<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>ChrisWeigant.com &#187; American Society</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.chrisweigant.com/category/american-society/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com</link>
	<description>Reality-based political commentary</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 06:17:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [195] -- SOTU Review</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/01/27/ftp195/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/01/27/ftp195/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jan 2012 00:27:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign Ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Libya]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=5112</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Well, that was an eventful week in politics, wasn't it?</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/01/27/ftp195/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>33</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>King&#039;s &quot;Drum Major Instinct&quot; Speech</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/01/16/kings-drum-major-instinct-speech/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/01/16/kings-drum-major-instinct-speech/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2012 01:07:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guest Authors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Name-dropping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religion]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=5065</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[Program Note: I am taking the day off today.  But I did want to post this link to a transcript of Martin Luther King Junior's "Drum Major Instinct" speech.  This is the speech that was misquoted on his new memorial in Washington D.C., and you really have to read the speech itself to [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/01/16/kings-drum-major-instinct-speech/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Happy Birthday, Common Sense</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/01/11/happy-birthday-common-sense/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/01/11/happy-birthday-common-sense/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2012 01:09:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Name-dropping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=5046</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Two hundred and thirty-six years ago this week, a pamphlet was published in Philadelphia.  There is some disagreement among historians over the exact date (variously given as January 9th or 10th), and the pamphlet's title page itself only lists the year, 1776.  Whatever the actual date, though, Thomas Paine's <em>Common Sense</em> hit the American consciousness like a bombshell -- one which would reverberate for years to come.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/01/11/happy-birthday-common-sense/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Old-School Editorializing</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/01/10/old-school-editorializing/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/01/10/old-school-editorializing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2012 01:55:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=5042</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>What struck me about New Hampshire's contest, being in the midst of historical research into such things, was the old-school nature of the <em>Union Leader</em>, a very conservative New Hampshire newspaper.  It struck a lot of the media as interesting as well, but I didn't see anyone else commenting on such historical context.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2012/01/10/old-school-editorializing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Amazing, Ginormous List Of Official Banished Words Of The Year</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/12/30/the-amazing-ginormous-list-of-official-banished-words-of-the-year/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/12/30/the-amazing-ginormous-list-of-official-banished-words-of-the-year/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Dec 2011 00:25:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Humor]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4996</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>It's that time of year again -- when we turn our eyes to Lake Superior State University (in beautiful Sault Ste. Marie, Michigan), and their official list of this year's banished words.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/12/30/the-amazing-ginormous-list-of-official-banished-words-of-the-year/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>My 2011 &quot;McLaughlin Awards&quot; [Part 1]</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/12/16/my-2011-mclaughlin-awards-part-1/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/12/16/my-2011-mclaughlin-awards-part-1/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Dec 2011 01:36:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign Ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Free Speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iran]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Libya]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Name-dropping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pakistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4954</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>As always, if you disagree with any (or all) of my picks, feel free to make your own in the comments.  The categories are completely open to interpretation, and don't forget that there will be a "Part 2" column next week, so I can likely squeeze things I forgot in there.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/12/16/my-2011-mclaughlin-awards-part-1/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>33</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Real &quot;War On Christmas&quot;</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/12/14/the-real-war-on-christmas/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/12/14/the-real-war-on-christmas/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Dec 2011 00:05:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religion]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4943</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>But just because the modern-day "War on Christmas" may not, in fact, exist does not mean that such a war never existed in America.  The subject of Christmas was indeed at the heart of a previous bitter political dispute, but you've got to go pretty far back in time to find it.  All the way back to the New England Puritans.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/12/14/the-real-war-on-christmas/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>93</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Historic Interlude -- Guess The Decade</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/11/22/historic-interlude-guess-the-decade/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/11/22/historic-interlude-guess-the-decade/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Nov 2011 00:33:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4822</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>It's all bunkum, of course.  America has always enjoyed a rousing good political fight, and our media has almost always reflected this (to their profit).  Read the following excerpt, if you have a problem believing this, and see if you can put it in context.  When, in other words, was the following written?</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/11/22/historic-interlude-guess-the-decade/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Guest Column: Occupy Wall Street is Not the Tea Party of the Left</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/11/09/guest-column-occupy-wall-street-is-not-the-tea-party-of-the-left/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/11/09/guest-column-occupy-wall-street-is-not-the-tea-party-of-the-left/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Nov 2011 21:35:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Free Speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guest Authors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Bill of Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4776</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Every so often, I am so impressed by a comment to one of my columns that I offer to just turn my column over to the author, and let them have my soapbox.  This doesn't happen often, usually around once per year.
I've written a few columns so far about the Occupy Wall Street protest, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/11/09/guest-column-occupy-wall-street-is-not-the-tea-party-of-the-left/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>82</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>America&#039;s First Political Sex Scandal: The Reynolds/Hamilton Affair</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/11/07/americas-first-political-sex-scandal-the-reynoldshamilton-affair/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/11/07/americas-first-political-sex-scandal-the-reynoldshamilton-affair/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Nov 2011 23:33:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Name-dropping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4768</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>While the subject of which American politician's sex scandal came first is a debatable one (such as: did Benjamin Franklin's dalliances in Paris count?), most agree that the sex-and-blackmail scandal of Alexander Hamilton was the first with any impact, from George Washington's time onwards.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/11/07/americas-first-political-sex-scandal-the-reynoldshamilton-affair/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Championing Rapists&#039; Fatherhood Rights</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/11/02/championing-rapists-fatherhood-rights/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/11/02/championing-rapists-fatherhood-rights/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Nov 2011 22:33:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4745</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>This was, to put it mildly, completely unacceptable to a large swath of the Republican base.  Cain hastily backtracked, and is now as "pro-life" as he can humanly be, stating that abortion should be illegal in every single case -- no matter what the extenuating circumstances.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/11/02/championing-rapists-fatherhood-rights/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>24</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bank Of America Backs Down</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/11/01/bank-of-america-backs-down/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/11/01/bank-of-america-backs-down/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Nov 2011 22:58:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4741</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>This is not only a victory for consumers (and the Occupy Wall Street folks, incidentally), but a triumph of mathematics and economics.  Because it is ridiculous that big banks should even <em>contemplate</em> these fees in the first place.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/11/01/bank-of-america-backs-down/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>19</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [187] -- GOP&#039;s 22-Week Work Year</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/10/28/ftp187/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/10/28/ftp187/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2011 23:13:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Talking Points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guest Authors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Name-dropping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4724</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>We'd like to begin today with an issue that we regularly get incensed about here, mostly because it flies under the radar of just about everyone -- including the entire media universe.  Because for once, Democrats are making the attempt to use the issue to make some political hay (even though, in this regard, they're admittedly almost as bad as the Republicans).</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/10/28/ftp187/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>32</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>From The Archives -- Church And State Revisited: The Story Of Smoot</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/10/13/from-the-archives-church-and-state-revisited-the-story-of-smoot-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/10/13/from-the-archives-church-and-state-revisited-the-story-of-smoot-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Oct 2011 23:57:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Bill of Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4660</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Because Mormonism is in the news again, due to a Rick Perry supporter calling it a "cult," I thought it was high time to re-run the following column.