<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>ChrisWeigant.com &#187; American Society</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.chrisweigant.com/category/american-society/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com</link>
	<description>Reality-based political commentary</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 00:11:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>San Francisco Mime Troupe&#039;s Latest: &quot;POSIBILIDAD, or Death of the Worker&quot;</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/09/06/san-francisco-mime-troupes-latest-posibilidad-or-death-of-the-worker/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/09/06/san-francisco-mime-troupes-latest-posibilidad-or-death-of-the-worker/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Sep 2010 22:08:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Interviews]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=2658</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The play is unabashedly Leftist, in the classic meaning of the term.  It tells two parallel stories of factories facing shutdowns, and the possibilities open to them; one from modern-day San Francisco and one from a few years ago in Argentina, and it manages to link these two stories in a very personal way through the lead female character.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/09/06/san-francisco-mime-troupes-latest-posibilidad-or-death-of-the-worker/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Borderline Truthiness</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/09/02/borderline-truthiness/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/09/02/borderline-truthiness/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 23:57:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=2643</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>But politics isn't social science, where causality must be rigorously proven.  Politics is, to be blunt, whatever you can get away with saying to the voters.  Think not B.F. Skinner, but rather P.T. Barnum, in other words.  "Event X happened because party Y passed legislation Z" is an <em>expected</em> statement from a politician, on any subject under the sun.  Call it "spin" if you will, but a large part of it lies in convincing the American public that you have a right to claim credit because of your policies.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/09/02/borderline-truthiness/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama Reframes Mosque Debate</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/08/16/obama-reframes-mosque-debate/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/08/16/obama-reframes-mosque-debate/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Aug 2010 00:21:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Free Speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Bill of Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=2544</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>President Barack Obama, in a White House Ramadan address last Friday, expressed his thoughts on the "Ground Zero mosque" debate, and in doing so not only got it exactly right, but also managed to change the debate in a considerable way which few have noticed yet.  Because in his comments Friday (and in his off-the-cuff comment the next day), the president refocused the debate from the notion of "should be allowed" to the question of "should."  In doing so, Obama elevated the level of the debate for both him and the project's detractors.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/08/16/obama-reframes-mosque-debate/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>252</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>If Gay Marriage Wins...</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/08/09/if-gay-marriage-wins/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/08/09/if-gay-marriage-wins/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Aug 2010 23:36:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Bill of Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=2508</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Last week, a federal judge handed down his decision in the case  <em>Perry v. Schwarzenegger</em>, which said (in no uncertain terms) that gay marriage was a civil right, and should be guaranteed to all -- no matter what voters thought about it -- in much the same way that interracial marriage is a constitutional right guaranteed to all (which happened via a similarly-contentious federal court ruling in the 1960s).  While this ruling was rightfully hailed by gay rights supporters, everyone knows that there is still a long road ahead until it reaches the Supreme Court, where the matter may be fundamentally decided.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/08/09/if-gay-marriage-wins/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>20</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Perry v. Schwarzenegger</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/08/05/perry-v-schwarzenegger/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/08/05/perry-v-schwarzenegger/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Aug 2010 23:40:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Bill of Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=2495</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>There are certain court cases everyone schooled in America at least recognizes the names of: <em>Marbury v. Madison, Plessy v. Ferguson, Brown v. Board of Education</em>, and, most recently, <em>Roe v. Wade</em>.  Even if you don't remember the particular details in these cases, chances are you'll at least have heard all of these names before.  And we could be on the brink of another landmark case entering this pantheon of pivotal legal decisions: <em>Perry v. Schwarzenegger</em>.  Yes, California's "Governator" may go down in history as being on the wrong side of this case (even though he personally supports overturning Proposition 8).</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/08/05/perry-v-schwarzenegger/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Memorializing Second-Class Soldiers</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/05/31/memorializing-second-class-soldiers/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/05/31/memorializing-second-class-soldiers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jun 2010 00:16:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Bill of Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=2169</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Memorial Day is the time to memorialize all the brave individuals who served our country throughout its history, and sometimes paid the ultimate price for doing so.  