Crack-whore says "bzzzz bzzzz" like a little gnat...

This is far from the first time in the comments section of this blog that you've posted a comment about you and your wife being "players" and regaling us all with multiple tales of your life as a whore... TMI... but I would wager the other regular readers of the blog are as devastated as I am to find out that you've turned to crack to solve your problems. I'm so sorry for y'all.

Perhaps you should consider joining a support group for other whores like yourselves who are coping with multiple addictions or maybe take up a hobby like bowling or golf or something.

Par for the course for crack-whore welfare girl...

Work on your putting and "just say no" to crack, and your scores can only get better. Good luck! :)

Exactly right, sir! I love it.

And the new one:

Don has received notoriety for a brief meeting, that many politicians would have taken, but most importantly, and to the best of my knowledge, nothing happened after the meeting concluded.

https://tinyurl.com/ybj3y6fk

"To the best of my knowledge." *laughs*

Very telling, indeed. :)

Welfare Girl says "blaa blaaa blaaa blaaa" when the FACTs prove her wrong...

I thought we had agreed to stop talking about your family situation, snowflake. Everyone here already knows you're flat broke and living on welfare in your doublewide in Shithole, Florida, and I will be more than happy to refer to you as "Welfare Girl" if that is your wish; however, I admit to preferring "snowflake" and "moron."

Strzok got fired today, moron. Do you have to have it explained to you that this fact proves you were wrong every time you insisted he was already fired? :)

It was on company time and company equipment.. THAT makes it public information..

Careful there, moron... you're undercutting your own ridiculous assertion that James Comey leaked "government owned confidential documents."

Bowditch is signaling, "I'll be your Bork!"

Balthy makes an excellent point here, and I would wager that Trump will be our Nixon and that "all the president's men"... a very large portion thereof, of course... will go to prison. I've been saying it for years now, and some of them are already there or packing their bags to go. :)

The trouble with having you twist my words the way you do, is that I can't even go back and find where you went so wildly off the rails.

I got your six, Balthy. See above. :)

You said you were "comfortable" with them making the rules..

Don't back pedal now...

Oh, I see the problem, this is simply yet another case of the moron's reading comprehension issues screaming to be addressed. Balthasar said exactly the opposite:

But am I comfortable with mega-companies deciding what gets discussed on the public airwaves? No. I'm against harassment, and the aforementioned 'fighting words' (narrowly defined), but not in favor of censorship. It's messy.

Again, that's why I'm in favor of net neutrality.

The problem is the same as it usually is: The moron has undeniable reading comprehension issues. :)

Wow, that counts as news over there? Even the article admits that neither of these things is either unusual or unexpected. Nor were the supposed 'anti-Trump' quotes offered in the article anything out of the ordinary. That's a sign of astro-turfed outrage. Must've been a slow news day.

That is your opinion and you are entitled to believe it.

Yes, Don. Unlike the moron in Shithole, Florida, I am quite capable of recognizing a fact versus an opinion, and I don't really need anyone such as yourself informing me repeatedly what I am "entitled" to believe. I also don't agree with your opinion that CW has a "responsibility" to shill your opinion.

The fact is that "freedom of speech" includes the freedom not to have to speak... carpe diem... and having his own "reality based blog" in no way whatsoever creates either an obligation or a requirement on CW's part to shill for every Don, Dick, and Harry that trolls his blog.

Of course, your opinion is that it is okay for CW to ignore this reality or that it is not a reality.

Just when I thought you understood the difference between an opinion versus a fact, you go and refer to your unproven theories as "reality."

Well, alright then, I suddenly find myself of the opinion that you're not worth a further response, and now I believe I understand why CW has chosen simply to ignore your near daily lickspittle. :)

Why support a president who talks about being supportive of law enforcement unless they are looking into any possible wrongdoing by him or anyone who supports him!?!?

Trump wouldn’t be allowed to do a ride-along with most police departments with his background and known criminal associates, but I guess most police departments have much higher standards than the GOP does.

Let’s count how many different explanations Trump has offered concerning his ties to the Russians during the campaign:

There were none! No collusion!

Hillary is the one who is guilty of collusion — that thing that isn’t really a crime unless we’re talking about her!

So the FACTS come out..

Fired FBI agent Peter Strzok sets up anti-Trump Twitter account, GoFundMe page seeking $150G
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018/08/13/fired-fbi-agent-peter-strzok-sets-up-anti-trump-twitter-account-gofundme-page-seeking-150g.html

Storked is just after a payday....

Typical Democrat...

Morons were saying that Strokes was still an FBI agent??

No, sir. It was a moron claiming repeatedly and incorrectly that Strzok wasn't still an FBI agent, and that moron was indeed yourself.

FBI fires Peter Strzok, months after anti-Trump texts revealed

Yes, sir. That happened just today… so quite obviously any moron like you who whined incessantly and repetitively that Strzok wasn't still an FBI agent before today has just been proven wrong regarding each and every time he heretofore claimed otherwise.

As usual, morons have NO FACTS to support their claims..

As usual, here I am explaining to the moron that insisted multiple times before today that Strzok had already lost his job that just because that finally did happen at a later date, that doesn't somehow magically make facts out of all the times he lied about it in the past... quite the contrary.

Do you ever get tired of being the one to focus the klieg lights directly onto your own ridiculous bullshit? :)

Because Republicans' cartoon-caricature of Strzok was being used as a cudgel by Fox News against Mueller, just at the time that the investigation was getting under way. Mueller sidelined Strzok without commenting on the validity of the charges, leaving that task up to the IG, who cleared Strzok. If further proof was needed, an all-day grilling of Strzok by a hostile House Committee failed to tarnish Strzok's reputation with anyone who wasn't already hostile to him.

