<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>ChrisWeigant.com &#187; 2012 Elections</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.chrisweigant.com/category/elections/2012-elections/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com</link>
	<description>Reality-based political commentary</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2026 23:23:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Joe Biden Should &#039;Evolve&#039; On Legalizing Weed</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2023/12/07/joe-biden-should-evolve-on-legalizing-weed/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2023/12/07/joe-biden-should-evolve-on-legalizing-weed/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Dec 2023 00:52:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2024 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Vice President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=24423</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>President Joe Biden seems to be having some trouble getting young voters enthused about voting for him next year.  There's a very simple answer to this problem -- one that he should adopt as soon as possible.  He should announce that he has "evolved" on the subject of legalizing the recreational use of marijuana for adults, and unveil a new plan to make it happen on the federal level.  This wouldn't be anywhere near as risky as the first time the word "evolve" was attached to Biden getting out in front of a political issue.  For Biden, it'd be seen as a real Nixon-goes-to-China shift in position, which would only add to its appeal.  And it is tailor-made to get young voters to the polls in droves (as well as plenty of older voters as well).</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2023/12/07/joe-biden-should-evolve-on-legalizing-weed/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>An Alternate Reality Exercise</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2023/10/30/an-alternate-reality-exercise/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2023/10/30/an-alternate-reality-exercise/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Oct 2023 22:41:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2016 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2024 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign Ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voting Rights]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=24280</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Mike Pence surprised everyone this weekend, when he abruptly announced he was ending his campaign for the Republican presidential nomination during a speech Pence gave in Las Vegas.  The surprise wasn't that Pence's presidential ambitions were doomed -- anyone with half a brain could see that from the get-go -- but that Pence had actually realized it himself, this early in the process.  Personally, I knew from the day he announced that Mike Pence was never going to win the Republican nomination -- not even if Donald Trump had suddenly decided not to run.  Even <em>without</em> Trump in the race, Pence would still have been doomed.  His flavor of Republicanism is a thing of the past, he has an incredibly bland and smarmy personality (he really deserves to have Trump hit him for being "sanctimonious," much more than Ron DeSantis), and he enraged the MAGA crowd by not following the Dear Leader's order to somehow wave a magic wand and overturn the results of the 2020 election on January 6th.  Add all of that up and it equals a big defeat from the Republican voting base, plain and simple.  So watching the coverage of the development on yesterday's morning political-chatfest shows wasn't any real surprise (other than the early timing of it).  What <em>was</em> a surprise (for me, at least) this Sunday morning was to see Arnold Schwarzenegger being interviewed (for some unfathomable reason) on NBC's <em>Meet The Press</em>.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2023/10/30/an-alternate-reality-exercise/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Electoral Math -- It&#039;s That Time Again...</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2020/07/13/electoral-math-its-that-time-again/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2020/07/13/electoral-math-its-that-time-again/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2020 01:58:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2008 Electoral Math]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Electoral Math]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2016 Electoral Math]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2020 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2020 Electoral Math]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Vice President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=18892</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Welcome to the first 2020 installment of our quadrennial series tracking the electoral math in the presidential race.  We've done this three times previously, and (like pretty much everyone else in the political prediction game) failed miserably the last time around.  Hey, two out of three ain't bad, right?</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2020/07/13/electoral-math-its-that-time-again/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>136</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Inevitability Of Legalization</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/07/17/the-inevitability-of-legalization/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/07/17/the-inevitability-of-legalization/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jul 2019 00:19:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2016 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2020 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Name-dropping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=17122</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Attending the breakout sessions on marijuana legal reform at Netroots Nation has only gotten better and better over the years.  Each year's panel is unique, of course, but I'm speaking of a larger picture here, because over the past decade or so the question of legalizing marijuana for recreational adult use has gone from a literal pipe dream to an aspiration to a solid plan to (in state after state) a triumphant reality.  And now there is an aura of inevitability about legalization for the entire country -- an concept which would have seemed wildly unrealistic just ten or twelve years ago.  We're winning this battle, and we're going to win this whole war in the very near future.  This lends a spirit of optimism to the discussion that just wasn't present a decade ago.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/07/17/the-inevitability-of-legalization/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>76</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Good Economic News Not Always The Best Political Indicator</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/04/29/good-economic-news-not-always-the-best-political-indicator/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/04/29/good-economic-news-not-always-the-best-political-indicator/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Apr 2019 01:09:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2016 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2018 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2020 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign Ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=16758</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>When political wonks look at factors which influence presidential elections, one of the most obvious correlations is with how the economy's doing.  Economic indicators are a good indication of the mood of the voters, or at least they have been in the past.  Of course, as with any attempt to identify causality in the nebulous field of politics, this isn't a hard-and-fast rule or anything, but tracking the economy is a better indicator than most as to whether the voters are in the mood for a change at the top or not.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/04/29/good-economic-news-not-always-the-best-political-indicator/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>65</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Lest We Forget</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2018/11/12/lest-we-forget/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2018/11/12/lest-we-forget/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2018 01:54:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2016 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2018 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=16103</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>But I have to add at least a short note of condemnation for President Donald Trump before we get to that.  Trump's actions over the weekend were (to use a word he loves throwing around with abandon) nothing short of disgraceful.  He only went to the centenary because the Pentagon essentially denied him his own military parade, and his boredom with the entire process was evident to all.  And yet, for some reason, prominent ex-military voices are silent here at home.  Just imagine what they would have said if a Democrat had put in a similar performance on the world's stage at a solemn event to honor our war dead.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2018/11/12/lest-we-forget/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Are GOP Voters Delusionally Overconfident?</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2018/09/18/are-gop-voters-delusionally-overconfident/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2018/09/18/are-gop-voters-delusionally-overconfident/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2018 23:38:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2018 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=15914</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Just to warn everyone up front, this is not really going to be a proper column.  I had actually intended to take the day off for unrelated reasons, but rather than running a re-run column or not running anything at all, the following caught my eye.  So I'm running this excerpt to stimulate conversation in the comments, because it certainly is an interesting concept, if true -- especially given the fact that the poll came from the Republican National Committee itself.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2018/09/18/are-gop-voters-delusionally-overconfident/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>124</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Slaying The Gerrymander</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2018/02/20/slaying-the-gerrymander/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2018/02/20/slaying-the-gerrymander/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Feb 2018 00:49:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2018 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2020 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=15136</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The "Gerry-Mander," originally, was a flying lizard -- or, one might say, a dragon.  In March of 1812, the <em>Boston Gazette</em> published <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:The_Gerry-Mander.png">a cartoon</a> based on a district the governor at the time (Elbridge Gerry) had approved.  The cartoonist thought it looked like a salamander, drew the winged lizard, and thus introduced the word "gerrymander" to the politician lexicon.  In current American politics, a wide group of citizens are now girding their loins and seeking to slay the gerrymander dragon, once and for all.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2018/02/20/slaying-the-gerrymander/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>40</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Trump&#039;s Easily-Debunked Lie</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2017/02/16/trumps-easily-debunked-lie/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2017/02/16/trumps-easily-debunked-lie/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2017 00:53:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2016 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=13551</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>President Donald Trump gave a press conference today, in which he uttered more than one blatant falsehood.  The fact-checkers are, once again, going to have to pull an all-nighter just to keep up with them all.  But while they're busy disproving the weightier of these lies, I thought I'd concentrate on just the easiest to debunk.  Call me lazy if you will, but this one is just so laughably wrong that it would be downright hilarious if it weren't so obvious that Trump has such a deep-seated need to believe in it.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2017/02/16/trumps-easily-debunked-lie/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>189</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama&#039;s Farewell</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2017/01/11/obamas-farewell/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2017/01/11/obamas-farewell/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2017 01:27:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=13393</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Last night, President Barack Obama bid the American public farewell.  He gave a speech that was inspiring, and called upon Americans to get involved in the political process in a multitude of ways.  Like many historic farewell addresses (even quoting from George Washington's), it also delivered a warning about what Obama perceives as current and future dangers which threaten America.  Washington's farewell address, when <a href="http://avalon.law.yale.edu/18th_century/washing.asp">read in full</a>, contains a scathing denunciation of the mere concept of political parties (called "factions" at the time), and Obama's followed suit in denouncing the rabidly partisan era we now find ourselves in.