ChrisWeigant.com

Archive of Articles in the "The Supreme Court" Category

Friday Talking Points [63] -- Populist Rage?

[ Posted Friday, January 30th, 2009 – 18:12 UTC ]

While I think a growing populist rage is indeed possible in this country at this point, I don't quite think we're there yet -- and I really don't think most Washington politicians would know how to ride that wave even if it did appear. Because, from Obama on down, Democrats know how to stoke the fires of populist rage, but what they propose doing about it usually falls far, far short of what I would call "populism."

Read Complete Article »

My Final Inaugural Report -- The Good, The Bad, And The Ugly

[ Posted Sunday, January 25th, 2009 – 22:32 UTC ]

The swearing-in ceremony itself, and the opening acts which proceeded it were the best thing, capped by Barack Obama's oath of office.

Read Complete Article »

"I Was There!" -- My Experience Of The Inauguration Of President Obama [Parts 1 & 2]

[ Posted Wednesday, January 21st, 2009 – 19:21 UTC ]

[Update: Second installment of this article has now been added, below.]
Barack Hussein Obama's oath of office was indeed inspiring to hear, if a bit flawed in the execution. Both he and the Chief Justice seemed to have an attack of nerves, and they both wound up blowing their lines. For me, though, the [...]

Read Complete Article »

Pay-To-Play: Inauguration Tickets, Only $12,500 Each!

[ Posted Wednesday, January 7th, 2009 – 17:25 UTC ]

Want a ticket to the official Inauguration Day swearing-in event held on public property? Well, you can easily have one -- guaranteed -- for the low, low price of only $12,500. [To be completely honest, that price is much like how airline's advertise "one-way based on roundtrip purchase" fares that don't actually exist -- since you have to "donate" a whopping $50,000 for four guaranteed tickets.] But wait! It's a package deal! You also get, for your hard-earned dollars, bleacher seats to watch the Inaugural Parade, tickets to at least one of the Inaugural Balls the Obamas will actually attend, and other sundry perks and goodies. What a deal, eh?

Read Complete Article »

Burris, Race, Religion, And The Senate

[ Posted Monday, January 5th, 2009 – 18:28 UTC ]

The growing intensity of the rhetoric surrounding Roland Burris, Rod Blagojevich, and Barack Obama's vacant Senate seat reached new heights (or depths, depending on your point of view) this weekend, by both Burris and his supporters. This is getting so completely out of hand that some perspective is sorely needed here.

Read Complete Article »

Is Rick Warren Beyond The Pale?

[ Posted Monday, December 29th, 2008 – 17:16 UTC ]

Is Rick Warren, pastor of a California mega-church and author of The Purpose Driven Life considered unacceptable in American society at large? Was Obama's invitation to Warren to speak at his inauguration akin to, in today's world, inviting a white supremacist, an anti-Semite, or a blatant misogynist to speak? To put it another way, is Rick Warren beyond the pale?

Read Complete Article »

Friday Talking Points [57] -- End Of Prohibition 75th Anniversary Edition

[ Posted Friday, December 5th, 2008 – 18:43 UTC ]

Brian Williams, NBC's talking head extraordinaire, is probably a decent guy, a guy with whom you could sit down and have a beer. [More on the alcohol subject at the end, I promise.] But that doesn't excuse something he said last night on Jay Leno's show.

Read Complete Article »

What's In A Name? (...And Other Trivia)

[ Posted Tuesday, December 2nd, 2008 – 17:12 UTC ]

Personally, I could care less whether he says "I, Barack Hussein Obama..." or "I, Barack Obama..." or "I, Barry Obama..." or whatever else he chooses to say. The man behind the name is who people voted for, not the name itself. The man will be president, and I don't care whether he calls himself by a nickname ("Jimmy Carter") by initials ("F.D.R" or "L.B.J.") or by his full name. Whatever he's comfortable with, as far as I'm concerned.

Read Complete Article »

Political Parties Are Not "Checks" Or "Balances"

[ Posted Monday, December 1st, 2008 – 17:52 UTC ]

There's an old inside-the-Beltway joke where a new House member is being shown around by a veteran of his own party. He is awed by entering the House floor for the first time, and is shown his new seat. He asks, pointing across the aisle to where the other party sits, "Is that where the enemy sits?" The older and wiser Congressman replies, "No, no, here in the House of Representatives we call our opponents 'the loyal opposition.' You're new, so you need to understand this. 'The enemy' is the Senate."

Read Complete Article »

Spam, Free Speech, And Anonymity (continued...)

[ Posted Thursday, November 13th, 2008 – 18:15 UTC ]

As I see it, the issue breaks down in a number of ways. The first question is anonymity -- do Americans have an absolute right to anonymity in political messages? The second question is technological -- is anonymity a right, no matter what the medium? And the third question seems to be political, and deal with campaign and election law -- what kinds of rules on speech are constitutionally allowable in politics?

Read Complete Article »