<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>ChrisWeigant.com &#187; Other</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.chrisweigant.com/category/television/other/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com</link>
	<description>Reality-based political commentary</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2026 21:58:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>The End Of An Era</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2026/05/21/the-end-of-an-era-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2026/05/21/the-end-of-an-era-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2026 23:20:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Humor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Other]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=27630</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Tonight will mark not the passing of a torch, but instead the end of an era.  Tonight, the last episode of <em>The Late Show</em> will air.  Media historians in the future will probably look back at this as a turning point, signalling the end of the dominance of late-night broadcast television comedians to provide humor and ridicule about current events and the news.  For me, this is a sad milestone.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2026/05/21/the-end-of-an-era-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Our American Secular Religion</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2026/02/09/our-american-secular-religion/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2026/02/09/our-american-secular-religion/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2026 23:54:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Other]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=27278</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Did everyone have a nice time in church yesterday?</p>
<p>I ask that question ironically, because while the big main event yesterday wasn't technically religious in nature, it is the closest thing we have to a national American religion that everyone can participate in equally: watching the Super Bowl.  There is no overt praying (but plenty of spontaneous praying by fans of the team that is losing), no pastor or minister or priest or rabbi or imam, and no hymns.  There was an actual wedding this time around (a first, surely?) but it was part of a staged musical event and therefore doesn't really count as a religious service <em>per se</em>.  Nevertheless, an enormous slice of the American public gathered together around their television sets and all watched the same thing for hours on end.  That's as close to a national worship service as you can get, even though it was completely secular.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2026/02/09/our-american-secular-religion/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Jimmy Kimmel Returns</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2025/09/24/jimmy-kimmel-returns/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2025/09/24/jimmy-kimmel-returns/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2025 22:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FCC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Free Speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Humor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Name-dropping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Other]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Bill of Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=26835</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Last night, Jimmy Kimmel returned to the airwaves.  Well, most of them, at any rate.  Two corporate conglomerates of ABC affiliates refused to air the show, but with modern technology available, everyone can now watch his opening monologue even if you live in a television market where his show was pre-empted.</p>
<p>The <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c1tjh_ZO_tY">official YouTube video</a> of the opening of <em>Jimmy Kimmel Live!</em> has (as of this writing) 15.7 million views.  If you haven't seen it yet, it is well worth watching.  In fact, today we are pre-empting our own political column to present a full transcript of what Jimmy had to say last night in his opening monologue, because it is an important statement on free speech that stands on its own, and one that everyone who cares about free speech should either read or watch.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2025/09/24/jimmy-kimmel-returns/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Disney Puts Kimmel Back On The Air</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2025/09/22/disney-puts-kimmel-back-on-the-air/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2025/09/22/disney-puts-kimmel-back-on-the-air/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2025 23:02:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FCC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Free Speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Humor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Other]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Bill of Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=26825</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Disney, in the end, did the right thing.  That's the big news today.  And it is a clear victory for free speech.</p>
<p>Last week, Disney abruptly yanked Jimmy Kimmel's late-night show off the airwaves, after being pressured to do so (for purely political reasons) by the head of the Federal Communications Commission.  Today, Disney apparently saw the error of their ways and announced that Kimmel will return tomorrow night.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2025/09/22/disney-puts-kimmel-back-on-the-air/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>From The Archives -- The COVID Generation</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2025/03/12/from-the-archives-the-covid-generation/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2025/03/12/from-the-archives-the-covid-generation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2025 03:02:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Other]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=26165</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><strong>Program Note:</strong> Today is the final day I was too preoccupied with real-life stuff to write a new column (new columns will resume tomorrow), so I conclude my little look back at the COVID pandemic with a much later article than the last two.  I wrote this before we were all completely out of the woods (pandemic-wise), mostly because I was exasperated with the silliness of the baby boomers dictating to all following generations: "You shall be known by a single letter" (which wasn't true at the time, for most of us), and also with the silliness of merely drawing an arbitrary line on a calendar and declaring "<em>This</em> generation will end at this year, and the <em>next</em> generation shall begin here!"  To me, a "generation" implies a shared event or a shared perspective that is outwardly defined (such as the post-World War II baby boom), and not by an arbitrary division of years.</p>
<p>In any case, the term still hasn't caught on (at least, that I am aware of), so maybe I'm still just trying to (pun intended) make it "go viral."  So here is my rare foray into sociology (or whatever you want to call it), just in the hopes that people start using it one day.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2025/03/12/from-the-archives-the-covid-generation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>68</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Maybe R.F.K. Jr. Can Ban Televised Drug Ads</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2025/02/13/maybe-r-f-k-jr-can-ban-televised-drug-ads/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2025/02/13/maybe-r-f-k-jr-can-ban-televised-drug-ads/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Feb 2025 00:10:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Other]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=26076</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Robert F. Kennedy Junior is now going to be in charge of overseeing the nation's health systems.  This seems to be a prime example of the ironic question: "What could <em>possibly</em> go wrong with that?" since Kennedy is so obviously not even <em>remotely</em> qualified for the position, and he holds so many bizarre and conspiratorial viewpoints on health care and medicine that <em>HuffPost</em> ran the story with a main-page "screamer" headline: "<a href="https://www.huffpost.com/entry/rfk-jr-confirmed-health-secretary_n_67ace961e4b0239406ded2e3">Quack Confirmed!</a>"  If anything, calling R.F.K. Jr. a "quack" is an <em>under</em>statement of the reality.</p>
<p>But today I am in a ra]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2025/02/13/maybe-r-f-k-jr-can-ban-televised-drug-ads/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>28</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Birth Of The Modern World</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2024/01/24/the-birth-of-the-modern-world/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2024/01/24/the-birth-of-the-modern-world/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jan 2024 22:48:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Name-dropping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Other]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=24593</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Few people will actually celebrate it, but today is the 40th birthday of the modern world.  Because on this day, back in 1984, Apple Computers began selling the first Macintosh model.  And thus 1984 was not like <em>Nineteen Eighty-Four</em>.</p>
<p>That's what the ad promised, at any rate.  The <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VtvjbmoDx-I">television ad</a> that introduced the Mac only ran nationally once (during the Super Bowl, no less), but it's still one of the most memorable ads of all time (which it should be, seeing as how it was directed by none other than Ridley Scott).  This all seems entirely appropriate for the revolutionary product it was promoting.  In the timeline of technological advancement in average people's lives, there was "before Mac," and then there was "after Mac" -- which is the world we all live in today.  And it all started forty years ago.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2024/01/24/the-birth-of-the-modern-world/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>I Welcome The Return Of The Court Jesters</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2023/10/05/i-welcome-the-return-of-the-court-jesters/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2023/10/05/i-welcome-the-return-of-the-court-jesters/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Oct 2023 22:29:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Humor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Other]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=24181</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>There are plenty of things I could be writing about today, not least among them the horrifying and completely laughable notion of making Donald Trump speaker of the House, but I decided to focus in on the "laughable" part instead.  Because I, for one, am <em>immensely</em> pleased that late-night comedy shows are back on the air every night (and, starting this weekend, on Saturday night as well).</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2023/10/05/i-welcome-the-return-of-the-court-jesters/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Menendez Needs To Go</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2023/09/26/menendez-needs-to-go/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2023/09/26/menendez-needs-to-go/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Sep 2023 22:35:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2024 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cuba]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Humor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Other]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=24136</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>This has been a notable week for Labor.  President Joe Biden today visited an autoworkers' Union picket line in Detroit, in what is being described as "the first time ever" for a sitting president (nobody seems to have any definitive word on whether Biden truly is the first or not, but then again nobody has yet come up with another example from American history either).  The week started out with the news that the Hollywood writers appear to have come to a deal with the studios to end their strike.  And I have to say that while I applauded seeing Biden visit a Union picket line, I <em>really</em> cheered the news from Hollywood, as I have been seriously missing late-night television comics in my life.  I look at politics all day, every day, and it is almost necessary (for my sanity) for me to decompress with some good political humor at the end of the day (or, for <em>Saturday Night Live</em>, at the end of the week).  But that hasn't been an option for months now.  The good news is that late-night will be the first part of the industry to recover, so we could start seeing new shows within days of the agreement being finalized.</p>
