<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.1.3" -->
<rss version="0.92">
<channel>
	<title>ChrisWeigant.com</title>
	<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php</link>
	<description>Reality-based political commentary</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 01:32:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss092</docs>
	<language>en</language>
	
	<item>
		<title>Burris, Race, Religion, And The Senate</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The growing intensity of the rhetoric surrounding Roland Burris, Rod Blagojevich, and Barack Obama's vacant Senate seat reached new heights (or depths, depending on your point of view) this weekend, by both Burris and his supporters.  This is getting so completely out of hand that some perspective is sorely needed here.</p>]]></description>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2009/01/05/burris-race-religion-and-the-senate/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [59] &#8212; New Year&#039;s Resolutions (For Democrats)</title>
		<description><![CDATA[Happy New Year 2009!
Because I&#039;ve always felt it is more amusing to make new year&#039;s resolutions that others should follow, today&#039;s Friday Talking Points will be some resolutions for Democrats.  For once, I will keep a foolish resolution I made at the beginning of 2008 to write shorter columns, because this close to New [...]]]></description>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2009/01/02/friday-talking-points-59-new-years-resolutions-for-democrats/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>It&#039;s That Time Of Year Again &#8212; The Banished Words List</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>From Lake Superior State University (LSSU) comes the <a href="http://www.lssu.edu/banished/current.php">annual list of banished words</a>, which have overstayed their welcome among our popular culture, and are henceforth banished into the linguistic wilderness.</p>]]></description>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2008/12/30/its-that-time-of-year-again-the-banished-words-list/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Is Rick Warren Beyond The Pale?</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Is Rick Warren, pastor of a California mega-church and author of <em>The Purpose Driven Life</em> considered unacceptable in American society at large?  Was Obama's invitation to Warren to speak at his inauguration akin to, in today's world, inviting a white supremacist, an anti-Semite, or a blatant misogynist to speak?  To put it another way, is Rick Warren beyond the pale?</p>]]></description>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2008/12/29/is-rick-warren-beyond-the-pale/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>My 2008 &#034;McLaughlin Awards&#034; [Part 2]</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Three names suggest themselves in this category.  The first, sad to say, is Sarah Palin.  While some dismiss her with the term (which she herself uttered on <em>Saturday Night Live</em>) "Caribou Barbie," my educated guess is that we have not seen the last of Alaska's governor on the national stage.  Because while the list of things Palin lacks is long and daunting, she has one star quality which may prove to be strong enough to cancel all the rest out -- charisma.  A politician can learn about such mundane things as world events and how to speak with political finesse, but charisma can't really be learned -- it's more of an innate quality.  And Palin's got it.  For those laughing at the prospect of Sarah Palin ever reappearing, I caution that when Ronald Reagan first ran for president, we all laughed at him, too.  An actor becoming president?  Pre-<em>pos</em>-terous!  So don't underestimate charisma, or Palin's ambition.</p>]]></description>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2008/12/26/my-2008-mclaughlin-awards-part-2/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Mr. Claus Goes To Washington</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>I fully admit I would rather be at home now than covering the annual "sit on Santa's lap" photo-op for politicians, but I seem to have annoyed my editor, so here I am -- your intrepid holiday reporter.  While I fully admit that I <em>did</em> spike the punch at our annual holiday party, I explain this away in traditional Washington fashion -- by stating that I was young and irresponsible when this occurred.  Last week, I was much younger and <em>much</em> more irresponsible than I am now.  Ahem.  Besides, nobody got hurt (much) and I think everyone had a much better time at the party as a result... the "Elf Incident" aside....  Anyway, this explains why I was assigned to cover this particular event -- instead of being snug at home in my bed, wondering what a sugarplum looks like (in case one should dance in my head tonight).</p>]]></description>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2008/12/24/mr-claus-goes-to-washington/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>In Praise Of Senator Dianne Feinstein</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>I am not usually an enormous fan of California's senior senator.  But I have to give Dianne Feinstein credit where credit is due, and praise her for stepping up to the plate on introducing some accountability and limits to the Wall Street bailout money.  Also (being filled with the holiday spirit) I have words for praise for Senators Norm Coleman (R-MN) and even Joe Lieberman (Joe Liebermans For Joe Lieberman Party - CT).</p>]]></description>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2008/12/23/in-praise-of-senator-dianne-feinstein/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Make Wall Street Take The Same Deal The Autoworkers Get</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>I would suggest that no employee of any Wall Street firm getting taxpayer money can make any more than a union autoworker.  That would be a good place to start from.</p>]]></description>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2008/12/22/make-wall-street-take-the-same-deal-the-autoworkers-get/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>My 2008 &#034;McLaughlin Awards&#034; [Part 1]</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Welcome to our annual awards!  For the past three years, this column has paid homage (translation: "ripped off their gimmick") to the <a href="http://www.mclaughlin.com/"><em>McLaughlin Group</em></a> television show by handing out our own year-end awards (while using the same categories).  This will be a two-part column, with the second installment appearing one week from today.  And feel free to watch the <em>McLaughlin Group</em> on your local PBS station this weekend, to compare my picks with theirs.</p>]]></description>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2008/12/19/my-2008-mclaughlin-awards-part-1/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Three-Dot Thursday</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>We haven't done one of these in a while, but between working on tomorrow's column (don't miss Part One of our annual awards show!) and all the usual holiday stuff, I don't have enough time for more than a few short items here.  Oh, I did want to say thanks to everyone who has donated so far to the "Send Chris To The Inauguration Fund" as we have just topped halfway towards our giving goal.  I sincerely appreciate the support.</p>]]></description>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2008/12/18/three-dot-thursday-3/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Constitutional Coup Averted In Illinois</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The Illinois Supreme Court has just, without comment, rejected what was in essence a coup attempt by the state Attorney General, which would have installed the Lieutenant Governor in Governor Blagojevich's place.  Attorney General Lisa Madigan's legal reasoning was, to put it mildly, unique.  She tried to make the case that the Governor was "unfit for duty" and therefore had to be replaced so the state could continue to function.  The entire episode raises a bigger question: could this ever happen to the President of the United States?  The answer turns out to be: "Yes, but... it'll probably never happen."</p>]]></description>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2008/12/17/constitutional-coup-averted-in-illinois/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Was Blagojevich Just Too Crude?