<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Friday Talking Points -- Out Of This World</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.chrisweigant.com/2026/04/03/friday-talking-points-out-of-this-world/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2026/04/03/friday-talking-points-out-of-this-world/</link>
	<description>Reality-based political commentary</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 16 May 2026 07:55:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Kick</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2026/04/03/friday-talking-points-out-of-this-world/#comment-222263</link>
		<dc:creator>Kick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2026 18:49:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=27458#comment-222263</guid>
		<description>John M from Ct.
1

&lt;i&gt;On #5, &quot;It is technically illegal to deface money&quot;, I don&#039;t think that applies to the idea of using a Sharpie to black out the president&#039;s signature on a dollar bill. &lt;/i&gt;

Correct! 18 U.S.C. Section 333 forbids defacing United States currency, but small markings/redactions are generally ignored. The law applies to the intent to render the currency unfit for use.

Also, good luck proving that I and/or _________ &lt;---[insert name here] defaced it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John M from Ct.<br />
1</p>
<p><i>On #5, "It is technically illegal to deface money", I don't think that applies to the idea of using a Sharpie to black out the president's signature on a dollar bill. </i></p>
<p>Correct! 18 U.S.C. Section 333 forbids defacing United States currency, but small markings/redactions are generally ignored. The law applies to the intent to render the currency unfit for use.</p>
<p>Also, good luck proving that I and/or _________ &lt;---[insert name here] defaced it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kick</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2026/04/03/friday-talking-points-out-of-this-world/#comment-222262</link>
		<dc:creator>Kick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2026 18:15:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=27458#comment-222262</guid>
		<description>Donald Trump is repeatedly whining like a toddler about his negative press coverage and then one minute later explains how brave he is. *laughs*

The stupid goes all the way down to the bone.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Donald Trump is repeatedly whining like a toddler about his negative press coverage and then one minute later explains how brave he is. *laughs*</p>
<p>The stupid goes all the way down to the bone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nypoet22</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2026/04/03/friday-talking-points-out-of-this-world/#comment-222261</link>
		<dc:creator>nypoet22</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2026 17:23:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=27458#comment-222261</guid>
		<description>well, so much for THAT prediction. 

here&#039;s another thought on the DHS funding:
congressional Republicans have forgotten what a compromise is, perhaps because it&#039;s been literally decades since Democrats have actually forced them to make one. 

JL</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>well, so much for THAT prediction. </p>
<p>here's another thought on the DHS funding:<br />
congressional Republicans have forgotten what a compromise is, perhaps because it's been literally decades since Democrats have actually forced them to make one. </p>
<p>JL</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nypoet22</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2026/04/03/friday-talking-points-out-of-this-world/#comment-222235</link>
		<dc:creator>nypoet22</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2026 02:58:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=27458#comment-222235</guid>
		<description>the New York Knicks and UConn both wish Dawn Staley had gotten the job over Mike Brown</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the New York Knicks and UConn both wish Dawn Staley had gotten the job over Mike Brown</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John M from Ct.</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2026/04/03/friday-talking-points-out-of-this-world/#comment-222234</link>
		<dc:creator>John M from Ct.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2026 01:18:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=27458#comment-222234</guid>
		<description>On #5, &quot;It is technically illegal to deface money&quot;, I don&#039;t think that applies to the idea of using a Sharpie to black out the president&#039;s signature on a dollar bill.

As one FB poster put it, &quot;It is legal to make a thick black mark through that signature. Making marks is allowed as long as it doesn’t deface the serial number or otherwise make it so it can’t circulate.&quot;

The law is about making the money unusable. A blacked-out signature does not have that effect.

I&#039;m hoping, myself, that within a year of this new bill&#039;s circulation, 70-80% of them will have the president&#039;s name black out - redacted, if you will, just as his name is redacted in the Epstein files. If you get my drift.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On #5, "It is technically illegal to deface money", I don't think that applies to the idea of using a Sharpie to black out the president's signature on a dollar bill.</p>
<p>As one FB poster put it, "It is legal to make a thick black mark through that signature. Making marks is allowed as long as it doesn’t deface the serial number or otherwise make it so it can’t circulate."</p>
<p>The law is about making the money unusable. A blacked-out signature does not have that effect.</p>
<p>I'm hoping, myself, that within a year of this new bill's circulation, 70-80% of them will have the president's name black out - redacted, if you will, just as his name is redacted in the Epstein files. If you get my drift.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
