<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Time After Time</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.chrisweigant.com/2025/04/10/time-after-time/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2025/04/10/time-after-time/</link>
	<description>Reality-based political commentary</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 07:43:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Chris Weigant</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2025/04/10/time-after-time/#comment-218410</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Apr 2025 04:20:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=26262#comment-218410</guid>
		<description>ok probably too exhausted to even get to today&#039;s column&#039;s comments... but am caught up until here...

-CW</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ok probably too exhausted to even get to today's column's comments... but am caught up until here...</p>
<p>-CW</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Weigant</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2025/04/10/time-after-time/#comment-218409</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Apr 2025 04:18:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=26262#comment-218409</guid>
		<description>MtnCaddy [19] -

Really?  the bit about web designers?

I am exhausted now, but will contact you privately over the weekend.

Thanks!

-CW</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MtnCaddy [19] -</p>
<p>Really?  the bit about web designers?</p>
<p>I am exhausted now, but will contact you privately over the weekend.</p>
<p>Thanks!</p>
<p>-CW</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Weigant</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2025/04/10/time-after-time/#comment-218408</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Apr 2025 04:17:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=26262#comment-218408</guid>
		<description>now it&#039;s got me thinking...

if you had a time machine and went back and killed your grandfather and disappeared, what would you be guilty of?

ex post facto suicide?

(heh)

-CW</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>now it's got me thinking...</p>
<p>if you had a time machine and went back and killed your grandfather and disappeared, what would you be guilty of?</p>
<p>ex post facto suicide?</p>
<p>(heh)</p>
<p>-CW</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Weigant</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2025/04/10/time-after-time/#comment-218407</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Apr 2025 04:16:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=26262#comment-218407</guid>
		<description>Kick [15] -

OK, I had to look up &quot;dysphemistically&quot;...

didn&#039;t know there was an antonym for &quot;euphemistically&quot;!  thanks!

-CW</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kick [15] -</p>
<p>OK, I had to look up "dysphemistically"...</p>
<p>didn't know there was an antonym for "euphemistically"!  thanks!</p>
<p>-CW</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Weigant</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2025/04/10/time-after-time/#comment-218406</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Apr 2025 04:14:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=26262#comment-218406</guid>
		<description>nypoet22 [13] -

Um, no that&#039;s &quot;ex post facto&quot;.

Bills of attainder are similar, though -- it&#039;s the targeting of one person specifically through legislation.  In Trump&#039;s case it would be more like &quot;executive order of attainder&quot;... maybe we need a new term...

-CW</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>nypoet22 [13] -</p>
<p>Um, no that's "ex post facto".</p>
<p>Bills of attainder are similar, though -- it's the targeting of one person specifically through legislation.  In Trump's case it would be more like "executive order of attainder"... maybe we need a new term...</p>
<p>-CW</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Weigant</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2025/04/10/time-after-time/#comment-218405</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Apr 2025 04:12:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=26262#comment-218405</guid>
		<description>John M from Ct. [12] -

Sorry, failed to cite it.  Poll was from Wikipedia, but I&#039;ve seen similar polls showing DST with an edge.  Not an overwhelming edge, but still...

-CW</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John M from Ct. [12] -</p>
<p>Sorry, failed to cite it.  Poll was from Wikipedia, but I've seen similar polls showing DST with an edge.  Not an overwhelming edge, but still...</p>
<p>-CW</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Weigant</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2025/04/10/time-after-time/#comment-218404</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Apr 2025 04:11:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=26262#comment-218404</guid>
		<description>MtnCaddy [8] -

I think &quot;fuckhead&quot; would be a noun.  Adjective?  Maybe &quot;fuckheadedly&quot;... no that&#039;s an adverb.  &quot;Fuckheadish&quot; maybe?

heh

:-)