</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>This is not a follow up to what I wrote <a href="http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2008/12/12/friday-talking-points-58-expletive-deleted-blagojevich/">last Friday</a>, because this isn't about Illinois Governor Blagojevich's "crude" language.  Instead, I write today about Blaggy's crude tactics.  Because I'm kind of having a hard time condemning him for doing almost the same thing as what other politicians do more successfully (and completely "legally") with a wink and a nod.  There's a game, and there are certain rules to the game.  Blaggy went a bit too far, and was caught.  He is now paying the price.  But what he "got caught" at isn't that all that different from what many (if not most) politicians -- of <em>both</em> parties -- do.</p>]]></description>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2008/12/16/was-blagojevich-just-too-crude/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Maybe Levin And Bowen Should Throw Shoes</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>I know it's a lot more interesting to talk about two shoes getting thrown at President Bush in Iraq, but two more important stories are getting ignored as a result.  These are two metaphorical "shoes" thrown at Bush, by the Senate and by Bush's own Inspector General in Iraq.  And they're going to have a much more lasting impact on how history sees our Iraq adventure than one video clip of a guy hucking his footwear at President Bush.  Because they deal with torture, and the failure of the Iraq reconstruction effort.</p>]]></description>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2008/12/15/maybe-levin-and-bowen-should-throw-shoes/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [58] &#8212; [Expletive Deleted] Blagojevich</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The history of profanity in American political discourse is an untold story out there just waiting for someone to research and write about -- although finding a willing publisher might be a bit of a problem.  Because it seems we're back to the Nixonian days of "[expletive deleted]."</p>]]></description>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2008/12/12/friday-talking-points-58-expletive-deleted-blagojevich/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Inauguration News: D.C. Power Plays And Other Craziness</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>With slightly less than a month and a half to go before Barack Obama's inauguration, Washington, D.C. has officially reached the "freakout" point on the Richter scale of event planning.  This may indeed turn out to be justified, if the predicted crowd shows up.  Even so, some of what is quietly happening in background of the planning process is worth drawing attention to.</p>]]></description>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2008/12/11/inauguration-news-dc-power-plays-and-other-craziness/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>A Close Look At The Iraq Status Of Forces Agreement [Part 2]</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>So while some have decried this timetable for withdrawal, I think it is going to wind up facilitating a much faster overall American withdrawal than would have happened without the six month deadline.  Events may prove me wrong, but that's how I see it now.</p>]]></description>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2008/12/09/a-close-look-at-the-iraq-status-of-forces-agreement-part-2/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>A Close Look At The Iraq Status Of Forces Agreement [Part 1]</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>There has been a lot of ink spilled over the ramifications of the agreement recently struck between the United States and Iraq on our presence there for the next three years.  The Status Of Forces Agreement ("SOFA") was passed by the Iraqi Parliament and signed by all three members of the Iraqi Executive Council, meaning it will have the force of law come the first of January, 2009.  President Bush has decided that his signature was enough for America to enter the agreement, so Congress never got their say on the document.  But with such commentary flying left and right, I thought I would go to the document itself to see what it actually says (versus how people are interpreting it).</p>]]></description>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2008/12/08/a-close-look-at-the-iraq-status-of-forces-agreement-part-1/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [57] &#8212; End Of Prohibition 75th Anniversary Edition</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Brian Williams, NBC's talking head <em>extraordinaire</em>, is probably a decent guy, a guy with whom you could sit down and have a beer.  [More on the alcohol subject at the end, I promise.]  But that doesn't excuse something he said last night on Jay Leno's show.</p>]]></description>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2008/12/05/friday-talking-points-57-end-of-prohibition-75th-anniversary-edition/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>In Defense Of Dianne Feinstein</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>I am normally not much inclined to give California Senator Dianne Feinstein the benefit of the doubt, mostly because I have a good enough memory to recall the dozens of times she has earned the "DINO" (Democrat In Name Only) label for voting with Republicans.  She's not my favorite senator, in other words.  She's not even my favorite senator from California -- and likely never will be as long as Barbara Boxer is still serving.  But I have to say, the recent kerfluffle over her comments on torture and the Army Field Manual seem to me to be a tempest in a teapot.  I am willing to take her at her word that she was quoted out of context in the <em>New York Times</em>, and I am also willing to take her at her word in the clarification of her comments she has subsequently issued.</p>]]></description>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2008/12/04/in-defense-of-dianne-feinstein/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>How Will Obama Enrage The Left?</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>I'm going to make a prediction here (one I have mentioned in passing before): Barack Obama is going to do something to absolutely <em>enrage</em> leftists, progressives, and the few remaining Americans who actually call themselves liberals; and, furthermore, he's going to do it within his first 100 days in office.  The only thing I won't predict is what that "something" is going to be.</p>]]></description>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2008/12/03/how-will-obama-enrage-the-left/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>What&#039;s In A Name? (&#8230;And Other Trivia)</title>
		<description><![CDATA[</p>Personally, I could care less whether he says "I, Barack Hussein Obama..." or "I, Barack Obama..." or "I, Barry Obama..." or whatever else he chooses to say.  The man behind the name is who people voted for, not the name itself.  The man will be president, and I don't care whether he calls himself by a nickname ("Jimmy Carter") by initials ("F.D.R" or "L.B.J.") or by his full name.  Whatever he's comfortable with, as far as I'm concerned.<p>]]></description>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2008/12/02/whats-in-a-name-and-other-trivia/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Political Parties Are Not &#034;Checks&#034; Or &#034;Balances&#034;</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>There's an old inside-the-Beltway joke where a new House member is being shown around by a veteran of his own party.  He is awed by entering the House floor for the first time, and is shown his new seat.  He asks, pointing across the aisle to where the other party sits, "Is that where the enemy sits?"  The older and wiser Congressman replies, "No, no, here in the House of Representatives we call our opponents 'the loyal opposition.'  You're new, so you need to understand this.  'The enemy' is the Senate."</p>]]></description>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2008/12/01/political-parties-are-not-checks-or-balances/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>[Site Maintenance Note]</title>
		<description><![CDATA[This past weekend, the ChrisWeigant.com website got a mild facelift.  The most noticeable new thing is the Pledge Drive logo and thermometer, (which you should click on to find out what it&#039;s all about!)
