So am I overthinking any of this?

I would say the evidence is overwhelming (and archived) that you are not.

As for the thumb thing, you definitely have a twin and can thus prove the muscular right digitus primus manus is provably environmental versus hereditary. ;)

i have no idea what you're talking about.

Here let me help you, JL, neither does he.

you gave your word and then broke it; what else is pertinent?

What else is new?

most pejorative terms don't bother me; that one does. i think you're bright enough to get a point across without that one word.

Maybe you should reconsider that and also the fact he's proven himself repeatedly to be an attention-seeking, urinating, defecating, hunching, crotch-sniffing trolling rube in obvious desperate need of attention.

So am I overthinking any of this?

cho’mo gave his word betting on black turnout for Trump 2020 and chose to not pay his wager. He is simply without honor and hence, unworthy of my attention.

Yeah, So you're saying he'll be here to perform the repetitive shits and urination all over the place in the (archived) attempts to mark what he hysterically seems to genuinely believe is his territory is spot-on despite the visual.

The simp pisses all over Weigantia. I’m waiting for the upgrade here so I didn’t install the blocker. So I scroll — which is fine so long as I use my left index finger every other time. Wouldn’t wanna meet the Queen of All My Dreams and she be bailing on me because of my comparatively monster right index finger (which suggests genetic issues and therefore I am not good breeding stock.)

JL

The above comment seems to call into question your request for me to stop using the word 'retarded' to accurately describe Bashit Troll, Victoria Troll and the rest of the Democrat Party, eh??

Just sayin'....

Heading to work now.. Keeping the streets of Florida safe for democracy!! :D

Apparently, ya'all are perfectly fine with DEMOCRATS mocking disabled people.. :eyeroll:

The recent comments made by Rep. Jasmine Crockett, in which she mockingly referred to Texas Governor Greg Abbott as "Governor Hot Wheels," have sparked outrage and highlighted a glaring hypocrisy within the Democratic Party. This incident is particularly striking given the fervent condemnation Democrats directed at PRESIDENT Trump when he allegedly mocked a disabled reporter. The double standard is not only evident but also troubling, as it raises questions about the sincerity of the brain dead Democrats' commitment to respecting individuals with disabilities.

Crockett's remarks, made during an event hosted by the Human Rights Campaign, were not just a casual jab; they were a blatant mockery of Governor Abbott's disability, which he has lived with since a tragic accident at the age of 26. Such comments are not only disrespectful but also perpetuate harmful stereotypes about individuals with disabilities. The backlash from Republican lawmakers, including Rep. Randy Weber, who is moving to censure Crockett for her "disgraceful" attack, underscores the seriousness of her words. Weber's assertion that Crockett's behavior is "reprehensible" and "discriminatory in nature" resonates with many who believe that mocking someone's disability is never acceptable, regardless of political affiliation.

The hypocrisy becomes even more pronounced when we consider the Democrats' previous outrage over Trump's alleged mockery of a disabled journalist. At that time, the party rallied around the idea that such behavior was not only inappropriate but indicative of a broader culture of disrespect and intolerance. Yet, when one of their own engages in similar behavior, the response is markedly different. Instead of a unified condemnation, there seems to be a reluctance to hold Crockett accountable, revealing a troubling inconsistency in the party's values.

This situation raises important questions about the brain dead Democrat Party's commitment to inclusivity and respect for all individuals, regardless of their abilities. If the party truly stands for the rights and dignity of people with disabilities, it must hold its members to the same standards it demands of others. Allowing Crockett's comments to go unchallenged not only undermines the party's credibility but also sends a message that mocking individuals with disabilities is acceptable if it serves a political agenda.

So, children... What did you learn??

The brain dead Democrats' response to Rep. Jasmine Crockett's comments about Governor Abbott SHOULD serve as a wake-up call. The party must confront its hypocrisy and reaffirm its commitment to treating all individuals with respect and dignity. If brain dead Democrats wish to regain the trust of the American voter, then brain dead Democrats must demonstrate that their principles extend beyond partisan lines and that they are willing to hold their own accountable for actions that undermine the values they claim to uphold.

Of course, WE all know that will never happen..

Hypocrisy. It's not a bug in Democrat programming. It's a feature.

SILENCE GIVES ASSENT......

