<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>ChrisWeigant.com &#187; 2012 Elections</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.chrisweigant.com/category/elections/2012-elections/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com</link>
	<description>Reality-based political commentary</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 06:17:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [196] -- Poor Mitt?</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/02/03/ftp196/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/02/03/ftp196/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 00:10:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign Ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Free Speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Talking Points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Bill of Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Vice President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=5146</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Mitt Romney, frontrunner for the Republican nomination, announced he wasn't too worried about poor people.  Maybe it would be fun to see Romney debate Joe Biden, just because nobody would know what to expect from either of them.  Heh.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/02/03/ftp196/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>GOP PUMAs?</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/02/02/gop-pumas/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/02/02/gop-pumas/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 01:17:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=5141</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The thought which keeps flitting through my mind is whether the Republicans are going to face their own "PUMA" problem this fall.  For those who don't remember the term from 2008, PUMA stood for "Party Unity, My Ass!" and was the rallying cry of the non-existent hordes of pro-Hillary Democrats who were reportedly going to cause major disruption at the Democratic National Convention, and then throw the election to John McCain in the fall.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/02/02/gop-pumas/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>15</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama Poll Watch -- January, 2012</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/02/01/opw1201/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/02/01/opw1201/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 22:34:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama Poll Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=5135</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>President Barack Obama continued a three-month upward swing in the polls in January, with his average job approval rating for the month ticking up 1.2 points, and his disapproval rate falling by exactly the same amount.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/02/01/opw1201/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mittmentum!</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/01/31/mittmentum/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/01/31/mittmentum/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 02:57:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=5127</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>All in all, it's looking like whether Newt Gingrich wants to admit it yet or not, by Super Tuesday this race will likely be pretty much over.  Of course, this year, predictions of such a nature have certainly had a way of turning out wrong, but it's safe to say that Mitt Romney is feeling pretty good about things right about now.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/01/31/mittmentum/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Predicting Florida: Newt&#039;s Petard</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/01/30/predicting-florida-newts-petard/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/01/30/predicting-florida-newts-petard/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 01:03:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign Ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=5121</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>As we wend our way through the Republican primary season, at times predicting the outcome of a single state's race is very hard to do.  At other times, it is actually pretty easy.  Florida looks to be one of the latter.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/01/30/predicting-florida-newts-petard/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [195] -- SOTU Review</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/01/27/ftp195/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/01/27/ftp195/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jan 2012 00:27:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign Ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Libya]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=5112</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Well, that was an eventful week in politics, wasn't it?</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/01/27/ftp195/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>33</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Conservative Establishment Piles On Newt</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/01/26/conservative-establishment-piles-on-newt/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/01/26/conservative-establishment-piles-on-newt/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 00:54:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=5107</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Newt Gingrich may win the Florida Republican primary.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/01/26/conservative-establishment-piles-on-newt/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Alternative Millionaires&#039; Minimum Tax</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/01/25/the-alternative-millionaires-minimum-tax/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/01/25/the-alternative-millionaires-minimum-tax/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 00:01:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=5103</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>President Obama last night unveiled a new twist on an old idea in his State Of The Union address to Congress -- limit the loopholes and tax giveaways that very wealthy people use to reduce their taxes far below the rate honest workers pay.  Obama called for a minimum tax rate of 30 percent on income over one million dollars.  To some, this sounds like a radical idea, but it really isn't.  It is merely a refinement of a part of the tax code that has been with us for decades: the Alternative Minimum Tax.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/01/25/the-alternative-millionaires-minimum-tax/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>18</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The State Of The Union</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/01/24/the-state-of-the-union/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/01/24/the-state-of-the-union/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 05:43:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iran]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Libya]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pakistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=5098</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>I haven't written one of these snap-judgment reactions to a speech in a while, so forgive me if this is a bit choppy and disorganized.  As always, I am writing this before looking at other opinions of President Obama's just-completed State Of The Union speech.  I feel this keeps my opinion unsullied by any sort of "groupthink" effect.  Sometimes I read other speech reviews the next day and find I agree with them, sometimes not, but this way at least you know I'm not just regurgitating others' thoughts.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/01/24/the-state-of-the-union/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>28</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pure Newtonium</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/01/23/pure-newtonium/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/01/23/pure-newtonium/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 23:32:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=5093</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>What a difference a week makes, at least in the Republican primary contest.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/01/23/pure-newtonium/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>77</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [194] -- Out Of Touch</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/01/20/ftp194/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/01/20/ftp194/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jan 2012 00:31:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign Ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Talking Points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=5081</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[OK, to be completely honest, we just felt like beating up on some Republicans today.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/01/20/ftp194/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>48</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Economic Optimism?</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/01/19/economic-optimism/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/01/19/economic-optimism/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 00:19:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=5077</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>It's still early days to even know if the economy is truly about to enter a strong recovery or not.  A few data points on a graph do not always a trend line make, to put it another way.  But from what I have personally seen in previous recessions, there always seems to be a real "tipping point" where American businesses collectively decide that things are going to be better soon -- and then they start hiring people and fulfilling their own prophecy.  This could indeed be such a turning point.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/01/19/economic-optimism/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>43</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Not-Romney Race Killing Not-Romney&#039;s Chances</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/01/18/not-romney-race-killing-not-romneys-chances/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/01/18/not-romney-race-killing-not-romneys-chances/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 00:42:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=5072</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>If either Gingrich or Santorum (or even Perry) had managed to cement their status as the alpha "not-Romney" in the race at this point, they might have had a chance in that fabled "two-man race" (or, more properly, "two-man-plus-Ron-Paul race").  Adding Gingrich and Santorum's support in South Carolina easily shows that Romney could have been defeated here, if the field had narrowed.  Florida would even be in play, likely.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/01/18/not-romney-race-killing-not-romneys-chances/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>23</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Governor O&#039;Malley Is Right</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/01/17/governor-omalley-is-right/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/01/17/governor-omalley-is-right/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 00:50:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign Ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=5067</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>O'Malley makes a good point.  President Obama's re-election team should heed it.