But, in particular, this year I'd like to focus on all those who did their duty for their country, and fought for the American ideal of equality for all citizens -- even while they did not enjoy such rights themselves, either in the military or in American life at the time.  These second-class citizens, one would think, would have even less reason than citizens accorded full rights under the law to risk death on a foreign battlefield, and therefore would not have volunteered to do so.  One would be wrong in thinking this, however.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/05/31/memorializing-second-class-soldiers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Religion, Bigotry, And Political Hypocrisy</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/05/17/religion-bigotry-and-political-hypocrisy/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/05/17/religion-bigotry-and-political-hypocrisy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 May 2010 01:18:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=2095</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Pat Buchanan, in his usual less-than-charming manner, <a href="http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&#038;pageId=153417">brought up a point</a> last week about the religious diversity (or lack thereof) of the Supreme Court.  Buchanan pointed out that, if Elena Kagan is confirmed to the highest court (as seems likely), there will be only two religions represented on the court -- Judaism and Catholicism.  He further points out that the court will be one-third Jewish, when Jews account for only two percent of the American population.  Now, aside from the highly amusing spectacle of right-wingers advocating some sort of quota system, I think there's a deeper point here than Buchanan's "pity the unrepresented Protestant majority" theme.  Because, even though virtually no politician would ever admit it, there is indeed a widespread (but unacknowledged) religious bigotry in America.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/05/17/religion-bigotry-and-political-hypocrisy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Arizona&#039;s Forbidding Landscape</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/05/13/arizonas-forbidding-landscape/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/05/13/arizonas-forbidding-landscape/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 May 2010 02:02:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Bill of Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=2082</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Arizona is a truly beautiful state.  It has many spectacular sights, of which the Grand Canyon is the most awe-inspiring.  But Arizona is also a state of forbidding landscapes -- much of the state is desert or near-desert, where the heat of the midday sun is a force of nature to be heavily respected, if not downright feared.  But what has put Arizona into the news recently is its "forbidding" political landscape.  Specifically, on immigration.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/05/13/arizonas-forbidding-landscape/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>32</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Republicans Boycott Arizona?</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/05/12/republicans-boycott-arizona/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/05/12/republicans-boycott-arizona/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 May 2010 00:15:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=2076</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>It was <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/05/12/AR2010051203317.html?hpid=topnews">just announced</a> that the 2012 Republican National Convention will be held in Tampa, Florida, rather than Salt Lake City, Utah or Phoenix, Arizona, the other two cities that were in the running.  Now, it's pretty easy to see why Utah would be contentious, seeing as how Mitt Romney may be the party's nominee.  Holding the GOP convention in the heart of Mormonism would seem to be some sort of tacit party endorsement of Romney, in other words.  Or perhaps it's just that the conventioneers want to have more fun (and more bars) available to them while they go about the sober (ahem) business of nominating their presidential candidate.  But Phoenix is another story entirely.  Because I can't help but think that the Republican Party just imposed their own <em>de facto</em> boycott of Arizona, due to the state's recent legislative anti-immigrant fervor.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/05/12/republicans-boycott-arizona/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>18</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>In Memoriam, Frank Frazetta</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/05/12/in-memoriam-frank-frazetta/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/05/12/in-memoriam-frank-frazetta/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 May 2010 13:07:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=2058</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Frank Frazetta recently passed away.  You may not immediately recognize his name, but it is likely you have seen his artwork at least once in your life, especially if you recognize the name of the southern rock band "Molly Hatchet."  Frazetta's artwork occupied a certain niche, where it was wildly popular.  This niche is hard to define, as it actually ranges over a wide realm of what might be called the "Kingdom of Geekiness" -- science fiction, fantasy, and even (gasp!) <em>comic books</em>.  Naturally, as a result, Frazetta was sneered at by the "real" art world.  This matters not a whit to fans of his artwork, who are legion.  As, indeed, it should not.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/05/12/in-memoriam-frank-frazetta/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>EPA Moves To End Mountaintop-Removal Mining</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/04/22/epa-moves-to-end-mountaintop-removal-mining/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/04/22/epa-moves-to-end-mountaintop-removal-mining/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Apr 2010 23:08:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=1926</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Instead, I'd like to highlight some good environmentalist news from a few weeks ago, which didn't really get much media attention at the time.  