<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Biden Brilliantly Redefines Bipartisanship</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.chrisweigant.com/2021/02/18/biden-brilliantly-redefines-bipartisanship/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2021/02/18/biden-brilliantly-redefines-bipartisanship/</link>
	<description>Reality-based political commentary</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 23 May 2026 06:14:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: nypoet22</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2021/02/18/biden-brilliantly-redefines-bipartisanship/#comment-175270</link>
		<dc:creator>nypoet22</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Feb 2021 14:36:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=20066#comment-175270</guid>
		<description>@don,

that is a distinction without a difference.

i.e. just about any hypotheseis could potentially be correct. you might as well claim that carbonated water is wet as evidentiary support for selling your soft drink.

personally, i think a publicly financed media conglomerate is not a bad concept at all. for that matter, neither is an organization to support more honest campaign finance. your fault isn&#039;t concept, it&#039;s ego. get over yourself, and take people&#039;s critical comments as opportunities to learn something. at the moment you don&#039;t have the knowledge or experience to succeed, and are pushing away the advice of others who do. do you really believe that everyone is simply dodging valid arguments, rather than pointing out gaping holes in those arguments that need to be addressed in order for you to actually be successful?

in either case, best of luck. also, enjoy some pie.
JL</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@don,</p>
<p>that is a distinction without a difference.</p>
<p>i.e. just about any hypotheseis could potentially be correct. you might as well claim that carbonated water is wet as evidentiary support for selling your soft drink.</p>
<p>personally, i think a publicly financed media conglomerate is not a bad concept at all. for that matter, neither is an organization to support more honest campaign finance. your fault isn't concept, it's ego. get over yourself, and take people's critical comments as opportunities to learn something. at the moment you don't have the knowledge or experience to succeed, and are pushing away the advice of others who do. do you really believe that everyone is simply dodging valid arguments, rather than pointing out gaping holes in those arguments that need to be addressed in order for you to actually be successful?</p>
<p>in either case, best of luck. also, enjoy some pie.<br />
JL</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nypoet22</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2021/02/18/biden-brilliantly-redefines-bipartisanship/#comment-175259</link>
		<dc:creator>nypoet22</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Feb 2021 18:15:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=20066#comment-175259</guid>
		<description>hypothetical: involving or being based on a suggested idea or theory : being or involving a hypothesis : CONJECTURAL
~merriam-webster

anything &quot;could&quot; happen. that&#039;s such a broad statement as to be meaningless. not everything can happen, and until something does start to happen, it&#039;s hypothetical.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hypothetical: involving or being based on a suggested idea or theory : being or involving a hypothesis : CONJECTURAL<br />
~merriam-webster</p>
<p>anything "could" happen. that's such a broad statement as to be meaningless. not everything can happen, and until something does start to happen, it's hypothetical.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MtnCaddy</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2021/02/18/biden-brilliantly-redefines-bipartisanship/#comment-175257</link>
		<dc:creator>MtnCaddy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Feb 2021 16:58:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=20066#comment-175257</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;The only thing left, really is &quot;knee-jerk reactionary obstructionism to anything Democrats are for, no matter how beneficial or popular,&quot; &quot;absolute fealty if not outright worship towards Donald Trump,&quot; and &quot;tax cuts for the wealthy is the answer to just about any problem that comes along.&quot; That&#039;s really it. That&#039;s all they&#039;ve got left.&lt;/i&gt;







