<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Trump&#039;s Second Impeachment Trial (Day 1)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.chrisweigant.com/2021/02/09/trumps-second-impeachment-trial-day-1/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2021/02/09/trumps-second-impeachment-trial-day-1/</link>
	<description>Reality-based political commentary</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 May 2026 04:08:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Elizabeth Miller</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2021/02/09/trumps-second-impeachment-trial-day-1/#comment-175024</link>
		<dc:creator>Elizabeth Miller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2021 19:45:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=20014#comment-175024</guid>
		<description>In future I will always use the preview thingy. In future I will always use the preview thingy. In future, I will always ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In future I will always use the preview thingy. In future I will always use the preview thingy. In future, I will always ...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elizabeth Miller</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2021/02/09/trumps-second-impeachment-trial-day-1/#comment-175023</link>
		<dc:creator>Elizabeth Miller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2021 19:45:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=20014#comment-175023</guid>
		<description>EDIT!

But, isn&#039;t &quot;&lt;b&gt;NOT&lt;/b&gt; showing up&quot; the virtual equivalent of voting for conviction? I mean, if conviction occurs after they abstain, they will suffer the same consequences as they would have if they had voted with the super majority for conviction, no?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>EDIT!</p>
<p>But, isn't "<b>NOT</b> showing up" the virtual equivalent of voting for conviction? I mean, if conviction occurs after they abstain, they will suffer the same consequences as they would have if they had voted with the super majority for conviction, no?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elizabeth Miller</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2021/02/09/trumps-second-impeachment-trial-day-1/#comment-175022</link>
		<dc:creator>Elizabeth Miller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2021 19:44:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=20014#comment-175022</guid>
		<description>But, isn&#039;t &quot;showing up&quot; the virtual equivalent of voting for conviction? I mean, if conviction occurs after they abstain, they will suffer the same consequences as they would have if they had voted with the super majority for conviction, no?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But, isn't "showing up" the virtual equivalent of voting for conviction? I mean, if conviction occurs after they abstain, they will suffer the same consequences as they would have if they had voted with the super majority for conviction, no?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ListenWhenYouHear</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2021/02/09/trumps-second-impeachment-trial-day-1/#comment-174998</link>
		<dc:creator>ListenWhenYouHear</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2021 05:53:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=20014#comment-174998</guid>
		<description>MtnCaddy

If Republican Senators decide they do not want to vote, nothing requires them to show up to work the day the vote occurs. It makes it it much easier to get 2/3 votes to convict if there are less members in the jury!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MtnCaddy</p>
<p>If Republican Senators decide they do not want to vote, nothing requires them to show up to work the day the vote occurs. It makes it it much easier to get 2/3 votes to convict if there are less members in the jury!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MtnCaddy</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2021/02/09/trumps-second-impeachment-trial-day-1/#comment-174987</link>
		<dc:creator>MtnCaddy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2021 18:46:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=20014#comment-174987</guid>
		<description>Don&#039;t be overly discouraged by the Senate Repug&#039;s two Impeachment related votes thus far, most recently regarding it&#039;s Constitutionality.  





They are keeping themselves safe from Trumpanzie rage for the moment and, in the end, can still vote to end the scourge of Trumpism. Or abstain: same result, less political pain, perhaps.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don't be overly discouraged by the Senate Repug's two Impeachment related votes thus far, most recently regarding it's Constitutionality.  </p>
<p>They are keeping themselves safe from Trumpanzie rage for the moment and, in the end, can still vote to end the scourge of Trumpism. Or abstain: same result, less political pain, perhaps.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MtnCaddy</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2021/02/09/trumps-second-impeachment-trial-day-1/#comment-174986</link>
		<dc:creator>MtnCaddy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2021 18:28:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=20014#comment-174986</guid>
		<description>Acquittal is the foregone conclusion and remains the smart bet.






But Trump is still a yuge problem for the Establishment Repugs and this is still their yugest and bestus chance to be rid of him. This from &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2021-02-10/mcconnell-signals-to-gop-trump-impeachment-is-a-conscience-vote&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Bloomberg.&lt;/a&gt;

&lt;i&gt;Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell is signaling to fellow Republicans that the final vote on Donald Trump’s impeachment is matter of conscience and that senators who disputed the constitutionality of the trial could still vote to convict the former president...