Perhaps if they had delayed the announcement, it would have made a bigger splash today, being Earth Day and all.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/04/22/epa-moves-to-end-mountaintop-removal-mining/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Where Tea Partiers Live</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/04/21/where-tea-partiers-live/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/04/21/where-tea-partiers-live/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Apr 2010 00:21:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=1920</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Ever wondered where the Tea Partiers actually live?  The PBS <em>NewsHour</em> website has now helpfully mapped it out as part of their "<a href="http://www.pbs.org/newshour/patchworknation/">Patchwork Nation</a>" project (in partnership with the <em>Christian Science Monitor</em>), for anyone interested to see.  This map isn't exactly surprising, as it shows Tea Partiers are more concentrated in traditional Republican areas.  But it is interesting to see such a level of detail, measured as concentration of Tea Party members for every county across America.<p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/04/21/where-tea-partiers-live/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>15</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tea Partying&#039;s First Anniversary</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/04/14/tea-partyings-first-anniversary/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/04/14/tea-partyings-first-anniversary/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Apr 2010 23:59:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=1884</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>What I just wrote could describe tomorrow's "first anniversary" Tea Party rallies.  Or it could describe a late-1960s anti-war rally.  About the only thing these two historical eras have in common is the age of the driving force behind the protests.  In other words, don't look now, but the Baby Boomers are back in the streets.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/04/14/tea-partyings-first-anniversary/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>31</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>From The Archives -- Tea And Sympathy</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/04/13/from-the-archives-tea-and-sympathy/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/04/13/from-the-archives-tea-and-sympathy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Apr 2010 01:46:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=1879</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>[<em>Apologies for posting a repeat of an old column here, but I am busy doing my taxes, so didn't have the time to write today.  This column <a href="http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/04/13/tea-and-sympathy/">originally ran</a> here exactly one year ago today, and was written right before the first "tax day tea parties" took place.  It's hard to believe, looking back, that this entire movement is only one year old, but they began on tax day, 2009.  Since Thursday will likely see large anniversary rallies and marches by the Tea Party folks, I thought it was a good time to take a look back at the advice I gave to them last year, and the history of the Boston Tea Party as well.  So, if you'll forgive me for the repeat column, while I scurry around at the last minute to get my taxes done, I promise we'll resume new columns starting tomorrow.</em>]</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/04/13/from-the-archives-tea-and-sympathy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>15</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>In (Partial) Defense Of Michele Bachmann</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/04/08/in-partial-defense-of-michele-bachmann/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/04/08/in-partial-defense-of-michele-bachmann/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Apr 2010 23:56:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Bill of Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=1843</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>I've written here before <a href="http://www.chrisweigant.com/2008/09/29/in-defense-of-sarah-palin/">in defense of Sarah Palin</a>, and since the two just recently shared a campaign rally stage, I thought it'd be timely to write at least a partial defense of Michele Bachmann today.  Because a recent comment by the Minnesota Representative has gotten a lot of ridicule from the left side of the blogosphere, but nobody bothers to point out that she's actually right in what she says about the U.S. Census Bureau and Japanese internment during World War II.  This is intellectually dishonest, I feel, which is why I have to make the attempt to defend her words.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/04/08/in-partial-defense-of-michele-bachmann/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Exceptional Democracy</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/04/07/exceptional-democracy/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/04/07/exceptional-democracy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Apr 2010 22:52:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=1829</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Americans, in general, like to believe in the concept of "American Exceptionalism."  This doctrine can be summed up as: "We're the best damn country on the planet, wouldn't the rest of you lesser countries agree?"  But to me, what is telling is that whenever nascent democratic forms of government develop in other places in the world (born through the ravages of war, popular revolt, simple modernization, or any of a number of other reasons) and the people affected have the opportunity to select what form their new democracies shall take; they almost without exception (pun intended) choose some form of the British parliamentary system, rather than American-style representative democracy.