Yes, Casino Royale was the first Bond novel written by Ian Fleming in 1952.

That's right, of course, M... and published April 13, 1953.

Have I ever mentioned that Casino Royale is my most favourite Bond movie. Not THAT Casino Royale! :)

Why, yes, M... you have definitely mentioned that a time... or two or three.

http://www.chrisweigant.com/2020/07/17/ftp582/#comment-164251

This is fun.

Because we are nothing if not fun. :)

Have I ever mentioned that Casino Royale is my most favourite Bond movie. Not THAT Casino Royale! :)

This is fun.

Not a Bond fan, eh?

Au contraire, M. Remember who sent you the video of Daniel Craig slinking sleekly out of the ocean and that time the filter kept eating our posts over and over to the point we ultimately deduced that the culprit was the word "casino"... as in "Casino Royale"?

So CW fixed it for us, and now we can "say" the word "casino" "casino" "casino" to our hearts' content.

Good times. :)

FUN FACT: The first novel in which M appears? Casino Royale

Not a Bond fan, eh?

Patience, CW! THIS MESS has so many moving parts (and don't we know that the big fish will retain the best lawyers?) so this is something that will take DoJ all the time they need to do it right.

The video doesn't lie, and there are shit-tons of it primarily provided by the perpetrators themselves via their own posts on social media.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jWJVMoe7OY0

And to any moron who wants to watch a compilation of the perpetrators' own recorded videos and continue to downplay and whitewash the pre-planned events of 1/6/21 as recorded and archived for all posterity via miles and miles of video, you are:

* In denial.
* A useful idiot.

Huh?

You know, EM, the opposite of "sir," if I type it, I'll be going against your wishes not to be called it.

Well, there is only one 'M' and I sure ain't her/him. Heh.

Okay, EM <--- Then what is that there? ;)

By the way, am I the only one looking forward to president Biden's speech at the Capitol tomorrow?

No, sir. <--- This here is the result of being asked not to refer to you as, you know... "M"

He is expected to call out Trump!

"Singular responsibility" ... because if Trump doesn't lie repeatedly about the election even in the face of all the evidence showing there was no widespread fraud that would have changed the outcome of the election that Trump lost to Biden, none of this happens.

I may have mentioned a time or two in the past that Benedict Donald was the biggest threat to America.

http://www.chrisweigant.com/2016/05/13/ftp391/#comment-75291

This is what I meant.

He is expected to call out Trump!

Hope so ...

A big heartfelt congratulations on reaching yet another fundraising goal!!!

I shall get my contribution out in the mail tomorrow. Sorry.

I was home listening to AG Garland's address to his colleagues and the nation at large because I'm still recovering from an unexpected and unprecedented reaction to my booster shot. I swear, no more vaccines for me for at LEAST another six months. Heh.

Here is the paragraph that stood out to me:

"The Justice Department remains committed to holding all January 6th perpetrators, at any level, accountable under law — whether they were present that day or were otherwise criminally responsible for the assault on our democracy. We will follow the facts wherever they lead."

But, I suppose many on the left will find something to criticize in that, too. Oh, I kid most of the left. :)

"It is my considered judgment that my oath to support and defend the Constitution constrains me from claiming unilateral authority to determine which electoral votes should be counted and which should not."

~ Mike Pence

Read Pence’s full letter here

A bit disingenuous there. Here is what precedes your quote to put in perspective:

Police officers who put their lives on the line every day to serve our communities have been targeted with extraordinary levels of violence.

That person found the judge's home, shot and killed her son and injured her husband. These acts and threats of violence are not associated with any one set of partisan or ideological views, but they are permeating so many parts of our national life that they risk becoming normalized and routine if we do not stop them.

Much more serious than whataboutism property crimes... and interesting that you chose to take it out of context.

Forgot to mention your inability to comprehend the written word and flailing determination to prove your ignorance over and over ad nauseam. :)

So, Biden's AG agrees with me.

Biden's AG doesn't know you exist. The only way Merrick Garland will even know you exist is if Trump shits his pants in the AG's presence, and you and the other members of Cult 45 become dislodged. :)

BOTH sides of the political spectrum are at fault here...

If by "here," you mean the admitted conspiracy of January 6, I regret to inform you that you're up to your eyeballs in bullshit.

Your repetitive deflection, ridiculous whataboutism, and perpetual false equivalency are again duly noted. :)

Garland sounds sincere, and I prefer to hope he will come through. At the same time, I can't help wondering what further evidence you would need to bring charges of sedition against a person who called Georgia's chief election official to say, "find me 11,000 votes."

Andygaus tells it like it is. It seems Donald and Mark failed to tell Peter and Steve and the other co-conspirators that the State of Georgia via its representatives had already told them to go pound sand when Trump conspired to commit fraud, saying: "I just want 11,780 votes."

Full transcript and audio of recorded call

Thank you, Georgia; hard evidence doesn't lie.

So Georgia was a state who wasn't going to join in the conspiracy to commit election fraud. Why didn't Trump and/or Meadows inform Navarro and/or Bannon that Georgia was already a hard "no"? Thoughts to ponder.

So, Biden's AG agrees with me.

BOTH sides of the political spectrum are at fault here...

22 years (collectively) of Democrat BLM and AntiFa riots and attacks on hundreds of government buildings all over the country prove that beyond ANY doubt...

Got another dot to connect:

* Peter Navarro says the quiet part out loud.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ghh_esKFyxQ

Peter is totally unaware he's describing a conspiracy to commit a coup.

And I would have gotten away with it, too, if it weren't for those meddling kids!