It really has been too long, but I am never not here.

You and yours best be taking care of yourselves; I know you will be because we are all men of action.

XOXOXO
Kick

Hello, sweet friend! It’s been too long! Thanks for the comment!

R

Russ, you are correct, of course, and isn't it just infinitely comical to listen to the gullible righties whine about the "politicization" of their attempted coup? They had a shit-ton of signs printed up that read "stop the steal," and they seriously think the reason for their planned conspiracy isn't giant honking obvious?

Nice post. :)

Always appreciate the shout out but all I did was take candy from a baby. I feel maybe I should have resisted temptation, in fact. But then troll said "it'll be for a good cause" (oh, the irony!) and I had to go for it.

His revisionist history after the fact when he agreed to the wager beforehand is totally transparent. He's butthurt about being called out for his spamming the board with entire articles... so suddenly he returns and claims CW is "dead to him" based on something that happened years ago? I call bullshit on that. He's now a freeloading troll on CW's forum and a welcher on the bet he insisted on, and while he's gullible enough to fall for his own invented bullshit, he's only fooling himself if he believes he fooled CW or anyone else with that revisionist history bullshit ridiculous after-the-fact drivel and spew when he was begging us all to bet him for a worthy cause, CW.

So, to recap: You are correct, the troll is a welcher... and on multiple levels based on his bullshit:

* He underpaid the wager based on the terms.
* He stiffed CW based on his butthurt revisionist history.

He's also multiple butthurt but hasn't slowed down posting his personal information on this forum. It doesn't get more ignorant than that.

What are "Autonomous Zones" but an insurrection??

AntiFa is purely political.. BLM is purely political..

Political violence and political intimidation..

These are the facts...

Not factually accurate.. By their own admission, the Democrat BLM and AntiFa riots were politically motivated. In their own words, BLM and AntiFa sought to, thru violence, bring about social and political change.

Black Lives Matter: An analysis of Social-Political Activism in Social Media
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/325167328_Black_Lives_Matter_An_analysis_of_Social-Political_Activism_in_Social_Media

So, it's factually proven that BLM is political..

BLM is a communist organization started by communist organizers for the purpose of the overthrow of the US Government.

History is repeating itself again as explained below.
sarscov2.blogspot.com/2020/09/blmantifa-political-change-through.html

A Communist & Anarchist Movement That Explicitly Endorses Violence
Antifa is a revolutionary Marxist/anarchist militia movement that seeks to bring down the United States by means of violence and intimidation. As a September 2017 report in The Atlantic notes, Antifa is responsible for “a level of sustained political street warfare not seen in the U.S. since the 1960s.”
discoverthenetworks.org/organizations/Antifa

So, as you can see, Russ...

The facts prove you completely and utterly wrong..

An insurrection is political by its nature. This is especially true when the outgoing President and leader of the Republican Party plans, organizes, and leads the attack on the Capitol to overturn the EC vote.

And yet, the FBI has categorically stated that there are no facts to support your claims..

Funny how that is, eh? :D

An insurrection is political by its nature. This is especially true when the outgoing President and leader of the Republican Party plans, organizes, and leads the attack on the Capitol to overturn the EC vote. The January 6 failed insurrection’s purpose was, therefore, political — so it is common sense to expect the accused’s political beliefs to be part of the prosecution’s questioning.

The riots that occurred during the Floyd protests were not politically motivated. Politics were not brought up during the prosecution of those accused of committing crimes because politics played no role in what occurred.

Yeah, I wondered who (if anyone) would be anal enough to point that out.

Well, I am definitely the documentarian around here, and I was funning you because I am nothing if not fun.

I also documented in [27] the facts regarding your bet with the troll and him welching in multiple ways. The only thing I left out was your intelligent observation about the troll's word and rat piss. Feel better now?