Basement Biden did, what?? 2 or 3 press conferences his ENTIRE 4 years??

PRESIDENT Trump has taken questions from the press practically EVERY SINGLE DAY of his SECOND Presidency!!!

It's no wonder you brain dead Democrats got beat so badly!!!

Ya'all are soooo afraid of facing the press.. THAT is why Headboard Harris never did a press conference...

SILENCE GIVES ASSENT......

EXACTLY!!!

This is EXACTLY RIGHT, Victoria Troll

And if this journalist DOESN'T release "every single word of it without skipping a single one" then EVERYONE here will have to concede that this brain dead Democrat so-called "journalist" is lying...

I am sooo glad you see things my way, Victoria Troll.. :D

Looks like the short answer is: Gaslight.

Gaslight... Obstruct... Project... same shit, different day.

Michale will provide the long answer ad nauseam once he gets his marching orders and is told how to think about it...

So you're saying he'll be here to perform the repetitive shits and urination all over the place in the (archived) attempts to mark what he hysterically seems to genuinely believe is his territory? Or are you maybe saying he'll be here to perform more of that repetitive hunching/crotch sniffing behavior toward his master, Hair Dick Tater? Or maybe both?

Please let me know since I would say the vast majority of the time I invoke the TamperMonkey device on Firefox wherein I block him out of existence. Thanks to everyone who helps to keep that running smoothly... Bashi, MyVoice.

If nothing classified was released, then it should be fine for the journalist to release screen shots of the entire conversation, right?

Of course. Why not? The journalist in question could easily add to what he's obviously already released verbatim and which the White House has obviously already conceded is a Signal discussion of the military action in question:

The Trump Administration Accidentally Texted Me Its War Plans

U.S. national-security leaders included me in a group chat about upcoming military strikes in Yemen. I didn’t think it could be real. Then the bombs started falling.

Release every single word of it without skipping a single one. Since multiple of the clowns have now stated (many of them under oath and subject to prosecution) that nothing was classified, then by all means necessary, publish the entire chat.

Elect a felon... get a crime scene.
Appoint clowns... expect a circus.

No one knows but everyone is SURE it's going to be a long long LONG time.. :D

This information comes from The Wall Street Journal...

The brain dead Democrat Party finds itself increasingly lost in the political wilderness, grappling with a series of ideological pathologies that have alienated them from the very voters they seek to represent.

The party's internal strife and blame-shifting—most notably directed at Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer—reflect a deeper issue: a huge leftward ideological lurch that has distanced them from everyday Americans. This disconnect is evident in the party's inability to articulate a coherent set of principles or convictions, leaving them vulnerable to criticism and discontent.

California serves as a microcosm of the brain dead Democrat Party's broader struggles. With nearly two decades of complete control over state government, the results are stark:

the highest poverty rate
soaring unemployment
unprecedented homelessness crisis.

The so-called "California Dream" has become a nightmare for practically every Californian, as essential living costs skyrocket alongside taxes. This failure is not merely a result of external factors; it is a direct consequence of the party's misguided policies and priorities.

One of the most glaring issues is the ideology of "climatism," which prioritizes extreme environmentalism over practical governance. This pathological focus has led to the shutdown of local energy industries while California imports oil and gas from distant sources, ironically increasing carbon emissions. Such policies are not only impractical but also indicative of a broader elitism that disregards the needs of working-class citizens.

Moreover, the Democratic Party's narcissism is evident in its leaders' constant self-congratulation for championing various ideological causes, often at the expense of addressing the real concerns of their constituents. This self-serving attitude fosters a disconnect that leaves many voters feeling unheard and unrepresented.

The party's cronyism, heavily influenced by government unions and trial lawyers, further exacerbates the situation, as policies are crafted to benefit a select few rather than the general populace.

The bureaucratic overreach in California is another symptom of the brain dead Democrats' ideological failings. The state's myriad regulatory agencies impose burdensome mandates that stifle business growth and innovation. This bureaucratism creates an environment where it is increasingly difficult to operate a business, driving entrepreneurs and jobs away from the state.

Perhaps the most troubling aspect of the brain dead Democrat Party's current predicament is its approach to homelessness and addiction. The party's "pathological compassionism" has resulted in policies that prevent the enforcement of treatment for those struggling with addiction, perpetuating a cycle of despair rather than offering genuine solutions. This utterly misguided approach not only fails to address the root causes of homelessness but also reflects a broader incompetence that has become completely representative of the party's governance.

