<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Obama Poll Watch -- March, 2010</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/04/02/opw1003/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/04/02/opw1003/</link>
	<description>Reality-based political commentary</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2026 05:31:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/04/02/opw1003/#comment-8325</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Apr 2010 10:56:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=1781#comment-8325</guid>
		<description>I would just like someone (anyone!!) to explain to me exactly HOW the Federal Government can FORCE someone to buy something (at their OWN expense) that they may not want to purchase.

None of the talking heads in the media have been able to answer this..  They all say, &quot;Oh, these lawsuits will fail&quot; and &quot;Oh they have no legal case&quot; etc etc...

But NO ONE has been able to say WHY....

Funny how that is, eh??

Hell, the very scary precedent it sets should be enough to have ya&#039;all screaming for the hills.

Imagine a GOP Controlled Congress and White House forcing ya&#039;all to buy GM Trucks and SUVs because it&#039;s for the good of the country...

How would ya&#039;all feel about THAT!??   :D

Strictly discussing the LEGAL issues, there is no way that CrapCare will be found to be constitutional.  CrapCare&#039;s only hope is that Obama will be able to stack the SCOTUS in his favor before CrapCare comes before it.


Michale.....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would just like someone (anyone!!) to explain to me exactly HOW the Federal Government can FORCE someone to buy something (at their OWN expense) that they may not want to purchase.</p>
<p>None of the talking heads in the media have been able to answer this..  They all say, "Oh, these lawsuits will fail" and "Oh they have no legal case" etc etc...</p>
<p>But NO ONE has been able to say WHY....</p>
<p>Funny how that is, eh??</p>
<p>Hell, the very scary precedent it sets should be enough to have ya'all screaming for the hills.</p>
<p>Imagine a GOP Controlled Congress and White House forcing ya'all to buy GM Trucks and SUVs because it's for the good of the country...</p>
<p>How would ya'all feel about THAT!??   :D</p>
<p>Strictly discussing the LEGAL issues, there is no way that CrapCare will be found to be constitutional.  CrapCare's only hope is that Obama will be able to stack the SCOTUS in his favor before CrapCare comes before it.</p>
<p>Michale.....</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elizabeth Miller</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/04/02/opw1003/#comment-8322</link>
		<dc:creator>Elizabeth Miller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Apr 2010 18:40:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=1781#comment-8322</guid>
		<description>I wish them all well on their little adventure. After all, it&#039;s not like they have anything more important that needs their urgent attention.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wish them all well on their little adventure. After all, it's not like they have anything more important that needs their urgent attention.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/04/02/opw1003/#comment-8320</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Apr 2010 17:06:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=1781#comment-8320</guid>
		<description>Five more states have joined the FL et al Lawsuit against CrapCare...


Michale....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Five more states have joined the FL et al Lawsuit against CrapCare...</p>
<p>Michale....</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/04/02/opw1003/#comment-8315</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Apr 2010 10:37:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=1781#comment-8315</guid>
		<description>Now let&#039;s talk about Obama&#039;s &quot;redistribution&quot; plan..

For this, I am going to give you an example of a college economics professor at an upstate New York school of higher education.

This professor&#039;s class had insisted that Obama&#039;s &quot;redistribution of wealth&quot; program can work and that no one would be poor and no one would be rich, a great equalizer.  The professor then said, &quot;OK, we will have an experiment in this class on Obama&#039;s plan&quot;.  All grades would be averaged and everyone would receive the same grade so no one would fail and no one would receive an A....
 
After the first test, the grades were averaged and everyone got a B.  The students who studied hard were upset and the students who studied little were happy.  

As the second test rolled around, the students who studied little had studied even less and the ones who studied hard decided they wanted a free ride too so they studied little. The second test average was a D.  Now, no one was happy. 

When the 3rd test rolled around, the average was an F.  The scores never increased as bickering, blame and name-calling all resulted in hard feelings and no one would study for the benefit of anyone else. 

All failed, to their great surprise, and the professor told them that redistribution of wealth would also ultimately fail because when the reward is great, the effort to succeed is great but when government takes all the reward away, no one will try or want to succeed.  

The fatal flaw in Obama&#039;s plan is that it fails to take into account human nature.  It makes grand assumptions about human beings that just aren&#039;t true.