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/10/13/from-the-archives-church-and-state-revisited-the-story-of-smoot-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Marijuana Prohibition&#039;s Legal Insanity Continues</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/10/10/marijuana-prohibitions-legal-insanity-continues/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/10/10/marijuana-prohibitions-legal-insanity-continues/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Oct 2011 22:54:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4643</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Like many other Americans, I thoroughly enjoyed watching historical documentarian Ken Burns' recent <em>Prohibition</em> series, on PBS.  But I was disappointed by its abrupt end.  Burns took the easy way out and didn't point out that right around the same time the legal federal prohibition on alcohol ended, the prohibition of marijuana was ramping up in a big way.  And, while the alcohol-targeted Prohibition ended, this prohibition remains.  In, fact, it is getting worse, as the Obama administration is continuing a crackdown on anyone who is approaching the problem in any sort of sane or rational manner -- including local and state government officials.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/10/10/marijuana-prohibitions-legal-insanity-continues/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [184] -- Long Live Steve Jobs</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/10/07/ftp184/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/10/07/ftp184/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Oct 2011 23:39:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Talking Points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Name-dropping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4629</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>A corporate leader passed away this week, and millions mourned his passing and celebrated his life.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/10/07/ftp184/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>17</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mad As Hell</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/10/05/mad-as-hell/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/10/05/mad-as-hell/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Oct 2011 23:05:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Name-dropping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4615</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The protesters in the Occupy Wall Street movement have been getting criticized for not being focused enough, or not providing a list of demands, or not having leaders, or any number of other things by the media.  But this can be forgiven, because the media are now at least paying attention, rather than just completely ignoring the protest.  What surprises me is that the media (at least so far) haven't realized the frustration the protesters feel is the real story here.  Call it free-floating rage, if you will.  Or, even better, call it an updated Howard Beale moment.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/10/05/mad-as-hell/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>17</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [183] -- What I&#039;d Call &quot;Class Warfare&quot;</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/09/30/ftp183/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/09/30/ftp183/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2011 23:26:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Talking Points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Humor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4590</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Last week (as with this week) the subject <em>de semaine</em> was "class warfare."  The comment which inspired this week's mini-rants contained a simple, repetitive concept: "When [something outrageous pushed by Republicans happens], nobody calls it 'class warfare'.  Maybe we should."</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/09/30/ftp183/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>62</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Death Before Philately!</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/09/27/death-before-philately/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/09/27/death-before-philately/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Sep 2011 23:22:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4574</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The United States Postal Service very quietly changed one of their bedrock rules this week.  Up until this point, in America, you had to be dead to be on a stamp.  Now, <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2011/09/27/us/postal-service-will-begin-honoring-living-people-on-stamps.html">anything goes</a> -- the living will get their chance to be immortalized on an American stamp alongside the dead.  This is a <em>very</em> bad idea, and Congress should really step in and put a stop to it as soon as possible.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/09/27/death-before-philately/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Our Gay Revolutionary War Hero</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/09/20/our-gay-revolutionary-war-hero/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/09/20/our-gay-revolutionary-war-hero/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Sep 2011 23:32:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4542</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Today marks the end of the "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" policy of not allowing gay servicemembers to openly do their duty in the American military.  There are plenty of other columns out there celebrating this fact, so instead of going into details, I'd like to offer an excerpt from a book I recently read.  The book is <em>One Nation Under Sex</em>, by Larry Flynt and David Eisenbach, Ph.D.  Whatever you may think of Flynt for his other activities, his books are always a good read and always exhaustively researched and annotated.  Which is why his telling of this particular story is the best I've yet come across.  Gay people have been in the United States military from the very beginning.  They've always served, the only change now is that they'll be able to do so without having to hide who they are.  Which is why this is such a good lesson to ponder on today of all days.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/09/20/our-gay-revolutionary-war-hero/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>22</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama Redefines Populism</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/09/19/obama-redefines-populism/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/09/19/obama-redefines-populism/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Sep 2011 23:57:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4535</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>"Populism" is a word that gets thrown around with abandon by folks masquerading as journalists on television these days.  Sarah Palin had the word used to describe her, and later, the entire Tea Party movement was labeled "populist" by the chattering classes.  Today, President Obama unveiled a truly populist agenda, by proposing to tax millionaires at the same tax rate that middle-class Americans pay.  By doing so, Obama will (hopefully) redefine the term "populism" in the political conversation.  Or, to be technical, he will re-redefine the word back to what it originally meant.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/09/19/obama-redefines-populism/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [180] -- Give &#039;Em Hell, Barry!</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/09/09/ftp180/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/09/09/ftp180/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Sep 2011 00:02:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign Ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Talking Points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4503</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>President Barack Obama opened his re-election campaign last night with a wowzer of a speech to a joint session of Congress.  But we'll get to that in detail in a minute.  First, we must mark an important anniversary this week.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/09/09/ftp180/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>22</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [179] -- Labor Daze</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/09/02/ftp179/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/09/02/ftp179/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Sep 2011 23:06:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Talking Points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4470</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>It surpasses all irony and actually enters into the realm of bitter humor that we're about to celebrate Labor Day when the unemployment rate remains at the sky-high level of 9.1 percent.  There are millions of Americans who are <em>not</em> laboring for a paycheck this year, and they have nothing at all to celebrate.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/09/02/ftp179/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>28</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>When Democratic Rhetoric Goes Too Far</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/08/31/when-democratic-rhetoric-goes-too-far/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/08/31/when-democratic-rhetoric-goes-too-far/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Aug 2011 23:09:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Free Speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4463</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>All of us should be aware (and ashamed) of this history.  That such things took place in our country is something all Americans should know.  This almost goes without saying.  But what apparently does need saying is the reverse -- that the history of lynching should not be abused and belittled by politicians in hyperbolic fashion to make a much smaller point.  Even if -- or perhaps <em>especially</em> if -- the politician in question is an African-American.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/08/31/when-democratic-rhetoric-goes-too-far/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>50</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>King&#039;s Eloquence Goes Far Beyond &quot;I Have A Dream&quot;</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/08/26/kings-eloquence-goes-far-beyond-i-have-a-dream/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/08/26/kings-eloquence-goes-far-beyond-i-have-a-dream/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Aug 2011 23:48:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Name-dropping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4449</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>As we all know, we're not there yet.  We're a little closer than we were when Dr. King was taken from us, but we've still got quite a ways to go yet.  For inspiration on the journey which still awaits us all, I strongly urge all Americans to seek out Dr. King's actual words -- the words you're <em>not</em> used to hearing over and over again.  Take ten or fifteen minutes and read the text of one of his speeches.  Watch video, or listen to audio of Dr. King speaking.  It will be well worth the time it takes.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/08/26/kings-eloquence-goes-far-beyond-i-have-a-dream/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>35</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [177] -- Corporations Are People, Mitt?</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/08/12/ftp177/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/08/12/ftp177/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Aug 2011 00:17:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Talking Points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4402</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>But perhaps I'm being too harsh.  The reason the clip was edited down so much was that the <em>other</em> heckling clip was <em>so much better</em> -- Romney misspeaking, and then instead of just immediately walking it back, actually digging the hole deeper.  In answer to a question about raising taxes on corporations, Romney answered (at first) that he wasn't going to raise taxes "on people."  When the questioner yelled back "Corporations, not people!" Romney could easily have said something along the lines of "Sorry, I meant to say corporations -- I'm actually not going to raise taxes on people <em>or</em> on corporations, and here's why...."  It would have just melded the whole thing into standard Republican dogma, and Romney would have been safe.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/08/12/ftp177/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>36</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Wisconsin Centennial Worth Celebrating</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/08/10/a-wisconsin-centennial-worth-celebrating/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/08/10/a-wisconsin-centennial-worth-celebrating/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Aug 2011 23:42:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4391</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Since the news this morning out of Wisconsin is a bit depressing for progressives (and Progressives), I thought it was time to mark an important upcoming centennial there.  