<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Friday Talking Points -- Selenofriggatriskaidekaphobia (Revisited)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/09/13/ftp542/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/09/13/ftp542/</link>
	<description>Reality-based political commentary</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 May 2026 01:45:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/09/13/ftp542/#comment-143953</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Sep 2019 21:15:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=17396#comment-143953</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;Mea culpa on my typing, but the only Weigantian who comes close to 24/7 politics is our resident troll.&lt;/I&gt;

As usual, not factually accurate..

I RARELY post after 2000hrs and am usually out of Weigantia for HOURS at a time..

Further, up until recently, I hadn&#039;t posted in over a month..

So, once again.. You have nothing but lame-assed bullshit..

And I have the facts..  :D

&lt;I&gt;Your meaning didn&#039;t go over my head,&lt;/I&gt;

Obviously it did..   :eyeroll:</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Mea culpa on my typing, but the only Weigantian who comes close to 24/7 politics is our resident troll.</i></p>
<p>As usual, not factually accurate..</p>
<p>I RARELY post after 2000hrs and am usually out of Weigantia for HOURS at a time..</p>
<p>Further, up until recently, I hadn't posted in over a month..</p>
<p>So, once again.. You have nothing but lame-assed bullshit..</p>
<p>And I have the facts..  :D</p>
<p><i>Your meaning didn't go over my head,</i></p>
<p>Obviously it did..   :eyeroll:</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TheStig</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/09/13/ftp542/#comment-143951</link>
		<dc:creator>TheStig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Sep 2019 20:57:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=17396#comment-143951</guid>
		<description>Stucki-

Mea culpa on my typing, but the only Weigantian who comes close to 24/7 politics is our resident troll.

Your meaning didn&#039;t go over my head, you threw whatever point you were trying to make into the bushes.  Center right is a political position....especially if you show enough interest to vote.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stucki-</p>
<p>Mea culpa on my typing, but the only Weigantian who comes close to 24/7 politics is our resident troll.</p>
<p>Your meaning didn't go over my head, you threw whatever point you were trying to make into the bushes.  Center right is a political position....especially if you show enough interest to vote.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kick</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/09/13/ftp542/#comment-143950</link>
		<dc:creator>Kick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Sep 2019 20:54:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=17396#comment-143950</guid>
		<description>dsws
226

&lt;i&gt;Forecasting isn&#039;t. Fussing about the details of what a politician did or didn&#039;t say? Yeah, that is. &lt;/i&gt;

How many times must it be said that the Birmingham office was unaware of the Moron-in-Chief&#039;s tweet when they made their forecast due to being inundated with calls and questions? Birmingham put out a correct forecast because otherwise it&#039;s their asses if people are harmed in the unnecessary preparation of their homes when they&#039;re not in the path of the hurricane in question. As I said, a weather forecast isn&#039;t political. It was Trump who whined like a little bitch about their correct forecast... not the other way around.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>dsws<br />
226</p>
<p><i>Forecasting isn't. Fussing about the details of what a politician did or didn't say? Yeah, that is. </i></p>
<p>How many times must it be said that the Birmingham office was unaware of the Moron-in-Chief's tweet when they made their forecast due to being inundated with calls and questions? Birmingham put out a correct forecast because otherwise it's their asses if people are harmed in the unnecessary preparation of their homes when they're not in the path of the hurricane in question. As I said, a weather forecast isn't political. It was Trump who whined like a little bitch about their correct forecast... not the other way around.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/09/13/ftp542/#comment-143949</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Sep 2019 20:41:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=17396#comment-143949</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;But yeah, feel free to blame the founders. It&#039;s flat-out amazing that they recognized 3 centuries ago that all the idiots in the nation would gravitate to the coasts.&lt;/I&gt;

heh.. Now THAT was funny.. :D

Hay.. Wait a tic.. *I* am on the coast!!!   :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>But yeah, feel free to blame the founders. It's flat-out amazing that they recognized 3 centuries ago that all the idiots in the nation would gravitate to the coasts.</i></p>
<p>heh.. Now THAT was funny.. :D</p>
<p>Hay.. Wait a tic.. *I* am on the coast!!!   :D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: C. R. Stucki</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/09/13/ftp542/#comment-143947</link>
		<dc:creator>C. R. Stucki</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Sep 2019 19:35:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=17396#comment-143947</guid>
		<description>Stig

&quot;Apolytical&quot;, WTF?

I used the word (correctly spelled) in the sense of &#039;The opposite of Weigantians&#039;, meaning like they care about who is president, but they don&#039;t eat, drink and sleep it 24/7&#039;.  That seems pretty plain to me, but if it sailed right over your head, I&#039;m not surprised. 

But yeah, feel free to blame the founders.  It&#039;s flat-out amazing that they recognized 3 centuries ago that all the idiots in the nation would gravitate to the coasts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stig</p>
<p>"Apolytical", WTF?</p>
<p>I used the word (correctly spelled) in the sense of 'The opposite of Weigantians', meaning like they care about who is president, but they don't eat, drink and sleep it 24/7'.  That seems pretty plain to me, but if it sailed right over your head, I'm not surprised. </p>
<p>But yeah, feel free to blame the founders.  It's flat-out amazing that they recognized 3 centuries ago that all the idiots in the nation would gravitate to the coasts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/09/13/ftp542/#comment-143925</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Sep 2019 16:51:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=17396#comment-143925</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;They were not the majority either. The Electoral College gave them their victory.&lt;/I&gt;

As it is written in the US Constitution..

You don&#039;t like it??  Renounce your citizenship and move..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>They were not the majority either. The Electoral College gave them their victory.</i></p>
<p>As it is written in the US Constitution..</p>
<p>You don't like it??  Renounce your citizenship and move..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TheStig</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/09/13/ftp542/#comment-143924</link>
		<dc:creator>TheStig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Sep 2019 16:31:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=17396#comment-143924</guid>
		<description>Stuki 231

&quot;it was you guys who forced the great mass of apolitical, center-right, middle-of-the-country, average Americans to vote for him by choosing as his opponent, a person that those sort of folks, (aka the &quot;deplorables&quot;), simply couldn&#039;t tolerate!&quot;


Stuki, engage your brain before posting.  

the &quot;great mass of apolyticals&quot;   ?????  WTF?

in the next part of your sentence you defined their politics:  &quot;center-right&quot;.  

They were not the majority either.  The Electoral College gave them their victory.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stuki 231</p>
<p>"it was you guys who forced the great mass of apolitical, center-right, middle-of-the-country, average Americans to vote for him by choosing as his opponent, a person that those sort of folks, (aka the "deplorables"), simply couldn't tolerate!"</p>
<p>Stuki, engage your brain before posting.  </p>
<p>the "great mass of apolyticals"   ?????  WTF?</p>
<p>in the next part of your sentence you defined their politics:  "center-right".  </p>
<p>They were not the majority either.  The Electoral College gave them their victory.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/09/13/ftp542/#comment-143917</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Sep 2019 16:12:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=17396#comment-143917</guid>
		<description>Oops.. Sorry.. Those comments were meant for today&#039;s commentary..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oops.. Sorry.. Those comments were meant for today's commentary..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/09/13/ftp542/#comment-143916</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Sep 2019 16:11:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=17396#comment-143916</guid>
		<description>&lt;B&gt;Even Rep. Tulsi Gabbard, one of the many candidates seeking the party’s nomination, has admitted that it’s “fair” to describe some of her competitors as favoring open borders, saying, “If you look at the practical implications of some of the things they’re pushing for, it is essentially open borders.”  

Donald Trump’s success in combating the illegal immigration crisis and securing the border is anathema to the open-borders Democrats who now thoroughly dominate their party’s agenda. They want their crisis back, no matter how much human suffering that entails.  &lt;/B&gt;

No matter HOW ya&#039;all want to slice it.. Democrats are losing.. And losing big..  :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>Even Rep. Tulsi Gabbard, one of the many candidates seeking the party’s nomination, has admitted that it’s “fair” to describe some of her competitors as favoring open borders, saying, “If you look at the practical implications of some of the things they’re pushing for, it is essentially open borders.”  </p>
<p>Donald Trump’s success in combating the illegal immigration crisis and securing the border is anathema to the open-borders Democrats who now thoroughly dominate their party’s agenda. They want their crisis back, no matter how much human suffering that entails.  </b></p>
<p>No matter HOW ya'all want to slice it.. Democrats are losing.. And losing big..  :D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/09/13/ftp542/#comment-143915</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Sep 2019 16:10:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=17396#comment-143915</guid>
		<description>&lt;B&gt;Some Democrats were already seething over a series of recent court rulings that upheld President Trump’s border initiatives, and now that the success of those initiatives has become apparent, they’re anxious to hamstring our enforcement efforts and reverse our recent progress. According to Politico, some House Democrats are looking for “payback” for Trump’s immigration tactic, raising concerns that open-borders hardliners in the Democratic caucus might try to block funding for immigration enforcement agencies, such as the Border Patrol and ICE.  

“There is a greater and greater sense in the Democratic Party that any support of the administration’s policies is giving cover to moral wrongdoing,” Democrat Rep. Ro Khanna explained.  

Remarkably, the 2020 Democrat presidential candidates are even more radical on immigration than their colleagues in Congress. For these extremists, obstructing President Trump’s border security agenda is small potatoes — their explicit objective is to “decriminalize” illegal immigration, turning America into a country with, in effect, no borders at all.  

As if that weren’t radical enough, on the second day of their presidential primary debate in June, every Democrat on the stage openly admitted that they would support providing “free” (i.e., taxpayer-funded) health care to every single illegal alien in the country.  &lt;/B&gt;

And Democrats are apoplectic that President Trump continues to dominate the Democrats in this area..

Funny how not a SINGLE commentary around here mentions ALL of the court losses that Democrats have sustained at the hands of President Trump..

Too painful?? Yea, I can see that..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>Some Democrats were already seething over a series of recent court rulings that upheld President Trump’s border initiatives, and now that the success of those initiatives has become apparent, they’re anxious to hamstring our enforcement efforts and reverse our recent progress. According to Politico, some House Democrats are looking for “payback” for Trump’s immigration tactic, raising concerns that open-borders hardliners in the Democratic caucus might try to block funding for immigration enforcement agencies, such as the Border Patrol and ICE.  </p>
<p>“There is a greater and greater sense in the Democratic Party that any support of the administration’s policies is giving cover to moral wrongdoing,” Democrat Rep. Ro Khanna explained.  </p>
<p>Remarkably, the 2020 Democrat presidential candidates are even more radical on immigration than their colleagues in Congress. For these extremists, obstructing President Trump’s border security agenda is small potatoes — their explicit objective is to “decriminalize” illegal immigration, turning America into a country with, in effect, no borders at all.  </p>
<p>As if that weren’t radical enough, on the second day of their presidential primary debate in June, every Democrat on the stage openly admitted that they would support providing “free” (i.e., taxpayer-funded) health care to every single illegal alien in the country.  </b></p>
<p>And Democrats are apoplectic that President Trump continues to dominate the Democrats in this area..</p>
<p>Funny how not a SINGLE commentary around here mentions ALL of the court losses that Democrats have sustained at the hands of President Trump..</p>
<p>Too painful?? Yea, I can see that..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/09/13/ftp542/#comment-143914</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Sep 2019 16:09:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=17396#comment-143914</guid>
		<description>&lt;B&gt;Of course, our broken immigration system isn’t repairing itself. The progress we’ve made in recent months is entirely due to the tireless efforts of President Trump, who has managed to implement a variety of effective policies to better protect the U.S.-Mexico border despite the Democrat Party leadership’s best efforts to obstruct his agenda in Congress. Even after he fulfilled one of his core campaign promises by securing funds to construct more of the border wall using his executive authority, the president has continued to pursue other impactful initiatives to address the border crisis in the absence of congressional action.  

In June, for instance, he  successfully persuaded Mexico to assist the U.S. in curtailing illegal immigration. The Mexican government not only agreed to expand the “Remain in Mexico” policy, which requires asylum-seekers to stay on the Mexican side of the border while they await their U.S. court hearings, but our neighbor to the south also deployed thousands of additional police and National Guard troops on its southern border to intercept illegal immigrants trying to traverse Mexico from Central America. 

The White House later reached another breakthrough deal with Guatemala that is designed to reduce fraudulent asylum claims, and plans to formalize similar deals with other Central American countries by October.  

Immigration experts widely credit these diplomatic breakthroughs — the enforcement deal with Mexico, in particular — with alleviating the crisis on the border and reducing the rate of illegal immigrant apprehensions.  &lt;/B&gt;

Immigration experts give credit where credit is due...

President Trump is continuing to win the Illegal Immigration Battles..  :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>Of course, our broken immigration system isn’t repairing itself. The progress we’ve made in recent months is entirely due to the tireless efforts of President Trump, who has managed to implement a variety of effective policies to better protect the U.S.-Mexico border despite the Democrat Party leadership’s best efforts to obstruct his agenda in Congress. Even after he fulfilled one of his core campaign promises by securing funds to construct more of the border wall using his executive authority, the president has continued to pursue other impactful initiatives to address the border crisis in the absence of congressional action.  </p>
<p>In June, for instance, he  successfully persuaded Mexico to assist the U.S. in curtailing illegal immigration. The Mexican government not only agreed to expand the “Remain in Mexico” policy, which requires asylum-seekers to stay on the Mexican side of the border while they await their U.S. court hearings, but our neighbor to the south also deployed thousands of additional police and National Guard troops on its southern border to intercept illegal immigrants trying to traverse Mexico from Central America. </p>
<p>The White House later reached another breakthrough deal with Guatemala that is designed to reduce fraudulent asylum claims, and plans to formalize similar deals with other Central American countries by October.  </p>
<p>Immigration experts widely credit these diplomatic breakthroughs — the enforcement deal with Mexico, in particular — with alleviating the crisis on the border and reducing the rate of illegal immigrant apprehensions.  </b></p>
<p>Immigration experts give credit where credit is due...</p>
<p>President Trump is continuing to win the Illegal Immigration Battles..  :D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/09/13/ftp542/#comment-143913</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Sep 2019 16:07:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=17396#comment-143913</guid>
		<description>&lt;B&gt;President Trump’s immigration policies are steadily curbing the flow of illegal immigrants across our southern border — but some Democrats are determined to keep the humanitarian catastrophe going for as long as possible for political gain and at America’s expense.  

Border Patrol agents are currently projected to apprehend approximately 843,000 illegal immigrants this year. Although that number is still unacceptably high, it’s significantly below the projections that were being made as recently as June, when we were on pace to apprehend well over 1 million illegal immigrants through the end of the year.  


This drop reflects the fact that the number of apprehensions per month has been trending sharply downward this summer — in August, immigration enforcement agents caught about 51,000 illegal immigrants at the Southwest border, 56% fewer than in May, when the number of apprehensions peaked at 133,000.  &lt;/B&gt;

President Trump rules... Democrats drool..  :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>President Trump’s immigration policies are steadily curbing the flow of illegal immigrants across our southern border — but some Democrats are determined to keep the humanitarian catastrophe going for as long as possible for political gain and at America’s expense.  </p>
<p>Border Patrol agents are currently projected to apprehend approximately 843,000 illegal immigrants this year. Although that number is still unacceptably high, it’s significantly below the projections that were being made as recently as June, when we were on pace to apprehend well over 1 million illegal immigrants through the end of the year.  </p>
<p>This drop reflects the fact that the number of apprehensions per month has been trending sharply downward this summer — in August, immigration enforcement agents caught about 51,000 illegal immigrants at the Southwest border, 56% fewer than in May, when the number of apprehensions peaked at 133,000.  </b></p>
<p>President Trump rules... Democrats drool..  :D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/09/13/ftp542/#comment-143912</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Sep 2019 16:07:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=17396#comment-143912</guid>
		<description>&lt;B&gt;Daunted by Trump&#039;s Success, Dems Want the Border Crisis Back&lt;/B&gt;
https://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2019/09/17/daunted_by_trumps_success_dems_want_the_border_crisis_back_141266.html

President Trump is kicking the Democrat&#039;s asses on illegal immigration response..

And now the POTUS has the SCOTUS..  

Democrats are toast!!  :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>Daunted by Trump's Success, Dems Want the Border Crisis Back</b><br />
<a href="https://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2019/09/17/daunted_by_trumps_success_dems_want_the_border_crisis_back_141266.html" rel="nofollow">https://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2019/09/17/daunted_by_trumps_success_dems_want_the_border_crisis_back_141266.html</a></p>
<p>President Trump is kicking the Democrat's asses on illegal immigration response..</p>
<p>And now the POTUS has the SCOTUS..  </p>
<p>Democrats are toast!!  :D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/09/13/ftp542/#comment-143879</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Sep 2019 10:19:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=17396#comment-143879</guid>
		<description>CRS,

&lt;I&gt;Yeah, I&#039;m well aware tnat not a single Democratic of the Weigantian hue would EVER have voted for him, but it was you guys who forced the great mass of apolitical, center-right, middle-of-the-country, average Americans to vote for him by choosing as his opponent, a person that those sort of folks, (aka the &quot;deplorables&quot;), simply couldn&#039;t tolerate!

Keep that in mind while you&#039;re picking his next opponent.&lt;/I&gt;

Com&#039;on, CRS!!!

Taking responsibility is like admitting that they were wrong..

They simply can&#039;t do that...

Asking them to do so is like asking the sun to set in the east and rise in the west...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CRS,</p>
<p><i>Yeah, I'm well aware tnat not a single Democratic of the Weigantian hue would EVER have voted for him, but it was you guys who forced the great mass of apolitical, center-right, middle-of-the-country, average Americans to vote for him by choosing as his opponent, a person that those sort of folks, (aka the "deplorables"), simply couldn't tolerate!</p>
<p>Keep that in mind while you're picking his next opponent.</i></p>
<p>Com'on, CRS!!!</p>
<p>Taking responsibility is like admitting that they were wrong..</p>
<p>They simply can't do that...</p>
<p>Asking them to do so is like asking the sun to set in the east and rise in the west...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/09/13/ftp542/#comment-143878</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Sep 2019 10:17:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=17396#comment-143878</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;As for Kavanaugh, the issue is that the FBI failed to question Kavanaugh, Dr. Ford, or any of the people that contacted the FBI claiming to be victims or witnesses to possible acts by Kavanaugh, yet the Republicans claimed that Kavanaugh had been cleared by the FBI of any wrong doing. That and the fact Kavanaugh appeared to perjure himself in his testimony and the FBI somehow cleared him of that without interviewing anyone related to the claims he made...including him!&lt;/I&gt;

Why would the FBI have to question Ford or Justice Kavanaugh??  They already have their sworn testimony..  Questioning them would be a waste of time.. Totally redundant..

&lt;I&gt;My guess is this, once Trump is removed from office and the DOJ is being run by someone with an ounce of integrity, we will learn just how much of a role Russia played in Trump’s and other members of the GOP’s victories. &lt;/I&gt;

We already KNOW how much of a role Russia played..

NONE...

EVERY Democrat from Obama on down who discussed this made the exact same point..

The integrity of our election was un-touched by Russia meddling.. Not a single Hillary vote was changed to a Trump vote...

We already KNOW the facts. You just can&#039;t handle the reality to you make up some bullshit that we really don&#039;t know..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>As for Kavanaugh, the issue is that the FBI failed to question Kavanaugh, Dr. Ford, or any of the people that contacted the FBI claiming to be victims or witnesses to possible acts by Kavanaugh, yet the Republicans claimed that Kavanaugh had been cleared by the FBI of any wrong doing. That and the fact Kavanaugh appeared to perjure himself in his testimony and the FBI somehow cleared him of that without interviewing anyone related to the claims he made...including him!</i></p>
<p>Why would the FBI have to question Ford or Justice Kavanaugh??  They already have their sworn testimony..  Questioning them would be a waste of time.. Totally redundant..</p>
<p><i>My guess is this, once Trump is removed from office and the DOJ is being run by someone with an ounce of integrity, we will learn just how much of a role Russia played in Trump’s and other members of the GOP’s victories. </i></p>
<p>We already KNOW how much of a role Russia played..</p>
<p>NONE...</p>
<p>EVERY Democrat from Obama on down who discussed this made the exact same point..</p>
<p>The integrity of our election was un-touched by Russia meddling.. Not a single Hillary vote was changed to a Trump vote...</p>
<p>We already KNOW the facts. You just can't handle the reality to you make up some bullshit that we really don't know..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/09/13/ftp542/#comment-143877</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Sep 2019 10:14:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=17396#comment-143877</guid>
		<description>Ya&#039;all have your political based Trump hating opinions and I have the OFFICIAL Statement from the highest possible authority...

I won&#039;t concede when the facts clearly show I am factually accurate and ya&#039;all will NEVER concede you are wrong..

So, any further discussion is pointless..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ya'all have your political based Trump hating opinions and I have the OFFICIAL Statement from the highest possible authority...</p>
<p>I won't concede when the facts clearly show I am factually accurate and ya'all will NEVER concede you are wrong..</p>
<p>So, any further discussion is pointless..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: C. R. Stucki</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/09/13/ftp542/#comment-143876</link>
		<dc:creator>C. R. Stucki</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Sep 2019 03:18:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=17396#comment-143876</guid>
		<description>Listen

By way of injecting a modest dose of reality into this forum, I have to point out that while the Republicans nominated Trump, it was YOU DEMOCRATICS THAT ELECTED HIM!

Yeah, I&#039;m well aware tnat not a single Democratic of the Weigantian hue would EVER have voted for him, but it was you guys who forced the great mass of apolitical, center-right, middle-of-the-country, average Americans to vote for him by choosing as his opponent, a person that those sort of folks, (aka the &quot;deplorables&quot;),  simply couldn&#039;t tolerate!

