.

What isn't in dispute is that Trump was irate when the SS wouldn't allow him to join the mob he just sent to the capitol telling them to "fight like hell," which was a preplanned conspiracy that included Trump who was fully briefed and absolutely 100% aware at the time he sent them that they were armed and dangerous. Very helpful if you're one of the multiple police officers suing Trump for monetary and punitive damages that he was most definitely directly involved in causing, but I digress.

As anyone paying attention to all the testimony could observe, the Committee obviously wants to question White House Counsel; they've played that video testimony of Kushner multiple times wherein he used the term "whiners" to describe White House counsellors. They obviously also want to get these SS agents back in under oath, and they also obviously know more already and clearly know what they're doing. Because while everyone is chasing their tails denying the SS Agent's retelling of the story to Cassidy Hutchinson, they will be, in point of fact, confirming other things that they appear to left out when they swore to tell the "whole truth" under penalty of perjury and/or refused to testify at all. You see, there is no such thing as "privilege" when crimes are being committed, and Cassidy Hutchinson was an eyewitness to White House counsel claiming over and over the illegality of multiple things.

At the end of the last hearing, the Committee dangled the fact that they are well aware that witnesses are being tampered with (illegal, obstruction of justice) and proffered multiple instances of proof. I would wager that those who illegally tampered with witnesses (and they know who they are), are being informed there's still time to clear up their inconsistencies and outright lies under penalty of perjury.

As Speak2 so rightly noted in yesterday's commentary:

He [Congressman Thompson] followed up by taunting the outlier witnesses for not testifying or pleading the fifth. The truth will out.

To paraphrase again, if anyone suddenly starts remembering or if anyone finds some courage that had been in hiding, the Committee's doors are open.

That was a beautiful bit of, what's the right word? Is it trolling? Snark? It's something and it was righteously vicious!!!

*
That is dead on accurate, Speak2, and the word you were looking for was "warning." Congressman Thompson is telling them that the Committee is well aware there are those who swore under penalty of perjury to tell "the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth"... but who didn't quite live up to their oath, but there is still time to remedy that felony... but WARNING, that window is closing. :)

Not factually accurate..

The GOP was given the opportunity to chose the same kind of morons that are Trump/America haters..

They refused to join the Cardassians...

THAT's the fact..

Your team was give the opportunity for equal representation on the committee and very specifically turned it down. I have zero sympathy. Zero.

Would that be The Black Knight school of rhetoric?

I was wrong on Biden v Texas...... I guess it was bound to happen eventually that I would be wrong..

https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/21pdf/21-954_7l48.pdf

Oh well... Doesn't dampen my mood at all.. :D

https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/21pdf/20-1530_n758.pdf

Chevron is still intact..

But Democrats Global Warming agenda is dead..

WOOT!!!!!

No bombshell... No smoking gun..

Life is good.. :D

No.. She lied..

She stated that she wrote some kind of note or narrative or release..

The FACTS show that the message was written by someone else..

She LIED...

Period...

You can wish that, but it's not very realistic.

It would be if it was a GOP'er that Democrats didn't like who lied....

Just the old double standard...

I'd agree to THAT even if it turns out to be, in your parlance, 1000% factually accurate.

Not lied, reported on hearsay, the veracity of which has YET to be ascertained by any under oath testimony. that IS a fact.

taints and discredits EVERYTHING she says..

You can wish that, but it's not very realistic.

Everyone else did..

So would you agree that it's not a bombshell??

Especially given the fact that a LOT of it was a lie...

I know you don't want to believe that... But it's a fact..

And, conversely, I understand why ya'all want this "bombshell" to be more than it is..

It's a dud... The facts PROVE it's a dud..

ALL ya'all have for a FACT is that President Trump was angry that Democrats cheated..

Big whoop...

