Trump invoked a law from the 1700s this week which would allow him personally to determine who gets deported. No due process, no hearing before a judge -- none of that. Just Trump deciding: "I don't like this guy, let's kick him out."

And with that nugget, CW exactly identifies the obvious core of the instant issue. Contrary to the hysterical prattling nonsense of the right-wingnut propaganda "unelected" goon squad on echo chamber network television and the drivel and spew of the regurgitating rubes all over social media: The Courts aren't attempting to usurp the power of the presidency, the president is attempting to usurp the power of the Courts.

President Adjudicated Rapist 34-Time Convicted Felon isn't too fond of following the statutes of the United States; kind of obvious to anyone who can read and interpret documents marked as Exhibits and public record.

People are entitled to due process under multiple sections of the United States Constitution. Give them due process, and if you have the proof they are whomever you claim, then TYA and send them out of the country. The POTUS and his goon squad do not get to ignore the Constitution; we fought a revolution to get rid of a king.

This one isn't rocket science.

Moreover, the focus on physical advantages and finishing times is irrelevant to the emotional impact of the experiences of young girls FORCED to compete against men.

First, these young girls are not being FORCED to compete against MEN. They are not FORCED to compete against anyone. That is their choice whether they participate or not. If they do CHOOSE to compete, they are not competing against MEN; they are competing against trans females their own age!

Moreover, the focus on physical advantages and finishing times is irrelevant to the emotional impact of the experiences of young girls FORCED to compete against men.

Again, this point is irrelevant as the scenario described does not actually exist!

While the comment demands specifics about the physical advantages held by transgender athletes, it overlooks the fact that the mere presence of biological males in women's sports can create an environment of fear and anxiety for female athletes. Especially in the locker rooms where young girls are FORCED to disrobe in front of men and see men disrobe.

The mere presence of males is what is causing the fear and anxiety for female athletes? Fear of what, exactly? You keep making comments regarding the suffering athletes like Cassidy have to put up with, but you aren't saying what that suffering actually includes. Also, why is Cassidy by herself in this suffering? Why aren't we seeing entire squads coming forward together if this is such an issue for female athletes? What we are seeing are those squads standing beside their trans female teammates calling BS on these complaints! Many of the coaches of these teams are males. That would be an even bigger problem for female athletes like Cassidy if this was actually the real issue.

As someone who coached high school sports (Freshman and JV teams) for years, there is no one being forced to completely disrobe in front of anyone. For those who are embarrassed to get naked around others, there are stalls that they can go into and change.

The question of whether cisgender female athletes have physical advantages over Cassidy is misguided and utterly without merit.

I could not agree with you more...yet that was still the argument you chose to run with!!!

When she learned that she would be competing against a male athlete in Nordic skiing, the emotional toll was overwhelming. The defeat she felt upon realizing she would face someone with physical advantages was heartbreaking.

So my asking that you identify and define those so-called advantages was necessary. You are the one saying that this was what was causing her to suffer so terribly!

The real problem I have with this entire line of argument is that it sounds more like the complaints that a MAN would ASSUME female athletes have against allowing trans female athletes to compete than complaints from actual female athletes! You keep pointing to how unfair it is that they should have to go compete against MEN who they could never be expected to match their strength and skills... something that I have never heard female athletes EVER say. And refusing to provide the actual results of these competitions can only be seen as proof that the trans athletes are not unbeatable GODS in these sports.

No matter HOW much you would wish it, your predictions were WAY OFF..

I seriously have no idea. trump came into the campaign with a big advantage, but he's lost a lot of it by his customary unforced errors. if I had to guess i'd say Donald still wins by a whisker, but seriously that little, like less than ten thousand votes in a single decisive state.
chrisweigant.com/2024/11/01/friday-talking-points-harris-makes-her-closing-argument/#comment-212688

I still have Donald up at the moment, but your completely unrealistic cheerleading is giving me hope that perhaps i'm wrong.
chrisweigant.com/2024/11/01/friday-talking-points-harris-makes-her-closing-argument/#comment-212717

i'm not so sure. At the moment I have Donald up 283-257, with Kamala winning Michigan, Wisconsin and Nevada, and a messy situation in PA with all sorts of dirty tricks on every side. However, I think any of the three Eastern swing states could very easily flip my model and give Harris the win.
chrisweigant.com/2024/11/04/electoral-math-my-2024-picks/#comment-212716

if Donald wins, i can practically guarantee it won't be with more than 290 electoral votes. in the extremely unlikely event that Donald completely sweeps the swing states, he'll get 312.
chrisweigant.com/2024/11/04/electoral-math-my-2024-picks/#comment-212730

my current prediction is 281-257, with PA as the linchpin.
chrisweigant.com/2024/11/04/electoral-math-my-2024-picks/#comment-212732

Those are all your predictions in the few days before the election.. I could go further and find others where your predictions were even MORE off..

Now, let's compare those to my FINAL prediction..

Of course.. I am not saying that 2024 is going to be exactly the same as 1980, vote for vote..

What I AM saying is that it's not going to be a razor thin win for President Trump. It's going to be a blow-out win for President Trump where it's going to be indisputable and it won't drag out for days or weeks, but rather we should know by this time tomorrow, if not sooner..

My prediction was dead on balls accurate whilst your predictions used words like "extremely unlikely" that PRESIDENT Trump would sweep the swing states..

So, your claim that your predictions were more accurate than mine is simply wishful thinking...

Much like your claims that the brain dead Democrat Party is a viable political entity in the here and now..

Simply wishful thinking...

it's a heck of a lot closer than your prediction (presuming 1980 was your actual prediction rather than 1984 - i'm giving you the benefit of the doubt on that one). you and I made the same prediction about who would win. I missed the margin by three states and 29 electoral votes; you missed it by 15 states and 177 electoral votes. in the objective reality that's actually objective, my guess was closer.

JL

Oh, just so we're clear.. The ABOVE comment about how brain dead Democrats are completely wrong about illegal immigrant criminals comes from RCP..

The following comment about the brain dead Democrat Party being dead comes from TIME magazine and Democrat Rep Jake Auchincloss...

The current state of the Democrat Party is one of disarray and irrelevance, as highlighted by DEMOCRAT Rep. Jake Auchincloss's recent admission that the party is “bereft of big ideas.” This stark acknowledgment by a DEMOCRAT reflects a broader truth: the Democrat Party is struggling to present a viable political platform that resonates with the American public. Instead of focusing on innovative solutions to pressing issues, the party has become mired in a cycle of ineffective governance, ideological rigidity, Trump/America hate and PTDS.

The Democrats' failure to address the consequences of their policies, particularly during the COVID-19 pandemic, has left them vulnerable. The catastrophic school closures, which deprived children of essential education and social experiences, exemplify the party's inability to learn from its mistakes. Auchincloss's call for a commitment to one-on-one tutoring for struggling students is a step in the right direction, but it underscores the brain dead party's lack of proactive, comprehensive strategies to address the fallout from their past decisions.

Moreover, the brain dead Democrats' fixation on appeasing their base rather than engaging with moderate and swing voters has alienated a significant portion of the electorate. The party's leadership seems more concerned with maintaining ideological purity than with crafting policies that genuinely improve the lives of everyday Americans. This disconnect is evident in their reluctance to embrace bold, transformative ideas that could galvanize support.

So, children.. What have you learned??

The brain dead Democrat Party's current trajectory suggests that it is not a viable political entity. With a lack of big ideas, a failure to learn from past mistakes, and a tendency to prioritize ideology over effective governance, the party risks becoming increasingly irrelevant in the eyes of the American people. It is time for the Democrats to reassess their approach and reconnect with the values and needs of the electorate if they hope to remain a significant force in American politics.

SILENCE GIVES ASSENT....

The recent actions of federal courts in blocking PRESIDENT Trump from invoking the Alien Enemies Act represent a significant overreach that undermines the executive powers granted to the President of the United States. This interference not only challenges the authority of the presidency but also disregards the pressing national security concerns that necessitate such actions.

U.S. District Judge James Boasberg's ruling to halt the deportation of Venezuelan gang members under the Alien Enemies Act is a prime example of judicial overreach. PRESIDENT Trump's decision to deport members of Tren de Aragua and MS-13 was based on a clear understanding of the threats these groups pose to American citizens. The tragic murders committed by illegal immigrants, such as the heinous acts against 12-year-old Jocelyn Nungaray and nursing student Laken Riley, underscore the urgency of addressing this issue. Yet, Judge Boasberg, in his ruling, seems to prioritize legal technicalities over the safety of American citizens, effectively placing himself in a position to dictate national security policy.

The Alien Enemies Act, established in 1798, provides the President with the authority to act decisively in times of national threat. As established in the landmark case Ludecke v. Watkins, the courts have no jurisdiction to review the President's invocation of this act. Justice Felix Frankfurter's opinion in that case made it unequivocally clear that the President's power to order the removal of enemy aliens is not subject to judicial scrutiny. This precedent should serve as a guiding principle for current courts, yet it appears to be ignored in favor of partisan agendas.

The notion that a district court judge can unilaterally obstruct the President's constitutional authority to protect the nation is alarming. It sets a dangerous precedent where judicial activism can override the executive branch's responsibilities, particularly in matters of national security. The Constitution grants the President the power to act in the best interest of the country, especially when faced with threats from foreign entities.

Moreover, the media's portrayal of these judicial decisions often fails to highlight the implications of such overreach. Instead of focusing on the potential dangers posed by groups like Tren de Aragua, the narrative shifts to vilifying the President for attempting to enforce the law. This distortion of facts not only misleads the public but also undermines the seriousness of the threats we face.