So in the end is this: fire him without cause, what the hell. We're in the Trump universe now, which is like Oz, except that the Wizard speaks with a distinctly Baltic accent.

So in the end is this: fire him without cause, what the hell. We're in the Trump universe now, which is like Oz, except that the Wizard speaks with a distinctly Baltic accent.

Congrats on breaking the 3,000 mark — That’s an impressive accomplishment!

Here’s to looking forward to the next 3,000!

-Russ

Jeesus H Christ!!

You Democrats are becoming downright hysterically hilarious...

If ya'all had ANY self-respect, you would be embarrassed by the actions of your Democrat Party...

How ANY cop can vote Democrat is just disgusting..

Bullshit.. He was on a company pager while working..

There is no expectation of privacy..

If it will make you understand better, pretend it's a cop saying shit about a black person while on duty using a Department cell phone..

You would nail him to the wall over it..

Yer so damn hypocritical..

If it was so on the up and up, why did the FBI can his ass???

Why did Mueller fire him from the probe??

Because it was wrong...

It's that simple..

Strzok had an expectation of privacy at the time, and he viewed them then, as he does now, as irrelevant to the performance of his job, an opinion backed by the DOJ's own IG.

That was the result of that farcical hearing Strzok endured in the House a month ago. In the end, Republicans had to admit that they couldn't prove that any of his opinions affected his job performance.

Andy McCabe was hustled out precisely so that an ambitious stooge like Bowditch could be installed in his place. Strzok's firing by Bowditch is a flare to signal Trump: "I'm in place, boss. You can pull the trigger on Rosenstein any time.".

And I'd bet that the events that follow Rosenstein's firing would spawn at least two Academy award winning movies. Maybe three.

It was on company time and company equipment.. THAT makes it public information..

Let me reiterate: I am not in favor of censorship.

UNLESS it's people you don't agree with are the ones being censored..

That's what the facts prove beyond any doubt..

The trouble with having you twist my words the way you do, is that I can't even go back and find where you went so wildly off the rails.

Let me reiterate: I am not in favor of censorship. Full Stop. Am I a fan of Alex Jones? hahaha No. Do I hope he has a hard time? Absolutely, he's a jerk.

That should clear it up for you.

He was exchanging personal emails with his girlfriend. None of those emails were work-related, and none were posted marked "for everyone".

The IG already presented a report confirming that none of Strzok's privately expressed opinions appear to have affected his job performance, so where's the offense that justifies the firing?

Oh, he dared to criticize the Dear Leader. Oh my.

Sounds like grounds for a lawsuit to me. I'm sure Mike Avenatti would be glad to take that case.

Check your wrists: they're the ones shackled to the interests of the Orangutan in chief.

You said you were "comfortable" with them making the rules..

That is defending..

Don't back pedal now...

Since you're such a free speech advocate, Michale, how about agent Strzok's right to express a private opinion in a private email?

He wasn't on a private email. He was on the job, on an FBI owned and paid for pager....

Once again..

I have FACTS and reality..

You have Party slavery..

Bowditch is signaling, "I'll be your Bork!"

worth repeating.

Michale, I wasn't DEFENDING mega corporations, simply pointing out that the ones who have booted Jones from their platforms have a legal right to do so. Reality sucks, eh? I didn't make up the rules.

Further, I've already pointed out that protect Facebook and Twitter in this were largely written by Republicans, and that Democrats have always been wary of carving out spaces for corporations to stomp all over free speech.

As an example, I raised the Net Neutrality debate, wherein the GOP clearly sided against the Democrats in favor of mega-corporations that want to decide which internet users are favored and which are not. Of you really believe, as I do, that the internet should be allowed to be a free-speech free-for-all, then you have to also be in favor of Net Neutrality.

So who do you side with, Alex Jones, or the GOP?

FBI fires Peter Strzok, months after anti-Trump texts revealed
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018/08/13/fbi-fires-peter-strzok-months-after-anti-trump-texts-revealed.html

As usual, morons have NO FACTS to support their claims..

OOps. "Lick" was a typo- it should have been Kick.

If I wanted to use a form of Lick it would have been licked as you are constantly "licked" in our exchanges because you can't "win" when all you do is deflect to avoid addressing the issues and make stuff up.

Said the DH who has been groveling to the author for years to shill for his pathetic attempt at political activism: Winning!

Please keep floundering, flailing, trolling, and chasing your fishtail for another 3 years, Don; that way you'll never have to wonder why you're "failing/not succeeding." :)

Key phrase there being "IF {she} had a valid argument"

She doesn't, so she simply lies..

It takes a special kind of stupid to whine about "lies" in a comment full of another person's opinions. I am entitled to my opinions and my "freedom of speech," not unlike your twin in stupidity, Alex that way... regardless of your recent pathetic attempts at censorship on CW's blog. :)

Now if lies are suddenly an issue for you, I'd say it's a little too late because that ship has left the White Star Dock in Southampton and ain't going to arrive in New York:

https://tinyurl.com/y8xcra6c

*laughs*

It is an elementary idea.

So your continued claim that people don't understand it is utterly nonsensical and asinine. We all get it. CW gets it. So that leaves you as the disconnect, Don.

The "loads of good advice" have nothing to do with the issue at hand- which is should CW address One Demand.

Wrong, Don. CW has already addressed your solicitation and made it clear that he isn't going to shill for it because of the ideas contained in "One Demand" and/or your repetitive delivery has not proven to be a catalyst that moves him to support you. The disconnect is obviously on your end.

That is just deflection to try to let CW off the hook for not meeting his responsibility as a journalist that claims to address reality to inform citizens aboot this real idea or at least explain why he won't address it.

CW doesn't need to be let "off the hook" when it's his lure, his pole, and you're nothing more than the tiny little fish flailing in your attempts to commandeer his boat. It's not his "responsibility as a journalist" to shill for you; he owes you absolutely nothing.

