<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>ChrisWeigant.com &#187; Domestic Policy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.chrisweigant.com/category/domestic-policy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com</link>
	<description>Reality-based political commentary</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Sep 2010 00:25:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Will Obama Nominate Elizabeth Warren Tomorrow?</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/09/09/will-obama-nominate-elizabeth-warren-tomorrow/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/09/09/will-obama-nominate-elizabeth-warren-tomorrow/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Sep 2010 00:24:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Name-dropping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=2675</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>President Obama may be on the verge of a significant announcement -- the nomination of Elizabeth Warren to head the newly-formed Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.  This is pure conjecture on my part, I have to admit right up front.  But politically, it would indeed give the president a boost right when he needs it most, heading into the midterm election season.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/09/09/will-obama-nominate-elizabeth-warren-tomorrow/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama&#039;s Bipartisan Obsession (Finally) Ends</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/09/08/obamas-bipartisan-obsession-finally-ends/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/09/08/obamas-bipartisan-obsession-finally-ends/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 00:06:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=2670</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>President Barack Obama gave a wowser of a speech today.  In it, he signaled that he's completely over his obsession with chasing the non-existent pipe dream of bipartisanship from Republicans.  Obama dove into the 2010 election season fray with this speech, and appeared much more like the "Candidate Obama" that so many of his supporters have been missing for so long.  In a speech that was touted as an announcement of a legislative package to get the economy moving faster, Obama not only rolled out his economic ideas, but also did a better job of defining the Democratic narrative than he's done in quite a while.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/09/08/obamas-bipartisan-obsession-finally-ends/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>19</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>San Francisco Mime Troupe&#039;s Latest: &quot;POSIBILIDAD, or Death of the Worker&quot;</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/09/06/san-francisco-mime-troupes-latest-posibilidad-or-death-of-the-worker/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/09/06/san-francisco-mime-troupes-latest-posibilidad-or-death-of-the-worker/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Sep 2010 22:08:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Interviews]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=2658</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The play is unabashedly Leftist, in the classic meaning of the term.  It tells two parallel stories of factories facing shutdowns, and the possibilities open to them; one from modern-day San Francisco and one from a few years ago in Argentina, and it manages to link these two stories in a very personal way through the lead female character.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/09/06/san-francisco-mime-troupes-latest-posibilidad-or-death-of-the-worker/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [137] -- Listen To Westen And Lakoff, Democrats!</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/09/03/ftp137/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/09/03/ftp137/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 23:24:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign Ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Talking Points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Name-dropping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=2649</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Jollification aside, though, we're still one week away from Congress returning to briefly do their job (or at least give the appearance of doing so), before they award themselves another month or so off, in order to campaign.  Labor Day is right around the corner (or perhaps blowing past the corner at 75 miles per hour, if you live in the hurricane zone -- which contains, my television assures me, everything east of about Denver).</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/09/03/ftp137/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Borderline Truthiness</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/09/02/borderline-truthiness/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/09/02/borderline-truthiness/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 23:57:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=2643</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>But politics isn't social science, where causality must be rigorously proven.  Politics is, to be blunt, whatever you can get away with saying to the voters.  Think not B.F. Skinner, but rather P.T. Barnum, in other words.  "Event X happened because party Y passed legislation Z" is an <em>expected</em> statement from a politician, on any subject under the sun.  Call it "spin" if you will, but a large part of it lies in convincing the American public that you have a right to claim credit because of your policies.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/09/02/borderline-truthiness/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Turning The Page On Iraq</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/08/31/turning-the-page-on-iraq/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/08/31/turning-the-page-on-iraq/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Sep 2010 01:53:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=2626</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Obama struck a rather humble tone in his remarks, which seemed just about right for the situation.  He didn't go out of his way to either claim personal credit, or point the finger of blame.  He even included President Bush, by name, in his remarks, after phoning him earlier today.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/08/31/turning-the-page-on-iraq/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [136] -- Girding For Battle</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/08/27/ftp136/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/08/27/ftp136/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Aug 2010 23:36:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Free Speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Talking Points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Name-dropping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=2609</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The big fight this election season hasn't really dawned yet.  And all the issues in the past will likely pale in comparison to the big fight that's just ahead of us.  Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (to his credit) set up this fight, right before the midterm election's homestretch.  The big fight this year is going to be over extending the Bush tax cuts to the wealthiest two percent of American workers, and to the top three percent of American small businesses.  On the other side are, respectively, <em>ninety-eight percent</em> of American workers, and <em>ninety-seven percent</em> of American small businesses.  Not bad odds, even for Democrats.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/08/27/ftp136/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>46</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tea Party&#039;s GOP Hostile Takeover Continues</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/08/25/tea-partys-gop-hostile-takeover-continues/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/08/25/tea-partys-gop-hostile-takeover-continues/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Aug 2010 00:03:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Bill of Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=2593</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The answer, as with all things Tea Party, is (once again): "it's hard to be sure."  We won't really know until after the midterm elections, and at that point so much "spin" will be on the airwaves one might (if one grew up in Kansas, for the sake of argument) be excused the immediate impulse to run for the tornado shelter in the backyard.  In other words, even <em>after</em> the elections, the answer is going to depend on who is doing the answering.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/08/25/tea-partys-gop-hostile-takeover-continues/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>27</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Disappointing Poll Results</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/08/24/disappointing-poll-results/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/08/24/disappointing-poll-results/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Aug 2010 00:53:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=2587</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Yesterday we <a href="http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/08/23/to-lefties-how-does-obama-disappoint/">ran a poll here</a> on why, exactly, Obama has disappointed so many Lefties (and other people who voted for him).  Today we present the results of this poll, which (so far) has garnered exactly 100 entries, a statistically nice round number.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/08/24/disappointing-poll-results/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>16</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>To Lefties: How Does Obama Disappoint?</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/08/23/to-lefties-how-does-obama-disappoint/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/08/23/to-lefties-how-does-obama-disappoint/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Aug 2010 23:42:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Bill of Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=2581</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Since it's Monday, meaning this column will appear in <em>Huffington Post</em> as well as on my own website, I thought I'd do the courtesy of actually asking a fairly large, fairly Lefty audience what they thought, instead of just offering up my own explanations for the phenomenon.  So, what do you think?  I promise I'll tally everyone's comments in an effort to try to qualify what the Left (or at least, the portion of it reading this) really thinks about their disappointment with the president.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/08/23/to-lefties-how-does-obama-disappoint/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>34</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [135] -- The Sky Is Falling!</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/08/20/ftp135/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/08/20/ftp135/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Aug 2010 00:08:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Free Speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Talking Points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Bill of Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=2568</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The media, quite obviously, has lost any capacity it once may have had for self-examination, to say nothing of its sense of irony.  Every so often, this is proven beyond doubt by a single story.  This, sadly, is one of those times.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/08/20/ftp135/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>72</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [134] -- Some Reality For Gibbs</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/08/13/ftp134/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/08/13/ftp134/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Aug 2010 00:36:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign Ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Talking Points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Name-dropping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=2534</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Because before we get to that, we simply must begin our column the way we do every week here, which is to call for the abolition of the Pentagon.  Yes, as we've done consistently for the past 133 weeks, we demand that the Defense Department's budget be zeroed out entirely.  Oh, and also that we immediately adopt a Canadian-style health care system.  Can't forget that, as we've been railing about it for ever since Friday Talking Points, Volume One.  And lest we forget, President Obama is nothing more than George W. Bush's third term.  As I said, none of this will come as any surprise to faithful readers, since we've been saying this sort of thing all along, ever since we were massively disappointed that Dennis Kucinich didn't win the presidency.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/08/13/ftp134/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>120</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>If Gay Marriage Wins...