<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>ChrisWeigant.com &#187; Iraq</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.chrisweigant.com/category/foreign-policy/iraq/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com</link>
	<description>Reality-based political commentary</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 22:55:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [195] -- SOTU Review</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/01/27/ftp195/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/01/27/ftp195/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jan 2012 00:27:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign Ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Libya]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=5112</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Well, that was an eventful week in politics, wasn't it?</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/01/27/ftp195/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>33</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The State Of The Union</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/01/24/the-state-of-the-union/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/01/24/the-state-of-the-union/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 05:43:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iran]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Libya]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pakistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=5098</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>I haven't written one of these snap-judgment reactions to a speech in a while, so forgive me if this is a bit choppy and disorganized.  As always, I am writing this before looking at other opinions of President Obama's just-completed State Of The Union speech.  I feel this keeps my opinion unsullied by any sort of "groupthink" effect.  Sometimes I read other speech reviews the next day and find I agree with them, sometimes not, but this way at least you know I'm not just regurgitating others' thoughts.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/01/24/the-state-of-the-union/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>28</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [193] -- Run It Up The Flagpole</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/01/13/ftp193/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/01/13/ftp193/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2012 23:50:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign Ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Talking Points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iran]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Libya]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=5055</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Not a whole lot has been happening in Washington, due to Congress being out on one of their countless month-long vacations.  Not a whole lot of Democrats have been in the news, either, since the Republican primary season is sucking all the oxygen out of the political arena right now.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/01/13/ftp193/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>81</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [192] -- Obama Picking His Fights</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/01/06/ftp192/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/01/06/ftp192/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2012 22:56:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Talking Points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=5026</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>I have to say, while the Republicans have been having their three-ring primary circus, President Obama has been looking better and better.  Both in comparison to the Republican field (of nightmares, so to speak), and also because Obama's been making progress on his own.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/01/06/ftp192/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>160</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama Poll Watch -- December, 2011</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/01/04/opw1112/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/01/04/opw1112/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2012 23:07:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama Poll Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pakistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=5016</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>President Obama had a pretty good month last month in the job approval polls, bettering his standing in both approval and disapproval by roughly three-fourths of percentage point.  This may not sound like that big a deal, but it was the second straight month of solid gains for the president in both categories.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/01/04/opw1112/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>62</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>My 2011 &quot;McLaughlin Awards&quot; [Part 2]</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/12/23/my-2011-mclaughlin-awards-part-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/12/23/my-2011-mclaughlin-awards-part-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Dec 2011 22:08:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Libya]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Name-dropping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4982</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Her campaign so far has been the populist model for every other Democrat to mimic if they want to catch the wave of anger at Wall Street, and use it to their benefit.  Without question, Elizabeth Warren is Destined For Political Stardom.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/12/23/my-2011-mclaughlin-awards-part-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>43</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama Looking Stronger</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/12/22/obama-looking-stronger/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/12/22/obama-looking-stronger/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Dec 2011 23:58:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4978</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>President Obama is looking a lot stronger these days.  Today, especially, the president emerges as the big winner in the showdown with John Boehner and the House Republicans.  But Obama's been looking better and better all month, so Boehner caving should be seen as just the icing on the cake for Obama.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/12/22/obama-looking-stronger/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>29</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>War Is Over.  What Next?</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/12/19/war-is-over-what-next/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/12/19/war-is-over-what-next/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Dec 2011 00:20:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iran]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Libya]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4962</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>American troops are, finally, out of Iraq.  The war is technically over.  Our men and women in uniform will be home for the holidays.  This is all good news, and is worth celebrating by a nation weary of decade-long wars.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/12/19/war-is-over-what-next/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>My 2011 &quot;McLaughlin Awards&quot; [Part 1]</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/12/16/my-2011-mclaughlin-awards-part-1/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/12/16/my-2011-mclaughlin-awards-part-1/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Dec 2011 01:36:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign Ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Free Speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iran]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Libya]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Name-dropping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pakistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4954</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>As always, if you disagree with any (or all) of my picks, feel free to make your own in the comments.  The categories are completely open to interpretation, and don't forget that there will be a "Part 2" column next week, so I can likely squeeze things I forgot in there.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/12/16/my-2011-mclaughlin-awards-part-1/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>33</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama Poll Watch -- November, 2011</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/12/05/opw1111/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/12/05/opw1111/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2011 22:34:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Contests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama Poll Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4892</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>This month Obama poll watchers got some good news, and some bad news.  This was capped off, at the end of the month, by the Washington punditocracy making an incredibly stupid comparison between polling for Barack Obama and Jimmy Carter -- which we will address at the end of the column (complete with a "guess the president" graph quiz, for your amusement).</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/12/05/opw1111/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>25</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [187] -- GOP&#039;s 22-Week Work Year</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/10/28/ftp187/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/10/28/ftp187/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2011 23:13:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Talking Points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guest Authors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Name-dropping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4724</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>We'd like to begin today with an issue that we regularly get incensed about here, mostly because it flies under the radar of just about everyone -- including the entire media universe.  Because for once, Democrats are making the attempt to use the issue to make some political hay (even though, in this regard, they're admittedly almost as bad as the Republicans).</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/10/28/ftp187/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>32</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Occupy Crossroads</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/10/27/occupy-crossroads/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/10/27/occupy-crossroads/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2011 22:18:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Free Speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Libya]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4720</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The "Occupy Wall Street" movement seems to be at a crossroads.  The path it chooses to take next may be the deciding moment for whether it declines into irrelevance or grows beyond its current boundaries into something larger.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/10/27/occupy-crossroads/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>35</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Republicans Disrespect Iraqi Democracy</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/10/24/republicans-disrespect-iraqi-democracy/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/10/24/republicans-disrespect-iraqi-democracy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Oct 2011 00:28:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iran]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4709</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>While predictable, this reaction is absolutely ridiculous.  Every single talking point the Republicans came up with on the subject shows their almost complete lack of understanding of the basic concepts of democracy -- both here at home, and abroad.  Which is why these points need refuting, one by one.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/10/24/republicans-disrespect-iraqi-democracy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>17</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [186] -- Foreign Policy Issues Reappear</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/10/21/ftp186/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/10/21/ftp186/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Oct 2011 22:46:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign Ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Talking Points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Libya]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4698</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>It has been a big week on the foreign policy front, with the death of Libya's dictator and President Obama's announcement today that all U.S. troops would be out of Iraq by the end of this year (leaving roughly 150 to guard the embassy).  But before we get to all of that, I've got some domestic advice for the president's re-election team.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/10/21/ftp186/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>16</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>From The Archives -- Obama&#039;s Libya Strategy Proves His Critics Wrong</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/10/20/from-the-archives-obamas-libya-strategy-proves-his-critics-wrong/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/10/20/from-the-archives-obamas-libya-strategy-proves-his-critics-wrong/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Oct 2011 00:29:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Libya]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4693</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Too busy researching today to write, even though it is a momentous day in Libya.  