Some other minor things on the site were fixed.  Such as removing the Election 2008 stuff.  I also simplified [...]]]></description>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2008/12/01/site-maintanence-note/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Guest Column: Why Obama&#039;s Election Should Be Considered Historic</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Obama has said that he will be the President of ALL Americans.  As such, he will certainly disappoint.  But that's all right.  I didn't just award him my vote, I awarded him my trust.  My hope is that he is wiser than I, more knowledgeable than I.  And I trust him to make the decisions I hope that I would make, if I were wiser and more knowledgeable.  I hope Obama's presidency will be as all presidencies should be: constitutional, ethical, transparent, broadly representative and reality-based.  Even though each of us are "special interests," he doesn't have to pander to me, he doesn't have to be "black," he just has to represent me.  I don't demand a bigger piece of the pie.  I may not even GET a piece of the pie.  All I ask is that I have a seat at the table.</p>]]></description>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2008/11/26/guest-column-why-obamas-election-should-be-considered-historic/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Should Inauguration Day Be Moved Up?</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Deep into the interregnum (interpresidentum?... interpresidium?) between the outgoing Bush administration and the incoming Obama administration seems to be a good time to ask: Does this make sense anymore?  Why does America wait two-and-a-half months between when we elect our leaders and when we actually let them enter office?  And does it make sense to change it?</p>]]></description>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2008/11/25/should-inauguration-day-be-moved-up/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>A Response To Rep. Elijah Cummings</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>In the past few weeks, we've heard story after story of corporate excess, often in admonishments toward corporate executives from various congressional committees.  CEOs on private planes!  <em>Gasp!</em>  Outrageous compensation packages and bonuses for executives!  <em>Who knew?</em>  Posh conferences in luxury resorts!  <em>Golly!</em>  Taxpayer dollars may pay hundreds of millions in stadium naming rights!  <em>Lions and tigers and bears, oh my!</em></p>]]></description>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2008/11/24/a-response-to-rep-elijah-cummings/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [56] &#8212; Turkeys Everywhere!</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>And, by those definitions, the turkeys were flying fast and thick last week.  First up was the decision to let Senator Joe Lieberman (CT - Ego Party) remain as chairman of the Homeland Security Committee in the Senate (see definition (a), above).  Only 13 Democratic senators voted against Joe, who blackmailed the party by saying if they didn't give him his chairmanship back he would not only bolt to the Republican Party but also vote against Democratic proposals every chance he got.  Way to demean your vote, Joe!  Nothing like selling your vote in order to prop up your own ego!</p>]]></description>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2008/11/21/friday-talking-points-56-turkeys-everywhere/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Hillary Clinton&#039;s Cabinet Eligibility</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Is Hillary Clinton eligible to become Secretary of State?  Putting aside the question of what her chances of being appointed actually are (which I wrote about yesterday), is she even legally able to take the job if offered?  The answer appears to be a strong "probably."</p>]]></description>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2008/11/20/hillary-clintons-cabinet-eligibility/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Is Hillary Nomination Offer A Red Herring?</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Basing my reasoning on absolutely no hard facts (which I fully admit up front), here's the scenario that keeps suggesting itself to my addled brain (and which, to my surprise, doesn't seem to have suggested itself to anyone else): during the discussions between Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama (which took place between the end of the primary season and when she began campaigning for him), Hillary gets Barack to agree to this sideshow if he gets elected.  She will be "offered" Secretary of State, which she will then decline "because there's so much to do in the Senate."  But -- and here's the crux of my thinking -- she will gain by this situation by improving her prestige in the Senate and attaining more power than she normally would have (due to her low seniority status).</p>]]></description>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2008/11/19/is-hillary-nomination-offer-a-red-herring/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Begich Leads Stevens By 2,374 Votes</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>At 12:39 PM (Alaska time) Democratic challenger Mark Begich led the incumbent (and convicted felon) Senator Ted Stevens by 2,374 votes -- an improvement of over 1,300 votes in today's tally.  By my thumbnail estimates, there appear to be just over 10,000 ballots left to count, meaning that Stevens' defeat seems likely at this point.</p>]]></description>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2008/11/18/begich-leads-stevens-by-2374-votes/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Memo To Right-Wing: Withdrawal Timetable Now Doubleplusgood</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>I mean, it is so fantastical I had to actually laugh at it.  Because <em>of course</em> every single right-winger in America who has been using such language will immediately start using the same language about George Bush.  All who have called the concept of an American "timetable for withdrawal" as being: downright dangerous, weak, a surrender, cowardly, losing a war to al Qaeda, giving up on the War On Terror, giving the terrorists what they want, a crazy Democratic idea, a dangerously naive idea by [insert name of Democratic politician here], proof that Democrats love to lose wars, proof that Democrats are un-American, anti-American, and blame-America-first -- <em>all</em> of the people who have ever uttered anything of that ilk will <em>of course</em> be intellectually honest and consistent, and will now denounce Bush <em>in exactly the same fierce language</em> as they have used previously.  Because to do otherwise would just reveal their monstrous hypocrisy.  And of course they will not shirk their duty to do so, since they've been provided with such a shining example of an American leader "caving in to terrorists" and surrendering in the face of the enemy.  Of course they'll denounce Bush just as strongly as they have been denouncing others who have espoused such views.</p>]]></description>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2008/11/17/memo-to-right-wing-withdrawal-timetable-now-doubleplusgood/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [55] &#8212; &#034;Bretton Woods II&#034;?  Not Quite.</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Bush's meeting is going to last six hours.  And nobody expects it to come up with anything even close to the same magnitude of what happened in Bretton Woods.  Nobody sane, that is.  So please, media types, don't call it what it's not.  Let's have some truth in advertising here.  Call it "Desperate Bush Lame-Duck Photo-Op With World Leaders Who Would Really Rather Be Talking To Obama," if you have to slap a label on it.  Because that's a lot closer to what it's going to be.</p>]]></description>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2008/11/14/friday-talking-points-55-bretton-woods-ii-not-quite/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Spam, Free Speech, And Anonymity (continued&#8230;)</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>As I see it, the issue breaks down in a number of ways.  The first question is anonymity -- do Americans have an absolute right to anonymity in political messages?  The second question is technological -- is anonymity a right, no matter what the medium?  And the third question seems to be political, and deal with campaign and election law -- what kinds of rules on speech are constitutionally allowable in politics?</p>]]></description>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2008/11/13/spam-free-speech-and-anonymity-continued/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Anonymity Of &#034;Obama Is A Muslim&#034; Emails Constitutionally-Protected?</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>One of the more scurrilous 2008 campaign tactics (in a campaign seemingly full of them) had to have been those insidious "Have you heard... Barack Obama is a secret Muslim?!?" emails.  These bounced hither and yon on the internet almost from the beginning of the campaign itself (or at the very least, since when it looked like Obama had a chance at the nomination).  This sort of activity would likely fall into most people's "there ought to be a law" list -- a list of things worth changing in our election process.  Unfortunately, the state Supreme Court of Virginia handed down a ruling in the midst of the campaign which may ultimately make <em>any</em> sort of limits on this sort of anonymous political (and technological) mudslinging actually <em>unconstitutional</em>.  