<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Friday Talking Points -- A Busy Week</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.chrisweigant.com/2022/01/21/friday-talking-points-a-busy-week/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2022/01/21/friday-talking-points-a-busy-week/</link>
	<description>Reality-based political commentary</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2026 02:48:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2022/01/21/friday-talking-points-a-busy-week/#comment-183942</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Jan 2022 22:35:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=21522#comment-183942</guid>
		<description>&lt;B&gt;You&#039;re gonna miss this
You&#039;re gonna want this back
You&#039;re gonna wish these days hadn&#039;t gone by so fast
These are some good times
So take a good look around
You may not know it now
But you&#039;re gonna miss this&lt;/B&gt;

TRACE ADKINS
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lBDN8yWyNYU

:D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>You're gonna miss this<br />
You're gonna want this back<br />
You're gonna wish these days hadn't gone by so fast<br />
These are some good times<br />
So take a good look around<br />
You may not know it now<br />
But you're gonna miss this</b></p>
<p>TRACE ADKINS<br />
<a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lBDN8yWyNYU" rel="nofollow">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lBDN8yWyNYU</a></p>
<p>:D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2022/01/21/friday-talking-points-a-busy-week/#comment-183941</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Jan 2022 22:31:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=21522#comment-183941</guid>
		<description>Yer gonna miss this when I am gone, Russ..  :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yer gonna miss this when I am gone, Russ..  :D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2022/01/21/friday-talking-points-a-busy-week/#comment-183940</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Jan 2022 22:31:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=21522#comment-183940</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;THAT is how one answers when they know that they have no idea what they are talking about. Short and sweet and let’s move on ASAP!&lt;/I&gt;

No.. THAT&#039;s how one answers when they are discussing FACTS...

Do you have any facts of your own to dispute my facts??

No, you do not..

&lt;I&gt; You admit that CRT did not define these concepts, but then you go on to claim that CRT “uses them falsely” — further proof that it is dishonest when people claim CRT is being taught in our schools when it is actually Systemic Racism being discussed.&lt;/I&gt;

No, it&#039;s CRT being discussed.  Since CRT uses the EXCUSE of systemic racism to justify their OWN systemic racism..

This is fact..  Well documented fact..

&lt;I&gt;You’ve got it backwards… when we say, “The first (RACE) man to do….”, it’s because society had prevented anyone but white males to compete in that field. It’s celebrating that our society is becoming more equal by their accomplishment!&lt;/I&gt;

Which has absolutely NO RELEVANCE in a TRUE Equality Society..

You are celebrating a RACE or other group&#039;s accomplishment when the RACE or other group didn&#039;t accomplish dick..  A PERSON accomplished it..

And whatever roadblocks may have existed in the past has NO BEARING on the *PERSON*&#039;s accomplishment in the here and now..

Thank you for confirming my point...

&lt;I&gt;Only the first person who discovers a cure for a disease gets credit for it. Did you not know that?!?&lt;/I&gt;

YES... The first *PERSON* gets the credit..  Not the first PERSON of a specific race/gender/lifestyle choice/medical condition...

In a TRULY equal society, a PERSON&#039;S accomplishment is celebrated..  THAT is how Dr Martin Luther King wanted our society to be..  Completely color blind..

But you Democrats want to continue living in a race based society..

And that ain&#039;t gonna happen..

&lt;I&gt;Strange that someone so interested in us having a society based on EQUALITY would have been against marriage equality and supported the cake bakery that did not want to make a wedding cake for a gay couple!&lt;/I&gt;

In a TRULY equal society, the gay couple would simply move on to a different baker...  Remember, we&#039;re talking equal SOCIETY...

&lt;I&gt;So they are only appropriate when they support a negative connotation and are wrong when they are meant to highlight a positive?&lt;/I&gt;

No, they are only appropriate in the context of a discussion ABOUT racism..

Andygaus claimed that black Americans were arrested in MA for marijuana use more, SOLELY because they were black..

I provided stats that PROVE other reasons are at work and there are no facts to support a claim of systemic racism..

If you don&#039;t want to see those stats without those kinds of connotations, quit making the claim of systemic racism where you have NO FACTS to prove it exists..

&lt;I&gt;Who told you that I want to redo our master bathroom? I hate it!&lt;/I&gt;

I am everywhere...  :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>THAT is how one answers when they know that they have no idea what they are talking about. Short and sweet and let’s move on ASAP!</i></p>
<p>No.. THAT's how one answers when they are discussing FACTS...</p>
<p>Do you have any facts of your own to dispute my facts??</p>
<p>No, you do not..</p>
<p><i> You admit that CRT did not define these concepts, but then you go on to claim that CRT “uses them falsely” — further proof that it is dishonest when people claim CRT is being taught in our schools when it is actually Systemic Racism being discussed.</i></p>
<p>No, it's CRT being discussed.  Since CRT uses the EXCUSE of systemic racism to justify their OWN systemic racism..</p>
<p>This is fact..  Well documented fact..</p>
<p><i>You’ve got it backwards… when we say, “The first (RACE) man to do….”, it’s because society had prevented anyone but white males to compete in that field. It’s celebrating that our society is becoming more equal by their accomplishment!</i></p>
<p>Which has absolutely NO RELEVANCE in a TRUE Equality Society..</p>
<p>You are celebrating a RACE or other group's accomplishment when the RACE or other group didn't accomplish dick..  A PERSON accomplished it..</p>
<p>And whatever roadblocks may have existed in the past has NO BEARING on the *PERSON*'s accomplishment in the here and now..</p>
<p>Thank you for confirming my point...</p>
<p><i>Only the first person who discovers a cure for a disease gets credit for it. Did you not know that?!?</i></p>
<p>YES... The first *PERSON* gets the credit..  Not the first PERSON of a specific race/gender/lifestyle choice/medical condition...</p>
<p>In a TRULY equal society, a PERSON'S accomplishment is celebrated..  THAT is how Dr Martin Luther King wanted our society to be..  Completely color blind..</p>
<p>But you Democrats want to continue living in a race based society..</p>
<p>And that ain't gonna happen..</p>
<p><i>Strange that someone so interested in us having a society based on EQUALITY would have been against marriage equality and supported the cake bakery that did not want to make a wedding cake for a gay couple!</i></p>
<p>In a TRULY equal society, the gay couple would simply move on to a different baker...  Remember, we're talking equal SOCIETY...</p>
<p><i>So they are only appropriate when they support a negative connotation and are wrong when they are meant to highlight a positive?</i></p>
<p>No, they are only appropriate in the context of a discussion ABOUT racism..</p>
<p>Andygaus claimed that black Americans were arrested in MA for marijuana use more, SOLELY because they were black..</p>
<p>I provided stats that PROVE other reasons are at work and there are no facts to support a claim of systemic racism..</p>
<p>If you don't want to see those stats without those kinds of connotations, quit making the claim of systemic racism where you have NO FACTS to prove it exists..</p>
<p><i>Who told you that I want to redo our master bathroom? I hate it!</i></p>
<p>I am everywhere...  :D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ListenWhenYouHear</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2022/01/21/friday-talking-points-a-busy-week/#comment-183937</link>
		<dc:creator>ListenWhenYouHear</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Jan 2022 21:21:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=21522#comment-183937</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;&lt;b&gt;Systemic racism and white privilege aren’t concepts that CRT introduced…&lt;/b&gt;

True.. But CRT uses them falsely and non-factually to the max...&lt;/i&gt;

THAT is how one answers when they know that they have no idea what they are talking about.  Short and sweet and let’s move on ASAP!  

And come to think of it, your answer only proves the point I was making!  You admit that CRT did not define these concepts, but then you go on to claim that CRT “uses them falsely” — further proof that it is dishonest when people claim CRT is being taught in our schools when it is actually Systemic Racism being discussed.  

&lt;i&gt;&lt;b&gt;A “TRULY equal society”? You mean one where we do not celebrate our individual accomplishments?&lt;/b&gt;

But you people are not celebrating individual accomplishments. You people are celebrating accomplishements based on race or gender or lifestyle choice or medical status..

A &quot;TRULY equal society&quot; is where we don&#039;t celebrate accomplishments based on race or gender or lifestyle or medical status..

In a TRULY equal society we celebrate a PERSON&#039;S accomplishments.. Not a groups&#039;...&lt;/i&gt;

You’ve got it backwards… when we say, “The first (RACE) man to do….”, it’s because society had prevented anyone but white males to compete in that field.  It’s celebrating that our society is becoming more equal by their accomplishment!  

Or maybe that is really what upsets you… that people different from you that have been denied the same opportunities that white males have enjoyed for centuries are finally able to enjoy them as well? 

&lt;I&gt;Let&#039;s say you do something completely and utterly fantastic.. Cure cancer or something.

What would you prefer to hear??

WOW!! Look what a gay person did!!! The first gay person to cure cancer!!!

Or would you rather hear what a TRULY equal society would say??

WOW!! Look what Russ Finklestein did!! He cured cancer!!!

Which statement is more representative of a truly equal society??&lt;/i&gt;

Only the first person who discovers a cure for a disease gets credit for it.  Did you not know that?!?    

Strange that someone so interested in us having a society based on EQUALITY would have been against marriage equality and supported the cake bakery that did not want to make a wedding cake for a gay couple!   

&lt;b&gt;You people use LABELS all the time... There are times when labels are appropriate when in the context of the discussion..

In the context of the discussion about a TRULY equal society, labels/groups are NOT appropriate...&lt;/b&gt;

So they are only appropriate when they support a negative connotation and are wrong when they are meant to highlight a positive?  
&lt;I&gt;
Apologies if you don&#039;t like what you see in the mirror.. :D&lt;/i&gt;

Who told you that I want to redo our master bathroom?   I hate it!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i><b>Systemic racism and white privilege aren’t concepts that CRT introduced…</b></p>
<p>True.. But CRT uses them falsely and non-factually to the max...</i></p>
<p>THAT is how one answers when they know that they have no idea what they are talking about.  Short and sweet and let’s move on ASAP!  </p>
<p>And come to think of it, your answer only proves the point I was making!  You admit that CRT did not define these concepts, but then you go on to claim that CRT “uses them falsely” — further proof that it is dishonest when people claim CRT is being taught in our schools when it is actually Systemic Racism being discussed.  </p>
<p><i><b>A “TRULY equal society”? You mean one where we do not celebrate our individual accomplishments?</b></p>
<p>But you people are not celebrating individual accomplishments. You people are celebrating accomplishements based on race or gender or lifestyle choice or medical status..</p>
<p>A "TRULY equal society" is where we don't celebrate accomplishments based on race or gender or lifestyle or medical status..</p>
<p>In a TRULY equal society we celebrate a PERSON'S accomplishments.. Not a groups'...</i></p>
<p>You’ve got it backwards… when we say, “The first (RACE) man to do….”, it’s because society had prevented anyone but white males to compete in that field.  It’s celebrating that our society is becoming more equal by their accomplishment!  </p>
<p>Or maybe that is really what upsets you… that people different from you that have been denied the same opportunities that white males have enjoyed for centuries are finally able to enjoy them as well? </p>
<p><i>Let's say you do something completely and utterly fantastic.. Cure cancer or something.</p>
<p>What would you prefer to hear??</p>
<p>WOW!! Look what a gay person did!!! The first gay person to cure cancer!!!</p>
<p>Or would you rather hear what a TRULY equal society would say??</p>
<p>WOW!! Look what Russ Finklestein did!! He cured cancer!!!</p>
<p>Which statement is more representative of a truly equal society??</i></p>
<p>Only the first person who discovers a cure for a disease gets credit for it.  Did you not know that?!?    </p>
<p>Strange that someone so interested in us having a society based on EQUALITY would have been against marriage equality and supported the cake bakery that did not want to make a wedding cake for a gay couple!   </p>
<p><b>You people use LABELS all the time... There are times when labels are appropriate when in the context of the discussion..</p>
<p>In the context of the discussion about a TRULY equal society, labels/groups are NOT appropriate...</b></p>
<p>So they are only appropriate when they support a negative connotation and are wrong when they are meant to highlight a positive?<br />
<i><br />
Apologies if you don't like what you see in the mirror.. :D</i></p>
<p>Who told you that I want to redo our master bathroom?   I hate it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2022/01/21/friday-talking-points-a-busy-week/#comment-183870</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Jan 2022 23:13:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=21522#comment-183870</guid>
		<description>OK..  It&#039;s that time again, my fellow Weigantians..  

We got close to #250!!!  :D

Have a great night..

It&#039;s safe, cad.. You can come out now..  :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK..  It's that time again, my fellow Weigantians..  </p>
<p>We got close to #250!!!  :D</p>
<p>Have a great night..</p>
<p>It's safe, cad.. You can come out now..  :D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2022/01/21/friday-talking-points-a-busy-week/#comment-183869</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Jan 2022 23:10:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=21522#comment-183869</guid>
		<description>&lt;B&gt;The Black Lives Matter chapter in Washington, D.C., recently expressed indignation that police officers who are shot in the line of duty are automatically treated as &quot;heroes&quot; after an officer was shot and wounded Sunday night in Northwest D.C.

As the scene was still unfolding, Black Lives Matter D.C. took the opportunity to promote its #StopMPD campaign and warn against the spread of &quot;copaganda.&quot; 

&quot;This is the point we’ve been making for months,&quot; the group tweeted Sunday night. &quot;Look at the reaction and coverage tonight. Tear jerker press conferences and proclamations of heroes coming soon. Imagine if people knew these folks’ names. Being Black in DC is more dangerous than any job.&lt;/B&gt;

And BLM proves once again how scumbag they are and how anti-America they are...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>The Black Lives Matter chapter in Washington, D.C., recently expressed indignation that police officers who are shot in the line of duty are automatically treated as "heroes" after an officer was shot and wounded Sunday night in Northwest D.C.</p>
<p>As the scene was still unfolding, Black Lives Matter D.C. took the opportunity to promote its #StopMPD campaign and warn against the spread of "copaganda." </p>
<p>"This is the point we’ve been making for months," the group tweeted Sunday night. "Look at the reaction and coverage tonight. Tear jerker press conferences and proclamations of heroes coming soon. Imagine if people knew these folks’ names. Being Black in DC is more dangerous than any job.</b></p>
<p>And BLM proves once again how scumbag they are and how anti-America they are...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2022/01/21/friday-talking-points-a-busy-week/#comment-183868</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Jan 2022 23:07:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=21522#comment-183868</guid>
		<description>&lt;B&gt;Several police departments across America saw their funding slashed as the far-left &quot;defund the police&quot; movement gained steam, after the 2020 murder of George Floyd.

Many prominent Democrats — including Reps. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez of New York and Rashida Tlaib of Michigan — were vocal proponents of the movement, pushing the idea on social media amid the protests.&lt;/B&gt;

And ta think there are actually people who HONESTLY believe that Democrats don&#039;t want to &lt;B&gt;DEFUND, DEMONIZE, DEMORALIZE THE POLICE&lt;/B&gt;...

It boggles the mind...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>Several police departments across America saw their funding slashed as the far-left "defund the police" movement gained steam, after the 2020 murder of George Floyd.</p>
<p>Many prominent Democrats — including Reps. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez of New York and Rashida Tlaib of Michigan — were vocal proponents of the movement, pushing the idea on social media amid the protests.</b></p>
<p>And ta think there are actually people who HONESTLY believe that Democrats don't want to <b>DEFUND, DEMONIZE, DEMORALIZE THE POLICE</b>...</p>
<p>It boggles the mind...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2022/01/21/friday-talking-points-a-busy-week/#comment-183867</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Jan 2022 23:06:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=21522#comment-183867</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;It&#039;s like having your drunk right-wing Uncle show up at the dinner table every night of the year and not just Thanksgiving.&lt;/I&gt;

&lt;B&gt;&quot;Quit trying to {ignore} me and {ignore} me!!!&quot;&lt;/B&gt;
-Morpheus

Yunno, we had a Weigantian™ like cad about 8-10 years ago..

Kevin was his name, I believe..

He too would also go on and on about how he was &quot;ignoring&quot; me..

He would delight in posting EVERY DAY how much he is &quot;ignoring&quot; me... :D  Just like cad..

 Proof positive how much space I occupied in his head...

JUST like cad... :D


It&#039;s so adorable..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>It's like having your drunk right-wing Uncle show up at the dinner table every night of the year and not just Thanksgiving.</i></p>
<p><b>"Quit trying to {ignore} me and {ignore} me!!!"</b><br />
-Morpheus</p>
<p>Yunno, we had a Weigantian™ like cad about 8-10 years ago..</p>
<p>Kevin was his name, I believe..</p>
<p>He too would also go on and on about how he was "ignoring" me..</p>
<p>He would delight in posting EVERY DAY how much he is "ignoring" me... :D  Just like cad..</p>
<p> Proof positive how much space I occupied in his head...</p>
<p>JUST like cad... :D</p>
<p>It's so adorable..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2022/01/21/friday-talking-points-a-busy-week/#comment-183866</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Jan 2022 23:02:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=21522#comment-183866</guid>
		<description>Democrats admit that their &lt;B&gt;DEFUND, DEMONIZE, DEMORALIZE THE POLICE&lt;/B&gt; policies have resulted in the huge uptick in crime and violence in Democrat run cities..

&lt;B&gt;White House blames &#039;underfunding of some police departments&#039; for violent crime spike

Democratic cities across America pledged to slash police funding after 2020 uprisings

White House press secretary Jen Psaki blamed the &quot;underfunding&quot; of some police forces for the spike in crime gripping America.

During the White House press briefing on Monday, Psaki was asked by Fox News’ Peter Doocy on what the Biden administration believes is fueling the crime surge that has stunned Americans.

Psaki pointed to &quot;gun violence&quot; as a &quot;huge reason&quot; for the uptick in crime as well as the &quot;underfunding of some police departments and their need for additional resources.&quot;&lt;/B&gt;
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/psaki-blames-underfunding-police-crime-spike

The only question that remains...

Why do Democrats hate America so much???</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Democrats admit that their <b>DEFUND, DEMONIZE, DEMORALIZE THE POLICE</b> policies have resulted in the huge uptick in crime and violence in Democrat run cities..</p>
<p><b>White House blames 'underfunding of some police departments' for violent crime spike</p>
<p>Democratic cities across America pledged to slash police funding after 2020 uprisings</p>
<p>White House press secretary Jen Psaki blamed the "underfunding" of some police forces for the spike in crime gripping America.</p>
<p>During the White House press briefing on Monday, Psaki was asked by Fox News’ Peter Doocy on what the Biden administration believes is fueling the crime surge that has stunned Americans.</p>
<p>Psaki pointed to "gun violence" as a "huge reason" for the uptick in crime as well as the "underfunding of some police departments and their need for additional resources."</b><br />
<a href="https://www.foxnews.com/politics/psaki-blames-underfunding-police-crime-spike" rel="nofollow">https://www.foxnews.com/politics/psaki-blames-underfunding-police-crime-spike</a></p>
<p>The only question that remains...</p>
<p>Why do Democrats hate America so much???</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MtnCaddy</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2022/01/21/friday-talking-points-a-busy-week/#comment-183865</link>
		<dc:creator>MtnCaddy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Jan 2022 22:56:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=21522#comment-183865</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s like having your drunk right-wing Uncle show up at the dinner table &lt;b&gt;every&lt;/b&gt; night of the year and not just Thanksgiving.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It's like having your drunk right-wing Uncle show up at the dinner table <b>every</b> night of the year and not just Thanksgiving.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2022/01/21/friday-talking-points-a-busy-week/#comment-183864</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Jan 2022 22:43:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=21522#comment-183864</guid>
		<description>Once again, cad proves how he is incapable of ignoring me..  :D


&lt;I&gt;Someone ought to get a life.&lt;/I&gt;

Says the guy who spews multiple drunk-posts in a row when he is sure it&#039;s safe and I am not around..  :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Once again, cad proves how he is incapable of ignoring me..  :D</p>
<p><i>Someone ought to get a life.</i></p>
<p>Says the guy who spews multiple drunk-posts in a row when he is sure it's safe and I am not around..  :D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MtnCaddy</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2022/01/21/friday-talking-points-a-busy-week/#comment-183863</link>
		<dc:creator>MtnCaddy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Jan 2022 22:22:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=21522#comment-183863</guid>
		<description>Checking in...alas, excessive trollery. *surprised look on my face*


Someone ought to get a life.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Checking in...alas, excessive trollery. *surprised look on my face*</p>
<p>Someone ought to get a life.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2022/01/21/friday-talking-points-a-busy-week/#comment-183862</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Jan 2022 21:24:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=21522#comment-183862</guid>
		<description>&lt;B&gt;Biden’s now losing support from the base

The biggest warning sign from the latest polling: The president’s not just cratering with swing voters, but losing ground with his core supporters.