I'll be commenting on this in the near future, most likely, but for now this will have to do.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/10/20/from-the-archives-obamas-libya-strategy-proves-his-critics-wrong/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The End Of The Iraq War Is In Sight</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/10/17/the-end-of-the-iraq-war-is-in-sight/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/10/17/the-end-of-the-iraq-war-is-in-sight/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2011 22:50:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4676</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The end of the American military's involvement in Iraq is almost upon us.  Someone in the White House recently leaked what should have been apparent to everyone all along -- that the Pentagon is preparing to withdraw <em>all</em> our remaining troops from Iraq, by the end of this year.  Less than 200 will remain, to guard the embassy, but all our other brave men and women in uniform will be home to celebrate the dawning of a new year.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/10/17/the-end-of-the-iraq-war-is-in-sight/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>17</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [182] -- Class Warfare?  Hardly.</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/09/23/ftp182/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/09/23/ftp182/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Sep 2011 23:12:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Talking Points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4556</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>A satellite is falling out of the sky, but it probably won't hit anybody.  Probably.  I personally got over this fear by listening to Creedence Clearwater Revival's "It Came Out Of The Sky" (which I heartily recommend, just on general principles).</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/09/23/ftp182/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>27</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama&#039;s Libya Strategy Proves His Critics Wrong</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/08/22/obamas-libya-strategy-proves-his-critics-wrong/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/08/22/obamas-libya-strategy-proves-his-critics-wrong/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Aug 2011 00:05:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Libya]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4436</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Even with all those caveats, however, Obama deserves a victory lap at this point.  At the heart of Obama's war plan for Libya was an enormous gamble that could have failed in any number of ways.  It didn't.  America successfully cleared the skies of Libya, and then "within days, not weeks" we bowed out of the lead role in the fight.  The French, the British, and the rest of N.A.T.O. stepped up to the plate and performed admirably well.  The American military continued in a support role -- exactly as Obama told us would happen -- and the outcome, at this point in time, has to be judged a clear success.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/08/22/obamas-libya-strategy-proves-his-critics-wrong/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>69</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Afghanistan Withdrawal Polling</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/06/28/afghanistan-withdrawal-polling/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/06/28/afghanistan-withdrawal-polling/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jun 2011 00:03:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4171</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Some poll numbers are starting to come in on President Obama's announced withdrawal plans for American troops in Afghanistan.  Overall, the polling shows public support is about as high as could be expected, given the fact that the opposition to Obama's plan is split between "pull more out faster" and "pull the troops out slower."</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/06/28/afghanistan-withdrawal-polling/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Predicting Obama&#039;s Afghanistan Announcement</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/06/22/predicting-obamas-afghanistan-announcement/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/06/22/predicting-obamas-afghanistan-announcement/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2011 19:54:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Libya]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pakistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4138</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Later today, President Obama is going to address the nation on the subject of the Afghanistan war.  Specifically, he's going to make good on a promise made a year-and-a-half ago: to begin the withdrawal of American troops from Afghanistan next month.  The big question everyone's been speculating about in the run-up to this announcement has been how big a reduction the president will announce.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/06/22/predicting-obamas-afghanistan-announcement/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>25</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Beginning The End Of America&#039;s Longest War</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/05/09/beginning-the-end-of-americas-longest-war/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/05/09/beginning-the-end-of-americas-longest-war/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 May 2011 00:12:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pakistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Vice President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=3938</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>In roughly two months, President Barack Obama is going to announce the beginning of the end of America's longest war.  He could not have known, when he initially set this summer for the beginning of the withdrawal of American troops from Afghanistan, that the timing would work out so perfectly.  With Osama Bin Laden now dead, it's going to be a lot easier to begin pulling out of Afghanistan.  The only question left to ask is how fast this drawdown will be accomplished.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/05/09/beginning-the-end-of-americas-longest-war/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [166] -- Osama Bin Laden Is Still Dead</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/05/06/ftp166/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/05/06/ftp166/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 May 2011 23:01:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign Ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Talking Points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iran]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Libya]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pakistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=3920</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>I don't care how ironic that sounds to some, it's true.  Osama Bin Laden declared war on America, waged that war for years (and killed Americans in doing so), then hid for many more years, and was finally hunted down and killed like an animal.  Mission accomplished.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/05/06/ftp166/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>50</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Reviewing America&#039;s Wars [Part 2]</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/04/21/reviewing-americas-wars-part-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/04/21/reviewing-americas-wars-part-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Apr 2011 07:37:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Libya]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pakistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=3829</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>President Obama is trying a new concept for America in Libya -- where we open a war, but then almost immediately bow out and turn it over to others to deal with.  In Libya's case, this means N.A.T.O., led largely by Britain, France, and Italy.  Libya is also another country with a few diplomatic fictions in place.  We're not supposed to be on anyone's "side" in Libya, even though it is obvious we are aiding the rebel forces.  We're not supposed to be explicitly for "regime change" (because the United Nations didn't approve it), even though we are quite obviously in favor of Ghaddafi leaving as soon as possible.  And nobody's supposed to be "arming" the rebels, even though as time goes by it becomes obvious that they're getting their ammunition from somewhere (not to mention uniforms, communications equipment, and other "non-lethal" support).</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/04/21/reviewing-americas-wars-part-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Reviewing America&#039;s Wars [Part 1]</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/04/20/reviewing-americas-wars-part-1/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/04/20/reviewing-americas-wars-part-1/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Apr 2011 00:19:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iran]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Libya]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pakistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=3823</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Since the mainstream media has, quite obviously, abdicated all responsibility for reporting the news in any sort of journalistic fashion, I thought today would be a good day to review the current status of America's wars.  Depending on how you count, there are now three (or four) of these wars which have been all but forgotten by the media these days.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/04/20/reviewing-americas-wars-part-1/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama&#039;s Libyan Gamble, Week Two</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/03/28/obamas-libyan-gamble-week-two/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/03/28/obamas-libyan-gamble-week-two/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Mar 2011 23:09:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Libya]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=3699</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Events on the ground in Libya, roughly one week after coalition warplanes and cruise missiles began flying, seem to have taken a turn for the better for the rebel forces.  Surprisingly, though, the American media and political establishment seems largely focused on any number of ways this war could turn out badly for America, for Libya, and for the world.  As city after city falls to the rebel forces, perhaps this narrative will shift somewhat.  President Obama is about to give a speech to the nation, which may help focus the media on what is actually going on in Libya, rather than speculating about what could happen.  Or perhaps not -- Obama's speech may become "the story" itself, and be picked apart word by word for the next few days, no matter what the rebels are doing in Libya.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/03/28/obamas-libyan-gamble-week-two/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>46</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama&#039;s Libyan Gamble</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/03/21/obamas-libyan-gamble/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/03/21/obamas-libyan-gamble/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Mar 2011 23:02:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Libya]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pakistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=3663</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Admiral Mullen, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, made the rounds of the Sunday morning political shows yesterday, to lay out the Obama administration's plan for this war.  Very few people in the media listened to what he said.  The war plan for Libya -- if everything goes perfectly -- can be summed up as: "Lead the initial attack with cruise missiles.  Spend a few days bombing command-and-control infrastructure, and generally kicking butt as we see fit.  Take out as many Libyan Air Force assets as possible.  Then turn the entire thing over to 'the coalition' and step back into a support role.  Let the French, the British, and the Arabs (and anyone else who wants to join in) supply the warplanes and pilots to patrol the no-fly zone from this point onward, while American pilots fly the electronic jamming planes and intelligence aircraft necessary to provide the fighters with an accurate picture of what's going on."</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/03/21/obamas-libyan-gamble/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>23</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [159] -- Firing Up The Base</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/03/18/ftp159/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/03/18/ftp159/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Mar 2011 00:22:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Talking Points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pakistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=3654</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Here's a quick test for whether you are being fed speculation and fluff, or whether you are being told real information: Are there numbers involved?  If so, then thank a scientist (and the editor or producer who allows such science on the air, I guess).