<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>ChrisWeigant.com &#187; Populism</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.chrisweigant.com/category/populism/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com</link>
	<description>Reality-based political commentary</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 23:31:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Romney&#039;s &quot;Very Poor&quot; Choice Of Words</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/02/06/romneys-very-poor-choice-of-words/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/02/06/romneys-very-poor-choice-of-words/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 23:31:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign Ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=5159</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Mitt Romney's gaffe last week (reproduced in full, above) is going to wind up the "gaffe that keeps on giving" for Barack Obama and the Democrats in this election cycle.  Because the more Romney's comment is examined and dissected, the worse it looks for him.  This could, in fact, be the defining moment for Mitt Romney as a national political presence.  That phrase is often bandied about in politics, but I use it here in the full literal sense of "defining moment" -- a point in time which absolutely cements an image in the public mind of who you are and what you stand for as a politician.  The image, quite obviously, is not a good one for Romney.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/02/06/romneys-very-poor-choice-of-words/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [196] -- Poor Mitt?</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/02/03/ftp196/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/02/03/ftp196/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 00:10:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign Ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Free Speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Talking Points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Bill of Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Vice President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=5146</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Mitt Romney, frontrunner for the Republican nomination, announced he wasn't too worried about poor people.  Maybe it would be fun to see Romney debate Joe Biden, just because nobody would know what to expect from either of them.  Heh.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/02/03/ftp196/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>27</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama Poll Watch -- January, 2012</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/02/01/opw1201/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/02/01/opw1201/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 22:34:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama Poll Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=5135</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>President Barack Obama continued a three-month upward swing in the polls in January, with his average job approval rating for the month ticking up 1.2 points, and his disapproval rate falling by exactly the same amount.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/02/01/opw1201/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [195] -- SOTU Review</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/01/27/ftp195/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/01/27/ftp195/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jan 2012 00:27:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign Ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Libya]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=5112</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Well, that was an eventful week in politics, wasn't it?</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/01/27/ftp195/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>33</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Alternative Millionaires&#039; Minimum Tax</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/01/25/the-alternative-millionaires-minimum-tax/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/01/25/the-alternative-millionaires-minimum-tax/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 00:01:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=5103</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>President Obama last night unveiled a new twist on an old idea in his State Of The Union address to Congress -- limit the loopholes and tax giveaways that very wealthy people use to reduce their taxes far below the rate honest workers pay.  Obama called for a minimum tax rate of 30 percent on income over one million dollars.  To some, this sounds like a radical idea, but it really isn't.  It is merely a refinement of a part of the tax code that has been with us for decades: the Alternative Minimum Tax.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/01/25/the-alternative-millionaires-minimum-tax/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>18</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The State Of The Union</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/01/24/the-state-of-the-union/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/01/24/the-state-of-the-union/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 05:43:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iran]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Libya]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pakistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=5098</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>I haven't written one of these snap-judgment reactions to a speech in a while, so forgive me if this is a bit choppy and disorganized.  As always, I am writing this before looking at other opinions of President Obama's just-completed State Of The Union speech.  I feel this keeps my opinion unsullied by any sort of "groupthink" effect.  Sometimes I read other speech reviews the next day and find I agree with them, sometimes not, but this way at least you know I'm not just regurgitating others' thoughts.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/01/24/the-state-of-the-union/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>28</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pure Newtonium</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/01/23/pure-newtonium/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/01/23/pure-newtonium/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 23:32:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=5093</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>What a difference a week makes, at least in the Republican primary contest.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/01/23/pure-newtonium/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>77</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [194] -- Out Of Touch</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/01/20/ftp194/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/01/20/ftp194/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jan 2012 00:31:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign Ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Talking Points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=5081</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[OK, to be completely honest, we just felt like beating up on some Republicans today.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/01/20/ftp194/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>48</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Governor O&#039;Malley Is Right</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/01/17/governor-omalley-is-right/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/01/17/governor-omalley-is-right/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 00:50:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign Ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=5067</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>O'Malley makes a good point.  President Obama's re-election team should heed it.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/01/17/governor-omalley-is-right/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>King&#039;s &quot;Drum Major Instinct&quot; Speech</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/01/16/kings-drum-major-instinct-speech/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/01/16/kings-drum-major-instinct-speech/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2012 01:07:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guest Authors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Name-dropping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religion]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=5065</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[Program Note: I am taking the day off today.  But I did want to post this link to a transcript of Martin Luther King Junior's "Drum Major Instinct" speech.  This is the speech that was misquoted on his new memorial in Washington D.C., and you really have to read the speech itself to [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/01/16/kings-drum-major-instinct-speech/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [192] -- Obama Picking His Fights</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/01/06/ftp192/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/01/06/ftp192/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2012 22:56:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Talking Points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=5026</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>I have to say, while the Republicans have been having their three-ring primary circus, President Obama has been looking better and better.  Both in comparison to the Republican field (of nightmares, so to speak), and also because Obama's been making progress on his own.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/01/06/ftp192/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>160</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>My 2011 &quot;McLaughlin Awards&quot; [Part 2]</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/12/23/my-2011-mclaughlin-awards-part-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/12/23/my-2011-mclaughlin-awards-part-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Dec 2011 22:08:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Libya]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Name-dropping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4982</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Her campaign so far has been the populist model for every other Democrat to mimic if they want to catch the wave of anger at Wall Street, and use it to their benefit.  Without question, Elizabeth Warren is Destined For Political Stardom.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/12/23/my-2011-mclaughlin-awards-part-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>43</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama Looking Stronger</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/12/22/obama-looking-stronger/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/12/22/obama-looking-stronger/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Dec 2011 23:58:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4978</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>President Obama is looking a lot stronger these days.  Today, especially, the president emerges as the big winner in the showdown with John Boehner and the House Republicans.  But Obama's been looking better and better all month, so Boehner caving should be seen as just the icing on the cake for Obama.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/12/22/obama-looking-stronger/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>29</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Making A List, Checking It Twice...</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/12/21/making-a-list-checking-it-twice/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/12/21/making-a-list-checking-it-twice/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Dec 2011 00:32:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Humor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Name-dropping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4972</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The Head Elf turns back to his iPad.  "Mitch McConnell says he wants some media attention.  He complains they all ignore him and run to John Boehner instead.  Boehner, on the other hand, wants <em>less</em> attention paid to the fact that he can't control his own caucus."