On the first of September in 1911, the first constitutional workers' compensation law took full effect in Wisconsin.  The law had been passed on May 3, 1911.  By all rights, I should have written about it back then, or waited until September for the anniversary of the law taking effect, but I thought today was a good day to reminisce about when Wisconsin was at the forefront of the Labor movement, instead of where they find themselves today.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/08/10/a-wisconsin-centennial-worth-celebrating/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>15</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [175] -- In The Darkest Depths Of Mordor</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/07/29/ftp175/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/07/29/ftp175/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jul 2011 23:37:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Talking Points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Name-dropping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4338</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>If I were a Hobbit, right about now I would be wondering just <em>how the heck</em> I wound up at the center of this Washington intraparty political fight, personally.  What (I would ponder in my metaphorical Hobbit hole) had I done to <em>any of these folks</em> to deserve being dragged into this fracas?</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/07/29/ftp175/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>54</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Brinksmanship-pocalypse-mageddon</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/07/26/brinksmanship-pocalypse-mageddon/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/07/26/brinksmanship-pocalypse-mageddon/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jul 2011 00:18:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Humor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4321</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>We're all sick and tired of the debt ceiling debate, so I'm just going off on a complete tangent today for a little grammar rant.  Hope no one minds.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/07/26/brinksmanship-pocalypse-mageddon/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>23</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [174] -- What Would Ronald Reagan Do?</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/07/22/ftp174/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/07/22/ftp174/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jul 2011 00:12:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Talking Points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4303</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The bigger space news this week, sadly, was not that exciting.  The final space shuttle mission just ended.  Although I didn't see it specifically, a newspaper headline-writer with a sense of irony would have set the story under: "The Shuttle Has Landed."  Because this week also saw an anniversary of import to the discussion -- 42 years ago this Wednesday, Neil Armstrong radioed back to Houston the immortal phrase: "The <em>Eagle</em> has landed," marking the first safe landing on Earth's natural satellite by the human species.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/07/22/ftp174/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>81</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Light Bulb Moment</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/07/12/light-bulb-moment/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/07/12/light-bulb-moment/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jul 2011 00:28:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4246</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>I should begin by saying that if you have no idea what I'm talking about at all, you are in good company.  Most Americans don't even know there's a light bulb debate happening right now in Congress.  If you live in California, however, you likely have already realized what is going on: standard light bulbs are being effectively banned.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/07/12/light-bulb-moment/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>From The Archives -- The Forgotten Battle Which Won The American Revolution</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/07/04/from-the-archives-the-forgotten-battle-which-won-the-american-revolution-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/07/04/from-the-archives-the-forgotten-battle-which-won-the-american-revolution-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jul 2011 19:20:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4200</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Which is why, this Independence Day, I will personally be lifting my glass in a toast to a French admiral, and the French sailors who served under him.  Because without Admiral Compte de Grasse's efforts, we might not even have an Independence Day to be celebrating.  The Battle of the Chesapeake deserves to be remembered.  This military triumph deserves a bit of celebration.  By all Americans.  So, I hope you'll join me in honoring the good French admiral this Sunday.  Lift a glass and give grateful thanks to his bravery and his heroic efforts on behalf of our own revolution -- whose successful end he made possible:</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/07/04/from-the-archives-the-forgotten-battle-which-won-the-american-revolution-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Random Netroots Nation Musings [Part 2]</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/06/23/random-netroots-nations-musings-part-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/06/23/random-netroots-nations-musings-part-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jun 2011 00:03:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Humor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Name-dropping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4144</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Finally, I leave you with a secret, just in case you ever find yourself attending a Netroots Nation convention: if you want to guess which state will host Netroots Nation next year, look for a senator attending who is not from the state you're currently in.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/06/23/random-netroots-nations-musings-part-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Random Netroots Nation Musings [Part 1]</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/06/21/random-netroots-nations-musings-part-1/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/06/21/random-netroots-nations-musings-part-1/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2011 00:03:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Humor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=4133</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>It's always fun to get together with a lot of people who share your interests and/or opinions.  Netroots Nation is a giant mix of people who blog from a Lefty perspective, politicians who value the opinion and share the views of such bloggers, and interest groups who want to influence what folks over on the left think and write about.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/06/21/random-netroots-nations-musings-part-1/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Media Gets Punked, Again</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/05/19/media-gets-punked-again/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/05/19/media-gets-punked-again/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 May 2011 23:24:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=3996</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>In this year's version of the "Balloon Boy" fake news story, it was revealed today that the "Botox Mommy" story was a complete fabrication.  In other words, those stalwart "journalists" -- busily gatekeeping their little hearts out to keep the mainstream media so very, very far above the blogosphere when it comes to fact-checking -- once again got punked.  Not only did they get punked, but it actually cost them at least ten grand in the process.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/05/19/media-gets-punked-again/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>15</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tax Dollars Well Spent</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/05/10/tax-dollars-well-spent/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/05/10/tax-dollars-well-spent/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 May 2011 23:31:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=3945</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The Library of Congress today announced the launch of what they're calling a "National Jukebox" which puts the entire pre-1925 Sony catalogue of recordings online to the public for free.  This is the coolest use of tax dollars I've seen in quite a while, so I thought I would give it the exposure it deserves.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/05/10/tax-dollars-well-spent/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [166] -- Osama Bin Laden Is Still Dead</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/05/06/ftp166/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/05/06/ftp166/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 May 2011 23:01:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign Ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Talking Points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iran]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Libya]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pakistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=3920</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>I don't care how ironic that sounds to some, it's true.  Osama Bin Laden declared war on America, waged that war for years (and killed Americans in doing so), then hid for many more years, and was finally hunted down and killed like an animal.  Mission accomplished.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/05/06/ftp166/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>50</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&quot;Geronimo, E.K.I.A.&quot;</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/05/05/geronimo-e-k-i-a/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/05/05/geronimo-e-k-i-a/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 May 2011 23:26:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=3914</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>We've been oppressed for so long, it just doesn't matter anymore.  The government does what it wants when it wants. The name calling is going to stay around forever. But when you think about it, this is an insult.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/05/05/geronimo-e-k-i-a/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>30</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Los Angeles Dodgers Need To Step Up To The Plate</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/05/03/los-angeles-dodgers-need-to-step-up-to-the-plate/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/05/03/los-angeles-dodgers-need-to-step-up-to-the-plate/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 May 2011 23:08:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sports]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=3897</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>I don't write about sports very often.  This column isn't even really about sports, either, it's about doing what is right.  In baseball terms: "stepping up to the plate."  The Los Angeles Dodgers baseball team needs to do so, because it is already overdue.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/05/03/los-angeles-dodgers-need-to-step-up-to-the-plate/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Any Channel</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/05/02/any-channel/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/05/02/any-channel/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 May 2011 00:00:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Other]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pakistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=3891</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>"Turn on your television... to any channel."</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/05/02/any-channel/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>23</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Should America Assassinate?</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/04/27/should-america-assassinate/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/04/27/should-america-assassinate/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2011 00:27:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Libya]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=3863</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Assassination, as a foreign policy option, is supposed to be completely forbidden to America.  That's the theory, at least.  But in our post-9/11 world, the once-unthinkable is now increasingly being seen as a viable option.  The moral discussion of whether or not America should engage in assassination, though, hasn't even really begun in any noticeable way.  