<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Trump Gets A Special Counsel</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.chrisweigant.com/2022/11/21/trump-gets-a-special-counsel/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2022/11/21/trump-gets-a-special-counsel/</link>
	<description>Reality-based political commentary</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2026 03:33:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: MtnCaddy</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2022/11/21/trump-gets-a-special-counsel/#comment-200933</link>
		<dc:creator>MtnCaddy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Nov 2022 01:26:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=22860#comment-200933</guid>
		<description>[17]





&lt;i&gt; Mueller found indications of possible obstruction and refer&#039;ed those to be further investigated.. The AG at the time felt those were not worthy of investigating further...&lt;/i&gt;





…AG Bill Barr aka Trump’s personal attorney? Yeah, that’s really convincing. 






Your Cheetogod cost Repugs the last three elections and if he isn’t in custody he’ll make it four in a row &lt;i&gt;Oh please please please start tweeting again, Donald!&lt;/i&gt;


America just isn’t into Facism, who’d a thunk?




And you’ll be&lt;i&gt; Trump? Never heard of him!&lt;/i&gt; which REFLECTS facts in evidence: your blindly anti-Democrat sentiments coupled with your life in a right wing parallel universe where Trump won reelection absolutely guarantees it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[17]</p>
<p><i> Mueller found indications of possible obstruction and refer'ed those to be further investigated.. The AG at the time felt those were not worthy of investigating further...</i></p>
<p>…AG Bill Barr aka Trump’s personal attorney? Yeah, that’s really convincing. </p>
<p>Your Cheetogod cost Repugs the last three elections and if he isn’t in custody he’ll make it four in a row <i>Oh please please please start tweeting again, Donald!</i></p>
<p>America just isn’t into Facism, who’d a thunk?</p>
<p>And you’ll be<i> Trump? Never heard of him!</i> which REFLECTS facts in evidence: your blindly anti-Democrat sentiments coupled with your life in a right wing parallel universe where Trump won reelection absolutely guarantees it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ListenWhenYouHear</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2022/11/21/trump-gets-a-special-counsel/#comment-200932</link>
		<dc:creator>ListenWhenYouHear</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2022 23:16:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=22860#comment-200932</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Irregardless of that fact, the simple fact is Mueller was empaneled to find RUSSIA COLLUSION...&lt;/i&gt;

Why would the DOJ have Mueller looking to find evidence of something that was not even a crime?  Russian collusion was defined as what, exactly?  What legal code violation would that be?  (The sound of crickets and then silence.) 

Trump is done.  The Supreme Court refused to prevent Congress from getting his tax returns.  So sad!  Time to see who all has bought him and for how much!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Irregardless of that fact, the simple fact is Mueller was empaneled to find RUSSIA COLLUSION...</i></p>
<p>Why would the DOJ have Mueller looking to find evidence of something that was not even a crime?  Russian collusion was defined as what, exactly?  What legal code violation would that be?  (The sound of crickets and then silence.) </p>
<p>Trump is done.  The Supreme Court refused to prevent Congress from getting his tax returns.  So sad!  Time to see who all has bought him and for how much!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2022/11/21/trump-gets-a-special-counsel/#comment-200931</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2022 21:54:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=22860#comment-200931</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;Mueller found ten instances of Obstruction of Justice, said explicitly that he was by no means exonerating Trump’s conduct but rather was respecting the DoJ memo preventing him from indicting a sitting President.&lt;/I&gt;

Not factually accurate..  

Mueller found indications of possible obstruction and refer&#039;ed those to be further investigated..  The AG at the time felt those were not worthy of investigating further...

Irregardless of that fact, the simple fact is Mueller was empaneled to find RUSSIA COLLUSION...

There was none.. 

End of story..

8/20</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Mueller found ten instances of Obstruction of Justice, said explicitly that he was by no means exonerating Trump’s conduct but rather was respecting the DoJ memo preventing him from indicting a sitting President.</i></p>
<p>Not factually accurate..  </p>
<p>Mueller found indications of possible obstruction and refer'ed those to be further investigated..  The AG at the time felt those were not worthy of investigating further...</p>
<p>Irregardless of that fact, the simple fact is Mueller was empaneled to find RUSSIA COLLUSION...</p>
<p>There was none.. </p>
<p>End of story..</p>
<p>8/20</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2022/11/21/trump-gets-a-special-counsel/#comment-200930</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2022 21:52:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=22860#comment-200930</guid>
		<description>MC,

&lt;I&gt;The results were much better for Republicans running in red states and districts. But for party strategists operating anywhere outside the most reliably conservative terrain, the election’s message was unequivocal. In those contested areas, “there is no road back to relevance if Donald Trump continues to be the dominant figure in the Republican Party and especially if he is our nominee in 2024,” Dick Wadhams, the former GOP chair in Colorado, told me.&lt;/I&gt;

You quote a Left Wing rag as if it actually MEANS anything or has anything to do with facts and reality..