</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/12/21/making-a-list-checking-it-twice/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>25</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>My 2011 &quot;McLaughlin Awards&quot; [Part 1]</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/12/16/my-2011-mclaughlin-awards-part-1/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/12/16/my-2011-mclaughlin-awards-part-1/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Dec 2011 01:36:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign Ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Free Speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iran]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Libya]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Name-dropping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pakistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4954</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>As always, if you disagree with any (or all) of my picks, feel free to make your own in the comments.  The categories are completely open to interpretation, and don't forget that there will be a "Part 2" column next week, so I can likely squeeze things I forgot in there.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/12/16/my-2011-mclaughlin-awards-part-1/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>33</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [191] -- The White Knight Is Talking Backwards...</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/12/09/ftp191/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/12/09/ftp191/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Dec 2011 00:01:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign Ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Talking Points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Name-dropping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4921</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>You know, it strikes me that this week may be one politics-watchers look back on when proving the thesis: "Anything can happen in politics, and usually does."  I can picture seeing some wise pundit a few years down the road making the historical reference: "Yeah, but remember when Newt Gingrich and Ron Paul were leading the polls in the Iowa caucuses?  Anything can happen... just <em>any</em>thing..."</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/12/09/ftp191/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>58</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Teddy Roosevelt&#039;s &quot;The New Nationalism&quot; Speech</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/12/06/teddy-roosevelts-the-new-nationalism-speech/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/12/06/teddy-roosevelts-the-new-nationalism-speech/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Dec 2011 00:53:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guest Authors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Name-dropping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4903</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[President Barack Obama gave a speech today in a small town in Kansas.  The reason he chose this venue for this speech was to draw historical comparisons with a speech given there by Teddy Roosevelt, over one hundred years ago.  While you may see some clips of Obama's speech in the news, few will bother to look up the original speech.  Which is a shame, and which is why we present it today.  We leave comparisons with Obama's speech to others, for now, mostly because the speech itself is a long one.  But it is worth reading to the end, to see where the real (capital-P) Progressives stand in American history.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/12/06/teddy-roosevelts-the-new-nationalism-speech/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama Poll Watch -- November, 2011</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/12/05/opw1111/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/12/05/opw1111/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2011 22:34:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Contests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama Poll Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4892</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>This month Obama poll watchers got some good news, and some bad news.  This was capped off, at the end of the month, by the Washington punditocracy making an incredibly stupid comparison between polling for Barack Obama and Jimmy Carter -- which we will address at the end of the column (complete with a "guess the president" graph quiz, for your amusement).</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/12/05/opw1111/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>25</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [190] -- Fine With Me!</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/12/02/ftp190/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/12/02/ftp190/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2011 23:47:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Campaign Ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Talking Points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4871</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>So here's my proposal: Congress should pass a new schedule of fines.  Each would be worded thusly: "the fine shall be $10 million, or 10 percent of the profits the company reported on its annual shareholders' report last year, <strong>whichever is larger</strong>."  That'd be for a minor fine, of course, like a parking ticket.  A bigger infraction would lead to, say, "50 percent," or "100 percent," or even higher.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/12/02/ftp190/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>203</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Three-Dot Thursday</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/12/01/three-dot-thursday-5/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/12/01/three-dot-thursday-5/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2011 01:14:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Libya]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4867</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Collins is, I remind everyone, nominally a member of the Republican Party.  She's right -- this could defuse a major talking point for Republicans, and do it in a very elegant way.  As I said, Democrats should be beating a path to her office door, to quickly work this idea up into legislation that Democrats can support.  It is one of the best ideas I've heard all year, and it deserves serious consideration not only because the idea itself is so workable, but also for the sheer politics of it all -- this could take away a big GOP talking point, right before election season begins.  Democrats: take note!  Please....</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/12/01/three-dot-thursday-5/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>15</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Republicans&#039; Tax Dilemma</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/11/28/republicans-tax-dilemma/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/11/28/republicans-tax-dilemma/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Nov 2011 21:46:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4832</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Have the Republicans in Congress painted themselves into a corner on taxes?  They seem to be in the position of choosing between a number of courses of action, most of which would normally be seen as going against their principles.  They may have dealt themselves a losing hand, to put it another way.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/11/28/republicans-tax-dilemma/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>43</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [189] -- Cut Congress&#039; Pay!</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/11/18/ftp189/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/11/18/ftp189/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Nov 2011 23:40:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Talking Points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4807</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The last time Members of Congress took a cut in pay was on April 1, 1933 -- the midst of a Great Depression.  At a time of similar economic turmoil and record deficits, Congress should not require sacrifices of others without tightening its own belt.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/11/18/ftp189/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>42</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Two Suggestions For Occupy Wall Street</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/11/16/two-suggestions-for-occupy-wall-street/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/11/16/two-suggestions-for-occupy-wall-street/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Nov 2011 00:39:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Free Speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4798</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The big question for the Occupy protests has now become: What next?  With the multiple evictions across the country, the Occupiers have been given an ultimatum of sorts by the powers-that-be: protest and rally all you want, but you can't "occupy" these places any longer by erecting tents and making them your residences.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/11/16/two-suggestions-for-occupy-wall-street/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>64</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>From The Archives: Occupy Crossroads</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/11/15/from-the-archives-occupy-crossroads/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/11/15/from-the-archives-occupy-crossroads/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Nov 2011 01:26:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Free Speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4794</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The "Occupy Wall Street" movement seems to be at a crossroads.  The path it chooses to take next may be the deciding moment for whether it declines into irrelevance or grows beyond its current boundaries into something larger.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/11/15/from-the-archives-occupy-crossroads/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>24</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Guest Column: Occupy Wall Street is Not the Tea Party of the Left</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/11/09/guest-column-occupy-wall-street-is-not-the-tea-party-of-the-left/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/11/09/guest-column-occupy-wall-street-is-not-the-tea-party-of-the-left/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Nov 2011 21:35:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Free Speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guest Authors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Bill of Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4776</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Every so often, I am so impressed by a comment to one of my columns that I offer to just turn my column over to the author, and let them have my soapbox.  This doesn't happen often, usually around once per year.
I've written a few columns so far about the Occupy Wall Street protest, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/11/09/guest-column-occupy-wall-street-is-not-the-tea-party-of-the-left/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>82</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [188] -- Why Not Occupy The Media?</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/11/04/ftp188/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/11/04/ftp188/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Nov 2011 23:50:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Free Speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Talking Points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4759</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Like many Americans, I watched the events unfold in Oakland this week with some trepidation.  Occupy Oakland tried two new tactics in protesting, and both were very successful at achieving a key goal -- that of getting your message across.  Both the general strike and the temporary port shutdown were successful, in this regard.  Later in the night, however, a group of jerks came close to ruining all this, by their criminal behavior.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/11/04/ftp188/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>138</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bank Of America Backs Down</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/11/01/bank-of-america-backs-down/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/11/01/bank-of-america-backs-down/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Nov 2011 22:58:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4741</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>This is not only a victory for consumers (and the Occupy Wall Street folks, incidentally), but a triumph of mathematics and economics.  Because it is ridiculous that big banks should even <em>contemplate</em> these fees in the first place.