<p>What will the comics talk about?  Well, they've certainly got plenty of material to work with.  A lot of Trump's legal developments happened after the strike began, just for starters.  Just within the world of politics, there have been plenty of juicy stories just ripe for ridicule over the summer.  But at some point they'll also pick up on the most current events; the most current easy low-hanging targets for political ridicule.  Which, in a very roundabout way, leads me to the subject of this article: Senator Robert Menendez needs to resign his seat -- and for his own sake, he should do it before Stephen Colbert and Seth Meyers and all the rest of them get back to work.  He might spare himself a boatload of ridicule by doing so.  Admittedly, that's a rather strange angle to see it all from, but it's what popped into my mind when the scandal broke almost simultaneously with the writers striking a deal.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2023/09/26/menendez-needs-to-go/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>And Then There Were 13... Or 10?  Or Maybe 9?</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2023/08/29/and-then-there-were-13-or-10-or-maybe-9/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2023/08/29/and-then-there-were-13-or-10-or-maybe-9/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Aug 2023 23:26:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2024 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Humor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Name-dropping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Other]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Vice President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=24011</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Way back in 2015, late-night television's Stephen Colbert had a ritual bit he'd run every time a presidential candidate dropped out of the race.  Using the impressive ceiling in his studio, he projected an image of the also-ran candidate <em>&#224; la</em> how the deaths of each "tribute" in <em>The Hunger Games</em> were announced.  He called it the "Hungry For Power Games."  Of course, earlier this year, late-night television was the first to go dark when the Hollywood writers went on strike, so we can't expect this sort of thing in the current campaign until they are all back at work (and being paid better).  Which is a shame, because the Republican presidential field is already beginning to narrow.  Today, the mayor of Miami, Francis Suarez, became the first to officially <a href="https://www.huffpost.com/entry/miami-mayor-francis-suarez-drops-out-gop-presidential-race_n_64ee2555e4b03845723dcb77">drop out of the race</a>.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2023/08/29/and-then-there-were-13-or-10-or-maybe-9/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Please End This Insanity</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2022/09/29/please-end-this-insanity/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2022/09/29/please-end-this-insanity/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2022 21:42:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Other]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=22642</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>This column isn't about politics.  It's about safety, and television, and common sense.  Because if things don't change, someone is going to get badly hurt and/or die.  While we're all watching.  Which is why today I'm writing something I have long thought: no sane person should ever "report live" from a hurricane.</p>
<p>What is the benefit to having a human being standing in a street fighting hurricane-force winds?  There is none.  A shot of the street itself is more than enough to show what is happening.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2022/09/29/please-end-this-insanity/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The House January 6th Select Committee Hearings [Episode 7]</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2022/07/12/the-house-january-6th-select-committee-hearings-episode-7/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2022/07/12/the-house-january-6th-select-committee-hearings-episode-7/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jul 2022 00:47:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2020 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Impeachment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Other]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Vice President]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voting Rights]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=22279</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>After an extended break (which was interrupted by the unplanned sixth of these live hearings), the House Select Committee to Investigate January 6th reconvened today for the seventh such hearing.  Today's hearing centered around the violent rightwing militia groups that attacked the United States Capitol, and how they were encouraged to do so by Donald Trump.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2022/07/12/the-house-january-6th-select-committee-hearings-episode-7/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>66</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The House January 6th Select Committee Hearings [Episode 5]</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2022/06/23/the-house-january-6th-select-committee-hearings-episode-5/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2022/06/23/the-house-january-6th-select-committee-hearings-episode-5/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jun 2022 01:56:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2020 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Impeachment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Other]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Vice President]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voting Rights]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=22202</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Today saw the final June hearing of the House Select Committee on January 6th.  Next week, Congress scarpers off on one of their many two-week holiday breaks, ostensibly for the July 4th holiday, so we won't be getting another of these hearings until the week of July 11th, at the earliest.  But the committee does indeed plan to hold more public hearings, although they continue to hold their cards <em>very</em> close to the vest on exactly how many such hearings will take place, as well as the subject of any of the upcoming hearings.  Perhaps this is done to build tension and interest among the public, or perhaps it is just because they are now reportedly being <em>flooded</em> with new information and new testimony, all offered up since the beginning of the public hearings earlier this month.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2022/06/23/the-house-january-6th-select-committee-hearings-episode-5/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>115</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The House January 6th Select Committee Hearings [Episode 2]</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2022/06/13/the-house-january-6th-select-committee-hearings-episode-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2022/06/13/the-house-january-6th-select-committee-hearings-episode-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jun 2022 23:26:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2020 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Impeachment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Other]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voting Rights]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=22156</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Early this morning (<em>very</em> early, for those of us on the West Coast!), the second June hearing of the House January 6th committee was supposed to get underway.  This didn't happen on time, due to a last-minute changeup in the program.  One of the two in-person witnesses for the first hour, Bill Stepien, cancelled his appearance at the last minute.  Stepien was Donald Trump's campaign manager for the last three or four months of the 2020 presidential campaign, and was thus in a unique position to provide an eyewitness account of what went both before and after the election.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2022/06/13/the-house-january-6th-select-committee-hearings-episode-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>32</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The House January 6th Select Committee Hearings [Episode 1]</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2022/06/10/the-house-january-6th-select-committee-hearings-episode-1/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2022/06/10/the-house-january-6th-select-committee-hearings-episode-1/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Jun 2022 00:24:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2020 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Impeachment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Other]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Vice President]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voting Rights]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=22148</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Last night's hearing was meant to be an overview of the upcoming miniseries season.  The next seven hearings were outlined, which will expose what Representative Liz Cheney called Donald Trump's "seven-point plan" to overturn a free and fair election.  Next week, we will get at least two and possibly three more hearings (the official <a href="https://january6th.house.gov/committee_activity">January 6th Committee website</a> only lists the first two (as of this writing), on Monday and Wednesday mornings, but it is being widely reported there will be a third next Thursday at 1:00 P.M. Eastern time).  That's a fairly fast pace, and it looks like the next two weeks will be chock full of hearings.  I am assuming that at the end there will be a final hearing in primetime which will wrap up the entire storyline and present the full case to the American people about what went on, who was responsible, and what we should do now to ensure that it never happens again.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2022/06/10/the-house-january-6th-select-committee-hearings-episode-1/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>142</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Waiting For The Show To Start</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2022/06/09/waiting-for-the-show-to-start/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2022/06/09/waiting-for-the-show-to-start/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jun 2022 22:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2020 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2022 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2024 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Impeachment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Other]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Vice President]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voting Rights]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=22143</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>I am reminded, listening to all the hype and buzz building about tonight's House January 6th Select Committee's nationally-televised primetime hearing, of the lyrics of Emerson, Lake, and Palmer's "Karn Evil 9" ("Come inside the show's about to start / Guaranteed to blow your head apart").  But maybe that's just me.</p>
<p>For once, though (progressive rock references aside), the show that we'll all see tonight may actually live up to its billing.  Because for once, Democrats are approaching it with professional help in presenting their findings <em>as a narrative</em>.  This is more important than you might think.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2022/06/09/waiting-for-the-show-to-start/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>122</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Biden To Give Televised Address To Nation</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2022/06/02/biden-to-give-televised-address-to-nation/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2022/06/02/biden-to-give-televised-address-to-nation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jun 2022 22:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gun Control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Other]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Vice President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=22109</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>President Joe Biden is about to give an evening speech on national television.  This shouldn't be all that rare an event, but with Biden it sadly has been.  Last March, he gave such a speech on the COVID-19 pandemic response.  Last <em>March</em>.  Biden himself has reportedly been frustrated by his inability to get his message out, but he really bears a goodly portion of the blame for this himself.  Where was the speech to the nation on the Russian invasion of Ukraine?  How about a primetime address on inflation?  Or the infant formula bottleneck?  Or gas prices?  Maybe he shouldn't have given a speech on each and every one of these important issues, but it would have been nice to see at least one or two of them addressed by the president, or perhaps a few within just one speech.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2022/06/02/biden-to-give-televised-address-to-nation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>117</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Televised January 6th Hearings To Begin Next Week</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2022/06/01/televised-january-6th-hearings-to-begin-next-week/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2022/06/01/televised-january-6th-hearings-to-begin-next-week/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jun 2022 22:25:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2020 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2022 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2024 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Impeachment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Other]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=22103</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Next Thursday, if all goes according to schedule, the nation will finally start to see what the House Select Committee on January 6th has uncovered during its lengthy investigation of the worst attack on the United States Capitol since 1814.  This won't be a one-time show either -- there will be at least eight installments of this miniseries in June, with some of them appearing in primetime.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2022/06/01/televised-january-6th-hearings-to-begin-next-week/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>103</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Don&#039;t Forget The Ukrainian Invasion Is Only One Week Old</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2022/03/03/dont-forget-the-ukrainian-invasion-is-only-one-week-old/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2022/03/03/dont-forget-the-ukrainian-invasion-is-only-one-week-old/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Mar 2022 00:00:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Other]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Russia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ukraine]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=21694</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>It is hard to admit, but the world should really not get its hopes up too high for any sort of outcome in Ukraine other than the one Vladimir Putin initially set out to achieve.  