You do, Mr. H you seem to care whether media bias exists, but only if it precludes all other issues in favor of your precious fixation, One Demand.

I know, right!? It's a wonder he doesn't rename the precious as "One Ring."

You do, Mr. H you seem to care whether media bias exists, but only if it precludes all other issues in favor of your precious fixation, One Demand.

I know, right!? It's a wonder he doesn't rename the precious as "One Ring."

She took money to fight candidates that take corporate PAC money saying it would NOT be given to candidates that take corporate PAC money

Can you back this up with something official from either AOC or her PAC?

When I heard about this, I couldn't help but think about Death Harris.

"Male took off his colostomy bag and started swinging it at others, some units have feces on them..."

Oh, I see exactly what today is. It's "y'all have ganged up and are trying to kill me" day. It's a conspiracy! Heh.

Y'all are implanting visuals that are going to linger. I can't stop laughing. I need a drink because it's 5 o'clock somewhere. Oh, wait... it's 7:15 here. Drink! :)

I hear you. :)

So here we are.

Yes, sir.

It relaxes me to go on the journey that a few paragraphs of fluff here and there provide, I maintain my end of the covenant entered into between blogger and blogged, my presence effects no precarious balance struggling to find allies of like-mindedness. The two monolithic constructs herein manage elegantly choreographed coexistence despite their contrary intransigence.

"Boil on the butt!" ;)

*still laughing*

The only question is whether this will be presented with a MIDDOTW week award for following the SOP of the Deathocrats, a MDDOTW award for the hypocrisy and betrayal or just completely ignored.

Wrong. There are lots more questions out there due to the fact that everything is not about you and your "tilting-at-windmills political philosphy," Death Harris.

You seem completely and totally oblivious to the fact that this blog isn't about you and your bullshit. It's mind boggling how utterly self-centered you are... the height of conceit... and for absolutely no reason whatsoever that I can discern.

So to recap: Get over yourself! Everything isn't about you.

I'm sensing bits of the Trumpian legacy of lies flaking away just around the corner, Rudy seems set to burst, like the boil on the butt he is. Barr and his antics look fairly ripe too.

"Boil on the butt"! *I can't stop laughing* :)

Yes, this blog is one man's opinion on politics.

No shit, Death.

And it includes a comments section for us to put in our opinions on the one man's opinion on politics.

State the obvious.

And that INCLUDES my opinion that as a public figure covering politics CW should address One Demand instead of avoiding it and/or offering dodges.

CW isn't a public figure, and his blog only includes your opinion of your monomania for two reasons:

(1) You haven't stopped trolling and spamming your personal one-man crusading bullshit on his blog when he's requested on multiple occasions that you either stop doing it or be banned and expunged from his site via the "red card."

(2) He hasn't yet thrown that "red card."

And since CW has lauded people for not taking no or no answer for an answer from other public figures and keeping after them until they get an answer then it is okay for me to keep after CW to hold him to the same standards he expects from other public figures.

CW is not a public figure; regardless, why do you keep making this asinine claim that CW has lauded others for not taking "no" for an answer and then practically blaming him for your trolling and spamming of him? Ridiculous! Show me all these quotes where CW has "lauded people." I will be happy to show you all the quotes where he has specifically singled you out and referred to you as a "troll" (because you are one) and the quotes where he has specifically told you to stop with your monomania on his blog. You seem determined to ignore his actual comments in favor of making shit up about him practically begging you to troll him since he's "lauded" all these "people." Name these "people" and show us the quotes.

So to reiterate: It's delusional to practically blame him for you stalking his blog with your personal bullshit as if he asked for it... particularly when he has actually singled you out and asked you to stop.

And the standards he sets for this blog with the ENTIRE mission statement.

You keep bringing that up also as if it's some kind of contract he's made with every Don, Dick, and Harry who believes he is owed something. This is his blog, and I can find nothing in his mission statement that should be misconstrued as an implied contract for him to service your pathetic personal political purity pity party.

That includes "My main focus will be the hypocrisy and foibles that emanate so regularly from Washington,DC, but are ignored by the mainstream media."

I cannot fathom why you believe that sentence is some kind of implied contract wherein the author has volunteered to shill for every dipshit with an idea out there who is being ignored by the mainstream media. Why favor these general sentences from the mission statement versus the author's direct paragraphs written personally to you? It defies common sense, which it appears you have none.