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2017/01/11/obamas-farewell/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>22</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>2016 Electoral Math -- Clinton Continues Her Rise</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/10/10/2016-electoral-math-clinton-continues-her-rise/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/10/10/2016-electoral-math-clinton-continues-her-rise/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Oct 2016 01:55:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2016 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2016 Electoral Math]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign Ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama Poll Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=12960</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Even with that big caveat, Hillary Clinton had another good week in the polls.  In fact, almost all the news was good news for Clinton and bad news for Donald Trump.  Clinton continued to ride the wave from the first debate, and this week shows the public's reaction to Trump's tax returns being leaked, showing an almost-billion-dollar loss in a single year (so much for the "I'm a great businessman" thing...).  Trump is defiant about not paying any federal income taxes for almost two decades, which certainly didn't help him any with public opinion.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/10/10/2016-electoral-math-clinton-continues-her-rise/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>79</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Oldest, Or Second-Oldest</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/09/15/oldest-or-second-oldest/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/09/15/oldest-or-second-oldest/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Sep 2016 22:08:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2016 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=12825</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Up until the past week, there was one aspect of the 2016 presidential race that most had completely overlooked.  Barring any third-party surprises, America is about to elect either the oldest or the second-oldest first-term president ever.  Furthermore, if Bernie Sanders had edged Hillary Clinton out for the Democratic nomination, we would have been guaranteed to elect the oldest first-term president in our entire history.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/09/15/oldest-or-second-oldest/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>56</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Democrats In The City Of Brotherly Love (Primetime)</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/08/01/democrats-in-the-city-of-brotherly-love-primetime-part-1/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/08/01/democrats-in-the-city-of-brotherly-love-primetime-part-1/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Aug 2016 00:06:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2016 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign Ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=12587</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Today I'd like to take a look at the four nights by focusing in only on the prime-time hour that appeared on broadcast television.  For all the other things that happened on the stage of the convention, you always had to wonder: "Is anyone else out there actually even seeing this stuff?"  I mean, cable channels did cover the convention live and you could even just tap into the feed (without all the commentary, in other words), but I wonder how many voters devote that kind of time and attention to this stuff.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/08/01/democrats-in-the-city-of-brotherly-love-primetime-part-1/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>80</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Unified, Mostly</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/07/12/unified-mostly/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/07/12/unified-mostly/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jul 2016 23:02:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2016 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign Ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=12483</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Hillary Clinton got her long-awaited endorsement from Bernie Sanders today, in an event designed to unify the Democratic Party base heading into their national convention.  Although there are still plenty of "Bernie or Bust" die-hards out there, Democrats had already largely unified behind Clinton, even before Sanders officially endorsed her today.  Perhaps this all would have played out differently in a different election year, but Donald Trump is proving to be a powerful unifying force among Democrats -- because his elevation to president is seen as being downright unthinkable by both Bernie and Hillary supporters.  Getting behind Hillary may be problematic for some Bernie supporters, but considering the alternative is a big motivating factor for most.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/07/12/unified-mostly/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>87</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The End Of An Exhausting Primary Season</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/06/07/the-end-of-an-exhausting-primary-season/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/06/07/the-end-of-an-exhausting-primary-season/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jun 2016 01:33:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2016 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign Ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Vice President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=12329</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>For the first time, I am writing a column which is designed to be updated, perhaps later tonight or perhaps even tomorrow.  Because today is the end of the primary road for 2016, so while I'd like to take a nostalgic look back at the entire primary season, I'm also going to eventually update my stats to provide the final 2016 numbers on how well I picked all the primary races.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/06/07/the-end-of-an-exhausting-primary-season/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>46</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>An Update And Some Big Site News</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/05/24/an-update-and-some-big-site-news/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/05/24/an-update-and-some-big-site-news/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 May 2016 00:19:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2016 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Name-dropping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Syria]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Vice President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=12268</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>I should mention right up front that I'm essentially punting on today's article.  I had planned on doing this anyway, but then an appointment I had got cancelled at the last minute, so I at least now have the time to jot down a few things -- a news update and then some great news for the site.  The first is just me patting myself on the back (again, I'm admitting this up front, in case there are cat videos or something else on the web which would be a better use of your time than reading this), but the second is a bit of personal news that I think regular readers will be almost as excited about as I am.  But before we get to dessert, we've got to eat our vegetables.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/05/24/an-update-and-some-big-site-news/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>23</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Down Country Roads</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/05/10/down-country-roads/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/05/10/down-country-roads/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 May 2016 22:01:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2016 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign Ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=12208</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>As we await the primary results from West Virginia, we have to note we've reached a milestone in the "predict the primaries" contest.  With the exit of Ted Cruz and John Kasich from the Republican race, Donald Trump now stands alone, as he's the last Republican still in the race.  Since he is now the presumptive nominee, we will not be calling any future Republican primaries (starting tonight, by ignoring the West Virginia and Nebraska GOP results).  This is because calling a race with only one candidate is so easy it counts (in our rules, at least) as cheating -- pumping the score up by calling contests that are foregone conclusions.  So what this all means is that I've now got a final score for my 2016 Republican primary picks.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/05/10/down-country-roads/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>16</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Convention Dreams</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/03/31/convention-dreams/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/03/31/convention-dreams/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Apr 2016 00:13:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2016 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign Ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cuba]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Name-dropping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=12038</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>I'm pleased to announce that ChrisWeigant.com is applying for press credentials for both national political conventions this year.  Longtime readers of the site will remember that I (and my lovely wife, whose blogs <a href="http://www.irishtimes.com/blogs/generationemigration/2012/09/06/becoming-a-us-citizen-to-vote-for-obama/">also appeared</a> in the <em>Irish Times</em>) attended the 2012 Democratic National Convention, but seeing as how the level of political excitement this year (in both parties) seems almost unparalleled, this year we really want to see what both parties have to offer, in person.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/03/31/convention-dreams/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>24</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Wonky Diversion</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/03/15/a-wonky-diversion/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/03/15/a-wonky-diversion/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Mar 2016 22:20:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2016 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=11956</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Since we're all going to be busy tonight watching the next round of election returns come in, I'm not even going to attempt any political analysis today.  Everything might change in a couple of hours, so why bother?  Instead, I'm going to just toss out a wonky diversion for everyone to contemplate while we wait for West Podunk County to get its act together and get the damn numbers in to election central.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/03/15/a-wonky-diversion/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>109</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [381] -- Is Trump Bigger Than Liam Neeson?</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/03/04/ftp381/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/03/04/ftp381/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Mar 2016 00:09:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2016 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign Ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Talking Points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Name-dropping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Vice President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=11912</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>It's been a wild and crazy week -- so much so, in fact, that we're going to start with a quote we <em>never</em> thought would become appropriate to use in a column about politics.   It's from the movie <em>Taken</em>, where Liam Neeson's character utters the classic line: "Now's not the time for dick-measuring."</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/03/04/ftp381/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>238</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>From The Archives -- Trump Mania</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/02/25/from-the-archives-trump-mania/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/02/25/from-the-archives-trump-mania/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2016 01:14:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2016 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign Ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=11875</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Most intelligent political analysts' reaction (right, left, and center) to the news that Donald Trump may be considering a run for the presidency could be summed up as some version of: "You have <em>got</em> to be kidding me."  Followed quickly by: "This is going to be <em>so</em> much fun!"  But the real punchline to this joke of a candidacy was actually on the punditocracy, when Trump's poll numbers took off and soon put him either in the lead or very close to it for the Republican nomination.  Republican voters, it seems, aren't following the punditocracy's lead on "The Donald."</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/02/25/from-the-archives-trump-mania/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>52</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>My New Hampshire Picks</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/02/08/my-new-hampshire-picks/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/02/08/my-new-hampshire-picks/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2016 00:18:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2016 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign Ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Contests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=11799</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>It is time once again to peer deeply into my somewhat-foggy crystal ball, and attempt to pick the winners of tomorrow night's New Hampshire primary.  