Children... What have you learned??

The federal courts must recognize their limitations and respect the constitutional boundaries that define the powers of the President. The invocation of the Alien Enemies Act is a legitimate exercise of executive authority aimed at safeguarding American lives. It is imperative that the judiciary refrains from overstepping its bounds and allows the President to fulfill his duty to protect the nation. The safety of American citizens should always take precedence over partisan politics and judicial overreach.

Once again, brain dead Democrats are trying to protect illegal immigrant rapists and murderers and drug dealers. Brain dead Democrats are trying to keep illegal immigrant rapists and murderers and drug dealers in the United States..

How completely and utterly brain dead are brain dead woke progressive Democrats, eh!??

SILENCE GIVES ASSENT....

Wikipedia's recent actions reveal a troubling pattern of bias and propaganda that undermines its credibility as a reliable source of information. The online encyclopedia has consistently targeted PRESIDENT Trump's nominees, distorting their reputations and erasing significant achievements in a blatant display of partisan manipulation. This behavior is not just an isolated incident; it reflects a broader agenda that prioritizes political bias over factual reporting.

A recent study by the Media Research Center highlights how Wikipedia editors have systematically altered the entries of Trump’s nominees, such as Pete Hegseth, a decorated war hero. After Hegseth was nominated for defense secretary, Wikipedia removed references to his military medals and accolades, replacing them with unfounded allegations and negative portrayals. This is a clear example of how the platform has become a tool for character assassination, prioritizing political agendas over the truth.

Moreover, the treatment of other nominees, like Kash Patel, further illustrates Wikipedia's bias. The platform has transformed their pages into platforms for critics, allowing politically motivated attacks to overshadow their qualifications and contributions. This selective editing raises serious questions about the integrity of Wikipedia as a source of information, especially when it comes to public figures who challenge the leftist narrative.

Co-founder Larry Sanger has long criticized Wikipedia for its bias, calling attention to the operational structure that favors radical leftists in positions of authority. As Wikipedia continues to propagate left-wing narratives, it is imperative for users and search engines to recognize its shortcomings. The reliance on Wikipedia for information not only perpetuates misinformation but also erodes trust in legitimate sources. It is time for readers who value truth and objectivity to reconsider their use of Wikipedia and seek out more balanced and reliable alternatives.

Anyone who uses Wikipedia as a source AGAINST the enemies of the brain dead Democrat Party is ignorant of facts and is ignorant of Objective Reality...

SILENCE GIVES ASSENT....

The above ^^^^^^ comment came from the NY SLIMES...

Brain dead Bashit Troll gets all whiney and hysterical when I don't name my sources...

I know, I know.. He's a whiney little shit..

It's fitting because brain dead Democrat terrorism has caused so much pain and suffering against TESLA, it's a good thing that Elon Musk can make up the losses with SPACE X contracts...

Elon Musk's ability to recoup losses from Tesla through lucrative contracts with the U.S. government, particularly for SpaceX, is a remarkable turn of events that underscores the resilience of his business empire. As Tesla has faced challenges, including terrorism, vandalism and threats from radical groups, Musk has strategically positioned SpaceX to benefit from federal contracts that could amount to TENS OF BILLIONS of dollars.

The recent agreement between SpaceX and various government agencies, including the Department of Defense and NASA, highlights Musk's influence and the technological superiority of his companies. SpaceX's Falcon 9 rocket is being recognized as a revolutionary solution for the Pentagon's logistics needs, allowing for rapid military cargo transport. Additionally, SpaceX's Starlink satellite internet service is now eligible for a significant portion of the federal government's $42 billion rural broadband initiative, which had previously excluded it during the Biden administration.

This shift in policy is particularly fitting, as it comes in the wake of losses incurred by Tesla due to acts of vandalism and terrorism, often attributed to radical Democrat groups. The damage to Tesla vehicles and dealerships has been a direct result of political terrorism, yet Musk's ability to pivot and secure government contracts demonstrates his business acumen and the support he has garnered from the Trump administration. The irony that losses from Tesla, caused by what can only be described as Democrat terrorism, are being offset by substantial government contracts for SpaceX is not lost on many observers.

Musk's role in the White House, particularly as the head of the Department of Government Efficiency, has allowed him to influence policy and secure contracts that benefit his companies. This unprecedented access to government resources showcases Musk's unique position in the intersection of business and government. His ability to leverage his relationships within the PRESIDENT Trump administration has positioned SpaceX to dominate the space industry, further solidifying its status as a key player in national defense and exploration.

As SpaceX continues to expand its operations and secure new contracts, the financial benefits will undoubtedly help Musk recover from the setbacks faced by Tesla. The potential for billions in new federal contracts, coupled with the technological advancements that SpaceX brings to the table, ensures that Musk's ventures remain at the forefront of innovation and government support.

So, children.. Let's recap...

Elon Musk's ability to recoup losses from Tesla through SpaceX contracts with the U.S. government is a testament to his resilience and strategic foresight. The irony of recovering from losses caused by political hostility with government contracts is a fitting narrative in the ongoing saga of Musk's business empire. As he continues to navigate the complexities of federal contracts and influence, the future looks bright for both SpaceX and Musk's broader ambitions in space exploration and technology.

And just think.. Elon Musk owes this TENS OF BILLIONS in new wealth to brain dead Democrat terrorists who thought it was such an awesome idea to commit terrorism against TESLA..

Great job, brain dead Democrats!!! :D

This information comes from WaPoop… :D

The collaboration between the IRS and ICE to share tax data for immigration enforcement is a significant step in the fight against illegal immigrant criminals, particularly concerning illegal immigrants who have committed crimes.

This agreement, which would allow ICE to access taxpayer information to confirm the identities and addresses of suspected undocumented individuals, represents a proactive approach to ensuring that those who violate immigration laws are held accountable.

For years, the IRS has maintained a policy of confidentiality regarding taxpayer information, reassuring illegal immigrant workers that their tax filings would not lead to deportation.

However, the current administration's push for mass deportation necessitates a reevaluation of how federal agencies can work together to enforce immigration laws effectively. By allowing ICE to cross-reference names and addresses with IRS databases, the government can more accurately identify individuals who pose a grave threat to public safety.

This agreement is particularly crucial as it aligns with PRESIDENT Trump's commitment to using every available resource to conduct a comprehensive crackdown on illegal immigrant criminals.

The IRS's involvement signifies a broader strategy to utilize all federal agencies in the fight against illegal immigration, especially those who have been convicted of violent crimes. The collaboration aims to ensure that individuals with final removal orders are swiftly deported, thereby enhancing public safety and upholding the rule of law.

Moreover, the move to share taxpayer information with ICE is a clear message that illegal activities will not be tolerated. Those who engage in criminal behavior while residing in the U.S. illegally will face the full extent of the law.

The potential penalties for those found to be in violation of immigration laws are severe, with some facing up to 20 years in prison for acts of domestic terrorism related to immigration violations.

While some may express concern over the implications for taxpayer privacy, it is essential to recognize that this agreement is designed to target individuals who have already been identified as threats.

The IRS and ICE are taking necessary steps to ensure that the safety of American citizens is prioritized, and that those who break the law are held accountable. This collaboration marks a pivotal moment in the ongoing efforts to secure our borders and enforce immigration laws effectively.

PRESIDENT Trump is doing an AWESOME job!! The ONLY people who have to worry about this are the criminals and scumbags who are trying to evade the law for their criminal activities...

GO PRESIDENT Trump!!!! :D

The recent comments from Rep. Jasmine Crockett, calling for Elon Musk to be "taken down," have raised serious concerns about the violence rhetoric coming from some members of the brain dead Democrat Party.

Attorney General Pam Bondi's warning to Crockett to "tread very carefully" is a reminder that such statements can incite terrorism and violence and have real-world consequences.

Crockett's remarks were made during a call with the TESLA TAKEDOWN movement, which has been linked to acts of terrorism, vandalism and violence against Tesla vehicles and dealerships across multiple states. These actions, including arson and shots fired, are not just peaceful protests; they are acts of domestic terrorism that will not be tolerated. Bondi has made it clear that those who engage in such violence and terrorism and those who instigate or encourage such violence and terrorism will face severe legal repercussions.

The Justice Department is already taking action, with individuals accused of damaging Teslas facing up to 20 years in prison for their actions. This is a strong message that terrorism and violence, regardless of the political motivation behind it, will be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the anti-terrorism laws.

It is crucial for public officials to understand the weight of their words and the potential for inciting violence. The brain dead Democrat Party must take responsibility for the actions of its members and ensure that calls for violence are condemned, not encouraged. The safety of individuals and the integrity of our democratic processes must come first.

Let it be known that any acts of terrorism or violence, regardless of their source, will be met with swift and decisive legal action. The rule of law must prevail, and those who threaten it will be held accountable.

Your comment questioning Cassidy Carlisle's experiences and the validity of her feelings regarding competing against transgender female athletes totally ignores the crucial point: the emotional and psychological toll that such experiences can have on young female athletes. It is not merely about winning or losing; it is about the integrity of competition and the feelings of vulnerability that arise when policies prioritize inclusivity over the well-being of female athletes.

Was Cassidy a star female athlete that only lost when she was forced to compete against trans female athletes? How EXACTLY did she suffer from competing against trans female athletes?

First, the assertion that Cassidy was not a star athlete or that her losses were solely against transgender athletes is an attempt to undermine her experiences. Typical move by brain dead Democrats pushing this unfair agenda. This line of questioning implies that unless she was a top competitor, her feelings of discomfort and inadequacy are invalid. Who the fuck do you think you are that you decide if these young women's feelings are valid are not!?