Congratulations, you're the big winner. I knew you had it in you. *smh*

Heh. :)

Always appreciate the shout out but all I did was take candy from a baby. I feel maybe I should have resisted temptation, in fact. But then troll said "it'll be for a good cause" (oh, the irony!) and I had to go for it.

yes, the current supreme court majority are massive hypocrites. and this surprises whom?

Mandates for me but not for thee, eh?

The Supreme Court can lock out the public and anyone who fails their testing mandate from their work environment and additionally require the wearing of masks in their work environment. So if these hypocrites decide it is unconstitutional for the POTUS to protect American citizens from COVID in the same manner they are protecting themselves, then I think the President of the United States should sign an Executive Order forbidding the closure of the SCOTUS to the public.

If it is declared unconstitutional by these hypocrites for POTUS to require testing mandates, then the SCOTUS can shove the Supreme Court testing/mask mandates as high up their asses as they can manage -- depending on arm length and ass girth, etcetera, et alia -- and can open up the Supreme Court posthaste to the public... bar none, sans testing, sans masking, and RIGHT EFFING NOW.

Yeah, I wondered who (if anyone) would be anal enough to point that out.

Congratulations, you're the big winner. I knew you had it in you. *smh*

almost forgot, if i want to get even snootier i'm also entitled to add the initials Ph.D. at the end.

JL

no, it's Joshua Michael Lynn Ebsworth Shafner Eisenstein

(the Shafner is only honorary, but the rest is in fact my legal name.)

@kick,

yes, the current supreme court majority are massive hypocrites. and this surprises whom?

JL

https://www.pewresearch.org/politics/2021/06/30/behind-bidens-2020-victory/

Proof for facts contained in [27]

Apart from the small shift among Hispanic voters, Joe Biden’s electoral coalition looked much like Hillary Clinton’s, with Black, Hispanic and Asian voters and those of other races casting about four-in-ten of his votes. Black voters remained overwhelmingly loyal to the Democratic Party, voting 92%-8% for Biden.

Pew Research Center

Oh, and can you give me your final word on the Weigantian(™michale) wager donation?? I want to get that behind me and make full payment on the wager..

Welcher...??? Haarrumph... Not even close.. :D

As for that bet with MtnCaddy the troll lost, he has claimed that Donald Trump received 18% of the "black" vote... which is bullshit, as per his usual. He has therefore underpaid the wager to which agreed, and didn't pay CW, which he claimed he would pay... and this, of course, was after he agreed to said wager to pay CW, which was made multiple years after the incident he is blaming as his reason for welching on the actual recipient of the bet.

If he had anything against CW over that old butthurt he can't get over, he would have naturally never insisted on the wager at the outset with MtnCaddy. This whole "I refuse to honor my bet to pay CW that I made with MtnCaddy for reasons that existed years and years before said bet" is just nonsensical revisionist history and also not rocket science.

So to recap: He has welched on the bet by:

* Understating the amount he's required to pay by overstating the amount of "black" vote received by Trump. Trump actually received 8% and not 18%.

* Not paying CW as agreed to in the bet... for reasons that existed years before he made the bet with CW.

So, yes, the troll is quite obviously butthurt with CW for reasons we all witnessed, and blaming CW for his other pre-existing butthurt at the time of the bet is side-splitting comedy as well as revisionist history. He is butthurt on top of butthurt and now welching on top of welching.

Congratulations on kicking his ass, MtnCaddy, but he practically insisted that you do it when he made that ridiculous wager.

It's amazing how ya'all simply cannot stop talking about me..

Definitely reminds me of you and your demonstrable terminal butthurt and victimhood wherein you cannot stop yourself from whining about other posters. Also never fails to evoke thoughts of Cousin Eddie and the jelly of the month club.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I8oplQKbPuQ

Especially MtnCaddy who goes on and on about how much he hates me and how much everyone should ignore me, yet 100% of his comments in this commentary alone mentions me..

Incorrect... as per usual. So, you either suck at math or your well-known reading comprehension issues continue unabated... or both.

