<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>ChrisWeigant.com &#187; Politicians</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.chrisweigant.com/category/politicians/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com</link>
	<description>Reality-based political commentary</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 23:31:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Romney&#039;s &quot;Very Poor&quot; Choice Of Words</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/02/06/romneys-very-poor-choice-of-words/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/02/06/romneys-very-poor-choice-of-words/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 23:31:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign Ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=5159</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Mitt Romney's gaffe last week (reproduced in full, above) is going to wind up the "gaffe that keeps on giving" for Barack Obama and the Democrats in this election cycle.  Because the more Romney's comment is examined and dissected, the worse it looks for him.  This could, in fact, be the defining moment for Mitt Romney as a national political presence.  That phrase is often bandied about in politics, but I use it here in the full literal sense of "defining moment" -- a point in time which absolutely cements an image in the public mind of who you are and what you stand for as a politician.  The image, quite obviously, is not a good one for Romney.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/02/06/romneys-very-poor-choice-of-words/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [196] -- Poor Mitt?</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/02/03/ftp196/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/02/03/ftp196/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 00:10:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign Ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Free Speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Talking Points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Bill of Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Vice President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=5146</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Mitt Romney, frontrunner for the Republican nomination, announced he wasn't too worried about poor people.  Maybe it would be fun to see Romney debate Joe Biden, just because nobody would know what to expect from either of them.  Heh.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/02/03/ftp196/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>28</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>GOP PUMAs?</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/02/02/gop-pumas/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/02/02/gop-pumas/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 01:17:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=5141</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The thought which keeps flitting through my mind is whether the Republicans are going to face their own "PUMA" problem this fall.  For those who don't remember the term from 2008, PUMA stood for "Party Unity, My Ass!" and was the rallying cry of the non-existent hordes of pro-Hillary Democrats who were reportedly going to cause major disruption at the Democratic National Convention, and then throw the election to John McCain in the fall.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/02/02/gop-pumas/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>16</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama Poll Watch -- January, 2012</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/02/01/opw1201/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/02/01/opw1201/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 22:34:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama Poll Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=5135</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>President Barack Obama continued a three-month upward swing in the polls in January, with his average job approval rating for the month ticking up 1.2 points, and his disapproval rate falling by exactly the same amount.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/02/01/opw1201/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mittmentum!</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/01/31/mittmentum/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/01/31/mittmentum/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 02:57:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=5127</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>All in all, it's looking like whether Newt Gingrich wants to admit it yet or not, by Super Tuesday this race will likely be pretty much over.  Of course, this year, predictions of such a nature have certainly had a way of turning out wrong, but it's safe to say that Mitt Romney is feeling pretty good about things right about now.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/01/31/mittmentum/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Predicting Florida: Newt&#039;s Petard</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/01/30/predicting-florida-newts-petard/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/01/30/predicting-florida-newts-petard/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 01:03:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign Ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=5121</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>As we wend our way through the Republican primary season, at times predicting the outcome of a single state's race is very hard to do.  At other times, it is actually pretty easy.  Florida looks to be one of the latter.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/01/30/predicting-florida-newts-petard/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [195] -- SOTU Review</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/01/27/ftp195/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/01/27/ftp195/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jan 2012 00:27:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign Ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Libya]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=5112</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Well, that was an eventful week in politics, wasn't it?</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/01/27/ftp195/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>33</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Conservative Establishment Piles On Newt</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/01/26/conservative-establishment-piles-on-newt/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/01/26/conservative-establishment-piles-on-newt/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 00:54:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=5107</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Newt Gingrich may win the Florida Republican primary.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/01/26/conservative-establishment-piles-on-newt/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The State Of The Union</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/01/24/the-state-of-the-union/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/01/24/the-state-of-the-union/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 05:43:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iran]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Libya]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pakistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=5098</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>I haven't written one of these snap-judgment reactions to a speech in a while, so forgive me if this is a bit choppy and disorganized.  As always, I am writing this before looking at other opinions of President Obama's just-completed State Of The Union speech.  I feel this keeps my opinion unsullied by any sort of "groupthink" effect.  Sometimes I read other speech reviews the next day and find I agree with them, sometimes not, but this way at least you know I'm not just regurgitating others' thoughts.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/01/24/the-state-of-the-union/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>28</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pure Newtonium</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/01/23/pure-newtonium/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/01/23/pure-newtonium/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 23:32:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=5093</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>What a difference a week makes, at least in the Republican primary contest.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/01/23/pure-newtonium/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>77</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [194] -- Out Of Touch</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/01/20/ftp194/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/01/20/ftp194/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jan 2012 00:31:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign Ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Talking Points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=5081</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[OK, to be completely honest, we just felt like beating up on some Republicans today.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/01/20/ftp194/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>48</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Economic Optimism?</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/01/19/economic-optimism/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/01/19/economic-optimism/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 00:19:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=5077</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>It's still early days to even know if the economy is truly about to enter a strong recovery or not.  A few data points on a graph do not always a trend line make, to put it another way.  But from what I have personally seen in previous recessions, there always seems to be a real "tipping point" where American businesses collectively decide that things are going to be better soon -- and then they start hiring people and fulfilling their own prophecy.  This could indeed be such a turning point.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/01/19/economic-optimism/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>43</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Not-Romney Race Killing Not-Romney&#039;s Chances</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/01/18/not-romney-race-killing-not-romneys-chances/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/01/18/not-romney-race-killing-not-romneys-chances/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 00:42:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=5072</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>If either Gingrich or Santorum (or even Perry) had managed to cement their status as the alpha "not-Romney" in the race at this point, they might have had a chance in that fabled "two-man race" (or, more properly, "two-man-plus-Ron-Paul race").  Adding Gingrich and Santorum's support in South Carolina easily shows that Romney could have been defeated here, if the field had narrowed.  Florida would even be in play, likely.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/01/18/not-romney-race-killing-not-romneys-chances/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>23</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Governor O&#039;Malley Is Right</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/01/17/governor-omalley-is-right/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/01/17/governor-omalley-is-right/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 00:50:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign Ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=5067</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>O'Malley makes a good point.  President Obama's re-election team should heed it.