-CW</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MtnCaddy [8] -</p>
<p>I think "fuckhead" would be a noun.  Adjective?  Maybe "fuckheadedly"... no that's an adverb.  "Fuckheadish" maybe?</p>
<p>heh</p>
<p>:-)</p>
<p>-CW</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Weigant</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2025/04/10/time-after-time/#comment-218403</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Apr 2025 04:09:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=26262#comment-218403</guid>
		<description>Kick [3] -

Quoting the esteemed ex-senator Al Franken:

&quot;I like Ted Cruz more than any other senator.  And I HATE Ted Cruz!&quot;

:-)

-CW</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kick [3] -</p>
<p>Quoting the esteemed ex-senator Al Franken:</p>
<p>"I like Ted Cruz more than any other senator.  And I HATE Ted Cruz!"</p>
<p>:-)</p>
<p>-CW</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Weigant</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2025/04/10/time-after-time/#comment-218402</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Apr 2025 04:08:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=26262#comment-218402</guid>
		<description>MtnCaddy [1] -

Oh, I fully agree.  But hey, I just had to write SOMETHING that wasn&#039;t about tariffs this week!

-CW</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MtnCaddy [1] -</p>
<p>Oh, I fully agree.  But hey, I just had to write SOMETHING that wasn't about tariffs this week!</p>
<p>-CW</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MyVoice</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2025/04/10/time-after-time/#comment-218399</link>
		<dc:creator>MyVoice</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Apr 2025 03:09:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=26262#comment-218399</guid>
		<description>[19] MtnCaddy:

Your link, which otherwise takes one to this selfsame page, has a quote mark at the end. That&#039;s what takes it to the 404 page. Not sure what the Daddy Vladdy link should be. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[19] MtnCaddy:</p>
<p>Your link, which otherwise takes one to this selfsame page, has a quote mark at the end. That's what takes it to the 404 page. Not sure what the Daddy Vladdy link should be.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MtnCaddy</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2025/04/10/time-after-time/#comment-218397</link>
		<dc:creator>MtnCaddy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Apr 2025 00:41:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=26262#comment-218397</guid>
		<description>Chris I’m still on a smartphone only and,




1- It keeps on signing me out by itself — which sucks because there’s no reason to ever sign out on this device. This has been happening for months.




2- I post a link that looks proper in the preview window above, but when selected it goes to your 404 — Page Not Found instead of &lt;a href=&quot;“&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Daddy Vladdy (1:08)&lt;/a&gt;. This problem is new.





Also, my BFF is a website developer par excellence. I think you’d be glad you talked to him. Decades and largely self taught</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chris I’m still on a smartphone only and,</p>
<p>1- It keeps on signing me out by itself — which sucks because there’s no reason to ever sign out on this device. This has been happening for months.</p>
<p>2- I post a link that looks proper in the preview window above, but when selected it goes to your 404 — Page Not Found instead of <a href="“" rel="nofollow">Daddy Vladdy (1:08)</a>. This problem is new.</p>
<p>Also, my BFF is a website developer par excellence. I think you’d be glad you talked to him. Decades and largely self taught</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nypoet22</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2025/04/10/time-after-time/#comment-218389</link>
		<dc:creator>nypoet22</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2025 13:31:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=26262#comment-218389</guid>
		<description>I really should go back and read that document more closely again. it&#039;s been awhile since i&#039;ve done so, and the Trump administration has been doing so many things that run afoul of the text.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really should go back and read that document more closely again. it's been awhile since i've done so, and the Trump administration has been doing so many things that run afoul of the text.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nypoet22</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2025/04/10/time-after-time/#comment-218385</link>
		<dc:creator>nypoet22</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2025 10:18:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=26262#comment-218385</guid>
		<description>well shoot, John. you&#039;re right. the time bending would indeed be ex post facto. the two practices are both explicitly prohibited by the Constitution.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>well shoot, John. you're right. the time bending would indeed be ex post facto. the two practices are both explicitly prohibited by the Constitution.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elizabeth Miller</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2025/04/10/time-after-time/#comment-218383</link>
		<dc:creator>Elizabeth Miller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2025 04:48:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=26262#comment-218383</guid>
		<description>I like changing the time twice a year so I&#039;m for doing nothing. And that song has been playing in my head all day long.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like changing the time twice a year so I'm for doing nothing. And that song has been playing in my head all day long.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kick</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2025/04/10/time-after-time/#comment-218382</link>
		<dc:creator>Kick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2025 04:45:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=26262#comment-218382</guid>
		<description>MtnCaddy
8

