The evidence before and after the murder says otherwise, see links above.

I am defending a friend from slander.. I know, I know.. A fat cow like you doesn't HAVE any friends so you don't know the feeling..

I'm great, you uneducated snowflake, but you're not defending anyone from "slander," you moron; libel is the written word, and opinions on a chat board aren't exactly libel. If they were, then you've committed libel against others many times over and over ad nauseam in repetitive fashion.

What's the matter, snowflake? You've demonstrated multiple times now that you sure can dish it out, but you can't seem to take it... even when it's a post that isn't to you and isn't about you... you got yourself all worked up and your knickers in a twist.

Waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa. Waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa.

I couldn't care less if you got your widdle feelers hurt because you didn't like an opinion that you didn't agree with about George "Wannabe Cop" Zimmerman on a political chat board. If differing opinions on a political blog are too much for you, perhaps you should grow some thicker skin or the sense enough to recognize it's not about you... because everything isn't about you.

Actually, my connection with Zimmerman is well documented here..

As is your unequaled ignorance and inveterate lying... so I repeat:
You have no FACTS. You NEVER do. :)

What relevance does that have to the fact that you lied, moron??

You're confused again. I said Zimmerman was a "wannabe cop," and then you got yourself all heated up over the itty bitty phrase and might melt yourself, snowflake.

Yes and "wannabe" is a derisive term and, when it comes to Z, completely and utterly inaccurate..

I am defending a friend from slander.. I know, I know.. A fat cow like you doesn't HAVE any friends so you don't know the feeling..

Where is your proof of that anyway? You have NO FACTS just bullshit... once again, you have NOTHING but bullshit.... NO FACTS to support anything you say... :D

Actually, my connection with Zimmerman is well documented here..

Once again, you get caught in bullshit lies..

But enough about your "friend" Zimmerman; you've both obviously let yourselves go.

Says the fat cow who reeks of.. well. just reeks..

are you quite sure your "friend" Zimmerman is not a "wannabe cop"? :) *LOL*

I am quite positive...

Do you have ANY facts to support your claim, bitch-tard??

No???

Of course you don't. You NEVER do...

What part of "there is a different definition between "wannabe" and "want to be" is incomprehensible to you, moron???

What part of the term "wannabe cop" in a post not for you and not about you has you whining like a little bitch and got your knickers all in a twist, snowflake?

Waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa. Waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa.

Why don't you quit your whining and regale us all some more with your "Grammar Lessons by Goober" from his double-wide in the swamps from the Shithole State?

Says the bitch-tard who is playing semantic games using the derisive term "wannabe" and then, when getting caught in her bullshit and lies, claiming she is actually saying "want to be"...

You're confused again. I said Zimmerman was a "wannabe cop," and then you got yourself all heated up over the itty bitty phrase and might melt yourself, snowflake.

It's pathetic that you don't like my phrasing, but it's a hoot and a holler to watch you carry on like a whiny little bitch over a phrase in a comment that wasn't meant for you and wasn't about you, snowflake.

You calling another poster a "liar" because you claim to know the killer and he wasn't a "wannabe cop" at the time of the killing because he wanted to be a "judge" like his father [who HINT was never a "judge" to begin with so how well could you possibly know him if you think his father is something he never was] is about the most pathetic hairsplitting bullshit I've seen you post on this blog to date.

He "was" your friend, snowflake? Or should I say "is" your friend so as not to offend your snowflake tendencies and send you off on a whiny little bitchfest?

Where is your proof of that anyway? You have NO FACTS just bullshit... once again, you have NOTHING but bullshit.... NO FACTS to support anything you say... :D

You got caught in MORE bullshit and now yer just desperately flailing to save face...

I'm great, moron, but dude, a grammar lame? At least crack a grammar book and learn some damn grammar before you make an attempt at teaching it to educated people versus confirming you're the uneducated moron grammar lame dude. :)

It's not going to work because the facts clearly are on my side...

What facts? You have NOTHING but bullshit.... NO FACTS to support anything you say... :D

And yer desperation reeks, you fat cow...

But enough about your "friend" Zimmerman; you've both obviously let yourselves go. Years after the killing he was toting a gun and doing police-type work for free and according to the owner, without even being asked.

Johnson confirmed he knows Zimmerman but told WKMG-TV he did not hire him to handle security.

“I didn’t okay it. I didn’t know about it. I didn’t authorize it. I didn’t pay for it,” he said. “He had just watched Facebook and the news and just took it upon himself to come up here and sit.”

“I sent him a text message telling him not to come back to the store anymore,” he added.

https://tinyurl.com/ybszzb2v

Your friend "Z" must really love being a "mall cop" to do it for free and without the consent of the business owner. Since the evidence and the facts show that he sure seems to want to enforce the law, are you quite sure your "friend" Zimmerman is not a "wannabe cop"? :) *LOL*

Sorry for the massive delay in posting your comment. I answered you in the comment thread to Tuesday's article:

http://www.chrisweigant.com/2018/02/27/all-in-the-family/#comment-116842

-CW

What part of "there is a different definition between "wannabe" and "want to be" is incomprehensible to you, moron???

You got caught in your own stupidity and in the act of being the uneducated rube you always are. HINT: Those who don't understand grammar shouldn't try to explain it to those who actually do. You're the one playing semantic games and ignoring verb tense and claiming sentences mean things they never meant.

Says the bitch-tard who is playing semantic games using the derisive term "wannabe" and then, when getting caught in her bullshit and lies, claiming she is actually saying "want to be"...

You got caught in MORE bullshit and now yer just desperately flailing to save face...

It's not going to work because the facts clearly are on my side...

Your ignorance permeates your every post and explains your pathetic existence, goober. :)

And yer desperation reeks, you fat cow...

