<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 46 Minutes Of Festivus Grievances</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.chrisweigant.com/2020/12/03/46-minutes-of-festivus-grievances/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2020/12/03/46-minutes-of-festivus-grievances/</link>
	<description>Reality-based political commentary</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2026 15:56:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Elizabeth Miller</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2020/12/03/46-minutes-of-festivus-grievances/#comment-172649</link>
		<dc:creator>Elizabeth Miller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2020 21:58:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=19676#comment-172649</guid>
		<description>Hello, Everyone!

I have a very special Holiday treat that I would like to share with everyone this week at the &lt;b&gt;CW Sunday Night Music Festival and Dance Party&lt;/b&gt;

You won&#039;t want to miss this so don&#039;t forget to drop by!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello, Everyone!</p>
<p>I have a very special Holiday treat that I would like to share with everyone this week at the <b>CW Sunday Night Music Festival and Dance Party</b></p>
<p>You won't want to miss this so don't forget to drop by!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MyVoice</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2020/12/03/46-minutes-of-festivus-grievances/#comment-172648</link>
		<dc:creator>MyVoice</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2020 17:43:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=19676#comment-172648</guid>
		<description>While we&#039;re speaking of pardons, here&#039;s a WaPo opinion by UC Hastings College of Law professor Aaron Rappaport on why blanket pardons may not pass muster with all the SCOTUS Originalists.

&lt;a href=&quot;https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2020/12/03/trump-blanket-pardons-children-giuliani-law/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;It might not be so simple for Trump to pardon his children and Giuliani&lt;/a&gt;

Sorry, I don&#039;t know whether that&#039;s behind a paywall, so here&#039;s a section from the middle:

&lt;i&gt;Most observers assume that the president is free to issue blanket pardons, believing the president’s power in this area is effectively unlimited beyond the few constraints explicitly mentioned in the Constitution (no pardons in cases of impeachment, or for state crimes). My scholarship suggests that interpretation is incorrect.

In fact, based on the Framers’ original understanding of the pardon authority, the better reading is that, while the pardon power grants the president expansive authority, that power is not unlimited. Most importantly, the Framers would have understood that pardons must be issued for specific crimes. They were not intended to be broad grants of immunity, get-out-of-jail-free cards bestowed by presidential grace.

The Supreme Court has repeatedly affirmed that the scope of the pardon clause should be interpreted in light of its meaning at the time of the founding. This originalist methodology means looking to 18th-century English law. As the court said in an 1855 case, “when the words to grant pardons were used in the constitution, they conveyed to the mind the authority as exercised by the English crown, or by its representatives in the colonies. At that time both Englishmen and Americans attached the same meaning to the word pardon.”

That meaning included what might be called a “specificity requirement” — a pardon would be deemed valid only if it identified the specific offenses to which it applied. As William Blackstone, the leading authority on English law at the time, declared: “A pardon of all felonies will not pardon a conviction.” Instead, the offense “must be particularly mentioned.” Blanket pardons, in other words, were invalid.&lt;/i&gt;

&#039;Tis always good to maintain hope whenever that remains a reasonable course.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While we're speaking of pardons, here's a WaPo opinion by UC Hastings College of Law professor Aaron Rappaport on why blanket pardons may not pass muster with all the SCOTUS Originalists.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2020/12/03/trump-blanket-pardons-children-giuliani-law/" rel="nofollow">It might not be so simple for Trump to pardon his children and Giuliani</a></p>
<p>Sorry, I don't know whether that's behind a paywall, so here's a section from the middle:</p>
<p><i>Most observers assume that the president is free to issue blanket pardons, believing the president’s power in this area is effectively unlimited beyond the few constraints explicitly mentioned in the Constitution (no pardons in cases of impeachment, or for state crimes). My scholarship suggests that interpretation is incorrect.</p>
<p>In fact, based on the Framers’ original understanding of the pardon authority, the better reading is that, while the pardon power grants the president expansive authority, that power is not unlimited. Most importantly, the Framers would have understood that pardons must be issued for specific crimes. They were not intended to be broad grants of immunity, get-out-of-jail-free cards bestowed by presidential grace.</p>
<p>The Supreme Court has repeatedly affirmed that the scope of the pardon clause should be interpreted in light of its meaning at the time of the founding. This originalist methodology means looking to 18th-century English law. As the court said in an 1855 case, “when the words to grant pardons were used in the constitution, they conveyed to the mind the authority as exercised by the English crown, or by its representatives in the colonies. At that time both Englishmen and Americans attached the same meaning to the word pardon.”</p>
<p>That meaning included what might be called a “specificity requirement” — a pardon would be deemed valid only if it identified the specific offenses to which it applied. As William Blackstone, the leading authority on English law at the time, declared: “A pardon of all felonies will not pardon a conviction.” Instead, the offense “must be particularly mentioned.” Blanket pardons, in other words, were invalid.</i></p>
<p>'Tis always good to maintain hope whenever that remains a reasonable course.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MtnCaddy</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2020/12/03/46-minutes-of-festivus-grievances/#comment-172647</link>
		<dc:creator>MtnCaddy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2020 05:00:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=19676#comment-172647</guid>
		<description>Double-Ooooo!