Keep that in mind while you&#039;re picking his next opponent.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Listen</p>
<p>By way of injecting a modest dose of reality into this forum, I have to point out that while the Republicans nominated Trump, it was YOU DEMOCRATICS THAT ELECTED HIM!</p>
<p>Yeah, I'm well aware tnat not a single Democratic of the Weigantian hue would EVER have voted for him, but it was you guys who forced the great mass of apolitical, center-right, middle-of-the-country, average Americans to vote for him by choosing as his opponent, a person that those sort of folks, (aka the "deplorables"),  simply couldn't tolerate!</p>
<p>Keep that in mind while you're picking his next opponent.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ListenWhenYouHear</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/09/13/ftp542/#comment-143875</link>
		<dc:creator>ListenWhenYouHear</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Sep 2019 02:33:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=17396#comment-143875</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;At one point or another EACH and EVERY candidate has promised In Labor Or After Labor Abortions, Free and FULL HealthCare to Crimmigrants (That&#039;s Criminal Illegal Immigrants for the morons out there), Open Borders, A BAN on ALL Fossil Fuels and gun confiscation.. Or any combination of the afore...&lt;/I&gt;

PROVE IT!   Prove where each candidate has made each of those promises or admit you are full of shit!    Michale, your lies are just a sad indicator that you are fully aware of how screwed Trump is in this next election!  
&lt;I&gt;
But a Cat 5 Strike with an east to west trajectory on Southern FL that WON&#039;T affect Alabama???

Only someone COMPLETELY ignorant of Hurricanes would think that..&lt;/I&gt;

Completely agree with you.  But look where the hurricane was located when Trump made his claims.  It had passed and was east of the southern tip of Florida.  

&lt;i&gt;At the time President Trump made the claim, he was factually accurate.. At least, that&#039;s the Official NOAA statement..&lt;/i&gt;

If you wouldn’t have added that last line, I might still think that you actually believed what you have been arguing was the truth.   But that line makes it very clear that you know it’s bullshit.  Kinda like how you repeatedly post the same articles over and over again as if that somehow changes the truth.   

As for Kavanaugh, the issue is that the FBI failed to question Kavanaugh, Dr. Ford, or any of the people that contacted the FBI claiming to be victims or witnesses to possible acts by Kavanaugh, yet the Republicans claimed that Kavanaugh had been cleared by the FBI of any wrong doing.   That and the fact Kavanaugh appeared to perjure himself in his testimony and the FBI somehow cleared him of that without interviewing anyone related to the claims he made...including him!   

My guess is this, once Trump is removed from office and the DOJ is being run by someone with an ounce of integrity, we will learn just how much of a role Russia played in Trump’s and other members of the GOP’s victories.   We will see just about every policy passed and every court appointment Trump made be rescinded and ruled invalid.  While we cannot, nor should we wish to, remove Trump’s presidency from our history books, we can remove the stain on democracy caused by the corruption that accompanied it.  

The GOP sold it soul in their desire to remain in power.  I had thought that the report looking at why the GOP lost in 2008 and warning them of where they needed to change if they wanted to remain relevant as a political party would have maybe gotten them to change their ways.  I never expected that they’d see that as a call to double down so they could do as much damage as possible before the party dies.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>At one point or another EACH and EVERY candidate has promised In Labor Or After Labor Abortions, Free and FULL HealthCare to Crimmigrants (That's Criminal Illegal Immigrants for the morons out there), Open Borders, A BAN on ALL Fossil Fuels and gun confiscation.. Or any combination of the afore...</i></p>
<p>PROVE IT!   Prove where each candidate has made each of those promises or admit you are full of shit!    Michale, your lies are just a sad indicator that you are fully aware of how screwed Trump is in this next election!<br />
<i><br />
But a Cat 5 Strike with an east to west trajectory on Southern FL that WON'T affect Alabama???</p>
<p>Only someone COMPLETELY ignorant of Hurricanes would think that..</i></p>
<p>Completely agree with you.  But look where the hurricane was located when Trump made his claims.  It had passed and was east of the southern tip of Florida.  </p>
<p><i>At the time President Trump made the claim, he was factually accurate.. At least, that's the Official NOAA statement..</i></p>
<p>If you wouldn’t have added that last line, I might still think that you actually believed what you have been arguing was the truth.   But that line makes it very clear that you know it’s bullshit.  Kinda like how you repeatedly post the same articles over and over again as if that somehow changes the truth.   </p>
<p>As for Kavanaugh, the issue is that the FBI failed to question Kavanaugh, Dr. Ford, or any of the people that contacted the FBI claiming to be victims or witnesses to possible acts by Kavanaugh, yet the Republicans claimed that Kavanaugh had been cleared by the FBI of any wrong doing.   That and the fact Kavanaugh appeared to perjure himself in his testimony and the FBI somehow cleared him of that without interviewing anyone related to the claims he made...including him!   </p>
<p>My guess is this, once Trump is removed from office and the DOJ is being run by someone with an ounce of integrity, we will learn just how much of a role Russia played in Trump’s and other members of the GOP’s victories.   We will see just about every policy passed and every court appointment Trump made be rescinded and ruled invalid.  While we cannot, nor should we wish to, remove Trump’s presidency from our history books, we can remove the stain on democracy caused by the corruption that accompanied it.  </p>
<p>The GOP sold it soul in their desire to remain in power.  I had thought that the report looking at why the GOP lost in 2008 and warning them of where they needed to change if they wanted to remain relevant as a political party would have maybe gotten them to change their ways.  I never expected that they’d see that as a call to double down so they could do as much damage as possible before the party dies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nypoet22</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/09/13/ftp542/#comment-143871</link>
		<dc:creator>nypoet22</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Sep 2019 01:40:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=17396#comment-143871</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Trump turned out to be wrong [on september 1].. As had every other forecaster on the planet.. &lt;/i&gt;

...in 5% of their predictions

...on august 28th.

for heaven&#039;s sake, the map donald is pointing to says &quot;thursday&quot; next to the image of the hurricane, and september 1 was a monday. the hurricane had ALREADY taken a different path from the one predicted on his map, and was at that precise moment many miles to the east of where his map said it ought to have been.

JL</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Trump turned out to be wrong [on september 1].. As had every other forecaster on the planet.. </i></p>
<p>...in 5% of their predictions</p>
<p>...on august 28th.</p>
<p>for heaven's sake, the map donald is pointing to says "thursday" next to the image of the hurricane, and september 1 was a monday. the hurricane had ALREADY taken a different path from the one predicted on his map, and was at that precise moment many miles to the east of where his map said it ought to have been.</p>
<p>JL</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/09/13/ftp542/#comment-143867</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Sep 2019 22:50:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=17396#comment-143867</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;Re sharpiegate:

http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/09/06/ftp541/#comment-143411

Trump was wrong.&lt;/I&gt;

Trump turned out to be wrong..  As had every other forecaster on the planet..

At the time President Trump made his statement, he was factually accurate..

So says the ultimate authority on this subject, the head and the chief of staff of the NOAA..

Personally, I was paying too much attention to my own issues with Dorian and whether or not we should evacuate the children and grandchildren...

But a Cat 5 Strike with an east to west trajectory on Southern FL that WON&#039;T affect Alabama???

Only someone COMPLETELY ignorant of Hurricanes would think that..

At the time President Trump made the claim, he was factually accurate..  At least, that&#039;s the Official NOAA statement..  

&lt;I&gt;Really though, I use he, him, his.&lt;/I&gt;

Oh thank the gods...  :D


OK  NOW my time is my wife&#039;s.. :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Re sharpiegate:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/09/06/ftp541/#comment-143411" rel="nofollow">http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/09/06/ftp541/#comment-143411</a></p>
<p>Trump was wrong.</i></p>
<p>Trump turned out to be wrong..  As had every other forecaster on the planet..</p>
<p>At the time President Trump made his statement, he was factually accurate..</p>
<p>So says the ultimate authority on this subject, the head and the chief of staff of the NOAA..</p>
<p>Personally, I was paying too much attention to my own issues with Dorian and whether or not we should evacuate the children and grandchildren...</p>
<p>But a Cat 5 Strike with an east to west trajectory on Southern FL that WON'T affect Alabama???</p>
<p>Only someone COMPLETELY ignorant of Hurricanes would think that..</p>
<p>At the time President Trump made the claim, he was factually accurate..  At least, that's the Official NOAA statement..  </p>
<p><i>Really though, I use he, him, his.</i></p>
<p>Oh thank the gods...  :D</p>
<p>OK  NOW my time is my wife's.. :D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/09/13/ftp542/#comment-143866</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Sep 2019 22:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=17396#comment-143866</guid>
		<description>Welp, my time belongs to my beautiful wife right now..

See ya&#039;all in the AM.. :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Welp, my time belongs to my beautiful wife right now..</p>
<p>See ya'all in the AM.. :D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dsws</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/09/13/ftp542/#comment-143865</link>
		<dc:creator>dsws</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Sep 2019 22:06:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=17396#comment-143865</guid>
		<description>Re sharpiegate:

http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/09/06/ftp541/#comment-143411

Trump was wrong.

[213] of that page, Kick:

&lt;i&gt;The forecasting of the weather isn&#039;t a &quot;political dispute.&quot;&lt;/i&gt;

Forecasting isn&#039;t.  Fussing about the details of what a politician did or didn&#039;t say?  Yeah, that is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re sharpiegate:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/09/06/ftp541/#comment-143411" rel="nofollow">http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/09/06/ftp541/#comment-143411</a></p>
<p>Trump was wrong.</p>
<p>[213] of that page, Kick:</p>
<p><i>The forecasting of the weather isn't a "political dispute."</i></p>
<p>Forecasting isn't.  Fussing about the details of what a politician did or didn't say?  Yeah, that is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dsws</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/09/13/ftp542/#comment-143864</link>
		<dc:creator>dsws</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Sep 2019 21:56:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=17396#comment-143864</guid>
		<description>[195]

&lt;I&gt;Please not xe&lt;/i&gt;

I told Facebook that my preferred pronouns are they, them, their.  But that&#039;s mostly a word nerd thing, and only secondarily a gender politics thing.  Shakespeare and Chaucer used gender neutral&quot;they&quot;, and there&#039;s no good reason to insist on knowing or guessing someone&#039;s gender before talking about them.

Really though, I use he, him, his.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[195]</p>
<p><i>Please not xe</i></p>
<p>I told Facebook that my preferred pronouns are they, them, their.  But that's mostly a word nerd thing, and only secondarily a gender politics thing.  Shakespeare and Chaucer used gender neutral"they", and there's no good reason to insist on knowing or guessing someone's gender before talking about them.</p>
<p>Really though, I use he, him, his.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/09/13/ftp542/#comment-143863</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Sep 2019 21:50:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=17396#comment-143863</guid>
		<description>I can always tell when ya&#039;all are in the pits about how bad and how much your Democrats are losing and how much President Trump is winning...

Ya&#039;all cede the field of battle to me.. :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can always tell when ya'all are in the pits about how bad and how much your Democrats are losing and how much President Trump is winning...</p>
<p>Ya'all cede the field of battle to me.. :D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/09/13/ftp542/#comment-143862</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Sep 2019 21:41:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=17396#comment-143862</guid>
		<description>Once again, the question has to be asked..

With this latest bullshit from the NY Grime??

How much bullshit does the Democrat Party think it can spew before Americans start walking away from the Democrat Party???</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Once again, the question has to be asked..</p>
<p>With this latest bullshit from the NY Grime??</p>
<p>How much bullshit does the Democrat Party think it can spew before Americans start walking away from the Democrat Party???</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/09/13/ftp542/#comment-143861</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Sep 2019 20:09:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=17396#comment-143861</guid>
		<description>Ya&#039;all want to talk about all the court cases that Democrats have lost in the last couple weeks??? 

No??  

Oh, well.. OK..   :^/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ya'all want to talk about all the court cases that Democrats have lost in the last couple weeks??? </p>
<p>No??  </p>
<p>Oh, well.. OK..   :^/</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/09/13/ftp542/#comment-143860</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Sep 2019 20:03:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=17396#comment-143860</guid>
		<description>Don&#039;t worry people..

We go on our annual family cruise in April..  Ya&#039;all will get a nice 10 day vacay from the facts and from reality..

Of course, I might pop in to share some family pictures of all the fun we&#039;re having.. :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don't worry people..</p>
<p>We go on our annual family cruise in April..  Ya'all will get a nice 10 day vacay from the facts and from reality..</p>
<p>Of course, I might pop in to share some family pictures of all the fun we're having.. :D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/09/13/ftp542/#comment-143859</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Sep 2019 20:00:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=17396#comment-143859</guid>
		<description>&lt;B&gt;&quot;I just don&#039;t understand why they didn&#039;t put this information in the article.&quot;&lt;/B&gt;
-Joe Scarborough

They hate President Trump and will say anything, print ANYTHING to try and take him down..

DUUUUHHHHHH...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>"I just don't understand why they didn't put this information in the article."</b><br />
-Joe Scarborough</p>
<p>They hate President Trump and will say anything, print ANYTHING to try and take him down..</p>
<p>DUUUUHHHHHH...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/09/13/ftp542/#comment-143858</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Sep 2019 19:58:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=17396#comment-143858</guid>
		<description>&lt;B&gt;New York Times criticized from both sides of aisle over now-revised Kavanaugh allegations&lt;/B&gt;
https://www.foxnews.com/media/new-york-times-kavanaugh-criticism

Once again..  Ya&#039;all just HAVE to know what a major cock-up for the NY Grime when it starts getting lambasted by BOTH Trump/America haters and Trump supporters...  :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>New York Times criticized from both sides of aisle over now-revised Kavanaugh allegations</b><br />
<a href="https://www.foxnews.com/media/new-york-times-kavanaugh-criticism" rel="nofollow">https://www.foxnews.com/media/new-york-times-kavanaugh-criticism</a></p>
<p>Once again..  Ya'all just HAVE to know what a major cock-up for the NY Grime when it starts getting lambasted by BOTH Trump/America haters and Trump supporters...  :D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/09/13/ftp542/#comment-143857</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Sep 2019 19:56:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=17396#comment-143857</guid>
		<description>Even Trump/America hater Joe Scarborough is taken aback at the complete malfeasance of the NY GRIME..

&lt;B&gt;Joe Scarborough &#039;could not believe&#039; NYT ran report on Kavanaugh allegation with &#039;glaring omission&#039;&lt;/B&gt;
https://www.foxnews.com/media/joe-scarborough-new-york-times-kavanaugh-report

Ya&#039;all just HAVE to know what a major frak-up it is for the NY GRIME when Trump/America haters start in on the NYG....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Even Trump/America hater Joe Scarborough is taken aback at the complete malfeasance of the NY GRIME..</p>
<p><b>Joe Scarborough 'could not believe' NYT ran report on Kavanaugh allegation with 'glaring omission'</b><br />
<a href="https://www.foxnews.com/media/joe-scarborough-new-york-times-kavanaugh-report" rel="nofollow">https://www.foxnews.com/media/joe-scarborough-new-york-times-kavanaugh-report</a></p>
<p>Ya'all just HAVE to know what a major frak-up it is for the NY GRIME when Trump/America haters start in on the NYG....</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/09/13/ftp542/#comment-143856</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Sep 2019 19:45:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=17396#comment-143856</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s actually funny..

I actually believed that, since ya&#039;all have professed total fealty to the NOAA in the past, since ya&#039;all CONSTANTLY appealed to the NOAA Authority, that ya&#039;all would ACTUALLY accept the FACTS this time...

But apparently, ya&#039;all&#039;s HHPTDS is MORE ingrained than even I believed...

Fascinating study....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It's actually funny..</p>
<p>I actually believed that, since ya'all have professed total fealty to the NOAA in the past, since ya'all CONSTANTLY appealed to the NOAA Authority, that ya'all would ACTUALLY accept the FACTS this time...</p>
<p>But apparently, ya'all's HHPTDS is MORE ingrained than even I believed...</p>
<p>Fascinating study....</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/09/13/ftp542/#comment-143855</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Sep 2019 19:38:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=17396#comment-143855</guid>
		<description>What it all boils down to is this.

Ya&#039;all have Trump/America hating spewages from Global Warming morons...

And I have the FACTS in the form of an OFFICIAL STATEMENT from their boss that puts lie to all their Trump/America hating statements.


&#039;nuff said..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What it all boils down to is this.</p>
<p>Ya'all have Trump/America hating spewages from Global Warming morons...</p>
<p>And I have the FACTS in the form of an OFFICIAL STATEMENT from their boss that puts lie to all their Trump/America hating statements.</p>
<p>'nuff said..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/09/13/ftp542/#comment-143854</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Sep 2019 19:30:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=17396#comment-143854</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;Trump was ballz on WRONG.

In that Dorian never impacted Alabama..

Yes he was... Eventually

there&#039;s no eventually about it. his incorrect information was a week old when he tweeted it.&lt;/I&gt;

Except the FACTS prove that to be factually inaccurate..

&lt;B&gt;From Wednesday, August 28, through Monday, September 2, the information provided by NOAA and the National Hurricane Center to President Trump and the wider public demonstrated that tropical-storm-force winds from Hurricane Dorian could impact Alabama. This is clearly demonstrated in Hurricane Advisories #15 through #41, which can be viewed at the following link.&lt;/B&gt;

The NOAA, which is the ultimate authority in these sorts of issues,  stated quite clearly that &lt;B&gt;&lt;I&gt;&quot;From Wednesday, August 28, through Monday, September 2, the information provided by NOAA and the National Hurricane Center to President Trump and the wider public demonstrated that tropical-storm-force winds from Hurricane Dorian could impact Alabama.&quot; &lt;/I&gt;&lt;/B&gt;

Does 1 Sep fall within the 28 Aug thru 2 Sep timeline that the NOAA gave???

Why yes... yes it does..

Ergo, on 1 Sep President Trump was factually accurate based on the briefings he received from the NOAA..

You have a beef??  Apologize to your President and take it up with the NOAA....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Trump was ballz on WRONG.</p>
<p>In that Dorian never impacted Alabama..</p>
<p>Yes he was... Eventually</p>
<p>there's no eventually about it. his incorrect information was a week old when he tweeted it.</i></p>
<p>Except the FACTS prove that to be factually inaccurate..</p>
<p><b>From Wednesday, August 28, through Monday, September 2, the information provided by NOAA and the National Hurricane Center to President Trump and the wider public demonstrated that tropical-storm-force winds from Hurricane Dorian could impact Alabama. This is clearly demonstrated in Hurricane Advisories #15 through #41, which can be viewed at the following link.</b></p>
<p>The NOAA, which is the ultimate authority in these sorts of issues,  stated quite clearly that <b><i>"From Wednesday, August 28, through Monday, September 2, the information provided by NOAA and the National Hurricane Center to President Trump and the wider public demonstrated that tropical-storm-force winds from Hurricane Dorian could impact Alabama." </i></b></p>
<p>Does 1 Sep fall within the 28 Aug thru 2 Sep timeline that the NOAA gave???</p>
<p>Why yes... yes it does..</p>
<p>Ergo, on 1 Sep President Trump was factually accurate based on the briefings he received from the NOAA..</p>
<p>You have a beef??  Apologize to your President and take it up with the NOAA....</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/09/13/ftp542/#comment-143853</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Sep 2019 19:24:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=17396#comment-143853</guid>
		<description>Woot!!!! 214!!! 

A new personal best!!!!

Bring on the Holiday fund raiser!!!  :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Woot!!!! 214!!! </p>
<p>A new personal best!!!!</p>
<p>Bring on the Holiday fund raiser!!!  :D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/09/13/ftp542/#comment-143852</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Sep 2019 19:24:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=17396#comment-143852</guid>
		<description>&lt;B&gt;Fear is a good motivator, but it hasn’t worked for those seeking action on climate change. Voters aren’t willing to sacrifice for Gaia, and neither are the politicians demanding their votes.

Until the alarmists start behaving like there is a crisis, they shouldn’t expect everyday Americans to believe them.&lt;/B&gt;

EXACTLY...

This is it in a nutshell..

Not a SINGLE Dumbocrat, either here in Weigantia or out in the real world acts like Global Warming or Climate Change or Climate Crisis or whatever Dumbocrat Marketing is calling it today...

Not a SINGLE one of ya&#039;all, not a SINGLE proponent of this con actually **ACT** like it&#039;s actually an emergency..

So, if ya&#039;all don&#039;t...???

Why should ANYONE take ya&#039;all seriously???

Answer??  No one should....  Because it&#039;s NOTHING but a huge con..

THAT is the ONLY logical conclusion that explains ya&#039;all&#039;s and the Dumbocrat&#039;s complacency...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>Fear is a good motivator, but it hasn’t worked for those seeking action on climate change. Voters aren’t willing to sacrifice for Gaia, and neither are the politicians demanding their votes.</p>
<p>Until the alarmists start behaving like there is a crisis, they shouldn’t expect everyday Americans to believe them.</b></p>
<p>EXACTLY...</p>
<p>This is it in a nutshell..</p>
<p>Not a SINGLE Dumbocrat, either here in Weigantia or out in the real world acts like Global Warming or Climate Change or Climate Crisis or whatever Dumbocrat Marketing is calling it today...</p>
<p>Not a SINGLE one of ya'all, not a SINGLE proponent of this con actually **ACT** like it's actually an emergency..</p>
<p>So, if ya'all don't...???</p>
<p>Why should ANYONE take ya'all seriously???</p>
<p>Answer??  No one should....  Because it's NOTHING but a huge con..</p>
<p>THAT is the ONLY logical conclusion that explains ya'all's and the Dumbocrat's complacency...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/09/13/ftp542/#comment-143851</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Sep 2019 19:21:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=17396#comment-143851</guid>
		<description>Ooops...

&lt;B&gt;Hypocrisy will get them nowhere

The hypocrisy of environmental doomsayers is galling, but it also reveals they don’t actually believe we’re in a crisis. 

This was the main message coming out of CNN’s seven-hour climate town halls, featuring all the major Democratic presidential primary candidates.

Sen. Bernie Sanders endorsed using federally funded abortions as a means of population control. Mayor Pete Buttigieg called climate change “a kind of sin” but defended his private air travel “because this is a very big country.”

