<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>ChrisWeigant.com &#187; 2014 Elections</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.chrisweigant.com/category/elections/2014-elections/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com</link>
	<description>Reality-based political commentary</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2026 23:02:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Debate Advice For Hillary And Bernie</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/01/18/debate-advice-for-hillary-and-bernie/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/01/18/debate-advice-for-hillary-and-bernie/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2016 01:27:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2014 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2016 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign Ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=11712</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>So we had the fourth Democratic debate last night, and I suppose we should all be thankful that Debbie Wasserman Schultz didn't somehow manage to schedule it to compete with one of football's playoff games.  I wouldn't be surprised if the debate had a pretty low viewership, appearing as it did on a Sunday night during a three-day weekend, but those who did manage to catch it saw a much more high-spirited contest between Bernie Sanders and Hillary Clinton than we've previously seen.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/01/18/debate-advice-for-hillary-and-bernie/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>85</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [348] -- Double Standards And Hypocrisy</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/05/29/ftp348/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/05/29/ftp348/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2015 00:06:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2014 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2016 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign Ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cuba]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Talking Points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Syria]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=10766</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>We're going to begin today with a rather loaded question.  How much attention do you think the media should be paying towards a presidential nominee who is right now getting 13 to 15 percent support in public opinion polls of their party's voters?</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/05/29/ftp348/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>130</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama Poll Watch -- January, 2015</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/02/02/opw1501/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/02/02/opw1501/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2015 01:16:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2014 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama Poll Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=10259</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>President Obama just finished a very good month in public opinion polling.  Obama showed such notable improvement in January that it's tough to choose which metric he did best in.  In improvement over the previous month, Obama just had the best month of his second term (so far).  His January improvement was the fourth-best of his entire presidency.  He hit numbers he hasn't seen since the summer of 2013 -- gaining back all the ground lost (and more) since the disastrous rollout of the Obamacare website.  NBC's Chuck Todd, during coverage of Obama's State Of The Union speech, came up with the best metaphor for what has been happening since the midterm elections last year: Obama stole the GOP's "honeymoon."  After a big Republican political victory, Obama has been increasingly bold.  As a result, <em>Obama</em> got the bump in polling, instead of the Republicans.  January was indeed a very good month for President Obama.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/02/02/opw1501/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>19</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The 55 Limit</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/01/22/the-55-limit/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/01/22/the-55-limit/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2015 00:50:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2014 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2016 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=10216</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Sammy Hagar, famously, couldn't drive 55.  The double-nickel Hagar sang about was the national speed limit, in miles per hour.  The Republican Party is about to find out that there's a new 55 limit in Washington, and it's going to cause some Hagar-level rage on its own.  Because 55 senators is not the same as 60, or 67.  This simple mathematical statement is about to confound the GOP's entire strategy for the next two years.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/01/22/the-55-limit/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Morning In Obama&#039;s America</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/01/20/morning-in-obamas-america/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/01/20/morning-in-obamas-america/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2015 05:22:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2014 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2016 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign Ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iran]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Name-dropping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Russia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Vice President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=10207</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Listening to President Barack Obama's State Of The Union speech tonight, I couldn't help but think that he's been waiting a long time to give such a speech, and he was happy to finally be giving it.  Finally he could speak of the economy without having to hedge his language.  Finally, he could unleash his inner optimism once again.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/01/20/morning-in-obamas-america/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>110</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [332] -- Getting Ready For Obama&#039;s Big Speech</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/01/16/ftp332/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/01/16/ftp332/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Jan 2015 00:58:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2014 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2016 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cartoons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Free Speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Talking Points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=10192</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>This was a busy week in politics, as the Republicans in the new Congress began a bout of legislating and President Obama ramped up his agenda in preparation for next Tuesday's big speech to Congress and the country.  So let's just dive in to the week that was, shall we?</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/01/16/ftp332/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>47</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama Bouncing Back</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/01/14/obama-bouncing-back-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/01/14/obama-bouncing-back-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2015 00:37:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2014 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2016 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=10183</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>In less than a week, President Obama will give his State Of The Union speech to Congress and the nation.  Sitting presidents usually get a bump in the polls immediately afterwards, since it is always the most-watched political speech of the entire year.  But what's interesting to note, one week out, is that Obama is already enjoying somewhat of a bounce in his job approval polling.  What's more, Obama seems poised to rise even higher in public approval, since the next issue teed up for a major political battle is one where Obama's stance is a lot more popular than the Republican position: immigration reform.  All in all, ever since his forceful response to the midterm elections, Obama seems to be getting more and more popular.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/01/14/obama-bouncing-back-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>45</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Claiming Credit</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/01/05/claiming-credit/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/01/05/claiming-credit/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2015 23:59:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2014 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2016 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=10146</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>President Obama is doing the preparatory work for his upcoming State Of The Union speech this week, by visiting three states to tout his successes and also to build support for the proposals he's likely to make in the big speech.  This is all standard politics, really.  But Democrats should really join in a loud chorus right now to help Obama achieve the first of those goals -- claiming credit for turning the American economy around.  This is important for two reasons.  The first is that Democrats (and Obama), up until now, have been too timid to claim much of any credit for the economy, out of fears that it could take a turn for the worse and they'd end up looking like Pollyannas (Obama already got his fingers burnt on this previously, with the supposed summer of "green shoots," quite a while back).  The second reason it behooves Democrats to claim some credit right now is that if they don't, Republicans are already chomping at the bit to claim all that credit for themselves.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/01/05/claiming-credit/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>15</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>My 2014 &quot;McLaughlin Awards&quot; [Part 2]</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/12/26/my-2014-mclaughlin-awards-part-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/12/26/my-2014-mclaughlin-awards-part-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Dec 2014 02:14:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2014 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2016 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign Ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Free Speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Talking Points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Name-dropping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Russia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Bill of Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Vice President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=10118</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Welcome back to our annual year-end awards column!</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/12/26/my-2014-mclaughlin-awards-part-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>19</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>My 2014 &quot;McLaughlin Awards&quot; [Part 1]</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/12/19/my-2014-mclaughlin-awards-part-1/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/12/19/my-2014-mclaughlin-awards-part-1/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Dec 2014 02:34:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2014 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2016 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign Ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Talking Points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Name-dropping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Russia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Syria]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Bill of Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Vice President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=10099</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>As we do every year, we are pre-empting our "Friday Talking Points" columns for the next two weeks, to bring you our best and worst of 2014.  And, yes, we are going to continue our supercilious and no-doubt-annoying habit of using the editorial "we" throughout these two columns, so thanks for asking!  Heh.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/12/19/my-2014-mclaughlin-awards-part-1/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>154</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [330] -- How Bad Laws Get Made</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/12/12/ftp330/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/12/12/ftp330/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Dec 2014 00:29:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2014 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Talking Points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=10070</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>There were two big things going on in the political world this week: the release of the Senate torture report, and the cromnibus bill which kept the government open.  For the most part, we're going to cover the torture report at the end, in a very unusual talking points section.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/12/12/ftp330/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>64</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The D.C. Marijuana Compromise</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/12/09/the-d-c-marijuana-compromise/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/12/09/the-d-c-marijuana-compromise/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2014 01:14:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2014 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2016 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=10053</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>One Maryland Republican in the House, apparently still upset that his state donated the land for D.C. centuries ago (or something), pushed an amendment to the cromnibus that would have flat-out overturned the will of the people on Initiative 71, and kept recreational marijuana fully illegal in District law.  Democrats indicated that this was a deal-breaker for them (on the entire cromnibus bill), so today a compromise of sorts seems to have been reached.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/12/09/the-d-c-marijuana-compromise/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [329] -- &#039;Tis The Season</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/12/05/ftp329/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/12/05/ftp329/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Dec 2014 01:05:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2014 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Talking Points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iran]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Libya]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=10036</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>It is indeed the season.  