Before I get to that, though, some old business needs to be brought up.  First, we have some very recent old business and then some truly ancient business, so bear with me.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/02/08/my-new-hampshire-picks/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>40</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Trump Just Fulfilling The GOP&#039;s Grand Debate Design</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/01/28/trump-just-fulfilling-the-gops-grand-debate-design/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/01/28/trump-just-fulfilling-the-gops-grand-debate-design/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2016 23:56:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2016 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign Ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=11757</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Donald Trump, whether he wins the Republican nomination or not (or the White House, for that matter), has certainly turned the world of American politics on its head this election cycle.  Trump is the undisputed king of Teflon -- because absolutely <em>nothing</em> he says or does ever sticks to him.  His campaign has been pronounced "dead" or "toast" so many times now (by the inside-the-Beltway set) that it's impossible to keep count.  Each time, his poll numbers actually rise rather than suffer the predicted collapse.  This time around, after the dust settles in the fracas over tonight's debate, Trump will likely once again emerge stronger.  Which is exactly what the Republican Party hoped would happen (albeit to someone other than Trump, but even so...) during debate season.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/01/28/trump-just-fulfilling-the-gops-grand-debate-design/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>113</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>GOP Presidential Field Overview</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/01/04/gop-presidential-field-overview/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/01/04/gop-presidential-field-overview/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2016 02:04:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2016 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign Ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=11655</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Once again, it's been a month since I last <a href="http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/12/07/gop-field-shrinks-to-four-as-jeb-fades/">took a look</a> at the Republican presidential field as a whole, and in the intervening time two further candidates have dropped out, bringing the total to an almost-manageable 12 candidates (11 if you don't count Jim Gilmore... and at this point, many don't).  Even an even dozen, though, is better than trying to keep track of 17 of these folks.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/01/04/gop-presidential-field-overview/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bernie Don&#039;t Get No Respect From Media</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/09/30/bernie-dont-get-no-respect-from-media/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/09/30/bernie-dont-get-no-respect-from-media/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2015 23:58:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2016 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Vice President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=11276</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Bernie Sanders, as far as the media is concerned, is the Rodney Dangerfield of presidential candidates -- "he don't get no respect."  Of the 23 candidates running for president in the two major parties, precisely four of them have ever shown even 20 percent support (in their polling averages from their base voters).  Actually, to be completely accurate, five people have hit the 20 percent support level since the race began this year, but Joe Biden is not actually a candidate yet.  The other four are Donald Trump, Ben Carson, Hillary Clinton, and Bernie Sanders.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/09/30/bernie-dont-get-no-respect-from-media/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>46</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>GOP Presidential Polling, Then And Now</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/09/08/gop-presidential-polling-then-and-now/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/09/08/gop-presidential-polling-then-and-now/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2015 23:58:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2016 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign Ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=11181</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Labor Day weekend is over, meaning the world of political punditry heaves a collective sigh of relief because, according to the calendar they use, this marks the end of the summer "Silly Season" and the point where the public starts to actually pay some attention to politics once again -- specifically, the presidential race.  There's some truth to this, although people in Iowa and New Hampshire have likely already begun considering political presidential candidates, and there are plenty of people elsewhere who won't get interested until we get a lot closer to actually voting in primaries and caucuses.  Still, with the second Republican presidential debate due next week, I thought it'd be a good time for a quick review of where the Republican field now stands and where it could go in the very near future.  My personal feeling is that Donald Trump might just be approaching a point where he becomes unstoppable, which started as a gut feeling but looks entirely plausible, given the data. </p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/09/08/gop-presidential-polling-then-and-now/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>45</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nonpartisan Redistricting Wins</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/06/30/nonpartisan-redistricting-wins/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/06/30/nonpartisan-redistricting-wins/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2015 23:59:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=10877</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The Supreme Court issued their last rulings of the season yesterday, and I thought one ruling kind of got short shrift by the media.  Granted, there were other big rulings on the same day (the court usually saves their biggest cases for last, but this year they actually released the two biggest decisions last week) involving E.P.A. regulations and the death penalty, but the redistricting case -- to me, at least -- was more important.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/06/30/nonpartisan-redistricting-wins/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>17</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bobby Jindal Becomes 13th GOP Candidate</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/06/24/bobby-jindal-becomes-13th-gop-candidate/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/06/24/bobby-jindal-becomes-13th-gop-candidate/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2015 23:30:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2016 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign Ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Vice President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=10866</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Bobby Jindal, the governor of Louisiana, just became the 13th Republican candidate for president.  Whether this will prove to be lucky or unlucky remains to be seen.  Even though the field is already incredibly crowded, Jindal will not be the last Republican to announce -- there are at least two other contenders who will likely jump in (Scott Walker and Chris Christie), with the possibility of a few more longshot candidates as well.  The more crowded the field gets, the harder it is going to be for any one of them to stand out, which is precisely Jindal's main problem.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/06/24/bobby-jindal-becomes-13th-gop-candidate/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>23</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Jeb?</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/06/15/jeb/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/06/15/jeb/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2015 01:28:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2016 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign Ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=10828</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Today, Jeb Bush formally entered the race for the Republican nomination for president.  I should point out, as a bit of personal trivia, that his new campaign logo ("Jeb!") has allowed me to create what I believe is the shortest headline I have ever written (in over 2,000 blog posts).</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/06/15/jeb/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>41</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>From The Archives -- Marriage Equality&#039;s Giant Leap Forward</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/04/28/from-the-archives-marriage-equalitys-giant-leap-forward/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/04/28/from-the-archives-marriage-equalitys-giant-leap-forward/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2015 00:08:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Bill of Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=10623</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Sorry, I do not mean to make light of the historic nature of today's case, far from it in fact.  I have to admit being personally stunned at how fast events have developed.  Almost exactly two years ago I wrote a column predicting that America had <a href="http://www.chrisweigant.com/2013/03/25/the-gay-marriage-tipping-point/">reached the tipping point</a> on marriage equality.  I've re-run this column a few times, and <a href="http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/10/07/a-marriage-equality-victory-lap/">last October</a> I pointed out that when I wrote the original article, the following was true:</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/04/28/from-the-archives-marriage-equalitys-giant-leap-forward/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>18</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>GOP Off To The Races Early</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/02/16/gop-off-to-the-races-early/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/02/16/gop-off-to-the-races-early/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2015 23:54:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2016 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=10312</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The Republican Party and the political media world are already off to the 2016 horseraces.  With endless fascination, the latest polling from Iowa and New Hampshire is examined under the microscopes of the pundits and sweeping pronouncements are made as to who the eventual frontrunners will be.  Of course, it is way too early for any real analysis of the public's mood, but that doesn't stop the oddsmaking within the Beltway.  After all, the Democratic nomination race is setting up to be a snoozer, so why not get started obsessing over the Republican race?</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/02/16/gop-off-to-the-races-early/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>37</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How President Hillary Clinton Would Compare With President Obama</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/08/12/how-president-hillary-clinton-would-compare-with-president-obama/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/08/12/how-president-hillary-clinton-would-compare-with-president-obama/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2014 00:04:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2016 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=9491</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>I realize that to call this column "premature" would indeed even be an understatement.  But you'll have to forgive me, since it's one of those lazy summer days where all of Washington is off on vacation (President Obama is taking two weeks at the beach, and Congress is taking the entire freakin' <em>month</em> off, as usual).  So it seems like a good time for some unadulterated speculation of the sheerest sort.  And I'm not even going to get drawn in to all the 2016 election speculation today.  I'm going to skip over it all and just jump forward to January, 2017, as we all watch the first woman inaugurated to the presidency.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/08/12/how-president-hillary-clinton-would-compare-with-president-obama/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>15</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Obama Tactic</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/08/11/the-obama-tactic/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/08/11/the-obama-tactic/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2014 00:28:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iran]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Libya]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Syria]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=9487</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>American aircraft are once again waging war over the skies of Iraq.  President Obama, as many have pointed out, is now the fourth United States president in a row to order some form of military offensive in Iraq.  As always, plenty of critics immediately popped up to loudly explain what the president was doing wrong.  The usual characters on the right demanded a much more intensive military action, the ones on the left warned darkly about slippery slopes and possible blowback, and the American people seemed to heave a sigh of resignation, in a "here we go again" moment.