</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/03/18/ftp159/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>44</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The No-Fly Zone Decision</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/03/14/the-no-fly-zone-decision/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/03/14/the-no-fly-zone-decision/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Mar 2011 00:11:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pakistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=3632</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The world's opinion-makers, in both government and media, seem to have settled on the idea that imposing a "no-fly zone" over Libya would be a good idea for all concerned.  Not everyone has jumped on this bandwagon yet, but it seems to be the most popular option under discussion by those advocating "doing something" about the situation in Libya.  But would a no-fly zone really change the dynamic all that much?  Even if it had been imposed two weeks ago, would it have achieved any real goal?  These are hard questions to answer, but anyone advocating a no-fly zone (especially one largely imposed by the U.S. military) really does need to at least consider them.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/03/14/the-no-fly-zone-decision/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>37</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama Should Give Second Cairo Speech</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/02/28/obama-should-give-second-cairo-speech/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/02/28/obama-should-give-second-cairo-speech/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Mar 2011 00:58:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iran]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pakistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=3554</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Now, obviously, events have changed the situation on the ground dramatically since Obama gave this speech over a year and a half ago.  In the last two months, two governments have fallen -- including Egypt's, where Obama gave his speech -- and many more are in danger of falling (to some degree or another).  Libya is currently in the midst of what can only be termed a civil war, as a result of the wave of "people power" spreading throughout the region.  Leaders even of countries that have not yet had mass demonstrations are scrambling to make political reforms happen as fast as they possibly can, in the hopes of keeping their populace happy enough that these leaders may remain in power.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/02/28/obama-should-give-second-cairo-speech/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>17</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [156] -- Fighting On Several Fronts</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/02/25/ftp156/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/02/25/ftp156/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Feb 2011 00:20:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Talking Points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=3544</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>We've got so much to cover this week, we're going to have to move pretty quickly here.  In international news, North Africa and the Middle East are still seething.  The American news media, however, are (I actually heard this phrase being used by someone with a blowdried haircut the other night on television) experiencing "revolution fatigue."  Seriously.  They're bored with the whole storyline.  Another dictator fell?  Crowds of unarmed people being machine-gunned?  Yawn.  Don't we have an Oscars story we could run, instead?</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/02/25/ftp156/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>21</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Revolutionary Thoughts</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/02/16/revolutionary-thoughts/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/02/16/revolutionary-thoughts/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Feb 2011 00:33:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iran]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Vice President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=3488</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The revolutionary tidal wave (or, if you prefer, the "Tunisami") sweeping the Middle East and North Africa spreads ever wider, as in country after country young protesters take to the streets in an attempt to change their countries' governments.  But don't expect an outcome equal to the (mostly) peaceful overthrows in Tunis and Egypt in every single country now affected by this "people power" movement.  There are major differences from country to country, both in terms of the form of government (and the military), and in terms of the likelihood of a victorious outcome for the protesters.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/02/16/revolutionary-thoughts/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [154] -- Egypt Rising</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/02/11/ftp154/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/02/11/ftp154/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Feb 2011 00:37:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cartoons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Talking Points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=3468</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The stunning news today of Egyptian leader Hosni Mubarak stepping down has all but eclipsed the other political news of the week.  Who would have thought, a month ago, that a government that had oppressed its own people for over three decades would fall simply because a bunch of people marched in the streets and refused to give up?</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/02/11/ftp154/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>36</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Democracy&#039;s Drawback</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/01/31/democracys-drawback/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/01/31/democracys-drawback/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Jan 2011 23:15:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iran]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=3401</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>America is a strong supporter of democracy worldwide.  Except, of course, when we aren't.  That piece of doublethink has been at the center of American foreign policy pretty much since World War II, and it is the heart of the conundrum we now find ourselves in regards to what is happening in Egypt and other countries in North Africa and the Middle East.  Because we're conceptually all in favor of democracy -- right up until the "wrong" person or group wins an election.  According to our definition of "wrong," of course.  This is the key drawback to democracy (and American support of democracy in the rest of the world) -- sometimes the "wrong" people win.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/01/31/democracys-drawback/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>22</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>So Long, Joe</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/01/18/so-long-joe/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/01/18/so-long-joe/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jan 2011 02:36:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2006 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=3342</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Senator Joe Lieberman will announce tomorrow (from all reports) that he will not be seeking another term in the Senate.  Democrats across the land are collectively heaving a large sigh of relief at the news.  "So long, Joe," seems to be the prevailing sentiment, although if you listen closely you can hear the muttered "... don't let the door hit you on the way out," or other less-than-endearing sentiments.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/01/18/so-long-joe/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.&#039;s Vietnam Speech</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/01/17/dr-martin-luther-king-jr-s-vietnam-speech/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/01/17/dr-martin-luther-king-jr-s-vietnam-speech/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jan 2011 01:02:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guest Authors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=3336</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps the more tragic recognition of reality took place when it became clear to me that the war was doing far more than devastating the hopes of the poor at home. It was sending their sons and their brothers and their husbands to fight and to die in extraordinarily high proportions relative to the rest of the population. We were taking the young black men who had been crippled by our society and sending them 8,000 miles away to guarantee liberties in Southeast Asia which they had not found in Southwest Georgia and East Harlem. So we have been repeatedly faced with the cruel irony of watching Negro and white boys on TV screens as they kill and die together for a nation that has been unable to seat them together in the same schools. So we watch them in brutal solidarity burning the huts of a poor village, but we realize that they would never live on the same block in Detroit. I could not be silent in the face of such cruel manipulation of the poor.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/01/17/dr-martin-luther-king-jr-s-vietnam-speech/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>From The Archives -- Obama&#039;s Iraq Withdrawal Timeline</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/12/30/from-the-archives-obamas-iraq-withdrawal-timeline/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/12/30/from-the-archives-obamas-iraq-withdrawal-timeline/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Dec 2010 02:28:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=3249</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[Note: This time, next year, the big political news story will be the Republican primary campaign for who will take on President Obama in 2012.  The first primaries and caucuses will be right around the corner (although, hopefully, they'll be in February, 2012 -- a modest improvement on how early the primary calendar has [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/12/30/from-the-archives-obamas-iraq-withdrawal-timeline/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>My 2010 &quot;McLaughlin Awards&quot; [Part 2]</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/12/24/my-2010-mclaughlin-awards-part-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/12/24/my-2010-mclaughlin-awards-part-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Dec 2010 02:34:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Free Speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Vice President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=3212</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Welcome back to our annual year-end awards column!</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/12/24/my-2010-mclaughlin-awards-part-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>44</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [149] -- Making Holiday Sausage</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/12/10/ftp149/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/12/10/ftp149/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Dec 2010 00:46:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Talking Points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iran]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=3152</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The holidays are just around the corner, and the preparatory legislative sausage-making on Capitol Hill is in full swing.  What a happy, happy time of year!</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/12/10/ftp149/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Terrifying Hallowe&#039;en Nightmares, Left And Right</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/10/29/terrifying-halloween-nightmares-left-and-right/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/10/29/terrifying-halloween-nightmares-left-and-right/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Oct 2010 23:17:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Humor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Name-dropping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=2929</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>It's that time of year again... the time when we pre-empt our usual Friday Talking Points column here and instead gather 'round the virtual campfire and shove a metaphorical flashlight under our chin, and proceed to tell two tales of horror guaranteed to make your blood run like ice water in the veins, no matter which side of the political divide you hail from.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/10/29/terrifying-halloween-nightmares-left-and-right/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama Poll Watch -- September, 2010</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/10/04/opw1009/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/10/04/opw1009/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Oct 2010 20:34:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama Poll Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Vice President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=2793</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>President Obama got a bit of a bounce in his monthly poll average in September, but the news is of a decidedly mixed variety.  There is good news and bad in the numbers from last month for Obama, and it's looking like there won't be much of a pre-election change in his numbers which could help congressional Democrats out on the midterm campaign trail.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/10/04/opw1009/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [137] -- Listen To Westen And Lakoff, Democrats!