But the FACTS are on my side.. As is usually the case.. :D

For most of the events to which she testified under oath, that is accurate. She was backstage during the speech, and in the west wing afterward. The one aspect of the testimony that's in serious doubt is the report of what she was told, i.e. hearsay. As any kid who's ever played telephone can tell you, messages can get skewed between multiple tellings. I understand why you want that to be more than it is, but that's not rational, it's just as much trump derangement as for who want to treat it like a smoking gun.

jl

I am sure you would.. :D

But "derangement" has negative connotations so it's not really applicable for those who fervently support all the good that President Trump has done..

January 6 being a case in point

The Russia Collusion Delusion is a much better example..

But the 6JC is a good example of PTDS as well...

Wanna lay bets on how many red-shirts bite the dust??? :D

Oh, and... Good morning Jean Luc... :D

Good morning. This is not a field of battle, it's a field of discussion.

You obviously haven't read any of Kick's comments to and about me, eh?? :D

I'll try to sift through the shell casings and find an argument i can respond to.

Sure... Sift thru the facts.. :D I'll be around.. :D

It’s like holding a hearing to find out whether Johnny Depp was guilty or not but only presenting Amber Heard’s side. Those of us who watched the whole trial know the evidence presented destroyed Heard’s case.

Cassidy Hutchins’ testimony is somewhat reminiscent of Amber Heard’s. It is sincere but overly dramatic. She’s pretty, with a husky voice, and definitely someone most people would want to believe. But of course, her story is starting to fall apart.

You might wonder why would she risk her career to lie under oath? Why would Heard have done it? In Heard’s case, she believed she was going to win the trial because in the wake of the Me Too era, there was no such thing as a defense against an accusation of abuse or rape. For Hutchins, she essentially had no career left. Trump would not hire her after he left office. Her resume wasn’t going to get her much work. Ah, but to be a star witness for the Left she’ll get the Liz Cheney treatment. She’ll get a golden ticket into the land of the special people, the ruling class, MSNBC. She might even make the cover of TIME.

She’s a hero now. She can go on Rachel Maddow’s show. She will be praised to the high heavens by people like Rob Reiner and Stephen Colbert. Hey, even Barbra Streisand is out there singing her praises. This, as opposed to starting out her political career as Mark Meadows’ aide. She would be tainted forever. Now, she’s a star.

Exactly...

The entire 6JC is NOTHING but *ONE* side of the story..

The Trump/America haters' side..

It's EXACTLY like a Cardassian Trial....

ONLY the state's case is presented and guilt is pre-determined...

I actually hope SCOTUS wannabe Garland DOES try and prosecute President Trump..

Because NOTHING would guarantee President Trump's re-election by landslide MORE than Garland prosecuting President Trump and President Trump WINNNING...

AGAIN...

And ya'all just HAVE to know that President Trump will win..

Because, while Democrats and Trump America haters have the upper hand in this Cardassian Show Trial...

When the proceedings are moved into a REAL Federation Court, A> the *OTHER* side of the story will be heard and B> the ONE side that has already been presented can be torn apart and mutilated with the FACTS...

So, yea... SCOTUS Wannabe Garland... Go ahead..

Prosecute President Trump on this flimsy and bigoted Cardassian so-called "evidence"...

I double dog DARE you to do it!!!

OK... NOW the mic is open.. :D

I'll try to sift through the shell casings and find an argument i can respond to.

Any takers?? :D

Jan. 6 Hearings Look Like the Show Trials in Soviet Union

The Season Finale of Catch Trump if You Can

If there is one thing I learned watching the Johnny Depp and Amber Heard trial it’s this: you can’t just hear one side of the story.

Because of social media, apparently, convictions in the Court of Opinion have now replaced due process and the presumption of innocence. Had Depp never sued Heard, we would never have known Heard was the abuser.

The January 6th hearings look a lot more like the show trials in the Soviet Union under Stalin. Witnesses would only be called if they backed up the accusations made against various prisoners of course. They would be found guilty, of course, because dissent was not allowed, nor was a fair defense.