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/08/11/the-obama-tactic/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>40</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Will The Tea Party &quot;Strike Back&quot;?</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/06/03/will-the-tea-party-strike-back/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/06/03/will-the-tea-party-strike-back/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2014 23:29:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2014 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign Ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=9188</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Today is primary election day in eight states across the land (including my own).  The most media attention will be paid to the Mississippi Republican Senate primary, where the incumbent, Senator Thad Cochran, may be in trouble from a Tea Party challenger.  So while the storyline a few weeks ago was "Establishment Republicans win big over Tea Party," the storyline tomorrow may be "Tea Party strikes back!"</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/06/03/will-the-tea-party-strike-back/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Tea Party Is Dead!  Long Live The Tea Party!</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/05/07/the-tea-party-is-dead-long-live-the-tea-party/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/05/07/the-tea-party-is-dead-long-live-the-tea-party/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2014 00:23:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2014 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=9057</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Today's article title is meant as commentary on the media's overreactions to the first big round of primary election results (announced last night), and not any sort of supportive call to arms.  Just to be clear up front, in case anyone was expecting a very different sort of article.  It really should read "The Tea Party Is Dead / Long Live The Tea Party," since it represents a clear dichotomy in how pundits reacted to the primary results.  Since the Tea Party candidates didn't do very well (and even that's putting it charitably) in this first big round of primaries, many are now proclaiming total victory for the Establishment Republican faction of the Republican Party, and an absolute rout of the Tea Party faction.  The second way of interpreting the results warns that rumors of the Tea Party's death are premature, and that what <em>really</em> happened was that the Tea Party's takeover bid for the entire Republican Party is now a complete success.  The Tea Party won, this way of thinking goes, because they have now <em>become</em> the Republican Party.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/05/07/the-tea-party-is-dead-long-live-the-tea-party/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>16</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tea Party&#039;s Influence On The Wane?</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/04/28/tea-partys-influence-on-the-wane/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/04/28/tea-partys-influence-on-the-wane/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2014 00:27:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2014 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=9009</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Over the course of the next two months, the Tea Party movement may become to be seen (to mix a few metaphors) as more of a paper tiger than the tail that wags the Republican dog.  To put it a little more concretely, the Tea Party may be losing some of its outsized influence over the Republican Party.  It is still too early to state with any degree of certainty (since the Tea Partiers have shown themselves to be impressively resilient on previous occasions), but if Tea Party power is indeed on the wane it could signal a turning point in modern American politics.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/04/28/tea-partys-influence-on-the-wane/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>GOP&#039;s Post-Mortem Post-Mortem</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/03/19/gops-post-mortem-post-mortem/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/03/19/gops-post-mortem-post-mortem/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2014 00:34:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2014 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2016 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=8794</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Has it really been a whole year since the Republican Party put out their "post-mortem" document, which tried to identify why they got shellacked so badly in the 2012 election?  Since it's not a big date on my political calendar, the one-year anniversary kind of snuck up on me, I'll admit.  But since the Republican National Committee used the term "post-mortem" in the first place, I guess it's now time for a post-mortem on the post-mortem (insert your own zombie or "dead man walking" joke here, if you must).</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/03/19/gops-post-mortem-post-mortem/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tea Party Primary Problems</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/02/24/tea-party-primary-problems/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/02/24/tea-party-primary-problems/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Feb 2014 01:10:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2014 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=8690</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>As we enter into what political wonks call "primary season," the next few months are going to prove instructive as to the relative strength in the Republican Party of both the Tea Party and the Establishment Republican factions.  The Tea Party rode high in the 2010 election cycle, and was again influential during the whole 2012 race, but one has to wonder if the luster of the Tea Party's shine is beginning to wear off -- even among Republican primary voters.  The next few months will tell, as sitting Republicans either win their primaries or are dethroned by their Tea Party challengers.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/02/24/tea-party-primary-problems/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>23</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>My 2013 &quot;McLaughlin Awards&quot; [Part 1]</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2013/12/20/my-2013-mclaughlin-awards-part-1/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2013/12/20/my-2013-mclaughlin-awards-part-1/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Dec 2013 02:27:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2014 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2016 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Talking Points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Name-dropping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Bill of Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=8392</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Welcome everyone to our year-end awards columns!  Every year, we pre-empt our normal "Friday Talking Points" columns for two weeks, in order to take a look back at the year that was.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2013/12/20/my-2013-mclaughlin-awards-part-1/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>27</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>From The Archives -- Unpacking The Court</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2013/11/19/from-the-archives-unpacking-the-court/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2013/11/19/from-the-archives-unpacking-the-court/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Nov 2013 00:57:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=8245</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>In one of their stunning (but regular) "up is down" leaps of illogic, the Republican Party is charging President Obama with "court-packing."  In reality, they're just miffed that a Democrat is going to exercise his constitutional authority to appoint judges in the regular order of things.  To call such actions "court-packing" is nothing short of laughable, to be blunt.  In fact, the only hinkey business afoot is coming from Republicans themselves on the issue.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2013/11/19/from-the-archives-unpacking-the-court/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>America: Legalize It!</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2013/10/22/america-legalize-it/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2013/10/22/america-legalize-it/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Oct 2013 00:22:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2014 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2016 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Vice President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=8106</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Gallup just <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/10/22/legal-marijuana-poll_n_4143995.html">released a poll</a> showing a large majority -- 58 percent -- of the American public now thinks marijuana should be fully legalized for adult recreational use.  This is somewhat stunning news.  The "somewhat" part is that this is really only a continuation of a decades-long trend towards acceptance in public opinion.  The "stunning" part is how quickly it is now happening.  In fact, it might be fair to say that we may only be a year or two away from marijuana legalization reaching a political "tipping point" from which there will be no going back.  I wrote <a href="http://www.chrisweigant.com/2013/03/25/the-gay-marriage-tipping-point/">earlier this year</a> that gay marriage can now be seen to be over this "tipping point" -- it's hard to now imagine going back to the days of "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" and the Defense Of Marriage Act.  Legalizing marijuana hasn't hit this point of no return yet... but it certainly can be glimpsed on the horizon.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2013/10/22/america-legalize-it/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>17</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Boehner Hammers Last Nail In Republican Coffin</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2013/09/30/boehner-hammers-last-nail-in-republican-coffin/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2013/09/30/boehner-hammers-last-nail-in-republican-coffin/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Oct 2013 04:16:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2014 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=7996</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Speaker of the House John Boehner has apparently just let the House of Representatives go home for the night, even though there's an hour left before the federal 2013 fiscal year ends (as of this writing).  This guarantees at least a short-term partial shutdown of the federal government.  Irony of ironies, however: the shutdown will <em>not</em> actually affect the Obamacare insurance exchanges, which will open on time tomorrow as planned.  Meaning the whole "defund Obamacare" point of principle the shutdown supposedly hinges on <em>won't actually be achieved by the shutdown</em>.  This basic truth was, as usual, completely ignored by most of the mainstream media who have spent the last week, instead, salivating over the prospect of a knock-down political fight.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2013/09/30/boehner-hammers-last-nail-in-republican-coffin/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>62</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [271] -- A Weed Screed</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2013/08/30/ftp271/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2013/08/30/ftp271/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Aug 2013 00:09:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Free Speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Talking Points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Bill of Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=7857</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>This is all by way of introducing you to today's column.  We're throwing out our usual format today, because of a monumental shift in federal policy this week.  Such a momentous and historic occasion deserves special treatment, we feel, and that special treatment translates to the following unorthodox presentation: first, a few awards; then, some talking points from respected voices; and finally, my own screed at the end.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2013/08/30/ftp271/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>28</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Natural Born Presidents (Part 1)</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2013/08/20/natural-born-presidents-part-1/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2013/08/20/natural-born-presidents-part-1/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Aug 2013 00:18:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Vice President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=7808</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The problem, obviously, is that nobody's ever adequately legally defined what exactly "a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States" means.  There have been no court challenges.  It has become a political issue at times, but has never been adjudicated at all -- which means it is completely open to interpretation, for now.  By anyone, really.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2013/08/20/natural-born-presidents-part-1/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>24</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [262] -- War On Women Continues Apace</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2013/06/14/ftp262/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2013/06/14/ftp262/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Jun 2013 23:37:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Talking Points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Syria]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=7506</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Last week, Republicans seem to have decided that the whole "autopsy" business after they got beaten so badly in the 2012 elections was just hogwash, and that they should double-down on their demonization and scapegoatery efforts.  