<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>ChrisWeigant.com &#187; News</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.chrisweigant.com/category/television/news/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com</link>
	<description>Reality-based political commentary</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 23:31:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Romney&#039;s &quot;Very Poor&quot; Choice Of Words</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/02/06/romneys-very-poor-choice-of-words/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/02/06/romneys-very-poor-choice-of-words/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 23:31:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign Ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=5159</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Mitt Romney's gaffe last week (reproduced in full, above) is going to wind up the "gaffe that keeps on giving" for Barack Obama and the Democrats in this election cycle.  Because the more Romney's comment is examined and dissected, the worse it looks for him.  This could, in fact, be the defining moment for Mitt Romney as a national political presence.  That phrase is often bandied about in politics, but I use it here in the full literal sense of "defining moment" -- a point in time which absolutely cements an image in the public mind of who you are and what you stand for as a politician.  The image, quite obviously, is not a good one for Romney.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/02/06/romneys-very-poor-choice-of-words/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [196] -- Poor Mitt?</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/02/03/ftp196/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/02/03/ftp196/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 00:10:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign Ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Free Speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Talking Points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Bill of Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Vice President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=5146</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Mitt Romney, frontrunner for the Republican nomination, announced he wasn't too worried about poor people.  Maybe it would be fun to see Romney debate Joe Biden, just because nobody would know what to expect from either of them.  Heh.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/02/03/ftp196/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>28</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>GOP PUMAs?</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/02/02/gop-pumas/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/02/02/gop-pumas/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 01:17:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=5141</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The thought which keeps flitting through my mind is whether the Republicans are going to face their own "PUMA" problem this fall.  For those who don't remember the term from 2008, PUMA stood for "Party Unity, My Ass!" and was the rallying cry of the non-existent hordes of pro-Hillary Democrats who were reportedly going to cause major disruption at the Democratic National Convention, and then throw the election to John McCain in the fall.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/02/02/gop-pumas/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>16</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [195] -- SOTU Review</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/01/27/ftp195/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/01/27/ftp195/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jan 2012 00:27:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign Ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Libya]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=5112</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Well, that was an eventful week in politics, wasn't it?</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/01/27/ftp195/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>33</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [194] -- Out Of Touch</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/01/20/ftp194/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/01/20/ftp194/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jan 2012 00:31:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign Ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Talking Points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=5081</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[OK, to be completely honest, we just felt like beating up on some Republicans today.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/01/20/ftp194/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>48</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Economic Optimism?</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/01/19/economic-optimism/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/01/19/economic-optimism/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 00:19:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=5077</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>It's still early days to even know if the economy is truly about to enter a strong recovery or not.  A few data points on a graph do not always a trend line make, to put it another way.  But from what I have personally seen in previous recessions, there always seems to be a real "tipping point" where American businesses collectively decide that things are going to be better soon -- and then they start hiring people and fulfilling their own prophecy.  This could indeed be such a turning point.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/01/19/economic-optimism/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>43</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Not-Romney Race Killing Not-Romney&#039;s Chances</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/01/18/not-romney-race-killing-not-romneys-chances/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/01/18/not-romney-race-killing-not-romneys-chances/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 00:42:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=5072</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>If either Gingrich or Santorum (or even Perry) had managed to cement their status as the alpha "not-Romney" in the race at this point, they might have had a chance in that fabled "two-man race" (or, more properly, "two-man-plus-Ron-Paul race").  Adding Gingrich and Santorum's support in South Carolina easily shows that Romney could have been defeated here, if the field had narrowed.  Florida would even be in play, likely.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/01/18/not-romney-race-killing-not-romneys-chances/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>23</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [193] -- Run It Up The Flagpole</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/01/13/ftp193/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/01/13/ftp193/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2012 23:50:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign Ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Talking Points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iran]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Libya]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=5055</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Not a whole lot has been happening in Washington, due to Congress being out on one of their countless month-long vacations.  Not a whole lot of Democrats have been in the news, either, since the Republican primary season is sucking all the oxygen out of the political arena right now.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/01/13/ftp193/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>81</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Happy Birthday, Common Sense</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/01/11/happy-birthday-common-sense/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/01/11/happy-birthday-common-sense/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2012 01:09:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Name-dropping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=5046</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Two hundred and thirty-six years ago this week, a pamphlet was published in Philadelphia.  There is some disagreement among historians over the exact date (variously given as January 9th or 10th), and the pamphlet's title page itself only lists the year, 1776.  Whatever the actual date, though, Thomas Paine's <em>Common Sense</em> hit the American consciousness like a bombshell -- one which would reverberate for years to come.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/01/11/happy-birthday-common-sense/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Old-School Editorializing</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/01/10/old-school-editorializing/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/01/10/old-school-editorializing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2012 01:55:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=5042</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>What struck me about New Hampshire's contest, being in the midst of historical research into such things, was the old-school nature of the <em>Union Leader</em>, a very conservative New Hampshire newspaper.  It struck a lot of the media as interesting as well, but I didn't see anyone else commenting on such historical context.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/01/10/old-school-editorializing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [192] -- Obama Picking His Fights</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/01/06/ftp192/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/01/06/ftp192/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2012 22:56:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Talking Points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=5026</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>I have to say, while the Republicans have been having their three-ring primary circus, President Obama has been looking better and better.  Both in comparison to the Republican field (of nightmares, so to speak), and also because Obama's been making progress on his own.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/01/06/ftp192/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>160</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama Poll Watch -- December, 2011</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/01/04/opw1112/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/01/04/opw1112/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2012 23:07:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama Poll Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pakistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=5016</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>President Obama had a pretty good month last month in the job approval polls, bettering his standing in both approval and disapproval by roughly three-fourths of percentage point.  This may not sound like that big a deal, but it was the second straight month of solid gains for the president in both categories.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/01/04/opw1112/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>62</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Romney Inevitable?</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/01/03/romney-inevitable/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/01/03/romney-inevitable/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2012 04:48:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign Ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=5009</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>I thought I'd wait to write today until the Iowa results were in, because I haven't done one of these "snap judgment" sorts of things for a while.  As I begin, roughly 85 percent of the votes have been reported.