&lt;i&gt;I am too lazy in general and too drunk on this occasion to look it up: so is fuckhead a noun? &lt;/i&gt;

Yes, a noun dysphemistically modeled after &quot;DH.&quot; 

&lt;i&gt;I know it’s not a verb nor an adverb so could that word be an adjective? &lt;/i&gt;

It could be if you added an &quot;ed&quot; to the end of it. :)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GlTEjlHXXkw</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MtnCaddy<br />
8</p>
<p><i>I am too lazy in general and too drunk on this occasion to look it up: so is fuckhead a noun? </i></p>
<p>Yes, a noun dysphemistically modeled after "DH." </p>
<p><i>I know it’s not a verb nor an adverb so could that word be an adjective? </i></p>
<p>It could be if you added an "ed" to the end of it. :)</p>
<p><a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GlTEjlHXXkw" rel="nofollow">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GlTEjlHXXkw</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John M from Ct.</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2025/04/10/time-after-time/#comment-218379</link>
		<dc:creator>John M from Ct.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2025 02:58:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=26262#comment-218379</guid>
		<description>nyp on [13]

I think the law that punishes for acts that were legal at the time is called an &quot;ex post facto&quot; law. The Constitution does forbid this kind of thing.

Then there is the law that specifically names a person or party to be punished, rather than a class of persons who have committed some act. That is a &quot;bill of attainder&quot;, and the Constitution forbids that as well.

Both types of law, clearly, had been the tools of injustice in English history and the U.S. Framers wanted none of them.

I&#039;m not clear: how do either of these concepts relate to Chris&#039;s essay on the latest proposal to reform the U.S. time standard?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>nyp on [13]</p>
<p>I think the law that punishes for acts that were legal at the time is called an "ex post facto" law. The Constitution does forbid this kind of thing.</p>
<p>Then there is the law that specifically names a person or party to be punished, rather than a class of persons who have committed some act. That is a "bill of attainder", and the Constitution forbids that as well.</p>
<p>Both types of law, clearly, had been the tools of injustice in English history and the U.S. Framers wanted none of them.</p>
<p>I'm not clear: how do either of these concepts relate to Chris's essay on the latest proposal to reform the U.S. time standard?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nypoet22</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2025/04/10/time-after-time/#comment-218376</link>
		<dc:creator>nypoet22</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2025 02:21:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=26262#comment-218376</guid>
		<description>speaking of time, it&#039;s blatantly unconstitutional to make a law or regulation that punishes someone for something that was legal at the time they did it, often with no trial or due process. the language of the constitution calls this a &quot;bill of attainder&quot;

when I did a quick search to see if my reasoning was sound, I found that a judge had already &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.justsecurity.org/110109/president-cannot-issue-attainder-bills/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;considered this in a recent ruling against the trump administration.&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>speaking of time, it's blatantly unconstitutional to make a law or regulation that punishes someone for something that was legal at the time they did it, often with no trial or due process. the language of the constitution calls this a "bill of attainder"</p>
<p>when I did a quick search to see if my reasoning was sound, I found that a judge had already <a href="https://www.justsecurity.org/110109/president-cannot-issue-attainder-bills/" rel="nofollow">considered this in a recent ruling against the trump administration.</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John M from Ct.</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2025/04/10/time-after-time/#comment-218374</link>
		<dc:creator>John M from Ct.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2025 01:40:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=26262#comment-218374</guid>
		<description>I feel like &#039;Standard Time&#039; must have been based on something like noon is when the sun is at its zenith at the center of each designated national time zone. &#039;Daylight Saving Time&#039; was a distortion of that standard introduced as a wartime measure involving summertime farming efficiency during WW I - that is, before electric lights were common in the countryside.