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/11/01/bank-of-america-backs-down/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>19</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [187] -- GOP&#039;s 22-Week Work Year</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/10/28/ftp187/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/10/28/ftp187/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2011 23:13:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Talking Points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guest Authors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Name-dropping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4724</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>We'd like to begin today with an issue that we regularly get incensed about here, mostly because it flies under the radar of just about everyone -- including the entire media universe.  Because for once, Democrats are making the attempt to use the issue to make some political hay (even though, in this regard, they're admittedly almost as bad as the Republicans).</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/10/28/ftp187/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>32</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Occupy Crossroads</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/10/27/occupy-crossroads/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/10/27/occupy-crossroads/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2011 22:18:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Free Speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Libya]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4720</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The "Occupy Wall Street" movement seems to be at a crossroads.  The path it chooses to take next may be the deciding moment for whether it declines into irrelevance or grows beyond its current boundaries into something larger.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/10/27/occupy-crossroads/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>35</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Republicans Attack Cain&#039;s 9-9-9 Plan</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/10/19/republicans-attack-cains-9-9-9-plan/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/10/19/republicans-attack-cains-9-9-9-plan/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Oct 2011 00:10:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign Ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4688</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Last night, at yet another Republican presidential candidate debate, Herman Cain was roundly criticized for his simplistic 9-9-9 tax plan by his fellow Republicans.  I have to admit, it was a little bizarre (in a "Nixon goes to China" sort of way) to see Republicans disparaging a tax plan for being "regressive."  Ron Paul was unafraid to actually use this word, and while several other candidates avoided the term they in essence leveled the same charge: 9-9-9 would wind up <em>increasing</em> taxes on the poor and the middle class.  Being Republicans, though, they didn't also speak of the other side of this coin -- the fact that 9-9-9 would lower taxes on the wealthy and <em>really</em> lower them on the ultra-wealthy.  But still, it was odd enough to see candidate after candidate speak of their concern for the tax burden of the lower-class and middle-class, since this is usually a Democratic argument.  Perhaps all those 99 Percenters out there demonstrating in the streets are getting through to the Republican politicians?  Stranger things have happened.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/10/19/republicans-attack-cains-9-9-9-plan/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>23</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [185] -- I Am A 99 Percenter</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/10/14/ftp185/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/10/14/ftp185/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Oct 2011 23:30:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Talking Points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4664</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>But, having said all of that, I'm going to make a suggestion anyway, on one particular facet of the movement: its name.  Because I truly think that if the protest wants to grow and expand into a forceful movement for change, it should consider a bit of rebranding.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/10/14/ftp185/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>109</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>When The People Lead</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/10/11/when-the-people-lead/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/10/11/when-the-people-lead/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Oct 2011 23:34:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4649</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The idea behind that title is: "When the People lead, the leaders will follow."  I read this on a bumpersticker a few decades ago, although I must admit I haven't bothered to research the phrase's origins.  Wherever it came from, the idea is a simple (and amusing) one: when the so-called "leaders" aren't leading, then the People will step in and do it for them.  Eventually, the "leaders" will wake up to what is going on and get on board themselves, pretending to have led the movement all along.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/10/11/when-the-people-lead/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [184] -- Long Live Steve Jobs</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/10/07/ftp184/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/10/07/ftp184/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Oct 2011 23:39:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Talking Points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Name-dropping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4629</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>A corporate leader passed away this week, and millions mourned his passing and celebrated his life.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/10/07/ftp184/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>17</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mad As Hell</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/10/05/mad-as-hell/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/10/05/mad-as-hell/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Oct 2011 23:05:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Name-dropping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4615</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The protesters in the Occupy Wall Street movement have been getting criticized for not being focused enough, or not providing a list of demands, or not having leaders, or any number of other things by the media.  But this can be forgiven, because the media are now at least paying attention, rather than just completely ignoring the protest.  What surprises me is that the media (at least so far) haven't realized the frustration the protesters feel is the real story here.  Call it free-floating rage, if you will.  Or, even better, call it an updated Howard Beale moment.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/10/05/mad-as-hell/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>17</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Wall Street Protest, Circa 1967</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/10/03/wall-street-protest-circa-1967/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/10/03/wall-street-protest-circa-1967/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Oct 2011 23:51:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4605</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Forty-four years ago, Abbie Hoffman and a few friends made a statement on Wall Street.  His merry band of pranksters took a tour of the New York Stock Exchange on August 24, 1967.  The tour ended at a gallery overlooking the actual trading floor.  Hoffman and his friends rushed to the railing, and began throwing money onto the heads of the traders below.  The stock ticker (at the time, the sacred heartbeat of the American financial system) was halted for six minutes, while the crowd grubbed for the money on the floor.  Hoffman's group was then escorted out, where they spoke to a crowd of reporters.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/10/03/wall-street-protest-circa-1967/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [183] -- What I&#039;d Call &quot;Class Warfare&quot;</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/09/30/ftp183/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/09/30/ftp183/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2011 23:26:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Talking Points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Humor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4590</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Last week (as with this week) the subject <em>de semaine</em> was "class warfare."  The comment which inspired this week's mini-rants contained a simple, repetitive concept: "When [something outrageous pushed by Republicans happens], nobody calls it 'class warfare'.  Maybe we should."</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/09/30/ftp183/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>62</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [182] -- Class Warfare?  Hardly.</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/09/23/ftp182/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/09/23/ftp182/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Sep 2011 23:12:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Talking Points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4556</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>A satellite is falling out of the sky, but it probably won't hit anybody.  Probably.  I personally got over this fear by listening to Creedence Clearwater Revival's "It Came Out Of The Sky" (which I heartily recommend, just on general principles).</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/09/23/ftp182/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>27</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Elizabeth Warren&#039;s Campaign Takes Off</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/09/21/elizabeth-warrens-campaign-takes-off/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/09/21/elizabeth-warrens-campaign-takes-off/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Sep 2011 23:27:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4545</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Elizabeth Warren is a polarizing figure.  Liberals love her with a fierce passion.  Republicans hate her with a fiery passion.  What this means is that lots and lots of money from outside the state will be pumped into this race.  The reason why Democrats are going to be watching this race closer than any other Senate race next year is easy to see: this may be the only state Democrats have a good chance to pick up a seat from the Republicans.  The math isn't good for Democrats this time around in the Senate, and they are in danger of losing control of the chamber next year.  Warren may be the sole bright spot in this environment for Democrats.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/09/21/elizabeth-warrens-campaign-takes-off/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>18</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama Redefines Populism</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/09/19/obama-redefines-populism/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/09/19/obama-redefines-populism/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Sep 2011 23:57:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4535</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>"Populism" is a word that gets thrown around with abandon by folks masquerading as journalists on television these days.  Sarah Palin had the word used to describe her, and later, the entire Tea Party movement was labeled "populist" by the chattering classes.  Today, President Obama unveiled a truly populist agenda, by proposing to tax millionaires at the same tax rate that middle-class Americans pay.  By doing so, Obama will (hopefully) redefine the term "populism" in the political conversation.  Or, to be technical, he will re-redefine the word back to what it originally meant.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/09/19/obama-redefines-populism/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [181] -- Ads Obama Should Run</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/09/16/ftp181/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/09/16/ftp181/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Sep 2011 23:08:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign Ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Talking Points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Name-dropping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4524</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Since the president is not facing a primary challenger, and since the president has raised a whopping big pile of money already, and (most importantly) since the president has rediscovered the joys of speaking directly to the American people about his agenda -- why not buy some political ads, now?