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/01/17/governor-omalley-is-right/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [193] -- Run It Up The Flagpole</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/01/13/ftp193/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/01/13/ftp193/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2012 23:50:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign Ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Talking Points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iran]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Libya]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=5055</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Not a whole lot has been happening in Washington, due to Congress being out on one of their countless month-long vacations.  Not a whole lot of Democrats have been in the news, either, since the Republican primary season is sucking all the oxygen out of the political arena right now.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/01/13/ftp193/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>81</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mitt&#039;s Tax Returns</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/01/12/mitts-tax-returns/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/01/12/mitts-tax-returns/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2012 00:19:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=5051</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>What is hiding in Mitt Romney's tax returns?</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/01/12/mitts-tax-returns/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>74</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Happy Birthday, Common Sense</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/01/11/happy-birthday-common-sense/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/01/11/happy-birthday-common-sense/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2012 01:09:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Name-dropping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=5046</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Two hundred and thirty-six years ago this week, a pamphlet was published in Philadelphia.  There is some disagreement among historians over the exact date (variously given as January 9th or 10th), and the pamphlet's title page itself only lists the year, 1776.  Whatever the actual date, though, Thomas Paine's <em>Common Sense</em> hit the American consciousness like a bombshell -- one which would reverberate for years to come.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/01/11/happy-birthday-common-sense/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Old-School Editorializing</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/01/10/old-school-editorializing/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/01/10/old-school-editorializing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2012 01:55:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=5042</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>What struck me about New Hampshire's contest, being in the midst of historical research into such things, was the old-school nature of the <em>Union Leader</em>, a very conservative New Hampshire newspaper.  It struck a lot of the media as interesting as well, but I didn't see anyone else commenting on such historical context.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/01/10/old-school-editorializing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Calling New Hampshire&#039;s Primary</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/01/09/calling-new-hampshires-primary/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/01/09/calling-new-hampshires-primary/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2012 23:11:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=5036</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Tomorrow, New Hampshire voters will go to their first-in-the-nation (don't-mention-Iowa-to-us-that's-a-caucus-dammit!) primary, and cast their votes in the Republican nominating contest.  Which means it's time to haul out the old crystal ball and attempt to predict what's going to happen.  If you hate these types of speculative wonktastic articles, then I strongly advise you to just close this article right now, and start a game of Angry Birds or something.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/01/09/calling-new-hampshires-primary/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [192] -- Obama Picking His Fights</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/01/06/ftp192/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/01/06/ftp192/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2012 22:56:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Talking Points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=5026</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>I have to say, while the Republicans have been having their three-ring primary circus, President Obama has been looking better and better.  Both in comparison to the Republican field (of nightmares, so to speak), and also because Obama's been making progress on his own.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/01/06/ftp192/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>160</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama Poll Watch -- December, 2011</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/01/04/opw1112/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/01/04/opw1112/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2012 23:07:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama Poll Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pakistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=5016</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>President Obama had a pretty good month last month in the job approval polls, bettering his standing in both approval and disapproval by roughly three-fourths of percentage point.  This may not sound like that big a deal, but it was the second straight month of solid gains for the president in both categories.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/01/04/opw1112/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>62</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Romney Inevitable?</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/01/03/romney-inevitable/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/01/03/romney-inevitable/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2012 04:48:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign Ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=5009</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>I thought I'd wait to write today until the Iowa results were in, because I haven't done one of these "snap judgment" sorts of things for a while.  As I begin, roughly 85 percent of the votes have been reported.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/01/03/romney-inevitable/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>18</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Predicting Iowa</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/01/02/predicting-iowa/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/01/02/predicting-iowa/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jan 2012 23:20:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign Ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=5001</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>I realize everyone is probably already sick of hearing predictions about the Iowa Republican caucuses, and if this does indeed describe you then you should probably go watch a football game or something -- because that's exactly what we're going to do today: throw prognosticatory Hawkeye darts at the wall, and take our chances as we may.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/01/02/predicting-iowa/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>My 2011 &quot;McLaughlin Awards&quot; [Part 2]</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/12/23/my-2011-mclaughlin-awards-part-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/12/23/my-2011-mclaughlin-awards-part-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Dec 2011 22:08:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Libya]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Name-dropping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4982</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Her campaign so far has been the populist model for every other Democrat to mimic if they want to catch the wave of anger at Wall Street, and use it to their benefit.  Without question, Elizabeth Warren is Destined For Political Stardom.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/12/23/my-2011-mclaughlin-awards-part-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>43</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama Looking Stronger</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/12/22/obama-looking-stronger/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/12/22/obama-looking-stronger/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Dec 2011 23:58:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4978</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>President Obama is looking a lot stronger these days.  Today, especially, the president emerges as the big winner in the showdown with John Boehner and the House Republicans.  But Obama's been looking better and better all month, so Boehner caving should be seen as just the icing on the cake for Obama.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/12/22/obama-looking-stronger/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>29</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Making A List, Checking It Twice...</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/12/21/making-a-list-checking-it-twice/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/12/21/making-a-list-checking-it-twice/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Dec 2011 00:32:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Humor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Name-dropping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4972</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The Head Elf turns back to his iPad.  "Mitch McConnell says he wants some media attention.  He complains they all ignore him and run to John Boehner instead.  Boehner, on the other hand, wants <em>less</em> attention paid to the fact that he can't control his own caucus."</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/12/21/making-a-list-checking-it-twice/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>25</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>My 2011 &quot;McLaughlin Awards&quot; [Part 1]</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/12/16/my-2011-mclaughlin-awards-part-1/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/12/16/my-2011-mclaughlin-awards-part-1/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Dec 2011 01:36:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign Ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Free Speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iran]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Libya]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Name-dropping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pakistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4954</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>As always, if you disagree with any (or all) of my picks, feel free to make your own in the comments.  The categories are completely open to interpretation, and don't forget that there will be a "Part 2" column next week, so I can likely squeeze things I forgot in there.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/12/16/my-2011-mclaughlin-awards-part-1/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>33</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Happy Bill Of Rights Day</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/12/15/happy-bill-of-rights-day/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/12/15/happy-bill-of-rights-day/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Dec 2011 01:03:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Free Speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Bill of Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Vice President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4950</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Instead, I'd like to gently point out that the same Founding Fathers that achieved this monumental milestone in government (some of them, at least) were the same ones who tried to eviscerate these same basic protections -- within seven years of the Bill of Rights' ratification.