All you are doing is repeating the same bullshit.

Don't knock it until you've tried it. Oh, wait!

You have added nothing new worthy of a response as it has already been covered.

What is: "Why CW Ignores Don Harris"... Redundant Trolls for $1000, Alex.

Get lost.

You are not worthy of commenting here.

He's more than worthy. You, on the other hand: If you had a scintilla of intelligence with which to grasp the level of infinite ignorance your repetitive bullshit and stalking of the author sounds to everyone else day in and day out, replete with your asinine juvenile nescient prattling, you'd be able to recognize your obvious projection quoted herein... but you don't... so you can't, One Dumb Man.

Doesn't like it when he has to answer serious questions...

I can understand why... It is super easy to just make shit up and be unencumbered by reality.

Fortunately, Don Qui you are not the arbiter of who gets to post here and you might be cautious of what you wish for...

In the meantime I will continue to hand your ass to you until you can answer the hard questions about your "movement".... such as it is...

All you are doing is repeating the same bullshit.

Have you ever read a few of your posts? Talk about the pot calling the kettle black!

It is time to require commenters post under their real name or tell the trolls to cut the crap.

Does that include your crap? goode trickle has a pretty well reasoned argument. You might try it sometime...

On a side note: I think it's foolish to participate on the net with your real name.

Not that fictional statistic of counted vs cast... You failed last time I asked, I am sure you will again. Of the 34 states ( not a bullshit lie, but truth borne out by law) name which ones keep track of this fictional stat and publish it.

As to the FOIA crap, you, again, failed last time I asked. Who exactly are you going to FOIA? How will you be protecting voter information received as a result of the FOIA? What information exactly will you be FOIAing?

As to getting information from the one dumbman website, Again I will ask how you plan on protecting personal information and what you plan to do with that information. Just because everyone else asks for it is not good enough, especially when one considers you have none of the disclaimers, warnings, or use statements everyone else uses. We won't even get into the whole your not registered as a 501 election advocacy group.

I am pretty sure that I have a firm grip on how democracy works. Unfortunately not all of us have access to the volumes of electoral wisdom you quite clearly think you have....List your laws, rules, regulations, hell even academic papers that support your electoral fantasy count assertion. I doubt you will be able to do even that since you never have before. Why bring facts to the table, when polluting pixels is easier.

What is bullshit about the website claims again? Fact: I never said YOU went to Go Daddy, that would imply you had a basic level of website management knowledge.

What is clear from your website prattling is that in addition to election law, FOIA process as it pertains to elections, and registered non-profit requirements, we get to add website management to the list of things you know nothing about.

You went through either T-35 hosting or Smartsites to set up one dumbman... which in turn went to one to register the domain or to the other for the website design.

In either case my original point still remains that ANYONE can register a .org domain without having to prove they are a valid non profit/charitable organization.

When trying to refute ones example it helps to bring more to the table than if x amount were participating in one dumbman there would be one dumbman approved candidates on the ballot. Next time try reading all of the criteria before you speak, it is not that hard, it is kind of like two trains math

I get the whole supposed multi election bullshit you are laying down... but you have yet to adequately explain how many cycles it will take for this to work, but it is certain it will take more than one.

In the meantime your "strategy" results in votes being thrown away, and for those paying attention, that could mean that if the wrong party wins you won't have to worry about your "multi-election strategy" any longer.

If the term purity test has been debunked I must have missed it. Last time I checked one dumbman demands one dumbman candidates take no contributions over 200 bucks. That is a number you have picked and set the level at. It is in fact the quintessential definition of a purity test. Candidates either tow your ridiculous line and are deemed suitable one dumbman candidates(pure) or they burn in the fires of big money hell.

When it comes to the website claims what is bullshit? It is not my fault that you obviously have no clue about website management. If you did you would realize that ANYONE can set up a .org domain without having to prove they are a valid organization.

In a way you having gone through Smartsites or T35 Hosting to get your website in a box just goes to show that you are incapable of doing the hard work required to make one dumbman something bigger than one dumb man.

Just because 34 states have rules that may not result in some write-in votes not being counted in the total to elect candidates does not mean those votes in most of those states can not be counted for the purpose they are cast.