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/01/03/romney-inevitable/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>18</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Predicting Iowa</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/01/02/predicting-iowa/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/01/02/predicting-iowa/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jan 2012 23:20:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign Ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=5001</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>I realize everyone is probably already sick of hearing predictions about the Iowa Republican caucuses, and if this does indeed describe you then you should probably go watch a football game or something -- because that's exactly what we're going to do today: throw prognosticatory Hawkeye darts at the wall, and take our chances as we may.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/01/02/predicting-iowa/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>My 2011 &quot;McLaughlin Awards&quot; [Part 2]</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/12/23/my-2011-mclaughlin-awards-part-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/12/23/my-2011-mclaughlin-awards-part-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Dec 2011 22:08:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Libya]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Name-dropping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4982</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Her campaign so far has been the populist model for every other Democrat to mimic if they want to catch the wave of anger at Wall Street, and use it to their benefit.  Without question, Elizabeth Warren is Destined For Political Stardom.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/12/23/my-2011-mclaughlin-awards-part-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>43</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama Looking Stronger</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/12/22/obama-looking-stronger/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/12/22/obama-looking-stronger/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Dec 2011 23:58:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4978</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>President Obama is looking a lot stronger these days.  Today, especially, the president emerges as the big winner in the showdown with John Boehner and the House Republicans.  But Obama's been looking better and better all month, so Boehner caving should be seen as just the icing on the cake for Obama.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/12/22/obama-looking-stronger/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>29</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>My 2011 &quot;McLaughlin Awards&quot; [Part 1]</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/12/16/my-2011-mclaughlin-awards-part-1/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/12/16/my-2011-mclaughlin-awards-part-1/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Dec 2011 01:36:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign Ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Free Speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iran]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Libya]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Name-dropping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pakistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4954</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>As always, if you disagree with any (or all) of my picks, feel free to make your own in the comments.  The categories are completely open to interpretation, and don't forget that there will be a "Part 2" column next week, so I can likely squeeze things I forgot in there.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/12/16/my-2011-mclaughlin-awards-part-1/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>33</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Happy Bill Of Rights Day</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/12/15/happy-bill-of-rights-day/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/12/15/happy-bill-of-rights-day/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Dec 2011 01:03:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Free Speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Bill of Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Vice President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4950</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Instead, I'd like to gently point out that the same Founding Fathers that achieved this monumental milestone in government (some of them, at least) were the same ones who tried to eviscerate these same basic protections -- within seven years of the Bill of Rights' ratification.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/12/15/happy-bill-of-rights-day/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Call The Newtsplosion Contest</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/12/12/call-the-newtsplosion-contest/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/12/12/call-the-newtsplosion-contest/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Dec 2011 23:17:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Contests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Humor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4932</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Peggy Noonan, a consummate Washington insider with impeccable conservative credentials, recently came up with a <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970203413304577086824255350642.html?mod=WSJ_latestheadlines">nice turn of phrase</a> to describe Newt Gingrich: "He is a human hand grenade who walks around with his hand on the pin, saying, 'Watch this!' "  Back in Newt's heyday, the comic strip <em>Doonesbury</em> portrayed Gingrich as a lit bomb with a short fuse, who would occasionally explode with a bang.  Right and Left seem to be in agreement on Newt's resemblance to trinitrotoluene, in other words (or, maybe, "Newtroglycerine"?).  Which leaves only one key question to be answered: When, exactly, will this "Newtsplosion" take place?</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/12/12/call-the-newtsplosion-contest/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>57</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [191] -- The White Knight Is Talking Backwards...</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/12/09/ftp191/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/12/09/ftp191/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Dec 2011 00:01:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign Ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Talking Points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Name-dropping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4921</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>You know, it strikes me that this week may be one politics-watchers look back on when proving the thesis: "Anything can happen in politics, and usually does."  I can picture seeing some wise pundit a few years down the road making the historical reference: "Yeah, but remember when Newt Gingrich and Ron Paul were leading the polls in the Iowa caucuses?  Anything can happen... just <em>any</em>thing..."</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/12/09/ftp191/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>58</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Two Ron Paul Winning Scenarios</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/12/07/two-ron-paul-winning-scenarios/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/12/07/two-ron-paul-winning-scenarios/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2011 00:05:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign Ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4911</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Since the 2012 Republican nomination fight has, so far been marked by its "anything could happen" nature, and since Ron Paul is still very much in the race in places like Iowa, let's explore how he could actually win the Republican nomination.  This scenario is unthinkable for many inside-the-Beltway types and mainstream media types alike, but since it is the height of speculation season, a winning Paul scenario is worth considering.  Two of them, in fact.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/12/07/two-ron-paul-winning-scenarios/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama Poll Watch -- November, 2011</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/12/05/opw1111/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/12/05/opw1111/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2011 22:34:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Contests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama Poll Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4892</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>This month Obama poll watchers got some good news, and some bad news.  This was capped off, at the end of the month, by the Washington punditocracy making an incredibly stupid comparison between polling for Barack Obama and Jimmy Carter -- which we will address at the end of the column (complete with a "guess the president" graph quiz, for your amusement).</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/12/05/opw1111/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>25</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Historic Interlude -- Guess The Decade</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/11/22/historic-interlude-guess-the-decade/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/11/22/historic-interlude-guess-the-decade/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Nov 2011 00:33:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4822</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>It's all bunkum, of course.  America has always enjoyed a rousing good political fight, and our media has almost always reflected this (to their profit).  Read the following excerpt, if you have a problem believing this, and see if you can put it in context.  When, in other words, was the following written?</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/11/22/historic-interlude-guess-the-decade/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [189] -- Cut Congress&#039; Pay!</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/11/18/ftp189/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/11/18/ftp189/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Nov 2011 23:40:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Talking Points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4807</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The last time Members of Congress took a cut in pay was on April 1, 1933 -- the midst of a Great Depression.  At a time of similar economic turmoil and record deficits, Congress should not require sacrifices of others without tightening its own belt.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/11/18/ftp189/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>42</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Two Suggestions For Occupy Wall Street</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/11/16/two-suggestions-for-occupy-wall-street/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/11/16/two-suggestions-for-occupy-wall-street/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Nov 2011 00:39:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Free Speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4798</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The big question for the Occupy protests has now become: What next?  With the multiple evictions across the country, the Occupiers have been given an ultimatum of sorts by the powers-that-be: protest and rally all you want, but you can't "occupy" these places any longer by erecting tents and making them your residences.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/11/16/two-suggestions-for-occupy-wall-street/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>64</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>From The Archives: Occupy Crossroads</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/11/15/from-the-archives-occupy-crossroads/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/11/15/from-the-archives-occupy-crossroads/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Nov 2011 01:26:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Free Speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4794</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The "Occupy Wall Street" movement seems to be at a crossroads.  The path it chooses to take next may be the deciding moment for whether it declines into irrelevance or grows beyond its current boundaries into something larger.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/11/15/from-the-archives-occupy-crossroads/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>24</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cain&#039;s Ridiculous Lefty Conspiracy Theory</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/11/10/cains-ridiculous-lefty-conspiracy-theory/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/11/10/cains-ridiculous-lefty-conspiracy-theory/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Nov 2011 01:30:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4780</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Herman Cain is, if he can be believed, convinced that a conspiracy from the Left is responsible for the accusations of sexual harassment against him.  This is, not to put too fine a point on it, ridiculous.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/11/10/cains-ridiculous-lefty-conspiracy-theory/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>48</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Guest Column: Occupy Wall Street is Not the Tea Party of the Left</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/11/09/guest-column-occupy-wall-street-is-not-the-tea-party-of-the-left/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/11/09/guest-column-occupy-wall-street-is-not-the-tea-party-of-the-left/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Nov 2011 21:35:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Free Speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guest Authors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Bill of Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4776</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Every so often, I am so impressed by a comment to one of my columns that I offer to just turn my column over to the author, and let them have my soapbox.  This doesn't happen often, usually around once per year.
