<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>ChrisWeigant.com &#187; 2008 Elections</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.chrisweigant.com/category/elections/2008-elections/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com</link>
	<description>Reality-based political commentary</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 May 2026 23:36:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>A New York State Of Mind</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2024/09/26/a-new-york-state-of-mind/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2024/09/26/a-new-york-state-of-mind/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Sep 2024 22:57:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2020 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Impeachment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=25583</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>In a surprise turn of events, the mayor of New York City will <em>not</em> now go on to run for president.  Or maybe that should read: In a surprise turn of events, this time it wasn't the <em>governor</em> of New York caught in a career-ending scandal, but instead just the mayor of New York City.</p>
<p>That's the way I reacted to hearing <a href="https://www.nytimes.com/live/2024/09/26/nyregion/eric-adams-indicted-news">the breaking news</a> that New York City Mayor Eric Adams had been indicted on five federal charges, including bribery and money-laundering: "Wait... the <em>mayor</em>?  Shouldn't that be the <em>governor</em>?!?"  I apologize to Governor Kathy Hochul for this knee-jerk reaction, since (as of yet) she has not been implicated in any career-ending scandal.  But it should be a forgivable reaction, after reviewing the recent history of both offices.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2024/09/26/a-new-york-state-of-mind/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Let New Hampshire Go First</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2023/01/26/let-new-hampshire-go-first/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2023/01/26/let-new-hampshire-go-first/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2023 00:17:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2020 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2024 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign Ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voting Rights]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=23111</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>At President Joe Biden's urging, the Democratic National Committee has picked a big and (in my opinion) a completely unnecessary fight with the state of New Hampshire.  Last year, when the party met to decide which states would go first in the presidential primary calendar, Biden blindsided just about everyone with his own preferred schedule.  Earlier, the party had announced there would be a free-for-all for states to apply for early primary slots, which was largely seen as a convenient way to demote Iowa from the early states, for multiple reasons (the largest being how incompetent they had been in 2020).  This conventional wisdom held that one or perhaps even two other additional states would be elevated to the ranks of the early-voting states, again for multiple reasons.  But few predicted that New Hampshire would be affected.  This proved to be wrong, as Biden released his preferred schedule: South Carolina would be the "first in the nation" state, followed by Nevada and New Hampshire three days later (both voting on the same day).  Yesterday, the party met again and instead of locking in Biden's new schedule, gave two states until June to comply with the new setup -- New Hampshire and Georgia (which was newly elevated into the ranks of early-voting states).</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2023/01/26/let-new-hampshire-go-first/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>In Praise Of Sarah Palin</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2020/08/13/in-praise-of-sarah-palin/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2020/08/13/in-praise-of-sarah-palin/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2020 23:09:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2020 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign Ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Humor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Vice President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=19076</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>In the midst of political divisions deeper and wider than ever before, we just got an unexpected bit of bipartisanship from an extremely unexpected source -- former vice-presidential candidate Sarah Palin.  In the same spirit, I would like to offer up my words of praise for her taking a far different tack from pretty much the entire Republican Party on the nomination of Kamala Harris as Joe Biden's running mate.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2020/08/13/in-praise-of-sarah-palin/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>46</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Electoral Math -- It&#039;s That Time Again...</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2020/07/13/electoral-math-its-that-time-again/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2020/07/13/electoral-math-its-that-time-again/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2020 01:58:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2008 Electoral Math]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Electoral Math]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2016 Electoral Math]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2020 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2020 Electoral Math]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Vice President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=18892</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Welcome to the first 2020 installment of our quadrennial series tracking the electoral math in the presidential race.  We've done this three times previously, and (like pretty much everyone else in the political prediction game) failed miserably the last time around.  Hey, two out of three ain't bad, right?</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2020/07/13/electoral-math-its-that-time-again/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>136</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Democrats United</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2020/04/15/democrats-united/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2020/04/15/democrats-united/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2020 00:02:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2016 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2020 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign Ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Impeachment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Vice President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=18401</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>For the first time since 2004, Democrats are united in the spring of a presidential election year.  The primary season is essentially over, with only one candidate left standing.  All the other candidates of note have now endorsed presumptive nominee Joe Biden.  This is downright remarkable when you consider where we were just a few short months ago.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2020/04/15/democrats-united/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>62</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Third Debate&#039;s Effect On The Democratic Polls</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/09/23/the-third-debates-effect-on-the-democratic-polls/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/09/23/the-third-debates-effect-on-the-democratic-polls/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Sep 2019 00:44:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2020 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign Ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Vice President]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ukraine]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=17436</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Well, the numbers are in, so it's time to take another look at the Democratic horserace, after the third debate shook things up a bit.  There are new polls out at both the national level and in Iowa, the Democratic National Committee just announced the new criteria for the fifth debate (to happen in November), and the field continues to shrink as time goes by.  So a lot's been going on out on the hustings.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/09/23/the-third-debates-effect-on-the-democratic-polls/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>126</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Contemplating The 2020 Primary Calendar</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/09/03/contemplating-the-2020-primary-calendar/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/09/03/contemplating-the-2020-primary-calendar/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Sep 2019 23:50:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2016 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2020 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign Ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=17350</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Labor Day is the official kickoff of the fall campaign season, when voters increasingly begin to pay attention to the presidential race.  Or so the pundits claim, at any rate.  Whether this week will be much different than last week is yet to be determined, but I for one am going to hang on to that lazy hazy summer glow for one more day by taking a look much farther into the future and contemplating the start of this cycle's primary calendar in a big-picture sort of fashion.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/09/03/contemplating-the-2020-primary-calendar/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points -- Cavuto Dumps On Trump!</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/08/30/ftp540/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/08/30/ftp540/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Aug 2019 02:02:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2018 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2020 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign Ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Free Speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Talking Points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mexico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North Korea]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Russia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Vice President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=17338</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>You know things are getting bad in Trumpland when Our Dear Leader is openly attacking Fox News for not being servile enough.</p>
<p>In a series of angry tweets, Trump this week <a href="https://www.huffpost.com/entry/trump-tweets-fox-isnt-working-for-us-after-its-amicable-interview-with-dnc-staffer_n_5d66939ee4b01fcc690d2f5d">called Fox News</a> "HOPELESS &#038; CLUELESS" and ended his rant with:</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/08/30/ftp540/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>29</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is It Really True That &quot;No One Is Above The Law&quot;?</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/07/24/is-it-really-true-that-no-one-is-above-the-law/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/07/24/is-it-really-true-that-no-one-is-above-the-law/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jul 2019 00:09:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2020 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=17154</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>While plenty of others have plenty of other things to say today about Robert Mueller's testimony in front of two House committees, what struck me the most was a rather large unanswered question.  Indeed, it was hard to actually avoid thinking about the concept, because in the first hearing most of the Democrats finished their five minutes with some form of the following declaration: "No one is above the law," sometimes adding: "...not even a president" and sometimes just leaving it implied.  But does this phrase have any real-world meaning or is it just so much sanctimonious nonsense?</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/07/24/is-it-really-true-that-no-one-is-above-the-law/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>139</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Inevitability Of Legalization</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/07/17/the-inevitability-of-legalization/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/07/17/the-inevitability-of-legalization/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jul 2019 00:19:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2016 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2020 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Name-dropping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=17122</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Attending the breakout sessions on marijuana legal reform at Netroots Nation has only gotten better and better over the years.  Each year's panel is unique, of course, but I'm speaking of a larger picture here, because over the past decade or so the question of legalizing marijuana for recreational adult use has gone from a literal pipe dream to an aspiration to a solid plan to (in state after state) a triumphant reality.  And now there is an aura of inevitability about legalization for the entire country -- an concept which would have seemed wildly unrealistic just ten or twelve years ago.  We're winning this battle, and we're going to win this whole war in the very near future.  This lends a spirit of optimism to the discussion that just wasn't present a decade ago.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/07/17/the-inevitability-of-legalization/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>76</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>From The Archives -- 2007 Candidate Speech Series: John Edwards</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/07/12/from-the-archives-2007-candidate-speech-series-john-edwards/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/07/12/from-the-archives-2007-candidate-speech-series-john-edwards/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jul 2019 19:00:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=17100</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>[<strong>Program Note:</strong> <em>While I am away this week attending Netroots Nation, I thought a blast from the past would be entertaining for my readers.  In 2007, also while away on vacation, I conducted a journalistic experiment.  I contacted the campaigns of all eight Democratic candidates for president and asked them for permission to reprint a transcript of the speech of their choice from their candidate.  All responded, although Dennis Kucinich's campaign was unable to provide me with a transcript because he always spoke without notes (I ran one of his white papers instead).