</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/09/16/ftp181/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>39</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Merkley&#039;s Right: CBO Should Score Jobs</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/09/14/merkleys-right-cbo-should-score-jobs/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/09/14/merkleys-right-cbo-should-score-jobs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Sep 2011 22:52:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4518</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Senator Jeff Merkley of Oregon has just proposed a stunningly good idea: for all legislation which emerges from the joint committee charged with lowering the deficit, direct the congressional "scoring" referee not only to provide the numbers for the impact on the federal budget, but also to provide data on the impact on the unemployment rate and the jobs situation.  This is such an excellent idea, both on its merits and politically, that it should immediately be supported by all Democrats.  Because it would force the public debate to cover the entire scope of the proposals being offered up, and it would do so by providing the data the public most cares about right now: how will this create or destroy jobs?</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/09/14/merkleys-right-cbo-should-score-jobs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>17</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Will Palin Go Rogue?</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/09/12/will-palin-go-rogue/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/09/12/will-palin-go-rogue/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Sep 2011 22:17:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Name-dropping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4511</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>"What will Sarah do?" has been a question on the minds of many in the run-up to the Republican primary season next year.  Definitively figuring out the answer to this question is a fool's game, however, because Sarah Palin continually shows the ability to surprise the punditocracy, the public, and the Republican establishment.  Only Palin herself is ever confident of knowing what Sarah will do next, in other words.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/09/12/will-palin-go-rogue/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>28</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [180] -- Give &#039;Em Hell, Barry!</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/09/09/ftp180/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/09/09/ftp180/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Sep 2011 00:02:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign Ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Talking Points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4503</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>President Barack Obama opened his re-election campaign last night with a wowzer of a speech to a joint session of Congress.  But we'll get to that in detail in a minute.  First, we must mark an important anniversary this week.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/09/09/ftp180/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>22</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Congressional Democrats&#039; Advice For Obama&#039;s Jobs Speech</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/09/07/congressional-democrats-advice-for-obamas-jobs-speech/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/09/07/congressional-democrats-advice-for-obamas-jobs-speech/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Sep 2011 22:10:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Interviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4493</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The nation is waiting to hear what President Obama is going to say tomorrow night, when he gives an address to a joint session of Congress on the subject of jobs.  Plenty of people have already been offering advice to the White House, but instead we thought it'd be interesting to ask some of the people who are going to be sitting in the audience tomorrow what they'd advise the president to include in his speech.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/09/07/congressional-democrats-advice-for-obamas-jobs-speech/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>28</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [179] -- Labor Daze</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/09/02/ftp179/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/09/02/ftp179/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Sep 2011 23:06:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Talking Points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4470</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>It surpasses all irony and actually enters into the realm of bitter humor that we're about to celebrate Labor Day when the unemployment rate remains at the sky-high level of 9.1 percent.  There are millions of Americans who are <em>not</em> laboring for a paycheck this year, and they have nothing at all to celebrate.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/09/02/ftp179/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>28</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ron Paul Versus Government</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/08/29/ron-paul-versus-government/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/08/29/ron-paul-versus-government/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Aug 2011 23:36:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4460</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>To his supporters, one of Ron Paul's most endearing qualities is his forthrightness.  Paul doesn't mince words, he tells you to your face exactly what he thinks.  And, to give the man credit, he keeps to his positions even when it would be a lot easier for him to either fudge an answer or tone down his beliefs, the way most politicians do (at certain times).</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/08/29/ron-paul-versus-government/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Taking Rick Perry Seriously</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/08/24/taking-rick-perry-seriously/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/08/24/taking-rick-perry-seriously/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Aug 2011 00:12:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4442</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>This should force pundits across the political spectrum to re-evaluate Rick Perry's campaign.  Instead of seeing through the lens of: "what my circle of friends thinks of Rick Perry's gaffes," this time the pundits should focus a little more closely on: "what Republican primary voters think of Rick Perry as a candidate."  Because, so far, they seem to be flocking to support Perry -- to the visible detriment of Mitt Romney's standing in the polls.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/08/24/taking-rick-perry-seriously/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>15</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [178] -- Phony Vacation Outrage</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/08/19/ftp178/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/08/19/ftp178/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Aug 2011 23:52:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign Ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Talking Points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4422</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>It's silly season in the political world, once again.  And this year -- just like every year a Democrat occupies the White House -- an old favorite of a story is making the rounds.  It involves some very thinly-veneered outrage, which is completely fabricated and hypocritical in the extreme.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/08/19/ftp178/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>GOP Field Tightens</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/08/15/gop-field-tightens/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/08/15/gop-field-tightens/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Aug 2011 23:32:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4411</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Almost a full month ago, I placed four names in the "Frontrunners" category: Michele Bachmann, Sarah Palin, Rick Perry, and Mitt Romney.  This list hasn't changed at all, although Palin will fall back the next time around if she doesn't announce in the next three or four weeks (more on this in a bit).</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/08/15/gop-field-tightens/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>41</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [177] -- Corporations Are People, Mitt?</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/08/12/ftp177/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/08/12/ftp177/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Aug 2011 00:17:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Talking Points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4402</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>But perhaps I'm being too harsh.  The reason the clip was edited down so much was that the <em>other</em> heckling clip was <em>so much better</em> -- Romney misspeaking, and then instead of just immediately walking it back, actually digging the hole deeper.  In answer to a question about raising taxes on corporations, Romney answered (at first) that he wasn't going to raise taxes "on people."  When the questioner yelled back "Corporations, not people!" Romney could easily have said something along the lines of "Sorry, I meant to say corporations -- I'm actually not going to raise taxes on people <em>or</em> on corporations, and here's why...."  It would have just melded the whole thing into standard Republican dogma, and Romney would have been safe.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/08/12/ftp177/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>36</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Wisconsin Centennial Worth Celebrating</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/08/10/a-wisconsin-centennial-worth-celebrating/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/08/10/a-wisconsin-centennial-worth-celebrating/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Aug 2011 23:42:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4391</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Since the news this morning out of Wisconsin is a bit depressing for progressives (and Progressives), I thought it was time to mark an important upcoming centennial there.  On the first of September in 1911, the first constitutional workers' compensation law took full effect in Wisconsin.  The law had been passed on May 3, 1911.  By all rights, I should have written about it back then, or waited until September for the anniversary of the law taking effect, but I thought today was a good day to reminisce about when Wisconsin was at the forefront of the Labor movement, instead of where they find themselves today.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/08/10/a-wisconsin-centennial-worth-celebrating/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>15</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Wisconsin&#039;s Vote More Important Than Iowa&#039;s</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/08/08/wisconsins-vote-more-important-than-iowas/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/08/08/wisconsins-vote-more-important-than-iowas/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Aug 2011 23:52:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4381</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>This week is being touted, in the political world, as a big week in the state of Iowa.  There will be a nationally-televised Republican presidential candidate debate, and then a few days later the Ames Straw Poll will take place.  The straw poll is (as always) being hyped in the media as the "first voting" in the upcoming presidential nominating contest.  But the media should pay more attention to what is happening in Wisconsin this week, because rather than some "vote"-buying exercise (that always proves itself to be completely meaningless in the grand scheme of the presidential election process), Wisconsin could prove to be a much better weathervane in terms of predicting which way the political winds will be blowing, come next year.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/08/08/wisconsins-vote-more-important-than-iowas/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [176] -- More Tea, Anyone?</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/08/05/ftp176/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/08/05/ftp176/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Aug 2011 23:34:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Talking Points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Vice President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4371</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>With the conclusion of the debt ceiling "crisis," the media pivoted swiftly to their standard larger questions (to them, at any rate) about any political event these days: "Who won?  