Former vice president Joe Biden promised to &quot;take millions of vehicles off the road” via high-speed rail. The next day, he held a fundraiser co-hosted by a fossil fuel magnate.

The hypocrisy is galling, but it reveals that so many environmental doomsayers don’t actually believe we’re in a crisis at all.

To Thunberg’s credit, at least she avoids air travel. The same can’t be said for her audience or those grasping for power parroting her message.


Rising sea levels are threatening to destroy coastal communities, yet former President Barack Obama just bought a $15 million estate on Martha’s Vineyard. Leonardo DiCaprio, Prince Harry and others in the top 0.1% flew to a Google Camp in Sicily, requiring 117 separate flights. Seems like a Google Hangout would be better for the planet.&lt;/B&gt;

How UTTERLY moronic is Odumbo??

He whines and screams and cries about Global Warming and the rise of the oceans..

Then he goes and buys a 15 million massive carbon belching estate on a fraking ISLAND!!!

And YOU people still follow the moron!!

It&#039;s mind-boggling how gullible ya&#039;all are..

Com&#039;on, JL.. Next to me, you have one of the more logical minds here..  

Can YOU explain Obama&#039;s reasoning??

I am betting you won&#039;t because you can&#039;t..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ooops...</p>
<p><b>Hypocrisy will get them nowhere</p>
<p>The hypocrisy of environmental doomsayers is galling, but it also reveals they don’t actually believe we’re in a crisis. </p>
<p>This was the main message coming out of CNN’s seven-hour climate town halls, featuring all the major Democratic presidential primary candidates.</p>
<p>Sen. Bernie Sanders endorsed using federally funded abortions as a means of population control. Mayor Pete Buttigieg called climate change “a kind of sin” but defended his private air travel “because this is a very big country.”</p>
<p>Former vice president Joe Biden promised to "take millions of vehicles off the road” via high-speed rail. The next day, he held a fundraiser co-hosted by a fossil fuel magnate.</p>
<p>The hypocrisy is galling, but it reveals that so many environmental doomsayers don’t actually believe we’re in a crisis at all.</p>
<p>To Thunberg’s credit, at least she avoids air travel. The same can’t be said for her audience or those grasping for power parroting her message.</p>
<p>Rising sea levels are threatening to destroy coastal communities, yet former President Barack Obama just bought a $15 million estate on Martha’s Vineyard. Leonardo DiCaprio, Prince Harry and others in the top 0.1% flew to a Google Camp in Sicily, requiring 117 separate flights. Seems like a Google Hangout would be better for the planet.</b></p>
<p>How UTTERLY moronic is Odumbo??</p>
<p>He whines and screams and cries about Global Warming and the rise of the oceans..</p>
<p>Then he goes and buys a 15 million massive carbon belching estate on a fraking ISLAND!!!</p>
<p>And YOU people still follow the moron!!</p>
<p>It's mind-boggling how gullible ya'all are..</p>
<p>Com'on, JL.. Next to me, you have one of the more logical minds here..  </p>
<p>Can YOU explain Obama's reasoning??</p>
<p>I am betting you won't because you can't..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/09/13/ftp542/#comment-143850</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Sep 2019 19:20:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=17396#comment-143850</guid>
		<description>&lt;B&gt;Hypocrisy will get them nowhere

The hypocrisy of environmental doomsayers is galling, but it also reveals they don’t actually believe we’re in a crisis.
The hypocrisy of environmental doomsayers is galling, but it also reveals they don’t actually believe we’re in a crisis. 

This was the main message coming out of CNN’s seven-hour climate town halls, featuring all the major Democratic presidential primary candidates.

Sen. Bernie Sanders endorsed using federally funded abortions as a means of population control. Mayor Pete Buttigieg called climate change “a kind of sin” but defended his private air travel “because this is a very big country.”

Former vice president Joe Biden promised to &quot;take millions of vehicles off the road” via high-speed rail. The next day, he held a fundraiser co-hosted by a fossil fuel magnate.

The hypocrisy is galling, but it reveals that so many environmental doomsayers don’t actually believe we’re in a crisis at all.

To Thunberg’s credit, at least she avoids air travel. The same can’t be said for her audience or those grasping for power parroting her message.


Rising sea levels are threatening to destroy coastal communities, yet former President Barack Obama just bought a $15 million estate on Martha’s Vineyard. Leonardo DiCaprio, Prince Harry and others in the top 0.1% flew to a Google Camp in Sicily, requiring 117 separate flights. Seems like a Google Hangout would be better for the planet.

How UTTERLY moronic is Odumbo??

He whines and screams and cries about Global Warming and the rise of the oceans..

Then he goes and buys a 15 million massive carbon belching estate on a fraking ISLAND!!!

And YOU people still follow the moron!!

It&#039;s mind-boggling how gullible ya&#039;all are..

Com&#039;on, JL.. Next to me, you have one of the more logical minds here..  

Can YOU explain Obama&#039;s reasoning??

I am betting you won&#039;t because you can&#039;t..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>Hypocrisy will get them nowhere</p>
<p>The hypocrisy of environmental doomsayers is galling, but it also reveals they don’t actually believe we’re in a crisis.<br />
The hypocrisy of environmental doomsayers is galling, but it also reveals they don’t actually believe we’re in a crisis. </p>
<p>This was the main message coming out of CNN’s seven-hour climate town halls, featuring all the major Democratic presidential primary candidates.</p>
<p>Sen. Bernie Sanders endorsed using federally funded abortions as a means of population control. Mayor Pete Buttigieg called climate change “a kind of sin” but defended his private air travel “because this is a very big country.”</p>
<p>Former vice president Joe Biden promised to "take millions of vehicles off the road” via high-speed rail. The next day, he held a fundraiser co-hosted by a fossil fuel magnate.</p>
<p>The hypocrisy is galling, but it reveals that so many environmental doomsayers don’t actually believe we’re in a crisis at all.</p>
<p>To Thunberg’s credit, at least she avoids air travel. The same can’t be said for her audience or those grasping for power parroting her message.</p>
<p>Rising sea levels are threatening to destroy coastal communities, yet former President Barack Obama just bought a $15 million estate on Martha’s Vineyard. Leonardo DiCaprio, Prince Harry and others in the top 0.1% flew to a Google Camp in Sicily, requiring 117 separate flights. Seems like a Google Hangout would be better for the planet.</p>
<p>How UTTERLY moronic is Odumbo??</p>
<p>He whines and screams and cries about Global Warming and the rise of the oceans..</p>
<p>Then he goes and buys a 15 million massive carbon belching estate on a fraking ISLAND!!!</p>
<p>And YOU people still follow the moron!!</p>
<p>It's mind-boggling how gullible ya'all are..</p>
<p>Com'on, JL.. Next to me, you have one of the more logical minds here..  </p>
<p>Can YOU explain Obama's reasoning??</p>
<p>I am betting you won't because you can't..</b></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/09/13/ftp542/#comment-143849</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Sep 2019 19:16:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=17396#comment-143849</guid>
		<description>&lt;B&gt;The years-long fear campaign hasn’t worked; any Marketing 101 student would change the messaging. Instead, progressive politicians just ramp up the panic.

Throughout our lives, eco-fearmongering has been a constant. My first-grade teacher handed out maps showing how a pollution-caused ice age would soon cover our Chicago suburb with a glacier. Mom eased the panic with a reminder we were moving to Phoenix that summer.

After that, acid rain was going to kill us, then the ozone hole, then global warming, then “global weirding,” and now, climate change. Granted, the climate has always changed, but progressives think it started about a century ago.

Despite the wildly different scenarios, from freezing oceans to boiling ones, the solution is always the same: curtail capitalism and let government control more of our lives.&lt;/B&gt;

It&#039;s amazing.. There has ALWAYS been some sort of imminent emergency that Left Wingers whine and cry about...

And no matter WHAT the emergency is, their solution is ALWAYS the same..

&lt;B&gt;&quot;GIVE US MORE POWER OVER YOUR LIVES&quot;&lt;/B&gt;

It&#039;s so blatantly obvious, yet Left Wingers are totally oblivious...   :eyeroll:</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>The years-long fear campaign hasn’t worked; any Marketing 101 student would change the messaging. Instead, progressive politicians just ramp up the panic.</p>
<p>Throughout our lives, eco-fearmongering has been a constant. My first-grade teacher handed out maps showing how a pollution-caused ice age would soon cover our Chicago suburb with a glacier. Mom eased the panic with a reminder we were moving to Phoenix that summer.</p>
<p>After that, acid rain was going to kill us, then the ozone hole, then global warming, then “global weirding,” and now, climate change. Granted, the climate has always changed, but progressives think it started about a century ago.</p>
<p>Despite the wildly different scenarios, from freezing oceans to boiling ones, the solution is always the same: curtail capitalism and let government control more of our lives.</b></p>
<p>It's amazing.. There has ALWAYS been some sort of imminent emergency that Left Wingers whine and cry about...</p>
<p>And no matter WHAT the emergency is, their solution is ALWAYS the same..</p>
<p><b>"GIVE US MORE POWER OVER YOUR LIVES"</b></p>
<p>It's so blatantly obvious, yet Left Wingers are totally oblivious...   :eyeroll:</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/09/13/ftp542/#comment-143848</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Sep 2019 19:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=17396#comment-143848</guid>
		<description>But!!! The Polls!!  The Polls!!! you say???

&lt;B&gt;A recent Reuters/Ipsos poll showed that 69% of Americans want aggressive action to combat climate change.

So far, so good.

How many would support a rate hike of $100 a year to tackle the problem? Only 29%.&lt;/B&gt;

Sure, you can find a poll or hundred that has ignorant Left Wingers screaming in panic about Global Warming.

But then, when you poll them and ask them will they give up cash out of their wallets?? Give up their cars??  Give up their IPADs and Cell Phones??  Give up a SINGLE creature comfort???

Your &quot;polls&quot; drop to &lt;B&gt;&quot;NOT ONLY **NO** BUT ***HELL NO***!!!!&quot;&lt;/B&gt;

So, obviously, it can&#039;t be any REAL emergency, can it??

:eyeroll:</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But!!! The Polls!!  The Polls!!! you say???</p>
<p><b>A recent Reuters/Ipsos poll showed that 69% of Americans want aggressive action to combat climate change.</p>
<p>So far, so good.</p>
<p>How many would support a rate hike of $100 a year to tackle the problem? Only 29%.</b></p>
<p>Sure, you can find a poll or hundred that has ignorant Left Wingers screaming in panic about Global Warming.</p>
<p>But then, when you poll them and ask them will they give up cash out of their wallets?? Give up their cars??  Give up their IPADs and Cell Phones??  Give up a SINGLE creature comfort???</p>
<p>Your "polls" drop to <b>"NOT ONLY **NO** BUT ***HELL NO***!!!!"</b></p>
<p>So, obviously, it can't be any REAL emergency, can it??</p>
<p>:eyeroll:</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/09/13/ftp542/#comment-143847</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Sep 2019 19:10:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=17396#comment-143847</guid>
		<description>&lt;B&gt;If the alarmists can&#039;t even treat climate change like a crisis, neither will we

Greta Thunberg, a 16-year-old Swedish climate activist, chose fear as a centerpiece of her message.

“I don’t want your hope,” she told the World Economic Forum Annual Meeting. “I don’t want you to be hopeful. I want you to panic. I want you to feel the fear I feel every day. “

Davos attendees dutifully applauded as aircrews refueled their fleet of private jets.

We want change, but not if we must change..

For some reason, voters aren’t eager to feel fear every day. Sure, they claim that climate change is important, but not if it requires changing their lifestyle, even a little.&lt;/B&gt;
https://www.azcentral.com/story/opinion/op-ed/2019/09/14/climate-change-wont-stopped-fear-or-hypocrisy/2294906001/

Here ya go, JL..

If Global Warming is such a sure thing and such a dire thing..

Why do those who scream about it the loudest go about their lives in their private jets and their SUV convoys, IGNORING the so-called &quot;threat&quot; except for the lip-service they pay to the so-called &quot;emergency&quot;??

I bet you still drive a car or get driven in a car or other mobile vehicle that is not human powered..

I bet you still use electricity and a refrigerator and a washer/dryer and a microwave and an air conditioner, eh??

If Global Warming is such a dead on big emergency, shouldn&#039;t you stop??

Of course... But you won&#039;t because it&#039;s a &quot;theoretical&quot; emergency..  A POLITICAL emergency..

It surely isn&#039;t a real or actual emergency ....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>If the alarmists can't even treat climate change like a crisis, neither will we</p>
<p>Greta Thunberg, a 16-year-old Swedish climate activist, chose fear as a centerpiece of her message.</p>
<p>“I don’t want your hope,” she told the World Economic Forum Annual Meeting. “I don’t want you to be hopeful. I want you to panic. I want you to feel the fear I feel every day. “</p>
<p>Davos attendees dutifully applauded as aircrews refueled their fleet of private jets.</p>
<p>We want change, but not if we must change..</p>
<p>For some reason, voters aren’t eager to feel fear every day. Sure, they claim that climate change is important, but not if it requires changing their lifestyle, even a little.</b><br />
<a href="https://www.azcentral.com/story/opinion/op-ed/2019/09/14/climate-change-wont-stopped-fear-or-hypocrisy/2294906001/" rel="nofollow">https://www.azcentral.com/story/opinion/op-ed/2019/09/14/climate-change-wont-stopped-fear-or-hypocrisy/2294906001/</a></p>
<p>Here ya go, JL..</p>
<p>If Global Warming is such a sure thing and such a dire thing..</p>
<p>Why do those who scream about it the loudest go about their lives in their private jets and their SUV convoys, IGNORING the so-called "threat" except for the lip-service they pay to the so-called "emergency"??</p>
<p>I bet you still drive a car or get driven in a car or other mobile vehicle that is not human powered..</p>
<p>I bet you still use electricity and a refrigerator and a washer/dryer and a microwave and an air conditioner, eh??</p>
<p>If Global Warming is such a dead on big emergency, shouldn't you stop??</p>
<p>Of course... But you won't because it's a "theoretical" emergency..  A POLITICAL emergency..</p>
<p>It surely isn't a real or actual emergency ....</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/09/13/ftp542/#comment-143846</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Sep 2019 19:02:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=17396#comment-143846</guid>
		<description>&lt;B&gt;Maureen Dowd: Has game-changing Trump doomed Democrats to irrelevance?

Democratic debate shows how president has altered the way US experiences politics&lt;/B&gt;
https://www.irishtimes.com/news/world/us/maureen-dowd-has-game-changing-trump-doomed-democrats-to-irrelevance-1.4018833

Ya have to KNOW that Democrats are in trouble when Maureen Uber-Trump-Hater Dowd is saying the Democrats are going down...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>Maureen Dowd: Has game-changing Trump doomed Democrats to irrelevance?</p>
<p>Democratic debate shows how president has altered the way US experiences politics</b><br />
<a href="https://www.irishtimes.com/news/world/us/maureen-dowd-has-game-changing-trump-doomed-democrats-to-irrelevance-1.4018833" rel="nofollow">https://www.irishtimes.com/news/world/us/maureen-dowd-has-game-changing-trump-doomed-democrats-to-irrelevance-1.4018833</a></p>
<p>Ya have to KNOW that Democrats are in trouble when Maureen Uber-Trump-Hater Dowd is saying the Democrats are going down...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/09/13/ftp542/#comment-143845</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Sep 2019 18:58:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=17396#comment-143845</guid>
		<description>&lt;B&gt;What Pogrebin and Kelly left out of their story, yet reported in their book, is that the alleged victim doesn’t remember the incident and refuses to talk about it. That’s journalistic malpractice.

So no corroboration, no evidence, no victim and no witness (only hearsay of one), but the “paper of record” is perfectly fine with defaming Kavanaugh all over again.

By the way, in the book, the authors gratuitously name the woman, including a new surname she uses, even though she doesn’t want to talk — and the woman’s friends the reporters did speak to say she doesn’t remember anything. Why shame her? Because she refuses to back up the reporters’ agenda?&lt;/B&gt;

Once again, the Trump hating media outs a private citizen in their putrid and futile hatred of everything Trump...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>What Pogrebin and Kelly left out of their story, yet reported in their book, is that the alleged victim doesn’t remember the incident and refuses to talk about it. That’s journalistic malpractice.</p>
<p>So no corroboration, no evidence, no victim and no witness (only hearsay of one), but the “paper of record” is perfectly fine with defaming Kavanaugh all over again.</p>
<p>By the way, in the book, the authors gratuitously name the woman, including a new surname she uses, even though she doesn’t want to talk — and the woman’s friends the reporters did speak to say she doesn’t remember anything. Why shame her? Because she refuses to back up the reporters’ agenda?</b></p>
<p>Once again, the Trump hating media outs a private citizen in their putrid and futile hatred of everything Trump...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/09/13/ftp542/#comment-143844</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Sep 2019 18:57:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=17396#comment-143844</guid>
		<description>&lt;B&gt;The Brett Kavanaugh lynch mob can’t let it go. Now Democrats want to impeach the conservative Supreme Court justice over a new sexual misconduct allegation in the New York Times so shady, even the newspaper doesn’t seem to believe in it.

This fresh smear is buried in the 11th paragraph of a story written by Times reporters Robin Pogrebin and Kate Kelly, adapted from their upcoming book, “The Education of Brett Kavanaugh.”

They name their alleged witness to the alleged incident as Max Stier, a Washington lawyer and former Yale classmate of Kavanaugh’s, described as a “respected thought leader on federal government management,” but who also appears to be the same Max Stier who was on then-President Bill Clinton’s legal team during the Lewinsky scandal in 1998, when he worked at the law firm Williams &amp; Connolly.&lt;/B&gt;

So, apparently this Max Stier is a scumbag from way WAY back...

Makes sense..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>The Brett Kavanaugh lynch mob can’t let it go. Now Democrats want to impeach the conservative Supreme Court justice over a new sexual misconduct allegation in the New York Times so shady, even the newspaper doesn’t seem to believe in it.</p>
<p>This fresh smear is buried in the 11th paragraph of a story written by Times reporters Robin Pogrebin and Kate Kelly, adapted from their upcoming book, “The Education of Brett Kavanaugh.”</p>
<p>They name their alleged witness to the alleged incident as Max Stier, a Washington lawyer and former Yale classmate of Kavanaugh’s, described as a “respected thought leader on federal government management,” but who also appears to be the same Max Stier who was on then-President Bill Clinton’s legal team during the Lewinsky scandal in 1998, when he worked at the law firm Williams &amp; Connolly.</b></p>
<p>So, apparently this Max Stier is a scumbag from way WAY back...</p>
<p>Makes sense..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/09/13/ftp542/#comment-143843</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Sep 2019 18:56:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=17396#comment-143843</guid>
		<description>&lt;B&gt;Devine: Latest Brett Kavanaugh smear doesn’t hold up&lt;/B&gt;
https://nypost.com/2019/09/15/devine-latest-brett-kavanaugh-smear-doesnt-hold-up/

Once again.. Democrats overreach and are made to look like complete and utter fools...

Couldn&#039;t happen to a more deserving pieces of crap..

Again, the question just BEGS to be asked..

Do ya&#039;all get soo utterly tired of seeing your Democrat bitch-slapped and LOSE all the time???</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>Devine: Latest Brett Kavanaugh smear doesn’t hold up</b><br />
<a href="https://nypost.com/2019/09/15/devine-latest-brett-kavanaugh-smear-doesnt-hold-up/" rel="nofollow">https://nypost.com/2019/09/15/devine-latest-brett-kavanaugh-smear-doesnt-hold-up/</a></p>
<p>Once again.. Democrats overreach and are made to look like complete and utter fools...</p>
<p>Couldn't happen to a more deserving pieces of crap..</p>
<p>Again, the question just BEGS to be asked..</p>
<p>Do ya'all get soo utterly tired of seeing your Democrat bitch-slapped and LOSE all the time???</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nypoet22</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/09/13/ftp542/#comment-143842</link>
		<dc:creator>nypoet22</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Sep 2019 18:46:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=17396#comment-143842</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Trump was ballz on WRONG.

In that Dorian never impacted Alabama..

Yes he was... Eventually&lt;/i&gt;

there&#039;s no eventually about it. his incorrect information was a week old when he tweeted it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Trump was ballz on WRONG.</p>
<p>In that Dorian never impacted Alabama..</p>
<p>Yes he was... Eventually</i></p>
<p>there's no eventually about it. his incorrect information was a week old when he tweeted it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/09/13/ftp542/#comment-143841</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Sep 2019 18:42:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=17396#comment-143841</guid>
		<description>&lt;B&gt;On &quot;No Interruption,&quot; Fox Nation host Tomi Lahren sat down with Andrew Pollack, father of Parkland shooting victim Meadow Pollack.

Pollack became an outspoken advocate for school safety since the Parkland shooting, and he has now written a new book detailing his own investigation into the events that led to the massacre.

&quot;I wanted to look into it, I wanted to honor my daughter to see what happened, and how it could happen that I put my daughter in a school, in a nice neighboorhood, and then I&#039;m never going to see her again,&quot; Pollack said. &quot;I wanted to know the facts. I didn&#039;t just listen to mainstream media, I didn&#039;t jump on that bandwagon -- and I found out that there was a multitude of failures and policies that lead up to my daughter getting murdered, that the mainstream media didn&#039;t want to cover.&quot;

In &quot;Why Meadow Died: The People and Policies That Created The Parkland Shooter and Endanger America&#039;s Students,&quot; Pollack discusses his views on gun control, why he blames Democratic policies for his daughter&#039;s murder, and precautions that parents can take to ensure the safety of their children.

Pollack argued that new gun control laws are an ineffective solution to the school shooting epidemic, in part because current laws are not being enforced.  For example, the Parkland shooter had a violent record, but he was not arrested and therefore able to obtain a weapon legally.