I've written a few columns so far about the Occupy Wall Street protest, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/11/09/guest-column-occupy-wall-street-is-not-the-tea-party-of-the-left/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>82</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>America&#039;s First Political Sex Scandal: The Reynolds/Hamilton Affair</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/11/07/americas-first-political-sex-scandal-the-reynoldshamilton-affair/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/11/07/americas-first-political-sex-scandal-the-reynoldshamilton-affair/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Nov 2011 23:33:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Name-dropping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4768</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>While the subject of which American politician's sex scandal came first is a debatable one (such as: did Benjamin Franklin's dalliances in Paris count?), most agree that the sex-and-blackmail scandal of Alexander Hamilton was the first with any impact, from George Washington's time onwards.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/11/07/americas-first-political-sex-scandal-the-reynoldshamilton-affair/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [188] -- Why Not Occupy The Media?</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/11/04/ftp188/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/11/04/ftp188/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Nov 2011 23:50:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Free Speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Talking Points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4759</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Like many Americans, I watched the events unfold in Oakland this week with some trepidation.  Occupy Oakland tried two new tactics in protesting, and both were very successful at achieving a key goal -- that of getting your message across.  Both the general strike and the temporary port shutdown were successful, in this regard.  Later in the night, however, a group of jerks came close to ruining all this, by their criminal behavior.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/11/04/ftp188/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>138</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Championing Rapists&#039; Fatherhood Rights</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/11/02/championing-rapists-fatherhood-rights/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/11/02/championing-rapists-fatherhood-rights/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Nov 2011 22:33:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4745</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>This was, to put it mildly, completely unacceptable to a large swath of the Republican base.  Cain hastily backtracked, and is now as "pro-life" as he can humanly be, stating that abortion should be illegal in every single case -- no matter what the extenuating circumstances.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/11/02/championing-rapists-fatherhood-rights/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>24</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [187] -- GOP&#039;s 22-Week Work Year</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/10/28/ftp187/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/10/28/ftp187/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2011 23:13:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Talking Points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guest Authors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Name-dropping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4724</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>We'd like to begin today with an issue that we regularly get incensed about here, mostly because it flies under the radar of just about everyone -- including the entire media universe.  Because for once, Democrats are making the attempt to use the issue to make some political hay (even though, in this regard, they're admittedly almost as bad as the Republicans).</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/10/28/ftp187/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>32</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Occupy Crossroads</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/10/27/occupy-crossroads/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/10/27/occupy-crossroads/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2011 22:18:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Free Speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Libya]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4720</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The "Occupy Wall Street" movement seems to be at a crossroads.  The path it chooses to take next may be the deciding moment for whether it declines into irrelevance or grows beyond its current boundaries into something larger.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/10/27/occupy-crossroads/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>35</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Republicans Disrespect Iraqi Democracy</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/10/24/republicans-disrespect-iraqi-democracy/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/10/24/republicans-disrespect-iraqi-democracy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Oct 2011 00:28:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iran]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4709</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>While predictable, this reaction is absolutely ridiculous.  Every single talking point the Republicans came up with on the subject shows their almost complete lack of understanding of the basic concepts of democracy -- both here at home, and abroad.  Which is why these points need refuting, one by one.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/10/24/republicans-disrespect-iraqi-democracy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>17</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [186] -- Foreign Policy Issues Reappear</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/10/21/ftp186/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/10/21/ftp186/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Oct 2011 22:46:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign Ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Talking Points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Libya]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4698</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>It has been a big week on the foreign policy front, with the death of Libya's dictator and President Obama's announcement today that all U.S. troops would be out of Iraq by the end of this year (leaving roughly 150 to guard the embassy).  But before we get to all of that, I've got some domestic advice for the president's re-election team.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/10/21/ftp186/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>16</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Republicans Attack Cain&#039;s 9-9-9 Plan</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/10/19/republicans-attack-cains-9-9-9-plan/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/10/19/republicans-attack-cains-9-9-9-plan/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Oct 2011 00:10:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign Ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4688</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Last night, at yet another Republican presidential candidate debate, Herman Cain was roundly criticized for his simplistic 9-9-9 tax plan by his fellow Republicans.  I have to admit, it was a little bizarre (in a "Nixon goes to China" sort of way) to see Republicans disparaging a tax plan for being "regressive."  Ron Paul was unafraid to actually use this word, and while several other candidates avoided the term they in essence leveled the same charge: 9-9-9 would wind up <em>increasing</em> taxes on the poor and the middle class.  Being Republicans, though, they didn't also speak of the other side of this coin -- the fact that 9-9-9 would lower taxes on the wealthy and <em>really</em> lower them on the ultra-wealthy.  But still, it was odd enough to see candidate after candidate speak of their concern for the tax burden of the lower-class and middle-class, since this is usually a Democratic argument.  Perhaps all those 99 Percenters out there demonstrating in the streets are getting through to the Republican politicians?  Stranger things have happened.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/10/19/republicans-attack-cains-9-9-9-plan/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>23</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The End Of The Iraq War Is In Sight</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/10/17/the-end-of-the-iraq-war-is-in-sight/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/10/17/the-end-of-the-iraq-war-is-in-sight/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2011 22:50:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4676</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The end of the American military's involvement in Iraq is almost upon us.  Someone in the White House recently leaked what should have been apparent to everyone all along -- that the Pentagon is preparing to withdraw <em>all</em> our remaining troops from Iraq, by the end of this year.  Less than 200 will remain, to guard the embassy, but all our other brave men and women in uniform will be home to celebrate the dawning of a new year.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/10/17/the-end-of-the-iraq-war-is-in-sight/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>17</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [185] -- I Am A 99 Percenter</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/10/14/ftp185/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/10/14/ftp185/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Oct 2011 23:30:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Talking Points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4664</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>But, having said all of that, I'm going to make a suggestion anyway, on one particular facet of the movement: its name.  Because I truly think that if the protest wants to grow and expand into a forceful movement for change, it should consider a bit of rebranding.