</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/09/03/ftp137/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/09/03/ftp137/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 23:24:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign Ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Talking Points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Name-dropping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=2649</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Jollification aside, though, we're still one week away from Congress returning to briefly do their job (or at least give the appearance of doing so), before they award themselves another month or so off, in order to campaign.  Labor Day is right around the corner (or perhaps blowing past the corner at 75 miles per hour, if you live in the hurricane zone -- which contains, my television assures me, everything east of about Denver).</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/09/03/ftp137/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama Poll Watch -- August, 2010</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/09/01/opw1008/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/09/01/opw1008/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Sep 2010 20:25:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama Poll Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Bill of Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=2635</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Augusts, to be frank, are not President Obama's friend.  The past month was no different, at least as measured by public opinion polling.  Obama was on a downswing heading into the month, and his numbers reflect this in a stark way.  In other words, it was a bad month for Obama.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/09/01/opw1008/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>17</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Turning The Page On Iraq</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/08/31/turning-the-page-on-iraq/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/08/31/turning-the-page-on-iraq/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Sep 2010 01:53:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=2626</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Obama struck a rather humble tone in his remarks, which seemed just about right for the situation.  He didn't go out of his way to either claim personal credit, or point the finger of blame.  He even included President Bush, by name, in his remarks, after phoning him earlier today.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/08/31/turning-the-page-on-iraq/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How About A Press Conference, Mister President?</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/08/30/how-about-a-press-conference-mister-president/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/08/30/how-about-a-press-conference-mister-president/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2010 00:45:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=2620</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>So, while I'll watch tomorrow's Oval Office address, I will be thinking about the question I'd like to ask Obama right now: "Mr. President, when are you going to hold your next press conference?"</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/08/30/how-about-a-press-conference-mister-president/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>92</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [135] -- The Sky Is Falling!</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/08/20/ftp135/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/08/20/ftp135/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Aug 2010 00:08:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Free Speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Talking Points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Bill of Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=2568</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The media, quite obviously, has lost any capacity it once may have had for self-examination, to say nothing of its sense of irony.  Every so often, this is proven beyond doubt by a single story.  This, sadly, is one of those times.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/08/20/ftp135/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>72</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama&#039;s Iraq Withdrawal Timeline</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/08/02/obamas-iraq-withdrawal-timeline/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/08/02/obamas-iraq-withdrawal-timeline/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Aug 2010 23:28:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=2464</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>But in all the media reports I've seen yet on the Iraq withdrawal part of the speech (considered by the media to be the most newsworthy part), very little attention is being paid to how exactly we got where we are today -- President Obama announcing he's meeting an important milestone on the timetable for American military withdrawal from Iraq.  So I thought it'd be worth a look back at what preceded today's speech.  Because, as I said, the mainstream media so far have fallen down on the job of providing any sort of context or perspective (or, even, "a timeline") to Obama's Iraq withdrawal whatsoever -- or, even worse than omitting things, getting them factually wrong.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/08/02/obamas-iraq-withdrawal-timeline/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>More Biden, Please</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/07/19/more-biden-please/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/07/19/more-biden-please/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jul 2010 00:29:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Vice President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=2412</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The White House is, quite obviously, getting back into campaign mode.  This is a good thing for Democrats, because it means putting the last spadeful of dirt on the carcass of President Obama's hopes of bipartisanship in Washington during his term of office.  But while Obama has recently begun to make the case to voters why electing Democrats this November is a good idea, Vice President Joe Biden has apparently been doing a much better job in terms of framing the debate on Democratic terms.  Which means the smartest thing Obama could do right now is to send the Vice President out in front of the media and in front of campaign events to make the case a lot more strongly than Obama could (or should).  In other words: more Biden, please.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/07/19/more-biden-please/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>32</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [130] -- Who Is This &quot;They&quot; Obama Speaks Of?</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/07/09/ftp130/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/07/09/ftp130/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jul 2010 00:17:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Talking Points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Vice President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=2374</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>My biggest problem with both Obama's speech and Emanuel's interview is that neither one of them truly seems to understand that an election is underway.  The word "Republican" is not uttered once by President Obama.  Rahm only uses the word four times, and only two of those are really drawing distinctions between what Democrats want to do, and what Republicans want to do (or, more to the point, not to do).  And <em>neither one of them</em> uses the word "Democrat" (or "Democrats" or "Democratic") <em>once</em>.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/07/09/ftp130/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>75</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama Poll Watch -- June, 2010</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/07/07/opw1006/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/07/07/opw1006/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jul 2010 22:29:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama Poll Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=2360</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Obama, after gaining a bit in his average approval ratings in May, slipped back in June.  But the reversal was slight, continuing a five-month streak of amazingly stable numbers.  Since February, Obama's approval rating has stayed within one half of one percentage point, which is pretty remarkable.  Unfortunately, this trend may be at an end, and his numbers may be headed even further downwards in July.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/07/07/opw1006/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>31</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Good News From Iraq</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/06/30/good-news-from-iraq/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/06/30/good-news-from-iraq/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jun 2010 21:36:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Vice President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=2328</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>So while I go out and celebrate my patriotism this weekend, my thoughts will be with the soldiers returning home safely to their loved ones, as we wind at least one of our wars down.  And with the ones who didn't make it home, and with the ones who haven't made it home yet.  But no matter how you feel about America's involvement in Iraq or Afghanistan, I think everyone can agree that seeing soldiers coming home is good news indeed.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/06/30/good-news-from-iraq/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>We&#039;re All Terrorist Supporters</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/06/23/were-all-terrorist-supporters/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/06/23/were-all-terrorist-supporters/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jun 2010 00:13:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pakistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=2297</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The Supreme Court recently ruled that the post-9/11 laws against "materially supporting" terrorist groups should be very broadly interpreted.  Even counseling any group on the official list of terrorist organizations about peaceful topics is now to be considered "supporting terrorism."  Which leads me to wonder what they'd say about actually paying a terrorist organization tens of millions of dollars.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/06/23/were-all-terrorist-supporters/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Straight-Up, No-Chaser Libertarianism</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/05/20/straight-up-no-chaser-libertarianism/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/05/20/straight-up-no-chaser-libertarianism/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 May 2010 23:30:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Bill of Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=2114</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Rand Paul, who just clinched the Republican Party nomination for the Senate race in Kentucky, is apparently not quite ready for primetime.  His recent remarks on the Civil Rights Act painfully show why being a politician is not as easy as some people think.  The problem for Paul, son of Ron Paul, is that even if he somehow survives this flap, it is almost guaranteed that there are going to be plenty more of them during the campaign.  Because both Pauls, father and son, are (at heart) libertarians.  Which requires some explanation, because many folks have never come into contact with the concept of libertarianism.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/05/20/straight-up-no-chaser-libertarianism/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>17</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Exceptional Democracy</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/04/07/exceptional-democracy/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/04/07/exceptional-democracy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Apr 2010 22:52:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=1829</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Americans, in general, like to believe in the concept of "American Exceptionalism."  This doctrine can be summed up as: "We're the best damn country on the planet, wouldn't the rest of you lesser countries agree?"  But to me, what is telling is that whenever nascent democratic forms of government develop in other places in the world (born through the ravages of war, popular revolt, simple modernization, or any of a number of other reasons) and the people affected have the opportunity to select what form their new democracies shall take; they almost without exception (pun intended) choose some form of the British parliamentary system, rather than American-style representative democracy.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/04/07/exceptional-democracy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama Gets His Groove Back</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/03/30/obama-gets-his-groove-back/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/03/30/obama-gets-his-groove-back/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Mar 2010 00:28:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=1755</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>You can call it his groove, or you can call it his mojo, or (if you're less <em>Austin Powers</em>-minded), you can call it his political momentum.  But whatever you choose to call it, Barack Obama has emerged, phoenix-like, from the ashes of the healthcare debate rancor and is now forging ahead on many fronts.  This political rebirth is not guaranteed of success in any way, but it certainly is refreshing to see, I have to say.