One thing that is undeniable is that, for most of the people here in Weigantia(™michale) I have rent-free space in their heads.. :D

Allow me to explain your pathetic existence here, which description will be totally accurate and on point, as I am wont to do:

You are a troll who occupies rent-free space here who gets his jollies by prattling on incessantly and shitting all over the board every chance you get. Then you strut around like you're somebody because no one failed to notice your colossal shitstorm.

"We have hospitals that are almost at full capacity with people severely ill on ventilators. We have over 100,000 children, which we've never had before, in serious condition, many on ventilators."
-Justice Sotomayer

Hysterical and ignorant..

The ACTUAL facts??

The current national pediatric COVID census per HHS is 3,342. Many/most incidental.

Once again.. Proof positive that Democrats/America Haters are hysterical and emotional without any facts to back up their claims..

OK... NOW I am outta here.. :D

So am I to gather that your full name is Joshua Eisenstein?

I congratulate you on your reading ability; however, allow me to remind you that a full name in America generally (but not always) contains three components. Yes, I tease; I am fun that way.

Wasn't that an excellent petition? I thought so.

Have a happy.. :D

If only irony wasn't dead.

JL, due to your very nice petition, I should like to get your thoughts regarding the Supreme Court hearing today regarding Biden's testing mandate for large employers.

I cannot fathom how a Supreme Court that would deign to issue their own testing mandates regarding COVID would deny the President of the United States to issue similar mandates in order to protect Americans:

Supreme Court of the United States
Office of the Clerk
Washington, DC 20543-0001

Scott S. Harris
Clerk of the Court
(202) 479-3011

September 27, 2021

Below is information concerning the October, November and December 2021 oral argument sessions.

1. COVID testing. Arguing counsel and co-counsel planning to attend argument are asked to take a PCR COVID test on the morning before argument (including Sunday before a Monday argument). The Court will arrange for testing at a downtown medical facility at Court expense. We expect that results of those tests will be available by 6:00pm on the same day that they are administered.

2. Remote argument. An arguing attorney who receives a positive test will not argue in person, but will instead be expected to participate remotely by telephone connection to the Courtroom. While we hope that the chances of this occurring are small, counsel should give
some advance consideration to the telephone setup that they would use in the event that it is necessary. Our experience with telephonic arguments has been that use of an iPhone or comparable cellular phone with wired earbuds worked well, so long as the cellular signal was strong in that location. Attorneys who have participated in the Court’s telephonic arguments could also choose to use the same setup that was used previously. The best sound quality in those arguments was obtained through a traditional landline (not a “Voice over Internet
Protocol” line) with a commercial-grade conference speakerphone that supports full-duplex calling, i.e., a telephone that allows someone speaking to hear clearly when another person on the line is speaking as well. Questioning by telephone would follow the same format as in the Courtroom.

3. Courtroom procedures. Assuming that test results are negative, counsel should report to the Lawyers’ Lounge by 9:15am on the morning of argument. Counsel can enter through the northwest door (on the ground level to the left of the front steps), and we ask that you not enter before 8:45am. Please note that that there will be no access to the Court cafeteria or Library for counsel on the day of argument. At the meeting in the Lawyers’ Lounge, we will go over Courtroom procedures and answer any last-minute questions. Counsel in the first case of the day can then move to the Courtroom. If there is a second argument, counsel in that case will remain in the Lawyers’ Lounge until the first case breaks, and then will move promptly to the Courtroom for argument. Audio of the argument will be made available in the Lawyers’ Lounge. Counsel in the first case will be expected to leave the Courtroom and the building after the first case is finished.

