Your '2%/SOLELY based on race/gender' comments are wholly non-serious.

Speaking of non-serious, Ted Cruz asked her whether she agreed that babies are racist?

I understand he is a serious presidential candidate. Good God. Let me rephrase that ... I understand he is a presidential candidate for 2024, seriously!? Good God.

Guess I'm not missing anything. I don't have time for any of this nonsense.

Haven't had a chance to watch, Michale - working day and night, you know.

Why aren't you watching on C-Span?

Yes, at least some of us did listen and take the charges she made seriously. I'm still not a hundred percent sure she was lying, although she had a lot of sketchy things in her story to call suspicion

Heh.
For me, the sketchiest of the sketchiest was her claim that she and Biden got it on in a secluded hallway in his senate office building. That was a real hoot!

I love this, Listen. What part of a more perfect union doesn't mean including and telling everybody's story?

John Paul Mac Isaac told Fox News that he is legally blind, and therefore he "can't be 100% sure" that the individual who dropped off the laptop was Hunter Biden. But when he was backing up the hard drive, he stumbled upon "disturbing" images, including "pornography", that freaked him out. Apparently, although Isaac's blindness prevented him from positively ID-ing Hunter Biden, it didn't stop him from viewing the contents of the hard drive.

https://remarkboard.com/m/i-wanted-it-out-of-my-shop-computer-repairman-shares/1f2oez7sscmm4

What was the guy doing snooping through and reading the content of the emails? That isn’t necessary when searching for corrupted data or for backing up a hard drive!

And he was disturbed finding “pornography” on a laptop??? Notice that he did not find pornography on the laptop — but “pornography” instead!

Funny, one of the FoxNews articles on their interviewing the guy fails to mention that he was blind even though it does come up in the attached video.

As for Discovery…

Tal and her imaginary (now robotic) friend whatsisname lend absolutely NOTHING to the story. Just one big virtue signal character that takes up valuable screen time..

You are shown the first ever Trill symbiont successfully merged with a human and then merged with an AI android and all you can focus on is that they are non-binary and identify as them/they ??!! The writers haven’t made how they identify and their sexual orientation anything more than passing footnote in their storyline.

I realize that you cannot get what it means for kids who are part of the LGBTQ+ community to see these characters on TV; but trust me it is significant. Growing up, I never saw any representation of a gay man that wasn’t a flaming queen completely void of masculinity. Seriously, I would see the news reporting on the Pride parades and they always showed the most flamboyant and nelly men (wearing only assless chaps and feathered boas). It made me think, if that’s GAY, then I am definitely NOT GAY and it made me want to hide my sexual orientation even deeper in the closet.

I found myself in tears this season when they showed Stamets and Dr. Culber getting into bed talking about their day. There was nothing special about the scene — which is why it moved me to tears! They weren’t having sex… they weren’t having some deep conversation…they were just being a couple going to bed. I am so thrilled that kids today are able to witness what I would have given anything to have had my teenage self get to see that on StarTrek!

Along with other definitions, "history" is one we need to clarify. It generally means something that came beforehand.

Blasey Ford had zero suspicious or attention seeking history.

Other than the fact that she went thru a Democrat politician who kept her story under wraps for over a month and that even her own witnesses claimed she was making things up..

Yes, other than those facts she had "zero" suspicious or attention getting history..

Blasey Ford's actions PROVE that it was nothing but a political agenda...

Yes, at least some of us did listen and take the charges she made seriously. I'm still not a hundred percent sure she was lying, although she had a lot of sketchy things in her story to call suspicion, among them a social media post professing her attraction to Vladimir Putin. Blasey Ford had zero suspicious or attention seeking history.

Do you think Democrats should listen?

Yes. And those claims should be thoroughly investigated.

California preschoolers' anti-Biden chant enrages parents: 'Indoctrinating her students'

One outraged mother said, 'That was the great message she learned that day'

A California parent was outraged after she saw video of her daughter and other preschool students chanting in class that they wanted President Biden out of office.

"Who's our president," a preschool teacher at Turning Point Christian School in Norco asked the young students, according to a short video posted on a school messaging app.