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/03/30/obama-gets-his-groove-back/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Iraq Milestones</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/02/22/iraq-milestones/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/02/22/iraq-milestones/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 00:16:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iran]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=1558</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>A major milestone happened in Iraq recently, but nobody paid it much attention.  It's understandable, since there is a lot currently going on to distract both the media and the public, from the Winter Olympics to the Washington health reform "summit" later this week.  Even on military matters, the headlines this week will likely be about different subjects, from the "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" policy hearings on Capitol Hill to the progress of a new offensive in Afghanistan.  But that doesn't mean we shouldn't also be talking about Iraq.  Because, for the first time since the war began, there are fewer than 100,000 American troops in Iraq.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/02/22/iraq-milestones/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>45</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama&#039;s Second-Year Potential</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/01/06/obamas-second-year-potential/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/01/06/obamas-second-year-potential/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jan 2010 01:20:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2010/01/06/obamas-second-year-potential/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>President Barack Obama has the potential of having a pretty good second year in office.  Conventional inside-the-Beltway wisdom is that "nothing much gets done in a congressional election year," but this ignores the fact that life itself does not halt for electioneering, but rather keeps right on happening.  And there are quite a few positive things either explicitly scheduled for 2010, or at least very likely to happen.  This doesn't automatically mean the president is guaranteed to have a great year, but it certainly sets the scene for Obama managing to have a fairly good year.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/01/06/obamas-second-year-potential/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>My 2009 &quot;McLaughlin Awards&quot; [Part 2]</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/01/01/my-2009-mclaughlin-awards-part-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/01/01/my-2009-mclaughlin-awards-part-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Jan 2010 02:47:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Free Speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Bill of Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Vice President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2010/01/01/my-2009-mclaughlin-awards-part-2/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Welcome back to my annual outright theft of <em>The McLaughlin Group</em>'s awards categories for the past year in politics.  What's that?  We're sorry, but out lawyers insist we instead use the phrase "my annual legally-allowable constitutionally-protected parody" instead.  So sorry.  For those of you who missed it, <a href="http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2009/12/25/my-2009-mclaughlin-awards-part-1-2/">Part 1</a> of this column ran last week, on Christmas.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/01/01/my-2009-mclaughlin-awards-part-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Realistic Look At Obama&#039;s Afghanistan Strategy</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/12/03/a-realistic-look-at-obamas-afghanistan-strategy/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/12/03/a-realistic-look-at-obamas-afghanistan-strategy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 00:27:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pakistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2009/12/03/a-realistic-look-at-obamas-afghanistan-strategy/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>At first glance, it seems like nobody's happy with President Obama's new Afghanistan strategy, announced Tuesday night before an audience of West Point cadets.  Voices from the left and right (for different reasons, of course) are decrying the president's decision as not what they wanted to hear.  Hard-liners are attempting to score political points, from both sides of the aisle.  But when you strip away the heated rhetoric, what remains?  To me, the core question becomes: "Is Obama's new policy a good thing or a bad thing, and does it have a chance of working?"  OK, that's really two questions.  And, for now, I think the answer to both is: "Maybe."  Maybe, and then again, maybe not.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/12/03/a-realistic-look-at-obamas-afghanistan-strategy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Forgotten Wars</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/12/01/forgotten-wars/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/12/01/forgotten-wars/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 00:34:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2009/12/01/forgotten-wars/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>I know I'm supposed to be writing about Afghanistan today, in advance of President Obama's speech tonight, but I am still waiting to hear what the man has to say before analyzing it, so you'll just have to join me as I wait and see.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/12/01/forgotten-wars/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>War Tax A Good Idea</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/11/24/war-tax-a-good-idea/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/11/24/war-tax-a-good-idea/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 00:45:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2009/11/24/war-tax-a-good-idea/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The idea itself is a basic one -- pay for the costs of war now, instead of endlessly borrowing money in order to do so.  A few weeks ago, the White House leaked an interesting factoid -- it costs one million dollars to put one U.S. soldier in Afghanistan for one year.  This is a nice round number, and gets people to think about the war in a new light -- how much it costs.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/11/24/war-tax-a-good-idea/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [100] -- Whigging Out</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/11/06/ftp100/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/11/06/ftp100/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 00:28:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Talking Points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Humor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Name-dropping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2009/11/06/friday-talking-points-100-whigging-out/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>This column today celebrates a milestone -- triple digits on the odometer!  That's right, as hard as it may seem to believe, this is the <em>one hundredth volume</em> of your weekly <strong>Friday Talking Points</strong> column.  For a little over two years now, we've brought you our thoughts on "the week that was in politics," and for a little less time than that, we've announced our weekly winners of both the aforementioned <strong>MIDOTW</strong> as well as the ignominious <strong>Most Disappointing Democrat Of The Week</strong>.  And we wrap it all up with some practical, good old-fashioned, home-brewed Democratic spin, our Talking Points for the week ahead.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/11/06/ftp100/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>One Year After Obama&#039;s Election: Still Smarter... Than The Alternative</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/11/04/one-year-after-obamas-election-still-smarter-than-the-alternative/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/11/04/one-year-after-obamas-election-still-smarter-than-the-alternative/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 23:55:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2009/11/04/one-year-after-obamas-election-still-smarter-than-the-alternative/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The day before I cast my vote for Barack Obama, I wrote a column titled <a href="http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2008/11/03/barack-obama-is-smarter-than-us/">"Barack Obama Is Smarter Than Us."</a>  By "us," I meant the legions of us lefty bloggers out here, who second-guessed his campaign <em>on a daily basis</em> for nigh on two years.  I included myself in that "us" as well -- because, I fully admit, I got incredibly frustrated during Obama's campaign when he didn't do what I really, really wanted him to.  Or didn't do it fast enough to suit me.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/11/04/one-year-after-obamas-election-still-smarter-than-the-alternative/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Talking About Afghanistan</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/10/08/talking-about-afghanistan/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/10/08/talking-about-afghanistan/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 23:29:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iran]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pakistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Vice President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2009/10/08/talking-about-afghanistan/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Still, the image remains.  The media has apparently discovered that we have troops in Afghanistan.  This may come as a shock to some, since the mainstream media (at least on television) have pretty much ignored this fact for around seven years now (so much so that Afghanistan became known as "the forgotten war" for a while).  But the reporting on what President Obama is going to do next in Afghanistan has been so over-the-top in the past few weeks, it has astonished me (and I do not astonish easily, especially when it comes to the idiocy of the evening news).  More stories have run on Afghanistan, I would be willing to venture, in the past two weeks than have run in the past two years.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/10/08/talking-about-afghanistan/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Forgotten War</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/09/23/the-forgotten-war/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/09/23/the-forgotten-war/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 22:39:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2009/09/23/the-forgotten-war/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>No so very long ago, Afghanistan was known as "the forgotten war."  While America's attention was largely focused on Baghdad, many forgot our military was even in another country.  But these days, Afghanistan is hard to miss in the headlines.  Rumors are swirling over what President Obama will do there -- increase American troops, draw down troops, keep the same troops (it depends on which headlines you read) -- and how he will change our strategy and goals.  Talk of "failure" is rampant, except that now it is not coming from the anti-war crowd, but instead from the Pentagon.  President Obama needs to get out front on this issue, by beginning to talk about our newly-forgotten war: Iraq.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/09/23/the-forgotten-war/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>18</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [94] -- Two Years Of FTP</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/09/18/friday-talking-points-94-two-years-of-ftp/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/09/18/friday-talking-points-94-two-years-of-ftp/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Sep 2009 00:04:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Talking Points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iran]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Vice President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2009/09/18/friday-talking-points-94-two-years-of-ftp/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>How time flies.  This column marks its second anniversary today, by the calendar if not the Volume number.  For the second straight year, we only produced 47 columns, but by the calendar we've gone two full years and a few odd days.  Actually, now that I think of it, more than just a <em>few</em> odd days.  Ahem.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/09/18/friday-talking-points-94-two-years-of-ftp/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>23</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [90] -- Obama To Switch Parties</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/08/21/friday-talking-points-90-obama-to-switch-parties/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/08/21/friday-talking-points-90-obama-to-switch-parties/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2009 23:02:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Free Speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Talking Points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Humor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2009/08/21/friday-talking-points-90-obama-to-switch-parties/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>President Obama stunned the political world today by announcing he will switch political parties, and soon become a Republican.  "It seems the only way we're going to get bipartisanship in this town is if I lead the way," he said, in brief remarks before leaving for vacation.  "The Republicans have refused to work with me because I'm a Democrat, and Republicans' biggest strength has always been the ability to fall into line with whatever their leaders tell them, unlike other certain unnamed political parties in America..." (the president appeared to cough several times at this point, although one of his coughs sounded suspiciously like the word "Democrats," if truth be told...).  