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/01/17/governor-omalley-is-right/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [193] -- Run It Up The Flagpole</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/01/13/ftp193/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/01/13/ftp193/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2012 23:50:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign Ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Talking Points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iran]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Libya]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=5055</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Not a whole lot has been happening in Washington, due to Congress being out on one of their countless month-long vacations.  Not a whole lot of Democrats have been in the news, either, since the Republican primary season is sucking all the oxygen out of the political arena right now.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/01/13/ftp193/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>81</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mitt&#039;s Tax Returns</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/01/12/mitts-tax-returns/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/01/12/mitts-tax-returns/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2012 00:19:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=5051</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>What is hiding in Mitt Romney's tax returns?</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/01/12/mitts-tax-returns/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>74</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Old-School Editorializing</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/01/10/old-school-editorializing/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/01/10/old-school-editorializing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2012 01:55:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=5042</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>What struck me about New Hampshire's contest, being in the midst of historical research into such things, was the old-school nature of the <em>Union Leader</em>, a very conservative New Hampshire newspaper.  It struck a lot of the media as interesting as well, but I didn't see anyone else commenting on such historical context.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/01/10/old-school-editorializing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Calling New Hampshire&#039;s Primary</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/01/09/calling-new-hampshires-primary/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/01/09/calling-new-hampshires-primary/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2012 23:11:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=5036</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Tomorrow, New Hampshire voters will go to their first-in-the-nation (don't-mention-Iowa-to-us-that's-a-caucus-dammit!) primary, and cast their votes in the Republican nominating contest.  Which means it's time to haul out the old crystal ball and attempt to predict what's going to happen.  If you hate these types of speculative wonktastic articles, then I strongly advise you to just close this article right now, and start a game of Angry Birds or something.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/01/09/calling-new-hampshires-primary/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [192] -- Obama Picking His Fights</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/01/06/ftp192/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/01/06/ftp192/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2012 22:56:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Talking Points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=5026</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>I have to say, while the Republicans have been having their three-ring primary circus, President Obama has been looking better and better.  Both in comparison to the Republican field (of nightmares, so to speak), and also because Obama's been making progress on his own.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/01/06/ftp192/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>160</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama Poll Watch -- December, 2011</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/01/04/opw1112/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/01/04/opw1112/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2012 23:07:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama Poll Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pakistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=5016</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>President Obama had a pretty good month last month in the job approval polls, bettering his standing in both approval and disapproval by roughly three-fourths of percentage point.  This may not sound like that big a deal, but it was the second straight month of solid gains for the president in both categories.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/01/04/opw1112/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>62</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Romney Inevitable?</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/01/03/romney-inevitable/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/01/03/romney-inevitable/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2012 04:48:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign Ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=5009</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>I thought I'd wait to write today until the Iowa results were in, because I haven't done one of these "snap judgment" sorts of things for a while.  As I begin, roughly 85 percent of the votes have been reported.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/01/03/romney-inevitable/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>18</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Predicting Iowa</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/01/02/predicting-iowa/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/01/02/predicting-iowa/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jan 2012 23:20:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign Ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=5001</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>I realize everyone is probably already sick of hearing predictions about the Iowa Republican caucuses, and if this does indeed describe you then you should probably go watch a football game or something -- because that's exactly what we're going to do today: throw prognosticatory Hawkeye darts at the wall, and take our chances as we may.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/01/02/predicting-iowa/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Question Of The Day</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/12/28/question-of-the-day/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/12/28/question-of-the-day/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Dec 2011 00:41:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4992</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[Program Note: Only a few days left in our Holiday Fundraising Drive!  If you're sending your donation in by "snail mail," drop me an email and let me know the amount, and I will add it to our total.  We're very close to reaching the goal we set, so get those last-minute donations [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/12/28/question-of-the-day/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>83</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>My 2011 &quot;McLaughlin Awards&quot; [Part 2]</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/12/23/my-2011-mclaughlin-awards-part-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/12/23/my-2011-mclaughlin-awards-part-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Dec 2011 22:08:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Libya]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Name-dropping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4982</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Her campaign so far has been the populist model for every other Democrat to mimic if they want to catch the wave of anger at Wall Street, and use it to their benefit.  Without question, Elizabeth Warren is Destined For Political Stardom.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/12/23/my-2011-mclaughlin-awards-part-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>43</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama Looking Stronger</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/12/22/obama-looking-stronger/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/12/22/obama-looking-stronger/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Dec 2011 23:58:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4978</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>President Obama is looking a lot stronger these days.  Today, especially, the president emerges as the big winner in the showdown with John Boehner and the House Republicans.  But Obama's been looking better and better all month, so Boehner caving should be seen as just the icing on the cake for Obama.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/12/22/obama-looking-stronger/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>29</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Making A List, Checking It Twice...</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/12/21/making-a-list-checking-it-twice/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/12/21/making-a-list-checking-it-twice/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Dec 2011 00:32:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Humor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Name-dropping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4972</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The Head Elf turns back to his iPad.  "Mitch McConnell says he wants some media attention.  He complains they all ignore him and run to John Boehner instead.  Boehner, on the other hand, wants <em>less</em> attention paid to the fact that he can't control his own caucus."</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/12/21/making-a-list-checking-it-twice/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>25</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>My 2011 &quot;McLaughlin Awards&quot; [Part 1]</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/12/16/my-2011-mclaughlin-awards-part-1/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/12/16/my-2011-mclaughlin-awards-part-1/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Dec 2011 01:36:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign Ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Free Speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iran]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Libya]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Name-dropping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pakistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4954</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>As always, if you disagree with any (or all) of my picks, feel free to make your own in the comments.  The categories are completely open to interpretation, and don't forget that there will be a "Part 2" column next week, so I can likely squeeze things I forgot in there.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/12/16/my-2011-mclaughlin-awards-part-1/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>33</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Call The Newtsplosion Contest</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/12/12/call-the-newtsplosion-contest/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/12/12/call-the-newtsplosion-contest/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Dec 2011 23:17:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Contests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Humor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4932</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Peggy Noonan, a consummate Washington insider with impeccable conservative credentials, recently came up with a <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970203413304577086824255350642.html?mod=WSJ_latestheadlines">nice turn of phrase</a> to describe Newt Gingrich: "He is a human hand grenade who walks around with his hand on the pin, saying, 'Watch this!' "  Back in Newt's heyday, the comic strip <em>Doonesbury</em> portrayed Gingrich as a lit bomb with a short fuse, who would occasionally explode with a bang.  