One of the most worrisome political signs for the Biden administration from the latest round of polling is that the president isn’t just losing support among typical swing voters—suburbanites, independents, anti-Trump Republicans—but he’s now starting to take friendly fire from his own base.

This vicious cycle is the political version of inflation, providing the White House few obvious tools to get out of the mess they’ve created for themselves. It’s a self-inflicted problem. Just as the president overstimulated the economy by pushing through $1.9 trillion in COVID stimulus, he inflated expectations among his supporters that he’d pass a transformative big-government agenda like FDR and LBJ.

He’s now dealing with a nasty hangover, with two centrist members of his own party blocking his Build Back Better social-spending plan along with a last-ditch effort to roll back the legislative filibuster to pass voting reform. He’s taking heat on all sides: Frustrated moderates facing tough reelections amid fierce political headwinds and disillusioned progressives who believe all hope is lost.&lt;/B&gt;
https://www.nationaljournal.com/s/716300/bidens-now-losing-support-from-the-base/?unlock=I5WACY8X4T6RJEWX

This is a VERY worrisome sign for Joe Biden and the Democrats..

It shows that there is no bottom in sight for Biden&#039;s approval numbers...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>Biden’s now losing support from the base</p>
<p>The biggest warning sign from the latest polling: The president’s not just cratering with swing voters, but losing ground with his core supporters.</p>
<p>One of the most worrisome political signs for the Biden administration from the latest round of polling is that the president isn’t just losing support among typical swing voters—suburbanites, independents, anti-Trump Republicans—but he’s now starting to take friendly fire from his own base.</p>
<p>This vicious cycle is the political version of inflation, providing the White House few obvious tools to get out of the mess they’ve created for themselves. It’s a self-inflicted problem. Just as the president overstimulated the economy by pushing through $1.9 trillion in COVID stimulus, he inflated expectations among his supporters that he’d pass a transformative big-government agenda like FDR and LBJ.</p>
<p>He’s now dealing with a nasty hangover, with two centrist members of his own party blocking his Build Back Better social-spending plan along with a last-ditch effort to roll back the legislative filibuster to pass voting reform. He’s taking heat on all sides: Frustrated moderates facing tough reelections amid fierce political headwinds and disillusioned progressives who believe all hope is lost.</b><br />
<a href="https://www.nationaljournal.com/s/716300/bidens-now-losing-support-from-the-base/?unlock=I5WACY8X4T6RJEWX" rel="nofollow">https://www.nationaljournal.com/s/716300/bidens-now-losing-support-from-the-base/?unlock=I5WACY8X4T6RJEWX</a></p>
<p>This is a VERY worrisome sign for Joe Biden and the Democrats..</p>
<p>It shows that there is no bottom in sight for Biden's approval numbers...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2022/01/21/friday-talking-points-a-busy-week/#comment-183861</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Jan 2022 20:23:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=21522#comment-183861</guid>
		<description>&lt;B&gt;&quot;Always remember that the police &amp; prison systems were created to preserve slavery. To break the chains we must fight for total abolition.&quot;&lt;/B&gt;

The essence of Critical Race Theory....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>"Always remember that the police &amp; prison systems were created to preserve slavery. To break the chains we must fight for total abolition."</b></p>
<p>The essence of Critical Race Theory....</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2022/01/21/friday-talking-points-a-busy-week/#comment-183860</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Jan 2022 20:19:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=21522#comment-183860</guid>
		<description>&lt;B&gt;NYC council member demands &#039;racist&#039; NYPD be closed down: &#039;Thugs in blue&#039;

Democrat Socialist Councilwoman Kristin Richardson Jordan has spent career attacking NYPD

The New York City police department should be closed down, all criminals should be released from jail and police officers are a &quot;racist, rogue military force&quot; who are &quot;thugs in blue.&quot;

So says the new city council member who represents the Harlem district where the shocking ambush of two of the NYPD&#039;s finest occurred Friday night. 

Democrat Socialist Councilwoman Kristin Richardson Jordan has spent a career attacking the NYPD that she says needs to be dismantled because it is a suppressive tool of White American society.&lt;/B&gt;
https://www.foxnews.com/us/nyc-council-member-demands-racist-nypd-closed

The anti-cop attitude of Democrats is well documented...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>NYC council member demands 'racist' NYPD be closed down: 'Thugs in blue'</p>
<p>Democrat Socialist Councilwoman Kristin Richardson Jordan has spent career attacking NYPD</p>
<p>The New York City police department should be closed down, all criminals should be released from jail and police officers are a "racist, rogue military force" who are "thugs in blue."</p>
<p>So says the new city council member who represents the Harlem district where the shocking ambush of two of the NYPD's finest occurred Friday night. </p>
<p>Democrat Socialist Councilwoman Kristin Richardson Jordan has spent a career attacking the NYPD that she says needs to be dismantled because it is a suppressive tool of White American society.</b><br />
<a href="https://www.foxnews.com/us/nyc-council-member-demands-racist-nypd-closed" rel="nofollow">https://www.foxnews.com/us/nyc-council-member-demands-racist-nypd-closed</a></p>
<p>The anti-cop attitude of Democrats is well documented...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2022/01/21/friday-talking-points-a-busy-week/#comment-183859</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Jan 2022 19:36:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=21522#comment-183859</guid>
		<description>&lt;B&gt;CNN&#039;s Acosta, liberal media melt down over Bari Weiss’ COVID remarks: ‘Grow up’

According to Acosta, Weiss must understand &#039;trolling people to own the libs is not a sacrifice&#039;

MSNBC host Mehdi Hasan ripped Weiss for &quot;moaning&quot; about the pandemic as part of his high-speed &quot;60 Second Rant&quot; segment on Sunday.


&quot;Oh, it’s ridiculous, is it?&quot; he responded. &quot;People who should be complaining right now are our overworked and burned-out healthcare workers. But no. It’s never them moaning or whining about the pandemic.&quot;&lt;/B&gt;
https://www.foxnews.com/media/cnns-acosta-liberal-media-melt-down-over-bari-weiss-covid-remarks-grow-up

You mean the overworked burned-out healthcare workers that you and your fellow Democrats tried to throw under the bus because they wanted to follow the science???

Frakin&#039; hypocrite...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>CNN's Acosta, liberal media melt down over Bari Weiss’ COVID remarks: ‘Grow up’</p>
<p>According to Acosta, Weiss must understand 'trolling people to own the libs is not a sacrifice'</p>
<p>MSNBC host Mehdi Hasan ripped Weiss for "moaning" about the pandemic as part of his high-speed "60 Second Rant" segment on Sunday.</p>
<p>"Oh, it’s ridiculous, is it?" he responded. "People who should be complaining right now are our overworked and burned-out healthcare workers. But no. It’s never them moaning or whining about the pandemic."</b><br />
<a href="https://www.foxnews.com/media/cnns-acosta-liberal-media-melt-down-over-bari-weiss-covid-remarks-grow-up" rel="nofollow">https://www.foxnews.com/media/cnns-acosta-liberal-media-melt-down-over-bari-weiss-covid-remarks-grow-up</a></p>
<p>You mean the overworked burned-out healthcare workers that you and your fellow Democrats tried to throw under the bus because they wanted to follow the science???</p>
<p>Frakin' hypocrite...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2022/01/21/friday-talking-points-a-busy-week/#comment-183858</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Jan 2022 18:28:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=21522#comment-183858</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;i&#039;m not implying any of the leaps you&#039;ve made.&lt;/I&gt;

Do I detect a bit of an :eyeroll: there??  :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>i'm not implying any of the leaps you've made.</i></p>
<p>Do I detect a bit of an :eyeroll: there??  :D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2022/01/21/friday-talking-points-a-busy-week/#comment-183857</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Jan 2022 18:17:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=21522#comment-183857</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;Imposing or forcing cultural diversity is the anti-thesis of a merit-based equality-based society.&lt;/I&gt;

And, forgive my presumption but...  Just to address the point that is a Left Wing progression of the afore mentioned point...

A society that is not merit-based is a society of dullard sheep... 

Think the Children Of Vaal :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Imposing or forcing cultural diversity is the anti-thesis of a merit-based equality-based society.</i></p>
<p>And, forgive my presumption but...  Just to address the point that is a Left Wing progression of the afore mentioned point...</p>
<p>A society that is not merit-based is a society of dullard sheep... </p>
<p>Think the Children Of Vaal :D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2022/01/21/friday-talking-points-a-busy-week/#comment-183856</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Jan 2022 18:13:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=21522#comment-183856</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;i&#039;m not implying any of the leaps you&#039;ve made. cultural diversity does not equal accepting people who are unqualified.&lt;/I&gt;

Imposing or forcing cultural diversity is the anti-thesis of a merit-based equality-based society.

Democrats either need to give up on the notion of imposing race-based criteria or concede that they are not really interested in a society of true equality

They can&#039;t have both...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>i'm not implying any of the leaps you've made. cultural diversity does not equal accepting people who are unqualified.</i></p>
<p>Imposing or forcing cultural diversity is the anti-thesis of a merit-based equality-based society.</p>
<p>Democrats either need to give up on the notion of imposing race-based criteria or concede that they are not really interested in a society of true equality</p>
<p>They can't have both...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nypoet22</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2022/01/21/friday-talking-points-a-busy-week/#comment-183855</link>
		<dc:creator>nypoet22</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Jan 2022 18:08:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=21522#comment-183855</guid>
		<description>@m,

i&#039;m not implying any of the leaps you&#039;ve made. cultural diversity does not equal accepting people who are unqualified.

JL</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@m,</p>
<p>i'm not implying any of the leaps you've made. cultural diversity does not equal accepting people who are unqualified.</p>
<p>JL</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2022/01/21/friday-talking-points-a-busy-week/#comment-183854</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Jan 2022 17:59:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=21522#comment-183854</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;If you DO want a society with a race based system instead of a system based on meritocracy, then enforce a quota system where the exact percentages of races in college equal the exact percentages of races that are in the general community...&lt;/I&gt;

It&#039;s the only way to be sure to have a race based system that is directly representative of the community...

&lt;B&gt;&quot;Nuke the site from orbit.  It&#039;s the only way to be sure&quot;&lt;/B&gt;
-Riply, ALIENS</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>If you DO want a society with a race based system instead of a system based on meritocracy, then enforce a quota system where the exact percentages of races in college equal the exact percentages of races that are in the general community...</i></p>
<p>It's the only way to be sure to have a race based system that is directly representative of the community...</p>
<p><b>"Nuke the site from orbit.  It's the only way to be sure"</b><br />
-Riply, ALIENS</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2022/01/21/friday-talking-points-a-busy-week/#comment-183853</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Jan 2022 17:53:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=21522#comment-183853</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;college admissions aren&#039;t just about having to &quot;compete,&quot; they&#039;re about creating a community that stimulates thought, &lt;/I&gt;

Really??

I thought college was about training future leaders, not making people feel good about themselves..

&lt;I&gt; if by being &quot;blind&quot; to considerations of ethnicity we create cultural homogeneity, we&#039;re doing a disservice to all the students, regardless of ethnicity.&lt;/I&gt;

So, yer saying that we should admit people into college who may lack the skill, maturity and ability to succeed because they may (or may not) have faced challenges in the upbringing??

We ALL face challenges in our upbringings.. These days, most if not all, have NOTHING to do with the color of our skin..

All I am saying is, if Democrats TRULY want a society based on equality, then race based criteria has GOT to go..

If you DO want a society with a race based system instead of a system based on meritocracy, then enforce  a quota system where the exact percentages of races in college equal the exact percentages of races that are in the general community...

There ya go..  There is the Democrat version of &quot;equality&quot;...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>college admissions aren't just about having to "compete," they're about creating a community that stimulates thought, </i></p>
<p>Really??</p>
<p>I thought college was about training future leaders, not making people feel good about themselves..</p>
<p><i> if by being "blind" to considerations of ethnicity we create cultural homogeneity, we're doing a disservice to all the students, regardless of ethnicity.</i></p>
<p>So, yer saying that we should admit people into college who may lack the skill, maturity and ability to succeed because they may (or may not) have faced challenges in the upbringing??</p>
<p>We ALL face challenges in our upbringings.. These days, most if not all, have NOTHING to do with the color of our skin..</p>
<p>All I am saying is, if Democrats TRULY want a society based on equality, then race based criteria has GOT to go..</p>
<p>If you DO want a society with a race based system instead of a system based on meritocracy, then enforce  a quota system where the exact percentages of races in college equal the exact percentages of races that are in the general community...</p>
<p>There ya go..  There is the Democrat version of "equality"...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nypoet22</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2022/01/21/friday-talking-points-a-busy-week/#comment-183852</link>
		<dc:creator>nypoet22</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Jan 2022 17:46:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=21522#comment-183852</guid>
		<description>college admissions aren&#039;t just about having to &quot;compete,&quot; they&#039;re about creating a community that stimulates thought, which tends to include people from a variety of cultural backgrounds. if by being &quot;blind&quot; to considerations of ethnicity we create cultural homogeneity, we&#039;re doing a disservice to all the students, regardless of ethnicity.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>college admissions aren't just about having to "compete," they're about creating a community that stimulates thought, which tends to include people from a variety of cultural backgrounds. if by being "blind" to considerations of ethnicity we create cultural homogeneity, we're doing a disservice to all the students, regardless of ethnicity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2022/01/21/friday-talking-points-a-busy-week/#comment-183851</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Jan 2022 17:23:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=21522#comment-183851</guid>
		<description>&lt;B&gt;In ruling for Harvard, a federal district court judge said abandoning considerations of race &quot;would cause a sharp decline in the percentage of African American and Hispanic students.&quot;&lt;/B&gt;

Exactly how??

Are they saying that black and hispanic students would be afraid they couldn&#039;t compete if the admissions process was color blind??

Sounds like a pretty racist attitude to have, eh??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>In ruling for Harvard, a federal district court judge said abandoning considerations of race "would cause a sharp decline in the percentage of African American and Hispanic students."</b></p>
<p>Exactly how??</p>
<p>Are they saying that black and hispanic students would be afraid they couldn't compete if the admissions process was color blind??</p>
<p>Sounds like a pretty racist attitude to have, eh??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2022/01/21/friday-talking-points-a-busy-week/#comment-183850</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Jan 2022 17:07:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=21522#comment-183850</guid>
		<description>&lt;B&gt;Supreme Court will consider challenge to affirmative action in college admissions

The case, naming Harvard and the University of North Carolina, is the most serious threat in decades to affirmative action at public and private colleges and universities.&lt;/B&gt;
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/supreme-court/supreme-court-will-consider-challenges-affirmative-action-harvard-unc-admissions-n1287915

FINALLY!!

Let&#039;s get rid of ALL systemic/institutionalized 
 racism...

It&#039;s the *ONLY* way to have a color-blind everyone is equal society that DEMOCRATS claim they want...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>Supreme Court will consider challenge to affirmative action in college admissions</p>
<p>The case, naming Harvard and the University of North Carolina, is the most serious threat in decades to affirmative action at public and private colleges and universities.</b><br />
<a href="https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/supreme-court/supreme-court-will-consider-challenges-affirmative-action-harvard-unc-admissions-n1287915" rel="nofollow">https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/supreme-court/supreme-court-will-consider-challenges-affirmative-action-harvard-unc-admissions-n1287915</a></p>
<p>FINALLY!!</p>
<p>Let's get rid of ALL systemic/institutionalized<br />
 racism...</p>
<p>It's the *ONLY* way to have a color-blind everyone is equal society that DEMOCRATS claim they want...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2022/01/21/friday-talking-points-a-busy-week/#comment-183849</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Jan 2022 17:05:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=21522#comment-183849</guid>
		<description>Now let&#039;s hear from one of the Democrats most ardent water carriers....  



&lt;B&gt;&quot;President Biden’s news conference on Wednesday was designed to kick off a second year reset of his presidency, recapture his political identity, if you will, but our new NBC News poll suggests Mr. Biden does need a reset because he&#039;s lost his identity a bit.&quot;

&quot;He&#039;s no longer seen as competent and effective, no longer seen as a good commander-in-chief, or perhaps most damaging, as easy-going and likable. In fact, just 5% of adults say Mr. Biden has performed better than expected as president, one of the many lowest firsts and fewest in our poll.&quot;

&quot;But as you can see, two of our three most important indexes is sitting in shellacking territory right for the Democrats. This is a dangerous place for the party and the president to be at the one-year mark of this presidency.&quot; &lt;/B&gt;
-Chuck Todd, NBC NEWS

WOW...  Just...  WOW...

Like I have always said..

If yer SUPPORTERS are starting to come down on ya like THIS...

It&#039;s time to rethink things..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now let's hear from one of the Democrats most ardent water carriers....  </p>
<p><b>"President Biden’s news conference on Wednesday was designed to kick off a second year reset of his presidency, recapture his political identity, if you will, but our new NBC News poll suggests Mr. Biden does need a reset because he's lost his identity a bit."</p>
<p>"He's no longer seen as competent and effective, no longer seen as a good commander-in-chief, or perhaps most damaging, as easy-going and likable. In fact, just 5% of adults say Mr. Biden has performed better than expected as president, one of the many lowest firsts and fewest in our poll."</p>
<p>"But as you can see, two of our three most important indexes is sitting in shellacking territory right for the Democrats. This is a dangerous place for the party and the president to be at the one-year mark of this presidency." </b><br />
-Chuck Todd, NBC NEWS</p>
<p>WOW...  Just...  WOW...</p>
<p>Like I have always said..</p>
<p>If yer SUPPORTERS are starting to come down on ya like THIS...</p>
<p>It's time to rethink things..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2022/01/21/friday-talking-points-a-busy-week/#comment-183848</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Jan 2022 16:37:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=21522#comment-183848</guid>
		<description>Reading the above news article..

How do Democrats sleep at night, supporting such a scumbag and terroristic and opportunistic group like BLM??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Reading the above news article..</p>
<p>How do Democrats sleep at night, supporting such a scumbag and terroristic and opportunistic group like BLM??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2022/01/21/friday-talking-points-a-busy-week/#comment-183847</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Jan 2022 16:35:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=21522#comment-183847</guid>
		<description>Referencing comment #208 above...

&lt;B&gt;BLM DC complains that shot police officers treated as &#039;heroes&#039; in &#039;tear jerker press conferences&#039;

Black Lives Matter DC says, &#039;Being Black in DC is more dangerous than any job&#039;&lt;/B&gt;
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/blm-dc-complains-shot-police-officers-treated-heroes

Only if you are a scumb-bag criminal who preys on the weak and the helpless...

&lt;B&gt;&lt;I&gt;And remind the few....
When ill of us they speak.....
That we are all that stands between....
The monsters and the weak.....&lt;/B&gt;&lt;/I&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Referencing comment #208 above...</p>
<p><b>BLM DC complains that shot police officers treated as 'heroes' in 'tear jerker press conferences'</p>
<p>Black Lives Matter DC says, 'Being Black in DC is more dangerous than any job'</b><br />
<a href="https://www.foxnews.com/politics/blm-dc-complains-shot-police-officers-treated-heroes" rel="nofollow">https://www.foxnews.com/politics/blm-dc-complains-shot-police-officers-treated-heroes</a></p>
<p>Only if you are a scumb-bag criminal who preys on the weak and the helpless...</p>
<p><b><i>And remind the few....<br />
When ill of us they speak.....<br />
That we are all that stands between....<br />
The monsters and the weak.....</i></b></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2022/01/21/friday-talking-points-a-busy-week/#comment-183846</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Jan 2022 16:31:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=21522#comment-183846</guid>
		<description>&lt;B&gt;Russia has insisted that it has no intention to invade its neighbor, but its recent actions could suggest otherwise. Russian troops have been deployed to the eastern border with Ukraine and tensions were not eased after talks Friday between Blinken and Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov in Geneva.