That position is starkly different than McConnell’s declaration at the start of Trump’s first impeachment trial last year that he did not consider himself an impartial juror.&lt;/i&gt;





I&#039;m researching whether or not Senators can &lt;i&gt;simply abstain&lt;/i&gt; come time to vote -- full report shortly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Acquittal is the foregone conclusion and remains the smart bet.</p>
<p>But Trump is still a yuge problem for the Establishment Repugs and this is still their yugest and bestus chance to be rid of him. This from <a href="https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2021-02-10/mcconnell-signals-to-gop-trump-impeachment-is-a-conscience-vote" rel="nofollow">Bloomberg.</a></p>
<p><i>Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell is signaling to fellow Republicans that the final vote on Donald Trump’s impeachment is matter of conscience and that senators who disputed the constitutionality of the trial could still vote to convict the former president...</p>
<p>That position is starkly different than McConnell’s declaration at the start of Trump’s first impeachment trial last year that he did not consider himself an impartial juror.</i></p>
<p>I'm researching whether or not Senators can <i>simply abstain</i> come time to vote -- full report shortly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MtnCaddy</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2021/02/09/trumps-second-impeachment-trial-day-1/#comment-174984</link>
		<dc:creator>MtnCaddy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2021 17:58:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=20014#comment-174984</guid>
		<description>[11]







This is an excellent and to the point summary of the MAGAt mindset. Many fell in love with Trump&#039;s TV portrayal of a supposed billionaire, yes, but &quot;sticking it to the Libs&quot; is the bottom line for these poor Devils.





[12]





It&#039;s only &lt;i&gt;More political theater, even dumber that the first episode&lt;/i&gt; if you&#039;re going to be cool when Joe Biden openly extorts a country to announce a fake investigation of, say, Nikki Haley during the next Presidential primary season, and then send the ANTIFA/BLM people to stop Haley&#039;s Electoral vote victory confirmation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[11]</p>
<p>This is an excellent and to the point summary of the MAGAt mindset. Many fell in love with Trump's TV portrayal of a supposed billionaire, yes, but "sticking it to the Libs" is the bottom line for these poor Devils.</p>
<p>[12]</p>
<p>It's only <i>More political theater, even dumber that the first episode</i> if you're going to be cool when Joe Biden openly extorts a country to announce a fake investigation of, say, Nikki Haley during the next Presidential primary season, and then send the ANTIFA/BLM people to stop Haley's Electoral vote victory confirmation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: C. R. Stucki</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2021/02/09/trumps-second-impeachment-trial-day-1/#comment-174983</link>
		<dc:creator>C. R. Stucki</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2021 16:54:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=20014#comment-174983</guid>
		<description>More political theater, even dumber that the first episode.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>More political theater, even dumber that the first episode.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John M</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2021/02/09/trumps-second-impeachment-trial-day-1/#comment-174982</link>
		<dc:creator>John M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2021 14:12:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=20014#comment-174982</guid>
		<description>To get a handle on the mindset we are dealing with here, both of Trump and of the vast majority of people who voted for him and who are now the base of the Republican party, I offer the following analysis: 

MAGA Trump voters are a lost cause. They don&#039;t vote based on policy. It doesn&#039;t matter to them what Democrats do. MAGA Trump voters only want 2 things: 1) To see people who look and talk like themselves in power 2) To see those people &quot;stick&quot; it to the Libs. There is no amount of messaging by Democrats that can persuade them.

For Example: If Donald Trump was in favor of a 15 dollar minimum wage, they would be in favor of it. If he was against it, they would be against it. If Democrats were for it, they would be against it, simply because Democrats were for it, even if it was something they originally supported. 

Democrats have won the culture war, this has been accepted by both parties. Republicans have abandoned or surrendered their positions on gay marriage, free trade, deficits, law and order, etc. The vast majority of what now constitutes the Republican base never really cared about those things (except maybe evangelicals, who could care less about Trump&#039;s own morals, as it now turns out), as Republican legislators have come to find out. 

That&#039;s why the Republicans only concentrated on TWO things while in power. 1) A tax cut and 2) getting as many conservative judges in power as possible. Because corporate America can get what it wants thru the courts.

