Yes, you moved the goalposts considerably. You made the statement, and I quote:

But I'll let you in on a little known (at least in Weigantia) fact.. President Trump is going to win the popular vote. By a considerably margin..

~ Michale

To which I replied, and I quote again:

I'll seriously bet you a million dollars Trump does not win the popular vote by a "considerably margin."

~ Kick

You have an immoral imperative whereas you simply cannot admit when you are wrong.

You think you know me. *laughs*

To accomplish this you have a nasty habit of stating your claims whereas they are intentionally ambiguous, obtuse and equivocal and open to whatever interpretation serves your America Hate agenda.

There was nothing ambiguous about my statement, and I don't have an "America Hate" agenda. My claims are usually very unambiguous and only open to interpretation by people who have no concept of what simple words actually mean.

I am simply not going to allow you to get away with it this time.

Your confusion regarding simple word meanings is entirely under your control yet not entirely unexpected. If you're having trouble keeping up, I suggest you procure a dictionary.

I am going to demand that you state with complete clarity and unambiguously what exactly you are betting the million dollars on..

Since you are as admittedly confused as per your usual state of being, I have already posted the quote above. If any of those words are at all unclear to you, open that dictionary I suggested you procure and make good use of it.

Are you betting a million dollars that President Trump WILL win the Popular Vote, just not by a "considerable margin"??

I see you are confused as well as hysterical.

Or, are you betting a million dollars that President Trump won't win the Popular Vote at all??

You made the statement that Trump would win the popular vote by a "considerably margin," and I bet you a million that what you claimed would not happen. Then you attempted to amend the laughable claim by amending it to remove a word, proving beyond doubt that:

(1) You lack the courage of your convictions, and

(2) You are fully cognizant your claim is unadulterated bullshit.

Which is it?? Put up or shut up, baby... :D I really could use that million dollars.. :D

State the obvious; obtaining a good education can be expensive, and you are demonstrably in desperate need.

And, anticipating your equivocal, obtuse and ambiguous response, I won't NEED the million, depending on what you are actually betting.. :D

Oh, no. You definitely need the million. You actually can fix stupid, but it'll cost you considerable time and money.

So, you do acknowledge that President Trump could win the election..

~ Michale

*

There is only one person on this forum who has ever denied that a presidential candidate could win the election, and it's actually you.

That's not what I asked you, now is it..

Let's start your education now. You made a factual statement that I acknowledged something (something I've acknowledged previously). If that was meant to be a question, a person with even a smidgen of a brain/education would have followed it with a question mark (?) versus the period period (..) with which you punctuated it. You will note you punctuated your question I quoted directly above this comment in the same ignorant fashion.

What part of "along the lines of" is not clear to you, honey?? :D

I would ask what part of science and math is not clear to you, but I already know the answer. Nice use of the question mark, though; repetitive yet correct, and don't call me "honey."

It wasn't unclear. I'm telling you this ain't 1980, and science and math -- preexisting data and addition -- already precludes your prediction. That isn't possible in 2024... not even "along the lines of." No way. No how.

Why not quote MSNBC?? It would have as much credibility... :D

I quoted nothing. I posted a URL to support my claim... you should try it.

Don’t hold your breath when Kamala wins. Cho’mo does not pay as agreed.

As to the wager, yer on. And if I win, you donate $50 to CW...

Why??

Because of bonehead interviews like the one Harris gave to a muslim influencer..

HE wanted to talk about Gaza.. SHE went on and on about bacon.

BACON!!!??? A food that muslims cannot eat..

Harris campaign tells Muslim interviewer he can't ask about Gaza, she talks up bacon instead: 'Taken aback'

The Muslim influencer was reportedly told the Israel-Gaza war was off-limits in the interview

The interview was SO bad and SO utterly damning for Harris that the influencer just shit-canned the whole interview...

Kamala Harris’ interview with a Muslim social media influencer was never released after the vice president avoided discussing Gaza but surprisingly praised bacon—a food strictly prohibited in Islam.

Kareem Rahma, the host of the widely followed “Subway Takes” series on Instagram and TikTok, decided not to air his conversation with Harris, which was recorded over the summer, according to his comments to the New York Times.

Before the interview, Rahma intended to challenge Harris on her administration’s stance on Israel, particularly in light of the ongoing conflict in Gaza—a position he strongly opposes, as reported by the Times. However, despite multiple requests to address this topic during discussions with her team and the Democratic National Committee, he was denied.

Instead, Harris’ team agreed she would share a “hot take” on people removing their shoes on airplanes. The format of Rahma’s show involves guests, including notable figures, defending an unconventional opinion.