</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/07/12/from-the-archives-2007-candidate-speech-series-john-edwards/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>174</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>From The Archives -- 2007 Candidate Speech Series: Barack Obama</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/07/11/from-the-archives-2007-candidate-speech-series-barack-obama/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/07/11/from-the-archives-2007-candidate-speech-series-barack-obama/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jul 2019 19:00:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=17094</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>[<strong>Program Note:</strong> <em>While I am away this week attending Netroots Nation, I thought a blast from the past would be entertaining for my readers.  In 2007, also while away on vacation, I conducted a journalistic experiment.  I contacted the campaigns of all eight Democratic candidates for president and asked them for permission to reprint a transcript of the speech of their choice from their candidate.  All responded, although Dennis Kucinich's campaign was unable to provide me with a transcript because he always spoke without notes (I ran one of his white papers instead).</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/07/11/from-the-archives-2007-candidate-speech-series-barack-obama/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>37</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>From The Archives -- 2007 Candidate Speech Series: Hillary Clinton</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/07/10/from-the-archives-2007-candidate-speech-series-hillary-clinton/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/07/10/from-the-archives-2007-candidate-speech-series-hillary-clinton/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jul 2019 19:00:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=17090</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>[<strong>Program Note:</strong> <em>While I am away this week attending Netroots Nation, I thought a blast from the past would be entertaining for my readers.  In 2007, also while away on vacation, I conducted a journalistic experiment.  I contacted the campaigns of all eight Democratic candidates for president and asked them for permission to reprint a transcript of the speech of their choice from their candidate.  All responded, although Dennis Kucinich's campaign was unable to provide me with a transcript because he always spoke without notes (I ran one of his white papers instead).</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/07/10/from-the-archives-2007-candidate-speech-series-hillary-clinton/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>34</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>From The Archives -- 2007 Candidate Speech Series: Mike Gravel</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/07/09/from-the-archives-2007-candidate-speech-series-mike-gravel/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/07/09/from-the-archives-2007-candidate-speech-series-mike-gravel/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jul 2019 19:00:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=17087</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>[<strong>Program Note:</strong> <em>While I am away this week attending Netroots Nation, I thought a blast from the past would be entertaining for my readers.  In 2007, also while away on vacation, I conducted a journalistic experiment.  I contacted the campaigns of all eight Democratic candidates for president and asked them for permission to reprint a transcript of the speech of their choice from their candidate.  All responded, although Dennis Kucinich's campaign was unable to provide me with a transcript because he always spoke without notes (I ran one of his white papers instead).</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/07/09/from-the-archives-2007-candidate-speech-series-mike-gravel/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>51</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>From The Archives -- 2007 Candidate Speech Series: Joe Biden</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/07/08/from-the-archives-2007-candidate-speech-series-joe-biden/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/07/08/from-the-archives-2007-candidate-speech-series-joe-biden/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jul 2019 19:00:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=17082</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>[<strong>Program Note:</strong> <em>While I am away this week attending Netroots Nation, I thought a blast from the past would be entertaining for my readers.  In 2007, also while away on vacation, I conducted a journalistic experiment.  I contacted the campaigns of all eight Democratic candidates for president and asked them for permission to reprint a transcript of the speech of their choice from their candidate.  All responded, although Dennis Kucinich's campaign was unable to provide me with a transcript because he always spoke without notes (I ran one of his white papers instead).</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/07/08/from-the-archives-2007-candidate-speech-series-joe-biden/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>85</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Comparing Bernie 2020 To The 2016 Race</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/04/02/comparing-bernie-2020-to-the-2016-race/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/04/02/comparing-bernie-2020-to-the-2016-race/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Apr 2019 00:16:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2016 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2020 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign Ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Vice President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=16649</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Before attempting to draw any comparisons or contrasts between Bernie Sanders and the rest of the 2020 Democratic presidential field, what I find rather ironic is to compare his second bid for the White House to two of the candidates from last time around: Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump.  Because, whether he likes it or not, Sanders is now close to occupying the position that Clinton held the last time around, and (if he's lucky) he might just follow the path Trump charted in the 2016 race.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/04/02/comparing-bernie-2020-to-the-2016-race/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>173</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Lest We Forget</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2018/11/12/lest-we-forget/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2018/11/12/lest-we-forget/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2018 01:54:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2016 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2018 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=16103</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>But I have to add at least a short note of condemnation for President Donald Trump before we get to that.  Trump's actions over the weekend were (to use a word he loves throwing around with abandon) nothing short of disgraceful.  He only went to the centenary because the Pentagon essentially denied him his own military parade, and his boredom with the entire process was evident to all.  And yet, for some reason, prominent ex-military voices are silent here at home.  Just imagine what they would have said if a Democrat had put in a similar performance on the world's stage at a solemn event to honor our war dead.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2018/11/12/lest-we-forget/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>[From The Archives] Craig Ferguson&#039;s Excellent Rant -- &quot;If You Don&#039;t Vote, You&#039;re A Moron.&quot;</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2018/11/06/from-the-archives-craig-fergusons-excellent-rant-if-you-dont-vote-youre-a-moron/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2018/11/06/from-the-archives-craig-fergusons-excellent-rant-if-you-dont-vote-youre-a-moron/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2018 22:04:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2018 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guest Authors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Name-dropping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Other]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=16083</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>So rather than sit down today and write out a "Get out there and VOTE!" column, I thought I'd re-run a column I wrote ten years ago.  This was the first time I ever saw Ferguson, and when I did my jaw hit the floor.  People (at least, back then) just <em>didn't say stuff like this on television</em>, no matter how late the hour.  I was so enthralled by Craig's rant that I sat down and transcribed it the next day.  It remains the best "get out and vote" rant I've ever seen, so while the political references are dated (this was during the McCain/Obama race), the sentiments are not.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2018/11/06/from-the-archives-craig-fergusons-excellent-rant-if-you-dont-vote-youre-a-moron/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>58</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Trump&#039;s Easily-Debunked Lie</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2017/02/16/trumps-easily-debunked-lie/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2017/02/16/trumps-easily-debunked-lie/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2017 00:53:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2016 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=13551</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>President Donald Trump gave a press conference today, in which he uttered more than one blatant falsehood.  The fact-checkers are, once again, going to have to pull an all-nighter just to keep up with them all.  But while they're busy disproving the weightier of these lies, I thought I'd concentrate on just the easiest to debunk.  Call me lazy if you will, but this one is just so laughably wrong that it would be downright hilarious if it weren't so obvious that Trump has such a deep-seated need to believe in it.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2017/02/16/trumps-easily-debunked-lie/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>189</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama&#039;s Farewell</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2017/01/11/obamas-farewell/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2017/01/11/obamas-farewell/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2017 01:27:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=13393</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Last night, President Barack Obama bid the American public farewell.  He gave a speech that was inspiring, and called upon Americans to get involved in the political process in a multitude of ways.  Like many historic farewell addresses (even quoting from George Washington's), it also delivered a warning about what Obama perceives as current and future dangers which threaten America.  Washington's farewell address, when <a href="http://avalon.law.yale.edu/18th_century/washing.asp">read in full</a>, contains a scathing denunciation of the mere concept of political parties (called "factions" at the time), and Obama's followed suit in denouncing the rabidly partisan era we now find ourselves in.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2017/01/11/obamas-farewell/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>22</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Response: My Election Blame List</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/12/05/a-response-my-election-blame-list/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/12/05/a-response-my-election-blame-list/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2016 01:22:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2016 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign Ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Humor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Vice President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=13226</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>This article was written in response to a <em>Huffington Post</em> <a href=" http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/things-i-blame-for-hillary-clintons-loss-ranked_us_58459894e4b0496fbcb0c26d ">article</a> by Max Weiss, which was in turn written as a response to a <em>Slate</em> <a href=" http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/politics/2016/12/hillary_clinton_didn_t_lose_because_of_jill_stein_and_james_comey.html ">article</a>.  The original <em>Slate</em> article was titled: "So We're Still Blaming Jill Stein And James Comey, Huh?" and the Weiss response was titled: "Things I Blame For Hillary Clinton's Loss, Ranked."  But the Weiss list was so far removed from my own feelings about the Clinton loss that I felt it was time to respond with my own blame list.  It's been a month since the election, so hopefully enough time has passed that Democrats can discuss what went so wrong.  So here is my own list of the things I blame for the 2016 election loss, ranked.  And I have to quote Weiss in saying (while he was blaming Bernie Sanders): "I know this is going to piss a lot of people off, but so be it."</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/12/05/a-response-my-election-blame-list/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>142</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Legalization&#039;s March Continues, With Or Without Democrats To Lead It</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/11/30/legalizations-march-continues-with-or-without-democrats-to-lead-it/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/11/30/legalizations-march-continues-with-or-without-democrats-to-lead-it/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2016 01:55:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2016 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=13202</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Nancy Pelosi just got re-elected to lead the House Democrats, but almost a third of them voted for a much younger representative who urged the party to shift focus in a major way.  Hillary Clinton underperformed among minorities and young people, which contributed in a big way towards her loss in the presidential election.  And Barack Obama, in a <em>Rolling Stone</em> "<a href=" http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/features/obama-on-his-legacy-trumps-win-and-the-path-forward-w452527">exit interview</a>" just revived one of the major Democratic problems he ran against, by saying: "The point is that politics in a big, diverse country like this requires us to move the ball forward not in one long Hail Mary to the end zone, but to, you know, systemically make progress."  This, from a man who ran on: "Yes we can!' as a campaign slogan.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/11/30/legalizations-march-continues-with-or-without-democrats-to-lead-it/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>72</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Get Out And Vote!