Which is a shame, because the country as a whole should consider what its leaders are doing in this respect.  Especially while we're bombing Tripoli, once again.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/04/27/should-america-assassinate/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>34</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [158] -- In Non-Charlie-Sheen News...</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/03/11/ftp158/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/03/11/ftp158/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Mar 2011 00:38:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Talking Points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=3623</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>And then -- you simply <em>can't</em> make this stuff up -- the anchor uttered the worst segue I think I've ever heard, possibly the worst in all of television news history: "We turn from the live feed of the tsunami in Japan to a police raid on Charlie Sheen's house in Los Angeles...."</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/03/11/ftp158/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>20</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What &quot;The American People&quot; Really Want</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/03/07/what-the-american-people-really-want/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/03/07/what-the-american-people-really-want/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Mar 2011 01:58:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=3596</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Ever since the midterm congressional election last year, Republicans have been repeating the phrase "The American People" as often as they can, as a sort of mantra.  This isn't all that unusual, since politicians claiming a popular mandate is par for the course in the political game.  But Republicans are exhibiting a rather large amount of overreach when it comes to claiming what "The American People" really want the government to do (and not to do).  This is going to be on full display in the coming weeks, as the budget fights heat up (finishing this year's budget, raising the debt ceiling, and tackling next year's budget).  Most Republicans, especially those of the Tea Party persuasion, are firmly convinced they've got a sweeping mandate to slash federal spending in all sorts of areas.  But they may be surprised by what the public really thinks about these issues, and what they do and do not support.  Helpfully, a new poll put out by the <em>Wall Street Journal</em> and <em>NBC</em> shows a clear list of priorities for what the people really want to see cut, and what they don't.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/03/07/what-the-american-people-really-want/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Big Brother v. Little Brother</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/02/23/big-brother-v-little-brother/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/02/23/big-brother-v-little-brother/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Feb 2011 00:48:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iran]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=3531</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Everyone knows who "Big Brother" is, of course, because we all had to read George Orwell's <em>Nineteen Eighty-Four</em> at some point in our schooling.  Big Brother is the fictional benevolent figurehead in Orwell's "negative Utopia" masterpiece, whose beaming visage is a front for a totalitarian police state which spies relentlessly upon its own citizenry.  Television sets, in this future world, are both unavoidable and two-way -- broadcasting images of what you are doing in your own home to the government watchers.  To some extent, Orwell's dark fantasy has become everyday life in some places (it's almost impossible to avoid being publicly filmed now in cities like London, for instance).  But there's been a balancing revolution in surveillance as well -- which is more and more apparent in the recent news.  I'm going to call this effect "Little Brother" -- citizens watching, filming, and reporting on governmental activities to a rapt worldwide audience.  And we've already seen how powerful a tool this can be in the Middle East.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/02/23/big-brother-v-little-brother/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Our Forgotten &quot;Presidents&quot;</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/02/21/our-forgotten-presidents/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/02/21/our-forgotten-presidents/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Feb 2011 01:29:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=3518</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The two formerly-individual holidays celebrating Washington's Birthday and Lincoln's Birthday have been merged into a single federal holiday -- a holiday which, while intended to honor both Washington and Lincoln, has now become somewhat "genericized" (in name, at least) into a celebration of all our presidents.  But what about the forgotten presidents?  [Or, to be scrupulously accurate, "presidents"?]</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/02/21/our-forgotten-presidents/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>16</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Oh, Say, Can You Sing?</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/02/08/oh-say-can-you-sing/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/02/08/oh-say-can-you-sing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Feb 2011 01:15:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Name-dropping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=3451</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Christina Aguilera is -- quite rightly -- getting a lot of grief these days, because she flubbed a line while singing the National Anthem at the start of last weekend's Super Bowl.  But while her mangled version of the lyrics was pretty cringe-inducing, to me what was completely indefensible was her mangling of the tune itself.  Because this is one song which really shouldn't be open to "interpretation" -- at least not during such a prominent event.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/02/08/oh-say-can-you-sing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Politics Ends At The Water&#039;s Edge</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/02/04/politics-ends-at-the-waters-edge/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/02/04/politics-ends-at-the-waters-edge/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Feb 2011 00:44:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Free Speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=3437</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>This doesn't mean blind obedience or unquestioned following of any leader.  But it does mean "don't bump his elbow" deference to our elected leader when the country needs to speak with one voice.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/02/04/politics-ends-at-the-waters-edge/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>64</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [151] -- Obama&#039;s Speech</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/01/14/ftp151/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/01/14/ftp151/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Jan 2011 00:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Talking Points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=3327</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>To honor the fallen this week, we're going to refrain from our usual heated political rhetoric here for a change.  It's only fitting, really, after such an emotional week for America.  So, just to warn everyone up front, we're not going to be heaping our usual amounts of scorn on Republicans this week.  Instead, we're going to (briefly) heap some scorn on the mainstream media, and then after a foreshortened awards section, we are going to reprint the text of President Obama's moving speech in Tucson this Wednesday, for those of you who haven't had the chance to view it or read it.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/01/14/ftp151/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Search For Meaning</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/01/11/the-search-for-meaning/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/01/11/the-search-for-meaning/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Jan 2011 02:16:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=3304</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Both of these urges run deep.  It's part of the human condition to try to fit things into a rational framework in our minds, and to reassure ourselves that if we only had done things a little differently, we could have avoided this tragedy.  The problem is, neither one of these is any sort of universal truth.  Sometimes craziness happens for no reason other than mental imbalance, and sometimes it happens explosively with little warning.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/01/11/the-search-for-meaning/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>27</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Heroism</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/01/10/heroism/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/01/10/heroism/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Jan 2011 01:26:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=3298</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>When a national tragedy happens -- especially one with political relevance -- the country explodes in a paroxysm of commentary about the incident, in what psychologists would probably label a desperate attempt to attach some sort of meaning.  Looking around the media universe today, I see that this is now happening from all sides.  Snap judgments are made, spin is spun, and everyone tries to fit what happened into their own view of the world, whatever that happens to be.  But since everyone else is covering the bases on this front, I thought I'd focus on heroism.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/01/10/heroism/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Epic Viral Fail -- The Official Banished Words List</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/01/04/epic-viral-fail-the-official-banished-words-list/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/01/04/epic-viral-fail-the-official-banished-words-list/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Jan 2011 00:14:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Humor]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=3272</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Thanks once again to the intrepid folks at Lake Superior State University, this year's "Official Banished Words List" has now gone viral.  Whoops!  I guess we're going to have to rewrite that sentence, since "viral" was on the top of the list of words and phrases that have just become so annoying that -- for the good of the language (and, of course The American People) -- the only possible reaction is to banish them completely from our lexicon.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2011/01/04/epic-viral-fail-the-official-banished-words-list/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>From The Archives -- Why Christmas Is Not On The Solstice</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/12/23/from-the-archives-why-christmas-is-not-on-the-solstice-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/12/23/from-the-archives-why-christmas-is-not-on-the-solstice-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Dec 2010 01:51:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Humor]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=3207</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>[<strong>Program Note:</strong> <em>This column originally ran three years ago, and every so often I dust it off and run it again, to allow me to do some Christmas shopping and whatnot.  What with Part 2 of our "McLaughlin Awards" running tomorrow, there just wasn't time to put together a column today.  Don't forget to check back here tomorrow (or over the weekend) for the second part of our year-end roundup, and for today I hope you'll enjoy my "go to" Christmas column.  Thanks again to everyone who has donated in our 2010 Holiday Pledge Drive, allowing us to exceed our fundraising goal.  And hope you've all got your shopping and wrapping done, too.</em>]</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/12/23/from-the-archives-why-christmas-is-not-on-the-solstice-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nominate Words And Phrases For Banishment</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/12/21/nominate-words-and-phrases-for-banishment/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/12/21/nominate-words-and-phrases-for-banishment/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Dec 2010 00:49:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Humor]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=3195</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>I couldn't immediately come up with any phrases which have risen to the level of hair-pulling every time I hear them, although in recent weeks, "The Comeback Kid" being used about Obama has gotten pretty annoying, I have to say.  Come on people, that was Bill Clinton's moniker!  Have the wits to come up with an original phrase, at least, will you?