As we&#039;re at the beginnings of a tsunami of &lt;i&gt;corrupt pardons&lt;/i&gt; this, from Glenn Kirschner, suggests that maybe our fave traitor Mike Flynn &lt;a href=&quot;https://youtu.be/RZlFCJzL8W0&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;isn&#039;t out of the woods yet.&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Double-Ooooo!</p>
<p>As we're at the beginnings of a tsunami of <i>corrupt pardons</i> this, from Glenn Kirschner, suggests that maybe our fave traitor Mike Flynn <a href="https://youtu.be/RZlFCJzL8W0" rel="nofollow">isn't out of the woods yet.</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elizabeth Miller</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2020/12/03/46-minutes-of-festivus-grievances/#comment-172646</link>
		<dc:creator>Elizabeth Miller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2020 03:49:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=19676#comment-172646</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t adapt well to change. Never have. However, my saving grace is that given just a little time with the new stuff, I forget what the old stuff was all about. Heh.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don't adapt well to change. Never have. However, my saving grace is that given just a little time with the new stuff, I forget what the old stuff was all about. Heh.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MtnCaddy</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2020/12/03/46-minutes-of-festivus-grievances/#comment-172645</link>
		<dc:creator>MtnCaddy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2020 03:20:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=19676#comment-172645</guid>
		<description>Great. I&#039;ll probably have to get a new smartphone.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great. I'll probably have to get a new smartphone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elizabeth Miller</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2020/12/03/46-minutes-of-festivus-grievances/#comment-172644</link>
		<dc:creator>Elizabeth Miller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2020 03:05:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=19676#comment-172644</guid>
		<description>Seriously, though, it sounds like a lot of fun! :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seriously, though, it sounds like a lot of fun! :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elizabeth Miller</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2020/12/03/46-minutes-of-festivus-grievances/#comment-172643</link>
		<dc:creator>Elizabeth Miller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2020 03:02:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=19676#comment-172643</guid>
		<description>Great.

I&#039;ll probably have to get a new computer. :(</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great.</p>
<p>I'll probably have to get a new computer. :(</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Weigant</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2020/12/03/46-minutes-of-festivus-grievances/#comment-172642</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2020 02:57:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=19676#comment-172642</guid>
		<description>MtnCaddy and everyone else -

Good news!  Well, not right away, but eventually.  CW.com&#039;s world headquarters (heh) will be undergoing a big computer upgrade late this month.  It will likely take until some time early next year (early spring, say) for me to get everything up and running and ready for the next step -- but the next step (hopefully) will be to UPDATE THE FORMAT here totally.  Drag it into the future.  Upgraded WP, new template that allows for smart phone use, the whole shebang.  I have wanted to do this for years, and it will soon be possible.  I will keep everyone updated on the progress, as soon as possible.

&quot;It&#039;s a Festivus miracle!&quot;

:-)

-CW</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MtnCaddy and everyone else -</p>
<p>Good news!  Well, not right away, but eventually.  CW.com's world headquarters (heh) will be undergoing a big computer upgrade late this month.  It will likely take until some time early next year (early spring, say) for me to get everything up and running and ready for the next step -- but the next step (hopefully) will be to UPDATE THE FORMAT here totally.  Drag it into the future.  Upgraded WP, new template that allows for smart phone use, the whole shebang.  I have wanted to do this for years, and it will soon be possible.  I will keep everyone updated on the progress, as soon as possible.</p>
<p>"It's a Festivus miracle!"</p>
<p>:-)</p>
<p>-CW</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Weigant</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2020/12/03/46-minutes-of-festivus-grievances/#comment-172641</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2020 02:53:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=19676#comment-172641</guid>
		<description>OK, found the cite.  I will post this somewhere in tomorrow&#039;s article, too.  It&#039;s from Philip Bump at the Washington Post:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2020/12/02/most-petulant-46-minutes-american-history/

pertinent quote:

&lt;em&gt;It was a cri de coeur that, given the season, begs comparisons to the Festivus airing of grievances from George Costanza’s father on “Seinfeld” — another older Queens man unable to gracefully accept the nature of the world around him.

Introducing that comparison, though, risks diminishing the danger of Trump’s commentary.&lt;/em&gt;

Mea culpa.