Meaning it would be impossible to pass any sort of laws against the practice at all.</p>]]></description>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2008/11/12/anonymity-of-obama-is-a-muslim-emails-constitutionally-protected/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Final Election Picks Wrapup</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>OK, I know it's been a week and we've got to move on.  The election is over, the dust has settled, and I really should be writing about something else rather than indulging in navel-gazing.  But I can't help myself.  I have to write one more article about the election, and in particular my picks.  I apologize in advance.  If you don't like watching someone else pat themselves on the back, then just skip today's article altogether and go out and decorate a veteran's grave.  You have been warned.</p>]]></description>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2008/11/11/final-election-picks-wrapup/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Election 2008 Odds And Ends &#8212; Waiting For Missouri And Alaska, Pro-Marijuana Initiatives And More&#8230;</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>First, though, I got tired of endlessly downloading various "election results" webpages, in the hopes of getting some final results.  And I also got tired of waiting for the mainstream media to do its job and inform the public what is going on with the remaining states, whose election results have not yet been reported.  So I called up the state election officials myself, and thought I would share with you what I found.</p>]]></description>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2008/11/10/election-2008-odds-and-ends-waiting-for-missouri-and-alaska-pro-marijuana-initiatives-and-more/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [54] &#8212; Republican Fossilization</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Of course, the big question on everyone's mind right now is: What is going on up in Minnesota?  Al Franken is tantalizingly close to taking a lead in his Senate race, but very few details are available in the media (with the exception of <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/11/07/franken-inches-forward-to_n_142172.html">this report</a> from the <em>Huffington Post</em>) to let us know exactly what is going on.  So I went to the source, and contacted the Franken campaign for some details.</p>]]></description>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2008/11/07/friday-talking-points-54-republican-fossilization/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Martin Luther King, Jr.&#039;s Final Speech</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>[<em>I am taking another day of rest today (normal columns will resume tomorrow).  Instead of an article, I present here today as a public service the full text of Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.'s final speech, which was given the night before he was assassinated (April 3, 1968).  King was in Memphis in support of striking sanitation workers.  If you don't have time to read the full speech, which is rather long, please at least scroll down to the end and read the last few paragraphs.  Video of the speech is available from</em> <a href="http://www.mlkonline.net/promised.html">www.mlkonline.net</a>.]</p>
]]></description>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2008/11/06/martin-luther-king-jrs-final-speech/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Rerun: Happy Days Are Here Again, So Don&#039;t Screw It Up</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>[<em>This is a repeat of a column I did right after the 2006 election.  Most of it is still appropriate, but since I am taking a few days off for a well-needed (and, in my humble opinion, well-deserved) rest, it suggested itself as the best possible column to run today.  I still love the tinky piano soundtrack -- paid for by my tax dollars, no less.  The Toles cartoon is still hilarious, and could have run today.  Some of the items are out of date, however.  Now would be a dandy time to strip Lieberman of his committee assignments, for instance.  In any case, I beg the gentle reader's forgiveness for this re-run, but it's been a long two years....</em>]</p>]]></description>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2008/11/05/rerun-happy-days-are-here-again-so-dont-screw-it-up/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Final Electoral Math &#8212; My Election Picks</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>But the most exciting news is that Al Franken will win a very tight race in Minnesota.  Senator Al Franken will take over from Senator Hillary Clinton as the biggest annoyance to Republican peace of mind across the country.  Just the fact that Franken will now be in the United States Senate is going to drive some right-wingers clear around the bend (that's my prediction, anyway).</p>]]></description>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2008/11/04/final-electoral-math-my-election-picks/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Barack Obama Is Smarter Than Us</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>But it has to be said -- Barack Obama is where he is today because he is smarter than us.  Now, by "us" I am not referring to you, dear reader (perish the thought!), but rather the collective "us" out here blogging in the progressive trenches on the left.  We (and I certainly include myself in this) have been second-guessing Obama's political tactics and strategy for over a year now.  Obama has had us tearing our hair out at times with frustration, and each time he wound up proving us wrong.</p>]]></description>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2008/11/03/barack-obama-is-smarter-than-us/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>BOO!!  Two Spine-Tingling Tales Of Terror</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Gather 'round, ghouls and goblins!  Our annual Hallowe'en fright fest is about to begin... full of scary monsters, ghostly tales, and horrors galore... because on this night, everyone -- <em>even the politically wonky</em> -- deserves to be scared right down to their socks!!  O, ye lefties -- think you that Obama's election <em>absolutely cannot</em> be derailed?  O, ye righties -- think you that Nancy Pelosi, Harry Reid, and Barack Obama comprise the <em>creepiest, most apocalyptic</em> trifecta of liberal horrendousness you can imagine?</p>]]></description>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2008/10/31/boo-two-spine-tingling-tales-of-terror/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Election Day News Lead?</title>
		<description><![CDATA[While the news from Election Night is going to be all about losers and winners from various parts of the country, I think that the news from Election Day is going to be similar across a large number of states.  I&#039;m talking about what the news story will be before the returns actually start [...]]]></description>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2008/10/30/election-day-news-lead/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Electoral Math &#8212; Obama Has Closed The Deal</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>If you detect a certain giddiness here at Electoral Math Central, it is due to the fact that the election is actually drawing nigh, after a seemingly eternal campaign season.  It's been a long, long road to where we find ourselves, and we're all feeling the strain.  But fear not!  Election Day is just around the corner, and just about everything seems to be breaking Obama's way.</p>]]></description>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2008/10/29/electoral-math-obama-has-closed-the-deal/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Free Speech Restored In Berkeley</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Good news for the Bill of Rights out of Berkeley -- they've restored free speech.  The really astounding thing, and the reason this is a "man bites dog" story and not a "dog bites man" bit of non-news, is that they updated their laws in support of those voicing extreme right-wing positions.  Since Berkeley is charmingly known in the Bay Area as "The People's Republic Of Berkeley," this is news indeed.</p>]]></description>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2008/10/28/free-speech-restored-in-berkeley/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Talking With The F.B.I.&#039;s Undercover Source In Alaska&#039;s VECO Corruption Case</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>You know, I don't necessarily believe so, and that's a sad reflection, isn't it?  It's a sad reflection on how little stock we seem to put into character in politics.  It's going to be a tight race, but Stevens could still win this thing.  Stevens has been around so long, and we do have a very partisan situation up here in Alaska, where evidently some are willing to accept representation irrespective of a conviction.  I think some people will se]]></description>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2008/10/27/talking-with-the-fbis-undercover-source-in-alaskas-veco-corruption-case/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [53] &#8212; Why McCain Is Losing, And Why Democrats Shouldn&#039;t Say So</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>But strategically, it started falling apart almost immediately.  