Who lost?"</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/08/05/ftp176/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>100</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>No FAA Bill?  No-Fly List.</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/08/03/no-faa-bill-no-fly-list/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/08/03/no-faa-bill-no-fly-list/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Aug 2011 22:57:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4363</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>This is unacceptable.  This is beyond dysfunctional.  This is, in fact, an outrage.  So I'm giving Congress a grace period of precisely two days, to get their butts back to Washington to fix this problem <em>immediately</em>.  If I don't have a bill on my desk by the end of this Friday, I will instruct my Attorney General to immediately put every member of Congress on the "no-fly" list.  To be blunt, if they can't find the time to fund the F.A.A. and prefer to take weeks off on vacation instead, then they will not be allowed to use the F.A.A.'s services in the meantime.  Period.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/08/03/no-faa-bill-no-fly-list/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>24</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Which Three Democratic Senators?</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/08/01/which-three-democratic-senators/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/08/01/which-three-democratic-senators/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Aug 2011 23:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4348</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The House and Senate are getting ready to vote on the deal struck to avoid America defaulting on her debts.  Nobody knows exactly the magnitude of what is being cut in detail yet, and the news media seem more interested in the eternal "who's up/who's down" horserace nonsense than in informing the public what exactly has been agreed to in this deal.  This should come as no surprise, since it is (as always) <em>ever</em> so much more fun for "journalists" to blather on about "what it all means" seen through the political lens, instead of "what it all means" in terms of... well, what it <em>actually is going to mean</em> for America.  Perhaps in a few days, when they get bored with the political aspects, we'll finally find out exactly what the cuts are going to cover.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/08/01/which-three-democratic-senators/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>22</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [175] -- In The Darkest Depths Of Mordor</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/07/29/ftp175/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/07/29/ftp175/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jul 2011 23:37:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Talking Points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Name-dropping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4338</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>If I were a Hobbit, right about now I would be wondering just <em>how the heck</em> I wound up at the center of this Washington intraparty political fight, personally.  What (I would ponder in my metaphorical Hobbit hole) had I done to <em>any of these folks</em> to deserve being dragged into this fracas?</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/07/29/ftp175/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>54</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Can Speaker Boehner Survive?</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/07/28/can-speaker-boehner-survive/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/07/28/can-speaker-boehner-survive/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jul 2011 23:33:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4334</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>As I write this, the House of Representatives has still not voted on Speaker John Boehner's plan to raise the debt ceiling.  But no matter how the vote goes, the real question behind this week's action in the Republican caucus in the House may be whether Boehner will still be Speaker when the shouting's over and done.  The simmering Tea Party factionalism may be about to explode into public view, in other words.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/07/28/can-speaker-boehner-survive/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>29</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Congress&#039; Real Deadline: Summer Vacation</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/07/27/congress-real-deadline-summer-vacation/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/07/27/congress-real-deadline-summer-vacation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jul 2011 22:07:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4326</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>There are now only a handful of possible outcomes of the debt ceiling standoff in Washington.  We'll get to them all in a minute in more detail.  One way or another, it's a pretty safe bet that the issue will (at least temporarily) be resolved by the fifth of August, at the absolute latest.  Bank on it.  The reason for such certainty is a simple one: if the debate goes on in any way <em>past</em> that date, then it will start to cut into Congress' month-long summer vacation.  Which is (as any observer of American politics should know full well) the <em>one unthinkable bridge-too-far</em> in Washington.  Because Congress' vacations are sacred... at least, to them.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/07/27/congress-real-deadline-summer-vacation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>20</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Another Debt Commission?  Really?</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/07/25/another-debt-commission-really/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/07/25/another-debt-commission-really/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jul 2011 23:11:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Vice President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4314</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>There is a grand tradition in Washington -- which is followed by both parties, at various times -- of avoiding big and politically-delicate problems.  This tradition used to be called the "blue-ribbon commission," although for some reason the "blue-ribbon" part isn't used much anymore.  But whatever you call it, this political dodge is created for one purpose and one purpose alone: to waste time.  To the best of my knowledge, no commission (blue-ribbon or otherwise bedecked) has ever come up with a solution to anything which has been thus implemented by the politicians (again, of <em>either</em> party) to solve a big problem (although you could make an argument for the base-closing commission, I guess).  But virtually <em>all</em> of these commissions have succeeded wildly on their main objective of wasting as much time as possible.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/07/25/another-debt-commission-really/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>16</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [174] -- What Would Ronald Reagan Do?</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/07/22/ftp174/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/07/22/ftp174/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jul 2011 00:12:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Talking Points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4303</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The bigger space news this week, sadly, was not that exciting.  The final space shuttle mission just ended.  Although I didn't see it specifically, a newspaper headline-writer with a sense of irony would have set the story under: "The Shuttle Has Landed."  Because this week also saw an anniversary of import to the discussion -- 42 years ago this Wednesday, Neil Armstrong radioed back to Houston the immortal phrase: "The <em>Eagle</em> has landed," marking the first safe landing on Earth's natural satellite by the human species.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/07/22/ftp174/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>81</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Breaking Down The Polling Numbers</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/07/21/breaking-down-the-polling-numbers/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/07/21/breaking-down-the-polling-numbers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jul 2011 00:51:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4295</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>This is but one poll, to be sure.  But most of the other polls I've seen this week back up the data presented here.  Americans are turned off by Republican extremism, and open to Democrats' willingness to compromise.  They are disgusted with the way the lawmakers in Washington are operating, and they may just take out this anger next year at the polls.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/07/21/breaking-down-the-polling-numbers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>2012 Republican Presidential Field Update</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/07/18/2012-republican-presidential-field-update/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/07/18/2012-republican-presidential-field-update/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2011 22:24:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4276</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>In the past few weeks, one rising star has appeared in the Republican firmament (or two, depending on how you count them), and more than a few have begun fading -- perhaps permanently -- from center stage.  But the field itself is not yet set (in terms of who is actually running and who will sit this one out), as the Republican Party continues to search for the perfect candidate to defeat President Obama.  In fact, two of our four frontrunners this time around have not even announced their candidacy yet -- showing how volatile the entire race still remains.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/07/18/2012-republican-presidential-field-update/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [173] -- Obama 2.0?</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/07/15/ftp173/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/07/15/ftp173/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jul 2011 23:50:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Talking Points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Libya]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Vice President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4262</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Are we seeing the new model of Barack Obama's presidency?  Is this (in the parlance of Silicon Valley) "Obama 2.0"?</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/07/15/ftp173/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>36</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Memory Lane: Footnotes From Yesterday&#039;s Article</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/07/14/memory-lane-footnotes-from-yesterdays-article/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/07/14/memory-lane-footnotes-from-yesterdays-article/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jul 2011 23:46:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4257</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Today, I'd like to excerpt some of those articles, as "footnotes" to yesterday's column.  While copyright laws prevent me from just pasting whole articles in here, I am allowed fair usage excerpts, which is what you'll find below.  The promise of the internet was supposed to be easy access to this sort of thing, but in recent years many media sites have locked off their archives behind paywalls, making it impossible to freely access this historical material.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/07/14/memory-lane-footnotes-from-yesterdays-article/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Historical Context Missing From Debt Ceiling Reporting</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/07/13/historical-context-missing-from-debt-ceiling-reporting/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/07/13/historical-context-missing-from-debt-ceiling-reporting/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jul 2011 23:17:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4252</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>I've always been astounded at the near-complete lack of historical memory regularly exhibited by both Washington politicians and the "journalists" who purport to cover them.  Nothing I've seen in the past few weeks has caused me to change this opinion, either, as the fight over raising the federal debt ceiling has played itself out.