In my opinion that covers the Hypocrisy of the big money Deathocrats and One Demand.

So you believe that a blog author's general mission statement is a greenlight to you and your own one-man personal crusade while choosing to totally ignore the paragraphs that were actually meant for you personally? Do you perhaps see your problem? You're missing the forest for the trees. He's actually addressed you personally in no uncertain terms while you're out there fantasizing that his mission statement is your contract to troll. Nuts!

And the paragraph about media bias and issues put into the "who cares" category.

Sentence fragments are not paragraphs. He's addressed you personally.

And the list of promises at the end.

Sentence fragments are not paragraphs. He's addressed you personally.

All apply to CW addressing things like One Demand.

No, they don't. That general mission statement is not about you and your personal bullshit, but I can show you multiple paragraphs that address your trolliness and your personal crap directly and in no uncertain terms.

So to recap: You're ignoring the reality of the paragraphs that were written to you personally in favor of your fantasy that CW's mission statement is some kind of a contract requiring him to shill your shit. It isn't. You have a personal response that was written for you so there's no reason to choose your delusions over that reality.

Would you enjoy the reality of CW actually writing a column about you? I can picture it now.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
````````````````````````````

My Blog Troll Has One Demand,
and I'm Going to Let Him Have It

I have a blog. My blog has a troll. Not an ordinary troll, mind you, but one that believes my general mission statement is about him while ignoring responses written directly to him. Although I've definitely responded to his tilting-at-windmills political philosophy and requested he stop his trolliness or be banished from my site, he continues to prefer his fantasy over reality. It's nothing I haven't already said in previous comments, but he's been trolling for this, and I'm going to give it to him.

[Insert previous comments here.]

Any man’s death diminishes me,
because I am involved in mankind;
and therefore never send to know for whom the bell tolls;
it tolls for thee.

~ John Donne

You certainly got the tense right, half point.

I'm afraid I might have moved on to a different thing entirely and clumsily contaminated the new thought in my haste.

I'll give you a heads up when we start playing 'Matsui', and it will never start with...

"A doctor, who specializes in skin diseases, will dream he has fallen asleep in front of the television. Later, he will wake up in front of the television, but not remember his dream."

...And most importantly, can never end with Kashmir...

There are lines that one never crosses.

LL&P

The obvious non sequitur of;

"And the paragraph about media bias and issues put into the "who cares" category.

And;

"That should be the hypocrisy of the big money Deathocrats and the media not covering One Demand."

I suppose one could argue that both statements can be true at once, but it's an infinitely easier lift to consider both parts equally invalid and self-canceling...The 42 here is... You do, Mr. H you seem to care whether media bias exists, but only if it precludes all other issues in favor of your precious fixation, One Demand.

This one just left a smile up for grabs, which I thought I would try on, if I like it, I might keep it, one can never have too many smiles.

"And that INCLUDES my opinion that as a public figure covering politics CW should address One Demand instead of avoiding it and/or offering dodges."

I'm not quite sure how much of 'public figure' an avowed blogger can really lay claim to be, they're almost by definition an aloof spectral species of cultural observer that are rarely seen and never heard as they float among the issues of the day. As for addressing One Demand our in-house incorporeal insouciant has done justice to One Demand and found it wanting. One Demand had its name put to the test and can't, in fairness, be said to be living up to its name as you demand it to be scrutinized and re-evaluated many times daily when it hasn't varied at all from its original form. I think Einstien referred to that flogging of the same dead horse as 'crazy' in his own dry vernacular.

Are you expecting CW to have amended his evaluation of OD (odious dialogue or one demand, if you please) when no change has occurred since his first opinion was made?

It could just be that he wants no part of crazy.

hmmm?

LL&P

so if i'm the only other person who knew what the hell you were talking about, it's my fault for wanting somebody else to be in on the joke?

When I heard about this, I couldn't help but think about Death Harris.

So here we are.

It relaxes me to go on the journey that a few paragraphs of fluff here and there provide, I maintain my end of the covenant entered into between blogger and blogged, my presence effects no precarious balance struggling to find allies of like-mindedness. The two monolithic constructs herein manage elegantly choreographed coexistence despite their contrary intransigence.