So, children.. Let us recap....

The brain dead Democrat Party must confront these ideological pathologies if it EVER hopes to regain the trust of voters and find its way out of the political wilderness.

By acknowledging the failures of elitism, narcissism, cronyism, bureaucratism, and incompetism, the brain dead party can begin to craft a more pragmatic and inclusive agenda.

Without this critical self-reflection and course correction, the brain dead Democrats risk remaining lost in the wilderness, disconnected from the very people they claim to serve. The time for change is now, and the future of the party depends on its ability to adapt and respond to the needs of everyday Americans.

But we all know the facts.. HONEST self reflection is not in the Democrat character in ANY way, shape or form..

So, the brain dead Democrats are going to be lost in the wilderness for a LONG time to come...

"SILENCE GIVES ASSENT.....

Ya gotta love it!! :D

The following comes from SFGATE, a known brain dead Democrat propaganda site... :D

The recent town halls in California have become a battleground for discontent among brain dead Democrat constituents, revealing a troubling trend for Democrats. As frustration mounts over the actions of billionaire Elon Musk and his DOGE squad, many voters are expressing their anger directly to their elected representatives. This backlash is not just a reflection of dissatisfaction with government cuts; it highlights a deeper concern about perceived fraud and abuse within the system, which brain dead Democrats seem increasingly desperate to conceal.

At town hall meetings across the state, including those hosted by Representatives Ro Khanna and Gil Cisneros, constituents have voiced their frustrations, demanding to know why the Democrat Party has not taken a stronger stand against Musk's aggressive cuts to essential government services.

One resident's pointed question —“Why hasn’t the Democrat Party fought yet?”— captures the sentiment of many who feel abandoned by their leaders. The palpable fear and anger expressed by attendees indicate a growing disillusionment with the party's ability to address their concerns.

The situation is exacerbated by the fact that DOGE is uncovering significant issues of fraud and abuse within Democrat operations. As these revelations come to light, brain dead Democrats are understandably anxious about the implications for their party and the broader political landscape. The more the public learns about these issues, the more pressure there is on brain dead Democrats to respond effectively. However, instead of addressing these concerns head-on, many Democrat so-called "leaders" appear to be sidestepping the issue, which only fuels further frustration among Democrat constituents.

Brain dead Democrats are facing the music, and the results are not pretty. The anger directed at them during these town halls is a clear signal that voters are demanding accountability and action, not just empty hysterical rhetoric.

As the political climate continues to shift, it is evident that brain dead Democrats must reassess their strategies and messaging. The fragmented approach that has characterized their response to issues like DOGE and government cuts is no longer sufficient.

If they fail to unite and address the concerns of their constituents, they risk alienating a significant portion of their voter base, potentially leading to dire consequences in upcoming elections. The time for meaningful action is now, and the pressure is on Democrats to rise to the occasion or face the consequences of their inaction.

And, of course, INACTION is what today's brain dead Democrat Party is all about.. :D

SILENCE GIVES ASSENT....

The ongoing conflict between the judiciary and the executive branch, particularly as it pertains to the actions of Democrat activist judges, raises serious concerns about the constitutional balance of power. The recent commentary by former Judge Luttig, which suggests that a rebuke from the Supreme Court could cripple Donald Trump's presidency, reflects a misunderstanding of the constitutional framework and the limitations of judicial authority.

Luttig's assertion that the Supreme Court has the power to "assert" its authority overlooks a fundamental principle: the judiciary lacks the means to enforce its decisions. The Court does not possess the "sword" or the "purse" to compel compliance from the executive branch. This reality underscores the importance of maintaining a clear separation of powers, where each branch of government operates within its defined limits. When brain dead activist judges overstep their bounds, as seen in cases involving the PRESIDENT Trump administration, they not only undermine the executive branch but also risk destabilizing the very foundation of our government.

Moreover, it is essential to recognize that Congress has the constitutional authority to reign in lower courts. Congress created the lower courts and, therefore, has the power to modify their behavior and actions. This is a critical aspect of the checks and balances system designed by the framers of the Constitution. If the judiciary is perceived to be overreaching or interfering with the executive branch's operations, it is Congress' responsibility to step in and address these issues. This could involve legislation that clarifies the limits of judicial authority or even restructuring the lower courts to ensure they operate within their constitutional boundaries.