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/07/13/historical-context-missing-from-debt-ceiling-reporting/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Light Bulb Moment</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/07/12/light-bulb-moment/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/07/12/light-bulb-moment/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jul 2011 00:28:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4246</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>I should begin by saying that if you have no idea what I'm talking about at all, you are in good company.  Most Americans don't even know there's a light bulb debate happening right now in Congress.  If you live in California, however, you likely have already realized what is going on: standard light bulbs are being effectively banned.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/07/12/light-bulb-moment/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [172] -- Obama&#039;s Fourteenth Option</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/07/08/ftp172/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/07/08/ftp172/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jul 2011 22:44:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Talking Points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Bill of Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4225</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The silly season has come early to Washington, it seems.  The root cause is a simple fact of American politics these days -- sometimes, there just can't be transparency.  That's a fairly provocative statement, so allow me to explain my reasoning in detail.  Then, later on (in the talking points section of our program), we'll get into the option of the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution, and how Obama should be using it right about now.  But for now, it's time for a sober assessment of where Washington currently stands.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/07/08/ftp172/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>25</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [171] -- Excerpting Obama&#039;s Press Conference</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/07/01/ftp171/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/07/01/ftp171/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jul 2011 23:29:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Talking Points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4187</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Since the year is now exactly half over, I took the opportunity yesterday to <a href="http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/06/30/obamas-right-congress-doesnt-work/">tally up</a> how much vacation time Congress has taken this year, so far.  The answer is pretty shocking -- the House has taken 46 out of a possible 125 non-holiday weekdays off, and the Senate (not to be outdone) has gone on vacation for 49 days out of those 125.  To put this another way, out of 26 weeks Congress could have worked, the House took over <em>nine weeks</em> off on vacation, and the Senate took almost <em>ten weeks</em> to play rather than work.  Something for everyone to ponder as we all enjoy our measly three-day vacation this weekend!</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/07/01/ftp171/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama&#039;s Right: Congress Doesn&#039;t Work</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/06/30/obamas-right-congress-doesnt-work/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/06/30/obamas-right-congress-doesnt-work/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jun 2011 23:56:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4181</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>President Obama, in his press conference yesterday, took Congress to task over the fact that it doesn't work.  In fact, he did so in <em>both</em> senses of the phrase "doesn't work."  Obama lit into Congress for not doing much in the best of times, and also pointed out the glaring fact that Congress sure does take a lot of vacation time, don't they?</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/06/30/obamas-right-congress-doesnt-work/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>No Budget?  No Paycheck!</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/06/29/no-budget-no-paycheck-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/06/29/no-budget-no-paycheck-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jun 2011 23:16:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4176</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>California has just concluded its first test of a radical concept: if legislators can't manage to do one of the most basic tasks they are hired to do in a timely manner, then cut their pay.  No on-time budget?  No paycheck.  Period.  And while there's not enough data to draw any hard-and-fast conclusions, the idea seemed to work exactly as it was designed: this time around, the politicians were very personally motivated to do their job.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/06/29/no-budget-no-paycheck-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bachmann Rising, Palin Fading?</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/06/27/bachmann-rising-palin-fading/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/06/27/bachmann-rising-palin-fading/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jun 2011 23:15:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4163</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Michele Bachmann's political fortunes are visibly on the rise.  Mostly due to a well-received debate performance and a single good poll in Iowa, Bachmann is now the newest shining star to emerge on the stage of the Republican presidential nomination contest.  Whether she later proves to be a flavor-of-the-week or whether she actually has staying power is still an open question, at this point.  But what appears increasingly obvious is that Bachmann's rise is coming at the expense of another Republican woman's draw on the Republican primary electorate: Sarah Palin.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/06/27/bachmann-rising-palin-fading/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [170] -- Newt Loses Two, Huntsman Gains An &quot;H&quot;</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/06/24/ftp170/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/06/24/ftp170/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jun 2011 23:13:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Talking Points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Libya]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Bill of Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Vice President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4150</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Well, it's certainly been an eventful couple of weeks, hasn't it?</p>
<p>We're back on our regular weekly schedule here after returning home from our second trip this month (this one to Netroots Nation), after which I can firmly conclude that flying, these days, sucks.  Big time.  Sigh.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/06/24/ftp170/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>16</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Spinning Hochul&#039;s Special Election Win</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/05/25/spinning-hochuls-special-election-win/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/05/25/spinning-hochuls-special-election-win/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 May 2011 23:39:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4031</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Sometimes special elections are harbingers of things to come.  And sometimes they are not.  The tricky part is that nobody can tell the difference until long afterwards.  Which certainly doesn't stop rampant speculation in the meantime.  Last night, a Democrat pulled off a surprising upset in New York's 26th congressional district, in an election that was forced due to the resignation of a House member who got caught trolling the internet (with shirtless pictures, no less) for extramarital fun and games.  What this signifies for the 2012 election is anyone's guess, at this point.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/05/25/spinning-hochuls-special-election-win/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Republican Field Shaping Up</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/05/23/republican-field-shaping-up/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/05/23/republican-field-shaping-up/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 May 2011 23:34:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4018</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>With all this frantic jumping in and out of the race, I thought it was time to take another look at the Republican field to see how it is shaping up.  At this point, there are only a few holdouts left on the sidelines, as most of the bigwigs (and some decidedly "smallwigs") have made their intentions known.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/05/23/republican-field-shaping-up/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>22</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [168] -- Zombie Attack!</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/05/20/ftp168/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/05/20/ftp168/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 May 2011 23:46:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign Ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Talking Points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Libya]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Bill of Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4003</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>A word here about timing is necessary, I think.  While the blog post is quite obviously meant as a semi-joke, wouldn't this have been more fun in, say, mid-October -- a few weeks before Hallowe'en?  Instead of this week, with the "End of Days" prophesied for midafternoon this Saturday?  I'm just saying....</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/05/20/ftp168/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>23</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [164] -- Skynet Attacks!</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/04/22/ftp164/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/04/22/ftp164/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Apr 2011 23:34:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Talking Points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Libya]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pakistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=3835</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Again, this is not science fiction.  It's a reality that already exists in the skies over at least two countries right now (and possibly more).  Robots <em>are</em> killing humans.  These robots are not acting on their own, they are fully controlled by human operators -- but the next generation of drone aircraft will not need a human to operate them (again, this is fact, not supposition).  Robot artillery, robot tanks, and robot infantry cannot be all that far behind.  War as the ultimate video game, in other words.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/04/22/ftp164/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>55</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama Hits His Rhetorical Stride</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/04/19/obama-hits-his-rhetorical-stride/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/04/19/obama-hits-his-rhetorical-stride/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Apr 2011 00:08:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=3817</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>But I have to say, just on the scale of speechifyin' alone, Obama seems to be starting his re-election campaign very strongly -- by framing his issues within a basic Democratic narrative which has been missing in action for quite a while.  For that reason alone, both of his recent speeches are worth reading.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/04/19/obama-hits-his-rhetorical-stride/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>16</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [163] -- The Ads Just Write Themselves</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/04/15/ftp163/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/04/15/ftp163/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Apr 2011 00:33:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Talking Points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=3798</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Something the media largely missed in the midst of multiple budgetary battles this week was the fact that this is what bipartisanship looks like.  