After marveling at the crowd size for a few days, something became painfully obvious -- Palin was merely repeating her convention speech over and over again, with very few changes.  Sure, it had been a great speech (if you're a Republican, that is) at the convention, but after a week or so it was wearing a little thin.  And if John McCain had shut the door on the media regarding <em>his</em> interviews; when it came to keeping Palin away from the media, he not only shut the door, he barred it, locked the keep, lowered the portcullis, raised the drawbridge, released the moat monster, and started boiling oil on the parapets.</p>]]></description>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2008/10/24/friday-talking-points-53-why-mccain-is-losing-and-why-democrats-shouldnt-say-so/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Patriot Games</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Barack Obama may have just forever changed a sincerely ugly dynamic in American politics that has existed since before I was born -- the old Republican refrain which questions the patriotism of Democrats.  They've been beating this drum for a long time, which is why it would truly be stunning if Obama manages to put it to rest once and for all.  From McCarthyism to post-Vietnam "Democrats hate our troops" nonsense to silly games about flag-worship to a few days ago, this has been a favorite weapon to use against Democrats: They're not patriotic.  They're not real Americans.  They don't love their country.  They blame America first.  In fact, they hate America.  Unlike all us America-loving Republicans.</p>]]></description>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2008/10/23/patriot-games/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Electoral Math &#8212; Obama Holds His Lead</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Which reminds me, what the heck is John McCain doing in Pennsylvania?  He must be counting on one whopping big Bradley Effect there, because almost every poll I've seen says he doesn't stand a chance in the Keystone State.</p>]]></description>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2008/10/22/electoral-math-obama-holds-his-lead/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>McCain Rally Team Disrespects The Flag</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>But still, what would have been said if this was at an Obama rally?  I bet this doesn't even make the national news tonight.  And that is one honking big double standard.</p>]]></description>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2008/10/21/mccain-rally-team-disrespects-the-flag/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>&#034;Video Your Vote&#034; On PBS And YouTube</title>
		<description><![CDATA[While 2008 is guaranteed to be an election &#034;like no other&#034; in American politics for many other reasons, it will also be the first election where the voters themselves may wind up doing the best job of policing the election process itself.  The Public Broadcasting System (PBS) and YouTube have teamed up to offer [...]]]></description>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2008/10/20/video-your-vote-on-pbs-and-youtube/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [52] &#8212; What A Long, Strange Trip It&#039;s Been</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>And now we find ourselves a few weeks out from Election Day, and things are looking pretty good for Democrats everywhere.  It's been an exhausting campaign, and I don't think anyone can argue that the Grateful Dead lyric I used as this week's title is inaccurate.  It has been a long and strange journey indeed.</p>]]></description>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2008/10/17/friday-talking-points-52-what-a-long-strange-trip-its-been/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Final Debate Review</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>As usual, I don't really have much of an opinion about who "won" the debate last night, because I think such designations are inherently subjective.  I can see both sides thinking their candidate "won" the night last night, in other words.</p>]]></description>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2008/10/16/final-debate-review/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Electoral Math &#8212; Obama Lead Insurmountable?</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>This week's word is going to be "insurmountable."  Look for it coming from the lips and pens of pundits everywhere in the next week.  Because while mainstream media journalists are obviously trying to portray this race as a lot closer than it really is (better ratings that way), if Obama can just hold on to the leads he has right now -- not improve them in any way, just hold them -- then Election Day viewing parties nationwide may be over before anyone's even finished their first beer.</p>]]></description>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2008/10/15/electoral-math-obama-lead-insurmountable/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Maliki Running Out Bush&#039;s Clock</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>I've been saying for a while now that Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri Al-Maliki holds the upper hand in the game of "chicken" he's playing with George Bush over negotiating a Status Of Forces Agreement (SOFA) for American troops to legally stay in Iraq past the first of next year.  Now it appears both sides are pretty close to admitting that there will be no agreement, and that they had better start talking about some sort of short-term arrangement, which would allow whoever America's next president is to take over the negotiating table.</p>]]></description>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2008/10/14/maliki-running-out-bushs-clock/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Exclusive Interview: Frank Prewitt, Author Of Last Bridge To Nowhere</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>For those interested in the backstory of the octopus-like reach of the VECO corruption investigation, there is currently no better inside look at the entire mess than the amazing new book <em>Last Bridge To Nowhere</em>, by author Frank Prewitt.  Prewitt has a unique perspective on the entire mess, since he was the F.B.I.'s "Confidential Source #1" throughout the evidence-gathering phase of the long-running investigation.  Codenamed "Patient," Prewitt spent countless hours documenting sleazy deals, payoffs, bribes, and other shenanigans; often wearing a wire and taping encounters to provide court evidence.</p>]]></description>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2008/10/13/exclusive-interview-frank-prewitt-author-of-last-bridge-to-nowhere/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [51] &#8212; Some Positivity</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Things are getting pretty nasty out on the McCain campaign trail, it seems.  Not much talk of "reaching across the aisle" these days.  Now, while anyone with a halfway-decent brain saw this coming, this obviously doesn't include most of the mainstream media.  Of <em>course</em> the end of the campaign was going to be nasty.  Of <em>course</em> McCain and his minions were going to throw everything they could at Obama.  Barack Obama himself knew this was coming.  Democrats should have known it was coming.  It's the old story of the <a href="http://allaboutfrogs.org/stories/scorpion.html">scorpion and the frog</a> -- McCain is getting nasty because he's a Republican candidate for president.  "I'm a Republican, it's my nature," in other words.</p>]]></description>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2008/10/10/friday-talking-points-51-some-positivity/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Surveillance Powers Abused</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Two stories from the "power corrupts" department appeared this week, one on the state level and one on the federal level.  Both just go to show, once again, that whenever sweeping surveillance powers are granted to those in authority the end result is almost always the same -- widespread abuse of such power to go after anyone the government takes a dislike to, rather than the "terrorists" who are the supposed targets of the law.</p>]]></description>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2008/10/09/surveillance-powers-abused/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Electoral Math &#8212; Obama Landslide?</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>I have to admit, that's a pretty provocative title.  And enumerating the poultry before they emerge from the ova is always risky... as the saying goes.  But it's hard to look at this week's polls without the word "landslide" appearing in your forebrain.</p>]]></description>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2008/10/08/electoral-math-obama-landslide/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Post-Debate Thoughts</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Both candidates had the same pre-debate tactics, and both attempted exactly the same thing.  They both tried to "psyche out" their opponent by warning how hard they were going to fight.  It didn't work for either of them.  Neither one of them really took the bait, and the entire debate was a snoozefest compared to what it was billed as.