Right and Left seem to be in agreement on Newt's resemblance to trinitrotoluene, in other words (or, maybe, "Newtroglycerine"?).  Which leaves only one key question to be answered: When, exactly, will this "Newtsplosion" take place?</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/12/12/call-the-newtsplosion-contest/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>57</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [191] -- The White Knight Is Talking Backwards...</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/12/09/ftp191/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/12/09/ftp191/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Dec 2011 00:01:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign Ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Talking Points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Name-dropping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4921</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>You know, it strikes me that this week may be one politics-watchers look back on when proving the thesis: "Anything can happen in politics, and usually does."  I can picture seeing some wise pundit a few years down the road making the historical reference: "Yeah, but remember when Newt Gingrich and Ron Paul were leading the polls in the Iowa caucuses?  Anything can happen... just <em>any</em>thing..."</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/12/09/ftp191/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>58</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>From The Archives -- Question For Obama: How About A Science-Based Drug Policy?</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/12/08/from-the-archives-question-for-obama-how-about-a-science-based-drug-policy/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/12/08/from-the-archives-question-for-obama-how-about-a-science-based-drug-policy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Dec 2011 00:26:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4917</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Two-and-a-half years ago, I wrote the following column, hoping that the Obama administration was going to live up to its promise to have a "science-based" drug policy.  I spoke of two examples: medical marijuana, and the "morning after" pill.  Today seemed a real good day to re-run this column.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/12/08/from-the-archives-question-for-obama-how-about-a-science-based-drug-policy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Two Ron Paul Winning Scenarios</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/12/07/two-ron-paul-winning-scenarios/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/12/07/two-ron-paul-winning-scenarios/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2011 00:05:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign Ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4911</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Since the 2012 Republican nomination fight has, so far been marked by its "anything could happen" nature, and since Ron Paul is still very much in the race in places like Iowa, let's explore how he could actually win the Republican nomination.  This scenario is unthinkable for many inside-the-Beltway types and mainstream media types alike, but since it is the height of speculation season, a winning Paul scenario is worth considering.  Two of them, in fact.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/12/07/two-ron-paul-winning-scenarios/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama Poll Watch -- November, 2011</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/12/05/opw1111/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/12/05/opw1111/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2011 22:34:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Contests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama Poll Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4892</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>This month Obama poll watchers got some good news, and some bad news.  This was capped off, at the end of the month, by the Washington punditocracy making an incredibly stupid comparison between polling for Barack Obama and Jimmy Carter -- which we will address at the end of the column (complete with a "guess the president" graph quiz, for your amusement).</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/12/05/opw1111/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>25</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Three-Dot Thursday</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/12/01/three-dot-thursday-5/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/12/01/three-dot-thursday-5/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2011 01:14:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Libya]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4867</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Collins is, I remind everyone, nominally a member of the Republican Party.  She's right -- this could defuse a major talking point for Republicans, and do it in a very elegant way.  As I said, Democrats should be beating a path to her office door, to quickly work this idea up into legislation that Democrats can support.  It is one of the best ideas I've heard all year, and it deserves serious consideration not only because the idea itself is so workable, but also for the sheer politics of it all -- this could take away a big GOP talking point, right before election season begins.  Democrats: take note!  Please....</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/12/01/three-dot-thursday-5/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>15</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Newt?  Really?</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/11/30/newt-really/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/11/30/newt-really/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2011 23:15:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign Ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4860</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>To put this another way: it is time to start taking Newt Gingrich seriously, folks.  Because he's got a solid chance of denying the Republican nomination from Mitt Romney.  For better or worse, the possibility of Newt pulling this feat off is becoming a lot more concrete.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/11/30/newt-really/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>47</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Republicans&#039; Tax Dilemma</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/11/28/republicans-tax-dilemma/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/11/28/republicans-tax-dilemma/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Nov 2011 21:46:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4832</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Have the Republicans in Congress painted themselves into a corner on taxes?  They seem to be in the position of choosing between a number of courses of action, most of which would normally be seen as going against their principles.  They may have dealt themselves a losing hand, to put it another way.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/11/28/republicans-tax-dilemma/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>43</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Republican Field Approaches Iowa And New Hampshire</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/11/21/republican-field-approaches-iowa-and-new-hampshire/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/11/21/republican-field-approaches-iowa-and-new-hampshire/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2011 23:55:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign Ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4817</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The race for the Republican presidential nomination has certainly been anything but dull this year.  Every time you turn around, it seems another name pops up as the alternative to Mitt Romney.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/11/21/republican-field-approaches-iowa-and-new-hampshire/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Deficit Committee&#039;s Trigger Lock</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/11/17/deficit-committees-trigger-lock/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/11/17/deficit-committees-trigger-lock/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Nov 2011 00:51:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4803</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>If the committee fails, though, there are supposed to be "triggers" pulled -- automatic cuts to both domestic spending and military budgets.  But you know what?  I am confident that these triggers will never be pulled.  To put it another way, these automatic cuts are never going to happen.  Oh, sure, there may be some noise about them, accompanied by handwringing and teeth-gnashing inside the Beltway, but I remain confident that the actual budget cuts will never take place.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/11/17/deficit-committees-trigger-lock/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&quot;Anybody But Romney, Inc.&quot; Announces Presidential Bid</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/11/14/anybody-but-romney-inc-announces-presidential-bid/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/11/14/anybody-but-romney-inc-announces-presidential-bid/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 22:56:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Humor]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4786</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>In a surprise move today, the seven major Republican candidates for president (who are not named "Mitt Romney") decided to merge their campaigns, and run as a single corporate "person" they are now calling "Anybody But Romney, Incorporated."</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/11/14/anybody-but-romney-inc-announces-presidential-bid/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>49</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cain&#039;s Ridiculous Lefty Conspiracy Theory</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/11/10/cains-ridiculous-lefty-conspiracy-theory/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/11/10/cains-ridiculous-lefty-conspiracy-theory/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Nov 2011 01:30:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4780</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Herman Cain is, if he can be believed, convinced that a conspiracy from the Left is responsible for the accusations of sexual harassment against him.  This is, not to put too fine a point on it, ridiculous.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/11/10/cains-ridiculous-lefty-conspiracy-theory/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>48</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Guest Column: Occupy Wall Street is Not the Tea Party of the Left</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/11/09/guest-column-occupy-wall-street-is-not-the-tea-party-of-the-left/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/11/09/guest-column-occupy-wall-street-is-not-the-tea-party-of-the-left/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Nov 2011 21:35:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Free Speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guest Authors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Bill of Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4776</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Every so often, I am so impressed by a comment to one of my columns that I offer to just turn my column over to the author, and let them have my soapbox.  This doesn't happen often, usually around once per year.