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/12/15/happy-bill-of-rights-day/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Year-End Award Suggestions?</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/12/13/year-end-award-suggestions/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/12/13/year-end-award-suggestions/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2011 01:55:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Contests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Name-dropping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4938</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Feel free to suggest anyone or anything you'd like.  The only rules of interpretation for what the categories mean are your own.  If I think they're the best suggestion I've heard, I may use some of your suggestions in this Friday's column.  We'll be returning to this subject next week, for part two, with a whole new set of categories.  For now, who would you select for any or all of the following?  Post your choices in the comments!</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/12/13/year-end-award-suggestions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>32</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Call The Newtsplosion Contest</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/12/12/call-the-newtsplosion-contest/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/12/12/call-the-newtsplosion-contest/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Dec 2011 23:17:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Contests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Humor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4932</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Peggy Noonan, a consummate Washington insider with impeccable conservative credentials, recently came up with a <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970203413304577086824255350642.html?mod=WSJ_latestheadlines">nice turn of phrase</a> to describe Newt Gingrich: "He is a human hand grenade who walks around with his hand on the pin, saying, 'Watch this!' "  Back in Newt's heyday, the comic strip <em>Doonesbury</em> portrayed Gingrich as a lit bomb with a short fuse, who would occasionally explode with a bang.  Right and Left seem to be in agreement on Newt's resemblance to trinitrotoluene, in other words (or, maybe, "Newtroglycerine"?).  Which leaves only one key question to be answered: When, exactly, will this "Newtsplosion" take place?</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/12/12/call-the-newtsplosion-contest/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>57</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [191] -- The White Knight Is Talking Backwards...</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/12/09/ftp191/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/12/09/ftp191/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Dec 2011 00:01:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign Ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Talking Points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Name-dropping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4921</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>You know, it strikes me that this week may be one politics-watchers look back on when proving the thesis: "Anything can happen in politics, and usually does."  I can picture seeing some wise pundit a few years down the road making the historical reference: "Yeah, but remember when Newt Gingrich and Ron Paul were leading the polls in the Iowa caucuses?  Anything can happen... just <em>any</em>thing..."</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/12/09/ftp191/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>58</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>From The Archives -- Question For Obama: How About A Science-Based Drug Policy?</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/12/08/from-the-archives-question-for-obama-how-about-a-science-based-drug-policy/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/12/08/from-the-archives-question-for-obama-how-about-a-science-based-drug-policy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Dec 2011 00:26:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4917</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Two-and-a-half years ago, I wrote the following column, hoping that the Obama administration was going to live up to its promise to have a "science-based" drug policy.  I spoke of two examples: medical marijuana, and the "morning after" pill.  Today seemed a real good day to re-run this column.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/12/08/from-the-archives-question-for-obama-how-about-a-science-based-drug-policy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Two Ron Paul Winning Scenarios</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/12/07/two-ron-paul-winning-scenarios/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/12/07/two-ron-paul-winning-scenarios/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2011 00:05:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign Ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4911</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Since the 2012 Republican nomination fight has, so far been marked by its "anything could happen" nature, and since Ron Paul is still very much in the race in places like Iowa, let's explore how he could actually win the Republican nomination.  This scenario is unthinkable for many inside-the-Beltway types and mainstream media types alike, but since it is the height of speculation season, a winning Paul scenario is worth considering.  Two of them, in fact.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/12/07/two-ron-paul-winning-scenarios/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Teddy Roosevelt&#039;s &quot;The New Nationalism&quot; Speech</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/12/06/teddy-roosevelts-the-new-nationalism-speech/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/12/06/teddy-roosevelts-the-new-nationalism-speech/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Dec 2011 00:53:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guest Authors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Name-dropping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4903</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[President Barack Obama gave a speech today in a small town in Kansas.  The reason he chose this venue for this speech was to draw historical comparisons with a speech given there by Teddy Roosevelt, over one hundred years ago.  While you may see some clips of Obama's speech in the news, few will bother to look up the original speech.  Which is a shame, and which is why we present it today.  We leave comparisons with Obama's speech to others, for now, mostly because the speech itself is a long one.  But it is worth reading to the end, to see where the real (capital-P) Progressives stand in American history.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/12/06/teddy-roosevelts-the-new-nationalism-speech/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama Poll Watch -- November, 2011</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/12/05/opw1111/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/12/05/opw1111/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2011 22:34:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Contests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama Poll Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4892</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>This month Obama poll watchers got some good news, and some bad news.  This was capped off, at the end of the month, by the Washington punditocracy making an incredibly stupid comparison between polling for Barack Obama and Jimmy Carter -- which we will address at the end of the column (complete with a "guess the president" graph quiz, for your amusement).</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/12/05/opw1111/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>25</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [190] -- Fine With Me!</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/12/02/ftp190/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/12/02/ftp190/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2011 23:47:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Campaign Ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Talking Points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4871</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>So here's my proposal: Congress should pass a new schedule of fines.  Each would be worded thusly: "the fine shall be $10 million, or 10 percent of the profits the company reported on its annual shareholders' report last year, <strong>whichever is larger</strong>."  That'd be for a minor fine, of course, like a parking ticket.  A bigger infraction would lead to, say, "50 percent," or "100 percent," or even higher.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/12/02/ftp190/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>203</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Three-Dot Thursday</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/12/01/three-dot-thursday-5/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/12/01/three-dot-thursday-5/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2011 01:14:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Libya]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4867</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Collins is, I remind everyone, nominally a member of the Republican Party.  She's right -- this could defuse a major talking point for Republicans, and do it in a very elegant way.  As I said, Democrats should be beating a path to her office door, to quickly work this idea up into legislation that Democrats can support.  It is one of the best ideas I've heard all year, and it deserves serious consideration not only because the idea itself is so workable, but also for the sheer politics of it all -- this could take away a big GOP talking point, right before election season begins.  Democrats: take note!  Please....</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/12/01/three-dot-thursday-5/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>15</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Newt?  Really?</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/11/30/newt-really/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/11/30/newt-really/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2011 23:15:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign Ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4860</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>To put this another way: it is time to start taking Newt Gingrich seriously, folks.  Because he's got a solid chance of denying the Republican nomination from Mitt Romney.  For better or worse, the possibility of Newt pulling this feat off is becoming a lot more concrete.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/11/30/newt-really/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>47</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Republicans&#039; Tax Dilemma</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/11/28/republicans-tax-dilemma/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/11/28/republicans-tax-dilemma/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Nov 2011 21:46:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4832</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Have the Republicans in Congress painted themselves into a corner on taxes?  They seem to be in the position of choosing between a number of courses of action, most of which would normally be seen as going against their principles.  They may have dealt themselves a losing hand, to put it another way.