The point of show trials was to intimidate anyone who might consider thinking for themselves or seeing Stalin in a negative light. In our country now, journalists are expected to go along with whatever the state tells them is true. If they step out of line they will be viciously bullied on Twitter, forced to apologize or, in some cases, fired.
https://sashastone.substack.com/p/the-season-finale-of-catch-trump#details

Cardassian Show Trial is a MUCH better analogy because.. well.. It's Trek!! :D

But the season finale of this hollywood "blockbuster" was yesterday..

And it went over as well as the Series Finale of GAME OF THRONES..

It totally and irrevocably tainted and discredited then entire process...

Every "fact" the Cardassian Show Trial put forth is now called into question..

As with the Russia Collusion Delusion, there is no 'there' there... It's a huge NOTHING BURGER...

A rather apt ending of the 6JC given what happened to ya'all's Russia Collusion Delusion, eh?? :D

"Oh what a beautiful morning...
Oh what a beautiful day...
I've got a beautiful feeling....
Everything's going my way..."

And, in the non-racist and non-sexist world that Democrats CLAIM they want to live in...

The collective response to the above headline would be, "Yea?? So??"

Hypocrisy.. It's not a bug in Democrat programming. It's a feature.

If the SCOTUS rules broadly (which is the prevailing opinion that they will) this will likely have broader repercussions for the Democrat anti-America agenda than RvW...

Regardless of whether the SCOTUS rules narrowly and preserves Chevron or rules broadly and throws out Chevron...

The Democrat anti-America Global Warming agenda is history...

GONE BABY!!! :D

District Of Columbia used to be a MAY ISSUE district... In 2017, the lower courts in DC ruled that such MAY ISSUE status is unconstitutional...

So, DC became a SHALL ISSUE, a MUST ISSUE district..

The DC AG at the time allowed this to stand because he was afraid that, had he challenged it to the SCOTUS, the SCOTUS would rule in favor of the 2nd and Bruen would have become a reality nationwide 5 years earlier..

In short, the DC AG was smart and knew his limitations and the limitations of his political agenda...

Unfortunately, Democrats today have lost that ability to recognize their own limitations..

"A man's got to know his limitations!!"
-Clint Eastwood, MAGNUM FORCE

:D

Democrats today.. What a joke.. :D

Restoring the Founders’ right to bear arms
https://www.scotusblog.com/2022/06/restoring-the-founders-right-to-bear-arms/

Especially noteworthy...

This test resulted in nearly every challenged firearm restriction across the country being upheld during its 12-year reign. By the time Bruen was decided, with few exceptions, the lower courts had essentially limited the Second Amendment to protecting the possession of handguns in the home — the narrowest possible reading of District of Columbia v. Heller, which struck down prohibitions on handguns and functional firearms in the home. This incremental nullification of the Second Amendment led some judges to call it “the Rodney Dangerfield of the Bill of Rights.”

Despite several justices’ repeated objections, lower courts continued “resisting th[e] Court’s decisions” and treating “the Second Amendment as a disfavored right.” As Justice Samuel Alito noted in his Bruen concurrence, the Supreme Court saw how manipulatable the two-part test was the last time it agreed to review a Second Amendment case. In 2018, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 2nd Circuit upheld under the two-part test New York City’s law preventing residents from taking their handguns outside city limits. But once the Supreme Court granted cert, the city conceded that the law did not benefit public safety and repealed it to moot the case.

NY Officials knew that they had frak'ed up and, as Democrats are wont to do, way WAY overreached..

In a futile bid at damage control, Democrats rescinded the law that prompted the SCOTUS granted cert. hoping that the court would allow their "Never mind, we were just kidding" to go un-noticed..

"NO GOOD, THAT IS!!!"
-Robin Williams, LIVE AT THE MET

..replied the SCOTUS. You wanted this law adjudicated and by god we gonna adjudicate da bitch!!!! :D

Of course, the SCOTUS did not use those exact words.. :D

But it's a perfect example of one the BIGGEST problems that Democrats have..