"Biden," the students responded, KABC reported.

"What do we want to do with him?" the teacher asked.

"We want him out," the students responded in unison twice.

https://www.foxnews.com/us/video-california-biden-we-want-him-out-preschoolers-chant-controversy

Completely unacceptable, right??

Pre-school kids should be allowed to be KIDS and not have political shit shoved down their throats, right???

Remember that when ya'all advocate for kids to have gender-bending political shit shoved down their throats, eh??

I am REALLY trying to get into S4 of Discovery..

Can we have that androgynous Tal person transfer'ed to the Red Shirts??

She has GOT to be the most annoying and eye-rolling sci fi character since Jar Jar Binks??

At least Jar Jar was funny...

Tal and her imaginary (now robotic) friend whatsisname lend absolutely NOTHING to the story. Just one big virtue signal character that takes up valuable screen time..

But I am pressing on with watching..

Remind me again how Democrats should "listen" when accusations are made??

Because, yunno... It seems that Lefties don't want to "listen" when the claims are made AGAINST Democrats..

Did anyone here want to "listen" to Tara Reade's claims??

No.. I don't believe ya'all did..

So please.. Don't insult my intelligence by claiming Blasey Ford's claims with absolutely ZERO supporting facts should have been listen'ed to...

Blasey Ford was absolutely NOTHING but a trump'ed up political hit job that had absolutely NO BASIS in fact or reality...

If she had walked in off the streets to a police station and made those claims, she would have likely been arrested and charged with filing a false report if they would have bother'ed to listen to her at all..

Do you think Democrats should listen?? :D

}}}}if someone does make that claim, let's listen.{{{

Yer joking, right??

Because I can list DOZENS of names of people making claims and Democrats not only REFUSING to "listen" but actively ATTACKING people in the most VILE of manner for making "claims"...

Would you like that list??

Jackson doesn’t ‘quite remember the basis’ for Dred Scott decision

Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson said she doesn’t “quite remember the basis” for the Dred Scott decision of 1857, which declared that people of African descent were not U.S. citizens.

Jackson made the comment during questioning by Sen. John Cornyn, R-Texas, who said the Dred Scott decision, “which treated slaves as chattel property, was a product of substantive due process.”

Jackson responded, “The justices have interpreted the due process clause of the 14th Amendment to include a substantive provision, the rights to due process, they have interpreted that to mean not just procedural rights relative to government action, but also the protection of certain personal rights related to intimacy and autonomy. They include things like the right to rear one's children. I believe the right to travel, the right to marriage, interracial marriage, the right to an abortion, contraception—“

“Treating slaves as chattel property?” Cornyn interjected.

“I don't quite remember the basis for the Dred Scott opinion, but I'll trust you, that that’s—" Jackson said.

“The fact is,” Cornyn interrupted, “is it not that you can use substantive due process to justify basically any result?”

“The court has identified standards for the determination of rights under the Fourteenth Amendment, substantive due process," Jackson replied.

"FUMBLE!!!! FUMBLIA!!!!"
-Ron Schneider, NECESSARY ROUGHNESS

if someone does make that claim, let's listen.

Yer joking, right??

The dictionary no longer considers your definition of racism valid.

Not factually accurate..

Your politically oriented definitional change of racism does not change the meaning of what racism is..

Democrat definitions is like Democrat science..

It's nothing but very poorly disguised Democrat activism..

How do we know??

I am sure we can find someone who will make that bullshit claim.. Someone who doesn't remember when or where it happened. Someone who claims there were witnesses there.. Witnesses that stated under oath that the accuser was full of crap..

I am sure there is someone out there like that.. Someone like Blasey-Ford...

sounds a little like the songwriter jackson browne.

https://youtu.be/k0vYnD6GGyU

Ketanji Brown Jackson serves on board of school that promotes critical race theory

Judge Jackson serves on board of Georgetown Day School, which promotes books by originators of critical race theory

Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson, President Biden's Supreme Court nominee, serves on the board of trustees for an elite private Washington, D.C., school that promotes critical race theory (CRT).