Yes, it's that magical time of year when the wee folk of Capitol Hill <em>actually get something done.</em>  These brief bursts of activity only happen very rarely, of course, and always immediately proceed another one of the many, many long vacations Congress takes during the year.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/12/05/ftp329/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>34</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Marijuana Rider On The Cromnibus?</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/12/04/marijuana-rider-on-the-cromnibus/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/12/04/marijuana-rider-on-the-cromnibus/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2014 01:28:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2014 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=10032</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>OK, I do realize that everyone is already sick of the term "cromnibus."  I'm no exception -- I was sick of it the first time I heard it, in fact.  But seeing as how we've only got one more week of talking about it (before it becomes an answer in political barroom trivia games of the future), I felt it was time to stretch the inane metaphor once again.  Because today the subject on Capitol Hill is riders.  That's right, the riders on the cromnibus.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/12/04/marijuana-rider-on-the-cromnibus/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>30</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cromnibus Stop?</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/12/03/cromnibus-stop/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/12/03/cromnibus-stop/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2014 02:03:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2014 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=10027</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>There are plenty of metaphors to choose from, as we all breathlessly watch the Republican Party make their latest attempt at semi-rational governing.  Since the vehicle chosen for this Washington drama has been dubbed the "cromnibus," these metaphors all lean on the transportation theme.  Will the wheels on the cromnibus go 'round and 'round?  Are Tea Partiers waiting at the cromnibus stop, or will they just stop the cromnibus?  Will the cromnibus even leave its House depot?  Who will be forced to sit at the back of the cromnibus?  Republicans are either on the cromnibus, or off the cromnibus (warning: due to its origins in the counterculture, Republicans may not get the reference in this last one).</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/12/03/cromnibus-stop/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama Poll Watch -- November, 2014</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/12/01/opw1411/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/12/01/opw1411/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2014 00:47:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2014 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama Poll Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=9998</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Added together, the differences from October to November for Obama's average monthly job approval and job disapproval ratings total a whopping 0.1 percent.  That's pretty flat.  Remarkably, this was during a month with several enormous political stories, from the midterm election results to immigration reform to Ferguson, Missouri.  Before we get to all of that, let's take a look at the flatness of the chart for November.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/12/01/opw1411/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Jumping On The Cromnibus</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/11/26/jumping-on-the-cromnibus/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/11/26/jumping-on-the-cromnibus/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Nov 2014 00:29:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2014 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Humor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=9988</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Yes, apparently that's a new word now: "cromnibus."  Now, some, editorially-speaking, have been insisting on "CRomnibus" or "Cromnibus," but for the time being here, we've decided that it doesn't qualify for proper-name status in any way.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/11/26/jumping-on-the-cromnibus/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>27</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [328] -- Obama&#039;s Gutsy Move</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/11/21/ftp328/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/11/21/ftp328/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2014 00:40:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2014 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Talking Points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=9967</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>When Congress wouldn't pass a bill, the president had to act on immigration and deportation policy, to keep families intact -- a measure that affected 40 percent of the undocumented immigrants in the United States.  The president in question was George H. W. Bush, and the year was 1990.  Congress, at the time, was run by the opposition party.  What did they do in response?  They passed a bill, which Bush later signed.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/11/21/ftp328/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>43</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [327] -- The Calm Between The Storms</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/11/14/ftp327/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/11/14/ftp327/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Nov 2014 00:56:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2014 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2016 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Talking Points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iran]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=9938</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>What walks like a duck and quacks like a duck but seems to have serious mobility problems?</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/11/14/ftp327/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>36</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Elizabeth Warren Moves Up</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/11/13/elizabeth-warren-moves-up/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/11/13/elizabeth-warren-moves-up/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2014 23:59:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2014 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2016 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=9934</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Senator Elizabeth Warren is about to become more influential in the Democratic Party.  It was <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/post-politics/wp/2014/11/13/warren-tester-join-senate-democratic-leadership-after-deep-losses/">announced today</a> that she will be joining the ranks of the Democrats' Senate leadership, albeit in a newly-created position that might be best called "Progressive Liaison."  The position is seen as forming a new bridge between progressives and the party leadership, who have mostly been much more timid when it comes to issues with real populist appeal.  Depending on what sort of leadership role Warren carves out for herself, this could be very good news.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/11/13/elizabeth-warren-moves-up/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>SiX Could Be The Answer To ALEC</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/11/10/six-could-be-the-answer-to-alec/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/11/10/six-could-be-the-answer-to-alec/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2014 01:04:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2014 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2016 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign Ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Free Speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=9918</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><em>Politico</em> has <a href="http://www.politico.com/story/2014/11/democrats-create-an-alec-killer-112733_full.html">an interesting article</a> up which details the efforts in the liberal political donor camp to come up with something to combat the influence of the conservative American Legislative Exchange Council, or ALEC.  The new liberal counterpart will be named the State Innovation Exchange, or "SiX."  Creative capitalization seems to be their first innovation.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/11/10/six-could-be-the-answer-to-alec/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>29</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [326] -- A Democratic Economic Platform For Next Time</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/11/07/ftp326/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/11/07/ftp326/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Nov 2014 00:14:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2014 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2016 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Talking Points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=9910</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>President Obama called the 2010 midterms a "shellacking."  He demurred on providing a label for the 2014 midterms, but others sprang into the void.  The most notable label so far (the one seemingly most repeated, at any rate) is that Democrats suffered an "ass-kicking" this past Tuesday night.  At this point, I won't quibble over terms.  Democrats got beat, and they got beat pretty badly.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/11/07/ftp326/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>88</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama Poll Watch -- October, 2014</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/11/06/opw1410/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/11/06/opw1410/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2014 00:44:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2014 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign Ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama Poll Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=9905</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>This may come as a surprise to some, especially after Tuesday's election results, but President Obama actually had a rather good October in his job approval polling.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/11/06/opw1410/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Aftermath</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/11/05/the-aftermath/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/11/05/the-aftermath/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2014 00:00:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2014 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2016 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=9896</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>It's either the morning after, or the mourning after -- take your choice.</p>
<p>Last night, Democrats got well and truly shellacked once again in a midterm election.  It was so bad, it's pretty hard for Democrats to even attempt to gild the lily or spot that elusive silver lining.  Republicans are consumed with glee, which they've well earned this year.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/11/05/the-aftermath/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>95</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Some Other Races To Watch Tonight</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/11/04/some-other-races-to-watch-tonight/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/11/04/some-other-races-to-watch-tonight/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2014 23:20:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2014 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign Ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=9892</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Happy Election Day, everyone!  It being an off-year election, there will be no presidential race to dominate the news tonight as the election returns come in.  The biggest races will be in the Senate, with political control of the chamber hanging in the balance.  On the House side, the only real question is how many seats the Republicans will pick up.  But there are plenty of interesting down-ballot races to watch, while waiting for Alaska's returns to come in late in the night (or, perhaps, the recounting of West Podunk's ballots).  I thought, as a preview/guide to tonight's returns, it'd be worth the time to take a quick look at some of the other contests we may be hearing about this evening.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/11/04/some-other-races-to-watch-tonight/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>63</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>My Final Midterm Election Picks</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/11/03/my-final-midterm-election-picks-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/11/03/my-final-midterm-election-picks-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2014 00:03:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2006 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2014 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign Ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=9880</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>We are now officially down to the wire for the 2014 midterm elections.  How well will the Republicans do this year?  Will the Democrats hold the line in the Senate?  Tune in tomorrow night....</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/11/03/my-final-midterm-election-picks-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>26</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Senate Elections&#039; Homestretch</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/10/29/senate-elections-homestretch/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/10/29/senate-elections-homestretch/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2014 23:36:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2014 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign Ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=9860</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>We have now entered the homestretch of the 2014 midterm election season, with less than a week to go before Election Day.  Many Senate races remain incredibly close, and Democrats got some welcome news this week from far up north.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/10/29/senate-elections-homestretch/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>50</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Onward To 2016!