You got caught in yer lies.. AGAIN...

A "wannabe cop" is a completely different meaning than someone who, at one time, wanted to be a cop...

So what part of the past tense verb has confused you? Stating that George Zimmerman was a "wannabe cop" is not the same thing as saying George Zimmerman is a "wannabe cop." This is how the use of past tense verbiage works, but how does one get through to an obvious uneducated moron like yourself who incorrectly attempts grammar and falls flat on his fugly face?

You got caught in another lie and now yer, once again, playing semantic games in a desperate and vain attempt to cover up your bullshit..

You got caught in your own stupidity and in the act of being the uneducated rube you always are. HINT: Those who don't understand grammar shouldn't try to explain it to those who actually do. You're the one playing semantic games and ignoring verb tense and claiming sentences mean things they never meant.

Crack a grammar book and try not taking everyone's posts personally and whining like a toddler about comments that aren't about you; because everything is not about you.

Your ignorance permeates your every post and explains your pathetic existence, goober. :)

Well, isn't that convenient.. :^/

So you can call people names all you want and it's all perfectly acceptable.. :^/

Nice spin, Russ....

I have a friend with a 13 yo son, Brian, who was born with Down Syndrome. Brian is the first to tell you that a person who is “retarded” was born that way and it isn’t their fault. However, Brian is quick to call you a “tard” if you do something stupid; as “tards” aren’t born that way, they simply choose to be mentally deficient!

A "wannabe cop" is a completely different meaning than someone who, at one time, wanted to be a cop...

You got caught in another lie and now yer, once again, playing semantic games in a desperate and vain attempt to cover up your bullshit..

Where are your facts, Coptard?

Where are your facts, bitch??

You have none..

I said Zimmerman was a "wannabe cop," and he was.

No he was not. And I have facts on my side.. As usual, all you have are lies and bullshit..

Weigantia would like to thank you again for this additional

Now you speak for Weigantia???

BBBWWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

Just another liar who hasn't a clue.. :D

I don't see the Mueller stuff as particularly newsworthy. Trump can pardon everyone involved if he feels like bothering.

He can pardon them for federal crimes, but accepting a pardon is an admission of guilt and would put them in legal jeopardy for their corresponding state crimes.

And not one single person in the entire country is going to change their vote over it.

Obviously a vote already made cannot be changed, but I know multiple people who voted for Trump who will never vote for him again... so there's that. :)

"Wannabe" has a specific meaning...

And so does "wannabe cop," which is exactly what I said to Russ when you decided to hijack my post to him and start spewing your regular nonsensical hair splitting bullshit with me.

Z, at one point, thought about being a cop..

Obviously, I already know this, which is why I referred to him as a "wannabe cop."

Your use of the term "wannabe" is incorrect in describing George Zimmerman..

I referred to him as a "wannabe cop," which you apparently had no trouble quoting in your post at [215].

OK, bitch, so now we are back to this?? Fine..

Call me whatever you wish; it doesn't change the fact that in the phrase "wannabe cop" that I used in my comment to Russ (not you), the word "wannabe" is an adjective, and you insisting it's a noun with your incorrect grammar lame doesn't change the fact that it's an adjective.

He was not.. I know him. You do not.. You have NO FACTS to support your claim.. I do..

Where are your facts, Coptard? I provided several above; while you provided the phrases, "I know him" and "He told me he wanted to follow in his dad's footsteps and be a judge." Well, considering the fact that his father wasn't actually a judge at all, how well could you possibly actually know him, Coptard?

But seriously, I don't give a shit, Michale. My post wasn't to you or about you; everything is not about you, Michale. When somebody criticizes a police officer, a "wannabe cop," Donald Trump or __________ <-- take your pick, try not to read their comment like it has anything at all to do with you because it's not about you since not everything is.

I said Zimmerman was a "wannabe cop," and he was. I said nothing about the timing of when he was a "wannabe cop," but it's quite obvious it wouldn't matter two shits whether or not he still wanted to be a cop because he never could under the circumstances.
_______________

Weigantia would like to thank you again for this additional contribution regarding your overwhelming qualifications as board coptard who apparently thinks every comment about someone he likes is about him personally when nothing could be further from the truth. :)

Exactly.. A big nothing burger that's not going to change anyone's mind over anything..

Smart guy..... :D

Smart people....

No, I am not admitting that..

"Wannabe" has a specific meaning...

Z, at one point, thought about being a cop..

Your use of the term "wannabe" is incorrect in describing George Zimmerman..

Wrong again, moron; it was an adjective, and Russ didn't use it.

It's really that simple, bitch...

Yea, but the rules don't apply to her. She is a Dumbocrat after all..

Incorrect.

Actually, I think "wannabe" would probably be considered an adjective.

CRS, 100% correct.

wan-na-be

noun informal derogatory
1. a person who tries to be like someone else or to fit in with a particular group of people.
"a star-struck wannabe"

adjective
1. aspiring or wanting to be a specified type of person.
"a pair of wannabe pop stars"

In the context that Russ and Veronica was using it, it was a noun...

Wrong again, moron; it was an adjective, and Russ didn't use it.
_______________

Weigantia would like to thank you again for this additional contribution regarding your overwhelming qualifications as board coptard. :)

As usual, you move the goal posts..

You said ZImmerman was a "wannabe" which is a noun...

Your reading comprehension problems and ignorance rear their ugly head again, incorrect Coptard. I commented to Russ that Zimmerman was a "wannabe cop," and you quoted me in [215] saying: Except the FACTS clearly show that Z was *NOT* a "wannabe cop"...

What part of your own quote of my comment to Russ confused you?

Additionally, a grammar lame, Coptard? If you're going to spew grammar lames you might want to make sure you know what you're talking about... and HINT: you very rarely do. In the phrase "wannabe cop," "wannabe" is an adjective. Crack a book.