What natters to the Republican voting base is the perception of who has power. A multicultural, multiracial, liberal, black and brown America is seen as an existential threat by MAGA America. Not policy, but WHO wields the decision making, is what matters to them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To get a handle on the mindset we are dealing with here, both of Trump and of the vast majority of people who voted for him and who are now the base of the Republican party, I offer the following analysis: </p>
<p>MAGA Trump voters are a lost cause. They don't vote based on policy. It doesn't matter to them what Democrats do. MAGA Trump voters only want 2 things: 1) To see people who look and talk like themselves in power 2) To see those people "stick" it to the Libs. There is no amount of messaging by Democrats that can persuade them.</p>
<p>For Example: If Donald Trump was in favor of a 15 dollar minimum wage, they would be in favor of it. If he was against it, they would be against it. If Democrats were for it, they would be against it, simply because Democrats were for it, even if it was something they originally supported. </p>
<p>Democrats have won the culture war, this has been accepted by both parties. Republicans have abandoned or surrendered their positions on gay marriage, free trade, deficits, law and order, etc. The vast majority of what now constitutes the Republican base never really cared about those things (except maybe evangelicals, who could care less about Trump's own morals, as it now turns out), as Republican legislators have come to find out. </p>
<p>That's why the Republicans only concentrated on TWO things while in power. 1) A tax cut and 2) getting as many conservative judges in power as possible. Because corporate America can get what it wants thru the courts.</p>
<p>What natters to the Republican voting base is the perception of who has power. A multicultural, multiracial, liberal, black and brown America is seen as an existential threat by MAGA America. Not policy, but WHO wields the decision making, is what matters to them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ListenWhenYouHear</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2021/02/09/trumps-second-impeachment-trial-day-1/#comment-174977</link>
		<dc:creator>ListenWhenYouHear</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2021 08:15:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=20014#comment-174977</guid>
		<description>If the Senate is tasked with serving as the jury in determining the guilt or innocence of Trump for each Article of Impeachment that the House has brought against him, then how can they acquit him on the grounds that the trial is unconstitutional?  That is not a charge that they are tasked with adjudicating!   

Senators took this oath at the start of the trial:

&lt;b&gt;&lt;I&gt;‘I solemnly swear (or affirm, as the case may be,) that in all things appertaining to the trial of the impeachment of Donald J. Trump, now pending, I will do impartial justice according to the Constitution and laws: so help me God.’&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/b&gt;

Not sure how Republicans can be viewed as not violating their oaths if they are ignoring the charges being brought against Trump by acquitting him based on something not stated in the Articles of Impeachment?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If the Senate is tasked with serving as the jury in determining the guilt or innocence of Trump for each Article of Impeachment that the House has brought against him, then how can they acquit him on the grounds that the trial is unconstitutional?  That is not a charge that they are tasked with adjudicating!   </p>
<p>Senators took this oath at the start of the trial:</p>
<p><b><i>‘I solemnly swear (or affirm, as the case may be,) that in all things appertaining to the trial of the impeachment of Donald J. Trump, now pending, I will do impartial justice according to the Constitution and laws: so help me God.’</i></b></p>
<p>Not sure how Republicans can be viewed as not violating their oaths if they are ignoring the charges being brought against Trump by acquitting him based on something not stated in the Articles of Impeachment?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ListenWhenYouHear</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2021/02/09/trumps-second-impeachment-trial-day-1/#comment-174976</link>
		<dc:creator>ListenWhenYouHear</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2021 07:59:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=20014#comment-174976</guid>
		<description>Donald Trump could hold a news conference tomorrow where he brags about how successful his attempted insurrection was and how impressive his plan was to hold Congress hostage truly was, but Rudy screwed it all up — and the Republicans in the Senate would still vote to acquit Trump!   