&quot;To me, gun control would’ve been if they arrested him for punching his mother’s teeth out and he got a background,” explained Pollack. &quot;Democrats put these policies in place that don&#039;t believe in holding kids accountable or arresting them while they&#039;re juveniles...so if they don&#039;t arrest them and they don&#039;t get a background, then they&#039;re able to purchase weapons legally and a background check is useless,&quot; he said.&lt;/B&gt;

Dumbocrats go on and on about adding more gun laws.. Yet they don&#039;t even enforce the laws that exist to prevent murderous psycho scumbags from getting weapons...

Morons....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>On "No Interruption," Fox Nation host Tomi Lahren sat down with Andrew Pollack, father of Parkland shooting victim Meadow Pollack.</p>
<p>Pollack became an outspoken advocate for school safety since the Parkland shooting, and he has now written a new book detailing his own investigation into the events that led to the massacre.</p>
<p>"I wanted to look into it, I wanted to honor my daughter to see what happened, and how it could happen that I put my daughter in a school, in a nice neighboorhood, and then I'm never going to see her again," Pollack said. "I wanted to know the facts. I didn't just listen to mainstream media, I didn't jump on that bandwagon -- and I found out that there was a multitude of failures and policies that lead up to my daughter getting murdered, that the mainstream media didn't want to cover."</p>
<p>In "Why Meadow Died: The People and Policies That Created The Parkland Shooter and Endanger America's Students," Pollack discusses his views on gun control, why he blames Democratic policies for his daughter's murder, and precautions that parents can take to ensure the safety of their children.</p>
<p>Pollack argued that new gun control laws are an ineffective solution to the school shooting epidemic, in part because current laws are not being enforced.  For example, the Parkland shooter had a violent record, but he was not arrested and therefore able to obtain a weapon legally.</p>
<p>"To me, gun control would’ve been if they arrested him for punching his mother’s teeth out and he got a background,” explained Pollack. "Democrats put these policies in place that don't believe in holding kids accountable or arresting them while they're juveniles...so if they don't arrest them and they don't get a background, then they're able to purchase weapons legally and a background check is useless," he said.</b></p>
<p>Dumbocrats go on and on about adding more gun laws.. Yet they don't even enforce the laws that exist to prevent murderous psycho scumbags from getting weapons...</p>
<p>Morons....</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/09/13/ftp542/#comment-143840</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Sep 2019 18:39:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=17396#comment-143840</guid>
		<description>&lt;B&gt;Father of Parkland shooting victim: &#039;Guns didn’t kill my daughter, Democratic policies did&#039;&lt;/B&gt;
https://www.foxnews.com/media/father-of-parkland-shooting-victim-andrew-pollack-blames-dems-guns-didnt-kill-my-daughter-but-democratic-policies-did

Compare this grieving father to the attention bitch, David Hogg and his hypocrisy...

:eyeroll:</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>Father of Parkland shooting victim: 'Guns didn’t kill my daughter, Democratic policies did'</b><br />
<a href="https://www.foxnews.com/media/father-of-parkland-shooting-victim-andrew-pollack-blames-dems-guns-didnt-kill-my-daughter-but-democratic-policies-did" rel="nofollow">https://www.foxnews.com/media/father-of-parkland-shooting-victim-andrew-pollack-blames-dems-guns-didnt-kill-my-daughter-but-democratic-policies-did</a></p>
<p>Compare this grieving father to the attention bitch, David Hogg and his hypocrisy...</p>
<p>:eyeroll:</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/09/13/ftp542/#comment-143839</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Sep 2019 18:36:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=17396#comment-143839</guid>
		<description>&lt;B&gt;&quot;An earlier version of this article, which was adapted from a forthcoming book, did not include one element of the book&#039;s account regarding an assertion by a Yale classmate that friends of Brett Kavanaugh pushed his penis into the hand of a female student at a drunken dorm party,&quot; The Times wrote in a correction Monday. &quot;The book reports that the female student declined to be interviewed and friends say that she does not recall the incident. That information has been added to the article.&quot;

“That information has been added to the article.” 

Seriously? Here we’ve got a national news outlet publishing unverified claims of sexual misconduct against a sitting SCOTUS Justice – claims that Democrats are now using to call for his impeachment – and the Times never bothered to include that the alleged victim denies the whole thing?

And they wonder why Trump calls them the “enemy of the people.”

This. This would be why.&lt;/B&gt;

Democrats...   The STOOPIDEST pile of flotsam on the planet..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>"An earlier version of this article, which was adapted from a forthcoming book, did not include one element of the book's account regarding an assertion by a Yale classmate that friends of Brett Kavanaugh pushed his penis into the hand of a female student at a drunken dorm party," The Times wrote in a correction Monday. "The book reports that the female student declined to be interviewed and friends say that she does not recall the incident. That information has been added to the article."</p>
<p>“That information has been added to the article.” </p>
<p>Seriously? Here we’ve got a national news outlet publishing unverified claims of sexual misconduct against a sitting SCOTUS Justice – claims that Democrats are now using to call for his impeachment – and the Times never bothered to include that the alleged victim denies the whole thing?</p>
<p>And they wonder why Trump calls them the “enemy of the people.”</p>
<p>This. This would be why.</b></p>
<p>Democrats...   The STOOPIDEST pile of flotsam on the planet..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/09/13/ftp542/#comment-143838</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Sep 2019 18:33:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=17396#comment-143838</guid>
		<description>&lt;B&gt;NYT &#039;Corrects&#039; Their Kavanaugh &#039;Bombshell&#039; After Internet Explodes&lt;/B&gt;
https://www.mrctv.org/blog/nyt-corrects-their-kavanaugh-bombshell-after-internet-explodes

Once again..

Democrats and the NY GRIME has egg all over their faces.. 

:D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>NYT 'Corrects' Their Kavanaugh 'Bombshell' After Internet Explodes</b><br />
<a href="https://www.mrctv.org/blog/nyt-corrects-their-kavanaugh-bombshell-after-internet-explodes" rel="nofollow">https://www.mrctv.org/blog/nyt-corrects-their-kavanaugh-bombshell-after-internet-explodes</a></p>
<p>Once again..</p>
<p>Democrats and the NY GRIME has egg all over their faces.. </p>
<p>:D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/09/13/ftp542/#comment-143837</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Sep 2019 18:32:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=17396#comment-143837</guid>
		<description>Despite claims to the contrary...

&lt;B&gt;Judiciary chairman throws cold water on Kavanaugh impeachment
Jerry Nadler says the committee is too busy &#039;impeaching the president&#039; to consider investigating the Supreme Court justice.&lt;/B&gt;
https://www.politico.com/story/2019/09/16/house-judiciary-kavanaugh-impeachment-1498124

Democrats CAN&#039;T walk and chew gun as previously claimed..  

:eyeroll:</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Despite claims to the contrary...</p>
<p><b>Judiciary chairman throws cold water on Kavanaugh impeachment<br />
Jerry Nadler says the committee is too busy 'impeaching the president' to consider investigating the Supreme Court justice.</b><br />
<a href="https://www.politico.com/story/2019/09/16/house-judiciary-kavanaugh-impeachment-1498124" rel="nofollow">https://www.politico.com/story/2019/09/16/house-judiciary-kavanaugh-impeachment-1498124</a></p>
<p>Democrats CAN'T walk and chew gun as previously claimed..  </p>
<p>:eyeroll:</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/09/13/ftp542/#comment-143836</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Sep 2019 15:40:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=17396#comment-143836</guid>
		<description>JM,

&lt;I&gt;Trump was ballz on WRONG.&lt;/I&gt;

In that Dorian never impacted Alabama..

Yes he was...  Eventually

But EVERY Forecaster was ALSO wrong when they said that Dorian would strike South Florida.

Funny how you ignore that...

Why is that??

&lt;I&gt;In a forceful email sent to staff, Craig McLean, the chief scientist of NOAA, took on anonymous members of his own organization who may have “violated NOAA’s policies of scientific integrity.”&lt;/I&gt;

And THAT is why Craig McLean is not the head of the NOAA.. Because he spews bullshit TOTALLY based on Party Ideology..

He&#039;s a Dumbocrat stooge..

No one with more than 2 brain cells to rub together would believe a word he says..

&lt;I&gt;Trump tweeted about Dorian threatening Alabama on 1 September, apparently relying on information that was several days old. &lt;/I&gt;

Except the FACTS prove that is wrong..

&lt;B&gt;From Wednesday, August 28, through Monday, September 2, the information provided by NOAA and the National Hurricane Center to President Trump and the wider public demonstrated that tropical-storm-force winds from Hurricane Dorian could impact Alabama. This is clearly demonstrated in Hurricane Advisories #15 through #41, which can be viewed at the following link.&lt;/B&gt;

What is it about 28 Aug thru 2 Sep is unclear to you??

Can&#039;t you see past your Party slavery??

The fact is, President Trump was factually accurate with the information he had..

If you want to whine and cry that Trump was eventually proven wrong, then you would HAVE to whine and cry that ALL THE OTHER FORECASTERS were eventually proven wrong..

But you can&#039;t do that because your Party Slavery won&#039;t LET you do that...

&lt;B&gt;&quot;And so it goes... And so it goes... And so will you soon I suppose...&quot;&lt;/B&gt;
-Billy Joel</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>JM,</p>
<p><i>Trump was ballz on WRONG.</i></p>
<p>In that Dorian never impacted Alabama..</p>
<p>Yes he was...  Eventually</p>
<p>But EVERY Forecaster was ALSO wrong when they said that Dorian would strike South Florida.</p>
<p>Funny how you ignore that...</p>
<p>Why is that??</p>
<p><i>In a forceful email sent to staff, Craig McLean, the chief scientist of NOAA, took on anonymous members of his own organization who may have “violated NOAA’s policies of scientific integrity.”</i></p>
<p>And THAT is why Craig McLean is not the head of the NOAA.. Because he spews bullshit TOTALLY based on Party Ideology..</p>
<p>He's a Dumbocrat stooge..</p>
<p>No one with more than 2 brain cells to rub together would believe a word he says..</p>
<p><i>Trump tweeted about Dorian threatening Alabama on 1 September, apparently relying on information that was several days old. </i></p>
<p>Except the FACTS prove that is wrong..</p>
<p><b>From Wednesday, August 28, through Monday, September 2, the information provided by NOAA and the National Hurricane Center to President Trump and the wider public demonstrated that tropical-storm-force winds from Hurricane Dorian could impact Alabama. This is clearly demonstrated in Hurricane Advisories #15 through #41, which can be viewed at the following link.</b></p>
<p>What is it about 28 Aug thru 2 Sep is unclear to you??</p>
<p>Can't you see past your Party slavery??</p>
<p>The fact is, President Trump was factually accurate with the information he had..</p>
<p>If you want to whine and cry that Trump was eventually proven wrong, then you would HAVE to whine and cry that ALL THE OTHER FORECASTERS were eventually proven wrong..</p>
<p>But you can't do that because your Party Slavery won't LET you do that...</p>
<p><b>"And so it goes... And so it goes... And so will you soon I suppose..."</b><br />
-Billy Joel</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John M</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/09/13/ftp542/#comment-143835</link>
		<dc:creator>John M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Sep 2019 15:28:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=17396#comment-143835</guid>
		<description>&quot;Sharpiegate is over. Once again, it was proven that ya&#039;all&#039;s hysteria was bogus and that President Trump was dead on ballz factually accurate...

Chalk it up to another President Trump win.. :D&quot;


Trump was ballz on WRONG.

Chalk it up as another President Trump LOSS. :-D

Here are the REAL FACTS, from the ONLY Authority possible:

In a forceful email sent to staff, Craig McLean, the chief scientist of NOAA, took on anonymous members of his own organization who may have “violated NOAA’s policies of scientific integrity.” 

At no point did Dorian present a risk to Alabama in the way Trump claimed it would. The National Weather Service forecast around the time of Trump’s tweet indicated about a 5 percent chance of tropical-force winds for a small corner of Alabama, a far cry from Trump’s warning that it would be “hit (much) harder.”

“My understanding is that this intervention to contradict the forecaster was not based on science but on external factors including reputation and appearance, or simply put, political,” McLean said of the press release in his email. “The content of this press release is very concerning as it compromises the ability of NOAA to convey life-saving information necessary to avoid substantial and specific danger to public health and safety.”

The head of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Neil Jacobs (Noaa) appeared close to tears, as he both defended the administration and thanked a local weather office that contradicted Donald Trump’s claims about Hurricane Dorian threatening Alabama.

Neil Jacobs, the acting administrator, told a meteorology group a Noaa statement that criticized the Birmingham-area forecast office after it disagreed with the president was meant to clarify “technical aspects” about Dorian’s potential impact.

“What it did not say, however, was that we understood and fully support the good intent of the weather office, which was to calm fears in support of public safety,” said Jacobs.

Trump tweeted about Dorian threatening Alabama on 1 September, apparently relying on information that was several days old. In other words, information that was both no longer accurate and way out of date at the time Trump was saying that it was in fact the most recent forecast. Trump was plainly and simply WRONG. 

The statement from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) backing President Trump over the National Weather Service (NWS) in claiming Alabama could be in the path of Hurricane Dorian is now under investigation by the Commerce Department’s Office of Inspector General.

In a message to NOAA staff members, Inspector General Peggy E. Gustafson wrote that the NWS “must maintain standards of scientific integrity,” according to The New York Times.

Gustafson added that the episode had called “into question the NWS’s processes, scientific independence, and ability to communicate accurate and timely weather warnings and data to the nation in times of national emergency.”

The Inspector General&#039;s office has asked NOAA employees to preserve their communications relating to the statement.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>"Sharpiegate is over. Once again, it was proven that ya'all's hysteria was bogus and that President Trump was dead on ballz factually accurate...</p>
<p>Chalk it up to another President Trump win.. :D"</p>
<p>Trump was ballz on WRONG.</p>
<p>Chalk it up as another President Trump LOSS. :-D</p>
<p>Here are the REAL FACTS, from the ONLY Authority possible:</p>
<p>In a forceful email sent to staff, Craig McLean, the chief scientist of NOAA, took on anonymous members of his own organization who may have “violated NOAA’s policies of scientific integrity.” </p>
<p>At no point did Dorian present a risk to Alabama in the way Trump claimed it would. The National Weather Service forecast around the time of Trump’s tweet indicated about a 5 percent chance of tropical-force winds for a small corner of Alabama, a far cry from Trump’s warning that it would be “hit (much) harder.”</p>
<p>“My understanding is that this intervention to contradict the forecaster was not based on science but on external factors including reputation and appearance, or simply put, political,” McLean said of the press release in his email. “The content of this press release is very concerning as it compromises the ability of NOAA to convey life-saving information necessary to avoid substantial and specific danger to public health and safety.”</p>
<p>The head of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Neil Jacobs (Noaa) appeared close to tears, as he both defended the administration and thanked a local weather office that contradicted Donald Trump’s claims about Hurricane Dorian threatening Alabama.</p>
<p>Neil Jacobs, the acting administrator, told a meteorology group a Noaa statement that criticized the Birmingham-area forecast office after it disagreed with the president was meant to clarify “technical aspects” about Dorian’s potential impact.</p>
<p>“What it did not say, however, was that we understood and fully support the good intent of the weather office, which was to calm fears in support of public safety,” said Jacobs.</p>
<p>Trump tweeted about Dorian threatening Alabama on 1 September, apparently relying on information that was several days old. In other words, information that was both no longer accurate and way out of date at the time Trump was saying that it was in fact the most recent forecast. Trump was plainly and simply WRONG. </p>
<p>The statement from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) backing President Trump over the National Weather Service (NWS) in claiming Alabama could be in the path of Hurricane Dorian is now under investigation by the Commerce Department’s Office of Inspector General.</p>
<p>In a message to NOAA staff members, Inspector General Peggy E. Gustafson wrote that the NWS “must maintain standards of scientific integrity,” according to The New York Times.</p>
<p>Gustafson added that the episode had called “into question the NWS’s processes, scientific independence, and ability to communicate accurate and timely weather warnings and data to the nation in times of national emergency.”</p>
<p>The Inspector General's office has asked NOAA employees to preserve their communications relating to the statement.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/09/13/ftp542/#comment-143833</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Sep 2019 14:53:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=17396#comment-143833</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;I knew that areas with lots of fracking have very large numbers of earthquakes of low magnitude. I would have assumed that the number would exceed what happens in California, but I probably would have guessed in the 1.0-2.5 range, rather than 3.0. If fracking ever triggers quakes large enough to do significant damage, I haven&#039;t heard about it.

Although apparently it&#039;s the wastewater injection that does it, rather than the fracking per se: https://www.usgs.gov/natural-hazards/earthquake-hazards/induced-earthquakes?qt-science_support_page_related_con=4#qt-science_support_page_related_con
&lt;/I&gt;

It&#039;s funny..

When I display the facts, people in here just can&#039;t shut up...  They have to go to hysterical lengths to TRY and prove me wrong..

When dsws shows the exact same facts, no one challenges him.. or her..  Please not &#039;xe&#039;??  

I guess that&#039;s a compliment of sorts...  :D

&lt;I&gt;I still think coal is much, much worse than fracking. Or pretty much anything else except maybe agriculture.&lt;/I&gt;

It is.. These people simply don&#039;t know any better..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>I knew that areas with lots of fracking have very large numbers of earthquakes of low magnitude. I would have assumed that the number would exceed what happens in California, but I probably would have guessed in the 1.0-2.5 range, rather than 3.0. If fracking ever triggers quakes large enough to do significant damage, I haven't heard about it.</p>
<p>Although apparently it's the wastewater injection that does it, rather than the fracking per se: <a href="https://www.usgs.gov/natural-hazards/earthquake-hazards/induced-earthquakes?qt-science_support_page_related_con=4#qt-science_support_page_related_con" rel="nofollow">https://www.usgs.gov/natural-hazards/earthquake-hazards/induced-earthquakes?qt-science_support_page_related_con=4#qt-science_support_page_related_con</a><br />
</i></p>
<p>It's funny..</p>
<p>When I display the facts, people in here just can't shut up...  They have to go to hysterical lengths to TRY and prove me wrong..</p>
<p>When dsws shows the exact same facts, no one challenges him.. or her..  Please not 'xe'??  </p>
<p>I guess that's a compliment of sorts...  :D</p>
<p><i>I still think coal is much, much worse than fracking. Or pretty much anything else except maybe agriculture.</i></p>
<p>It is.. These people simply don't know any better..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dsws</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/09/13/ftp542/#comment-143832</link>
		<dc:creator>dsws</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Sep 2019 14:00:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=17396#comment-143832</guid>
		<description>[138] Listen:

&lt;i&gt;since Oklahoma started allowing fracking, there has been a massive increase in the number of earthquakes that the state experiences every year. Did you know that Oklahoma now suffers from more 3.0 earthquakes than Southern California every year?&lt;/i&gt;

I knew that areas with lots of fracking have very large numbers of earthquakes of low magnitude.  I would have assumed that the number would exceed what happens in California, but I probably would have guessed in the 1.0-2.5 range, rather than 3.0.  If fracking ever triggers quakes large enough to do significant damage, I haven&#039;t heard about it.

Although apparently it&#039;s the wastewater injection that does it, rather than the fracking per se: https://www.usgs.gov/natural-hazards/earthquake-hazards/induced-earthquakes?qt-science_support_page_related_con=4#qt-science_support_page_related_con

I still think coal is much, much worse than fracking.  Or pretty much anything else except maybe agriculture.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[138] Listen:</p>
<p><i>since Oklahoma started allowing fracking, there has been a massive increase in the number of earthquakes that the state experiences every year. Did you know that Oklahoma now suffers from more 3.0 earthquakes than Southern California every year?</i></p>
<p>I knew that areas with lots of fracking have very large numbers of earthquakes of low magnitude.  I would have assumed that the number would exceed what happens in California, but I probably would have guessed in the 1.0-2.5 range, rather than 3.0.  If fracking ever triggers quakes large enough to do significant damage, I haven't heard about it.</p>
<p>Although apparently it's the wastewater injection that does it, rather than the fracking per se: <a href="https://www.usgs.gov/natural-hazards/earthquake-hazards/induced-earthquakes?qt-science_support_page_related_con=4#qt-science_support_page_related_con" rel="nofollow">https://www.usgs.gov/natural-hazards/earthquake-hazards/induced-earthquakes?qt-science_support_page_related_con=4#qt-science_support_page_related_con</a></p>
<p>I still think coal is much, much worse than fracking.  Or pretty much anything else except maybe agriculture.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/09/13/ftp542/#comment-143831</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Sep 2019 13:27:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=17396#comment-143831</guid>
		<description>OK  Gonna take a break.. Let ya&#039;all catch up since yer lagging.  :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK  Gonna take a break.. Let ya'all catch up since yer lagging.  :D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/09/13/ftp542/#comment-143830</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Sep 2019 13:26:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=17396#comment-143830</guid>
		<description>&lt;B&gt;2020 Democrats hate Trump’s China trade war. Too bad they don’t have any better ideas.

Thursday’s debate showed that candidates are struggling to define a China trade policy to counter Trump’s.&lt;/B&gt;
https://www.vox.com/2019/9/13/20864192/democratic-debate-2020-trade-trump-china

hehehehehe  Even the Left Wing rag VOX says that Democrats don&#039;t have shit.. :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>2020 Democrats hate Trump’s China trade war. Too bad they don’t have any better ideas.</p>
<p>Thursday’s debate showed that candidates are struggling to define a China trade policy to counter Trump’s.</b><br />
<a href="https://www.vox.com/2019/9/13/20864192/democratic-debate-2020-trade-trump-china" rel="nofollow">https://www.vox.com/2019/9/13/20864192/democratic-debate-2020-trade-trump-china</a></p>
<p>hehehehehe  Even the Left Wing rag VOX says that Democrats don't have shit.. :D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/09/13/ftp542/#comment-143829</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Sep 2019 13:24:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=17396#comment-143829</guid>
		<description>@ &#039;nuck

It&#039;s the NY GRIME, &#039;Nuck...

You REALLY put stock in that they say??

And who is this &quot;expert&quot;??