Russia wants concrete assurances that NATO will not continue to expand, because Moscow sees that expansion as a security risk. NATO has said the demands are unacceptable and that joining the alliance is a right of any country and does not threaten Russia.&lt;/B&gt;

Here&#039;s the facts..  While Russia&#039;s actions are understandable, there are absolutely NO FACTS to support the claim that the US or NATO is a threat to Russia territory or sovereignty...

Given that fact, Russia&#039;s actions are inappropriate and illegal...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>Russia has insisted that it has no intention to invade its neighbor, but its recent actions could suggest otherwise. Russian troops have been deployed to the eastern border with Ukraine and tensions were not eased after talks Friday between Blinken and Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov in Geneva.</p>
<p>Russia wants concrete assurances that NATO will not continue to expand, because Moscow sees that expansion as a security risk. NATO has said the demands are unacceptable and that joining the alliance is a right of any country and does not threaten Russia.</b></p>
<p>Here's the facts..  While Russia's actions are understandable, there are absolutely NO FACTS to support the claim that the US or NATO is a threat to Russia territory or sovereignty...</p>
<p>Given that fact, Russia's actions are inappropriate and illegal...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2022/01/21/friday-talking-points-a-busy-week/#comment-183845</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Jan 2022 16:11:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=21522#comment-183845</guid>
		<description>&lt;B&gt;NATO sending fighters, ships to region; UK to withdraw some staff from embassy in Ukraine
European Union aims to show united front in face of what it sees as Russian aggression&lt;/B&gt;
https://www.foxnews.com/world/uk-to-withdraw-some-staff-from-embassy-in-ukraine-due-to-threat-from-russia

On the road to war...  :^/

Rather apropos that WW III would start under a Democrat administration..  :^/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>NATO sending fighters, ships to region; UK to withdraw some staff from embassy in Ukraine<br />
European Union aims to show united front in face of what it sees as Russian aggression</b><br />
<a href="https://www.foxnews.com/world/uk-to-withdraw-some-staff-from-embassy-in-ukraine-due-to-threat-from-russia" rel="nofollow">https://www.foxnews.com/world/uk-to-withdraw-some-staff-from-embassy-in-ukraine-due-to-threat-from-russia</a></p>
<p>On the road to war...  :^/</p>
<p>Rather apropos that WW III would start under a Democrat administration..  :^/</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2022/01/21/friday-talking-points-a-busy-week/#comment-183844</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Jan 2022 15:23:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=21522#comment-183844</guid>
		<description>&lt;B&gt;In other words, these two studies provide good evidence that high-profile policing incidents and the ensuing scrutiny drive discretionary police activity down and violent crime, especially homicide, up. That doesn’t settle the debate, of course. It remains an open question why a reduction in enforcement of petty crimes would lead to an increase in serious ones like homicide. But it does give support to those who propose a relationship between 2020’s wave of anti-police protests and the ensuing homicide wave still sweeping the country—and to those who believe that continued hostility to the police will lead to more bloodshed.&lt;/B&gt;

&lt;I&gt;It remains an open question why a reduction in enforcement of petty crimes would lead to an increase in serious ones like homicide. &lt;/I&gt;

Not really..  It&#039;s called Broken Windows Policing...

A reduction in the enforcement of petty and quality of life crimes (IE Vandalism, Broken Windows, etc etc) emboldens the criminal element and makes them believe that there is not a credible law enforcement and therefore they are free to attack and ravage whole neighborhoods..

Under Democrat policies, crime DOES pay...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>In other words, these two studies provide good evidence that high-profile policing incidents and the ensuing scrutiny drive discretionary police activity down and violent crime, especially homicide, up. That doesn’t settle the debate, of course. It remains an open question why a reduction in enforcement of petty crimes would lead to an increase in serious ones like homicide. But it does give support to those who propose a relationship between 2020’s wave of anti-police protests and the ensuing homicide wave still sweeping the country—and to those who believe that continued hostility to the police will lead to more bloodshed.</b></p>
<p><i>It remains an open question why a reduction in enforcement of petty crimes would lead to an increase in serious ones like homicide. </i></p>
<p>Not really..  It's called Broken Windows Policing...</p>
<p>A reduction in the enforcement of petty and quality of life crimes (IE Vandalism, Broken Windows, etc etc) emboldens the criminal element and makes them believe that there is not a credible law enforcement and therefore they are free to attack and ravage whole neighborhoods..</p>
<p>Under Democrat policies, crime DOES pay...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2022/01/21/friday-talking-points-a-busy-week/#comment-183843</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Jan 2022 15:19:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=21522#comment-183843</guid>
		<description>&lt;B&gt;Cheng and Long’s observations are consonant with a drop in police activity and an increase in violent crime following the events in Ferguson. But what about the effects of officer-involved fatalities in general? A second study, by Deepak Premkumar of the Public Policy Institute of California, compares arrest patterns among police departments in 52 cities that experienced high-profile shooting incidents to 2,688 police departments that did not—and comes to a similar conclusion.

Just as in Cheng and Long’s study, Premkumar finds that police reduce their activity—as measured by arrests—after a high-profile incident, but not evenly. He finds large average declines in arrests for minor offenses (up to 33 percent for marijuana possession) but no significant decline in arrests for major offenses, whether violent crime or property crime. At the same time, cities that experienced high-profile incidents, relative to those that did not, saw a 10 percent to 17 percent increase in murders and robberies, as well as small increases in theft and grand theft auto.

Both studies not only identify a decline in police activity and an increase in homicide after a high-profile incident but also argue that the nature of the decline in activity supports a “public scrutiny” mechanism for the effect. In particular, a drop in police activity for minor offenses drives the overall policing pullback. This fact supports a theory (as articulated by Premkumar) whereby officers reduce arrests that they deem “less important” in order to minimize public contact. That differs from a competing theory under which a loss of police “legitimacy”—which, in turn, reduces community engagement with the cops—drives the Ferguson Effect. If the competing theory were borne out, the study should have found reductions in arrests for offenses of all kinds.&lt;/B&gt;

Again, it&#039;s a no brainer..  When a political Party, as a Party platform, has a &lt;B&gt;DEFUND, DEMONIZE, DEMORALIZE&lt;/B&gt; law enforcement, scumbags are encouraged to attack and target cops..

It&#039;s so hard to be a cop anyways..   By Democrats adding a POLITICAL target on cops&#039; backs in addition to all the other targets on cops&#039; backs, Democrats just make it that much harder and that much more dangerous to be a cop..

The result??   Violent crime and crime in general flares out of control...

As we see in Democrat-run areas....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>Cheng and Long’s observations are consonant with a drop in police activity and an increase in violent crime following the events in Ferguson. But what about the effects of officer-involved fatalities in general? A second study, by Deepak Premkumar of the Public Policy Institute of California, compares arrest patterns among police departments in 52 cities that experienced high-profile shooting incidents to 2,688 police departments that did not—and comes to a similar conclusion.</p>
<p>Just as in Cheng and Long’s study, Premkumar finds that police reduce their activity—as measured by arrests—after a high-profile incident, but not evenly. He finds large average declines in arrests for minor offenses (up to 33 percent for marijuana possession) but no significant decline in arrests for major offenses, whether violent crime or property crime. At the same time, cities that experienced high-profile incidents, relative to those that did not, saw a 10 percent to 17 percent increase in murders and robberies, as well as small increases in theft and grand theft auto.</p>
<p>Both studies not only identify a decline in police activity and an increase in homicide after a high-profile incident but also argue that the nature of the decline in activity supports a “public scrutiny” mechanism for the effect. In particular, a drop in police activity for minor offenses drives the overall policing pullback. This fact supports a theory (as articulated by Premkumar) whereby officers reduce arrests that they deem “less important” in order to minimize public contact. That differs from a competing theory under which a loss of police “legitimacy”—which, in turn, reduces community engagement with the cops—drives the Ferguson Effect. If the competing theory were borne out, the study should have found reductions in arrests for offenses of all kinds.</b></p>
<p>Again, it's a no brainer..  When a political Party, as a Party platform, has a <b>DEFUND, DEMONIZE, DEMORALIZE</b> law enforcement, scumbags are encouraged to attack and target cops..</p>
<p>It's so hard to be a cop anyways..   By Democrats adding a POLITICAL target on cops' backs in addition to all the other targets on cops' backs, Democrats just make it that much harder and that much more dangerous to be a cop..</p>
<p>The result??   Violent crime and crime in general flares out of control...</p>
<p>As we see in Democrat-run areas....</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2022/01/21/friday-talking-points-a-busy-week/#comment-183842</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Jan 2022 15:15:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=21522#comment-183842</guid>
		<description>Russ,

This is what I don&#039;t get about your support for the Democrat Party..

They hate cops...  For me, that&#039;s a deal breaker.. I could not support a Party that hated on cops as a party platform..

I dunno..  Maybe it&#039;s because I was actually a cop who patrolled the streets...  

&lt;B&gt;&quot;Being a cop is not what we do, it&#039;s who we are..&quot;&lt;/B&gt;
-James Woods, THE HARD WAY

That is probably one of the BIGGEST reasons I cannot nor will ever support the Democrat Party..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Russ,</p>
<p>This is what I don't get about your support for the Democrat Party..</p>
<p>They hate cops...  For me, that's a deal breaker.. I could not support a Party that hated on cops as a party platform..</p>
<p>I dunno..  Maybe it's because I was actually a cop who patrolled the streets...  </p>
<p><b>"Being a cop is not what we do, it's who we are.."</b><br />
-James Woods, THE HARD WAY</p>
<p>That is probably one of the BIGGEST reasons I cannot nor will ever support the Democrat Party..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2022/01/21/friday-talking-points-a-busy-week/#comment-183841</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Jan 2022 14:52:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=21522#comment-183841</guid>
		<description>&lt;B&gt;The more-recent study, just published in the Journal of Public Economics by university economists Cheng Cheng and Wei Long, looks at the effect of Brown’s death on police activity and crime on a week-to-week level in St. Louis (which is near Ferguson), and on a month-to-month level in 60 big cities. The St. Louis police department collects high-quality data on self-initiated activity, the authors note, allowing them to assess in specific detail police behavior just before and just after Brown’s death.

Their findings manage somehow to be both unsurprising and shocking. In the immediate aftermath of Brown’s death, self-initiated arrests fell 62 percent. Similar declines are seen across nine out of 11 categories of self-initiated activities, including foot patrol (down 82 percent) and pedestrian checks (76 percent). Notably, the decline in arrests is concentrated among misdemeanor arrests (more discretionary than felonies) and among arrests of blacks (rather than whites). This reduction in police activity persisted for at least the next two years. In the same period, the city experienced a significant rise in homicide and aggravated assault.

The multicity analysis shows a similar pattern. Cheng and Long assume that a Ferguson Effect will be more common in cities with higher black population shares, so they compare those in the top quartile of black population against the other cities as a control. They identify the same phenomenon as in St. Louis: the blackest cities saw larger declines in arrests relative to those with smaller black populations, driven by a decline in misdemeanor arrests, and a simultaneous large (10 percent) increase in homicide.&lt;/B&gt;

The facts are clear..

Anti-police sentiment and active attacks on LEOs greatly  diminishes the LEOs desire to be pro-active in their day to day patrols..

And once cops pull back, violent crime and crimes of all types flourish...

All caused by Democrats and their &lt;B&gt;DEFUND, DEMONIZE, DEMORALIZE THE POLICE&lt;/B&gt; policies..

And those policies are the DIRECT result of Democrats doing so utterly poorly in down-stream elections in 2020...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>The more-recent study, just published in the Journal of Public Economics by university economists Cheng Cheng and Wei Long, looks at the effect of Brown’s death on police activity and crime on a week-to-week level in St. Louis (which is near Ferguson), and on a month-to-month level in 60 big cities. The St. Louis police department collects high-quality data on self-initiated activity, the authors note, allowing them to assess in specific detail police behavior just before and just after Brown’s death.</p>
<p>Their findings manage somehow to be both unsurprising and shocking. In the immediate aftermath of Brown’s death, self-initiated arrests fell 62 percent. Similar declines are seen across nine out of 11 categories of self-initiated activities, including foot patrol (down 82 percent) and pedestrian checks (76 percent). Notably, the decline in arrests is concentrated among misdemeanor arrests (more discretionary than felonies) and among arrests of blacks (rather than whites). This reduction in police activity persisted for at least the next two years. In the same period, the city experienced a significant rise in homicide and aggravated assault.</p>
<p>The multicity analysis shows a similar pattern. Cheng and Long assume that a Ferguson Effect will be more common in cities with higher black population shares, so they compare those in the top quartile of black population against the other cities as a control. They identify the same phenomenon as in St. Louis: the blackest cities saw larger declines in arrests relative to those with smaller black populations, driven by a decline in misdemeanor arrests, and a simultaneous large (10 percent) increase in homicide.</b></p>
<p>The facts are clear..</p>
<p>Anti-police sentiment and active attacks on LEOs greatly  diminishes the LEOs desire to be pro-active in their day to day patrols..</p>
<p>And once cops pull back, violent crime and crimes of all types flourish...</p>
<p>All caused by Democrats and their <b>DEFUND, DEMONIZE, DEMORALIZE THE POLICE</b> policies..</p>
<p>And those policies are the DIRECT result of Democrats doing so utterly poorly in down-stream elections in 2020...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2022/01/21/friday-talking-points-a-busy-week/#comment-183840</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Jan 2022 14:41:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=21522#comment-183840</guid>
		<description>OK..  Let&#039;s talk about the Ferguson Effect..

&lt;B&gt;New Evidence for the Ferguson Effect

Recent studies support a long-standing theory connecting police protests and rising violent crime.

In 2015 and 2016, the coincidence of a major surge in homicides following mass protests over the police killing of Michael Brown in Ferguson, Missouri, prompted a heated debate about whether the demonstrations, and the anti-police hostility they engendered, helped cause the murder spike. Law enforcement leaders and some public commentators—including City Journal contributing editor Heather Mac Donald—identified a “Ferguson Effect,” whereby public scrutiny reduced police proactivity and led to an increase in violent crime. Supporters of the protests just as fervently derided the idea as imaginary and “debunked.”&lt;/B&gt;
https://www.city-journal.org/new-evidence-connects-police-protests-and-rising-violent-crime?skip=1

The Ferguson Effect is a real and provable effect that explains how Democrats are screwing over the minorities they claim to care about..

And it makes sense..

Cops are human, after all..  They are not going to go out there and put themselves in a position where they could be prosecuted simply for doing their jobs..

I mean, when I patrolled the streets, I didn&#039;t really given any thought to political considerations.. I did my job to the best of my ability and I (probably naively) assumed that I couldn&#039;t be faulted for doing honorable, legal and morally correct actions..  

While I was in several shootings, I never had to worry about politics because I knew I was morally and ethically in the right..

I really feel for today&#039;s cops who have to navigate such a political and ideological mine-field..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK..  Let's talk about the Ferguson Effect..</p>
<p><b>New Evidence for the Ferguson Effect</p>
<p>Recent studies support a long-standing theory connecting police protests and rising violent crime.</p>
<p>In 2015 and 2016, the coincidence of a major surge in homicides following mass protests over the police killing of Michael Brown in Ferguson, Missouri, prompted a heated debate about whether the demonstrations, and the anti-police hostility they engendered, helped cause the murder spike. Law enforcement leaders and some public commentators—including City Journal contributing editor Heather Mac Donald—identified a “Ferguson Effect,” whereby public scrutiny reduced police proactivity and led to an increase in violent crime. Supporters of the protests just as fervently derided the idea as imaginary and “debunked.”</b><br />
<a href="https://www.city-journal.org/new-evidence-connects-police-protests-and-rising-violent-crime?skip=1" rel="nofollow">https://www.city-journal.org/new-evidence-connects-police-protests-and-rising-violent-crime?skip=1</a></p>
<p>The Ferguson Effect is a real and provable effect that explains how Democrats are screwing over the minorities they claim to care about..</p>
<p>And it makes sense..</p>
<p>Cops are human, after all..  They are not going to go out there and put themselves in a position where they could be prosecuted simply for doing their jobs..</p>
<p>I mean, when I patrolled the streets, I didn't really given any thought to political considerations.. I did my job to the best of my ability and I (probably naively) assumed that I couldn't be faulted for doing honorable, legal and morally correct actions..  </p>
<p>While I was in several shootings, I never had to worry about politics because I knew I was morally and ethically in the right..</p>
<p>I really feel for today's cops who have to navigate such a political and ideological mine-field..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2022/01/21/friday-talking-points-a-busy-week/#comment-183839</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Jan 2022 14:29:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=21522#comment-183839</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;Gotta run ...&lt;/I&gt;


Awwwwww  :^(  Ya know what happens when ya leave me to my own devices..  :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Gotta run ...</i></p>
<p>Awwwwww  :^(  Ya know what happens when ya leave me to my own devices..  :D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2022/01/21/friday-talking-points-a-busy-week/#comment-183838</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Jan 2022 14:13:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=21522#comment-183838</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;Well, I&#039;ll believe THAT when I see it. Ahem.&lt;/I&gt;

Your skepticism is well founded..  I hope to prove you wrong..  :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Well, I'll believe THAT when I see it. Ahem.</i></p>
<p>Your skepticism is well founded..  I hope to prove you wrong..  :D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elizabeth Miller</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2022/01/21/friday-talking-points-a-busy-week/#comment-183837</link>
		<dc:creator>Elizabeth Miller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Jan 2022 14:09:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=21522#comment-183837</guid>
		<description>Gotta run ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gotta run ...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elizabeth Miller</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2022/01/21/friday-talking-points-a-busy-week/#comment-183836</link>
		<dc:creator>Elizabeth Miller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Jan 2022 14:08:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=21522#comment-183836</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;I am adopting the phase of ignoring their comments unless they are on-topic..&lt;/i&gt;

Well, I&#039;ll believe THAT when I see it. Ahem.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>I am adopting the phase of ignoring their comments unless they are on-topic..</i></p>
<p>Well, I'll believe THAT when I see it. Ahem.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2022/01/21/friday-talking-points-a-busy-week/#comment-183835</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Jan 2022 13:41:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=21522#comment-183835</guid>
		<description>WOOt!!!!   200!!!!   :D

Quantity **AND** Quality..  :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WOOt!!!!   200!!!!   :D</p>
<p>Quantity **AND** Quality..  :D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2022/01/21/friday-talking-points-a-busy-week/#comment-183834</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Jan 2022 13:40:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=21522#comment-183834</guid>
		<description>I have a new subject to discuss, Liz..

But I&#039;ll hold off and see if you want to delve into the filibuster discussion, or anything else I have posted, more thoroughly..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a new subject to discuss, Liz..</p>
<p>But I'll hold off and see if you want to delve into the filibuster discussion, or anything else I have posted, more thoroughly..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2022/01/21/friday-talking-points-a-busy-week/#comment-183833</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Jan 2022 13:39:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=21522#comment-183833</guid>
		<description>But that&#039;s great that you will feel the same..

Because after reading the above posted commentary, I am coming around to the idea that getting rid of the filibuster might be the best course of action for the GOP..

I still don&#039;t agree with getting rid of the filibuster.. But I am coming around to supporting the action..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But that's great that you will feel the same..</p>
<p>Because after reading the above posted commentary, I am coming around to the idea that getting rid of the filibuster might be the best course of action for the GOP..</p>
<p>I still don't agree with getting rid of the filibuster.. But I am coming around to supporting the action..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2022/01/21/friday-talking-points-a-busy-week/#comment-183832</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Jan 2022 13:38:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=21522#comment-183832</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;Of course, I&#039;ll feel the same. You don&#039;t really read my comments, do ya ... :(&lt;/I&gt;

I read every word... 

But I must have missed that one..  

If it was interspersed with the Weigantian™ troll (Bashi) and/or Weigantian™ terrorist (Vick) comments that would explain why I missed it..  