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/04/07/exceptional-democracy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Guest Column: Celebrating My First Year As An American</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/03/20/guest-column-celebrating-my-first-year-as-an-american/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/03/20/guest-column-celebrating-my-first-year-as-an-american/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 23:45:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guest Authors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=1704</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>One year ago I <a href="http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/03/22/guest-author-why-i-decided-to-become-an-american/">wrote about</a> my experience becoming an American citizen.  Yesterday, I celebrated my first anniversary as an American.  When I became a citizen, I felt that I now "belonged."  I felt that I had made a commitment to this country.  I felt that I had a responsibility to be a participant in the political process and an active member of my community.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/03/20/guest-column-celebrating-my-first-year-as-an-american/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>35</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ad Hoc, Ad Loc, Quid Pro Quo</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/03/02/ad-hoc-ad-loc-quid-pro-quo/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/03/02/ad-hoc-ad-loc-quid-pro-quo/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 22:43:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=1598</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>If you think this is building up to some deep and meaningful point, well, it's not.  Sorry to disappoint you.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/03/02/ad-hoc-ad-loc-quid-pro-quo/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Legal Odds And Ends</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/02/25/legal-odds-and-ends/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/02/25/legal-odds-and-ends/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 01:12:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Free Speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Bill of Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=1577</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The first privacy issue comes from an <a href="http://salon.com/wires/us/2010/02/23/D9E24D6O2_us_911_calls_privacy/index.html">interesting story</a> earlier this week about how some states are considering banning the release of recorded 911 emergency calls to the public (or -- more to the point -- to the press).  This is an interesting First Amendment hair to split, because a reasonable case can be made both ways.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/02/25/legal-odds-and-ends/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>In Memoriam</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/02/11/in-memoriam/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/02/11/in-memoriam/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Feb 2010 00:52:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sports]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=1504</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>So it is with a heavy heart indeed that we salute Fred Morrison and his Pluto Platter, as he metaphorically floats off -- spinning gently, on the lightest of breezes -- into the sunset.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/02/11/in-memoriam/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ask.  Tell.</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/02/04/ask-tell/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/02/04/ask-tell/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 02:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=1471</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>But while gay marriage has not exactly gained majority support from voters (as evidenced by recent referenda in California and Maine), allowing gays to serve openly in the military has actually become a lot less contentious, and has garnered a lot more support from the general public.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/02/04/ask-tell/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Grammatical Interlude</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/02/02/grammatical-interlude/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/02/02/grammatical-interlude/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 23:06:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Populism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=1434</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Today's column is a short interlude, or perhaps even intermission, from our usual political wonkery.  This is due mostly to the fact that we're busy around ChrisWeigant.com Central preparing charts for tomorrow's "Obama Poll Watch" column.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/02/02/grammatical-interlude/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>19</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.&#039;s Nobel Peace Prize Acceptance Speech</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/01/18/rev-dr-martin-luther-king-jr-s-nobel-peace-prize-acceptance-speech/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/01/18/rev-dr-martin-luther-king-jr-s-nobel-peace-prize-acceptance-speech/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 22:46:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guest Authors]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=1330</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>I think Alfred Nobel would know what I mean when I say that I accept this award in the spirit of a curator of some precious heirloom which he holds in trust for its true owners -- all those to whom beauty is truth and truth beauty -- and in whose eyes the beauty of genuine brotherhood and peace is more precious than diamonds or silver or gold.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/01/18/rev-dr-martin-luther-king-jr-s-nobel-peace-prize-acceptance-speech/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Harry&#039;s &quot;Washington Gaffe&quot;</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/01/11/harrys-washington-gaffe/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/01/11/harrys-washington-gaffe/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 01:27:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=1296</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>So please don't read the rest of this article as a defense of Harry Reid, for sheer political reasons.  