A nobody.. With NO accompanying facts to prove his case..

And it&#039;s from 1996 to boot..

Wow.. you MUST be desperate..  :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ 'nuck</p>
<p>It's the NY GRIME, 'Nuck...</p>
<p>You REALLY put stock in that they say??</p>
<p>And who is this "expert"??</p>
<p>A nobody.. With NO accompanying facts to prove his case..</p>
<p>And it's from 1996 to boot..</p>
<p>Wow.. you MUST be desperate..  :D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James T Canuck</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/09/13/ftp542/#comment-143828</link>
		<dc:creator>James T Canuck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Sep 2019 13:13:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=17396#comment-143828</guid>
		<description>And humans can&#039;t effect the Earth... https://www.nytimes.com/1996/03/03/news/dams-for-water-supply-are-altering-earth-s-orbit-expert-says.html 

LL&amp;P</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And humans can't effect the Earth... <a href="https://www.nytimes.com/1996/03/03/news/dams-for-water-supply-are-altering-earth-s-orbit-expert-says.html" rel="nofollow">https://www.nytimes.com/1996/03/03/news/dams-for-water-supply-are-altering-earth-s-orbit-expert-says.html</a> </p>
<p>LL&amp;P</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/09/13/ftp542/#comment-143827</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Sep 2019 13:12:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=17396#comment-143827</guid>
		<description>Poor poor joe...

&lt;B&gt;Biden struggles to recall the word &#039;escalator&#039; when denouncing Trump&#039;s 2015 rapists comment

Democratic front-runner Joe Biden struggled to recall the word &quot;escalator&quot; while bashing President Trump during a campaign stop in Miami, Florida.

Speaking at at the historic Ball &amp; Chain nightclub on Sunday afternoon to mark the start of Hispanic Heritage Month, Biden slammed the president&#039;s June 2015 comments about Mexican immigrants during his 2016 campaign announcement speech.

&quot;Remember when he came down, uh, down the, uh, down his escalator of Trump Tower?&quot; Biden said after some prompting from the audience. &quot;He announced on the way down, one of the reasons he was running was because of all those Mexican rapists.&quot;&lt;/B&gt;
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/biden-struggles-to-recall-the-word-escalator-when-denouncing-trumps-2015-rapists-comment

Slurred speech, senility and bullshit.. All rolled into one..   :eyeroll:

THIS is the best the Democrats can offer??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Poor poor joe...</p>
<p><b>Biden struggles to recall the word 'escalator' when denouncing Trump's 2015 rapists comment</p>
<p>Democratic front-runner Joe Biden struggled to recall the word "escalator" while bashing President Trump during a campaign stop in Miami, Florida.</p>
<p>Speaking at at the historic Ball &amp; Chain nightclub on Sunday afternoon to mark the start of Hispanic Heritage Month, Biden slammed the president's June 2015 comments about Mexican immigrants during his 2016 campaign announcement speech.</p>
<p>"Remember when he came down, uh, down the, uh, down his escalator of Trump Tower?" Biden said after some prompting from the audience. "He announced on the way down, one of the reasons he was running was because of all those Mexican rapists."</b><br />
<a href="https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/biden-struggles-to-recall-the-word-escalator-when-denouncing-trumps-2015-rapists-comment" rel="nofollow">https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/biden-struggles-to-recall-the-word-escalator-when-denouncing-trumps-2015-rapists-comment</a></p>
<p>Slurred speech, senility and bullshit.. All rolled into one..   :eyeroll:</p>
<p>THIS is the best the Democrats can offer??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/09/13/ftp542/#comment-143826</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Sep 2019 13:06:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=17396#comment-143826</guid>
		<description>OK  Interesting story..

For the last decade or so, NASA and the NOAA has been tweaking weather temp data to produce the desired rise in temp &quot;evidence&quot;..

Of course, there were those who caught the NOAA and NASA fudging the numbers to produce the desired result..

NOAA/NASA&#039;s excuse for the tweaking and fudging was because they weather stations were old and placed in heat sources that skewed the result.  No word on WHY all the tweaking and fudging were UPWARDS and not DOWNWARDS..

Anyway, after a year or so of flack, NASA said FINE.. We&#039;ll build a NEW and RELIABLE and HYPER ACCURATE system.. 

NASA with help from the NOAA designed the most accurate and sophisticated weather station imaginable..

144 of these hyper accurate stations were built..  

NASA/NOAA then went all over the country to scout out the locations where these new hyper-accurate weather stations would be placed..  No expense was spared to find the perfect spot.. &lt;B&gt;&quot;Now, no one can accuse us of having bad data from bad locations!!!&quot;&lt;/B&gt; NASA and NOAA thought to themselves..

In 2004, the placement of these new hyper accurate weather stations began..

By 2005, the system was in place and the grid was activated!!

And, 14 years later, what did these hyper-accurate weather stations show??

That there was NO WARMING in the CONUS..  As a matter of fact, this hyper accurate system PROVED that there was actually a bit of cooling in the Continental United States..

The Global Warming hysteria is a con...  Pure and simple..

The planet will NOT be destroyed in 11 years as Occasional Cortex claims...

Anyone who subscribes to the con is either a moron or blinded by a Party agenda...

This is what the FACTS show..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK  Interesting story..</p>
<p>For the last decade or so, NASA and the NOAA has been tweaking weather temp data to produce the desired rise in temp "evidence"..</p>
<p>Of course, there were those who caught the NOAA and NASA fudging the numbers to produce the desired result..</p>
<p>NOAA/NASA's excuse for the tweaking and fudging was because they weather stations were old and placed in heat sources that skewed the result.  No word on WHY all the tweaking and fudging were UPWARDS and not DOWNWARDS..</p>
<p>Anyway, after a year or so of flack, NASA said FINE.. We'll build a NEW and RELIABLE and HYPER ACCURATE system.. </p>
<p>NASA with help from the NOAA designed the most accurate and sophisticated weather station imaginable..</p>
<p>144 of these hyper accurate stations were built..  </p>
<p>NASA/NOAA then went all over the country to scout out the locations where these new hyper-accurate weather stations would be placed..  No expense was spared to find the perfect spot.. <b>"Now, no one can accuse us of having bad data from bad locations!!!"</b> NASA and NOAA thought to themselves..</p>
<p>In 2004, the placement of these new hyper accurate weather stations began..</p>
<p>By 2005, the system was in place and the grid was activated!!</p>
<p>And, 14 years later, what did these hyper-accurate weather stations show??</p>
<p>That there was NO WARMING in the CONUS..  As a matter of fact, this hyper accurate system PROVED that there was actually a bit of cooling in the Continental United States..</p>
<p>The Global Warming hysteria is a con...  Pure and simple..</p>
<p>The planet will NOT be destroyed in 11 years as Occasional Cortex claims...</p>
<p>Anyone who subscribes to the con is either a moron or blinded by a Party agenda...</p>
<p>This is what the FACTS show..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/09/13/ftp542/#comment-143825</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Sep 2019 12:55:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=17396#comment-143825</guid>
		<description>DH,

&lt;I&gt;Michale (145)-
To paraphrase Condoleezza Rice:

&quot;We don&#039;t want that evidence to be a giant mushroom cloud eminating from Yellowstone.&quot; :D&lt;/I&gt;

So, it&#039;s better to tank and destroy the economy AND the country so Democrats can be SHOWN how utterly stoopid and moronic they are for their belief in the END OF THE WORLD Global Warming con???

I don&#039;t think so..

Interesting story... Next comment...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DH,</p>
<p><i>Michale (145)-<br />
To paraphrase Condoleezza Rice:</p>
<p>"We don't want that evidence to be a giant mushroom cloud eminating from Yellowstone." :D</i></p>
<p>So, it's better to tank and destroy the economy AND the country so Democrats can be SHOWN how utterly stoopid and moronic they are for their belief in the END OF THE WORLD Global Warming con???</p>
<p>I don't think so..</p>
<p>Interesting story... Next comment...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/09/13/ftp542/#comment-143824</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Sep 2019 12:53:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=17396#comment-143824</guid>
		<description>&lt;B&gt;Trumped Out?
After nearly four years of ceaseless attacks by Democrats and the press, the strange thing is not that Trump can be occasionally wearisome, but that he is even still breathing.&lt;/B&gt;
https://amgreatness.com/2019/09/15/trumped-out/

Democrats just can&#039;t win..

No matter what they throw at President Trump, he comes back harder and stronger... :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>Trumped Out?<br />
After nearly four years of ceaseless attacks by Democrats and the press, the strange thing is not that Trump can be occasionally wearisome, but that he is even still breathing.</b><br />
<a href="https://amgreatness.com/2019/09/15/trumped-out/" rel="nofollow">https://amgreatness.com/2019/09/15/trumped-out/</a></p>
<p>Democrats just can't win..</p>
<p>No matter what they throw at President Trump, he comes back harder and stronger... :D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/09/13/ftp542/#comment-143823</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Sep 2019 12:45:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=17396#comment-143823</guid>
		<description>&lt;B&gt;In any case, Stier’s claim, which even two Democratic senators’ offices didn’t find particularly worthwhile, was that he had seen an inebriated Kavanaugh, pants-down, at a freshman-year party. Stier’s claim to the staffers, we’re told, was that other people at the party put Kavanaugh’s genitalia into the hands of a classmate. Another unnamed person alleged said that he or she might have remembered hearing that the female student had transferred out of her college because of Kavanaugh, “though exactly why was unclear.”

The reporters, who describe Democrats in glowing terms and Republicans otherwise, say that Stier is a “respected thought leader” in the defense of the federal bureaucracy. They don’t mention his history of working for the Clintons. As for the victim? They say she “has refused to discuss the incident, though several of her friends said she does not recall it.”

To repeat: Several of her friends said she does not recall it.

So to summarize, the only new claim in the new book is that a Democratic attorney told two senators that he saw an incident where a third party allegedly did something to Kavanaugh and the young woman. In their book, the authors are upset that this claim didn’t lead to a massive FBI investigation, although they don’t explain why they think it should have.

Pogebrin and Kelly left the victim’s denial out of their New York Times story. It is unclear why the reporters and editors allowed the story to be published without this salient fact that they conceded, albeit briefly, in their own book.&lt;/B&gt;

I have to dispute Ms Hemingway&#039;s assertion..

It is NOT unclear why these lying scumabags, these NY GRIME reporters ( I know, I know.. &#039;lying scumbags&#039; &#039;NY GRIME Reporters&#039; I know it&#039;s redundant) chose to leave that FACT out of the NY GRIME article and why NY Grime allowed it..

They are morons.. Hysterical and vindictive morons..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>In any case, Stier’s claim, which even two Democratic senators’ offices didn’t find particularly worthwhile, was that he had seen an inebriated Kavanaugh, pants-down, at a freshman-year party. Stier’s claim to the staffers, we’re told, was that other people at the party put Kavanaugh’s genitalia into the hands of a classmate. Another unnamed person alleged said that he or she might have remembered hearing that the female student had transferred out of her college because of Kavanaugh, “though exactly why was unclear.”</p>
<p>The reporters, who describe Democrats in glowing terms and Republicans otherwise, say that Stier is a “respected thought leader” in the defense of the federal bureaucracy. They don’t mention his history of working for the Clintons. As for the victim? They say she “has refused to discuss the incident, though several of her friends said she does not recall it.”</p>
<p>To repeat: Several of her friends said she does not recall it.</p>
<p>So to summarize, the only new claim in the new book is that a Democratic attorney told two senators that he saw an incident where a third party allegedly did something to Kavanaugh and the young woman. In their book, the authors are upset that this claim didn’t lead to a massive FBI investigation, although they don’t explain why they think it should have.</p>
<p>Pogebrin and Kelly left the victim’s denial out of their New York Times story. It is unclear why the reporters and editors allowed the story to be published without this salient fact that they conceded, albeit briefly, in their own book.</b></p>
<p>I have to dispute Ms Hemingway's assertion..</p>
<p>It is NOT unclear why these lying scumabags, these NY GRIME reporters ( I know, I know.. 'lying scumbags' 'NY GRIME Reporters' I know it's redundant) chose to leave that FACT out of the NY GRIME article and why NY Grime allowed it..</p>
<p>They are morons.. Hysterical and vindictive morons..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/09/13/ftp542/#comment-143822</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Sep 2019 12:42:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=17396#comment-143822</guid>
		<description>&lt;B&gt;The only supposedly new claim made in the book isn’t new and comes from Democrat attorney Max Stier, a Yale classmate of Kavanaugh’s with whom he has a long and contentious history. In the words of the Yale Daily News, they were “pitted” against each other during the Whitewater investigation in the 1990s when Kavanaugh worked for Independent Counsel Ken Starr. Stier defended President Bill Clinton, whose legal troubles began when a woman accused him of exposing himself to her in hotel room she had been brought to. Clinton later settled with the woman for $850,000 and, due to a contempt of court citation for misleading testimony, ended up losing his law license for five years. Stier worked closely with David Kendall, who went on to defend Hillary Clinton against allegations of illegally handling classified information. Kavanaugh’s reference to his opponents being motivated by “revenge on behalf of the Clintons” met with befuddlement by liberal media, despite the surprisingly large number of Clinton-affiliated attorneys who kept popping up during his confirmation hearings.&lt;/B&gt;

Everything always flows back to the Clintons...  :^/

Positively shocking.. NOT..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>The only supposedly new claim made in the book isn’t new and comes from Democrat attorney Max Stier, a Yale classmate of Kavanaugh’s with whom he has a long and contentious history. In the words of the Yale Daily News, they were “pitted” against each other during the Whitewater investigation in the 1990s when Kavanaugh worked for Independent Counsel Ken Starr. Stier defended President Bill Clinton, whose legal troubles began when a woman accused him of exposing himself to her in hotel room she had been brought to. Clinton later settled with the woman for $850,000 and, due to a contempt of court citation for misleading testimony, ended up losing his law license for five years. Stier worked closely with David Kendall, who went on to defend Hillary Clinton against allegations of illegally handling classified information. Kavanaugh’s reference to his opponents being motivated by “revenge on behalf of the Clintons” met with befuddlement by liberal media, despite the surprisingly large number of Clinton-affiliated attorneys who kept popping up during his confirmation hearings.</b></p>
<p>Everything always flows back to the Clintons...  :^/</p>
<p>Positively shocking.. NOT..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/09/13/ftp542/#comment-143821</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Sep 2019 12:41:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=17396#comment-143821</guid>
		<description>&lt;B&gt;Alleged Victim In New York Times Kavanaugh Story Denies Any Recollection Of Incident

New York Times reporters Robin Pogebrin and Kate Kelly are out with a new book that attempts to buttress the unsubstantiated claims deployed last year against Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh.

“The Education of Brett Kavanaugh: An Investigation” is neither a look at the education of Brett Kavanaugh nor an investigation. They admit they found no evidence to support the claims made by Christine Blasey Ford or Debbie Ramirez, although they say their “gut reaction” to the allegations is that they are true. They generously concede that their “gut” tells them that Michael Avennati client Julie Swetnick’s claims are not true, citing the lack of corroboration.


The “lack of corroboration” standard was unevenly held to by the authors. Blasey Ford’s four witnesses all denied knowledge of the party at which her alleged assault took place. Ramirez went from telling Ronan Farrow “I don’t have any stories about Brett Kavanaugh and sexual misconduct,” to telling friends of an incident for which she “couldn’t be sure” Kavanaugh was involved, to now being the centerpiece of the Pogebrin and Kelly book. Ramirez also had no eyewitness support for her story that allegedly took place at a well-attended party, even after friendly media outlets contacted some 75 classmates trying to find corroboration. Both women had the support of many friends and activists, however.&lt;/B&gt;
https://thefederalist.com/2019/09/15/alleged-victim-in-new-york-times-kavanaugh-story-doesnt-remember-incident/

What IS it about Dumbocrats and their desire to support ANY claim against a Republican, even if the claims have NO SUBSTANTIATING evidence and NO EYEWITNESS testimony???

Haven&#039;t Democrats heard of a little thing called DUE PROCESS???

Apparently, not...

:eyeroll:</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>Alleged Victim In New York Times Kavanaugh Story Denies Any Recollection Of Incident</p>
<p>New York Times reporters Robin Pogebrin and Kate Kelly are out with a new book that attempts to buttress the unsubstantiated claims deployed last year against Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh.</p>
<p>“The Education of Brett Kavanaugh: An Investigation” is neither a look at the education of Brett Kavanaugh nor an investigation. They admit they found no evidence to support the claims made by Christine Blasey Ford or Debbie Ramirez, although they say their “gut reaction” to the allegations is that they are true. They generously concede that their “gut” tells them that Michael Avennati client Julie Swetnick’s claims are not true, citing the lack of corroboration.</p>
<p>The “lack of corroboration” standard was unevenly held to by the authors. Blasey Ford’s four witnesses all denied knowledge of the party at which her alleged assault took place. Ramirez went from telling Ronan Farrow “I don’t have any stories about Brett Kavanaugh and sexual misconduct,” to telling friends of an incident for which she “couldn’t be sure” Kavanaugh was involved, to now being the centerpiece of the Pogebrin and Kelly book. Ramirez also had no eyewitness support for her story that allegedly took place at a well-attended party, even after friendly media outlets contacted some 75 classmates trying to find corroboration. Both women had the support of many friends and activists, however.</b><br />
<a href="https://thefederalist.com/2019/09/15/alleged-victim-in-new-york-times-kavanaugh-story-doesnt-remember-incident/" rel="nofollow">https://thefederalist.com/2019/09/15/alleged-victim-in-new-york-times-kavanaugh-story-doesnt-remember-incident/</a></p>
<p>What IS it about Dumbocrats and their desire to support ANY claim against a Republican, even if the claims have NO SUBSTANTIATING evidence and NO EYEWITNESS testimony???</p>
<p>Haven't Democrats heard of a little thing called DUE PROCESS???</p>
<p>Apparently, not...</p>
<p>:eyeroll:</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/09/13/ftp542/#comment-143819</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Sep 2019 12:30:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=17396#comment-143819</guid>
		<description>&lt;B&gt;Finally, there is one more unseen thing that strengthens Republican faith in President Trump as we get closer to Election Day. That is the unseen — and usually unspoken — price tag for all the free stuff promised by the Democratic marauders who are laying siege to our capitalist economy. Free college, free pre-K, free health care, free jobs, free money — add it all up, and you will soon discover that a hundred trillion dollars in spending is the equivalent of that unseen iceberg that sunk the Titanic.

The Democrats may be enjoying a pleasant cruise in the friendly waters of the fawning mainstream media today, but when President Trump starts campaigning in earnest, they won’t know what hit them.&lt;/B&gt;

Democrat candidates have, by their OWN documented and video taped words, have rendered themselves un-electable...

It&#039;s THAT simple...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>Finally, there is one more unseen thing that strengthens Republican faith in President Trump as we get closer to Election Day. That is the unseen — and usually unspoken — price tag for all the free stuff promised by the Democratic marauders who are laying siege to our capitalist economy. Free college, free pre-K, free health care, free jobs, free money — add it all up, and you will soon discover that a hundred trillion dollars in spending is the equivalent of that unseen iceberg that sunk the Titanic.</p>
<p>The Democrats may be enjoying a pleasant cruise in the friendly waters of the fawning mainstream media today, but when President Trump starts campaigning in earnest, they won’t know what hit them.</b></p>
<p>Democrat candidates have, by their OWN documented and video taped words, have rendered themselves un-electable...</p>
<p>It's THAT simple...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/09/13/ftp542/#comment-143818</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Sep 2019 12:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=17396#comment-143818</guid>
		<description>&lt;B&gt;It’s no different than the decision to leave your MAGA hat at home when you head out for dinner at a tony restaurant and (supposing you live in New York City) a Broadway play. Haven’t we all seen brutal images of old men (and young, for that matter) being beaten for the audacity to wear their red cap in the wrong neighborhood?

Likewise, we are inundated 24 hours a day with anti-Trump propaganda on the cable news channels and on the Internet telling us that the president is a Russian spy (thanks, CNN!), a racist (thanks, MSNBC!), a liar (thanks, Washington Post!) and a lying racist Russian spy (thanks, New York Times!).

It’s enough to make you keep quiet at the water cooler the day after another rousing Trump rally, or to maybe add a grumble under your breath about how you can’t stand his juvenile tweets, and it may even be enough to make you tell a prying pollster that you support the vulgar, boorish demagogue Beto O’Rourke and his open borders rather than the president who gets things done in spite of (or maybe because of) his brash narcissistic personality.&lt;/B&gt;

The Dumbocrat Party, the Party of peace and love and respect and tolerance..

But the FACTS clearly show that it&#039;s the Democrat Party who hates on anyone that doesn&#039;t toe their line..

If you are a Republican, you are under threat of a would-be Bernie Bro mass-murderer while you are practicing baseball for a charity game..

If you are a Republican, you are under threat of a scumbag Warren supporting mass shooter in Dayton Ohio.

And if you are a hispanic American who votes Trump, you are under threat of a scumbag Eco-mass shooter in El Paso Texas.

These serious threats don&#039;t take into account there everyday threats from Democrat AntiFa terrorists who will attack someone and beat someone and assault someone for just wearing a red hat, regardless of what it says!!

I have a mind to have a bright red hat made that says RED STATE DEMOCRAT on it and walk thru Seattle or Portland..  AntiFa terrorists will attack in swarms..  Of course I always am armed so it wouldn&#039;t end well for them..