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/11/28/republicans-tax-dilemma/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>43</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Republican Field Approaches Iowa And New Hampshire</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/11/21/republican-field-approaches-iowa-and-new-hampshire/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/11/21/republican-field-approaches-iowa-and-new-hampshire/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2011 23:55:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign Ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4817</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The race for the Republican presidential nomination has certainly been anything but dull this year.  Every time you turn around, it seems another name pops up as the alternative to Mitt Romney.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/11/21/republican-field-approaches-iowa-and-new-hampshire/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [189] -- Cut Congress&#039; Pay!</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/11/18/ftp189/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/11/18/ftp189/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Nov 2011 23:40:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Talking Points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4807</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The last time Members of Congress took a cut in pay was on April 1, 1933 -- the midst of a Great Depression.  At a time of similar economic turmoil and record deficits, Congress should not require sacrifices of others without tightening its own belt.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/11/18/ftp189/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>42</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Deficit Committee&#039;s Trigger Lock</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/11/17/deficit-committees-trigger-lock/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/11/17/deficit-committees-trigger-lock/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Nov 2011 00:51:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4803</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>If the committee fails, though, there are supposed to be "triggers" pulled -- automatic cuts to both domestic spending and military budgets.  But you know what?  I am confident that these triggers will never be pulled.  To put it another way, these automatic cuts are never going to happen.  Oh, sure, there may be some noise about them, accompanied by handwringing and teeth-gnashing inside the Beltway, but I remain confident that the actual budget cuts will never take place.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/11/17/deficit-committees-trigger-lock/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cain&#039;s Ridiculous Lefty Conspiracy Theory</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/11/10/cains-ridiculous-lefty-conspiracy-theory/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/11/10/cains-ridiculous-lefty-conspiracy-theory/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Nov 2011 01:30:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4780</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Herman Cain is, if he can be believed, convinced that a conspiracy from the Left is responsible for the accusations of sexual harassment against him.  This is, not to put too fine a point on it, ridiculous.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/11/10/cains-ridiculous-lefty-conspiracy-theory/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>48</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Guest Column: Occupy Wall Street is Not the Tea Party of the Left</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/11/09/guest-column-occupy-wall-street-is-not-the-tea-party-of-the-left/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/11/09/guest-column-occupy-wall-street-is-not-the-tea-party-of-the-left/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Nov 2011 21:35:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Free Speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guest Authors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Bill of Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4776</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Every so often, I am so impressed by a comment to one of my columns that I offer to just turn my column over to the author, and let them have my soapbox.  This doesn't happen often, usually around once per year.
I've written a few columns so far about the Occupy Wall Street protest, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/11/09/guest-column-occupy-wall-street-is-not-the-tea-party-of-the-left/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>82</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Red State Pessimism?</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/11/08/red-state-pessimism/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/11/08/red-state-pessimism/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Nov 2011 23:10:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4773</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The author's basic premise is that Romney is a flip-flopper who can't be trusted by conservatives.  He'll win the Republican nomination, and then go on to lose to Obama next year.  The article (and the hundreds of comments) make fascinating reading.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/11/08/red-state-pessimism/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>15</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>America&#039;s First Political Sex Scandal: The Reynolds/Hamilton Affair</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/11/07/americas-first-political-sex-scandal-the-reynoldshamilton-affair/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/11/07/americas-first-political-sex-scandal-the-reynoldshamilton-affair/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Nov 2011 23:33:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Name-dropping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4768</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>While the subject of which American politician's sex scandal came first is a debatable one (such as: did Benjamin Franklin's dalliances in Paris count?), most agree that the sex-and-blackmail scandal of Alexander Hamilton was the first with any impact, from George Washington's time onwards.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/11/07/americas-first-political-sex-scandal-the-reynoldshamilton-affair/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [188] -- Why Not Occupy The Media?</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/11/04/ftp188/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/11/04/ftp188/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Nov 2011 23:50:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Free Speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Talking Points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4759</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Like many Americans, I watched the events unfold in Oakland this week with some trepidation.  Occupy Oakland tried two new tactics in protesting, and both were very successful at achieving a key goal -- that of getting your message across.  Both the general strike and the temporary port shutdown were successful, in this regard.  Later in the night, however, a group of jerks came close to ruining all this, by their criminal behavior.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/11/04/ftp188/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>138</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Championing Rapists&#039; Fatherhood Rights</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/11/02/championing-rapists-fatherhood-rights/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/11/02/championing-rapists-fatherhood-rights/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Nov 2011 22:33:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4745</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>This was, to put it mildly, completely unacceptable to a large swath of the Republican base.  Cain hastily backtracked, and is now as "pro-life" as he can humanly be, stating that abortion should be illegal in every single case -- no matter what the extenuating circumstances.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/11/02/championing-rapists-fatherhood-rights/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>24</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bank Of America Backs Down</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/11/01/bank-of-america-backs-down/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/11/01/bank-of-america-backs-down/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Nov 2011 22:58:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4741</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>This is not only a victory for consumers (and the Occupy Wall Street folks, incidentally), but a triumph of mathematics and economics.  Because it is ridiculous that big banks should even <em>contemplate</em> these fees in the first place.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/11/01/bank-of-america-backs-down/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>19</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [187] -- GOP&#039;s 22-Week Work Year</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/10/28/ftp187/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/10/28/ftp187/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2011 23:13:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Talking Points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guest Authors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Name-dropping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4724</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>We'd like to begin today with an issue that we regularly get incensed about here, mostly because it flies under the radar of just about everyone -- including the entire media universe.  Because for once, Democrats are making the attempt to use the issue to make some political hay (even though, in this regard, they're admittedly almost as bad as the Republicans).</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/10/28/ftp187/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>32</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Occupy Crossroads</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/10/27/occupy-crossroads/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/10/27/occupy-crossroads/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2011 22:18:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Free Speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Libya]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4720</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The "Occupy Wall Street" movement seems to be at a crossroads.  The path it chooses to take next may be the deciding moment for whether it declines into irrelevance or grows beyond its current boundaries into something larger.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/10/27/occupy-crossroads/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>35</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Rise And Fall Of Rick Perry</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/10/25/the-rise-and-fall-of-rick-perry/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/10/25/the-rise-and-fall-of-rick-perry/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Oct 2011 22:36:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign Ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4714</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Two months ago, Perry led the field with 23 percent (to Romney's 16 percent second-place).  Two months ago, Herman Cain was at five percent.  Cain is now, to be blunt, eating Perry's lunch (insert your own pizza joke here).  Even the Tea Party has all but abandoned Perry in favor of Cain, at this point.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/10/25/the-rise-and-fall-of-rick-perry/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Republicans Disrespect Iraqi Democracy</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/10/24/republicans-disrespect-iraqi-democracy/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/10/24/republicans-disrespect-iraqi-democracy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Oct 2011 00:28:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iran]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4709</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>While predictable, this reaction is absolutely ridiculous.  