4. COVID precautions. The Court asks that attorneys wear masks that cover the nose and mouth at all times within the Court building, except when actively eating or drinking. The Court also asks that attorneys wear an N95 or KN95 mask in the Courtroom, except when presenting argument. N95 or KN95 masks will be provided in the Lawyers’ Lounge.

https://www.supremecourt.gov/announcements/Fall_2021_argument_COVID_protocols.pdf

It's this same SCOTUS who's mandated testing for anyone entering their working environment, and prohibits entrance to those who test positive, that will decide whether or not the President of the United States has the power via testing mandate to protect the working environments of Americans who work for large employers (defined 100+ employees).

Apparently the Ohio Solicitor General who argued against mandates before the SCOTUS today was required to phone in because he tested positive when he took the PCR test mandated by the SCOTUS.

The Court required a PCR test yesterday which detected the virus so for that reason he is arguing remotely.

~ Statement from Office of Ohio Solicitor General Benjamin Flowers

When is some enterprising attorney going to sue the Supreme Court for their mandates? I mean, if these testing mandates are unconstitutional (as purported by the right-wing nutjobs who submitted themselves to said testing mandates before being allowed to argue the unconstitutionality of the president's testing mandates) then why on Earth is the Supreme Court issuing testing mandates, mask mandates, and also closing the Supreme Court to the public and those who fail to test negative to the SCOTUS testing mandates?

Discuss. :)

Conservative Supreme Court justices grill Biden lawyer on OSHA vaccine requirement

Justices seem split along ideological lines on vaccine requirements affecting nearly 100 million workers
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/supreme-court-justices-biden-vaccine-mandates-oral-arguments

A vaccine mandate for a virus that has a 99%+ survival rate...

A vaccine mandate for a new variant that hasn't seen a *SINGLE* death in the United States..

Get that... Omicron has **NOT** killed a single person in the US...

NO ONE in the US has died of Omicron...

These are the facts...

Basement Biden is gonna get spanked **AGAIN** by the SCOTUS...

CANNOT wait til the Roe V Wade killer ruling is handed down in June.. :D

here's a little something for everyone's perusal

Very nice.

Snow Cat Ridge in Dade City, FL...

Although not nearly as fun as real snow, it was a blast!!! :D

Our grandkids have never seen snow before and, while it's true, they probably still haven't, it was close enough for them to have a kick arse time!! :D

Feel free to peruse our awesomely fun time..

Cut n Paste the following into your CHROME Web Browser...

mfccfl.us/snow1.jpg

mfccfl.us/snow2.jpg

mfccfl.us/snow3.jpg

mfccfl.us/snow4.jpg

mfccfl.us/snow5.jpg

A fun time was had by all!!! :D

To one and all I say the best way to insult trolls is to not even acknowledge their existence, as they are not worth anyone's time.

Just say no.

Why should anyone listen to you when it's obvious you can't even follow your own advice??

RealClearInvestigations has developed the comparison database allowing readers to draw their own conclusions -- including the all-but-forgotten riot in Washington on Inauguration Day 2017, as protesters challenged Trump’s election and legitimacy.

The RCI database proves conclusively that the 6 Jan hysteria is SOLELY based on partisan politics and has no factual basis in reality..

Given the facts, that is the only conclusion possible...

Please note that these facts come from the ONLY OFFICIALLY RECOGNIZED News Source here in Weigantia(™michale) that is objective and unbiased..

Updated and Reposted:
RealClearInvestigations' Jan. 6-BLM Riots Comparison

In the summer 2020 riots, the vast majority of charges were dismissed, as they were in the Inauguration 2017 unrest. Prosecutors have dropped a single Capitol riot case.

Keep in mind that this represents just a SINGLE YEAR of Democrat BLM and AntiFa riots..

This country has been thru 22 YEARS (collectively) of Democrat BLM and AntiFa riots...

Even just using ONE YEAR of that 22 years proves beyond ANY doubt that 6 Jan is nothing compared to the violence and attacks on HUNDREDS of government buildings all over the country that Democrats have perpetrated against this country..