I've written a few columns so far about the Occupy Wall Street protest, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/11/09/guest-column-occupy-wall-street-is-not-the-tea-party-of-the-left/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>82</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Red State Pessimism?</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/11/08/red-state-pessimism/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/11/08/red-state-pessimism/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Nov 2011 23:10:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4773</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The author's basic premise is that Romney is a flip-flopper who can't be trusted by conservatives.  He'll win the Republican nomination, and then go on to lose to Obama next year.  The article (and the hundreds of comments) make fascinating reading.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/11/08/red-state-pessimism/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>15</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>America&#039;s First Political Sex Scandal: The Reynolds/Hamilton Affair</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/11/07/americas-first-political-sex-scandal-the-reynoldshamilton-affair/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/11/07/americas-first-political-sex-scandal-the-reynoldshamilton-affair/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Nov 2011 23:33:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Name-dropping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4768</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>While the subject of which American politician's sex scandal came first is a debatable one (such as: did Benjamin Franklin's dalliances in Paris count?), most agree that the sex-and-blackmail scandal of Alexander Hamilton was the first with any impact, from George Washington's time onwards.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/11/07/americas-first-political-sex-scandal-the-reynoldshamilton-affair/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [188] -- Why Not Occupy The Media?</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/11/04/ftp188/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/11/04/ftp188/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Nov 2011 23:50:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Free Speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Talking Points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4759</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Like many Americans, I watched the events unfold in Oakland this week with some trepidation.  Occupy Oakland tried two new tactics in protesting, and both were very successful at achieving a key goal -- that of getting your message across.  Both the general strike and the temporary port shutdown were successful, in this regard.  Later in the night, however, a group of jerks came close to ruining all this, by their criminal behavior.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/11/04/ftp188/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>138</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Championing Rapists&#039; Fatherhood Rights</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/11/02/championing-rapists-fatherhood-rights/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/11/02/championing-rapists-fatherhood-rights/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Nov 2011 22:33:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4745</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>This was, to put it mildly, completely unacceptable to a large swath of the Republican base.  Cain hastily backtracked, and is now as "pro-life" as he can humanly be, stating that abortion should be illegal in every single case -- no matter what the extenuating circumstances.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/11/02/championing-rapists-fatherhood-rights/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>24</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bank Of America Backs Down</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/11/01/bank-of-america-backs-down/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/11/01/bank-of-america-backs-down/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Nov 2011 22:58:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4741</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>This is not only a victory for consumers (and the Occupy Wall Street folks, incidentally), but a triumph of mathematics and economics.  Because it is ridiculous that big banks should even <em>contemplate</em> these fees in the first place.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/11/01/bank-of-america-backs-down/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>19</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Horrifying Hallowe&#039;en Tales, Left And Right</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/10/31/horrifying-halloween-tales-left-and-right/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/10/31/horrifying-halloween-tales-left-and-right/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Oct 2011 22:07:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Humor]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4736</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>[<em>Cue: Rattling chains and spooky organ music, topped off with a terrifying high-pitched scream...</em>]</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/10/31/horrifying-halloween-tales-left-and-right/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [187] -- GOP&#039;s 22-Week Work Year</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/10/28/ftp187/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/10/28/ftp187/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2011 23:13:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Talking Points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guest Authors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Name-dropping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4724</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>We'd like to begin today with an issue that we regularly get incensed about here, mostly because it flies under the radar of just about everyone -- including the entire media universe.  Because for once, Democrats are making the attempt to use the issue to make some political hay (even though, in this regard, they're admittedly almost as bad as the Republicans).</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/10/28/ftp187/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>32</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Rise And Fall Of Rick Perry</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/10/25/the-rise-and-fall-of-rick-perry/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/10/25/the-rise-and-fall-of-rick-perry/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Oct 2011 22:36:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign Ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4714</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Two months ago, Perry led the field with 23 percent (to Romney's 16 percent second-place).  Two months ago, Herman Cain was at five percent.  Cain is now, to be blunt, eating Perry's lunch (insert your own pizza joke here).  Even the Tea Party has all but abandoned Perry in favor of Cain, at this point.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/10/25/the-rise-and-fall-of-rick-perry/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Republicans Disrespect Iraqi Democracy</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/10/24/republicans-disrespect-iraqi-democracy/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/10/24/republicans-disrespect-iraqi-democracy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Oct 2011 00:28:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iran]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4709</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>While predictable, this reaction is absolutely ridiculous.  Every single talking point the Republicans came up with on the subject shows their almost complete lack of understanding of the basic concepts of democracy -- both here at home, and abroad.  Which is why these points need refuting, one by one.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/10/24/republicans-disrespect-iraqi-democracy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>17</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [186] -- Foreign Policy Issues Reappear</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/10/21/ftp186/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/10/21/ftp186/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Oct 2011 22:46:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign Ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Talking Points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Libya]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4698</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>It has been a big week on the foreign policy front, with the death of Libya's dictator and President Obama's announcement today that all U.S. troops would be out of Iraq by the end of this year (leaving roughly 150 to guard the embassy).  But before we get to all of that, I've got some domestic advice for the president's re-election team.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/10/21/ftp186/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>16</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Republicans Attack Cain&#039;s 9-9-9 Plan</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/10/19/republicans-attack-cains-9-9-9-plan/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/10/19/republicans-attack-cains-9-9-9-plan/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Oct 2011 00:10:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign Ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4688</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Last night, at yet another Republican presidential candidate debate, Herman Cain was roundly criticized for his simplistic 9-9-9 tax plan by his fellow Republicans.  I have to admit, it was a little bizarre (in a "Nixon goes to China" sort of way) to see Republicans disparaging a tax plan for being "regressive."  Ron Paul was unafraid to actually use this word, and while several other candidates avoided the term they in essence leveled the same charge: 9-9-9 would wind up <em>increasing</em> taxes on the poor and the middle class.  Being Republicans, though, they didn't also speak of the other side of this coin -- the fact that 9-9-9 would lower taxes on the wealthy and <em>really</em> lower them on the ultra-wealthy.  But still, it was odd enough to see candidate after candidate speak of their concern for the tax burden of the lower-class and middle-class, since this is usually a Democratic argument.  Perhaps all those 99 Percenters out there demonstrating in the streets are getting through to the Republican politicians?  Stranger things have happened.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/10/19/republicans-attack-cains-9-9-9-plan/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>23</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Quick Separation-Of-Powers Historical Footnote</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/10/18/a-quick-separation-of-powers-historical-footnote/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/10/18/a-quick-separation-of-powers-historical-footnote/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Oct 2011 00:07:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4684</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The issue of what, exactly, "three co-equal branches" means in American government -- and, more importantly, what happens when two of them disagree -- goes back a long way.  Further than Franklin Roosevelt, further even than Abraham Lincoln.  