Every single talking point the Republicans came up with on the subject shows their almost complete lack of understanding of the basic concepts of democracy -- both here at home, and abroad.  Which is why these points need refuting, one by one.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/10/24/republicans-disrespect-iraqi-democracy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>17</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [186] -- Foreign Policy Issues Reappear</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/10/21/ftp186/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/10/21/ftp186/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Oct 2011 22:46:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign Ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Talking Points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Libya]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4698</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>It has been a big week on the foreign policy front, with the death of Libya's dictator and President Obama's announcement today that all U.S. troops would be out of Iraq by the end of this year (leaving roughly 150 to guard the embassy).  But before we get to all of that, I've got some domestic advice for the president's re-election team.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/10/21/ftp186/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>16</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Republicans Attack Cain&#039;s 9-9-9 Plan</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/10/19/republicans-attack-cains-9-9-9-plan/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/10/19/republicans-attack-cains-9-9-9-plan/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Oct 2011 00:10:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign Ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4688</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Last night, at yet another Republican presidential candidate debate, Herman Cain was roundly criticized for his simplistic 9-9-9 tax plan by his fellow Republicans.  I have to admit, it was a little bizarre (in a "Nixon goes to China" sort of way) to see Republicans disparaging a tax plan for being "regressive."  Ron Paul was unafraid to actually use this word, and while several other candidates avoided the term they in essence leveled the same charge: 9-9-9 would wind up <em>increasing</em> taxes on the poor and the middle class.  Being Republicans, though, they didn't also speak of the other side of this coin -- the fact that 9-9-9 would lower taxes on the wealthy and <em>really</em> lower them on the ultra-wealthy.  But still, it was odd enough to see candidate after candidate speak of their concern for the tax burden of the lower-class and middle-class, since this is usually a Democratic argument.  Perhaps all those 99 Percenters out there demonstrating in the streets are getting through to the Republican politicians?  Stranger things have happened.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/10/19/republicans-attack-cains-9-9-9-plan/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>23</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The End Of The Iraq War Is In Sight</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/10/17/the-end-of-the-iraq-war-is-in-sight/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/10/17/the-end-of-the-iraq-war-is-in-sight/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2011 22:50:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4676</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The end of the American military's involvement in Iraq is almost upon us.  Someone in the White House recently leaked what should have been apparent to everyone all along -- that the Pentagon is preparing to withdraw <em>all</em> our remaining troops from Iraq, by the end of this year.  Less than 200 will remain, to guard the embassy, but all our other brave men and women in uniform will be home to celebrate the dawning of a new year.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/10/17/the-end-of-the-iraq-war-is-in-sight/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>17</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [185] -- I Am A 99 Percenter</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/10/14/ftp185/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/10/14/ftp185/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Oct 2011 23:30:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Talking Points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4664</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>But, having said all of that, I'm going to make a suggestion anyway, on one particular facet of the movement: its name.  Because I truly think that if the protest wants to grow and expand into a forceful movement for change, it should consider a bit of rebranding.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/10/14/ftp185/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>109</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>From The Archives -- Church And State Revisited: The Story Of Smoot</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/10/13/from-the-archives-church-and-state-revisited-the-story-of-smoot-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/10/13/from-the-archives-church-and-state-revisited-the-story-of-smoot-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Oct 2011 23:57:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Bill of Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4660</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Because Mormonism is in the news again, due to a Rick Perry supporter calling it a "cult," I thought it was high time to re-run the following column.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/10/13/from-the-archives-church-and-state-revisited-the-story-of-smoot-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Surveying GOP Field</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/10/12/surveying-gop-field/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/10/12/surveying-gop-field/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Oct 2011 23:24:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign Ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4653</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The last time we wrote, Rick Perry had just jumped in the race.  Since then, nobody else has gotten in, while two prominent names decided to sit this one out.  Several candidates caught fire, and several also burned out (at least, poll-wise).  So it goes, on the campaign merry-go-round.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/10/12/surveying-gop-field/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>When The People Lead</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/10/11/when-the-people-lead/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/10/11/when-the-people-lead/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Oct 2011 23:34:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4649</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The idea behind that title is: "When the People lead, the leaders will follow."  I read this on a bumpersticker a few decades ago, although I must admit I haven't bothered to research the phrase's origins.  Wherever it came from, the idea is a simple (and amusing) one: when the so-called "leaders" aren't leading, then the People will step in and do it for them.  Eventually, the "leaders" will wake up to what is going on and get on board themselves, pretending to have led the movement all along.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/10/11/when-the-people-lead/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Marijuana Prohibition&#039;s Legal Insanity Continues</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/10/10/marijuana-prohibitions-legal-insanity-continues/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/10/10/marijuana-prohibitions-legal-insanity-continues/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Oct 2011 22:54:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4643</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Like many other Americans, I thoroughly enjoyed watching historical documentarian Ken Burns' recent <em>Prohibition</em> series, on PBS.  But I was disappointed by its abrupt end.  Burns took the easy way out and didn't point out that right around the same time the legal federal prohibition on alcohol ended, the prohibition of marijuana was ramping up in a big way.  And, while the alcohol-targeted Prohibition ended, this prohibition remains.  In, fact, it is getting worse, as the Obama administration is continuing a crackdown on anyone who is approaching the problem in any sort of sane or rational manner -- including local and state government officials.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/10/10/marijuana-prohibitions-legal-insanity-continues/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [184] -- Long Live Steve Jobs</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/10/07/ftp184/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/10/07/ftp184/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Oct 2011 23:39:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Talking Points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Name-dropping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4629</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>A corporate leader passed away this week, and millions mourned his passing and celebrated his life.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/10/07/ftp184/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>17</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mad As Hell</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/10/05/mad-as-hell/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/10/05/mad-as-hell/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Oct 2011 23:05:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Name-dropping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4615</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The protesters in the Occupy Wall Street movement have been getting criticized for not being focused enough, or not providing a list of demands, or not having leaders, or any number of other things by the media.  But this can be forgiven, because the media are now at least paying attention, rather than just completely ignoring the protest.  What surprises me is that the media (at least so far) haven't realized the frustration the protesters feel is the real story here.  Call it free-floating rage, if you will.  Or, even better, call it an updated Howard Beale moment.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/10/05/mad-as-hell/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>17</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>And Then There Was One...</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/10/04/and-then-there-was-one/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/10/04/and-then-there-was-one/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Oct 2011 22:49:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4611</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The media, of course, likely won't believe Christie -- at least until he says "No" several more times.  Last week he gave a speech that created a media frenzy, and in the question-and-answer period responded to the twenty-millionth time he was asked exactly the same question that there was a "mashup" video available online of him saying "No" <em>over and freakin' over again</em>, and anyone who was interested in the answer should just go review this video.  The media forgot to report this, and instead focused on what they decided was a more ambivalent answer to being asked the same question for the twenty-million-and-one-th time.  "Christie Might Run!" was the headline they decided to go with.  They were bored, quite obviously, and attacked with the ferocity of a shark pack with chum in the water.  The fact that there actually <em>was no actual chum</em> didn't even seem to faze them.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/10/04/and-then-there-was-one/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>26</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [183] -- What I&#039;d Call &quot;Class Warfare&quot;</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/09/30/ftp183/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/09/30/ftp183/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2011 23:26:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Talking Points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Humor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4590</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Last week (as with this week) the subject <em>de semaine</em> was "class warfare."  