The media, at least the "serious" ones, residing either inside the Beltway or in lower Manhattan, have long made much sport out of decrying "partisanship" -- at least, when Democrats act like Democrats, at any rate.  Politicians are supposed to "work together" in some Utopian dreamland, to "get serious things done."  It sounds great in an editorial, and all of that.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/04/15/ftp163/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>46</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Suggestions For Obama&#039;s Medicare Counterproposal</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/04/11/suggestions-for-obamas-medicare-counterproposal/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/04/11/suggestions-for-obamas-medicare-counterproposal/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Apr 2011 00:21:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=3780</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>President Obama has now called a "do-over" on his 2012 budget proposal.  This news broke on the Sunday morning political television chat circuit, as the dust was settling on the government shutdown standoff for the remainder of the 2011 budget.  Obama's move was prompted by the budget proposal put on the table by Republican numbers guru Paul Ryan, which seeks to "reform entitlements" by turning Medicare into a voucher system.  Obama's new proposal will reportedly also offer "entitlement reform," although no specifics have leaked out yet.  What the president should realize at this point, though, is that Ryan has just put him in the driver's seat.  Ryan's proposal is so radical that it's going to be very easy for Democrats to present themselves as a more humane alternative to the Republican agenda, and it's going to be very easy for whatever Obama comes up with to look a lot better than just handing seniors a voucher and saying: "Good luck with that medical insurance marketplace."</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/04/11/suggestions-for-obamas-medicare-counterproposal/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>17</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [162] -- Budget Standoff Continues</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/04/08/ftp162/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/04/08/ftp162/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2011 23:51:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Contests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Talking Points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Libya]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=3767</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Sigh.  What's depressing about the whole thing, to me at least, is how the entire knock-down-drag-out fight is merely the <em>preliminary round</em>.  This whole government shutdown walk-to-the-brink-and-stare-into-the-abyss thing is nothing more than the <em>warmup</em> for the next budgetary battles -- which will be <em>much bigger</em>.  The entire initial fight is about staking out ground for the next two fights -- raising the debt ceiling, and the 2012 budget.  Nobody involved -- not the Tea Party Republicans, not President Obama, not John Boehner, not Harry Reid -- really cares all that much about how this particular round ends up.  They're all stuck thinking: "If I give in now, they'll want more later" -- and they're all entirely correct.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/04/08/ftp162/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Real Budget Battle Hasn&#039;t Yet Begun</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/03/31/real-budget-battle-hasnt-yet-begun/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/03/31/real-budget-battle-hasnt-yet-begun/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Mar 2011 23:01:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=3720</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The media is currently obsessing over the prospects of a government shutdown next Friday, and over the congressional budget negotiations currently taking place which could prevent it from happening.  But this is a relatively small fish to fry, because the real budget battle will be officially joined next Tuesday, when Republican Paul Ryan unveils his budget plan for 2012, complete with 10-year projections.  What is currently being debated pales in consequence to the fight over the 2012 budget, although it may take the media a while to realize it, because it is so much more fun to say "government shutdown" in a scary voice on television.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/03/31/real-budget-battle-hasnt-yet-begun/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Congress: Nice Work, If You Can Get It</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/03/29/congress-nice-work-if-you-can-get-it/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/03/29/congress-nice-work-if-you-can-get-it/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Mar 2011 23:37:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2006 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=3705</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The low water mark is the Senate, this year, who has seen fit to only show up <em>one-half</em> of the weekdays available to it.  They took an astonishing <em>twenty-eight</em> workdays off, in under three months' time.  That is taking almost <em>six weeks off</em>, to put it another way.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/03/29/congress-nice-work-if-you-can-get-it/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [159] -- Firing Up The Base</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/03/18/ftp159/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/03/18/ftp159/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Mar 2011 00:22:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Talking Points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pakistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=3654</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Here's a quick test for whether you are being fed speculation and fluff, or whether you are being told real information: Are there numbers involved?  If so, then thank a scientist (and the editor or producer who allows such science on the air, I guess).</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/03/18/ftp159/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>44</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Democrats Play Some Offense</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/03/16/democrats-play-some-offense/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/03/16/democrats-play-some-offense/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Mar 2011 00:00:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=3643</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Are Democrats starting to play some offense?  Three reports seem to lead to this conclusion, although at this point it is too early to tell what sort of effect this will have on the political landscape, for both the near future and for the 2012 election season.  For now, it is refreshing to see Democrats pushing back on a few key issues, whatever their chances of legislative (or political) success happen to be.  And the Democrats have picked three pretty good issues with which to launch this particular offensive -- the mortgage crisis, gay marriage, and taxing millionaires.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/03/16/democrats-play-some-offense/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [158] -- In Non-Charlie-Sheen News...</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/03/11/ftp158/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/03/11/ftp158/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Mar 2011 00:38:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Talking Points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=3623</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>And then -- you simply <em>can't</em> make this stuff up -- the anchor uttered the worst segue I think I've ever heard, possibly the worst in all of television news history: "We turn from the live feed of the tsunami in Japan to a police raid on Charlie Sheen's house in Los Angeles...."</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/03/11/ftp158/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>20</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>On Tactics</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/03/10/on-tactics/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/03/10/on-tactics/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Mar 2011 00:23:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=3617</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>To be fair, Democrats and Republicans alike are prone to doing this sort of thing.  Both using political tactics such as these, and decrying them as being somehow "unfair."  There's no monopoly by either party on this type of political hypocrisy.  Yes, hypocrisy is the right word to use.  Unless you'd prefer "political moral relativism of the worst kind," which is slightly more accurate but a little wordy.  Either way, the equation reads: "This sort of thing is <em>just fine</em> when our side uses it, but <em>downright evil</em> when the other side does the same thing."</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/03/10/on-tactics/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>72</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What &quot;The American People&quot; Really Want</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/03/07/what-the-american-people-really-want/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/03/07/what-the-american-people-really-want/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Mar 2011 01:58:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=3596</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Ever since the midterm congressional election last year, Republicans have been repeating the phrase "The American People" as often as they can, as a sort of mantra.  This isn't all that unusual, since politicians claiming a popular mandate is par for the course in the political game.  But Republicans are exhibiting a rather large amount of overreach when it comes to claiming what "The American People" really want the government to do (and not to do).  This is going to be on full display in the coming weeks, as the budget fights heat up (finishing this year's budget, raising the debt ceiling, and tackling next year's budget).  Most Republicans, especially those of the Tea Party persuasion, are firmly convinced they've got a sweeping mandate to slash federal spending in all sorts of areas.  But they may be surprised by what the public really thinks about these issues, and what they do and do not support.  Helpfully, a new poll put out by the <em>Wall Street Journal</em> and <em>NBC</em> shows a clear list of priorities for what the people really want to see cut, and what they don't.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/03/07/what-the-american-people-really-want/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [157] -- Eight Point Nine</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/03/04/ftp157/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/03/04/ftp157/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Mar 2011 01:06:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Free Speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Talking Points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Bill of Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=3585</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>While technically true ("job growth" is not the same thing as the unemployment rate), but that last sentence could also have been written as: "the unemployment rate fell at the fastest rate in over fifty years -- since 1958, to be exact."  Both are true, and yet they tell very different stories -- "a grim nine percent" versus "fell at the fastest rate in over fifty years."</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/03/04/ftp157/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>29</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [156] -- Fighting On Several Fronts</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/02/25/ftp156/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/02/25/ftp156/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Feb 2011 00:20:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Talking Points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=3544</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>We've got so much to cover this week, we're going to have to move pretty quickly here.  In international news, North Africa and the Middle East are still seething.  The American news media, however, are (I actually heard this phrase being used by someone with a blowdried haircut the other night on television) experiencing "revolution fatigue."  Seriously.  They're bored with the whole storyline.  Another dictator fell?  Crowds of unarmed people being machine-gunned?  Yawn.  Don't we have an Oscars story we could run, instead?</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/02/25/ftp156/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>21</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Labor Shut Out Of Sunday Morning Talk Show Circuit?