I am adopting the phase of ignoring their comments unless they are on-topic..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Of course, I'll feel the same. You don't really read my comments, do ya ... :(</i></p>
<p>I read every word... </p>
<p>But I must have missed that one..  </p>
<p>If it was interspersed with the Weigantian™ troll (Bashi) and/or Weigantian™ terrorist (Vick) comments that would explain why I missed it..  </p>
<p>I am adopting the phase of ignoring their comments unless they are on-topic..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elizabeth Miller</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2022/01/21/friday-talking-points-a-busy-week/#comment-183830</link>
		<dc:creator>Elizabeth Miller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Jan 2022 13:33:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=21522#comment-183830</guid>
		<description>Michale,

&lt;i&gt;OK.. Fine.. I&#039;ll touch bases with you when the GOP has the Senate and see if you feel the same.. :D Fair enough??&lt;/i&gt;

Of course, I&#039;ll feel the same. You don&#039;t really read my comments, do ya ... :(</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michale,</p>
<p><i>OK.. Fine.. I'll touch bases with you when the GOP has the Senate and see if you feel the same.. :D Fair enough??</i></p>
<p>Of course, I'll feel the same. You don't really read my comments, do ya ... :(</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2022/01/21/friday-talking-points-a-busy-week/#comment-183829</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Jan 2022 13:22:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=21522#comment-183829</guid>
		<description>Once again, Joe Biden is throwing Americans under the bus.  This time it&#039;s in Ukraine instead of Afghanistan..

&lt;B&gt;No Evacuation for Now of U.S. Citizens in Ukraine: State Dept.

The United States is not &quot;at this time&quot; organizing an evacuation of American citizens from Ukraine despite rising fears of an unspecified military action by Russia, a State Department spokesperson said Saturday. 

In the event matters deteriorate, however, &quot;American citizens should not anticipate that there will be U.S. government-sponsored evacuations,&quot; the spokesperson said, speaking on grounds of anonymity. 

&quot;Currently, commercial flights are available to support departures.&quot;  

The State Department had already advised U.S. citizens not to travel to Ukraine due to concerns about Covid-19. A department website also urges them &quot;to reconsider travel due to increased threats from Russia.&quot;&lt;/B&gt;
https://www.themoscowtimes.com/2022/01/22/no-evacuation-for-now-of-us-citizens-in-ukraine-state-dept-a76122

Why does Biden hate Americans so much???</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Once again, Joe Biden is throwing Americans under the bus.  This time it's in Ukraine instead of Afghanistan..</p>
<p><b>No Evacuation for Now of U.S. Citizens in Ukraine: State Dept.</p>
<p>The United States is not "at this time" organizing an evacuation of American citizens from Ukraine despite rising fears of an unspecified military action by Russia, a State Department spokesperson said Saturday. </p>
<p>In the event matters deteriorate, however, "American citizens should not anticipate that there will be U.S. government-sponsored evacuations," the spokesperson said, speaking on grounds of anonymity. </p>
<p>"Currently, commercial flights are available to support departures."  </p>
<p>The State Department had already advised U.S. citizens not to travel to Ukraine due to concerns about Covid-19. A department website also urges them "to reconsider travel due to increased threats from Russia."</b><br />
<a href="https://www.themoscowtimes.com/2022/01/22/no-evacuation-for-now-of-us-citizens-in-ukraine-state-dept-a76122" rel="nofollow">https://www.themoscowtimes.com/2022/01/22/no-evacuation-for-now-of-us-citizens-in-ukraine-state-dept-a76122</a></p>
<p>Why does Biden hate Americans so much???</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2022/01/21/friday-talking-points-a-busy-week/#comment-183828</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Jan 2022 13:17:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=21522#comment-183828</guid>
		<description>But here&#039;s what I&#039;ll do..

When the GOP takes control of the Senate in 2023, let&#039;s revisit the Filibuster issue, mm kay??

If Democrats STILL want to get rid of the filibuster then, I&#039;ll support ya&#039;all to the hilt!..

How can it be any more fair that that??  :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But here's what I'll do..</p>
<p>When the GOP takes control of the Senate in 2023, let's revisit the Filibuster issue, mm kay??</p>
<p>If Democrats STILL want to get rid of the filibuster then, I'll support ya'all to the hilt!..</p>
<p>How can it be any more fair that that??  :D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2022/01/21/friday-talking-points-a-busy-week/#comment-183827</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Jan 2022 13:16:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=21522#comment-183827</guid>
		<description>&lt;B&gt;The filibuster is not on an inevitable path to its demise; a lot of political stars still need to come into alignment. And then, even if that happens, what follows may not be what the majority expects.&lt;/B&gt;

Exactly..  The laws of unintended consequences..

Harry Reid&#039;s killing of the filibuster for judicial nominees directly lead to a 6-3 Conservative SCOTUS..

Democrats have always been short-sighted and refuse to even CONSIDER long term consequences...  But this time is a whole new level of stoopidity for Democrats..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>The filibuster is not on an inevitable path to its demise; a lot of political stars still need to come into alignment. And then, even if that happens, what follows may not be what the majority expects.</b></p>
<p>Exactly..  The laws of unintended consequences..</p>
<p>Harry Reid's killing of the filibuster for judicial nominees directly lead to a 6-3 Conservative SCOTUS..</p>
<p>Democrats have always been short-sighted and refuse to even CONSIDER long term consequences...  But this time is a whole new level of stoopidity for Democrats..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2022/01/21/friday-talking-points-a-busy-week/#comment-183826</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Jan 2022 13:05:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=21522#comment-183826</guid>
		<description>Back to the Filibuster...

&lt;B&gt;Is the Filibuster a &#039;Dead Rule Walking&#039;?

After Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer fell two votes short of altering the filibuster rule and easing passage of voting rights legislation, progressive opponents of the filibuster were quick to find the bright side.

“Despite this setback, it has never been clearer that the filibuster is a dead rule walking,” read a statement from the Fix Our Senate coalition. “Forty-eight Senate Democrats support reform. President Biden, a long-time supporter of the filibuster, now supports reform. Every Democrat running for Senate, from moderates to progressives, supports reform. … As the late [Senate Majority] Leader [Harry] Reid said, it’s not a matter of if the filibuster will be eliminated, but when – and who is in charge when that happens.” Former Reid aide and author of the anti-filibuster book “Kill Switch” Adam Jentleson shared on Twitter that “the trajectory is clear. Dems have crossed the rubicon &amp; grasp the need for reform in a way they didn&#039;t before.” Jonathan Chait of New York magazine wrote, “[N]early the entire Democratic Party has figured out that, in the long run, the filibuster hurts them more than it hurts Republicans. The next time Democrats gain control, they will do away with whatever remains of it.”&lt;/B&gt;
https://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2022/01/24/is_the_filibuster_a_dead_rule_walking_147082.html

Fine...  

If that&#039;s the way Democrats want to look at it, then the ONLY logical course of action is for the GOP to get rid of the Filibuster when they take control of the Senate..

That will give the GOP at least 6 years to push this country back to the Right where it belongs..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Back to the Filibuster...</p>
<p><b>Is the Filibuster a 'Dead Rule Walking'?</p>
<p>After Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer fell two votes short of altering the filibuster rule and easing passage of voting rights legislation, progressive opponents of the filibuster were quick to find the bright side.</p>
<p>“Despite this setback, it has never been clearer that the filibuster is a dead rule walking,” read a statement from the Fix Our Senate coalition. “Forty-eight Senate Democrats support reform. President Biden, a long-time supporter of the filibuster, now supports reform. Every Democrat running for Senate, from moderates to progressives, supports reform. … As the late [Senate Majority] Leader [Harry] Reid said, it’s not a matter of if the filibuster will be eliminated, but when – and who is in charge when that happens.” Former Reid aide and author of the anti-filibuster book “Kill Switch” Adam Jentleson shared on Twitter that “the trajectory is clear. Dems have crossed the rubicon &amp; grasp the need for reform in a way they didn't before.” Jonathan Chait of New York magazine wrote, “[N]early the entire Democratic Party has figured out that, in the long run, the filibuster hurts them more than it hurts Republicans. The next time Democrats gain control, they will do away with whatever remains of it.”</b><br />
<a href="https://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2022/01/24/is_the_filibuster_a_dead_rule_walking_147082.html" rel="nofollow">https://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2022/01/24/is_the_filibuster_a_dead_rule_walking_147082.html</a></p>
<p>Fine...  </p>
<p>If that's the way Democrats want to look at it, then the ONLY logical course of action is for the GOP to get rid of the Filibuster when they take control of the Senate..</p>
<p>That will give the GOP at least 6 years to push this country back to the Right where it belongs..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2022/01/21/friday-talking-points-a-busy-week/#comment-183825</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Jan 2022 13:00:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=21522#comment-183825</guid>
		<description>&lt;B&gt;To fly home we needed a COVID PCR test, almost impossible to come by in Montreal, with lineups hours long at most hospitals. Consequently, the Quebec government won’t allow anyone but the very sick to take them, while travellers must go to private clinics and pay perhaps $200.

Meanwhile, every Florida pharmacy does free PCR tests, even for travelling foreigners. It seems bizarre in a country with no universal medicare, where people are often bankrupted by medical bills.

But when we went for our free test at a pharmacy, there were a dozen people waiting, all wearing masks, the only place I’d seen that all week.

For the first time, it felt a bit like home.&lt;/B&gt;

The sheep always feel at home with such restrictions.   :^/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>To fly home we needed a COVID PCR test, almost impossible to come by in Montreal, with lineups hours long at most hospitals. Consequently, the Quebec government won’t allow anyone but the very sick to take them, while travellers must go to private clinics and pay perhaps $200.</p>
<p>Meanwhile, every Florida pharmacy does free PCR tests, even for travelling foreigners. It seems bizarre in a country with no universal medicare, where people are often bankrupted by medical bills.</p>
<p>But when we went for our free test at a pharmacy, there were a dozen people waiting, all wearing masks, the only place I’d seen that all week.</p>
<p>For the first time, it felt a bit like home.</b></p>
<p>The sheep always feel at home with such restrictions.   :^/</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2022/01/21/friday-talking-points-a-busy-week/#comment-183824</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Jan 2022 13:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=21522#comment-183824</guid>
		<description>&lt;B&gt;{Quebec&#039;s} curfew was lifted, but we still can’t legally invite anyone to our home, while other Western countries and Canadian provinces allow from five to 20 guests.&lt;/B&gt;

This is simply MIND-BOGGLING!!

Imagine the GOVERNMENT telling you you can&#039;t have guests in your own home!!!

What kind of slave would put up with such restrictions!!???</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>{Quebec's} curfew was lifted, but we still can’t legally invite anyone to our home, while other Western countries and Canadian provinces allow from five to 20 guests.</b></p>
<p>This is simply MIND-BOGGLING!!</p>
<p>Imagine the GOVERNMENT telling you you can't have guests in your own home!!!</p>
<p>What kind of slave would put up with such restrictions!!???</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2022/01/21/friday-talking-points-a-busy-week/#comment-183823</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Jan 2022 12:58:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=21522#comment-183823</guid>
		<description>&lt;B&gt;By any measure, Florida life seems surreal, as if everyone’s wearing blinders and trying not to notice a disease that’s killed more than 63,000 Floridians. That’s about twice as many deaths as in all of Canada, in a state with two-thirds our country’s population.

It’s health madness, but there’s a psychological upside, since COVID doesn’t dominate all life like here. We Montrealers live in a tense, depressing pandemic bubble — all-COVID, all the time — which is why many people avoid following the news.

In Florida, entire conversations happen without the C-word mentioned, unless you bring it up — which, of course, I did. I asked a group of seven 60-somethings I met at a restaurant terrace how they felt about Florida’s non-existent pandemic rules.

Every last one said they loved how Florida handles things. In the words of one woman “Our philosophy here is: I look after myself and you look after yourself. If you want to wear a mask indoors, you should. If you don’t want to go to a restaurant, you shouldn’t.”

When I asked about our collective responsibility to protect others she shrugged and said: “That’s just not how we think here.”

I mentioned Quebec’s recent curfew, but they all just laughed, dismissing it as “Canadian communism.” Many others obviously agree as more people moved to Florida during the pandemic than any other state .&lt;/B&gt;

Omicron  has not killed ANY Floridians.. Even the number he cites is not factually accurate..  5% of that number is the factual COVID death count..

The author is talking OLD BS that has already been debunked as nothing but fear mongering..

&lt;B&gt;Thousands of Quebecers have also looked into moving there since the pandemic.&lt;/B&gt;

There is a reason for that... 

Human beings crave freedom and liberty...  

&lt;B&gt;&quot;They that would give up personal freedom and liberty for a little temporary safety do not deserve freedom OR safety...&quot;&lt;/B&gt;
-Benjamin Franklin</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>By any measure, Florida life seems surreal, as if everyone’s wearing blinders and trying not to notice a disease that’s killed more than 63,000 Floridians. That’s about twice as many deaths as in all of Canada, in a state with two-thirds our country’s population.</p>
<p>It’s health madness, but there’s a psychological upside, since COVID doesn’t dominate all life like here. We Montrealers live in a tense, depressing pandemic bubble — all-COVID, all the time — which is why many people avoid following the news.</p>
<p>In Florida, entire conversations happen without the C-word mentioned, unless you bring it up — which, of course, I did. I asked a group of seven 60-somethings I met at a restaurant terrace how they felt about Florida’s non-existent pandemic rules.</p>
<p>Every last one said they loved how Florida handles things. In the words of one woman “Our philosophy here is: I look after myself and you look after yourself. If you want to wear a mask indoors, you should. If you don’t want to go to a restaurant, you shouldn’t.”</p>
<p>When I asked about our collective responsibility to protect others she shrugged and said: “That’s just not how we think here.”</p>
<p>I mentioned Quebec’s recent curfew, but they all just laughed, dismissing it as “Canadian communism.” Many others obviously agree as more people moved to Florida during the pandemic than any other state .</b></p>
<p>Omicron  has not killed ANY Floridians.. Even the number he cites is not factually accurate..  5% of that number is the factual COVID death count..</p>
<p>The author is talking OLD BS that has already been debunked as nothing but fear mongering..</p>
<p><b>Thousands of Quebecers have also looked into moving there since the pandemic.</b></p>
<p>There is a reason for that... </p>
<p>Human beings crave freedom and liberty...  </p>
<p><b>"They that would give up personal freedom and liberty for a little temporary safety do not deserve freedom OR safety..."</b><br />
-Benjamin Franklin</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2022/01/21/friday-talking-points-a-busy-week/#comment-183822</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Jan 2022 12:53:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=21522#comment-183822</guid>
		<description>OK..  Where were we...  

Oh yes... The global warming con..  

Well, I guess I have factually beat enough on that deceased equine..  

MOVING ON...

&lt;B&gt;Josh Freed: Florida feels like another planet compared with Quebec

I have a confession to make: I recently fled Quebec for a week, a refugee from Legault’s 2.0 curfew-and-confinement rules.

A friend told me about an available condo in Florida, my wife and I made a last-second decision to briefly escape and work remotely. But the second we landed, it felt like we’d arrived on another planet.


While Quebec is in full confinement mode, Florida is Cowboyland, where you barely know COVID is happening, despite much higher new case and hospitalization rates than ours .

It’s lunacy by Canadian standards, but an eye-opening experience. For starters, everyone’s out and about, filling bars, restaurants, movies, gyms, and jam-packed sports arenas.

Stores and supermarkets don’t require masks but some cashiers and customers wear them, though often under their nose or chin — Florida-style. It seems a way of announcing: “Look — I’m masked!” when they’re not.&lt;/B&gt;
https://montrealgazette.com/news/local-news/josh-freed-florida-feels-like-another-planet-compared-with-quebec



Florida is frakin&#039; AWESOME!!!   :D

Even Canadians are escaping the totalitarian regimes in favor of sanity and freedom!!

Liz you should come visit!!  My lovely wife and I would personally love to show you the nation&#039;s oldest city...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK..  Where were we...  </p>
<p>Oh yes... The global warming con..  </p>
<p>Well, I guess I have factually beat enough on that deceased equine..  </p>
<p>MOVING ON...</p>
<p><b>Josh Freed: Florida feels like another planet compared with Quebec</p>
<p>I have a confession to make: I recently fled Quebec for a week, a refugee from Legault’s 2.0 curfew-and-confinement rules.</p>
<p>A friend told me about an available condo in Florida, my wife and I made a last-second decision to briefly escape and work remotely. But the second we landed, it felt like we’d arrived on another planet.</p>
<p>While Quebec is in full confinement mode, Florida is Cowboyland, where you barely know COVID is happening, despite much higher new case and hospitalization rates than ours .</p>
<p>It’s lunacy by Canadian standards, but an eye-opening experience. For starters, everyone’s out and about, filling bars, restaurants, movies, gyms, and jam-packed sports arenas.</p>
<p>Stores and supermarkets don’t require masks but some cashiers and customers wear them, though often under their nose or chin — Florida-style. It seems a way of announcing: “Look — I’m masked!” when they’re not.</b><br />
<a href="https://montrealgazette.com/news/local-news/josh-freed-florida-feels-like-another-planet-compared-with-quebec" rel="nofollow">https://montrealgazette.com/news/local-news/josh-freed-florida-feels-like-another-planet-compared-with-quebec</a></p>
<p>Florida is frakin' AWESOME!!!   :D</p>
<p>Even Canadians are escaping the totalitarian regimes in favor of sanity and freedom!!</p>
<p>Liz you should come visit!!  My lovely wife and I would personally love to show you the nation's oldest city...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nypoet22</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2022/01/21/friday-talking-points-a-busy-week/#comment-183821</link>
		<dc:creator>nypoet22</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Jan 2022 12:52:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=21522#comment-183821</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Global warming fanatics need to come to grips with the FACT that they lose and lose and are going to keep on losing..&lt;/i&gt;

fifty years of humans losing our chance to preserve a habitable climate for ourselves isn&#039;t easy to come to grips with, whether by fanaticism or denial.

in science there&#039;s no such thing as 100% certainty, but calculus does provide for such things that are so nearly certain there&#039;s very little point disputing them, except to provide further proof. one such certainty is that the combined systems in which humans live have gotten significantly hotter over the past century. another such certainty is that human activity has been the most significant cause of that increase.

poor politics or poor lawsuits don&#039;t change those facts, they just mean we as a species aren&#039;t doing a very good job at self-preservation.

&lt;i&gt;Eggs aren’t pie. So when I discuss eggs, you screaming to stop discussing pie is blatantly dishonest.&lt;/i&gt;

heaven forbid we should stop discussing pie!

~JL climate pie troll</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Global warming fanatics need to come to grips with the FACT that they lose and lose and are going to keep on losing..</i></p>
<p>fifty years of humans losing our chance to preserve a habitable climate for ourselves isn't easy to come to grips with, whether by fanaticism or denial.</p>
<p>in science there's no such thing as 100% certainty, but calculus does provide for such things that are so nearly certain there's very little point disputing them, except to provide further proof. one such certainty is that the combined systems in which humans live have gotten significantly hotter over the past century. another such certainty is that human activity has been the most significant cause of that increase.</p>
<p>poor politics or poor lawsuits don't change those facts, they just mean we as a species aren't doing a very good job at self-preservation.</p>
<p><i>Eggs aren’t pie. So when I discuss eggs, you screaming to stop discussing pie is blatantly dishonest.</i></p>
<p>heaven forbid we should stop discussing pie!</p>
<p>~JL climate pie troll</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2022/01/21/friday-talking-points-a-busy-week/#comment-183820</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Jan 2022 11:42:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=21522#comment-183820</guid>
		<description>OK...  Gotta get ready for work...

I&#039;ll see ya&#039;all in a bit..  

Onward and upward to TWO FIFTY!!!!!!  :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK...  Gotta get ready for work...</p>
<p>I'll see ya'all in a bit..  </p>
<p>Onward and upward to TWO FIFTY!!!!!!  :D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2022/01/21/friday-talking-points-a-busy-week/#comment-183819</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Jan 2022 11:42:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=21522#comment-183819</guid>
		<description>&lt;B&gt;Looking Ahead

The SCOTUS ruling is expected to continue to have ripple effects through 2022, as state courts are directed to consider all grounds for removal before moving a case forward at the state or federal level.

Meanwhile, the energy industry continues to invest billions of dollars a year into improving efficiencies of their systems and developing new technologies to address climate change.