The comment which inspired this week's mini-rants contained a simple, repetitive concept: "When [something outrageous pushed by Republicans happens], nobody calls it 'class warfare'.  Maybe we should."</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/09/30/ftp183/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>62</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>GOP Field Wide Open?</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/09/29/gop-field-wide-open/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/09/29/gop-field-wide-open/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2011 23:34:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4585</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The Republican presidential field continues to defy the expectations and easy story lines from the political media and the rest of the inside-the-Beltway crowd.  Just last week, this was supposed to now be "a two-man race," but in a week's time the story has shifted to almost utter chaos.  A new Fox News poll out shows that the easy read of the electorate the media was pushing last week is now completely wrong.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/09/29/gop-field-wide-open/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Death Before Philately!</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/09/27/death-before-philately/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/09/27/death-before-philately/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Sep 2011 23:22:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4574</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The United States Postal Service very quietly changed one of their bedrock rules this week.  Up until this point, in America, you had to be dead to be on a stamp.  Now, <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2011/09/27/us/postal-service-will-begin-honoring-living-people-on-stamps.html">anything goes</a> -- the living will get their chance to be immortalized on an American stamp alongside the dead.  This is a <em>very</em> bad idea, and Congress should really step in and put a stop to it as soon as possible.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/09/27/death-before-philately/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Memo To Rick Perry</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/09/26/memo-to-rick-perry/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/09/26/memo-to-rick-perry/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Sep 2011 22:38:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign Ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Humor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4569</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Well, it's been great fun and all, but we are sorry to inform you that your viable candidacy for the Republican presidential nomination is hereby over.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/09/26/memo-to-rick-perry/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>15</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [182] -- Class Warfare?  Hardly.</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/09/23/ftp182/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/09/23/ftp182/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Sep 2011 23:12:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Talking Points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4556</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>A satellite is falling out of the sky, but it probably won't hit anybody.  Probably.  I personally got over this fear by listening to Creedence Clearwater Revival's "It Came Out Of The Sky" (which I heartily recommend, just on general principles).</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/09/23/ftp182/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>27</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Thinning The Debate Herd</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/09/22/thinning-the-debate-herd/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/09/22/thinning-the-debate-herd/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Sep 2011 22:03:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4553</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>At some point, television is going to have to start limiting which Republican candidates get invited to the debates.  The herd of hopefuls must be thinned.  This may happen soon, and tonight may be the last of the mega-debates of the season.  One can only hope.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/09/22/thinning-the-debate-herd/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Elizabeth Warren&#039;s Campaign Takes Off</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/09/21/elizabeth-warrens-campaign-takes-off/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/09/21/elizabeth-warrens-campaign-takes-off/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Sep 2011 23:27:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4545</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Elizabeth Warren is a polarizing figure.  Liberals love her with a fierce passion.  Republicans hate her with a fiery passion.  What this means is that lots and lots of money from outside the state will be pumped into this race.  The reason why Democrats are going to be watching this race closer than any other Senate race next year is easy to see: this may be the only state Democrats have a good chance to pick up a seat from the Republicans.  The math isn't good for Democrats this time around in the Senate, and they are in danger of losing control of the chamber next year.  Warren may be the sole bright spot in this environment for Democrats.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/09/21/elizabeth-warrens-campaign-takes-off/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>18</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama Redefines Populism</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/09/19/obama-redefines-populism/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/09/19/obama-redefines-populism/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Sep 2011 23:57:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4535</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>"Populism" is a word that gets thrown around with abandon by folks masquerading as journalists on television these days.  Sarah Palin had the word used to describe her, and later, the entire Tea Party movement was labeled "populist" by the chattering classes.  Today, President Obama unveiled a truly populist agenda, by proposing to tax millionaires at the same tax rate that middle-class Americans pay.  By doing so, Obama will (hopefully) redefine the term "populism" in the political conversation.  Or, to be technical, he will re-redefine the word back to what it originally meant.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/09/19/obama-redefines-populism/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [181] -- Ads Obama Should Run</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/09/16/ftp181/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/09/16/ftp181/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Sep 2011 23:08:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign Ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Talking Points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Name-dropping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4524</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Since the president is not facing a primary challenger, and since the president has raised a whopping big pile of money already, and (most importantly) since the president has rediscovered the joys of speaking directly to the American people about his agenda -- why not buy some political ads, now?</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/09/16/ftp181/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>39</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Merkley&#039;s Right: CBO Should Score Jobs</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/09/14/merkleys-right-cbo-should-score-jobs/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/09/14/merkleys-right-cbo-should-score-jobs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Sep 2011 22:52:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4518</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Senator Jeff Merkley of Oregon has just proposed a stunningly good idea: for all legislation which emerges from the joint committee charged with lowering the deficit, direct the congressional "scoring" referee not only to provide the numbers for the impact on the federal budget, but also to provide data on the impact on the unemployment rate and the jobs situation.  This is such an excellent idea, both on its merits and politically, that it should immediately be supported by all Democrats.  Because it would force the public debate to cover the entire scope of the proposals being offered up, and it would do so by providing the data the public most cares about right now: how will this create or destroy jobs?</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/09/14/merkleys-right-cbo-should-score-jobs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>17</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Will Palin Go Rogue?</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/09/12/will-palin-go-rogue/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/09/12/will-palin-go-rogue/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Sep 2011 22:17:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Name-dropping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4511</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>"What will Sarah do?" has been a question on the minds of many in the run-up to the Republican primary season next year.  Definitively figuring out the answer to this question is a fool's game, however, because Sarah Palin continually shows the ability to surprise the punditocracy, the public, and the Republican establishment.  Only Palin herself is ever confident of knowing what Sarah will do next, in other words.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/09/12/will-palin-go-rogue/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>28</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [180] -- Give &#039;Em Hell, Barry!</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/09/09/ftp180/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/09/09/ftp180/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Sep 2011 00:02:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign Ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Talking Points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4503</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>President Barack Obama opened his re-election campaign last night with a wowzer of a speech to a joint session of Congress.  But we'll get to that in detail in a minute.  First, we must mark an important anniversary this week.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/09/09/ftp180/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>22</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Congressional Democrats&#039; Advice For Obama&#039;s Jobs Speech</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/09/07/congressional-democrats-advice-for-obamas-jobs-speech/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/09/07/congressional-democrats-advice-for-obamas-jobs-speech/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Sep 2011 22:10:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Interviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4493</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The nation is waiting to hear what President Obama is going to say tomorrow night, when he gives an address to a joint session of Congress on the subject of jobs.  Plenty of people have already been offering advice to the White House, but instead we thought it'd be interesting to ask some of the people who are going to be sitting in the audience tomorrow what they'd advise the president to include in his speech.