Putin wants to completely subdue and occupy Ukraine, which he sees as nothing more than a part of Russia.  He will do whatever it takes to achieve that goal.  And although not inevitable, the most likely outcome by far is that Russia will completely crush the Ukrainian military and eventually conquer every city in the entire country.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2022/03/03/dont-forget-the-ukrainian-invasion-is-only-one-week-old/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>67</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Toto, I Have A Feeling We&#039;re Not In Kansas Anymore</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2021/11/30/toto-i-have-a-feeling-were-not-in-kansas-anymore/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2021/11/30/toto-i-have-a-feeling-were-not-in-kansas-anymore/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 2021 23:37:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2022 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign Ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Other]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=21295</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Nope -- we're definitely not in Kansas anymore.  We're not even where we're supposed to be, which is Pennsylvania.  We may be in New Jersey; it's not immediately clear (which brings up a rather ironic twist on "There's no place like home," I suppose, since we're not really sure where his home actually <em>is</em> right now...).  But today the <a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2021/11/30/dr-mehmet-oz-announces-senate-run/">following news</a> appeared from some fantastical locale or another:</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2021/11/30/toto-i-have-a-feeling-were-not-in-kansas-anymore/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The COVID Generation</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2021/09/30/the-covid-generation/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2021/09/30/the-covid-generation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Sep 2021 22:44:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Other]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=21046</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>This is taking silliness to an entirely new level.  This entire sequence of  "let's just give generations letters" began a long time ago, mostly pushed by Baby Boomers who (perhaps) didn't want any other generation to have a label cooler than theirs.  After all, for a good decade or so, the Baby Boomers themselves were referred to (disparagingly) as "the Me Generation."  Everything always had to be about them, in other words, so the following generations would just have to make do with "X," "Y," and "Z."</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2021/09/30/the-covid-generation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Vaccine Appointments Thrown Open Today</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2021/04/19/vaccine-appointments-thrown-open-today/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2021/04/19/vaccine-appointments-thrown-open-today/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Apr 2021 23:13:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Other]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=20327</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Starting today, any American age 16 or older should be able to schedule an appointment to get their first COVID-19 vaccine shot.  President Joe Biden originally set a goal of the first of May for this milestone, but was able to move it up a few weeks due to the overwhelming success of his vaccination program so far.  Biden's first 100 days won't be up until next week, but he has already met or is on track to meet every pandemic-response goal he set for his administration -- including getting an astounding 200 million shots into people's arms in his first 100 days.  This was actually a <em>doubling</em> of Biden's original stated goal, but he'll still hit the increased target he set for himself.  It seems probable, at this point, that Biden's first year in office will largely be judged on the overall success America ultimately sees in the fight against the deadly disease.  And up until this point, Biden's been doing a pretty stellar job.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2021/04/19/vaccine-appointments-thrown-open-today/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>47</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Biden&#039;s Infrastructure Week Is No Joke</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2021/03/31/bidens-infrastructure-week-is-no-joke/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2021/03/31/bidens-infrastructure-week-is-no-joke/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Mar 2021 23:32:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2016 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Other]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Vice President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=20242</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>During the presidency of Donald Trump, the term "infrastructure week" became a running joke.  Team Trump would tee up some big infrastructure event or announcement (in the hopes of driving the media narrative), but then the team captain would just self-destruct in front of everyone, derailing any hope of actually achieving anything meaningful.  The first time this happened -- although few now remember it as the first infrastructure week fiasco -- was at a press announcement event with Trump's secretary of Transportation, Elaine Chao.  There were a few dog-and-pony props set up, and Chao made her announcement, which mostly dealt with cutting what Republicans consider onerous rules and regulations, in order to move things like highway projects forward faster with less red tape.  After her presentation was over, though, Trump took the podium and was soon asked by a journalist about the other big story of the day: the violent and deadly clash in Charlottesville, Virginia, between white supremacists and people opposed to white supremacy.  Few may remember the context, but everyone remembers what happened next -- Trump's: "very fine people on both sides" rant.  That was the first infrastructure week under Trump.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2021/03/31/bidens-infrastructure-week-is-no-joke/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>America Is Ready To Explode</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2021/03/18/america-is-ready-to-explode/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2021/03/18/america-is-ready-to-explode/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2021 22:13:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Other]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=20193</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>America is on the verge of an explosion.  I can feel its rumblings already.  My guess is it's already started happening in a small way, and in the next two or three months it is going to spread like wildfire.  OK, I'll stop with the flaming metaphors and just explain what I'm talking about instead, how's that?</p>
<p>Here's the best way to put it: "What are <em>you</em> going to do when it's over?"</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2021/03/18/america-is-ready-to-explode/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>16</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Waiting For Trump To Go</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2020/12/17/waiting-for-trump-to-go/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2020/12/17/waiting-for-trump-to-go/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2020 00:49:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2020 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Other]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=19758</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>What will the political landscape look like after Donald Trump leaves office?  That question is on a lot of people's mind right now, for obvious reasons.  Everyone who voted for Joe Biden wants the entire country to move on and move forward, obviously.  But even a lot of Republicans truly hope that the post-Trump world arrives sooner rather than later.  What's standing in the way, however, is Trump himself, who shows no signs of fading into the background any time soon.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2020/12/17/waiting-for-trump-to-go/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Michigan State Board Of Canvassers Does The Right Thing</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2020/11/23/the-michigan-state-board-of-canvassers-does-the-right-thing/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2020/11/23/the-michigan-state-board-of-canvassers-does-the-right-thing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2020 00:22:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2020 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Other]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=19636</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>I spent some time today watching the end of the Michigan State Board of Canvassers meeting on television.  Now, I'm a pretty wonky guy when it comes to politics, but even I never thought I would ever spend any of my time watching a state elections board perform their rather mundane duties.  Over the years, I've watched more congressional hearings than I can count, but not since the year 2000 has anyone paid such close attention to the nuts-and-bolts inner workings of how votes are counted and certified in this country.  And I certainly wasn't the only one watching -- the streaming on YouTube reportedly had over 30,000 viewers.  For the Michigan State Board of Canvassers.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2020/11/23/the-michigan-state-board-of-canvassers-does-the-right-thing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ken Is The Only Possible Choice</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2020/11/19/ken-is-the-only-possible-choice/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2020/11/19/ken-is-the-only-possible-choice/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2020 00:01:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Humor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Name-dropping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Other]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=19615</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>I have to apologize in advance, because today's column has nothing whatsoever to do with politics.  Regular readers know that on <em>exceedingly</em> rare occasions, I feel the need to comment about something completely separate from the political world.  Sometimes I'll toss in my two cents on the subject of sports, or grammar, or anything else I feel so strongly about that I am compelled to share my thoughts.  But I certainly never thought I'd ever devote an entire column to a television game show.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2020/11/19/ken-is-the-only-possible-choice/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>32</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Good Riddance To The Washington NFL Team&#039;s Offensive Name</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2020/07/15/good-riddance-to-the-washington-nfl-teams-offensive-name/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2020/07/15/good-riddance-to-the-washington-nfl-teams-offensive-name/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2020 22:55:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Other]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=18907</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Today I am going to spike a football in the end zone.  That's as appropriate as a sports metaphor gets, really, because I am celebrating the fact that the Washington Ethnic Slurs football team has finally decided to retire their official team name.  They seem to be in some sort of discussions (variously reported as being with Native American groups, the military, or possibly someone who already owns the trademark and/or copyright) about what the new team name will be, but as of Monday they will never be called the "Washington Redskins" ever again.  And that is indeed a reason for an end-zone celebration.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2020/07/15/good-riddance-to-the-washington-nfl-teams-offensive-name/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>49</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Our Reality-Television President</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2020/05/06/our-reality-television-president/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2020/05/06/our-reality-television-president/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2020 23:35:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2020 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Other]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=18520</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>In the latest whiplash-inducing reversal of a monumentally stupid idea from the president, Donald Trump has now announced that he's changed his mind and the White House coronavirus task force will <em>not</em> actually be disbanded.  One day earlier, he had floated the idea of just sending them all back to where they came from and instead convening a "let's get the country open no matter how many people it kills" task force in its place.  But then Trump saw the public's reaction, and he hastily reversed course.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2020/05/06/our-reality-television-president/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>66</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points -- Something Misbegotten In The State Of Denmark</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/08/23/ftp539/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/08/23/ftp539/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Aug 2019 01:20:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2020 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign Ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Talking Points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gun Control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Israel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Other]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Russia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=17307</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The great fear of those who did not support Donald Trump's election in 2016 was that if America hit a crisis point -- a virtual certainty, over a span of four years -- Trump would prove to be dangerously unstable and not know how to deal with it.  