</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/08/09/if-gay-marriage-wins/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/08/09/if-gay-marriage-wins/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Aug 2010 23:36:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Bill of Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=2508</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Last week, a federal judge handed down his decision in the case  <em>Perry v. Schwarzenegger</em>, which said (in no uncertain terms) that gay marriage was a civil right, and should be guaranteed to all -- no matter what voters thought about it -- in much the same way that interracial marriage is a constitutional right guaranteed to all (which happened via a similarly-contentious federal court ruling in the 1960s).  While this ruling was rightfully hailed by gay rights supporters, everyone knows that there is still a long road ahead until it reaches the Supreme Court, where the matter may be fundamentally decided.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/08/09/if-gay-marriage-wins/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>20</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [133] -- The Silly Season Begins</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/08/06/ftp133/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/08/06/ftp133/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Aug 2010 00:45:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign Ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Talking Points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Bill of Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=2500</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>August in Washington means the beginning of the official "silly season" of politics.  This is because Congress takes the whole month off, and political news stories become rather thin on the ground.  Intrepid political reporters, wishing to be on vacation themselves, get lazy and start going crazy over non-stories hyped into political wildfires seemingly overnight -- over the silliest of subjects.  But these fun and games have not quite yet begun, because the Senate wrapped up work this week, and a few legal decisions of great moment were in the news.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/08/06/ftp133/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>160</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Perry v. Schwarzenegger</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/08/05/perry-v-schwarzenegger/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/08/05/perry-v-schwarzenegger/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Aug 2010 23:40:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Bill of Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=2495</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>There are certain court cases everyone schooled in America at least recognizes the names of: <em>Marbury v. Madison, Plessy v. Ferguson, Brown v. Board of Education</em>, and, most recently, <em>Roe v. Wade</em>.  Even if you don't remember the particular details in these cases, chances are you'll at least have heard all of these names before.  And we could be on the brink of another landmark case entering this pantheon of pivotal legal decisions: <em>Perry v. Schwarzenegger</em>.  Yes, California's "Governator" may go down in history as being on the wrong side of this case (even though he personally supports overturning Proposition 8).</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/08/05/perry-v-schwarzenegger/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama Poll Watch -- July, 2010</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/08/04/opw1007/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/08/04/opw1007/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Aug 2010 21:32:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama Poll Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=2485</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>President Barack Obama has reached the first crossover point of his presidency, where his job approval numbers with the public are lower than his disapproval numbers.  This is not exactly good news for Obama fans, especially heading into a midterm election.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/08/04/opw1007/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Conservative Mosque Hypocrisy</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/08/03/conservative-mosque-hypocrisy/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/08/03/conservative-mosque-hypocrisy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Aug 2010 22:41:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Free Speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Bill of Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=2474</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Instead, I am amazed once again (even though I really shouldn't be by this point) at how adept Republicans and conservatives (but not hardcore Libertarians, I have to admit, who generally put their political philosophy above pandering to the public) are at suddenly throwing large parts of their core ideology over the side of the boat whenever something is happening (or about to happen) that they just don't agree with on a gut level.  "Get the government off everyone's back!" very quickly becomes: "Get the government into your bedroom, your end-of-life decisions, or what chemicals you choose to ingest in the privacy of your own home -- and do it in a manner which we agree with!"</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/08/03/conservative-mosque-hypocrisy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>67</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://www.nyc.gov/html/om/html/2010b/media/pc080310_govisland512k.asx" length="471" type="video/x-ms-asf" />
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [132] -- The DMV?  Really?</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/07/30/ftp132/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/07/30/ftp132/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 23:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign Ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Talking Points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=2453</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Whoops!  Looks like the first thing that's been going on is that the region <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/07/29/AR2010072905868.html">now has a new nickname</a> -- the "DMV" -- amongst the hipster set (note: I fully understand that that use of "hipster" automatically disqualifies me from judging what is cool and what is not among today's youth).  This moniker comes from the hip-hop music scene, and it stands for "District (of Columbia), Maryland, and Virginia."</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/07/30/ftp132/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>29</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cocaine Sentencing Injustice Slightly Lessened</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/07/29/cocaine-sentencing-injustice-slightly-lessened/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/07/29/cocaine-sentencing-injustice-slightly-lessened/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 07:34:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=2442</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Crack cocaine, it is widely known, causes irrational behavior.  I speak not of irrational behavior among the drug's users, but rather among politicians.  It has done so ever since crack appeared on the scene in America during the 1980s.  Today it was announced that Congress has approved a bill (which will now head for President Obama's desk) which will scale back the worst of the irrational legislation which passed in the Reagan era.  Somewhat.  In true incrementalist fashion, Democrats have now made things <em>slightly less unfair</em>, but fell far short of actual fairness.  It's as if, right after the Civil War, Congress announced that black people would now count as <em>four</em>-fifths of a person, instead of the previous three-fifths -- in other words, a step towards equality, but not exactly the giant leap of the Thirteenth and Fourteenth Amendments.  Which makes it rather hard to praise such an effort, even though it does represent (some) progress.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/07/29/cocaine-sentencing-injustice-slightly-lessened/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Reaganomics Today</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/07/22/reaganomics-today/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/07/22/reaganomics-today/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2010 00:00:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cartoons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Humor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=2428</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Another dispatch from our resident cartoonist, C.W. Cunningham.  And you thought there would be nothing here but a reprint of an old column today... surprise!
&#160;

About the Cartoonist  &#124;  Reprint Policy
&#160;
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/07/22/reaganomics-today/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>More Biden, Please</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/07/19/more-biden-please/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/07/19/more-biden-please/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jul 2010 00:29:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Vice President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=2412</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The White House is, quite obviously, getting back into campaign mode.  This is a good thing for Democrats, because it means putting the last spadeful of dirt on the carcass of President Obama's hopes of bipartisanship in Washington during his term of office.  But while Obama has recently begun to make the case to voters why electing Democrats this November is a good idea, Vice President Joe Biden has apparently been doing a much better job in terms of framing the debate on Democratic terms.  Which means the smartest thing Obama could do right now is to send the Vice President out in front of the media and in front of campaign events to make the case a lot more strongly than Obama could (or should).  In other words: more Biden, please.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/07/19/more-biden-please/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>32</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [131] -- Democratic Campaign Advice</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/07/16/ftp131/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/07/16/ftp131/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jul 2010 23:14:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Talking Points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=2403</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>This week, Congress -- moving with its usual less-than-blinding speed -- passed a Wall Street reform bill, a mere two years after the crisis hit.  Wall Street responded by pulling a secret lever which caused the biggest earthquake Washington has ever felt.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/07/16/ftp131/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>37</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Some Good News For Obama</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/07/15/some-good-news-for-obama/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/07/15/some-good-news-for-obama/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jul 2010 23:32:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=2398</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>President Obama got two pieces of good news today: the Senate passed Wall Street reform, and the volcano of oil on the seabed of the Gulf of Mexico may finally have been brought under control.  Whether this does him any good with the public remains to be seen, however.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/07/15/some-good-news-for-obama/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>18</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Fall Political Schedule</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/07/13/the-fall-political-schedule/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/07/13/the-fall-political-schedule/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jul 2010 23:11:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign Ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=2393</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The next few weeks could turn out to be the most important politically in the remainder of this year.  Because this may be the last chance Congress has of passing any big or contentious legislation, before politics consumes everything (even more than at the current time).  This is due to a combination of factors, but mostly boils down to the congressional calendar and the midterm election season.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/07/13/the-fall-political-schedule/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>68</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How Democrats Should Respond To Jon Kyl</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/07/12/how-democrats-should-respond-to-jon-kyl/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/07/12/how-democrats-should-respond-to-jon-kyl/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jul 2010 23:57:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=2386</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>But this blade cuts both ways.  