Jackson’s questionnaire for the Senate Judiciary Committee says that she has been a board of trustees member at Georgetown Day School since 2019 and a member of the Georgetown Day School community for nearly a decade.

"Since becoming part of the GDS community seven years ago, Patrick and I have witnessed the transformative power of a rigorous progressive education that is dedicated to fostering critical thinking, independence, and social justice," Jackson said in the Winter 2019/2020 edition of Georgetown Day School’s magazine, referring to her husband.

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/ketanji-brown-jackson-board-school-critical-race-theory

I am liking this nominee less and less...

As well he should..

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=euFaRaVi4Js

That's the link I am following.. I tried the WaPo Youtube but it was too nauseating...

Lemme know if there is a better link that you are watching...

Assuming you are watching...

Don't we want to live in a society where such a claim as "the first black woman to" blaa blaa blaaa be met with a collective, "Yea?? So???"...

As long as Democrats continue to divide us by race, we simply CANNOT achieve such a society Democrats CLAIM they are working towards...

Once again. Democrats are their own worst enemies..

Everything that Democrats say about Jackson Brown was ALSO true about Judge Kavanaugh...

And yet we know how Democrats treated Kavanaugh... :^/

Babylon Bee editor: We refuse to bow to Twitter’s censorship of a joke

Well, it finally happened (we’re kind of surprised it didn’t happen sooner): The Babylon Bee has been locked out of our Twitter account.

The satirical article that offended the Twitter overlords? “The Babylon Bee’s Man Of The Year Is Rachel Levine.” For the simple offense of labeling a biological man a man, through a satirical headline, we have lost access to all 1.3 million of our followers on Twitter.

A world where you can state a simple biological fact and face censorship, the loss of revenue and your livelihood, and excommunication from the public square for stating truth, no matter how satirical tongue-in-cheek your tone is, is a scary one indeed. As the famous Ron Paul saying goes, “Truth is treason in the empire of lies.”

It's a sad sad world when a company can kill your livelihood and online presence SOLELY because you state a bona fide scientific FACT...

Thank you, Democrat Party.. :^/

Odumbo and Occasional Cortex are my red lines.. :D

I'll give you WaPo and NY Times, but Odumbo and Occasional Cortex are sacrosanct.. :D

Awww, com'on.. Their trademarks.. :D

OK, OK.. I'll give up some of my favorites.. :D

Putin Misunderstands History. So, Unfortunately, Does the U.S.

Biden is making a colossal mistake in thinking he can bleed Russia dry, topple Putin and signal to China to keep its hands off Taiwan.

The Biden administration not only thinks it’s doing enough to sustain the Ukrainian war effort, but not so much as to provoke Putin to escalation. It also thinks it’s doing enough to satisfy public opinion, which has rallied strongly behind Ukraine, but not so much as to cost American lives, aside from a few unlucky volunteers and journalists.

The optimism, however, is the assumption that allowing the war to keep going will necessarily undermine Putin’s position; and that his humiliation in turn will serve as a deterrent to China. I fear these assumptions may be badly wrong and reflect a misunderstanding of the relevant history.

https://www.bloomberg.com/opinion/articles/2022-03-22/niall-ferguson-putin-and-biden-misunderstand-history-in-ukraine-war

Biden is not learning the proper lessons of history...

“The language people speak in the corridors of power is not economics or politics. It is history.”
-Former SecDef Ashton Carter

Fox News Headline:

Zelenskyy: Russia is ‘torturing, kidnapping’ children; Mariupol ‘completely destroyed’:

It's this kind of sensationalist "reporting" that makes me distrust ANYTHING we're getting from the Media sites...

Beat him in a fair election..

This trying to use the law for political ends?? It's bullshit and will ultimately end in failure..

Further, by continuing to lose and lose and lose again to President Trump, you show the American people that President Trump is a winner.. Over and over and over again President Trump wins..

The Russia Collusion Delusion loses.. President Trump wins..

The Kardashian Committee loses.. President Trump wins..

With every win, ya'all make President Trump stronger and stronger...