Reid has a few political options now, none of which have much to do with what he said to a reporter during the 2008 presidential campaign: he can stick it out, hoping for an upset victory which would allow him to remain Majority Leader; he can step down from the leadership position, campaign as just another senator in the midterms; or he can announce he will not be running this year, and give another Democrat a shot at his Senate seat.  My preference would actually be for that last one, but my political instincts tell me that he'll run and not step down from his leadership spot, choosing instead to "tough it out," and hoping that he can spend enough during the campaign to convince Silver State voters to send him back to Washington.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2010/01/11/harrys-washington-gaffe/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>20</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Teachable Moment -- The Official Banished Words List</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/12/31/a-teachable-moment-the-official-banished-words-list/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/12/31/a-teachable-moment-the-official-banished-words-list/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Dec 2009 23:02:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Humor]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2009/12/31/a-teachable-moment-the-official-banished-words-list/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>In any case, in these economic times, I felt we better end with some transparency here.  As your Web Site Czar, standing on the cusp of a shovel-ready upgrade of ChrisWeigant.com to begin the new year (but not, for those who can count to ten, the "new decade") which will improve the site (but not require you to download a new app) by getting rid of some toxic assets, software-wise, and providing a stimulus to your experience here; I can truly say that 2010 will be a year of bromance between all of us chillaxin' here.  Because we like to consider ChrisWeigant.com Obamaliciously too big to fail.  Oh, and don't forget to friend me by following my tweets!  And I assure you, there will be no sexting....</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/12/31/a-teachable-moment-the-official-banished-words-list/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Last Chance To Enter Words/Phrases For Banishment</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/12/29/last-chance-to-enter-wordsphrases-for-banishment/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/12/29/last-chance-to-enter-wordsphrases-for-banishment/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Dec 2009 00:27:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Humor]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2009/12/29/last-chance-to-enter-wordsphrases-for-banishment/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Thursday's column, with luck, will be another year-end tradition -- the annual "banished words" list from northern Michigan.  Last year, <a href="http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2008/12/30/its-that-time-of-year-again-the-banished-words-list/">I wrote about the list</a> and had such fun doing so that I'm going to end 2009 by doing the same.  But this means that today is pretty much the last chance you have to enter phrases you'd like banned from everyday usage by your peers.  And 2009 was a rich year for grating phrases, from "death panels" to "teabaggers."  In any case, check out the official Lake Superior State University "Banished Words" site, and <a href="http://www.lssu.edu/banished/submit_word.php">enter your nominations today!</a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/12/29/last-chance-to-enter-wordsphrases-for-banishment/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Thankful For The Web</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/11/26/thankful-for-the-web/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/11/26/thankful-for-the-web/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 19:27:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2009/11/26/thankful-for-the-web/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Because yesterday's column was a wee bit un-holiday-spirit-ish, I offer up my thanks today.  I am thankful for the web.  I am thankful that I can sit in front of a machine and have at my fingertips perhaps not the sum of human knowledge, but a pretty close approximation (the closest the race has ever seen since, perhaps, the library at Alexandria).</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/11/26/thankful-for-the-web/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>On Being A Twit</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/11/10/on-being-a-twit/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/11/10/on-being-a-twit/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 23:59:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Name-dropping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2009/11/10/on-being-a-twit/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>There are big subjects which I should be writing about today.  The abortion battle within the Democratic Party, for instance.  What Obama is going to announce about our troop commitment in Afghanistan.  And, believe it or not, David Hasselhoff's contribution to freedom.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/11/10/on-being-a-twit/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cold War&#039;s End -- The Wall Comes Down</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/11/09/cold-wars-end-the-wall-comes-down/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/11/09/cold-wars-end-the-wall-comes-down/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 01:16:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2009/11/09/cold-wars-end-the-wall-comes-down/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>It must be a little hard to understand, for anyone reading this under the age of about 30 or so, the significance of the fall of the Berlin Wall 20 years ago.  Because one event has become historical shorthand for an immense change in the dynamics of not just our country, but the entire world.  We've all seen the pictures of an exuberant crowd at the Brandenburg Gate (or "Checkpoint Charlie"), seemingly tearing The Wall down with their bare hands.  But it wasn't just one wall, or one city, or even one country that the events in Berlin were changing -- it was the entire political makeup of the planet.  Because the fall of The Wall signified the fall of the Soviet Union, and an end to the Cold War.  And while this was of enormous historical import, I fear that future generations won't really pay much attention to it.  