</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/10/28/onward-to-2016/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/10/28/onward-to-2016/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2014 00:12:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2014 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2016 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign Ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Humor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Name-dropping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=9856</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>With one week to go until the 2014 midterm elections, almost all of the punditocracy world is absolutely <em>chomping at the bit</em> for this cycle to already be over, so they can concentrate on the much-more-fun 2016 presidential election season.  This is pretty obvious, with some media now swooning over Jeb Bush's possible candidacy and the Clintons out stumping for other Democrats (and being covered more in the news than the actual candidates).</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/10/28/onward-to-2016/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>19</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [325] -- McConnell For Sale!</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/10/24/ftp325/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/10/24/ftp325/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Oct 2014 00:58:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2014 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign Ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Free Speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Talking Points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Bill of Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=9839</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>A program note, before we get started: there will be no Friday Talking Points column next week.  We have to make room for our traditional Hallowe'en column, where we try to scare the pants off of everyone across the political spectrum with spooky tales of what the upcoming election might mean (plus, we get to show off our politically-inspired Jack-o-lanterns).  So don't miss that, but the Friday Talking Points column won't be back until after the election.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/10/24/ftp325/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>33</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Senate Election Overview -- Democrats Hanging On?</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/10/22/senate-election-overview-democrats-hanging-on/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/10/22/senate-election-overview-democrats-hanging-on/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2014 00:37:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2014 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign Ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=9829</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Sorry for the overly-provocative title, but I'm a little surprised at how all the big media election-predicting sites have apparently decided to just call the whole Senate for Republicans and clock out early.  Because I just don't see it as quite the slam-dunk everyone else does, at this point.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/10/22/senate-election-overview-democrats-hanging-on/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>51</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Contemplating A Republican Senate</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/10/20/contemplating-a-republican-senate/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/10/20/contemplating-a-republican-senate/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2014 00:40:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2014 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2016 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=9819</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>As frightening a prospect as it is for progressives and liberals and other assorted Democrats, it is now impossible not to contemplate what two years of a Republican-led Senate would be like.  While Democrats are still putting on a brave face about their chances in the 2014 midterms ("Our ground game is going to <em>win the day!</em>"), the possibility of Republicans picking up the six Senate seats they now need to gain control of the chamber is very real and even (according to many election forecasters) probable.  But what would this mean for President Obama's last two years in office?</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/10/20/contemplating-a-republican-senate/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>20</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [324] -- Don&#039;t Panic</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/10/17/ftp324/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/10/17/ftp324/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Oct 2014 00:42:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2014 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign Ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Talking Points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=9794</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>That headline, of course, quotes the cover to the fictional <em>Hitchhiker's Guide To The Galaxy</em>: "Don't Panic."  This week, it seems like timely advice, as the news media and American politicians go into full-blown panic mode over one death and two illnesses within the United States.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/10/17/ftp324/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>40</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Senate Still Up For Grabs</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/10/15/senate-still-up-for-grabs/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/10/15/senate-still-up-for-grabs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2014 00:06:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2014 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign Ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=9785</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Welcome back to my intermittent overview of the 2014 midterm Senate races.  On that note, I should add that from this point forward I'll be doing these columns on a weekly basis, right up until the Monday before the election when I'll make my final election predictions.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/10/15/senate-still-up-for-grabs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>24</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Voting By Mail</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/10/14/voting-by-mail/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/10/14/voting-by-mail/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2014 00:29:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2014 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=9780</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The Colorado Senate race this year will be a close contest (no matter who wins), if the polling is correct.  Poll after poll shows a very tight race.  However, pollsters' predictions of who exactly will "turn out" to vote may be flawed this year, in this particular state.  Because Colorado, for the first time, will be joining two other states in the West by conducting their election by mail.  Every registered voter gets a real ballot (not just a "sample ballot" or a "practice ballot") in the mail, and will be able to easily return their filled-out ballot by mail.  They won't be "turning out," one might say, instead they'll be "turning in."</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/10/14/voting-by-mail/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [323] -- Is There Anybody Out There?</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/10/10/ftp323/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/10/10/ftp323/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Oct 2014 00:37:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2014 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign Ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Talking Points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Syria]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=9765</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>I address this desperate attempt at communication to any remaining survivors in America of the apocalyptic scourge that is Ebola.  Is there anybody still out there?  Because, according to my television for the past few weeks, the death rates have been climbing so high that hundreds of millions of Americans should be pushing up the daisies by now.  So, with full sorrow for the uncounted lives lost over the past few weeks, I humbly wonder whether anyone is left on the internet to read this lonely missive.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/10/10/ftp323/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>73</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Senate Election Overview</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/10/08/senate-election-overview-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/10/08/senate-election-overview-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2014 23:48:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2014 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign Ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Vice President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=9755</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Welcome back once again to our ongoing pigeonholing exercise for this year's midterm Senate races.  The big question, of course, is whether Republicans will pick up the six seats they need to wrest control of the chamber from the dastardly (according to them) Harry Reid and his Democratic minions.  The answer to this pressing question is still not clear, and it actually may not be definitively answered until long after election night (for <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/10/08/elections-senate-control_n_5951506.html">various interesting and wonky reasons</a>).</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/10/08/senate-election-overview-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>48</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama Poll Watch -- September, 2014</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/10/06/opw1409/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/10/06/opw1409/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2014 00:00:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2014 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama Poll Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Syria]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=9745</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>President Obama announced a new American war this month, but it didn't resonate in his polling much, if at all.  Overall, his poll numbers dropped, but the net result was rather flat.  But the (so far) very slow nature of this new war may lead to Obama's numbers ticking up in the future.  To put this slightly differently, Obama's poll numbers may very well reflect the direction of the war for the next few months (although the midterm election will also have a big influence).  But before we look to the future, though, let's start with the new chart showing September's numbers.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/10/06/opw1409/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [322] -- Games The Whole Family Can Play</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/10/03/ftp322/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/10/03/ftp322/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Oct 2014 00:55:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2014 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign Ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Contests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Talking Points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Syria]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=9734</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Since we devoted last week's column to Eric Holder's record, we've got two weeks worth of stuff to cover today, so we're going to have to whip through things in a whirlwind fashion.  But we have included not just one... not just two... but <em>three</em> reader-participation contests in this week's edition, for those who want to join in the fun in the comments.  Ready for all that?  Buckle up, then, here we go.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/10/03/ftp322/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>81</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Democrats Cheer Kansas Ruling</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/10/01/democrats-cheer-kansas-ruling/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/10/01/democrats-cheer-kansas-ruling/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2014 23:08:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2014 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign Ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=9726</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The chances of Greg Orman defeating Senator Pat Roberts in Kansas just got a whole lot better.  A lawsuit which tried to force the Kansas Democratic Party to field a candidate in the race just essentially got laughed out of court, which means there will be no Democrat on the ballot at all.  Roberts will be on the ballot as the incumbent Republican, Orman will appear as an Independent, and there will also be a third candidate, Libertarian Randall Batson.  But no Democrat will appear.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/10/01/democrats-cheer-kansas-ruling/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>23</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Profiles In Cowardice</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/09/29/profiles-in-cowardice/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/09/29/profiles-in-cowardice/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2014 23:03:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2014 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Syria]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=9717</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The United States Congress is currently abdicating one of its most solemn duties: declaring when America is at war, and with whom.  This is nothing short of disgraceful, and every member of Congress who didn't actively push their leadership to hold a vote should be ashamed of themselves right now.  Because by completely abdicating their constitutional warmaking power to the executive branch, they are displaying nothing short of their own "profiles in cowardice."</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/09/29/profiles-in-cowardice/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>42</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Zombie Preparedness In Kansas</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/09/23/zombie-preparedness-in-kansas/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/09/23/zombie-preparedness-in-kansas/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2014 23:48:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2014 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=9690</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Zombies are in the news again.  