Did Z WANT to be a cop? At one time, obviously..

So now you admit he was a "wannabe cop"... exactly what I said.

But, at the time of the shooting he was going to school to prepare for a law degree... He told me he wanted to follow in his dad's footsteps and be a judge..

If I had said he was a "wannabe cop" at the time of the shooting, you'd have a point, but I didn't say that... so you don't.

I also have no doubt whatsoever that Zimmerman would lie to anybody about his father being a "judge." This is bullshit. His father was not a "judge," he was a court officer in Virginia called a "magistrate" and his mother was a court clerk.

Statement of Kristi Wright, with the Department of Legislative and Public Relations in Virginia:

“Robert J. Zimmerman served as a full-time magistrate from 2000-2006. Please be advised that in Virginia magistrates are judicial officers, but they are not considered “judges” and do not possess trial jurisdiction. More detailed information on the role of the magistrate in Virginia is available on Virginia’s Judicial System Website.”

https://tinyurl.com/y8ns5rcg

Z was NOT a "wannabe"... This is fact.

I said he was a "wannabe cop," and he was, Coptard. :)

Yea, but the rules don't apply to her. She is a Dumbocrat after all..

Actually, I think "wannabe" would probably be considered an adjective.

wannabe noun
BrE /?w?n?bi/ ; NAmE /?w??n?bi/ , /?w??n?bi/
(informal, disapproving)

a person who behaves, dresses, etc. like somebody famous because they want to be like them
a rock star wannabe

In the context that Russ and Veronica was using it, it was a noun...

Surely you're aware that "tard" (abbreviation for 'retard')
represents the ultimate in political incorrectness in this day and age, right???

Michale

Actually, I think "wannabe" would probably be considered an adjective.

As usual, you move the goal posts..

You said ZImmerman was a "wannabe" which is a noun...

Did Z WANT to be a cop? At one time, obviously.. But, at the time of the shooting he was going to school to prepare for a law degree... He told me he wanted to follow in his dad's footsteps and be a judge..

In the couple months prior to the shooting, Z was offered a position as a PSA, but turned it down because he wanted to concentrate on his studies..

If he were truly a 'wannabe', he would have jumped at the chance to be a PSA, because it would have meant a uniform and a patrol car..

Z was NOT a "wannabe"... This is fact.

You are wrong... AGAIN.. This is fact..

Except the FACTS clearly show that Z was *NOT* a "wannabe cop"...

THE FACTS

* In July 2009, George Zimmerman applied to be a Prince William, Virginia, police officer, but Zimmerman was rejected because his bad credit/financial situation would've made him vulnerable to criminals.

* In March 2010, Zimmerman submitted an application for police ride-along with the Sanford Police Department.

* Zimmerman was working toward an associate's degree in criminal justice and set to graduate in spring 2012.

https://tinyurl.com/ya7g9rsm

Was Zimmerman ever a police officer? ~ No.
Did he "wannabe" a police officer? ~ Obviously.
_______________

Weigantia would like to thank you for this additional contribution regarding your overwhelming qualifications as board coptard. :)

You know... You can own that tank you have always wanted if you get a class 10 FFL....

At least there are no restrictions there right?

That would certainly cover it, but in Texas I would simply need to obtain a destructive device permit under NFA. As any tank I would likely purchase would already be registered under said Act, it would simply need to be transferred to me.

https://tinyurl.com/o8dwt8v

Will we ever buy one? Not bloody likely. :)

And that is VERY easy to prove...

An Executive Order stating that, if you can't balance your checkbook, you have NO BUSINESS voting...

Moronic, right??

An Executive Order stating that, if you can't balance your checkbook, you have NO BUSINESS engaging in Free Speech...

Moronic, right??

Like I said... Ya'all really need to end each day and start each day with saying to yerselves:

GUN OWNERSHIP IS AS MUCH OF A CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT AS FREE SPEECH OR FREE ASSEMBLY OR ANY OF THE OTHER FREEDOMS GUARANTEED IN THE BILL OF RIGHTS

If ya'all are gonna advocate taking away a Constitutional right to further a partisan agenda, then you damn well acknowledge that ANY constitutional right can be taken away to further a partisan agenda and that such is PERFECTLY acceptable to ya'all....

That stoopid rebuttal to the republicons using the CRA to repeal the regulation preventing mentally incompetent people who are on Permanent SDI takes the cake.

And yet, the ACLU sided and supported President Trump...

As astonishing as it may seem, I'll take the ACLU over ya'all's hysterical NeverTrump-ism every day of the week and twice on Sunday...

F you had read the regulation in question it stipulates that only people on permanent SDI for mental incompetence should not be allowed to own a gun, or in other words you don't get to be on the dole and buy guns if you don't have all your marbles, there is nothing about if you have lost your marbles on your own dime in the regulation.

Hay.. Don't look at me.. CW characterized the legislation as not being able to balance a checkbook means one shouldn't own a gun.. Not once, but twice...

So, if you have a problem with THAT characterization, then take it up with CW....

Odumbo's EO was as stoopid and as moronic as his anti-gun FAST AND FURIOUS debacle...

Glad to know that the republicons prefer free guns to

Any FACTS that prove this??

No??

Of course not.. Ya'all NEVER have any facts...

Except the FACTS clearly show that Z was *NOT* a "wannabe cop"...

But I wouldn't expect you to have ANYTHING to do with FACTs... :^/

Being the liar that you are and all that...

did Nunes and the Fox News morons all romance THE SAME BAD COW before they went on TV?

It's name is Moopert Murdoch. :)

An old friend of mine from Etobicoke, now with a 'dubious news network,' said as much about Nunes and his security level>clearance.