The "Plum Line" blog over at WashingtonPost.com has a <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/plum-line/wp/2013/06/13/the-morning-plum-house-gop-stomps-all-over-republican-rebranding/">good rundown</a> (although now that the site is disappearing behind a paywall, I may have to reconsider linking to its articles in the future).</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2013/06/14/ftp262/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>16</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is It Time For Holder To Go?</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2013/05/15/is-it-time-for-holder-to-go/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2013/05/15/is-it-time-for-holder-to-go/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2013 23:05:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Bill of Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=7377</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Is it time for Attorney General Eric Holder to (as is frequently said in politics) "spend some more time with his family"?</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2013/05/15/is-it-time-for-holder-to-go/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Republican Hypocrisy, Chapter 4,397</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2013/04/11/republican-hypocrisy-chapter-4397/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2013/04/11/republican-hypocrisy-chapter-4397/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Apr 2013 23:44:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2014 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=7209</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>OK, I'll admit right up front that that title is a bit of hyperbole.  I really haven't documented 4,396 other instances of Republican hypocrisy.  It just feels like it, that's all.  Today's installment even crosses over from garden-variety hypocrisy to full-blown Orwellian doublethink, in fact.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2013/04/11/republican-hypocrisy-chapter-4397/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Still Waiting For Obama&#039;s Marijuana Policy</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2013/04/08/still-waiting-for-obamas-marijuana-policy/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2013/04/08/still-waiting-for-obamas-marijuana-policy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Apr 2013 00:05:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=7193</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The 2012 election happened over five months ago, at the beginning of November.  One notable result of this election was that two states -- Washington and Colorado -- voted to legalize marijuana for adult recreational use.  This was a direct challenge to federal drug policy.  We are all still waiting for the Obama administration's response.  I don't know about you, but I, for one, am getting a little sick and tired of the wait.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2013/04/08/still-waiting-for-obamas-marijuana-policy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>18</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama Poll Watch -- March, 2013</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2013/04/03/opw1303/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2013/04/03/opw1303/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Apr 2013 23:13:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iran]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama Poll Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=7169</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>OK, with that out of the way, let's have a look at March's polling.  President Obama lost almost all the ground he had gained late in the 2012 election season, and his numbers fell back to where he was roughly six months ago.  This isn't as bad as some media have made it out to be, since it may represent Obama's true natural level of support.  But we're getting ahead of ourselves, let's take a look at this month's chart:</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2013/04/03/opw1303/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>15</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Poll Watch Preliminary Teaser</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2013/04/02/poll-watch-preliminary-teaser/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2013/04/02/poll-watch-preliminary-teaser/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Apr 2013 23:15:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=7162</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The sharper-eyed among you may have noticed that yesterday was supposed to be Obama Poll Watch day, where we offer up our monthly musings on the state of Barack Obama's public job approval rating.  Well, since yesterday was a rather auspicious date on the calendar, we decided to push the poll-watching to Wednesday.  Also, because we're still working on the charts.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2013/04/02/poll-watch-preliminary-teaser/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>18</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [250] -- Happy Sestercentennial Column!</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2013/03/22/ftp250/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2013/03/22/ftp250/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Mar 2013 00:08:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign Ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Talking Points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=7112</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Welcome to the 250th Friday Talking Points column!</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2013/03/22/ftp250/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>RNC PR BS</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2013/03/20/rnc-pr-bs/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2013/03/20/rnc-pr-bs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Mar 2013 23:39:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2014 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=7103</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Republican National Committee chair Reince Priebus is in the news this week, for his "autopsy" report on the Republican Party in the 2012 election.  Priebus and a few other hardy Republican souls took months to examine what went wrong for the party, and what should be done to set things right for the next time around.  Their prescription for change, unfortunately, is to change how their message is delivered rather than to change much in the way of Republican policies.  I'm certainly not the first to point this out, but this idea works out to exactly the same as what you are left with when you remove the vowels from the national party chairman's name: RNC PR BS.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2013/03/20/rnc-pr-bs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>44</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [249] -- Chides Of March</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2013/03/15/ftp249/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2013/03/15/ftp249/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Mar 2013 00:09:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Talking Points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=7087</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Welcome to the Ides of March, now known as the day after "Pi Day."  If you need to look up either of those references, may I humbly suggest that your pop-cultural education may not be quite wide enough.  The Wides of March?  Maybe I'm just being too snarky -- yet another of the Snides of March, perhaps.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2013/03/15/ftp249/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>63</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama Poll Watch -- January, 2013</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2013/02/06/opw1301/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2013/02/06/opw1301/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2013 23:23:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama Poll Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=6925</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>President Obama ended up his first term by consolidating the job approval polling gains he made in his re-election.  His numbers have settled into a new range, and were remarkably steady all month long.  Obama's "second honeymoon" period with the public may not last more than a few months, but for now seems to be holding steady.  With the election fading into the past, Obama's in a pretty good position right now in terms of "political capital," but this will likely change as legislative reality sets in.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2013/02/06/opw1301/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>17</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Will The 113th Congress Actually Get Some Things Done?</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2013/02/05/will-the-113th-congress-actually-get-some-things-done/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2013/02/05/will-the-113th-congress-actually-get-some-things-done/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2013 01:05:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2014 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=6921</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>It is fashionable nowadays for pundits to decry the partisan polarization in Washington, and to bemoan how "broken" Congress is.  Nothing will get done with such divided government, such conventional wisdom dictates.  We're in for a long and bitter two years of legislative gridlock.  I try to be an eternal optimist (while still staying within the bounds of reasonableness), and I can't help but wonder if this thinking may turn out to be wrong.  Perhaps -- just <em>perhaps</em>, mind you -- the 113th Congress will be able to actually get a few important things done.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2013/02/05/will-the-113th-congress-actually-get-some-things-done/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [242] -- Obama&#039;s Second Inauguration</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2013/01/25/ftp242/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2013/01/25/ftp242/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jan 2013 01:20:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Talking Points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Name-dropping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=6879</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>President Barack Hussein Obama's second inauguration pretty much dominated the political news this week.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2013/01/25/ftp242/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>64</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Battle Hymn</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2013/01/21/battle-hymn/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2013/01/21/battle-hymn/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2013 05:55:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Vice President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=6859</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>America shares a civic religion.  Today was its holiest day.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2013/01/21/battle-hymn/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>24</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [241] -- Revive The &quot;No Budget, No Pay Act&quot;</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2013/01/18/ftp241/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2013/01/18/ftp241/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2013 23:02:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Talking Points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Vice President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=6848</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Eric Cantor, much to our surprise, almost just did something we not only would have agreed with, but in fact given our wholehearted support to.  Almost.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2013/01/18/ftp241/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>44</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Four Years Ago</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2013/01/17/four-years-ago/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2013/01/17/four-years-ago/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2013 00:45:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Name-dropping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Vice President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=6844</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>We're going to spend today waxing nostalgic, just to warn everyone up front.  Because four years ago I traveled to Washington D.C. to attend the Inauguration of President Barack Hussein Obama's first term in office.  Next Monday will be his second swearing-in ceremony (he will actually be officially sworn in on Sunday, as the Constitution dictates, but since it falls on a Sunday the public event will be held on Monday -- which just happens to be Martin Luther King Jr.'s federal holiday as well).  On top of this symbology, exactly 150 Januaries ago American witnessed President Lincoln issuing the Emancipation Proclamation.  So it's going to be a meaningful event, one assumes, in all sorts of ways.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2013/01/17/four-years-ago/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama Poll Watch -- December, 2012</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2013/01/02/opw1212/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2013/01/02/opw1212/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2013 00:17:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama Poll Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=6774</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>A happy chart indeed for Obama fans.  