They way WAY over-estimate their support and their capabilities and way WAY under-estimate the depth of opposition that every day patriotic Americans have against Democrats and their anti-America agenda..

With Dobbs and with Bruen.... The SCOTUS mightily slapped down Democrats and....

"....declared in one voice...

We will not go quietly into the night. We will not vanish without a fight. We’re going to live on. We’re going to survive. Today we celebrate our Independence Day!"
-President Whitmore, INDEPENDENCE DAY

HUZZAAAHHHH!!!

That's what I like about you, Joshua..

When push comes to shove, pragmatism takes precedence over ideology...

While that's true of everyone here, to a certain extent, it's especially noticeable with you.

"The Force is strong with this one."
-Darth Vader, STAR WARS IV, A New Hope

:D

if their democratic allies betray them, they should start moving their money to the GOP. they may be corrupt to the bone, but at least those folks deliver for their benefactors.

Sounds like something I would say.. :D

Michale.....
http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/05/22/guest-column-and-cartoon-teach-your-children-well/#comment-21822

Ahhhhh The good ole days...

Before the onset of President Trump Derangement Syndrome....

:D

When push comes to shove, pragmatism takes precedence over ideology...

While that's true of everyone here, to a certain extent, it's especially noticeable with you.

"The Force is strong with this one."
-Darth Vader, STAR WARS IV, A New Hope

:D

if their democratic allies betray them, they should start moving their money to the GOP. they may be corrupt to the bone, but at least those folks deliver for their benefactors.

Sounds like something I would say.. :D

Michale.....
http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/05/22/guest-column-and-cartoon-teach-your-children-well/#comment-21822

Ahhhhh The good ole days...

Before the onset of President Trump Derangement Syndrome....

:D

Is this going to be ANOTHER day where ya'all cede the field of battle to me??

AGAIN!!?? :(

I get it.. I really do.. The strength of ya'all's counter argument is in the toilet.. I understand that..

But we can still have fun!

We can talk Trek.. We can talk the new Dr Strange movie... Maybe BOSCH LEGACY...

Ya'll KNOW it's a bad idea to leave me to my own devices here...

Idle Hands and all that.. :D

Come out come out wherever you are... :D

Mayor Eric Adams is going to the scene of the shooting where the woman pushing a stroller was shot dead
https://www.foxnews.com/us/new-york-city-woman-pushing-stroller-upper-east-side-shot-dead

New York City...

A 3rd world warzone shithole.. :^/

Another PERFECT example of Democrats' BS and horrendous DEFUND, DEMORALIZE, DEMONIZE THE POLICE policies...

Democrats Are Fooling Themselves On The Popularity Of Abortion

One of the central justifications for the left’s proposed court-packing scheme is to claim that the reversal of Roe v. Wade is so radically out of step with the American public that it is an undemocratic, minoritarian power grab. Not only is the argument based on the unconstitutional notion that justices should weigh the vagaries of public opinion before ruling, but it also relies on the irreconcilable claim that empowering the public to vote on an issue unmentioned in the Constitution is an attack on “democracy.”

“54 Percent of Americans Oppose A National Law Codifying Roe.”

Baby Killing AKA Abortion is NOT going to be the mid-term savior that Democrats want it to be..

It's a simple FACT... Ya'all need to face reality.. :D

There are 2 big cases left to be resolved in the Supreme Court today..

West Virginia v. Environmental Protection Agency

This case is about the federal government's ability to create environmental regulations. The challengers are a group of 27 Republican attorneys general, many from states with traditions in the fossil fuel industry, including West Virginia.

Previous rulings have embraced the Chevron Doctrine which states, in part, that deference should be given to federal agencies in imposing rules and regulations..

This is especially important to Democrats because they want to impose their hysterical Global Warming agenda...