Of course citizens are not likely to step into the voting booth as participants in One Demand- because they don't know aboot the opportunity because people like CW are shirking their responsibility to inform them aboot One Demand while shilling for the corrupt two party Big Money system.

Again, little blowfish, it's his boat.

You are wrong that people can only vote for the candidates on their ballot.

We've covered this shit ad nauseam, Don, including links proving that write-in votes are not counted in the vast majority of states.

So even if it is not counted as an official vote it will still have to be counted as a disallowed vote.

Wrong, Don. In the vast majority of states it's not counted at all. It's been covered. Clue in.

And YOU are the only one that thinks that people have to participate in One Demand in order to be able to vote in any election.

Wrong, Don. I am the one who keeps repeating the fact that people don't need to participate in your bullshit while you are simultaneously insisting that CW has a "responsibility" to inform the citizenry . People can throw away their vote without any help from your "One Demand."

I never said people have to participate in One Demand in order to be able to vote. I have only said that it is one option.

You insist it's CW's "responsibility" to inform the citizenry about your bullshit on one hand while insisting it's merely "one option" on the other... whatever you have to tell yourself, Don.

If you had a valid argument against One Demand you would provide it instead of deflecting and making stuff up.

Been there, done that; the majority on this blog have too, and then you claim: "The loads of good advice have nothing to do with the issue at hand- which is should CW address One Demand" (quoting your BS above), and then you prattle on and on for awhile until you're back to claiming that if there was "a valid argument against One Demand" it would be provided... and on and on ad infinitum in your flailing and floundering. :)

Key phrase there being "IF {she} had a valid argument"

She doesn't, so she simply lies..

Ahhh Yes..

"Peaceful" and "tolerant" Democrats..

THAT is what the Democrat Party stands for these days..

Par for the course for crack-whore welfare girl...

You done whining like a little "witch" yet about "First Amendment rights" and "freedom of speech" after your pathetic attempt to institute rules on another man's blog whereby posters should be banned by CW based on your very own promulgated rules? I guess you forgot about your pathetic attempt at censorship, and here you are just a few months later in "full on" bullshit hypocrisy mode because your brain follicles ceased producing long ago, and you can't remember your own ridiculous "spewage."

That spoon you've got shoved up your backside is seeing a lot of wrist action lately. If you can't handle a taste of your own "spit" shoveled right back at you, then perhaps you should shut your ass up!

*laughs*

Hurry up and go cash your welfare check, bitch.. Then you can pretend to have a life for a few days with your crack purchase..

So, what you are saying is "That's Different"..

But it's not.. It's about private businesses choosing who they will and will not serve..

You don't have a problem with businesses discriminating against people YOU find politically unacceptable..

How is that not hypocrisy??

Yes of course it's different.

"I knew you'de say that..."
-Judge Dredd

:D

2) But it also says that Democrats ARE going to sweep the House in a blue wave this November anyway

That is NOT what it says...

They may win in dozens of districts scattered across the country in the fall, it may even be a "blue wave" election.

MAY... not "are going to"..

But I have NO DOUBT that you read it exactly as you wanted to read it..

3) And points out that as bad as Democratic polling numbers are, the Republican numbers are even more dismal and worse off than the Democrats

Once again, it DOES not say that..

Over the same period, the perception of Republican candidates remained virtually unchanged.

And once again, you read ONLY what you want to believe.. What it actually says has NO BEARING on your position.. FACTS don't matter..

Once again..

YOU have Party slavery...

**I** have FACTS...

You couldn't recognize a non sequitur if it lived on your face.

I hate it when a devastating point is marred by a simple typo.. :D

Then your swamp in Shithole must just be overflowing with hate. :)

Since we were talking about which Party values freedom of speech, your comment is non-sequitor..

Since Balthy was directly rebutting your ridiculous and asinine statement that "everything he [Alex Jones] spews is HIS RIGHT under the First Amendment of the United States.." he's totally on point, and you lose again. John M made the exact same point... so you lose twice.

Face the facts, Mugshots, you suck at this debate thingy and your grasp of the rule of law and the Constitution is tenuous at best, and you've already proven you don't give two shits about "First Amendment rights" that day you came back from your pity party and attempted to institute your pathetic rules and punishments that you wanted instituted by the author according to your whims if posters didn't toe your line and comment to suit your tender "snowflake" sensibilities.

So there are facts on one hand and hypocritical idiot spew on the other, and it doesn't take a rocket science to figure out which side you keep repeatedly finding yourself landing on... hoisted by your own petard. :)

"This is why Democrats won't win the House and have NO CHANCE at the Senate..."

Once again Michale I have to ask do you ever bother to even read the articles that you post the links to? If you have you would have discovered the following:

1) Yes the article points out Democratic problems

2) But it also says that Democrats ARE going to sweep the House in a blue wave this November anyway

3) And points out that as bad as Democratic polling numbers are, the Republican numbers are even more dismal and worse off than the Democrats

"Basically, you are saying that, as a privately owned business, it has the right to serve whomever it wants and, more importantly, DENY service to whomever it wants.."

Nice try. But as you know, we were talking about the First Amendment to the constitution applying only to the government, not to private entities. NOW, you are talking about something else completely, as you well know. Which would be private organizations being subject to and governed by civil rights laws.

"So, if it were Facebook Bakery and a person was gay and wanted a cake, Facebook could deny service because it's.....as YOU say... it's private...

"Well... er... uh.... That's different!!!""

Yes of course it's different. The reason you are now trying to compare apples and oranges is because you lost the original discussion and you know it, so now you are the one trying to bring up something totally else.

If we were still on the original subject you would have a point, but we're not so you don't.