Not <em>actual</em> zombies, but instead the growing governmental awareness that the citizenry needs to be prepared against any possible future zombie attack.  And, no, I'm not kidding.  It's the time of the season.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/09/23/zombie-preparedness-in-kansas/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>23</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Prosecutors Object To War On Weed</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/09/22/prosecutors-object-to-war-on-weed/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/09/22/prosecutors-object-to-war-on-weed/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2014 00:09:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2014 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=9684</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The prosecution objects.  That's one way to put it, at any rate.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/09/22/prosecutors-object-to-war-on-weed/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>23</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [320] -- Congress Briefly Interrupts 3-Month Vacation To &quot;Work&quot;</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/09/19/ftp320/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/09/19/ftp320/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2014 23:57:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2014 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2016 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign Ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Talking Points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Syria]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Vice President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=9675</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Congress followed up their recent five-week vacation with almost <em>two whole weeks</em> of actually doing their jobs, so to reward themselves they're now going to take off on another vacation.  Until mid-November.  The American people will show their disgust at this pathetic work ethic by returning upwards of ninety percent of them to office, if this year is anything like a typical one.  The big question on everyone's mind is whether the Democrats will hold onto control of the Senate, which will mean two years of gridlock with the Republican House, or whether Republicans will gain control of the Senate, which will mean two years of gridlock with both the Tea Party and the president.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/09/19/ftp320/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>67</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Senate Election Overview</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/09/17/senate-election-overview/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/09/17/senate-election-overview/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2014 23:10:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2014 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Vice President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=9666</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>It is time to once again take a broad look at the upcoming Senate midterm elections.  As always in non-presidential election years, I seldom pay much attention to the House races, for a number of reasons.  First, there are a lot of them -- too many for one person to reasonably keep track of.  Second, this year seems like a pretty foregone conclusion: the House will remain Republican, and the only two real questions are whether (and by how much) they will increase their lead, and how strong the Tea Party faction will be after the dust settles on election night.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/09/17/senate-election-overview/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [319] -- Slouching Off To War</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/09/12/ftp319/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/09/12/ftp319/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2014 22:56:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2014 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Talking Points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Libya]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Syria]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=9643</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Back in 2007, I thought it would be a good idea to write congressional Democrats a memo, in the hopes they could begin to learn a skill Republicans seem to be born with: the ability to stay on-topic and present your political ideas and agenda items succinctly and memorably to the public.  I had grown tired of watching the Sunday political shows where Republicans all sang off the same songsheet while Democrats were easily led into the weeds with long rambling tangents to what they should have been saying that particular week.  This early effort grew, in the following weeks and months, into the format we now use weekly: a quick rundown of amusing items in the political news of the week, the awarding of the <strong>Most Impressive Democrat Of The Week</strong> and the <strong>Most Disappointing Democrat Of The Week</strong>, and then seven numerated talking points suggested for all Democrats to use to explain the Democratic position to all and sundry (especially on Sundry morning talk shows... so to speak...).</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/09/12/ftp319/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>78</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama Poll Watch -- August, 2014</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/09/11/opw1408/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/09/11/opw1408/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2014 23:04:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2014 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama Poll Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Russia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Syria]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=9638</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>OK, with that out of the way, let's take a look at how President Obama did in job approval polling last month.  The results were mixed, but overall fairly positive.  Here's the new chart:</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/09/11/opw1408/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>15</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Challenge From The Left</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/09/09/the-challenge-from-the-left/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/09/09/the-challenge-from-the-left/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2014 23:41:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2014 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2016 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Vice President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=9627</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>By the time I post this article, the election returns may have already been announced in New York state's Democratic gubernatorial primary.  I state this up front to let readers know that I'm writing this before knowing how big a margin of victory the current governor, Andrew Cuomo, manages to gain over his Progressive challenger, Zephyr Teachout.  Cuomo's victory is pretty much a foregone conclusion, but the size of his victory may be an important gauge of the growth of the Progressives, or what has previously been called "the Democratic wing of the Democratic Party."  If Teachout does better than expected, it could have reverberations in the next few years, as the 2016 presidential contest gets underway.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/09/09/the-challenge-from-the-left/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>25</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Coyly Campaigning In Kansas</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/09/08/coyly-campaigning-in-kansas/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/09/08/coyly-campaigning-in-kansas/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2014 23:39:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2014 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Vice President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=9622</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Last week, a political tornado of sorts happened in Kansas (of all places), raising the possibility of this Senate race becoming the tipping point which could decide partisan control of the Senate for the next two years.  Democratic candidate Chad Taylor attempted to drop out of the race completely, clearing the field for Independent Greg Orman to take on sitting Senator Pat Roberts.  Orman, however, is being coy by refusing to announce which party he'll caucus with on the all-important vote for Senate Majority Leader, should Orman win his race.  If he does beat Roberts, Orman will become the third sitting Independent in the Senate.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/09/08/coyly-campaigning-in-kansas/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>18</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [318] -- The Gender Gap</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/08/29/ftp318/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/08/29/ftp318/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2014 00:25:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2014 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign Ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Free Speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Talking Points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Syria]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Bill of Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=9578</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>President Obama gave a press conference recently, and -- since it is still the political Silly Season -- got a lot of media attention.  For what he was wearing.  No, <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/08/28/obama-tan-suit_n_5732532.html">seriously</a>.  Washington was all a-twitter (or even a-Twitter) because Obama wore a suit that was not dark blue or black.  While some may smack their heads over the idiocy of what passes as the Washington press corps, the right thing to do is to celebrate how males have finally reached sartorial equality with women, when viewed by political "journalists."  This is not a backhanded compliment, I hasten to point out, it is meant as a backhanded insult.  Because it is <em>always</em> insulting to a politician to focus on what she (or, now, he) is wearing, instead of <em>reporting on the substance of her words and actions</em>.  This has been going on for women in politics for exactly as long as women have <em>been</em> in American politics, right up to Hillary Clinton's pantsuits and Sarah Palin's shopping spree.  All women know this -- they will be judged on what they wear, sometimes more than what they say or do.  Especially female politicians.  President Obama is just getting a tiny taste of what women have had to put up with in the political arena since Day One.  So I choose to celebrate this new equality (of the idiocy of the political press), and the closing of this particular part of the gender gap.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/08/29/ftp318/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>132</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Impending Showdown</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/08/27/the-impending-showdown/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/08/27/the-impending-showdown/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2014 23:39:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2014 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign Ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=9567</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>"It's quiet out there... too quiet."</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/08/27/the-impending-showdown/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>41</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Marijuana Donor Dollars</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/08/26/marijuana-donor-dollars/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/08/26/marijuana-donor-dollars/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2014 00:06:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2014 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2016 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign Ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=9563</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The national Democratic Party is reluctant to support divisive issues, at times.  They drag their feet until pressured by a significant faction within their own base to stop waffling and take a clear progressive stand.  This is pretty much common knowledge, and the same can actually be said to a differing extent for the Republican Party (although you'd have to replace the word "progressive" with "conservative" to make it work).  What usually pressures the national party enough to act is when large party donors begin to threaten to turn off the spigot, which puts the flow of money to the national party at significant risk.  Gay marriage advocates (for example) had gotten a lot of lip service and lukewarm support from Democrats, right up until they started drawing a line in the sand: no marriage equality support, no more donations.  Which led to not only President Obama but the entire Democratic Party quickly "evolving" on the issue.  This may now be starting to happen on the subject of marijuana.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/08/26/marijuana-donor-dollars/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>15</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [317] -- Big And Little Brother</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/08/22/ftp317/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/08/22/ftp317/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Aug 2014 00:06:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2014 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2016 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign Ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Free Speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Talking Points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Russia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Syria]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=9546</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>A lot happened in the world of politics this week.  People are still dumping buckets of ice water over their heads, for instance.  There are actually <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/catherine-rampell-scandals-hiding-in-plain-sight/2014/08/18/9fc6b852-270e-11e4-86ca-6f03cbd15c1a_story.html">multiple scandals</a> happening to various governors right now, but since none of them involve sex, the media is mostly ignoring them (with the exception of Rick Perry, perhaps, since the media has been swooning over him ever since he put on a pair of glasses).  But we're going to ignore most of it all this week, to focus instead on the aftermath and ramifications of what has been happening in Ferguson, Missouri for the past few weeks.