Last month I predicted this rise by noting that many of the nationwide polling operations just ceased polling after the election was over.  This dearth of data meant that while Obama's numbers were climbing fast, the "poll of polls" average at RealClearPolitics.com was dragged downwards by pre-election numbers still being averaged in.  While I did predict that Obama's numbers would continue to rise in December (as more and more data came in), I will admit that even I was surprised at size of the post-election bump which Obama managed.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2013/01/02/opw1212/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>My 2012 &quot;McLaughlin Awards&quot; [Part 2]</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/12/28/my-2012-mclaughlin-awards-part-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/12/28/my-2012-mclaughlin-awards-part-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Dec 2012 01:02:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign Ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Talking Points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Libya]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Name-dropping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Vice President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=6752</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Welcome back to our annual year-end awards column!</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/12/28/my-2012-mclaughlin-awards-part-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>22</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>My 2012 &quot;McLaughlin Awards&quot; [Part 1]</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/12/21/my-2012-mclaughlin-awards-part-1/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/12/21/my-2012-mclaughlin-awards-part-1/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Dec 2012 01:13:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign Ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Humor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Libya]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Name-dropping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Vice President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=6730</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Welcome to the seventh annual <em>homage</em> (which sounds <em>so</em> much nicer than "blatant ripoff," don't you think?) to the television show <em>The McLaughlin Group</em>, since they have the most extensive year-end award category list of anyone around.  Since "extensive" is my middle name (well, not really, although I do tend to wander off into the parenthetical wilderness at times, do I not?), such a long list fits right in here.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/12/21/my-2012-mclaughlin-awards-part-1/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>62</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [237] -- So Delightful</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/12/07/ftp237/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/12/07/ftp237/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Dec 2012 01:10:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Talking Points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=6659</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Where to begin?  Let's see, Obama's job approval polling is not completely through the roof, but it certainly has scraped the ceiling.  The Associated Press just released a <a href="http://ap-gfkpoll.com/uncategorized/our-latest-poll-findings-17">new poll</a> that has Obama at 57 percent approval, 41 percent disapproval -- a job approval level the president hasn't seen since Osama Bin Laden's death.  Added to today's unemployment rate dropping to the lowest point since Obama has held office, and you've got to believe that the folks in the White House have plenty to celebrate this holiday season.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/12/07/ftp237/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>46</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama Poll Watch -- November, 2012</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/12/03/opw1211/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/12/03/opw1211/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2012 23:28:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama Poll Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=6618</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>All in all, a pretty triumphant month for the president, no matter how you look at it.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/12/03/opw1211/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>24</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [236] -- Obama 2.0?</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/11/30/ftp236/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/11/30/ftp236/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Dec 2012 00:19:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Talking Points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Libya]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=6599</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Before his second term has even begun, are we seeing "Obama 2.0" in action?  This is the question swirling around right now in the inside-the-Beltway punditocracy, and it's a refreshing one to contemplate: has President Barack Obama finally learned his lesson that his old method of legislative negotiation simply was not working?  Has he, to put it another way, grown some backbone?</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/11/30/ftp236/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>227</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Another County Heard From</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/11/29/another-county-heard-from/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/11/29/another-county-heard-from/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2012 00:38:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=6594</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>I don't believe I've ever done something like this before, but I got the following as an email from a regular here at CW.com who has been absent of late.  I've been meaning to post it as a comment, but I've been having problems posting comments of late as well (don't even get me started on my computer problems right now...).  But I thought it needed passing along, and I didn't have anything profound to write about today, so I thought I'd share this with everyone.  I realize it's a few weeks late (which is what made me think of elections), but I asked and received permission to share it from <strong>Chris1962</strong>, so better late than never.  Our thoughts are with her and everyone else dealing with the storm cleanup from Sandy.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/11/29/another-county-heard-from/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Happy Thanksgiving, President Obama (And Some Second-Term Advice)</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/11/21/happy-thanksgiving-president-obama-and-some-second-term-advice/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/11/21/happy-thanksgiving-president-obama-and-some-second-term-advice/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Nov 2012 01:33:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=6576</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The millions of Americans who voted for you will likely sit down on Thursday and give thanks that you will be our nation's leader for the next four years.  Our thanks will be added to you and your family's thanks for the same thing, I assume.  We all sincerely hope you and your loved ones have a very happy Thanksgiving this year.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/11/21/happy-thanksgiving-president-obama-and-some-second-term-advice/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>124</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama&#039;s Election Bounce</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/11/20/obamas-election-bounce/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/11/20/obamas-election-bounce/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2012 01:20:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=6570</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>This should come as no real surprise, since almost every incumbent president gets such a bump from a successful re-election effort.  But it certainly is notable for Obama, who has struggled since the beginning of 2010 to gain a positive job approval rating from over half the country.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/11/20/obamas-election-bounce/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Eternal Game Of Chicken</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/11/19/the-eternal-game-of-chicken/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/11/19/the-eternal-game-of-chicken/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2012 01:15:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=6566</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>It's supposed to be turkey week, but instead I'd like to talk about the eternal game of "chicken" that our elected representatives in Washington keep playing.  Because now I see not just Democrats talking about why going over the "fiscal cliff" might not be such a bad idea, but it seems Republicans are <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/marc-thiessen-lets-go-over-the-fiscal-cliff/2012/11/19/be05bc72-3251-11e2-9cfa-e41bac906cc9_story.html">considering the matter</a> as well.  Which leaves me wondering: has everyone on the banks of the Potomac just gone stark staring crazy?</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/11/19/the-eternal-game-of-chicken/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>55</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [235] -- The Can-Kicking Congress</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/11/16/ftp235/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/11/16/ftp235/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Nov 2012 01:47:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Talking Points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=6559</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The real news is happening behind closed doors, of course, as Congress absolutely must act before the end of the year or we're all driving over that fiscal cliff together.  Or maybe it's just a "slope" -- this seems to be a new talking point from some pundits.  Whichever... my money is on "nothing will actually happen until the last week in December, when a Band-Aid will be slapped over the whole thing and the can kicked as far down the road as the politicians think they can get away with."  Not to mix metaphors, or anything,  Sigh.</p>
<p>But I'll get to my true feelings towards Congress in a rant which will take the place of our talking points this week.  First, though, let's hand out a few quick awards.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/11/16/ftp235/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>91</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Time To Get Serious About Marijuana</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/11/13/time-to-get-serious-about-marijuana/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/11/13/time-to-get-serious-about-marijuana/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2012 01:28:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Humor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=6545</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>This is a roundabout way of introducing this column, by pointing out that we all saw the same Cheech and Chong movies, growing up.  Which is doubtlessly why the governor of Colorado felt it was appropriate to send out the following as a response to the voters of his state approving marijuana legalization:</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/11/13/time-to-get-serious-about-marijuana/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [234] -- Advice For The Republican Party</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/11/09/ftp234/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/11/09/ftp234/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2012 21:43:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign Ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Talking Points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=6532</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>No, seriously.  All kidding aside.  I've got the winning issue that -- if Republicans were to jump on it <em>right at this very moment</em>, and get out in front and show some leadership -- could revitalize their entire party, save them from the brink of demographic extinction, and enormously boost their chances to win future national elections.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/11/09/ftp234/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>154</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>From The Archives -- Our 51st &quot;Estado&quot;</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/11/08/from-the-archives-our-51st-estado/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/11/08/from-the-archives-our-51st-estado/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2012 00:17:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=6524</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What happens if Puerto Rico becomes the 51st state of the Union?]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/11/08/from-the-archives-our-51st-estado/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Revenge Of The Pot-Smoking, Gay-Marrying, Women-Empowering, DREAMing Liberals</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/11/07/revenge-of-the-pot-smoking-gay-marrying-women-empowering-dreaming-liberals/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/11/07/revenge-of-the-pot-smoking-gay-marrying-women-empowering-dreaming-liberals/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2012 00:23:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=6520</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Seriously, a man running for the most powerful office in the country <em>didn't bother to plan</em> for one of the two contingencies that were guaranteed to happen last night?  And he wanted us to let him make crucial decisions for all of us?  