But it will prove my point nicely how it&#039;s the Democrat Party and their antifa terrorists who the intolerant and violent bigots..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>It’s no different than the decision to leave your MAGA hat at home when you head out for dinner at a tony restaurant and (supposing you live in New York City) a Broadway play. Haven’t we all seen brutal images of old men (and young, for that matter) being beaten for the audacity to wear their red cap in the wrong neighborhood?</p>
<p>Likewise, we are inundated 24 hours a day with anti-Trump propaganda on the cable news channels and on the Internet telling us that the president is a Russian spy (thanks, CNN!), a racist (thanks, MSNBC!), a liar (thanks, Washington Post!) and a lying racist Russian spy (thanks, New York Times!).</p>
<p>It’s enough to make you keep quiet at the water cooler the day after another rousing Trump rally, or to maybe add a grumble under your breath about how you can’t stand his juvenile tweets, and it may even be enough to make you tell a prying pollster that you support the vulgar, boorish demagogue Beto O’Rourke and his open borders rather than the president who gets things done in spite of (or maybe because of) his brash narcissistic personality.</b></p>
<p>The Dumbocrat Party, the Party of peace and love and respect and tolerance..</p>
<p>But the FACTS clearly show that it's the Democrat Party who hates on anyone that doesn't toe their line..</p>
<p>If you are a Republican, you are under threat of a would-be Bernie Bro mass-murderer while you are practicing baseball for a charity game..</p>
<p>If you are a Republican, you are under threat of a scumbag Warren supporting mass shooter in Dayton Ohio.</p>
<p>And if you are a hispanic American who votes Trump, you are under threat of a scumbag Eco-mass shooter in El Paso Texas.</p>
<p>These serious threats don't take into account there everyday threats from Democrat AntiFa terrorists who will attack someone and beat someone and assault someone for just wearing a red hat, regardless of what it says!!</p>
<p>I have a mind to have a bright red hat made that says RED STATE DEMOCRAT on it and walk thru Seattle or Portland..  AntiFa terrorists will attack in swarms..  Of course I always am armed so it wouldn't end well for them..</p>
<p>But it will prove my point nicely how it's the Democrat Party and their antifa terrorists who the intolerant and violent bigots..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/09/13/ftp542/#comment-143817</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Sep 2019 12:01:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=17396#comment-143817</guid>
		<description>&lt;B&gt;As for those presidential polls that show Trump lagging badly, you have to ask yourself why the 2020 surveys would be any more predictive than the ones in 2016 were.

Most of the polls are commissioned by media organizations that are virulently anti-Trump, or by political interests that are threatened by President Trump’s anti-establishment instincts. That, in itself, should make them suspect. It’s no secret that there are as many ways to jigger a poll’s outcome as there are ways to mix a drink.

But beyond the question of polling mixology — er, methodology — you have to ask yourself whether there are reasons why even a valid poll would come to invalid conclusions. The answer, of course, is that there are — and in the case of a poll about Donald Trump, the reason is ... well ... Donald Trump. He is such a polarizing figure that many poll respondents probably do not feel safe sharing their intention to vote for the man.&lt;/B&gt;

The fact that ya&#039;all put such faith in polls is hilarious!!

Considering how bad ya&#039;all were burned in 2016 by polls..

Any normal person would be so gun shy of polls, they would stay away from them with a passion..

But ya&#039;all lovingly embrace polls.  But ONLY the polls that say what you want to hear...

There is a phrase for that.. 

BIAS CONFIRMATION

Ya&#039;all only pay attention to the news and &quot;facts&quot; that confirm ya&#039;all&#039;s ingrained bias..

One would think ya&#039;all would remember that, by and large, President Trump voters do not participate in polls..

So EVERY poll that attacks President Trump is, by default, a BIASED poll whose conclusions are USELESS..

Garbage In, Garbage Out..

DUH...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>As for those presidential polls that show Trump lagging badly, you have to ask yourself why the 2020 surveys would be any more predictive than the ones in 2016 were.</p>
<p>Most of the polls are commissioned by media organizations that are virulently anti-Trump, or by political interests that are threatened by President Trump’s anti-establishment instincts. That, in itself, should make them suspect. It’s no secret that there are as many ways to jigger a poll’s outcome as there are ways to mix a drink.</p>
<p>But beyond the question of polling mixology — er, methodology — you have to ask yourself whether there are reasons why even a valid poll would come to invalid conclusions. The answer, of course, is that there are — and in the case of a poll about Donald Trump, the reason is ... well ... Donald Trump. He is such a polarizing figure that many poll respondents probably do not feel safe sharing their intention to vote for the man.</b></p>
<p>The fact that ya'all put such faith in polls is hilarious!!</p>
<p>Considering how bad ya'all were burned in 2016 by polls..</p>
<p>Any normal person would be so gun shy of polls, they would stay away from them with a passion..</p>
<p>But ya'all lovingly embrace polls.  But ONLY the polls that say what you want to hear...</p>
<p>There is a phrase for that.. </p>
<p>BIAS CONFIRMATION</p>
<p>Ya'all only pay attention to the news and "facts" that confirm ya'all's ingrained bias..</p>
<p>One would think ya'all would remember that, by and large, President Trump voters do not participate in polls..</p>
<p>So EVERY poll that attacks President Trump is, by default, a BIASED poll whose conclusions are USELESS..</p>
<p>Garbage In, Garbage Out..</p>
<p>DUH...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/09/13/ftp542/#comment-143816</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Sep 2019 11:54:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=17396#comment-143816</guid>
		<description>&lt;B&gt;We are not racists, and the president is not a white supremacist. If he were, he would acquiesce to the deplorable conditions that have existed for years in America’s Democrat-run urban centers. Instead, he has challenged Democrats to live up to their rhetoric about human rights. It’s time to do something about poverty — not just talk about it. Trump has accomplished more in three years than 50 years of self-congratulatory leftist social engineering with inflated titles such as “The Great Society.” If you want greatness, you can start with the record-low unemployment among blacks, Latinos and women that are the result of Trump’s war against globalism and the entrenched bureaucracy.&lt;/B&gt;

Democrats always talk the talk... 

But it&#039;s ONLY President Trump who has actually walked the walk...

Every black American, every hispanic American, every woman in this country is BETTER off under President Trump than they EVER were under Odumbo..

This is documented FACT...

And THAT is why your Democrats are hysterical with Hate... Because they have simply spewed platitudes about equality but kept black Americans and hispanic Americans in the place that Democrat feel they should remain it.

And along comes President Trump and bitch slaps Democrats and elevates black Americans and hispanic Americans with TRUE and REAL TANGIBLE equality..

President Trump has given black Americans and hispanic Americans the ONE thing that Democrats never could..

The OPPORTUNITY to succeed...

Democrats just wanted to keep black Americans and hispanic Americans on the welfare plantation..

President Trump said, &lt;B&gt;&quot;FRAK THAT!!!&quot;&lt;/b&gt; and gave black Americans and hispanic Americans back their self respect that Democrats had ripped away...

Ya&#039;all know this is factually accurate, which is EXACTLY why these FACTS will be ignored..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>We are not racists, and the president is not a white supremacist. If he were, he would acquiesce to the deplorable conditions that have existed for years in America’s Democrat-run urban centers. Instead, he has challenged Democrats to live up to their rhetoric about human rights. It’s time to do something about poverty — not just talk about it. Trump has accomplished more in three years than 50 years of self-congratulatory leftist social engineering with inflated titles such as “The Great Society.” If you want greatness, you can start with the record-low unemployment among blacks, Latinos and women that are the result of Trump’s war against globalism and the entrenched bureaucracy.</b></p>
<p>Democrats always talk the talk... </p>
<p>But it's ONLY President Trump who has actually walked the walk...</p>
<p>Every black American, every hispanic American, every woman in this country is BETTER off under President Trump than they EVER were under Odumbo..</p>
<p>This is documented FACT...</p>
<p>And THAT is why your Democrats are hysterical with Hate... Because they have simply spewed platitudes about equality but kept black Americans and hispanic Americans in the place that Democrat feel they should remain it.</p>
<p>And along comes President Trump and bitch slaps Democrats and elevates black Americans and hispanic Americans with TRUE and REAL TANGIBLE equality..</p>
<p>President Trump has given black Americans and hispanic Americans the ONE thing that Democrats never could..</p>
<p>The OPPORTUNITY to succeed...</p>
<p>Democrats just wanted to keep black Americans and hispanic Americans on the welfare plantation..</p>
<p>President Trump said, <b>"FRAK THAT!!!"</b> and gave black Americans and hispanic Americans back their self respect that Democrats had ripped away...</p>
<p>Ya'all know this is factually accurate, which is EXACTLY why these FACTS will be ignored..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/09/13/ftp542/#comment-143815</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Sep 2019 11:47:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=17396#comment-143815</guid>
		<description>OK, let&#039;s get back to it..

Since Real Clear Politics is the accepted source of choice around here...  

&lt;B&gt;Why Trump Will Win: &#039;The Evidence of Things Unseen&#039;


If that is true in politics, then the faith of Trump supporters that he will be reelected is based on what was unseen and unheard on the Democrat debate stage in Houston on Thursday — namely, the thriving economy and the many other accomplishments of this administration.

Admittedly, being a Trump supporter sometimes tests your faith. When the polls consistently show your candidate — your president — running behind every Democratic candidate — even Liliputian Beto O’Rourke — by eight, nine, 10 points, then yes, you could be forgiven for having moments of doubt.

But doubt is the foundation of clear thinking. Only by questioning every premise — and discarding those that cannot bear weight — do you build an edifice of belief worth living in.

The premise of the Democrat debate was that President Trump is a white supremacist, that his supporters are racists, and that the Constitution is a catalog of suggestions that can be ignored by an all-knowing tyrant like Kamala Harris, who wants to eliminate assault weapons (and the Second Amendment) by executive order.

So, for Republicans, the bedrock Constitution is one of those things unseen by Democrats that give most conservatives faith that Trump will prevail in November 2020. The alternative is simply unthinkable.&lt;/B&gt;
https://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2019/09/16/why_trump_will_win_the_evidence_of_things_unseen_141258.html

While the alternative to a Trump re-election is definitely unthinkable, that is not why I have faith that President Trump will prevail..

My faith is borne of indisputable FACT..

Like that FACT that every poll since Jun of 2015 that predicted President Trump&#039;s demise has been WRONG..  It&#039;s a FACT that they have ALL been wrong..

And while it&#039;s true that past performance may not accurately predict future events there is the ADDED fact of how bad the crop of Wannabe Trump&#039;s Opponents are..

At one point or another EACH and EVERY candidate has promised In Labor Or After Labor Abortions, Free and FULL HealthCare to Crimmigrants (That&#039;s Criminal Illegal Immigrants for the morons out there), Open Borders, A BAN on ALL Fossil Fuels and gun confiscation.. Or any combination of the afore...

Now, if one can step back from their Party Slavery and look at things LOGICALLY and OBJECTIVELY (a Mission Impossible for ya&#039;all to be sure) they would discover that these far left claims and promises will leave EACH and EVERY Candidate un-electable by virtue of being the anti-thesis to everything Independents and NPAs stand for..

Let that FACT sink in...  EACH and EVERY Democrat candidate has rendered themselves UN-ELECTABLE by virtue of the Far Left positions they have taken in the Democrat Primary..

For the one or two cooler heads here in Weigantia, I know for a FACT that this far Left surge worries ya&#039;all.. Ya&#039;all are simply afraid to come out and say it..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK, let's get back to it..</p>
<p>Since Real Clear Politics is the accepted source of choice around here...  </p>
<p><b>Why Trump Will Win: 'The Evidence of Things Unseen'</p>
<p>If that is true in politics, then the faith of Trump supporters that he will be reelected is based on what was unseen and unheard on the Democrat debate stage in Houston on Thursday — namely, the thriving economy and the many other accomplishments of this administration.</p>
<p>Admittedly, being a Trump supporter sometimes tests your faith. When the polls consistently show your candidate — your president — running behind every Democratic candidate — even Liliputian Beto O’Rourke — by eight, nine, 10 points, then yes, you could be forgiven for having moments of doubt.</p>
<p>But doubt is the foundation of clear thinking. Only by questioning every premise — and discarding those that cannot bear weight — do you build an edifice of belief worth living in.</p>
<p>The premise of the Democrat debate was that President Trump is a white supremacist, that his supporters are racists, and that the Constitution is a catalog of suggestions that can be ignored by an all-knowing tyrant like Kamala Harris, who wants to eliminate assault weapons (and the Second Amendment) by executive order.</p>
<p>So, for Republicans, the bedrock Constitution is one of those things unseen by Democrats that give most conservatives faith that Trump will prevail in November 2020. The alternative is simply unthinkable.</b><br />
<a href="https://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2019/09/16/why_trump_will_win_the_evidence_of_things_unseen_141258.html" rel="nofollow">https://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2019/09/16/why_trump_will_win_the_evidence_of_things_unseen_141258.html</a></p>
<p>While the alternative to a Trump re-election is definitely unthinkable, that is not why I have faith that President Trump will prevail..</p>
<p>My faith is borne of indisputable FACT..</p>
<p>Like that FACT that every poll since Jun of 2015 that predicted President Trump's demise has been WRONG..  It's a FACT that they have ALL been wrong..</p>
<p>And while it's true that past performance may not accurately predict future events there is the ADDED fact of how bad the crop of Wannabe Trump's Opponents are..</p>
<p>At one point or another EACH and EVERY candidate has promised In Labor Or After Labor Abortions, Free and FULL HealthCare to Crimmigrants (That's Criminal Illegal Immigrants for the morons out there), Open Borders, A BAN on ALL Fossil Fuels and gun confiscation.. Or any combination of the afore...</p>
<p>Now, if one can step back from their Party Slavery and look at things LOGICALLY and OBJECTIVELY (a Mission Impossible for ya'all to be sure) they would discover that these far left claims and promises will leave EACH and EVERY Candidate un-electable by virtue of being the anti-thesis to everything Independents and NPAs stand for..</p>
<p>Let that FACT sink in...  EACH and EVERY Democrat candidate has rendered themselves UN-ELECTABLE by virtue of the Far Left positions they have taken in the Democrat Primary..</p>
<p>For the one or two cooler heads here in Weigantia, I know for a FACT that this far Left surge worries ya'all.. Ya'all are simply afraid to come out and say it..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/09/13/ftp542/#comment-143814</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Sep 2019 11:13:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=17396#comment-143814</guid>
		<description>OK, take 5 people.. I can imagine ya&#039;all are exhausted..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK, take 5 people.. I can imagine ya'all are exhausted..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/09/13/ftp542/#comment-143813</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Sep 2019 11:11:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=17396#comment-143813</guid>
		<description>&lt;B&gt;The Steele dossier, despite McCabe’s prior obfuscations, was acquired illegally. Money was laundered through a law firm to a dirt-gathering opposition research firm, Fusion GPS, to a foreign agent, Christopher Steele, to Russian sources making most of the stuff up. The fact that the transaction went through multiple hands does not make it any more legal. It just makes the coming indictment longer.

McCabe, the man he worked for, James Comey, and the people who worked under McCabe, such as Peter Strzok and Lisa Page, then took this fruit of foreign interference in our election and used it to commit a fraud upon the FISA court to trigger the illegal surveillance of one political campaign by another with the aid of co-conspirators at the DoJ and FBI.

That McCabe himself was a key architect of this coup is found in the texts of FBI Agent Peter Strozk, who speaks of the plan hatched in “Andy’s office” to stop Trump at all costs, with this end justifying any and all means:

&lt;I&gt;Out of all the damning, politically charged anti-Trump text messages released, one text from Strzok to (Lisa) Page on August 15, 2016, raised the most suspicion. It referred to a conversation and a meeting that had just taken place in &quot;Andy&#039;s&quot; (widely believed to be Deputy FBI Dir. Andrew McCabe&#039;s) office. According to Rep. Jim Jordan (R-OH), Strzok had texted this: &quot;I want to believe the path you threw out for consideration in Andy&#039;s office [break]... that there&#039;s no way he gets elected. I want to believe that... But I&#039;m afraid we can&#039;t take that risk... We have to do something about it.&quot;

In another text, Page said: &quot;maybe you’re meant to stay where you are because you’re meant to protect the country from that menace.&quot; Strzok replied: &quot;I can protect our country at many levels, not sure if that helps.&quot;

&quot;This goes to intent,&quot; Jordan said. &quot;We can&#039;t take the risk that the people of this great country might elect Donald Trump. We can&#039;t take this risk. This is Peter Strzok, head of counterintelligence at the FBI. This is Peter Strzok, who I think had a hand in that dossier that was all dressed up and taken to the FISA court. He&#039;s saying, &#039;we can&#039;t take the risk, we have to do something about it.&#039;&quot;&lt;/I&gt;&lt;/B&gt;
https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2019/09/will_mccabe_bring_the_fbi_down_with_him.html#ixzz5zgX37cC4

The whole house of cards are coming down on Democrats like a ton of bricks.. 

It&#039;s going to be a sight to behold..  :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>The Steele dossier, despite McCabe’s prior obfuscations, was acquired illegally. Money was laundered through a law firm to a dirt-gathering opposition research firm, Fusion GPS, to a foreign agent, Christopher Steele, to Russian sources making most of the stuff up. The fact that the transaction went through multiple hands does not make it any more legal. It just makes the coming indictment longer.</p>
<p>McCabe, the man he worked for, James Comey, and the people who worked under McCabe, such as Peter Strzok and Lisa Page, then took this fruit of foreign interference in our election and used it to commit a fraud upon the FISA court to trigger the illegal surveillance of one political campaign by another with the aid of co-conspirators at the DoJ and FBI.</p>
<p>That McCabe himself was a key architect of this coup is found in the texts of FBI Agent Peter Strozk, who speaks of the plan hatched in “Andy’s office” to stop Trump at all costs, with this end justifying any and all means:</p>
<p><i>Out of all the damning, politically charged anti-Trump text messages released, one text from Strzok to (Lisa) Page on August 15, 2016, raised the most suspicion. It referred to a conversation and a meeting that had just taken place in "Andy's" (widely believed to be Deputy FBI Dir. Andrew McCabe's) office. According to Rep. Jim Jordan (R-OH), Strzok had texted this: "I want to believe the path you threw out for consideration in Andy's office [break]... that there's no way he gets elected. I want to believe that... But I'm afraid we can't take that risk... We have to do something about it."</p>
<p>In another text, Page said: "maybe you’re meant to stay where you are because you’re meant to protect the country from that menace." Strzok replied: "I can protect our country at many levels, not sure if that helps."</p>
<p>"This goes to intent," Jordan said. "We can't take the risk that the people of this great country might elect Donald Trump. We can't take this risk. This is Peter Strzok, head of counterintelligence at the FBI. This is Peter Strzok, who I think had a hand in that dossier that was all dressed up and taken to the FISA court. He's saying, 'we can't take the risk, we have to do something about it.'"</i></b><br />
<a href="https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2019/09/will_mccabe_bring_the_fbi_down_with_him.html#ixzz5zgX37cC4" rel="nofollow">https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2019/09/will_mccabe_bring_the_fbi_down_with_him.html#ixzz5zgX37cC4</a></p>
<p>The whole house of cards are coming down on Democrats like a ton of bricks.. </p>
<p>It's going to be a sight to behold..  :D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/09/13/ftp542/#comment-143812</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Sep 2019 11:08:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=17396#comment-143812</guid>
		<description>&lt;B&gt;McCabe was at the heart of all the criminal activity and knows where the bodies are buried. His silence until now may be traced to the fact that to date no one has actually been held accountable. An easy indictment of his boss, book tour veteran James Comey, was bypassed and newly minted CNN analyst McCabe, filling the chair vacated by creepy porn lawyer Michael Avenatti, got to join his fellow liar and leaker, John Brennan, at the poster child for fake news.

“Lack of candor” about leaking to the press is the least of McCabe’s worries. McCabe is a signatory to at least one of the FISA applications requesting surveillance of American citizens, namely Team Trump. His signature was his affirmation that the information in it, based largely on the Steele dossier paid for by Team Hillary and the DNC and compiled from Russian sources by a British agent, was accurate and verified. The FISA warrant he signed was a fraud committed on the court.&lt;/B&gt;
https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2019/09/will_mccabe_bring_the_fbi_down_with_him.html#ixzz5zgWVZAFg

The people over McCabe must be sweating buckets, wondering if McCabe is going to make good on his threats to take them all down with him..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>McCabe was at the heart of all the criminal activity and knows where the bodies are buried. His silence until now may be traced to the fact that to date no one has actually been held accountable. An easy indictment of his boss, book tour veteran James Comey, was bypassed and newly minted CNN analyst McCabe, filling the chair vacated by creepy porn lawyer Michael Avenatti, got to join his fellow liar and leaker, John Brennan, at the poster child for fake news.</p>
<p>“Lack of candor” about leaking to the press is the least of McCabe’s worries. McCabe is a signatory to at least one of the FISA applications requesting surveillance of American citizens, namely Team Trump. His signature was his affirmation that the information in it, based largely on the Steele dossier paid for by Team Hillary and the DNC and compiled from Russian sources by a British agent, was accurate and verified. The FISA warrant he signed was a fraud committed on the court.</b><br />
<a href="https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2019/09/will_mccabe_bring_the_fbi_down_with_him.html#ixzz5zgWVZAFg" rel="nofollow">https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2019/09/will_mccabe_bring_the_fbi_down_with_him.html#ixzz5zgWVZAFg</a></p>
<p>The people over McCabe must be sweating buckets, wondering if McCabe is going to make good on his threats to take them all down with him..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/09/13/ftp542/#comment-143811</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Sep 2019 11:05:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=17396#comment-143811</guid>
		<description>There is a reckoning at hand..

&lt;B&gt;Will McCabe Bring the FBI Down with Him?

The DoJ’s rejection of a last-ditch appeal by the legal team representing fired FBI Director Andrew McCabe and the recommendation by federal prosecutors that charges actually be filed against the documented liar, leaker, and co-conspirator in the attempted coup against duly elected President Donald Trump puts the deep state in a face-to-face confrontation with a potential legal Armageddon. An indictment will leave McCabe with no excuse for not carrying out his threat to bring them all down with him.

Before his firing, McCabe sent a shot across  the bow of his co-conspirators in the plots to keep Hillary Clinton out of prison and Donald Trump out of the White House, according to Fox News correspondent Adam Housely in a series of tweets reported by Gateway Pundit at the time of the firing:

&lt;I&gt;Fox News reporter Adam Housley reported on Twitter tonight about the firing of FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe, stating his sources were telling him that in the past few days McCabe threatened to “take people down with him” if he was fired...

