<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Taking The Long View</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.chrisweigant.com/2020/10/08/taking-the-long-view/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2020/10/08/taking-the-long-view/</link>
	<description>Reality-based political commentary</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2026 22:30:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: dsws</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2020/10/08/taking-the-long-view/#comment-170165</link>
		<dc:creator>dsws</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2020 01:38:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=19377#comment-170165</guid>
		<description>Under established Supreme Court precedent, a Republican does not need to get more votes than his opponent in order to win a state&#039;s electoral votes.  He only needs to be ahead at some point in the process of counting ballots.  Trump still has a very good chance of getting a second term.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Under established Supreme Court precedent, a Republican does not need to get more votes than his opponent in order to win a state's electoral votes.  He only needs to be ahead at some point in the process of counting ballots.  Trump still has a very good chance of getting a second term.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TheStig</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2020/10/08/taking-the-long-view/#comment-170053</link>
		<dc:creator>TheStig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Oct 2020 00:20:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=19377#comment-170053</guid>
		<description>Sf Bear -13

I find your scenario very likely.  That wouldn&#039;t stop Trump from trying to sell the idea to Pence.  Trump is a salesman.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sf Bear -13</p>
<p>I find your scenario very likely.  That wouldn't stop Trump from trying to sell the idea to Pence.  Trump is a salesman.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kick</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2020/10/08/taking-the-long-view/#comment-170051</link>
		<dc:creator>Kick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2020 21:49:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=19377#comment-170051</guid>
		<description>Red Alert: After Trump whines like a toddler yesterday that he is upset with his Secretary of State for not locating Hillary Clinton&#039;s &quot;missing&quot; emails, Mike Pompeo reports he&#039;s suddenly found them and will release them before November 3. 

Fun Fact: Hillary Clinton isn&#039;t running for President in 2020.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Red Alert: After Trump whines like a toddler yesterday that he is upset with his Secretary of State for not locating Hillary Clinton's "missing" emails, Mike Pompeo reports he's suddenly found them and will release them before November 3. </p>
<p>Fun Fact: Hillary Clinton isn't running for President in 2020.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ListenWhenYouHear</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2020/10/08/taking-the-long-view/#comment-170050</link>
		<dc:creator>ListenWhenYouHear</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2020 20:30:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=19377#comment-170050</guid>
		<description>Well, it’s Friday, so we should be hearing from Bill Barr or someone else on the “weekend news bomb” that Trump’s campaign wants dropped in the next few hours!   What will it be???  What Biden criminal act will be uncovered?  

  I did just hear that Trump plans on holding a Super Spreader Event on Saturday where he will personally spit in every person’s  in attendance mouth!   Go herd mentality!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, it’s Friday, so we should be hearing from Bill Barr or someone else on the “weekend news bomb” that Trump’s campaign wants dropped in the next few hours!   What will it be???  What Biden criminal act will be uncovered?  </p>
<p>  I did just hear that Trump plans on holding a Super Spreader Event on Saturday where he will personally spit in every person’s  in attendance mouth!   Go herd mentality!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SF Bear</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2020/10/08/taking-the-long-view/#comment-170049</link>
		<dc:creator>SF Bear</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2020 19:11:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=19377#comment-170049</guid>
		<description>The Stig #12.  I do not see any reason Pence would be willing to pardon Trump, what is in it for him?  I assume Trump won&#039;t leave till after the election and the ensuing chaos resolves into a consensus that he lost.  At that point Pence&#039;s carrier is over.  The Tea Party folks will associate him with the failed Trump regime and shun him and no one else will have anything to do with him.  How can he feel anything but resentment toward Trump at that point.  Other than a brief stint as president what good will have come from his support of Trump.  I think his refusal to pardon will be his final fuck you to the man that brought him all this grief.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Stig #12.  I do not see any reason Pence would be willing to pardon Trump, what is in it for him?  I assume Trump won't leave till after the election and the ensuing chaos resolves into a consensus that he lost.  At that point Pence's carrier is over.  The Tea Party folks will associate him with the failed Trump regime and shun him and no one else will have anything to do with him.  How can he feel anything but resentment toward Trump at that point.  Other than a brief stint as president what good will have come from his support of Trump.  I think his refusal to pardon will be his final fuck you to the man that brought him all this grief.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TheStig</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2020/10/08/taking-the-long-view/#comment-170048</link>
		<dc:creator>TheStig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2020 18:23:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=19377#comment-170048</guid>
		<description>The four of P&#039;s of Political Analysis are starting to converge about who will be the next President and the verdict is not good for Trump. Not cast in concrete, but not encouraging.