</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/12/21/nominate-words-and-phrases-for-banishment/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>20</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Politically-Polarized Sesquicentennial</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/12/13/a-politically-polarized-sesquicentennial/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/12/13/a-politically-polarized-sesquicentennial/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Dec 2010 02:26:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Free Speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Bill of Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=3161</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>A theme has emerged, in recent years, of America as a nation almost hopelessly divided, politically.  This theme is most often reinforced by such superlative declarations (by "journalists" who really should know better) as "America is more politically divided than ever," or "this is the most politically polarized Washington has ever been," or similar such alarmist rhetoric.  It has even gotten to the point where many see such statements as truisms -- statements so obviously true that they are seen as irrefutable.  This is a gross error, born of the fact that most "journalists" simply have no concept of their own country's history.  Because while we are indeed currently politically divided and somewhat polarized, this is actually our normal state as a nation -- and on the polarization scale, we're nowhere near the "most divided" we've ever been.  Far from it.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/12/13/a-politically-polarized-sesquicentennial/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Barnstorming Era Of Spaceflight Begins</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/12/09/the-barnstorming-era-of-spaceflight-begins/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/12/09/the-barnstorming-era-of-spaceflight-begins/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Dec 2010 01:59:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=3146</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Well, that's one of those headlines that's a lot better poetically than literally, I'll admit up front.  But yesterday's news in spaceflight deserves some sort of mention, because it could be the start of a new era.  A private company launched a capsule into orbit, and then recovered it by splashing it down in the Pacific Ocean.  This was a test flight, but eventually the company will use this arrangement to ferry astronauts up to the International Space Station for the United States, after N.A.S.A.'s space shuttle is retired forever.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/12/09/the-barnstorming-era-of-spaceflight-begins/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>15</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama&#039;s New Theme: A Sputnik Moment</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/12/06/obamas-new-theme-a-sputnik-moment/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/12/06/obamas-new-theme-a-sputnik-moment/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Dec 2010 00:56:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=3119</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>President Obama gave a speech today in Winston-Salem, North Carolina.  Billed as a speech on the economy, it may provide an early forecast of what is likely to be the overarching theme of Obama's State Of The Union speech next month.  While this speech has not gotten a whole lot of attention so far, one phrase of it is garnering some mild interest: the idea that America is experiencing a "Sputnik moment."  What remains to be seen is whether this talking point is going to catch on and become an actual Democratic narrative next year.  It certainly is worth mentioning, due to the almost complete lack of any Democratic narrative these days.  Whether it inspires the public's imagination, though, is an even tougher row to hoe.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/12/06/obamas-new-theme-a-sputnik-moment/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>20</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&quot;Don&#039;t Ask, Don&#039;t Tell&quot; Needs To Go</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/11/30/dont-ask-dont-tell-needs-to-go/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/11/30/dont-ask-dont-tell-needs-to-go/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Dec 2010 01:08:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=3068</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>America could be on the verge of finally getting rid of the officially-sanctioned discrimination against citizens willing to serve their country in uniform because of their sexual orientation.  Then again, it could be on the verge of setting up an even bigger fight on the issue outside the halls of Congress.  Either way, this historic debate is about to be put front and center in the political world this week.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/11/30/dont-ask-dont-tell-needs-to-go/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>33</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Three-Dot Tuesday</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/11/23/three-dot-tuesday/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/11/23/three-dot-tuesday/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Nov 2010 02:03:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cartoons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Humor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=3052</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>It's going to be a short one today, folks.  Since Congress is on yet another one of its week-long vacations, politically it has been a pretty slow week.  Even the mainstream media is left fanning the flames of the airport security foofaroo in a desperate attempt to fill their allotted timeslots, in the absence of any real news out of Washington.  Well, actually, even if there were such news coming out of Washington, the media would likely still be distracted by the shiniest object in their (quite limited) ability to perceive these things.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/11/23/three-dot-tuesday/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>An Immodest Proposal</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/11/22/an-immodest-proposal/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/11/22/an-immodest-proposal/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Nov 2010 00:41:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Humor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=3046</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Which is why I'd like to offer a modest proposal.  Actually, to be strictly correct and technically accurate, I should say an <em>immodest</em> proposal -- that everyone should have to fly naked.  Immediately ban all clothing of any kind from all flights, in order to reach a one-hundred percent rate of security against clothing bombs.  This would be the ultimate in security for the flying public, and therefore should be our new policy for every commercial flight.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/11/22/an-immodest-proposal/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>30</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Heroes Never Call Themselves Heroes</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/11/16/heroes-never-call-themselves-heroes/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/11/16/heroes-never-call-themselves-heroes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Nov 2010 01:23:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=3020</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>For the first time since the Vietnam War, a Medal of Honor has been awarded to a living serviceman.  The Medal of Honor is the highest military award America bestows, and not very many of them are handed out, so this is indeed news.  There have been other Medal of Honor recipients since Vietnam, but all of them have been awarded posthumously -- a telling statement on the type of bravery it takes to earn this medal.  And, inevitably, the word "hero" is used to describe the recipient.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/11/16/heroes-never-call-themselves-heroes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rare Earth Optimism</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/11/11/rare-earth-optimism/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/11/11/rare-earth-optimism/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Nov 2010 01:53:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=2997</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The town of Mountain Pass, California, is about as close to a ghost town as you can get without actually being empty.  The town lies fifteen miles in from the Nevada border, on the interstate highway route from Los Angeles to Las Vegas.  It is a mining boom town that went bust -- and not back in the Wild West days, but very recently.  But it's not just <em>any</em> mining town out in the desert, it's a very special one.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/11/11/rare-earth-optimism/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Terrifying Hallowe&#039;en Nightmares, Left And Right</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/10/29/terrifying-halloween-nightmares-left-and-right/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/10/29/terrifying-halloween-nightmares-left-and-right/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Oct 2010 23:17:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Humor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Name-dropping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=2929</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>It's that time of year again... the time when we pre-empt our usual Friday Talking Points column here and instead gather 'round the virtual campfire and shove a metaphorical flashlight under our chin, and proceed to tell two tales of horror guaranteed to make your blood run like ice water in the veins, no matter which side of the political divide you hail from.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/10/29/terrifying-halloween-nightmares-left-and-right/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Shaking Hands</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/10/28/shaking-hands/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/10/28/shaking-hands/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Oct 2010 23:32:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=2921</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Incivility seems to be running fairly high in the country right now, what with heads being crushed under boots by political supporters and whatnot.  But the incivility which has me scratching my head has nothing to do with politics.  Instead, I've been asking a question which (so far) has remained unanswered, so I toss it out today in the hopes that a sports whiz knows the answer: Why do professional baseball players not shake hands with the other team after the game?</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/10/28/shaking-hands/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Entertainment And Politics</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/10/27/entertainment-and-politics/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/10/27/entertainment-and-politics/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Oct 2010 23:49:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Free Speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Humor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Bill of Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=2915</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>When ex-actor Ronald Reagan won the presidency for the first time, I became convinced that American politics had become indistinguishable from show business.  Nothing that has happened in the intervening years has caused me to change my mind on the subject.  But the phenomenon of television personalities throwing their own pseudo-political "rallies" on the National Mall in Washington certainly breaks new ground in both the political arena and the entertainment world, I have to admit.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/10/27/entertainment-and-politics/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>35</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama Administration Settles With Native American Farmers</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/10/19/obama-administration-settles-with-native-american-farmers/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/10/19/obama-administration-settles-with-native-american-farmers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Oct 2010 23:35:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=2874</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>It's a good time of year for it, as well.  Because Thanksgiving is right around the corner, which is supposed (in the easily-digestible children's version, at least) to be all about Native American farmers absolutely <em>saving the lives</em> of the white newcomers, by teaching them how to grow their own food.  In other words, I bet this settlement gets a prominent mention in the White House's official Thanksgiving Day message.