Smart guy, your friend. :)

Funny how an off-hand remark triggers a memory hitherto blurred by a few pints and loud bar.

*LOL* :)

You keep using the term “coptard” to describe Michael. Just wondering what your definition for that term is?

With sincerest apologies to the knowledgeable and decent such as yourself, I do have quite a treasure trove of cop slang.

coptard

A law enforcement officer [or former] who exhibits behavior that is characteristic of a human being of below average intelligence.

A coptard will constantly drone on and on about how knowledgeable they are about law and/or law enforcement while repeatedly demonstrating otherwise. For instance, the resident board coptard insists that Officer Peterson followed "SOP" despite all evidence to the contrary.

Not as bad as when mall security claims to be part of “law enforcement”, but not that far off, either.

*LOL* ... "mall cop."

If George Zimmerman fits the definition of “coptard”, then I am sure that I will fully agree with it!

If George Zimmerman were the real thing versus just a "wannabe cop," he would most definitely fit the definition. :)

Dude, I live in CA. Even if I'm not happy, I can get happy.

But thanks, I'm good :)

Hope you are too. Sincerely.

That stoopid rebuttal to the republicons using the CRA to repeal the regulation preventing mentally incompetent people who are on Permanent SDI takes the cake.

IF you had read the regulation in question it stipulates that only people on permanent SDI for mental incompetence should not be allowed to own a gun, or in other words you don't get to be on the dole and buy guns if you don't have all your marbles, there is nothing about if you have lost your marbles on your own dime in the regulation.

Glad to know that the republicons prefer free guns to free cel phones, or food and medical care for that matter.

You know... You can own that tank you have always wanted if you get a class 10 FFL....

At least there are no restrictions there right?

Show me the supreme court ruling placing a lower age boundary on gun purchase rights Michale :)

*LOL*

Do you think he's even aware of the fact that last Tuesday, 2/20, the Supreme Court made it abundantly clear yet again that the government has broad power regarding the restriction and regulation of firearms when they dismissed a Second Amendment challenge to California's 10-day waiting period in order to purchase a gun? This is yet another in a long line of cases where the justices have repeatedly refused to block strict gun restrictions/regulations, including but not limited to state bans on the sale of semi-automatic weapons.

So there's that. :)

Re Muslims - I didn't bring it up. John M started it by saying it was OK for Dems to try to delegitimize Trump because Reps had done the same to Obama (where born, Muslim, etc.)

Not kidding at all (about no Muslims). Not many Muslims (maybe not zero, but close) in small Rocky Mtn rural communities. Likewise Black folks. We have to make do with Injuns.

Currently reading Ron Chernow's U.S. Grant bio. Got it from local library, big mistake. Shoulda spent the $ for Kindle. Damn thing weighs a ton.

Why do you keep saying sad? Your life unhappy?

You are kidding, right?

Re "What is my problem with Muslims?" I reject the premise of the question. What causes you to jump to that unjustified conclusion

So why are you commenting on Obama being Muslim? Why did you bring it up if it means nothing to you one way or the other?

Is it that you think it is clever of you to throw about red meat for Michale?

Very sad. How about you tell us about whatever book you are reading if you just want to kill a few pixels.

You can bet that Deputy Peterson was told EXACTLY that..

Stand by for back-up and keep feeding intel...

No, you equated a military cop with a mall cop..

You hate the military.. Typical Dumbocrat...

Are u saying that Dumbocrat officials NEVER encouraged or supported Left Wing boycotts??

You see, this is why it's IMPOSSIBLE to think ya'all have any credibility...

What a two-faced liar you are...

You compare citizens exercising their right to protest to an elected official threatening to use his elected office go after businesses that do not support organizations that he believes they must back?!?!

It’s your dishonesty that constantly makes me thankful that you are not a police officer... and makes me wonder just how much dishonor you must have brought upon other officers by your example.

Figures....

Just basing that on your comments on here, not the position that you once held.

Re "What does it matter. . .?" Who says it does matter?

Re "Is there any law against it?" None that I know of.

Re "Do I treat Muslims differently than non-Muslims?" I don't have any occasion to treat Muslims at all, never met one.

Re "Do I think Muslims should be barred from elected office?" No.

Re "What is my problem with Muslims?" I reject the premise of the question. What causes you to jump to that unjustified conclusion?

What is your problem with Muslims?

If Odumbo is a muslim why would he LIE about it???

He DID say "his muslim faith"...

Let's take these one by one shall we?:

1) "But I never understood about the Muslim thing. Just because his father was a born Muslim,"

Barack Hussein Obama, Sr., was a black MUSLIM from Nyangoma-Kogel, Kenya. When Obama was two years old, his parents divorced. His father was an atheist or agnostic (i.e., no longer a practicing Muslim) by the time he married the younger Obama’s mother. The senior Obama first moved thousands of miles away, from Hawaii to Connecticut, so he couldn’t have received much of an “introduction to Islam” from his (biological) father, who after Connecticut eventually returned to Kenya and never again had any direct influence over his son’s education.

2) "his mother was a Muslim convert"

His mother Ann Dunham, in reality, was a white ATHEIST from Wichita, Kansas.

3)"his step-father was a Muslim, and his early education took place in Muslim schools,"

Lolo Soetoro, the second husband of Obama’s mother, Ann Dunham, was an Indonesian oil manager. Barack and his mother moved to Jakarta, Indonesia, where Obama spent 4-5 years attending both Muslim and Catholic schools before his mother sent him back to the United States to live with his maternal grandmother. As a six-year-old in Catholic school, he studied the catechism.”

Barack Hussein Obama joined the United Church of Christ in Chicago in the 1980's.

"don't know why anybody might conclude that he was a "secret" Muslim, right?"