Why would you do that??

7/20</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MC,</p>
<p><i>The results were much better for Republicans running in red states and districts. But for party strategists operating anywhere outside the most reliably conservative terrain, the election’s message was unequivocal. In those contested areas, “there is no road back to relevance if Donald Trump continues to be the dominant figure in the Republican Party and especially if he is our nominee in 2024,” Dick Wadhams, the former GOP chair in Colorado, told me.</i></p>
<p>You quote a Left Wing rag as if it actually MEANS anything or has anything to do with facts and reality..</p>
<p>Why would you do that??</p>
<p>7/20</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MtnCaddy</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2022/11/21/trump-gets-a-special-counsel/#comment-200929</link>
		<dc:creator>MtnCaddy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2022 21:51:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=22860#comment-200929</guid>
		<description>Elizabeth and Michale, 






LEST YE FORGET 





Mueller found ten instances of Obstruction of Justice, said explicitly that he was by no means exonerating Trump’s conduct but rather was respecting the DoJ memo preventing him from indicting a sitting President.





Trump is not a sitting President which means this case is now in play, along with the porn star/Playboy Playmate hush money payments.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Elizabeth and Michale, </p>
<p>LEST YE FORGET </p>
<p>Mueller found ten instances of Obstruction of Justice, said explicitly that he was by no means exonerating Trump’s conduct but rather was respecting the DoJ memo preventing him from indicting a sitting President.</p>
<p>Trump is not a sitting President which means this case is now in play, along with the porn star/Playboy Playmate hush money payments.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MtnCaddy</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2022/11/21/trump-gets-a-special-counsel/#comment-200928</link>
		<dc:creator>MtnCaddy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2022 21:38:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=22860#comment-200928</guid>
		<description>[11]





Liz, good heavens! Where are you getting your news from? Smith was NOT fired by Trump — I’m pretty certain he was at The Hague (ICC) jump starting prosecutions of war criminals in 2017.


No, Garland plays it strictly by the book and has no choice but to appoint a Special Prosecutor. Take a look at the statement Smith made when he accepted the job.





Your logic eludes me: why would Garland even appoint an SP if he had no intention of prosecuting Trump?



Those of us outside the MAGAt universe KNOW much (but probably not all) of the evidence against Trump, and the J6C has done a superb job of presenting  the particulars to the public. How in the world does Garland NOT indict, starting with the open-and-shut document theft case? Yes &lt;i&gt;it’s taking forever but getting it right is far more important than doing it quickly. &lt;/i&gt; Have a little faith and a little more patience. Our midterm election results reminded me of a favorite Winston Churchill quote:


&lt;b&gt;Americans always end up doing the right thing, after they try everything else.




Stratelak
POB 8336
Green Valley Lake
CA 92341-8336



Thanking you in advance!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[11]</p>
<p>Liz, good heavens! Where are you getting your news from? Smith was NOT fired by Trump — I’m pretty certain he was at The Hague (ICC) jump starting prosecutions of war criminals in 2017.</p>
<p>No, Garland plays it strictly by the book and has no choice but to appoint a Special Prosecutor. Take a look at the statement Smith made when he accepted the job.</p>
<p>Your logic eludes me: why would Garland even appoint an SP if he had no intention of prosecuting Trump?</p>
<p>Those of us outside the MAGAt universe KNOW much (but probably not all) of the evidence against Trump, and the J6C has done a superb job of presenting  the particulars to the public. How in the world does Garland NOT indict, starting with the open-and-shut document theft case? Yes <i>it’s taking forever but getting it right is far more important than doing it quickly. </i> Have a little faith and a little more patience. Our midterm election results reminded me of a favorite Winston Churchill quote:</p>
<p><b>Americans always end up doing the right thing, after they try everything else.</p>
<p>Stratelak<br />
POB 8336<br />
Green Valley Lake<br />
CA 92341-8336</p>
<p>Thanking you in advance!</b></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MtnCaddy</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2022/11/21/trump-gets-a-special-counsel/#comment-200927</link>
		<dc:creator>MtnCaddy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2022 18:45:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=22860#comment-200927</guid>
		<description>This from an &lt;a href=&quot;//apple.news/AZQmpOSxgRiuiMGZC5Zvkyg”&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Atlantic&lt;/a&gt; article,