-CW</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK, found the cite.  I will post this somewhere in tomorrow's article, too.  It's from Philip Bump at the Washington Post:</p>
<p><a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2020/12/02/most-petulant-46-minutes-american-history/" rel="nofollow">https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2020/12/02/most-petulant-46-minutes-american-history/</a></p>
<p>pertinent quote:</p>
<p><em>It was a cri de coeur that, given the season, begs comparisons to the Festivus airing of grievances from George Costanza’s father on “Seinfeld” — another older Queens man unable to gracefully accept the nature of the world around him.</p>
<p>Introducing that comparison, though, risks diminishing the danger of Trump’s commentary.</em></p>
<p>Mea culpa.</p>
<p>-CW</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MtnCaddy</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2020/12/03/46-minutes-of-festivus-grievances/#comment-172640</link>
		<dc:creator>MtnCaddy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2020 02:19:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=19676#comment-172640</guid>
		<description>Please recall the notion that &lt;i&gt;most of Trump&#039;s communications all along have been directed first, last and foremost his base.&lt;/i&gt;






Sure, he&#039;s venting. But more more importantly &lt;b&gt;it keeps the money coming&lt;/b&gt; -- what, a $170M and counting? And it preserves and maximizes his present and future influence. He&#039;ll claim &quot;he was robbed&quot; for the next four years (or whenever SDNY takes him away, whichever comes first!)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please recall the notion that <i>most of Trump's communications all along have been directed first, last and foremost his base.</i></p>
<p>Sure, he's venting. But more more importantly <b>it keeps the money coming</b> -- what, a $170M and counting? And it preserves and maximizes his present and future influence. He'll claim "he was robbed" for the next four years (or whenever SDNY takes him away, whichever comes first!)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MtnCaddy</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2020/12/03/46-minutes-of-festivus-grievances/#comment-172639</link>
		<dc:creator>MtnCaddy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2020 02:08:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=19676#comment-172639</guid>
		<description>D&#039;yall have any idea what a pain it is doing all this on a smartphone?*smh*</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>D'yall have any idea what a pain it is doing all this on a smartphone?*smh*</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MtnCaddy</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2020/12/03/46-minutes-of-festivus-grievances/#comment-172638</link>
		<dc:creator>MtnCaddy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2020 02:04:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=19676#comment-172638</guid>
		<description>Ooooo, what a coincidence! I couldn&#039;t fall asleep last night so I dialed up Trump on YouTube. A few minutes in I realized that if I kept listening that there&#039;d be no way I was gonna fall asleep...probably end up pacing the room wanting to kick my dog. And I &lt;i&gt;never&lt;/i&gt; kick my dogs!








So I, too, fast forwarded it to the end and I remember thinking  that of the half hour I&#039;d skipped I didn&#039;t miss a damn thing. I noticed the absence of the the customary plethora of ad libs and didn&#039;t make the connection between the &lt;i&gt;lack of said ad libs&lt;/i&gt; and the &lt;i&gt;oddity of two camara angles.&lt;/i&gt; I guessed that maybe they were trying to dial up their production values a notch. You know, practicing up for TRUMP TV -- it&#039;s not like alternative employment opportunities will exist for a lot of Trump&#039;s enablers. Some of them will &lt;i&gt;never eat lunch in this town again.&lt;/i&gt; Heh.





&lt;i&gt;Snowflake-in-Chief.&lt;/i&gt; I like that! And if you agree that &quot;immitation is the best form of flattery&quot; I&#039;d like to use it, Boss.





I&#039;ll agree. As actors go Trump doesn&#039;t have much of an emotional palette but IMO this was his best reading off a teleprompter speech yet. Even better than what I recall of his Inauguration and SOTU efforts. None of that &quot;hostage video&quot; &lt;i&gt;sentiment&lt;/i&gt; (as those Glad-they-didn&#039;t-join-Operation-Iraqi-Freedom-Surrender-Monkey-Frenchies would say.)







I see William Barr going the distance. Don&#039;t y&#039;all think our intrepid AG knows where a lot of the bodies are buried? And Rudy as AG would be pointless -- there&#039;s just not enough time for him to be more useful to Trump than &lt;b&gt;exactly what he&#039;s doing right now.&lt;/b&gt; Without Rudy to attract TV attention to &quot;the Cause&quot; these other clowns, er, attorneys would fall off the radar screen.