Given ALL of the FACTS above, I have NO idea why someone might conclude that either.

What is your problem with Muslims?

If You Have A Mental Illness, This Antifa Student Group Wants You

The Revolutionary Student Front at the University of Texas at Austin hosted a “Revolutionary Mental Health Program” “to address the mental health needs of students in a way that would primarily serve to politicize and strengthen them, to become more committed to revolution and more capable of carrying it out,” reported Far Left Watch.
http://dailycaller.com/2018/02/26/texas-antifa-mental-illness/

Yea, let's follow Dumbocrats.. :^/

Think back to all the boycotts that Dumbocrats supported and pushed...

What a two-faced liar you are...

I will kill any tax legislation that benefits @Delta unless the company changes its position and fully reinstates its relationship with @NRA. Corporations cannot attack conservatives and expect us not to fight back.

THIS is what Republicans ARE: they use their official powers to punish people/companies that disagree with Repubs or make legal choices Repubs don't like. They also clearly write and pass legislation to help cronies and hurt un-cronies, as opposed to serving the citizenry.

HEH

Hearty agreement about "The Trump admin. doing just fine undermining itself", but you can't be serious that that fact negates that the Dems/Libs are also doing it.

Presuming, BTW, that you're aware that I did not vote for Trump, and that I consider him to be a world-class asshole.

I never said nor cared about where Obama was born, etc, although I acknowledge the fact that other Reps/Cons did say all those things.

But I never understood about the Muslim thing. Just because his father was a born Muslim, his mother was a Muslim convert his step-father was a Muslim, and his early education took place in Muslim schools, don't know why anybody might conclude that he was a "secret" Muslim, right?

Concludes:

Also, we fucking love it when Devin Nunes says that when people attack him, it’s because he’s getting too close. Yes, that’s right, everyone is afraid of the cunning investigative work of Devin Nunes, whose brain may have Mad Cow Disease on account of how he MIGHT fuck cows.

It is only Fair and Balanced to allow us to do so.

Oh com'on, John... That is what you and the rest of the Never Trumpers have been doing for the last 2 years..

And ya'all have *ALWAYS* been wrong...

All we Dem/Libs acknowledge that because of the way our peculiar electoral college system is set up, Trump was legally elected President without having won the popular vote.

President Trump was the legally elected President without having hit a home run in the World Series..

What's yer point??

But then, it's not like all you Rep/Conservatives ever tried to delitigimize our nation's first black President with all those accusations of "he wasn't born in this country" "he's a secret Muslim" "his birth certificate is fake" "his school records are fake" nonsense?

And how was your reaction to that??

So, you thought the BEST course of action would be to act EXACTLY like that???

"GOOD CALL!!"
-Jim Carrey, LIAR LIAR

:D

"Well, as the Russians ares saying, "Bullski Shitsky"!"

Apparently, you need this pointed out to you until it finally sinks in:

"Tyler, the Republican consultant, wonders how Trump supporters can argue that the social media ads and fake stories had no impact, when it was exactly the sort of thing the Trump campaign was doing itself. “You can’t say that what you were doing was effective, but what the Russians were doing wasn’t effective,” he said."

"There is a repugnantly elitist overtone to the whole Dem/Lib sponsored effort to undermine and delegitimize the Trump administration that permeates Weigantia"

Except no one is trying to "delegitimize" the Trump administration. The Trump administration is doing that just fine undermining itself.

All we Dem/Libs acknowledge that because of the way our peculiar electoral college system is set up, Trump was legally elected President without having won the popular vote.

But then, it's not like all you Rep/Conservatives ever tried to delitigimize our nation's first black President with all those accusations of "he wasn't born in this country" "he's a secret Muslim" "his birth certificate is fake" "his school records are fake" nonsense?

An old friend of mine from Etobicoke, now with a 'dubious news network,' said as much about Nunes and his security level>clearance.

Funny how an off-hand remark triggers a memory hitherto blurred by a few pints and loud bar.

LL&P

Oooooo Nice slam against the military..

Figures....

There is a repugnantly elitist overtone to the whole Dem/Lib sponsored effort to undermine and delegitimize the Trump administration that permeates Weigantia, and the entire Dem/Lib construct, the theme of which is that "We are universally far too smart, far too sophisticated to fall victim to the often ridiculous efforts of the Russians to delude us with their Facebook posts and DNC emails, but all of you guys (the great unwashed, borderline illiterate masses) were so gullible as to allow yourselves to be deluded, costing Hillary to lose the election".

hehehehehehehehe

Hilarious.....

That's not factually accurate... I was a certified deputy sheriff and a graduate of a POST certified Police Academy..

But, of course FACTS have no place here..

Yea.. That's yer claim.. But you are a proven liar, so....

"Funny how you ONLY quote polls that say what you want to hear. :D"

Funny how you only do the same. :-D

"Now, if you quote the polls that say what you DON'T want to hear, then Trump's polling is at 50%.. Which is even HIGHER than it was for Odumbo at this point in Odumbo's administration.."

Says your older, previous poll, and not the newer, more recent polls which contradict your older one.

FUN WITH POLLS :D

You keep using the term “coptard” to describe Michael. Just wondering what your definition for that term is?

Since Michael was never a state commissioned police officer but was a military police officer (which means he never dealt with anyone who wasn’t completely tied to the military’s rules), I always take his claims of being “former law enforcement” to have an asterisk after it. Not as bad as when mall security claims to be part of “law enforcement”, but not that far off, either.

If George Zimmerman fits the definition of “coptard”, then I am sure that I will fully agree with it!

You're damn right there is and if being educated, well read, and relying on evidence rather than gut instinct is "elite" then sign me up.

You keep wallowing in propaganda from the right wing or Russia, and relying on your "common sense" to tell you what is right, but don't expect the rest of us to.