The consequences could be alarming, as Ted Cruz <a href="https://www.huffpost.com/entry/ted-cruz-donald-trump-denmark-video_n_5d5e769fe4b02cc97c89351d">joked about</a> on the campaign trail at the time:</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/08/23/ftp539/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>71</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>[From The Archives] Craig Ferguson&#039;s Excellent Rant -- &quot;If You Don&#039;t Vote, You&#039;re A Moron.&quot;</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2018/11/06/from-the-archives-craig-fergusons-excellent-rant-if-you-dont-vote-youre-a-moron/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2018/11/06/from-the-archives-craig-fergusons-excellent-rant-if-you-dont-vote-youre-a-moron/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2018 22:04:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2018 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guest Authors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Name-dropping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Other]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=16083</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>So rather than sit down today and write out a "Get out there and VOTE!" column, I thought I'd re-run a column I wrote ten years ago.  This was the first time I ever saw Ferguson, and when I did my jaw hit the floor.  People (at least, back then) just <em>didn't say stuff like this on television</em>, no matter how late the hour.  I was so enthralled by Craig's rant that I sat down and transcribed it the next day.  It remains the best "get out and vote" rant I've ever seen, so while the political references are dated (this was during the McCain/Obama race), the sentiments are not.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2018/11/06/from-the-archives-craig-fergusons-excellent-rant-if-you-dont-vote-youre-a-moron/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>58</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Good Riddance, Chief Wahoo</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2018/10/09/good-riddance-chief-wahoo/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2018/10/09/good-riddance-chief-wahoo/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2018 23:30:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Other]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=15986</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The Cleveland Indians' season is over.  While this was a cause for sadness among their fans, there is also a good reason for everyone else to rejoice at the close of Cleveland's 2018 season.  Because the 71-year tenure of the maniacally grinning and blatantly racist Cleveland mascot "Chief Wahoo" is also now <a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/sports/2018/10/09/cleveland-indians-season-is-over-so-is-chief-wahoos-year-run/?noredirect=on">at an end</a>.  Sort of.  The Indians, starting next season, will not display this offensive logo any more on their uniforms -- however, they will still (sadly) continue to sell Chief Wahoo merchandise to their fans.  A step forward, in other words, but not the true end of the road for what unquestionably has to be the most racist and offensive logo in modern professional sports.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2018/10/09/good-riddance-chief-wahoo/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>15</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>An Avenatti Run Would Help Democrats</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2018/08/14/an-avenatti-run-would-help-democrats/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2018/08/14/an-avenatti-run-would-help-democrats/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Aug 2018 23:38:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2018 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2020 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Name-dropping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Other]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=15787</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The best commentary on the Omarosa-versus-Trump saga I've yet heard came from Republican pundit Ana Navarro.  Forgive me for paraphrasing (I'm doing this from memory), but last Sunday she pointed out: "Omarosa is entirely the creation of Donald Trump.  Trump <em>deserves</em> Omarosa."  That pretty much sums it up.  A reality-show president is being attacked by a former (three-time!) contestant on his reality show, with all the drama and faux outrage of a scripted encounter on that reality show.  The question for most viewers isn't (as the media anguishes over): "Which one do you believe?" but rather: "Whose presentation is <em>more entertaining</em>?"  As Navarro pointed out, Trump does indeed deserve Omarosa.  Especially seeing as he was the one that hired her -- for the fourth time -- to be an aide in his White House.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2018/08/14/an-avenatti-run-would-help-democrats/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>125</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Three Californias?  Don&#039;t Hold Your Breath...</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2018/06/13/three-californias-dont-hold-your-breath/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2018/06/13/three-californias-dont-hold-your-breath/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jun 2018 00:25:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2018 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Other]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=15576</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Primary election season for the 2018 midterms continues apace.  Last night, voters in Maine reaffirmed their commitment to their new "ranked-choice" voting system.  Two Democrats in Wisconsin proved why Governor Scott Walker was so right to be scared of holding special elections, as two more state-level legislative seat flipped from Republican to Democratic (which makes 44, and counting...).  A brothel owner in Nevada won his primary.  In Virginia, a man who defended the white supremacists in Charlottesville won the GOP nomination and will take on Senator Tim Kaine.  So there's plenty of election news to talk about today.  But instead of addressing any of these, I simply have to chime in on the fact that in my home state of California a ballot measure has now qualified for the November ballot which will allow voters to decide whether to support the idea of splitting California into three states or not.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2018/06/13/three-californias-dont-hold-your-breath/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>105</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Blame Canada!</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2018/06/11/blame-canada/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2018/06/11/blame-canada/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jun 2018 23:29:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign Ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iran]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mexico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Other]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=15568</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Donald Trump has apparently decided to take the advice of that impressive fount of political wisdom, <em>South Park</em>.  It's hard to come to any other conclusion, really, when you recall that one of the songs from their first big movie (a song nominated for an Academy Award, no less) was titled: "Blame Canada."  President Trump was obviously inspired by the lyrics: "With all their beady little eyes / And flapping heads so full of lies," when he began his tweetstorm against Justin Trudeau after Trump left the G-7 meeting early.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2018/06/11/blame-canada/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>99</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bye-Bye, Roseanne</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2018/05/29/bye-bye-roseanne/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2018/05/29/bye-bye-roseanne/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2018 00:04:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Free Speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Humor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Other]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=15519</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The best quip I've heard about the explosive television news today <a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/entertainment/tv/abc-wanted-a-contrarian-on-mainstream-tv-roseanne-was-never-right-for-the-job/2018/05/29/7c5d3e18-636e-11e8-a69c-b944de66d9e7_story.html?noredirect=on">has got to be</a>: "This was the problem all along: Having <em>Roseanne</em> back meant having Roseanne back."  In other words, the show was great and funny and all of that, but Roseanne Barr (the actress, not the Roseanne Conner character) had, in the years that intervened between the original run's cancellation and the reboot, completely gone off the rails.  She was not just a Trump voter, to put this another way, she was out-Trumping Trump in her support of crazy conspiracy theories.  And, yes, some of those crazy conspiracy theories were also pretty racist or (at the start, she later became staunchly pro-Israel) blatantly anti-Semitic.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2018/05/29/bye-bye-roseanne/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Roseanne Continues Long Tradition</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2018/04/05/roseanne-continues-long-tradition/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2018/04/05/roseanne-continues-long-tradition/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Apr 2018 00:46:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2016 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Humor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Other]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=15323</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>This is going to be a rather strange column for me to write, because it centers on a few subjects that I don't normally write about.  In fact, I usually studiously <em>avoid</em> writing about these subjects.  But with all the hoo-hah over the reboot of the television sitcom <em>Roseanne</em>, I felt it was time to chime in on popular television culture and my own television viewing preferences.  Again, two subjects that I normally strive to avoid, mostly because this just isn't that kind of blog.  So if these subjects bore you to death, I'd just stop reading right now.  Fair warning.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2018/04/05/roseanne-continues-long-tradition/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>22</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Media Giving Trump A Pass On Lack Of Press Conferences</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2018/01/10/media-giving-trump-a-pass-on-lack-of-press-conferences/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2018/01/10/media-giving-trump-a-pass-on-lack-of-press-conferences/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jan 2018 01:02:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Immigration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Other]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=14973</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Why is the White House press corps giving such a giant pass to Donald Trump for his lack of solo press conferences?  We are days away from marking his first year in office and in all of that time, Trump has only held <em>one</em> formal solo press conference -- a whopping 328 days ago, on February 16.  And yet there is nary a peep from the press corps about this remarkable lack.  Previously, when presidents have stiff-armed the press for months on end, news organizations begin running countdown clocks (technically, they're actually count-<em>up</em> clocks) showing how many days and months it has been since the last presidential presser.  Haven't seen anything like that this time, though.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2018/01/10/media-giving-trump-a-pass-on-lack-of-press-conferences/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>40</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>President Oprah?</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2018/01/08/president-oprah/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2018/01/08/president-oprah/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jan 2018 01:43:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2020 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Name-dropping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Other]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=14964</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>We're officially through the looking glass, folks.  I woke up this morning to find not one or two, but <em>four</em> articles on the <em>Washington Post</em> website speculating about the possibility of Oprah Winfrey running for president.  Apparently she gave a zinger of a speech last night while accepting a lifetime Golden Globe award, which sparked all the buzz.  So I am forced to consider the idea myself: President Oprah?</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2018/01/08/president-oprah/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>69</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why No Hurricane Maria National Telethon?</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2017/10/04/why-no-hurricane-maria-national-telethon/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2017/10/04/why-no-hurricane-maria-national-telethon/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Oct 2017 23:30:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Other]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=14562</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Donald Trump is rightfully getting slammed over his lackadaisical response to Hurricane Maria in Puerto Rico.  