If Republicans are going to stop a bill to extend unemployment which costs less than $40 billion, then how can they turn around and advocate extending the Bush tax cuts on the rich which would cost almost <em>seven hundred billion dollars</em> and still say with a straight face that they're some sort of "deficit hawks"?</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/07/12/how-democrats-should-respond-to-jon-kyl/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>17</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [130] -- Who Is This &quot;They&quot; Obama Speaks Of?</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/07/09/ftp130/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/07/09/ftp130/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jul 2010 00:17:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Talking Points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Vice President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=2374</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>My biggest problem with both Obama's speech and Emanuel's interview is that neither one of them truly seems to understand that an election is underway.  The word "Republican" is not uttered once by President Obama.  Rahm only uses the word four times, and only two of those are really drawing distinctions between what Democrats want to do, and what Republicans want to do (or, more to the point, not to do).  And <em>neither one of them</em> uses the word "Democrat" (or "Democrats" or "Democratic") <em>once</em>.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/07/09/ftp130/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>75</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama Poll Watch -- June, 2010</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/07/07/opw1006/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/07/07/opw1006/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jul 2010 22:29:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama Poll Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=2360</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Obama, after gaining a bit in his average approval ratings in May, slipped back in June.  But the reversal was slight, continuing a five-month streak of amazingly stable numbers.  Since February, Obama's approval rating has stayed within one half of one percentage point, which is pretty remarkable.  Unfortunately, this trend may be at an end, and his numbers may be headed even further downwards in July.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/07/07/opw1006/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>31</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Media&#039;s Tea Party</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/07/06/the-medias-tea-party/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/07/06/the-medias-tea-party/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jul 2010 23:58:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Other]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=2354</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The Tea Party movement could possibly be generalized as a group of people who are proud of (and sometimes revel in) being impossible to generalize.  This, of course, doesn't stop the media from trying.  In today's sad state of American journalism, everything's got to have a simplistic narrative that fits within a 15-second soundbite, at the very maximum.  Nuances and subtleties are out.  Strong statements beginning with phrases like: "The Tea Partiers are..." (or "...believe...", or "....as a group...") are what is in.  But even given this reduction in critical thinking, what's amazing is how wrong the media has gotten the Tea Partiers (or, at the least, a goodly portion of them).</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/07/06/the-medias-tea-party/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pessimism On Immigration Reform</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/07/01/pessimism-on-immigration-reform/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/07/01/pessimism-on-immigration-reform/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jul 2010 00:59:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=2334</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>President Obama gave a speech today on immigration reform.  He made his case, and pleaded with Congress to deliver up a comprehensive legislative package on the issue.  But chances of this happening, as the old saw goes, are somewhere between "slim" and "none."  Perhaps President Obama will achieve immigration reform at some point in his presidency, but I personally just don't see it happening any time soon.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/07/01/pessimism-on-immigration-reform/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Republicans Fighting To Increase Deficit</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/06/29/republicans-fighting-to-increase-deficit/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/06/29/republicans-fighting-to-increase-deficit/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jun 2010 05:03:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=2323</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The Wall Street reform bill, now christened Dodd-Frank, is entering its final stretch this week.  The House/Senate conference committee is finishing up work on the bill, and the goal is to get it through both houses of Congress and on the president's desk by July Fourth.  A quick look at a calendar shows that this is a very tight schedule.  To complicate matters, the death of Senator Robert Byrd now means the Democrats are short a vote they had been counting on.  Which means they need some Republicans to vote with them, or the bill won't survive the inevitable filibuster attempt.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/06/29/republicans-fighting-to-increase-deficit/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Supreme Court Helps Out Kagan</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/06/28/supreme-court-helps-out-kagan/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/06/28/supreme-court-helps-out-kagan/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jun 2010 00:50:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Free Speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Bill of Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=2319</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>A Supreme Court ruling just out may serve to blunt Republican criticism of Elena Kagan, who started her confirmation hearings today in the Senate.  So far, Republicans haven't come up with much of any substance to attack Kagan on (although I admit, I haven't watched any of today's confirmation hearings yet), but they all pretty much agree upon one issue -- the fact that Kagan, as dean of the Harvard law school, upheld a school policy of barring military recruiters from campus due to the fact that the military discriminates against gays.  But the ruling in <em>Christian Legal Society v. Martinez</em> seems to give the high court's imprimatur to universities not allowing groups that practice such discrimination on campus -- which Kagan can now point to in defense of her position.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/06/28/supreme-court-helps-out-kagan/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [129] -- Incrementalism Wins Big</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/06/25/ftp129/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/06/25/ftp129/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jun 2010 23:52:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Talking Points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=2308</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>We're going to begin today with the news that a popular New Jersey beach is considering allowing women to sunbathe topless.  And then move right on to the financial reform bill, by way of a neck-snapping segue.  Just to warn you up front.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/06/25/ftp129/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [128] -- Merry Bartonmas!</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/06/18/ftp128/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/06/18/ftp128/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jun 2010 00:27:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Talking Points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=2285</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Christmas has come in June for the Democratic Party.  Republican Joe Barton just delivered a huge, nicely wrapped present to Democrats.  The only question is whether they'll open it and make use of it, or halfheartedly play with it once and then throw it in a corner (since the Democratic Party is kind of fickle about using such free gifts from Republicans, for no explicable reason whatsoever).  But more on the flailing Joe Barton in a bit.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/06/18/ftp128/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>38</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama Seizes The Moment?</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/06/15/obama-seizes-the-moment/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/06/15/obama-seizes-the-moment/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jun 2010 04:38:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=2270</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>President Obama, in his first-ever primetime address from the Oval Office, did not mince words.  He didn't have time to -- the speech was one of the shortest I think I've ever seen from Barack Obama, clocking in at 17 or 18 minutes.  But although he didn't take a lot of time, he covered a lot.  Of particular note was the directness of his language, which at times could even be described as "forceful."</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/06/15/obama-seizes-the-moment/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>32</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama&#039;s Pivotal Week</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/06/14/obamas-pivotal-week/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/06/14/obamas-pivotal-week/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jun 2010 00:30:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=2260</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>All this activity is welcome, because up until now the White House has seemed a bit adrift in their response to the tragedy.  They may have been on top of the entire situation from Day One, as they claim, but it wasn't readily apparent to the public, meaning they either were actually adrift, or they have been having a communication and press relations problem.  This must be frustrating to the White House, since the press has been somewhat lacking in their own response and coverage.  Case in point, after obsessing for a solid week that the president needed to "show some rage" over the situation, the press immediately pounced when Obama did show a bit of annoyance, immediately proclaiming that he was "too angry," or the press just giggled in true Beavis and Butthead fashion: "heh heh heh... the president said <em>ass</em>... heh heh."</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/06/14/obamas-pivotal-week/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [127] -- Letting A Crisis Go To Waste</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/06/11/ftp127/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/06/11/ftp127/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jun 2010 00:28:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Talking Points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=2248</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>President Barack Obama's administration was supposed to follow a basic premise: never let a crisis go to waste.  That was according to one of his own advisors, shortly after Obama took office.  But so far, their track record on doing so has been decidedly mixed.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/06/11/ftp127/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>35</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Wall Street Reform Conference Committee Membership Announced</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/06/09/wall-street-reform-conference-committee-membership-announced/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/06/09/wall-street-reform-conference-committee-membership-announced/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jun 2010 00:50:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=2228</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The Wall Street reform effort in Congress will enter a new phase tomorrow, as the conference committee between the House and Senate will meet to begin hashing out the differences between the House and Senate versions which have already passed.  The membership of this conference committee was announced today, and the committee will hold its first meeting tomorrow.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/06/09/wall-street-reform-conference-committee-membership-announced/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [126] -- We&#039;d Like Our Gulf Back</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/06/04/ftp126/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/06/04/ftp126/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jun 2010 00:04:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Talking Points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=2199</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The mainstream media, led by the intrepid White House press corps, closely followed by the inside-the-Beltway punditocracy, has declared what must happen for the oil to stop flowing into the Gulf of Mexico: President Obama needs to get angry at the oil.