The whole Russia interference isn't anything new, just a new player participating.

Go read "The Age of Propaganda" by UC Santa Cruz professors Elliot Aronson and Anthony Pratkanis which was written in the early 1990's. It is all there, and those of us who read that book or a similar one have had a jaundiced eye to the media in any form since.

Show me the supreme court ruling placing a lower age boundary on gun purchase rights Michale :)

Also, the voting age for non-white males used to be "None".

You really need to be more sympathetic to we Libs. After all, there's just no EASY way to describe morons-cheaters-traitors like Trumpers and GOP-complicit-bigwig-traitors without sounding negative.

And also, actually WANTING honesty from our leaders and lamenting dishonesty from our crimnal-WH-occupants ends up sounding "pure and virtuous" -- how can it not?

Our problem is our opposition political party is corrupt at the top and deluded at the bottom, with a mushy middle full of people making excuses for their leaders' crimes/failures while supporting their "smash the little guy" policies.

It's just not possible to be accurate and complimentary at the same time.

In a NUTshell (pun intended), "We, the sophisticated and educated elite, only vote our pure and virtuous ideology, but you uneducated dolts all let yourselves be conned by (mostly illegal) political propaganda"!"

Well, as the Russians ares saying, "Bullski Shitsky"!

There you go again putin' words in other peoples mouths. What he actually said is below.

"There is no allegation in the indictment that the charged conduct altered the outcome of the 2016 election."

And

"There's no allegation in the indictment of any effect on the outcome of the election."

If you are going to use other peoples words at least use the actual ones.

"Duck, or you'll be talkin' out your ass."
Buford T Justice
Smokey and the Bandit

Hilarious. :)

Nunes hasn’t even read the source intelligence his dumb memo was based on.

I would wager Ignorant Tool Nunes lost his TS security clearance. Seriously.

The meta-data on those websites prove they were published AFTER you lied about what Officer Burton said...

More BS from you. Please keep proving facts don't matter to you, and make yourself useful and get some new movie quotes... the one about "god" is overused and would like you to stop using His name in vain... pun intended :) *LOL*

Yea.. That's yer claim..

But I have PROVEN you to be a liar, so your claim is also a lie..

I PROVED you lied about it..

You proved you're a liar and/or blind about the issue.

That's the beginning and end of the discussion.. :D

Still wrong... multiple times now. :)

Remember all the drama over THE MEMO? It feels like it was many years ago, because that’s how everything feels now. (Trump Time Compression Syndrome is real, y’all.) But it was in fact just a couple weeks ago! Well finally the Democrats on the House Intelligence Committee (HPSCI), led by the stalwart Adam Schiff, have released their response, which takes all of HPSCI chair/Trump slut Devin Nunes’s lies, stomps on them, stomps on them some more, and constantly reminds everyone that Nunes hasn’t even read the source intelligence his dumb memo was based on.

The outcome of the election was NOT AFFECTED IN ANY WAY
-Mueller's boss, Rod Rosenstein

Trump’s Approval Rating Drops Back To His Worst With 2 New Polls

Funny how you ONLY quote polls that say what you want to hear. :D

Now, if you quote the polls that say what you DON'T want to hear, then Trump's polling is at 50%.. Which is even HIGHER than it was for Odumbo at this point in Odumbo's administration..

FUN WITH POLLS :D

“Defendants and their co-conspirators began to encourage U.S. minority groups not to vote in the 2016 U.S. presidential election or to vote for a third-party U.S. presidential candidate,” according to a Feb. 16 grand jury indictment obtained by Mueller.

Over the entire final month of the race, Trump essentially centered his campaign on talking about the emails stolen by Russian intelligence and then released through its allied group WikiLeaks.

“You clearly wouldn’t do that if you didn’t think that was effective,” said Rick Tyler, a GOP consultant who worked for Texas Sen. Ted Cruz’s presidential campaign during the primaries.

Although Trump lost the popular tally by nearly 3 million votes nationally, he won three states that most observers expected to go to Clinton by a total margin of 77,744. Were the Russian efforts enough to have moved 77,744 votes in Wisconsin, Michigan and Pennsylvania?

Exit polling suggests that voters’ concern about Clinton and emails — and Trump’s pounding on that theme with the help of WikiLeaks in the final weeks — indeed made a difference.

In Michigan, for instance, 60 percent of the electorate was bothered by the email issue, and 75 percent of those voters supported Trump. Relatedly, a quarter of Michigan voters settled on a candidate in the final month. That group broke for Trump 52 to 37 percent, while those who decided earlier voted for Clinton 50 to 47 percent.

The fact of Russian interference in the election and Russian President Vladimir Putin’s preference for Trump was detailed in a Jan. 6, 2017, report released by the U.S. intelligence agencies. That conclusion was reinforced by Mueller’s Feb. 16, 2018, indictment.

“They engaged in operations primarily intended to communicate derogatory information about Hillary Clinton, to denigrate other candidates such as Ted Cruz and Marco Rubio, and to support Bernie Sanders and then-candidate Donald Trump,” the indictment states.

Tyler, the Republican consultant, wonders how Trump supporters can argue that the social media ads and fake stories had no impact, when it was exactly the sort of thing the Trump campaign was doing itself. “You can’t say that what you were doing was effective, but what the Russians were doing wasn’t effective,” he said.

Despite Trump’s bullish take on his performance, the president’s approval rating fell five points over last month to 35 percent, according to a CNN survey, conducted by polling firm SSRS. That number matches the lowest rating of his presidency in December.

A separate poll by USA Today and Suffolk University’s Political Research Center found similar results, with the president’s approval rating also slipping to match the lowest point that survey has found at 38 percent, with 60 percent disapproving of the job he’s doing.

Word.....