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/10/14/ftp185/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>109</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Surveying GOP Field</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/10/12/surveying-gop-field/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/10/12/surveying-gop-field/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Oct 2011 23:24:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign Ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4653</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The last time we wrote, Rick Perry had just jumped in the race.  Since then, nobody else has gotten in, while two prominent names decided to sit this one out.  Several candidates caught fire, and several also burned out (at least, poll-wise).  So it goes, on the campaign merry-go-round.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/10/12/surveying-gop-field/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>When The People Lead</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/10/11/when-the-people-lead/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/10/11/when-the-people-lead/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Oct 2011 23:34:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4649</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The idea behind that title is: "When the People lead, the leaders will follow."  I read this on a bumpersticker a few decades ago, although I must admit I haven't bothered to research the phrase's origins.  Wherever it came from, the idea is a simple (and amusing) one: when the so-called "leaders" aren't leading, then the People will step in and do it for them.  Eventually, the "leaders" will wake up to what is going on and get on board themselves, pretending to have led the movement all along.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/10/11/when-the-people-lead/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [184] -- Long Live Steve Jobs</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/10/07/ftp184/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/10/07/ftp184/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Oct 2011 23:39:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Talking Points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Name-dropping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4629</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>A corporate leader passed away this week, and millions mourned his passing and celebrated his life.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/10/07/ftp184/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>17</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mad As Hell</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/10/05/mad-as-hell/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/10/05/mad-as-hell/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Oct 2011 23:05:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Name-dropping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4615</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The protesters in the Occupy Wall Street movement have been getting criticized for not being focused enough, or not providing a list of demands, or not having leaders, or any number of other things by the media.  But this can be forgiven, because the media are now at least paying attention, rather than just completely ignoring the protest.  What surprises me is that the media (at least so far) haven't realized the frustration the protesters feel is the real story here.  Call it free-floating rage, if you will.  Or, even better, call it an updated Howard Beale moment.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/10/05/mad-as-hell/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>17</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>And Then There Was One...</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/10/04/and-then-there-was-one/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/10/04/and-then-there-was-one/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Oct 2011 22:49:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4611</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The media, of course, likely won't believe Christie -- at least until he says "No" several more times.  Last week he gave a speech that created a media frenzy, and in the question-and-answer period responded to the twenty-millionth time he was asked exactly the same question that there was a "mashup" video available online of him saying "No" <em>over and freakin' over again</em>, and anyone who was interested in the answer should just go review this video.  The media forgot to report this, and instead focused on what they decided was a more ambivalent answer to being asked the same question for the twenty-million-and-one-th time.  "Christie Might Run!" was the headline they decided to go with.  They were bored, quite obviously, and attacked with the ferocity of a shark pack with chum in the water.  The fact that there actually <em>was no actual chum</em> didn't even seem to faze them.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/10/04/and-then-there-was-one/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>26</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Wall Street Protest, Circa 1967</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/10/03/wall-street-protest-circa-1967/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/10/03/wall-street-protest-circa-1967/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Oct 2011 23:51:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4605</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Forty-four years ago, Abbie Hoffman and a few friends made a statement on Wall Street.  His merry band of pranksters took a tour of the New York Stock Exchange on August 24, 1967.  The tour ended at a gallery overlooking the actual trading floor.  Hoffman and his friends rushed to the railing, and began throwing money onto the heads of the traders below.  The stock ticker (at the time, the sacred heartbeat of the American financial system) was halted for six minutes, while the crowd grubbed for the money on the floor.  Hoffman's group was then escorted out, where they spoke to a crowd of reporters.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/10/03/wall-street-protest-circa-1967/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [183] -- What I&#039;d Call &quot;Class Warfare&quot;</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/09/30/ftp183/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/09/30/ftp183/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2011 23:26:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Talking Points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Humor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4590</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Last week (as with this week) the subject <em>de semaine</em> was "class warfare."  The comment which inspired this week's mini-rants contained a simple, repetitive concept: "When [something outrageous pushed by Republicans happens], nobody calls it 'class warfare'.  Maybe we should."</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/09/30/ftp183/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>62</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>GOP Field Wide Open?</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/09/29/gop-field-wide-open/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/09/29/gop-field-wide-open/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2011 23:34:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4585</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The Republican presidential field continues to defy the expectations and easy story lines from the political media and the rest of the inside-the-Beltway crowd.  Just last week, this was supposed to now be "a two-man race," but in a week's time the story has shifted to almost utter chaos.  A new Fox News poll out shows that the easy read of the electorate the media was pushing last week is now completely wrong.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/09/29/gop-field-wide-open/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Republican Primary Scheduling Headaches</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/09/28/republican-primary-scheduling-headaches/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/09/28/republican-primary-scheduling-headaches/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2011 23:27:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4579</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Instead I'd like to talk about the backroom struggling within the Republican Party this week which is a lot more interesting and will likely be a lot more germane to the race -- the question of who goes first (or, more to the point, who goes <em>fifth</em>) in the Republican primary calendar.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/09/28/republican-primary-scheduling-headaches/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Memo To Rick Perry</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/09/26/memo-to-rick-perry/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/09/26/memo-to-rick-perry/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Sep 2011 22:38:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign Ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Humor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4569</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Well, it's been great fun and all, but we are sorry to inform you that your viable candidacy for the Republican presidential nomination is hereby over.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/09/26/memo-to-rick-perry/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>15</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [182] -- Class Warfare?  Hardly.</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/09/23/ftp182/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/09/23/ftp182/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Sep 2011 23:12:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Talking Points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4556</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>A satellite is falling out of the sky, but it probably won't hit anybody.  Probably.  I personally got over this fear by listening to Creedence Clearwater Revival's "It Came Out Of The Sky" (which I heartily recommend, just on general principles).</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/09/23/ftp182/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>27</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Thinning The Debate Herd</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/09/22/thinning-the-debate-herd/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/09/22/thinning-the-debate-herd/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Sep 2011 22:03:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4553</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>At some point, television is going to have to start limiting which Republican candidates get invited to the debates.  The herd of hopefuls must be thinned.  This may happen soon, and tonight may be the last of the mega-debates of the season.  One can only hope.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/09/22/thinning-the-debate-herd/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama Redefines Populism</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/09/19/obama-redefines-populism/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/09/19/obama-redefines-populism/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Sep 2011 23:57:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4535</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>"Populism" is a word that gets thrown around with abandon by folks masquerading as journalists on television these days.  Sarah Palin had the word used to describe her, and later, the entire Tea Party movement was labeled "populist" by the chattering classes.  Today, President Obama unveiled a truly populist agenda, by proposing to tax millionaires at the same tax rate that middle-class Americans pay.  By doing so, Obama will (hopefully) redefine the term "populism" in the political conversation.  Or, to be technical, he will re-redefine the word back to what it originally meant.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/09/19/obama-redefines-populism/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Will Palin Go Rogue?</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/09/12/will-palin-go-rogue/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/09/12/will-palin-go-rogue/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Sep 2011 22:17:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Name-dropping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4511</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>"What will Sarah do?" has been a question on the minds of many in the run-up to the Republican primary season next year.  