Willard Mitt Romney's shocking lack of preparedness last night, when it came to speech time, was truly the icing on the sweet, sweet cake of Barack Hussein Obama's second victorious election, at least for me.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/11/07/revenge-of-the-pot-smoking-gay-marrying-women-empowering-dreaming-liberals/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>218</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Let The 2016 Speculation Begin!</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/11/06/let-the-2016-speculation-begin/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/11/06/let-the-2016-speculation-begin/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2012 23:57:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Vice President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=6515</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>OK, let me start by saying that headline is really just a cheap joke.  Sort of.  The wonks of America will indeed start speculating about the 2014 and 2016 elections either tonight or sometime tomorrow morning, at the latest, but I'm going to refrain from such idle chatter for now, mostly because we've got <em>this year's</em> election to get through first.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/11/06/let-the-2016-speculation-begin/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>126</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Final Electoral Math -- My 2012 Election Picks</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/11/05/final-electoral-math-my-2012-election-picks/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/11/05/final-electoral-math-my-2012-election-picks/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2012 23:18:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2008 Electoral Math]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Electoral Math]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama Poll Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Vice President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=6510</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Welcome to the last of these Electoral Math columns, at least for the next three and a half years.  Today, we're just going to throw caution to the wind, and go ahead and predict the outcome of tomorrow night's returns.  Before we get to that, though, a quick rundown of my previous record in the election prediction business, and then (for completeness' sake) the final electoral math graphs for 2012.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/11/05/final-electoral-math-my-2012-election-picks/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>63</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [233] -- Wake Me When It&#039;s Over</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/11/02/ftp233/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/11/02/ftp233/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2012 23:09:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign Ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Free Speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Talking Points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Humor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Name-dropping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Bill of Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=6497</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Every so often, I get an idea which I know would make me millions of dollars.  Today, I had another one: develop and market a pill which, when taken, would put you to sleep until the morning after the election.  The pill would be magically timed to work no matter when you took it, meaning a citizen in Texas or California might not want to take one until perhaps mid-October, but the folks in Iowa and New Hampshire might be expected to take one New Year's Eve -- thus avoiding not only the debates and punditary frenzy of the general election, but the entire primary season as well.  It would be marketed under the name "The Rip Van Winkle Pill."</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/11/02/ftp233/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>148</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama Poll Watch -- October, 2012</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/11/01/opw1210/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/11/01/opw1210/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2012 23:54:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama Poll Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=6492</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>October was debate month, and -- surprise! -- it didn't affect his job approval numbers much, if at all.  In either direction, really.  Obama's job approval rating hardly fluctuated at all throughout all three debates, continuing his trend upward but at a more modest rate.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/11/01/opw1210/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>48</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Spine-Chilling Hallowe&#039;en Tales (Left, Right, And Center)</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/10/31/spine-chilling-hallowe%e2%80%99en-tales-left-right-and-center/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/10/31/spine-chilling-hallowe%e2%80%99en-tales-left-right-and-center/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2012 00:12:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Humor]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=6478</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>It's that time of year again, so gather 'round, kiddies, for our spine-tingling and bone-chilling tales of political horror!</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/10/31/spine-chilling-hallowe%e2%80%99en-tales-left-right-and-center/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>35</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Coping With Disaster</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/10/30/coping-with-disaster/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/10/30/coping-with-disaster/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2012 22:56:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=6471</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The worst of times always brings out the best in people.  When disaster strikes, people tend to rediscover their inner humanity.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/10/30/coping-with-disaster/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>32</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>2012 Electoral Math -- One Week Out</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/10/29/2012-electoral-math-one-week-out/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/10/29/2012-electoral-math-one-week-out/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2012 23:31:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2008 Electoral Math]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Electoral Math]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama Poll Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=6466</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Are you worried that Frankenstorm will restrict your access to up-to-date polling numbers?  Do you know more about the state of the race in places you’ve never been to, but haven’t decided what to do for Hallowe’en yet?  Then you have come to the right place!  With one week to go before Election Day dawns, the race for president is about as tight as it can get, so let's get right to it.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/10/29/2012-electoral-math-one-week-out/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>49</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [232] -- Frankenstorm!  Hank For Senate!</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/10/26/ftp232/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/10/26/ftp232/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2012 23:01:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign Ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Talking Points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Humor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Interviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iran]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Name-dropping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=6443</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>No matter what your political affiliations, I think we can all agree we're getting a little burnt out on Election 2012.  "When will it end?" we wonder -- and we don't even live in a state currently under siege in the continuing television ad war.  We can only imagine what Ohioans, Floridians, and Virginians must be experiencing right now.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/10/26/ftp232/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>42</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>School Records</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/10/25/school-records/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/10/25/school-records/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2012 23:55:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cartoons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Humor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=6439</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>No, this is not going to be a column about Donald Trump, who is apparently trying to get his face in the news again over Barack Obama's college records.  Instead, we are going to feature a cartoon about education, from Joshua L. Eisenstein, PhD., in collaboration with cartoonist Sushila Oliphant.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/10/25/school-records/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Last Election For Electoral College?</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/10/24/last-election-for-electoral-college/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/10/24/last-election-for-electoral-college/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2012 23:43:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=6433</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>I'm going to paint a picture of how America could scrap the Electoral College system in the next decade, but I make no predictions whatsoever about the chances this could become reality.  You'll have to judge that sort of thing for yourselves.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/10/24/last-election-for-electoral-college/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>31</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>2012 Electoral Math -- The Race Tightens</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/10/23/2012-electoral-math-the-race-tightens/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/10/23/2012-electoral-math-the-race-tightens/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2012 23:38:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Electoral Math]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama Poll Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=6428</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>As you can see, the race has tightened considerably since the first debate.  There were more states tied during this last week than we've seen in a while, which shows up in white on the above chart.  Virginia, Colorado, and New Hampshire were all tied at one point during the period, although at the end Virginia was the only one left even.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/10/23/2012-electoral-math-the-race-tightens/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>53</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What Was The Debate Subject, Again?</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/10/22/what-was-the-debate-subject-again/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/10/22/what-was-the-debate-subject-again/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2012 04:29:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign Ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iran]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Libya]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pakistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=6418</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>To paraphrase an oldie but a goodie: "What if they had a debate and nobody read the agenda?"  Tonight's debate was, ostensibly, supposed to be on foreign policy.  However, both Mitt Romney and Barack Obama decided fairly early on that the differences between the two policy-wise were pretty small, so they both decided to hijack the foreign policy debate and instead just continue the debates on the economy, instead.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/10/22/what-was-the-debate-subject-again/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>129</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [231] -- Snappy Women Label Needed</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/10/19/ftp231/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/10/19/ftp231/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2012 23:04:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign Ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Contests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Talking Points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=6409</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>As always, we are here to bring you the burning questions of the day that nobody else is asking.  Today's question: What will we call the 2012 women?</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/10/19/ftp231/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>46</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&quot;Predict The Election&quot; Contest</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/10/17/predict-the-election-contest/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/10/17/predict-the-election-contest/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2012 01:53:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Contests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=6399</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Since everyone else in the punditary universe is rehashing last night's presidential debate, we're going to do something more frivolous and fun today.  