I'm aware that you were not specific about where the 'moral support' came from. I mentioned it because it's currently getting so much press play, like when the former SNL senator was screaming about the Facebook people being too stupid to realize the Russians were meddling in our election when the ads were "paid for with Rubles".

Which demonstrated once again that Dems/Libs are only in favor of free speech when it agrees with their worldview.

Heather Locklear was arrested Sunday night for felony domestic violence and battery on a cop.
http://www.tmz.com/2018/02/26/heather-locklear-arrest-domestic-violence-battery-cop/

Dumbocrats... :^/

Once again..

You continue to lie...

"You can't win.. I've got god on my side!!"
-Max Von Sydow, NEEDFUL THINGS

:D

You made the claim as to what Officer Burton said..

I PROVED you lied about it..

That's the beginning and end of the discussion.. :D

NICE STRAWMAN!! :D

Well, you claimed that a 100% factual statement was incorrect so I tried to guess what a Coptard would believe.

It was really impressive how you knocked that straw man OUT!!

It was simply a guess as to what bullshit you believed since you claimed that a 100% factual statement was "flat out wrong."

Of course, I never said any such thing.. And the fact that you would go to such lame extremes proves how desperate and flailing you are...

What part of the words "then I guess" is unclear at all when I've obviously taken ownership of the statement, Coptard?

Yea.. Just like you said Officer Burton said a specific thing, which he didn't..

NICE STRAWMAN!! :D

I read it in an article multiple times and supplied the link, but nice straw man... actually not even a good try, and now it turns out there were 3 other deputies standing outside the school and not going inside when protocol since Columbine says you go into the school and take action regardless of whether you have backup.

Again, it's in multiple places in the text and under two pictures, including the one of Officer Burton in a police uniform and a Mariners uniform:

And in an interview with the New York Times, Coral Springs Officer Tim Burton revealed Peterson hid from Cruz when the teenager started shooting. Burton, who used to be a professional baseball player, said Peterson hid behind a concrete column.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5427207/Trump-says-cop-hid-gunman-coward.html

So Blind Coptard, it should be interesting to hear the excuse of those three as to why they also remained outside in plain view of students and other officers who arrived on the scene and observed them standing there. :)

NICE STRAWMAN!! :D

It was really impressive how you knocked that straw man OUT!!

Of course, I never said any such thing.. And the fact that you would go to such lame extremes proves how desperate and flailing you are...

Liar. I mentioned nothing about Facebook in my post, and Stucki mentioned nothing about Facebook in his original post until he responded and falsely characterized what I posted and moved the goalposts.

Yea.. Just like you said Officer Burton said a specific thing, which he didn't..

You have already proven you are the liar here..

Actually, that is exactly what you said..

Liar. I mentioned nothing about Facebook in my post, and Stucki mentioned nothing about Facebook in his original post until he responded and falsely characterized what I posted and moved the goalposts.

But why let FACTS ruin a perfectly good internet rant, eh :D

I have a better question: Why lie about something that never happened like an inveterate asshole? As I have said many times and you keep proving on a regular basis, you wouldn't recognize a fact if it lived on your face. On the other hand, you lie on a regular basis, proving that facts mean nothing whatsoever in the alternate reality in which you reside. :)

Me: If/when they are formally charged with a crime, they will be "innocent until proven guilty" of said crime(s)

You: That is flat out wrong..

So if you think it is "flat out wrong" that they'll be "innocent until proven guilty" of a crime, then I guess you think they'll be guilty of said crime until proven innocent? M'kay!

Here, let me spoon feed you like a toddler in terms a pre-K child could understand.

True or False: One violates a law when they fail to stop at a sign labelled "STOP." ~ True

True or False: One does not violate the law when they fail to stop at a sign labelled "STOP" if a law enforcement officer fails to issue them a ticket. ~ False

The fact that no one gives them a ticket has no bearing on whether or not they are guilty of committing the crime because they definitely did not stop at the sign that said "STOP," which is a violation of law.

They are ALWAYS innocent until proven guilty, regardless of whether or not they are formally charged..

Incorrect. See above. Here let me help you more: Who proved Rick Gates was guilty of multiple crimes? No one. He is guilty because he confessed to committing multiple crimes including conspiracy against the United States.

The fact is, some charged with crime(s) will be innocent and some will be guilty, but it's up to the United States of America to charge them a.k.a. "indict" and then either obtain a plea of guilt of crime(s)... as they did with Flynn, Papadopolous, Gates, and others... or otherwise be prepared to prove in a court of law their guilt, while Defendant attempts to prove the opposite in order to obtain "exoneration" after due consideration of the case. :)

Class dismissed.

That's the facts and that's the reality you just can't handle...

Please keep providing proof of your ignorance regarding the law, Coptard. :)

Actually, that is exactly what you said..

But why let FACTS ruin a perfectly good internet rant, eh :D

OK, I'll take your word that Russkies buying Facebook ads is "a criminal violation".

I said no such thing, and your post didn't even mention Facebook whatsoever. You said, and I quote: "getting dirt on your opponent, getting moral support or whatever, from Ruskies is NOT illegal, even if you're 100% guilty as sin," and I supplied the federal laws that refuted that statement. "Getting dirt on your opponent" from a foreign source can be a violation of federal laws as I noted in my post, and "getting moral support or whatever from Ruskies" can be illegal if it can be proven the Trump campaign aided and/or abetted the "Ruskies" who "hacked" the election, particularly in a case of quid pro quo:

A Russian lawyer who met with President Donald Trump’s oldest son last year says he indicated that a law targeting Russia could be re-examined if his father won the election and asked her for written evidence that illegal proceeds went to Hillary Clinton’s campaign.