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/10/19/obama-administration-settles-with-native-american-farmers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Relevance Of Frank Zappa</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/09/27/the-relevance-of-frank-zappa/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/09/27/the-relevance-of-frank-zappa/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Sep 2010 00:30:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Free Speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Humor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Bill of Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=2760</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Frank Zappa was recently honored by the city of Baltimore (where he spent the first years of his life) by the erection of a bust in front of a public library.  And, yes, I like to think Frank is up there somewhere smiling down on my usage of the words "erection" and "bust" in that sentence.  More on that in a bit.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/09/27/the-relevance-of-frank-zappa/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Won&#039;t U B My 100th Follower?  Pls?</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/09/14/wont-u-b-my-100th-follower-pls/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/09/14/wont-u-b-my-100th-follower-pls/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Sep 2010 23:03:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Humor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Name-dropping]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=2698</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>OK, that was an annoying headline, I fully admit. It was annoying to type out, and I can only imagine how annoying it must be to read.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/09/14/wont-u-b-my-100th-follower-pls/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>21</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>San Francisco Mime Troupe&#039;s Latest: &quot;POSIBILIDAD, or Death of the Worker&quot;</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/09/06/san-francisco-mime-troupes-latest-posibilidad-or-death-of-the-worker/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/09/06/san-francisco-mime-troupes-latest-posibilidad-or-death-of-the-worker/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Sep 2010 22:08:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Interviews]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=2658</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The play is unabashedly Leftist, in the classic meaning of the term.  It tells two parallel stories of factories facing shutdowns, and the possibilities open to them; one from modern-day San Francisco and one from a few years ago in Argentina, and it manages to link these two stories in a very personal way through the lead female character.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/09/06/san-francisco-mime-troupes-latest-posibilidad-or-death-of-the-worker/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Borderline Truthiness</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/09/02/borderline-truthiness/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/09/02/borderline-truthiness/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 23:57:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=2643</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>But politics isn't social science, where causality must be rigorously proven.  Politics is, to be blunt, whatever you can get away with saying to the voters.  Think not B.F. Skinner, but rather P.T. Barnum, in other words.  "Event X happened because party Y passed legislation Z" is an <em>expected</em> statement from a politician, on any subject under the sun.  Call it "spin" if you will, but a large part of it lies in convincing the American public that you have a right to claim credit because of your policies.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/09/02/borderline-truthiness/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama Reframes Mosque Debate</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/08/16/obama-reframes-mosque-debate/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/08/16/obama-reframes-mosque-debate/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Aug 2010 00:21:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Free Speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Bill of Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=2544</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>President Barack Obama, in a White House Ramadan address last Friday, expressed his thoughts on the "Ground Zero mosque" debate, and in doing so not only got it exactly right, but also managed to change the debate in a considerable way which few have noticed yet.  Because in his comments Friday (and in his off-the-cuff comment the next day), the president refocused the debate from the notion of "should be allowed" to the question of "should."  In doing so, Obama elevated the level of the debate for both him and the project's detractors.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/08/16/obama-reframes-mosque-debate/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>253</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>If Gay Marriage Wins...</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/08/09/if-gay-marriage-wins/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/08/09/if-gay-marriage-wins/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Aug 2010 23:36:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Bill of Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=2508</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Last week, a federal judge handed down his decision in the case  <em>Perry v. Schwarzenegger</em>, which said (in no uncertain terms) that gay marriage was a civil right, and should be guaranteed to all -- no matter what voters thought about it -- in much the same way that interracial marriage is a constitutional right guaranteed to all (which happened via a similarly-contentious federal court ruling in the 1960s).  While this ruling was rightfully hailed by gay rights supporters, everyone knows that there is still a long road ahead until it reaches the Supreme Court, where the matter may be fundamentally decided.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/08/09/if-gay-marriage-wins/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>20</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Perry v. Schwarzenegger</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/08/05/perry-v-schwarzenegger/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/08/05/perry-v-schwarzenegger/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Aug 2010 23:40:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Bill of Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=2495</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>There are certain court cases everyone schooled in America at least recognizes the names of: <em>Marbury v. Madison, Plessy v. Ferguson, Brown v. Board of Education</em>, and, most recently, <em>Roe v. Wade</em>.  Even if you don't remember the particular details in these cases, chances are you'll at least have heard all of these names before.  And we could be on the brink of another landmark case entering this pantheon of pivotal legal decisions: <em>Perry v. Schwarzenegger</em>.  Yes, California's "Governator" may go down in history as being on the wrong side of this case (even though he personally supports overturning Proposition 8).</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/08/05/perry-v-schwarzenegger/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Memorializing Second-Class Soldiers</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/05/31/memorializing-second-class-soldiers/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/05/31/memorializing-second-class-soldiers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jun 2010 00:16:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Bill of Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=2169</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Memorial Day is the time to memorialize all the brave individuals who served our country throughout its history, and sometimes paid the ultimate price for doing so.  But, in particular, this year I'd like to focus on all those who did their duty for their country, and fought for the American ideal of equality for all citizens -- even while they did not enjoy such rights themselves, either in the military or in American life at the time.  These second-class citizens, one would think, would have even less reason than citizens accorded full rights under the law to risk death on a foreign battlefield, and therefore would not have volunteered to do so.  One would be wrong in thinking this, however.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/05/31/memorializing-second-class-soldiers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Religion, Bigotry, And Political Hypocrisy</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/05/17/religion-bigotry-and-political-hypocrisy/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/05/17/religion-bigotry-and-political-hypocrisy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 May 2010 01:18:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=2095</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Pat Buchanan, in his usual less-than-charming manner, <a href="http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&#038;pageId=153417">brought up a point</a> last week about the religious diversity (or lack thereof) of the Supreme Court.  Buchanan pointed out that, if Elena Kagan is confirmed to the highest court (as seems likely), there will be only two religions represented on the court -- Judaism and Catholicism.  He further points out that the court will be one-third Jewish, when Jews account for only two percent of the American population.  Now, aside from the highly amusing spectacle of right-wingers advocating some sort of quota system, I think there's a deeper point here than Buchanan's "pity the unrepresented Protestant majority" theme.  Because, even though virtually no politician would ever admit it, there is indeed a widespread (but unacknowledged) religious bigotry in America.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/05/17/religion-bigotry-and-political-hypocrisy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Arizona&#039;s Forbidding Landscape</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/05/13/arizonas-forbidding-landscape/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/05/13/arizonas-forbidding-landscape/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 May 2010 02:02:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Bill of Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=2082</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Arizona is a truly beautiful state.  It has many spectacular sights, of which the Grand Canyon is the most awe-inspiring.  But Arizona is also a state of forbidding landscapes -- much of the state is desert or near-desert, where the heat of the midday sun is a force of nature to be heavily respected, if not downright feared.  But what has put Arizona into the news recently is its "forbidding" political landscape.  Specifically, on immigration.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/05/13/arizonas-forbidding-landscape/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>32</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Republicans Boycott Arizona?</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/05/12/republicans-boycott-arizona/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/05/12/republicans-boycott-arizona/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 May 2010 00:15:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=2076</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>It was <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/05/12/AR2010051203317.html?hpid=topnews">just announced</a> that the 2012 Republican National Convention will be held in Tampa, Florida, rather than Salt Lake City, Utah or Phoenix, Arizona, the other two cities that were in the running.  Now, it's pretty easy to see why Utah would be contentious, seeing as how Mitt Romney may be the party's nominee.  Holding the GOP convention in the heart of Mormonism would seem to be some sort of tacit party endorsement of Romney, in other words.  Or perhaps it's just that the conventioneers want to have more fun (and more bars) available to them while they go about the sober (ahem) business of nominating their presidential candidate.  But Phoenix is another story entirely.  Because I can't help but think that the Republican Party just imposed their own <em>de facto</em> boycott of Arizona, due to the state's recent legislative anti-immigrant fervor.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/05/12/republicans-boycott-arizona/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>18</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>In Memoriam, Frank Frazetta</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/05/12/in-memoriam-frank-frazetta/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/05/12/in-memoriam-frank-frazetta/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 May 2010 13:07:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=2058</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Frank Frazetta recently passed away.  You may not immediately recognize his name, but it is likely you have seen his artwork at least once in your life, especially if you recognize the name of the southern rock band "Molly Hatchet."  