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/09/07/congressional-democrats-advice-for-obamas-jobs-speech/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>28</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama Poll Watch -- August, 2011</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/09/05/opw1108/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/09/05/opw1108/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Sep 2011 23:19:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama Poll Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4485</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>For President Obama, August is indeed the cruelest month.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/09/05/opw1108/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [179] -- Labor Daze</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/09/02/ftp179/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/09/02/ftp179/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Sep 2011 23:06:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Talking Points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4470</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>It surpasses all irony and actually enters into the realm of bitter humor that we're about to celebrate Labor Day when the unemployment rate remains at the sky-high level of 9.1 percent.  There are millions of Americans who are <em>not</em> laboring for a paycheck this year, and they have nothing at all to celebrate.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/09/02/ftp179/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>28</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>When Democratic Rhetoric Goes Too Far</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/08/31/when-democratic-rhetoric-goes-too-far/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/08/31/when-democratic-rhetoric-goes-too-far/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Aug 2011 23:09:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Free Speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4463</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>All of us should be aware (and ashamed) of this history.  That such things took place in our country is something all Americans should know.  This almost goes without saying.  But what apparently does need saying is the reverse -- that the history of lynching should not be abused and belittled by politicians in hyperbolic fashion to make a much smaller point.  Even if -- or perhaps <em>especially</em> if -- the politician in question is an African-American.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/08/31/when-democratic-rhetoric-goes-too-far/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>50</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ron Paul Versus Government</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/08/29/ron-paul-versus-government/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/08/29/ron-paul-versus-government/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Aug 2011 23:36:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4460</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>To his supporters, one of Ron Paul's most endearing qualities is his forthrightness.  Paul doesn't mince words, he tells you to your face exactly what he thinks.  And, to give the man credit, he keeps to his positions even when it would be a lot easier for him to either fudge an answer or tone down his beliefs, the way most politicians do (at certain times).</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/08/29/ron-paul-versus-government/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>King&#039;s Eloquence Goes Far Beyond &quot;I Have A Dream&quot;</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/08/26/kings-eloquence-goes-far-beyond-i-have-a-dream/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/08/26/kings-eloquence-goes-far-beyond-i-have-a-dream/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Aug 2011 23:48:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Name-dropping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4449</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>As we all know, we're not there yet.  We're a little closer than we were when Dr. King was taken from us, but we've still got quite a ways to go yet.  For inspiration on the journey which still awaits us all, I strongly urge all Americans to seek out Dr. King's actual words -- the words you're <em>not</em> used to hearing over and over again.  Take ten or fifteen minutes and read the text of one of his speeches.  Watch video, or listen to audio of Dr. King speaking.  It will be well worth the time it takes.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/08/26/kings-eloquence-goes-far-beyond-i-have-a-dream/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>35</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Taking Rick Perry Seriously</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/08/24/taking-rick-perry-seriously/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/08/24/taking-rick-perry-seriously/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Aug 2011 00:12:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4442</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>This should force pundits across the political spectrum to re-evaluate Rick Perry's campaign.  Instead of seeing through the lens of: "what my circle of friends thinks of Rick Perry's gaffes," this time the pundits should focus a little more closely on: "what Republican primary voters think of Rick Perry as a candidate."  Because, so far, they seem to be flocking to support Perry -- to the visible detriment of Mitt Romney's standing in the polls.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/08/24/taking-rick-perry-seriously/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>15</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama&#039;s Libya Strategy Proves His Critics Wrong</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/08/22/obamas-libya-strategy-proves-his-critics-wrong/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/08/22/obamas-libya-strategy-proves-his-critics-wrong/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Aug 2011 00:05:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Libya]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4436</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Even with all those caveats, however, Obama deserves a victory lap at this point.  At the heart of Obama's war plan for Libya was an enormous gamble that could have failed in any number of ways.  It didn't.  America successfully cleared the skies of Libya, and then "within days, not weeks" we bowed out of the lead role in the fight.  The French, the British, and the rest of N.A.T.O. stepped up to the plate and performed admirably well.  The American military continued in a support role -- exactly as Obama told us would happen -- and the outcome, at this point in time, has to be judged a clear success.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/08/22/obamas-libya-strategy-proves-his-critics-wrong/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>69</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [178] -- Phony Vacation Outrage</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/08/19/ftp178/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/08/19/ftp178/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Aug 2011 23:52:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign Ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Talking Points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4422</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>It's silly season in the political world, once again.  And this year -- just like every year a Democrat occupies the White House -- an old favorite of a story is making the rounds.  It involves some very thinly-veneered outrage, which is completely fabricated and hypocritical in the extreme.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/08/19/ftp178/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>GOP Field Tightens</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/08/15/gop-field-tightens/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/08/15/gop-field-tightens/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Aug 2011 23:32:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4411</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Almost a full month ago, I placed four names in the "Frontrunners" category: Michele Bachmann, Sarah Palin, Rick Perry, and Mitt Romney.  This list hasn't changed at all, although Palin will fall back the next time around if she doesn't announce in the next three or four weeks (more on this in a bit).</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/08/15/gop-field-tightens/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>41</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [177] -- Corporations Are People, Mitt?</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/08/12/ftp177/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/08/12/ftp177/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Aug 2011 00:17:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Talking Points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4402</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>But perhaps I'm being too harsh.  The reason the clip was edited down so much was that the <em>other</em> heckling clip was <em>so much better</em> -- Romney misspeaking, and then instead of just immediately walking it back, actually digging the hole deeper.  In answer to a question about raising taxes on corporations, Romney answered (at first) that he wasn't going to raise taxes "on people."  When the questioner yelled back "Corporations, not people!" Romney could easily have said something along the lines of "Sorry, I meant to say corporations -- I'm actually not going to raise taxes on people <em>or</em> on corporations, and here's why...."  It would have just melded the whole thing into standard Republican dogma, and Romney would have been safe.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/08/12/ftp177/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>36</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Wisconsin Centennial Worth Celebrating</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/08/10/a-wisconsin-centennial-worth-celebrating/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/08/10/a-wisconsin-centennial-worth-celebrating/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Aug 2011 23:42:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4391</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Since the news this morning out of Wisconsin is a bit depressing for progressives (and Progressives), I thought it was time to mark an important upcoming centennial there.  On the first of September in 1911, the first constitutional workers' compensation law took full effect in Wisconsin.  The law had been passed on May 3, 1911.  By all rights, I should have written about it back then, or waited until September for the anniversary of the law taking effect, but I thought today was a good day to reminisce about when Wisconsin was at the forefront of the Labor movement, instead of where they find themselves today.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/08/10/a-wisconsin-centennial-worth-celebrating/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>15</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Wisconsin&#039;s Vote More Important Than Iowa&#039;s</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/08/08/wisconsins-vote-more-important-than-iowas/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/08/08/wisconsins-vote-more-important-than-iowas/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Aug 2011 23:52:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4381</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>This week is being touted, in the political world, as a big week in the state of Iowa.  There will be a nationally-televised Republican presidential candidate debate, and then a few days later the Ames Straw Poll will take place.  The straw poll is (as always) being hyped in the media as the "first voting" in the upcoming presidential nominating contest.  But the media should pay more attention to what is happening in Wisconsin this week, because rather than some "vote"-buying exercise (that always proves itself to be completely meaningless in the grand scheme of the presidential election process), Wisconsin could prove to be a much better weathervane in terms of predicting which way the political winds will be blowing, come next year.