So I vote for eliminating DST. As you say, a permanent DST has already been tried in the modern era, and it didn&#039;t fly. So lets go back to a permanent standard time.

Yes, there will be complaints, but there are complaints now. Surely the complaints basically cancel each other out?

And in the end you make it seem like good government and sound policy must always come from a politician&#039;s sense of what will keep him or her from losing the next election. Maybe so - but aren&#039;t there any examples of Congress doing the RIGHT THING rather than the politically expedient thing, ever?

(PS can you fill us in on that poll you cited, where the split was: 21% like switching clocks 2x year - 62% don&#039;t like it and want just one time year-round. Sure, that 62% couldn&#039;t agree on which time they wanted, DST or standard, but wait: That&#039;s only 83%. What did the other 17% say to the poll. &quot;I need more time&quot;?)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I feel like 'Standard Time' must have been based on something like noon is when the sun is at its zenith at the center of each designated national time zone. 'Daylight Saving Time' was a distortion of that standard introduced as a wartime measure involving summertime farming efficiency during WW I - that is, before electric lights were common in the countryside.</p>
<p>So I vote for eliminating DST. As you say, a permanent DST has already been tried in the modern era, and it didn't fly. So lets go back to a permanent standard time.</p>
<p>Yes, there will be complaints, but there are complaints now. Surely the complaints basically cancel each other out?</p>
<p>And in the end you make it seem like good government and sound policy must always come from a politician's sense of what will keep him or her from losing the next election. Maybe so - but aren't there any examples of Congress doing the RIGHT THING rather than the politically expedient thing, ever?</p>
<p>(PS can you fill us in on that poll you cited, where the split was: 21% like switching clocks 2x year - 62% don't like it and want just one time year-round. Sure, that 62% couldn't agree on which time they wanted, DST or standard, but wait: That's only 83%. What did the other 17% say to the poll. "I need more time"?)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nypoet22</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2025/04/10/time-after-time/#comment-218371</link>
		<dc:creator>nypoet22</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2025 01:30:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=26262#comment-218371</guid>
		<description>@caddy,
yes, it&#039;s a noun.
JL</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@caddy,<br />
yes, it's a noun.<br />
JL</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MtnCaddy</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2025/04/10/time-after-time/#comment-218370</link>
		<dc:creator>MtnCaddy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2025 01:07:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=26262#comment-218370</guid>
		<description>Upon further review, double well put!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Upon further review, double well put!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MtnCaddy</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2025/04/10/time-after-time/#comment-218369</link>
		<dc:creator>MtnCaddy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2025 01:04:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=26262#comment-218369</guid>
		<description>Asking for a (drunk) friend.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Asking for a (drunk) friend.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MtnCaddy</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2025/04/10/time-after-time/#comment-218368</link>
		<dc:creator>MtnCaddy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2025 01:04:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=26262#comment-218368</guid>
		<description>Kick
3






I am too lazy in general and too drunk on this occasion to look it up: so is &lt;b&gt;fuckhead&lt;/b&gt; a noun? I know it’s not a verb nor an adverb so could that word be an adjective?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kick<br />
3</p>
<p>I am too lazy in general and too drunk on this occasion to look it up: so is <b>fuckhead</b> a noun? I know it’s not a verb nor an adverb so could that word be an adjective?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nypoet22</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2025/04/10/time-after-time/#comment-218367</link>
		<dc:creator>nypoet22</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2025 01:03:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=26262#comment-218367</guid>
		<description>https://youtu.be/aLPyeTPNLoY?si=wGFu9Rwwq5F-dfuk</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://youtu.be/aLPyeTPNLoY?si=wGFu9Rwwq5F-dfuk" rel="nofollow">https://youtu.be/aLPyeTPNLoY?si=wGFu9Rwwq5F-dfuk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MtnCaddy</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2025/04/10/time-after-time/#comment-218366</link>
		<dc:creator>MtnCaddy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2025 01:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=26262#comment-218366</guid>
		<description>poet