&lt;i&gt; The results were much better for Republicans running in red states and districts. But for party strategists operating anywhere outside the most reliably conservative terrain, the election’s message was unequivocal. In those contested areas, &lt;b&gt;“there is no road back to relevance if Donald Trump continues to be the dominant figure in the Republican Party and especially if he is our nominee in 2024,” &lt;/b&gt;Dick Wadhams, the former GOP chair in Colorado, told me.&lt;/i&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This from an <a href="//apple.news/AZQmpOSxgRiuiMGZC5Zvkyg”" rel="nofollow">Atlantic</a> article,</p>
<p><i> The results were much better for Republicans running in red states and districts. But for party strategists operating anywhere outside the most reliably conservative terrain, the election’s message was unequivocal. In those contested areas, <b>“there is no road back to relevance if Donald Trump continues to be the dominant figure in the Republican Party and especially if he is our nominee in 2024,” </b>Dick Wadhams, the former GOP chair in Colorado, told me.</i></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elizabeth Miller</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2022/11/21/trump-gets-a-special-counsel/#comment-200926</link>
		<dc:creator>Elizabeth Miller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2022 18:43:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=22860#comment-200926</guid>
		<description>Michale,

&lt;i&gt;Twitter is no longer a Democrat Propaganda haven.. :D&lt;/i&gt;

Twitter is the twitspace it always has been and always will be. You&#039;re not a part of it, right?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michale,</p>
<p><i>Twitter is no longer a Democrat Propaganda haven.. :D</i></p>
<p>Twitter is the twitspace it always has been and always will be. You're not a part of it, right?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elizabeth Miller</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2022/11/21/trump-gets-a-special-counsel/#comment-200925</link>
		<dc:creator>Elizabeth Miller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2022 18:42:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=22860#comment-200925</guid>
		<description>Caddy,

Wasn&#039;t the special counsel tapped to take charge in the DOJ&#039;s Trump investigation fired by Trump in 2017? 

DOJ couldn&#039;t find someone who wasn&#039;t fired by Trump? Whatever. 

Isn&#039;t AG Garland just punting all of this anyways by announcing a special counsel? A favourite political analyst suggests that the best way to beat Trump is to beat Trump.

Punting, er ... appointing a special counsel means to me that no indictments will be forthcoming. You may just have to learn to deal with that.

By the way, what&#039;s your mailing address, again ... sorry.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Caddy,</p>
<p>Wasn't the special counsel tapped to take charge in the DOJ's Trump investigation fired by Trump in 2017? </p>
<p>DOJ couldn't find someone who wasn't fired by Trump? Whatever. </p>
<p>Isn't AG Garland just punting all of this anyways by announcing a special counsel? A favourite political analyst suggests that the best way to beat Trump is to beat Trump.</p>
<p>Punting, er ... appointing a special counsel means to me that no indictments will be forthcoming. You may just have to learn to deal with that.</p>
<p>By the way, what's your mailing address, again ... sorry.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2022/11/21/trump-gets-a-special-counsel/#comment-200924</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2022 17:14:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=22860#comment-200924</guid>
		<description>Yunno what&#039;s so awesome about Elon&#039;s Twitter??

&lt;B&gt;Biden White House fact-checked by Twitter users again for exaggerated deficit claim

President Biden has overseen 4th-largest budget deficit in US history for fiscal year 2022


President Biden&#039;s communications team attempted to exaggerate the administration&#039;s record on lowering the deficit on Twitter and was handed another Community Note that provided missing context for the White House&#039;s claim. 

&quot;The Biden-Harris Administration lowered the deficit with the single largest one-year reduction in American history,&quot; the White House tweeted Monday. 

President Biden&#039;s communications team attempted to exaggerate the administration&#039;s record on lowering the deficit on Twitter and was handed another Community Note that provided missing context for the White House&#039;s claim. 

&quot;The Biden-Harris Administration lowered the deficit with the single largest one-year reduction in American history,&quot; the White House tweeted Monday. &lt;/B&gt;
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/biden-white-house-fact-checked-twitter-users-again-exaggerated-deficit-claim


Biden and Democrats are not used to actually being fact checked..  