The &lt;b&gt;Pollsters&lt;/b&gt; see Trump losing voter approval at both state and national levels, with a very high statistical significance. 

The &lt;b&gt;Pundits&lt;/b&gt; who take a broader, more intuitive approach also see  Trump losing steam, but vary quite a bit about about how to color the states on a US map. That said, I don&#039;t know of any who say Trump is the favorite or running head to head with Biden.

The &lt;b&gt;Predictors&lt;/b&gt; (Nate Silver of 538 and such), who see politics thru the lens of Generalized Linear Models are giving Trump somewhere in the range of a 20-25% of winning a second term.

The &lt;b&gt;Punters&lt;/b&gt;, blokes who place real money bets (where that is legal or not closely policed) were the last to come on board the rough consensus train.  Until recently, the punters were acting like Biden and Trump were almost neck and neck, with Biden a wee bit behind just a few weeks ago.  Not anymore. The Punters are now betting that Trump has about a 1 in 3 chance of winning the Electoral College.

Here is my point to all the above. Trump faces a retirement full of litigation and legal fees not paid by somebody else. His businesses are losing money and loans are coming due. &lt;b&gt; To the extent that Trump can think straight between the COVID and the Steroids, should he hand the reins over to Pence, in exchange for a blanket pardon?  Or should Trump just refuse to leave office because the election was unfair and because he says so.  A safer alternative might be for Trump to quickly skip town to Russia, N. Korea or some other totalitarian haven.  What would Roy Cohn advise?&lt;b&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The four of P's of Political Analysis are starting to converge about who will be the next President and the verdict is not good for Trump. Not cast in concrete, but not encouraging.</p>
<p>The <b>Pollsters</b> see Trump losing voter approval at both state and national levels, with a very high statistical significance. </p>
<p>The <b>Pundits</b> who take a broader, more intuitive approach also see  Trump losing steam, but vary quite a bit about about how to color the states on a US map. That said, I don't know of any who say Trump is the favorite or running head to head with Biden.</p>
<p>The <b>Predictors</b> (Nate Silver of 538 and such), who see politics thru the lens of Generalized Linear Models are giving Trump somewhere in the range of a 20-25% of winning a second term.</p>
<p>The <b>Punters</b>, blokes who place real money bets (where that is legal or not closely policed) were the last to come on board the rough consensus train.  Until recently, the punters were acting like Biden and Trump were almost neck and neck, with Biden a wee bit behind just a few weeks ago.  Not anymore. The Punters are now betting that Trump has about a 1 in 3 chance of winning the Electoral College.</p>
<p>Here is my point to all the above. Trump faces a retirement full of litigation and legal fees not paid by somebody else. His businesses are losing money and loans are coming due. <b> To the extent that Trump can think straight between the COVID and the Steroids, should he hand the reins over to Pence, in exchange for a blanket pardon?  Or should Trump just refuse to leave office because the election was unfair and because he says so.  A safer alternative might be for Trump to quickly skip town to Russia, N. Korea or some other totalitarian haven.  What would Roy Cohn advise?</b><b></b></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SF Bear</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2020/10/08/taking-the-long-view/#comment-170047</link>
		<dc:creator>SF Bear</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2020 16:19:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=19377#comment-170047</guid>
		<description>John M.from Ct #4 got a whole lot right.  For even if the resurgent Dems capture the presidency al la Obama, the Tea Party Repbs have a lot of structural advantage in holding the Senate.  Imagine this 40% being led by a Smart, Charismatic, and Ruthless person (The mirror image of trump)!  I believe the Dems will need to maintain this level of engagement and enthusiasm we see today for a very long time as this struggle will resemble the Forty Years War.  Even after Biden is settled into the white house and Trump is living in Moscow folks are going to be be surprised to see the absolute refusal on the part of the 40% to accept the changes in law and society desired by the Dems.  With the right leadership they could prevail.  Be afraid, very afraid, this nightmare will not end anytime soon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John M.from Ct #4 got a whole lot right.  For even if the resurgent Dems capture the presidency al la Obama, the Tea Party Repbs have a lot of structural advantage in holding the Senate.  Imagine this 40% being led by a Smart, Charismatic, and Ruthless person (The mirror image of trump)!  I believe the Dems will need to maintain this level of engagement and enthusiasm we see today for a very long time as this struggle will resemble the Forty Years War.  Even after Biden is settled into the white house and Trump is living in Moscow folks are going to be be surprised to see the absolute refusal on the part of the 40% to accept the changes in law and society desired by the Dems.  With the right leadership they could prevail.  Be afraid, very afraid, this nightmare will not end anytime soon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SF Bear</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2020/10/08/taking-the-long-view/#comment-170046</link>
		<dc:creator>SF Bear</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2020 16:02:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=19377#comment-170046</guid>
		<description>Chris, I think you underestimate the tenacity of the forces unleashed by Trump.  His rise to power demonstrated the power of this minority group of Americans I shall call the Racist Tea Party.  This 40% of the electorate is not going to go away, fuled as they are by talk radio and Fox News. You assume these folks will quietly assimilate back into a re-emergent Mitt Romney Republican Party but actually the opposite will happen.  The sane Republicans have begun migrating into the Democratic Party and this Tea Part will continue to hold sway over the titular Republican Party.  