Yours is a dangerous narrative that seeks to diminish the voices of young girls like Cassidy, who are navigating complex emotions in a highly competitive environment. The pressure to conform to policies that prioritize inclusivity can lead to feelings of confusion and defeat, regardless of an athlete's ranking or performance.

What physical advantages did the trans athletes hold over Cassidy? The article fails to say what physical advantages trans female athletes held over her. Did any cis female athletes have physical advantages over Cassidy or was it only trans females? Did the trans female athletes always take first in the Nordic skiing competitions?

Moreover, the focus on physical advantages and finishing times is irrelevant to the emotional impact of the experiences of young girls FORCED to compete against men. While the comment demands specifics about the physical advantages held by transgender athletes, it overlooks the fact that the mere presence of biological males in women's sports can create an environment of fear and anxiety for female athletes. Especially in the locker rooms where young girls are FORCED to disrobe in front of men and see men disrobe. Cassidy's feelings of defeat stem not only from the physical competition but also from the emotional burden of competing in a system that does not fully recognize her rights and experiences as a female athlete.

The question of whether cisgender female athletes have physical advantages over Cassidy is misguided and utterly without merit. Every athlete has unique strengths and weaknesses, and competition is inherently about overcoming those differences. However, the introduction of male athletes into women's sports totally shatters this dynamic, as it creates an uneven playing field that undermines the very essence of fair competition. Cassidy's experience is not just about her individual performance; it is about the broader implications for all female athletes who may feel similarly marginalized.

You brain dead Democrats claim you "PROTECT" women, yet you force young girls to compete against men and share locker rooms with men. Some "protection". :eyeroll:

Furthermore, your insistence on demanding finishing times as evidence of unfairness is a completely narrow-minded view of the issue. The emotional and psychological effects of competing against transgender athletes cannot be quantified by "finishing times". :eyeroll:

Cassidy's story highlights the internal struggle many young girls face when they feel their identities and opportunities are threatened and shattered. The fear of backlash for speaking out only adds to this burden, silencing voices that deserve to be heard.

You brain dead Democrats are GREAT about silencing innocent voices that don't conform to your hate-women/girls agenda..

Cassidy Carlisle's experiences are valid and deserve recognition. The attempt to dictate how she should feel or to minimize her struggles is not only dismissive but also harmful. But it's typical of brain dead Democrats pushing an agenda..

It is essential to foster a dialogue that respects the rights and feelings of the women and girl athletes, ensuring that the integrity of women's sports is upheld. Cassidy's courage to speak out is a testament to the need for a better conversation that prioritizes the voices of young female athletes over the demands of men who can't hack it in MEN'S Sports so they have to compete against women and girls..

unfortunatlely for me, I called it pretty early and pretty accurately.

Not even close..

You said it was "extremely unlikely" that PRESIDENT Trump would sweep the swing states..

While you acknowledged that it COULD happen, you said it was "extremely unlikely"..

That's not calling it accurately JL, no matter how much you wish it is..

The experiences of young girls like Cassidy Carlisle highlight the profound hurt and anguish that can arise from policies allowing biological males to compete in women's sports. For many girls, sports are not just a pastime; they are a vital part of their identity, a source of empowerment, and a space where they can build confidence and camaraderie. However, when these girls are forced to share locker rooms and compete against biological males, it can lead to feelings of vulnerability, confusion, and defeat.

Was Cassidy a star female athlete that only lost when she was forced to compete against trans female athletes? How EXACTLY did she suffer from competing against trans female athletes?

When she learned that she would be competing against a male athlete in Nordic skiing, the emotional toll was overwhelming. The defeat she felt upon realizing she would face someone with physical advantages was heartbreaking.

What physical advantages did the trans athletes hold over Cassidy? The article fails to say what physical advantages trans female athletes held over her. Did any cis female athletes have physical advantages over Cassidy or was it only trans females? Did the trans female athletes always take first in the Nordic skiing competitions?

If Cassidy only lost to trans female athletes she competed against, then there might be some truth to your argument. Since you did not state any of her or other athletes' finishing times to show us how unfair it was for Cassidy, you provide no facts to support your argument.

you were predicting a 1984 level landslide,

Not factually accurate.. I was predicting a "1980 level landslide".. At first.

My FINAL prediction was:

"It's going to be a blow-out win for President Trump where it's going to be indisputable and it won't drag out for days or weeks, but rather we should know by this time tomorrow, if not sooner.."

And that was dead on ballz accurate...

Sorry, JL.. I like you but you don't get to rewrite recent history... :D

the result was exactly what i said it would be if all the swing states swung Donald's way, 312 electors.

Yes, but you ALSO said that THAT was "extremely unlikely"...

Com'on.. Fess up... You blew the call... Own it... Yer the only one here who has that capacity...

Caddy, just give it up and sleep it off...

And lay off the drugs... :eyeroll:

that was an excellent example of cherry picking your own comments, as well as mine. you were predicting a 1984 level landslide, while i predicted it would be closer. the result was exactly what i said it would be if all the swing states swung Donald's way, 312 electors. i thought that unlikely but possible. Reagan defeated Mondale in the popular vote by 17 points, and in the electrical vote by 500; nothing like that was remotely possible, but that's what you predicted.

in this conversation, silence is probably a sign of high intelligence.

JL

Ya'all have been PWN'ed six ways from Sunday...

But it's that time of the night..

Ya'all have fun and I'll see everyone bright and early in the morning and we can start it all over again.. :D

What a total brain dead luser…

Melakon would likely disagree with that...

I have avoided your comments because I still like ya... But this one is just too good..

I still have Donald up at the moment, but your completely unrealistic cheerleading is giving me hope that perhaps i'm wrong.
-JL

My "unrealistic cheerleading"??

Of course.. I am not saying that 2024 is going to be exactly the same as 1980, vote for vote..

What I AM saying is that it's not going to be a razor thin win for President Trump. It's going to be a blow-out win for President Trump where it's going to be indisputable and it won't drag out for days or weeks, but rather we should know by this time tomorrow, if not sooner..
-Michale

What part was unrealistic??

"It's NOT going to be a razor thin win for PRESIDENT Trump."

That was factually accurate..

"It's going to be a blow-out win for President Trump where it's going to be indisputable and it won't drag out for days or weeks, but rather we should know by this time tomorrow, if not sooner.."

That was also DEAD ON BALLZ ACCURATE as well...

So, I am wondering where you get the claim of "unrealistic cheerleading"???

Because the OBJECTIVE REALITY is that I called it dead on ballz perfect..

I'm just sayin'... :D

And remind the few..
When ill of us they speak...
That we are all that stands between...
The monsters and the weak...

https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/13839e8d10b9303c8d9aee50576e15b15f4844be91d15073a21097a85b780c50.jpg

Which is what I have been telling you for YEARS!!!

Thanx for proving MY point!!! :D

The link you put in is a WEIGANTIA link, ya frakin' MORON!!!

Yer stoned out of yer skull, ain'tcha??

:eyeroll:

SPOILER ALERT:
A lot!

“What people worry about is that this administration acts with a unbelievable kind of cocktail of incompetence and illegality,” Himes said of the deportation and the Department of Government Efficiency.

“When you fire all of the people at the Department of Energy who look after our nuclear weapons and then say ‘oopsie, we need to hire you back,’ that’s incompetence,” he continued.

Bozo the clown party...

Women are the wall, and Trump is going to pay for it.
chrisweigant.com/2024/11/04/electoral-math-my-2024-picks/#comment-212718
-Victoria Troll

Yea, nice wall, Victoria Troll!!! :D

I want someone to do an under-the-radar effort in Texas over the next four years, and actually turn it blue. Nobody polls there, because it’s not a swing state.
chrisweigant.com/2024/11/04/electoral-math-my-2024-picks/#comment-212719
-Dan

Good luck with that, Dan.. Lemme know how it comes out!! :D

A whole lot of undecided voters have been specifically citing Trump's Madison Square Garden rally as the reason they decided to vote for Harris. Trump's hate-fest reminded a lot of voters of the absolute chaos they could expect for four years if he wins, and it has turned them away from Trump.
chrisweigant.com/2024/11/04/electoral-math-my-2024-picks/
-2025 CW

Apparently, it didn't turn them that far away from PRESIDENT Trump, eh?? :D

A respected and prescient Iowa poll has Kamala up 47-44. Our female heavy early turnout is groovy and we’re going to blow through 2020’s 155m votes cast.
chrisweigant.com/2024/11/01/friday-talking-points-harris-makes-her-closing-argument/#comment-212626
-Dishonorably Discharged Druggie Child Rapist

You actually BELIEVED that Headboard Harris would win IOWA!!!???? Man, you must have been TOTALLY stoned!!!

BBBBWWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

I just LOVE this new game!! :D

But facts are facts..

And the fact that ya'all ignore the facts is EXACTLY why yer brain dead Democrat Party lost so badly in 2024..

And is STILL losing in the here and now.. :D

Who am I kidding?

Link or it didn't happen...

Perfect.

I bet they will. Musk and Trump stealing your money...

Are fighting back!!! :D

The recent wave of violence targeting Tesla vehicles and their owners has escalated to a level that can only be described as domestic terrorism.

This alarming trend, which includes acts of vandalism, arson, and even gunfire, represents a coordinated effort to intimidate and harm individuals associated with Elon Musk’s electric car company.

The FBI has reported incidents across at least nine states, highlighting the severity and widespread nature of these attacks.

Former FBI special agent Nicole Parker has correctly condemned these acts as domestic terrorism, emphasizing that such behavior should carry the highest penalties under the law.