Actually having to be FACTUAL with all their claims...

Twitter is no longer a Democrat Propaganda haven..  :D

I love it!!  :D

6/20</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yunno what's so awesome about Elon's Twitter??</p>
<p><b>Biden White House fact-checked by Twitter users again for exaggerated deficit claim</p>
<p>President Biden has overseen 4th-largest budget deficit in US history for fiscal year 2022</p>
<p>President Biden's communications team attempted to exaggerate the administration's record on lowering the deficit on Twitter and was handed another Community Note that provided missing context for the White House's claim. </p>
<p>"The Biden-Harris Administration lowered the deficit with the single largest one-year reduction in American history," the White House tweeted Monday. </p>
<p>President Biden's communications team attempted to exaggerate the administration's record on lowering the deficit on Twitter and was handed another Community Note that provided missing context for the White House's claim. </p>
<p>"The Biden-Harris Administration lowered the deficit with the single largest one-year reduction in American history," the White House tweeted Monday. </b><br />
<a href="https://www.foxnews.com/politics/biden-white-house-fact-checked-twitter-users-again-exaggerated-deficit-claim" rel="nofollow">https://www.foxnews.com/politics/biden-white-house-fact-checked-twitter-users-again-exaggerated-deficit-claim</a></p>
<p>Biden and Democrats are not used to actually being fact checked..  </p>
<p>Actually having to be FACTUAL with all their claims...</p>
<p>Twitter is no longer a Democrat Propaganda haven..  :D</p>
<p>I love it!!  :D</p>
<p>6/20</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2022/11/21/trump-gets-a-special-counsel/#comment-200923</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2022 16:34:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=22860#comment-200923</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;Michale when the shit hits Trump’s fan you’ll instantly jump ship to DeSanctimonious and it’ll be Donald Trump? Don’t think I’m familiar with the name…&lt;/I&gt;

Assumes facts not in evidence...

&lt;I&gt;We get it — it’s what ya hafta do when you live in a world of make believe.&lt;/I&gt;

That&#039;s funny.. I was thinkin the EXACT same thing about you.. :D

5/20</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Michale when the shit hits Trump’s fan you’ll instantly jump ship to DeSanctimonious and it’ll be Donald Trump? Don’t think I’m familiar with the name…</i></p>
<p>Assumes facts not in evidence...</p>
<p><i>We get it — it’s what ya hafta do when you live in a world of make believe.</i></p>
<p>That's funny.. I was thinkin the EXACT same thing about you.. :D</p>
<p>5/20</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MtnCaddy</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2022/11/21/trump-gets-a-special-counsel/#comment-200922</link>
		<dc:creator>MtnCaddy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2022 16:07:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=22860#comment-200922</guid>
		<description>Michale when the shit hits Trump’s fan you’ll instantly jump ship to DeSanctimonious and it’ll be &lt;i&gt;Donald Trump? Don’t think I’m familiar with the name…&lt;/i&gt;





We get it — it’s what ya hafta do when you live in a world of make believe.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michale when the shit hits Trump’s fan you’ll instantly jump ship to DeSanctimonious and it’ll be <i>Donald Trump? Don’t think I’m familiar with the name…</i></p>
<p>We get it — it’s what ya hafta do when you live in a world of make believe.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2022/11/21/trump-gets-a-special-counsel/#comment-200921</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2022 13:45:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=22860#comment-200921</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;The big question in my mind is…is Elon Musk trying to ensure that the Democrats run the table in 2024?&lt;/I&gt;

Actually, Elon is ensuring that Twitter is going to be rid of Woke Hall-Monitor journos...  :D

&lt;B&gt;Elon Musk cheers woke journalist migration from Twitter: ‘Judgy hall monitors stay on other platforms’

The social media site Mastodon has become a popular alternative among a certain set of journalists

&quot;Among the many irritating things about Mastodon is that it enables status-chasing journalists to gatekeep their peers by judging whether they have enough clout or are useful to other people&#039;s career ladder-climbing,&quot; digital media consultant Heidi N. Moore tweeted Sunday about an article on journa.host.