A Testimony to the longevity of individual stances and their back and forth sustained mutually assured continuation. Simply put.

At least one will always.

LL&P

i still think nobody else gets it.

JL

Critical thinking skills should be all that are needed, but under the circumstances, you should do like Bashi says and look up his previous response to your AOC trolling. Then ask your mom to explain his comment to you (due to your reading comprehension issue).

Pontificating again?

AOC, unlike you, understands politics. She gets shit done rather than whine about no one agreeing with arbitrary goal posts of questionable purity. I already answered the why last time you criticized AOC for her PAC, so I will leave it to you to look up the reason she is supporting all democrats in reelection rather than those small few who 100% agree with her...

What's all this, has your idée fixe finally broken, Mr. H?

...Or is it just a common-all-garden Freudian-slip?

I'm sensing bits of the Trumpian legacy of lies flaking away just around the corner, Rudy seems set to burst, like the boil on the butt he is. Barr and his antics look fairly ripe too.

Surely every caliginous act brought into view must chip away at some support, somewhere... No one is Teflon-coated completely? Gotti did die in jail.

Trump v Facebook... lol, This one was easy, Facebook has just reported one of the best quarters in its brief history, outpacing Wall st. projections with an impressive 48% gain over the same period last year. Their MAU (monthly active users) grew by a half-billion for the same time period, not losing 74 million as we're lied to by right-wing media empty-heads and their drones.

Zuckers so-called 'oversight board' seems to have had the desired effect, that of appearing to do something but actually giving him six more months to pick a quiet time to jettison his petard. He should have just ripped that bandaid off entirely, if Trump has his druthers, he'd marshal his mob to make Twitter flutter. Hair Trump honestly believes he built Twitter from the lie up, he sees them of having double-crossed his ambitions, he might have a scintilla of a point there...Meh, even a blind chicken gets a piece of corn sometimes.

LL&P

"If Cheney is punished by her own party, I will not applaud, but I also will not sob. I sit silently in acknowledgment, as one does, when karma swings low and performs its function." ... Charles Blow, New York Times

I recognized your foul stench. ;)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ruo_O5E686c

Somebody stop us!

luke, leia and liz - who knew?

Who knew? This guy: https://www.rebelscum.com/DarthTater.asp

While the GOP wholeheartedly supports the Mr. and eagerly supports the pricks... balls simply cannot be tolerated. ;)

hehe

I do kind of feel bad for her, in the same way, I feel bad for the feeder Goldfish I throw in with my Pihranas.

Two words: "Cheeto Jesus"

Lol, this actually is healthy for the GOP, they're just taking the scenic route through the five stages of grief, and ran out of gas before departing Denial.

Anger is where they make up for lost time as they, as a group, seem to be forever angry.

Bargaining will be a tough row to hoe for them, they don't play well with others, much less themselves.

Depression isn't really their thing, ignorance remains bliss, as always. By that standard, they are forever ecstatic.

Acceptance, their final stop, they'll find Liz waiting for them with a nice tall pitcher of who gives a fuck how these people destroy themselves, just that they do.

It's a mind-boggler how Republicans will process all this when the only thing tangible from which to draw a conclusion is that the GOP has zero loyalty to themselves, so why would anyone expect loyalty from them in return for a vote.

Their long and winding road through the stages of grief was always going to be drawn out, no one remembered to pack a moral compass, and Cheeto Jesus, the bus driver, gets paid by the hour and therefore is in no rush to let the journey end.

LL&P.

The last time that I drove back to California (after delivering a U-HAUL truck full of clothing to one of our impoverished Native American First Nations Brothers and Sisters in South Dakota) I made my partner stop underneath the "Welcome to Oklahoma/Texas" signs...and take a photo of me from behind, apparently pissing on said signs.)

Oh, how do I really feel?

Deathkiller Harris, you are an uncompromising idiot, and have wasted any chance of recruiting support here in Weigantia because English (comprehension) is not something you have any appitude at. Stop wasting our time.

[5]

An article on how to bake a Derby pie might be interesting as well, but if you click on ABOUT THIS BLOG at the top of the page, it says:

Not Derby pie. Not One Crackpot Demand. Not your obsessive compulsive fixation.

D'ya think we should establish a GoFundMe account so DeathkillerDon can get some ESL education? I'm in...he's so much better at political humor than political advocacy. I see real potential here. 'Course I see a lot of potential in the 74 million idiots who voted for Deathkiller Trump, so there's that.