The notion that a Supreme Court rebuke could tarnish Trump's legacy is equally misguided. If previous controversies —including two impeachment trials, an alleged insurrection, and multiple indictments— failed to impede PRESIDENT Trump's political trajectory, it is unlikely that a judicial ruling would have any lasting impact. In fact, the more the judiciary attempts to assert its dominance over the executive branch, the more it invites backlash and potential overreach from PRESIDENT Trump. This dynamic creates a cycle of conflict that ultimately harms the integrity of both institutions.

Luttig's invocation of Marbury v. Madison is particularly telling. Chief Justice Marshall wisely chose not to confront President Jefferson directly, understanding that such a confrontation would be futile. The judiciary's role is not to engage in unwinnable conflicts with the executive but to interpret the law within the confines of its authority. By failing to recognize this, judges who engage in performative activism risk not only their credibility but also the stability of the judicial system as a whole.

So, children.. Let's recap...

The interference of brain dead Democrat activist judges in the operations of the executive branch poses a serious threat to the constitutional balance of power.

The judiciary must recognize its limitations and refrain from engaging in conflicts that undermine the authority of the Executive Branch.

Congress, as the body that created the lower courts, has the power to intervene and ensure that the judiciary operates within its constitutional boundaries.

A failure to respect this principle could lead to a further erosion of public trust in the judicial system and a destabilization of our democratic institutions.

It is imperative that all branches of government work collaboratively to uphold the Constitution and maintain the delicate balance of power that is essential to our democracy.

OR....

Or brain dead Democrats can continue to push these brain dead activist Democrat judges into further intruding on the power of the Executive Branch which will ultimately destroy our democracy..

Get that?? BRAIN DEAD DEMOCRATS will be the ones who destroy this great democracy...

SILENCE GIVES ASSENT.....

Third time's the charm.. :D

"I've never seen numbers like we're getting now on the Democratic Party All the moderates have said this party has to move to the center, but the left seems to be taking more of a dominant role in the party, and the ratings have just gone boom! In my poll, they were in the 30s, and in some polls, they were in the 20s. Normal favorable/unfavorable ratings for the Democratic Party are 45-51. I've never seen anything like this.

When Trump does a pretty good job, the party is going to have no chance whatsoever if it doesn’t figure out how to move to the center and get another Bill Clinton in."
-Democrat Strategist Mark Penn

Brain dead Democrats won't listen to Mr Penn..

All brain dead Democrats want to do is whine and cry and scream hysterically and try to bring back Bernie Sanders and Occasional Cortex...

Because THAT worked so well in the past, eh!?? :eyeroll:

"I've never seen numbers like we're getting now on the Democratic Party All the moderates have said this party has to move to the center, but the left seems to be taking more of a dominant role in the party, and the ratings have just gone boom! In my poll, they were in the 30s, and in some polls, they were in the 20s. Normal favorable/unfavorable ratings for the Democratic Party are 45-51. I've never seen anything like this.

I simply don't see the Democrats supporting that. They want to try to do what they did in 2016, which was to rip it all down. That's not working. PRESIDENT Trump is a lot smarter than he was in 2017.

In presidential politics, you generally don't see what's coming. Nobody saw Donald Trump coming, nobody saw Barack Obama coming. Nobody saw Bill Clinton coming when he was Bill Clinton.

When PRESIDENT Trump does a pretty good job, the party is going to have no chance whatsoever if it doesn’t figure out how to move to the center and get another Bill Clinton in."
-Democrat Strategist Mark Penn

Brain dead Democrats won't listen to Mr Penn..

All brain dead Democrats want to do is whine and cry and scream hysterically and try to bring back Bernie Sanders and Occasional Cortex...

Because THAT worked so well in the past, eh!?? :eyeroll:

I simply don't see the Democrats supporting that. They want to try to do what they did in 2016, which was to rip it all down. That's not working. PRESIDENT Trump is a lot smarter than he was in 2017.

In presidential politics, you generally don't see what's coming. Nobody saw Donald Trump coming, nobody saw Barack Obama coming. Nobody saw Bill Clinton coming when he was Bill Clinton.