The first president to truly tangle with the Supreme Court was actually Andrew Jackson, who fought the court on two separate issues: Jackson's policy of "Indian removal," and the Second Bank of the United States.  The first one is where Jackson responded (according to legend -- he may not have actually said this) to a court ruling against him: "John Marshall has made his decision; now let him enforce it!"  By doing so, Jackson was stating his open defiance of a Supreme Court decision, and pointing out that the Executive Branch actually controlled the levers of federal power, and not the Judicial Branch.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/10/18/a-quick-separation-of-powers-historical-footnote/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>From The Archives -- Church And State Revisited: The Story Of Smoot</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/10/13/from-the-archives-church-and-state-revisited-the-story-of-smoot-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/10/13/from-the-archives-church-and-state-revisited-the-story-of-smoot-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Oct 2011 23:57:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Bill of Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4660</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Because Mormonism is in the news again, due to a Rick Perry supporter calling it a "cult," I thought it was high time to re-run the following column.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/10/13/from-the-archives-church-and-state-revisited-the-story-of-smoot-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Surveying GOP Field</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/10/12/surveying-gop-field/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/10/12/surveying-gop-field/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Oct 2011 23:24:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign Ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4653</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The last time we wrote, Rick Perry had just jumped in the race.  Since then, nobody else has gotten in, while two prominent names decided to sit this one out.  Several candidates caught fire, and several also burned out (at least, poll-wise).  So it goes, on the campaign merry-go-round.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/10/12/surveying-gop-field/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>When The People Lead</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/10/11/when-the-people-lead/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/10/11/when-the-people-lead/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Oct 2011 23:34:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4649</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The idea behind that title is: "When the People lead, the leaders will follow."  I read this on a bumpersticker a few decades ago, although I must admit I haven't bothered to research the phrase's origins.  Wherever it came from, the idea is a simple (and amusing) one: when the so-called "leaders" aren't leading, then the People will step in and do it for them.  Eventually, the "leaders" will wake up to what is going on and get on board themselves, pretending to have led the movement all along.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/10/11/when-the-people-lead/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Marijuana Prohibition&#039;s Legal Insanity Continues</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/10/10/marijuana-prohibitions-legal-insanity-continues/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/10/10/marijuana-prohibitions-legal-insanity-continues/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Oct 2011 22:54:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4643</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Like many other Americans, I thoroughly enjoyed watching historical documentarian Ken Burns' recent <em>Prohibition</em> series, on PBS.  But I was disappointed by its abrupt end.  Burns took the easy way out and didn't point out that right around the same time the legal federal prohibition on alcohol ended, the prohibition of marijuana was ramping up in a big way.  And, while the alcohol-targeted Prohibition ended, this prohibition remains.  In, fact, it is getting worse, as the Obama administration is continuing a crackdown on anyone who is approaching the problem in any sort of sane or rational manner -- including local and state government officials.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/10/10/marijuana-prohibitions-legal-insanity-continues/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [184] -- Long Live Steve Jobs</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/10/07/ftp184/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/10/07/ftp184/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Oct 2011 23:39:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Talking Points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Name-dropping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4629</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>A corporate leader passed away this week, and millions mourned his passing and celebrated his life.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/10/07/ftp184/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>17</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama Poll Watch -- September, 2011</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/10/06/opw1109/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/10/06/opw1109/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Oct 2011 22:49:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama Poll Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4622</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Barack Obama's poll numbers in September were not good.  In fact, they were pretty bad.  Obama fans looking for good news will have to be content with the fact that at least Obama seems to be slowing the trend of his dropping numbers somewhat.  This isn't exactly a turnaround for him, but September was a lot less of a drastic change than the three months which preceded it.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/10/06/opw1109/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>And Then There Was One...</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/10/04/and-then-there-was-one/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/10/04/and-then-there-was-one/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Oct 2011 22:49:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4611</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The media, of course, likely won't believe Christie -- at least until he says "No" several more times.  Last week he gave a speech that created a media frenzy, and in the question-and-answer period responded to the twenty-millionth time he was asked exactly the same question that there was a "mashup" video available online of him saying "No" <em>over and freakin' over again</em>, and anyone who was interested in the answer should just go review this video.  The media forgot to report this, and instead focused on what they decided was a more ambivalent answer to being asked the same question for the twenty-million-and-one-th time.  "Christie Might Run!" was the headline they decided to go with.  They were bored, quite obviously, and attacked with the ferocity of a shark pack with chum in the water.  The fact that there actually <em>was no actual chum</em> didn't even seem to faze them.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/10/04/and-then-there-was-one/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>26</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [183] -- What I&#039;d Call &quot;Class Warfare&quot;</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/09/30/ftp183/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/09/30/ftp183/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2011 23:26:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Talking Points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Humor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4590</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Last week (as with this week) the subject <em>de semaine</em> was "class warfare."  The comment which inspired this week's mini-rants contained a simple, repetitive concept: "When [something outrageous pushed by Republicans happens], nobody calls it 'class warfare'.  Maybe we should."</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/09/30/ftp183/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>62</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>GOP Field Wide Open?</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/09/29/gop-field-wide-open/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/09/29/gop-field-wide-open/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2011 23:34:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4585</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The Republican presidential field continues to defy the expectations and easy story lines from the political media and the rest of the inside-the-Beltway crowd.  Just last week, this was supposed to now be "a two-man race," but in a week's time the story has shifted to almost utter chaos.  A new Fox News poll out shows that the easy read of the electorate the media was pushing last week is now completely wrong.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/09/29/gop-field-wide-open/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Republican Primary Scheduling Headaches</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/09/28/republican-primary-scheduling-headaches/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/09/28/republican-primary-scheduling-headaches/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2011 23:27:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4579</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Instead I'd like to talk about the backroom struggling within the Republican Party this week which is a lot more interesting and will likely be a lot more germane to the race -- the question of who goes first (or, more to the point, who goes <em>fifth</em>) in the Republican primary calendar.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/09/28/republican-primary-scheduling-headaches/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Memo To Rick Perry</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/09/26/memo-to-rick-perry/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/09/26/memo-to-rick-perry/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Sep 2011 22:38:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign Ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Humor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4569</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Well, it's been great fun and all, but we are sorry to inform you that your viable candidacy for the Republican presidential nomination is hereby over.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/09/26/memo-to-rick-perry/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>15</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [182] -- Class Warfare?  Hardly.</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/09/23/ftp182/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/09/23/ftp182/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Sep 2011 23:12:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Talking Points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4556</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>A satellite is falling out of the sky, but it probably won't hit anybody.  Probably.  I personally got over this fear by listening to Creedence Clearwater Revival's "It Came Out Of The Sky" (which I heartily recommend, just on general principles).</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/09/23/ftp182/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>27</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Thinning The Debate Herd</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/09/22/thinning-the-debate-herd/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/09/22/thinning-the-debate-herd/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Sep 2011 22:03:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4553</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>At some point, television is going to have to start limiting which Republican candidates get invited to the debates.  