I wish I were kidding, but sadly, I am not.  This is the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/06/04/ftp126/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>21</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Swampiness</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/06/03/swampiness/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/06/03/swampiness/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jun 2010 05:12:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=2195</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Washington, before it became a city, was a swamp.  You can put fancy neoclassical buildings up everywhere, but it seems you can never get rid of the inherent swampiness of the town.  Sigh.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/06/03/swampiness/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>20</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama Poll Watch -- May, 2010</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/06/02/opw1005/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/06/02/opw1005/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jun 2010 08:27:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign Ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama Poll Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=2183</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>While I would immediately caution everyone not to get overly optimistic about what I'm about to say, President Obama's approval rating was looking up in April.  Gains were modest, but were pretty much across the board.  Although, as I said, the end of the month saw a slight reversal to this trend, likely the result of the drip, drip, drip nature (or, more properly, "gush, gush, gush") of the BP oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/06/02/opw1005/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Memorializing Second-Class Soldiers</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/05/31/memorializing-second-class-soldiers/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/05/31/memorializing-second-class-soldiers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jun 2010 00:16:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Bill of Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=2169</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Memorial Day is the time to memorialize all the brave individuals who served our country throughout its history, and sometimes paid the ultimate price for doing so.  But, in particular, this year I'd like to focus on all those who did their duty for their country, and fought for the American ideal of equality for all citizens -- even while they did not enjoy such rights themselves, either in the military or in American life at the time.  These second-class citizens, one would think, would have even less reason than citizens accorded full rights under the law to risk death on a foreign battlefield, and therefore would not have volunteered to do so.  One would be wrong in thinking this, however.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/05/31/memorializing-second-class-soldiers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [125] -- Ask!  Tell!</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/05/28/ftp125/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/05/28/ftp125/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 May 2010 23:11:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Talking Points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=2156</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Our headline today quite obviously references the legislative progress this week on banning the military's "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" policy (of not allowing gay people to openly serve their country)... but we've got another asking-and-telling issue which we simply <em>must</em> deal with first, before we get to any of that.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/05/28/ftp125/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>21</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Separating Enforcement From Permission</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/05/26/separating-enforcement-from-permission/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/05/26/separating-enforcement-from-permission/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 May 2010 23:45:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Vice President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=2144</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>This, it should be easy to see, is a conflict of interest.  If an agency's main purpose is to make money off of an industry (by the granting of oil drilling leases, for example), but also to police that industry, then there is an inherent, built-in conflict.  When one part of the agency does its job better, the other part of the agency can't do its job as well.  These jobs may not be mutually exclusive, but they're definitely working at cross purposes.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/05/26/separating-enforcement-from-permission/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ask Rand Paul What He Would Cut</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/05/24/ask-rand-paul-what-he-would-cut/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/05/24/ask-rand-paul-what-he-would-cut/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 May 2010 01:08:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=2133</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The recent controversy over Republican senatorial nominee Rand Paul's comments and views on civil rights (and on the role of the federal government versus private business and private individuals in general), is certainly entertaining and quite possibly damaging to his candidacy (or possibly not, this is Kentucky we're talking about, after all), but at the same time it is probably not going to be the key issue that decides Kentucky voters this November.  It's a pretty safe assumption that most people for whom civil rights are a top voting issue have already made up their minds not to vote for Paul anyway.  But there's a much more fundamental argument to have with Tea Party candidates like Paul (and Republican candidates in general) which, so far, has been missing in the media debate.  The real question that should be asked is: "What, exactly, in the federal budget will you cut to 'rein in Washington spending' and attack the deficit?"  Because the answers to that are going to be the most effective argument to make against the Tea Party movement's surge within the Republican Party -- because my guess is that no matter what they answer, the voters are not going to like it.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/05/24/ask-rand-paul-what-he-would-cut/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [124] -- How&#039;s That Libertarian Thingie Workin&#039; Out For Ya?</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/05/21/ftp124/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/05/21/ftp124/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 May 2010 00:02:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2008 Electoral Math]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign Ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Talking Points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=2119</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The new media narrative, which is exactly what the White House was pushing just <em>before</em> the primaries happened, coincidentally (for once, Democratic framing actually worked -- the media snapped it up like a cheese puff at cocktail hour) is now: "it's an anti-incumbent year."  The White House was pushing this, because it is a lot better sounding than what the media was using previously, which was: "it's an anti-Democrat year," or even: "it's an anti-Obama-agenda year."  Of course, even if it is just an "anti-incumbent" year, Democrats still have more incumbencies to defend, so it's not like the party's out of the woods yet in regards to November.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/05/21/ftp124/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Straight-Up, No-Chaser Libertarianism</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/05/20/straight-up-no-chaser-libertarianism/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/05/20/straight-up-no-chaser-libertarianism/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 May 2010 23:30:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Bill of Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=2114</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Rand Paul, who just clinched the Republican Party nomination for the Senate race in Kentucky, is apparently not quite ready for primetime.  His recent remarks on the Civil Rights Act painfully show why being a politician is not as easy as some people think.  The problem for Paul, son of Ron Paul, is that even if he somehow survives this flap, it is almost guaranteed that there are going to be plenty more of them during the campaign.  Because both Pauls, father and son, are (at heart) libertarians.  Which requires some explanation, because many folks have never come into contact with the concept of libertarianism.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/05/20/straight-up-no-chaser-libertarianism/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>17</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [123] -- A Working Senate</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/05/14/ftp123/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/05/14/ftp123/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 May 2010 00:59:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Talking Points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=2087</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Now, you can take this as a joke in one of two ways.  The first, of course, pokes fun at the fact that the Senate takes an absolutely <em>gargantuan</em> amount of vacation time every year, when they are instead supposed to be doing "The People's Business."  The second, of course, refers to the fact that the Senate is somewhat of a broken mechanism these days, notorious for not getting much done, ever, on anything.  Compare, for instance, the amount of bills the House passes to the glacial pace of "work" in the Senate, of late.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/05/14/ftp123/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Arizona&#039;s Forbidding Landscape</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/05/13/arizonas-forbidding-landscape/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/05/13/arizonas-forbidding-landscape/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 May 2010 02:02:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Bill of Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=2082</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Arizona is a truly beautiful state.  It has many spectacular sights, of which the Grand Canyon is the most awe-inspiring.  But Arizona is also a state of forbidding landscapes -- much of the state is desert or near-desert, where the heat of the midday sun is a force of nature to be heavily respected, if not downright feared.  But what has put Arizona into the news recently is its "forbidding" political landscape.  Specifically, on immigration.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/05/13/arizonas-forbidding-landscape/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>32</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Republicans Boycott Arizona?</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/05/12/republicans-boycott-arizona/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/05/12/republicans-boycott-arizona/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 May 2010 00:15:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=2076</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>It was <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/05/12/AR2010051203317.html?hpid=topnews">just announced</a> that the 2012 Republican National Convention will be held in Tampa, Florida, rather than Salt Lake City, Utah or Phoenix, Arizona, the other two cities that were in the running.  Now, it's pretty easy to see why Utah would be contentious, seeing as how Mitt Romney may be the party's nominee.  Holding the GOP convention in the heart of Mormonism would seem to be some sort of tacit party endorsement of Romney, in other words.  Or perhaps it's just that the conventioneers want to have more fun (and more bars) available to them while they go about the sober (ahem) business of nominating their presidential candidate.  But Phoenix is another story entirely.  Because I can't help but think that the Republican Party just imposed their own <em>de facto</em> boycott of Arizona, due to the state's recent legislative anti-immigrant fervor.