During the interview, however, Harris veered off-topic, declaring, “bacon is a spice.” This was an unexpected remark, especially since Rahma, like many practicing Muslims, avoids pork due to religious beliefs.

Simply another FACT that proves Harris is unelectable...

Journalist Mark Halperin says early voting numbers bad for Democrats..

With early voting turnout breaking records in key battleground states, a large number of Republican voters are showing up, potentially paving the way for a win by former President Donald Trump, according to veteran political journalist Mark Halperin.

Speaking on Tuesday's episode of the Morning Meeting podcast, Halperin discussed reports suggesting Republicans are outperforming Democrats in early voting, particularly in battleground states like Nevada and North Carolina.

"If the early vote numbers stay the way they are—and that's a big if—we'll almost certainly know before Election Day who's going to win," Halperin said.

"Make no mistake, if these numbers hold up in the states where we can partially understand the data, we'll know Donald Trump is going to win on Election Day," he added.

Ya'all see the facts???

Harris/Walz simply has NO PATH to victory...

Black Lives Matter activist to vote for Donald Trump: 'I definitely would not be supporting Kamala Harris'

'For so long, we've just been blindly loyal to the Democrat Party – for no reason,' Mark Fisher, co-founder of Black Lives Matter Rhode Island, said

A Black Lives Matter activist on the eve of Election Day slammed Vice President Kamala Harris and said that he plans to vote for former President Trump.

"Kamala Harris would use anything to her advantage. I definitely would not be supporting Kamala Harris. If she ever got anywhere close to power, it would be a disaster for this country," said co-founder of Black Lives Matter [BLM] Rhode Island Mark Fisher in an interview with The New York Post published on Monday.

Fisher explained further to the New York Post that historically, the Democratic Party has been the party Black people overwhelmingly voted for, yet, never "got anything in return." He also cited "abysmal" poverty and crime and a "failing" education system in Black communities.

The "lifelong Democrat" voted for President Biden in 2020, a decision he "regrets."

A small segment of those millions and millions of black American voters that swung their allegiance to President Trump. :D

Only 40% of black Americans approve of Biden, Harris and their policies..

One of those other pesky inconvenient facts that PROVES that Harris simply CANNOT win...

http://mfccfl.us/SwingStates.jpg

:D

And remind the few..
When ill of us they speak...
That we are all that stands between...
The monsters and the weak...
https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/13839e8d10b9303c8d9aee50576e15b15f4844be91d15073a21097a85b780c50.jpg

in 1980 I was 5 years old. there are about a million differences between that election and this one.

Of course.. I am not saying that 2024 is going to be exactly the same as 1980, vote for vote..

While history seldom repeats itself... History has been known to, on MANY occasions, rhyme.

What I AM saying is that it's not going to be a razor thin win for President Trump. It's going to be a blow-out win for President Trump where it's going to be indisputable and it won't drag out for days or weeks, but rather we should know by this time tomorrow, if not sooner..

if Donald wins, i can practically guarantee it won't be with more than 290 electoral votes. in the extremely unlikely event that Donald completely sweeps the swing states, he'll get 312. that's his ceiling, because that's how divided our country is.

Once again, in 1980, pollsters made the same predictions.. Once again, those 1980 pollsters were WAY wrong..

Harris had just a bit over 100 days to enter the race, establish herself and generate a real campaign platform..

And she only accomplished ONE of those things..

if Kamala wins, she could realistically get 302. if we're going to be unrealistic and presume a best case scenario for her,

When one takes into account all the boneheaded moves she made....

ZERO Press Conferences..
NOT totally divorcing herself from Biden and his policies, which Americans by the tens of millions, hate...
Picking NO BALLZ WALZ!!???
Weak, softball interviews (sans a SINGLE interview on FoxNews) that she TOTALLY miffed..

Plus HUNDREDS and HUNDREDS of other mistakes...

There is simply NO scenario where Harris wins that could be, in it's wildest dreamz, "realistic"..

You are doing what everyone else here in Weigantia is doing...

Cherry picking the facts that support your hopes while ignoring the PLETHORA of facts that would PROVE to you that it's going to be a blow-out win for President Trump, just like it was a blow-out win for St Ronald Reagan

the ceiling would be 319, or 325 if we're going to be insane and throw in Iowa.

Well, we DO agree on this. Caddy's claim of Harris taking Iowa is COMPLETELY insane and is only possible in the diseased mind of a suffer'er of an acute case of PTDS AKA Trump/America Hate Syndrome (T/AHS)

my current prediction is 281-257, with PA as the linchpin.

We agree that President Trump is going to win..

That's all that is important.. :D

For the next week or two, CW is going to be commentating on all the facts as to why Harris and Walz lost the race..