Let&#039;s add, &lt;i&gt;making it more difficult (and possibly more dangerous) for poor women in red states to get an abortion.&lt;/i&gt; To keep the Christofacists in line.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>The only thing left, really is "knee-jerk reactionary obstructionism to anything Democrats are for, no matter how beneficial or popular," "absolute fealty if not outright worship towards Donald Trump," and "tax cuts for the wealthy is the answer to just about any problem that comes along." That's really it. That's all they've got left.</i></p>
<p>Let's add, <i>making it more difficult (and possibly more dangerous) for poor women in red states to get an abortion.</i> To keep the Christofacists in line.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ChrisWeigant.com &#187; Friday Talking Points -- Ted Fled!</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2021/02/18/biden-brilliantly-redefines-bipartisanship/#comment-175248</link>
		<dc:creator>ChrisWeigant.com &#187; Friday Talking Points -- Ted Fled!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Feb 2021 02:09:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=20066#comment-175248</guid>
		<description>[...] Biden Brilliantly Redefines Bipartisanship [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Biden Brilliantly Redefines Bipartisanship [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elizabeth Miller</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2021/02/18/biden-brilliantly-redefines-bipartisanship/#comment-175246</link>
		<dc:creator>Elizabeth Miller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Feb 2021 01:03:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=20066#comment-175246</guid>
		<description>She has always struck me as a political hack. I could be wrong. I trust Biden&#039;s judgement over my own, after all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>She has always struck me as a political hack. I could be wrong. I trust Biden's judgement over my own, after all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nypoet22</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2021/02/18/biden-brilliantly-redefines-bipartisanship/#comment-175244</link>
		<dc:creator>nypoet22</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Feb 2021 00:11:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=20066#comment-175244</guid>
		<description>@don, 

The podcast is estimated at approximately 15k listeners. Still no 15 million. 

Something that COULD happen is hypothetical by definition.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@don, </p>
<p>The podcast is estimated at approximately 15k listeners. Still no 15 million. </p>
<p>Something that COULD happen is hypothetical by definition.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elizabeth Miller</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2021/02/18/biden-brilliantly-redefines-bipartisanship/#comment-175242</link>
		<dc:creator>Elizabeth Miller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2021 22:25:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=20066#comment-175242</guid>
		<description>I wonder if anyone can explain to me why Biden chose Neera Tanden for head of the Office of Management and Budget?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder if anyone can explain to me why Biden chose Neera Tanden for head of the Office of Management and Budget?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nypoet22</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2021/02/18/biden-brilliantly-redefines-bipartisanship/#comment-175239</link>
		<dc:creator>nypoet22</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2021 17:51:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=20066#comment-175239</guid>
		<description>@don,

if you&#039;re going to propose an idea with hypothetical numbers, you need some real-life numbers to back them up. ralph nader has 107.8k followers on twitter. when that&#039;s how many he can manage to convince to click a button ONLINE, how do you make the jump from there to 15 million people giving a hundred dollars of real money? 

JL</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@don,</p>
<p>if you're going to propose an idea with hypothetical numbers, you need some real-life numbers to back them up. ralph nader has 107.8k followers on twitter. when that's how many he can manage to convince to click a button ONLINE, how do you make the jump from there to 15 million people giving a hundred dollars of real money? </p>
<p>JL</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ListenWhenYouHear</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2021/02/18/biden-brilliantly-redefines-bipartisanship/#comment-175236</link>
		<dc:creator>ListenWhenYouHear</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2021 17:04:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=20066#comment-175236</guid>
		<description>And just a reminder... FIFA and the NFL are both non-profits.   Remind us all again why something being a non-profit automatically makes it trustworthy?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And just a reminder... FIFA and the NFL are both non-profits.   Remind us all again why something being a non-profit automatically makes it trustworthy?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ListenWhenYouHear</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2021/02/18/biden-brilliantly-redefines-bipartisanship/#comment-175235</link>
		<dc:creator>ListenWhenYouHear</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2021 16:56:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=20066#comment-175235</guid>
		<description>I’m pretty sure that you cannot have a “non-profit” that people can buy shares in.  Non-profits can accept donations of any size, but selling “shares” would be illegal.   People cannot own shares in a non-profit — this is something that I would have thought you were aware of seeing how you have been running OneDumbMan for like 10 years now... OH WAIT!    OneDumbMan is not technically a non-profit organization... it’s more of a Ponzi scheme.  