FiveThirtyEight founder Nate Silver replied, &quot;Mastodon seems like a honeytrap for hall-monitor personality types. Honestly if Elon gets all the hall monitors to migrate to Mastodon that might be his greatest contribution toward the betterment of humanity.&quot;

Journalist Glenn Greenwald tweeted, &quot;Over on Mastodon - the obscure refuge to which liberal journalists are fleeing in fear of free speech even though they can&#039;t figure it out - they&#039;re already banning each other over the most trivial infractions. It&#039;s like a laboratory to study how censorship-happy rats behave.&quot;&lt;/B&gt;
https://www.foxnews.com/media/elon-musk-cheers-woke-journalist-migration-twitter-judgy-hall-monitors-stay-platforms

Ya know that people are onto something relevant when Nate Silver *AND* Glenn Greenwald agree..  :D

Twitter is going to be SOOO much nicer without the woke morons who think they have anything interesting or relevant to say..  :D

4/20</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>The big question in my mind is…is Elon Musk trying to ensure that the Democrats run the table in 2024?</i></p>
<p>Actually, Elon is ensuring that Twitter is going to be rid of Woke Hall-Monitor journos...  :D</p>
<p><b>Elon Musk cheers woke journalist migration from Twitter: ‘Judgy hall monitors stay on other platforms’</p>
<p>The social media site Mastodon has become a popular alternative among a certain set of journalists</p>
<p>"Among the many irritating things about Mastodon is that it enables status-chasing journalists to gatekeep their peers by judging whether they have enough clout or are useful to other people's career ladder-climbing," digital media consultant Heidi N. Moore tweeted Sunday about an article on journa.host.</p>
<p>FiveThirtyEight founder Nate Silver replied, "Mastodon seems like a honeytrap for hall-monitor personality types. Honestly if Elon gets all the hall monitors to migrate to Mastodon that might be his greatest contribution toward the betterment of humanity."</p>
<p>Journalist Glenn Greenwald tweeted, "Over on Mastodon - the obscure refuge to which liberal journalists are fleeing in fear of free speech even though they can't figure it out - they're already banning each other over the most trivial infractions. It's like a laboratory to study how censorship-happy rats behave."</b><br />
<a href="https://www.foxnews.com/media/elon-musk-cheers-woke-journalist-migration-twitter-judgy-hall-monitors-stay-platforms" rel="nofollow">https://www.foxnews.com/media/elon-musk-cheers-woke-journalist-migration-twitter-judgy-hall-monitors-stay-platforms</a></p>
<p>Ya know that people are onto something relevant when Nate Silver *AND* Glenn Greenwald agree..  :D</p>
<p>Twitter is going to be SOOO much nicer without the woke morons who think they have anything interesting or relevant to say..  :D</p>
<p>4/20</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2022/11/21/trump-gets-a-special-counsel/#comment-200920</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2022 09:55:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=22860#comment-200920</guid>
		<description>The Smith investigation is going to end the same way the Mueller investigation ended..

With egg all over the Democrats&#039; face and a big boost to President Trump and no crime has been committed..

Remember..  Ya&#039;all were SOOO sure of ya&#039;all&#039;s Russia Collusion delusion..  Just as sure as ya&#039;all are about this new political witch hunt..

One would think that Democrats would learn their lessons, yet..  Here we are..  :D

&lt;B&gt;&quot;Mr Simpson, you can&#039;t put a price on the safety of your family!!&quot;
&quot;I wouldn&#039;t have thought so either.  Yet, here we are..&quot;&lt;/B&gt;
-THE SIMPSONS

:D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Smith investigation is going to end the same way the Mueller investigation ended..</p>
<p>With egg all over the Democrats' face and a big boost to President Trump and no crime has been committed..</p>
<p>Remember..  Ya'all were SOOO sure of ya'all's Russia Collusion delusion..  Just as sure as ya'all are about this new political witch hunt..</p>
<p>One would think that Democrats would learn their lessons, yet..  Here we are..  :D</p>
<p><b>"Mr Simpson, you can't put a price on the safety of your family!!"<br />
"I wouldn't have thought so either.  Yet, here we are.."</b><br />
-THE SIMPSONS</p>
<p>:D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2022/11/21/trump-gets-a-special-counsel/#comment-200919</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2022 09:50:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=22860#comment-200919</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;The J6C has built such a compelling case against Trump — and it’s not even done yet — &lt;/I&gt;

It&#039;s so cute that you actually believe both of those things..  :D

The 6 Jan Cardassian court is done.. Fini.. It will go down in history as the biggest laughable joke since Democrats&#039; Russia Collusion delusion...