There will be oodles and oodles of facts and data that CW will cite as to why Harris/Walz lost...

The funny thing will be that all of the facts and data that CW is going to cite will be the exact same facts and data that I have been putting out there since Biden fulfilled my "BIDEN WON'T EVEN FINISH THE RACE!!!" prediction..

I can picture it now..

"Here is the reason why Harris lost.. Blaaahh Blaaahhhh Blaahhh.."
-CW

"Yea, I pointed out those facts a month ago..."
-Michale

"And here are some more facts and data points that shows why Harris/Walz lost..."
-CW

"Yea... I mentioned that a few months back.. :D"
-Michale

It's going to be a lot of fun for me to have all the facts that I have been pointing out for the last few months being confirmed by the VERY Democrats who refused to even CONSIDER these facts as they were occurring. :D

OK.. Now I really gotz to get to bed..

Ni Ni all.. :D

YA'ALL claimed that Biden was completely competent and not only would he WIN the election, but he would ALSO be fine for another 4 years..

*I* said that Biden was too old and senile and wouldn't even FINISH the election..

Given the FACT that ya'all were completely and utterly full of felgercarp…. The question HAS to be asked..

What makes ya'all think ya'all have *ANY* credibility in the bank??

Seems like ALL the credibility is on MY SIDE of the equation, eh?? :D

Anyways, I'll probably check in around 1400ish and then I'll be at work and unavailable to rub ya'all's noses in it til approx. 0700-0800 tomorrow.. We might hit breakfast with all the other cops to celebrate President Trump's win... So it might be later as today is my Friday.. :D

But don't worry.. Since no one has seen fit to accept my offer of truce, the gloat-machine will be in high gear tomorrow.. :D

I still have Donald up at the moment, but your completely unrealistic cheerleading is giving me hope that perhaps i'm wrong.

Many people said the same thing about Jimmy Carter and Ronald Reagan in 1980...

I was there and watched it happen.. I can tell you what happened next.. :D

Where were you??? :D

I have TWO simple questions..

Simple question where the ONLY acceptable answers are YES and NO...

I will pose the questions and then I will predict everyone's answer.. :D

#1 Will President Trump win the election?? YES or NO

#2 When President Trump wins the election, will you people accept the results?? YES OR NO

First, CW.. He has stated NO to the first question. Which is disappointing, really... CW, I love ya, man, but that is not a reality based answer.. That is an answer driven by ideology and wishcasting…

As I have pointed out with supporting FACTS, it's an impossibility that Harris/Walz can win..

CW's likely answer to the 2nd question is going to be "It depends on the election itself."

Which is funny because that is the answer President Trump and JD Vance have given and were mercilessly castigated for it..

Ironic, eh?? :D

Caddy will say "Absolutely NOT" to #1 and will likely give a similar answer as CW's to #2.. Again, the irony is very VERY thick that both CW and Caddy will give the exact same answer as President Trump.. :D

JL will likely answer "Probably" to question #1.. Even though it's not a YES/NO answer I'll take it cuz I like JL... :D JL will likely join CW and Caddy with the #2 answer.. Again, irony of ironies they are ALL sounding like President Trump..

Kick will well... kick (punt) on both questions.. It's that immoral imperative of her's that refuses to get tied down to specifics that she will have to admit she is wrong on later.. So, no answers from Kick..

Russ??? Hmmmm I am guessing he will say NO to #1 and is likely to join JL, CW and Caddy with the same "It depends on the election" answer..

JUST like President Trump's answer. :D

Dan hasn't been around enough for me to predict his answer...

And I save the favorite for last.. :D

Liz will likely say YES to #1 and join all the others for the answer to #2...

Isn't it amazing that ya'all answer the exact same as President Trump!!?? :D

Does that cover everyone??

:D

There has been quite a bit of movement in the polling this week, and almost all of it has been good news for Kamala Harris. It's looking like Donald Trump peaked about a week too early, in fact. Harris seems to have created some last-minute momentum, and last-minute momentum can decide close races like this

That's what MSNBC and WaPoop has told you, eh?? :D

Do you have any facts to support this from UN-BIASED and OBJECTIVE news sources??

No??? Of course not.. :D

A whole lot of undecided voters have been specifically citing Trump's Madison Square Garden rally as the reason they decided to vote for Harris. Trump's hate-fest reminded a lot of voters of the absolute chaos they could expect for four years if he wins, and it has turned them away from Trump.

Same question...

Any OBJECTIVE and UN-BIASED news sources saying this??

The early-voting numbers may just mean a far lower number on Election Day, rather than signifying a boost in anyone's turnout.