The herd of hopefuls must be thinned.  This may happen soon, and tonight may be the last of the mega-debates of the season.  One can only hope.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/09/22/thinning-the-debate-herd/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Elizabeth Warren&#039;s Campaign Takes Off</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/09/21/elizabeth-warrens-campaign-takes-off/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/09/21/elizabeth-warrens-campaign-takes-off/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Sep 2011 23:27:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4545</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Elizabeth Warren is a polarizing figure.  Liberals love her with a fierce passion.  Republicans hate her with a fiery passion.  What this means is that lots and lots of money from outside the state will be pumped into this race.  The reason why Democrats are going to be watching this race closer than any other Senate race next year is easy to see: this may be the only state Democrats have a good chance to pick up a seat from the Republicans.  The math isn't good for Democrats this time around in the Senate, and they are in danger of losing control of the chamber next year.  Warren may be the sole bright spot in this environment for Democrats.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/09/21/elizabeth-warrens-campaign-takes-off/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>18</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama Redefines Populism</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/09/19/obama-redefines-populism/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/09/19/obama-redefines-populism/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Sep 2011 23:57:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4535</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>"Populism" is a word that gets thrown around with abandon by folks masquerading as journalists on television these days.  Sarah Palin had the word used to describe her, and later, the entire Tea Party movement was labeled "populist" by the chattering classes.  Today, President Obama unveiled a truly populist agenda, by proposing to tax millionaires at the same tax rate that middle-class Americans pay.  By doing so, Obama will (hopefully) redefine the term "populism" in the political conversation.  Or, to be technical, he will re-redefine the word back to what it originally meant.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/09/19/obama-redefines-populism/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [181] -- Ads Obama Should Run</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/09/16/ftp181/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/09/16/ftp181/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Sep 2011 23:08:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign Ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Talking Points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Name-dropping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4524</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Since the president is not facing a primary challenger, and since the president has raised a whopping big pile of money already, and (most importantly) since the president has rediscovered the joys of speaking directly to the American people about his agenda -- why not buy some political ads, now?</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/09/16/ftp181/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>39</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Merkley&#039;s Right: CBO Should Score Jobs</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/09/14/merkleys-right-cbo-should-score-jobs/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/09/14/merkleys-right-cbo-should-score-jobs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Sep 2011 22:52:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4518</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Senator Jeff Merkley of Oregon has just proposed a stunningly good idea: for all legislation which emerges from the joint committee charged with lowering the deficit, direct the congressional "scoring" referee not only to provide the numbers for the impact on the federal budget, but also to provide data on the impact on the unemployment rate and the jobs situation.  This is such an excellent idea, both on its merits and politically, that it should immediately be supported by all Democrats.  Because it would force the public debate to cover the entire scope of the proposals being offered up, and it would do so by providing the data the public most cares about right now: how will this create or destroy jobs?</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/09/14/merkleys-right-cbo-should-score-jobs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>17</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Will Palin Go Rogue?</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/09/12/will-palin-go-rogue/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/09/12/will-palin-go-rogue/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Sep 2011 22:17:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Name-dropping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4511</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>"What will Sarah do?" has been a question on the minds of many in the run-up to the Republican primary season next year.  Definitively figuring out the answer to this question is a fool's game, however, because Sarah Palin continually shows the ability to surprise the punditocracy, the public, and the Republican establishment.  Only Palin herself is ever confident of knowing what Sarah will do next, in other words.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/09/12/will-palin-go-rogue/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>28</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [180] -- Give &#039;Em Hell, Barry!</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/09/09/ftp180/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/09/09/ftp180/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Sep 2011 00:02:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign Ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Talking Points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4503</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>President Barack Obama opened his re-election campaign last night with a wowzer of a speech to a joint session of Congress.  But we'll get to that in detail in a minute.  First, we must mark an important anniversary this week.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/09/09/ftp180/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>22</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama Poll Watch -- August, 2011</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/09/05/opw1108/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/09/05/opw1108/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Sep 2011 23:19:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama Poll Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4485</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>For President Obama, August is indeed the cruelest month.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/09/05/opw1108/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [179] -- Labor Daze</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/09/02/ftp179/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/09/02/ftp179/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Sep 2011 23:06:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Talking Points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4470</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>It surpasses all irony and actually enters into the realm of bitter humor that we're about to celebrate Labor Day when the unemployment rate remains at the sky-high level of 9.1 percent.  There are millions of Americans who are <em>not</em> laboring for a paycheck this year, and they have nothing at all to celebrate.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/09/02/ftp179/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>28</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ron Paul Versus Government</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/08/29/ron-paul-versus-government/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/08/29/ron-paul-versus-government/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Aug 2011 23:36:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4460</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>To his supporters, one of Ron Paul's most endearing qualities is his forthrightness.  Paul doesn't mince words, he tells you to your face exactly what he thinks.  And, to give the man credit, he keeps to his positions even when it would be a lot easier for him to either fudge an answer or tone down his beliefs, the way most politicians do (at certain times).</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/08/29/ron-paul-versus-government/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Taking Rick Perry Seriously</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/08/24/taking-rick-perry-seriously/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/08/24/taking-rick-perry-seriously/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Aug 2011 00:12:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4442</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>This should force pundits across the political spectrum to re-evaluate Rick Perry's campaign.  Instead of seeing through the lens of: "what my circle of friends thinks of Rick Perry's gaffes," this time the pundits should focus a little more closely on: "what Republican primary voters think of Rick Perry as a candidate."  Because, so far, they seem to be flocking to support Perry -- to the visible detriment of Mitt Romney's standing in the polls.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/08/24/taking-rick-perry-seriously/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>15</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [178] -- Phony Vacation Outrage</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/08/19/ftp178/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/08/19/ftp178/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Aug 2011 23:52:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign Ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Talking Points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4422</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>It's silly season in the political world, once again.  And this year -- just like every year a Democrat occupies the White House -- an old favorite of a story is making the rounds.  It involves some very thinly-veneered outrage, which is completely fabricated and hypocritical in the extreme.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/08/19/ftp178/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>GOP Field Tightens</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/08/15/gop-field-tightens/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/08/15/gop-field-tightens/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Aug 2011 23:32:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4411</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Almost a full month ago, I placed four names in the "Frontrunners" category: Michele Bachmann, Sarah Palin, Rick Perry, and Mitt Romney.  This list hasn't changed at all, although Palin will fall back the next time around if she doesn't announce in the next three or four weeks (more on this in a bit).</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/08/15/gop-field-tightens/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>41</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [177] -- Corporations Are People, Mitt?