<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Speaker&#039;s Contest Is Wide Open</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.chrisweigant.com/2023/10/23/speakers-contest-is-wide-open/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2023/10/23/speakers-contest-is-wide-open/</link>
	<description>Reality-based political commentary</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 May 2026 04:47:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: nypoet22</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2023/10/23/speakers-contest-is-wide-open/#comment-204594</link>
		<dc:creator>nypoet22</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Oct 2023 17:05:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=24250#comment-204594</guid>
		<description>221, pardon</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>221, pardon</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nypoet22</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2023/10/23/speakers-contest-is-wide-open/#comment-204593</link>
		<dc:creator>nypoet22</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Oct 2023 17:04:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=24250#comment-204593</guid>
		<description>by &quot;more moderate&quot; i meant more moderate than anyone else they&#039;d put forward. clearly nobody who met that definition volunteered, but that doesn&#039;t mean the entire 217 member conference is devoid of a single reasonable voice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>by "more moderate" i meant more moderate than anyone else they'd put forward. clearly nobody who met that definition volunteered, but that doesn't mean the entire 217 member conference is devoid of a single reasonable voice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John M from Ct.</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2023/10/23/speakers-contest-is-wide-open/#comment-204585</link>
		<dc:creator>John M from Ct.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Oct 2023 18:28:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=24250#comment-204585</guid>
		<description>When we say that &quot;just two, Emmer and Scott, voted to certify Biden&#039;s election&quot;, that seems to suggest that they are somehow more &#039;moderate&#039; than the others on this list, on the question of supporting Trump&#039;s Big Lie that he actually won in 2020.

Another political commentary site, EV.com, took a slightly longer perspective on this question today:

&quot;The two clear, objective criteria for labeling someone a 2020 election denier are: (1) if they voted to reject 2020 electoral votes from one or more states, and (2) if they signed the amicus brief asking the Supreme Court to declare the 2020 results to be phony. Here&#039;s a rundown of the eight still-standing candidates, and where they stood on each matter:

&quot;Candidate      Voted to Reject? Signed Brief?

Jack Bergman (R-MI)	Yes	Yes
Byron Donalds (R-FL)	Yes	No
Tom Emmer (R-MN)	No	Yes
Kevin Hern (R-OK)	Yes	Yes
Mike Johnson (R-LA)	Yes	Yes
Gary Palmer (R-AL)	Yes	Yes
Pete Sessions (R-TX)	Yes	No
Austin Scott (R-GA)	No	Yes

&quot;In short, you have eight election deniers, including four who might be called double election deniers.&quot;

I am puzzled by nyp22&#039;s plaintive wish for a &quot;more moderate member&quot; of the Republican House who could win the Speakership with just a &quot;small contingent&quot; of Democrats voting for him or her. Who, exactly, would that be? How, in terms of numbers, would a Republican Representative get almost all the Republican votes for Speaker if it was clear he also had some support from known communist pedophile Democratic members?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When we say that "just two, Emmer and Scott, voted to certify Biden's election", that seems to suggest that they are somehow more 'moderate' than the others on this list, on the question of supporting Trump's Big Lie that he actually won in 2020.</p>
<p>Another political commentary site, EV.com, took a slightly longer perspective on this question today:</p>
<p>"The two clear, objective criteria for labeling someone a 2020 election denier are: (1) if they voted to reject 2020 electoral votes from one or more states, and (2) if they signed the amicus brief asking the Supreme Court to declare the 2020 results to be phony. Here's a rundown of the eight still-standing candidates, and where they stood on each matter:</p>
<p>"Candidate      Voted to Reject? Signed Brief?</p>
<p>Jack Bergman (R-MI)	Yes	Yes<br />
Byron Donalds (R-FL)	Yes	No<br />
Tom Emmer (R-MN)	No	Yes<br />
Kevin Hern (R-OK)	Yes	Yes<br />
Mike Johnson (R-LA)	Yes	Yes<br />
Gary Palmer (R-AL)	Yes	Yes<br />
Pete Sessions (R-TX)	Yes	No<br />
Austin Scott (R-GA)	No	Yes</p>
<p>"In short, you have eight election deniers, including four who might be called double election deniers."</p>
<p>I am puzzled by nyp22's plaintive wish for a "more moderate member" of the Republican House who could win the Speakership with just a "small contingent" of Democrats voting for him or her. Who, exactly, would that be? How, in terms of numbers, would a Republican Representative get almost all the Republican votes for Speaker if it was clear he also had some support from known communist pedophile Democratic members?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nypoet22</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2023/10/23/speakers-contest-is-wide-open/#comment-204582</link>
		<dc:creator>nypoet22</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Oct 2023 01:22:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=24250#comment-204582</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m hoping a small contingent of conservative Dems convinces the Republicans to nominate a more moderate member in exchange for their support.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I'm hoping a small contingent of conservative Dems convinces the Republicans to nominate a more moderate member in exchange for their support.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