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/05/12/republicans-boycott-arizona/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>18</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Democratic Primary Overview</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/05/10/democratic-primary-overview/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/05/10/democratic-primary-overview/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 May 2010 01:43:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign Ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=2051</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>While the Tea Party folks have gotten a lot of attention from the media in the Republican primaries so far, there are a few Democratic primary races which may have just as interesting an impact on the Democrats as the Tea Party challenges are having for Republicans.  And since last week <a href="http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/05/05/tea-partys-midterm-influence/">I took a look</a> at the effect of the Tea Partiers in Republican races, today I thought it would be worth paying some attention to the Democratic side of the aisle.  Because the anti-incumbent "throw the bums out" feeling seems to be happening to some degree in both parties this year.  What it all means for the general election remains to be seen, of course.  For now, let's take a look at a handful of these upcoming primary races.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/05/10/democratic-primary-overview/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [122] -- Bikini Bottom Update</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/05/07/ftp122/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/05/07/ftp122/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 May 2010 01:00:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign Ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Talking Points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Name-dropping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pakistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Bill of Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=2039</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Since it's the Friday after month's-end, the new monthly unemployment numbers were released today.  Which adds another bar to the "bikini bottom" chart.  Now, the measure of how many people know exactly what this means is exactly the measure of how well Democrats are getting the "jobs" message out.  Because, as I've said previously, this chart should be front and center in the Democrats' campaigns this year.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/05/07/ftp122/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>47</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama Poll Watch -- April, 2010</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/05/03/opw1004/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/05/03/opw1004/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 May 2010 09:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama Poll Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=1989</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>I'm starting to feel a little like Martin's character, I have to admit.  Because President Barack Obama seems to have hit a plateau in his approval ratings, which have remained largely unchanged for the past three months now, and not significantly changed since last November.  Could it be that we've all just made up our minds about the job the president is doing?  Should I just end this with "next Obama Poll Watch column in three months...?"</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/05/03/opw1004/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>25</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [121] -- Swampy Muck</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/04/30/ftp121/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/04/30/ftp121/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Apr 2010 22:57:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Talking Points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=1969</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Boy, Louisiana just can't seem to catch a break, can it?  If it isn't Mother Nature walloping it with hurricanes, its a man-made disaster of enormous proportions about to bury its bayous and waterways under a blanket of foul-smelling muck.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/04/30/ftp121/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Reid Leads</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/04/28/reid-leads/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/04/28/reid-leads/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Apr 2010 23:08:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=1958</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid just showed Democrats what real leadership (and what bargaining from a position of strength) looks like.  After three days of repeated cloture votes to bring Chris Dodd's Wall Street reform bill to the floor of the Senate for debate, it appears the Republicans are ready to blink.  The Republicans successfully managed to block the debate, in three successive votes, but they know they're paying a political price for doing so.  At this point, the only question is how many of them will jump the aisle and vote with the Democrats in the next vote.<p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/04/28/reid-leads/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ben Nelson Twists In The Wind</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/04/27/ben-nelson-twists-in-the-wind/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/04/27/ben-nelson-twists-in-the-wind/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Apr 2010 00:48:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=1953</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid held a second vote today on whether to begin debate on the Wall Street reform bill put forth by Senator Chris Dodd.  As expected, all the Republicans voted against openly debating the bill once again.  Also as expected, all the Democrats voted to move forward.  Except one.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/04/27/ben-nelson-twists-in-the-wind/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Reid Calls Republicans&#039; Bluff</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/04/26/reid-calls-republicans-bluff/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/04/26/reid-calls-republicans-bluff/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Apr 2010 00:54:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=1946</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid just scored a political victory by <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/04/26/AR2010042601969.html?hpid=topnews">losing a vote</a>.  That sounds counterintuitive, but it's true.  By failing to bring the Wall Street reform bill written by Chris Dodd to the floor for debate, and by losing a cloture vote on the issue to Republican opposition, Reid has shown that the Democrats (and the White House) have learned a few lessons from the health reform debate.  Because by refusing to back down, and refusing to "compromise" (read: water the bill down and add loopholes for Wall Street) with Republicans, Reid is showing real strength, and real leadership.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/04/26/reid-calls-republicans-bluff/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [120] -- Republicans Chicken Out</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/04/23/ftp120/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/04/23/ftp120/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Apr 2010 08:53:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Talking Points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Bill of Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=1931</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Democrats had a pretty good week last week.  As attention shifts away from unpronounceable volcanoes (more on them in a moment) to the struggle in the Senate over Wall Street reform, the two parties almost seem to have changed their normal methods of playing the political game.  The Republicans are all over the map on the issue, and extremely worried about the impression by angry voters that they are doing Wall Street's bidding -- as well they should be.  Republicans are, one day, loudly denouncing the reform bill, using their standard Big Lie technique... and then, the next day, saying a deal is very close, and even voting for strong reform in committees.  Republicans (some of them, at least) are chickening out of the upcoming partisan battle the Republican leadership seems to want over the issue (more on chickens later on, too). Democrats have, so far, managed both to admirably stay on message and showed an amazing amount of backbone in countering specious Republican arguments.  And, so far, polls show the voters are solidly on the Democrats' side on this one, and just <em>not buying</em> what Republicans are telling them.  As I said, we seem to have entered BackwardsLand, or something.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/04/23/ftp120/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>62</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>EPA Moves To End Mountaintop-Removal Mining</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/04/22/epa-moves-to-end-mountaintop-removal-mining/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/04/22/epa-moves-to-end-mountaintop-removal-mining/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Apr 2010 23:08:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=1926</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Instead, I'd like to highlight some good environmentalist news from a few weeks ago, which didn't really get much media attention at the time.  Perhaps if they had delayed the announcement, it would have made a bigger splash today, being Earth Day and all.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/04/22/epa-moves-to-end-mountaintop-removal-mining/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>D.C. Legalizes Medical Marijuana</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/04/20/d-c-legalizes-medical-marijuana/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/04/20/d-c-legalizes-medical-marijuana/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Apr 2010 01:17:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Humor]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=1914</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The Washington, D.C. Council voted today to legalize medicinal marijuana.  The <em>Washington Post</em> <a href="http://voices.washingtonpost.com/local-breaking-news/dc/dc-council-approves-medical-ma.html?hpid=topnews">reported the story</a> in a straightforward manner, which failed to note the amusing part of the story:</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/04/20/d-c-legalizes-medical-marijuana/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>26</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Big VAT Lie</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/04/19/a-big-vat-lie/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/04/19/a-big-vat-lie/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Apr 2010 23:56:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=1906</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>I speak of the "value-added tax," or "VAT."  Republicans are horrified that President Obama has a secret plan to pass this tax, and are shouting from the rooftops (of the nearest Fox News building) how strongly they're going to oppose it.  The facts that Obama himself has come out against the idea, and it seems to have <em>virtually no support</em> in Congress, have not gotten in the way of Republicans doing so, either.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/04/19/a-big-vat-lie/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [119] -- Democrats, Sell Yourselves!</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/04/16/ftp119/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/04/16/ftp119/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Apr 2010 23:43:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Talking Points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=1894</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>There was <a href="http://www.salon.com/news/feature/story/index.html?story=/news/feature/2010/04/15/us_odd_beer_bust">an amusing story</a> in the news recently about some folks who got word that a beer company had sent hundreds of cases of beer to the local dump, because it was past its expiration date.  Finding this a shame, these enterprising folks "liberated" themselves 50 cases of free beer, presumably to drink it forthwith.  The most amusing part was the closing quote in the article, from the beer company's president: "Beer is a popular product."</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/04/16/ftp119/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>17</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tax Day Secret -- Democrats Lowered Your Taxes!</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/04/15/tax-day-secret-democrats-lowered-your-taxes/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/04/15/tax-day-secret-democrats-lowered-your-taxes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Apr 2010 06:41:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=1890</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>My wife and I got an eight hundred dollar tax break this year.  