Truth be told, I can already feel it slipping away in the American consciousness.  Which, while I understand the impulse, I still think is a shame.  Because as the Cold War is forgotten, passing into the dusty pages of children's history books, we run the risk of forgetting some of its lessons.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/11/09/cold-wars-end-the-wall-comes-down/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>19</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>From The Pentagon To Monty Python: The Internet Turns 40</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/10/28/from-the-pentagon-to-monty-python-the-internet-turns-40/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/10/28/from-the-pentagon-to-monty-python-the-internet-turns-40/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 23:57:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Humor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2009/10/28/from-the-pentagon-to-monty-python-the-internet-turns-40/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Tomorrow is the internet's fortieth birthday.  Its creators are even <a href="http://www.google.com/hostednews/afp/article/ALeqM5hT_JTmvX3eD5DsLVwKb6ex0tursg">throwing it a birthday party</a> at the University of California, Los Angeles, the origin of the first message ever transmitted over what we know today as "the internet," on October 29, 1969.  If you're wondering what the first message ever transmitted was -- the digital age's "Come here, Watson," statement, as it were -- it consisted of two letters: "LO."  It was actually supposed to be "LOG," as in "LOG IN," but the receiving computer crashed after receiving just the first two letters -- not a very auspicious beginning, it must be admitted.  Still, for poetic reasons, "LO" seems pretty apt: "Lo!  The Internet was created!"</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/10/28/from-the-pentagon-to-monty-python-the-internet-turns-40/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The News Media We Deserve</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/10/20/the-news-media-we-deserve/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/10/20/the-news-media-we-deserve/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 01:05:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2009/10/20/the-news-media-we-deserve/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>That question has been on my mind of late, due to an overload of idiocy on the airwaves.  But, I had to wonder, is it truly idiocy from the media talking heads, idiocy from the people who decide what stories to air (and what prominence to give them), or could it quite possibly have something to do with the idiocy of those watching as well?  It's a hard question to ask, which is why "Do we get the media we deserve?" is so much more polite.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/10/20/the-news-media-we-deserve/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>36</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Twenty Years Ago -- The &quot;Big One&quot; Of &#039;89</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/10/15/twenty-years-ago-the-big-one-of-89/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/10/15/twenty-years-ago-the-big-one-of-89/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 01:04:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sports]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2009/10/15/twenty-years-ago-the-big-one-of-89/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Now, there is no hard-and-fast rule about what constitutes a "big" quake, to say nothing of the (always-capitalized) "Big One."  Generally, it is measured in how much damage the quake leaves behind.  But any quake above 6.0, and/or any quake that lasts longer than three or four seconds, is (in my book, at least) a big quake.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/10/15/twenty-years-ago-the-big-one-of-89/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Republican Leaders Join In Honoring New Rotunda Statue Of Radical Socialist Woman</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/10/07/republican-leaders-join-in-honoring-new-rotunda-statue-of-radical-socialist-woman/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/10/07/republican-leaders-join-in-honoring-new-rotunda-statue-of-radical-socialist-woman/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 20:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Name-dropping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2009/10/07/republican-leaders-join-in-honoring-new-rotunda-statue-of-radical-socialist-woman/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>There are sins of commission in the way we're taught American history as children -- such as the fable about George Washington chopping down the cherry tree (which never actually happened).  Then there are the much more prevalent sins of omission -- which conveniently gloss over the parts of American history which we have to "protect the children" from learning about.  The reason I preface this column with such an observation is because a woman -- whose name we all know -- was honored today by the unveiling of her statue in the United States Capitol's Rotunda.  Democratic Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi was on hand for this ceremony, as was Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid.  But the astonishing thing (to me) was that Republican leaders Mitch McConnell and John Boehner were also on hand, as well as the Republican governor of the <em>very</em> red state from whence this woman came.  This state has honored the woman before, when it selected her to be their representation on their own state quarter.  But the truly astonishing thing is that this woman not only helped found the A.C.L.U., but also was a radical and revolutionary Socialist, a fan of the Soviet Union and Lenin, a member of the Industrial Workers of the World (the "I.W.W.", or the "Wobblies"), and an ardent foe and critic of capitalism.  Not the type of woman usually honored by Republicans, you might think.  But, in a glaring sin of omission committed by history teachers across this great land (and repeated by politicians even now), the only story we all know about her is of the daunting odds she overcame in her childhood.  We're all familiar with this shared story, but it abruptly ends when she becomes an adult.  All the parts about the raging Socialist she later became are conveniently swept under the rug.