So, after several years of waging war in the courtroom without racking up even a single victory, and with a Congress and White House that have expressed a sincere desire to do the things that could actually tackle climate change, why are the proponents of litigation continuing to waste taxpayer resources in this vain effort so a few trial lawyers can hopefully become very rich while accomplishing precisely nothing on climate change?&lt;/B&gt;

And THERE is the other shoe dropping..

The global warming con has NEVER been about the climate..

It&#039;s ALWAYS been about making money...

Period...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>Looking Ahead</p>
<p>The SCOTUS ruling is expected to continue to have ripple effects through 2022, as state courts are directed to consider all grounds for removal before moving a case forward at the state or federal level.</p>
<p>Meanwhile, the energy industry continues to invest billions of dollars a year into improving efficiencies of their systems and developing new technologies to address climate change.</p>
<p>So, after several years of waging war in the courtroom without racking up even a single victory, and with a Congress and White House that have expressed a sincere desire to do the things that could actually tackle climate change, why are the proponents of litigation continuing to waste taxpayer resources in this vain effort so a few trial lawyers can hopefully become very rich while accomplishing precisely nothing on climate change?</b></p>
<p>And THERE is the other shoe dropping..</p>
<p>The global warming con has NEVER been about the climate..</p>
<p>It's ALWAYS been about making money...</p>
<p>Period...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2022/01/21/friday-talking-points-a-busy-week/#comment-183818</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Jan 2022 11:37:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=21522#comment-183818</guid>
		<description>Yunno what&#039;s even MORE hilarious!!!????

The global warming litigation people disputed THEIR OWN SCIENCE!!!!

BBBBWWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHHAAHAHHAHA

&lt;B&gt;Attribution Proponents Criticize Their Own Science

This defeat can be clearly labeled as an “own goal.”

The use of climate lawsuits has spawned the development of so-called “attribution research” – or the flawed attempt to assign a certain amount of carbon emissions to specific companies.

In June, a group of academics – who are outspoken supporters of the climate litigation campaign – released a report that admits that the climate attribution science currently being deployed by plaintiffs’ attorneys has serious flaws:

&lt;I&gt;“We find that the evidence submitted and referenced in these cases lags considerably behind the state-of-the-art in climate science, impeding causation claims.”&lt;/I&gt;

Hey, that’s their words – and it’s very clear why they’re speaking out, and it has nothing to do with the pursuit of greater knowledge through scientific understanding. Instead, it’s all about the litigation. As Friederike Otto, one of the authors of the report, told E&amp;E News just a couple months earlier:

&lt;I&gt;“Unlike every other branch of climate science or science in general, event attribution was actually originally suggested with the courts in mind.”&lt;/I&gt;

Admitting your made-up science is really about lawsuits + saying the science stinks = a big defeat for climate litigation.&lt;/B&gt;

How hilarious is that!!!???  :D

Global warming fanatics got together and exclaimed with ONE VOICE:

&lt;B&gt;&quot;Let&#039;s all put on metal cleats, whip out our dicks and then STOMP on them!!!&quot;&lt;/B&gt;

heheheheheheheheeheheheheheehe</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yunno what's even MORE hilarious!!!????</p>
<p>The global warming litigation people disputed THEIR OWN SCIENCE!!!!</p>
<p>BBBBWWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHHAAHAHHAHA</p>
<p><b>Attribution Proponents Criticize Their Own Science</p>
<p>This defeat can be clearly labeled as an “own goal.”</p>
<p>The use of climate lawsuits has spawned the development of so-called “attribution research” – or the flawed attempt to assign a certain amount of carbon emissions to specific companies.</p>
<p>In June, a group of academics – who are outspoken supporters of the climate litigation campaign – released a report that admits that the climate attribution science currently being deployed by plaintiffs’ attorneys has serious flaws:</p>
<p><i>“We find that the evidence submitted and referenced in these cases lags considerably behind the state-of-the-art in climate science, impeding causation claims.”</i></p>
<p>Hey, that’s their words – and it’s very clear why they’re speaking out, and it has nothing to do with the pursuit of greater knowledge through scientific understanding. Instead, it’s all about the litigation. As Friederike Otto, one of the authors of the report, told E&amp;E News just a couple months earlier:</p>
<p><i>“Unlike every other branch of climate science or science in general, event attribution was actually originally suggested with the courts in mind.”</i></p>
<p>Admitting your made-up science is really about lawsuits + saying the science stinks = a big defeat for climate litigation.</b></p>
<p>How hilarious is that!!!???  :D</p>
<p>Global warming fanatics got together and exclaimed with ONE VOICE:</p>
<p><b>"Let's all put on metal cleats, whip out our dicks and then STOMP on them!!!"</b></p>
<p>heheheheheheheheeheheheheheehe</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2022/01/21/friday-talking-points-a-busy-week/#comment-183817</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Jan 2022 11:32:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=21522#comment-183817</guid>
		<description>&lt;B&gt;King County Withdraws

In the spring of 2018, King County, Washington (home of Seattle) was among the first municipalities to file a climate lawsuit. Just over three years later, it threw in the towel on the case.

In September, the county gave “notice of its voluntary dismissal of this action,” making it the first plaintiff to give up on a lawsuit. The move also represents a blow to plaintiffs’ attorney Matt Pawa, who was a key player at the infamous La Jolla conference in 2012 where the playbook for the entire climate litigation campaign was mapped out and who was at the helm for San Francisco and Oakland’s loss as well as the New York City defeat.&lt;/B&gt;

And another defeat for the global warming zealots..

All they know how to do is LOSE..

And why???

Because sane rational Americans are simply NOT buying the kaa-kaa anymore...

As an aside to Liz..

Don&#039;t blame me for off topic comments.  It was Vick who brought up Climate Change...  :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>King County Withdraws</p>
<p>In the spring of 2018, King County, Washington (home of Seattle) was among the first municipalities to file a climate lawsuit. Just over three years later, it threw in the towel on the case.</p>
<p>In September, the county gave “notice of its voluntary dismissal of this action,” making it the first plaintiff to give up on a lawsuit. The move also represents a blow to plaintiffs’ attorney Matt Pawa, who was a key player at the infamous La Jolla conference in 2012 where the playbook for the entire climate litigation campaign was mapped out and who was at the helm for San Francisco and Oakland’s loss as well as the New York City defeat.</b></p>
<p>And another defeat for the global warming zealots..</p>
<p>All they know how to do is LOSE..</p>
<p>And why???</p>
<p>Because sane rational Americans are simply NOT buying the kaa-kaa anymore...</p>
<p>As an aside to Liz..</p>
<p>Don't blame me for off topic comments.  It was Vick who brought up Climate Change...  :D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2022/01/21/friday-talking-points-a-busy-week/#comment-183816</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Jan 2022 11:24:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=21522#comment-183816</guid>
		<description>&lt;B&gt;New York City Defeat

On the merits of climate litigation, New York continues to be the poster child for these flailing lawsuits. The New York attorney general’s case against ExxonMobil was decisively defeated in 2019, and in April of this year, the 2nd Circuit affirmed a lower court’s dismissal of New York City’s public nuisance lawsuit, ending the case for good. The court ruled that lawsuits aren’t the proper tool for addressing climate change:

“To permit this suit to proceed under state law would further risk upsetting the careful balance that has been struck between the prevention of global warming, a project that necessarily requires national standards and global participation, on the one hand, and energy production, economic growth, foreign policy, and national security, on the other.” (emphasis added)

The defeat is a sharp rebuke to outgoing Mayor Bill de Blasio who blatantly admitted the goal of the suit was to put the oil and natural gas industry out of business, saying in 2018, “Let’s help bring the death knell to this industry.”

Despite the loss, less than a month later, de Blasio filed yet another climate lawsuit despite politicians in New York having an 0-3 record, this time focused on consumer deception claims.&lt;/B&gt;

DeBlowHole strikes again...   :eyeroll:

Once again, loss stacks up upon loss...   Like their Democrat sponsors, global warming con artists are ONLY good at losing..  And losing..  And losing...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>New York City Defeat</p>
<p>On the merits of climate litigation, New York continues to be the poster child for these flailing lawsuits. The New York attorney general’s case against ExxonMobil was decisively defeated in 2019, and in April of this year, the 2nd Circuit affirmed a lower court’s dismissal of New York City’s public nuisance lawsuit, ending the case for good. The court ruled that lawsuits aren’t the proper tool for addressing climate change:</p>
<p>“To permit this suit to proceed under state law would further risk upsetting the careful balance that has been struck between the prevention of global warming, a project that necessarily requires national standards and global participation, on the one hand, and energy production, economic growth, foreign policy, and national security, on the other.” (emphasis added)</p>
<p>The defeat is a sharp rebuke to outgoing Mayor Bill de Blasio who blatantly admitted the goal of the suit was to put the oil and natural gas industry out of business, saying in 2018, “Let’s help bring the death knell to this industry.”</p>
<p>Despite the loss, less than a month later, de Blasio filed yet another climate lawsuit despite politicians in New York having an 0-3 record, this time focused on consumer deception claims.</b></p>
<p>DeBlowHole strikes again...   :eyeroll:</p>
<p>Once again, loss stacks up upon loss...   Like their Democrat sponsors, global warming con artists are ONLY good at losing..  And losing..  And losing...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2022/01/21/friday-talking-points-a-busy-week/#comment-183815</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Jan 2022 11:22:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=21522#comment-183815</guid>
		<description>And, in the MAJOR DEFEATS category...  :D

&lt;B&gt;SCOTUS Ruling

One of the most devastating defeats of the nearly decade-long climate litigation campaign came in May when the U.S. Supreme Court overwhelmingly sided with the energy companies on a key procedural question that will help decide if these lawsuits are heard in federal or state court.

In a 7-1 decision, the court ruled that the U.S. Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals should have considered all grounds for removal before affirming a lower court’s decision that sent the City of Baltimore’s case back to state court. The decision had significant ramifications for the climate litigation campaign, and cases from California, Colorado and Rhode Island also landed back in the circuit courts for further consideration.

The magnitude of the ruling wasn’t lost on the media. Bloomberg Law observed that the industry now has the “the upper hand” in these cases, while Reuters reported the lopsided decision meant a difficult path now lies ahead for the plaintiffs.&lt;/B&gt;

And this was a FULLY bi-partisan decision for the SCOTUS where a Democrat sided with the Conservative majority..

Global warming fanatics need to come to grips with the FACT that they lose and lose and are going to keep on losing..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And, in the MAJOR DEFEATS category...  :D</p>
<p><b>SCOTUS Ruling</p>
<p>One of the most devastating defeats of the nearly decade-long climate litigation campaign came in May when the U.S. Supreme Court overwhelmingly sided with the energy companies on a key procedural question that will help decide if these lawsuits are heard in federal or state court.</p>
<p>In a 7-1 decision, the court ruled that the U.S. Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals should have considered all grounds for removal before affirming a lower court’s decision that sent the City of Baltimore’s case back to state court. The decision had significant ramifications for the climate litigation campaign, and cases from California, Colorado and Rhode Island also landed back in the circuit courts for further consideration.</p>
<p>The magnitude of the ruling wasn’t lost on the media. Bloomberg Law observed that the industry now has the “the upper hand” in these cases, while Reuters reported the lopsided decision meant a difficult path now lies ahead for the plaintiffs.</b></p>
<p>And this was a FULLY bi-partisan decision for the SCOTUS where a Democrat sided with the Conservative majority..</p>
<p>Global warming fanatics need to come to grips with the FACT that they lose and lose and are going to keep on losing..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2022/01/21/friday-talking-points-a-busy-week/#comment-183814</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Jan 2022 11:19:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=21522#comment-183814</guid>
		<description>And here is an explanation as to why the global warming fanatics continue to fail and fail and fail again in the courts..

&lt;B&gt;The past year has not been a great one for supporters of the climate litigation campaign.

There were several devastating blows dealt to climate lawsuits, both on the process and the merits, and as Law360 summed up:

“The U.S. Supreme Court expanded the ability for fossil fuel companies to fight climate nuisance lawsuits lodged by state and local governments, and the Second Circuit rejected one such suit outright.”

In response, the plaintiffs’ attorneys have had to call in the reinforcements and place academics on their payroll to help explain why, against all the evidence, these lawsuits aren’t failing. Meanwhile, major activist organizations are holding personal meetings with top government officials in order to recruit them to their side.&lt;/B&gt;
https://eidclimate.org/2021-revealed-why-climate-litigation-will-continue-to-fail/

What part of *NO* do the global warming fanatics not understand???</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And here is an explanation as to why the global warming fanatics continue to fail and fail and fail again in the courts..</p>
<p><b>The past year has not been a great one for supporters of the climate litigation campaign.</p>
<p>There were several devastating blows dealt to climate lawsuits, both on the process and the merits, and as Law360 summed up:</p>
<p>“The U.S. Supreme Court expanded the ability for fossil fuel companies to fight climate nuisance lawsuits lodged by state and local governments, and the Second Circuit rejected one such suit outright.”</p>
<p>In response, the plaintiffs’ attorneys have had to call in the reinforcements and place academics on their payroll to help explain why, against all the evidence, these lawsuits aren’t failing. Meanwhile, major activist organizations are holding personal meetings with top government officials in order to recruit them to their side.</b><br />
<a href="https://eidclimate.org/2021-revealed-why-climate-litigation-will-continue-to-fail/" rel="nofollow">https://eidclimate.org/2021-revealed-why-climate-litigation-will-continue-to-fail/</a></p>
<p>What part of *NO* do the global warming fanatics not understand???</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2022/01/21/friday-talking-points-a-busy-week/#comment-183813</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Jan 2022 11:16:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=21522#comment-183813</guid>
		<description>&lt;B&gt;He has been sounding the climate alarm for more than four decades — first as a young congressman and then 15 years ago, with his film &quot;An Inconvenient Truth.&quot; 
 
It earned him an Oscar, a Nobel Peace Prize, and plenty of scorn from climate change deniers. 
 
Despite all his accolades, Gore said he has not succeeded in getting the message across. &lt;/B&gt;

The inconvenient FACT of &quot;An Inconvenient Truth&quot; is that it&#039;s a fantasy movie totally devoid on any real scientific fact....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>He has been sounding the climate alarm for more than four decades — first as a young congressman and then 15 years ago, with his film "An Inconvenient Truth." </p>
<p>It earned him an Oscar, a Nobel Peace Prize, and plenty of scorn from climate change deniers. </p>
<p>Despite all his accolades, Gore said he has not succeeded in getting the message across. </b></p>
<p>The inconvenient FACT of "An Inconvenient Truth" is that it's a fantasy movie totally devoid on any real scientific fact....</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2022/01/21/friday-talking-points-a-busy-week/#comment-183812</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Jan 2022 11:11:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=21522#comment-183812</guid>
		<description>Speaking of the Global Warming con...

&lt;B&gt;Al Gore on his hopes for the planet: &quot;Job number one is to stop using the sky as an open sewer&quot;&lt;/B&gt;
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/al-gore-climate-change/

The crazed sex poodle is still alive???

WOW....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Speaking of the Global Warming con...</p>
<p><b>Al Gore on his hopes for the planet: "Job number one is to stop using the sky as an open sewer"</b><br />
<a href="https://www.cbsnews.com/news/al-gore-climate-change/" rel="nofollow">https://www.cbsnews.com/news/al-gore-climate-change/</a></p>
<p>The crazed sex poodle is still alive???</p>
<p>WOW....</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2022/01/21/friday-talking-points-a-busy-week/#comment-183811</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Jan 2022 10:25:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=21522#comment-183811</guid>
		<description>250 comments today is going to be a long slog...

But I can give it the ol&#039; Weigantian™ try... :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>250 comments today is going to be a long slog...</p>
<p>But I can give it the ol' Weigantian™ try... :D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2022/01/21/friday-talking-points-a-busy-week/#comment-183810</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Jan 2022 10:24:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=21522#comment-183810</guid>
		<description>So, that belies the claim that I only use Right Wing sources..

Of course, being a Left Wing Rag, the NY Grime HAS to say some nice things about Biden and Democrats..

But overall, the writing is on the wall...

Even Left Wing Water Carriers are throwing Biden and the Democrats to the wolves...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, that belies the claim that I only use Right Wing sources..</p>
<p>Of course, being a Left Wing Rag, the NY Grime HAS to say some nice things about Biden and Democrats..</p>
<p>But overall, the writing is on the wall...</p>
<p>Even Left Wing Water Carriers are throwing Biden and the Democrats to the wolves...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2022/01/21/friday-talking-points-a-busy-week/#comment-183809</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Jan 2022 10:11:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=21522#comment-183809</guid>
		<description>&lt;B&gt;Mr. Biden, however, has contributed to his own political woes. Through much of the fall, the president and other administration officials seemed to be downplaying the dangers of inflation. Mr. Biden also continues to present the administration’s longer-term economic initiatives, like antitrust enforcement and a push for child care subsidies, as measures that would help to combat inflation. The effect of such policies would not be felt for some time, and Mr. Biden’s insistence on this implausible narrative may be contributing to a sense that he is not taking inflation seriously.&lt;/B&gt;

First, there was no inflation...

Then Biden admitted that, yes there is inflation but it&#039;s transitory...

Biden has been WRONG about everything..

Biden is destined to repeat Jimmy Carter&#039;s one term presidency...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>Mr. Biden, however, has contributed to his own political woes. Through much of the fall, the president and other administration officials seemed to be downplaying the dangers of inflation. Mr. Biden also continues to present the administration’s longer-term economic initiatives, like antitrust enforcement and a push for child care subsidies, as measures that would help to combat inflation. The effect of such policies would not be felt for some time, and Mr. Biden’s insistence on this implausible narrative may be contributing to a sense that he is not taking inflation seriously.</b></p>
<p>First, there was no inflation...</p>
<p>Then Biden admitted that, yes there is inflation but it's transitory...</p>
<p>Biden has been WRONG about everything..</p>
<p>Biden is destined to repeat Jimmy Carter's one term presidency...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2022/01/21/friday-talking-points-a-busy-week/#comment-183808</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Jan 2022 10:07:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=21522#comment-183808</guid>
		<description>&lt;B&gt;Most Americans don’t share the administration’s sunny view of its economic record, and it is little mystery why: The average worker’s paycheck doesn’t buy as many hamburgers as it did last year. (Using hamburgers to measure inflation is a twist on The Economist magazine’s Big Mac Index, which tracks the price of the classic hamburger in different currencies.) The government’s Consumer Price Index rose by 7 percent in 2021, the biggest jump since 1982. Mr. Biden’s approval rating remains low, and poll after poll finds that Americans are not pleased with his handling of the economy. Nearly two-thirds say the administration is insufficiently focused on inflation, according to a recent CBS News poll. There are similar numbers in other recent polls.&lt;/B&gt;

The American people know a bum steer when they see one..  And Biden and the Democrats are the bum&#039;est of steers...

&lt;B&gt;The nation’s mood has soured even as the economy has added more than six million jobs over the last year. For the core of the labor force, workers ages 25 to 54, employment recovered more quickly than in the prior three recessions, dating back to 1990. That’s a big deal: Even when paychecks are losing value, it’s better to get one.&lt;/B&gt;

Again with the six billion jobs added..  Those jobs aren&#039;t NEW jobs..  They WERE new jobs back when they were created by President Trump during his awesome administration..

When Democrats force people out of work due to a over-exaggerated pandemic, Democrats don&#039;t get to claim NEW JOBS when those people return back to their jobs that were previously created under President Trump&#039;s leadership...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>Most Americans don’t share the administration’s sunny view of its economic record, and it is little mystery why: The average worker’s paycheck doesn’t buy as many hamburgers as it did last year. (Using hamburgers to measure inflation is a twist on The Economist magazine’s Big Mac Index, which tracks the price of the classic hamburger in different currencies.) The government’s Consumer Price Index rose by 7 percent in 2021, the biggest jump since 1982. Mr. Biden’s approval rating remains low, and poll after poll finds that Americans are not pleased with his handling of the economy. Nearly two-thirds say the administration is insufficiently focused on inflation, according to a recent CBS News poll. There are similar numbers in other recent polls.</b></p>
<p>The American people know a bum steer when they see one..  And Biden and the Democrats are the bum'est of steers...</p>
<p><b>The nation’s mood has soured even as the economy has added more than six million jobs over the last year. For the core of the labor force, workers ages 25 to 54, employment recovered more quickly than in the prior three recessions, dating back to 1990. That’s a big deal: Even when paychecks are losing value, it’s better to get one.</b></p>
<p>Again with the six billion jobs added..  Those jobs aren't NEW jobs..  They WERE new jobs back when they were created by President Trump during his awesome administration..</p>
<p>When Democrats force people out of work due to a over-exaggerated pandemic, Democrats don't get to claim NEW JOBS when those people return back to their jobs that were previously created under President Trump's leadership...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2022/01/21/friday-talking-points-a-busy-week/#comment-183806</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Jan 2022 09:59:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=21522#comment-183806</guid>
		<description>But hay.. OK.. Ya&#039;all can complain I am using Right Wing sources...  So, let&#039;s hear from a dyed-in-the-wool Left Wing rag, the NY Grime...