Michale.....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now let's talk about Obama's "redistribution" plan..</p>
<p>For this, I am going to give you an example of a college economics professor at an upstate New York school of higher education.</p>
<p>This professor's class had insisted that Obama's "redistribution of wealth" program can work and that no one would be poor and no one would be rich, a great equalizer.  The professor then said, "OK, we will have an experiment in this class on Obama's plan".  All grades would be averaged and everyone would receive the same grade so no one would fail and no one would receive an A....</p>
<p>After the first test, the grades were averaged and everyone got a B.  The students who studied hard were upset and the students who studied little were happy.  </p>
<p>As the second test rolled around, the students who studied little had studied even less and the ones who studied hard decided they wanted a free ride too so they studied little. The second test average was a D.  Now, no one was happy. </p>
<p>When the 3rd test rolled around, the average was an F.  The scores never increased as bickering, blame and name-calling all resulted in hard feelings and no one would study for the benefit of anyone else. </p>
<p>All failed, to their great surprise, and the professor told them that redistribution of wealth would also ultimately fail because when the reward is great, the effort to succeed is great but when government takes all the reward away, no one will try or want to succeed.  </p>
<p>The fatal flaw in Obama's plan is that it fails to take into account human nature.  It makes grand assumptions about human beings that just aren't true.</p>
<p>Michale.....</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/04/02/opw1003/#comment-8314</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Apr 2010 10:27:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=1781#comment-8314</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;I&#039;m not sure which Comment Tips heading this would properly go under but, how to deal with Michale should fit nicely in there somewhere. &lt;/I&gt;

hehehehehehe

&lt;B&gt;&quot;I&#039;m gonna twist ya. I&#039;m gonna flip ya, frap your body &#039;til your bones hurt! When you squeal, I&#039;m just going to go faster and harder.&quot;&lt;/B&gt;
-Armageddon

Michale.....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>I'm not sure which Comment Tips heading this would properly go under but, how to deal with Michale should fit nicely in there somewhere. </i></p>
<p>hehehehehehe</p>
<p><b>"I'm gonna twist ya. I'm gonna flip ya, frap your body 'til your bones hurt! When you squeal, I'm just going to go faster and harder."</b><br />
-Armageddon</p>
<p>Michale.....</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Weigant</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/04/02/opw1003/#comment-8313</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Apr 2010 06:11:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=1781#comment-8313</guid>
		<description>Elizabeth -

Now, now...

Heh.

I&#039;m about 2/3 done with the comment tip page, but may not finish it tonight.  Then once I get it up and running, I have to add a link to the code so people can find it, which will take more time.  Anyway, just a progress report for everyone.  It&#039;s getting there...

Nice italics and bold, I must say!  Next up for you: how to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/04/02/opw1003/#comment-8311&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;create a hidden link&lt;/a&gt; -- you&#039;re oviously ready for the big time.

:-)

-CW</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Elizabeth -</p>
<p>Now, now...</p>
<p>Heh.</p>
<p>I'm about 2/3 done with the comment tip page, but may not finish it tonight.  Then once I get it up and running, I have to add a link to the code so people can find it, which will take more time.  Anyway, just a progress report for everyone.  It's getting there...</p>
<p>Nice italics and bold, I must say!  Next up for you: how to <a href="http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/04/02/opw1003/#comment-8311" rel="nofollow">create a hidden link</a> -- you're oviously ready for the big time.</p>
<p>:-)</p>
<p>-CW</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elizabeth Miller</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/04/02/opw1003/#comment-8311</link>
		<dc:creator>Elizabeth Miller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Apr 2010 02:50:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=1781#comment-8311</guid>
		<description>Chris,

I&#039;m not sure which &lt;b&gt;Comment Tips&lt;/b&gt; heading this would properly go under but, &lt;i&gt;how to deal with Michale&lt;/i&gt; should fit nicely in there somewhere. 