The relief efforts were slow to start and are still pretty disappointing -- the Navy hospital ship just arrived in Puerto Rico yesterday, for instance, a full <em>two weeks</em> after the storm hit.  Most of the island still has no electrical power or phone service.  Drinking water is not universally available.  The critics of Trump are right in pointing all of this out.  But there's another glaring absence that also should be raising questions: where is the response from Hollywood?  Where is the nationally-televised relief telethon?  Why did this happen for Hurricanes Harvey and Irma, but has not happened for Hurricane Maria?  Puerto Ricans are justified in calling attention to their second-class citizenship (as far as Donald Trump is concerned), but it's inexplicable why they are being also snubbed by the liberal artists who normally leap at an opportunity to be seen as doing good.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2017/10/04/why-no-hurricane-maria-national-telethon/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Netroots: Energized And Looking Forward</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2017/08/11/netroots-energized-and-looking-forward/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2017/08/11/netroots-energized-and-looking-forward/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Aug 2017 21:26:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2018 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Name-dropping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Other]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=14319</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The most heartening thing I've seen so far is how unified the atmosphere is.  I've been to Netroots in years following big election losses before, and some of these had a pervasive atmosphere of disappointment, if not outright depression.  This is not the case this year at all, I'm happy to report, even though 2016 was the most dismal election loss Democrats have suffered in a long time.  Instead of downcast attitudes, people have responded by energetically rededicating themselves to ushering in political change, and the overall feeling is actually one of optimism.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2017/08/11/netroots-energized-and-looking-forward/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>293</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Off With Her Head!</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2017/05/31/off-with-her-head/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2017/05/31/off-with-her-head/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jun 2017 00:17:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cartoons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Free Speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Humor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Other]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Bill of Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=14006</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>So, comedienne Kathy Griffin's head appears to be on the chopping block.  That's a metaphor, of course, and as of now it is even inaccurate, since CNN has <em>already</em> parted ways with Griffin (she co-hosted their New Year's Eve show with Anderson Cooper, one of the most bizarre television matchups since Al Franken and Arianna Huffington appeared "in bed" together, doing their version of election coverage in 1996).  Since CNN's announcement, the proper metaphor becomes: "Kathy Griffin axed by CNN."  Or, perhaps: "her head has already rolled."  These aren't really political metaphors, they're instead business-related.  Speaking of getting "axed" rather than getting fired is merely poetic hyperbole, and who among us hasn't ever used the "heads are going to roll" or "on the chopping block" line ourselves?  Does this kind of conflation cross a moral or ethical line?  Or is it merely what used to be called "gallows humor" -- attempting to make light of the worst of situations?</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2017/05/31/off-with-her-head/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>78</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>In Praise Of Court Jesters</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2017/05/11/in-praise-of-court-jesters/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2017/05/11/in-praise-of-court-jesters/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 May 2017 01:01:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Contests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Free Speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Humor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Other]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=13917</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>There must be something to the myths, though, even if only in a Jungian-archetypical kind of way.  Because they certainly still remain with us.  In today's world, of course, they are not dressed in motley (well, some less so than others...); and instead of a perch near the throne, they crack wise on television shows to an audience of millions.  They are our late-night comedians.  Two of them were in the news earlier this week, but before I get to Monday night's performances by Jimmy Kimmel and Seth Meyers, I'd like to confess my own evolution in favor of our modern court jesters.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2017/05/11/in-praise-of-court-jesters/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>85</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Beyond Sessions, Trump&#039;s Russian Scandal Is Here To Stay</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2017/03/02/beyond-sessions-trumps-russian-scandal-is-here-to-stay/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2017/03/02/beyond-sessions-trumps-russian-scandal-is-here-to-stay/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Mar 2017 00:21:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2016 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Other]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Russia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Vice President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=13621</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>As is frequently said in Washington, it's not the crime but the coverup that gets you.  It's looking like that theory is going to be tested sooner than anyone might have expected, in the Donald Trump administration.  No matter what happens now, they may have already done permanent damage to themselves in the eyes of the American public.  The underlying theme of Trump being no more than a stooge for Russia's Vladimir Putin seems to be growing by the day, at this point.  Which means that everything they do to fight this image is going to have the flavor of "Methinks they doth protest too much" about it.  At this point, they can't avoid it.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2017/03/02/beyond-sessions-trumps-russian-scandal-is-here-to-stay/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>69</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Thank You, Seth Meyers</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/12/20/thank-you-seth-meyers/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/12/20/thank-you-seth-meyers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2016 00:22:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Talking Points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Name-dropping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Other]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Videos]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=13291</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>I have to say, I don't write about television all that often, and when I do it is normally to rip into a network or a host or some other form of complaint.  As I did regularly, until NBC wised up and replaced David Gregory with Chuck Todd on <em>Meet The Press</em> (just to give one obvious example).  But today, I write in praise of a late-night host.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/12/20/thank-you-seth-meyers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>48</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tune In Next Week!</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/12/13/tune-in-next-week/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/12/13/tune-in-next-week/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2016 00:48:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Campaign Ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Other]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Russia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=13262</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>I wrote a few weeks ago about <a href="http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/11/23/mitt-romneys-dilemma/">the dilemma</a> Mitt Romney would face if Donald Trump offered him the secretary of State position.  That dilemma did not actually happen, and it now seems like Trump was just yanking Mitt's chain for the fun of it.  How presidential!  One of Trump's close advisors just admitted as much, saying Trump really just wanted Romney to publicly apologize for all the mean and nasty things he said about Trump during the election.  Romney reportedly refused to do so, which was probably smart because it seems to have been the whole point of the exercise.  Trump probably wasn't ever going to appoint Romney anyway, but wanted to see how low Mitt would grovel if he thought he could get the job.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/12/13/tune-in-next-week/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New Corporate Politics?</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/06/23/new-corporate-politics/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/06/23/new-corporate-politics/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2015 00:04:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Free Speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Other]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=10861</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Large corporations are getting more involved in politics.  Whether that is seen as a good thing or a bad thing depends upon the political issue involved and the side the corporation takes (and, of course, the side you're personally on).  Conservatives cheer when corporations take a stand on abortion, liberals cheer when a corporation stands up for gay or civil rights.  But it does seem like we're entering into a new era of corporate political behavior, or (since they're apparently people now) perhaps "corporate citizenship" might be a better term.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/06/23/new-corporate-politics/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>18</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>I Miss Craig Ferguson</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/05/21/i-miss-craig-ferguson/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/05/21/i-miss-craig-ferguson/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2015 00:27:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Humor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Other]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=10728</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>You know, today was one of those days when I was typing merrily along, writing a column, and then halfway through it had to research a few things -- and found that my entire premise had crumbled beneath me.  Also, I found a few existing columns in other media outlets which said pretty much exactly what I was trying to say.  So, suddenly, I didn't give a rat's ass about finishing the article.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/05/21/i-miss-craig-ferguson/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>If You Care About Government Surveillance, Watch 1971 Tonight On PBS</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/05/18/if-you-care-about-government-surveillance-watch-1971-tonight-on-pbs/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/05/18/if-you-care-about-government-surveillance-watch-1971-tonight-on-pbs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2015 21:49:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Other]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Bill of Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=10711</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Everyone who cares at all (one way or the other) about government surveillance should watch the documentary <em>1971</em> tonight, on the PBS show <em>Independent Lens</em>.  Everyone who has an opinion on the Edward Snowden revelations should watch this film.  Everyone who has an opinion on the USA PATRIOT Act should tune in.  Disturbed by the National Security Agency's actions?  Check your local listings for when <em>Independent Lens</em> airs.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/05/18/if-you-care-about-government-surveillance-watch-1971-tonight-on-pbs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [311] -- First Marijuana TV Ad Created</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/07/11/ftp312/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/07/11/ftp312/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jul 2014 01:10:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2014 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign Ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Talking Points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Humor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Name-dropping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Other]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Videos]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=9348</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Plenty of stuff happened in the past two weeks in the political world, but we'll get to all of that in a minute, because first we'd like to highlight (pun intended, of course) what is being billed as "the first marijuana television commercial."  It's not on the air yet, but Canadian company <a href="http://www.cropkingseeds.com/">Crop King Seeds</a> has released this first look at their ad (they do admit that they'll likely have to edit out one bit of profanity before the ad airs).  