</p>]]></description>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2008/10/07/post-debate-thoughts/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>You Don&#039;t Need A Weatherman To Know Which Way The Wind Blows</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>I offer this as a cautionary tale to people who now think Obama's so far out in front in the polls that his only real worry should be what color drapes to use in the Oval Office.  The earlier, and simpler, form of the metaphor springs to mind (from the immortal Yogi Berra): "The game isn't over 'til it's over."</p>]]></description>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2008/10/06/you-dont-need-a-weatherman-to-know-which-way-the-wind-blows/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [50] &#8212; Can I Call You Joe?</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Now, I refuse to get too wrapped up in the question of who "won" the debate.  In general, unless one candidate obviously self-destructs, this question is answered among most Americans quite subjectively and quite personally.  I thought, much as I did with the first presidential debate, that last night was largely a draw.  Neither candidate completely fell on their face, both candidates spoke fairly well, and neither one completely outshone the other.</p>]]></description>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2008/10/03/friday-talking-points-50-can-i-call-you-joe/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>The Palin Honeymoon Is Over</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The honeymoon Sarah Palin has been enjoying with American voters -- ever since John McCain's surprise announcement that he was putting her on the Republican ticket -- is now officially over.  And I'm writing this <em>before</em> tonight's vice presidential debate, I should note.</p>]]></description>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2008/10/02/the-palin-honeymoon-is-over/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Electoral Math Looking Good For Obama</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>It's time once again for our weekly look at the state polls in the electoral race between John McCain and Barack Obama.  Now, a lot has happened since <a href="http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2008/09/24/electoral-math-update-obama-bounces-back/">last week's column</a>, including the first debate, the "suspension" of McCain's campaign, Wall Street continuing to crash and burn, and Sarah Palin finally sitting down with Katie Couric (Katie must be beside herself with joy by this point, because she seems to be the only reporter Palin will now talk to).  Palin interviews have headlined on CBS' evening news show for four weeknights in a row now.  And that's not even mentioning the parody on Saturday Night Live ("I'd like to use my lifeline!").</p>]]></description>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2008/10/01/electoral-math-looking-good-for-obama/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Historical Interlude: Wandering From Alaska To Russia</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>With all the ruckus over whether you can see Russia from Alaska (or from Sarah Palin's porch), there's a story from the Cold War that is largely being overlooked.  Because back in 1986, one man walked from Alaska to the Soviet Union (as it was then known).</p>]]></description>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2008/09/30/historical-interlude-wandering-from-alaska-to-russia/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>In Defense Of Sarah Palin</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>While this will be a shock to anyone who has read just about any other column I've written, I speak today in defense of Sarah Palin.</p>]]></description>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2008/09/29/in-defense-of-sarah-palin/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [49] &#8212; Before And After The First Debate</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>OK, enough navel-gazing.  What a week it was, eh?  John McCain is showing what has been described as his "Ready, Fire, Aim" approach to running things, and even Republicans are shaking their heads in confusion over McCain's "I won't debate!... Well, OK, maybe I will..." grandstanding this week.  His non-suspension suspension of his campaign added to this feeling of watching a slow-motion train wreck happen.  All this actually helped McCain in one way -- because if there hadn't been such a circus to watch then Sarah Palin's disastrous interview with Katie Couric would have gotten a lot more attention.  Again, even conservatives are recoiling in horror from how unprepared this woman is for the job she's running for.  But it was buried under the bailout plan news, which had to have helped McCain in some small way.</p>]]></description>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2008/09/26/friday-talking-points-49-before-and-after-the-first-debate/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>How To Fix The Economy</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Instead, we have the return of our in-house cartoonist!  While it may have appeared to the public that CWCunningham was in an undisclosed location these past few months, he and I were actually colloborating on a video, in an effort to get (you can't make this stuff up) a liberal lobbying firm on K Street interested in our idea.  But, sadly, it came to naught.  But this week's financial meltdown proved to be too hard for him to resist, so we proudly present his take on the situation.</p>]]></description>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2008/09/25/how-to-fix-the-economy/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Electoral Math Update &#8212; Obama Bounces Back</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Since last week's dismal outlook for Obama, there has been an absolute flood of state poll numbers released.  One day after <a href="http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2008/09/17/electoral-math-checkup-obamas-low-point/">last week's column</a> ran, over thirty states released polls on the same day.  Whew!  They even polled the District of Columbia, for the first time in the entire election season (you can see why they hadn't bothered up until now -- it unsurprisingly came out 82/13 in Obama's favor).  But so many state polls are being released so fast, that for the first time <em>every single state</em> has been polled recently -- and not just in the past month, but in the past <em>week</em>.  This flood of data is a good thing, though, as it keeps the electoral map a lot closer to the current voter preferences state-by-state.</p>]]></description>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2008/09/24/electoral-math-update-obama-bounces-back/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Maliki&#039;s Spin</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>One can't help but wonder if President Bush is thinking to himself: "It wasn't supposed to be like this."  Now, there's a whole passel of issues which might make him feel this way, but in particular I'm talking about his negotiations with Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri Al-Maliki over the United States' continuing troop presence in Iraq.  Because it is increasingly looking like Bush is simply not going to get what he wanted.  But since what he wanted was to tie the hands of the incoming president, this is actually a good thing.</p>]]></description>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2008/09/23/malikis-spin/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Bad Laws Pass Fast</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>I know I'm supposed to be commenting on the details of the new economic bailout/recovery plan here, but in fact, I know my own limitations.  And one of those limitations is admitting that economics on a national or international scale is beyond me.  My actual belief is that it's beyond <em>anybody</em> -- that the "science" of economics is nothing short of voodoo.</p>]]></description>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2008/09/22/bad-laws-pass-fast/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [48] &#8212; Throwing Out The Rulebook</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Back in <a href="http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2008/06/20/friday-talking-points-36-end-the-medias-pro-mccain-bias-now/">Volume 36</a> of this <strong>Friday Talking Points</strong> column, I pointed out what seemed to me to be an obvious observation -- that the media was going a lot lighter on John McCain than they were on Barack Obama.  This earned me a fair amount of ridicule at the time (and also some support, I should say).  Now, however, I can definitively say that this situation has been rectified.  Whether it was McCain's campaign cutting off virtually all access to McCain (and literally <em>any</em> access to Palin), whether it was McCain's mudslinging and lies in his ads, or perhaps whether it was McCain manipulating the media after his running mate choice, and then savagely attacking them -- for whatever reason, the mainstream media are now closely examining everything McCain says.</p>]]></description>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2008/09/19/friday-talking-points-48-throwing-out-the-rulebook/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Addendum &#8212; Flood Of New State Polls</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Yesterday, I did a roundup of the state polls and the electoral math outlook for the presidential race.  Today, I checked the numbers as I do every morning, and over <em>thirty</em> states had new poll numbers -- an astonishing amount of data for one day.  