Frazetta's artwork occupied a certain niche, where it was wildly popular.  This niche is hard to define, as it actually ranges over a wide realm of what might be called the "Kingdom of Geekiness" -- science fiction, fantasy, and even (gasp!) <em>comic books</em>.  Naturally, as a result, Frazetta was sneered at by the "real" art world.  This matters not a whit to fans of his artwork, who are legion.  As, indeed, it should not.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/05/12/in-memoriam-frank-frazetta/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>EPA Moves To End Mountaintop-Removal Mining</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/04/22/epa-moves-to-end-mountaintop-removal-mining/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/04/22/epa-moves-to-end-mountaintop-removal-mining/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Apr 2010 23:08:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=1926</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Instead, I'd like to highlight some good environmentalist news from a few weeks ago, which didn't really get much media attention at the time.  Perhaps if they had delayed the announcement, it would have made a bigger splash today, being Earth Day and all.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/04/22/epa-moves-to-end-mountaintop-removal-mining/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Where Tea Partiers Live</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/04/21/where-tea-partiers-live/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/04/21/where-tea-partiers-live/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Apr 2010 00:21:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=1920</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Ever wondered where the Tea Partiers actually live?  The PBS <em>NewsHour</em> website has now helpfully mapped it out as part of their "<a href="http://www.pbs.org/newshour/patchworknation/">Patchwork Nation</a>" project (in partnership with the <em>Christian Science Monitor</em>), for anyone interested to see.  This map isn't exactly surprising, as it shows Tea Partiers are more concentrated in traditional Republican areas.  But it is interesting to see such a level of detail, measured as concentration of Tea Party members for every county across America.<p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/04/21/where-tea-partiers-live/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>15</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tea Partying&#039;s First Anniversary</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/04/14/tea-partyings-first-anniversary/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/04/14/tea-partyings-first-anniversary/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Apr 2010 23:59:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=1884</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>What I just wrote could describe tomorrow's "first anniversary" Tea Party rallies.  Or it could describe a late-1960s anti-war rally.  About the only thing these two historical eras have in common is the age of the driving force behind the protests.  In other words, don't look now, but the Baby Boomers are back in the streets.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/04/14/tea-partyings-first-anniversary/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>31</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>From The Archives -- Tea And Sympathy</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/04/13/from-the-archives-tea-and-sympathy/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/04/13/from-the-archives-tea-and-sympathy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Apr 2010 01:46:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=1879</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>[<em>Apologies for posting a repeat of an old column here, but I am busy doing my taxes, so didn't have the time to write today.  This column <a href="http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/04/13/tea-and-sympathy/">originally ran</a> here exactly one year ago today, and was written right before the first "tax day tea parties" took place.  It's hard to believe, looking back, that this entire movement is only one year old, but they began on tax day, 2009.  Since Thursday will likely see large anniversary rallies and marches by the Tea Party folks, I thought it was a good time to take a look back at the advice I gave to them last year, and the history of the Boston Tea Party as well.  So, if you'll forgive me for the repeat column, while I scurry around at the last minute to get my taxes done, I promise we'll resume new columns starting tomorrow.</em>]</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/04/13/from-the-archives-tea-and-sympathy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>15</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>In (Partial) Defense Of Michele Bachmann</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/04/08/in-partial-defense-of-michele-bachmann/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/04/08/in-partial-defense-of-michele-bachmann/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Apr 2010 23:56:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Bill of Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=1843</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>I've written here before <a href="http://www.chrisweigant.com/2008/09/29/in-defense-of-sarah-palin/">in defense of Sarah Palin</a>, and since the two just recently shared a campaign rally stage, I thought it'd be timely to write at least a partial defense of Michele Bachmann today.  Because a recent comment by the Minnesota Representative has gotten a lot of ridicule from the left side of the blogosphere, but nobody bothers to point out that she's actually right in what she says about the U.S. Census Bureau and Japanese internment during World War II.  This is intellectually dishonest, I feel, which is why I have to make the attempt to defend her words.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/04/08/in-partial-defense-of-michele-bachmann/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Exceptional Democracy</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/04/07/exceptional-democracy/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/04/07/exceptional-democracy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Apr 2010 22:52:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=1829</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Americans, in general, like to believe in the concept of "American Exceptionalism."  This doctrine can be summed up as: "We're the best damn country on the planet, wouldn't the rest of you lesser countries agree?"  But to me, what is telling is that whenever nascent democratic forms of government develop in other places in the world (born through the ravages of war, popular revolt, simple modernization, or any of a number of other reasons) and the people affected have the opportunity to select what form their new democracies shall take; they almost without exception (pun intended) choose some form of the British parliamentary system, rather than American-style representative democracy.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/04/07/exceptional-democracy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Guest Column: Celebrating My First Year As An American</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/03/20/guest-column-celebrating-my-first-year-as-an-american/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/03/20/guest-column-celebrating-my-first-year-as-an-american/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 23:45:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guest Authors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=1704</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>One year ago I <a href="http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/03/22/guest-author-why-i-decided-to-become-an-american/">wrote about</a> my experience becoming an American citizen.  Yesterday, I celebrated my first anniversary as an American.  When I became a citizen, I felt that I now "belonged."  I felt that I had made a commitment to this country.  I felt that I had a responsibility to be a participant in the political process and an active member of my community.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/03/20/guest-column-celebrating-my-first-year-as-an-american/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>35</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ad Hoc, Ad Loc, Quid Pro Quo</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/03/02/ad-hoc-ad-loc-quid-pro-quo/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/03/02/ad-hoc-ad-loc-quid-pro-quo/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 22:43:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=1598</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>If you think this is building up to some deep and meaningful point, well, it's not.  Sorry to disappoint you.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/03/02/ad-hoc-ad-loc-quid-pro-quo/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Legal Odds And Ends</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/02/25/legal-odds-and-ends/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/02/25/legal-odds-and-ends/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 01:12:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Free Speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Bill of Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=1577</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The first privacy issue comes from an <a href="http://salon.com/wires/us/2010/02/23/D9E24D6O2_us_911_calls_privacy/index.html">interesting story</a> earlier this week about how some states are considering banning the release of recorded 911 emergency calls to the public (or -- more to the point -- to the press).  This is an interesting First Amendment hair to split, because a reasonable case can be made both ways.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/02/25/legal-odds-and-ends/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>In Memoriam</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/02/11/in-memoriam/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/02/11/in-memoriam/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Feb 2010 00:52:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sports]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=1504</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>So it is with a heavy heart indeed that we salute Fred Morrison and his Pluto Platter, as he metaphorically floats off -- spinning gently, on the lightest of breezes -- into the sunset.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/02/11/in-memoriam/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ask.  Tell.</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/02/04/ask-tell/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/02/04/ask-tell/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 02:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=1471</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>But while gay marriage has not exactly gained majority support from voters (as evidenced by recent referenda in California and Maine), allowing gays to serve openly in the military has actually become a lot less contentious, and has garnered a lot more support from the general public.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/02/04/ask-tell/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Grammatical Interlude</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/02/02/grammatical-interlude/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/02/02/grammatical-interlude/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 23:06:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=1434</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Today's column is a short interlude, or perhaps even intermission, from our usual political wonkery.  This is due mostly to the fact that we're busy around ChrisWeigant.com Central preparing charts for tomorrow's "Obama Poll Watch" column.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/02/02/grammatical-interlude/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>19</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.&#039;s Nobel Peace Prize Acceptance Speech</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/01/18/rev-dr-martin-luther-king-jr-s-nobel-peace-prize-acceptance-speech/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/01/18/rev-dr-martin-luther-king-jr-s-nobel-peace-prize-acceptance-speech/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 22:46:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guest Authors]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=1330</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>I think Alfred Nobel would know what I mean when I say that I accept this award in the spirit of a curator of some precious heirloom which he holds in trust for its true owners -- all those to whom beauty is truth and truth beauty -- and in whose eyes the beauty of genuine brotherhood and peace is more precious than diamonds or silver or gold.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/01/18/rev-dr-martin-luther-king-jr-s-nobel-peace-prize-acceptance-speech/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Harry&#039;s &quot;Washington Gaffe&quot;</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/01/11/harrys-washington-gaffe/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/01/11/harrys-washington-gaffe/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 01:27:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=1296</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>So please don't read the rest of this article as a defense of Harry Reid, for sheer political reasons.  