We're going to run a "predict the election" contest for everyone to step into the pundits' shoes themselves.  Consider yourself a wonk?  Think you know better than the polls?  Ready to publicly state what your predictions are?  Well, then, get ready to play!</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/10/17/predict-the-election-contest/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>25</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama And Romney Bring Their &quot;A&quot; Game</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/10/16/obama-and-romney-bring-their-a-game/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/10/16/obama-and-romney-bring-their-a-game/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2012 03:58:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign Ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=6395</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Since I brought the subject up, however, I will jump into the "winners/losers" fray and give my snap reaction to what we all just witnessed tonight.  Barack Obama and Mitt Romney both brought their "A" game tonight, unlike Obama's first widely-panned performance.  Mitt Romney was not appreciably different tonight than the first debate, but Obama certainly had eaten his Wheaties this morning.  Or maybe the more up-to-date version is "drank his Red Bull," I really couldn't say.  This provided much more lively television, to put it mildly.  Actually, "mildly" isn't the right word, since not much of anything about tonight was mild in any way.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/10/16/obama-and-romney-bring-their-a-game/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>184</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>2012 Electoral Math -- Obama&#039;s Debate Cliff</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/10/15/2012-electoral-math-obamas-debate-cliff/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/10/15/2012-electoral-math-obamas-debate-cliff/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2012 01:41:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Electoral Math]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign Ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama Poll Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=6391</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Welcome back to our now-weekly Electoral Math column series.  In the introduction to <a href="http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/10/08/2012-electoral-math-debate-effects-remain-to-be-seen/">last week's column</a>, I warned that the full effects of the first televised presidential debate had yet to fully appear.  This week, the effects showed up in a big way -- which (as you can probably guess) was mostly good news for Mitt Romney and bad news for Barack Obama, as some of his numbers fell off a rather large cliff.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/10/15/2012-electoral-math-obamas-debate-cliff/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>19</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [230] -- Biden&#039;s Big Night</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/10/12/ftp230/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/10/12/ftp230/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2012 23:36:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign Ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Talking Points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iran]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Libya]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pakistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Vice President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=6377</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>We come to you live from the arena, the day after the vice-presidential debate.  The lights are being removed, the podiums are gone, and the cleanup crew is sweeping up the tiny, tiny pieces of Paul Ryan which were left all over the stage last night.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/10/12/ftp230/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>73</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Biden Unleashed</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/10/11/biden-unleashed/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/10/11/biden-unleashed/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2012 03:56:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign Ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Vice President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=6373</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Yesterday, I predicted the media would use some pugilistic terminology to talk about the vice-presidential debate, before it happened, to hype the event in an effort to get more people to tune in.  But I must admit, I didn't really expect the event itself to live up to the billing.<p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/10/11/biden-unleashed/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>106</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Veep Debate: Ready To Rumble?</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/10/10/veep-debate-ready-to-rumble/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/10/10/veep-debate-ready-to-rumble/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2012 00:16:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign Ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Vice President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=6369</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Before tomorrow night, we'll be hearing a whole lot of "vice-presidential debates haven't ever mattered," mostly uttered by the same people who told us, a week ago, that "presidential debates rarely change anything."  Since these nattering nabobs of negativism (to use a famous vice-presidential phrase) were wrong before, one has to at least consider that they may be wrong again.  Tomorrow's debate may matter a great deal to the voters.  The first presidential debate was watched by a jaw-dropping record number of viewers (upwards of 70 million), and it's all anyone's been talking about since in the political world (even the Big Bird stories were tied in to the debate).  So perhaps quite a few folks will tune in tomorrow night as well, and perhaps Joe Biden and Paul Ryan may prove to move public opinion this time around.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/10/10/veep-debate-ready-to-rumble/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Where&#039;s H. Ross Perot When You Need Him?</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/10/09/wheres-h-ross-perot-when-you-need-him/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/10/09/wheres-h-ross-perot-when-you-need-him/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2012 00:03:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign Ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=6365</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Taking an overview of the 2012 election can quickly lead one to some awfully cynical conclusions, such as "American politics is broken," or the more succinct "Washington is broken."  After all, politics is supposed to be about issues, but politicians (especially on the campaign trail) are more interested in high-flown language rather than getting all nitty and gritty with details.  The whole situation leaves me with a rather bizarre feeling: missing the likes of H. Ross Perot.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/10/09/wheres-h-ross-perot-when-you-need-him/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>32</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>2012 Electoral Math -- Debate Effects Remain To Be Seen</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/10/08/2012-electoral-math-debate-effects-remain-to-be-seen/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/10/08/2012-electoral-math-debate-effects-remain-to-be-seen/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Oct 2012 23:47:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Electoral Math]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign Ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama Poll Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=6359</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Among Barack Obama supporters, panic seems to be setting in after his first debate performance was roundly panned.  National polls have pulled back into a neck-and-neck contest.  This is all fun for the pundits, who (pre-debate) were on the verge of declaring the race all but over (and, hence, boring), but we hasten to remind everyone that this is <em>not</em> how we elect presidents.  The national popular vote is meaningless -- just ask Al Gore.  Presidential elections are won and lost state by state, which is how this column series examines things.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/10/08/2012-electoral-math-debate-effects-remain-to-be-seen/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>28</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [229] -- Beyond Debate</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/10/05/ftp229/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/10/05/ftp229/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Oct 2012 00:47:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign Ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Talking Points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Name-dropping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=6345</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The first presidential debate of the 2012 season happened this week, and (it pains us to say) the only person who called the outcome correctly was Chris Christie.  Last Sunday, he predicted a "game changer" of a debate, and that we'd all wake up Thursday with a whole new race and a whole new opinion of Mitt Romney.  While we rarely agree with Chris Christie about much of anything, we've got to at least hand it to him -- in the midst of the usual pre-debate expectations-lowering game, he went rogue and predicted a big win for his guy, and he turned out to be correct.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/10/05/ftp229/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>15</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Debating Formats</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/10/04/debating-formats/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/10/04/debating-formats/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Oct 2012 00:23:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign Ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=6341</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Last night's debate format was unusual in this day and age.  This was reportedly why Jim Lehrer "unretired" to moderate one last presidential debate.  It was supposed to be the crowning achievement of a stellar career which included running numerous debates in past years.  The overwhelming consensus today is that Lehrer should have stayed retired, and rested on his laurels, because if this was a crowning achievement it was more like a paper crown at a kid's birthday party.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/10/04/debating-formats/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Snap Debate Reactions</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/10/03/snap-debate-reactions/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/10/03/snap-debate-reactions/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Oct 2012 03:59:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign Ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Name-dropping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=6336</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>There is a whole lot wrong with the way the media reports debates, on that we can all agree, I think.  The overemphasis on who "won" and "lost," for starters.  The inevitable boiling-down of ninety minutes into a nine-second soundbite from both candidates (which we'll see everyone agree on by tomorrow morning).</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/10/03/snap-debate-reactions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>58</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama Poll Watch -- September, 2012</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/10/02/opw1209/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/10/02/opw1209/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2012 23:54:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign Ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama Poll Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=6330</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Shockingly, after a half a year of virtually no news whatsoever, last month was actually <em>newsworthy</em> in the world of presidential job approval polling.  Barack Obama had a good month, and hit a noteworthy milestone in the percent of Americans who approve of the job he's doing.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/10/02/opw1209/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Republicans Finally Admit Silliness Of Obama TelePrompTer Caricature</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/10/01/republicans-finally-admit-silliness-of-obama-teleprompter-caricature/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/10/01/republicans-finally-admit-silliness-of-obama-teleprompter-caricature/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2012 22:56:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Name-dropping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=6320</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>This caricature began <a href="http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/03/27/friday-talking-points-71-historically-speaking-from-a-teleprompter/">approximately</a> the day Obama took office, and has been used scathingly by Republicans over the past four years.  Obama was nothing more than a puppet, Republicans sneered, tied by the strings of his TelePrompTer, and unable to form a coherent thought or sentence on his own.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/10/01/republicans-finally-admit-silliness-of-obama-teleprompter-caricature/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>21</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