When PRESIDENT Trump does a pretty good job, the party is going to have no chance whatsoever if it doesn’t figure out how to move to the center and get another Bill Clinton in."
-Democrat Strategist Mark Penn

Brain dead Democrats won't listen to Mr Penn..

All brain dead Democrats want to do is whine and cry and scream hysterically and try to bring back Bernie Sanders and Occasional Cortex...

Because THAT worked so well in the past, eh!?? :eyeroll:

This comment comes from the cows over at THE VIEW...

The brain dead Democrat Party's reliance on figures like Occasional Cortex and the performative kabuki theatrics of rallies is a troubling trend that detracts from the meaningful and pragmatic solutions needed to address the pressing issues facing our country. As highlighted by Sara Haines on "The View," the party's current approach—characterized by loud, hysterical and emotional appeals rather than substantive policy discussions— is alienating moderate voters and failing to deliver real change.

While the enthusiasm generated by progressive leaders like Occasional Cortex and Bernie Sanders can be invigorating, it has absolutely ZERO depth and practicality required to navigate the complexities of governance.

The View's Haines aptly pointed out that simply "screaming" at rallies does not equate to effective leadership or problem-solving. The American public is not just looking for passionate and hysterical rhetoric; they are seeking actionable plans that address their everyday concerns, such as rising costs and economic stability.

The brain dead Democrat Party's fixation on performative and hysterical politics is particularly concerning in a time when leadership roles are wide open and the need for a coherent, unified agenda is critical. As The View's Whoopi Goldberg noted, while progressive figures are drawing large crowds, the question remains: what tangible outcomes have these rallies produced? The reality is that the party's focus on emotional appeals may be overshadowing the necessity for pragmatic solutions that resonate with a broader electorate.

There is nothing substantiative being said at these rallies. Though well attended, NOTHING ever comes of these rallies..

Moreover, the messaging from Occasional Cortex and Sanders often fails to align with the priorities of many voters. While they may energize a base that craves a "fighting opposition party," the policies they advocate—such as taxing the wealthy—may not address the immediate economic pain felt by the majority. As The View's Sunny Hostin pointed out, voters are looking for concrete action plans that can alleviate their struggles, not just fiery speeches that channel their frustrations.

The brain dead Democrat Party must recognize that the path to success lies not in performative kabuki theater but in a commitment to pragmatic governance. Leaders like Elissa Slotkin, who advocate for a more moderate and solution-oriented approach, exemplify the type of leadership that can bridge divides and appeal to a wider range of voters. The party needs to unite under a banner of actionable solutions, focusing on collaboration and compromise rather than divisive rhetoric.

So... Children.. What have you learned???

The brain dead Democrat Party's current trajectory, heavily influenced by figures like Occasional Cortex, is completely and utterly alienating moderate voters and failing to address ANY real issues facing the nation. It is time for the brain dead Democrat Party to shift its focus from hysterical performative politics to meaningful, pragmatic action that can truly make a difference in the lives of Americans.

If the brain dead Democrat Party even remembers HOW to take meaningful pragmatic actions.. :eyeroll:

SILENCE GIVES ASSENT.....

And there ain't NOTHING the brain dead Democrat activist judges can do about it!! :D

The recent actions of brain dead Democrat activist judges, particularly in the context of the PRESIDENT Trump administration's invocation of the state secrets privilege in a high-profile deportation case, raise serious concerns about judicial overreach and the undermining of executive authority. The Justice Department's decision to withhold sensitive national security information from the courts is not merely a legal maneuver; it is a necessary step to protect the integrity of our national security and foreign affairs.

In a recent court filing, Attorney General Pam Bondi and senior officials from the PRESIDENT Trump administration articulated the rationale behind invoking the state secrets privilege. They emphasized that disclosing certain information could pose a "reasonable danger" to national security. This privilege is a critical tool that allows the executive branch to safeguard sensitive information that, if revealed, could compromise the safety of our nation and its diplomatic relations. The court, as stated by the Justice Department, lacks the competence to address these complex national security concerns, and further intrusions into the executive branch's prerogatives could lead to dangerous and unwarranted separation-of-powers harms.