Beat him at the ballot box in a FAIR election...

But Democrats know that they cannot do that.

So they have these Kardashian committees, these wet dream prosecutions and civil cases that simply showcase how much President Trump wins all the time..

Democrats are their own worst enemies... By their own actions, they bring about the VERY thing they are trying to stop..

It's called

The Ishmael Effect

Do you know how many of those subpoenas are to people who are actually associated with the events of 6 Jan..

EIGHT.... ONLY 8 subpoenas are to people who are actually associated with 6 Jan

88 of the subpoenas are to people who had NOTHING to do with the events of 6 Jan..

Can ya'all say "FISHING EXPEDITION"??? Sure ya can..

Further, over 100 subpoenas have been issued in secret for phone records of people The Kardashian Committee refuse to identify.. Not even to the people they are seeking phone records from..

Ya'all are setting yerselves up for a BIGGER disappointment than when ya'all hyped the Russia Collusion only to have the wind taken out of yer sails when Mueller announced after 3 years and 33 million dollars..

There was no evidence of any collusion between Russia and the Trump campaign

Do ya'all REALLY want to go thru such a disappointment again??

REALLY??

Jan. 6 committee faces a thorny challenge: Persuading the public to care

The House Jan. 6 committee has tried to recruit high-profile journalists to write its report about the attack on the Capitol, hoping to build a narrative thriller that compels audiences and is a departure from government reports of yore.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/jan-6-committee-faces-a-thorny-challenge-convincing-the-public-to-care/ar-AAVegdY

Ya get that??

The 6 Jan committee tried to hire a creative writer to spice up the report as a Hollywood thriller.. :^/

Committee members and staffers are seeking to compile dramatic videos, texts and emails in a digital format that is easy to understand — and easy to share on social media. And they want to put together blockbuster televised hearings that the public actually tunes into, according to people with knowledge of the process who spoke on the condition of anonymity to speak candidly.

Once again.. The committee wants drama for social media...

We should probably change the name to The Kardashian Committee.. :^/

They’ll attempt to do so this spring through public hearings, along with a potential interim report and a final report that will be published ahead of the November midterms — with the findings likely a key part of the Democrats midterm strategy.

And THERE it is...

Along with preventing President Trump from running in 2024, THERE is the reason for The Kardashian Committee.. Nothing but an election strategy.. No interests in justice or facts or ANYTHING...

Just a plain old nefarious election strategy...

From ya'all's own WaPoop...

Stop Waiting for Trump to Get Convicted

Attorney General Merrick Garland is not going to save democracy. Nor is the attorney general of New York, Letitia James; the Manhattan district attorney, Alvin Bragg; nor the Fulton County district attorney, Fani Willis. As the apparent collapse of the New York district attorney’s investigation makes clear, criminal cases are hard to make. Donald Trump, despite his many seemingly criminal acts, is unlikely to ever spend a day in jail.

Observers of the Trump malignancy have an unfortunate habit of wish casting—believing that their most optimistic fantasies will become reality. They did this with the Mueller investigation—remember “It’s Mueller Time”?—and they did it with both of Trump’s impeachments. Their dream has always been that somehow, somewhere, someone would call Trump to account for his actions and, in doing so, save American democracy.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/opinion/stop-waiting-for-trump-to-get-convicted/ar-AAVkdRR?ocid=uxbndlbing

That is what the 6 Jan Committee is all about..

Convicting President Trump of SOMETHING... ANYTHING... As long as it prevents President Trump from running in 2024..

Because Democrats KNOW that they will not be able to field ANYONE that can beat President Trump in a fair election..

THIS is the reason why the 6 Jan Committee exists.. That and, as I said above, to give Democrats SOMETHING they can show to the voters in November..

Unfortunately, for Democrats, they will fail...