The lawyer, Natalia Veselnitskaya, said in a two-and-a-half-hour interview in Moscow that she would tell these and other things to the Senate Judiciary Committee on condition that her answers be made public, something it hasn’t agreed to. She has received scores of questions from the committee, which is investigating possible collusion between Russia and the Trump campaign. Veselnitskaya said she’s also ready -- if asked -- to testify to Special Counsel Robert Mueller.

https://tinyurl.com/ycpefwjz

So there's that. :)

That is flat out wrong..

They are ALWAYS innocent until proven guilty, regardless of whether or not they are formally charged..

That's the facts and that's the reality you just can't handle...

Neil is technically talking out of his ass..

Raising the gun purchase age to 75 is as constitutional as raising the voting age to 75 or the free speech age as 75..

Neil is just pushing buttons with NO REGARDS to reality...

"There is mimicry and there is mockery and THAT was definitely mockery"
-Dr Leonard McCoy

:D

Exactly..

So now you are agreeing with me that Neil is technically correct, but you are correct in regards to the current Supreme Court. :)

Neil is completely and utterly wrong when he claims that making it so only 75 and older can purchase firearms would pass Constitutional Muster..

I think you have moved the goalposts on Neil... again.

Thank you for agreeing with me..

Right back at you.

Hurts, don't it? :D

Not even a scintilla. :)

But they are INNOCENT until PROVEN guilty..

If/when they are formally charged with a crime, they will be "innocent until proven guilty" of said crime(s), but that is moving the goalposts when you consider the fact that your repeated claim ad nauseam is that they've been exonerated when no such thing has happened. :)

And THAT is what sticks in your craw..

My "craw" is just fine, Coptard. Thank you for adding to the ever growing list that proves you're ignorant and/or delusional.

President Trump is COMPLETELY and UTTERLY innocent..

Thank you for your uninformed opinion, but there is evidence that's available to the public that proves otherwise, while Trump's former foreign policy advisers/former National Security Adviser as well as former deputy campaign manager have pleaded guilty to multiple crimes committed both before and after Trump's inauguration, and "guilty" sure doesn't mean they're innocent. The fact that Trump is now referring to Flynn as a "liar" when a few months ago he referred to him as a "wonderful man" means it's time to clue in. :)

Re "It is a criminal violation . . ."

OK, I'll take your word that Russkies buying Facebook ads is "a criminal violation". As I said before, I'm not nearly as close to Russia as Sarah Palin was, but I can clearly hear all 13 of 'em laughing clear down here.

Even if Mueller can get them to come and be prosecuted, I'm betting they'll plead 1st amendment, and wont even be convicted.

One has to wonder if it's the same "position" she used when she slept her way into her Senate seat...

And yet, she supports abortion.. :^/

Ahhhh So you are saying that Constitutional rights are regulated based on what hysterical Left Wingers want...

You *ARE* drunk...

Incorrect again... particularly due to the fact that the makeup of the current Supreme Court swings in the entirely opposite direction. :)

Exactly..

Neil is completely and utterly wrong when he claims that making it so only 75 and older can purchase firearms would pass Constitutional Muster..

Thank you for agreeing with me..

Hurts, don't it? :D

But they are INNOCENT until PROVEN guilty..

And THAT is what sticks in your craw..

President Trump is COMPLETELY and UTTERLY innocent..

This is FACT.. :D

Fine. Then explain it to Neil.. Oh that's right. You only correct those who you find ideologically "unpure".. :D

Incorrect. You claim to have no ideology, and I correct you on a regular basis. :p

Neil is technically correct that the Supreme Court can regulate any constitutional right(s) as they so rule, while my point was that I did not think the sitting Supreme Court would rule that age restriction as constitutional. :)

But the "crimes" they are being charged for occurred long before they had any connection to the Trump campaign..

Incorrect. In fact, Paul Manafort, Trump's campaign manager, and Richard W. Gates III, the Trump deputy campaign manager who also helped with Trump's inauguration including funding among other things, were accused of multiple counts of fraud, conspiracy, and money laundering in financial schemes during the period 2006 through 2017.

Hint: Reading the indictments versus believing the lying tweets and/or the propaganda being disseminated by the right-wing echo chamber before you post inaccurate information would go a very long way to ending or at least reducing this common occurrence on your part. :)

Or maybe you have never heard of the INNOCENT UNTIL PROVEN GUILTY thingy...

"Innocent until proven guilty" is a legal "term of art" for someone charged with a crime, but in no way on Earth should one mistake this for a "fact." Indeed, people are guilty of crimes every day who may never be charged with the crimes they have committed, but that "no way in Hell" is the equivalent of meaning they are not guilty of committing a crime.

Continuing to spew this same line of BS ad nauseam constitutes nothing more than the prolific proof of your lack of intelligence regarding issues of law, to put it bluntly, the proof of being a "coptard." :)

To date, ALL Americans are COMPLETELY INNOCENT of knowingly colluding with the Russians...

Happy??

No. Quite obviously, people can be guilty of crimes without ever being charged with them. You spewing the right-wing rhetoric about "Bubba and the rapes," I wouldn't think I would have to explain this to you, but here were are. :)

I'll still be here to laugh my ass off when you completely come up empty again and again and again and again.. :D

I have no doubt that you'll still be the guy cheering on the statements of Vladimir Putin while insisting Obama was "hysterical" for expelling representatives of a country that attacked US:

https://tinyurl.com/y776v35s

You'll always be the "coptard" whining incessantly about "Bubba and the rapes" while insisting that Flynn and Trump et alia are "innocent until proven guilty" and sucking up the bullshit from the right-wing echo chamber and spewing it back here, whining "fake news, fake news" as the indictments surrounding the Trump campaign continue to be made public and the guilty pleas by Flynn, Gates, Papadopolous, and others grow ever deeper. :) *LOL*