And there are already news outlets that are non-profits... ProPublica being one of the best known.   What makes your idea better than those already in existence?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I’m pretty sure that you cannot have a “non-profit” that people can buy shares in.  Non-profits can accept donations of any size, but selling “shares” would be illegal.   People cannot own shares in a non-profit — this is something that I would have thought you were aware of seeing how you have been running OneDumbMan for like 10 years now... OH WAIT!    OneDumbMan is not technically a non-profit organization... it’s more of a Ponzi scheme.  </p>
<p>And there are already news outlets that are non-profits... ProPublica being one of the best known.   What makes your idea better than those already in existence?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nypoet22</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2021/02/18/biden-brilliantly-redefines-bipartisanship/#comment-175232</link>
		<dc:creator>nypoet22</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2021 15:29:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=20066#comment-175232</guid>
		<description>sure, somebody might convince 15 million people to give a hundred dollars for part ownership in a non-profit. but in order to sell it would have to be run by someone a lot better-liked than ralph nader. maybe try net-stalking lebron?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>sure, somebody might convince 15 million people to give a hundred dollars for part ownership in a non-profit. but in order to sell it would have to be run by someone a lot better-liked than ralph nader. maybe try net-stalking lebron?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elizabeth Miller</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2021/02/18/biden-brilliantly-redefines-bipartisanship/#comment-175227</link>
		<dc:creator>Elizabeth Miller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2021 05:01:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=20066#comment-175227</guid>
		<description>Chris,

&lt;i&gt;Already, one month in, I am finding quiet joy in sitting down to write an article and having to think about it.&lt;/i&gt;

I can just imagine the feeling! Say, what about a Biden Poll Watch?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chris,</p>
<p><i>Already, one month in, I am finding quiet joy in sitting down to write an article and having to think about it.</i></p>
<p>I can just imagine the feeling! Say, what about a Biden Poll Watch?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elizabeth Miller</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2021/02/18/biden-brilliantly-redefines-bipartisanship/#comment-175228</link>
		<dc:creator>Elizabeth Miller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2021 05:01:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=20066#comment-175228</guid>
		<description>Chris,

&lt;i&gt;Already, one month in, I am finding quiet joy in sitting down to write an article and having to think about it.&lt;/i&gt;

I can just imagine the feeling! Say, what about a Biden Poll Watch?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chris,</p>
<p><i>Already, one month in, I am finding quiet joy in sitting down to write an article and having to think about it.</i></p>
<p>I can just imagine the feeling! Say, what about a Biden Poll Watch?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ListenWhenYouHear</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2021/02/18/biden-brilliantly-redefines-bipartisanship/#comment-175226</link>
		<dc:creator>ListenWhenYouHear</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2021 02:10:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=20066#comment-175226</guid>
		<description>CW,

&lt;I&gt; Republicans are the party of saying &#039;no&#039; to every good idea that comes along, and they have absolutely no good ideas of their own. It&#039;s not even that their ideas are bad -- it&#039;s that they just don&#039;t even bother pretending to have them anymore. &lt;/i&gt;

But it’s more than just that Republicans are the party of saying ‘no’ to every good idea that comes along, it is the reason &lt;b&gt;WHY&lt;/b&gt; they oppose these ideas!   If Republicans claimed the reasons they opposed the ideas was because it conflicted with deeply held philosophical or political beliefs; it could be excused.   But that is not the case ... Republicans literally oppose Democrats ideas for the sake of opposing it!   Why would they do this?

First, they do not want Democrats to get any credit for doing anything that will be viewed as benefiting  the nation.  They want our nation to suffer when Democrats are in power because that is about the only way to convince voters to vote fo Republicans!   It is not that people vote for Republican because they like their platform or ideas (and establishment Republicans know this).   They have trained their supporters that ANY and  ALL ideas Democrats have are ALWAYS PURE EVIL and should be opposed at every turn!   And their base took to this training amazingly fast!   So much so that their base now views any concessions to find common ground to be a sign that you are a traitor to their cause!  They cannot negotiate because that is a sign of weakness!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CW,</p>
<p><i> Republicans are the party of saying 'no' to every good idea that comes along, and they have absolutely no good ideas of their own. It's not even that their ideas are bad -- it's that they just don't even bother pretending to have them anymore. </i></p>
<p>But it’s more than just that Republicans are the party of saying ‘no’ to every good idea that comes along, it is the reason <b>WHY</b> they oppose these ideas!   If Republicans claimed the reasons they opposed the ideas was because it conflicted with deeply held philosophical or political beliefs; it could be excused.   But that is not the case ... Republicans literally oppose Democrats ideas for the sake of opposing it!   Why would they do this?</p>
<p>First, they do not want Democrats to get any credit for doing anything that will be viewed as benefiting  the nation.  They want our nation to suffer when Democrats are in power because that is about the only way to convince voters to vote fo Republicans!   It is not that people vote for Republican because they like their platform or ideas (and establishment Republicans know this).   They have trained their supporters that ANY and  ALL ideas Democrats have are ALWAYS PURE EVIL and should be opposed at every turn!   And their base took to this training amazingly fast!   So much so that their base now views any concessions to find common ground to be a sign that you are a traitor to their cause!  They cannot negotiate because that is a sign of weakness!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John M from Ct.</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2021/02/18/biden-brilliantly-redefines-bipartisanship/#comment-175225</link>
		<dc:creator>John M from Ct.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2021 01:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=20066#comment-175225</guid>
		<description>A nice piece, in line with other commentaries I&#039;m reading, and with my own impression that the Republicans really have abandoned anything resembling a political platform of programs or legislation.