The attacks are not merely random acts of vandalism; they are politically motivated assaults aimed at those who support or are affiliated with Tesla and its leadership. This kind of targeted violence is TEXTBOOK terrorism and is utterly unacceptable in a democratic society and poses a significant threat to public safety.

In response to this growing threat, Tesla owners are fighting back by utilizing the company's innovative "sentry mode." This security feature allows vehicles to monitor their surroundings, recording any suspicious activity and alerting owners to potential threats.

When activated, the cameras and sensors remain vigilant, ready to capture evidence of any wrongdoing. This proactive approach empowers Tesla owners to take control of their safety and protect their property from these acts of domestic terrorism.

The recent incidents, including the shocking terrorist attack in Las Vegas where multiple Tesla vehicles were set on fire, underscore the urgent need for a robust response from law enforcement and the justice system.

Attorney General Pamela Bondi has made it clear that those participating in this wave of violence will face serious consequences, with federal terrorism charges and hate crime charges already being brought against individuals involved in these attacks.

It is crucial for society to recognize the seriousness of these actions and to stand in solidarity with Tesla owners who are facing this unprecedented wave of terrorism and violence. The attacks are not just against cars; they are attacks on the principles of free expression and the right to support innovative technologies.

As Tesla owners activate their sentry mode and take a stand against this domestic terrorism, it is a reminder that the days of committing crimes without consequence are over. The fight against this violence is not just about protecting vehicles; it is about safeguarding the values of safety, respect, and freedom that we hold dear.

The Democrat Party is a terrorist organization.. Plain and simple..

Questions around the signature led some to speculate the president may have used an autopen – a device he has criticized

Is Trump even president at this point? Or is it all Musk and Trump's handlers?

Link or it didn't happen. Too much find and replace garbage to search for it. I wonder what's actually in there that you are hiding from...

Gotta be some kinda record!!!! :D

Looks like the peanut gallery is awful quiet..

I guess they agree with everything I said.. :D

This information comes from Democrat Propaganda Site NBC NEWS... :D

The current state of the brain dead woke progressive Democrat Party is marked by a palpable and obvious civil war, as evidenced by Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer's recent defiance in the face of internal criticism.

Schumer's refusal to step down after his controversial decision to support a Republican funding bill highlights the growing rift within the party. While he insists that his actions were driven by a desire to prevent a government shutdown, many within his own ranks are questioning his leadership and the direction of the party.

Schumer's comments during his interview on NBC's "Meet the Press" reveal a leader who is increasingly isolated from the woke progressive wing of the party. His assertion that he acted out of "pure conviction" does little to quell the discontent brewing among brain dead Democrats who feel that the party is straying too far from its core values. The fact that some members, like Senator Michael Bennet, are openly discussing the need for a reevaluation of Democratic leadership underscores the urgency of the situation.

Moreover, the speculation surrounding a potential primary challenge from progressive figures like Occasional Cortex indicates that the party is at a crossroads. Many brain dead Democrats are frustrated with the old guard and are calling for a renewal of leadership that aligns more closely with the woke progressive "values" of the base. Representative Ro Khanna's remarks about the need for change reflect a broader sentiment that the party must adapt to the evolving political landscape or risk further alienation from voters.

Schumer's attempts to frame the situation as a fight against PRESIDENT Trump and a defense of democracy may resonate with some, but they do not address the fundamental issues plaguing the party. The brain dead Democrat Party's failure to effectively communicate its vision and unite its factions is leading to a complete and utter loss of confidence among voters. As the party grapples with its identity, it must confront the reality that the current leadership may not be equipped to navigate the challenges ahead.

So, children.. Let's recap what you have learned...

The brain dead Democrat Party civil war is becoming increasingly obvious to even the most brain dead Democrat with Chuck Schumer at the center of the storm. His refusal to step down amid growing dissent reflects a leadership crisis that could have significant implications for the party's future. If brain dead Democrats hope to regain the trust of the American people, they must address these internal divisions and work towards a cohesive vision that resonates with their constituents.

But we all know that will never happen.. Because brain dead Democrats will NEVER look in the mirror and HONESTLY self-reflect on their short-comings..

Hope ya'all like the political wilderness.. Yer gonna be there a while.. :D

SILENCE GIVES ASSENT....

I try to help him out with his brain dead troubles and he just ups and leaves...

"HOW ROOOD!!!"
-JarJar Binks

:D

Second Lieutenant Wyatt Hendrickson’s recent victory at the NCAA Wrestling Championships and his respectful salute to PRESIDENT Trump exemplify the deep admiration many Americans have for the president. After pulling off a stunning upset against Minnesota’s Gable Steveson, Hendrickson not only celebrated his win but also took a moment to acknowledge Trump, a gesture that speaks volumes about the respect and appreciation he holds for the president.

Hendrickson’s salute, followed by a handshake and a hug with PRESIDENT Trump, highlights a connection that transcends politics. It reflects a shared sense of patriotism and pride in representing the United States, especially as Hendrickson embarks on a career in the U.S. Air Force. His actions resonate with the values of hard work, dedication, and respect for leadership that many Americans admire. In a time when political divisions seem to dominate the conversation, Hendrickson’s display of respect serves as a reminder of the unity that can be found in shared accomplishments and national pride.

Moreover, Hendrickson’s victory is not just a personal achievement; it symbolizes the triumph of determination and faith. He drew inspiration from the biblical story of David and Goliath, embodying the mindset of a champion. This mentality aligns with Trump’s own narrative of fighting against the odds and standing up for what one believes in. Hendrickson’s focus on his faith and the support of his family further emphasizes the importance of community and resilience in achieving success.

As he plans to serve in the Air Force for the next 20 years, Hendrickson represents a new generation of leaders who are committed to their country. His salute to PRESIDENT Trump is a testament to the respect that many Americans have for a president who embodies the spirit of fighting for one’s beliefs. In a world where respect for leadership is often questioned, Hendrickson’s actions remind us of the importance of honoring those who serve and lead, both on and off the mat.

It is people like PRESIDENT Trump and 2nd LT Hendrickson who makes ALL of American citizens proud to be American!!!

If Bernie is so awesome, why is he afraid to answer a simple question??? On a Democrat Propaganda network no less...

Senator Bernie Sanders’ recent behavior during an interview on ABC’s "This Week" is nothing short of disappointing and revealing. When asked a straightforward question about whether he would support Occasional Cortex running for Senate, Sanders dismissed the inquiry as "nonsense" and abruptly left the interview. This reaction not only reflects poorly on his willingness to engage in meaningful political discourse but also highlights a troubling trend among some politicians who shy away from accountability.

Sanders, who has built his political career on advocating for progressive values and championing the voices of the people, should be prepared to address questions about the future of his party and its leadership. Occasional Cortex is a prominent figure in the brain dead Democrat Party, and speculation about her potential Senate run is not just "inside the Beltway" chatter; it is a legitimate topic of discussion that could have significant implications for the party's direction. By refusing to answer, Sanders appears to be avoiding a critical conversation about the future of progressive politics in America.

His dismissal of the question as "nonsense" is particularly troubling. It suggests a lack of respect for the concerns of voters who are eager to see strong leadership and a clear vision for the future. Instead of engaging with the question, Sanders chose to walk away, which is not the behavior one would expect from a seasoned politician who claims to represent the interests of the people.

Moreover, Sanders’ reluctance to discuss Occasional Cortex's potential candidacy raises questions about his commitment to fostering new leadership within the party. If he truly believes in empowering the next generation of leaders, he should welcome discussions about their ambitions and support their aspirations.

So, children.. What does this tell us about Bernie Sanders???

His refusal to answer a simple question about Occasional Cortex is a sign of political cowardice. It undermines his credibility and demonstrates a troubling unwillingness to engage in the very conversations that could shape the future of the Democrat Party. If Sanders wants to be seen as a true leader, he must be willing to confront difficult questions head-on rather than retreating from them.

Bernie's a chicken-shit.. He's not even a Has Been.. He's a NEVER WAS....

Were you ever on Digg during peak Dr No? Reddit Bernie bros got nothing on the original tea party...

Why am I not surprised!?? :eyeroll:

BBBBWWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

Yea, Bashit Troll...

THAT is a really reliable objective unbiased web site!!

Like I said, you people can never find actual objective news sources..

All you morons have is brain dead Democrat propaganda sites.. :eyeroll:

I view Bernie as the lefts Ron Paul. Hyper popular online but not so much in the real world. Like Ron Paul he is so dedicated to his principles that he has really not got much done in his long congressional career.

Ron Paul and his ideology was and is nowhere as popular as Bernie’s online. Bernie and his ideology got him a lot closer to the Presidency than did Paul’s. So what was the Ron Paul ideology? I remember no more foreign wars and legalize weed but that’s about it. Contrast that with Bernie moving the Overton Window and packing rallies to this day.

Also, he never really got ahead of his self-described democratic socialist label. The problem I see is he would not have run against Trump but against every derogatory thing Ronald Reagan ever said about socialists to which there is quite the plethora...

Republicans have been calling Democrats “Socialist” and even “Communist” since FDR. That includes Establishment Democrats aka DINOs, who have borne the stigma of these characterizations without offering the benefits of same. We Boomers are dying and being replaced by youngsters who don’t see Socialism in the same negative light.

So if you’re going to be called a Socialist no matter what why not offer voters the good stuff that, er, Democratic Socialism offers?

This is why Ron Paul is NOT the equivalent of Bernie Sanders.

What an evil dumbass...

And Bashit Troll totally buys into their Hate America bullshit..