</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/11/08/get-out-and-vote/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/11/08/get-out-and-vote/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Nov 2016 21:06:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2016 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Humor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Vice President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=13124</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><strong>Program Note:</strong> What follows is a repeat column from eight years ago, and the only time I've ever sat down and typed out a transcript because I was shocked that it didn't already exist on the web somewhere.  This was the first time I ever laid eyes on Craig Ferguson's late-night comedy talk show, and I have to admit I was hooked from this point on.  Oddly, he almost never mentioned politics again (except for the occasional sex scandal jokes) -- this was a completely out-of-character rant for him.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/11/08/get-out-and-vote/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>178</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>2016 Electoral Math -- Clinton Continues Her Rise</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/10/10/2016-electoral-math-clinton-continues-her-rise/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/10/10/2016-electoral-math-clinton-continues-her-rise/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Oct 2016 01:55:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2016 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2016 Electoral Math]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign Ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama Poll Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=12960</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Even with that big caveat, Hillary Clinton had another good week in the polls.  In fact, almost all the news was good news for Clinton and bad news for Donald Trump.  Clinton continued to ride the wave from the first debate, and this week shows the public's reaction to Trump's tax returns being leaked, showing an almost-billion-dollar loss in a single year (so much for the "I'm a great businessman" thing...).  Trump is defiant about not paying any federal income taxes for almost two decades, which certainly didn't help him any with public opinion.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/10/10/2016-electoral-math-clinton-continues-her-rise/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>79</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Oldest, Or Second-Oldest</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/09/15/oldest-or-second-oldest/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/09/15/oldest-or-second-oldest/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Sep 2016 22:08:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2016 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=12825</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Up until the past week, there was one aspect of the 2016 presidential race that most had completely overlooked.  Barring any third-party surprises, America is about to elect either the oldest or the second-oldest first-term president ever.  Furthermore, if Bernie Sanders had edged Hillary Clinton out for the Democratic nomination, we would have been guaranteed to elect the oldest first-term president in our entire history.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/09/15/oldest-or-second-oldest/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>56</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>McCain, A Rock, And A Hard Place</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/08/30/mccain-a-rock-and-a-hard-place/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/08/30/mccain-a-rock-and-a-hard-place/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Aug 2016 23:54:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2016 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Vice President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=12752</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Senator John McCain is, as I type this, awaiting the results of today's Arizona primary election.  The outcome will likely be that he will once again obtain the Republican Party's nomination for his Senate seat.  But the results will probably be a lot closer than any of McCain's other primary races, because he is facing a Tea Party (or perhaps "Trumpesque") challenger who actually has a chance to unseat McCain.  Discontent with McCain (and Establishment Republicans in general) from the Republican base voters is palpable -- so much so that McCain has been forced to support Donald Trump's campaign, even after Trump personally insulted him (and all American prisoners of war, for good measure) in a very public manner.  But even if McCain, as expected, wins tonight, he'll then go on to face a Democratic challenger in what could also be a very tight race for him.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/08/30/mccain-a-rock-and-a-hard-place/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Unified, Mostly</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/07/12/unified-mostly/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/07/12/unified-mostly/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jul 2016 23:02:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2016 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign Ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=12483</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Hillary Clinton got her long-awaited endorsement from Bernie Sanders today, in an event designed to unify the Democratic Party base heading into their national convention.  Although there are still plenty of "Bernie or Bust" die-hards out there, Democrats had already largely unified behind Clinton, even before Sanders officially endorsed her today.  Perhaps this all would have played out differently in a different election year, but Donald Trump is proving to be a powerful unifying force among Democrats -- because his elevation to president is seen as being downright unthinkable by both Bernie and Hillary supporters.  Getting behind Hillary may be problematic for some Bernie supporters, but considering the alternative is a big motivating factor for most.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/07/12/unified-mostly/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>87</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [396] -- No Magic Phrases</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/06/17/ftp396/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/06/17/ftp396/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Jun 2016 01:16:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2016 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign Ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Contests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Talking Points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iran]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Libya]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pakistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Syria]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Bill of Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=12371</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Before we begin, we should mention that this week's talking points section consists of a few extended excerpts from President Obama's recent speech on fighting the Islamic State.  What he had to say was important, and it counters several insidious talking points that have been used against him in the past, so we felt it was worth taking over this week's talking points.  Just to warn everyone up front.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/06/17/ftp396/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>258</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The End Of An Exhausting Primary Season</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/06/07/the-end-of-an-exhausting-primary-season/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/06/07/the-end-of-an-exhausting-primary-season/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jun 2016 01:33:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2016 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign Ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Vice President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=12329</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>For the first time, I am writing a column which is designed to be updated, perhaps later tonight or perhaps even tomorrow.  Because today is the end of the primary road for 2016, so while I'd like to take a nostalgic look back at the entire primary season, I'm also going to eventually update my stats to provide the final 2016 numbers on how well I picked all the primary races.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/06/07/the-end-of-an-exhausting-primary-season/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>46</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>PUMA BOBs?</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/05/23/puma-bobs/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/05/23/puma-bobs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 May 2016 23:55:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2016 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign Ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=12263</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>There's a question on the minds of many Democratic Party leaders right now, which might be phrased: Will there be PUMAs?  Or, to update it a bit: Will there be BOBs?  Or maybe even PUMA BOBs?  Perhaps you'll hear, at the convention: "I'm Bob Puma, glad to meet you"?</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/05/23/puma-bobs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>101</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [392] -- Don&#039;t Panic!</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/05/20/ftp392/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/05/20/ftp392/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 May 2016 00:18:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2016 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign Ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Talking Points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Name-dropping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Vice President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=12256</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>This column was written from bottom to top today.  The reason we started with the end and worked our way back up is that we were inspired to go off on a rant (rather than our usual talking points for Democrats).  This was due to unusually high levels of panic in the media this week (actually it's not that rare that mainstream media panic causes us to go off on a rant, just in general).  But because we started with this extended rant, we're going to have to summarize the week in lightning fashion here in this intro, because we are way behind schedule now.  So without much extraneous commentary, here are the stories we noticed during the week.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/05/20/ftp392/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>143</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Down Country Roads</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/05/10/down-country-roads/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/05/10/down-country-roads/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 May 2016 22:01:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2016 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign Ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=12208</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>As we await the primary results from West Virginia, we have to note we've reached a milestone in the "predict the primaries" contest.  With the exit of Ted Cruz and John Kasich from the Republican race, Donald Trump now stands alone, as he's the last Republican still in the race.  Since he is now the presumptive nominee, we will not be calling any future Republican primaries (starting tonight, by ignoring the West Virginia and Nebraska GOP results).  This is because calling a race with only one candidate is so easy it counts (in our rules, at least) as cheating -- pumping the score up by calling contests that are foregone conclusions.  So what this all means is that I've now got a final score for my 2016 Republican primary picks.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/05/10/down-country-roads/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>16</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The End Of Hillary Clinton&#039;s 2008 Campaign</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/04/27/the-end-of-hillary-clintons-2008-campaign/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/04/27/the-end-of-hillary-clintons-2008-campaign/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2016 01:15:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2016 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign Ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Vice President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=12150</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>To tell you the truth, I never thought I'd have to write this article.  I fully expected someone else to dig this stuff out, if the calls for Bernie Sanders to drop out of the race (or "say nice things about Hillary Clinton") began.  Now that they have, I still haven't seen any detailed reminders of how the 2008 Democratic primary race ended yet.  So I went ahead and dug them out on my own.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/04/27/the-end-of-hillary-clintons-2008-campaign/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>68</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [388] -- Crisp Bee Urine, And Other Fun Anagrams</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/04/22/ftp388/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/04/22/ftp388/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Apr 2016 23:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2016 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign Ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Talking Points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Humor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=12130</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>You have to have at least a little bit of pity these days for the chairman of the Republican National Committee, Reince Priebus.  He seems like one of those guys in a horror flick who keeps trying to convince everyone that the monster isn't real, and that everything can be explained by rational means... right up until the monster unexpectedly (for maximum shock value) rips his head clean off, in graphic 3D.  The guy who has persevered in keeping his little group of teenyboppers together and somewhat sane ("If we can just get out to the barn and fire up that Model T/snowmobile/hot air balloon/mine cart/tractor... we <em>can make it out of here to safety!</em>"), who eventually sacrifices himself (in some horrific way) so that the rest of the group of worthless highschoolers can have a chance at survival.  You know the guy, right?</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/04/22/ftp388/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>130</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Populism Isn&#039;t Going To Go Away</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/03/28/populism-isnt-going-to-go-away/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/03/28/populism-isnt-going-to-go-away/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Mar 2016 23:54:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2016 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Vice President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=12024</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Bernie Sanders just had a very good week.  