AP Exclusive: Google tracks your movements, like it or not

Storing your minute-by-minute travels carries privacy risks and has been used by police to determine the location of suspects — such as a warrant that police in Raleigh, North Carolina, served on Google last year to find devices near a murder scene. So the company will let you “pause” a setting called Location History.
https://apnews.com/828aefab64d4411bac257a07c1af0ecb/AP-Exclusive:-Google-tracks-your-movements,-like-it-or-not

Here's one of those mega-companies you are "comfortable" with..

My how the Democrat Party has changed...

Ya'all USED to side with the "little guy", with everyday patriotic Americans..

Now you side with Mega-Corps who trash privacy and the "little guy" is nothing but an irredeemable deplorable..

Sad...

https://twitter.com/TODAYshow/status/1028961157544075264

TRUMP: Omarosa? Omarosa what’s going on? I just saw on the news that you’re thinking about leaving? What happened?

OMAROSA: General Kelly—General Kelly came to me and said that you guys wanted me to leave.

TRUMP: No…I, I, Nobody even told me about it.

OMAROSA: Wow.

TRUMP: You know they run a big operation, but I didn’t know it. I didn’t know that. Goddamn it. I don’t love you leaving at all.

Apologies for the cursing, but I'm just the transcriber and not the Orange Asshat who actually said it.

The President of the United States claims that "they run a big operation," but he didn't know. While in another recording, the Chief of Staff claims that everyone on staff works for him and not the President of the United States.

Lordy, if Omarosa has tapes from the SITROOM, is there any doubt that Comey could have some? #Morons

This is why Democrats won't win the House and have NO CHANCE at the Senate...

Donald Trump is proof that the U.S. presidency is broken and democracy is in peril. It's time to amend the Constitution and abolish the presidency.
https://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/2018/08/10/donald-trump-russia-election-inept-monarch-abolish-presidency-column/923543002/

First it was ABOLISH ICE..

Now those wacky and crazy Democrats want to abolish the Presidency because their candidate lost..

:^/

Yea... DEMOCRATS are fit to govern... :^/

So, what do YOU think about the media openly conspiring to attack and bring down President Trump??

Is that to job of the media in your mind?? To become activists, create unruly violent mobs and attack a legally fairly and freely elected POTUS to undermine him and remove him from power??

Is that how far the Left has sunk??

Apparently.... :^/

Yes, I want every American to know that two Trump supporters were spotted at the president’s last rally, in Ohio, wearing T-shirts that read, “I’d rather be Russian than a Democrat.”

Two supporters out of thousands. Would Friedman suggest collectively publicizing the anti-police, anti-capitalist, anti-white, and other slogans on shorts and placards at rallies for Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez or and other Democrat? The question is rhetorical, because there is a de facto agreement in the mainstream media to hide radical elements of the left.
https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2018/08/trumps_media_opponents_are_leaping_into_his_trap.html

There you have it..

As President Trump says, the news media IS the enemy of the American people..

Just like the Democrat Party....

Funny how that is, eh???

I guess all ya'all Democrats are interested in police misconduct ONLY if ya'all can blame it on racism...

Sad...

https://youtu.be/QcSQIn_0ps0

I'de likely call that an example of a bad cop..

Or, at the very least, a good cop who is having a bad bad day...

So much for your claim that I never point out bad cops.. :^/

Once again, you are proven wrong with FACTS and you won't admit you were wrong..

The allegation that the physical abuse was caught on video was posted to Facebook late Saturday night by the woman's son, four days before Minnesota's primary election, where Ellison is facing off against four other Democrats for the open attorney general's seat.
https://www.mprnews.org/story/2018/08/12/abuse-allegation-made-against-keith-ellison-denies-attorney-general-election

Ah ah ah... Looks like the Democrat Wunderkind Ellison's halo is tarnished....

Looks like Ellison is about to be Fraken'ed....

Haven't yer Democrats created such a lovely world?? :^/

It also came after Hizzoner appeared on national TV Sunday to proclaim, “I believe in a free, strong media with diverse views — I’ll defend it with all I’ve got.”

https://nypost.com/2018/08/12/de-blasio-lets-security-haul-away-post-reporter-for-asking-question/

Once again, we see a Democrat official act EXACTLY as ya'all accuse President Trump of acting and the response??

{{chhhiiirrrrrppppp}} {{{cccchhhirrrrrpppppp}}}

Cricket city...

I think Kavanaugh is going to get borked over complicity and cover-up of his role in GWB-era torture.

Wanna put a wager on that???

That will only happen if Democrats WANT to give a huge majority to the GOP in the House and give the GOP a Filibuster-Proof majority in the Senate and guarantee President Trump's re-election by a landslide in 2020..

Democrats are not going to risk control of the House to stop Kavanaugh... They are gonna put up a token resistance and Kavanaugh will be confirmed by EOM Sep..

You can take that to the bank...

Here's why. As I proved in post [122], sometime in early 2019, following the impeachment conviction. and that quickly followed by Pence's resignation in disgrace, the Speaker of the House will become President.

LB!!! I have seen a new side of you!!! You DO have a sense of humor!!!! :D

That is a very funny joke... I am still laughing.. :D

Whaddaya think, michale?

I think you have a glowing career as either a stand-up comedian in your future.. :D

Or a career in Sci-Fi Alternate Reality Fiction writing.. :D

Since we were talking about which Party values freedom of speech, your comment is non-sequitor..

They are more than that. They led to families who buried their children being pursued and traumatized over and over again because people believed him when he called Sandy Hook a hoax, and took it out on the victims families in the worst possible way with the most despicable vile and death threats.

And yet, it's STILL covered under freedom of speech..

That is the EXACT kind of speech that the First Amendment is designed to protect..

There is also no such thing as free speech when you are on someone else's privately owned forum, like Facebook, twitter, or C.W.'s blog.

Exactly..