Gee, color me surprised!!! :eyeroll:

They are wheeling out old man Sanders and his spunky side-kick, Occasional Cortex!! :D

The recent "Fighting Oligarchy" tour featuring Senator Bernie Sanders and Representative Occasional Cortex is a clear indication of the desperation within the Democratic Party. This duo, reminiscent of a classic comedy team from a bygone era, is attempting to rally support in a party that is increasingly out of touch with the American electorate and DESPERATE to regain even the SMALLEST smidgen of relevance.

While they may present themselves as champions of the people, the reality is that they are fighting to maintain ideological control over a party that is struggling to connect with the vast majority of Americans.

The comedy tour, which has taken them across the country, is not just about opposing PRESIDENT Trump. It is a hail-mary attempt to reinvigorate a base that is rapidly losing faith in the woke progressive agenda.

With midterm elections looming, Sanders and Occasional Cortex are trying to distract from the fact that their brand of progressivism has been COMPLETELY and UTTERLY rejected by the American voter.

Polls indicate that a significant 80% of Americans are concerned about issues like illegal immigration, rising costs of living, and a lack of patriotism—issues that the brain dead Democrats have utterly failed to address effectively.

Instead of focusing on the pressing concerns of everyday Americans, Sanders and Occasional Cortex continue to push their outdated narratives about oligarchs and corporate greed. Their insistence on wearing masks at events, even in a post-pandemic world, further highlights their total disconnect from the realities faced by most citizens. While they may believe they are fighting for the working class, their actions suggest they are more interested in preserving their own fading political power.

Moreover, the brain dead Democrat Party is facing internal strife, with centrist figures like Rep. Ritchie Torres and Sen. John Fetterman gaining traction. These moderates are ready to reshape the party in a way that resonates more with the average voter, contrasting sharply with the far-left ideologies espoused by Sanders and Occasional Cortex. Even prominent figures like Bill Maher are calling out the absurdity of their antics, emphasizing that the party needs to move beyond the extremes.

So, children, let's recap..

The "Fighting Oligarchy" comedy tour is a desperate attempt by Sanders and Occasional Cortex to cling to relevance in a party that is increasingly out of step with the American people. As the brain dead Democrats grapple with their identity and direction, it is clear that the far-left agenda is losing its appeal. The American voter is ready for a change, and the antics of this comedic duo may very well mark the beginning of the end for their brand of socialism within the brain dead woke progressive Democrat Party.

SILENCE GIVES ASSENT....

PRESIDENT Trump’s unwavering commitment to deporting dangerous criminals is a vital aspect of his administration’s efforts to ensure the safety and security of American citizens. Recent developments, including Venezuela’s decision to resume accepting deportation flights from the U.S., highlight the effectiveness of Trump’s policies in combating crime and violence. With approximately 80% of Americans supporting the deportation of criminal migrants, it is clear that the majority of the population stands firmly behind Trump’s approach, while Democrats represent the minority who wish to keep these dangerous individuals in the country.

The announcement from Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro regarding the resumption of deportation flights is a significant victory for PRESIDENT Trump’s administration. By sending back individuals associated with gangs like Tren de Aragua, PRESIDENT Trump is taking decisive action to protect communities from the threats posed by these criminal organizations. This collaboration with foreign governments is essential for maintaining law and order, as it allows the U.S. to remove individuals who pose a risk to public safety and return them to their home countries.

PRESIDENT Trump’s administration has consistently argued for the authority to deport migrant criminals, and this latest development reinforces that stance. The overwhelming support from the American public—80% in favor of deporting dangerous criminals—demonstrates a clear mandate for action. This support reflects a widespread recognition that criminal behavior should not be tolerated, regardless of where it originates. In contrast, the Democrats’ position, which often leans toward leniency and protection for these individuals, places them in the minority, representing only 20% of the population.

By prioritizing the deportation of those involved in gang activities, PRESIDENT Trump is sending a strong message: America will not tolerate criminal behavior. This approach not only protects American citizens but also holds foreign governments accountable for the actions of their nationals. The fact that deportation flights are resuming indicates a shift in the relationship between the U.S. and Venezuela, which had been strained under Maduro’s regime.

PRESIDENT Trump’s leadership in this area is commendable and necessary for safeguarding American communities. His administration’s focus on deporting dangerous criminals reflects a dedication to law and order that resonates with the vast majority of citizens who prioritize safety above all else.

Now children... What have we learned??

PRESIDENT Trump’s actions in deporting dangerous criminals align with the desires of 80% of Americans who want to see a safer nation. His firm stance on immigration and criminal deportation stands in stark contrast to the Democrats, who represent a minority viewpoint that seeks to keep these threats within our borders. It is time for the government to listen to the will of the people and take decisive action to protect American lives.

SILENCE GIVES ASSENT.....

PRESIDENT Trump's recent appearance at the NCAA wrestling championships in Philadelphia showcased the undeniable affection and respect that many Americans have for him. The roaring reception he received, complete with chants of "USA! USA!" from the crowd, is a testament to his enduring popularity. Senator Markwayne Mullin aptly captured the sentiment, stating that "everyone loves" PRESIDENT Trump because they respect a fighter—someone who stands up for them and embodies their values.

Wrestling fans, known for their appreciation of hard work and determination, resonate deeply with PRESIDENT Trump's persona. As Mullin noted, many in the audience have faced challenges and understand the grit it takes to succeed, both in the ring and in life. Trump's ability to connect with this audience reflects a broader appeal that transcends traditional political boundaries. He represents a fighter who is not afraid to take on the establishment and advocate for the everyday American.

The enthusiasm at the event was palpable, and PRESIDENT Trump's self-awareness of the crowd's affection only amplified the moment. His comment, "They absolutely love me here, don't they?" highlights his understanding of the connection he has forged with his supporters. Unlike other political figures, Trump has consistently demonstrated that he is "for the people and from the people," making him relatable to many.

In contrast, the reception that other politicians, such as President Biden, might receive in similar settings often lacks the same warmth and enthusiasm. The chants of "USA!" for PRESIDENT Trump signify a collective recognition of his efforts to fight for American interests and values. As he continues to engage with his supporters, it is clear that President Trump remains a beloved figure among many Americans, embodying the spirit of resilience and determination that resonates across the nation.

If you don't love PRESIDENT Trump you ain't an American!!!

SILENCE GIVES ASSENT.....

BBBWWWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

Seriously, Russ Troll... I'll help you out.. If you are posting a comment and it just goes to a blank screen, it means a word in the comment is part of the NNL filter...

Post a portion of the comment at a time and you should be able to find the word that is offending the NNL filters..

Don't say I never do nuttin' for you...

His appearance at the NCAA wrestling championships is not just a strategic move; it symbolizes his enduring connection with the hardworking citizens of the state, particularly those outside the urban centers.

Democrats, including Vice President Kamala Harris, thought they could dominate Pennsylvania, especially in Philadelphia, often referred to as the City of Brotherly Love.

However, the reality is that while Harris may have won the city, it was Trump who captured the hearts of many in the surrounding areas. The divide between the urban and rural populations in Pennsylvania has only grown sharper, with PRESIDENT Trump’s supporters feeling increasingly alienated from the political elite.

The wrestling community, which embodies hard work and dedication, resonates with Trump’s message of resilience and determination. These athletes, who train tirelessly without the promise of lucrative contracts, reflect the values that many of Trump’s supporters admire. The enthusiasm for Trump among wrestling fans at the championships underscores his ability to connect with everyday Americans, contrasting sharply with the Democrats' reliance on urban votes.

As PRESIDENT Trump returns to Pennsylvania, it is clear that the brain dead Democrats underestimated his appeal and the strength of his support in the state. The wrestling event not only showcases his popularity but also highlights the growing divide between the two political factions. While Democrats may have thought they could secure Pennsylvania through urban dominance, PRESIDENT Trump’s enduring presence and the loyalty of his supporters reveal a different narrative—one where hard work, dedication, and a connection to the people ultimately prevail.

Wait a tic... Didn't ya'all say that Headboard Harris would win ALL of the Blue Wall???

What happened???

As an aside to brain dead Bashit Troll.. You asked me to post my source, I posted my source..

It's not my fault you are too much of a brain dead Democrat to do your own research...

This is exactly why I rarely engage with you.. You are simply too moronic and stoopid and retreaded to compete..

:eyeroll:

THIS INFORMATION COMES FROM THE OREGONIAN

I had to put this in emphasis because a brain dead moron here in Weigantia obviously can't read plain english... :eyeroll:

3rd world shit hole Portland, Oregon, once celebrated for its vibrant culture and progressive values, now finds itself grappling with a myriad of challenges that reflect a failure by brain dead Democrats to adequately care for its citizens. The city’s post-pandemic recovery has been completely sluggish and incompetent, revealing deep-seated issues that have only worsened over the past five years. As the city struggles to regain its footing, it becomes increasingly clear that the local government has neglected the very people it is meant to serve.

Brain dead Democrats incapable of competent governance.. It's the same story over and over again..

The pandemic exposed and exacerbated existing problems, such as rising homelessness, rampant crime, and total economic stagnation. While other cities have rebounded and are flourishing, Portland has lagged behind, with many storefronts remaining empty and pedestrian traffic significantly reduced. The once-thriving downtown area has become a shadow of its former self, with a staggering 36% drop in foot traffic compared to pre-pandemic levels. This decline is not merely a consequence of the pandemic; it is indicative of a broader failure by brain dead Democrats to address the needs of the community.

Moreover, the city’s completely inadequate response to the challenges it faces has been lackluster and totally devoid of ANY effectiveness whatsoever. While there have been some efforts to revitalize the area, such as the renovation of the Portland International Airport and plans for new public markets, these initiatives are completely failing to counteract the pervasive sense of neglect. The city has failed to implement effective strategies to combat homelessness and rampant crime, leaving many residents feeling unsafe, unsupported and totally without ANY semblance of effective governance.