&lt;B&gt;President Biden’s Economy Is Failing the Big Mac Test

Measured by the value of the wages that workers take home, which this board regards as the most important metric for assessing the health of the American economy, President Biden’s first year in office was not a very good year.

The dollar figures on workers’ paychecks rose handsomely over the past 12 months. But for most workers, that wasn’t enough to keep pace with the highest inflation in several decades, which eroded the value of each of those dollars.

The purchasing power of the average worker’s weekly pay declined by 2.3 percent from December 2020 to December 2021. Data for the final 20 days of Mr. Biden’s first year, not available yet, is unlikely to improve that picture.&lt;/B&gt;
https://www.nytimes.com/2022/01/22/opinion/president-biden-inflation-economy.html

As an aside to Bashi...  THERE ^^^^^ is the &quot;big reveal&quot;...  :D  No need to make a big deal out of it a few comments down the line, eh??

heheheheheheheehehehehehe

Anyways even the NY Grime, Democrat Water Carrier Extraordinaire is saying how bad Biden&#039;s economic policies have scroo&#039;ed da pooch..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But hay.. OK.. Ya'all can complain I am using Right Wing sources...  So, let's hear from a dyed-in-the-wool Left Wing rag, the NY Grime...</p>
<p><b>President Biden’s Economy Is Failing the Big Mac Test</p>
<p>Measured by the value of the wages that workers take home, which this board regards as the most important metric for assessing the health of the American economy, President Biden’s first year in office was not a very good year.</p>
<p>The dollar figures on workers’ paychecks rose handsomely over the past 12 months. But for most workers, that wasn’t enough to keep pace with the highest inflation in several decades, which eroded the value of each of those dollars.</p>
<p>The purchasing power of the average worker’s weekly pay declined by 2.3 percent from December 2020 to December 2021. Data for the final 20 days of Mr. Biden’s first year, not available yet, is unlikely to improve that picture.</b><br />
<a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2022/01/22/opinion/president-biden-inflation-economy.html" rel="nofollow">https://www.nytimes.com/2022/01/22/opinion/president-biden-inflation-economy.html</a></p>
<p>As an aside to Bashi...  THERE ^^^^^ is the "big reveal"...  :D  No need to make a big deal out of it a few comments down the line, eh??</p>
<p>heheheheheheheehehehehehe</p>
<p>Anyways even the NY Grime, Democrat Water Carrier Extraordinaire is saying how bad Biden's economic policies have scroo'ed da pooch..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2022/01/21/friday-talking-points-a-busy-week/#comment-183805</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Jan 2022 09:52:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=21522#comment-183805</guid>
		<description>How exactly did Biden and the Democrats scroo da pooch??

I am glad you asked that..

&lt;B&gt;His major mistakes? Depressing oilfield investment, reversing U.S. oil output and leaving us at the mercy of OPEC and higher gasoline prices; stoking out-of-control federal spending with the Democrat-only American Rescue Plan (ARP), sidelining millions of workers and fueling an ongoing labor shortage; delivering mask mandates that have exacerbated that worker shortage; ignoring the resulting inflation until voters rebelled, demanding the Federal Reserve take what may be harsh measures to change course.

Those are just the high points.&lt;/B&gt;

Under President Trump, America became energy independent and the largest EXPORTER of natural gas in the world..

Now, I don&#039;t know about ya&#039;all, but for a guy like me who grew up in the Carter years I remember vividly the huge gas lines and the gas rationing...  

To actually become INDEPENDENT from that.. To actually be able to be the largest EXPORTER???  

Well, for those who grew up as I did during the height of OPEC hostage-taking, it was magical...

And Biden and the Democrats threw all that away...

And for what!???  Some mythical global warming that has been PROVEN with REAL science to be a con??

Lemme ask ya&#039;all something..  If a US Pipeline would contribute to global warming and must be shut down, how is it that a LARGER RUSSIAN pipeline is perfectly acceptable??

You see why we KNOW that the global warming crap is just a con???

So yea...  Biden and the Democrats OWN this crappy economy..  It is ALL their doing..

But there is good news on the horizon.. Once the GOP owns Congress in November and President Trump is back in the Oval Office in 2024???

Things are going to turn around once more..  :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How exactly did Biden and the Democrats scroo da pooch??</p>
<p>I am glad you asked that..</p>
<p><b>His major mistakes? Depressing oilfield investment, reversing U.S. oil output and leaving us at the mercy of OPEC and higher gasoline prices; stoking out-of-control federal spending with the Democrat-only American Rescue Plan (ARP), sidelining millions of workers and fueling an ongoing labor shortage; delivering mask mandates that have exacerbated that worker shortage; ignoring the resulting inflation until voters rebelled, demanding the Federal Reserve take what may be harsh measures to change course.</p>
<p>Those are just the high points.</b></p>
<p>Under President Trump, America became energy independent and the largest EXPORTER of natural gas in the world..</p>
<p>Now, I don't know about ya'all, but for a guy like me who grew up in the Carter years I remember vividly the huge gas lines and the gas rationing...  </p>
<p>To actually become INDEPENDENT from that.. To actually be able to be the largest EXPORTER???  </p>
<p>Well, for those who grew up as I did during the height of OPEC hostage-taking, it was magical...</p>
<p>And Biden and the Democrats threw all that away...</p>
<p>And for what!???  Some mythical global warming that has been PROVEN with REAL science to be a con??</p>
<p>Lemme ask ya'all something..  If a US Pipeline would contribute to global warming and must be shut down, how is it that a LARGER RUSSIAN pipeline is perfectly acceptable??</p>
<p>You see why we KNOW that the global warming crap is just a con???</p>
<p>So yea...  Biden and the Democrats OWN this crappy economy..  It is ALL their doing..</p>
<p>But there is good news on the horizon.. Once the GOP owns Congress in November and President Trump is back in the Oval Office in 2024???</p>
<p>Things are going to turn around once more..  :D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2022/01/21/friday-talking-points-a-busy-week/#comment-183804</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Jan 2022 09:45:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=21522#comment-183804</guid>
		<description>So, one has to ask..  Whom do we have to blame for this crappy economy on fire (not in a good way)??

Well, none other than Biden and Democrat Party policies..

&lt;B&gt;How Biden torched the Trump recovery

The White House celebrated its first-year economic achievements by tweeting: “When @POTUS and @VP were sworn in, our economy was on the brink of collapse.”

That is a flat-out lie.  

As Biden first set foot in the Oval Office a year ago, real GDP was growing at 6.3 percent, inflation was 1.4 percent, the price of gasoline was $2.39 a gallon and Michigan’s consumer sentiment index stood at 79. Today, real growth has slowed to just over 2 percent, inflation is at 7 percent, gas is up to $3.31 a gallon and the Michigan Index is 68.8.

In addition, real wages dropped 2.4 percent over the past year, with inflation overwhelming pay hikes after several years of gains under President Trump.

In just one year, Biden has managed to torch an economy that was recovering robustly when he took office. One bad decision after another, compounded, to be sure, by certain events beyond his control, have scuttled the turnaround that was well underway the day he became president. &lt;/B&gt;
https://thehill.com/opinion/finance/590451-how-biden-torched-the-trump-recovery

I know that in my absence, ya&#039;all weren&#039;t aware of all the facts of how bad Democrats are doing...

I guess it&#039;s a good thing for ya&#039;all that I decided to grace Weigantia™ with my presence again..  :D  

Else, ya&#039;all would have continued to wallow in ignorance and been totally and completely shocked when Democrats were Uber-Nuclear-Apocalyptically shellacked in November..

Naw, it&#039;s OK.. Don&#039;t thank me..  Happy to lend a hand..  :D

Awww, com&#039; on.. Don&#039;t gush..  :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, one has to ask..  Whom do we have to blame for this crappy economy on fire (not in a good way)??</p>
<p>Well, none other than Biden and Democrat Party policies..</p>
<p><b>How Biden torched the Trump recovery</p>
<p>The White House celebrated its first-year economic achievements by tweeting: “When @POTUS and @VP were sworn in, our economy was on the brink of collapse.”</p>
<p>That is a flat-out lie.  </p>
<p>As Biden first set foot in the Oval Office a year ago, real GDP was growing at 6.3 percent, inflation was 1.4 percent, the price of gasoline was $2.39 a gallon and Michigan’s consumer sentiment index stood at 79. Today, real growth has slowed to just over 2 percent, inflation is at 7 percent, gas is up to $3.31 a gallon and the Michigan Index is 68.8.</p>
<p>In addition, real wages dropped 2.4 percent over the past year, with inflation overwhelming pay hikes after several years of gains under President Trump.</p>
<p>In just one year, Biden has managed to torch an economy that was recovering robustly when he took office. One bad decision after another, compounded, to be sure, by certain events beyond his control, have scuttled the turnaround that was well underway the day he became president. </b><br />
<a href="https://thehill.com/opinion/finance/590451-how-biden-torched-the-trump-recovery" rel="nofollow">https://thehill.com/opinion/finance/590451-how-biden-torched-the-trump-recovery</a></p>
<p>I know that in my absence, ya'all weren't aware of all the facts of how bad Democrats are doing...</p>
<p>I guess it's a good thing for ya'all that I decided to grace Weigantia™ with my presence again..  :D  </p>
<p>Else, ya'all would have continued to wallow in ignorance and been totally and completely shocked when Democrats were Uber-Nuclear-Apocalyptically shellacked in November..</p>
<p>Naw, it's OK.. Don't thank me..  Happy to lend a hand..  :D</p>
<p>Awww, com' on.. Don't gush..  :D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2022/01/21/friday-talking-points-a-busy-week/#comment-183803</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Jan 2022 09:38:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=21522#comment-183803</guid>
		<description>How do we know that cad&#039;s hope of inflation improving before the mid-terms is a pipe dream??

Because Biden&#039;s OWN economic advisors have stated so...

&lt;B&gt;Biden’s own economic advisors are saying that inflation won’t moderate until the end of 2022 — after the election. And given their track record on inflation — initially claiming it was “transitory” and would quickly dissipate — that prediction of the demise of inflation should be taken with a large grain of salt.&lt;/B&gt;

So, even if Biden&#039;s own advisors are right this time, it&#039;s not going to matter for the election..  Democrats will STILL get massacred and lose the House and the Senate..

As a matter of fact, it would not surprise me to learn that it&#039;s BECAUSE the GOP has been given control of Congress that we will get inflation under control..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How do we know that cad's hope of inflation improving before the mid-terms is a pipe dream??</p>
<p>Because Biden's OWN economic advisors have stated so...</p>
<p><b>Biden’s own economic advisors are saying that inflation won’t moderate until the end of 2022 — after the election. And given their track record on inflation — initially claiming it was “transitory” and would quickly dissipate — that prediction of the demise of inflation should be taken with a large grain of salt.</b></p>
<p>So, even if Biden's own advisors are right this time, it's not going to matter for the election..  Democrats will STILL get massacred and lose the House and the Senate..</p>
<p>As a matter of fact, it would not surprise me to learn that it's BECAUSE the GOP has been given control of Congress that we will get inflation under control..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2022/01/21/friday-talking-points-a-busy-week/#comment-183802</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Jan 2022 09:33:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=21522#comment-183802</guid>
		<description>&lt;B&gt;Inflation was a fact of life 40 years ago. You expected to walk into a grocery store and see the price of an item you bought the week before a few cents higher. You expected to drive by your local gas station and see a price increase from the previous day.

“Inflationary expectations” actually contributed to the real rate of inflation. When people anticipate prices going up, businesses factor in those expectations for the future. It’s a vicious cycle, and once it starts, it’s very difficult to turn off.

This is what Joe Biden is facing in the coming months. As inflation begins to settle into the American consciousness, expectations collide with reality, and fear begins to take over.

A fearful electorate does not normally support the party in power.&lt;/B&gt;

cad and many others have commented here that inflation will get better in time for the mid-terms..

That&#039;s just a pipe dream..  It&#039;s not going to happen..

Biden&#039;s approval ratings haven&#039;t found their bottom yet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>Inflation was a fact of life 40 years ago. You expected to walk into a grocery store and see the price of an item you bought the week before a few cents higher. You expected to drive by your local gas station and see a price increase from the previous day.</p>
<p>“Inflationary expectations” actually contributed to the real rate of inflation. When people anticipate prices going up, businesses factor in those expectations for the future. It’s a vicious cycle, and once it starts, it’s very difficult to turn off.</p>
<p>This is what Joe Biden is facing in the coming months. As inflation begins to settle into the American consciousness, expectations collide with reality, and fear begins to take over.</p>
<p>A fearful electorate does not normally support the party in power.</b></p>
<p>cad and many others have commented here that inflation will get better in time for the mid-terms..</p>
<p>That's just a pipe dream..  It's not going to happen..</p>
<p>Biden's approval ratings haven't found their bottom yet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2022/01/21/friday-talking-points-a-busy-week/#comment-183801</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Jan 2022 09:31:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=21522#comment-183801</guid>
		<description>Now that we have seen Saki&#039;s fantasy BS, let&#039;s take a look at the FACTS..

&lt;B&gt;The Political Power of Inflation Will Destroy Joe Biden and the Democrats

The current 7% rate of inflation is the highest it’s been in 40 years. This is very significant because it means that a large majority of Americans have never experienced inflation like this in their lifetimes&lt;/B&gt;
https://pjmedia.com/news-and-politics/rick-moran/2022/01/23/the-political-power-of-inflation-will-destroy-joe-biden-and-the-democrats-n1552027

Higher pay don&#039;t mean diddley squat if the cost of living is astronomically higher due to inflation..

DUH....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now that we have seen Saki's fantasy BS, let's take a look at the FACTS..</p>
<p><b>The Political Power of Inflation Will Destroy Joe Biden and the Democrats</p>
<p>The current 7% rate of inflation is the highest it’s been in 40 years. This is very significant because it means that a large majority of Americans have never experienced inflation like this in their lifetimes</b><br />
<a href="https://pjmedia.com/news-and-politics/rick-moran/2022/01/23/the-political-power-of-inflation-will-destroy-joe-biden-and-the-democrats-n1552027" rel="nofollow">https://pjmedia.com/news-and-politics/rick-moran/2022/01/23/the-political-power-of-inflation-will-destroy-joe-biden-and-the-democrats-n1552027</a></p>
<p>Higher pay don't mean diddley squat if the cost of living is astronomically higher due to inflation..</p>
<p>DUH....</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2022/01/21/friday-talking-points-a-busy-week/#comment-183800</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Jan 2022 09:28:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=21522#comment-183800</guid>
		<description>&lt;B&gt;President Biden has gotten results, and the greatest year of job creation in history shows that, and he will keep up that fight every day and every year on the challenges that remain.&lt;/B&gt;

That&#039;s the ONLY claim Biden can make and it&#039;s based on a lie...

Which sums up Biden&#039;s entire Presidency to date..

One big fat lie..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>President Biden has gotten results, and the greatest year of job creation in history shows that, and he will keep up that fight every day and every year on the challenges that remain.</b></p>
<p>That's the ONLY claim Biden can make and it's based on a lie...</p>
<p>Which sums up Biden's entire Presidency to date..</p>
<p>One big fat lie..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2022/01/21/friday-talking-points-a-busy-week/#comment-183799</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Jan 2022 09:26:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=21522#comment-183799</guid>
		<description>Hay Saki...

Howz those FREE TEST KITS coming along??   :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hay Saki...</p>
<p>Howz those FREE TEST KITS coming along??   :D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2022/01/21/friday-talking-points-a-busy-week/#comment-183798</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Jan 2022 09:26:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=21522#comment-183798</guid>
		<description>&lt;B&gt;A year ago, few would have imagined that 2021 would be the greatest year of job growth in American history. That the unemployment rate would be at 3.9% now, down from 6% at the start of 2021 – the biggest one-year drop in history. And that unemployment claims would be at historic lows because so many Americans were back to work, often at better jobs with better pay.&lt;/B&gt;

Those are jobs that already existed, created by President Trump..  The people were RETURING to those jobs after having to leave them due to the pandemic..

Those we&#039;re NEW jobs...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>A year ago, few would have imagined that 2021 would be the greatest year of job growth in American history. That the unemployment rate would be at 3.9% now, down from 6% at the start of 2021 – the biggest one-year drop in history. And that unemployment claims would be at historic lows because so many Americans were back to work, often at better jobs with better pay.</b></p>
<p>Those are jobs that already existed, created by President Trump..  The people were RETURING to those jobs after having to leave them due to the pandemic..</p>
<p>Those we're NEW jobs...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2022/01/21/friday-talking-points-a-busy-week/#comment-183797</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Jan 2022 09:24:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=21522#comment-183797</guid>
		<description>And, in the TOTALLY DELUSIONAL department..

&lt;B&gt;Jen Psaki: President Joe Biden&#039;s first year marked by tremendous progress&lt;/B&gt;
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/opinion/jen-psaki-president-joe-bidens-first-year-marked-by-tremendous-progress/ar-AASZ3Es

BBBBWWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHA

Saki&#039;s got jokes....     :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And, in the TOTALLY DELUSIONAL department..</p>
<p><b>Jen Psaki: President Joe Biden's first year marked by tremendous progress</b><br />
<a href="https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/opinion/jen-psaki-president-joe-bidens-first-year-marked-by-tremendous-progress/ar-AASZ3Es" rel="nofollow">https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/opinion/jen-psaki-president-joe-bidens-first-year-marked-by-tremendous-progress/ar-AASZ3Es</a></p>
<p>BBBBWWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHA</p>
<p>Saki's got jokes....     :D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2022/01/21/friday-talking-points-a-busy-week/#comment-183796</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Jan 2022 09:19:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=21522#comment-183796</guid>
		<description>Biden really scroo&#039;ed da pooch with giving Putin the green light for &quot;minor incursions&quot; into Ukraine..

Putin wouldn&#039;t have even CONSIDERED messing with Ukraine under President Trump....

Biden&#039;s a wussy...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Biden really scroo'ed da pooch with giving Putin the green light for "minor incursions" into Ukraine..</p>
<p>Putin wouldn't have even CONSIDERED messing with Ukraine under President Trump....</p>
<p>Biden's a wussy...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2022/01/21/friday-talking-points-a-busy-week/#comment-183795</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Jan 2022 09:12:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=21522#comment-183795</guid>
		<description>Russ,

&lt;I&gt;Systemic racism and white privilege aren’t concepts that CRT introduced…&lt;/I&gt;

True.. But CRT uses them falsely and non-factually to the max...

&lt;I&gt;A “TRULY equal society”? You mean one where we do not celebrate our individual accomplishments?&lt;/I&gt;

But you people are not celebrating individual accomplishments.  You people are celebrating accomplishements based on race or gender or lifestyle choice or medical status..

A &quot;TRULY equal society&quot; is where we don&#039;t celebrate accomplishments based on race or gender or lifestyle or medical status..  

In a TRULY equal society we celebrate a PERSON&#039;S accomplishments..  Not a groups&#039;...

Let&#039;s say you do something completely and utterly fantastic..  Cure cancer or something.

What would you prefer to hear??

&lt;B&gt;WOW!!  Look what a gay person did!!!  The first gay person to cure cancer!!!&lt;/B&gt;

Or would you rather hear what a TRULY equal society would say??

&lt;B&gt;WOW!!  Look what Russ Finklestein did!!  He cured cancer!!!&lt;/B&gt;

Which statement is more representative of a truly equal society??