</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/08/12/ftp177/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/08/12/ftp177/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Aug 2011 00:17:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Talking Points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4402</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>But perhaps I'm being too harsh.  The reason the clip was edited down so much was that the <em>other</em> heckling clip was <em>so much better</em> -- Romney misspeaking, and then instead of just immediately walking it back, actually digging the hole deeper.  In answer to a question about raising taxes on corporations, Romney answered (at first) that he wasn't going to raise taxes "on people."  When the questioner yelled back "Corporations, not people!" Romney could easily have said something along the lines of "Sorry, I meant to say corporations -- I'm actually not going to raise taxes on people <em>or</em> on corporations, and here's why...."  It would have just melded the whole thing into standard Republican dogma, and Romney would have been safe.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/08/12/ftp177/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>36</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Wisconsin&#039;s Vote More Important Than Iowa&#039;s</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/08/08/wisconsins-vote-more-important-than-iowas/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/08/08/wisconsins-vote-more-important-than-iowas/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Aug 2011 23:52:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4381</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>This week is being touted, in the political world, as a big week in the state of Iowa.  There will be a nationally-televised Republican presidential candidate debate, and then a few days later the Ames Straw Poll will take place.  The straw poll is (as always) being hyped in the media as the "first voting" in the upcoming presidential nominating contest.  But the media should pay more attention to what is happening in Wisconsin this week, because rather than some "vote"-buying exercise (that always proves itself to be completely meaningless in the grand scheme of the presidential election process), Wisconsin could prove to be a much better weathervane in terms of predicting which way the political winds will be blowing, come next year.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/08/08/wisconsins-vote-more-important-than-iowas/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [176] -- More Tea, Anyone?</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/08/05/ftp176/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/08/05/ftp176/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Aug 2011 23:34:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Talking Points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Vice President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4371</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>With the conclusion of the debt ceiling "crisis," the media pivoted swiftly to their standard larger questions (to them, at any rate) about any political event these days: "Who won?  Who lost?"</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/08/05/ftp176/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>100</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Which Three Democratic Senators?</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/08/01/which-three-democratic-senators/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/08/01/which-three-democratic-senators/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Aug 2011 23:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4348</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The House and Senate are getting ready to vote on the deal struck to avoid America defaulting on her debts.  Nobody knows exactly the magnitude of what is being cut in detail yet, and the news media seem more interested in the eternal "who's up/who's down" horserace nonsense than in informing the public what exactly has been agreed to in this deal.  This should come as no surprise, since it is (as always) <em>ever</em> so much more fun for "journalists" to blather on about "what it all means" seen through the political lens, instead of "what it all means" in terms of... well, what it <em>actually is going to mean</em> for America.  Perhaps in a few days, when they get bored with the political aspects, we'll finally find out exactly what the cuts are going to cover.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/08/01/which-three-democratic-senators/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>22</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [175] -- In The Darkest Depths Of Mordor</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/07/29/ftp175/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/07/29/ftp175/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jul 2011 23:37:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Talking Points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Name-dropping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4338</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>If I were a Hobbit, right about now I would be wondering just <em>how the heck</em> I wound up at the center of this Washington intraparty political fight, personally.  What (I would ponder in my metaphorical Hobbit hole) had I done to <em>any of these folks</em> to deserve being dragged into this fracas?</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/07/29/ftp175/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>54</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Can Speaker Boehner Survive?</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/07/28/can-speaker-boehner-survive/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/07/28/can-speaker-boehner-survive/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jul 2011 23:33:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4334</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>As I write this, the House of Representatives has still not voted on Speaker John Boehner's plan to raise the debt ceiling.  But no matter how the vote goes, the real question behind this week's action in the Republican caucus in the House may be whether Boehner will still be Speaker when the shouting's over and done.  The simmering Tea Party factionalism may be about to explode into public view, in other words.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/07/28/can-speaker-boehner-survive/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>29</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Congress&#039; Real Deadline: Summer Vacation</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/07/27/congress-real-deadline-summer-vacation/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/07/27/congress-real-deadline-summer-vacation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jul 2011 22:07:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4326</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>There are now only a handful of possible outcomes of the debt ceiling standoff in Washington.  We'll get to them all in a minute in more detail.  One way or another, it's a pretty safe bet that the issue will (at least temporarily) be resolved by the fifth of August, at the absolute latest.  Bank on it.  The reason for such certainty is a simple one: if the debate goes on in any way <em>past</em> that date, then it will start to cut into Congress' month-long summer vacation.  Which is (as any observer of American politics should know full well) the <em>one unthinkable bridge-too-far</em> in Washington.  Because Congress' vacations are sacred... at least, to them.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/07/27/congress-real-deadline-summer-vacation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>20</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Another Debt Commission?  Really?</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/07/25/another-debt-commission-really/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/07/25/another-debt-commission-really/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jul 2011 23:11:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Vice President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4314</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>There is a grand tradition in Washington -- which is followed by both parties, at various times -- of avoiding big and politically-delicate problems.  This tradition used to be called the "blue-ribbon commission," although for some reason the "blue-ribbon" part isn't used much anymore.  But whatever you call it, this political dodge is created for one purpose and one purpose alone: to waste time.  To the best of my knowledge, no commission (blue-ribbon or otherwise bedecked) has ever come up with a solution to anything which has been thus implemented by the politicians (again, of <em>either</em> party) to solve a big problem (although you could make an argument for the base-closing commission, I guess).  But virtually <em>all</em> of these commissions have succeeded wildly on their main objective of wasting as much time as possible.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/07/25/another-debt-commission-really/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>16</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [174] -- What Would Ronald Reagan Do?</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/07/22/ftp174/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/07/22/ftp174/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jul 2011 00:12:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Talking Points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4303</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The bigger space news this week, sadly, was not that exciting.  The final space shuttle mission just ended.  Although I didn't see it specifically, a newspaper headline-writer with a sense of irony would have set the story under: "The Shuttle Has Landed."  Because this week also saw an anniversary of import to the discussion -- 42 years ago this Wednesday, Neil Armstrong radioed back to Houston the immortal phrase: "The <em>Eagle</em> has landed," marking the first safe landing on Earth's natural satellite by the human species.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/07/22/ftp174/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>81</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Breaking Down The Polling Numbers</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/07/21/breaking-down-the-polling-numbers/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/07/21/breaking-down-the-polling-numbers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jul 2011 00:51:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4295</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>This is but one poll, to be sure.  But most of the other polls I've seen this week back up the data presented here.  Americans are turned off by Republican extremism, and open to Democrats' willingness to compromise.  They are disgusted with the way the lawmakers in Washington are operating, and they may just take out this anger next year at the polls.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/07/21/breaking-down-the-polling-numbers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>2012 Republican Presidential Field Update</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/07/18/2012-republican-presidential-field-update/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/07/18/2012-republican-presidential-field-update/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2011 22:24:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4276</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>In the past few weeks, one rising star has appeared in the Republican firmament (or two, depending on how you count them), and more than a few have begun fading -- perhaps permanently -- from center stage.  But the field itself is not yet set (in terms of who is actually running and who will sit this one out), as the Republican Party continues to search for the perfect candidate to defeat President Obama.  In fact, two of our four frontrunners this time around have not even announced their candidacy yet -- showing how volatile the entire race still remains.