However, brain dead Democrat activist judge James Boasberg has repeatedly pressed the government for more information regarding deportation flights, even going so far as to compare the treatment of Venezuelan nationals to that of Nazis. Such statements not only trivialize the historical suffering of millions but also reflect a troubling disregard for the executive branch's authority to manage immigration and national security matters. The brain dead Democrat judge's insistence on detailed disclosures, despite the administration's invocation of the state secrets privilege, represents a blatant overreach of judicial power.

The PRESIDENT Trump administration's position is clear: federal judges should not interfere with national security operations or immigration enforcement. The legal back-and-forth surrounding this case highlights a critical tension between the judiciary and the executive branch. The Justice Department's refusal to comply with Boasberg's requests for information is a necessary assertion of executive authority, aimed at preserving the delicate balance of power that is foundational to our government.

As the case moves through the courts, it is imperative that we recognize the potential dangers posed by activist judges who seek to undermine the executive branch's ability to protect our nation. The invocation of the state secrets privilege is not an act of defiance but a necessary measure to ensure that our national security remains intact. It is time for the judiciary to respect the boundaries of its authority and allow the executive branch to fulfill its constitutional responsibilities without unwarranted interference.

And now that Congress is going to pass laws that prohibit this kind of bullshit coming from brain dead Democrat activist judges, PRESIDENT Trump will score ANOTHER huge win to add to his already lengthy list of HUGE wins.. :D

SILENCE GIVES ASSENT...

Because what was actually said is no where NEAR what was the so-called "journalist" claims was said...

All ya'all have is all ya'all have EVER had... Some brain dead Trump/America hating Democrat claiming things were said, but NEVER having ANY facts to support the BS claims..

As Bashit Troll is fond of saying...

Link (to screen shots of the actual conversation) or it didn't happen...

You really are getting your ass kicked ALL the time, eh Bashit???

:D

Michale will provide the long answer ad nauseam once he gets his marching orders and is told how to think about it...

If nothing classified was released, then it should be fine for the journalist to release screen shots of the entire conversation, right?

Every one of the administration officials on that call has literally violated the Espionage Act by discussing those issues over the commercially available non-classified app Signal on their multiple phones. Better check every one of those phones for malware, but I digress. This is literally no different than Jack Teixeira posting confidential information on the commercially available non-classified app called Discord, just (obviously) a smaller amount of classified information.

The multiple people on that chat either knew or should have known they weren't supposed to be conducting it over Signal... FFS. Also, is anyone alive dumb enough to believe the asinine assertion that Marco Rubio doesn't know the laws contained in the Espionage Act? Rhetorical question. You're also dealing with issues wherein it is a violation of federal law if official records are not preserved. If those records on Signal were marked for deletion, that is a whole 'nother can of worms opened up there.

When will the Espionage Act prosecutions begin?

Can't answer that, but I would advise everyone not to hold your breath waiting on it. What I can tell you is that the statute of limitations for the vast majority of federal crimes is 5 years, but for espionage offenses it's 10 years or no limit whatsoever, obviously depending on the severity of the crime(s).

Or at the very least, when will the multiple congressional committee investigations into what happened appear?

When Democrats control the House again. The pendulum always swings back... sometimes swiftly and sometimes not so fast, but the pendulum definitely has never not swung back.

Okay... wait right there before I read another word. These morons discussed this type of classified information over Signal!? Every single one of them have totally disregarded known standard procedure... so have they all just collectively chosen to ignore the law or what? Not a real question. This type of discussion is obviously held in a SCIF. Don't even get me started on the fact that a journalist was added to the Signal discussion. This is not just a reckless breach, it's also careless as hell.

Based on prior experience, let me tell you what these morons are likely to do. They'll try to sweep under the rug that every single one of them on the chat are knowingly going against known procedure by using Signal. Secondly, some low-level functionary will get scapegoated/blamed and maybe even prosecuted for including a journalist (nuts!) on a Signal chat that should have been held in a SCIF in the first place.

This is what happens when you stuff an administration full of loyalists and Fox News toadies who haven't got a clue what they're doing. Idiots.

"What is the Department of Justice going to do about this massive breach of national security? When will the Espionage Act prosecutions begin? Or at the very least, when will the multiple congressional committee investigations into what happened appear?"

Oh, come on. The question is the answer: Nothing, never, never.