All of that is serious stuff, to be sure. But it is also, sadly, very common. Even if we accept that the case against Trump is strong enough to be charged (and the recent Mazars disclosures suggest that it is), the simple fact is that fraud of this sort is commonplace in the real-estate market, and failing to declare nonwage benefits is, likewise, a common occurrence. Trump’s criminality may well be greater in degree than that of others, but it is unlikely to be different in kind (at least not on the evidence we can currently see on the public record). To my mind (and also, apparently, to the mind of the Manhattan district attorney), that’s a pretty good defense, as is the lack of an insider who is willing to testify against Trump. If Trump can show that his practices are “common” in the real-estate community, that will make his “They’re picking on me” argument much stronger.

As I have also mentioned in the past, what President Trump is being accused of is something that is very common in the business circles that President Trump moves in..

How much criminality would we find if we crawled up Nancy Pelosi's butt with a microscope?? How much criminality would we find if we crawled up Chuck Schumer's butt with a microscope??

There is not 'there' there...

Likewise, a federal case against Trump related to the January 6 insurrection—if the Justice Department is indeed investigating one, though we do not know that it is—would be a challenging one. The main complaint, in reality, is both that Trump incited the riot and that he then did nothing to stop it once it got started. But as the former federal prosecutor Randall Eliason has said, making a criminal case out of inaction is difficult. To do that you have to prove a fairly close connection between a duty to act and a failure to do so. Though it is right and correct to say that Trump had a responsibility to act to forestall the riots, having at least partially contributed to their instigation, that’s as much a statement of moral culpability as it is a statement about a legal requirement.

The people who REALLY deserve the scorn and blame for 6 Jan are the people who did not provide proper security for the capitol.. President Trump ordered the National Guard activated, but Pelosi and Schumer belayed that order and refused to activate the Guard..

Those few cops that testified?? There were but a few of the HUNDREDS of cops that wanted to testify as to the security failures of the politicians in the run up to 6 Jan.. But the 6 Jan Committee stated up front that they will NOT investigate the security lapses that directly LEAD to the 6 Jan riot..

That right there tells ya'all the agenda of the 6 Jan Committee...

We know the full extent of what happened.

A Right Wing protest got out of control and became a Right Wing violent riot and an attack on a SINGLE government building at a SINGLE location over the span of a few hours..

Just like 22 years (collectively) of Democrat BLM and AntiFa violent riots and attacks on hundreds of government buildings all over the country.. Attacks were MANY people died, including 8 LEOs.. Attacks where tens, if not hundreds of thousands of people were injured.. Attacks that caused BILLIONS of dollars in damages and made entire neighborhoods look like 3rd world shithole warzones..

Where are the Democrat committees investigating THOSE violent attacks on THOSE hundreds of government buildings??

The 6 Jan Committee is nothing but a political exercise to give Democrats SOME semblance of a chance in November...

How do we know this?? Because Democrats explicitly STATED it..

So, there is your timetable.. Probably Aug or Sep is when the 6 Jan Committee will wrap things up..

Just in time for the November elections..

Further, Democrats have already admitted that the witch hunt is nothing but a ploy to try vainly to score points for the mid-term..

And what with Biden's war in Ukraine and the Hunter Biden scandal coming back to the forefront and Jackson Brown Affirmative Action hearings....

The committee is going to fade into the background as a huge nothing burger..

Oh sure.. Big Media will hype it up and play the big drama, like they did with the Russia Collusion delusion..

But, like the Russia Collusion delusion, it will be nothing but a rotten egg that says more about the disgusting politics of the committee members and less about President Trump..

Multiple news sites have cited the fact that the man is “legally blind” — which explains why he could not testify that he identified Hunter Biden as the man who dropped off the laptops.

I have only seen it in WaPoop and there was no verification of the claim..

I am pretty sure they would get called out for claiming he was blind when he wasn’t. If you want sworn affidavits from his doctors, you are on your own to get that.

Oh, com'on Russ.. Left Wing rags spew huge amounts of BS all the time and never get called out..

WaPoop claimed that the laptop was Russian Disinformation and the NY Grime just proved that it isn't..

There are many articles about the guy that talk to him and about him in depth and NONE of them mention ANYTHING about him being blind..

Hunter Biden all but conceded that the laptop was his..

The ownership of the laptop is not in doubt.. The NY GRIME stated for the record that it's ownership and content has been "authenticated"...