Even Washington, D.C. got polled, for the first time ever in this election cycle.  It's easy to see why D.C. doesn't get polled much, since the outcome isn't exactly in doubt -- the spread in this poll is greater than any other state at 82% for Barack Obama and a paltry 13% for John McCain.</p>]]></description>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2008/09/18/addendum-flood-of-new-state-polls/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Electoral Math Checkup &#8212; Obama&#039;s Low Point?</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Barack Obama has had a hard few weeks in the polls.  In fact, this week's check of how the electoral math plays out may (hopefully) be his lowest point during the campaign.</p>]]></description>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2008/09/17/electoral-math-checkup-obamas-low-point/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Media Turns On McCain</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The past week may have been a crucial turning point for the presidential hopes of John McCain.  Because finally -- <em>finally!</em> -- the mainstream media (including some very right-wing sources) have realized that it is not "McCain 2000" who is running this year, but "McCain 2008"  -- a whole different breed of cat.  This may have been McCain's biggest hidden asset, but ever since he hired the Karl Rove-trained campaign staff he's got now, he has carelessly tossed this potent secret weapon aside.</p>]]></description>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2008/09/16/media-turns-on-mccain/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>More Debbie Wasserman Schultz, Please</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>What a difference a weekend can make!  Barack Obama's campaign is strongly defending themselves in the air wars, and taking the fight to John McCain.  Joe Biden has found his voice on the campaign trail, giving some rousing stump speeches.  And Obama himself seems to be learning the "bumpersticker" rule of political slogans; keep it short and simple!  But the real highlight of the weekend had to be CBS' <em>Face The Nation</em>, where Representative Debbie Wasserman Schultz -- a former Hillary Clinton supporter, it should be noted -- showed everyone else what a surrogate is supposed to do.  She had her facts ready, she knew her issues, and she was <em>absolutely relentless</em> in making her points.  Her performance was so strong and so well focused that it would be foolish not to immediately send her out on the campaign trail and/or to as many television interviews as she can squeeze into her schedule.</p>]]></description>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2008/09/15/more-debbie-wasserman-schultz-please/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [47] &#8212; Our First Anniversary</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Yes, Volume 47 of the Friday Talking Points column is actually our one-year anniversary.  The <a href="http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2007/09/14/memo-to-democrats-talking-points/">very first installment</a> of this indomitable column aired on September 14, 2007.</p>]]></description>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2008/09/12/friday-talking-points-47-our-first-anniversary/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Craig Ferguson&#039;s Excellent Rant &#8212; &#034;If You Don&#039;t Vote, You&#039;re A Moron.&#034;</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>As a public service, today I am running a full transcript of Craig Ferguson, host of <em>The Late Late Show</em> on CBS, from last night, 8/10/08.</p>]]></description>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2008/09/11/craig-fergusons-excellent-rant-if-you-dont-vote-youre-a-moron/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Ad Suggestion For Obama &#8212; McCain AWOL On GI Bill</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Barack Obama has been getting lots of advice recently about what to do out on the campaign trail.  Since it seems to be "Give Obama Advice Week," I'd like to offer up a campaign ad script.</p>
<p>Part of the problem Obama's been having since Sarah Palin appeared is that he's been playing defense ever since.  He needs to go back on the offense on McCain, and drive the news cycle instead of just reacting to it.</p>]]></description>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2008/09/10/ad-suggestion-for-obama-mccain-awol-on-gi-bill/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Anbar Awakening In Danger Of Being Put To Sleep</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Because Maliki's Shi'ite-dominated government has shown absolutely no inclination to hire any of their former Sunni enemies, either in the military or otherwise.  And once the Americans are gone from the province, it's hard to believe that Maliki will continue paying them their $300 per month very much longer, either.</p>]]></description>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2008/09/09/anbar-awakening-in-danger-of-being-put-to-sleep/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Maliki&#039;s Leverage Over Bush</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Iraq's Prime Minister Nouri Al-Maliki seems to have the upper hand in the ongoing negotiations with the Bush administration.  The talks continue, in an attempt to hammer out an agreement for U.S. troops to operate in Iraq after the United Nations framework expires at the end of this year.  Upon reflection, it's easy to see why Maliki is getting stronger in this diplomatic tug-of-war, and Bush is getting weaker -- because the clock is running out on Bush, and because Bush's domestic popularity continues to fall while Maliki is using the international media to boost his own popularity with the voters in Iraq.</p>]]></description>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2008/09/08/malikis-leverage-over-bush/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [46] &#8212; Moose Poop!</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><strong>moose poop</strong> (<em>n</em>.) -- (1) Synonym for "bullshit," esp. when used to describe falsehoods coming out of Sarah Palin's mouth, or indeed any Republican in the 2008 election.  (2) Genteel term for the scat or feces of <em>alces alces</em> (North American moose).  <strong>See also:</strong> moose shit.  <strong>Usage:</strong> (1) <em>I see Sarah Palin's spouting the same old moose poop.</em> (2) <em>Watch your step, there's some moose poop on the trail here.</em></p>]]></description>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2008/09/05/friday-talking-points-46-moose-poop/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Republican Convention Wrapup</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>For all the undecided and just-getting-interested middle-class voters out there, McCain's speech didn't really offer much.  It certainly didn't offer any new ideas or policies I could get behind.  In fact, Obama's speech was addressed directly to such voters, and McCain's speech all but ignored them.  The image I got from McCain is that he's a "maverick" who is for <em>exactly what his party is for</em>.  Not very mavericky, in my book.</p>]]></description>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2008/09/04/republican-convention-wrapup/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>&#034;I Just Think I&#039;m Gonna Barf.&#034;</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>I open today with that <em>Fargo</em> quote for many reasons.  The first of which, it's funny.  As a matter of fact, it's so funny I think I'll make it the title of this piece, as well.  The second of which, I think <em>Fargo</em> DVDs are going to be selling like hotcakes after Sarah Palin's speech tonight.  Because, thirdly, this would be the perfect quote for Palin to use.  Sarah Palin (I really hope Republican speechwriters aren't reading this) has a very similar accent to Margie in <em>Fargo</em>, and references are <em>inevitably</em> going to be made... so she could get out in front of it, and indeed turn such references to her advantage.</p>]]></description>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2008/09/03/i-just-think-im-gonna-barf/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Obama Gets His Bounce</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>So a record 38 million Americans who watched Obama speak -- more than watched the opening ceremonies to the Olympics this year -- got to form <em>their own opinions</em> about Obama's speech.</p>]]></description>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2008/09/02/obama-gets-his-bounce/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Framing Sarah Palin</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Now, from the White House website itself, the <a href="http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2005/08/images/20050829-5_p082905pm-0125-515h.html">picture worth 10,000 words</a> which puts this entire "we feel your pain" lie to the ultimate test.  Here are George W. Bush and John McCain -- <em>on the exact same day Katrina hit New Orleans</em> -- celebrating what looks to me like the "festive occasion" of John McCain's birthday.  Again, this was the day that Hurricane Katrina hit New Orleans.</p>]]></description>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2008/09/01/framing-sarah-palin/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [45] &#8212; Lessons Democrats Should Learn From Obama&#039;s Speech</title>
