You can see it here.

Actually, the time was split pretty evenly between Harris and Pence.

No, it wasn't, EM. When Harris was having to spend her time telling the other dipshit that she was talking while he was interrupting her and asking the moderator to give her equal time, then she's not getting actual "pretty evenly" debate time.

So to recap: Harris having to spend her time telling Pence to STFU isn't "pretty evenly" while he was allowed to prattle on endlessly while she sat there.

*

I second the motion. Chris?

[54]

Chris Weigant wrote:

Don Harris [49] -

-CW

check it out

-CW

Somebody had to say it.

The filter ate my post saying basically the same thing.

Pence wouldn't let Harris get a word in edgewise, and the moderator got as much speaking time as the Senator. Pence's constant interrupting and patronizing of Harris won't help the GOP one iota with the suburban women and seniors leaving them in droves.

Mike Pence was a steaming hot pile of lying horseshit, and the fly knew exactly where to land.

Lies Lies Falsifies, Bloodshot Eyes, Lord of the Flies

vice president pence would be the next three most spoken words.

Giant fly will not commit to a small donor campaign and will allow PAC's to advertise on his behalf.

He also said he likes big pie.

I expect he/she will have a Twitter Account before midnight...possibly several accounts.
Can The Giant Fly commit to accepting donations < $200? If so,
Harris has candidate he can accept.

That Pence is oily debater.

The insects sure know where to land, do they not?

I honestly think Trump has reached a new level of ignorance, impulsivity, narcissism, stupidity, AND cruelty. Now doping is clearly involved, so his record performances may not be recognized by the Guinness Book....Trump may have to settle for a paltry Putin's Choice.

Awesome! :)

As for me thinking that people should only vote for small donor candidates you are right.

You are also right there are currently none to vote for.

With those confessions, you admit to disseminating information with the intent to disenfranchise voters. That is illegal in multiple jurisdictions.

Why is someone pressuring a public figure to do the right thing harassment?

You can't think of a single reason?

Is it because when you have no rational argument that you need to pretend it is harassment so that you can dismiss it as delusional?

No, moron; it's because the person you're harassing has said you're a troll and asked you to stop the trolling. Yes, you are a harassing troll:

[54] Chris Weigant wrote:

Don Harris [49] -

Yes. You are a troll. Deal with it.

As for your language, you are pushing me very very close to banning the first person ever from my site. You have been warned, and this is your final warning.

If ignoring you doesn't work, then banning you just might. Address the issues in the articles or the comments to those articles, and quit with your own monomania, because nobody's listening. Instead, you are just trolling.

And we're ALL way beyond getting tired of it.

Is that clear enough?

-CW

[Thursday, April 2nd, 2020 at 16:05 UTC]

http://www.chrisweigant.com/2020/04/01/april-is-the-cruelest-month/#comment-156925

*
CW writing about One Demand will not be showing that I am unstable or delusional.

CW writing about One Demand would be the dissemination of your voter disinformation that is incorrect in multiple states.

It is a rational approach to solving a real problem that 80% of citizens want a solution to.

Disseminating disinformation to voters is illegal and not rational at all. It doesn't solve a real problem when you encourage people to vote for themselves when that's not even possible in the vast majority of states and impossible and encouraging self-disenfranchisement.

It is no different than people forming or joining any organization on any other issue.

Yes, it is, moron.

It is how democracy is designed to work- you make a demand and enforce that demand with your votes.

Not casting a valid vote isn't the equivalent of voting. When you can't vote for yourself in the overwhelming number of states without collecting signatures and/or paying a fee of thousands of dollars in order to cast a valid vote for yourself, what your encouraging is disenfranchisement of voters. That is not how democracy is designed to work, and it's freaking illegal.

People don't really have a choice if they are not offered all the choices.

Bullshit... bullshit... bullshit. You still have a choice when all the choices aren't offered. Anyone telling you otherwise doesn't understand a damn thing about choosing, and you sound dumber than a barrel of hair to claim otherwise. You may not like the choices, but you still have a damn choice.

And believing what you want to believe despite the reality that contradicts what you believe is being delusional.

Says the board mooch who has an outdated website that contains voting disinformation. It is a violation of law to disseminate false information to voters, and your website does that in more ways than one.

Ask these guys what happened to them for disseminating false information to voters:

https://apnews.com/article/election-2020-technology-arrests-michigan-voting-rights-e0d49155dc8f347b1347cf779fd43812

So to recap: You are delusional if you seriously believe anyone is going to violate federal law and disseminate your false information.

I think this was a blessing from God that I caught it.

~ Donald Trump regarding COVID-19

*
So Trump has now gone from blaming China to now thanking God for the SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus.

*laughs uncontrollably* *catches breath* *more laughing*

I cannot fathom the ignorance it would take in order to a cast a vote for this kind of sheer unmitigated effing stupidity.