But the point that Balthy is making is he is DEFENDING those mega-corporations in their censorship of Jones, even though he claims that it's the GOP that doesn't value free-speech..

Put another way..

Weigantia is RIFE with "hate speech"... Would you be "comfortable" with CW's provider pulling the plug on cw.com due to Hate Speech??

Wouldn't you scream to the high heavens about censorship and freedom of speech...

Don't bother answering because you and I both know ya'all would..

But you bring up an interesting point..

Basically, you are saying that, as a privately owned business, it has the right to serve whomever it wants and, more importantly, DENY service to whomever it wants..

So, if it were Facebook Bakery and a person was gay and wanted a cake, Facebook could deny service because it's.....as YOU say... it's private...

"Well... er... uh.... That's different!!!"

Let the mealy-mouth back-pedaling begin!!! :D

Yeah, I twist Michale's tail, but remember, he is just a very confused Pelosi fan that'll get there in the end ;)

The hard way.

Well, he said he would be the first one to admit if he was wrong about Trump, but his ignorant posts to the contrary wherein he spews the spoon-fed Party line pablum on cue while helping to move the goalposts aren't exactly indicative that this will be the case.

So far he's only managed to prove he's nothing more than a classic case of a cult follower living in the right-wing fantasy bubble swallowed whole by Trump and heading for a circling toilet bowl being flushed by a tiny orange hand into the Twilight Zone.

Kick, I hope you'll be pleased to know that I've reconsidered my position that Pelosi has to go.

And you will be pleased to know that things actually do happen every day wherein Nancy Pelosi proves without question why it actually might be a good thing if she were to pass the torch, however, admittedly at far less frequent intervals that the Orange Asshat who is currently sworn in as the President of the United States... either written/oral and combined. For instance, yesterday I saw on live television where Nancy Pelosi claimed it was racist that Mitch McConnell said what he did about making Barack Obama a 1-term president. Honestly, LB, that's ridiculous when you consider that McConnell's wife was actually made a cabinet secretary in a quid pro quo to keep her husband in line lest he get any ideas of making Trump a 1-term president, and I don't for one second believe he would either do that or say that just because Trump has orange skin. Still, Trump has Nancy Pelosi beat by a mile in the "Who Needs to Step Down Because They Said or Tweeted Stupid Stuff" department.

I just grow weary of hearing people spew back the propaganda of Benedict Donald on cue because it's exactly what he wants. Very few in political circles gave two shits about the football players taking a knee until Trump decided to dictate the reasons they were doing it and convinced the uneducated goobers and TrumpTrash that taking a knee was disrespectful to the flag that Trump likes to hunch like it's his daughter. Pay no attention to the fact that "Cadet Bone Spurs Five Deferments, STDs Were My Personal Vietnam, and I Like People That Weren't Captured" has disrespected multiple thousands of soldiers outright, but I digress.

There are all kinds of reasons that Nancy Pelosi might consider passing the torch, but anyone taking the Traitor Bait versus discussing the actual issues is just allowing themselves to be spoon-fed by Hair Dick-Tater and giving credence to the whining drivel and spew of the Pablum Puking Putin Puppet.

Here's why. As I proved in post [122], sometime in early 2019, following the impeachment conviction....

Say what? I've said it before, and I'll say again, the GOP and their ignorant tools... Devin Nunes... spineless minions, and rank and file "useful idiots" do not give two shits whether or not Trump broke the law or even whether they themselves broke the law on multiple provable occasions. They're only concerned with all the pathetic conspiracy theory bullshit they can invent regarding "crimes" committed by the "others." Trump will continue to choose to lie and further debase our law enforcement and government institutions in order to obfuscate and cover up his own crimes, while the MAGAts and un- and undereducated morons will continue to believe Trump's lying bullshit because they wouldn't know a fact if it lived on their faces, and they're only concerned about their false equivalency and whataboutism bullshit and whining like little witches when you point out their crimes and the crimes of their spawn and their ilk. So there's that.

Cowards resign. I don't believe Trump will be impeached because he's a liar and a coward, but I'm hoping some of these GOP morons will grow a spine and put their country over the cult of personality that is Benedict Donald, Treasonous Trump, and Communist Mafia Don and prove me wrong.

In the meantime, the handwriting will be splashed across the wall in great big letters when more of the "My Ass Got Arrested" crowd become the newly indicted and handcuffed as well as ankle braceleted and prisoners of ADX Florence. I guess we'll see.

Pelosi has to stay.

Okay, LB... if you insist. ;)

Neil: So, no free speech for football players then?

Why of course not, silly. You are only allowed to take a knee if it's at the feet of Vladimir Vladomirovich Putin in the process of tearing down the intelligence agencies of America whom you insist you agree with except when you're busy doing overtime putting your own personal interests in front of the citizens of the United States that you swore on the Bible to protect and defend. /sarcasm off

There will be a tipping point; I can assure you, and I would wager that tipping point is going to include the following words/numbers... in no particular order:

* Prague
* July
* Cohen
* Hackers
* Italy
* 2016

Say... is it just me or did anybody else notice how Michael Cohen has become awfully quiet in the press lately? Mikey must really be busy. I personally would characterize him as an alto myself, although sometimes he hits some of those notes in the upper register. ;)

Just a follow up to the insanity reference:

"Well everyone in Mandrake Falls is pixilated. Except for us."
-The Faulkner sisters
Mr. Deeds Goes to Town

Why don't you follow-up on your "insanity" and "go to town" on your website? :)

In an amusing twist to the whole "Q" and "Qanon" story, some in the tin-foil hat crowd are now claiming that the whole "Q" thing is a left wing prank to highlight just how unhinged the RWNJs are.

Conspiracies within conspiracies within conspiracies - anything is possible when your attitude to reliable sources is "why bother".