Six states voted in the past week, and Bernie won five of them.  Overwhelmingly.  Bernie got over 70 percent of the vote in four states, and over 80 percent in Alaska.  All in all, a pretty good week.  His delegate count has now hit four digits, with superdelegates added in.  That's all pretty impressive, but rather than focusing on his chances for actually winning the Democratic presidential nomination this time around (which are still pretty low, even with that impressive string of victories), instead what intrigues me is how the movement of Democratic populism seems to be growing.  If Sanders falls short this time around, the next time a populist runs they may actually succeed.  Bernie has already gone a long way towards transforming the Democratic Party away from its embrace of economic centrism (the Bill Clinton and Democratic Leadership Council era) towards a much more people-centered party.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/03/28/populism-isnt-going-to-go-away/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>88</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Wonky Diversion</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/03/15/a-wonky-diversion/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/03/15/a-wonky-diversion/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Mar 2016 22:20:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2016 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=11956</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Since we're all going to be busy tonight watching the next round of election returns come in, I'm not even going to attempt any political analysis today.  Everything might change in a couple of hours, so why bother?  Instead, I'm going to just toss out a wonky diversion for everyone to contemplate while we wait for West Podunk County to get its act together and get the damn numbers in to election central.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/03/15/a-wonky-diversion/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>109</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The One Thing Hillary Cannot Do</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/03/10/the-one-thing-hillary-cannot-do/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/03/10/the-one-thing-hillary-cannot-do/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Mar 2016 00:50:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2016 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=11937</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The Republican presidential candidates are about to debate again, which is always entertaining for Democrats to watch (in horrified fashion, of course).  The current state of the Republican race is that it has reached the point where loud voices are beginning to demand that both Marco Rubio and (to a lesser extent, at least so far) John Kasich bow out of the race.  The logic is persuasive, to all but the candidates' inner circles: "You can't win the nomination, and your continued presence in the race is preventing our best shot at dethroning Donald Trump, so for the good of the party you should drop out."  Look for this to be the one thing Trump and Ted Cruz agree on, tonight -- that Rubio and Kasich should just pack it up and go home.  But while this argument is being made on the Republican side, for Democrats the argument just isn't going to be valid.  Because the one thing Hillary Clinton cannot do is to call on Bernie Sanders to exit the race.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/03/10/the-one-thing-hillary-cannot-do/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>18</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Clueless Media Refuses To Vet Candidates</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/02/18/clueless-media-refuses-to-vet-candidates/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/02/18/clueless-media-refuses-to-vet-candidates/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2016 01:28:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2016 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign Ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Name-dropping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Russia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=11842</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The mainstream media, or "Fourth Estate" (as it likes to call itself), is supposed to play an important role in how America chooses our presidents.  It is supposed to "vet" these candidates, which means digging into their backgrounds and exposing any dirty laundry -- or <em>refuting</em> stories of dirty laundry -- while the voters still have time to make up their minds before they vote.  Once again, however, the media is doing a particularly dismal job of doing so.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/02/18/clueless-media-refuses-to-vet-candidates/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>57</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [378] -- Back To The 1960s</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/02/12/ftp378/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/02/12/ftp378/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Feb 2016 01:15:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2016 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign Ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Free Speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Talking Points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=11819</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>For those readers who weren't alive (or old enough) to experience the 1960s, this week we had somewhat of a history lesson, packaged as a Democratic debate.  Now, part of why this happened is that the Democratic presidential campaign has entered into a "convince the minority voters" phase, since the upcoming two states to vote have a lot of Latino (Nevada) and African-American (South Carolina) voters.  So there was quite a bit of attention spent on the Civil Rights era, which will continue right up to Super Tuesday, at the very least.  We keep waiting for Bernie Sanders (or a moderator, for that matter) to bring up the term "Goldwater Girl" in a Hillary Clinton question, and last night would have been a dandy opportunity.  But PBS held a much more "polite" debate, meaning lots of softball questions and ignoring any unseemly discomfort for the candidates (at least, for the most part).</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/02/12/ftp378/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>152</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>My New Hampshire Picks</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/02/08/my-new-hampshire-picks/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/02/08/my-new-hampshire-picks/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2016 00:18:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2016 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign Ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Contests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=11799</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>It is time once again to peer deeply into my somewhat-foggy crystal ball, and attempt to pick the winners of tomorrow night's New Hampshire primary.  Before I get to that, though, some old business needs to be brought up.  First, we have some very recent old business and then some truly ancient business, so bear with me.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/02/08/my-new-hampshire-picks/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>40</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Palin-Trump Link Vindicated</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/01/26/palin-trump-link-vindicated/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/01/26/palin-trump-link-vindicated/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2016 01:12:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2016 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Vice President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=11746</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Every so often, I feel moved to write a column that is no more, really, than spiking a metaphorical football in the endzone.  To put it a different way, sometimes I write my opinion about something political only to then be almost immediately vindicated by someone much further in-the-know than I ever could be.  Today is one of those days, so if you're not interested in me indulging in a little gratuitous back-patting, then I'd suggest you stop reading this now.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/01/26/palin-trump-link-vindicated/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>107</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Blame John McCain For Donald Trump</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/01/20/blame-john-mccain-for-donald-trump/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/01/20/blame-john-mccain-for-donald-trump/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2016 00:02:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2016 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign Ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Vice President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=11722</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Yesterday, Sarah Palin endorsed Donald Trump for president.  "Of course she did," was the most common reaction to this news -- heard from both left and right.  It is not only the most natural progression, but in fact it completes a circle of sorts.  Because Palin really was the original Trump, in the world of Republican politics.  Which is why I blame John McCain more than anyone else for the fact that Donald Trump is the clear frontrunner of the Republican pack right now.  McCain's pick of Palin as running mate truly set the stage for where the GOP finds itself now.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/01/20/blame-john-mccain-for-donald-trump/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>77</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Debate Advice For Hillary And Bernie</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/01/18/debate-advice-for-hillary-and-bernie/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/01/18/debate-advice-for-hillary-and-bernie/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2016 01:27:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2014 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2016 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign Ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=11712</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>So we had the fourth Democratic debate last night, and I suppose we should all be thankful that Debbie Wasserman Schultz didn't somehow manage to schedule it to compete with one of football's playoff games.  I wouldn't be surprised if the debate had a pretty low viewership, appearing as it did on a Sunday night during a three-day weekend, but those who did manage to catch it saw a much more high-spirited contest between Bernie Sanders and Hillary Clinton than we've previously seen.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/01/18/debate-advice-for-hillary-and-bernie/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>85</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [374] -- The Knives Come Out</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/01/15/ftp374/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/01/15/ftp374/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Jan 2016 00:47:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2016 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign Ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Talking Points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Name-dropping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Syria]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=11703</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>In every 1950s "gang rumble" genre film, there comes a point where the fighting gets more serious.  This is, literally, where the knives come out.  I begin with this image because, metaphorically, that's exactly where we are in the 2016 presidential campaign.  The fight's getting a lot more serious, and there is bound to be some blood on the floor afterwards.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/01/15/ftp374/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>119</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Clinton Not Inevitable Nominee</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/01/11/clinton-not-inevitable-nominee/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/01/11/clinton-not-inevitable-nominee/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2016 01:25:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2016 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign Ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=11684</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Hillary Clinton is not the inevitable Democratic presidential nominee.  Clinton was not the inevitable nominee in 2008, and she is not inevitable in 2016 either.  Of course, this really isn't new or surprising, because <em>nothing</em> in politics is ever inevitable, really.  Elections are <em>always</em> about as "evitable" as one can imagine.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/01/11/clinton-not-inevitable-nominee/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>24</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Democratic Debate Preview</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/10/07/democratic-debate-preview/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/10/07/democratic-debate-preview/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2015 00:08:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2016 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign Ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Vice President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=11304</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Next Tuesday, we will finally get some degree of parity in the world of televised presidential debates, as the Democrats come together for the first time to make their case to the American public.  The Republicans have already held two debates and will hold their third later this month.  The Democratic National Committee decided to restrict the number of debates held, which has left the field open to the Republicans for two months now.  This decision has been hotly debated, mostly by Democrats not named "Hillary Clinton" (who make the case that the debate schedule was shortened to give Hillary an easier time of it).  But whatever you think of the decision, we're finally about to see all the Democratic candidates on one stage.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/10/07/democratic-debate-preview/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [364] -- New Speaker&#039;s Speaking Problem</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/10/02/ftp364/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/10/02/ftp364/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2015 00:43:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2016 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Talking Points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guest Authors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Name-dropping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Vice President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=11285</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Kevin McCarthy is not worthy.  