After the fall of trump there will be a fierce competition among a new group of ambitious pols to seize leadership of this 40% group of Americans.  Should one emerge who is devoid of the personal failings of Trump (grab um by the pussy) and who is a whole lot smarter it is not at all inconceivable that leader could create another path to victory in 2024 or beyond.  I do not think we are anywhere near putting this problem behind us.  I believe this country will be engaged in an existential struggle between the 60% and the 40% to see who will run the country for for a very long time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chris, I think you underestimate the tenacity of the forces unleashed by Trump.  His rise to power demonstrated the power of this minority group of Americans I shall call the Racist Tea Party.  This 40% of the electorate is not going to go away, fuled as they are by talk radio and Fox News. You assume these folks will quietly assimilate back into a re-emergent Mitt Romney Republican Party but actually the opposite will happen.  The sane Republicans have begun migrating into the Democratic Party and this Tea Part will continue to hold sway over the titular Republican Party.  </p>
<p>After the fall of trump there will be a fierce competition among a new group of ambitious pols to seize leadership of this 40% group of Americans.  Should one emerge who is devoid of the personal failings of Trump (grab um by the pussy) and who is a whole lot smarter it is not at all inconceivable that leader could create another path to victory in 2024 or beyond.  I do not think we are anywhere near putting this problem behind us.  I believe this country will be engaged in an existential struggle between the 60% and the 40% to see who will run the country for for a very long time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nypoet22</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2020/10/08/taking-the-long-view/#comment-170044</link>
		<dc:creator>nypoet22</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2020 14:25:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=19377#comment-170044</guid>
		<description>@don[7],

i think you meant that the farther north you go, the &lt;b&gt;further&lt;/b&gt; south you get.

https://www.merriam-webster.com/words-at-play/is-it-further-or-farther-usage-how-to-use

as for [8]... well, i don&#039;t think such comments do anything to further your cause. so to speak. it&#039;s the color of a rainbow farted by a unicorn.