Without further ado, here is their ad (used with full permission, as they would really like the ad to go viral):</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/07/11/ftp312/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>18</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Continuing Awfulness Of GOP&#039;s Effort To Reach Out To Women</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/05/22/the-continuing-awfulness-of-gops-effort-to-reach-out-to-women/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/05/22/the-continuing-awfulness-of-gops-effort-to-reach-out-to-women/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2014 22:53:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2014 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Other]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=9129</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>As has been noted, at times art imitates life and at other times life imitates art.  This is one of those latter times, when what was purported to be a "Women and Colorado's Future" debate among Republican gubernatorial candidates seemed like nothing more than a <em>Saturday Night Live</em> sketch ridiculing the awfulness of the Republicans' continuing failure to reach out to women voters in any meaningful way.  And that is actually the <em>most polite</em> thing I can bring myself to say about it: it seemed like satire, but (sadly) it wasn't.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/05/22/the-continuing-awfulness-of-gops-effort-to-reach-out-to-women/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>30</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>I Don&#039;t Care Who Is On Before Craig Ferguson</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/04/10/i-dont-care-who-is-on-before-craig-ferguson/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/04/10/i-dont-care-who-is-on-before-craig-ferguson/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2014 00:00:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Humor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Other]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=8924</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>To borrow (or, more accurately, "to blatantly steal") a phrase: "It's a great day for America!"</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/04/10/i-dont-care-who-is-on-before-craig-ferguson/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Medical Marijuana On Bones</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/04/08/medical-marijuana-on-bones/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/04/08/medical-marijuana-on-bones/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2014 23:10:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Other]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Vice President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=8912</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>I say all this as a preface to commenting on a television program I watched (well, most of it) last night.  Needless to say, commenting on pop culture isn't my strong point, and is in fact a rare occurrence in these pages.  But I was so struck by what I saw that I felt it merited mentioning.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/04/08/medical-marijuana-on-bones/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [295] -- Happy Pi Day!</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/03/14/ftp295/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/03/14/ftp295/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Mar 2014 00:45:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2014 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign Ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Free Speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Talking Points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Humor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Other]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Russia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=8778</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Today is 3/14, therefore a happy Pi Day to all!  Next year will be even more fun, though, since it'll be 3/14/15....</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/03/14/ftp295/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>40</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [289] -- Avoiding Immigration Traps</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/01/31/ftp289/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/01/31/ftp289/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Feb 2014 01:21:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2014 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Talking Points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Other]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=8576</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Republicans in the House have announced they are now ready to do something on immigration.  I only mention this in passing here, because the entire talking points section is going to be devoted to a warning for Democrats: there will be traps laid by the Republicans, so Democrats have to be vigilant about defusing each one as it pops up.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/01/31/ftp289/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>47</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Polyamorists&#039; Legal Victory</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2013/12/17/polyamorists-legal-victory/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2013/12/17/polyamorists-legal-victory/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Dec 2013 00:47:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Other]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=8373</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>A federal judge just made news by ruling that the state of Utah overstepped its constitutional bounds in their definition of bigamy, ruling in favor of a polygamist who had previously left the state for fear of being prosecuted.  This is the first step along a path I predicted six years ago, and is a big victory for polygamists' rights.  Or for "polyamory," which has been adopted as a more-neutral term for those who "love many."  It is not quite the victory that some of the news headlines would have had America believe ("bigamy," or being legally married to more than one person, is still a crime in Utah, even after the ruling), but it certainly is a first step along the path of securing legal equality.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2013/12/17/polyamorists-legal-victory/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>57</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Long Road To Societal Change</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2013/06/24/the-long-road-to-societal-change/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2013/06/24/the-long-road-to-societal-change/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Jun 2013 23:46:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Other]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=7555</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>This is an article about Paula Deen, racism, and the upcoming gay marriage decisions from the Supreme Court.  But mostly it's an article about the long, slow road to true changes in American society.  The beginning of this road always starts with the prevailing casual acceptance of bigotry and prejudice in everyday life, and the road doesn't end until society as a whole reaches the point of near-universal condemnation of a way of thinking which used to be widespread and unremarkable.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2013/06/24/the-long-road-to-societal-change/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>61</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hail To The Pigskins?</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2013/06/13/hail-to-the-pigskins/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2013/06/13/hail-to-the-pigskins/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Jun 2013 00:10:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Other]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=7501</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Frank Luntz, celebrated spinmeister, has <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/12/frank_luntz_hired_by_washington_football_team_to_convince_people_name_isnt_horribly_racist/">taken on a new task</a>, it seems.  He'll be in charge of figuring out a way to convince the public that a blatantly racist major sports team's name is really nothing to get upset about.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2013/06/13/hail-to-the-pigskins/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dare Not Speak Its Name</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2013/01/09/dare-not-speak-its-name/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2013/01/09/dare-not-speak-its-name/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2013 01:28:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Other]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=6803</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Last night, on a primetime television show, a character had an abortion.  Does this shock you?  It might, if only for the fact that such a plotline is so incredibly rare on American television.  In less than two weeks, the Supreme Court decision in the landmark <em>Roe v. Wade</em> case will be forty years old.  Four decades later, the debate over abortion still rages.  But it is a debate which is largely silent on the small screen.  Even last night, abortion did not really dare to speak its name.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2013/01/09/dare-not-speak-its-name/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [204] -- The Herd Mentality</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/03/30/ftp204/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/03/30/ftp204/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Mar 2012 00:11:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign Ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Talking Points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Name-dropping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Other]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=5411</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>This week, the punditocracy had no Republican primary contest to distract their attention ("The upcoming primary/caucus in some state I've never traveled through because it's a flyover state could be the <em>crucial turning point</em> in the <em>entire race</em>... details at 11:00..."), and so the political pontificators and prognosticators had nothing else to talk about (one would think) except the serious business before the Supreme Court this week -- Obamacare.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/03/30/ftp204/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>24</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Any Channel</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/05/02/any-channel/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/05/02/any-channel/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 May 2011 00:00:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Other]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pakistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=3891</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>"Turn on your television... to any channel."</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/05/02/any-channel/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>23</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Media&#039;s Tea Party</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/07/06/the-medias-tea-party/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/07/06/the-medias-tea-party/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jul 2010 23:58:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Other]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=2354</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The Tea Party movement could possibly be generalized as a group of people who are proud of (and sometimes revel in) being impossible to generalize.  This, of course, doesn't stop the media from trying.  In today's sad state of American journalism, everything's got to have a simplistic narrative that fits within a 15-second soundbite, at the very maximum.  Nuances and subtleties are out.  Strong statements beginning with phrases like: "The Tea Partiers are..." (or "...believe...", or "....as a group...") are what is in.  But even given this reduction in critical thinking, what's amazing is how wrong the media has gotten the Tea Partiers (or, at the least, a goodly portion of them).</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/07/06/the-medias-tea-party/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Heisenberg Effect Of Televising Political Negotiations</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/02/17/the-heisenberg-effect-of-televising-political-negotiations/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/02/17/the-heisenberg-effect-of-televising-political-negotiations/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2010 01:25:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Name-dropping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Other]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=1532</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>I'm going to start off today's column with a chart.  I'm doing this for several reasons, not least of which is the fact that it's a really good chart.  It is simple, easy to read, and involves very little mathematics (meaning it is accessible to a very wide spectrum of the American public).  And it is a very effective way of presenting the facts, free of media spin.  The chart comes from the White House, and shows the monthly number of jobs lost for approximately the past two years.  It also uses color very well, to separate George W. Bush's term in office from Barack Obama's.  Without further introduction, here is the chart:</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/02/17/the-heisenberg-effect-of-televising-political-negotiations/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>17</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Can Obama&#039;s Health Summit Succeed?</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/02/10/can-obamas-health-summit-succeed/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/02/10/can-obamas-health-summit-succeed/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 00:30:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Other]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=1497</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>President Obama has recently announced a health reform summit, to take place across the street from the White House, with the C-SPAN cameras rolling.  