Just kidding! ... sort of. :)

P.S. Notice that I&#039;ve finally learned how to use &lt;i&gt;italics&lt;/i&gt; and &lt;b&gt;bold&lt;/b&gt;? It only took a couple or three years!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chris,</p>
<p>I'm not sure which <b>Comment Tips</b> heading this would properly go under but, <i>how to deal with Michale</i> should fit nicely in there somewhere. </p>
<p>Just kidding! ... sort of. :)</p>
<p>P.S. Notice that I've finally learned how to use <i>italics</i> and <b>bold</b>? It only took a couple or three years!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/04/02/opw1003/#comment-8310</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Apr 2010 00:22:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=1781#comment-8310</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;Um, wait a minute, before I get to that... Michale, was &quot;Demolition Man&quot; the one with the line in it about &quot;President Schwarzeneggar&quot;? I forget...&lt;/I&gt;

It was indeed... :D  

&lt;B&gt;
Huxley: I’ve been an enthusiast of your escapades for quite some time now. I have, in fact, perused some newsreels from the Schwarzenegger Library, and that time you took that car...

Spartan: —Hold it. The Schwarzenegger Library?

Huxley: Yes. Schwarzenegger Presidential Library. wasn’t he an actor when you...

Spartan: —Stop. He was president?

Huxley: Yes. Even though he was not born in this country, his popularity at the time cased the 61st amendment, in which they said...

Spartan: —I don’t wanna know. 
&lt;/B&gt;

Posting the quotes made me want to watch the movie again..  :D

Michale.....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Um, wait a minute, before I get to that... Michale, was "Demolition Man" the one with the line in it about "President Schwarzeneggar"? I forget...</i></p>
<p>It was indeed... :D  </p>
<p><b><br />
Huxley: I’ve been an enthusiast of your escapades for quite some time now. I have, in fact, perused some newsreels from the Schwarzenegger Library, and that time you took that car...</p>
<p>Spartan: —Hold it. The Schwarzenegger Library?</p>
<p>Huxley: Yes. Schwarzenegger Presidential Library. wasn’t he an actor when you...</p>
<p>Spartan: —Stop. He was president?</p>
<p>Huxley: Yes. Even though he was not born in this country, his popularity at the time cased the 61st amendment, in which they said...</p>
<p>Spartan: —I don’t wanna know.<br />
</b></p>
<p>Posting the quotes made me want to watch the movie again..  :D</p>
<p>Michale.....</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Weigant</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/04/02/opw1003/#comment-8309</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Apr 2010 00:12:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=1781#comment-8309</guid>
		<description>OK, I&#039;m working on it.

Um, wait a minute, before I get to that... Michale, was &quot;Demolition Man&quot; the one with the line in it about &quot;President Schwarzeneggar&quot;?  I forget...

Sorry, got distracted there.  So, I&#039;m working on Comment Tips.  Here&#039;s what I&#039;ve got.  What other subjects should I cover?  Feel free to let me know your suggestions.

Beginner
========
- how to sign up as a site user
- how to log in
- how to comment
- general politeness rules for commenters
- reminder that I can boot anyone I feel like, wherever I feel like

Intermediate
============
- how to post a simple link
- html tags intro
- (b) tag - bold
- (i) tag - italic
- (u) tag - underline

Expert
======
- Permalinks
- fancier tags like (span), possibly others(?)
- (a html) tag
- how to post a photo
- stern warning not to post copyrighted photos

That&#039;s all I can think of at the moment, let me know any other ideas you may have, especially if you (1) have unanswered questions about commenting, or (2) you are an expert and see something I&#039;ve missed here.

Thanks!

-CW</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK, I'm working on it.</p>
<p>Um, wait a minute, before I get to that... Michale, was "Demolition Man" the one with the line in it about "President Schwarzeneggar"?  I forget...</p>
<p>Sorry, got distracted there.  So, I'm working on Comment Tips.  Here's what I've got.  What other subjects should I cover?  Feel free to let me know your suggestions.</p>
<p>Beginner<br />
========<br />
- how to sign up as a site user<br />
- how to log in<br />
- how to comment<br />
- general politeness rules for commenters<br />
- reminder that I can boot anyone I feel like, wherever I feel like</p>
<p>Intermediate<br />
============<br />
- how to post a simple link<br />
- html tags intro<br />
- (b) tag - bold<br />
- (i) tag - italic<br />
- (u) tag - underline</p>
<p>Expert<br />
======<br />
- Permalinks<br />
- fancier tags like (span), possibly others(?)<br />
- (a html) tag<br />
- how to post a photo<br />
- stern warning not to post copyrighted photos</p>
<p>That's all I can think of at the moment, let me know any other ideas you may have, especially if you (1) have unanswered questions about commenting, or (2) you are an expert and see something I've missed here.</p>
<p>Thanks!</p>
<p>-CW</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/04/02/opw1003/#comment-8307</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Apr 2010 23:06:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=1781#comment-8307</guid>
		<description>Getting back on track...