Except it does NOTHING TO SOLVE BIG MONEY IN POLITICS! NOTHING! $5000 is NOT BIG MONEY!!! If you think anything over $250 or $300 is BIG MONEY, you are just a freaking idiot.

The problem with your line of “thinking” — and I am being extremely generous by using that term — is that it requires us to believe that the ONLY way we can determine who will truly represent their constituents and work on behalf of the people by whether or not they jump through a hoop that you have held up as the magic purity test! It is why you get so bent when I bring up the homophobic Neo-Nazi white Nationalist candidate that may follow your example — let’s face it, they have made plenty of horrible life choices in their lifetime...what’s one more? You claim that One Demand won’t support such a candidate, but you have outlined that you have ONLY ONE DEMAND that someone must agree to in order to win your support. That is IT! Unless you plan on changing your scam’s name to One Demand Plus 4 or 5 Strong Suggestions, you really cannot say no to anyone who might want to hitch their wagon to your star.

The fact is that you have no way of ensuring that a person who will agree to run a small donation only campaign is the type person who deserves our support... but that is your One Dumb Plan!

Speaking of Randy Rainbow....

(Duet with PATTI LUPONE!!!!)

Russ, this is so funny. Lots of curse words too. I like it! :)

Same goes for voting to go to war with Iraq... the citizen support for stopping Iraq for getting/using WMD’s was massive.

While some senators may have understood their vote for the AUMF in Iraq as a vote for war, Senator Biden did not. Quite on the contrary, he voted in favour of it to avoid war.

Speaking of Randy Rainbow....

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5AoY6RRfMZM&ab_channel=RandyRainbow

(Duet with PATTI LUPONE!!!!)

LOVED that Covita video! Surprised Randy Rainbow didn’t beat them to that one!

-R

So, you want to bash Biden for supporting a crime bill that addressed what the media was telling everyone was, nationally, a huge problem at the time? A bill that a majority of the people — who today are complaining about how awful the bill was — voiced their full support for it at the time? The crime bill addressed what the press referred to at the time as “an epidemic of gang related drug crimes” across our nation. (The press’ tendency to misuse that word in describing certain social justice issues really becomes noticeable when we are facing the effects of a true EPIDEMIC, don’t you think?) Regardless of how that bill is viewed in hindsight, at the time, passing that bill was Biden following the “will of the people”.

Same goes for voting to go to war with Iraq... the citizen support for stopping Iraq for getting/using WMD’s was massive. No one ever WANTS to go to war (well, no one but maybe Dick Cheney). No one WANTED to get involved in the war with Japan and Germany in the 40’s until we were forced into it.

And if Biden’s got over 40 years of putting BigMoney before the will of the people, you’d think that you would provide specific cases to support your argument... but you never seem to do that!

The “reality” of it all is that you believe people should only back and vote for candidates that run small donation ONLY campaigns, of which there are zero nationwide to choose from! You harass CW to write an article that would show the world a mentally unstable man with delusional beliefs and political views that would serve no other purpose than to highlight your plight. That’s REALITY!

I think the hidden voters are people who normally just don't care much about politics or voting, but are sick of the orange one's relentless wall of noise. My brother is one of them and he lives in a purple state.

Adultery

The MAGA Church

"just because guam, marianas, USVI and samoa don't currently have a grassroots movement for it doesn't mean they'd turn down statehood if it were offered."

True enough. But only D.C., Puerto Rico, Guam and the USVI meet the population threshold for statehood. The Northern Marianas and American Samoa do not.

Polls show Biden ahead of Trump in Ohio by one percent, and trailing Trump in Iowa by only a half percent. Those are 8 to 9 percent swings in Biden's favor from Trump's margin against Hillary in those states in 2016.

Newsflash! None care one way or the other about any "pat on the back."

there is substantial recent evidence of biden behaving the way CW says he is (e.g. wearing a mask, speaking respectfully, listening and responding to voter concerns), and very little evidence (if any) of him behaving the way you say he is. i don't think anyone would claim biden is pure or perfect, himself included. but whatever his flaws, he has shown to be a decent human being. i had no intention of calling you out for it, but i sincerely believe that i'm not the delusional one in this scenario.

JL

https://tinyurl.com/y6p74blu

Donald Trump can't block Manhattan DA Cyrus Vance’s subpoena for his financial statements and tax records. Now he'll likely appeal it back to Supreme Court for a second time where he'll delay but lose and they'll be turned over.

Spoiler Alert: If Donald had documentation/justification for the business loses claimed on his tax returns, he would have turned them over already.

Poor Donald. There's no federal pardon that can save him from criminal tax fraud against the State of New York.

Winning! *shakes head*

this is a very good case, if biden and his supporters can hammer it home.

I definitely now believe that he was infected after watching him standing on the White House balcony gasping for air like a goldfish that jumped out of its bowl.