The president, clear-throated now, continued, "So I will now be the leader of the Republican Party, and they will fall in line with what I tell them to we're going to do.  The Democrats who are interested in bipartisanship can join us to pass Medicare-for-all, instead of the <a href="http://www.rubegoldberg.com/">Rube Goldberg</a> machine which they have been attempting to construct."</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/08/21/friday-talking-points-90-obama-to-switch-parties/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama&#039;s Second Hundred Days</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/08/07/obamas-second-hundred-days/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/08/07/obamas-second-hundred-days/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2009 16:00:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Campaign Ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FCC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iran]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Name-dropping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Other]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Bill of Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2009/08/07/obamas-second-hundred-days/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>I've always been confused why the media goes berserk about rating a president's "first 100 days," but then just <em>stops counting</em> after the first milestone.  This, to a statistician, would be known as a "zero dimensional data array" -- one data point, to be exact.  If you don't re-test the sample on a regular schedule, how are you supposed to compare it to anything?</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/08/07/obamas-second-hundred-days/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama&#039;s &quot;Drip, Drip, Drip...&quot; Intelligence Problem</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/07/13/obamas-drip-drip-drip-intelligence-problem/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/07/13/obamas-drip-drip-drip-intelligence-problem/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 23:23:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Vice President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2009/07/13/obamas-drip-drip-drip-intelligence-problem/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>President Obama has always said he wants to look forward, not backward.  This, when it comes to the actions of the previous administration, means Obama is content to just identify any problems with George Bush's (and Dick Cheney's) methods on security and intelligence matters, rectify any abuses and correct any mistakes, promise we'll never do it again, and move on.  Obama has never advocated -- and, indeed, done what he could to discourage -- any sort of investigation into Bush's actions in response to 9/11 (some of which continued throughout Bush's two terms).  Obama's opposition to such investigations has been steadfast and unwavering.  He has even (now that he leads the executive branch himself) strongly argued in the courts against any examination of how executive branch power was used under Bush.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/07/13/obamas-drip-drip-drip-intelligence-problem/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Beginning Of The End Of The Iraq War?</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/06/29/the-beginning-of-the-end-of-the-iraq-war/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/06/29/the-beginning-of-the-end-of-the-iraq-war/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 22:27:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2009/06/29/the-beginning-of-the-end-of-the-iraq-war/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Tomorrow will be an important date in the history of America's involvement in Iraq.  Because it is the first milestone on the timeline for withdrawal that Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri Al-Maliki wrested from George W. Bush late last year.  Which means, barring unforeseen circumstances (always a possibility in a war zone), tomorrow will mark the beginning of the end of America's military presence in Iraq.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/06/29/the-beginning-of-the-end-of-the-iraq-war/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [80] -- Parsing Obama&#039;s Cairo Speech</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/06/05/friday-talking-points-80-parsing-obamas-cairo-speech/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/06/05/friday-talking-points-80-parsing-obamas-cairo-speech/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 23:36:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Talking Points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iran]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2009/06/05/friday-talking-points-80-parsing-obamas-cairo-speech/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Although this is long, it merely hits the highlights of Obama's speech.  I encourage everyone to take ten minutes and read <a href="http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2009/06/04/a_new_beginning_with_muslims_96831.html">the entire transcript</a> for yourself.  Obama, it should be pointed out, did not have to give this speech -- he chose to.  He ran the risk of criticism here at home, and the benefits to him personally and politically in America were slight compared to the risk of actual political damage.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/06/05/friday-talking-points-80-parsing-obamas-cairo-speech/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>31</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>National Security Blanket</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/05/28/national-security-blanket/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/05/28/national-security-blanket/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 00:30:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2009/05/28/national-security-blanket/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Debates about national security always fascinate me, because almost without exception nobody bothers to define the term itself.  This, to me, is a key feature of any debate about national security versus the people's right to know what their government is doing in their name -- such as the one currently raging over whether to publicly release thousands of photographs of detainee abuse.  But the definition of "national security" is always conspicuous in its absence in the debate.  Which allows the government to get away with using two definitions of the term interchangeably, when only one should be legally allowed.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/05/28/national-security-blanket/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pelosi, Part Two</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/05/19/pelosi-part-two/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/05/19/pelosi-part-two/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 00:18:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Bill of Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2009/05/19/pelosi-part-two/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>When I wrote yesterday's column (<a href="http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2009/05/18/what-exactly-was-pelosi-supposed-to-do/">"What, Exactly, Was Pelosi Supposed To Do?"</a>) I expected a certain amount of debate, but I had no idea what direction it would take (which is the whole fun of the blogosphere).  To be perfectly honest, I thought some Pelosi defenders would take me to task for being too hard on her.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/05/19/pelosi-part-two/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What, Exactly, Was Pelosi Supposed To Do?</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/05/18/what-exactly-was-pelosi-supposed-to-do/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/05/18/what-exactly-was-pelosi-supposed-to-do/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2009 23:37:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2006 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Bill of Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2009/05/18/what-exactly-was-pelosi-supposed-to-do/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Listening to the news over the past week, it would be easy to come to the conclusion that Nancy Pelosi was personally responsible for torturing prisoners.  Because that's how the storyline seemed, if you had just beamed in from Mars and didn't know anything else about the debate on prisoner interrogation.  The problem is, we have not just arrived on this planet, and Nancy Pelosi will ultimately wind up in the history books with a footnote (if that) in the description of what took place under George W. Bush and Dick Cheney.  But her critics in the past few days have remarkably failed to answer a very basic question (not that the media is really asking, but maybe they'll get around to it) -- what, exactly, was Nancy Pelosi <em>supposed</em> to do?</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/05/18/what-exactly-was-pelosi-supposed-to-do/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [77] -- There&#039;s Always Next Week...</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/05/15/friday-talking-points-77-theres-always-next-week/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/05/15/friday-talking-points-77-theres-always-next-week/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 May 2009 00:44:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Talking Points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Bill of Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2009/05/15/friday-talking-points-77-theres-always-next-week/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>I have to start by saying that in all honesty, President Obama and the Democrats didn't have a great week.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/05/15/friday-talking-points-77-theres-always-next-week/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama&#039;s Tortured Logic</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/05/14/obamas-tortured-logic/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/05/14/obamas-tortured-logic/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 23:29:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2009/05/14/obamas-tortured-logic/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>President Obama recently reversed his position on an appellate court ruling which orders the release of hundreds of torture photos, and is now saying he will fight the decision.  Since the court in this case is already a federal appellate court, this would seem to mean that the Obama administration will file an appeal with the Supreme Court.  The practical effect of this filing will be to delay any action until October, when the court's next session begins.  And since the court does not rule immediately in most instances, it will likely delay it at least until the end of the year.  This leads to the question of whether this delay is precisely the desired outcome for Obama -- six months of breathing room on the matter.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/05/14/obamas-tortured-logic/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>25</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>First Milestone Approaches In Iraq Withdrawal Timetable</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/05/13/first-milestone-approaches-in-iraq-withdrawal-timetable/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/05/13/first-milestone-approaches-in-iraq-withdrawal-timetable/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 23:42:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2009/05/13/first-milestone-approaches-in-iraq-withdrawal-timetable/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>America is approaching an important date for our military involvement in Iraq.  By the end of next month, American combat forces are supposed to pull out of Iraqi cities.  Little attention has been paid to this first withdrawal deadline in the American media, but as the date gets closer hopefully they'll realize what is about to happen.  Because the next phase of America's military presence in Iraq could determine how fast President Obama can draw down the total number of American troops in the country.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/05/13/first-milestone-approaches-in-iraq-withdrawal-timetable/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pressuring Arlen Specter</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/05/07/pressuring-arlen-specter/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/05/07/pressuring-arlen-specter/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2009 00:46:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2009/05/07/pressuring-arlen-specter/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The intraparty struggle within the Democratic Party over what exactly to do with Arlen Specter now seems to <a href="http://voices.washingtonpost.com/44/2009/05/07/new_deal_specter_gets_a_subcom.html">have been worked out</a>.  For the time being, at least, Specter will not get to keep his overall seniority (which was apparently promised him by Majority Leader Harry Reid), but as a consolation prize will chair the Crime and Drugs Subcommittee, part of the Judiciary Committee he used to chair as a Republican.  This struggle may wind up being re-fought after the 2010 election, but for the next year and a half the dust appears to have settled on the issue.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/05/07/pressuring-arlen-specter/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Digging In To Obama&#039;s (And Republicans&#039;) Poll Numbers</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/04/27/digging-in-to-obamas-and-republicans-poll-numbers/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/04/27/digging-in-to-obamas-and-republicans-poll-numbers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 00:11:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2009/04/27/digging-in-to-obamas-and-republicans-poll-numbers/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Another "big news" number is the percent of people who think things in the country "are generally going in the right direction" versus "have gotten pretty seriously off on the wrong track."  