In fact, almost everybody got this break -- four hundred bucks per person.  Apparently, it was passed as part of the stimulus package last year.  I do remember, at the time, hearing something about how Obama's stimulus changed people's take-home pay by readjusting the federal withholding figures, but I had no idea it would turn into eight hundred bucks back on my tax form.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/04/15/tax-day-secret-democrats-lowered-your-taxes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>51</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tea Partying&#039;s First Anniversary</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/04/14/tea-partyings-first-anniversary/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/04/14/tea-partyings-first-anniversary/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Apr 2010 23:59:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=1884</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>What I just wrote could describe tomorrow's "first anniversary" Tea Party rallies.  Or it could describe a late-1960s anti-war rally.  About the only thing these two historical eras have in common is the age of the driving force behind the protests.  In other words, don't look now, but the Baby Boomers are back in the streets.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/04/14/tea-partyings-first-anniversary/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>31</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>From The Archives -- Tea And Sympathy</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/04/13/from-the-archives-tea-and-sympathy/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/04/13/from-the-archives-tea-and-sympathy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Apr 2010 01:46:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=1879</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>[<em>Apologies for posting a repeat of an old column here, but I am busy doing my taxes, so didn't have the time to write today.  This column <a href="http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/04/13/tea-and-sympathy/">originally ran</a> here exactly one year ago today, and was written right before the first "tax day tea parties" took place.  It's hard to believe, looking back, that this entire movement is only one year old, but they began on tax day, 2009.  Since Thursday will likely see large anniversary rallies and marches by the Tea Party folks, I thought it was a good time to take a look back at the advice I gave to them last year, and the history of the Boston Tea Party as well.  So, if you'll forgive me for the repeat column, while I scurry around at the last minute to get my taxes done, I promise we'll resume new columns starting tomorrow.</em>]</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/04/13/from-the-archives-tea-and-sympathy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>15</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Can Harry Reid Deliver?</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/04/12/can-harry-reid-deliver/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/04/12/can-harry-reid-deliver/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Apr 2010 23:12:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=1873</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid already had a lot of things on his plate to get done in the Senate this year, even before last week's news broke.  Now he's facing two more big issues in the midst of an election year (and in the midst of a fight for his own political life in Nevada) -- a new nuclear arms reduction treaty with Russia, and an upcoming confirmation battle over a Supreme Court nomination.  Given that Harry Reid's Senate is not exactly known for moving with blinding speed (to be fair, few Senates are), one has to wonder whether Harry Reid can deliver on some of these big issues before the midterm elections or not.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/04/12/can-harry-reid-deliver/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>22</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [118] -- Cold War Jumps Shark</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/04/09/ftp118/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/04/09/ftp118/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Apr 2010 00:08:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Talking Points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=1848</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Yesterday, President Obama signed a strategic arms reduction treaty (the "New START") with the president of Russia.  This is the first nuclear warhead treaty with Russia in 20 years.  It will reduce both countries' stockpiles of nuclear warheads by one-third.  And, as far as the network news in America was concerned, it was a very ho-hum story.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/04/09/ftp118/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>31</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Just Say: &quot;Wall Street Reform&quot;</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/04/05/just-say-wall-street-reform/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/04/05/just-say-wall-street-reform/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Apr 2010 23:49:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=1790</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>"Can you say 'Wall Street reform'?  I <em>knew</em> you could!"</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/04/05/just-say-wall-street-reform/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is Your Email Private?</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/03/31/is-your-email-private/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/03/31/is-your-email-private/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Mar 2010 23:40:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=1762</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Is your email private?  You may think it is, but you may also be surprised how easy it is for law enforcement to access it without a warrant.  For instance, any email you write today requires a warrant before the police can take a look at it.  But 180 days from now, that <em>same email</em> that you just sent can be accessed without a warrant.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/03/31/is-your-email-private/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama Gets His Groove Back</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/03/30/obama-gets-his-groove-back/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/03/30/obama-gets-his-groove-back/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Mar 2010 00:28:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=1755</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>You can call it his groove, or you can call it his mojo, or (if you're less <em>Austin Powers</em>-minded), you can call it his political momentum.  But whatever you choose to call it, Barack Obama has emerged, phoenix-like, from the ashes of the healthcare debate rancor and is now forging ahead on many fronts.  This political rebirth is not guaranteed of success in any way, but it certainly is refreshing to see, I have to say.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/03/30/obama-gets-his-groove-back/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [117] -- Piece Of Cake</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/03/26/ftp117/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/03/26/ftp117/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Mar 2010 23:36:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Talking Points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Vice President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=1738</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>No matter how you slice it, President Obama and the Democrats in Congress have achieved a stunning legislative accomplishment -- one which had been pronounced dead over and over again for the past year by the punditocracy.  Obama has now delivered upon one of his signature campaign issues, and (by doing so) dramatically improved his party's chances in the upcoming midterm elections.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/03/26/ftp117/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>From The Archives: Healthcare Reform Struggle Will Not End This Year</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/03/25/from-the-archives-healthcare-reform-struggle-will-not-end-this-year/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/03/25/from-the-archives-healthcare-reform-struggle-will-not-end-this-year/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Mar 2010 00:25:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=1732</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>No matter <em>what</em> healthcare bill passes, it is not going to remain static.  It is going to be revisited again and again over the next few decades.  Everyone may remember the initial passage years from now as the big historic "turning point," but there will still be a lot of work left to make it a truly historic change.  That's the way of lawmaking.  Rather than bitterly denouncing whatever emerges from Congress as being far short of what you expected, see it instead as merely the beginning of the long road towards making the system work the way you want it to.  See it as a call to action, and not a defeat, if you really want to make it better.  And don't get discouraged, because these things always take more time to get right than anyone expects.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/03/25/from-the-archives-healthcare-reform-struggle-will-not-end-this-year/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Republicans Embrace &quot;Party Of No&quot; Label</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/03/24/republicans-embrace-party-of-no-label/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/03/24/republicans-embrace-party-of-no-label/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Mar 2010 00:55:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=1725</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The Republican Party has, up until recently, tried to distance itself from the "Party of No" label which Democrats are fond of using against them.  "It's all the Democrats' fault that we can't bask in the sunshine of bipartisanship," they used to say.  But since Barack Obama's signature health reform legislation passed, the Republicans seem to actually be <em>embracing</em> the "Party of No" concept.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/03/24/republicans-embrace-party-of-no-label/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>15</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Will Democrats Come Out Swinging?</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/03/23/will-democrats-come-out-swinging/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/03/23/will-democrats-come-out-swinging/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Mar 2010 00:04:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=1715</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Examining the politics of the recently-passed healthcare reform legislation is tough, at this point, because the game is in the immediate process of changing.  President Obama's team likes the term "game-changer," and it is rare indeed to be able to identify such game-changing while it is still in process.  Usually these things are only apparent after the fact, when viewed in retrospect.  But, for better or worse, passing healthcare reform has indeed changed the political game for this year's midterm elections.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/03/23/will-democrats-come-out-swinging/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>19</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Health Reform Post-Mortem</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/03/22/health-reform-post-mortem/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/03/22/health-reform-post-mortem/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 23:39:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=1709</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>A post-mortem, in the medical sense, is when you carve up a body to figure out why it died.  But the term has migrated into the patois of American business, where (in corporate terms) a post-mortem is a meeting held after the completion of a project, where you review the course of the project from beginning to end.  You look at what went right, and what went wrong, and then you try to improve the procedure for future projects, in an effort to avoid making the same mistakes over again.  Now that fight for health reform legislation (in one form or another) is just about over, I feel it's time to take a look back, and identify some areas for improvement for the future Democratic legislation.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/03/22/health-reform-post-mortem/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>20</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [116] -- Is It Sausage Yet?