Well, I guess if there is anything positive about Trump’s time as president it would be that Trump has demonstrated how the Founding Fathers ideas on the Electoral College’s role in preventing an unfit cult leader from becoming President and that Impeachment is the best way to remove an unfit President from office were both huge FAILURES!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Donald Trump could hold a news conference tomorrow where he brags about how successful his attempted insurrection was and how impressive his plan was to hold Congress hostage truly was, but Rudy screwed it all up — and the Republicans in the Senate would still vote to acquit Trump!   </p>
<p>Well, I guess if there is anything positive about Trump’s time as president it would be that Trump has demonstrated how the Founding Fathers ideas on the Electoral College’s role in preventing an unfit cult leader from becoming President and that Impeachment is the best way to remove an unfit President from office were both huge FAILURES!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kick</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2021/02/09/trumps-second-impeachment-trial-day-1/#comment-174974</link>
		<dc:creator>Kick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2021 06:45:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=20014#comment-174974</guid>
		<description>CW: &lt;i&gt;He began by misidentifying himself as leading the case for the prosecution, not the defense. &lt;/i&gt;

I thought it was a particularly heartwarming gesture when he culminated all that rambling prattling nonsensical drivel by suggesting that the Department of Justice should arrest his client. Oh, I completely agree and not for nothing, I assure you. 

&lt;i&gt;But in general, Trump likes people who get feisty on television, so it&#039;s a fair assumption that Trump won&#039;t be very happy with Castor&#039;s performance today. &lt;/i&gt;

Thank you for your services; the check is (not) in the mail. Poor Donald... but what&#039;s a billionaire to do when it&#039;s difficult to retain respectable legal representation because you have a 50-plus-year reputation for being both a (mob connected) criminal and a deadbeat who doesn&#039;t pay his vendors for property purchased and/or services rendered.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CW: <i>He began by misidentifying himself as leading the case for the prosecution, not the defense. </i></p>
<p>I thought it was a particularly heartwarming gesture when he culminated all that rambling prattling nonsensical drivel by suggesting that the Department of Justice should arrest his client. Oh, I completely agree and not for nothing, I assure you. </p>
<p><i>But in general, Trump likes people who get feisty on television, so it's a fair assumption that Trump won't be very happy with Castor's performance today. </i></p>
<p>Thank you for your services; the check is (not) in the mail. Poor Donald... but what's a billionaire to do when it's difficult to retain respectable legal representation because you have a 50-plus-year reputation for being both a (mob connected) criminal and a deadbeat who doesn't pay his vendors for property purchased and/or services rendered.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kick</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2021/02/09/trumps-second-impeachment-trial-day-1/#comment-174973</link>
		<dc:creator>Kick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2021 06:05:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=20014#comment-174973</guid>
		<description>CW: &lt;i&gt;At the end, the Senate voted to affirm that the trial is indeed constitutional, by a vote of 56 to 44. The trial then adjourned until noon tomorrow.&lt;/i&gt;

The Constitution isn&#039;t the least bit unclear about this; however, a sizable portion of America&#039;s representatives in the United States Senate has decided to self-relinquish the awesome power granted to We the People through them by our United States Constitution in favor of cowering in the corner in fear. 

If 44 Republicans are too cowardly to even cast a vote that affirms their power to hold a trial regarding the impeachment of the 45th President, when it was also the GOP who refused to hold said trial while he held office, that tells you everything you need to know. 

The GOP is flailing and has ceased to govern. Reminds me of the Whig Party who supported the importance of the power of Congress over that of the president... except these cowards are just doing it in reverse. Abraham Lincoln was a Whig. Of course, it&#039;s far more nuanced and complicated than this, but the Whig Party became extinct when they ultimately fractured over the issue of slavery... some joining the Democratic Party, some retiring, and the anti-slavery Whigs becoming the Republican Party... and here we are now with the Party of Lincoln bending over and relinquishing their power in favor of an autocrat. 

History has its eyes on you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CW: <i>At the end, the Senate voted to affirm that the trial is indeed constitutional, by a vote of 56 to 44. The trial then adjourned until noon tomorrow.</i></p>
<p>The Constitution isn't the least bit unclear about this; however, a sizable portion of America's representatives in the United States Senate has decided to self-relinquish the awesome power granted to We the People through them by our United States Constitution in favor of cowering in the corner in fear. </p>
<p>If 44 Republicans are too cowardly to even cast a vote that affirms their power to hold a trial regarding the impeachment of the 45th President, when it was also the GOP who refused to hold said trial while he held office, that tells you everything you need to know. </p>
<p>The GOP is flailing and has ceased to govern. Reminds me of the Whig Party who supported the importance of the power of Congress over that of the president... except these cowards are just doing it in reverse. Abraham Lincoln was a Whig. Of course, it's far more nuanced and complicated than this, but the Whig Party became extinct when they ultimately fractured over the issue of slavery... some joining the Democratic Party, some retiring, and the anti-slavery Whigs becoming the Republican Party... and here we are now with the Party of Lincoln bending over and relinquishing their power in favor of an autocrat. </p>
<p>History has its eyes on you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Weigant</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2021/02/09/trumps-second-impeachment-trial-day-1/#comment-174972</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2021 05:45:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=20014#comment-174972</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m always astonished when I react to an event and later find out everyone else had the same reaction too (because it&#039;s usually so rare).