The scores of 50 percent for "right track" and 48 percent for "wrong track" don't sound all that impressive, until you compare them to preceding polls.  Just before Obama was sworn in, those numbers were 19 percent "right track" and 78 percent "wrong track."  Just before the election last year, the "right track" number was an abysmal <em>eight percent</em>, with <em>ninety percent</em> responding "wrong track."  Right track numbers haven't topped fifty percent since 2003.  That is a stunning turnaround, for only 100 days in office.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/04/27/digging-in-to-obamas-and-republicans-poll-numbers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama&#039;s First 94 Days</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/04/24/obamas-first-94-days/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/04/24/obamas-first-94-days/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2009 01:04:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2009/04/24/obamas-first-94-days/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>I admit, I am getting the jump on the rest of the media here, by writing my "First 100 Days" article six days early (some would say five days early, but they would be wrong).  I have jumped this particular gun already, I should point out, having already written one article (after Obama's first week in office) entitled <a href="http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2009/01/27/obamas-first-168-hours/">"Obama's First 168 Hours."</a>  So today we are going to pre-empt the usual Friday Talking Points article this week with a special edition on President Obama's "First 100 Days," since everyone will be talking about it starting this weekend.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/04/24/obamas-first-94-days/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>First 100 Days Retrospective, Part 2: (HW) Bush, Clinton, (W) Bush</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/04/23/first-100-days-retrospective-part-2-hwbush-clinton-wbush/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/04/23/first-100-days-retrospective-part-2-hwbush-clinton-wbush/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 00:12:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2009/04/23/first-100-days-retrospective-part-2-hwbush-clinton-wbush/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Welcome back to my pre-emptive strike on the thousands of journalists preparing their "Obama's 100 Days" articles for next week.  How many of them will count wrong and publish one day early (his first day in office, depending on how you measure, ended at noon 1/21/09)?  Time will tell.  So while I will be publishing my own take on "Obama's First 94 Days" tomorrow, we continue today with a look back at President Obama's immediate predecessors.  <a href="http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2009/04/22/first-100-days-retrospective-ford-carter-reagan/">Yesterday's article</a> examined Gerald Ford, Jimmy Carter, and Ronald Reagan's first 100 days (and how they were seen at the time in the media).  Today we take a look at George H.W. Bush, Bill Clinton, and George W. Bush.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/04/23/first-100-days-retrospective-part-2-hwbush-clinton-wbush/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [74] -- Pirates And Torture</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/04/17/friday-talking-points-74-pirates-and-torture/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/04/17/friday-talking-points-74-pirates-and-torture/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 23:57:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Talking Points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Bill of Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2009/04/17/friday-talking-points-74-pirates-and-torture/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>What a strange set of sentences that is to begin an article about the twenty-first century world we live in.  But pirates are attacking ships with regularity off the coast of Somalia.  This has been going on for years, but Americans just realized it is happening (because an American ship was just attacked).  And, while the two are not connected (and I am not advocating for their connection, sorry for the slightly-misleading headline), people are finally talking about torture after President Obama released the Bush torture memos to the public.  We'll get to the Bush torture memos in a bit, but I'd like to begin with a proposed solution to the pirate problem first.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/04/17/friday-talking-points-74-pirates-and-torture/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>33</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama Declares Himself President-For-Life (No Fooling!)</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/04/01/obama-declares-himself-president-for-life-no-fooling/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/04/01/obama-declares-himself-president-for-life-no-fooling/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2009 12:39:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Humor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iran]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Name-dropping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2009/04/01/obama-declares-himself-president-for-life-no-fooling/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What a morning!
I awoke to the sounds of my clock radio, and of President Obama giving an extraordinary speech across the airwaves.  I'll just transcribe what I heard for all of you here, without comment:
I, President Obama, have taken this opportunity to speak to all of America.  Because I'd like to make a [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/04/01/obama-declares-himself-president-for-life-no-fooling/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [67] -- Washington At Warp Speed</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/02/27/friday-talking-points-67-washington-at-warp-speed/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/02/27/friday-talking-points-67-washington-at-warp-speed/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Feb 2009 01:47:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Talking Points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2009/02/27/friday-talking-points-67-washington-at-warp-speed/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Barack Obama is moving Congress so fast, we're approaching warp speed.  Consider the fact that neither presidents Reagan nor Clinton got their (<em>much</em> smaller) stimulus packages passed for <em>over six months</em> -- and Obama got his passed in mere <em>weeks</em>.  And with Clinton and Reagan, that was a major party of their presidential legacy, whereas with Obama it is just the first item on a <em>very</em> long list of enormous changes to be made.  Soon.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/02/27/friday-talking-points-67-washington-at-warp-speed/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Iraq Denies Blackwater License</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/01/29/iraq-denies-blackwater-license/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/01/29/iraq-denies-blackwater-license/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 23:57:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2009/01/29/iraq-denies-blackwater-license/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>News from Iraq has seemingly slowed to a trickle, due to most of America wanting to turn the page and move on.  But an item which appeared today in the <em>Washington Post</em> shows that the Iraqi government is not wasting any time in asserting the prerogatives of true sovereignty which they gained on the first of this year.  Even in the midst of an Iraqi election (or perhaps <em>because</em> of the impending vote), <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/01/28/AR2009012803319_pf.html">Iraq announced</a> that the security company Blackwater Worldwide will not be getting a renewal of their license to operate in Iraq this year.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/01/29/iraq-denies-blackwater-license/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [62] -- Obama&#039;s Inaugural Speech</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/01/23/friday-talking-points-62-obamas-inaugural-speech/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/01/23/friday-talking-points-62-obamas-inaugural-speech/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Jan 2009 01:13:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Talking Points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iran]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Bill of Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2009/01/23/friday-talking-points-62-obamas-inaugural-speech/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Because Obama's Inaugural speech was indeed masterful.  When he started speaking, I was thinking "which line will be the one everyone focuses on?"  In other words, which line will be the "nothing to fear but fear itself" or "ask not what your country can do for you, ask what you can do for your country" moment?  Both of those lines are from previous inaugurations, so what would be remembered from Obama's speech?</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/01/23/friday-talking-points-62-obamas-inaugural-speech/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [61] -- Pardon Me?</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/01/16/friday-talking-points-61-pardon-me/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/01/16/friday-talking-points-61-pardon-me/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2009 23:49:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Talking Points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2009/01/16/friday-talking-points-61-pardon-me/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Taking that last one first, the status in Washington is fast approaching Officially Freaking Out (in the tradition of acronym-crazy D.C., I will refer to this from now on as "OFO") as they contemplate the city being overrun by Inauguration visitors.  To put this in perspective, Washington's population is around 600,000 people.  Estimates of the crowd which has even now begun descending on the city range from one million up to three million.  Three million people is <em>five times</em> the population of the city.  For comparison, take the population of the town or city you live in and multiply it by five.  Now picture that many out-of-towners arriving for an event.  It's like Woodstock descending on a small town, in other words.  Or, if you prefer, a Medieval siege.  No word yet on where to park the catapults and trebuchets.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/01/16/friday-talking-points-61-pardon-me/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bush&#039;s Farewell Speech</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/01/15/bushs-farewell-speech/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/01/15/bushs-farewell-speech/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2009 02:02:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2009/01/15/bushs-farewell-speech/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Mr. Bush, history doesn't record just seven years of your presidency.  It records what happened before 9/11 as well.  You were determined to do everything in your presidency differently than Bill Clinton.  And because the Clinton people were so alarmed about Al Qaeda, that meant that you could safely ignore it, since getting alarmed about it was doubtlessly the wrong thing to do.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/01/15/bushs-farewell-speech/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Support John Conyers&#039; Truth Commission</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/01/14/support-john-conyers-truth-commission/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/01/14/support-john-conyers-truth-commission/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2009 00:12:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Bill of Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2009/01/14/support-john-conyers-truth-commission/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Are you one of those people who wants to see what has been done in your name by the outgoing Bush administration?  Are you frustrated by all the "we need to look forward, not backward" language from Barack Obama and other Democratic leaders?  Well, now you can do something about it, by <a href="http://clerk.house.gov/member_info/mcapdir.html">calling up your House member</a> today and telling them to support John Conyers' H.R.104, a bill to "establish a national commission on presidential war powers and civil liberties."</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/01/14/support-john-conyers-truth-commission/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bush&#039;s Final Press Conference</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/01/12/bushs-final-press-conference/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/01/12/bushs-final-press-conference/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 00:36:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2009/01/12/bushs-final-press-conference/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>President George Bush gave his final press conference today.  Lest I be accused of "Bush Derangement Syndrome," I'm reproducing some of the most interesting answers Bush gave today, with a minimum of snarky commentary.  Actually, what I (and many others) have would properly be called "Bush Fatigue," as even his final week in office seems somehow endless.  But I think it's worth taking one last peek inside Bush's thinking because it is so interesting to hear how his views of his term in office differ so significantly from the way others see him.  If you'd like to read the entire transcript of the press release, the <a href="http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2009/01/20090112.html">White House website</a> has it up.