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/08/22/ftp317/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>83</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Marijuana Voter Effect</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/08/21/the-marijuana-voter-effect/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/08/21/the-marijuana-voter-effect/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2014 23:39:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2014 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2016 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=9541</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Do marijuana legalization ballot initiatives help Democrats at the ballot box?  Will Democrats even manage to hold onto the Senate because of pro-marijuana voters up north?  These are interesting questions, but I have to say that I'm slightly skeptical that any hard-and-fast answers to such questions will be provided this year.  We may not know for certain until after the <em>2016 election</em> is analyzed, in fact.  Which means anyone looking for Democrats to change their behavior might have a long wait in front of them, because if the data's not in until after 2016, then things can't be expected to politically shift in a big way until the 2018 elections -- two full election cycles from now.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/08/21/the-marijuana-voter-effect/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>McConnell&#039;s Reconciliation</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/08/20/mcconnells-reconciliation/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/08/20/mcconnells-reconciliation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2014 23:41:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2014 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=9536</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Many are focusing on another aspect of what McConnell is promising to do, which is understandable because shutting down the government has a lot bigger impact on the country than details of how the Senate conducts its business.  But, in this case, I'm choosing instead to ignore the forest (as it were) to concentrate on one particular tree.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/08/20/mcconnells-reconciliation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>25</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New Political Rule Of Thumb</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/08/19/new-political-rule-of-thumb/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/08/19/new-political-rule-of-thumb/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2014 00:19:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2014 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign Ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=9531</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>In the spirit (perhaps) of Bill Maher, I'd like to propose a "new rule" for politics: Anyone who tells you what "the next election will be all about," over a year before such election takes place, will be wrong.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/08/19/new-political-rule-of-thumb/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>21</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Perry Case Complicates Boehner&#039;s Lawsuit</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/08/18/perry-case-complicates-boehners-lawsuit/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/08/18/perry-case-complicates-boehners-lawsuit/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2014 23:17:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2014 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=9526</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The indictment of Governor Rick Perry of Texas and his subsequent court case are about to complicate things politically for John Boehner.  No matter the actual outcome of Perry's case, the arguments made by Perry and his supporters are going to provide an easy equivalence with Boehner's plans to sue President Obama -- an equivalence which would not have existed had Perry not been indicted.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/08/18/perry-case-complicates-boehners-lawsuit/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>64</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [316] -- Dog Days</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/08/15/ftp316/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/08/15/ftp316/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Aug 2014 00:01:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2014 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Free Speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Talking Points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Bill of Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=9505</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Welcome to the "Dog Days" of summer, at the height of the political Silly Season.  This year, one dog did indeed have his day in August, as 7-year-old "Duke" <a href="http://minnesota.cbslocal.com/2014/08/13/duke-the-dog-elected-mayor-in-cormorant-minn/">just won</a> a rather bizarre election to become mayor of Cormorant, Minnesota.  The strangest thing (to us) was that the "12 people in the village each paid $1 to cast a vote."  Um, didn't we make poll taxes illegal quite a while back?  The job (and the election) are assumably only "ceremonial" (at least we hope so), but still "Dog Elected Mayor," as a headline, is right up there with "Man Bites Dog."  As for Duke's mayoralty, well, it's a "Ruff!" job but someone's got to do it, we suppose.  So to speak (or roll over, or shake... <em>good</em> boy!)</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/08/15/ftp316/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>277</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama Prepares To Walk The Immigration Tightrope</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/08/13/obama-prepares-to-walk-the-immigration-tightrope/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/08/13/obama-prepares-to-walk-the-immigration-tightrope/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2014 00:00:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2014 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=9495</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>President Obama is about to walk a political tightrope, on immigration reform.  We know this because the White House has been hinting for weeks that Obama will be making an announcement outlining a big policy change.  Obama himself will be fulfilling a promise he made earlier this year -- that if Congress couldn't manage to act before the August break, then he would.  This is going to be a risky action for Obama to take, for many reasons (hence the tightrope metaphor).  How it all plays out is anyone's guess, at this point.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/08/13/obama-prepares-to-walk-the-immigration-tightrope/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [315] -- Past, Present, And Future</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/08/08/friday-talking-points-315-past-present-and-future/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/08/08/friday-talking-points-315-past-present-and-future/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Aug 2014 00:28:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2014 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign Ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Talking Points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Name-dropping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Russia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=9480</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>We've got a lot to cover today (as that headline should evince), but before we begin examining the anniversaries, elections, and politics of the week, I'd like to begin instead by promoting a video.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/08/08/friday-talking-points-315-past-present-and-future/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>26</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Draft Brian Schweitzer!</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/08/07/draft-brian-schweitzer/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/08/07/draft-brian-schweitzer/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2014 23:49:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2014 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2016 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=9475</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>There's been a shakeup in the Montana Senate race.  John Walsh, who was earlier appointed to the Senate (when Max Baucus left to become ambassador to China), has now announced he will be removing his name from the ballot.  This leaves the Democratic nomination empty.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/08/07/draft-brian-schweitzer/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Campaign Shifts To Immigration</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/08/04/campaign-shifts-to-immigration/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/08/04/campaign-shifts-to-immigration/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2014 23:40:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2014 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2016 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign Ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=9449</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>It wasn't supposed to happen this way.  Republicans were so confident they had devised a winning 2014 campaign strategy that they went ahead and just admitted what it was going to be, almost a year out.  As 2013 ended and 2014 began, Republicans weren't shy about letting everyone know that the midterm contest was going to be a single-issue election campaign for them, and that that single issue was going to be the abject failure of Obamacare.  Republicans in the House were adamant that <em>nothing else</em> should detract from this single-minded obsession, which (in layman's terms) equated to the House doing absolutely nothing on all the other issues on its agenda.  No immigration bill would be voted upon, they said, because doing so would just take attention away from the white-hot focus on Obamacare.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/08/04/campaign-shifts-to-immigration/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>34</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [314] -- Boehner&#039;s &quot;Keystone Kops&quot; House</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/08/01/ftp314/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/08/01/ftp314/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Aug 2014 00:59:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2014 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Talking Points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=9441</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>As I write this, the House has still not managed to pass a bill to deal with the border crisis.  They've been trying for a few days now, but have been locked in a serious battle between Tea Party hardliners and Republicans from more moderate districts.  The Tea Partiers are demanding the harshest possible bill, and the moderates are the ones who actually demanded that Speaker John Boehner attempt to do his job and get a bill through before they all fly home for a lavish five-week vacation.  Moderate Republicans know that "we couldn't pass anything" is going to be a tough sell back home.  When Boehner tries to make the bill extreme enough to appease the Tea Party hardliners, he loses moderate votes.  When he tries to make it appealing enough to the moderates to vote for it, he loses Tea Party votes.  Stay tuned, as the last act in this Keystone Kops drama has yet to take place!</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/08/01/ftp314/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>23</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Boehner&#039;s Game Of Chicken</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/07/29/boehners-game-of-chicken/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/07/29/boehners-game-of-chicken/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2014 23:11:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2014 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=9428</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>John Boehner is currently involved in playing what can only be called a "game of chicken" with his own party.  To rev this metaphor up to the redline (warning: this entire column is really nothing more than an extended metaphor), Boehner is driving the Republican Party towards a head-on collision with the Tea Party, way out on the edge of town, down Impeachment Road.  As is usual in these bouts of self-destructiveness, Boehner has already taken his go-to explanation out of his pocket, and tried to blame President Obama for the fine mess Boehner is creating for himself.  In other words, welcome to the opening of "Silly Season, 2014."</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/07/29/boehners-game-of-chicken/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>62</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Marijuana&#039;s Tipping Point?</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/07/28/marijuanas-tipping-point/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/07/28/marijuanas-tipping-point/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2014 21:31:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2014 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2016 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=9417</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Has marijuana legalization reached the tipping point, where positive change is now all but inevitable?  That question might have been seen as wildly optimistic even just last week, but over the weekend the respected <em>New York Times</em> editorial board fully endorsed legalizing recreational marijuana at the federal level, in a piece aptly entitled: "<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2014/07/27/opinion/sunday/high-time-marijuana-legalization.html">Repeal Prohibition, Again.</a>"  This has already shifted the debate so dramatically that some are now comparing it to the impact of Walter Cronkite coming out against the Vietnam War (after which, President Lyndon Johnson famously said: "If I've lost Cronkite, I've lost middle America").  While I'm cautiously optimistic and certainly think it will further the conversation, I have to say I think it might be just a little too early to declare this moment in time to be marijuana's tipping point.  I think we're fast approaching that moment, but I don't think we've gotten there quite yet.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/07/28/marijuanas-tipping-point/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>26</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [313] -- Prelude To Silly Season</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/07/25/ftp313/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/07/25/ftp313/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jul 2014 00:38:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2014 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2016 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign Ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Free Speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Talking Points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=9407</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Back in Washington, we have one week to go before the opening of "Silly Season 2014," an annual event brought on by hordes of political reporters scrambling around, devoid of actual stories, while Congress is away on its six-week vacation.  