</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/03/19/ftp116/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/03/19/ftp116/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 23:51:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Talking Points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=1694</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>If nothing else comes of it, you've got to admit that the health reform movement has given a lot of people a very detailed education about the sausage-making process in Washington.  Remember when the word "reconciliation" was universally understood to mean "getting back together" instead of "open partisan warfare," for instance?  The tortuous process health reform has wound in its progress from where we were a year ago to where we stand today at least provided many "teachable moments" on how things actually happen in Washington.  And -- as the term "sausage making" implies -- some of it ain't pretty.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/03/19/ftp116/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>36</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Texas Schoolbooks</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/03/16/texas-schoolbooks/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/03/16/texas-schoolbooks/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 23:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=1678</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>So, no matter what Texas decides to teach in their classrooms, I hope Obama's push to get at least 48 states to agree on how to educate their children succeeds.  Furthermore, I hope that at some point down the line, Texas and Alaska both see the benefits of joining this effort as well.  This may be wildly optimistic, but I think the goal of standardizing what a high school diploma means in America is a good one, and I see this as the most positive step towards this end I think I've ever seen.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/03/16/texas-schoolbooks/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Can Democrats Govern?</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/03/15/can-democrats-govern/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/03/15/can-democrats-govern/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 00:23:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=1671</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The next two weeks in Congress may provide an answer to the metaphysical question "Can Democrats govern?"  If the answer turns out to be "no," then a large part of the electorate is going to decide that it is pointless to bother electing large majorities of Democrats to Congress, because they simply can't get anything done when they get there.  If the answer turns out to be "yes" (or even "kind of"), then Democrats may have a chance to make the case this fall that electing lots of Democrats is the way for the voters to go.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/03/15/can-democrats-govern/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [115] -- Git &#039;Er Done!</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/03/12/ftp115/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/03/12/ftp115/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 01:20:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Talking Points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=1661</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>However, we must also give a nod to <a href="http://www.larrythecableguy.com/">Larry the Cable Guy</a> here, and put it even more forcefully (and less ay-LEET-ist, of course) by phrasing it: "Git 'er done!"  Just to give credit where it is due.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/03/12/ftp115/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>24</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Republicans Up Ante On Earmark Ban</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/03/11/republicans-up-ante-on-earmark-ban/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/03/11/republicans-up-ante-on-earmark-ban/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 01:40:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=1656</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Yesterday, House Democrats <a href="http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/03/10/banning-earmarks/">put an opening bid</a> on the table in the political game of banning earmarks -- all for-profit corporate earmarks would not be allowed in the budget appropriations bills this year (or possibly longer).  Today, House Republicans raised the stakes by proposing a ban on <em>all</em> earmarks (although only specifically for "this year"), and not just the ones directed towards for-profit entities.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/03/11/republicans-up-ante-on-earmark-ban/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>One Year Ago On Reconciliation</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/03/09/one-year-ago-on-reconciliation/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/03/09/one-year-ago-on-reconciliation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 20:21:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=1643</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>[<em>Today's column is going to be a rerun of a column I wrote exactly one year ago.  This is somewhat of a coincidence, since today I will be taking care of some previous commitments in the non-online world and will be too busy to write a new column.  So I went looking for an old column on healthcare reform, just to see where we were a year ago.  I read a few columns from last March, and picked one out on not just healthcare reform, but the concept of reconciliation in the Senate.  After I had read it and decided to use it, I realized it was posted one year ago to the day, so it serendipitously works as a good reprint article, since it looks pre-planned (even though it isn't).</em></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/03/09/one-year-ago-on-reconciliation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fred Phelps&#039; Hatemongering And The First Amendment</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/03/08/fred-phelps-hatemongering-and-the-first-amendment/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/03/08/fred-phelps-hatemongering-and-the-first-amendment/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 01:33:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Free Speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Bill of Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=1637</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Phelps is in the news today because a Maryland family brought a lawsuit against Phelps, seeking damages for Phelps' actions at their son's funeral, and the U.S. Supreme Court has announced it will hear the case's appeal.  By doing so, they open up the door to refining what is and what is not acceptable speech allowed under the First Amendment to the Constitution.  While the Supreme Court may instead rule much more narrowly (on the case itself, without addressing the free speech issue), the question is worth discussing: should what Phelps does be legal?</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/03/08/fred-phelps-hatemongering-and-the-first-amendment/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [114] -- When Will Rahm Go?  Place Your Bets!</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/03/05/ftp114/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/03/05/ftp114/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Mar 2010 01:14:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Contests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Talking Points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=1626</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>This sort of "mistakes were made, but not by me" legacy-polishing, it should be noted, is usually done as a politician is leaving the stage.  Which is enough of a reason for us to optimistically look into the future, here.  So we are going to open the betting for when Rahm Emanuel will exit the White House.  Or, to be more accurate, when he will announce his exit.  Because we're just going to assume (for the fun of it) that if Rahmbo's already covering his tracks by attempting to cast history over-favorably toward himself, then his exit can't be all that far ahead.  To be followed, as is usual, by signing a book contract worth at least seven figures.  Rahm was said to be interested it running for mayor of Chicago at one point, but whatever excuse he ultimately uses, we're taking bets on the actual date Rahm announces he is leaving.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/03/05/ftp114/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama&#039;s Remarks On Healthcare Reform</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/03/04/obamas-remarks-on-healthcare-reform/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/03/04/obamas-remarks-on-healthcare-reform/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 01:57:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=1621</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>President Obama, almost a year to the day after kicking off his efforts on healthcare reform, tried to nudge the process across the finish line yesterday, in front of a group of doctors and other health professionals.  While some of this made the news as chopped-up soundbites, I thought it was an interesting enough speech to print the entire transcript here.  Obama spoke for 19 minutes, and touched on the process he hopes to see in Congress on the issue soon.  Without further introduction, here is what the president had to say yesterday.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/03/04/obamas-remarks-on-healthcare-reform/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama Poll Watch -- February, 2010</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/03/03/opw1002/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/03/03/opw1002/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 22:54:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama Poll Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=1612</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>When will Obama turn this around?  <em>Will</em> Obama turn this around?  Well, there is a little good news recently, and Obama's numbers have gotten a bounce from his health reform "summit," but as this was at the end of February, it doesn't show up yet in the monthly figures, and it remains to be seen whether he will sustain it or not throughout March.  But we'll all have to wait until next month to see the outcome.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/03/03/opw1002/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>18</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [113] -- Republican Reconciliation Hypocrisy</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/02/26/ftp113/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/02/26/ftp113/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Feb 2010 01:47:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Talking Points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Name-dropping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=1582</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Once again, here is an enormous present, handed to Democrats on a silver platter.  Let's hope that Democrats don't (once again) ignore the present itself, and wind up on the floor playing with the shiny wrapping paper and the empty box.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/02/26/ftp113/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>28</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Legal Odds And Ends</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/02/25/legal-odds-and-ends/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/02/25/legal-odds-and-ends/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 01:12:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Free Speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Bill of Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=1577</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The first privacy issue comes from an <a href="http://salon.com/wires/us/2010/02/23/D9E24D6O2_us_911_calls_privacy/index.html">interesting story</a> earlier this week about how some states are considering banning the release of recorded 911 emergency calls to the public (or -- more to the point -- to the press).  This is an interesting First Amendment hair to split, because a reasonable case can be made both ways.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/02/25/legal-odds-and-ends/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Just The Facts, Ma&#039;am</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/02/24/just-the-facts-maam/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/02/24/just-the-facts-maam/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 23:17:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=1569</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>This will be easy enough for President Obama to accomplish, since he's probably the most Joe-Friday-ish of the bunch.  