Heh, Russ, I said the same thing about the appearance of a fish out of water... except "Clownfish Von Trump."

#Finding Nemo #Cheetolini

I do wonder if he might have been hallucinating when he saluted like he was inspecting the troops during a military parade.

#Cheetolini
#Covita

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4tZVnbDq9B4

The Lincoln Project mocks Trump... again. ;)

Yesterday, NY Post columnist Miranda Devine appeared on Dana Perino's show to help the GOP with old folks.

I think it's incredibly selfish of old people or neurotic people who are timid and afraid and won't come out of their basements

Let's hope the GOP sticks with that talking point.

Senator Pat Toomey (R-PA) announced that he will not seek re-election in 2022 just the other day.

If the NYtimes, CW or the rest of the media wants a pat on the back from me

LOL! I was gonna say that delusions of grandeur from you are priceless, but they're not. Definitely worth less than $201.

Please seek help (for your mental state, not your grift).

Precisely.

FYI, The Atlantic endorsed Abraham Lincoln in 1860 and LBJ in 1964.

If it's safe enough to go to the grocery store it's safe enough to vote.

Kinda puts the whole voting in person thing in perspective, amirite?

And, having said all that, the New York Times just endorsed Biden for president. Heh.

Like they had a choice

No, there's no rational choice to be made here. One of my fave politics websites, The Atlantic, has only endorsed three Presidential Candidates in their 163 year history. The last endorsement was for Hillary in 2016. No doubt they'll once again endorse in 2020...and it won't be Cheetogod.

I agree. Dexamethasone is not your typical steroid — far from it! For most steroids used to combat COPD and other breathing illnesses, the worst side effect was that it made your bones brittle (and tasted gawd-awful!) with prolonged use.

I have heard multiple stories from people who have loved ones who had been given it that their sick family member hallucinated like crazy when on it. A few did report that they were amazed at how quickly the medicine seemed to clear their lungs up and how great they felt within days. Those same people all said that their loved ones died days after they believed things had taken a turn for the better!

I definitely now believe that he was infected after watching him standing on the White House balcony gasping for air like a goldfish that jumped out of its bowl. It was painful to watch him forcing himself to act like he was not sick. I do wonder if he might have been hallucinating when he saluted like he was inspecting the troops during a military parade.

Stop it! You're killing me!

It's one thing to be taking a cocktail of opioids, but an entirely different thing to be on the 'roids. The former has more predictable behavioral effects and the latter is a fickle mistress that one cannot predict when, or what side effect will manifest.

Personally I do not want anyone with access to the "football" to be allowed control if they are on a unpredictable mind altering medication.

The "fake news" should be asking this question.

Unfortunately we already know what the answer would be....

I don't see where the steroids have made any difference to his ignorance, impulsivity, narcissism, stupidity, or cruelty. They look just the same as always.

I'll agree that they're making him believe that he isn't sick, but that's it.

It was not a spectacle and they knew it wouldn't be. It was a major politician behaving like a normal human being. Meanwhile, the orange one was behaving like a monster as usual.

I have long ago resigned myself to that truism.

It's a half-truism.

What puzzles me is this insistence, from the debate coverage of last week to this question of whether anyone has watched this Town Hall, that people need to understand who Biden is and who Trump is. In fact, the most comic coverage has been the media's desperate attempts to find genuinely undecided voters who aren't delusional or lying. Biden comes across as old, if not very old, but there's no doubt in his supporters' minds that he's about a 10^(10^15) improvement on the president, in every category that isn't an expression of sin, illegality, and immorality.

I feel the same way about the extensive analysis of Strong vs Weak states for the two candidates from the last post (yeomanlike work, by the way). Biden is ahead by every measure that matters - except the question of voter disruption, suppression, and obstruction.

That is where the media ought to be at this point. Every secretary of state, every board of elections supervisor, every local chief of police, every state judge with a nonsensical lawsuit about supposed fraud risks: what are you doing to ensure a free and fair election count in the first week of November, and later if necessary? Every media outlet, social media site, pundit on cable, state representative: what are you doing to get ready for the s***storm of nonsense that the GOP is preparing to flood the country with on November 3 and after?

That's the only story left - Biden by every indication for the past six months will have a popular and electoral majority in a free and fair election. Will this be a free and fair election?

Like they had a choice.

Indeed, in every way imaginable. :)

I'm really glad it went well.

I don't understand why Biden doesn't do more of these events and press interviews. When he was senator, I rarely missed a Sunday talk show lineup and certainly never when he was regularly on.

Sadly, I do.

To them, he is, has been and always will be nothing more than a gaffe machine and if Biden doesn't live up to that asinine billing, they're not interested.

Although, that may be starting to change.

No, it's not! Slap my wrist. It will never change. I have long ago resigned myself to that truism.

Yeah, what else is new? It must have been a good performance if the mainstream media and punditocracy ignored it. Sigh.