Definitively figuring out the answer to this question is a fool's game, however, because Sarah Palin continually shows the ability to surprise the punditocracy, the public, and the Republican establishment.  Only Palin herself is ever confident of knowing what Sarah will do next, in other words.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/09/12/will-palin-go-rogue/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>28</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [180] -- Give &#039;Em Hell, Barry!</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/09/09/ftp180/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/09/09/ftp180/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Sep 2011 00:02:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign Ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Talking Points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4503</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>President Barack Obama opened his re-election campaign last night with a wowzer of a speech to a joint session of Congress.  But we'll get to that in detail in a minute.  First, we must mark an important anniversary this week.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/09/09/ftp180/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>22</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ron Paul Versus Government</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/08/29/ron-paul-versus-government/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/08/29/ron-paul-versus-government/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Aug 2011 23:36:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4460</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>To his supporters, one of Ron Paul's most endearing qualities is his forthrightness.  Paul doesn't mince words, he tells you to your face exactly what he thinks.  And, to give the man credit, he keeps to his positions even when it would be a lot easier for him to either fudge an answer or tone down his beliefs, the way most politicians do (at certain times).</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/08/29/ron-paul-versus-government/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>King&#039;s Eloquence Goes Far Beyond &quot;I Have A Dream&quot;</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/08/26/kings-eloquence-goes-far-beyond-i-have-a-dream/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/08/26/kings-eloquence-goes-far-beyond-i-have-a-dream/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Aug 2011 23:48:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Name-dropping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4449</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>As we all know, we're not there yet.  We're a little closer than we were when Dr. King was taken from us, but we've still got quite a ways to go yet.  For inspiration on the journey which still awaits us all, I strongly urge all Americans to seek out Dr. King's actual words -- the words you're <em>not</em> used to hearing over and over again.  Take ten or fifteen minutes and read the text of one of his speeches.  Watch video, or listen to audio of Dr. King speaking.  It will be well worth the time it takes.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/08/26/kings-eloquence-goes-far-beyond-i-have-a-dream/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>35</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Taking Rick Perry Seriously</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/08/24/taking-rick-perry-seriously/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/08/24/taking-rick-perry-seriously/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Aug 2011 00:12:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4442</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>This should force pundits across the political spectrum to re-evaluate Rick Perry's campaign.  Instead of seeing through the lens of: "what my circle of friends thinks of Rick Perry's gaffes," this time the pundits should focus a little more closely on: "what Republican primary voters think of Rick Perry as a candidate."  Because, so far, they seem to be flocking to support Perry -- to the visible detriment of Mitt Romney's standing in the polls.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/08/24/taking-rick-perry-seriously/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>15</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [178] -- Phony Vacation Outrage</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/08/19/ftp178/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/08/19/ftp178/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Aug 2011 23:52:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign Ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Talking Points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4422</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>It's silly season in the political world, once again.  And this year -- just like every year a Democrat occupies the White House -- an old favorite of a story is making the rounds.  It involves some very thinly-veneered outrage, which is completely fabricated and hypocritical in the extreme.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/08/19/ftp178/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Libyan Battle Map</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/08/17/libyan-battle-map/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/08/17/libyan-battle-map/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Aug 2011 23:32:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Libya]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4416</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The rebels are on the move in Libya.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/08/17/libyan-battle-map/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>54</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>GOP Field Tightens</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/08/15/gop-field-tightens/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/08/15/gop-field-tightens/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Aug 2011 23:32:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4411</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Almost a full month ago, I placed four names in the "Frontrunners" category: Michele Bachmann, Sarah Palin, Rick Perry, and Mitt Romney.  This list hasn't changed at all, although Palin will fall back the next time around if she doesn't announce in the next three or four weeks (more on this in a bit).</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/08/15/gop-field-tightens/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>41</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [177] -- Corporations Are People, Mitt?</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/08/12/ftp177/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/08/12/ftp177/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Aug 2011 00:17:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Talking Points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4402</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>But perhaps I'm being too harsh.  The reason the clip was edited down so much was that the <em>other</em> heckling clip was <em>so much better</em> -- Romney misspeaking, and then instead of just immediately walking it back, actually digging the hole deeper.  In answer to a question about raising taxes on corporations, Romney answered (at first) that he wasn't going to raise taxes "on people."  When the questioner yelled back "Corporations, not people!" Romney could easily have said something along the lines of "Sorry, I meant to say corporations -- I'm actually not going to raise taxes on people <em>or</em> on corporations, and here's why...."  It would have just melded the whole thing into standard Republican dogma, and Romney would have been safe.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/08/12/ftp177/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>36</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Wisconsin&#039;s Vote More Important Than Iowa&#039;s</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/08/08/wisconsins-vote-more-important-than-iowas/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/08/08/wisconsins-vote-more-important-than-iowas/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Aug 2011 23:52:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4381</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>This week is being touted, in the political world, as a big week in the state of Iowa.  There will be a nationally-televised Republican presidential candidate debate, and then a few days later the Ames Straw Poll will take place.  The straw poll is (as always) being hyped in the media as the "first voting" in the upcoming presidential nominating contest.  But the media should pay more attention to what is happening in Wisconsin this week, because rather than some "vote"-buying exercise (that always proves itself to be completely meaningless in the grand scheme of the presidential election process), Wisconsin could prove to be a much better weathervane in terms of predicting which way the political winds will be blowing, come next year.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/08/08/wisconsins-vote-more-important-than-iowas/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [176] -- More Tea, Anyone?</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/08/05/ftp176/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/08/05/ftp176/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Aug 2011 23:34:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Talking Points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Vice President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4371</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>With the conclusion of the debt ceiling "crisis," the media pivoted swiftly to their standard larger questions (to them, at any rate) about any political event these days: "Who won?  Who lost?"</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/08/05/ftp176/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>100</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama Poll Watch -- July, 2011</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/08/02/opw1107/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/08/02/opw1107/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Aug 2011 00:17:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama Poll Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4355</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The easy answer to the question: "Who 'won' the debt ceiling debate?" is: nobody.  The public sees everyone involved in a more negative light than when the whole manufactured crisis began.  Hopefully, politicians will take note of this, but it is quite likely they will not, and this new standard of brinksmanship will become the norm, every time the debt ceiling debate arises.  There's a comforting thought, after the past month, eh?</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/08/02/opw1107/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>16</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Which Three Democratic Senators?</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/08/01/which-three-democratic-senators/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/08/01/which-three-democratic-senators/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Aug 2011 23:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4348</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The House and Senate are getting ready to vote on the deal struck to avoid America defaulting on her debts.  Nobody knows exactly the magnitude of what is being cut in detail yet, and the news media seem more interested in the eternal "who's up/who's down" horserace nonsense than in informing the public what exactly has been agreed to in this deal.  This should come as no surprise, since it is (as always) <em>ever</em> so much more fun for "journalists" to blather on about "what it all means" seen through the political lens, instead of "what it all means" in terms of... well, what it <em>actually is going to mean</em> for America.  Perhaps in a few days, when they get bored with the political aspects, we'll finally find out exactly what the cuts are going to cover.