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/07/18/2012-republican-presidential-field-update/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [173] -- Obama 2.0?</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/07/15/ftp173/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/07/15/ftp173/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jul 2011 23:50:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Talking Points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Libya]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Vice President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4262</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Are we seeing the new model of Barack Obama's presidency?  Is this (in the parlance of Silicon Valley) "Obama 2.0"?</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/07/15/ftp173/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>36</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Light Bulb Moment</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/07/12/light-bulb-moment/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/07/12/light-bulb-moment/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jul 2011 00:28:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4246</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>I should begin by saying that if you have no idea what I'm talking about at all, you are in good company.  Most Americans don't even know there's a light bulb debate happening right now in Congress.  If you live in California, however, you likely have already realized what is going on: standard light bulbs are being effectively banned.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/07/12/light-bulb-moment/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [172] -- Obama&#039;s Fourteenth Option</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/07/08/ftp172/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/07/08/ftp172/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jul 2011 22:44:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Talking Points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Bill of Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4225</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The silly season has come early to Washington, it seems.  The root cause is a simple fact of American politics these days -- sometimes, there just can't be transparency.  That's a fairly provocative statement, so allow me to explain my reasoning in detail.  Then, later on (in the talking points section of our program), we'll get into the option of the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution, and how Obama should be using it right about now.  But for now, it's time for a sober assessment of where Washington currently stands.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/07/08/ftp172/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>25</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dismal Media Poll Numbers</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/07/05/dismal-media-poll-numbers/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/07/05/dismal-media-poll-numbers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jul 2011 23:50:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4206</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The mainstream media love to use opinion poll numbers to highlight the American public's disapproval of certain persons and institutions.  But there's one poll number they never seem to get around to adequately reporting: their own.  There's a reason for this, and it is a simple one.  The media doesn't report their own poll numbers because their poll numbers stink, and it's less embarrassing to just ignore this fact rather than to report it.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/07/05/dismal-media-poll-numbers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [171] -- Excerpting Obama&#039;s Press Conference</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/07/01/ftp171/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/07/01/ftp171/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jul 2011 23:29:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Talking Points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4187</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Since the year is now exactly half over, I took the opportunity yesterday to <a href="http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/06/30/obamas-right-congress-doesnt-work/">tally up</a> how much vacation time Congress has taken this year, so far.  The answer is pretty shocking -- the House has taken 46 out of a possible 125 non-holiday weekdays off, and the Senate (not to be outdone) has gone on vacation for 49 days out of those 125.  To put this another way, out of 26 weeks Congress could have worked, the House took over <em>nine weeks</em> off on vacation, and the Senate took almost <em>ten weeks</em> to play rather than work.  Something for everyone to ponder as we all enjoy our measly three-day vacation this weekend!</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/07/01/ftp171/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bachmann Rising, Palin Fading?</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/06/27/bachmann-rising-palin-fading/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/06/27/bachmann-rising-palin-fading/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jun 2011 23:15:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4163</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Michele Bachmann's political fortunes are visibly on the rise.  Mostly due to a well-received debate performance and a single good poll in Iowa, Bachmann is now the newest shining star to emerge on the stage of the Republican presidential nomination contest.  Whether she later proves to be a flavor-of-the-week or whether she actually has staying power is still an open question, at this point.  But what appears increasingly obvious is that Bachmann's rise is coming at the expense of another Republican woman's draw on the Republican primary electorate: Sarah Palin.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/06/27/bachmann-rising-palin-fading/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [170] -- Newt Loses Two, Huntsman Gains An &quot;H&quot;</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/06/24/ftp170/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/06/24/ftp170/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jun 2011 23:13:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Talking Points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Libya]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Bill of Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Vice President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4150</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Well, it's certainly been an eventful couple of weeks, hasn't it?</p>
<p>We're back on our regular weekly schedule here after returning home from our second trip this month (this one to Netroots Nation), after which I can firmly conclude that flying, these days, sucks.  Big time.  Sigh.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/06/24/ftp170/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>16</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The 2012 Republican Presidential Field</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/06/13/the-2012-republican-presidential-field/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/06/13/the-2012-republican-presidential-field/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jun 2011 23:32:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4111</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The Republican presidential field for the 2012 presidential election will be on full display this evening, as CNN airs the second nationally-televised candidate debate, this one from the early-voting state of New Hampshire.  Since the first debate was a little light on heavyweight candidates, this is the first chance a lot of Republican primary voters will have to assess the biggest names in the race.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/06/13/the-2012-republican-presidential-field/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [169] -- Weiner Roast</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/06/10/ftp169/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/06/10/ftp169/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jun 2011 22:40:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Free Speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Talking Points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Bill of Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4093</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Having just gotten back from a trip abroad where the news was dominated by the story of a politician facing severe consequences (and the end of his political career) for his sexual misconduct, I opened up the pages of the American news to find... well, pretty much the same thing.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/06/10/ftp169/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama Poll Watch -- May, 2011</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/05/26/opw1105/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/05/26/opw1105/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 May 2011 06:04:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama Poll Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pakistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4047</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>This month was the best month President Barack Obama has ever had in the polls, when measured as change over the previous month.  If you count it one way (measured by absolute values) Obama's best month was technically the second month into his term -- when he was still enjoying his "honeymoon" period, and had 63.4 percent support from the public.  But in terms of actually <em>changing</em> public opinion, May was indeed the best month Obama's had, by far.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/05/26/opw1105/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Spinning Hochul&#039;s Special Election Win</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/05/25/spinning-hochuls-special-election-win/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/05/25/spinning-hochuls-special-election-win/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 May 2011 23:39:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4031</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Sometimes special elections are harbingers of things to come.  And sometimes they are not.  The tricky part is that nobody can tell the difference until long afterwards.  Which certainly doesn't stop rampant speculation in the meantime.  Last night, a Democrat pulled off a surprising upset in New York's 26th congressional district, in an election that was forced due to the resignation of a House member who got caught trolling the internet (with shirtless pictures, no less) for extramarital fun and games.  What this signifies for the 2012 election is anyone's guess, at this point.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/05/25/spinning-hochuls-special-election-win/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Republican Field Shaping Up</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/05/23/republican-field-shaping-up/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/05/23/republican-field-shaping-up/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 May 2011 23:34:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4018</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>With all this frantic jumping in and out of the race, I thought it was time to take another look at the Republican field to see how it is shaping up.  At this point, there are only a few holdouts left on the sidelines, as most of the bigwigs (and some decidedly "smallwigs") have made their intentions known.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/05/23/republican-field-shaping-up/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>22</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