Allow me to explain to ya&#039;all why Obama&#039;s agenda simply will not work in the here and now..

First, let&#039;s take CrapCare and the precedent that it&#039;s mandate sets..

So, we have a &quot;direct order&quot; from the Federal Government that tells us we HAVE to buy Health Insurance...

Why??  

Because it serves the &quot;greater good&quot;...

Now, down the line, what can that lead to??

Well, the government can order us to eat healthier...

Why???

Because it serves the &quot;greater good&quot;...

The government can order us to buy more economical cars..

Why??

Because it serves the &quot;greater good&quot;...

Can ya&#039;all even POSSIBLY conceive how the &quot;greater good&quot; argument leads us into a totalitarian state, a&#039;la &lt;B&gt;DEMOLITION MAN&lt;/B&gt;....

&lt;B&gt;&quot;Anything not good for you is bad, hence, illegal. Alcohol, caffeine, contact sports, meat . . . Bad language, child play, gasoline, uneducational toys, and anything spicy. Abortion is also illegal. But, then again so is pregnancy, if you don&#039;t have a license.&quot;&lt;/B&gt;

To paraphrase that same movie, &lt;B&gt;&quot;I&#039;ve seen {Obama&#039;s Agenda}. You know what it is? It&#039;s a 47-year-old virgin, sitting around in his beige pajamas, drinking a banana-broccoli shake, singing, &quot;I&#039;m an Oscar Meyer wiener.&quot;&lt;/B&gt;

Next, we&#039;ll look at &quot;redistribution of wealth&quot; and all that THAT implies..

But, I&#039;ll let ya&#039;all digest this first...  :D


Michale....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Getting back on track...</p>
<p>Allow me to explain to ya'all why Obama's agenda simply will not work in the here and now..</p>
<p>First, let's take CrapCare and the precedent that it's mandate sets..</p>
<p>So, we have a "direct order" from the Federal Government that tells us we HAVE to buy Health Insurance...</p>
<p>Why??  </p>
<p>Because it serves the "greater good"...</p>
<p>Now, down the line, what can that lead to??</p>
<p>Well, the government can order us to eat healthier...</p>
<p>Why???</p>
<p>Because it serves the "greater good"...</p>
<p>The government can order us to buy more economical cars..</p>
<p>Why??</p>
<p>Because it serves the "greater good"...</p>
<p>Can ya'all even POSSIBLY conceive how the "greater good" argument leads us into a totalitarian state, a'la <b>DEMOLITION MAN</b>....</p>
<p><b>"Anything not good for you is bad, hence, illegal. Alcohol, caffeine, contact sports, meat . . . Bad language, child play, gasoline, uneducational toys, and anything spicy. Abortion is also illegal. But, then again so is pregnancy, if you don't have a license."</b></p>
<p>To paraphrase that same movie, <b>"I've seen {Obama's Agenda}. You know what it is? It's a 47-year-old virgin, sitting around in his beige pajamas, drinking a banana-broccoli shake, singing, "I'm an Oscar Meyer wiener."</b></p>
<p>Next, we'll look at "redistribution of wealth" and all that THAT implies..</p>
<p>But, I'll let ya'all digest this first...  :D</p>
<p>Michale....</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elizabeth Miller</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/04/02/opw1003/#comment-8306</link>
		<dc:creator>Elizabeth Miller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Apr 2010 20:51:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=1781#comment-8306</guid>
		<description>Kevin,

Well, it looks as though we may soon be getting a bit of an education in that regard. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kevin,</p>
<p>Well, it looks as though we may soon be getting a bit of an education in that regard. :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/04/02/opw1003/#comment-8305</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Apr 2010 18:34:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=1781#comment-8305</guid>
		<description>Elizabeth,