The hypocrisy of Portland’s brain dead Democrat leadership is particularly glaring. While the city touts its progressive values and commitment to social justice, it has allowed the very fabric of its community to fray. The focus on high-profile projects and initiatives often overshadows the urgent need for basic services and support for vulnerable populations. This disconnect between rhetoric and reality has led to a growing disillusionment among residents, many of whom have chosen to leave the city in search of better opportunities and living conditions.

So, children.. What have we learned???

Portland’s struggles serve as a stark reminder of the consequences of brain dead Democrats neglecting the needs of citizens. The brain dead Democrat city’s failure to address homelessness, rampant crime, and economic stagnation reflects a broader systemic issue that must be confronted. If Portland is to reclaim its status as a vibrant and welcoming city, it must prioritize the well-being of its residents and take meaningful action to address the challenges they face. Only then can it hope to emerge from the shadows of its pandemic-era wounds and build a brighter future for all.

And THIS comes from a major Oregon newspaper THE OREGONIAN....

Cubans, farmers, vintners, whiskey makers and now that spring is here we will see how bad it's going to be for the construction industry. The leopards will be looking like Jabba the Hut after all the faces they will be feasting on...

Do you? Oh, that's right your too chicken to post links to what you post...

Maybe you should apply your slurs to yourself.

ALWAYS a fun game to play... :D

I think abortion, climate change and legalizing weed will get ‘em out to the polls. Again, has anybody heard of any ANY demographic moving Trump’s way? Where is he going to get the votes?
-Dishonorably Discharged Druggie Child Rapist

Where is PRESIDENT Trump going to get the votes??

From black Americans.. From Hispanic Americans. From women of ALL races... From former Democrats.. From the youths of America... From the seniors of America...

Pretty much EVERY DEMOGRAPHIC increased their votes for PRESIDENT Trump!! :D

Now... Tell me honestly... Don't you feel like the COMPLETE and UTTER idjut you are?? :D

I agree. But when was the last time ANY of these critically-important topics was mentioned in a talking point? Sadly, it seems to me that CW has been infected with "Trump derangement syndrome" and is unable to focus on anything else.
-italyrusty

Well, no shit sherlock... I have been telling you people that since Jun of 2015...

2025 Weigantia is ALL TRUMP/AMERICA HATE... ALL PTDS.... ALL THE TIME...

:eyeroll:

Au contraire, this will make an OVERWHELMING difference politically when Donold starts getting sentenced. Coming soon — and I’m glad I’m notJudge Marchan right about now.
-Dishonorably Discharged Druggie Child Rapist

How did that "sentencing" work out for ya, Druggie?? :D

hahahahahahahahahahahahahaha

For showing other Democrats what they all should be doing right about now, Bernie and A.O.C. are easily the winners of this week's Most Impressive Democrat Of The Week award. To be fair, there are a few other Democrats out there fighting as well, but Bernie and A.O.C. seem to be leading the pack right now.

You DO realize that Democrats have already passed judgement on Bernie Sanders' and Occasional Cortex's style of government, right??

There ain't NO WAY that this country will elect a brain dead woke progressive bartender as POTUS...

What IS it about brain dead woke progressive Democrats that they insist on trying the same thing over and over again and hoping for a different result..

:eyeroll:

The environmentalist Democrat... :D

The recent actions of environmentalist Democrats reveal a staggering hypocrisy that undermines the very principles of environmentalism they claim to champion.

As climate activists engage in violent protests against Tesla vehicles, they are not only betraying their supposed commitment to sustainability but also engaging in acts that are detrimental to the environment itself. This "orgy of liberal cannibalism" (credit to Chadwick Moore) showcases a troubling trend where the left eats its own, prioritizing ideological purity over genuine and rational environmental stewardship.

In a shocking display of hypocrisy, while these activists attack Tesla —once heralded as a beacon of green technology— they simultaneously support projects that devastate the environment. For instance, the Brazilian city of Belém is paving over vast areas of protected rainforest to accommodate climate activists attending the COP30 climate summit. This destruction contradicts the very essence of environmentalism, which seeks to protect such vital ecosystems. Similarly, in the UK, plans to bulldoze pristine countryside for solar farms highlight a disturbing trend where the pursuit of renewable energy comes at the expense of existing natural habitats.

And in an even MORE shocking display of hypocrisy, California Democrats are pushing to mine lithium in Death Valley National Park, home to endangered species, to support electric vehicle mandates. This reckless disregard for biodiversity in the name of green energy is a clear indication that the environmentalist agenda has become more about political posturing and virtue signaling than actual ecological preservation.

The hypocrisy extends to the rhetoric surrounding these actions. Celebrating the vandalism of Tesla vehicles, as seen in the reactions from public figures, reveals a troubling acceptance of terrorism and violence as a means to an end. This is not the behavior of true environmentalists; it is a betrayal of the movement's core values.

So, children. What have you learned??

The actions of environmentalist Democrats illustrate a profound and disturbing disconnect between their virtue-signaling rhetoric and the actual OBJECTIVE REALITY.

By engaging in terroristic behavior and supporting environmentally harmful projects, they undermine the very cause they claim to champion. It is time for a reevaluation of what true environmentalism means, free from the blatant and obvious hypocrisy that currently plagues the movement.

SILENCE GIVES ASSENT...….

This information comes from HuffPoop*

I applaud the actions of Paul Weiss Law Firm in agreeing to impose pro-America guidelines in its operations, particularly in the face of significant pressure from the PRESIDENT Trump administration. This decision reflects a crucial moment in the ongoing struggle between the principles of democracy and the encroachment of autocratic governance. By choosing to align with pro-American values, Paul Weiss is taking a stand that prioritizes the interests of the nation over partisan politics.

The firm’s history of championing civil rights and social justice is commendable, and it is heartening to see it navigate such a challenging landscape. However, their willingness to adapt and impose guidelines that resonate with the current administration’s focus on accountability and transparency is a necessary step in preserving the integrity of their operations. In a time when many institutions are bending to the will of political pressures, Paul Weiss’s actions signal a commitment to uphold the values that define America.

The decision to provide $40 million in pro bono services to the administration, while controversial, can be viewed as an opportunity for the firm to engage constructively with the government. This engagement can foster dialogue and collaboration that may ultimately benefit the broader community. By aligning with pro-America guidelines, Paul Weiss is not only protecting its interests but also reinforcing the importance of civic responsibility in the legal profession.

Moreover, the firm’s actions serve as a reminder that the legal community has a vital role to play in shaping the future of our democracy. By standing firm in their commitment to the rule of law and the principles of justice, Paul Weiss can help counteract the divisive narratives that threaten to undermine our democratic institutions.

So, children... Let's recap...

While the path forward may be fraught with challenges, Paul Weiss’s decision to impose pro-America guidelines is a commendable step toward ensuring that the legal profession remains a pillar of democracy. It is a call to action for other institutions to prioritize the common good over individual interests, reinforcing the notion that true leadership requires courage and a commitment to the values that unite us as a nation.

Congrats to the Paul Weiss Law Firm for it's steadfast commitment to the American dream!

* You see, people?? THAT is how you expand your reading repertoire to get at REAL and ACTUAL facts!!! Your brains have been rotted by reading NOTHING but propaganda... It's no wonder ya'all are so brain-dead... :eyeroll:

But it's a crisis caused by progressives in our government who are trying to protect the administrative state that holds no allegiance to the American voters...

The emergence of an administrative state that operates above politics and democracy poses significant dangers to the very fabric of American governance. This situation has escalated to a point where the federal judiciary appears to be engaging in a judicial coup d'état, undermining the authority of the ELECTED Executive Branch. The recent flurry of injunctions and restraining orders against the PRESIDENT Trump administration highlights this alarming trend, as unelected judges assert control over critical policy areas such as immigration, military enlistment, and foreign aid.

The sheer volume of judicial interventions against PRESIDENT Trump —more in a single month than during Biden's entire four-year term— illustrates a troubling shift in power dynamics. These actions are not merely legal decisions; they represent an attempt to usurp the President's constitutional authority and maintain the status quo of the administrative state, an unelected bureaucracy that has long operated with little or no accountability. This administrative state, often aligned with progressive ideologies, has effectively supplanted the political branches of government, rendering elections and the will of the people largely irrelevant.

Historically, the roots of this administrative state can be traced back to the New Deal and the progressive era, where figures like Woodrow Wilson advocated for a separation of governance from public opinion. Wilson's vision of a neutral, expert-driven bureaucracy was intended to insulate government from the perceived inefficiencies of democratic processes. However, this separation has led to a system where policy decisions are made by bureaucrats who are not accountable to voters, creating a disconnect between the government and the governed.

The implications of this administrative state are profound. When political questions, such as immigration policy, are delegated to unelected bureaucrats, the electorate loses its voice. The bureaucracy operates under its own agenda, often ignoring the mandates of elected officials. This has been starkly illustrated by the immigration system, where the failure of Congress to address the issue has allowed bureaucrats to implement policies that contradict the expressed will of the people.

The judiciary's role in this dynamic cannot be overstated. By issuing injunctions that protect the administrative state from presidential authority, judges are not merely interpreting the law; they are actively participating in a political struggle. This has been exacerbated by a lack of checks from the Supreme Court, which has allowed lower court judges to operate with impunity. The result is a judiciary that is increasingly seen as a partisan actor rather than a neutral arbiter of justice.