But he should be backed up by Democrats who have the facts close at hand, in detail and in great number, from unimpeachable sources.  If Democrats counter Republican rhetoric with hard, cold facts, it may not guarantee success for their objective; but it certainly will go a long way toward showing who is serious about fixing the problem, and who is not.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/02/24/just-the-facts-maam/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>15</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Reid&#039;s Smallball Paying Off?</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/02/23/reids-smallball-paying-off/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/02/23/reids-smallball-paying-off/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 01:02:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=1564</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Now, I know what you're thinking.  You're thinking: "Chris, it is <em>way</em> too early for baseball metaphors!"  You are correct.  It is.  But "smallball" is the only metaphor which sprang to mind, even in advance of spring training.  There's probably a hockey term I should have used, but I don't watch hockey much, so there you are.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/02/23/reids-smallball-paying-off/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>18</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [112] -- Public Option&#039;s Last Stand</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/02/19/ftp112/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/02/19/ftp112/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Feb 2010 01:13:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Talking Points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=1547</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Before we begin here, I'd like to humbly propose a new law.  No American television station should be allowed to have an exclusive contract for any Olympic games.  Period.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/02/19/ftp112/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Attacking The I.R.S.</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/02/18/attacking-the-i-r-s/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/02/18/attacking-the-i-r-s/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2010 01:18:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=1541</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The only proper response to such an action is to resoundingly condemn it for a murderously insane action by one warped individual.  That, even in these divided political times, should be the thing everyone can strongly agree upon -- Democrats, Republicans, Lefties, Righties, Centrists, Tea Partiers, Progressives, Libertarians, and all other factions as well.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/02/18/attacking-the-i-r-s/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Heisenberg Effect Of Televising Political Negotiations</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/02/17/the-heisenberg-effect-of-televising-political-negotiations/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/02/17/the-heisenberg-effect-of-televising-political-negotiations/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2010 01:25:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Name-dropping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Other]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=1532</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>I'm going to start off today's column with a chart.  I'm doing this for several reasons, not least of which is the fact that it's a really good chart.  It is simple, easy to read, and involves very little mathematics (meaning it is accessible to a very wide spectrum of the American public).  And it is a very effective way of presenting the facts, free of media spin.  The chart comes from the White House, and shows the monthly number of jobs lost for approximately the past two years.  It also uses color very well, to separate George W. Bush's term in office from Barack Obama's.  Without further introduction, here is the chart:</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/02/17/the-heisenberg-effect-of-televising-political-negotiations/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>17</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [111] -- Use It Or Lose It</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/02/12/ftp111/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/02/12/ftp111/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Feb 2010 02:44:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Talking Points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Humor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=1509</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>President Obama this week has successfully put the Republican Party on the defensive.  Now, this could be a fleeting thing, or it could be the start of a whole new way for Obama's administration to operate.  Time will tell.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/02/12/ftp111/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>40</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Can Obama&#039;s Health Summit Succeed?</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/02/10/can-obamas-health-summit-succeed/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/02/10/can-obamas-health-summit-succeed/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 00:30:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Other]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=1497</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>President Obama has recently announced a health reform summit, to take place across the street from the White House, with the C-SPAN cameras rolling.  He's invited Democratic and Republican leaders from Congress to this summit.  Many cynics have dismissed the effort already, either pronouncing it less than worthless, or calling it some form of political Kabuki theater which will do no good.  I think these pronunciations (especially the latter one) are a bit premature, to say the least.  Because either on a substantive level or a political level, I think there actually is a chance for some limited success for Obama in this exercise.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/02/10/can-obamas-health-summit-succeed/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>17</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [110] -- Left Still Waiting For Rahm Apology</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/02/05/ftp110/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/02/05/ftp110/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Feb 2010 01:23:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Talking Points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=1477</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Because Democrats need to realize that they <em>still have</em> the biggest majority in <em>both houses</em> of Congress that they are likely to see <em>in their lifetimes</em> -- and if they can't get things done with this overwhelming power, then they really should consider just folding up their tents and calling it a day as a political party.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/02/05/ftp110/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>35</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama Poll Watch -- January, 2010</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/02/03/opw1001/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/02/03/opw1001/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 23:44:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama Poll Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=1448</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>When taken as a whole, President Barack Obama's poll numbers last month moved the least amount of any month of his presidency so far.  His approval rating continued its trend of moving downwards, but only by two-tenths of a percent.  His disapproval rating continued upwards, but only by four-tenths of one percent.  Meaning January was a pretty stable month for Obama.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/02/03/opw1001/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [109] -- Obama Enters Lions&#039; Den, Bells Cat</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/01/29/ftp109/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/01/29/ftp109/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2010 00:59:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Talking Points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=1409</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Ahem.  Where was I?  Oh, right, last week.  Last week, when conservative "journalists" weren't pulling fratboy pranks on federal property (and getting arrested for such -- here's a tip to conservative "gotcha journalism" types: if you're going to do something this risky, might I suggest not doing it in a federal building where the F.B.I. probably has an office on the next floor?  I mean, you're making it too easy, guys, really.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/01/29/ftp109/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>23</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Laundry List Of Speech Reactions</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/01/28/laundry-list-of-speech-reactions/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/01/28/laundry-list-of-speech-reactions/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 00:36:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=1403</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The real term we should all be using is a "grocery shopping list," when you think about it.  The president is going to the Congressional store with a list of what he would like on America's table.  He reads the list, and then Congress attempts to put some of it in his shopping cart.  This metaphor has a lot more going for it, is much more versatile, and everybody's used a shopping list at some point or another.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/01/28/laundry-list-of-speech-reactions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>16</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Before And After Obama&#039;s Speech, With Populist Caucus Chair Bruce Braley</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/01/27/before-and-after-obamas-speech-with-populist-caucus-chair-bruce-braley/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/01/27/before-and-after-obamas-speech-with-populist-caucus-chair-bruce-braley/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 23:03:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Interviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=1391</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>I would like to hear President Obama outline a clear agenda, like the Populist Caucus' Blueprint for Recovery, to create good-paying jobs that can't be outsourced for America's middle class families.   A "jobless recovery" isn't a recovery for middle class families and the President and his Administration need to understand that.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/01/27/before-and-after-obamas-speech-with-populist-caucus-chair-bruce-braley/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A State Of The Union Address From F.D.R.</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/01/26/a-state-of-the-union-address-from-f-d-r/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/01/26/a-state-of-the-union-address-from-f-d-r/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 01:31:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=1383</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Today we are turning the column over to a State Of The Union speech from the past, to get everyone in the spirit for President Obama's first official State Of The Union speech tomorrow night.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/01/26/a-state-of-the-union-address-from-f-d-r/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Taking Tea Partiers Seriously</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/01/25/taking-tea-partiers-seriously/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/01/25/taking-tea-partiers-seriously/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 02:54:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=1376</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>There has been an interesting alignment which has slowly happened over the past year, between two groups not normally in agreement -- inside-the-Beltway mainstream media types, and the bloggy Left.  This alignment has occurred not in favor of some issue or another, but rather against a certain movement: the Tea Parties.  Both the Serious Persons in the media, and pretty much the entire Left, have agreed that the proper thing to do with the Tea Partiers is to mock them, in the hopes that they'll go away soon.  This, I fear, is a mistake, and it could be a costly one indeed for the Democratic Party.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/01/25/taking-tea-partiers-seriously/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