&lt;i&gt;It will go down in history as the most shameful speech our man-baby of a president ever gave. And with him, that&#039;s saying an awful lot.&lt;/i&gt;







&lt;i&gt;It was the biggest presidential tantrum in all history -- topping all the other ones Trump has previously thrown.&lt;/i&gt;







I dunno. Amidst the &lt;a href=&quot;https://youtu.be/rKQQ0aTcYjc&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;oceans&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;https://youtu.be/M7QzTM0IMp0&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;more oceans&lt;/a&gt; of Trumpian awfulness there&#039;s just got to be something worst. But I 
fear I&#039;m too exhausted to care to look for worse.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ooooo, what a coincidence! I couldn't fall asleep last night so I dialed up Trump on YouTube. A few minutes in I realized that if I kept listening that there'd be no way I was gonna fall asleep...probably end up pacing the room wanting to kick my dog. And I <i>never</i> kick my dogs!</p>
<p>So I, too, fast forwarded it to the end and I remember thinking  that of the half hour I'd skipped I didn't miss a damn thing. I noticed the absence of the the customary plethora of ad libs and didn't make the connection between the <i>lack of said ad libs</i> and the <i>oddity of two camara angles.</i> I guessed that maybe they were trying to dial up their production values a notch. You know, practicing up for TRUMP TV -- it's not like alternative employment opportunities will exist for a lot of Trump's enablers. Some of them will <i>never eat lunch in this town again.</i> Heh.</p>
<p><i>Snowflake-in-Chief.</i> I like that! And if you agree that "immitation is the best form of flattery" I'd like to use it, Boss.</p>
<p>I'll agree. As actors go Trump doesn't have much of an emotional palette but IMO this was his best reading off a teleprompter speech yet. Even better than what I recall of his Inauguration and SOTU efforts. None of that "hostage video" <i>sentiment</i> (as those Glad-they-didn't-join-Operation-Iraqi-Freedom-Surrender-Monkey-Frenchies would say.)</p>
<p>I see William Barr going the distance. Don't y'all think our intrepid AG knows where a lot of the bodies are buried? And Rudy as AG would be pointless -- there's just not enough time for him to be more useful to Trump than <b>exactly what he's doing right now.</b> Without Rudy to attract TV attention to "the Cause" these other clowns, er, attorneys would fall off the radar screen.</p>
<p><i>It will go down in history as the most shameful speech our man-baby of a president ever gave. And with him, that's saying an awful lot.</i></p>
<p><i>It was the biggest presidential tantrum in all history -- topping all the other ones Trump has previously thrown.</i></p>
<p>I dunno. Amidst the <a href="https://youtu.be/rKQQ0aTcYjc" rel="nofollow">oceans</a> and <a href="https://youtu.be/M7QzTM0IMp0" rel="nofollow">more oceans</a> of Trumpian awfulness there's just got to be something worst. But I<br />
fear I'm too exhausted to care to look for worse.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elizabeth Miller</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2020/12/03/46-minutes-of-festivus-grievances/#comment-172637</link>
		<dc:creator>Elizabeth Miller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2020 01:21:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=19676#comment-172637</guid>
		<description>I find it hard just thinking about watching it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I find it hard just thinking about watching it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Weigant</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2020/12/03/46-minutes-of-festivus-grievances/#comment-172636</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Weigant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2020 01:16:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=19676#comment-172636</guid>
		<description>John M from Ct - 

I tried.  I really did.  I just couldn&#039;t...

-CW</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John M from Ct - </p>
<p>I tried.  I really did.  I just couldn't...</p>
<p>-CW</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John M from Ct.</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2020/12/03/46-minutes-of-festivus-grievances/#comment-172633</link>
		<dc:creator>John M from Ct.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2020 23:46:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=19676#comment-172633</guid>
		<description>Well! Thanks for doing that - to the degree that you did it. And it&#039;s pretty damning testimony that you, our go-to political junkie who watches all the performances so we don&#039;t have to ... even you couldn&#039;t stomach Trump in this thing for more than fifteen minutes. 

I used to be more curious than I am now, about questions like who advised him that the first video take was somehow unacceptable in places? Who does he listen to, when he&#039;s masochistically enjoying performing the ultimate childish tantrum and meltdown for his swan song?

This too will pass. Having smeared his warm crap all over the office&#039;s historic walls for four years, he is leaving the presidency next month. Thank God we can be sure of at least that much.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well! Thanks for doing that - to the degree that you did it. And it's pretty damning testimony that you, our go-to political junkie who watches all the performances so we don't have to ... even you couldn't stomach Trump in this thing for more than fifteen minutes. </p>
<p>I used to be more curious than I am now, about questions like who advised him that the first video take was somehow unacceptable in places? Who does he listen to, when he's masochistically enjoying performing the ultimate childish tantrum and meltdown for his swan song?</p>
<p>This too will pass. Having smeared his warm crap all over the office's historic walls for four years, he is leaving the presidency next month. Thank God we can be sure of at least that much.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