And I&#039;m glad to hear you&#039;re feeling less stressed by this work you do! I love not having to avoid Trump news wherever possible, and not having to click on Ted Cruz news, and not having read explanations of that horrid Representative from Qanon, and not having to deal with any of it unless I want a secret and morbid thrill from time to time.

Instead I can watch Uncle Joe play with his dogs, or read about Dr. Fauci telling us the straight dope about the plague, or follow the speculation on just which ridiculously normal and important legislation is going to go down without abolishing the filibuster, so that sometime this spring or summer it is abolished, and some real stuff gets passed in the fall in time to be in action and popular by the following year&#039;s election season. Ahh.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A nice piece, in line with other commentaries I'm reading, and with my own impression that the Republicans really have abandoned anything resembling a political platform of programs or legislation.</p>
<p>And I'm glad to hear you're feeling less stressed by this work you do! I love not having to avoid Trump news wherever possible, and not having to click on Ted Cruz news, and not having read explanations of that horrid Representative from Qanon, and not having to deal with any of it unless I want a secret and morbid thrill from time to time.</p>
<p>Instead I can watch Uncle Joe play with his dogs, or read about Dr. Fauci telling us the straight dope about the plague, or follow the speculation on just which ridiculously normal and important legislation is going to go down without abolishing the filibuster, so that sometime this spring or summer it is abolished, and some real stuff gets passed in the fall in time to be in action and popular by the following year's election season. Ahh.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elizabeth Miller</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2021/02/18/biden-brilliantly-redefines-bipartisanship/#comment-175224</link>
		<dc:creator>Elizabeth Miller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2021 00:42:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=20066#comment-175224</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t expect the news media to get the new definition any time soon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don't expect the news media to get the new definition any time soon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elizabeth Miller</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2021/02/18/biden-brilliantly-redefines-bipartisanship/#comment-175223</link>
		<dc:creator>Elizabeth Miller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2021 00:39:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=20066#comment-175223</guid>
		<description>i&#039;m already starting to see double</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i'm already starting to see double</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elizabeth Miller</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2021/02/18/biden-brilliantly-redefines-bipartisanship/#comment-175222</link>
		<dc:creator>Elizabeth Miller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2021 00:38:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=20066#comment-175222</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Biden has managed to redefine the term to a new and more expansive meaning: &quot;What a clear majority of the voters -- with plenty of cross-aisle support -- approve of and/or support, in public opinion polls.&quot;&lt;/i&gt;

And, this is just the sort of thing that will guarantee him a second term.

Doesn&#039;t the new president look like he&#039;s getting younger? ::-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Biden has managed to redefine the term to a new and more expansive meaning: "What a clear majority of the voters -- with plenty of cross-aisle support -- approve of and/or support, in public opinion polls."</i></p>
<p>And, this is just the sort of thing that will guarantee him a second term.</p>
<p>Doesn't the new president look like he's getting younger? ::-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elizabeth Miller</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2021/02/18/biden-brilliantly-redefines-bipartisanship/#comment-175221</link>
		<dc:creator>Elizabeth Miller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2021 00:36:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=20066#comment-175221</guid>
		<description>I am enjoying a glass of wine - cheers!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am enjoying a glass of wine - cheers!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elizabeth Miller</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2021/02/18/biden-brilliantly-redefines-bipartisanship/#comment-175220</link>
		<dc:creator>Elizabeth Miller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2021 00:35:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=20066#comment-175220</guid>
		<description>I think a bunch of smallers bills can be a lot stronger than a big bill, no?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think a bunch of smallers bills can be a lot stronger than a big bill, no?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