JL</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@don[7],</p>
<p>i think you meant that the farther north you go, the <b>further</b> south you get.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.merriam-webster.com/words-at-play/is-it-further-or-farther-usage-how-to-use" rel="nofollow">https://www.merriam-webster.com/words-at-play/is-it-further-or-farther-usage-how-to-use</a></p>
<p>as for [8]... well, i don't think such comments do anything to further your cause. so to speak. it's the color of a rainbow farted by a unicorn.</p>
<p>JL</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TheStig</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2020/10/08/taking-the-long-view/#comment-170041</link>
		<dc:creator>TheStig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2020 12:30:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=19377#comment-170041</guid>
		<description>I lived in South Carolina during the 90s and the thought of it flipping Dem is plausible but nonetheless amazing. The only place you could find somebody willing to admit they had Democrat tendencies was in Charleston.  South Carolina was one of the first states to abandon state subsidized beach restoration. That was the only progressive state initiative I remember.  Beaches move and you can&#039;t engineer around that. Natives know that.  Northern colonists and tourists don&#039;t.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I lived in South Carolina during the 90s and the thought of it flipping Dem is plausible but nonetheless amazing. The only place you could find somebody willing to admit they had Democrat tendencies was in Charleston.  South Carolina was one of the first states to abandon state subsidized beach restoration. That was the only progressive state initiative I remember.  Beaches move and you can't engineer around that. Natives know that.  Northern colonists and tourists don't.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nypoet22</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2020/10/08/taking-the-long-view/#comment-170040</link>
		<dc:creator>nypoet22</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2020 06:27:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=19377#comment-170040</guid>
		<description>@jmct,

i also found cw&#039;s predictions a bit rosy/premature.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@jmct,</p>
<p>i also found cw's predictions a bit rosy/premature.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John M from Ct.</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2020/10/08/taking-the-long-view/#comment-170039</link>
		<dc:creator>John M from Ct.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2020 03:13:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=19377#comment-170039</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve been reading the &quot;Coming Democratic Majority Because Demographics&quot; articles for several decades now. They tend to conflict with the &quot;Oh my God, the Constitution allows Republican Minority Rule far into the Future&quot; articles that have been dominating the media since the 2016 election.

Your analysis seems to work from a different electoral breakdown than the &#039;whites will only be a plurality soon&#039; approach that the &#039;demographic&#039; articles tend to focus on. If I understand you, you see the change in power as coming from urban majorities in formerly conservative states, irrespective of race. 

But you seem to be defining power entirely in terms of the electoral college, i.e., the presidency. Even in the context of your analysis, the Senate seems more likely to be the Republicans&#039; stronghold going forward. As you say, when &quot;Republicans are left with only the states on the United States map which don&#039;t have much population&quot; the presidency may be out of reach - but not the Senate. 

And without the Senate, a long series of Democratic presidents will be in the same position Obama was in: all the good intentions in the world, and nary a major legislative program or liberal court system to show for it.

Of course, I may be wrong. Perhaps more powerful metropolitan areas will elect Democratic senators from a majority of states just as they may elect Democratic presidents. But the &quot;Coming Demographic Majority&quot; articles have been saying this for quite some time now. 

Finally, per your piece, Trump is a factor in the failure of these predictions, of course, but Trump is just the idiotic expression of a powerful minority of the country that has achieved solidarity, coherence, and central direction since the Reagan era. That minority has controlled the presidency more often than not; ditto the Senate; ditto the courts thanks to points 1 and 2 preceding. Will the urbanization of the southeastern Atlantic seaboard, Texas, and the southern mountain states really overcome the &quot;Oh my God, the Republicans&quot; factor of numerous smaller states dominated by Fox News watchers, in the coming decade or two?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I've been reading the "Coming Democratic Majority Because Demographics" articles for several decades now. They tend to conflict with the "Oh my God, the Constitution allows Republican Minority Rule far into the Future" articles that have been dominating the media since the 2016 election.</p>
<p>Your analysis seems to work from a different electoral breakdown than the 'whites will only be a plurality soon' approach that the 'demographic' articles tend to focus on. If I understand you, you see the change in power as coming from urban majorities in formerly conservative states, irrespective of race. </p>
<p>But you seem to be defining power entirely in terms of the electoral college, i.e., the presidency. Even in the context of your analysis, the Senate seems more likely to be the Republicans' stronghold going forward. As you say, when "Republicans are left with only the states on the United States map which don't have much population" the presidency may be out of reach - but not the Senate. </p>
<p>And without the Senate, a long series of Democratic presidents will be in the same position Obama was in: all the good intentions in the world, and nary a major legislative program or liberal court system to show for it.</p>
<p>Of course, I may be wrong. Perhaps more powerful metropolitan areas will elect Democratic senators from a majority of states just as they may elect Democratic presidents. But the "Coming Demographic Majority" articles have been saying this for quite some time now. </p>
<p>Finally, per your piece, Trump is a factor in the failure of these predictions, of course, but Trump is just the idiotic expression of a powerful minority of the country that has achieved solidarity, coherence, and central direction since the Reagan era. That minority has controlled the presidency more often than not; ditto the Senate; ditto the courts thanks to points 1 and 2 preceding. Will the urbanization of the southeastern Atlantic seaboard, Texas, and the southern mountain states really overcome the "Oh my God, the Republicans" factor of numerous smaller states dominated by Fox News watchers, in the coming decade or two?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ListenWhenYouHear</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2020/10/08/taking-the-long-view/#comment-170038</link>
		<dc:creator>ListenWhenYouHear</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2020 02:38:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=19377#comment-170038</guid>
		<description>CW,