Re. your comment #9, I humbly submit that I&#039;m more clueless. I too don&#039;t know about permalink, RSS feeds, or most of the options websites give me... Not a competition I want to be into :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Elizabeth,</p>
<p>Re. your comment #9, I humbly submit that I'm more clueless. I too don't know about permalink, RSS feeds, or most of the options websites give me... Not a competition I want to be into :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Weigant</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/04/02/opw1003/#comment-8304</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Apr 2010 21:27:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=1781#comment-8304</guid>
		<description>Oh, and I &lt;em&gt;highly&lt;/em&gt; recommend anyone who likes charts to check out the link nypoet22 posted.  It&#039;s a fairly detailed article, but worth a read.

I have two problems with the methodology, one of which the author admits to in the article.  (1) not everyone of every age thinks the same, so it&#039;s more &quot;trends&quot; than hard data points.  (2) While people&#039;s thinking does change over time, it&#039;s hard to establish baselines because today&#039;s youth (for instance) is much more liberal in some aspects than the youth of my day (on gay rights, for instance) and trending more conservative on other issues (abortion, for instance).  So it&#039;d be hard to say that one age feels one way when that&#039;s kind of a moving target.

But, like I said, nitpicking aside, it is an excellent article with lots of very cool graphs -- thanks to nypoet22 for pointing it out!

-CW</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, and I <em>highly</em> recommend anyone who likes charts to check out the link nypoet22 posted.  It's a fairly detailed article, but worth a read.</p>
<p>I have two problems with the methodology, one of which the author admits to in the article.  (1) not everyone of every age thinks the same, so it's more "trends" than hard data points.  (2) While people's thinking does change over time, it's hard to establish baselines because today's youth (for instance) is much more liberal in some aspects than the youth of my day (on gay rights, for instance) and trending more conservative on other issues (abortion, for instance).  So it'd be hard to say that one age feels one way when that's kind of a moving target.</p>
<p>But, like I said, nitpicking aside, it is an excellent article with lots of very cool graphs -- thanks to nypoet22 for pointing it out!</p>
<p>-CW</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Weigant</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/04/02/opw1003/#comment-8303</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Apr 2010 21:22:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=1781#comment-8303</guid>
		<description>OK, I see the spam filter is a little overly cautious, as it does seem to be rejecting comments with links.  Let me take a look at it.  For now, I&#039;ve reinstated all the filtered comments (Michale had one stuck, and a few from nypoet22, mostly trying to post the same link).  Anyway, I will see what I can do.

-CW</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK, I see the spam filter is a little overly cautious, as it does seem to be rejecting comments with links.  Let me take a look at it.  For now, I've reinstated all the filtered comments (Michale had one stuck, and a few from nypoet22, mostly trying to post the same link).  Anyway, I will see what I can do.</p>
<p>-CW</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/04/02/opw1003/#comment-8301</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Apr 2010 18:31:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=1781#comment-8301</guid>
		<description>By the bi, CW..

Numbers look perfect...  :D


Michale.....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By the bi, CW..</p>
<p>Numbers look perfect...  :D</p>
<p>Michale.....</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/04/02/opw1003/#comment-8300</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Apr 2010 18:30:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=1781#comment-8300</guid>
		<description>NYPoet,

If you make a post that has more than one hyper-link, it is held for moderation.  This prevents Link Spamming..

You can always do what I do.   If you make a post that requires more than one link, make an individual post for each link.

It&#039;s lotsa fun..  :D


Michale.....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NYPoet,</p>
<p>If you make a post that has more than one hyper-link, it is held for moderation.  This prevents Link Spamming..</p>
<p>You can always do what I do.   If you make a post that requires more than one link, make an individual post for each link.</p>
<p>It's lotsa fun..  :D</p>
<p>Michale.....</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nypoet22</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/04/02/opw1003/#comment-8298</link>
		<dc:creator>nypoet22</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Apr 2010 15:38:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=1781#comment-8298</guid>
		<description>...yeah, apparently posts containing hyperlinks do not work for me here at the moment. for anyone who wants to see the link, go to blog[dot]okcupid[dot]com - the title of the entry is &quot;The Democrats Are Doomed, or How A ‘Big Tent’ Can Be Too Big&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>...yeah, apparently posts containing hyperlinks do not work for me here at the moment. for anyone who wants to see the link, go to blog[dot]okcupid[dot]com - the title of the entry is "The Democrats Are Doomed, or How A ‘Big Tent’ Can Be Too Big"</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nypoet22</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/04/02/opw1003/#comment-8297</link>
		<dc:creator>nypoet22</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Apr 2010 15:30:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=1781#comment-8297</guid>
		<description>testing take 2 - here&#039;s the link:

http://blog.okcupid.com/index.php/2010/03/30/the-democrats-are-doomed-or-how-a-big-tent-can-be-too-big/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>testing take 2 - here's the link:</p>
<p><a href="http://blog.okcupid.com/index.php/2010/03/30/the-democrats-are-doomed-or-how-a-big-tent-can-be-too-big/" rel="nofollow">http://blog.okcupid.com/index.php/2010/03/30/the-democrats-are-doomed-or-how-a-big-tent-can-be-too-big/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nypoet22</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/04/02/opw1003/#comment-8296</link>
		<dc:creator>nypoet22</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Apr 2010 15:25:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=1781#comment-8296</guid>
		<description>testing, testing. i tried to comment twice yesterday, and the comments haven&#039;t shown up. i&#039;m wondering whether it was something about my browser, or maybe the link i included, which was to a great statistical analysis of why the republicans stick together and democrats tend to splinter off. anyhow, i like both the numbers and the permalinks, both good things. i&#039;ll end this post without the link and see if maybe that was the problem...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>testing, testing. i tried to comment twice yesterday, and the comments haven't shown up. i'm wondering whether it was something about my browser, or maybe the link i included, which was to a great statistical analysis of why the republicans stick together and democrats tend to splinter off. anyhow, i like both the numbers and the permalinks, both good things. i'll end this post without the link and see if maybe that was the problem...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elizabeth Miller</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/04/02/opw1003/#comment-8295</link>
		<dc:creator>Elizabeth Miller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Apr 2010 14:48:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=1781#comment-8295</guid>
		<description>... by the way, Chris ...

I forgot to mention that you have got to be the most considerate writer in the blogosphere with an appreciation for intelligent discourse with your readers - from the most challenging issues of the day to the technical aspects of ChrisWeigant.com - that is second to none.

You&#039;re the best!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>... by the way, Chris ...</p>
<p>I forgot to mention that you have got to be the most considerate writer in the blogosphere with an appreciation for intelligent discourse with your readers - from the most challenging issues of the day to the technical aspects of ChrisWeigant.com - that is second to none.</p>
<p>You're the best!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elizabeth Miller</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/04/02/opw1003/#comment-8294</link>
		<dc:creator>Elizabeth Miller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Apr 2010 14:39:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=1781#comment-8294</guid>
		<description>Chris,

Well, I don&#039;t know how intelligent it was as I&#039;ll be the first to admit that I am probably THE most computer illiterate person here - by far!

And, so I&#039;ll be making frequent use of the &#039;commenters tips&#039; page. Just be sure to make it easy to find. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chris,</p>
<p>Well, I don't know how intelligent it was as I'll be the first to admit that I am probably THE most computer illiterate person here - by far!</p>
<p>And, so I'll be making frequent use of the 'commenters tips' page. Just be sure to make it easy to find. :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Weigant</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/04/02/opw1003/#comment-8293</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Apr 2010 07:47:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=1781#comment-8293</guid>
		<description>Elizabeth -

I will soon add (as a response to your intelligent suggestion) a &quot;commenters tips&quot; page, where all this stuff will be explained.  But, stylistically, I just had to run by everyone the look and feel of the new things, just to see if anyone objected.

-CW</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Elizabeth -</p>
<p>I will soon add (as a response to your intelligent suggestion) a "commenters tips" page, where all this stuff will be explained.  But, stylistically, I just had to run by everyone the look and feel of the new things, just to see if anyone objected.</p>
<p>-CW</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elizabeth Miller</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/04/02/opw1003/#comment-8292</link>
		<dc:creator>Elizabeth Miller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Apr 2010 05:37:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=1781#comment-8292</guid>
		<description>Chris,

The numbers are not too tiny as far as I&#039;m concerned. But, I do like the brown colour - a little less conspicuous.