What will the main Silly Season story become, for pundits to endlessly obsess over this August?  Your guess is as good as mine.  Several candidates have already popped up ("Hey, let's all talk about impeachment!" for starters), but perhaps some lonely town hall meeting (with some hapless member of Congress) somewhere in the hinterlands will provide the fodder for this year's Silly Season obsession -- hopefully, with an epic rant caught on video!</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/07/25/ftp313/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>30</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Fallout From Reid&#039;s &quot;Nuclear Option&quot;</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/07/24/the-fallout-from-reids-nuclear-option/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/07/24/the-fallout-from-reids-nuclear-option/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2014 23:50:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2014 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=9403</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>For years, Harry Reid refused to act.  He struck deals with Republicans (that always soon collapsed), and shied away from using what was called (at the time) the "nuclear option."  As a result, judicial and other presidential nominations languished in the Senate, unvoted-upon.  Because Republicans could filibuster any nominee they wished, they essentially decided to filibuster <em>all</em> of them.  Finally, late last year, Harry Reid had had enough.  He called for a vote to change the Senate's rules (fun historical note: the filibuster is not actually mentioned in the Constitution), and from that point on all executive and judicial nominees (below the Supreme Court) would be confirmed only by a majority up-or-down vote.  We are about to see why this was so important, in the current "Obamacare can't give subsidies to customers of the federal exchange" court case.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/07/24/the-fallout-from-reids-nuclear-option/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>44</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Chalking Up Montana As A Democratic Loss</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/07/23/chalking-up-montana-as-a-democratic-loss/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/07/23/chalking-up-montana-as-a-democratic-loss/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2014 23:28:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2014 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=9397</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>I had intended to write a column today to take an overview of all the close races for Senate seats.  Every so often, I like to take a look at what the chances are for both parties to make gains in November (or, this year, to see whether the Republicans are going to gain a majority, realistically).  Instead, after seeing the <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2014/07/24/us/politics/montana-senator-john-walsh-plagiarized-thesis.html">recent news</a> from the <em>New York Times</em>, what is now called for is kissing goodbye any chances that the Montana Senate seat up for grabs will stay Democratic.  To be blunt: there is now exactly <em>zero</em> chance of that happening, and we should all chalk up one guaranteed Republican gain in the Senate.  The revelations that John Walsh plagiarized a major paper in college have now completely torpedoed his chances for retaining the seat.  To be fair, there was little chance that Walsh was going to win in any case.  But the difference between "little chance" and "no chance" can be measured in hope.  There is now no hope for Democrats in Montana, this year.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/07/23/chalking-up-montana-as-a-democratic-loss/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>34</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama&#039;s Immigration Dilemma</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/07/21/obamas-immigration-dilemma/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/07/21/obamas-immigration-dilemma/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2014 00:35:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2014 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2016 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=9388</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>President Obama faces a dilemma on immigration reform, and it goes beyond the current problem of children at the border.  If he sticks to his announced timetable, Obama will act in some way on immigration reform in the next month or so.  The Republican House has already signaled that it not only won't vote on the bipartisan plan passed by the Senate last year, but also that it won't hold <em>any</em> votes on immigration reform at all in the foreseeable future (before the midterm election, in other words).  This means if anything is going to happen, Obama will have to make it happen on his own.  Obama's real dilemma is that no matter what he does, it's not going to satisfy everyone.  In fact, it may not satisfy much of anyone.  But it is sure to annoy and even enrage certain groups.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/07/21/obamas-immigration-dilemma/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>18</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [312] -- Democrats&#039; &quot;Middle Class Jumpstart&quot; Agenda</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/07/18/friday-talking-points-312-democrats-middle-class-jumpstart-agenda/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/07/18/friday-talking-points-312-democrats-middle-class-jumpstart-agenda/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jul 2014 01:08:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2014 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Talking Points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Russia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Vice President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=9380</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The biggest political event of the week (for Democrats, at any rate) was Nancy Pelosi and the House Democrats rolling out a new campaign agenda -- the "Middle Class Jumpstart" -- in the tradition of Newt Gingrich's "Contract With America."  But we'll have much more on this later, as we're turning over the whole talking points portion of the program to this rollout.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/07/18/friday-talking-points-312-democrats-middle-class-jumpstart-agenda/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>97</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Boehner&#039;s Laughable Lawsuit</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/07/16/boehners-laughable-lawsuit/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/07/16/boehners-laughable-lawsuit/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2014 23:32:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2014 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=9371</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Speaker of the House John Boehner now seems pretty committed to his effort to bring a lawsuit against President Obama.  This is ridiculous on a number of different levels, and a majority of the American people <em>already</em> see it as nothing more than a political stunt (which is good to hear, since that is exactly what it is).  If Boehner keeps to the timetable he's set out, this sentiment may even grow right before the midterm election.  The Republicans believe that suing Obama will excite and turn out their base voters, and they're betting that this benefit will be larger than any political blowback (which would excite and turn out Democrats and Independents to the polls to vote against Republicans).  Whether they're right in this political calculation or not remains to be seen.  But what is undeniable is that, so far, this lawsuit is nothing short of laughable.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/07/16/boehners-laughable-lawsuit/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>37</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [311] -- First Marijuana TV Ad Created</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/07/11/ftp312/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/07/11/ftp312/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jul 2014 01:10:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2014 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign Ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Talking Points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Humor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Name-dropping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Other]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Videos]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=9348</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Plenty of stuff happened in the past two weeks in the political world, but we'll get to all of that in a minute, because first we'd like to highlight (pun intended, of course) what is being billed as "the first marijuana television commercial."  It's not on the air yet, but Canadian company <a href="http://www.cropkingseeds.com/">Crop King Seeds</a> has released this first look at their ad (they do admit that they'll likely have to edit out one bit of profanity before the ad airs).  Without further ado, here is their ad (used with full permission, as they would really like the ad to go viral):</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/07/11/ftp312/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>18</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obamacare Attacks Fizzle</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/07/10/obamacare-attacks-fizzle/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/07/10/obamacare-attacks-fizzle/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2014 23:20:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2014 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign Ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=9342</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Not so very long ago, Republican candidates foresaw a single-issue campaign for the 2014 midterms.  The race would be won, they assured themselves, on stoking the public's seething hatred of Obamacare.  Republicans didn't need to do anything else this year (something House Republicans excel at: doing nothing), and in fact they didn't want to hold votes on any other contentious issue (like immigration reform), since all that would do is distract people away from the single campaign issue of Obamacare.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/07/10/obamacare-attacks-fizzle/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>54</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Marijuana Legalization Update</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/07/07/marijuana-legalization-update/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/07/07/marijuana-legalization-update/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2014 00:17:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2014 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2016 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=9327</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Tomorrow, Washington state will become the second state with a legal recreational marijuana market (look for a whole bunch of stoner jokes on tomorrow's television news, in other words).  While Colorado and Washington both passed their legalization laws at the same time, Colorado's was fully implemented at the start of this year, while Washington waited until now to completely implement the new law.  So it seemed like a good time for an update on which other states are moving towards full legalization of marijuana for recreational purposes, since there is news from a handful of other states as well.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/07/07/marijuana-legalization-update/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>18</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [310] -- Courtin&#039; Season</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/06/27/ftp310/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/06/27/ftp310/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2014 23:52:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2014 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign Ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Free Speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Talking Points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Name-dropping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Bill of Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=9288</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>'Tis the season when the political press all goes a-courtin'.  So to speak.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/06/27/ftp310/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>147</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tea Iced!</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/06/25/tea-iced/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/06/25/tea-iced/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2014 00:28:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2014 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign Ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=9276</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Enough digression, though.  Last night, Senator Thad Cochran pulled off an upset of sorts, by defeating his Tea Party primary challenger in the rematch atmosphere of a "top two" runoff election.  His chance of victory had been seen by many (at least before the election results began coming in) as increasingly unlikely -- which is why the political world is abuzz over what just happened down in the Magnolia State.  Consider the fact that Cochran came in <em>second</em> in the original primary, and it was only due to a third candidate being in the race that he was even given the second chance of a runoff election (because main Tea Party challenger Chris McDaniel failed to reach 50 percent of the vote, to put this another way).  Because of this, and because of what was perceived as the growing national momentum of the Tea Party after Eric Cantor's epic defeat (more on this in a moment), it seemed Cochran was doomed.  The energy was supposed to mostly be on the Tea Party's side, and turnouts for runoff elections are notoriously low, so most watchers of politics had all but written off Cochran's chances to pull off an upset victory.  And yet, against all this conventional wisdom, Cochran still won -- he successfully "iced out" the Tea Party.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/06/25/tea-iced/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>From The Archives -- The Tea Party Is Dead!  Long Live The Tea Party!</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/06/24/from-the-archives-the-tea-party-is-dead-long-live-the-tea-party/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/06/24/from-the-archives-the-tea-party-is-dead-long-live-the-tea-party/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2014 23:27:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2014 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=9273</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>As we were entering into the shank of primary season a few weeks back, I wrote an article discussing how the political world would view the gains and losses of the Tea Party wing of the Republican Party.  