Of using the English language correctly, among other things.  Amusingly, though, this will likely not stop him from becoming the next speaker of the House.  And if his past is any prologue, hearing the speaker speak should provide all sorts of amusement for the rest of us.  It may not be the return of the garbled George W. Bush era of mangled English, but it could be close.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/10/02/ftp364/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>88</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bernie Don&#039;t Get No Respect From Media</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/09/30/bernie-dont-get-no-respect-from-media/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/09/30/bernie-dont-get-no-respect-from-media/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2015 23:58:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2016 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Vice President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=11276</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Bernie Sanders, as far as the media is concerned, is the Rodney Dangerfield of presidential candidates -- "he don't get no respect."  Of the 23 candidates running for president in the two major parties, precisely four of them have ever shown even 20 percent support (in their polling averages from their base voters).  Actually, to be completely accurate, five people have hit the 20 percent support level since the race began this year, but Joe Biden is not actually a candidate yet.  The other four are Donald Trump, Ben Carson, Hillary Clinton, and Bernie Sanders.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/09/30/bernie-dont-get-no-respect-from-media/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>46</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hillary&#039;s Enthusiasm Gap</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/08/17/hillarys-enthusiasm-gap/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/08/17/hillarys-enthusiasm-gap/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2015 23:59:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2016 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=11086</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Deep into the political silly season, it seems the pundits are getting rather tired of being so very, very wrong in predicting the imminent demise of Donald Trump's candidacy, so instead they all seem to have turned to a new summertime storyline: predicting the imminent demise of Hillary Clinton's candidacy.  This is what passes for conventional wisdom inside the Beltway in the dog days of August, but it's likely going to turn out to be just as wrong as the endless refrains of "surely <em>this</em> will sink Trump!" which preceded it.  For anyone so disconnected from reality to understand what I'm saying here, a handy reminder that we have over <em>fourteen months</em> before the 2016 election.  Even the first primaries are still a half a year away.  And <em>anything</em> can happen in that amount of time in politics.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/08/17/hillarys-enthusiasm-gap/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>53</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nonpartisan Redistricting Wins</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/06/30/nonpartisan-redistricting-wins/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/06/30/nonpartisan-redistricting-wins/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2015 23:59:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=10877</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The Supreme Court issued their last rulings of the season yesterday, and I thought one ruling kind of got short shrift by the media.  Granted, there were other big rulings on the same day (the court usually saves their biggest cases for last, but this year they actually released the two biggest decisions last week) involving E.P.A. regulations and the death penalty, but the redistricting case -- to me, at least -- was more important.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/06/30/nonpartisan-redistricting-wins/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>17</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Jeb?</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/06/15/jeb/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/06/15/jeb/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2015 01:28:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2016 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign Ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=10828</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Today, Jeb Bush formally entered the race for the Republican nomination for president.  I should point out, as a bit of personal trivia, that his new campaign logo ("Jeb!") has allowed me to create what I believe is the shortest headline I have ever written (in over 2,000 blog posts).</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/06/15/jeb/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>41</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Clinton Campaign Coverage, So Far</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/06/11/clinton-campaign-coverage-so-far/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/06/11/clinton-campaign-coverage-so-far/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2015 23:51:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2016 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign Ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=10816</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><em>I</em> have to pity the poor mainstream media reporters covering Hillary Clinton's campaign, a tiny bit.  No, no, I really do -- at least a smidgeon.  They know full well that, barring any large and unforeseen events, they'll be covering Clinton's campaign for at least the next eight or nine months without having much of any "horserace" story to tell.  If Clinton does as expected (again, barring a tremendous surge by Bernie Sanders or a sudden health problem for Hillary), she's going to become the Democratic nominee for president without much problem.  This presents a deep quandary for the mainstream Clinton reporters, since all pundits (and I definitely include myself in this) absolutely <em>love</em> writing horserace stories.  They're easy, they're poll-driven, and much like their namesake horseraces, it's always fun to see a dark horse pull into the lead or a frontrunner stumble or any other thrilling racetrack development that gets the heart pumping and the juices flowing.  To put it another way: horserace stories are <em>easy to write</em>, which is why we get so many of them during each election.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/06/11/clinton-campaign-coverage-so-far/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>23</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rand Paul Stands Firm</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/06/01/rand-paul-stands-firm/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/06/01/rand-paul-stands-firm/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2015 23:46:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2016 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Bill of Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=10774</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Yesterday, Senator Rand Paul stood firmly for his beliefs on the floor of the Senate.  As a result, portions of the USA PATRIOT Act have been allowed to lapse today.  Whether you think this is a tragedy, a victory, or even an absolute farce depends on your feelings for (or against) both the National Security Agency's metadata surveillance program and Senator Paul himself.  But while others are debating the finer points of government surveillance, I'd instead prefer to focus on Paul's political tactics.  Because, from where I'm sitting, Paul is to be admired and commended for both standing on principle and for using his position in the Senate to show the other candidates what actual (as opposed to rhetorical) leadership truly means.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/06/01/rand-paul-stands-firm/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>17</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Crassly Calculating Political Risk</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/05/14/crassly-calculating-political-risk/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/05/14/crassly-calculating-political-risk/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2015 00:02:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2016 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign Ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=10698</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>There's a crass and cynical formula for any given political candidate to follow, when any political issue is being discussed.  It goes something like this (yes, I made up all this terminology, so please bear with me):</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/05/14/crassly-calculating-political-risk/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>GOP Presidential Field Doubles In Size</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/05/04/gop-presidential-field-doubles-in-size/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/05/04/gop-presidential-field-doubles-in-size/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2015 00:18:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2016 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign Ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=10649</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Last week, the field of officially-announced Democratic presidential candidates doubled in size, from one person to two.  This week, the Republican presidential field is likewise going to double, from three candidates to six.  Ted Cruz, Rand Paul, and Marco Rubio have all previously officially announced their candidacies, and this week they will be joined by Carly Fiorina and Ben Carson (who announced today), and Mike Huckabee (scheduled to announce tomorrow).</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/05/04/gop-presidential-field-doubles-in-size/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>19</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>From The Archives -- Marriage Equality&#039;s Giant Leap Forward</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/04/28/from-the-archives-marriage-equalitys-giant-leap-forward/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/04/28/from-the-archives-marriage-equalitys-giant-leap-forward/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2015 00:08:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Bill of Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=10623</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Sorry, I do not mean to make light of the historic nature of today's case, far from it in fact.  I have to admit being personally stunned at how fast events have developed.  Almost exactly two years ago I wrote a column predicting that America had <a href="http://www.chrisweigant.com/2013/03/25/the-gay-marriage-tipping-point/">reached the tipping point</a> on marriage equality.  I've re-run this column a few times, and <a href="http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/10/07/a-marriage-equality-victory-lap/">last October</a> I pointed out that when I wrote the original article, the following was true:</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/04/28/from-the-archives-marriage-equalitys-giant-leap-forward/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>18</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [343] -- Free Ponies Getting Into The Weeds</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/04/24/ftp343/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/04/24/ftp343/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2015 00:26:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2016 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign Ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Talking Points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Humor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Bill of Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=10608</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>We'll get to other political news in a moment, but since last week contained the date 4/20, we're going to first run down all the marijuana news.  Coincidentally or not, there was a lot of it this week.  So let's just begin by "getting into the weeds" of politics, as it were (the ponies come along later, never fear).</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/04/24/ftp343/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>From The Archives -- A Hillary Clinton 2007 Campaign Speech</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/04/21/from-the-archives-a-hillary-clinton-2007-campaign-speech/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/04/21/from-the-archives-a-hillary-clinton-2007-campaign-speech/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2015 00:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign Ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guest Authors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=10592</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>A few words of introduction are necessary today.  I spent most of the day dealing with email (cleaning out my mailbox and fishing for quotes for tomorrow's article), so instead of a fresh column today, I'm re-running a speech from Hillary Clinton from November of 2007.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/04/21/from-the-archives-a-hillary-clinton-2007-campaign-speech/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>42</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Toughening Up Hillary</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/04/20/toughening-up-hillary/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/04/20/toughening-up-hillary/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2015 00:28:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2016 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign Ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Vice President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=10587</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>I write today to challenge what is fast becoming conventional wisdom in the political world.  In particular, the notion that Hillary Clinton really needs a strong primary challenge to "toughen her up" for the upcoming race with whomever the Republicans decide upon.  When you deconstruct the logic behind this idea, however, it falls apart.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/04/20/toughening-up-hillary/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>41</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is The Marijuana Vote Up For Grabs?</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/04/15/is-the-marijuana-vote-up-for-grabs/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/04/15/is-the-marijuana-vote-up-for-grabs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2015 00:29:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2016 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=10565</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>There are very few political issues today which have not already become firmly entrenched along the same basic party lines that all our other political issues hew towards.  