I hope you won&#039;t mind if I just ignore the numbers. :)

What&#039;s a permalink? Seriously!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chris,</p>
<p>The numbers are not too tiny as far as I'm concerned. But, I do like the brown colour - a little less conspicuous.</p>
<p>I hope you won't mind if I just ignore the numbers. :)</p>
<p>What's a permalink? Seriously!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Weigant</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/04/02/opw1003/#comment-8291</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Apr 2010 03:47:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=1781#comment-8291</guid>
		<description>Oooo!

Permalinks!

Any thoughts?  Love &#039;em?  Hate &#039;em?  Lemme know...

-CW</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oooo!</p>
<p>Permalinks!</p>
<p>Any thoughts?  Love 'em?  Hate 'em?  Lemme know...</p>
<p>-CW</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Weigant</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/04/02/opw1003/#comment-8289</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Apr 2010 02:55:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=1781#comment-8289</guid>
		<description>Oh, forgot to mention (also, just creating some test comments here to see how they look), you may have to &quot;Reload&quot; the page to see the new look.

-CW</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, forgot to mention (also, just creating some test comments here to see how they look), you may have to "Reload" the page to see the new look.</p>
<p>-CW</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Weigant</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/04/02/opw1003/#comment-8288</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Apr 2010 02:54:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=1781#comment-8288</guid>
		<description>OK, everyone -

How&#039;s that?  Are the comment numbers now too tiny?  I think I like the brown better...

Let me know.

-CW</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK, everyone -</p>
<p>How's that?  Are the comment numbers now too tiny?  I think I like the brown better...</p>
<p>Let me know.</p>
<p>-CW</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nypoet22</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/04/02/opw1003/#comment-8287</link>
		<dc:creator>nypoet22</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Apr 2010 15:18:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=1781#comment-8287</guid>
		<description>i thought i&#039;d posted this before, but i guess it didn&#039;t take. in the spirit of statistics, i found a very interesting blog entry on the statistical reasons why republicans hang together while democrats tend to splinter off.

http://blog.okcupid.com/index.php/2010/03/30/the-democrats-are-doomed-or-how-a-big-tent-can-be-too-big/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i thought i'd posted this before, but i guess it didn't take. in the spirit of statistics, i found a very interesting blog entry on the statistical reasons why republicans hang together while democrats tend to splinter off.</p>
<p><a href="http://blog.okcupid.com/index.php/2010/03/30/the-democrats-are-doomed-or-how-a-big-tent-can-be-too-big/" rel="nofollow">http://blog.okcupid.com/index.php/2010/03/30/the-democrats-are-doomed-or-how-a-big-tent-can-be-too-big/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nypoet22</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/04/02/opw1003/#comment-8286</link>
		<dc:creator>nypoet22</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Apr 2010 13:18:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=1781#comment-8286</guid>
		<description>kennedy was a machine! and speaking of machines, here&#039;s a link to a really cool statistical analysis of why republicans tend to hang together while democrats tend to splinter off:

http://blog.okcupid.com/index.php/2010/03/30/the-democrats-are-doomed-or-how-a-big-tent-can-be-too-big/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>kennedy was a machine! and speaking of machines, here's a link to a really cool statistical analysis of why republicans tend to hang together while democrats tend to splinter off:</p>
<p><a href="http://blog.okcupid.com/index.php/2010/03/30/the-democrats-are-doomed-or-how-a-big-tent-can-be-too-big/" rel="nofollow">http://blog.okcupid.com/index.php/2010/03/30/the-democrats-are-doomed-or-how-a-big-tent-can-be-too-big/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/04/02/opw1003/#comment-8277</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Apr 2010 00:12:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=1781#comment-8277</guid>
		<description>You won&#039;t see a CrapCare bounce for President Obama.

With all of the new news about CrapCare being bad, Obama is lucky he doesn&#039;t see a nose dive.

Michale.....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You won't see a CrapCare bounce for President Obama.</p>
<p>With all of the new news about CrapCare being bad, Obama is lucky he doesn't see a nose dive.</p>
<p>Michale.....</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