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/08/01/which-three-democratic-senators/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>22</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [175] -- In The Darkest Depths Of Mordor</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/07/29/ftp175/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/07/29/ftp175/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jul 2011 23:37:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Talking Points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Name-dropping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4338</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>If I were a Hobbit, right about now I would be wondering just <em>how the heck</em> I wound up at the center of this Washington intraparty political fight, personally.  What (I would ponder in my metaphorical Hobbit hole) had I done to <em>any of these folks</em> to deserve being dragged into this fracas?</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/07/29/ftp175/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>54</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Congress&#039; Real Deadline: Summer Vacation</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/07/27/congress-real-deadline-summer-vacation/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/07/27/congress-real-deadline-summer-vacation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jul 2011 22:07:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4326</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>There are now only a handful of possible outcomes of the debt ceiling standoff in Washington.  We'll get to them all in a minute in more detail.  One way or another, it's a pretty safe bet that the issue will (at least temporarily) be resolved by the fifth of August, at the absolute latest.  Bank on it.  The reason for such certainty is a simple one: if the debate goes on in any way <em>past</em> that date, then it will start to cut into Congress' month-long summer vacation.  Which is (as any observer of American politics should know full well) the <em>one unthinkable bridge-too-far</em> in Washington.  Because Congress' vacations are sacred... at least, to them.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/07/27/congress-real-deadline-summer-vacation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>20</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Brinksmanship-pocalypse-mageddon</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/07/26/brinksmanship-pocalypse-mageddon/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/07/26/brinksmanship-pocalypse-mageddon/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jul 2011 00:18:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Humor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4321</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>We're all sick and tired of the debt ceiling debate, so I'm just going off on a complete tangent today for a little grammar rant.  Hope no one minds.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/07/26/brinksmanship-pocalypse-mageddon/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>23</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Another Debt Commission?  Really?</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/07/25/another-debt-commission-really/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/07/25/another-debt-commission-really/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jul 2011 23:11:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Vice President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4314</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>There is a grand tradition in Washington -- which is followed by both parties, at various times -- of avoiding big and politically-delicate problems.  This tradition used to be called the "blue-ribbon commission," although for some reason the "blue-ribbon" part isn't used much anymore.  But whatever you call it, this political dodge is created for one purpose and one purpose alone: to waste time.  To the best of my knowledge, no commission (blue-ribbon or otherwise bedecked) has ever come up with a solution to anything which has been thus implemented by the politicians (again, of <em>either</em> party) to solve a big problem (although you could make an argument for the base-closing commission, I guess).  But virtually <em>all</em> of these commissions have succeeded wildly on their main objective of wasting as much time as possible.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/07/25/another-debt-commission-really/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>16</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Breaking Down The Polling Numbers</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/07/21/breaking-down-the-polling-numbers/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/07/21/breaking-down-the-polling-numbers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jul 2011 00:51:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4295</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>This is but one poll, to be sure.  But most of the other polls I've seen this week back up the data presented here.  Americans are turned off by Republican extremism, and open to Democrats' willingness to compromise.  They are disgusted with the way the lawmakers in Washington are operating, and they may just take out this anger next year at the polls.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/07/21/breaking-down-the-polling-numbers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Libyan Rebels Battle For Brega</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/07/20/libyan-rebels-battle-for-brega/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/07/20/libyan-rebels-battle-for-brega/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jul 2011 22:43:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Libya]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4288</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>A battle is currently being fought in Libya over the town of Brega, which could turn out to have strategic importance for the rebel forces.  This battle has been underway for days now, and may continue for days to come.  The American media has so far been ignoring this development in the Libyan revolution, perhaps due to lack of solid information from the frontlines.  But it deserves a bit more attention than it has so far been getting.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/07/20/libyan-rebels-battle-for-brega/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Just A Quick Thought...</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/07/19/just-a-quick-thought/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/07/19/just-a-quick-thought/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jul 2011 01:43:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4283</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>I find it interesting in the media circus surrounding Rupert Murdoch that nobody has yet started making references to the James Bond movie <em>Tomorrow Never Dies</em> -- since the villain in it was nothing short of a thinly-veiled caricature of Murdoch himself.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/07/19/just-a-quick-thought/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>40</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [173] -- Obama 2.0?</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/07/15/ftp173/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/07/15/ftp173/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jul 2011 23:50:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Talking Points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Libya]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Vice President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4262</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Are we seeing the new model of Barack Obama's presidency?  Is this (in the parlance of Silicon Valley) "Obama 2.0"?</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/07/15/ftp173/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>36</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Historical Context Missing From Debt Ceiling Reporting</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/07/13/historical-context-missing-from-debt-ceiling-reporting/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/07/13/historical-context-missing-from-debt-ceiling-reporting/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jul 2011 23:17:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4252</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>I've always been astounded at the near-complete lack of historical memory regularly exhibited by both Washington politicians and the "journalists" who purport to cover them.  Nothing I've seen in the past few weeks has caused me to change this opinion, either, as the fight over raising the federal debt ceiling has played itself out.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/07/13/historical-context-missing-from-debt-ceiling-reporting/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Big Debt Ceiling Stall</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/07/11/the-big-debt-ceiling-stall/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/07/11/the-big-debt-ceiling-stall/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jul 2011 23:21:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4241</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The entire political world right now is holding its collective breath over whether a deal will be struck between President Obama and the leadership of Congress to raise America's debt ceiling.  The more honest observers of this process have noted the "Kabuki theater" nature of the proceedings, as they wisely discount the possibility that the deadline will be reached with no agreement in place.  "This is all for show," the jaded pundits assure us, "there <em>will</em> be a deal."  But this reasoning can be taken one step further: not only will there be a last-minute deal, but the deal <em>will not happen</em> until that last minute -- and this is by design.  While duelling press conferences amuse the public, behind the scenes the name of the game Obama and the Republicans are playing could rightly be called "The Big Stall."</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/07/11/the-big-debt-ceiling-stall/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>33</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [172] -- Obama&#039;s Fourteenth Option</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/07/08/ftp172/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/07/08/ftp172/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jul 2011 22:44:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Talking Points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Bill of Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4225</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The silly season has come early to Washington, it seems.  The root cause is a simple fact of American politics these days -- sometimes, there just can't be transparency.  That's a fairly provocative statement, so allow me to explain my reasoning in detail.  Then, later on (in the talking points section of our program), we'll get into the option of the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution, and how Obama should be using it right about now.  But for now, it's time for a sober assessment of where Washington currently stands.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/07/08/ftp172/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>25</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dismal Media Poll Numbers</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/07/05/dismal-media-poll-numbers/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/07/05/dismal-media-poll-numbers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jul 2011 23:50:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4206</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The mainstream media love to use opinion poll numbers to highlight the American public's disapproval of certain persons and institutions.  But there's one poll number they never seem to get around to adequately reporting: their own.  There's a reason for this, and it is a simple one.  The media doesn't report their own poll numbers because their poll numbers stink, and it's less embarrassing to just ignore this fact rather than to report it.