In most cases, it's a matter of "Democrats believe X, while Republicans insist on Y."  On one issue, though, there is a sizeable (and growing) bloc of voters who are not only cross-partisan but also so committed they could be called "single-issue voters."  I'm speaking of the marijuana vote.  And it could be up for grabs next year.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/04/15/is-the-marijuana-vote-up-for-grabs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>19</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Will Hillary Show Up To Netroots Nation?</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/04/13/will-hillary-show-up-to-netroots-nation/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/04/13/will-hillary-show-up-to-netroots-nation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2015 23:54:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2016 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign Ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=10555</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>And so it begins.  Hillary Clinton is now officially in the race for the White House.  Her announcement, like pretty much everything else about her upcoming campaign, will be microscopically analyzed within an inch of its life.  Was she too generic?  Was she appealing enough?  Where were the specifics?  What about Bill?  And what was up with that laughably 1970s campaign logo?  Most of these deep-dive analyses won't make a tiny bit of difference, in the long run (well, OK, that logo is pretty bad, hopefully that's the first thing Team Hillary decides to change...).  But it'll certainly give all the pundits something to do in the meantime.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/04/13/will-hillary-show-up-to-netroots-nation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>54</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Back To The 1990s</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/03/10/back-to-the-1990s/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/03/10/back-to-the-1990s/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2015 00:24:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2016 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=10411</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>I guess the easiest way to begin this column is with the most probable presidential headline for next year: "Clinton Versus Bush."  Which is really somewhat of a cheap trick, since (to be fair) the 1990s were two Bushes and one Clinton ago, really.  Still, if this is the way the next election pans out, it will indeed have somewhat of a time-machine flavor to it.  It's technically not "back to the future," but instead the flip side: "forward to the past."</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/03/10/back-to-the-1990s/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>48</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The End Of Hillary&#039;s 140-Character Campaign</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/03/09/the-end-of-hillarys-140-character-campaign/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/03/09/the-end-of-hillarys-140-character-campaign/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2015 00:52:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2016 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign Ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=10406</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Hillary Clinton, by some accounts, wanted the luxury of waiting as long as possible before officially becoming a 2016 candidate for president.  There were good reasons for her to wait, the most prominent being that she could pick and choose which day-to-day political issues to address, and which she could safely ignore for the time being.  So the extent of her campaigning, so far, has largely been an occasional Twitter message.  It seems, however, that this luxury is about to come to an end.  Hillary's soon going to have to give the public more than 140 characters, whether she officially tosses her hat in the ring or not.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/03/09/the-end-of-hillarys-140-character-campaign/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>55</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hillary&#039;s Inevitable Inevitability Problem</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/02/10/hillarys-inevitable-inevitability-problem/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/02/10/hillarys-inevitable-inevitability-problem/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2015 23:52:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2016 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Vice President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=10299</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>While the fight for the 2016 Republican presidential nomination is already fiercely heating up, over on the Democratic side there is really only one question even being asked right now -- when will Hillary Clinton formally declare her candidacy?  Will she wait until summer, or throw her hat in the ring during the spring?  Whenever she does launch her campaign, she will inevitably face the same problem she grappled with the last time she ran.  Call it her inevitability problem (or maybe her "inevitable inevitability problem," if you're trying to come up with a clever headline).</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2015/02/10/hillarys-inevitable-inevitability-problem/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Post-Post-Racial</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/11/25/post-post-racial/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/11/25/post-post-racial/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2014 01:08:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=9984</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>It was fashionable, immediately after the election of Barack Obama, for some (mostly white) commentators to proclaim that America had entered a "post-racial" era.  What they meant by this, loosely translated, was: "A black man has been elected president, so all our racial problems must be over now, right?"</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/11/25/post-post-racial/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>176</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Marriage Equality Victory Lap</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/10/07/a-marriage-equality-victory-lap/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/10/07/a-marriage-equality-victory-lap/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2014 00:28:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=9751</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Today I am taking a victory lap of sorts, because while the term "tipping point" is now in a lot of headlines, I actually predicted this chain of events a year and a half ago, in the column below.  That doesn't sound like a whole lot of time, but consider that when I wrote this the following was true: </p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/10/07/a-marriage-equality-victory-lap/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>109</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [319] -- Slouching Off To War</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/09/12/ftp319/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/09/12/ftp319/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2014 22:56:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2014 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Talking Points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Libya]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Syria]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=9643</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Back in 2007, I thought it would be a good idea to write congressional Democrats a memo, in the hopes they could begin to learn a skill Republicans seem to be born with: the ability to stay on-topic and present your political ideas and agenda items succinctly and memorably to the public.  I had grown tired of watching the Sunday political shows where Republicans all sang off the same songsheet while Democrats were easily led into the weeds with long rambling tangents to what they should have been saying that particular week.  This early effort grew, in the following weeks and months, into the format we now use weekly: a quick rundown of amusing items in the political news of the week, the awarding of the <strong>Most Impressive Democrat Of The Week</strong> and the <strong>Most Disappointing Democrat Of The Week</strong>, and then seven numerated talking points suggested for all Democrats to use to explain the Democratic position to all and sundry (especially on Sundry morning talk shows... so to speak...).</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/09/12/ftp319/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>78</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How President Hillary Clinton Would Compare With President Obama</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/08/12/how-president-hillary-clinton-would-compare-with-president-obama/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/08/12/how-president-hillary-clinton-would-compare-with-president-obama/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2014 00:04:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2016 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=9491</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>I realize that to call this column "premature" would indeed even be an understatement.  But you'll have to forgive me, since it's one of those lazy summer days where all of Washington is off on vacation (President Obama is taking two weeks at the beach, and Congress is taking the entire freakin' <em>month</em> off, as usual).  So it seems like a good time for some unadulterated speculation of the sheerest sort.  And I'm not even going to get drawn in to all the 2016 election speculation today.  I'm going to skip over it all and just jump forward to January, 2017, as we all watch the first woman inaugurated to the presidency.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/08/12/how-president-hillary-clinton-would-compare-with-president-obama/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>15</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Obama Tactic</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/08/11/the-obama-tactic/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/08/11/the-obama-tactic/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2014 00:28:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iran]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Libya]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Syria]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=9487</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>American aircraft are once again waging war over the skies of Iraq.  President Obama, as many have pointed out, is now the fourth United States president in a row to order some form of military offensive in Iraq.  As always, plenty of critics immediately popped up to loudly explain what the president was doing wrong.  The usual characters on the right demanded a much more intensive military action, the ones on the left warned darkly about slippery slopes and possible blowback, and the American people seemed to heave a sigh of resignation, in a "here we go again" moment.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/08/11/the-obama-tactic/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>40</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ending America&#039;s Longest War</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/05/27/ending-americas-longest-war/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/05/27/ending-americas-longest-war/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2014 22:22:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=9146</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Today President Barack Obama announced the beginning of the end of America's longest war.  This announcement was fully anticipated and therefore came as no surprise, seeing as how Obama was elected in large part to end two wars.  He successfully withdrew all American troops from Iraq in 2011, and he announced today the schedule for withdrawing American troops from Afghanistan.  From 32,000 current troops, we will draw down to 9,800 by the end of this year.  This number will then shrink by half (to roughly 5,000) by the end of 2015.  By the end of 2016, they will all be out (except possibly for a small force left for security, in the range of 1,000 troops or less).  Thus will end a 15-year-long war effort -- the longest in American history.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/05/27/ending-americas-longest-war/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>GOP&#039;s Post-Mortem Post-Mortem</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/03/19/gops-post-mortem-post-mortem/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/03/19/gops-post-mortem-post-mortem/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2014 00:34:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2014 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2016 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=8794</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Has it really been a whole year since the Republican Party put out their "post-mortem" document, which tried to identify why they got shellacked so badly in the 2012 election?  Since it's not a big date on my political calendar, the one-year anniversary kind of snuck up on me, I'll admit.  But since the Republican National Committee used the term "post-mortem" in the first place, I guess it's now time for a post-mortem on the post-mortem (insert your own zombie or "dead man walking" joke here, if you must).</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/03/19/gops-post-mortem-post-mortem/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Insanely Early 2016 Speculation (Hillary Clinton Edition)</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/02/05/insanely-early-2016-speculation-hillary-clinton-edition/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/02/05/insanely-early-2016-speculation-hillary-clinton-edition/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Feb 2014 00:32:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2016 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign Ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Libya]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=8608</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Other than the Electoral College shift, another rather strange dynamic seems to be shaping up between the two dominant American political parties.  Democrats and Republicans are reversing their traditional scenarios when it comes to nominating presidential candidates.  This tradition even comes with its own bumpersticker slogan to define it: "Democrats fall in love, Republicans fall in line."  Democrats, in other words, have a large field to pick from and select the one that everybody likes best, in the end, and then enthusiastically gets behind them for the general election.  Republicans, however, pretty much know who is "next in line" for the nomination, and while other candidates may put up a limited fight, everyone knows who the nominee is going to be long before the first primary happens -- after which, Republicans all fall into line behind him, like him or not.  