*spew alert*

This is so awesome. I have to hand it to y'all today. I needed a good laugh, and the comments from the more intelligent posters have not let me down.

I can see I'm going to need a margarita to stop from laughing, and... oh, look... there is one conveniently located at the end of my arm here. :)

Think about it, Neil. It's an easy answer.

Yeah, I twist Michale's tail, but remember, he is just a very confused Pelosi fan that'll get there in the end ;)

The hard way.

Balthasar: Oh I would, just because he's a hateful, racist, dunce. His argument regarding the social networks that booted him for being an asshole has no merit, however, because they're not government entities, they're private businesses, allowed to set any rules they like regarding acceptable content, so long as their rules don't violate civil rights laws.

Let's all take a walk down "Memory Lane," shall we, and return to those thrilling days of a few months and weeks ago when Michale, who is as clueless as the day is long, came back from yet another one of his "hissy fit," "cry baby," "if I can't get my way I will leave the blog," wherein he seems to have completely blanked out right about now regarding his pathetic attempts upon his return to recruit other posters to lobby the author of the blog in order to impose rules of his own making. Indeed, he even had the punishments all written up and ready to be meted out according to his whims.

I posted my comment at [126] above for no other reason than to remind him about his failed efforts to impose his "Michale's Way or the Highway Rules Limiting Free Speech on a Blog Not Owned By Michale." It seems he's totally forgotten about his efforts to silence certain members of this very blog and therefore remains clueless regarding the fact that receiving a lecture from him about "freedom of speech" is akin to receiving admonishments from Hannibal Lecter about the ills of cannibalism.

He seems to have also forgotten about that entire incident wherein he and EM whined endlessly for days and days about a post Paula made, saying over and over that it was an issue of "common decency" that she shouldn't post her feelings about retiring supreme court justice Mr. Kennedy, and then he went and blew that whole pathetic argument into tiny little bits by declaring that multiple former officers of our United States intelligence agencies "deserve to be shot."

No worries, Balthy, seriously... because the demonstrable FACT is that Michale has proven unequivocally by his recent and past actions and statements that he doesn't give two shits about either "freedom of speech," "common decency," or the "rule of law" because he is... after all... nothing more than a hypocrite who incessantly whines about hypocrisy while being the demonstrable living embodiment of it, proving over and over again that he's nothing more than a Trump cultist who has bought "all in" to Don the Con and his travelling 3-ring circus of lying liars, traitors, swamp creatures, and ignoramuses who believe whatever propaganda they're spoon-fed by Benedict Donald and spew it back here mindlessly without ever factoring in their own bullshit. :)

Kick, I hope you'll be pleased to know that I've reconsidered my position that Pelosi has to go.

Here's why. As I proved in post [122], sometime in early 2019, following the impeachment conviction. and that quickly followed by Pence's resignation in disgrace, the Speaker of the House will become President. It would be too risky to open the speakership up in January, and there would inevitably be distractive and harmful maneuvering before the election.

Pelosi has to stay.

There's a clown bus full of new Democrat representatives that arrives in Washington in early January. While we know it'll be a clown bus rather than a car simply because there'll be so many of them, it's impossible to know until Nov 6th who even has a validated ticket for the bus. There's just not enough time for the stakeholders -lobbyists, donors, and the party itself- to understand the power alignments and personalities in the new caucus to feel assured that the speakership is solid.

Pelosi is the only safe bet out there. My lord, there's even a self-declaring Socialist running around; lord knows what animal spirits might be raised by that one. BTW, I think she's a Warren agent, groomed and sent out by the New England / Kennedy establishment wing of the party to give the really leftie Bernie people something to hope for.

That's a digression. Back to the point, Nancy Pelosi is the only person who will be serving in the House of Representatives in January who is known today to be qualified to be president, even if only as a caretaker until the 2020 election.

Obviously it equals a non-violent paradise.. :^/

Another shot of reality that no one wants to address...

It is the height of ignorance to believe that anyone here needs a lecture on "a non-violent paradise" from a guy who opined during a discussion of the former U.S. national security adviser and multiple former directors/deputies of our United States intelligence agencies that:

Personally, the [sic] deserve to be shot..

http://www.chrisweigant.com/2018/07/20/ftp493/#comment-123359

And with that nugget, it becomes easily recognizable that you're the living embodiment of a so-called "law enforcement officer" who has made a decision based on ignorance rather than procedure/rule of law, and when you defend their actions made out of their personal feelings of fear, prejudice, and/or "political slavery," you're obviously defending yourself.

Veronica deflecting and ignoring facts she doesn't like!!???

Your projection is again duly noted, and I see those multiple mugshots are still easily searchable.

Say it ain't so!!!! :D

Sorry, Michael... it is decidedly so and shall remain ever thus because crime doesn't pay, and the mugshots last forever. :)

Mueller is so stoopid and incompetent that he doesn't even know what his duty is..

I think the disconnect here is the fact that you either didn't read the order or you did read the order and your reading comprehension problem reared it's pathetic head as it is wont to do daily.

In HIS mind, his ONLY duty is to nullify a free, fair and legal election.

Then again, I would not rule out that it's also a possibility that the disconnect occurs due to your inveterate ignorance wherein you insist that you know what everyone else is thinking. If you're going to keep claiming that you know what is going on in near everyone's mind, people are going to naturally determine you're missing one. :)

Most of your responses are unrelated to the statement that you are responding to and are just avoiding addressing the issue at hand- that disease is called deflection.

No, sir. My responses regarding your techniques and repetitive spew are spot on, and therein lies your problem, Don: Your refusal to acknowledge what nearly everyone on this board has already told you multiple times over, and that's a disease called "delusional."

You are proving my point of whatever you need to tell yourself.