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/07/05/dismal-media-poll-numbers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [171] -- Excerpting Obama&#039;s Press Conference</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/07/01/ftp171/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/07/01/ftp171/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jul 2011 23:29:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Talking Points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4187</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Since the year is now exactly half over, I took the opportunity yesterday to <a href="http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/06/30/obamas-right-congress-doesnt-work/">tally up</a> how much vacation time Congress has taken this year, so far.  The answer is pretty shocking -- the House has taken 46 out of a possible 125 non-holiday weekdays off, and the Senate (not to be outdone) has gone on vacation for 49 days out of those 125.  To put this another way, out of 26 weeks Congress could have worked, the House took over <em>nine weeks</em> off on vacation, and the Senate took almost <em>ten weeks</em> to play rather than work.  Something for everyone to ponder as we all enjoy our measly three-day vacation this weekend!</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/07/01/ftp171/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama&#039;s Right: Congress Doesn&#039;t Work</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/06/30/obamas-right-congress-doesnt-work/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/06/30/obamas-right-congress-doesnt-work/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jun 2011 23:56:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4181</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>President Obama, in his press conference yesterday, took Congress to task over the fact that it doesn't work.  In fact, he did so in <em>both</em> senses of the phrase "doesn't work."  Obama lit into Congress for not doing much in the best of times, and also pointed out the glaring fact that Congress sure does take a lot of vacation time, don't they?</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/06/30/obamas-right-congress-doesnt-work/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bachmann Rising, Palin Fading?</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/06/27/bachmann-rising-palin-fading/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/06/27/bachmann-rising-palin-fading/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jun 2011 23:15:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4163</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Michele Bachmann's political fortunes are visibly on the rise.  Mostly due to a well-received debate performance and a single good poll in Iowa, Bachmann is now the newest shining star to emerge on the stage of the Republican presidential nomination contest.  Whether she later proves to be a flavor-of-the-week or whether she actually has staying power is still an open question, at this point.  But what appears increasingly obvious is that Bachmann's rise is coming at the expense of another Republican woman's draw on the Republican primary electorate: Sarah Palin.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/06/27/bachmann-rising-palin-fading/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [170] -- Newt Loses Two, Huntsman Gains An &quot;H&quot;</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/06/24/ftp170/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/06/24/ftp170/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jun 2011 23:13:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Talking Points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Libya]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Bill of Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Vice President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4150</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Well, it's certainly been an eventful couple of weeks, hasn't it?</p>
<p>We're back on our regular weekly schedule here after returning home from our second trip this month (this one to Netroots Nation), after which I can firmly conclude that flying, these days, sucks.  Big time.  Sigh.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/06/24/ftp170/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>16</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Predicting Obama&#039;s Afghanistan Announcement</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/06/22/predicting-obamas-afghanistan-announcement/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/06/22/predicting-obamas-afghanistan-announcement/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2011 19:54:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Libya]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pakistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4138</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Later today, President Obama is going to address the nation on the subject of the Afghanistan war.  Specifically, he's going to make good on a promise made a year-and-a-half ago: to begin the withdrawal of American troops from Afghanistan next month.  The big question everyone's been speculating about in the run-up to this announcement has been how big a reduction the president will announce.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/06/22/predicting-obamas-afghanistan-announcement/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>25</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>From The Archives -- In Defense Of Hookers</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/06/20/from-the-archives-in-defense-of-hookers/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/06/20/from-the-archives-in-defense-of-hookers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jun 2011 07:11:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4121</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>[<strong>Program Note:</strong> <em>OK, since I've been away, and since June has been a (shall we say) "sub-par" month for us here in terms of posting things in a timely manner, I'm going to run a rare late-Sunday column for your edification.  This is, in some ways, a </em>mea culpa<em> for the break in service last week.  Also, it seemed appropriate, since I've been away so much this month that I pretty much completely missed commenting on the continuing saga of Anthony Weiner.  So, while Weiner's case was a bit more unique (no hookers were even involved), I thought it time to dig this column out from <a href="http://www.chrisweigant.com/2008/03/11/in-defense-of-hookers/">three years ago<a>, which I wrote in the wake of the Eliot Spitzer scandal.  You may also wish to check out a follow-up column I wrote entitled <a href="http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/11/25/on-whores/">"On Whores"</a> in November of 2009.  In any case, this column somehow seemed appropriate, given the mainstream media frenzy in the past few weeks....</em>]</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/06/20/from-the-archives-in-defense-of-hookers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The 2012 Republican Presidential Field</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/06/13/the-2012-republican-presidential-field/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/06/13/the-2012-republican-presidential-field/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jun 2011 23:32:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4111</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The Republican presidential field for the 2012 presidential election will be on full display this evening, as CNN airs the second nationally-televised candidate debate, this one from the early-voting state of New Hampshire.  Since the first debate was a little light on heavyweight candidates, this is the first chance a lot of Republican primary voters will have to assess the biggest names in the race.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/06/13/the-2012-republican-presidential-field/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [169] -- Weiner Roast</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/06/10/ftp169/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/06/10/ftp169/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jun 2011 22:40:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Free Speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Talking Points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Bill of Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4093</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Having just gotten back from a trip abroad where the news was dominated by the story of a politician facing severe consequences (and the end of his political career) for his sexual misconduct, I opened up the pages of the American news to find... well, pretty much the same thing.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/06/10/ftp169/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Republican Field Shaping Up</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/05/23/republican-field-shaping-up/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/05/23/republican-field-shaping-up/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 May 2011 23:34:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4018</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>With all this frantic jumping in and out of the race, I thought it was time to take another look at the Republican field to see how it is shaping up.  At this point, there are only a few holdouts left on the sidelines, as most of the bigwigs (and some decidedly "smallwigs") have made their intentions known.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/05/23/republican-field-shaping-up/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>22</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [168] -- Zombie Attack!</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/05/20/ftp168/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/05/20/ftp168/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 May 2011 23:46:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign Ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Talking Points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Libya]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Bill of Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4003</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>A word here about timing is necessary, I think.  While the blog post is quite obviously meant as a semi-joke, wouldn't this have been more fun in, say, mid-October -- a few weeks before Hallowe'en?  Instead of this week, with the "End of Days" prophesied for midafternoon this Saturday?  I'm just saying....</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/05/20/ftp168/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>23</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Media Gets Punked, Again</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/05/19/media-gets-punked-again/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/05/19/media-gets-punked-again/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 May 2011 23:24:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=3996</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>In this year's version of the "Balloon Boy" fake news story, it was revealed today that the "Botox Mommy" story was a complete fabrication.  In other words, those stalwart "journalists" -- busily gatekeeping their little hearts out to keep the mainstream media so very, very far above the blogosphere when it comes to fact-checking -- once again got punked.  Not only did they get punked, but it actually cost them at least ten grand in the process.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/05/19/media-gets-punked-again/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>15</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Ryan Budget Acid Test</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/05/18/the-ryan-budget-acid-test/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/05/18/the-ryan-budget-acid-test/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 May 2011 22:41:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign Ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=3989</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>It's rare for me to have a moment of pity for someone like Newt Gingrich, but I have to admit I'm feeling a little sorry for the guy this week.  But before we delve into Newt's campaign problems in greater detail, it seems to me that most pundits are missing a big underlying new reality in the Republican Party.  The focus has all been on Newt himself, what he said, and the subsequent ire directed at him by prominent Righties.  