		<description><![CDATA[I know that just about the entire blogosphere is talking about John McCain&#039;s pick of Sarah Palin (who?) for his running mate, but I, for one, refuse to let John McCain distract me from writing about Barack Obama&#039;s acceptance speech last night, given to a cheering throng of 84,000 in Denver&#039;s football stadium (I refuse [...]]]></description>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2008/08/29/friday-talking-points-45-lessons-democrats-should-learn-from-obamas-speech/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Convention Thoughts &#8212; Day Three (Some Red Meat)</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>As I've said, this convention is being directed by a maestro -- slow and warm at first, then a big resounding call for unity, and now, on Day 3, some red meat to the crowd.  Tonight should be absolutely stunning, that's all I can say, because the "build" has gone swimmingly well.</p>]]></description>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2008/08/28/convention-thoughts-day-three-some-red-meat/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Convention Thoughts &#8212; Day Two (Hil-la-ry!)</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>...I have to say that the credit for the presentation of the convention has to be split between the Clintons and Barack's campaign team.  Each has proven what a great job of defying the media expectations Democrats can (at times) manage to do.  For the first two days, the media kept beating the "Hillary people are going to show a divided party" drum, and <em>it never happened</em>.  What was the overwhelming image out of the convention so far?  <em>Party unity</em>.  This would only increase on the next night, but I'm separating these into separate posts, so I'll get to that in a little bit here.  For now, I had to give credit to one talking head (I forget who it was, it may have been Bob Schieffer on CBS) who, obviously speaking without a script, said immediately after Hillary's speech something along the lines of: "Well, we've all be telling the story of how divided the Democrats are, but we were wrong.  They are united."  I didn't write down the exact words, but to me it was a stunning admission of journalistic failure -- <em>for almost everyone in the media</em>.  They really, really wanted a fight.  They didn't get one.  Too bad.  One would like to hope that now their media narrative will pivot on a dime into "It's astonishing how united the Democratic Party has become," but (as always when expecting things from the media) I'm not going to hold my breath or anything.</p>]]></description>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2008/08/28/convention-thoughts-day-two-hil-la-ry/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Convention Thoughts &#8212; Day One (Warm And Fuzzy)</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>...But the kids stole the show.  The youngest one, obviously having a ball with her moment on the world stage, in about five seconds became the best thing of the entire night.  Who can't resist an adorable girl saying "I love you Daddy!" to her father?</p>]]></description>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2008/08/28/convention-thoughts-day-one-warm-and-fuzzy/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>PUMA &#8212; Endangered Species</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>After Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton's speech tonight, every single one of her supporters who <em>could</em> be convinced now <em>have been</em> convinced.  Clinton gave certainly the best speech I have ever seen her give, if not the best speech she has ever given in her entire life.</p>]]></description>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2008/08/26/puma-endangered-species/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>A Historical Perspective On Divided Democratic Conventions</title>
		<description><![CDATA[Today begins the 2008 Democratic National Convention.  The media (or some sections of it, I should say) have been pushing for a big rousing fight on the floor of the convention in Denver &#8212; the Hillary Clinton supporters staging some sort of scene for the cameras &#8212; so they can continue their &#034;look how [...]]]></description>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2008/08/25/a-historical-perspective-on-divided-democratic-conventions/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [44] &#8212; McCain House Party!</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>But I'm certainly not looking this gift horse in the mouth.  For weeks now, I have been <a href="http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2008/08/21/john-mccains-glass-houses/">practically <em>begging</em></a> someone -- ANYone -- to ask John McCain this exact question: "How many houses do you and your wife own?"  <em>Politico</em> finally asked.  John McCain blew the answer.  Yet another gaffe from McCain, but the difference this time is that the media chose to run with it.</p>]]></description>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2008/08/22/friday-talking-points-44-mccain-house-party/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>John McCain&#039;s (Glass) Houses</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>One can almost picture the scene -- a high-level campaign strategy session inside Barack Obama's headquarters.  "So everyone's saying Obama should fight back against McCain's smears... how should we go about doing that?"  "Hey, what about... I don't know... maybe highlighting the <em>really stupid things</em> McCain says on the campaign trail -- <em>almost on a daily basis?!?</em>"</p>]]></description>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2008/08/21/john-mccains-glass-houses/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Electoral Math &#8212; Obama Sure Could Use A Bump</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>It's time once again to take a look at how the electoral math is shaping up for Barack Obama and John McCain.  While the news this time around isn't all that great for Obama, I wanted to take another of these snapshots of the polls -- before the running mates are announced and before the conventions happen -- in order to provide a statistical baseline to see how big a "bump" in the polls either candidate will get in the next few weeks.  My analysis in short: while the news isn't dire quite yet, Obama could certainly use such a bump at this point.</p>]]></description>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2008/08/20/electoral-math-obama-sure-could-use-a-bump/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Obama Begins To Fight Back</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Many people have been saying for the past few weeks (myself included) that Barack Obama needs to stand up for himself a little bit more, and strongly counter the negative attacks coming from John McCain.  I have also suggested (and I'm not alone in this one either) that Obama needs to start actually taking the fight to McCain, by painting a picture of McCain for America to see -- to counteract who the McCain campaign would like you to believe John McCain is.</p>]]></description>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2008/08/19/obama-begins-to-fight-back/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Let Them Drink Beer</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>There was a news item today about a group of college presidents who have signed on to an effort to "rethink" the drinking age in America.  While not explicitly calling for lowering the drinking age from 21 to 18, these collegiate leaders are urging legislators to at least consider the idea of letting states lower the <em>de facto</em> national drinking age.</p>]]></description>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2008/08/18/let-them-drink-beer/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [43] &#8212; And The Gold Medal For Snarkiness Goes To&#8230;</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Thanks to all for playing, and feel free to add more, as it's quite likely some of these winners will be found to have used humor-enhancing substances.  Ahem.</p>]]></description>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2008/08/15/friday-talking-points-43-and-the-gold-medal-for-snarkiness-goes-to/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>R-E-S-P-E-C-T</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>So it's official -- Hillary Clinton's name will be formally introduced for a roll-call vote at the Democratic Convention.  She will be given her due respect, as will her supporters.  Will this be enough for her voters to (finally) come around to supporting Barack Obama, or will the all-but-admitted fact that she's not going to be the vice presidential nominee further embitter the Hillary die-hards?  In other words, is this going to be a good thing or a bad thing for Obama?  Only time will tell, unfortunately.</p>]]></description>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2008/08/14/r-e-s-p-e-c-t/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Bush Olympic Photo Caption Contest</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Then May-Treanor turned her back to the president, offering her bikinied rear for one of the traditional slaps that volleyball players frequently give each other.</p>]]></description>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2008/08/13/bush-olympic-photo-caption-contest/</link>
			</item>
</channel>
</rss>