As PRESIDENT Trump attempts to reclaim control of the Executive Branch, he faces formidable resistance from both the judiciary and the entrenched bureaucracy. This struggle is not just about one administration; it is a critical battle for the future of American democracy. If the administrative state continues to operate above politics, it will undermine the principles of republican governance that the Founding Fathers envisioned.

The dangers of an unaccountable administrative state are clear: it erodes public trust, diminishes the role of elected representatives, and ultimately threatens the very essence of democracy. For the sake of restoring the balance of power and ensuring that the voice of the people is heard, it is imperative that this fight against the administrative state is won. Only then can we hope to reestablish a government that is truly accountable to its citizens, where public opinion and the consent of the governed are paramount.

^^^^^^ THIS is the kind of commentaries we USED to have here in Weigantia circa 2010...

It's sad that we don't see the likes of these kinds of commentaries anymore..

These days it's all TRUMP/AMERICA hate and all PTDS all the time..

"..tis sad, tis true... tis true, tis sad..."

I know, I know... But in my defense, there are SOO MANY facts out there that prove again and again how brain dead the Democrat Party really is..

Give this, I have taken it upon myself to bring REALITY back to this former "reality based" forum...

Sue me...

The current state of the Democrat Party is alarming, and many are beginning to question whether it can survive in its current form.

As Charlamagne tha God aptly pointed out, the party is in disarray, lacking leadership and a coherent message. With only 21% of voters approving of Democrats in Congress...

Get that!!??? ***TEWNTY ONE PERCENT*** approval rating for Congressional Democrats!!!

…. the party is facing an unprecedented crisis. This decline can largely be attributed to the overwhelming focus on Trump/America hate and PTDS rather than addressing the pressing issues that affect everyday Americans.

For years, the Democrat Party prided itself on being the champion of the working class, the disenfranchised, and the voiceless. However, this mission has been overshadowed by President Trump Derangement Syndrome (PTDS). Instead of engaging in meaningful discussions about rising costs of living, public safety, and education, brain dead woke progressive Democrat leaders have redirected their energy toward attacking PRESIDENT Trump’s administration and committing domestic terrorism against Elon Musk and TESLA. This has resulted in a COMPLETE abandonment of the bread-and-butter issues that once defined the party.

The far-left wing of the party has further complicated matters, pushing “woke” initiatives that alienate traditional liberals who believe in pragmatic solutions. Many old-school liberals are left wondering what happened to the party they once supported, and they now see PRESIDENT Trump as the catalyst for change in this country. The brain dead woke progressive Democrat Party’s current platform seems to revolve solely around “We hate Trump” which is not a sustainable or appealing message for voters. But it's the ONLY message this current brain dead Democrat Party has.. :eyeroll:

As PRESIDENT Trump continues to deliver on his promises and achieve significant milestones, the brain dead Democrats risk being left in the wilderness. The party’s fixation on hate and bigotry and intolerance rather than constructive policy is a death sentence for brain dead Democrat Party that has no future.

If the Democrats do not pivot back to addressing the real concerns of their constituents (which everyone knows brain dead Democrats CANNOT do) they may find themselves in a position from which the Democrat Party will never recover. The implosion of the Democratic Party, fueled by its obsession with PRESIDENT Trump, could mark the end of an era for a once-great political institution.

The end of the Democrat Party... Ya'all KNEW this is how it was going to go...

And ya'all only have yerselves to blame..

The hypocrisy of the brain dead Democrat Party regarding judicial impeachment is glaring and cannot be overlooked. For years, brain dead Democrats have been vocal about their desire to impeach Supreme Court justices, particularly after the fall of Roe v. Wade. They have threatened one-sided impeachments of GOP-appointed justices, all while decrying any similar calls from the Right as an attack on judicial independence. This double standard and blatant hypocrisy is not only disingenuous but also undermines the integrity of our judicial system.

Take, for instance, the recent calls from Republicans to impeach Judge James Boasberg, who blocked Donald Trump’s deportation of Venezuelan migrants. The outrage from brain dead Democrats is palpable, yet it rings hollow when we consider their own history. Just last year, high-profile Democrats like Occasional Cortex and Senator Ron Wyden openly called for the impeachment of justices like Samuel Alito and Clarence Thomas.

Where was the outrage then? Chief Justice John Roberts, in a rare move, issued a statement rebuking calls for Boasberg’s impeachment, yet he remained silent when Democrats were making similar demands against his fellow justices. This selective outrage is a clear indication of the partisan game being played. And if it's all about partisan politics, then it's not ANY kind of valid pronouncement...

The brain dead Democrats’ narrative that they are the guardians of judicial integrity while simultaneously pushing for the impeachment of justices based on political disagreements is fundamentally flawed and utterly without any merit whatsoever.

It creates a dangerous precedent where the judiciary becomes a pawn in the political arena, undermining its independence. The calls for impeachment should not be weaponized for political gain, regardless of which party is making them.

Moreover, this hypocrisy fuels a cycle of retaliation that threatens to destabilize our political system. As legal scholar Josh Blackman pointed out, the current climate of outrage and calls for impeachment from both sides only exacerbates tensions.

It creates an environment where the Right feels justified in responding with their own extreme measures, leading to a tit-for-tat escalation that benefits no one.

So, children.. What have we learned??

The brain dead Democrat Party must be held accountable for their hypocrisy regarding judicial impeachment. They cannot simultaneously condemn the Right for wanting to impeach judges while having engaged in similar behavior themselves. It is time for both parties to recognize the importance of judicial independence and to refrain from using impeachment as a political tool. The integrity of our judicial system depends on it.

In short...

"If ya wouldn't START none, there wouldn't BE none!!"
-Will Smith

:eyeroll:

It's no wonder ya'all have such a frak'ed brain dead viewpoint!!!

:eyeroll:

And you may know that this is leading to cries of "I didn't think the leopard would eat MY face!!!"

'Several Venezuelan organizations gathered at restaurant El Arepazo in Doral to address their concerns and send a message to Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem: "We are not criminals."'
https://www.cbsnews.com/miami/news/venezuelans-in-south-florida-outraged-after-protected-status-for-thousands-revoked/

Yet all of ya'all went hysterical about impeaching SCOTUS judges when they got rid of Roe v Wade..

Which simply prove the hypocrisy... AGAIN..

Ya'all LOVE pushing to impeach judges..

As long as it's the RIGHT judges...

As per ya'all's norm... Ya'all accuse the GOP of what you and your brain dead Democrats are guilty of..

Hypocrisy. It's not a bug in Democrat programming.. It's a feature...

And, once again, you give every else who uses similar terms against people who simply disagree with them politically a pass..

That's why I don't put much stock in it..

Like the Trump Hate, Like the Bezos Hate, like the Elon hate...

It's ALL nothing but political bigotry..

How do we know this??

We know this because before they became what they are today, ya'all LOVED Trump... LOVED Bezos... LOVED Elon...

These facts are well documented...

quite the opposite. it's annoying because it's false, and you know it's false.

It is not false no matter how any times you claim it is...

The entirety of the brain dead Democrat Party has built an entire cottage industry around SILENCE IS XXXXXX....

Silence is assent...

Silence is violence...

etc etc etc..

If I thought there was a snowball's chance in hell of you actually accepting the facts, I would list ALL of the instances of Democrats using the concept of SILENCE IS xxxxxx…

But you are so ingrained in your TRUMP/AMERICA hate and PTDS, there is simply no way you would accept the facts..

So, I don't even bother..

But make no mistake.. Democrats had built an entire cottage industry of claiming that SILENCE means a lot of different things when, more often than not, silence simply doesn't mean anything..

I disagree he would have won 2016. I view Bernie as the lefts Ron Paul. Hyper popular online but not so much in the real world. Like Ron Paul he is so dedicated to his principles that he has really not got much done in his long congressional career. Also, he never really got ahead of his self-described democratic socialist label. The problem I see is he would not have run against Trump but against every derogatory thing Ronald Reagan ever said about socialists to which there is quite the plethora...

Restoring these rates will also vastly reduce the motivation for shaky financial ventures like CDOs and 2007, remember?

We’ll never know if proposing a $15USD Minimum Wage or legalizing weed would have killed Kamala. But we do know it would have killed the Democratic donor class. It wasn’t the messaging STYLE so much that hurt Democrats it was the SUBSTANCE of their messaging.

There’s no way to undo the forty some years of damage done to The American Dream by Reaganism than to completely undo all the #NoMillionaireLeftBehind tax cuts.

I agree on Bernie. When I moved to the PNW and had to re-register to vote I decided to go independent because of both Bernie and Trump in 2016. Both tried to waltz in and take over the party without putting in the work. One succeeded, the other put in a good try but in the end it seemed to me what is the point of political parties if they can be derailed and taken over so easily?

He used to be able to come up with much more coherent arguments that were backed up by links and a semblance of research. As well as considerably fewer slurs and a wider variety of logical fallacies...

Though to both the name calling and the new condescending rhetorical flourishes, I just find hilarious. By doing so, Michale demonstrates how much of a clown he has become. Does anyone actually take it seriously? The rabid foaming at the mouth name calling is like a bad tempered toddler that wants a toy...

You have descended into a hateful clown, just like Trump...

Cho’mo must have been interesting back in the day for you to stick with him this long. I got here five years ago and found him and Don Harris to be the whacko troll twins, as neither engaged in good faith.

Dear Leader is a dick and that seems to have encouraged cho’mo to act likewise. With the maturity of a Middle School bully. That’s why I scroll.

He IS retarded so I am simply stating a fact...

no, mental retardation (or as I think they call it now, cognitive delay), is a neurological condition experienced by a very vulnerable population. using that term to describe someone who disagrees with you politically is very disappointing. you are not off the hook for breaking your promise, no matter how foolish you think someone is.