Chevron is on the chopping block today.. :D

The only REAL question is will the SCOTUS rule narrowly and preserve Chevron?? Or will the SCOTUS rule broadly and throw the Chevron Doctrine on the trash heap of history with Roe V Wade and Democrat Eugenics V Casey... :D

If the SCOTUS rules broadly (which is the prevailing opinion that they will) this will likely have broader repercussions for the Democrat anti-America agenda than RvW...

Biden v. Texas

This is the case that will decide whether President Trump's awesome and prescient REMAIN IN MEXICO policy will remain.. Biden's Handlers and Democrats have been wanting to erase President Trump's immigration policies even though Democrat town leaders along the border LOVE the policies..

I think it's an easy call as to which way the SCOTUS will go on this case.. :D The majority have signaled quite clearly that President Trump's immigration policies are good for America and they will likely rule for Texas...

So, two more wins for America and two more BRUTAL losses for Democrats and Trump/America haters.. :D Happy Happy Joy Joy!! :D

The fun begins at 1000hrs EDT and I, of course, will be spreading the glorious news!!

Work permitting, of course..

It's shaping up to be ANOTHER glorious and frabjous day!! :D

Jan. 6 panel effort to blame Trump for violence ignores pointed warnings Congress got much earlier

On New Year’s Eve, Capitol Police were warned protesters planned an “armed encampment” and would “hang corpses of Democrats” on Jan. 6. Other intelligence flagged potential for snipers.

With the help of a former junior White House aide, House Democrats on the Jan. 6 committee tried Tuesday to convince the public that former President Donald Trump and his team were aware of the potential for violence among armed protesters the day of the Capitol riot and ignored the security risks.

Their presentation, using the hearsay testimony of 25-year-old former presidential aide Cassidy Hutchison, for sure excited the news media.

But it could not obscure one stubborn fact that glaringly was ignored at the televised hearing: long before Hutchison overheard concerns inside the White House on Jan. 2 and Jan. 6, 2021, about guns and violence, the Capitol Police that reported to House Speaker Nancy Pelosi repeatedly received intelligence warnings about such possibilities and failed to increase security adequately or accept the Trump Pentagon’s offer for 10,000 or more National Guard troops.

Documents obtained Tuesday by Just the News from Capitol Police sources show the department received a pointed intelligence report on New Year’s Eve 2020 – a full week before the riot – that extremists planning to attend a rally earlier that day were discussing using guns, possibly in sniper attacks, and planning to violently storm the Capitol and hang Democratic members of Congress.
https://justthenews.com/government/congress/jan-6-panel-effort-tie-violence-trump-ignores-pointed-warnings-congress-got

The Cardassian Show trial won't allow ANY facts that don't support the pre-determined narrative..

JUST like a REAL Cardassian Show trial...

Garland ain't going to be basing ANY investigation on the Cardassian Show trial AKA the 6JC...

It's been proven to be a complete and utter farce and political witch hunt..

I know, I know.. Ya'all's hate compels you SOOOO much to want to see something that isn't there...

The Cardassian Show trial is irrevocably tainted and discredited..

Garland ain't gonna do crap with it...

Democrats and Trump/America haters lost..

AGAIN....

Read the ketchup on the wall; Trump is toast!

Yea, ya'all said that during the Russia Collusion delusion..

Ya'all were completely and utterly WRONG...

Ya'all said that during the 1st impeachment where Dumbocrats had to actually MAKE UP "crimes" to impeach President Trump over..

Ya'all were COMPLETELY AND UTTERLY WRONG...

Ya'all said the same thing during the 2nd impeachment..

Guess what happened?? Oh yea.. I remember.. Ya'all were WRONG.. AGAIN...

Again and again and again and again and again..

When it came to President Trump??

Ya'all were WRONG... As WRONG as WRONG can be.. :D

And you'll be WRONG again this time..

AND the next.. AND the next..