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/10/07/republican-leaders-join-in-honoring-new-rotunda-statue-of-radical-socialist-woman/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Best Government Dollar Spent -- The National Park System</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/09/28/best-government-dollar-spent-the-national-park-system-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/09/28/best-government-dollar-spent-the-national-park-system-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 22:31:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Other]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2009/09/28/best-government-dollar-spent-the-national-park-system-2/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>[<strong>Note:</strong> <em>This column originally ran August 17, 2009.  I don't usually re-run columns (and never so soon after their original appearance), but after watching the debut of Ken Burn's "The National Parks: America's Best Idea" last night, I had to dig this out.  I strongly encourage everyone to watch the rest of Burns' series, which is running all week long on your local PBS station.  I also strongly urge everyone to visit our National Parks, as well.  This column was written just after a road trip I took this summer, and just after President Obama had visited Yellowstone and the Grand Canyon.</em>]</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/09/28/best-government-dollar-spent-the-national-park-system-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Germs Don&#039;t Care If You Are Legal Or Not</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/08/19/germs-dont-care-if-you-are-legal-or-not/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/08/19/germs-dont-care-if-you-are-legal-or-not/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 23:13:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2009/08/19/germs-dont-care-if-you-are-legal-or-not/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>There is certainly no shortage of irony in the debate raging across the country on healthcare reform.  For me, though, the choicest bit of irony has to be the new rallying cry of those who want to shoot down any reform efforts -- that it would provide insurance for illegal immigrants.  This irony is lost on those who don't know their history, though.  Because fear of immigrants is what <em>started</em> the concept of "public health" in America.  But back then, it was fear of sick immigrants infecting everyone else which drove the debate.  Hence the irony.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/08/19/germs-dont-care-if-you-are-legal-or-not/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Best Government Dollar Spent -- The National Park System</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/08/17/best-government-dollar-spent-the-national-park-system/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/08/17/best-government-dollar-spent-the-national-park-system/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 23:42:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2009/08/17/best-government-dollar-spent-the-national-park-system/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Which is why it was heartening to see President Obama taking his family to visit two of the crown jewels of the National Park System -- Yellowstone and the Grand Canyon.  Most presidents don't even get around to visiting a National Park in their first year in office, unless you count the many places in Washington, D.C. which are administered by the National Park Service (technically, even the White House would count, under this designation).  And even when most presidents do visit National Parks, it is usually to make a political point or push a specific piece of legislation, with a park as a convenient photo-op backdrop.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/08/17/best-government-dollar-spent-the-national-park-system/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Talking Points [89] -- Fighting Crazy</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/08/14/friday-talking-points-89-fighting-crazy/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/08/14/friday-talking-points-89-fighting-crazy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Aug 2009 00:15:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Free Speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Talking Points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Bill of Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2009/08/14/friday-talking-points-89-fighting-crazy/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The healthcare reform fracas has gotten so bad, it has forced some in the media to actually do their jobs.  This statement will come as a shock to anyone who has become accustomed to the way these <em>soi-disant</em> "journalists" present just about any issue these days -- by having a center-left politician and a hard-right politician on to "debate," and then fanning the flames by refusing to referee and provide actual facts to the discussion.  But I think now (maybe) the "journalists" have finally gotten to the point of embarrassment, leading them to actually report on what is true and what is not in the entire debate.  In other words, as I said, to do their actual jobs.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/08/14/friday-talking-points-89-fighting-crazy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Le Sud-Ouest, Der S&#252;dwesten, Or Il Sud-Ovest</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/08/13/le-sud-ouest-der-sdwesten-or-il-sud-ovest/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/08/13/le-sud-ouest-der-sdwesten-or-il-sud-ovest/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2009 23:43:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[American Society]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/index.php/2009/08/13/le-sud-ouest-der-sdwesten-or-il-sud-ovest/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>This canyon is located a few miles east of Page, Arizona, and I've been looking for it for a long time -- around 20-25 years.  You might recognize the photos, as pretty much any calendar or photo book of the American Southwest will have a few shots of it.  As I said, the place is a photographer's dream.  The canyon is what is called a "slot canyon" made of red sandstone and, in places, is barely wide enough to squeeze through.  Here's another shot, showing the sandy floor:</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2009/08/13/le-sud-ouest-der-sdwesten-or-il-sud-ovest/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