He's invited Democratic and Republican leaders from Congress to this summit.  Many cynics have dismissed the effort already, either pronouncing it less than worthless, or calling it some form of political Kabuki theater which will do no good.  I think these pronunciations (especially the latter one) are a bit premature, to say the least.  Because either on a substantive level or a political level, I think there actually is a chance for some limited success for Obama in this exercise.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/02/10/can-obamas-health-summit-succeed/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>17</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The &quot;Let Obama Be Obama&quot; Moment</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/01/21/the-let-obama-be-obama-moment/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/01/21/the-let-obama-be-obama-moment/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 01:30:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Other]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=1354</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>It's about time to start fighting for the little guy and against the fat cats.  It's about time to start <em>fighting</em>, when it comes right down to it.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/01/21/the-let-obama-be-obama-moment/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>There Ought To Be A Law</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/12/14/there-ought-to-be-a-law/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/12/14/there-ought-to-be-a-law/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 01:27:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Other]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2009/12/14/there-ought-to-be-a-law/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>So I throw it open to everyone.  If you could write a bill for Congress to consider, on a mundane or commonsense issue to citizens everywhere, what would you propose?  No idea too small... no idea too silly... just toss it out there for discussion.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/12/14/there-ought-to-be-a-law/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Best Government Dollar Spent -- The National Park System</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/09/28/best-government-dollar-spent-the-national-park-system-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/09/28/best-government-dollar-spent-the-national-park-system-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 22:31:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Other]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2009/09/28/best-government-dollar-spent-the-national-park-system-2/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>[<strong>Note:</strong> <em>This column originally ran August 17, 2009.  I don't usually re-run columns (and never so soon after their original appearance), but after watching the debut of Ken Burn's "The National Parks: America's Best Idea" last night, I had to dig this out.  I strongly encourage everyone to watch the rest of Burns' series, which is running all week long on your local PBS station.  I also strongly urge everyone to visit our National Parks, as well.  This column was written just after a road trip I took this summer, and just after President Obama had visited Yellowstone and the Grand Canyon.</em>]</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/09/28/best-government-dollar-spent-the-national-park-system-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [91] -- Win One For Teddy</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/08/28/friday-talking-points-91-win-one-for-teddy/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/08/28/friday-talking-points-91-win-one-for-teddy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 23:57:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cartoons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Talking Points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Humor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Name-dropping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Other]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2009/08/28/friday-talking-points-91-win-one-for-teddy/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Republicans, masters of <em>chutzpah</em> that they are, have launched a <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/08/28/conservatives-warning-aga_n_271332.html">pre-emptive strike</a> against "politicizing" Senator Edward Kennedy's funeral with unseemly Democratic ideals.  This should be so ridiculous as to endanger Americans' health from side-splitting laughter, but (Democrats being Democrats) it might just work.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/08/28/friday-talking-points-91-win-one-for-teddy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>15</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama&#039;s Second Hundred Days</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/08/07/obamas-second-hundred-days/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/08/07/obamas-second-hundred-days/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2009 16:00:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Campaign Ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FCC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iran]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Name-dropping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Other]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Bill of Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2009/08/07/obamas-second-hundred-days/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>I've always been confused why the media goes berserk about rating a president's "first 100 days," but then just <em>stops counting</em> after the first milestone.  This, to a statistician, would be known as a "zero dimensional data array" -- one data point, to be exact.  If you don't re-test the sample on a regular schedule, how are you supposed to compare it to anything?</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/08/07/obamas-second-hundred-days/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is David Letterman The New Washington Post?</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/07/07/is-david-letterman-the-new-washington-post/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/07/07/is-david-letterman-the-new-washington-post/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 00:07:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Humor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Name-dropping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Other]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2009/07/07/is-david-letterman-the-new-washington-post/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Three decades ago, the newspaper <em>The Washington Post</em> took down a sitting president.  Now, it has been reduced to a shadow of its former self.  Recently offering to sell access to its reporters and administration bigwigs for the low, low price of $25,000 per "salon" certainly didn't help improve the paper's image.  But, little noticed among the mainstream media (but much more so among the <em>zeitgeist</em>), David Letterman has now played a major role not only in determining last year's election, but also in hounding Sarah Palin out of office (at least, according to Palin's close friends).  This, if true, is a notable achievement for a late-night comedian... but nobody seems to be noticing.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/07/07/is-david-letterman-the-new-washington-post/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Star Trek Gets A Few Things Right</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/05/12/star-trek-gets-a-few-things-right/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/05/12/star-trek-gets-a-few-things-right/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 05:45:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Humor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Other]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2009/05/12/star-trek-gets-a-few-things-right/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>My only other suggestion for their next movie would have to be: bring back Yeoman Janice Rand!  Hopefully, that is something on which we all can agree.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/05/12/star-trek-gets-a-few-things-right/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How To Fix The Economy</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2008/09/25/how-to-fix-the-economy/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2008/09/25/how-to-fix-the-economy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2008 22:56:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cartoons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Humor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Name-dropping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Other]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2008/09/25/how-to-fix-the-economy/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Instead, we have the return of our in-house cartoonist!  While it may have appeared to the public that CWCunningham was in an undisclosed location these past few months, he and I were actually colloborating on a video, in an effort to get (you can't make this stuff up) a liberal lobbying firm on K Street interested in our idea.  But, sadly, it came to naught.  But this week's financial meltdown proved to be too hard for him to resist, so we proudly present his take on the situation.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2008/09/25/how-to-fix-the-economy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Craig Ferguson&#039;s Excellent Rant -- &quot;If You Don&#039;t Vote, You&#039;re A Moron.&quot;</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2008/09/11/craig-fergusons-excellent-rant-if-you-dont-vote-youre-a-moron/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2008/09/11/craig-fergusons-excellent-rant-if-you-dont-vote-youre-a-moron/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2008 00:24:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Humor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Name-dropping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Other]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2008/09/11/craig-fergusons-excellent-rant-if-you-dont-vote-youre-a-moron/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>As a public service, today I am running a full transcript of Craig Ferguson, host of <em>The Late Late Show</em> on CBS, from last night, 8/10/08.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2008/09/11/craig-fergusons-excellent-rant-if-you-dont-vote-youre-a-moron/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama Gets His Bounce</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2008/09/02/obama-gets-his-bounce/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2008/09/02/obama-gets-his-bounce/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 21:26:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Other]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2008/09/02/obama-gets-his-bounce/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>So a record 38 million Americans who watched Obama speak -- more than watched the opening ceremonies to the Olympics this year -- got to form <em>their own opinions</em> about Obama's speech.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2008/09/02/obama-gets-his-bounce/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>In Honor Of George Carlin, Examining Nipplephobia And Buttcrackphobia In America</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2008/06/23/in-honor-of-george-carlin-examining-nipplephobia-and-buttcrackphobia-in-america/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2008/06/23/in-honor-of-george-carlin-examining-nipplephobia-and-buttcrackphobia-in-america/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 01:17:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[FCC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Free Speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Humor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Other]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Bill of Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2008/06/23/in-honor-of-george-carlin-examining-nipplephobia-and-buttcrackphobia-in-america/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Rest In Peace, Mr. Carlin.  You leave behind you a void that will be hard to fill.  Because, unfortunately, silliness is still rampant in America.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2008/06/23/in-honor-of-george-carlin-examining-nipplephobia-and-buttcrackphobia-in-america/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Debate Questions I&#039;d (Still) Like To Ask</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2008/04/16/debate-questions-id-still-like-to-ask/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2008/04/16/debate-questions-id-still-like-to-ask/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 21:02:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Free Speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Other]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Bill of Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2008/04/16/debate-questions-id-still-like-to-ask/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Back in the dim and distant past of this presidential campaign (i.e., February), I wrote a pre-debate column <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/chris-weigant/debate-questions-id-like_b_88389.html">listing questions</a> I would like to hear both Democratic candidates answer.  Today's column is a revision of this original.  Many of the questions I have are the same, for which I apologize.  I don't normally recycle my own material in this fashion, but unfortunately these questions remain largely unanswered, almost two months after the last debate.