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/01/12/bushs-final-press-conference/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>U.S. (Media) Pulls Out Of Iraq</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/01/06/us-media-pulls-out-of-iraq/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/01/06/us-media-pulls-out-of-iraq/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 01:09:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2009/01/06/us-media-pulls-out-of-iraq/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The American television news media is slipping out of Iraq, as quietly as they can.  This story <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/12/29/business/media/29bureaus.html?ref=television">was reported</a> by the <em>New York Times</em> over the holidays, and it may prove to be a consequential part of the way the war ends.  Because it might actually make it easier for President Obama to wind the war down, and avoid a lot of squabbling over how he does so.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/01/06/us-media-pulls-out-of-iraq/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>My 2008 &quot;McLaughlin Awards&quot; [Part 2]</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2008/12/26/my-2008-mclaughlin-awards-part-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2008/12/26/my-2008-mclaughlin-awards-part-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Dec 2008 01:05:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Name-dropping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Bill of Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2008/12/26/my-2008-mclaughlin-awards-part-2/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Three names suggest themselves in this category.  The first, sad to say, is Sarah Palin.  While some dismiss her with the term (which she herself uttered on <em>Saturday Night Live</em>) "Caribou Barbie," my educated guess is that we have not seen the last of Alaska's governor on the national stage.  Because while the list of things Palin lacks is long and daunting, she has one star quality which may prove to be strong enough to cancel all the rest out -- charisma.  A politician can learn about such mundane things as world events and how to speak with political finesse, but charisma can't really be learned -- it's more of an innate quality.  And Palin's got it.  For those laughing at the prospect of Sarah Palin ever reappearing, I caution that when Ronald Reagan first ran for president, we all laughed at him, too.  An actor becoming president?  Pre-<em>pos</em>-terous!  So don't underestimate charisma, or Palin's ambition.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2008/12/26/my-2008-mclaughlin-awards-part-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>My 2008 &quot;McLaughlin Awards&quot; [Part 1]</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2008/12/19/my-2008-mclaughlin-awards-part-1/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2008/12/19/my-2008-mclaughlin-awards-part-1/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Dec 2008 00:37:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign Ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Name-dropping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2008/12/19/my-2008-mclaughlin-awards-part-1/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Welcome to our annual awards!  For the past three years, this column has paid homage (translation: "ripped off their gimmick") to the <a href="http://www.mclaughlin.com/"><em>McLaughlin Group</em></a> television show by handing out our own year-end awards (while using the same categories).  This will be a two-part column, with the second installment appearing one week from today.  And feel free to watch the <em>McLaughlin Group</em> on your local PBS station this weekend, to compare my picks with theirs.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2008/12/19/my-2008-mclaughlin-awards-part-1/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Maybe Levin And Bowen Should Throw Shoes</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2008/12/15/maybe-levin-and-bowen-should-throw-shoes/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2008/12/15/maybe-levin-and-bowen-should-throw-shoes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 01:28:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2008/12/15/maybe-levin-and-bowen-should-throw-shoes/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>I know it's a lot more interesting to talk about two shoes getting thrown at President Bush in Iraq, but two more important stories are getting ignored as a result.  These are two metaphorical "shoes" thrown at Bush, by the Senate and by Bush's own Inspector General in Iraq.  And they're going to have a much more lasting impact on how history sees our Iraq adventure than one video clip of a guy hucking his footwear at President Bush.  Because they deal with torture, and the failure of the Iraq reconstruction effort.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2008/12/15/maybe-levin-and-bowen-should-throw-shoes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [58] -- [Expletive Deleted] Blagojevich</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2008/12/12/friday-talking-points-58-expletive-deleted-blagojevich/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2008/12/12/friday-talking-points-58-expletive-deleted-blagojevich/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Dec 2008 01:15:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Talking Points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Humor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iran]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2008/12/12/friday-talking-points-58-expletive-deleted-blagojevich/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The history of profanity in American political discourse is an untold story out there just waiting for someone to research and write about -- although finding a willing publisher might be a bit of a problem.  Because it seems we're back to the Nixonian days of "[expletive deleted]."</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2008/12/12/friday-talking-points-58-expletive-deleted-blagojevich/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Close Look At The Iraq Status Of Forces Agreement [Part 2]</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2008/12/09/a-close-look-at-the-iraq-status-of-forces-agreement-part-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2008/12/09/a-close-look-at-the-iraq-status-of-forces-agreement-part-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2008 06:29:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iran]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2008/12/09/a-close-look-at-the-iraq-status-of-forces-agreement-part-2/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>So while some have decried this timetable for withdrawal, I think it is going to wind up facilitating a much faster overall American withdrawal than would have happened without the six month deadline.  Events may prove me wrong, but that's how I see it now.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2008/12/09/a-close-look-at-the-iraq-status-of-forces-agreement-part-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Close Look At The Iraq Status Of Forces Agreement [Part 1]</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2008/12/08/a-close-look-at-the-iraq-status-of-forces-agreement-part-1/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2008/12/08/a-close-look-at-the-iraq-status-of-forces-agreement-part-1/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Dec 2008 02:47:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2008/12/08/a-close-look-at-the-iraq-status-of-forces-agreement-part-1/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>There has been a lot of ink spilled over the ramifications of the agreement recently struck between the United States and Iraq on our presence there for the next three years.  The Status Of Forces Agreement ("SOFA") was passed by the Iraqi Parliament and signed by all three members of the Iraqi Executive Council, meaning it will have the force of law come the first of January, 2009.  President Bush has decided that his signature was enough for America to enter the agreement, so Congress never got their say on the document.  But with such commentary flying left and right, I thought I would go to the document itself to see what it actually says (versus how people are interpreting it).</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2008/12/08/a-close-look-at-the-iraq-status-of-forces-agreement-part-1/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Memo To Right-Wing: Withdrawal Timetable Now Doubleplusgood</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2008/11/17/memo-to-right-wing-withdrawal-timetable-now-doubleplusgood/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2008/11/17/memo-to-right-wing-withdrawal-timetable-now-doubleplusgood/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 23:35:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Humor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2008/11/17/memo-to-right-wing-withdrawal-timetable-now-doubleplusgood/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>I mean, it is so fantastical I had to actually laugh at it.  Because <em>of course</em> every single right-winger in America who has been using such language will immediately start using the same language about George Bush.  All who have called the concept of an American "timetable for withdrawal" as being: downright dangerous, weak, a surrender, cowardly, losing a war to al Qaeda, giving up on the War On Terror, giving the terrorists what they want, a crazy Democratic idea, a dangerously naive idea by [insert name of Democratic politician here], proof that Democrats love to lose wars, proof that Democrats are un-American, anti-American, and blame-America-first -- <em>all</em> of the people who have ever uttered anything of that ilk will <em>of course</em> be intellectually honest and consistent, and will now denounce Bush <em>in exactly the same fierce language</em> as they have used previously.  Because to do otherwise would just reveal their monstrous hypocrisy.  And of course they will not shirk their duty to do so, since they've been provided with such a shining example of an American leader "caving in to terrorists" and surrendering in the face of the enemy.  Of course they'll denounce Bush just as strongly as they have been denouncing others who have espoused such views.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2008/11/17/memo-to-right-wing-withdrawal-timetable-now-doubleplusgood/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [55] -- &quot;Bretton Woods II&quot;?  Not Quite.</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2008/11/14/friday-talking-points-55-bretton-woods-ii-not-quite/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2008/11/14/friday-talking-points-55-bretton-woods-ii-not-quite/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Nov 2008 00:25:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Talking Points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2008/11/14/friday-talking-points-55-bretton-woods-ii-not-quite/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Bush's meeting is going to last six hours.  And nobody expects it to come up with anything even close to the same magnitude of what happened in Bretton Woods.  Nobody sane, that is.  So please, media types, don't call it what it's not.  Let's have some truth in advertising here.  Call it "Desperate Bush Lame-Duck Photo-Op With World Leaders Who Would Really Rather Be Talking To Obama," if you have to slap a label on it.  Because that's a lot closer to what it's going to be.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2008/11/14/friday-talking-points-55-bretton-woods-ii-not-quite/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [52] -- What A Long, Strange Trip It&#039;s Been</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2008/10/17/friday-talking-points-52-what-a-long-strange-trip-its-been/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2008/10/17/friday-talking-points-52-what-a-long-strange-trip-its-been/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Oct 2008 23:23:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Talking Points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Humor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Name-dropping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2008/10/17/friday-talking-points-52-what-a-long-strange-trip-its-been/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>And now we find ourselves a few weeks out from Election Day, and things are looking pretty good for Democrats everywhere.  It's been an exhausting campaign, and I don't think anyone can argue that the Grateful Dead lyric I used as this week's title is inaccurate.  It has been a long and strange journey indeed.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2008/10/17/friday-talking-points-52-what-a-long-strange-trip-its-been/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Maliki Running Out Bush&#039;s Clock</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2008/10/14/maliki-running-out-bushs-clock/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2008/10/14/maliki-running-out-bushs-clock/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 22:33:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2008/10/14/maliki-running-out-bushs-clock/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>I've been saying for a while now that Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri Al-Maliki holds the upper hand in the game of "chicken" he's playing with George Bush over negotiating a Status Of Forces Agreement (SOFA) for American troops to legally stay in Iraq past the first of next year.  Now it appears both sides are pretty close to admitting that there will be no agreement, and that they had better start talking about some sort of short-term arrangement, which would allow whoever America's next president is to take over the negotiating table.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2008/10/14/maliki-running-out-bushs-clock/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