But this time around the primary field is going to be wild and wooly over on the Republican side, with nobody being able to convincingly claim to be "next in line" (Rick Santorum or Paul Ryan could come closest to making such a claim, but this is going to be challenged by many others).  But over on the Democratic side, there is only one woman standing, at least at this point, and her name is Hillary Rodham Clinton.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2014/02/05/insanely-early-2016-speculation-hillary-clinton-edition/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>72</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>America: Legalize It!</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2013/10/22/america-legalize-it/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2013/10/22/america-legalize-it/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Oct 2013 00:22:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2014 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2016 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Vice President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=8106</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Gallup just <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/10/22/legal-marijuana-poll_n_4143995.html">released a poll</a> showing a large majority -- 58 percent -- of the American public now thinks marijuana should be fully legalized for adult recreational use.  This is somewhat stunning news.  The "somewhat" part is that this is really only a continuation of a decades-long trend towards acceptance in public opinion.  The "stunning" part is how quickly it is now happening.  In fact, it might be fair to say that we may only be a year or two away from marijuana legalization reaching a political "tipping point" from which there will be no going back.  I wrote <a href="http://www.chrisweigant.com/2013/03/25/the-gay-marriage-tipping-point/">earlier this year</a> that gay marriage can now be seen to be over this "tipping point" -- it's hard to now imagine going back to the days of "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" and the Defense Of Marriage Act.  Legalizing marijuana hasn't hit this point of no return yet... but it certainly can be glimpsed on the horizon.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2013/10/22/america-legalize-it/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>17</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Natural Born Presidents (Part 1)</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2013/08/20/natural-born-presidents-part-1/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2013/08/20/natural-born-presidents-part-1/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Aug 2013 00:18:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Vice President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=7808</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The problem, obviously, is that nobody's ever adequately legally defined what exactly "a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States" means.  There have been no court challenges.  It has become a political issue at times, but has never been adjudicated at all -- which means it is completely open to interpretation, for now.  By anyone, really.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2013/08/20/natural-born-presidents-part-1/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>24</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [269] -- The Debate Debate</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2013/08/16/ftp269/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2013/08/16/ftp269/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Aug 2013 00:22:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2014 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2016 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Free Speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Talking Points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=7791</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>We begin today with some awfully short memories, from both the Right and the Left, on the crossover subjects of presidential debates, television, and Hillary Clinton.  It all stems from the news that the Republican National Committee <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/08/16/rnc-resolution_n_3768906.html">has announced</a> it will not sanction 2016 Republican candidate debates on CNN and NBC, because the two stations are both putting together movies about Hillary Clinton.  The RNC feels that this will unacceptably prejudice the networks in the 2016 presidential race, in which Clinton is likely to be a Democratic candidate.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2013/08/16/ftp269/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>21</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>One Small Step For Eric Holder</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2013/08/12/one-small-step-for-eric-holder/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2013/08/12/one-small-step-for-eric-holder/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Aug 2013 23:26:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=7771</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Just so no one makes the accusation that I'm belittling Attorney General Eric Holder's speech today; if my headline were longer, it would conclude: "...and one giant leap for the Department of Justice."  Holder's <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/08/12/eric-holder-mandatory-minimum_n_3744575.html">speech today</a>, and his new policy announcements and proposals, are indeed a significant leap forward for the federal government, which -- ever since Nancy Reagan and the tragic <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/08/12/where_mandatory_minimums_came_from/">death of Len Bias</a> -- has been locking people up for drug offenses at a rate unparalleled in American history.  What Holder said today was that it's time for this outdated, expensive, and largely futile policy to end, or at least be severely curtailed.  And that, indeed, is a giant rhetorical and philosophical leap forward.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2013/08/12/one-small-step-for-eric-holder/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>From The Archives -- Gay Marriage And Polygamy</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2013/03/28/from-the-archives-gay-marriage-and-polygamy/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2013/03/28/from-the-archives-gay-marriage-and-polygamy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Mar 2013 00:24:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=7140</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So the question must also be asked: Do you support the concept of polygamy?  If so, why?  If not, why not?]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2013/03/28/from-the-archives-gay-marriage-and-polygamy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>So Long, Sarah</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2013/01/28/so-long-sarah/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2013/01/28/so-long-sarah/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2013 23:58:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Name-dropping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Vice President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=6889</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Last Friday, Sarah Palin left Fox News.  Her exit from the national stage is now complete.  But her passing from view bears comment, for the unique nature of her influence on the country's politics for the past four or five years.  Because one thing everyone can agree upon -- love her or hate her -- Sarah Palin was unique.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2013/01/28/so-long-sarah/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [241] -- Revive The &quot;No Budget, No Pay Act&quot;</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2013/01/18/ftp241/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2013/01/18/ftp241/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2013 23:02:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Talking Points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Vice President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=6848</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Eric Cantor, much to our surprise, almost just did something we not only would have agreed with, but in fact given our wholehearted support to.  Almost.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2013/01/18/ftp241/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>44</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Four Years Ago</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2013/01/17/four-years-ago/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2013/01/17/four-years-ago/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2013 00:45:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Name-dropping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Vice President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=6844</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>We're going to spend today waxing nostalgic, just to warn everyone up front.  Because four years ago I traveled to Washington D.C. to attend the Inauguration of President Barack Hussein Obama's first term in office.  Next Monday will be his second swearing-in ceremony (he will actually be officially sworn in on Sunday, as the Constitution dictates, but since it falls on a Sunday the public event will be held on Monday -- which just happens to be Martin Luther King Jr.'s federal holiday as well).  On top of this symbology, exactly 150 Januaries ago American witnessed President Lincoln issuing the Emancipation Proclamation.  So it's going to be a meaningful event, one assumes, in all sorts of ways.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2013/01/17/four-years-ago/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama Poll Watch -- December, 2012</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2013/01/02/opw1212/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2013/01/02/opw1212/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2013 00:17:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama Poll Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=6774</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>A happy chart indeed for Obama fans.  Last month I predicted this rise by noting that many of the nationwide polling operations just ceased polling after the election was over.  This dearth of data meant that while Obama's numbers were climbing fast, the "poll of polls" average at RealClearPolitics.com was dragged downwards by pre-election numbers still being averaged in.  While I did predict that Obama's numbers would continue to rise in December (as more and more data came in), I will admit that even I was surprised at size of the post-election bump which Obama managed.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2013/01/02/opw1212/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Final Electoral Math -- My 2012 Election Picks</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/11/05/final-electoral-math-my-2012-election-picks/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/11/05/final-electoral-math-my-2012-election-picks/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2012 23:18:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2008 Electoral Math]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Electoral Math]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama Poll Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Vice President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=6510</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Welcome to the last of these Electoral Math columns, at least for the next three and a half years.  Today, we're just going to throw caution to the wind, and go ahead and predict the outcome of tomorrow night's returns.  Before we get to that, though, a quick rundown of my previous record in the election prediction business, and then (for completeness' sake) the final electoral math graphs for 2012.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/11/05/final-electoral-math-my-2012-election-picks/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>63</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [233] -- Wake Me When It&#039;s Over</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/11/02/ftp233/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/11/02/ftp233/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2012 23:09:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign Ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Free Speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Talking Points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Humor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Name-dropping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Bill of Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=6497</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Every so often, I get an idea which I know would make me millions of dollars.  Today, I had another one: develop and market a pill which, when taken, would put you to sleep until the morning after the election.  The pill would be magically timed to work no matter when you took it, meaning a citizen in Texas or California might not want to take one until perhaps mid-October, but the folks in Iowa and New Hampshire might be expected to take one New Year's Eve -- thus avoiding not only the debates and punditary frenzy of the general election, but the entire primary season as well.  It would be marketed under the name "The Rip Van Winkle Pill."</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/11/02/ftp233/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>148</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>2012 Electoral Math -- One Week Out</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/10/29/2012-electoral-math-one-week-out/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/10/29/2012-electoral-math-one-week-out/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2012 23:31:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2008 Electoral Math]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Electoral Math]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama Poll Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=6466</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Are you worried that Frankenstorm will restrict your access to up-to-date polling numbers?  Do you know more about the state of the race in places you’ve never been to, but haven’t decided what to do for Hallowe’en yet?  Then you have come to the right place!  With one week to go before Election Day dawns, the race for president is about as tight as it can get, so let's get right to it.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/10/29/2012-electoral-math-one-week-out/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>49</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>America&#039;s Increasing Optimism May Help Obama</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/09/24/americas-increasing-optimism-may-help-obama/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/09/24/americas-increasing-optimism-may-help-obama/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2012 23:40:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=6287</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The American public, over the past few weeks, seems to have gotten more optimistic about the future.  