[7]

Just as I didn't trust the Lincoln Project while admiring their polished anti-Trump ads last year, so I don't particularly trust Rep. Cheney. But I can hardly disagree with the facts of what she says in her article, as you report. She deserves applause for not just her honesty, but her political courage.

Yeah, well I for one don't trust Lincoln Project, nor Mitt, nor Liz Cheney. But even sinners have been known to do God's work (says this Godless, Commie Pinko Loud and Proud Libtard) so let us celebrate, not disparage, what shreds of decent actions we may get from whatever Repugs, eh?

[8]

Gawd, Kick, I sure do enjoy your input in these pages. You are my favorite thing in the whole "Nothing but Queers and Steers" Texas Republic.

Wow. Just wow.

I hated Dick Cheney and I hate his daughter's politics, as do you.

It's just so unforeseen that I would find myself ADMIRING folks like Liz Cheney and Mitt Romney *smh* who are demonstrating more fealty to our Constitution than most of the other Repug #Putin'sBitches.

NANCY PELOSI
SPEAKER OF THE HOUSE

From the GOP Leadership: Help Wanted –
Non-Threatening Female

MAY 4, 2021

Seeking Replacement for House Republican Conference Chair

Word is out that House GOP Leaders are looking to push Rep. Liz Cheney from her post as House Republican Conference Chair – their most senior woman in GOP leadership – for a litany of very Republican reasons: she won’t lie, she isn’t humble enough, she’s like a girlfriend rooting for the wrong team, and more.

So what exactly are House GOP Leaders looking for in a #3? Punchbowl AM got the scoop and, well, it’s not surprising… they want a woman who isn’t a “threat” to them.

Inbox Punchbowl News AM

McCarthy and Scalise will want someone in leadership who is not only relentlessly on message, but also someone who does not pose a threat to them and their power.

As Michael Gerson, former speechwriter for President George W. Bush, put it in the Washington Post yesterday:

Nothing about this is normal. The GOP is increasingly defined not by its shared beliefs, but by its shared delusions. To be a loyal Republican, one must be either a sucker or a liar…Knowingly repeating a lie – an act of immorality – is now the evidence of Republican fidelity.

https://www.speaker.gov/newsroom/5421-0

I couldn't make myself read through this nonsense.

Translation: Don Harris didn't read it but declares it "nonsense." That lying bullshit right there is exactly how is shit here is exactly why no one should ever take a word I say seriously.

But an article on how you have denounced the THE Big Lie and are ready to take on the evil Big Money Deathocrats would be interesting.

Your shit is repeatedly and definitely uninteresting.

It is YEARS overdue.

Your crusade has produced multiple YEARS of human waste, which is why we refer to it as "bullshit mountain."

So to recap:

* You fail our test
* You do not pass "go"
* You do not collect $200 dollars
* You get no votes
* We're writing in our own names
* Our priceless idea will elicit a change in your behavior... any day now.

I even whistled when she casually listed the old mantra of 1980s Republicanism, "We believe in the rule of law, in limited government, in a strong national defense, and in prosperity and opportunity brought by low taxes and fiscally conservative policies." I disagree that those things are, by themselves and in the ways in which they are interpreted by Republicans, the best path forward for the country; but at least I recognize that they form a viable and consistent political platform within the American tradition. Trump torpedoed everything on that list - but not, I would add, without some help from the GOP US House and Senate over the past twenty years. Not to mention the previous Republican president ... and vice president.

I never thought I'd agree with Liz Cheney on a dang thing, but then I'm not the one who finally deduced that Donald Trump is a threat to the country. Fact is, she's on our side on this issue. Recognizing obvious facts and pointing them out is the very least that humans can do.

The GQP stabbing each other in the back want you to know that Biden is not a unifying president and that cancel culture will be the death of the Party... oops, they meant America. Connecting dots isn't their strong suit.

I couldn't make myself read . . .

Yes, we're well aware that your reading comprehension skills are not good and you'd rather just adsorb the lies and conspiracy theories from Youtube vids of failed comics instead.

an article on how you have denounced the THE Big Lie and are ready to take on the evil Big Money Deathocrats would be interesting

An article on how to bake a Derby pie might be interesting as well, but if you click on ABOUT THIS BLOG at the top of the page, it says:

This blog's purpose is to present to the public one man's view of politics.

Not Derby pie. Not One Crackpot Demand. Not your obsessive compulsive fixation.

Chris,

I thought you were the talking points guy. Here's what that should say:

I have to applaud how she's not just getting cancelled, but she actually seems to cherish the journey.