But after the dust settles on the incident itself, people are going to notice the bigger fact this fracas has illuminated: Republicans are doubling down on Paul Ryan's budget rather than backing away from it, to the point where it has now become <em>the</em> acid test for Republicans in 2012.  Which should be good news for Democrats.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/05/18/the-ryan-budget-acid-test/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Next Up: Rudy, Sarah, And Mitch</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/05/16/next-up-rudy-sarah-and-mitch/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/05/16/next-up-rudy-sarah-and-mitch/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 May 2011 23:56:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=3977</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Well, that was a fun couple of weeks, wasn't it?  For the past month or so, Donald Trump pretended to run for president and the media pretended he was serious (funniest headline I've seen today, from the <em>Washington Post</em>, <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/post-partisan/post/donald-trump-im-fired/2011/05/16/AFJHf34G_blog.html">"Donald Trump: I'm Fired!"</a>).  This entertaining period has now drawn to a close, much to the dismay of late-night comedians everywhere, as The Donald all but admits that the whole thing was a ratings and contract negotiations ploy to boost his "Apprentice" show on NBC.  What it all means is that we can now take a look at who is yet to decide to jump into the Republican nomination race in earnest, and without such clownish distraction.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/05/16/next-up-rudy-sarah-and-mitch/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [167] -- Happy Friday The Thirteenth, Ron!</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/05/13/ftp167/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/05/13/ftp167/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 May 2011 00:10:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Talking Points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=3964</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Ron Paul, apparently, is not a superstitious kind of guy.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/05/13/ftp167/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>19</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Jim Lehrer Steps Down</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/05/12/jim-lehrer-steps-down/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/05/12/jim-lehrer-steps-down/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 May 2011 22:45:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=3959</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The longest-running news anchor on American television is stepping down.  He will be missed, simply because he is a cut so far above all the blow-dried nincompoops on network and cable television.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/05/12/jim-lehrer-steps-down/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Full 2012 Republican Field</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/05/11/the-full-2012-republican-field/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/05/11/the-full-2012-republican-field/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 May 2011 00:50:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=3952</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>This has been an unusual year, in terms of presidential campaign politics, because (so far) it has run counter to the conventional wisdom.  A standard column for any pundit to write every four years is the "Campaign Starting Even Sooner!" article, in which you decry the fact that the presidential race is beginning earlier and earlier each cycle.  Not many of those articles have been written this time around.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/05/11/the-full-2012-republican-field/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>27</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [166] -- Osama Bin Laden Is Still Dead</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/05/06/ftp166/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/05/06/ftp166/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 May 2011 23:01:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign Ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Talking Points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iran]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Libya]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pakistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=3920</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>I don't care how ironic that sounds to some, it's true.  Osama Bin Laden declared war on America, waged that war for years (and killed Americans in doing so), then hid for many more years, and was finally hunted down and killed like an animal.  Mission accomplished.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/05/06/ftp166/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>50</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Any Channel</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/05/02/any-channel/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/05/02/any-channel/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 May 2011 00:00:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Other]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pakistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=3891</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>"Turn on your television... to any channel."</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/05/02/any-channel/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>23</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [165] -- Royally Screwed</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/04/29/ftp165/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/04/29/ftp165/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2011 22:58:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Talking Points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Humor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=3877</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>For reasons which surpasseth all understanding (at least to myself), I was actually up very early this morning, before the dawn as a matter of fact.  This was due to a scheduled television appearance which, unfortunately, did not occur (for technical reasons).  Since I was up, though, I caught the tail end of the British royal wedding, which (for us Pacific Coast Time folks) happened in the middle of the night.  Surprisingly enough, I have a few things to point out about the event.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/04/29/ftp165/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>57</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Trump Mania</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/04/25/trump-mania/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/04/25/trump-mania/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Apr 2011 23:57:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign Ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=3847</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Most intelligent political analysts' reaction (right, left, and center) to the news that Donald Trump may be considering a run for the presidency could be summed up as some version of: "You have <em>got</em> to be kidding me."  Followed quickly by: "This is going to be <em>so</em> much fun!"  But the real punchline to this joke of a candidacy was actually on the punditocracy, when Trump's poll numbers took off and soon put him either in the lead or very close to it for the Republican nomination.  Republican voters, it seems, aren't following the punditocracy's lead on "The Donald."</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/04/25/trump-mania/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>125</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Reviewing America&#039;s Wars [Part 2]</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/04/21/reviewing-americas-wars-part-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/04/21/reviewing-americas-wars-part-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Apr 2011 07:37:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Libya]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pakistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=3829</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>President Obama is trying a new concept for America in Libya -- where we open a war, but then almost immediately bow out and turn it over to others to deal with.  In Libya's case, this means N.A.T.O., led largely by Britain, France, and Italy.  Libya is also another country with a few diplomatic fictions in place.  We're not supposed to be on anyone's "side" in Libya, even though it is obvious we are aiding the rebel forces.  We're not supposed to be explicitly for "regime change" (because the United Nations didn't approve it), even though we are quite obviously in favor of Ghaddafi leaving as soon as possible.  And nobody's supposed to be "arming" the rebels, even though as time goes by it becomes obvious that they're getting their ammunition from somewhere (not to mention uniforms, communications equipment, and other "non-lethal" support).</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/04/21/reviewing-americas-wars-part-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Reviewing America&#039;s Wars [Part 1]</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/04/20/reviewing-americas-wars-part-1/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/04/20/reviewing-americas-wars-part-1/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Apr 2011 00:19:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iran]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Libya]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pakistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=3823</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Since the mainstream media has, quite obviously, abdicated all responsibility for reporting the news in any sort of journalistic fashion, I thought today would be a good day to review the current status of America's wars.  Depending on how you count, there are now three (or four) of these wars which have been all but forgotten by the media these days.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/04/20/reviewing-americas-wars-part-1/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama Hits His Rhetorical Stride</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/04/19/obama-hits-his-rhetorical-stride/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/04/19/obama-hits-his-rhetorical-stride/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Apr 2011 00:08:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=3817</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>But I have to say, just on the scale of speechifyin' alone, Obama seems to be starting his re-election campaign very strongly -- by framing his issues within a basic Democratic narrative which has been missing in action for quite a while.  For that reason alone, both of his recent speeches are worth reading.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/04/19/obama-hits-his-rhetorical-stride/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>16</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [163] -- The Ads Just Write Themselves</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/04/15/ftp163/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/04/15/ftp163/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Apr 2011 00:33:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Talking Points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=3798</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Something the media largely missed in the midst of multiple budgetary battles this week was the fact that this is what bipartisanship looks like.  The media, at least the "serious" ones, residing either inside the Beltway or in lower Manhattan, have long made much sport out of decrying "partisanship" -- at least, when Democrats act like Democrats, at any rate.  Politicians are supposed to "work together" in some Utopian dreamland, to "get serious things done."  It sounds great in an editorial, and all of that.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/04/15/ftp163/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>46</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