No, sir, and I repeat: "Delusional," and I would add to that "projection." It isn't me insisting that "all I can do is keep proving the option until people like CW are ready to listen, ready to understand;" that's all your handiwork. You've proven nothing, Don, other than your ignorant belief that doing the same thing over and over will somehow produce a different result, and in the process of that, you're insisting that it's everybody else who isn't "ready to listen" and "ready to understand." For the millionth time, Don: Your concepts are effing elementary; there's nothing complicated whatsoever about your bullshit or your delivery. You've been given loads of good advice on how to update your website, present it, as well as solicit others to help you, and you're still firmly convinced that it's perfectly wonderful, needs no improvement, and everyone else will come around to your way of thinking one day, that if you just keep repeating it ad nauseam on this blog or if you throw a few "f bombs" around to prove that you're "really, really mad this time" that this somehow is magically going to make the author change his mind and advertise your pathetic attempt at political activism. Whatever you have to tell yourself, Don.

But I will respond to your question of is there anything that Nancy Pelosi can't be blamed for?

Not surprisingly, Don chooses to answer the rhetorical question like it's a real question in need of an answer, and I will give everybody one guess what Don has to say.

Yes. CW refusing to address and inform citizens aboot One Demand and the current opportunity to mobilize the 20-30% of citizens that vote in presidential elections but do not vote in off year elections is entirely on CW and has nothing to do with Nancy Pelosi.

Then perhaps you should have thought of that, Don, before you regurgitated her name in your "SSDD" post at [13] above where you whine like a toddler that CW chose to "honorably mention" Nancy Pelosi while once again and forever choosing to ignore your repetitive and ridiculous begging him to shill for you. At this point of years and years of this shit, it's beyond pathetic to watch you continue to grovel. Haven't you got the least bit of pride or decency? <--- yet another rhetorical question that requires no answer whatsoever.

So ordinary citizens that vote for Big Money Democrats and expect them to not be controlled by their Big Money contributors as they have been for the last thirty years are insane to vote for Big Money Democrats again while expecting that this time the Big Money Democrats will not be controlled by their Big Money contributors and will represent ordinary citizens?

These people you're referring to as "ordinary citizens" aren't likely to be stepping into the voting booth and concerning themselves with the ignorant labels Don Harris has created to describe the ideas contained in his "failed/not succeeding yet" pathetic attempt at political activism. They can only vote for who is on the ballot in their district regardless of how the candidates on their ballot are funded and/or to which political party they are affiliated. They are generally going to be concerned with issues like health care affordability, availability, coverage for preexisting conditions, education, earning a decent working wage, etc.

I've got bad but obvious news for you, Don, and I'm telling you: The only moron out there who thinks it is necessary that "ordinary citizens" need to participate in "One Demand" in order to be able to cast a vote in an election held in any district, parish, or state in this country is... in fact... you, and it is the height of ignorance and the depths of indecency to continue to shill this shit on another man's website because you can't sell it yourself. :)

"I'm not just President; I'm also a client." - Donald Trump

Hahahahahahahahahahahahhahhahahhahahahahhahaha *takes breath* hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha

Charles Brown, Esq. makes an excellent point here, and I can't stop laughing.

I would just like to add that any of y'all with "male pattern stupidness" disease who can't seem to stop prattling on and on about Nancy Pelosi because your brain follicles quit producing, therefore you regurgitate whatever you're spoon-fed by Benedict Donald are little more than "useful idiots" and card carrying members of the Hair Dick-Tater Club. :)

At least he'll remain on the DC Circuit, which is the bench, using a baseball analogy, on which modern Supreme Court nominees sit. Remember, when Bork himself got borked, Reagan then brought Scalia in to pitch in the big league. This time, President Pelosi might be able to re-appoint Garland.

In what universe would there be a President Pelosi? The real world of 2019. Trump goes, and remember how the Vice President got chosen? Russian conspirator Manafort surreptitiously delayed Trump's plane on the ground in Indiana until Pence could meet Trump on board and the deal was sealed. If Pence is even a little dirty, he's a pussy, and would fold like a cheap suit. Who's next in line?

Whaddaya think, michale?

"How could REPUBLICANS take **ALL** of Chicago's gun laws off the books??

There hasn't been a Republican Mayor of Chicago since 1927...

The slime and violence that is Chicago is ALL Democrats...."

I guess you either missed or deliberately glossed over the part where the Illinois State Legislature took that power away from local jurisdictions like the City of Chicago because it didn't fit your narrative?

[54] Michale

"And guess what??? Everything he spews is HIS RIGHT under the First Amendment of the United States.."

Not entirely. Since the First Amendment only protects you from government censorship. Private companies like Facebook and Twitter have the right to do whatever they want regarding speech on their own sites.

[56] Michale

"His theories are the worst kind of popular tripe, his methods are sloppy, and his conclusions are highly questionable!"

They are more than that. They led to families who buried their children being pursued and traumatized over and over again because people believed him when he called Sandy Hook a hoax, and took it out on the victims families in the worst possible way with the most despicable vile and death threats.

"But we're not discussing the validity of Jones' speech, are we??

We're discussing if he has the RIGHT to that speech..

You and your Democrats say NO...

Facts, reality and the US Constitution say YES..."

Facts, reality and the U.S. Constitution DO NOT. They only protect you from government censorship, not regulation by private companies of their own platforms. Nor do they protect you from the consequences of your own speech, like lawsuits.

[73] Michale

"There is no such thing as Free Speech when you are on someone else's clock..

Duh..."

There is also no such thing as free speech when you are on someone else's privately owned forum, like Facebook, twitter, or C.W.'s blog.

Duh!

Why do you always protect bad cops?

Think about it, Neil. It's an easy answer.

But Neil isn't talking about a "questionable" case...

He's talking about cases where a cop went up to a black driver and said, "You were doing 26mph in a 25mph zone" and then pulled out his weapon and shot the driver..