Since that time, we have seen the Tea Party lose many big races, and spectacularly win at least one race.  Today, voters in Mississippi are going to add another chapter to this saga, as they decide the runoff election between sitting Senator Thad Cochran and his Tea Party challenger.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/06/24/from-the-archives-the-tea-party-is-dead-long-live-the-tea-party/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>34</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [309] -- Meet Brian Schweitzer</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/06/20/ftp309/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/06/20/ftp309/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jun 2014 00:07:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2014 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign Ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Talking Points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iran]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Libya]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pakistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Syria]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Vice President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=9260</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Today, we're going to have a special edition of the talking points, where we get to know a Montana politician who seems to be seriously considering taking on Hillary Clinton for the Democratic presidential nomination in 2016.  But before we do so, it was a busy week otherwise, so let's just dive right into it.  First, a look at what's going with Republicans.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/06/20/ftp309/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>90</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New Republican House Leadership</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/06/19/new-republican-house-leadership/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/06/19/new-republican-house-leadership/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2014 00:14:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2014 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Vice President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=9255</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The votes are in, and the Republican House caucus has just elected Kevin McCarthy as their new Majority Leader and Steve Scalise as their new Majority Whip.  All of this was precipitated, of course, by the current Majority Leader, Eric Cantor, being handed his hat by the voters in his home district.  After a roughly one-week "campaign" (which many have likened to a high school popularity contest such as the election of class president), McCarthy will now move up from the third-ranking Republican leadership position to the second, and Scalise will now take over from McCarthy.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/06/19/new-republican-house-leadership/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [308] -- Selenofriggatriskaidekaphobics Unite!</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/06/13/ftp308/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/06/13/ftp308/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Jun 2014 00:39:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2014 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign Ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Talking Points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Name-dropping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=9233</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>I have to begin this week by apologizing for the irreverent nature of that title, but then how often do you get a chance to coin a cool word like "selenofriggatriskaidekaphobia"?  The proper answer is that the chance won't come again <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/06/12/full-moon-friday-13th-2014_n_5488236.html">until 2049</a>, which explains why we couldn't resist.  The word is a mashup of two phobias, the fear of a full moon (selenophobia) and the fear of Friday the 13th (friggatriskaidekaphobia, not to be confused with fear of the number 13, which is just triskaidekaphobia, of course).  The rare occurrence of a full moon on a Friday the 13th won't happen again for another 35 years, so today's pretty much it for this generation of selenofriggatriskaidekaphobics, at least.  But enough of this looney etymological fun, let's get on with a week chock-full of political happenings, shall we?</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/06/13/ftp308/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>79</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Race Is On To Replace Cantor</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/06/12/the-race-is-on-to-replace-cantor/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/06/12/the-race-is-on-to-replace-cantor/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2014 23:56:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2014 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Name-dropping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=9229</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>In one week, House Republicans will vote on a replacement for Eric Cantor, who will be stepping down from his Majority Leader position (due to his loss in this week's primary).  This vote will provide a test of strength for both the Tea Party faction and for the Establishment Republicans.  Who wins this power struggle may eventually determine the direction of the Republicans in the House for years to come, meaning it'll be a fairly important vote.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/06/12/the-race-is-on-to-replace-cantor/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Aftershocks Of Cantor&#039;s Loss</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/06/11/the-aftershocks-of-cantors-loss/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/06/11/the-aftershocks-of-cantors-loss/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2014 23:51:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2014 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2016 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign Ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=9223</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Every so often, the American political world is turned upside down.  Last night was one of those moments, as House Majority Leader Eric Cantor was "primaried" out of a job.  Nobody (including me) predicted this upset.  Today, pundits are falling all over themselves to come up with an appropriate metaphor for the magnitude of Cantor's loss on the political scene.  Living in California as I do, I'm going to go with earthquake terminology: this was a massive and cataclysmic temblor for Republicans -- the equivalent of about a 9.0 on the political Richter scale.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/06/11/the-aftershocks-of-cantors-loss/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>54</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [307] -- An Alternate Reality To Consider</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/06/06/ftp307/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/06/06/ftp307/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2014 23:43:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2014 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Talking Points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iran]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Name-dropping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pakistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=9201</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>This week was notable in many respects in the political world, but one subject overwhelmed almost everything else.  We're going to address the prisoner swap and Bowe Bergdahl in an unusual way this week, in lieu of our regular talking points at the end of the column.  But first, we're going to take a very quick look at what else happened this week, and then hand out the weekly awards.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/06/06/ftp307/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>94</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Will The Tea Party &quot;Strike Back&quot;?</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/06/03/will-the-tea-party-strike-back/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/06/03/will-the-tea-party-strike-back/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2014 23:29:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2014 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign Ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=9188</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Today is primary election day in eight states across the land (including my own).  The most media attention will be paid to the Mississippi Republican Senate primary, where the incumbent, Senator Thad Cochran, may be in trouble from a Tea Party challenger.  So while the storyline a few weeks ago was "Establishment Republicans win big over Tea Party," the storyline tomorrow may be "Tea Party strikes back!"</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/06/03/will-the-tea-party-strike-back/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [306] -- End Of Reefer Madness?</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/05/30/ftp306/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/05/30/ftp306/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 May 2014 00:02:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2014 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2016 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Talking Points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=9168</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>It has been a momentous week, with the resignation (read: "firing") of a cabinet secretary, a presidential speech on America's foreign and military policy, and the announcement of a timetable to bring home the remaining troops in Afghanistan.  Plus all the usual Washington squabbling.  But one story risks being buried among all this other newsworthy stuff, and that is the vote which happened late last night in the House of Representatives.  Because, with a healthy bipartisan majority, they just voted to end the war on medical marijuana forever.  If the Senate follows their lead, this could be one of the biggest turning points in ending the federal War On Weed altogether.  In other words, it is a momentous event.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/05/30/ftp306/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>30</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Window Closing On Immigration Reform</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/05/29/window-closing-on-immigration-reform/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/05/29/window-closing-on-immigration-reform/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2014 23:19:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2014 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=9164</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The window of opportunity for comprehensive immigration reform to pass Congress is getting narrower, and is about to slam shut until (realistically) the year 2017.  More accurately, if John Boehner doesn't allow the House to vote on a bill before the August congressional month-long vacation, then there is little-to-zero chance of immigration reform passing before our next president is sworn into office.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/05/29/window-closing-on-immigration-reform/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [305] -- From Bears To Zombies</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/05/23/ftp305/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/05/23/ftp305/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 May 2014 00:45:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2014 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign Ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Talking Points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Libya]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Vice President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=9133</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Before we begin, our sincere condolences to the George W. Bush family for the loss of former White House pet Miss Beazley, who <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/05/17/miss-beazley-dead-dies_n_5344579.html">died this week</a>.  As always, we are strictly non-partisan in our love for "First Dogs" and "First Cats," because we feel the president's (<em>any</em> president's) humanity can only be improved by having a pet to play with on occasion (the photo of Bush with Miss Beazley which accompanies that article shows <em>exactly</em> what we're talking about).  As Harry Truman famously put it: "If you want a friend in Washington, get a dog."  Our thoughts are with the Bush family in their time of loss.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/05/23/ftp305/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>45</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Continuing Awfulness Of GOP&#039;s Effort To Reach Out To Women</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/05/22/the-continuing-awfulness-of-gops-effort-to-reach-out-to-women/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/05/22/the-continuing-awfulness-of-gops-effort-to-reach-out-to-women/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2014 22:53:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2014 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Other]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=9129</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>As has been noted, at times art imitates life and at other times life imitates art.  This is one of those latter times, when what was purported to be a "Women and Colorado's Future" debate among Republican gubernatorial candidates seemed like nothing more than a <em>Saturday Night Live</em> sketch ridiculing the awfulness of the Republicans' continuing failure to reach out to women voters in any meaningful way.  And that is actually the <em>most polite</em> thing I can bring myself to say about it: it seemed like satire, but (sadly) it wasn't.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/05/22/the-continuing-awfulness-of-gops-effort-to-reach-out-to-women/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>30</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rape Victim Ad In Montana</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/05/21/rape-victim-ad-in-montana/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/05/21/rape-victim-ad-in-montana/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2014 23:27:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2014 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign Ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=9123</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The Senate race in Montana is going to a be a tough one, that's for sure.  Democrats currently hold the seat, but this is one state where Republicans have a clear shot at an upset this November.  