&lt;I&gt;And for someone who thinks LABELING is so wrong, you sure loved talking about BLACK crime stats in this country earlier in the week!&lt;/I&gt;

It was in the context of the discussion we were having at the time..

You people use LABELS all the time...  There are times when labels are appropriate when in the context of the discussion..

In the context of the discussion about a TRULY equal society, labels/groups are NOT appropriate...

&lt;I&gt;You never owned slaves, so why should you be made to feel guilty for slavery in this country’s past, right?&lt;/I&gt;

Exactly..

&lt;I&gt;The guilt lies with those that actually committed the crimes… &lt;/I&gt;

You should tell your CRT buddies...  They are ALL about &quot;collective guilt&quot;...

&lt;I&gt; unless you are talking about the Black community and crime stats, I guess.&lt;/I&gt;

In the context of the discussion that andygaus started about black people being arrested more for marijuana use than white people, the stats were appropriate..  

They are facts that explain why black people are arrested more...

In the discussion of why black people are given harsher sentences, the stats are FACTS that explain that issue..

If you don&#039;t want to hear those stats then get your people like andygaus to shut up about criminal justice being based on racism.. Because that claim is bullshit without absolutely NO relevant facts to support it..

Nice doing the back and forth with ya, Russ..  :D

Apologies if you don&#039;t like what you see in the mirror..  :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Russ,</p>
<p><i>Systemic racism and white privilege aren’t concepts that CRT introduced…</i></p>
<p>True.. But CRT uses them falsely and non-factually to the max...</p>
<p><i>A “TRULY equal society”? You mean one where we do not celebrate our individual accomplishments?</i></p>
<p>But you people are not celebrating individual accomplishments.  You people are celebrating accomplishements based on race or gender or lifestyle choice or medical status..</p>
<p>A "TRULY equal society" is where we don't celebrate accomplishments based on race or gender or lifestyle or medical status..  </p>
<p>In a TRULY equal society we celebrate a PERSON'S accomplishments..  Not a groups'...</p>
<p>Let's say you do something completely and utterly fantastic..  Cure cancer or something.</p>
<p>What would you prefer to hear??</p>
<p><b>WOW!!  Look what a gay person did!!!  The first gay person to cure cancer!!!</b></p>
<p>Or would you rather hear what a TRULY equal society would say??</p>
<p><b>WOW!!  Look what Russ Finklestein did!!  He cured cancer!!!</b></p>
<p>Which statement is more representative of a truly equal society??</p>
<p><i>And for someone who thinks LABELING is so wrong, you sure loved talking about BLACK crime stats in this country earlier in the week!</i></p>
<p>It was in the context of the discussion we were having at the time..</p>
<p>You people use LABELS all the time...  There are times when labels are appropriate when in the context of the discussion..</p>
<p>In the context of the discussion about a TRULY equal society, labels/groups are NOT appropriate...</p>
<p><i>You never owned slaves, so why should you be made to feel guilty for slavery in this country’s past, right?</i></p>
<p>Exactly..</p>
<p><i>The guilt lies with those that actually committed the crimes… </i></p>
<p>You should tell your CRT buddies...  They are ALL about "collective guilt"...</p>
<p><i> unless you are talking about the Black community and crime stats, I guess.</i></p>
<p>In the context of the discussion that andygaus started about black people being arrested more for marijuana use than white people, the stats were appropriate..  </p>
<p>They are facts that explain why black people are arrested more...</p>
<p>In the discussion of why black people are given harsher sentences, the stats are FACTS that explain that issue..</p>
<p>If you don't want to hear those stats then get your people like andygaus to shut up about criminal justice being based on racism.. Because that claim is bullshit without absolutely NO relevant facts to support it..</p>
<p>Nice doing the back and forth with ya, Russ..  :D</p>
<p>Apologies if you don't like what you see in the mirror..  :D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2022/01/21/friday-talking-points-a-busy-week/#comment-183794</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Jan 2022 08:58:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=21522#comment-183794</guid>
		<description>Liz,

&lt;I&gt;Well, that wasn&#039;t the paradigm shift I was talking about.

The Senate is not what it used to be and so it is time for ... New Rules!!!&lt;/I&gt;

OK..  Fine..  I&#039;ll touch bases with you when the GOP has the Senate and see if you feel the same..  :D

Fair enough??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Liz,</p>
<p><i>Well, that wasn't the paradigm shift I was talking about.</p>
<p>The Senate is not what it used to be and so it is time for ... New Rules!!!</i></p>
<p>OK..  Fine..  I'll touch bases with you when the GOP has the Senate and see if you feel the same..  :D</p>
<p>Fair enough??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ListenWhenYouHear</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2022/01/21/friday-talking-points-a-busy-week/#comment-183793</link>
		<dc:creator>ListenWhenYouHear</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Jan 2022 06:22:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=21522#comment-183793</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt; Some high schools are already teaching lessons and units on CRT, where students write papers demonstrating their facility with applying the theory, while other schools are introducing CRT concepts, such as systemic racism, white privilege, microaggressions, implicit bias and intersectionality.&lt;/i&gt;

Systemic racism and white privilege aren’t concepts that CRT introduced… so discussing these concepts individually is not the same as discussing CRT.  If CRT  uses these as arguments to define the theory, then they can be viewed as ingredients that when mixed together correctly, make a final product.  You don’t take one ingredient by itself and claim it is the final product.   Eggs aren’t pie.  So when I discuss eggs, you screaming to stop discussing pie is blatantly dishonest.

&lt;b&gt;&lt;I&gt; It&#039;s my understanding that we are striving towards a TRUELY equal society...

A Society where claims of &quot;The first black American to&quot; blaaa blaaa blaaa or &quot;The first woman to&quot; blaaa blaaa blaaa or &quot;The first gay to&quot; blaaa blaaa are met with a puzzled expression and a perplexed, &quot;Yea??? So????&quot;

Isn&#039;t that what Democrats CLAIM to want???

Then why oh why are Democrats going out of their way to LABEL people.. To put them in a lane and make sure they STAY in their lane??

Why would Democrats do this??&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/b&gt;

A “TRULY equal society”?  You mean one where we do not celebrate our individual accomplishments?  Where we are all paid the same and have no choices in our lives?   Sounds a lot more like communism is what you are wanting for our country.   

And for someone who thinks LABELING is so wrong, you sure loved talking about BLACK crime stats in this country earlier in the week!   You never owned slaves, so why should you be made to feel guilty for slavery in this country’s past, right?   The guilt lies with those that actually committed the crimes… unless you are talking about the Black community and crime stats, I guess.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i> Some high schools are already teaching lessons and units on CRT, where students write papers demonstrating their facility with applying the theory, while other schools are introducing CRT concepts, such as systemic racism, white privilege, microaggressions, implicit bias and intersectionality.</i></p>
<p>Systemic racism and white privilege aren’t concepts that CRT introduced… so discussing these concepts individually is not the same as discussing CRT.  If CRT  uses these as arguments to define the theory, then they can be viewed as ingredients that when mixed together correctly, make a final product.  You don’t take one ingredient by itself and claim it is the final product.   Eggs aren’t pie.  So when I discuss eggs, you screaming to stop discussing pie is blatantly dishonest.</p>
<p><b><i> It's my understanding that we are striving towards a TRUELY equal society...</p>
<p>A Society where claims of "The first black American to" blaaa blaaa blaaa or "The first woman to" blaaa blaaa blaaa or "The first gay to" blaaa blaaa are met with a puzzled expression and a perplexed, "Yea??? So????"</p>
<p>Isn't that what Democrats CLAIM to want???</p>
<p>Then why oh why are Democrats going out of their way to LABEL people.. To put them in a lane and make sure they STAY in their lane??</p>
<p>Why would Democrats do this??</i></b></p>
<p>A “TRULY equal society”?  You mean one where we do not celebrate our individual accomplishments?  Where we are all paid the same and have no choices in our lives?   Sounds a lot more like communism is what you are wanting for our country.   </p>
<p>And for someone who thinks LABELING is so wrong, you sure loved talking about BLACK crime stats in this country earlier in the week!   You never owned slaves, so why should you be made to feel guilty for slavery in this country’s past, right?   The guilt lies with those that actually committed the crimes… unless you are talking about the Black community and crime stats, I guess.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elizabeth Miller</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2022/01/21/friday-talking-points-a-busy-week/#comment-183792</link>
		<dc:creator>Elizabeth Miller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Jan 2022 04:26:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=21522#comment-183792</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t know much about football but that rams bucs game was pretty exciting</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don't know much about football but that rams bucs game was pretty exciting</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nypoet22</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2022/01/21/friday-talking-points-a-busy-week/#comment-183791</link>
		<dc:creator>nypoet22</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Jan 2022 03:41:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=21522#comment-183791</guid>
		<description>yikes, i wonder what the over-under was for that one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yikes, i wonder what the over-under was for that one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nypoet22</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2022/01/21/friday-talking-points-a-busy-week/#comment-183790</link>
		<dc:creator>nypoet22</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Jan 2022 03:40:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=21522#comment-183790</guid>
		<description>well so much for the field goal pattern. that last one was decided by a touchdown in overtime.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>well so much for the field goal pattern. that last one was decided by a touchdown in overtime.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kick</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2022/01/21/friday-talking-points-a-busy-week/#comment-183789</link>
		<dc:creator>Kick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Jan 2022 03:12:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=21522#comment-183789</guid>
		<description>BashiBazouk 
154

&lt;i&gt;All three games decided by a field goal with 4 seconds left visiting team winning. &lt;/i&gt;

I know, right?

&lt;i&gt;See if they can complete the set. Go Bills, by a field goal! &lt;/i&gt;

Texas reminds you that we&#039;re talking about Patrick Mahomes. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BashiBazouk<br />
154</p>
<p><i>All three games decided by a field goal with 4 seconds left visiting team winning. </i></p>
<p>I know, right?</p>
<p><i>See if they can complete the set. Go Bills, by a field goal! </i></p>
<p>Texas reminds you that we're talking about Patrick Mahomes. :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kick</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2022/01/21/friday-talking-points-a-busy-week/#comment-183788</link>
		<dc:creator>Kick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Jan 2022 01:31:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=21522#comment-183788</guid>
		<description>Michale 
128

&lt;i&gt;Except I am not disparaging my wife... 

I am disparaging you... &lt;/i&gt;

You are desperately making the attempt and looking like a dick in the process; however, I laugh in your general direction and wonder why you are disparaging your wife. 

&lt;i&gt;So, once again, I caught you in a lie.. &lt;/i&gt;

You caught me assuming the person you were referring to in that disparaging term was you wife. 

&lt;i&gt;It&#039;s really easy to catch you in a lie, Victoria, because lying is all you do.. &lt;/i&gt;

Said the guy who claimed on this forum that he was a cop and then when he got called on that lie proceeded to claim that he never claimed to be a cop, which is provable lie.

&lt;i&gt;It is YOU who is disparaging my wife and you only do so because I kick your ass all over Weigantia™... &lt;/i&gt;

The fact you think this is an attack on your wife and not an attack on you proves just what a snowflake you are. &lt;--- Props to Bashi

&lt;i&gt;And, as you have been told by people much better than you (Myself, JL, Liz) such behavior on your part is not appropriate, not civilized and simply should not be done.. &lt;/i&gt;

It&#039;s patently obvious that you&#039;re under the nonsensical delusion that you and certain other posters are better than everyone else on this forum, and therein is the crux of your problem. Add to that fact your other problem of constantly whining like a snowflake that others should follow certain rules while you are free to post whatever absolute garbage you desire. You are such a snowflake that you want a safe space where you prattle on endlessly with all manner of bullshit while anyone who reciprocates is to be admonished. Well I&#039;d tell you that you can go screw that except for the obvious fact you&#039;re impotent and can&#039;t shut up about it. 

&lt;i&gt;But I understand why you do.. Your feeble and impotent attacks just brush off me so you have to escalate things because you are so desperate for relevance.. &lt;/i&gt;

You understand very little. Otherwise you wouldn&#039;t toss out terms toward other posters that elicit the same response every time. If you want to remind me of your wife, you know exactly how to do it. Not rocket science. Also, enough already about your impotency. It&#039;s irony at its finest that the biggest dick on the board has erectile dysfunction. Kindly seek medical help and stop whining constantly about your physical imperfections.

&lt;i&gt;Even the late CW knew my wife and he knew what a great person she is... &lt;/i&gt;

CW is very much alive, and you&#039;re obviously butthurt and crying out desperately for his attention. I&#039;m not concerned about whether she&#039;s a great person one way or the other, and I also don&#039;t recall CW writing a column about your wife since she&#039;s obviously not a politician. I do recall you posting that you voted for her and posting her name on the forum. 

&lt;i&gt;I will never be afraid to put my wife on a pedestal be it in Weigantia™ or in real life.. &lt;/i&gt;

I don&#039;t care. 

&lt;i&gt;Your constant attacks on her simply proves to everyone here what a disgusting and heinous reprobate you truly are... &lt;/i&gt;

I&#039;m not the one who is admittedly using a particular term in a nonsensical attempt to disparage another poster who puts a value on my opinion that is less than zero. You quite obviously believe you and other posters are better than others; however, I neither suffer that delusion nor do I suffer fools like you gladly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michale<br />
128</p>
<p><i>Except I am not disparaging my wife... </p>
<p>I am disparaging you... </i></p>
<p>You are desperately making the attempt and looking like a dick in the process; however, I laugh in your general direction and wonder why you are disparaging your wife. </p>
<p><i>So, once again, I caught you in a lie.. </i></p>
<p>You caught me assuming the person you were referring to in that disparaging term was you wife. </p>
<p><i>It's really easy to catch you in a lie, Victoria, because lying is all you do.. </i></p>
<p>Said the guy who claimed on this forum that he was a cop and then when he got called on that lie proceeded to claim that he never claimed to be a cop, which is provable lie.</p>
<p><i>It is YOU who is disparaging my wife and you only do so because I kick your ass all over Weigantia™... </i></p>
<p>The fact you think this is an attack on your wife and not an attack on you proves just what a snowflake you are. &lt;--- Props to Bashi</p>
<p><i>And, as you have been told by people much better than you (Myself, JL, Liz) such behavior on your part is not appropriate, not civilized and simply should not be done.. </i></p>
<p>It's patently obvious that you're under the nonsensical delusion that you and certain other posters are better than everyone else on this forum, and therein is the crux of your problem. Add to that fact your other problem of constantly whining like a snowflake that others should follow certain rules while you are free to post whatever absolute garbage you desire. You are such a snowflake that you want a safe space where you prattle on endlessly with all manner of bullshit while anyone who reciprocates is to be admonished. Well I'd tell you that you can go screw that except for the obvious fact you're impotent and can't shut up about it. </p>
<p><i>But I understand why you do.. Your feeble and impotent attacks just brush off me so you have to escalate things because you are so desperate for relevance.. </i></p>
<p>You understand very little. Otherwise you wouldn't toss out terms toward other posters that elicit the same response every time. If you want to remind me of your wife, you know exactly how to do it. Not rocket science. Also, enough already about your impotency. It's irony at its finest that the biggest dick on the board has erectile dysfunction. Kindly seek medical help and stop whining constantly about your physical imperfections.</p>
<p><i>Even the late CW knew my wife and he knew what a great person she is... </i></p>
<p>CW is very much alive, and you're obviously butthurt and crying out desperately for his attention. I'm not concerned about whether she's a great person one way or the other, and I also don't recall CW writing a column about your wife since she's obviously not a politician. I do recall you posting that you voted for her and posting her name on the forum. </p>
<p><i>I will never be afraid to put my wife on a pedestal be it in Weigantia™ or in real life.. </i></p>
<p>I don't care. </p>
<p><i>Your constant attacks on her simply proves to everyone here what a disgusting and heinous reprobate you truly are... </i></p>
<p>I'm not the one who is admittedly using a particular term in a nonsensical attempt to disparage another poster who puts a value on my opinion that is less than zero. You quite obviously believe you and other posters are better than others; however, I neither suffer that delusion nor do I suffer fools like you gladly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elizabeth Miller</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2022/01/21/friday-talking-points-a-busy-week/#comment-183787</link>
		<dc:creator>Elizabeth Miller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Jan 2022 01:02:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=21522#comment-183787</guid>
		<description>Michale,

&lt;i&gt;It&#039;s funny that Biden&#039;s &quot;paradigm shift&quot; happened at the EXACT same moment that Democrats were in the majority and they needed to push unpopular anti-America crap that not even their own PARTY agrees with!! :D&lt;/i&gt;

Well, that wasn&#039;t the paradigm shift I was talking about.

The Senate is not what it used to be and so it is time for ... New Rules!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michale,</p>
<p><i>It's funny that Biden's "paradigm shift" happened at the EXACT same moment that Democrats were in the majority and they needed to push unpopular anti-America crap that not even their own PARTY agrees with!! :D</i></p>
<p>Well, that wasn't the paradigm shift I was talking about.</p>
<p>The Senate is not what it used to be and so it is time for ... New Rules!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BashiBazouk</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2022/01/21/friday-talking-points-a-busy-week/#comment-183786</link>
		<dc:creator>BashiBazouk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Jan 2022 00:35:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=21522#comment-183786</guid>
		<description>All three games decided by a field goal with 4 seconds left visiting team winning. Amazing. See if they can complete the set. Go Bills, by a field goal!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All three games decided by a field goal with 4 seconds left visiting team winning. Amazing. See if they can complete the set. Go Bills, by a field goal!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BashiBazouk</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2022/01/21/friday-talking-points-a-busy-week/#comment-183785</link>
		<dc:creator>BashiBazouk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Jan 2022 00:27:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=21522#comment-183785</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;You can tap dance around the facts ALL you want..&lt;/i&gt;

I don&#039;t have the dance around squat. I have the English language backing me up. 

You want to play victim complex have fun, but on the way you might ask the fellow forum members what they think of your misogynistic posting that triggers the retort.

&lt;i&gt;Do you realize how full of shit you and Victoria are???&lt;/i&gt;

A hell of a lot less than you...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>You can tap dance around the facts ALL you want..</i></p>
<p>I don't have the dance around squat. I have the English language backing me up. </p>
<p>You want to play victim complex have fun, but on the way you might ask the fellow forum members what they think of your misogynistic posting that triggers the retort.</p>
<p><i>Do you realize how full of shit you and Victoria are???</i></p>
<p>A hell of a lot less than you...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kick</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2022/01/21/friday-talking-points-a-busy-week/#comment-183783</link>
		<dc:creator>Kick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Jan 2022 00:20:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=21522#comment-183783</guid>
		<description>Michale
122

&lt;i&gt;Well, carp... I was hoping to watch the Bucs go to the Super Bowl today.. :( &lt;/i&gt;

I was hoping they got their ass kicked just like Aaron Rogers. Heh.

&lt;i&gt;No.. IGNORING a person means not even acknowledging them or anything they do.. &lt;/i&gt;

Your problem here is that MtnCaddy doesn&#039;t generally claim he&#039;s &quot;IGNORING a person.&quot; Case in point from today&#039;s commentary:

&lt;blockquote&gt;
[49] &lt;b&gt;MtnCaddy&lt;/b&gt; &lt;i&gt;wrote&lt;/i&gt;:
[48]

Thing of it is, both of our trolls either don&#039;t know and/or don&#039;t care how stupid they look. There&#039;s really no reason to interact with them except to sharpen your Snark. 

http://www.chrisweigant.com/2022/01/21/friday-talking-points-a-busy-week/#comment-183678

&lt;/blockquote&gt;

He usually says something along the lines of &quot;there&#039;s no reason to interact with the trolls.&quot; Then you come along and claim that MtnCaddy isn&#039;t ignoring you when he, in fact, never mentioned you. 

I will concede the fact that you&#039;ve proven on multiple occasions that you obviously know you&#039;re a troll.

&lt;i&gt;If a Joe Blow is ignoring John Doe, the Joe does not even acknowledge that John is alive.. Joe does not acknowledge ANY of John&#039;s actions. &lt;/i&gt;

If Joe says he is ignoring the trolls and then John comes along and claims to be the troll who is not being ignored, then I would say John Doe obviously knows exactly who he is.

&lt;i&gt;THAT is what it means to IGNORE someone.. &lt;/i&gt;

So &lt;b&gt;you&lt;/b&gt; are acknowledging you&#039;re a troll? Rhetorical question.