Nice assessment of where we are now and where we could be headed after this election.   Because the GOP has been taken over by the Cult of Trump, and Trump has absolutely no ties to the Republican Party that aren’t solely self-serving, it is impossible to know what will remain of the GOP once Trump is out of office.  What happens to a political party after it turns into a cult of personality and that personality goes away?   What remains in the ashes?  

No one should expect Trump to show any concern for the party if it fails to re-elect him.     I don’t think Trump’s base is going to be as dedicated to him once they see him turn on them and his disdain and disgust for them is on full display.  Face it, he is going to need someone to blame for his loss, and it sure isn’t going to be himself!   I would be willing to bet that Trumps reaction to losing will be quick in coming and extremely bitter in nature.    I think we will see a sharp drop in voter turnout for the Republicans in 2022 and 2024 as a result.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CW,</p>
<p>Nice assessment of where we are now and where we could be headed after this election.   Because the GOP has been taken over by the Cult of Trump, and Trump has absolutely no ties to the Republican Party that aren’t solely self-serving, it is impossible to know what will remain of the GOP once Trump is out of office.  What happens to a political party after it turns into a cult of personality and that personality goes away?   What remains in the ashes?  </p>
<p>No one should expect Trump to show any concern for the party if it fails to re-elect him.     I don’t think Trump’s base is going to be as dedicated to him once they see him turn on them and his disdain and disgust for them is on full display.  Face it, he is going to need someone to blame for his loss, and it sure isn’t going to be himself!   I would be willing to bet that Trumps reaction to losing will be quick in coming and extremely bitter in nature.    I think we will see a sharp drop in voter turnout for the Republicans in 2022 and 2024 as a result.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MtnCaddy</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2020/10/08/taking-the-long-view/#comment-170037</link>
		<dc:creator>MtnCaddy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2020 01:15:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=19377#comment-170037</guid>
		<description>Your column, of course, presupposes that the Electoral College continues to exist in its current form. If a small number of States join the &quot;Our EC Votes will be awarded to whomever wins the NATIONAL Popular Vote&quot; movement (regardless of who wins each State&#039;s popular vote) then the fate of the GOP is a done deal. 






At that point the struggle for political power will be between the Progressive and Establishment wings of the Democratic Party.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your column, of course, presupposes that the Electoral College continues to exist in its current form. If a small number of States join the "Our EC Votes will be awarded to whomever wins the NATIONAL Popular Vote" movement (regardless of who wins each State's popular vote) then the fate of the GOP is a done deal. </p>
<p>At that point the struggle for political power will be between the Progressive and Establishment wings of the Democratic Party.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MtnCaddy</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2020/10/08/taking-the-long-view/#comment-170036</link>
		<dc:creator>MtnCaddy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2020 01:08:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=19377#comment-170036</guid>
		<description>Lincoln Project produced,






&lt;a href=&quot;https://youtu.be/snOebCXlMbU&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Church of MAGA -- Part Deux&lt;/a&gt;











&lt;a href=&quot;https://youtu.be/gdAEtkjDO3k&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Regeneron!&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lincoln Project produced,</p>
<p><a href="https://youtu.be/snOebCXlMbU" rel="nofollow">Church of MAGA -- Part Deux</a></p>
<p><a href="https://youtu.be/gdAEtkjDO3k" rel="nofollow">Regeneron!</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