8:31 p.m. PDT: “I am told yesterday McCabe felt the heat and went to try and save his last two days and even told some he would take people down with him if he was fired. So…let’s see what comes of this. I know this…a ton of agents…a ton…were watching this very closely.”&lt;/I&gt;&lt;/B&gt;
https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2019/09/will_mccabe_bring_the_fbi_down_with_him.html#ixzz5zgVOwStT
Follow us: @AmericanThinker on Twitter &#124; AmericanThinker on Facebook

McCabe is especially perturbed because, as he was going thru his personal papers in anticipation of incarceration, he found his own suicide note... 

The Democrat come-uppance is at hand...  :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is a reckoning at hand..</p>
<p><b>Will McCabe Bring the FBI Down with Him?</p>
<p>The DoJ’s rejection of a last-ditch appeal by the legal team representing fired FBI Director Andrew McCabe and the recommendation by federal prosecutors that charges actually be filed against the documented liar, leaker, and co-conspirator in the attempted coup against duly elected President Donald Trump puts the deep state in a face-to-face confrontation with a potential legal Armageddon. An indictment will leave McCabe with no excuse for not carrying out his threat to bring them all down with him.</p>
<p>Before his firing, McCabe sent a shot across  the bow of his co-conspirators in the plots to keep Hillary Clinton out of prison and Donald Trump out of the White House, according to Fox News correspondent Adam Housely in a series of tweets reported by Gateway Pundit at the time of the firing:</p>
<p><i>Fox News reporter Adam Housley reported on Twitter tonight about the firing of FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe, stating his sources were telling him that in the past few days McCabe threatened to “take people down with him” if he was fired...</p>
<p>8:31 p.m. PDT: “I am told yesterday McCabe felt the heat and went to try and save his last two days and even told some he would take people down with him if he was fired. So…let’s see what comes of this. I know this…a ton of agents…a ton…were watching this very closely.”</i></b><br />
<a href="https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2019/09/will_mccabe_bring_the_fbi_down_with_him.html#ixzz5zgVOwStT" rel="nofollow">https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2019/09/will_mccabe_bring_the_fbi_down_with_him.html#ixzz5zgVOwStT</a><br />
Follow us: @AmericanThinker on Twitter | AmericanThinker on Facebook</p>
<p>McCabe is especially perturbed because, as he was going thru his personal papers in anticipation of incarceration, he found his own suicide note... </p>
<p>The Democrat come-uppance is at hand...  :D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/09/13/ftp542/#comment-143810</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Sep 2019 11:02:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=17396#comment-143810</guid>
		<description>&lt;B&gt;Thursday’s debate was indeed a defining moment, but not for the candidate most pundits claim. While some may cry that the low-polling Castro blew his chance at a V.P. selection or clamor for him to step out of the race, it is the man he targeted whom we need to be focused upon. The former vice president can trumpet his Obama associations all he wishes, but after that debate, it comes across merely as the “I have a black friend” excuse. Biden is not only deficient as an antiracist, if he ever was one, but he is saying things — at a Democratic debate on an HBCU campus, no less — that make it absolutely impossible to trust him to be the party’s best candidate to address systemic racism and to ameliorate the nation the current administration leaves behind. 


If defeating Trump in 2020 is as important to Biden as he so often claims, he should end his campaign and remove himself from contention for president.&lt;/B&gt;

This is Progresso-Think of Joe Biden..

And ya&#039;all think there is UNITY in the Democrat Party??

Crazy...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>Thursday’s debate was indeed a defining moment, but not for the candidate most pundits claim. While some may cry that the low-polling Castro blew his chance at a V.P. selection or clamor for him to step out of the race, it is the man he targeted whom we need to be focused upon. The former vice president can trumpet his Obama associations all he wishes, but after that debate, it comes across merely as the “I have a black friend” excuse. Biden is not only deficient as an antiracist, if he ever was one, but he is saying things — at a Democratic debate on an HBCU campus, no less — that make it absolutely impossible to trust him to be the party’s best candidate to address systemic racism and to ameliorate the nation the current administration leaves behind. </p>
<p>If defeating Trump in 2020 is as important to Biden as he so often claims, he should end his campaign and remove himself from contention for president.</b></p>
<p>This is Progresso-Think of Joe Biden..</p>
<p>And ya'all think there is UNITY in the Democrat Party??</p>
<p>Crazy...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/09/13/ftp542/#comment-143809</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Sep 2019 10:48:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=17396#comment-143809</guid>
		<description>Wow...  Rolling Stone does not pull their punches..

&lt;B&gt;However, Davis later directed a question at Biden concerning his alarming 1975 comments on school segregation. She read the full quote, “I don’t feel responsible for the sins of my father and grandfather, I feel responsible for what the situation is today, for the sins of my own generation, and I’ll be damned if I feel responsible to pay for what happened 300 years ago,” and Biden smirked oddly as she did so. The correspondent followed up by asking, “What responsibility do you think that Americans need to take to repair the legacy of slavery in our country?” Without missing a beat, the Democratic front-runner delivered a response that was considerably more disqualifying than anything Castro said all night. 


Having just had something offensive that he said 44 years ago quoted back to him, Biden took the opportunity to say something that was arguably worse. 

After proposing that teacher raises are the first step to undoing the legacy of slavery, Biden said the following. It’s worth reading in full.

&lt;I&gt;Number two, make sure that we bring in to help the teachers deal with the problems that come from home. The problems that come from home, we need — we have one school psychologist for every 1,500 kids in America today. It’s crazy.

The teachers are — I’m married to a teacher. My deceased wife is a teacher. They have every problem coming to them. We have — make sure that every single child does, in fact, have 3-, 4-, and 5-year-olds go to school. School. Not daycare. School. We bring social workers into homes and parents to help them deal with how to raise their children.

It’s not that they don’t want to help. They don’t — they don’t know quite what to do. Play the radio, make sure the television — excuse me, make sure you have the record player on at night, the — the — make sure that kids hear words. A kid coming from a very poor school — a very poor background will hear 4 million words fewer spoken by the time they get there.&lt;/I&gt;&lt;/B&gt;

Personally, I think Biden is getting a raw deal here from the racists of the Democrat Party...

But maybe it&#039;s just me..   :^/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow...  Rolling Stone does not pull their punches..</p>
<p><b>However, Davis later directed a question at Biden concerning his alarming 1975 comments on school segregation. She read the full quote, “I don’t feel responsible for the sins of my father and grandfather, I feel responsible for what the situation is today, for the sins of my own generation, and I’ll be damned if I feel responsible to pay for what happened 300 years ago,” and Biden smirked oddly as she did so. The correspondent followed up by asking, “What responsibility do you think that Americans need to take to repair the legacy of slavery in our country?” Without missing a beat, the Democratic front-runner delivered a response that was considerably more disqualifying than anything Castro said all night. </p>
<p>Having just had something offensive that he said 44 years ago quoted back to him, Biden took the opportunity to say something that was arguably worse. </p>
<p>After proposing that teacher raises are the first step to undoing the legacy of slavery, Biden said the following. It’s worth reading in full.</p>
<p><i>Number two, make sure that we bring in to help the teachers deal with the problems that come from home. The problems that come from home, we need — we have one school psychologist for every 1,500 kids in America today. It’s crazy.</p>
<p>The teachers are — I’m married to a teacher. My deceased wife is a teacher. They have every problem coming to them. We have — make sure that every single child does, in fact, have 3-, 4-, and 5-year-olds go to school. School. Not daycare. School. We bring social workers into homes and parents to help them deal with how to raise their children.</p>
<p>It’s not that they don’t want to help. They don’t — they don’t know quite what to do. Play the radio, make sure the television — excuse me, make sure you have the record player on at night, the — the — make sure that kids hear words. A kid coming from a very poor school — a very poor background will hear 4 million words fewer spoken by the time they get there.</i></b></p>
<p>Personally, I think Biden is getting a raw deal here from the racists of the Democrat Party...</p>
<p>But maybe it's just me..   :^/</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/09/13/ftp542/#comment-143808</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Sep 2019 10:43:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=17396#comment-143808</guid>
		<description>&lt;B&gt;Why It’s Time for Joe to Go

Democrats need an antiracist nominee to run against a racist like Donald Trump. The third debate confirmed Biden isn’t up to the task&lt;/B&gt;
https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/political-commentary/drop-out-joe-biden-democratic-primary-884047/


Oh SNAP... Another bastion of liberal/progressive thought just bitch-slapped Joe Biden..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>Why It’s Time for Joe to Go</p>
<p>Democrats need an antiracist nominee to run against a racist like Donald Trump. The third debate confirmed Biden isn’t up to the task</b><br />
<a href="https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/political-commentary/drop-out-joe-biden-democratic-primary-884047/" rel="nofollow">https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/political-commentary/drop-out-joe-biden-democratic-primary-884047/</a></p>
<p>Oh SNAP... Another bastion of liberal/progressive thought just bitch-slapped Joe Biden..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/09/13/ftp542/#comment-143807</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Sep 2019 10:42:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=17396#comment-143807</guid>
		<description>Woot!! I might be able to hit 200 in one sitting!!!  :D

Lemme know if ya&#039;all need me to slow down so ya&#039;all can keep up..  :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Woot!! I might be able to hit 200 in one sitting!!!  :D</p>
<p>Lemme know if ya'all need me to slow down so ya'all can keep up..  :D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/09/13/ftp542/#comment-143806</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Sep 2019 10:42:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=17396#comment-143806</guid>
		<description>&lt;B&gt;Meanwhile, Booker and former Rep. Beto O’Rourke, once touted as charismatic incarnations of the Democrats’ future, revealed themselves to be man-children the minute they jumped into the race. They’re nowhere in the polls. Andrew Yang’s candidacy is centered on his promise to give every American $1,000, no doubt planning to task the agriculture department with developing the seeds for the trees the money will grow on. Other assorted candidates are at about 1 percent or less in the polls and deserve to be there.

Granted, Trump’s luck may run out elsewhere. The economy could tank, or some foreign policy disaster could engulf us. But he will always have his future Democratic opponent to fall back on.&lt;/B&gt;

Democrats..  Snatching defeat from the jaws of victory since 2013...  :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>Meanwhile, Booker and former Rep. Beto O’Rourke, once touted as charismatic incarnations of the Democrats’ future, revealed themselves to be man-children the minute they jumped into the race. They’re nowhere in the polls. Andrew Yang’s candidacy is centered on his promise to give every American $1,000, no doubt planning to task the agriculture department with developing the seeds for the trees the money will grow on. Other assorted candidates are at about 1 percent or less in the polls and deserve to be there.</p>
<p>Granted, Trump’s luck may run out elsewhere. The economy could tank, or some foreign policy disaster could engulf us. But he will always have his future Democratic opponent to fall back on.</b></p>
<p>Democrats..  Snatching defeat from the jaws of victory since 2013...  :D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/09/13/ftp542/#comment-143805</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Sep 2019 10:40:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=17396#comment-143805</guid>
		<description>&lt;B&gt;California Sen. Kamala Harris at least seems more reasonable and might do better in a general election. But she has so far been unable to sustain momentum, and her equivocating on issues like health care hasn’t helped. South Bend Mayor Pete Buttigieg has appeal as a clear-thinking, steady personality but runs roughly the 300th largest city in the United States and has shown little ability to appeal to black voters, who are so critical to gaining the Democratic nomination.&lt;/B&gt;

KamalaSutra&#039;s only ability is to sleep her way to the top. And I don&#039;t mean she actually does any sleeping.  :eyeroll:  

As for Buttigig??  He thought his gay blade would be his ticket to the White House. He found out that only checking ONE box on the Dumbocrat Checklist wasn&#039;t much help...  KamalaSutra checks TWICE as many boxes and she puts out to get ahead..  

Where do you people FIND these lusers???</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>California Sen. Kamala Harris at least seems more reasonable and might do better in a general election. But she has so far been unable to sustain momentum, and her equivocating on issues like health care hasn’t helped. South Bend Mayor Pete Buttigieg has appeal as a clear-thinking, steady personality but runs roughly the 300th largest city in the United States and has shown little ability to appeal to black voters, who are so critical to gaining the Democratic nomination.</b></p>
<p>KamalaSutra's only ability is to sleep her way to the top. And I don't mean she actually does any sleeping.  :eyeroll:  </p>
<p>As for Buttigig??  He thought his gay blade would be his ticket to the White House. He found out that only checking ONE box on the Dumbocrat Checklist wasn't much help...  KamalaSutra checks TWICE as many boxes and she puts out to get ahead..  </p>
<p>Where do you people FIND these lusers???</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/09/13/ftp542/#comment-143804</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Sep 2019 10:38:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=17396#comment-143804</guid>
		<description>&lt;B&gt;Biden also is poorly positioned to capitalize on another Trump weakness — the president’s incessant lying. This is because the former vice president has been veering from the truth himself, including recent claims that he opposed the Iraq War from the beginning, that he didn’t oppose busing and a story about pinning a silver star on a service member in Afghanistan, which had most of the truth stripped out of it. To be fair, the latter could also speak to Biden’s potentially deteriorating memory.

Neither of the two leftist Democrats running not too far behind Biden, Sens. Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts and Bernie Sanders of Vermont, holds much chance of winning the presidency in a country where, according to the 2018 Election Day exit polls, a significant portion of voters consider themselves moderates.

Warren supports &quot;Medicare for All,&quot; repealing the law criminalizing illegal entry, banning fracking, assessing a carbon tax, canceling most student loan debt, making public colleges and universities free, raising taxes — and spending the revenues — and providing universal child care. Also problematic: She claimed to be Native American despite no clear evidence that this was anything other than a family legend.

Sanders agrees with her on most counts, but with the added general election drawback of being an avowed socialist with the charm of a grumpy uncle. Red faced, scowling and howling hoarsely as if he had been yelling all day, Sanders angrily dismissed criticism on Thursday of his $30 trillion health care plan, which he somehow calculated would save Americans $20 trillion. “I wrote the damn bill,” he growled.&lt;/B&gt;

Keep in mind, these are not my words.. These are the words of one of the Left Wing Democrat propaganda outlets..

If yer propaganda outlet is talking you down, it&#039;s time for a good long look in the mirror..

Again, I&#039;m just sayin&#039;...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>Biden also is poorly positioned to capitalize on another Trump weakness — the president’s incessant lying. This is because the former vice president has been veering from the truth himself, including recent claims that he opposed the Iraq War from the beginning, that he didn’t oppose busing and a story about pinning a silver star on a service member in Afghanistan, which had most of the truth stripped out of it. To be fair, the latter could also speak to Biden’s potentially deteriorating memory.</p>
<p>Neither of the two leftist Democrats running not too far behind Biden, Sens. Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts and Bernie Sanders of Vermont, holds much chance of winning the presidency in a country where, according to the 2018 Election Day exit polls, a significant portion of voters consider themselves moderates.</p>
<p>Warren supports "Medicare for All," repealing the law criminalizing illegal entry, banning fracking, assessing a carbon tax, canceling most student loan debt, making public colleges and universities free, raising taxes — and spending the revenues — and providing universal child care. Also problematic: She claimed to be Native American despite no clear evidence that this was anything other than a family legend.</p>
<p>Sanders agrees with her on most counts, but with the added general election drawback of being an avowed socialist with the charm of a grumpy uncle. Red faced, scowling and howling hoarsely as if he had been yelling all day, Sanders angrily dismissed criticism on Thursday of his $30 trillion health care plan, which he somehow calculated would save Americans $20 trillion. “I wrote the damn bill,” he growled.</b></p>
<p>Keep in mind, these are not my words.. These are the words of one of the Left Wing Democrat propaganda outlets..</p>
<p>If yer propaganda outlet is talking you down, it's time for a good long look in the mirror..</p>
<p>Again, I'm just sayin'...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/09/13/ftp542/#comment-143803</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Sep 2019 10:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=17396#comment-143803</guid>
		<description>&lt;B&gt;What’s more, Joe Biden offsets Trump’s most glaring weakness — questions about whether his cerebral cortex is functioning smoothly. Already during the current campaign, Biden has forgotten what state he was in, referred to New Jersey Sen. Cory Booker as the president, called the actual commander in chief “President Hump,” proclaimed a preference for truth over facts and briefly relocated mass shootings that had occurred in El Paso, Texas, and Dayton, Ohio, to Houston and Michigan.

On Thursday, while sharper than he has been, the vice president was still unable to get through his opening statement without repeatedly glancing down at his notes. He again referred to a debate opponent as president, this time Sanders. Former San Antonio Mayor Julián Castro blew the dog whistle on Biden’s mental state as loudly as possible. “Are you forgetting already what you said just two minutes ago?” he demanded after the former VP denied he had said people would have to buy into his health care plan.

Last month, Biden unreassuringly proclaimed, “I want to be clear, I’m not going nuts.”&lt;/B&gt;

If you have to EXPLAIN to people that yer not going nuts, then you are losing the campaign...  

I&#039;m just sayin&#039;...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>What’s more, Joe Biden offsets Trump’s most glaring weakness — questions about whether his cerebral cortex is functioning smoothly. Already during the current campaign, Biden has forgotten what state he was in, referred to New Jersey Sen. Cory Booker as the president, called the actual commander in chief “President Hump,” proclaimed a preference for truth over facts and briefly relocated mass shootings that had occurred in El Paso, Texas, and Dayton, Ohio, to Houston and Michigan.</p>
<p>On Thursday, while sharper than he has been, the vice president was still unable to get through his opening statement without repeatedly glancing down at his notes. He again referred to a debate opponent as president, this time Sanders. Former San Antonio Mayor Julián Castro blew the dog whistle on Biden’s mental state as loudly as possible. “Are you forgetting already what you said just two minutes ago?” he demanded after the former VP denied he had said people would have to buy into his health care plan.</p>
<p>Last month, Biden unreassuringly proclaimed, “I want to be clear, I’m not going nuts.”</b></p>
<p>If you have to EXPLAIN to people that yer not going nuts, then you are losing the campaign...  </p>
<p>I'm just sayin'...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/09/13/ftp542/#comment-143802</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Sep 2019 10:34:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=17396#comment-143802</guid>
		<description>&lt;B&gt;As if to ensure President Trump&#039;s re-election, the Democrats have come up with former Vice President Joe Biden as the alleged front-runner — at least according to current polls — anointing him the most electable of the lot. This, however, is a theory deeply in want of evidence. Biden has already proven himself unelectable twice, during runs for the 1988 and 2008 Democratic presidential nomination that went exactly nowhere.&lt;/B&gt;

Democrats seem cursed with the &quot;Their Turn&quot; syndrome..  :eyeroll:</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>As if to ensure President Trump's re-election, the Democrats have come up with former Vice President Joe Biden as the alleged front-runner — at least according to current polls — anointing him the most electable of the lot. This, however, is a theory deeply in want of evidence. Biden has already proven himself unelectable twice, during runs for the 1988 and 2008 Democratic presidential nomination that went exactly nowhere.</b></p>
<p>Democrats seem cursed with the "Their Turn" syndrome..  :eyeroll:</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/09/13/ftp542/#comment-143801</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Sep 2019 10:32:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=17396#comment-143801</guid>
		<description>&lt;B&gt;Trump looks all set to get lucky again once Democrats decide which of the current forlorn crop of candidates they want as their nominee in 2020. One, Andrew Yang, stooped so low during Thursday night’s Democratic debate in Houston that he decided to start buying votes, saying his campaign would shell out $1,000 a month for a year to 10 families.&lt;/B&gt;

Pretty sad and pathetic lot o Democrat candidates.

Even the Leftist NBC News sees this..  :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>Trump looks all set to get lucky again once Democrats decide which of the current forlorn crop of candidates they want as their nominee in 2020. One, Andrew Yang, stooped so low during Thursday night’s Democratic debate in Houston that he decided to start buying votes, saying his campaign would shell out $1,000 a month for a year to 10 families.</b></p>
<p>Pretty sad and pathetic lot o Democrat candidates.</p>
<p>Even the Leftist NBC News sees this..  :D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/09/13/ftp542/#comment-143800</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Sep 2019 10:31:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=17396#comment-143800</guid>
		<description>&lt;B&gt;Among the most enviable and least recognized qualities of a presidential candidate is something they share with lottery winners and bowling champions: a talent for dumb luck. And for those politicians blessed with this wholly undeserved and unearned gift, the most valuable form of it, the lucky break coveted over all others, is a lousy opponent.

President Donald Trump demonstrated such talent in abundance in 2016 when he faced the widely despised Hillary Clinton. For anyone who had trouble voting for Trump because of various concerns about his character, the alternative of punching a chad for Clinton made things much easier.&lt;/B&gt;

Ahhh  The heady days of the 2016 election.. Where ya&#039;all reach such heights of orgasmic hysteria only to be violently dashed on the rocks below..

If ya&#039;all would like to relive those glorious and frabjous moments...

http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/11/08/get-out-and-vote/#comments

A lot of names from that wondrous day are no longer with us.. Gee.. I wonder why?  :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>Among the most enviable and least recognized qualities of a presidential candidate is something they share with lottery winners and bowling champions: a talent for dumb luck. And for those politicians blessed with this wholly undeserved and unearned gift, the most valuable form of it, the lucky break coveted over all others, is a lousy opponent.</p>
<p>President Donald Trump demonstrated such talent in abundance in 2016 when he faced the widely despised Hillary Clinton. For anyone who had trouble voting for Trump because of various concerns about his character, the alternative of punching a chad for Clinton made things much easier.</b></p>
<p>Ahhh  The heady days of the 2016 election.. Where ya'all reach such heights of orgasmic hysteria only to be violently dashed on the rocks below..</p>
<p>If ya'all would like to relive those glorious and frabjous moments...</p>
<p><a href="http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/11/08/get-out-and-vote/#comments" rel="nofollow">http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/11/08/get-out-and-vote/#comments</a></p>
<p>A lot of names from that wondrous day are no longer with us.. Gee.. I wonder why?  :D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/09/13/ftp542/#comment-143799</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Sep 2019 10:26:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=17396#comment-143799</guid>
		<description>From the bastion of Democrat-think...