And early voting in ALL Swing States are favoring President Trump and Republicans... :D Forgot to add that little FACT (Note To JL :D...) in... :D

Here is ANOTHER *FACT* for ya'all.. Pay attention, JL.. :D

IN the HISTORY of the country, there has NEVER been an incumbent win the election where 35% or less of the country felt the country was heading in the right direction..

Today, only 24% of the country feel America is heading in the right direction..

It is simply IMPOSSIBLE for Harris and NO BALLZ Walz to win...

Harris' campaign slogan is A NEW WAY FORWARD...

Yet she has completely and utterly FAILED to explain to Americans exactly what this NEW WAY is??

Remember what she has stated unequivocally on THREE different occasions???

"Knowing what you know now, would you have done anything different than Joe Biden."

"NOTHING COMES TO MIND" was Harris' response..

THAT should be Harris' campaign slogan...

NOTHING COMES TO MIND

"Kamala Harris, what exactly is your NEW WAY FORWARD??"

"NOTHING COMES TO MIND"

I am guessing that for anything TO come to mind... There would actually have to BE a mind to come to, eh??

Yes, there is simply NO WAY that Harris and Walz will win the election..

It is not within the realm of possibility...

I still have Donald up at the moment, but your completely unrealistic cheerleading is giving me hope that perhaps i'm wrong.

The facts are there, which I will get to in a moment..

Ya'all just refuse to see them because they only news sites ya'all read are the likes of MSNBC, WaPoop and The View... :^/

I had a whole assessment devoted to you and what a sad pathetic hate filled bigot you really are..

But then I decided you are really not worth it.

Yer going to die alone in some gutter with a needle in your arm and no one will care one whit about your passing other than to comment how much better off society is without the likes of you..

That you think anything you wrote should be viewed as a nightmare by Democrats is what makes no sense.

You don't believe that President Trump ushering a new Technological Golden Age Renaissance for America is a Democrat nightmare???

Hmmmm.. I would like to explore this with you if you are willing... I am sincerely intrigued. :D

What you wrote was great!

Thank you, Russ.. That means a lot, I sincerely mean that.... :D

But, since something momentous is happening today, I wanted to get my comments on the record before I crashed to prepare for tonight's 12-hr night shift.. :D

Kick,

}}}OK... Let's forget the "considerable margin" part..{{{

Moving the goalposts. Typical.

Not at all..

You have an immoral imperative whereas you simply cannot admit when you are wrong. To accomplish this you have a nasty habit of stating your claims whereas they are intentionally ambiguous, obtuse and equivocal and open to whatever interpretation serves your America Hate agenda.

I am simply not going to allow you to get away with it this time. I am going to demand that you state with complete clarity and unambiguously what exactly you are betting the million dollars on..

Are you betting a million dollars that President Trump WILL win the Popular Vote, just not by a "considerable margin"??

Or, are you betting a million dollars that President Trump won't win the Popular Vote at all??

Which is it?? Put up or shut up, baby... :D I really could use that million dollars.. :D

And, anticipating your equivocal, obtuse and ambiguous response, I won't NEED the million, depending on what you are actually betting.. :D

}}}So, you do acknowledge that President Trump could win the election..{{{

There is only one person on this forum who has ever denied that a presidential candidate could win the election, and it's actually you.

That's not what I asked you, now is it..

Once again, you prove your immoral imperative... :D

}}}A HUUUGGE win along the lines of 489 EV For President Trump and a mere 42 EV for Harris..{{{

That is not mathematically possible, science denier.

ELECTION 1980

Ronald Reagan Republican 489 43,901,812
Jimmy Carter (I) Democratic 49 35,483,820

What part of "along the lines of" is not clear to you, honey?? :D

https://www.politico.com/news/2022/01/04/police-officer-lawsuits-capitol-riot-trump-526491

Politico!!!???

BBBWWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

Why not quote MSNBC?? It would have as much credibility... :D

Perhaps when all the dust settles from the election, we'll discover that Trump actually handicapped his second attempt at reelection via two October surprises of his own making just days before the elections:

* October 27, 2024 - Trumpian Hatefest, Madison Square Garden, 4 Pennsylvania Plaza, New York, NY

* October 27, 2020 - Amy Coney Barrett Swearing-In Ceremony, White House, 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Washington, DC

There’s letters sealed, and my two schoolfellows,
Whom I will trust as I will adders fanged,
They bear the mandate. They must sweep my way
And marshal me to knavery. Let it work,
For ’tis the sport to have the engineer
Hoist with his own petard. And ’t shall go hard,
But I will delve one yard below their mines,
And blow them at the moon. Oh, ’tis most sweet
When in one line two crafts directly meet.

~ William Shakespeare, Hamlet, Act 3, Scene 4

*
Hell hath no fury...