</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/02/24/labor-shut-out-of-sunday-morning-talk-show-circuit/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/02/24/labor-shut-out-of-sunday-morning-talk-show-circuit/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Feb 2011 01:17:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=3538</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Now, apparently, organized Labor is outside the realm of what is allowable on mainstream political shows.  <em>Even when the subject at hand is organized Labor</em>.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/02/24/labor-shut-out-of-sunday-morning-talk-show-circuit/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Big Brother v. Little Brother</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/02/23/big-brother-v-little-brother/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/02/23/big-brother-v-little-brother/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Feb 2011 00:48:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iran]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=3531</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Everyone knows who "Big Brother" is, of course, because we all had to read George Orwell's <em>Nineteen Eighty-Four</em> at some point in our schooling.  Big Brother is the fictional benevolent figurehead in Orwell's "negative Utopia" masterpiece, whose beaming visage is a front for a totalitarian police state which spies relentlessly upon its own citizenry.  Television sets, in this future world, are both unavoidable and two-way -- broadcasting images of what you are doing in your own home to the government watchers.  To some extent, Orwell's dark fantasy has become everyday life in some places (it's almost impossible to avoid being publicly filmed now in cities like London, for instance).  But there's been a balancing revolution in surveillance as well -- which is more and more apparent in the recent news.  I'm going to call this effect "Little Brother" -- citizens watching, filming, and reporting on governmental activities to a rapt worldwide audience.  And we've already seen how powerful a tool this can be in the Middle East.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/02/23/big-brother-v-little-brother/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>No Budget?  No Pay.</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/02/22/no-budget-no-pay/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/02/22/no-budget-no-pay/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Feb 2011 00:59:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=3526</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Seriously, how many people does <em>anyone</em> know who get a whole week off for <em>Presidents' Day</em>?!?  Congress doesn't take vacations one day at a time, instead it takes off whole <em>weeks</em> -- at the drop of a stovepipe hat.  This has long annoyed me, but it becomes particularly odious when Congress is faced with a very serious deadline -- one that might wind up with a government shutdown -- and <em>nobody even suggests</em> that they might want to <em>get back to work</em> while this clock is ticking down.  Not Harry Reid, not John Boehner, not Nancy Pelosi, not Mitch McConnell, not any Tea Party Republican -- <em>nobody</em> has even entertained the idea that Congress should forego just one of their weeklong "district work periods" (which any sane Human Resources department would call "vacations").</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/02/22/no-budget-no-pay/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>My Class Warfare Rant</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/02/21/my-class-warfare-rant/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/02/21/my-class-warfare-rant/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Feb 2011 19:39:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=3512</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Before I even begin here, I'd like to address what my critics will respond with, when they hear what I have to say.  They're going to call these ideas "class warfare."  You know what?  They're right.  I am calling on the middle class and the working class and all the other classes that make up over 19 out of every 20 Americans to start fighting back.  Note that, please -- fighting <em>back</em>.  Because there has indeed been class warfare waged in America in recent decades, and our class is <em>losing</em> -- and losing badly.  The wealthiest of the wealthy -- the modern-day robber barons among us -- have been successfully waging class warfare on the rest of us for so long now that <em>I am sick of it</em> and I think it's time the rest of us fought back, rather than meekly submitting to the whims of the moneyed class.  So, before my critics even have a chance to respond, I will save them the trouble -- you are <em>damn right</em> that there is class warfare happening in America.  By admitting this, I'm urging the people who have borne the brunt of the situation to wake up and begin to stand up for what is right.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/02/21/my-class-warfare-rant/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>53</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [155] -- Class Warfare Indeed</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/02/18/ftp155/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/02/18/ftp155/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Feb 2011 23:53:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Talking Points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=3500</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Before I even begin here, I'd like to address what my critics will respond with, when they hear what I have to say.  They're going to call these ideas "class warfare."  You know what?  They're right.  I am calling on the middle class and the working class and all the other classes that make up over 19 out of every 20 Americans to start fighting back.  Note that, please -- fighting <em>back</em>.  Because there has indeed been class warfare waged in America in recent decades, and our class is <em>losing</em> -- and losing badly.  The wealthiest of the wealthy -- the modern-day robber barons among us -- have been successfully waging class warfare on the rest of us for so long now that <em>I am sick of it</em> and I think it's time the rest of us fought back, rather than meekly submitting to the whims of the moneyed class.  So, before my critics even have a chance to respond, I will save them the trouble -- you are <em>damn right</em> that there is class warfare happening in America.  By admitting this, I'm urging the people who have borne the brunt of the situation to wake up and begin to stand up for what is right.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/02/18/ftp155/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>22</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Revolutionary Thoughts</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/02/16/revolutionary-thoughts/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/02/16/revolutionary-thoughts/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Feb 2011 00:33:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iran]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Vice President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=3488</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The revolutionary tidal wave (or, if you prefer, the "Tunisami") sweeping the Middle East and North Africa spreads ever wider, as in country after country young protesters take to the streets in an attempt to change their countries' governments.  But don't expect an outcome equal to the (mostly) peaceful overthrows in Tunis and Egypt in every single country now affected by this "people power" movement.  There are major differences from country to country, both in terms of the form of government (and the military), and in terms of the likelihood of a victorious outcome for the protesters.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/02/16/revolutionary-thoughts/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Budget Season Overview</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/02/14/budget-season-overview/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/02/14/budget-season-overview/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Feb 2011 00:38:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=3478</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>It's "Budget Season" once again in Washington, and since it's going to be a particularly contentious and complex one this year, it's worth taking a moment at the beginning to provide an overview of the entire process which is about to play out over the next two or three months.  There are, at this point, three main budget battles to be fought.  One of these isn't strictly a budget battle, but will likely devolve into one, hence its inclusion in the list.  Two of these have hard and fast calendar deadlines.  All three of them are going to be major political battles, and it's unclear what the outcome of any of them is going to be at this point.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/02/14/budget-season-overview/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama: Too Many Boats Have Been Left Behind</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/02/07/obama-too-many-boats-have-been-left-behind/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/02/07/obama-too-many-boats-have-been-left-behind/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Feb 2011 23:31:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=3446</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Corporate America is on our minds today, because President Obama just gave a speech to the U.S. Chamber of Commerce.  With the future decidedly uncertain, Obama made overtures to the corporate community, and also called on them to be responsible and help build the middle class of this country, by insuring that all boats are lifted by the tide, and not get (as he put it) "left behind, stuck in the mud."  This wasn't the only time in the speech he got Kennedyesque, also calling on the corporate titans to: "Ask yourselves what you can do to hire more American workers, what you can do to support the American economy and invest in this nation."</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/02/07/obama-too-many-boats-have-been-left-behind/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>He Is Us</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/02/03/he-is-us/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/02/03/he-is-us/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Feb 2011 01:49:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iran]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=3431</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Egypt, it seems, is failing to follow a convenient storyline for the American journalists to follow.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/02/03/he-is-us/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama&#039;s New Ideas</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/01/26/obamas-new-ideas/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/01/26/obamas-new-ideas/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Jan 2011 23:57:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=3383</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The day after President Obama's big yearly speech to Congress and the American people, most pundits and talking-head types in the media are vying to outdo each other on stating "what it all means" or similar high-flown overanalysis.  What many of them seem to have missed, however, is the fact that Obama used his speech to introduce a few topics into the political debate.  Some of these topics have been around for a while, championed by various people and groups, but what seems newsworthy to me is the fact that Obama included them in his list of proposals for the future.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/01/26/obamas-new-ideas/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&quot;State Of The Union&quot; Predictions</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/01/24/state-of-the-union-predictions/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/01/24/state-of-the-union-predictions/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Jan 2011 01:01:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=3369</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Well, it's that time of year again.  The time of year when pundits across the land helpfully (oh, so helpfully) offer the president advice on what he should say in his "State Of The Union" speech tomorrow.  While I've engaged in this sort of thing before, this year I'd like to make predictions of what President Obama <em>will</em> say tomorrow night (as opposed to what I would <em>like</em> him to say).  Which means I'm not endorsing any of this personally, merely attempting to predict what will be in tomorrow night's speech in advance.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/01/24/state-of-the-union-predictions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>20</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