But, boy, everyone thought that first defense lawyer was a rambling clown, seems to be pretty universal.  Can&#039;t wait to see what Colbert and Seth do to him tonight...

-CW</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I'm always astonished when I react to an event and later find out everyone else had the same reaction too (because it's usually so rare).</p>
<p>But, boy, everyone thought that first defense lawyer was a rambling clown, seems to be pretty universal.  Can't wait to see what Colbert and Seth do to him tonight...</p>
<p>-CW</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elizabeth Miller</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2021/02/09/trumps-second-impeachment-trial-day-1/#comment-174970</link>
		<dc:creator>Elizabeth Miller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2021 04:20:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=20014#comment-174970</guid>
		<description>I saw Rep Jamie Raskin on a CNN program a little while ago and he was talking about his son - Tommy sounds like such a wonderful kid. It&#039;s a truly heartbreaking story ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I saw Rep Jamie Raskin on a CNN program a little while ago and he was talking about his son - Tommy sounds like such a wonderful kid. It's a truly heartbreaking story ...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nypoet22</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2021/02/09/trumps-second-impeachment-trial-day-1/#comment-174969</link>
		<dc:creator>nypoet22</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2021 04:18:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=20014#comment-174969</guid>
		<description>also, where is the commentary on donald trump&#039;s betrayal of the constitutional right to eat pie?

get edible.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>also, where is the commentary on donald trump's betrayal of the constitutional right to eat pie?</p>
<p>get edible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nypoet22</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2021/02/09/trumps-second-impeachment-trial-day-1/#comment-174968</link>
		<dc:creator>nypoet22</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2021 04:04:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=20014#comment-174968</guid>
		<description>here&#039;s a brief analysis from the atlantic:

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/opinion/why-jamie-raskins-speech-resonated/ar-BB1dxN5t</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>here's a brief analysis from the atlantic:</p>
<p><a href="https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/opinion/why-jamie-raskins-speech-resonated/ar-BB1dxN5t" rel="nofollow">https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/opinion/why-jamie-raskins-speech-resonated/ar-BB1dxN5t</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nypoet22</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2021/02/09/trumps-second-impeachment-trial-day-1/#comment-174965</link>
		<dc:creator>nypoet22</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2021 02:52:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=20014#comment-174965</guid>
		<description>perhaps castor will quit the trump case, and be replaced by toonces the driving cat.

https://youtu.be/5fvsItXYgzk

JL</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>perhaps castor will quit the trump case, and be replaced by toonces the driving cat.</p>
<p><a href="https://youtu.be/5fvsItXYgzk" rel="nofollow">https://youtu.be/5fvsItXYgzk</a></p>
<p>JL</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John M from Ct.</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2021/02/09/trumps-second-impeachment-trial-day-1/#comment-174964</link>
		<dc:creator>John M from Ct.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2021 01:47:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=20014#comment-174964</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the report! I&#039;ve no interest in watching or listening to the thing, as important as I know it to be.

Sooner or later I&#039;ll steel myself to watch the opening video (thanks for the link). I&#039;ve no desire at all to immerse myself in pure Trump and Trumpist violence, when I&#039;m just coming down from four years of changing the radio channel whenever his voice came on, and four years leaving the office when colleagues began defending him the morning after a long night of Fox-watching.

Please do continue the reports.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the report! I've no interest in watching or listening to the thing, as important as I know it to be.</p>
<p>Sooner or later I'll steel myself to watch the opening video (thanks for the link). I've no desire at all to immerse myself in pure Trump and Trumpist violence, when I'm just coming down from four years of changing the radio channel whenever his voice came on, and four years leaving the office when colleagues began defending him the morning after a long night of Fox-watching.</p>
<p>Please do continue the reports.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