&lt;i&gt;Cad is constantly acknowledging my presence here.. CONSTANTLY calling attention to my comments here.. &lt;/i&gt;

MtnCaddy is claiming to ignore the trolls. You are the one acknowledging to being a troll and CONSTANTLY calling attention to yourself. If you weren&#039;t depositing so much pilfered shit on this forum, there&#039;d obviously be no need for him or anyone else to notice the troll shit and make a comment. 

&lt;i&gt;&quot;Look!!! I am ignoring Michale!!!!&quot; &lt;/i&gt;

That&#039;s a fake quote and &lt;b&gt;your&lt;/b&gt; interpretation. So &lt;b&gt;you&lt;/b&gt; are acknowledging you&#039;re a troll.

&lt;i&gt;I realize it&#039;s beyond yer feeble intellect, but by commenting constantly my existence, Cad is doing the OPPOSITE of ignoring me.. &lt;/i&gt;

I realize it&#039;s beyond &quot;yer&quot; feeble intellect, but isn&#039;t it &lt;b&gt;you&lt;/b&gt; who are insisting &lt;b&gt;you&#039;re &lt;/b&gt; the troll?  Rhetorical question.

&lt;i&gt;I get it... Yer not to bright in the braincase.. &lt;/i&gt;

I will be nice and not post what I&#039;m thinking. Suffice it to say, it wasn&#039;t me who was &quot;not to bright&quot; and landed you in &quot;yer&quot; Shithole, but you will always have my pity. 

&lt;i&gt;That&#039;s why I pity you... 
&lt;/i&gt;

It doesn&#039;t work on me because it&#039;s always been my phrase for you, but I do thank you for letting me know what hits the mark. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michale<br />
122</p>
<p><i>Well, carp... I was hoping to watch the Bucs go to the Super Bowl today.. :( </i></p>
<p>I was hoping they got their ass kicked just like Aaron Rogers. Heh.</p>
<p><i>No.. IGNORING a person means not even acknowledging them or anything they do.. </i></p>
<p>Your problem here is that MtnCaddy doesn't generally claim he's "IGNORING a person." Case in point from today's commentary:</p>
<blockquote><p>
[49] <b>MtnCaddy</b> <i>wrote</i>:<br />
[48]</p>
<p>Thing of it is, both of our trolls either don't know and/or don't care how stupid they look. There's really no reason to interact with them except to sharpen your Snark. </p>
<p><a href="http://www.chrisweigant.com/2022/01/21/friday-talking-points-a-busy-week/#comment-183678" rel="nofollow">http://www.chrisweigant.com/2022/01/21/friday-talking-points-a-busy-week/#comment-183678</a></p>
</blockquote>
<p>He usually says something along the lines of "there's no reason to interact with the trolls." Then you come along and claim that MtnCaddy isn't ignoring you when he, in fact, never mentioned you. </p>
<p>I will concede the fact that you've proven on multiple occasions that you obviously know you're a troll.</p>
<p><i>If a Joe Blow is ignoring John Doe, the Joe does not even acknowledge that John is alive.. Joe does not acknowledge ANY of John's actions. </i></p>
<p>If Joe says he is ignoring the trolls and then John comes along and claims to be the troll who is not being ignored, then I would say John Doe obviously knows exactly who he is.</p>
<p><i>THAT is what it means to IGNORE someone.. </i></p>
<p>So <b>you</b> are acknowledging you're a troll? Rhetorical question.</p>
<p><i>Cad is constantly acknowledging my presence here.. CONSTANTLY calling attention to my comments here.. </i></p>
<p>MtnCaddy is claiming to ignore the trolls. You are the one acknowledging to being a troll and CONSTANTLY calling attention to yourself. If you weren't depositing so much pilfered shit on this forum, there'd obviously be no need for him or anyone else to notice the troll shit and make a comment. </p>
<p><i>"Look!!! I am ignoring Michale!!!!" </i></p>
<p>That's a fake quote and <b>your</b> interpretation. So <b>you</b> are acknowledging you're a troll.</p>
<p><i>I realize it's beyond yer feeble intellect, but by commenting constantly my existence, Cad is doing the OPPOSITE of ignoring me.. </i></p>
<p>I realize it's beyond "yer" feeble intellect, but isn't it <b>you</b> who are insisting <b>you're </b> the troll?  Rhetorical question.</p>
<p><i>I get it... Yer not to bright in the braincase.. </i></p>
<p>I will be nice and not post what I'm thinking. Suffice it to say, it wasn't me who was "not to bright" and landed you in "yer" Shithole, but you will always have my pity. </p>
<p><i>That's why I pity you...<br />
</i></p>
<p>It doesn't work on me because it's always been my phrase for you, but I do thank you for letting me know what hits the mark. :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MtnCaddy</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2022/01/21/friday-talking-points-a-busy-week/#comment-183781</link>
		<dc:creator>MtnCaddy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Jan 2022 23:58:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=21522#comment-183781</guid>
		<description>[114]



&lt;i&gt;You could get a lot of mileage out of that delusion were it not for your admitted impotency that you won&#039;t stop prattling on and on about. Like I said, check with your cardiovascular medical professional, it&#039;s not an infrequent condition for those with heart conditions.&lt;/i&gt;



Yessirree we have a Body Slam haha.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[114]</p>
<p><i>You could get a lot of mileage out of that delusion were it not for your admitted impotency that you won't stop prattling on and on about. Like I said, check with your cardiovascular medical professional, it's not an infrequent condition for those with heart conditions.</i></p>
<p>Yessirree we have a Body Slam haha.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kick</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2022/01/21/friday-talking-points-a-busy-week/#comment-183780</link>
		<dc:creator>Kick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Jan 2022 23:20:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=21522#comment-183780</guid>
		<description>Michale 
109

&lt;i&gt;You obviously didn&#039;t understand what Liz was trying to say.. &lt;/i&gt;

Liz wasn&#039;t &quot;trying to say&quot; anything; she wasn&#039;t vague or ambiguous in any way in her comments. 

&lt;i&gt;Look at it this way.. You can&#039;t use a STAND YOUR GROUND defense if you are committing a crime in the process.. &lt;/i&gt;

Look at it this way. I&#039;ve never been arrested for any crime nor have I ever been sued in a court of law for committing multiple crimes on a repetitive basis (which is obviously pubic record), and I will be taking the legal advice of someone who has when Hell freezes over. 

&lt;i&gt;You can&#039;t claim to be ignoring someone and then brag EVERY frakin&#039; comment how much you are ignoring someone.. &lt;/i&gt;

We already know that MtnCaddy owns you because you&#039;ve admitted on multiple occasions that you read his &quot;EVERY frakin&#039; comment&quot;... but please continue to reiterate that fact at every chance you get.

&lt;i&gt;If you DO brag about ignoring someone every time they comment, then you aren&#039;t really ignoring that person.. &lt;/i&gt;

Incorrect. If you spew out a bunch of diarrhea all day long that you copied from other websites and deposited it onto another man&#039;s blog, somebody coming along at the end of the day and claiming they ignored you doesn&#039;t mean they didn&#039;t notice your mountain of copied and deposited verbal diarrhea. You are confusing failing not to notice a fairly obvious mountainous pile of shit you&#039;ve had to scroll through with not ignoring it, and those two things are different. Mentioning the obvious pile of shit doesn&#039;t magically mean it wasn&#039;t also ignored. Those two things are not mutually exclusive. 

Someone acknowledging that they saw a giant pile of dogshit pie but ignored it isn&#039;t the equivalent of walking the dog. 

&lt;i&gt;Do you get it?? &lt;/i&gt;

Yes, I get it. Your dog shit pie is being ignored by people who scroll through it. One poster reporting to the forum that they&#039;re ignoring the pie doesn&#039;t magically make them a consumer. 

&lt;i&gt;Or do I need to use smaller words?? &lt;/i&gt;

When I&#039;m not scrolling through your mountain of pilfered excrement and absolutely ignoring the vast majority of it, I can assure you that I haven&#039;t failed to notice you&#039;ve already mastered the art of redundant small word usage, and you&#039;d be incorrect if you believed I hadn&#039;t additionally noticed your redundant usage of small ideas. That&#039;s why I ignore a shit-ton of your trollshit mountain and why I suspect MtnCaddy and others do likewise.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michale<br />
109</p>
<p><i>You obviously didn't understand what Liz was trying to say.. </i></p>
<p>Liz wasn't "trying to say" anything; she wasn't vague or ambiguous in any way in her comments. </p>
<p><i>Look at it this way.. You can't use a STAND YOUR GROUND defense if you are committing a crime in the process.. </i></p>
<p>Look at it this way. I've never been arrested for any crime nor have I ever been sued in a court of law for committing multiple crimes on a repetitive basis (which is obviously pubic record), and I will be taking the legal advice of someone who has when Hell freezes over. </p>
<p><i>You can't claim to be ignoring someone and then brag EVERY frakin' comment how much you are ignoring someone.. </i></p>
<p>We already know that MtnCaddy owns you because you've admitted on multiple occasions that you read his "EVERY frakin' comment"... but please continue to reiterate that fact at every chance you get.</p>
<p><i>If you DO brag about ignoring someone every time they comment, then you aren't really ignoring that person.. </i></p>
<p>Incorrect. If you spew out a bunch of diarrhea all day long that you copied from other websites and deposited it onto another man's blog, somebody coming along at the end of the day and claiming they ignored you doesn't mean they didn't notice your mountain of copied and deposited verbal diarrhea. You are confusing failing not to notice a fairly obvious mountainous pile of shit you've had to scroll through with not ignoring it, and those two things are different. Mentioning the obvious pile of shit doesn't magically mean it wasn't also ignored. Those two things are not mutually exclusive. </p>
<p>Someone acknowledging that they saw a giant pile of dogshit pie but ignored it isn't the equivalent of walking the dog. </p>
<p><i>Do you get it?? </i></p>
<p>Yes, I get it. Your dog shit pie is being ignored by people who scroll through it. One poster reporting to the forum that they're ignoring the pie doesn't magically make them a consumer. </p>
<p><i>Or do I need to use smaller words?? </i></p>
<p>When I'm not scrolling through your mountain of pilfered excrement and absolutely ignoring the vast majority of it, I can assure you that I haven't failed to notice you've already mastered the art of redundant small word usage, and you'd be incorrect if you believed I hadn't additionally noticed your redundant usage of small ideas. That's why I ignore a shit-ton of your trollshit mountain and why I suspect MtnCaddy and others do likewise.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2022/01/21/friday-talking-points-a-busy-week/#comment-183779</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Jan 2022 22:35:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=21522#comment-183779</guid>
		<description>Aww right..  It&#039;s that time again..  Dinner and a movie with my lovely wife..

Bright and early, we can pick this up...  :D

Maybe hit 250 comments!!???   :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Aww right..  It's that time again..  Dinner and a movie with my lovely wife..</p>
<p>Bright and early, we can pick this up...  :D</p>
<p>Maybe hit 250 comments!!???   :D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2022/01/21/friday-talking-points-a-busy-week/#comment-183778</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Jan 2022 22:33:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=21522#comment-183778</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;Now is time for the second half where Brady is going down!&lt;/I&gt;

I have never been a fan of Tom Brady..  But he is on the only Florida team that can seem to win so....

Mahomes is my new Tom Brady..  The quarterback I love to hate...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Now is time for the second half where Brady is going down!</i></p>
<p>I have never been a fan of Tom Brady..  But he is on the only Florida team that can seem to win so....</p>
<p>Mahomes is my new Tom Brady..  The quarterback I love to hate...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2022/01/21/friday-talking-points-a-busy-week/#comment-183777</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Jan 2022 22:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=21522#comment-183777</guid>
		<description>Bashi,

*I* told you that family should be left out of these flame wars..

JL told you that family should be left out of these flame wars..

LIZ told you that family should be left out of these flame wars..

ANY CIVILIZED person will tell you that family should be left out of these flame wars..

Yet..  ALL of those people are wrong..

And YOU and Victoria are right..

Do you realize how full of shit you and Victoria are???</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bashi,</p>
<p>*I* told you that family should be left out of these flame wars..</p>
<p>JL told you that family should be left out of these flame wars..</p>
<p>LIZ told you that family should be left out of these flame wars..</p>
<p>ANY CIVILIZED person will tell you that family should be left out of these flame wars..</p>
<p>Yet..  ALL of those people are wrong..</p>
<p>And YOU and Victoria are right..</p>
<p>Do you realize how full of shit you and Victoria are???</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2022/01/21/friday-talking-points-a-busy-week/#comment-183776</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Jan 2022 22:29:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=21522#comment-183776</guid>
		<description>Liz,

&lt;I&gt;But, there has been a paradigm shift, ahem, and I can understand why Biden no longer believes so much in the filibuster. The filibuster has lost all sense of its original meaning and purpose.&lt;/I&gt;

It&#039;s funny that Biden&#039;s &quot;paradigm shift&quot; happened at the EXACT same moment that Democrats were in the majority and they needed to push unpopular anti-America crap that not even their own PARTY agrees with!!  :D

And, yunno, I&#039;ll even go out on a limb with a prediction..

When the GOP takes the Senate in 2022, I am betting that Biden will undergo ANOTHER &quot;paradigm shift&quot; and be totally FOR the filibuster, ala his Senate speech on protecting the filibuster..  :D

Liz, you and I both know it&#039;s not a paradigm shift..  It&#039;s pure, unadulterated hypocrisy...

&lt;I&gt;Perhaps, ENDING the filibuster may actually promote more bipartisan votes in the Senate as Republicans and Democrats may not feel so forced to stick to the party line (Hey, there&#039;s a fun PRiSM tune in there!) and vote in favour of things just because it is in the best interests of the American people and the nation.

Imagine THAT for a moment!&lt;/I&gt;

All we would have is the tyranny of the majority..

But Hay..  OK..  Let&#039;s you and I make a New Years Resolution in Jan of 2023 and we will BOTH support killing the filibuster in the name of promoting bipartisan votes for the 2023-2024 legislative session..  :D

K???   :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Liz,</p>
<p><i>But, there has been a paradigm shift, ahem, and I can understand why Biden no longer believes so much in the filibuster. The filibuster has lost all sense of its original meaning and purpose.</i></p>
<p>It's funny that Biden's "paradigm shift" happened at the EXACT same moment that Democrats were in the majority and they needed to push unpopular anti-America crap that not even their own PARTY agrees with!!  :D</p>
<p>And, yunno, I'll even go out on a limb with a prediction..</p>
<p>When the GOP takes the Senate in 2022, I am betting that Biden will undergo ANOTHER "paradigm shift" and be totally FOR the filibuster, ala his Senate speech on protecting the filibuster..  :D</p>
<p>Liz, you and I both know it's not a paradigm shift..  It's pure, unadulterated hypocrisy...</p>
<p><i>Perhaps, ENDING the filibuster may actually promote more bipartisan votes in the Senate as Republicans and Democrats may not feel so forced to stick to the party line (Hey, there's a fun PRiSM tune in there!) and vote in favour of things just because it is in the best interests of the American people and the nation.</p>
<p>Imagine THAT for a moment!</i></p>
<p>All we would have is the tyranny of the majority..</p>
<p>But Hay..  OK..  Let's you and I make a New Years Resolution in Jan of 2023 and we will BOTH support killing the filibuster in the name of promoting bipartisan votes for the 2023-2024 legislative session..  :D</p>
<p>K???   :D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2022/01/21/friday-talking-points-a-busy-week/#comment-183775</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Jan 2022 22:25:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=21522#comment-183775</guid>
		<description>Bashi,

&lt;I&gt;Nobody called your wife anything. They insinuated you called you wife something.&lt;/I&gt;

You can tap dance around the facts ALL you want..

But the FACT is, you and Victoria dragged my wife into this bloodsport..

Justify it all you want.. Whatever you have to do to sleep at night..

But the simple fact is, you and victoria dragged my wife into our argument..

And that&#039;s a pretty reprehensible thing to do..

&lt;I&gt;In my opinion, I understand that Kick is just turning your words against you and is not disparaging your wife&lt;/I&gt;

Of course, that is your opinion.. Because of your political bigotry.. If Victoria had done the EXACT same thing to a fellow Democrat&#039;s wife, you would be aghast and tell Victoria to chill out..

So, your opinion doesn&#039;t mean shit because it&#039;s SOLELY based on your hate and bigotry..

You and that bitch, Victoria dragged my wife into our argument...

This is fact...

You can tap dance and play with what the meaning of &quot;IS&quot; is until the cows come, but the simple fact is ya&#039;all attacked my wife..

Spin it how you like so you can sleep at night.. It&#039;s meaningless.. Yer scum and that&#039;s that..

By the by, I accept your concession that you were lying when you said *I* attacked my wife..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bashi,</p>
<p><i>Nobody called your wife anything. They insinuated you called you wife something.</i></p>
<p>You can tap dance around the facts ALL you want..</p>
<p>But the FACT is, you and Victoria dragged my wife into this bloodsport..</p>
<p>Justify it all you want.. Whatever you have to do to sleep at night..</p>
<p>But the simple fact is, you and victoria dragged my wife into our argument..</p>
<p>And that's a pretty reprehensible thing to do..</p>
<p><i>In my opinion, I understand that Kick is just turning your words against you and is not disparaging your wife</i></p>
<p>Of course, that is your opinion.. Because of your political bigotry.. If Victoria had done the EXACT same thing to a fellow Democrat's wife, you would be aghast and tell Victoria to chill out..</p>
<p>So, your opinion doesn't mean shit because it's SOLELY based on your hate and bigotry..</p>
<p>You and that bitch, Victoria dragged my wife into our argument...</p>
<p>This is fact...</p>
<p>You can tap dance and play with what the meaning of "IS" is until the cows come, but the simple fact is ya'all attacked my wife..</p>
<p>Spin it how you like so you can sleep at night.. It's meaningless.. Yer scum and that's that..</p>
<p>By the by, I accept your concession that you were lying when you said *I* attacked my wife..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elizabeth Miller</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2022/01/21/friday-talking-points-a-busy-week/#comment-183774</link>
		<dc:creator>Elizabeth Miller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Jan 2022 22:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=21522#comment-183774</guid>
		<description>Actually, I may have missed the most fun part. :(</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, I may have missed the most fun part. :(</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elizabeth Miller</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2022/01/21/friday-talking-points-a-busy-week/#comment-183773</link>
		<dc:creator>Elizabeth Miller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Jan 2022 22:03:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=21522#comment-183773</guid>
		<description>Hey, Bashi! Thanks for reminding me ... this will be fun to watch. :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, Bashi! Thanks for reminding me ... this will be fun to watch. :-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elizabeth Miller</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2022/01/21/friday-talking-points-a-busy-week/#comment-183772</link>
		<dc:creator>Elizabeth Miller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Jan 2022 22:01:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=21522#comment-183772</guid>
		<description>Michale, 

I think I remember that Biden speech!

But, there has been a paradigm shift, ahem, and I can understand why Biden no longer believes so much in the filibuster. The filibuster has lost all sense of its original meaning and purpose.

Perhaps, ENDING the filibuster may actually promote more bipartisan votes in the Senate as Republicans and Democrats may not feel so forced to stick to the party line (Hey, there&#039;s a fun PRiSM tune in there!) and vote in favour of things just because it is in the best interests of the American people and the nation.

Imagine THAT for a moment!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michale, </p>
<p>I think I remember that Biden speech!</p>
<p>But, there has been a paradigm shift, ahem, and I can understand why Biden no longer believes so much in the filibuster. The filibuster has lost all sense of its original meaning and purpose.</p>
<p>Perhaps, ENDING the filibuster may actually promote more bipartisan votes in the Senate as Republicans and Democrats may not feel so forced to stick to the party line (Hey, there's a fun PRiSM tune in there!) and vote in favour of things just because it is in the best interests of the American people and the nation.</p>
<p>Imagine THAT for a moment!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BashiBazouk</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2022/01/21/friday-talking-points-a-busy-week/#comment-183771</link>
		<dc:creator>BashiBazouk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Jan 2022 21:59:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=21522#comment-183771</guid>
		<description>Now is time for the second half where Brady is going down!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now is time for the second half where Brady is going down!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