Of course, Neil doesn't provide any FACTS to support that claim...

But, that's how it is here in Weigantia...

No Facts, Cop Hating.. All the time...

Ni ni... Catch up in the morning. :D

Would that make the Trumpers happy? I think that would make them very happy.

There’s a catch here... RULED UNJUSTIFIED... Of course those shootings result in criminal charges.

But if you want a case that is questionable, look at the no-knock warrant serve of an ex-paratrooper Matt Stewart who ended up hanging himself in jail after being charged with murder for shooting one of the officers who burst into his home. No-knock warrant serves are typically done anytime firearms might be located at a location where a warrant must be served. They occur at a time when occupants are determined to be asleep. The police knock down the door and storm into the residence announcing that they are law enforcement after they are inside. Police will sometimes use flash-bangs when they enter to cause those inside to be disoriented.

While I understand the safety reasons offered behind them, I think that no-knock warrant serves trample over self-defense laws. How can anyone be expected to comprehend that the police are inside their home to serve a warrant after being jarred awake from a sound sleep (and possibly disoriented even more by a flash bang) with men in all black pointing assault rifles rushing into your home yelling?

Cities that can afford full time SWAT teams rarely have problems with these entries, it’s your smaller departments that tend to mess things up.

And, once again, I ask...

Why do I even bother.... :^/

Point out the UNJUSTIFIED errors...

Officer Yanez may or may not have been mistaken about Castile's intent..

The extra second or two that Yanez needed to take to make that determination positively could have cost Yanez his life...

But regardless, Yanez's actions were fully justified and he was acquitted by a jury that contained several black people and the acquittal was unanimous..

These are the FACTS...

If you think I am wrong, feel free to point out the errors..

{{chhirrrrpppppp}} {{ccchhhiirrrrrppppp}}

Yea, that's what I thought..

No credibility problems here folks, move along.

DO you have any facts to support that this happened??

No, you do not..

All you have is your cop hating agenda...

There are no errors committed by LEOs..

The fact that you can't see this proves you are nothing but a cop-hater with an agenda..

You can't prove a negative.. You made the accusation.. You prove that I DID say it...

What do you know about real law enforcement - you can't point to one case of a bad cop killing an innocent victim.

And yet, I have... The SC shooting... It was mentioned in your link...

So, once again, the FACTS prove you wrong and you can't admit it..

You have zero credibility. If you can't ever see any errors then you are a completely unreliable witness.

So if a cop shoots somebody who is doing 26 in a 25 zone, all is good in your world?

http://www.chrisweigant.com/2017/11/22/thankfully-2017-is-almost-over/#comment-110817

If they had done nothing wrong, they wouldn't have been shot..

DUH.....

Prove it - you've been asked multiple times why you never post anything about bad cops unless they are getting exonerated by the system.

What do you know about real law enforcement - you can't point to one case of a bad cop killing an innocent victim.

Why don't you want to discuss the facts of the case you named??

Is it because you are totally ignorant of the facts??

Or is it because you acknowledge that the facts will prove how much of a cop-hater you are???

Of course, I never said anything like that..

But once again, you prove my point..

You spew bullshit.. I provide FACTS.. You ignore the facts and can't admit you are wrong...

I never have..

Why do you always claim cops are bad when they are simply doing their jobs???

Your ONE example was a perfect example of a good shoot...

The RWNJs are going completely Qanon all over the place.

It could backfire however. They could eliminate the 2nd Amendment, or reword it to ensure that only trained military and authorized law enforcement can carry firearms. Oops.

Alternatively they could get exactly what they really want, a balanced budget amendment that would destroy the economy while, at the same time, eliminating SS and Medicare (how's them apples, retirees?).

What a bunch of crackpots. How'ya doing Michale, excited about a constitutional convention? Has "Q" told you what to think about it in some wildly obscure way?

First they protect bad cops and undermine the whole system, then they scream when one of their own, hired by another of their own, who was appointed by their leader, starts charging criminals.

You'd have a lot more credibility on the old "no cop is ever bad" fairytale Michale if you'd stop attacking any attempt to police the police.

No, but I don't want them shot when they are doing nothing wrong either.

Why do you always protect bad cops?

I pressed him frequently before the 2016 election and that was all he had.

Sad really.

And was Castile's fiancee worried about helping him in the aftermath of the shooting??

No.. She was only concerned about streaming it live so she could get a bigger settlement in the ghetto lottery.. :^/

Let's face the facts and reality, Neil..

When it comes to these police shootings, it's the MONEY that is the ONLY goal here... To hell with quaint concepts like justice and guilt and innocence..

These scumbags who scream and attack police are looking for a payout, plain and simple...

DO you REALLY want to be associated with scumbags like that??

Should read "If the person who killed Philando Castile hadn't been a cop they'd be in prison right now."

A badge in America gives access to a special criminal justice system where the insiders investigate the insiders and occasionally put on show trials for cover. This allows bad cops to get away with murder.

If it weren't true, why would the right wing be so crazy when football players raise the issue?

Of course, that SHOULD read:

See, now, if I were a Democrat, I would point out that the cop was hispanic and yer just attacking the COP because he is hispanic and that makes you a racist..

I hate it when a devastating point is marred by a simple typo.. :D

Basically, Castile didn't pay attention in his gun class and ignored the lesson on how to deal with LEOs while carrying..

He paid for his ignorance with his life...

That's a shame, but it's not the fault of the cop..

See, now, if I were a Democrat, I would point out that the cop was hispanic and yer just attacking the because he is hispanic and that makes you a racist..

But thank the gods I am not a Democrat, eh?? :D

Justified shooting...

Even though he was prosecuted and found innocent by a jury...

What makes you think the shooting was not justified?

Philando Castile