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2008/04/16/debate-questions-id-still-like-to-ask/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [20] -- Populism 101</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2008/02/22/friday-talking-points-20-populism-101/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2008/02/22/friday-talking-points-20-populism-101/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Feb 2008 01:56:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2006 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FCC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Talking Points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Name-dropping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Other]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2008/02/22/friday-talking-points-20-populism-101/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Both Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama have, of late, been inserting Populist themes into their speeches, in an effort to (depending on who you listen to) win votes in Ohio and Pennsylvania, or <a href="http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2008/02/15/friday-talking-points-19-a-rare-uprising-of-democrats/">court John Edwards' endorsement</a>.  Since this may be the last time I will address talking points to both campaigns, I thought I'd run through a few handy Neo-Populist positions for either Hillary or Barack to insert into their speeches.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2008/02/22/friday-talking-points-20-populism-101/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Undecided Voters Make Their Mark</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2008/01/10/undecided-voters-make-their-mark/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2008/01/10/undecided-voters-make-their-mark/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2008 01:33:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Other]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2008/01/10/undecided-voters-make-their-mark/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>In the wake of the New Hampshire primary opinion polling fiasco, everyone is focusing on various reasons the pollsters "got it wrong."  In the midst of all this media breastbeating, one fact seems to be escaping a lot of people -- it was the undecided voters who carried the day for Hillary Clinton.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2008/01/10/undecided-voters-make-their-mark/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>No Joke: Politics In The Era Of Late Night Reruns</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2007/12/12/no-joke-politics-in-the-era-of-late-night-reruns/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2007/12/12/no-joke-politics-in-the-era-of-late-night-reruns/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2007 23:43:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign Ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Humor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Name-dropping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Other]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2007/12/12/no-joke-politics-in-the-era-of-late-night-reruns/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Leno, Letterman, O'Brien and the rest of the late-night comics and hosts have all gone "dark" ever since the writers' strike began, leaving us with nothing but endless reruns to watch during the wee hours.  If this goes on for the next two months, what effect will this have on politics during the crucial presidential primary season?</p>
<p>I have to admit, I didn't come up with this idea myself.  I heard it as an offhand comment on one of the news shows (PBS' <em>News Hour</em>, I think) -- that if the strike went on, the candidates will all get a "free pass" on any amusing foibles during the campaign because the late night shows were on hiatus.  The person who said this wasn't serious, or at best only half-serious, but it got me to thinking.  What if this <em>does</em> have a major effect on politics?  What effect would it have, and would it be a good thing or a bad thing?</p>
<p>What if (insert crescendo music here for effect -- <em>dom Dom DOM!!</em>) it already <em>has</em> had an effect?</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2007/12/12/no-joke-politics-in-the-era-of-late-night-reruns/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>D&#039;oh!  House GOP Website Pirates Simpsons Images?</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2007/10/24/doh-house-gop-website-pirates-simpsons-images/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2007/10/24/doh-house-gop-website-pirates-simpsons-images/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2007 10:47:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cartoons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Free Speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Humor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Name-dropping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Other]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Bill of Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2007/10/24/doh-house-gop-website-pirates-simpsons-images/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p align="center"><img src='http://www.chrisweigant.com/blog/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2007/10/quimby.jpg' alt='Quimby' />&#160;&#160;&#160;<img src='http://www.chrisweigant.com/blog/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2007/10/mrburns.jpg' alt='CMBurns' />
<br /><strong>[<em>Mayor "Diamond" Joe Quimby and tycoon C. Montgomery Burns</em>]</strong></p>
<p>You may well wonder why I, a (mostly) serious political analyst, begin my weekly Wednesday column with the images of two <em>Simpsons</em> characters.  The answer is: these two images <em>are</em> the story.  More on that in a bit.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2007/10/24/doh-house-gop-website-pirates-simpsons-images/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Memo To Democrats: Talking Points</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2007/09/14/memo-to-democrats-talking-points/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2007/09/14/memo-to-democrats-talking-points/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2007 21:22:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Talking Points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Other]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2007/09/14/memo-to-democrats-talking-points/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>So Petraeus and Crocker have reported, President Bush has spoken to the nation, and the congressional war debate is slated to begin in earnest next week.  Since the Democrats seem to be incapable of staying "on message" the way Republicans effortlessly manage to do, I'd like to steal a page from the Republican playbook.  It's an idea whose time has come: Democratic talking points.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2007/09/14/memo-to-democrats-talking-points/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>36</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Frivolous Summer Column On Science Fiction</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2007/08/13/a-frivolous-summer-column-on-science-fiction/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2007/08/13/a-frivolous-summer-column-on-science-fiction/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Aug 2007 00:18:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Humor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Other]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2007/08/13/a-frivolous-summer-column-on-science-fiction/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Almost without exception, whenever space ships (large or small) are shown in space, the viewer is put at a distance, listening to engines rumble, weapons PING or ZAP or CHOW-CHOW-CHOW, and explosions satisfyingly go BOOM!  This needs to end.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2007/08/13/a-frivolous-summer-column-on-science-fiction/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&quot;Bong Hits 4 Jesus&quot;?  Ras Tafari!  Amen!</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2007/03/23/bong-hits-4-jesus-ras-tafari-amen/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2007/03/23/bong-hits-4-jesus-ras-tafari-amen/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Mar 2007 03:28:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Drugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Other]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2007/03/23/bong-hits-4-jesus-ras-tafari-amen/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Because it's hard to reconcile federal law which states that if you are a certain race (Native American) you are allowed to use an illegal drug (peyote) with your religious ceremony, the practice of many Christian sects which use a legal drug (wine) as a sacrament, and the fact that Rastafarians can be arrested for being caught using their illegal sacrament (ganja). Legally, it doesn't make a whole lot of sense.

But then common sense has never been a strong point of the Drug War.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2007/03/23/bong-hits-4-jesus-ras-tafari-amen/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Revisiting Torture: A First-Person Account</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2007/02/09/revisiting-torture-a-first-person-account/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2007/02/09/revisiting-torture-a-first-person-account/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Feb 2007 02:32:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Other]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2007/02/09/revisiting-torture-a-first-person-account/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The entire article is fascinating and well worth a read to anyone interested in what is being done in the name of the United States of America. Mr. Fair was quite brave to come forward and tell his story, and is the first to do so that I have read. This article deserves more prominence than it will likely get, which is why I draw your attention to it.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2007/02/09/revisiting-torture-a-first-person-account/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Studio 60, Gerald Ford, Cheney&#039;s Melodrama, And Other Odds And Ends</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2006/12/31/studio-60-gerald-ford-cheneys-melodrama-and-other-odds-and-ends/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2006/12/31/studio-60-gerald-ford-cheneys-melodrama-and-other-odds-and-ends/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 2007 00:46:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Name-dropping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Other]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2006/12/31/studio-60-gerald-ford-cheneys-melodrama-and-other-odds-and-ends/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[. . . It looks like the equation "Democrats = blue, Republicans = red" is pretty much set in stone for the foreseeable future. Does anyone else see the irony in the Republicans being the "red" party? Does nobody else remember Joe McCarthy and the "red = communism" equation that predated this?]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2006/12/31/studio-60-gerald-ford-cheneys-melodrama-and-other-odds-and-ends/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>My &quot;McLaughlin Awards&quot; For 2006 (Part 2)</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2006/12/28/my-mclaughlin-awards-for-2006-part-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2006/12/28/my-mclaughlin-awards-for-2006-part-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Dec 2006 00:20:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Humor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Name-dropping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Other]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2006/12/28/my-mclaughlin-awards-for-2006-part-2/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[PREDICTIONS
Speaker Pelosi will do a great job.
Karl Rove will be booted from the White House.
Congress will censure Bush and Cheney and "move on," but will not impeach.

NEW YEAR'S RESOLUTION
To get paid for writing these columns. I love writing them, and now I'm ready for my paycheck!]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2006/12/28/my-mclaughlin-awards-for-2006-part-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>My &quot;McLaughlin Awards&quot; For 2006 (Part 1)</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2006/12/27/my-mclaughlin-awards-for-2006-part-1/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2006/12/27/my-mclaughlin-awards-for-2006-part-1/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Dec 2006 01:55:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Humor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Name-dropping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Other]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2006/12/27/my-mclaughlin-awards-for-2006-part-1/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[WORST LIE
All the different variations of Bush saying: "absolutely, we're winning in Iraq." We're not. Deal with it. The first step on the road to recovery is admitting you've got a problem. And when "the problem" is an absolute refusal to acknowledge reality... and you're the President of the United States... then it becomes a problem for us all.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2006/12/27/my-mclaughlin-awards-for-2006-part-1/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Celebrity Candidate Casting Call</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2006/10/18/celebrity-candidate-casting-call/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2006/10/18/celebrity-candidate-casting-call/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Oct 2006 23:05:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2006 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Humor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Name-dropping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Other]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2006/10/18/celebrity-candidate-casting-call/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Finally, there's my favorite choice for a Democratic candidate: Al Franken. Anyone who has seen Robin Williams' new movie Man of the Year is already considering the question: could a comedian win the Presidency? Well... maybe, maybe not. But Franken has set his sights a little lower, publicly discussing how he's positioning himself for a Senate run from Minnesota in 2008. I truly think he could win, and I would love to see Senator Franken in action. C-SPAN meets Comedy Central!

Because he's good enough, he's smart enough, and doggone it, people like him.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2006/10/18/celebrity-candidate-casting-call/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