Senator John Walsh has just released a rather amazing television ad, though, which is the best pushback on the "personhood" concept I think I've ever seen.  Because it features a rape victim telling her own story.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/05/21/rape-victim-ad-in-montana/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Snoozy Tuesday</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/05/20/snoozy-tuesday/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/05/20/snoozy-tuesday/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2014 01:02:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2014 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign Ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=9119</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Today is a big day for primary elections.  Well, a medium-big day, maybe.  But it is worth pointing out that it's nowhere near a "super" day.  In the past few presidential election cycles, so many states voted in primary elections on one particular day that it merited the label "Super Tuesday."  Today, the label is also being used by a few, but it's really a stretch to call it "super," when only six states are voting in their primary elections.  In a few weeks, the third of June will beat that, with eight primaries occurring simultaneously.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/05/20/snoozy-tuesday/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Senate Electoral Dynamics In 2014 And 2016</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/05/19/senate-electoral-dynamics-in-2014-and-2016/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/05/19/senate-electoral-dynamics-in-2014-and-2016/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2014 00:15:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2014 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2016 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=9113</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>It is an open question which political party will control the Senate after this year's midterm elections.  But no matter the outcome -- whether Republicans gain control or Democrats narrowly retain it -- it is worth taking a look at the underlying dynamics of the Senate field for the next two election cycles.  Because while 2014 is a year where Republicans have a big advantage, 2016 is going to give Democrats a decided edge.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/05/19/senate-electoral-dynamics-in-2014-and-2016/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [304] -- Brain Damage</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/05/16/ftp304/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/05/16/ftp304/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2014 00:24:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2014 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2016 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign Ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Free Speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Talking Points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Libya]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Name-dropping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=9100</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Karl Rove successfully manipulated the entire news media this week, so we are going to play along today.  Rove's specialty is to take what could be considered a reasonable idea, and then twist it beyond recognition while dragging it through the swampiest mud he can dream up.  Well, that's admittedly a terrible (and mixed) metaphor, but I think you get the general idea.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/05/16/ftp304/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>96</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The VRWC, ODS, And Now CDS?</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/05/14/the-vrwc-ods-and-now-cds/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/05/14/the-vrwc-ods-and-now-cds/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2014 22:39:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2014 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2016 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign Ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Libya]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=9089</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Before there was what we now call "Obama Derangement Syndrome," there was the "Vast Right-Wing Conspiracy."  This month seems to be now be marking a turning point, to perhaps what might be called a new and virulent "Clinton Derangement Syndrome."  Or, more prosaically, what we're now seeing can be said to be the real start of the 2016 presidential election season.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/05/14/the-vrwc-ods-and-now-cds/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Run, Clay, Run!</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/05/13/run-clay-run/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/05/13/run-clay-run/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2014 00:20:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2006 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2014 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Name-dropping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=9083</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Right before the 2006 general election took place, I wrote a column titled "<a href="http://www.chrisweigant.com/2006/10/18/celebrity-candidate-casting-call/">Celebrity Candidate Casting Call</a>," which pointed out the disparity between the two American political parties when it came to fielding celebrity candidates.  The reason why it was noteworthy was the imbalance tilted exactly the <em>opposite</em> direction that one would assume -- Republican celebrities had jumped into politics, often very successfully, in numbers that far outpaced Democratic celebrities.  Since everyone knows Hollywood is a bastion of liberalism, the article was written in a "head-scratching" sort of tone.  Why, I wondered, didn't Democrats actually stand up for their beliefs by running for public office, and why were there so many Republicans doing so?</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/05/13/run-clay-run/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [303] -- Benghazi Frenzy!</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/05/09/ftp303/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/05/09/ftp303/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 May 2014 00:13:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2014 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign Ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Talking Points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Libya]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=9066</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>What was even more noticeable was <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/the-fix/wp/2014/05/09/forget-about-obamacare-benghazi-is-the-republicans-new-favorite-2014-buzzword/">what Republicans shifted to</a> instead: Benghazi!  Or, more accurately: "Benghazi!  Benghazi!  Benghazi!"  Yes, the Republicans are doubling down on holding yet another investigation -- in the hopes that this time <a href="www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/plum-line/wp/2014/05/08/the-five-stages-of-gop-scandal-mongering-a-readers-guide/">an actual scandal will emerge, somehow</a>.  Also, to tarnish Hillary Clinton (always a worthy motive in Republicanland).  Watch for this Benghazi frenzy to play out all summer long, since Republicans quite obviously have nothing positive to offer the voters this year.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/05/09/ftp303/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>161</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Big Republican Pivot</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/05/08/the-big-republican-pivot/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/05/08/the-big-republican-pivot/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2014 23:04:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2014 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2016 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign Ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Libya]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=9062</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The Republican Party's 2014 midterm election strategy was supposed to be simple, since it contained only one plank in the platform: the awfulness of Obamacare.  This isn't mere supposition, as Republicans have been freely admitting this for over six months now.  They were so sure of their strategy that they didn't even care if everyone knew what it was ahead of time.  The midterms would be "all Obamacare, all the time" on the Republican side, and that would usher them into victory.  They even convinced themselves to avoid tackling other issues (such as immigration) because doing so would be a <em>distraction</em> from the single-minded focus on Obamacare.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/05/08/the-big-republican-pivot/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>47</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Tea Party Is Dead!  Long Live The Tea Party!</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/05/07/the-tea-party-is-dead-long-live-the-tea-party/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/05/07/the-tea-party-is-dead-long-live-the-tea-party/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2014 00:23:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2014 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=9057</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Today's article title is meant as commentary on the media's overreactions to the first big round of primary election results (announced last night), and not any sort of supportive call to arms.  Just to be clear up front, in case anyone was expecting a very different sort of article.  It really should read "The Tea Party Is Dead / Long Live The Tea Party," since it represents a clear dichotomy in how pundits reacted to the primary results.  Since the Tea Party candidates didn't do very well (and even that's putting it charitably) in this first big round of primaries, many are now proclaiming total victory for the Establishment Republican faction of the Republican Party, and an absolute rout of the Tea Party faction.  The second way of interpreting the results warns that rumors of the Tea Party's death are premature, and that what <em>really</em> happened was that the Tea Party's takeover bid for the entire Republican Party is now a complete success.  The Tea Party won, this way of thinking goes, because they have now <em>become</em> the Republican Party.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/05/07/the-tea-party-is-dead-long-live-the-tea-party/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>16</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama Poll Watch -- April, 2014</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/05/05/opw1404/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/05/05/opw1404/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2014 23:04:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2014 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama Poll Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Russia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=9044</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>After suffering a negative month in the polls in March, President Obama bounced back in April, gaining back all the ground he had lost and then some (well, "and then a little bit more" would be more accurate...).  He still hasn't quite made it back to where his poll numbers were before the Obamacare website rollout, but if the trendlines continue in May, he is at least within reach of this goal for the first time since last October.  Let's take a look at the updated chart, shall we?</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/05/05/opw1404/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>36</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [302] -- Give America A Raise!</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/05/02/ftp302/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/05/02/ftp302/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2014 23:55:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2014 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign Ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Free Speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Talking Points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Bill of Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=9029</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>There was a lot of political news this week, most of it pretty good for Democrats.  In the Senate, Democrats forced Republicans to <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/post-politics/wp/2014/04/30/senate-republicans-block-minimum-wage-increase-bill/">filibuster a minimum wage bill</a> (more on that in a bit), and then the week ended with some <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/wonkblog/wp/2014/05/02/u-s-economy-adds-288000-jobs-in-april-jobless-rate-falls-to-6-3-percent/">very good news</a> in the unemployment numbers.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/05/02/ftp302/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>59</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Make A Funny Ad, Lose Your Job</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/04/29/make-a-funny-ad-lose-your-job/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/04/29/make-a-funny-ad-lose-your-job/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2014 23:03:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2014 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign Ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Free Speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Humor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=9014</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>I speak out today in support of a Tea Party candidate.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/04/29/make-a-funny-ad-lose-your-job/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tea Party&#039;s Influence On The Wane?</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/04/28/tea-partys-influence-on-the-wane/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/04/28/tea-partys-influence-on-the-wane/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2014 00:27:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2014 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=9009</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Over the course of the next two months, the Tea Party movement may become to be seen (to mix a few metaphors) as more of a paper tiger than the tail that wags the Republican dog.  To put it a little more concretely, the Tea Party may be losing some of its outsized influence over the Republican Party.  It is still too early to state with any degree of certainty (since the Tea Partiers have shown themselves to be impressively resilient on previous occasions), but if Tea Party power is indeed on the wane it could signal a turning point in modern American politics.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/04/28/tea-partys-influence-on-the-wane/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