I seem to recall when we last rode this merry-go-round it was thoroughly discussed and debunked. How again are you going to count ballots that do not get counted? Who is going to do all of the work and pay all of the money to get those ballots counted for the purpose for which they were cast? How are you going to separate those who wrote people in for reasons other than one dumbman from those that had other reasons?

I guess I need to remind you that YOU were the one who moved their goal post from it can be done in these 34 states to " we will start it in the states that allow write in ballots." which is currently 9 states(definitely a few and not a plurality).

It does have an effect on the money flowing from PACS into the system as well as an effect on money flowing into the PACS. When the big money candidates are no longer getting enough votes to win elections then the big money interests will stop putting money into the PACS.

Says the guy who has no clue about how PACs work and just how ingrained they are into the system... What fantasy planet are you living on?

Newsflash... as long as elections and thus office holders are determined by only valid counted ballots then there will be PACs unless meaningful legislation is enacted that curtails what they can do and what they can spend.

Voter dilution resulting in minority rule?

What is that- the Nader cost Gore the election nonsense?

If you had managed to continue your education beyond when it stopped during high school you would greatly comprehend the validity of the arguments behind semi-popular third party candidates leaching support from "establishment" candidates when they have very similar platforms. Not that I agree with it...but it is a valid theory for discussion.

Since I have to explain the basics of how an election works AGAIN... lets take the place you have at best a casual understanding of election law, New Jersey. Anyone can write in themselves and have the ballot counted. Lets assume in a house race there are 1 million ballots cast and no one dumbman purity test blood oath certified nut jobs...Er I mean candidates. The one dumbman blood oath dictates that you ignore the candidate who you might agree with 90 percent of the way all because they fail YOUR purity test and the oath demands they write their name in to send a message. Lets just say that 550,000 people write themselves in for this cycle.

Under current election law the the 550k write in votes would be just that, write in votes, there is a balance of 450k votes cast for the remaining candidates the person who gets the most votes wins, for sake of argument lets just say 250k votes were cast for the winner.

The last time I checked this is a prime example of voter dilution... and as long as elections are won by who can get a plurality of the cast ballots you can cry till the cows come home "multi-election strategy" it does not alter the simple fact you are requiring people to throw away their ballot until a message is sent and you get your purity tested candidates on the ballot... In the meantime everyone will just have to limp along with unpopular rule until that happens.

Explain to all of us again how you overcome that little problem.... It seems like there is an awful lot of work that has to happen there who is going to do it? You just want the glory but have yet to show that you can do the hard work (as evidenced by the cobweb you call a website).

I made a mistake and admitted it and did not repeat it. Not lying.

I have to call BS. Anyone who has worked with legitimate NP's or even looked into setting one up is well aware that it is not even close to the same process as some bozon getting on Go Daddy and registering a .org website.

It's the difference in the process that makes it virtually impossible that you made a "mistake" by thinking you were a "registered" NP.

Perhaps I have set the bar to high by expecting you to know WTF your are prattling on about.

Stop trolling or go away.

I wasn't aware that beating BS with a reality stick was trolling....

The problem with your theory that describing the problem with the "everyone is against you" delusion is I am not making that argument.

Really? Then who in government is not heavily influenced by big money according to you?

No one buys your "rational argument" deflection. We have all tried and you have failed the rational part with remarkable consistency. I think most of us are bored by it all and are just sick of post after post of the same circle jerk day after day. No one cares about your movement because you don't care about your movement. And by care, I mean get off your ass and do something other than harass political writers. Everyone and their mother has an idea. It's those that execute that succeed. You want people to value your idea? Make it in to something that is valued.

Still peddling that political horse paste?

The problem with the "everyone is against you" conspiracy delusion is it does not leave any room for maneuver. If the entire political world is in on the same conspiracy, why would you think the vote is still sacrosanct?

Sinema on the other hand has now shown her true color given that the only reason she is doing her dance is to continue enjoying the relatively easy big donor cash...

There should be a special place for Sinema, unfortunately it's filled with congresscriters...

When you sayTAKE THE VACCINE!!!!!!! Are you talking about that highly ineffective one that does not work in 34 states (again a plurality...not "a few"), does nothing to stop the big money flowing from PACs into the system, does not address voter dilution resulting in minority rule, and was created by a guy who lied about being a non-profit ( we both know you were caught trying to bullshit) that also does not have a clue about election law?

No thanks.... I would rather commit voter fraud...