Yunno WHY ya'all are ALWAYS wrong??

Because you speak from hate... Pure and simple, you speak from HATE.. And your hate blinds ya'all to the FACTS.. And to reality..

This Hutchison bimbo's testimony is a PERFECT example..

Ya'all hate SOOO much and WANT SOOO MUCH to believe that you'll swallow ANY BS story without even a SEMBLANCE of critical thinking...

Right off the bat, ya'all should have realized that the grabbing the steering wheel claim was completely and utterly BOGUS...

It was not in The Beast, it was in one of their SUV’s.

Again, NOT FACTUALLY ACCURATE...

Secret Service Is Reportedly Prepared to Testify Trump Didn’t Try to Commandeer Limo on Jan. 6, Despite Hutchinson Account

Your response is so much bullshit, Russ..

I get it.. Like JL, yer embarrassed that you got taken AGAIN. Your Trump/America hate blinded you to REALITY..

I understand and I pity you...

But this lame and inane attempt to equivocate and mitigate just makes it all worse..

Admit ya scroo'ed up.. Ya hate and hoped so much and it blew up in your face...

That's the long and short of those whole sad debacle..

Ya'all hate SOOO much and ya'all wanted to to be factually SOOOO much...

And it blew up in yer faces...

Pure and simple..

But the question is, will the Cardassians SEAT the witnesses??

The Cardassians are on record as avoiding ANY witnesses that refuted the required narrative..

HUNDREDS of cops were willing to testify that it was Congressional leadership and their unpreparedness and incompetence that actually was the cause of the 6 Jan riot..

Of course, the 6JC refused to allow THOSE cops to testify...

So, will the committee seat ANY witness that refutes the predetermined narrative??

Betcha they won't..

Which simply PROVES beyond ANY doubt..

The 6JC is nothing but a Cardassian Show Trial...

Pure and simple...

If she lied about the big things (which it's documented she did) she has no credibility for ANY of it..

Except, of course, with those who WANT to believe it.

Those who would believe ANYTHING about President Trump as long as it's bad...

PTDS.... Such a sad sad disease... :eyeroll:

there's no documented evidence yet to contradict what Cassidy Hutchinson said, just a vague report that the secret service members who were present may testify to something different from her account.

Aww, com'on.. "Vague reports" my ass!!!

Hutchison's BS has been completely and utterly refuted..

The "bombshell" was a dud... Pure and simple..

about what happened in the limo on the way back from the speech on january 6th. the rest is her direct experience, and there's zero evidence contrary to any other part of her testimony.

And what was the "other part" of her testimony??

President Trump was angry.. President Trump had a temper..

Big whoop... :eyeroll:

you're entitled to hope that her evidence will be refuted in its entirety, but that doesn't seem likely. at worst (or at best from your perspective), someone told her a story they'd misheard.

Bullshit.. She claimed FIRST PERSON eyewitness status... The moderator here STATED such...

She lied about authoring a note...

I get it JL... Yer trying to mitigate and equivocate up the wazzoo.. I understand..

It's embarrassing that ya'all got taken in... It's a symptom of the PTDS.. I understand completely..

Ya'all feel as silly and as embarrassed as ya'all did when the Russia Collusion thing turned out to be such a HUGE NOTHING BURGER...

I get it.. I feel for ya, I really do...

But I am also embarrassed for ya'all..

Ya'all REALLY need to get yer PTDS under control..

This hysterical Trump/America hate simply CAN'T be healthy eh? :^/

And you know Ms Oliphant. That's Way Cooler.

no objection here. also i just read the entire comments section of that article. fascinating stuff, and many of the comments still stand up to scrutiny ten years later.

It feels like we're doing an SEC. Take three cheap wins and call our conference record the real thing. I'd be more OK if Wisconsin were on the schedule.

'tis i

I've been wondering about the Joshua tag for a bit (not enough to look too hard, but...)

OSU on the road? Two in a row, baby!!!