&lt;B&gt;Keith Koffler Trump&#039;s 2020 chances look bright thanks to his Democratic rivals (looking at you, Joe Biden)

The economy could tank, or some foreign policy disaster could engulf us. But Trump will always have his future Democratic opponent to fall back on.&lt;/B&gt;
https://www.nbcnews.com/think/opinion/trump-s-2020-chances-look-bright-thanks-his-democratic-rivals-ncna1053456

Looks like NBC News has come around to reality..

The Democrat Candidates, INCLUDING BIDEN, are un-electable..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From the bastion of Democrat-think...</p>
<p><b>Keith Koffler Trump's 2020 chances look bright thanks to his Democratic rivals (looking at you, Joe Biden)</p>
<p>The economy could tank, or some foreign policy disaster could engulf us. But Trump will always have his future Democratic opponent to fall back on.</b><br />
<a href="https://www.nbcnews.com/think/opinion/trump-s-2020-chances-look-bright-thanks-his-democratic-rivals-ncna1053456" rel="nofollow">https://www.nbcnews.com/think/opinion/trump-s-2020-chances-look-bright-thanks-his-democratic-rivals-ncna1053456</a></p>
<p>Looks like NBC News has come around to reality..</p>
<p>The Democrat Candidates, INCLUDING BIDEN, are un-electable..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/09/13/ftp542/#comment-143798</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Sep 2019 10:24:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=17396#comment-143798</guid>
		<description>Moving on..

We have a lot of material to cover..  :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Moving on..</p>
<p>We have a lot of material to cover..  :D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/09/13/ftp542/#comment-143797</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Sep 2019 10:21:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=17396#comment-143797</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s funny that Democrats would want to celebrate the anniversary of their hysterical and unfounded attacks on Justice Kavanaugh with more hysterical and unfounded attacks on Justice Kavanaugh..

But it IS Democrats we&#039;re talking about so.....

I guess they just wanted to get their asses handed to them a SECOND time..   

&lt;B&gt;&quot;Such masochistic tendencies would likely be indicative of a deeper psychosis&quot;&lt;/B&gt;
-Lt Commander Spock</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It's funny that Democrats would want to celebrate the anniversary of their hysterical and unfounded attacks on Justice Kavanaugh with more hysterical and unfounded attacks on Justice Kavanaugh..</p>
<p>But it IS Democrats we're talking about so.....</p>
<p>I guess they just wanted to get their asses handed to them a SECOND time..   </p>
<p><b>"Such masochistic tendencies would likely be indicative of a deeper psychosis"</b><br />
-Lt Commander Spock</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/09/13/ftp542/#comment-143796</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Sep 2019 10:18:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=17396#comment-143796</guid>
		<description>&lt;B&gt;During the hearings, Harris strongly implied that she knew Kavanaugh had improperly discussed Special Counsel Robert Mueller&#039;s then-ongoing probe with a Trump-connected lawyer.

Harris provided no evidence for the bombshell insinuation, which went viral on social media and sent the hearing room into stunned silence, even as she directly accused Kavanaugh of lying under oath.&lt;/B&gt;

Once again, KamalaSutra proves how full of shit she really is...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>During the hearings, Harris strongly implied that she knew Kavanaugh had improperly discussed Special Counsel Robert Mueller's then-ongoing probe with a Trump-connected lawyer.</p>
<p>Harris provided no evidence for the bombshell insinuation, which went viral on social media and sent the hearing room into stunned silence, even as she directly accused Kavanaugh of lying under oath.</b></p>
<p>Once again, KamalaSutra proves how full of shit she really is...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/09/13/ftp542/#comment-143795</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Sep 2019 10:16:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=17396#comment-143795</guid>
		<description>&lt;B&gt;According to the Times, Stier &quot;notified senators and the FBI about this account&quot; last year during the Kavanaugh hearings, &quot;but the FBI did not investigate and Mr. Stier has declined to discuss it publicly.&quot;&lt;/B&gt;

Of COURSE the FBI didn&#039;t investigate.. Because they knew it was a bullshit story from the word GO...

&lt;B&gt;However, the Times&#039; article also conspicuously did not mention that Pogrebin and Kelly&#039;s book found that the female student in question had denied any knowledge of the alleged episode.

&quot;The book notes, quietly, that the woman Max Stier named as having been supposedly victimized by Kavanaugh and friends denies any memory of the alleged event,&quot; observed Mollie Hemingway. &quot;Seems, I don’t know, significant.&quot;&lt;/B&gt;

As the FACTS prove..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>According to the Times, Stier "notified senators and the FBI about this account" last year during the Kavanaugh hearings, "but the FBI did not investigate and Mr. Stier has declined to discuss it publicly."</b></p>
<p>Of COURSE the FBI didn't investigate.. Because they knew it was a bullshit story from the word GO...</p>
<p><b>However, the Times' article also conspicuously did not mention that Pogrebin and Kelly's book found that the female student in question had denied any knowledge of the alleged episode.</p>
<p>"The book notes, quietly, that the woman Max Stier named as having been supposedly victimized by Kavanaugh and friends denies any memory of the alleged event," observed Mollie Hemingway. "Seems, I don’t know, significant."</b></p>
<p>As the FACTS prove..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/09/13/ftp542/#comment-143794</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Sep 2019 10:15:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=17396#comment-143794</guid>
		<description>&lt;B&gt;The revitalized, longshot push to get Kavanaugh removed from the high court came as Democrats&#039; apparent effort to impeach President Trump has largely stalled. Trump, for his part, suggested Sunday that Kavanaugh should sue for defamation.

The Times piece by Robin Pogrebin and Kate Kelly, adapted from their forthcoming book, asserted that a Kavanaugh classmate, Clinton-connected nonprofit CEO Max Stier, &quot;saw Mr. Kavanaugh with his pants down at a different drunken dorm party, where friends pushed his penis into the hand of a female student.&quot;

The Times did not mention Stier&#039;s work as a Clinton defense attorney, or Stier&#039;s legal battles with Kavanaugh during the Whitewater investigation, and simply called him a &quot;respected thought leader.&quot;&lt;/B&gt;

Of course, the NY GRIME didn&#039;t mention the moron Stier&#039;s  connections to Clinton and Democrats and his hate for Justice Kavanaugh..

That would have been the RESPONSIBLE thing to do... And everyone knows that NY GRIME is not a responsible journalism outfit...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>The revitalized, longshot push to get Kavanaugh removed from the high court came as Democrats' apparent effort to impeach President Trump has largely stalled. Trump, for his part, suggested Sunday that Kavanaugh should sue for defamation.</p>
<p>The Times piece by Robin Pogrebin and Kate Kelly, adapted from their forthcoming book, asserted that a Kavanaugh classmate, Clinton-connected nonprofit CEO Max Stier, "saw Mr. Kavanaugh with his pants down at a different drunken dorm party, where friends pushed his penis into the hand of a female student."</p>
<p>The Times did not mention Stier's work as a Clinton defense attorney, or Stier's legal battles with Kavanaugh during the Whitewater investigation, and simply called him a "respected thought leader."</b></p>
<p>Of course, the NY GRIME didn't mention the moron Stier's  connections to Clinton and Democrats and his hate for Justice Kavanaugh..</p>
<p>That would have been the RESPONSIBLE thing to do... And everyone knows that NY GRIME is not a responsible journalism outfit...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/09/13/ftp542/#comment-143793</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Sep 2019 10:13:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=17396#comment-143793</guid>
		<description>&lt;B&gt;Throughout the day on Sunday, Kamala Harris, Elizabeth Warren, Bernie Sanders, Beto O&#039;Rourke, Cory Booker and Julian Castro, among others, declared that Kavanaugh &quot;must be impeached,&quot; citing the allegation.&lt;/B&gt;

And, of course, Dumbocrat candidates piled on without a SHRED of fact to support their hysterical tirades..

Thereby proving, ONCE AGAIN, that they are all unelectable..

Typical Dumbocrat moronic move..  :eyeroll:</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>Throughout the day on Sunday, Kamala Harris, Elizabeth Warren, Bernie Sanders, Beto O'Rourke, Cory Booker and Julian Castro, among others, declared that Kavanaugh "must be impeached," citing the allegation.</b></p>
<p>And, of course, Dumbocrat candidates piled on without a SHRED of fact to support their hysterical tirades..</p>
<p>Thereby proving, ONCE AGAIN, that they are all unelectable..</p>
<p>Typical Dumbocrat moronic move..  :eyeroll:</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/09/13/ftp542/#comment-143792</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Sep 2019 10:11:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=17396#comment-143792</guid>
		<description>&lt;B&gt;The paper&#039;s editors&#039; note, meanwhile, did little to stem a torrent of criticism late Sunday.

&quot;Should I be surprised at this point that the NYT would make such an unforgivable oversight?&quot; asked RealClearInvestigations&#039; Mark Hemingway.

Wrote the Washington Examiner&#039;s Jerry Dunleavy: &quot;Crazy how the &#039;one element&#039; that wasn’t included in the original article was the part where the alleged victim’s friends said she doesn’t remember it happening.&quot;

&quot;It’s important to point out that this correction almost certainly would have never occurred if conservative media folks like @MZHemingway  and others hadn’t obtained the copy of the actual book itself the same day the excerpt/article was released,&quot; author James Hasson said.&lt;/B&gt;

Once again, the NY GRIME is the pariah of legitimate news and journalism...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>The paper's editors' note, meanwhile, did little to stem a torrent of criticism late Sunday.</p>
<p>"Should I be surprised at this point that the NYT would make such an unforgivable oversight?" asked RealClearInvestigations' Mark Hemingway.</p>
<p>Wrote the Washington Examiner's Jerry Dunleavy: "Crazy how the 'one element' that wasn’t included in the original article was the part where the alleged victim’s friends said she doesn’t remember it happening."</p>
<p>"It’s important to point out that this correction almost certainly would have never occurred if conservative media folks like @MZHemingway  and others hadn’t obtained the copy of the actual book itself the same day the excerpt/article was released," author James Hasson said.</b></p>
<p>Once again, the NY GRIME is the pariah of legitimate news and journalism...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/09/13/ftp542/#comment-143791</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Sep 2019 10:09:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=17396#comment-143791</guid>
		<description>&lt;B&gt;The Times&#039; revision says: &quot;Editors&#039; Note: An earlier version of this article, which was adapted from a forthcoming book, did not include one element of the book&#039;s account regarding an assertion by a Yale classmate that friends of Brett Kavanaugh pushed his penis into the hand of a female student at a drunken dorm party. The book reports that the female student declined to be interviewed and friends say that she does not recall the incident. That information has been added to the article.&quot;&lt;/I&gt;

TRANSLATION:  The entire story was bullshit from the start..  The NY GRIME just wanted to help the authors sell more books..   :eyeroll:</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>The Times' revision says: "Editors' Note: An earlier version of this article, which was adapted from a forthcoming book, did not include one element of the book's account regarding an assertion by a Yale classmate that friends of Brett Kavanaugh pushed his penis into the hand of a female student at a drunken dorm party. The book reports that the female student declined to be interviewed and friends say that she does not recall the incident. That information has been added to the article."</p>
<p>TRANSLATION:  The entire story was bullshit from the start..  The NY GRIME just wanted to help the authors sell more books..   :eyeroll:</b></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/09/13/ftp542/#comment-143790</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Sep 2019 10:08:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=17396#comment-143790</guid>
		<description>&lt;B&gt;The only first-hand statement concerning the supposed attack in the original piece, which was published on Saturday, came from a Clinton-connected lawyer who claimed to have witnessed it.&lt;/B&gt;

Now THERE is a reliable source.. A Clinton-connected lawyer...  :eyeroll:

THAT should have been the first tip off that the whole story was bullshit..

ANYTHING connected to the Clintons is automatically suspect..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>The only first-hand statement concerning the supposed attack in the original piece, which was published on Saturday, came from a Clinton-connected lawyer who claimed to have witnessed it.</b></p>
<p>Now THERE is a reliable source.. A Clinton-connected lawyer...  :eyeroll:</p>
<p>THAT should have been the first tip off that the whole story was bullshit..</p>
<p>ANYTHING connected to the Clintons is automatically suspect..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/09/13/ftp542/#comment-143789</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Sep 2019 10:07:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=17396#comment-143789</guid>
		<description>&lt;B&gt;The New York Times suddenly made a major revision to a supposed bombshell piece late Sunday concerning a resurfaced allegation of sexual assault by Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh -- hours after virtually all 2020 Democratic presidential candidates had cited the original article as a reason to impeach Kavanaugh.

The update included the significant detail that several friends of the alleged victim said she did not recall the supposed sexual assault in question at all. The Times also stated for the first time that the alleged victim refused to be interviewed, and has made no comment about the episode.&lt;/B&gt;

In other words, NY GRIME printed complete and utter out of context, not the whole story bullshit..

And, ONCE AGAIN, they got caught spewing said bullshit..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>The New York Times suddenly made a major revision to a supposed bombshell piece late Sunday concerning a resurfaced allegation of sexual assault by Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh -- hours after virtually all 2020 Democratic presidential candidates had cited the original article as a reason to impeach Kavanaugh.</p>
<p>The update included the significant detail that several friends of the alleged victim said she did not recall the supposed sexual assault in question at all. The Times also stated for the first time that the alleged victim refused to be interviewed, and has made no comment about the episode.</b></p>
<p>In other words, NY GRIME printed complete and utter out of context, not the whole story bullshit..</p>
<p>And, ONCE AGAIN, they got caught spewing said bullshit..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/09/13/ftp542/#comment-143788</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Sep 2019 10:06:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=17396#comment-143788</guid>
		<description>And, of course, the NY GRIME has to issue ANOTHER rebuttal..  :eyeroll:

&lt;B&gt;NYT updates Kavanaugh &#039;bombshell&#039; to note accuser doesn&#039;t recall alleged assault&lt;/B&gt;
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/nyt-kavanaugh-bombshell-goes-bust-after-2020-dems-use-it-to-call-for-impeachment

ANYONE who believes ANYTHING coming out of the NY GRIME is a fool..  Or supremely ignorant..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And, of course, the NY GRIME has to issue ANOTHER rebuttal..  :eyeroll:</p>
<p><b>NYT updates Kavanaugh 'bombshell' to note accuser doesn't recall alleged assault</b><br />
<a href="https://www.foxnews.com/politics/nyt-kavanaugh-bombshell-goes-bust-after-2020-dems-use-it-to-call-for-impeachment" rel="nofollow">https://www.foxnews.com/politics/nyt-kavanaugh-bombshell-goes-bust-after-2020-dems-use-it-to-call-for-impeachment</a></p>
<p>ANYONE who believes ANYTHING coming out of the NY GRIME is a fool..  Or supremely ignorant..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/09/13/ftp542/#comment-143787</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Sep 2019 10:04:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=17396#comment-143787</guid>
		<description>@Russ,

&lt;I&gt; various anti-Justice Kavanaugh spewage that has no basis in fact...&lt;/I&gt;

You DO realize that all of that was almost a YEAR ago right??

You DO realize that ya already LOST that battle, right??

I mean, I am a military man.. I can understand waxing nostalgically over past glorious battles where I was victorious..

But it really seems moronic to wax over political battles where you got your asses handed to you...

I realize that those are the only political battles you HAVE to wax over.. The ones where you lost again and again and again and again..  Ex:  How&#039;s President Hillary Clinton workin&#039; out for ya?? :D  hehehehehehehehehe

But hay.. If you want to be reminded over and over of ALL the times that President Trump has handed you your ass because you LOST.... 

I&#039;ll be happy to oblige ya.. :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Russ,</p>
<p><i> various anti-Justice Kavanaugh spewage that has no basis in fact...</i></p>
<p>You DO realize that all of that was almost a YEAR ago right??</p>
<p>You DO realize that ya already LOST that battle, right??</p>
<p>I mean, I am a military man.. I can understand waxing nostalgically over past glorious battles where I was victorious..</p>
<p>But it really seems moronic to wax over political battles where you got your asses handed to you...</p>
<p>I realize that those are the only political battles you HAVE to wax over.. The ones where you lost again and again and again and again..  Ex:  How's President Hillary Clinton workin' out for ya?? :D  hehehehehehehehehe</p>
<p>But hay.. If you want to be reminded over and over of ALL the times that President Trump has handed you your ass because you LOST.... </p>
<p>I'll be happy to oblige ya.. :D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/09/13/ftp542/#comment-143786</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Sep 2019 10:00:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=17396#comment-143786</guid>
		<description>Since Dumbocrats are so obsessed with Justice Kavanaugh&#039;s penis, let&#039;s get the story...

&lt;B&gt;The New York Times Anti-Kavanaugh Bombshell Is Actually a Dud

The authors omit the fact that the alleged victim has no memory of the alleged incident.
If you opened Twitter on Sunday morning, you were likely greeted with the bombshell headline of the top trending news story: “NYT reporters’ book details new sexual assault allegation against Brett Kavanaugh.”

The allegation, Robin Pogrebin and Kate Kelly write in a New York Times story adapted from their forthcoming anti-Kavanaugh book, is this: “We also uncovered a previously unreported story about Mr. Kavanaugh in his freshman year that echoes Ms. Ramirez’s allegation. A classmate, Max Stier, saw Mr. Kavanaugh with his pants down at a different drunken dorm party, where friends pushed his penis into the hand of a female student.”

Wait a second. Who did what to whom?

Kavanaugh’s “friends pushed his penis into the hand of a female student”?

Can someone explain the logistics of the allegation here? Was Kavanaugh allegedly walking around naked when his friends pushed him into the female student?

NOW WATCH: &#039;Toxic Algae Found in New York City Parks&#039;

No, if I’m reading Pogrebin and Kelly right, the friends didn’t push Kavanaugh in the back. Rather, the “friends pushed his penis.”

What? How does that happen? Who are the friends? Who is the female student? Were there any witnesses besides Stier?

All that the authors write in the New York Times essay about corroborating the story is this: “Mr. Stier, who runs a nonprofit organization in Washington, notified senators and the F.B.I. about this account, but the F.B.I. did not investigate and Mr. Stier has declined to discuss it publicly. (We corroborated the story with two officials who have communicated with Mr. Stier.)”&lt;/B&gt;

This &quot;witness&quot; is a Democrat stooge and was one of Hillary Clinton&#039;s lawyer at one time..

Of course, this witness has NO CORROBORATING evidence to support his bullshit accusation and the people he said were present ALL deny it..

Again, I have to ask. What IS IT with your Dumbocrats??

Is THIS how they think one wins an erection?? er...I mean ELECTION??   :eyeroll:</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since Dumbocrats are so obsessed with Justice Kavanaugh's penis, let's get the story...</p>
<p><b>The New York Times Anti-Kavanaugh Bombshell Is Actually a Dud</p>
<p>The authors omit the fact that the alleged victim has no memory of the alleged incident.<br />
If you opened Twitter on Sunday morning, you were likely greeted with the bombshell headline of the top trending news story: “NYT reporters’ book details new sexual assault allegation against Brett Kavanaugh.”</p>
<p>The allegation, Robin Pogrebin and Kate Kelly write in a New York Times story adapted from their forthcoming anti-Kavanaugh book, is this: “We also uncovered a previously unreported story about Mr. Kavanaugh in his freshman year that echoes Ms. Ramirez’s allegation. A classmate, Max Stier, saw Mr. Kavanaugh with his pants down at a different drunken dorm party, where friends pushed his penis into the hand of a female student.”</p>
<p>Wait a second. Who did what to whom?</p>
<p>Kavanaugh’s “friends pushed his penis into the hand of a female student”?</p>
<p>Can someone explain the logistics of the allegation here? Was Kavanaugh allegedly walking around naked when his friends pushed him into the female student?</p>
<p>NOW WATCH: 'Toxic Algae Found in New York City Parks'</p>
<p>No, if I’m reading Pogrebin and Kelly right, the friends didn’t push Kavanaugh in the back. Rather, the “friends pushed his penis.”</p>
<p>What? How does that happen? Who are the friends? Who is the female student? Were there any witnesses besides Stier?</p>
<p>All that the authors write in the New York Times essay about corroborating the story is this: “Mr. Stier, who runs a nonprofit organization in Washington, notified senators and the F.B.I. about this account, but the F.B.I. did not investigate and Mr. Stier has declined to discuss it publicly. (We corroborated the story with two officials who have communicated with Mr. Stier.)”</b></p>
<p>This "witness" is a Democrat stooge and was one of Hillary Clinton's lawyer at one time..</p>
<p>Of course, this witness has NO CORROBORATING evidence to support his bullshit accusation and the people he said were present ALL deny it..</p>
<p>Again, I have to ask. What IS IT with your Dumbocrats??</p>
<p>Is THIS how they think one wins an erection?? er...I mean ELECTION??   :eyeroll:</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/09/13/ftp542/#comment-143785</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Sep 2019 09:55:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=17396#comment-143785</guid>
		<description>&lt;B&gt;NYT deletes bizarre tweet referencing Brett Kavanaugh’s ‘harmless’ penis&lt;/B&gt;
https://nypost.com/2019/09/15/nyt-deletes-bizarre-brett-kavanaugh-tweet-about-having-a-penis-thrust-in-your-face/

What IS IT about the NY GRIME???  

Morons..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>NYT deletes bizarre tweet referencing Brett Kavanaugh’s ‘harmless’ penis</b><br />
<a href="https://nypost.com/2019/09/15/nyt-deletes-bizarre-brett-kavanaugh-tweet-about-having-a-penis-thrust-in-your-face/" rel="nofollow">https://nypost.com/2019/09/15/nyt-deletes-bizarre-brett-kavanaugh-tweet-about-having-a-penis-thrust-in-your-face/</a></p>
<p>What IS IT about the NY GRIME???  </p>
<p>Morons..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