These recent gains have been somewhat modest and still far below a majority of the public being optimistic, but if this trend continues for the next month or so it will likely help President Obama's chances of being re-elected.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/09/24/americas-increasing-optimism-may-help-obama/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>67</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Guest Convention Correspondent -- My Road To The Convention</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/09/03/guest-convention-correspondent-my-road-to-the-convention/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/09/03/guest-convention-correspondent-my-road-to-the-convention/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Sep 2012 19:00:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign Ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guest Authors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=6166</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>I was five when President George Bush "beat" candidate Al Gore in the 2000 presidential election. At the time I had no clue about politics or party philosophy. However, I did know Al Gore received more overall votes in the election than George Bush, then the members of Supreme Court voted on who would become the next president, and they elected Bush. The election was the first political event that I can remember clearly in my life, and although I was always bound to be a liberal (given the household I grew up in), that lost election established my anti-conservative opinion. I followed the Kerry/Bush election in 2004 with determination (or at least all the determination a nine-year-old can muster), thinking I could somehow impact the results of the election. Of course I was wrong.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/09/03/guest-convention-correspondent-my-road-to-the-convention/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>31</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>From The Archives -- The Bradley Effect v. The Obama Effect</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/08/16/from-the-archives-the-bradley-effect-v-the-obama-effect/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/08/16/from-the-archives-the-bradley-effect-v-the-obama-effect/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Aug 2012 23:47:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=6065</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Opus's advice still stands the test of time, I should point out.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/08/16/from-the-archives-the-bradley-effect-v-the-obama-effect/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>26</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Could Voter Suppression Laws Suppress Republican Votes?</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/07/25/could-voter-suppression-laws-suppress-republican-votes/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/07/25/could-voter-suppression-laws-suppress-republican-votes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2012 23:43:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=5950</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Welcome to that magic time of year when political junkies in the media get so frantic for stories they just start rampantly speculating on everything under the sun.  This is a yearly contest to see who can come up with this year's "Silly Season" story that everyone else will obsess about for the entire month of August.  What will it be this year?  Mitt's "dancing horse" at the Olympics (as David Letterman has taken to calling it)?  President Obama secretly plotting to (fill in the blank)?</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/07/25/could-voter-suppression-laws-suppress-republican-votes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>38</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>2012 Electoral Math -- Mixed Pictures</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/07/18/2012-electoral-math-mixed-pictures/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/07/18/2012-electoral-math-mixed-pictures/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jul 2012 00:23:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Electoral Math]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=5911</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>As you can see, Obama started with an edge and has, for the most part, steadily maintained this edge.  Currently, Obama has 56.3 percent of the Electoral Votes (henceforth "EV"), and Romney has 43.7 percent, with no ties at all.  Obama has stayed roughly between 50 and 60 percent, with one dip slightly below the midpoint, since we started keeping data.  Romney has stayed mostly in the 40 to 45 percent range, although he has dipped below this as well.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/07/18/2012-electoral-math-mixed-pictures/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>106</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>GOP&#039;s Possible PUMA Problem</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/05/16/gops-possible-puma-problem/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/05/16/gops-possible-puma-problem/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 22:11:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=5615</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Is the Republican Party going to have a PUMA problem on their hands during their national nominating convention?  I'm not, of course, referring to the possibility that mountain lions will be stalking folks inside the convention center, but rather that a group of folks under the "Party Unity, My Ass!" banner will disrupt what is supposed to be a well-scripted and well-choreographed coronation.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/05/16/gops-possible-puma-problem/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Will Romney Have A &quot;Sister Souljah&quot; Moment?</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/05/07/will-romney-have-a-sister-souljah-moment/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/05/07/will-romney-have-a-sister-souljah-moment/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2012 22:00:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign Ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Name-dropping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=5578</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The Republican primaries, for all intents and purposes, are over.  Mitt won.  But since this has become general knowledge, I certainly haven't noticed Mitt tacking anywhere but far to the right.  Perhaps he took a "centrist" position in there somewhere, and I just missed it.  Or perhaps, as I started with, he is just now realizing the corner he's painted himself into.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/05/07/will-romney-have-a-sister-souljah-moment/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Happy Pivot Day!</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/04/10/happy-pivot-day/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/04/10/happy-pivot-day/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Apr 2012 00:12:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=5466</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Today is, of course, the day when the entire political universe pivots from the 2012 primary election season to the 2012 general election season.  This was precipitated by Rick Santorum exiting the race early today, much to Mitt Romney's relief.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/04/10/happy-pivot-day/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Individual Mandate&#039;s Conservative Origins</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/03/28/the-individual-mandates-conservative-origins/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/03/28/the-individual-mandates-conservative-origins/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2012 23:37:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=5403</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>While we're all waiting for the verdict from the Supreme Court, I thought it would be worthwhile to dig into the actual origins of the concept of the individual mandate.  Now, the idea itself may have been around for much longer than the documentation I could find online, but the real political push behind the idea seems to have started in 1989, from the ultra-conservative Heritage Foundation.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/03/28/the-individual-mandates-conservative-origins/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>30</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Proportionality Makes GOP Race Less Competitive</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/03/26/proportionality-makes-gop-race-less-competitive/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/03/26/proportionality-makes-gop-race-less-competitive/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2012 20:08:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=5394</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>To put it in plain English rather than mathematical figures, the Republican Party's plan of creating a more competitive race by awarding proportional delegates is simply not working, at least between the two frontrunners.  If none of the Republican state contests were proportional, Rick Santorum would be a lot closer to Mitt Romney right now.  Proportionality has made for a <em>less</em> competitive race between the two.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/03/26/proportionality-makes-gop-race-less-competitive/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Republicans&#039; Democrat Envy</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/02/22/republicans-democrat-envy/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/02/22/republicans-democrat-envy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2012 22:50:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign Ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=5238</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>You might not know it from the extended bouts of hair-pulling-and-garment-rending anguish emanating from the Republican Party establishment these days (see: any recent GOP commentary by a party elder or deep thinker which uses the phrase "brokered convention"), but the Republican Party is getting exactly what they asked for.  Not just asked for, in fact, but specifically <em>planned on</em>.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/02/22/republicans-democrat-envy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>28</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mitt Romney Finally Takes My Advice</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/02/21/mitt-romney-finally-takes-my-advice/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/02/21/mitt-romney-finally-takes-my-advice/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2012 01:02:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign Ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=5234</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[But the focus from the media has so far been on the <em>wrong car</em> -- at least as far as I am concerned. ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/02/21/mitt-romney-finally-takes-my-advice/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Primary Season Amnesia</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/02/13/primary-season-amnesia/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/02/13/primary-season-amnesia/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 00:37:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=5195</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The primary season opens with so many Republican candidates for the party's nomination for president that it seemingly takes forever just to ask each of them a single question in the televised debates.  Three different Republican candidates win the first three states' races, in a wide-open contest with no incumbent on the ballot.  The first results thin the large field of hopefuls, as minor candidates run out of funding and throw in the towel.  As more states vote, the two top candidates get to a point in early February where they are neck-and-neck in the number of individual states won -- with the third candidate lagging, because his support is based mostly in the South.  Ron Paul is also running, but not winning any states.  Dark mutterings are heard about the presumed-frontrunner not being able to "close the deal," and about his overall weak support among conservatives in the party.  The media is in a frenzy, all but drooling over the prospect of an open convention, where no Republican candidate has the magic number of delegates to secure the nomination.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/02/13/primary-season-amnesia/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>24</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Name That Tuesday!</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/02/07/name-that-tuesday/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/02/07/name-that-tuesday/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 22:55:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Contests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=5164</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Today is the first multi-state event in the 2012 Republican primary schedule, and I am shocked -- <em>shocked!</em> -- that the punditocracy has miserably failed to come up with a cutesy-poo name for today's voting.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/02/07/name-that-tuesday/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>GOP PUMAs?</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/02/02/gop-pumas/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/02/02/gop-pumas/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 01:17:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=5141</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The thought which keeps flitting through my mind is whether the Republicans are going to face their own "PUMA" problem this fall.  For those who don't remember the term from 2008, PUMA stood for "Party Unity, My Ass!" and was the rallying cry of the non-existent hordes of pro-Hillary Democrats who were reportedly going to cause major disruption at the Democratic National Convention, and then throw the election to John McCain in the fall.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/02/02/gop-pumas/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>16</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Predicting Iowa</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/01/02/predicting-iowa/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/01/02/predicting-iowa/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jan 2012 23:20:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign Ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=5001</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>I realize everyone is probably already sick of hearing predictions about the Iowa Republican caucuses, and if this does indeed describe you then you should probably go watch a football game or something -- because that's exactly what we're going to do today: throw prognosticatory Hawkeye darts at the wall, and take our chances as we may.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/01/02/predicting-iowa/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