2/20</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>The J6C has built such a compelling case against Trump — and it’s not even done yet — </i></p>
<p>It's so cute that you actually believe both of those things..  :D</p>
<p>The 6 Jan Cardassian court is done.. Fini.. It will go down in history as the biggest laughable joke since Democrats' Russia Collusion delusion...</p>
<p>2/20</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2022/11/21/trump-gets-a-special-counsel/#comment-200918</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2022 09:16:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=22860#comment-200918</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;Ultimately the facts of the case(s) will be the true test of the investigation. &lt;/I&gt;

HA!!!  Shirley, you jest...   :D

When have &quot;FACTS&quot; ever been the driving factor in ANYTHING Democrats have done vis a vis President Trump??

Remember, these are the SAME Democrats who had to invent pretend crimes to impeach President Trump over...

These are the same Democrats who had to invent a pretend Russia Collusion connection.

Facts??  Democrats don&#039;t need no stinkin&#039; facts..

Never have.  Never will...

1/20</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Ultimately the facts of the case(s) will be the true test of the investigation. </i></p>
<p>HA!!!  Shirley, you jest...   :D</p>
<p>When have "FACTS" ever been the driving factor in ANYTHING Democrats have done vis a vis President Trump??</p>
<p>Remember, these are the SAME Democrats who had to invent pretend crimes to impeach President Trump over...</p>
<p>These are the same Democrats who had to invent a pretend Russia Collusion connection.</p>
<p>Facts??  Democrats don't need no stinkin' facts..</p>
<p>Never have.  Never will...</p>
<p>1/20</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MtnCaddy</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2022/11/21/trump-gets-a-special-counsel/#comment-200917</link>
		<dc:creator>MtnCaddy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2022 01:54:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=22860#comment-200917</guid>
		<description>The big question in my mind is…is Elon Musk trying to ensure that the Democrats run the table in 2024? Allowing Trump back on Twitter is the GQP’s NIGHTMARE scenario, methinks. Talk about a Christmas present from my old College roomie, Elon!?! I had high expectations of him from the moment we met.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The big question in my mind is…is Elon Musk trying to ensure that the Democrats run the table in 2024? Allowing Trump back on Twitter is the GQP’s NIGHTMARE scenario, methinks. Talk about a Christmas present from my old College roomie, Elon!?! I had high expectations of him from the moment we met.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MtnCaddy</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2022/11/21/trump-gets-a-special-counsel/#comment-200916</link>
		<dc:creator>MtnCaddy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2022 01:48:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=22860#comment-200916</guid>
		<description>I’ll try to find the links* but the gist of Smith is that there weren’t many (or maybe any?) prosecutions at the ICC until he showed up, and the next thing you know there were a hundred. Unlike Mueller this guy is inheriting a now 22-month investigation and his appointment is the only personnel change that I’m aware of. 









* I just got my very first iPhone and I’ve been an Android guy to date, so I’m still figuring how to speak Apple.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I’ll try to find the links* but the gist of Smith is that there weren’t many (or maybe any?) prosecutions at the ICC until he showed up, and the next thing you know there were a hundred. Unlike Mueller this guy is inheriting a now 22-month investigation and his appointment is the only personnel change that I’m aware of. </p>
<p>* I just got my very first iPhone and I’ve been an Android guy to date, so I’m still figuring how to speak Apple.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MtnCaddy</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2022/11/21/trump-gets-a-special-counsel/#comment-200915</link>
		<dc:creator>MtnCaddy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2022 01:41:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=22860#comment-200915</guid>
		<description>The J6C has built such a compelling case against Trump — and it’s not even done yet — that I’m entirely confident the DoJ will indict him for the coup attempt. The documents case is pretty open and shut and will likely occur first. It would make a splendid Christmas present to our Constitutional Republic but I think it drops in early January.



After the Midterms delivered the message that the MAGAt/Christofacists crowd is but a third of the country, at best, I don’t see how DoJ doesn’t do it’s job.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The J6C has built such a compelling case against Trump — and it’s not even done yet — that I’m entirely confident the DoJ will indict him for the coup attempt. The documents case is pretty open and shut and will likely occur first. It would make a splendid Christmas present to our Constitutional Republic but I think it drops in early January.</p>
<p>After the Midterms delivered the message that the MAGAt/Christofacists crowd is but a third of the country, at best, I don’t see how DoJ doesn’t do it’s job.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