JL

quite the opposite. it's annoying because it's false, and you know it's false.

But he doesn't. He says he's an Independent, and he calls himself a Democratic Socialist. Sure, he caucuses with the Senate Democrats because what else could he do in the context of Senate operations, but he himself is not a 'Democrat' in the sense that the MIDTOW award intends.

Sorry, but just change that.

On the other hand, I appreciate the rant about Social Security. Just tonight, my wife was expressing her understanding, as she put it, of what Trump and Musk were trying to do in terms of reducing federal bureaucratic inefficiencies, even as she deflects that she doesn't care for Trump or Musk in terms of their style. "But just don't touch Social Security", she concluded. Hmmm... I didn't dare to break her heart, but she's going to hear the news sooner or later.

The anguish and mental stress Democrats inflict on these poor girls is simply heartbreaking... But brain dead Democrats don't care...

The experiences of young girls like Cassidy Carlisle highlight the profound hurt and anguish that can arise from policies allowing biological males to compete in women's sports. For many girls, sports are not just a pastime; they are a vital part of their identity, a source of empowerment, and a space where they can build confidence and camaraderie. However, when these girls are forced to share locker rooms and compete against biological males, it can lead to feelings of vulnerability, confusion, and defeat.

Cassidy's story is a poignant example of this struggle. At just 12 years old, she found herself in a locker room with a male student, an experience that left her feeling uncomfortable and uncertain. The pressure to conform to school policies, which prioritized inclusivity over the feelings of young girls, made her feel trapped. She recalls being told that avoiding the situation could result in being late to class, a clear indication that her discomfort was secondary to the administration's brain dead Democrat agenda. This moment marked the beginning of her realization that something was fundamentally wrong, yet she felt powerless to voice her concerns.

As she progressed through her athletic career, the impact of these policies became even more pronounced. When she learned that she would be competing against a male athlete in Nordic skiing, the emotional toll was overwhelming. The defeat she felt upon realizing she would face someone with physical advantages was heartbreaking. It was not just about losing a race; it was about the loss of a fair playing field, the very essence of competition that sports are built upon. The shock of this reality left her grappling with feelings of inadequacy and frustration.

Moreover, the societal pressure to remain silent about these experiences only exacerbated her anguish. As a high school student, Cassidy was acutely aware of the potential backlash she could face for speaking out. The fear of being ridiculed or ostracized for expressing her concerns about fairness in sports created a chilling effect, silencing many young girls who might otherwise share their stories. This silence is a heavy burden to bear, as it prevents them from advocating for their rights and the integrity of their sports.

The emotional impact of these policies extends beyond the individual experiences of athletes like Cassidy. It reflects a broader societal issue where the voices of young girls are often overshadowed by political agendas. The inclusion of transgender athletes in women's sports, while rooted in a desire for equality, can inadvertently marginalize the very individuals it aims to support. The anguish felt by these girls is a reminder that policies must consider the diverse perspectives and experiences of all athletes.

As Cassidy took her concerns to the public, participating in protests and speaking out against the policies that hurt her and her peers, she became a beacon of hope for many. Her courage to stand up for what she believes in is commendable, but it also underscores the urgent need for a dialogue that prioritizes the voices of young female athletes. The conversation surrounding transgender inclusion in sports must evolve to ensure that the rights and feelings of all athletes are respected and valued.

So, children.. Let's recap...

The hurt and anguish experienced by young girls like Cassidy Carlisle due to policies allowing male athletes to compete in women's sports cannot be overlooked. Their stories deserve to be heard, and their experiences must inform the ongoing discussions about fairness, inclusion, and the future of women's sports. It is essential to create an environment where all athletes can thrive, free from the fear of losing their opportunities and identities in the pursuit of equality.

But brain dead Democrats are more interested in pushing the agenda then in the feelings and safety of young girls..

When are we going to see some commentary about the dismal state of the brain dead Democrat Party??

The current state of the brain dead Democrat Party is alarming, as evidenced by recent polling data that reveals a significant decline in public favorability. With only 27% of registered voters viewing the party positively, the brain dead Democrats find themselves at their lowest approval ratings since 1990. This decline is not merely a statistical anomaly; it reflects a deeper crisis within the party, one that is characterized by an overwhelming focus on opposing PRESIDENT Trump rather than presenting a coherent and positive policy agenda.

Senator Chris Murphy's candid admission that the brain dead Democrat Party is ONLY concerned with obstructing the GOP agenda underscores this troubling reality. Instead of seeking common ground or compromise, many within the party seem more interested in fighting against PRESIDENT Trump and his supporters. This approach, as indicated by recent polls, is not resonating with the American voters. A significant portion of Democrat voters prefers to maintain their positions even if it leads to legislative gridlock, suggesting a willingness to prioritize opposition over progress.

The implications of this mindset are profound. The brain dead Democrat Party appears to be losing its identity, becoming a vessel for anti PRESIDENT Trump sentiment rather than a champion of progressive values. This is reminiscent of the Whig Party's demise, which ultimately became irrelevant as it failed to adapt to the changing political landscape. If the Democrats continue down this path, they risk becoming a historical footnote, remembered only for their inability to connect with the American public.

Moreover, the brain dead Democrat Party leadership appears to be out of touch with the values and aspirations of a majority of voters. Polls indicate that figures like Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, Kamala Harris, and Bernie Sanders—who represent a more radical leftist agenda—are seen as the best representatives of the party. This is concerning, as it suggests that the brain dead Democrat Party is moving further away from the center, alienating moderate voters who may be crucial for electoral success.

As the Republican Party rallies around PRESIDENT Trump and his agenda, enjoying rising approval ratings and a sense of unity, the brain dead Democrats are floundering. The lack of a positive vision or constructive leadership is evident, and without a significant shift in strategy, the party's future looks bleak. The brain dead Democrat Party must urgently reassess its priorities and seek to articulate a compelling agenda that resonates with the American people. Otherwise, it risks fading into obscurity, much like the Whigs before them. The time for introspection and self-reflection is now, or the party will find itself permanently sidelined in the political arena.

That is the state of ya'all's Democrat Party in the here and now..

And you people only have yerselves to blame...

This latest ruling to ban DOGE from reviewing Social Security information to find fraud is nonsense. The government can and should review all its data for possible fraud — this is not a search warrant — this is data in its possession that modern data analysis can analyze effectively. And the department routinely hires consultants who have access to this information. Rather than demanding privacy safeguards, which might have made sense, the judge barred all review of social security data to hunt down fraud. It’s time for Roberts to step in here and put some guardrails on what these lone judges can do as they are routinely exercising vast powers far in excess of what is reasonable.
-Democrat Advisor Mark Penn

Justice Roberts is setting up the courts to fail...

The LAW and the US Constitution and even some DEMOCRATS are all on PRESIDENT Trump's side...

The recent decision by Maine universities to comply with the PRESIDENT Trump administration's demands regarding transgender athletes in women's sports marks a significant shift in the ongoing debate over gender identity and athletic competition. This move, supported by Governor Janet Mills, reflects a broader trend of political pressure influencing educational institutions, particularly in the realm of sports.

The University of Maine System's announcement that it would adhere to Title IX regulations by restricting women's sports to biological females is a response to an executive order from PRESIDENT Trump. This order has reignited discussions about the fairness of allowing transgender women—individuals assigned male at birth—to compete in women's sports. The administration's stance, as articulated by PRESIDENT Trump on Truth Social, emphasizes the need for a clear and unequivocal apology from Governor Mills for her previous comments on the matter, further illustrating the political stakes involved.

The pressure exerted by the federal government, including the threat of losing federal funding, has forced Maine's universities to prioritize compliance over Democrat faux science.

This is one of those 80/20 issues that brain dead Democrats are on the 20% side of the issue...

It's only fair that we revisit MY comments before the election.. :D

Of course.. I am not saying that 2024 is going to be exactly the same as 1980, vote for vote..

What I AM saying is that it's not going to be a razor thin win for President Trump. It's going to be a blow-out win for President Trump where it's going to be indisputable and it won't drag out for days or weeks, but rather we should know by this time tomorrow, if not sooner..

BANG ON!!! DEAD ON BALLZ ACCURATE!!! :D

There was simply NO WAY that Headboard Harris could have won..

SIMPLY.... NO..... WAY....

All of ya'all that thought Headboard Harris actually had a shot at winning??

You were delusional...

"These are the facts of the case. And they are undisputed.."
-Captain Smilin' Jack Ross, A FEW GOOD MEN

Well, I have to give you SOME credit, Cad..

You WERE right about it not even being close!!! :D

I have to also give you credit for actually showing up and taking your well-deserved lumps....

So, there is that.. :D

Ad hominems of many flavors. Pathetic. Listing the BBC as a left wing rag takes what shred of credibility you pretend to have and tosses that sucker right out the window.

Extremely hypocritical considering you hide behind your sources.

What are you afraid of?

IOWA is in play!!???

BBBBBWWWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

Did you ACTUALLY post that, Cad!!???

You **ACTUALLY** thought that Iowa was in play!!???

BBBBWWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

How utterly MORONIC can you be!!???

Early voting shows women outvoting men 55% - 45% even though Repugs are pushing early voting. Young voters coming out in droves. Does anyone believe they’re coming out to vote Republican?
-Dishonorably Discharged Druggie Child Rapist

Uh.. yes.. That is EXACTLY what they were doing!! They were coming out to vote for PRESIDENT Trump!!! :D

How can you be so UTTERLY WRONG about everything, Cad??

:D