A Resource on Violent Political Unrest, Continually Updated
https://www.realclearinvestigations.com/articles/2021/09/09/realclearinvestigations_jan_6-blm_comparison_database_791370.html

View the link for an excellent chart that factually compares the SINGLE 6 Jan violent riot vs A FULL YEAR (2020) George Floyd Riots and the 2017 INAGURATION RIOTS... Both committed by Democrats...

The *FACTS* conclusively prove beyond ANY doubt how fully of kaa-kaa Democrats and Trump/America haters are...

My arguments are based on FACTS and PROVEN accurate data...

Ya'all's arguments are based SOLELY on hysterical emotionalism..

"OH MY GOD!!! IT'S THE US CAPITOL BUILDING!!!! IT'S THE ELECTORAL VOTE!!! THAT MEANS MORE THAN 22 YEARS OF RIOTING AND LOOTING AND ATTACKS ON HUNDREDS OF GOVERNMENT BUILDINGS!!!!"

^^^^ Hysterical emotionalism without a LICK of fact...

And THAT is why ya'all lose this argument.

Just a little reminder that the comments sections used to be fun around here ...

Oh, things are fun around here again. As a matter of fact, I am so taken about how things here in Weigantia(™michale) are so much like the old days, I am going to be posting pics of our family Snow Park adventure.. Stay tuned.. :D

Oh, and can you give me your final word on the Weigantian(™michale) wager donation?? I want to get that behind me and make full payment on the wager..

Welcher...??? Haarrumph... Not even close.. :D

M-

You will have to excuse me here... BUT... you are not in any way entitled to an opinion on the "FUN" of the comments section given that you and JL "missed Michale" and welcomed him back with open arms, while you told me to "write something intelligent".

Are you talking to me or Liz???

Especially MtnCaddy who goes on and on about how much he hates me and how much everyone should ignore me, yet 100% of his comments in this commentary alone mentions me..

One thing that is undeniable is that, for most of the people here in Weigantia(™michale) I have rent-free space in their heads.. :D

So am I to gather that your full name is Joshua Eisenstein?

Haven't you figured out by now that neither Don nor Michale are interested in anything besides getting people to pay attention to them? They escalate their outrageousness until someone bites but that IMO pollutes Weigantia.

To one and all I say the best way to insult trolls is to not even acknowledge their existence, as they are not worth anyone's time.

Just say no.

you are not in any way entitled to an opinion on the "FUN" of the comments section given that you and JL "missed Michale" and welcomed him back with open arms, while you told me to "write something intelligent".

Yeah, Elizabeth. What the fuck were you thinking?

The definition will likely be different for each person you ask.

https://www.change.org/blametheteacher

Just a little reminder that the comments sections used to be fun around here ...

You will have to excuse me here... BUT... you are not in any way entitled to an opinion on the "FUN" of the comments section given that you and JL "missed Michale" and welcomed him back with open arms, while you told me to "write something intelligent".

You have exactly what you whished for...now deal...or do i need to throw a few more real sharp elbows?

In the meantime go perform your Canadian Hand Wringing exercise elsewhere...

As Popeye would say "you gots whats you asked for"...

Oh, I see... Rosanne Boyland.

One of the Trump rioters actually blamed the police for the stampede and shared images of himself (and others, of course) participating in the fight at the door where she was trampled to death.

You see, the officers were refusing to allow the insurrectionists into the door, so the scumbags destroying the capitol and assaulting the police repeatedly had really no choice but to trample Ms. Boyland to death. *bad sarcasm*

The piece of shit who blamed the officers for her death was arrested on January 16 (thanks for the social media posts, asshole).

Here is video of the stampede at the door wherein Ms. Boyland was trampled to death. It was the door where presidents emerge to be inaugurated.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=koW5NYVlUz8

Yes, M... no fun at all.

You said we were fun scarcely hours ago:

http://www.chrisweigant.com/2022/01/05/merrick-garlands-progress-report/#comment-182546

Pray tell, whatever did we do (or not do) in the intervening hours that reshaped your opinion? ;)