Reid has a few political options now, none of which have much to do with what he said to a reporter during the 2008 presidential campaign: he can stick it out, hoping for an upset victory which would allow him to remain Majority Leader; he can step down from the leadership position, campaign as just another senator in the midterms; or he can announce he will not be running this year, and give another Democrat a shot at his Senate seat.  My preference would actually be for that last one, but my political instincts tell me that he'll run and not step down from his leadership spot, choosing instead to "tough it out," and hoping that he can spend enough during the campaign to convince Silver State voters to send him back to Washington.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/01/11/harrys-washington-gaffe/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>20</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Teachable Moment -- The Official Banished Words List</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/12/31/a-teachable-moment-the-official-banished-words-list/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/12/31/a-teachable-moment-the-official-banished-words-list/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Dec 2009 23:02:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Humor]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2009/12/31/a-teachable-moment-the-official-banished-words-list/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>In any case, in these economic times, I felt we better end with some transparency here.  As your Web Site Czar, standing on the cusp of a shovel-ready upgrade of ChrisWeigant.com to begin the new year (but not, for those who can count to ten, the "new decade") which will improve the site (but not require you to download a new app) by getting rid of some toxic assets, software-wise, and providing a stimulus to your experience here; I can truly say that 2010 will be a year of bromance between all of us chillaxin' here.  Because we like to consider ChrisWeigant.com Obamaliciously too big to fail.  Oh, and don't forget to friend me by following my tweets!  And I assure you, there will be no sexting....</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/12/31/a-teachable-moment-the-official-banished-words-list/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Last Chance To Enter Words/Phrases For Banishment</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/12/29/last-chance-to-enter-wordsphrases-for-banishment/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/12/29/last-chance-to-enter-wordsphrases-for-banishment/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Dec 2009 00:27:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Humor]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2009/12/29/last-chance-to-enter-wordsphrases-for-banishment/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Thursday's column, with luck, will be another year-end tradition -- the annual "banished words" list from northern Michigan.  Last year, <a href="http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2008/12/30/its-that-time-of-year-again-the-banished-words-list/">I wrote about the list</a> and had such fun doing so that I'm going to end 2009 by doing the same.  But this means that today is pretty much the last chance you have to enter phrases you'd like banned from everyday usage by your peers.  And 2009 was a rich year for grating phrases, from "death panels" to "teabaggers."  In any case, check out the official Lake Superior State University "Banished Words" site, and <a href="http://www.lssu.edu/banished/submit_word.php">enter your nominations today!</a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/12/29/last-chance-to-enter-wordsphrases-for-banishment/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Thankful For The Web</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/11/26/thankful-for-the-web/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/11/26/thankful-for-the-web/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 19:27:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2009/11/26/thankful-for-the-web/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Because yesterday's column was a wee bit un-holiday-spirit-ish, I offer up my thanks today.  I am thankful for the web.  I am thankful that I can sit in front of a machine and have at my fingertips perhaps not the sum of human knowledge, but a pretty close approximation (the closest the race has ever seen since, perhaps, the library at Alexandria).</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/11/26/thankful-for-the-web/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>On Being A Twit</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/11/10/on-being-a-twit/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/11/10/on-being-a-twit/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 23:59:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Name-dropping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2009/11/10/on-being-a-twit/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>There are big subjects which I should be writing about today.  The abortion battle within the Democratic Party, for instance.  What Obama is going to announce about our troop commitment in Afghanistan.  And, believe it or not, David Hasselhoff's contribution to freedom.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/11/10/on-being-a-twit/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cold War&#039;s End -- The Wall Comes Down</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/11/09/cold-wars-end-the-wall-comes-down/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/11/09/cold-wars-end-the-wall-comes-down/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 01:16:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2009/11/09/cold-wars-end-the-wall-comes-down/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>It must be a little hard to understand, for anyone reading this under the age of about 30 or so, the significance of the fall of the Berlin Wall 20 years ago.  Because one event has become historical shorthand for an immense change in the dynamics of not just our country, but the entire world.  We've all seen the pictures of an exuberant crowd at the Brandenburg Gate (or "Checkpoint Charlie"), seemingly tearing The Wall down with their bare hands.  But it wasn't just one wall, or one city, or even one country that the events in Berlin were changing -- it was the entire political makeup of the planet.  Because the fall of The Wall signified the fall of the Soviet Union, and an end to the Cold War.  And while this was of enormous historical import, I fear that future generations won't really pay much attention to it.  Truth be told, I can already feel it slipping away in the American consciousness.  Which, while I understand the impulse, I still think is a shame.  Because as the Cold War is forgotten, passing into the dusty pages of children's history books, we run the risk of forgetting some of its lessons.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/11/09/cold-wars-end-the-wall-comes-down/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>19</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>From The Pentagon To Monty Python: The Internet Turns 40</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/10/28/from-the-pentagon-to-monty-python-the-internet-turns-40/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/10/28/from-the-pentagon-to-monty-python-the-internet-turns-40/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 23:57:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Humor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2009/10/28/from-the-pentagon-to-monty-python-the-internet-turns-40/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Tomorrow is the internet's fortieth birthday.  Its creators are even <a href="http://www.google.com/hostednews/afp/article/ALeqM5hT_JTmvX3eD5DsLVwKb6ex0tursg">throwing it a birthday party</a> at the University of California, Los Angeles, the origin of the first message ever transmitted over what we know today as "the internet," on October 29, 1969.  If you're wondering what the first message ever transmitted was -- the digital age's "Come here, Watson," statement, as it were -- it consisted of two letters: "LO."  It was actually supposed to be "LOG," as in "LOG IN," but the receiving computer crashed after receiving just the first two letters -- not a very auspicious beginning, it must be admitted.  Still, for poetic reasons, "LO" seems pretty apt: "Lo!  The Internet was created!"</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/10/28/from-the-pentagon-to-monty-python-the-internet-turns-40/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The News Media We Deserve</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/10/20/the-news-media-we-deserve/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/10/20/the-news-media-we-deserve/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 01:05:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2009/10/20/the-news-media-we-deserve/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>That question has been on my mind of late, due to an overload of idiocy on the airwaves.  But, I had to wonder, is it truly idiocy from the media talking heads, idiocy from the people who decide what stories to air (and what prominence to give them), or could it quite possibly have something to do with the idiocy of those watching as well?  It's a hard question to ask, which is why "Do we get the media we deserve?" is so much more polite.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/10/20/the-news-media-we-deserve/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>36</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Twenty Years Ago -- The &quot;Big One&quot; Of &#039;89</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/10/15/twenty-years-ago-the-big-one-of-89/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/10/15/twenty-years-ago-the-big-one-of-89/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 01:04:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sports]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2009/10/15/twenty-years-ago-the-big-one-of-89/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Now, there is no hard-and-fast rule about what constitutes a "big" quake, to say nothing of the (always-capitalized) "Big One."  Generally, it is measured in how much damage the quake leaves behind.  But any quake above 6.0, and/or any quake that lasts longer than three or four seconds, is (in my book, at least) a big quake.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/10/15/twenty-years-ago-the-big-one-of-89/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Republican Leaders Join In Honoring New Rotunda Statue Of Radical Socialist Woman</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/10/07/republican-leaders-join-in-honoring-new-rotunda-statue-of-radical-socialist-woman/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/10/07/republican-leaders-join-in-honoring-new-rotunda-statue-of-radical-socialist-woman/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 20:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Name-dropping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2009/10/07/republican-leaders-join-in-honoring-new-rotunda-statue-of-radical-socialist-woman/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>There are sins of commission in the way we're taught American history as children -- such as the fable about George Washington chopping down the cherry tree (which never actually happened).  Then there are the much more prevalent sins of omission -- which conveniently gloss over the parts of American history which we have to "protect the children" from learning about.  The reason I preface this column with such an observation is because a woman -- whose name we all know -- was honored today by the unveiling of her statue in the United States Capitol's Rotunda.  Democratic Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi was on hand for this ceremony, as was Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid.  But the astonishing thing (to me) was that Republican leaders Mitch McConnell and John Boehner were also on hand, as well as the Republican governor of the <em>very</em> red state from whence this woman came.  This state has honored the woman before, when it selected her to be their representation on their own state quarter.  But the truly astonishing thing is that this woman not only helped found the A.C.L.U., but also was a radical and revolutionary Socialist, a fan of the Soviet Union and Lenin, a member of the Industrial Workers of the World (the "I.W.W.", or the "Wobblies"), and an ardent foe and critic of capitalism.  Not the type of woman usually honored by Republicans, you might think.  But, in a glaring sin of omission committed by history teachers across this great land (and repeated by politicians even now), the only story we all know about her is of the daunting odds she overcame in her childhood.  We're all familiar with this shared story, but it abruptly ends when she becomes an adult.  All the parts about the raging Socialist she later became are conveniently swept under the rug.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/10/07/republican-leaders-join-in-honoring-new-rotunda-statue-of-radical-socialist-woman/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