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/08/08/wisconsins-vote-more-important-than-iowas/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [176] -- More Tea, Anyone?</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/08/05/ftp176/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/08/05/ftp176/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Aug 2011 23:34:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Talking Points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Vice President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4371</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>With the conclusion of the debt ceiling "crisis," the media pivoted swiftly to their standard larger questions (to them, at any rate) about any political event these days: "Who won?  Who lost?"</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/08/05/ftp176/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>100</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>No FAA Bill?  No-Fly List.</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/08/03/no-faa-bill-no-fly-list/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/08/03/no-faa-bill-no-fly-list/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Aug 2011 22:57:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4363</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>This is unacceptable.  This is beyond dysfunctional.  This is, in fact, an outrage.  So I'm giving Congress a grace period of precisely two days, to get their butts back to Washington to fix this problem <em>immediately</em>.  If I don't have a bill on my desk by the end of this Friday, I will instruct my Attorney General to immediately put every member of Congress on the "no-fly" list.  To be blunt, if they can't find the time to fund the F.A.A. and prefer to take weeks off on vacation instead, then they will not be allowed to use the F.A.A.'s services in the meantime.  Period.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/08/03/no-faa-bill-no-fly-list/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>24</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama Poll Watch -- July, 2011</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/08/02/opw1107/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/08/02/opw1107/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Aug 2011 00:17:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama Poll Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4355</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The easy answer to the question: "Who 'won' the debt ceiling debate?" is: nobody.  The public sees everyone involved in a more negative light than when the whole manufactured crisis began.  Hopefully, politicians will take note of this, but it is quite likely they will not, and this new standard of brinksmanship will become the norm, every time the debt ceiling debate arises.  There's a comforting thought, after the past month, eh?</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/08/02/opw1107/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>16</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Which Three Democratic Senators?</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/08/01/which-three-democratic-senators/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/08/01/which-three-democratic-senators/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Aug 2011 23:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4348</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The House and Senate are getting ready to vote on the deal struck to avoid America defaulting on her debts.  Nobody knows exactly the magnitude of what is being cut in detail yet, and the news media seem more interested in the eternal "who's up/who's down" horserace nonsense than in informing the public what exactly has been agreed to in this deal.  This should come as no surprise, since it is (as always) <em>ever</em> so much more fun for "journalists" to blather on about "what it all means" seen through the political lens, instead of "what it all means" in terms of... well, what it <em>actually is going to mean</em> for America.  Perhaps in a few days, when they get bored with the political aspects, we'll finally find out exactly what the cuts are going to cover.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/08/01/which-three-democratic-senators/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>22</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [175] -- In The Darkest Depths Of Mordor</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/07/29/ftp175/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/07/29/ftp175/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jul 2011 23:37:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Talking Points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Name-dropping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4338</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>If I were a Hobbit, right about now I would be wondering just <em>how the heck</em> I wound up at the center of this Washington intraparty political fight, personally.  What (I would ponder in my metaphorical Hobbit hole) had I done to <em>any of these folks</em> to deserve being dragged into this fracas?</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/07/29/ftp175/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>54</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Can Speaker Boehner Survive?</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/07/28/can-speaker-boehner-survive/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/07/28/can-speaker-boehner-survive/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jul 2011 23:33:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4334</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>As I write this, the House of Representatives has still not voted on Speaker John Boehner's plan to raise the debt ceiling.  But no matter how the vote goes, the real question behind this week's action in the Republican caucus in the House may be whether Boehner will still be Speaker when the shouting's over and done.  The simmering Tea Party factionalism may be about to explode into public view, in other words.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/07/28/can-speaker-boehner-survive/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>29</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Congress&#039; Real Deadline: Summer Vacation</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/07/27/congress-real-deadline-summer-vacation/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/07/27/congress-real-deadline-summer-vacation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jul 2011 22:07:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4326</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>There are now only a handful of possible outcomes of the debt ceiling standoff in Washington.  We'll get to them all in a minute in more detail.  One way or another, it's a pretty safe bet that the issue will (at least temporarily) be resolved by the fifth of August, at the absolute latest.  Bank on it.  The reason for such certainty is a simple one: if the debate goes on in any way <em>past</em> that date, then it will start to cut into Congress' month-long summer vacation.  Which is (as any observer of American politics should know full well) the <em>one unthinkable bridge-too-far</em> in Washington.  Because Congress' vacations are sacred... at least, to them.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/07/27/congress-real-deadline-summer-vacation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>20</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Another Debt Commission?  Really?</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/07/25/another-debt-commission-really/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/07/25/another-debt-commission-really/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jul 2011 23:11:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Vice President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4314</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>There is a grand tradition in Washington -- which is followed by both parties, at various times -- of avoiding big and politically-delicate problems.  This tradition used to be called the "blue-ribbon commission," although for some reason the "blue-ribbon" part isn't used much anymore.  But whatever you call it, this political dodge is created for one purpose and one purpose alone: to waste time.  To the best of my knowledge, no commission (blue-ribbon or otherwise bedecked) has ever come up with a solution to anything which has been thus implemented by the politicians (again, of <em>either</em> party) to solve a big problem (although you could make an argument for the base-closing commission, I guess).  But virtually <em>all</em> of these commissions have succeeded wildly on their main objective of wasting as much time as possible.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/07/25/another-debt-commission-really/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>16</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [174] -- What Would Ronald Reagan Do?</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/07/22/ftp174/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/07/22/ftp174/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jul 2011 00:12:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Talking Points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4303</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The bigger space news this week, sadly, was not that exciting.  The final space shuttle mission just ended.  Although I didn't see it specifically, a newspaper headline-writer with a sense of irony would have set the story under: "The Shuttle Has Landed."  Because this week also saw an anniversary of import to the discussion -- 42 years ago this Wednesday, Neil Armstrong radioed back to Houston the immortal phrase: "The <em>Eagle</em> has landed," marking the first safe landing on Earth's natural satellite by the human species.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/07/22/ftp174/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>81</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Breaking Down The Polling Numbers</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/07/21/breaking-down-the-polling-numbers/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/07/21/breaking-down-the-polling-numbers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jul 2011 00:51:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4295</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>This is but one poll, to be sure.  But most of the other polls I've seen this week back up the data presented here.  Americans are turned off by Republican extremism, and open to Democrats' willingness to compromise.  They are disgusted with the way the lawmakers in Washington are operating, and they may just take out this anger next year at the polls.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/07/21/breaking-down-the-polling-numbers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>2012 Republican Presidential Field Update</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/07/18/2012-republican-presidential-field-update/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/07/18/2012-republican-presidential-field-update/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2011 22:24:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4276</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>In the past few weeks, one rising star has appeared in the Republican firmament (or two, depending on how you count them), and more than a few have begun fading -- perhaps permanently -- from center stage.  But the field itself is not yet set (in terms of who is actually running and who will sit this one out), as the Republican Party continues to search for the perfect candidate to defeat President Obama.  In fact, two of our four frontrunners this time around have not even announced their candidacy yet -- showing how volatile the entire race still remains.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/07/18/2012-republican-presidential-field-update/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