nite yakko — well put!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>poet</p>
<p>nite yakko — well put!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MtnCaddy</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2025/04/10/time-after-time/#comment-218365</link>
		<dc:creator>MtnCaddy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2025 00:58:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=26262#comment-218365</guid>
		<description>Tell ya what, CW. If you’re so desperate to hold onto your buddy Michale, why not,





1- give him the red card that he’s objectively earned, and,




2- go ahead and engage in some email thread with homeboy to your heart’s delight! That way you can maintain your loyalty to your buddy and spare the rest of us. I’m sure you’ll have a blast! Everybody wins!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tell ya what, CW. If you’re so desperate to hold onto your buddy Michale, why not,</p>
<p>1- give him the red card that he’s objectively earned, and,</p>
<p>2- go ahead and engage in some email thread with homeboy to your heart’s delight! That way you can maintain your loyalty to your buddy and spare the rest of us. I’m sure you’ll have a blast! Everybody wins!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nypoet22</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2025/04/10/time-after-time/#comment-218364</link>
		<dc:creator>nypoet22</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2025 00:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=26262#comment-218364</guid>
		<description>nite yakko</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>nite yakko</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kick</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2025/04/10/time-after-time/#comment-218363</link>
		<dc:creator>Kick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2025 00:57:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=26262#comment-218363</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Senator Ted Cruz is attempting to tackle a problem, but I for one don&#039;t expect to see the problem solved any time soon. &lt;/i&gt;

I would just like to take this opportunity to comment that Ted Cruz is an absolute __________. &lt;---- choose your own noun

Lock the clock. I don&#039;t even care how they decide to do it; just make sure it&#039;s a ginormously large clock and that Ted Cruz is locked inside it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Senator Ted Cruz is attempting to tackle a problem, but I for one don't expect to see the problem solved any time soon. </i></p>
<p>I would just like to take this opportunity to comment that Ted Cruz is an absolute __________. &lt;---- choose your own noun</p>
<p>Lock the clock. I don&#039;t even care how they decide to do it; just make sure it&#039;s a ginormously large clock and that Ted Cruz is locked inside it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MtnCaddy</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2025/04/10/time-after-time/#comment-218362</link>
		<dc:creator>MtnCaddy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2025 00:50:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=26262#comment-218362</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt; Few people like changing the clocks twice a year. But when you ask people which system they&#039;d prefer year-round, some support going to D.S.T. for the whole year while some support going on standard time instead. Both sides have their arguments for and against, and they are quite adamant that their preferred way is the best.&lt;/i&gt;








So if 62% versus 21% prefer &lt;b&gt;just PICK ONE&lt;/b&gt; I’d expect that once they pulled the trigger in perhaps only a year no one would bitch either way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i> Few people like changing the clocks twice a year. But when you ask people which system they'd prefer year-round, some support going to D.S.T. for the whole year while some support going on standard time instead. Both sides have their arguments for and against, and they are quite adamant that their preferred way is the best.</i></p>
<p>So if 62% versus 21% prefer <b>just PICK ONE</b> I’d expect that once they pulled the trigger in perhaps only a year no one would bitch either way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MtnCaddy</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2025/04/10/time-after-time/#comment-218361</link>
		<dc:creator>MtnCaddy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2025 00:46:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=26262#comment-218361</guid>
		<description>Yeah. Because in twenty years folks will really zero in on this as a truly existential issue.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah. Because in twenty years folks will really zero in on this as a truly existential issue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
