Wouldn't it be nice if we could put Trump on a spaceship and send him off to another world?

Trump and the trumplickers are already living on another world we refer to as Earth 2... where their heads reside firmly and permanently up inside each others' bigly fat asses.

We will be past this (except for some Democrat holdouts who LOVE martial law et al) by June.. And President Trump is going to be lauded by patriotic Americans for the awesome job he has done..

Thank you for yet another look into the mind of a bona fide effing moron still downplaying the seriousness of SARS-CoV-2 and unable to grasp reality.

HA!

It reminds of the time when Bill boarded a plane on the tarmac in Phoenix ... and set in motion the events that helped sabotage his wife's presidential campaign.

You see, the inference could even be implied and in the eyes of the beholder. It just didn't look good. :)

I know. And, I know he didn't do it, too. :)
I also know that I am rather unique, that way. Sigh.

We have political demonstrations where people go and cough on the police. We have anti-vaxxers.

Yeah, well, as problems go, I'd agree you've got one or more there. Yikes.

Trust and belief aren't the same as knowledge.

We don't need knowledge. Well-justified trust is good enough. But we need to be able to justify it with the level of study that a normal voter can put in during the course of a campaign.

It's really not that complicated, Dan.

It's a new disease, and people in the US are awful about cooperating with anything. We have political demonstrations where people go and cough on the police. We have anti-vaxxers. I'm pretty sure that article is one I had already read. If not, it's close enough that I couldn't tell the difference. So yes, I acknowledge that there are experts who are optimistic. I'm not optimistic. I hope I'm wrong, but I just don't see Americans having the level of compliance by the public that the article is calling for.

A threat can be effective without being explicit, or even overt. If someone has tantrums whenever he perceives a subordinate as insufficiently loyal, his catchphrase is "you're fired", and he routinely gropes without waiting for any indication of consent, a woman who needs to keep her job would be well-advised to infer the threat. Likewise, in the case of Miss Teen USA, for a girl who wants to avoid fallout from a tantrum. But in that case he merely bragged about being "allowed to go in" because he was "the owner of the pageant", and "inspect" their "everything" while "they're standing there with no clothes", not about actually grabbing the "everything".

The lockdowns were supposed to provide precious time to get this infrastructure in place.

Unless we're math nerds, who run out of regular letters to use as variables and need to use Greek. Here's capital lambda: ?.

For the upside-down L, it's capital gamma: ?.

And upside-down U isn't a letter, but still a math thing, intersection: ?.

we should be demanding that our leaders at all levels are focused on what to replace the lockdowns with.

We need to accomplish two things: get the current number of contagious people very low, and get the effective reproduction number permanently below one. We haven't done either, yet.

There are credible experts who think diagnosis and contact-tracing can work, when combined with a sustainable level of social distancing. I think we'll need to come up with some innovative stuff.

That means checking out a large number of options that are each very unlikely to be worthwhile, to find a few that are. Maybe we can dilute dish soap down to a level where it's harmless to spray it the way some municipalities spray for mosquito control, and have that decrease the viability of the virus on surfaces. Maybe blacklight bulbs like people sometimes use for novelty party lighting will turn out to produce enough UV to shorten virus viability in aerosol droplets, while still being at a level of UV exposure that's safe for people. Maybe HVAC systems can be reconfigured to decrease transmission via aerosol. Maybe it's worthwhile to use infrared cameras to detect fever. Maybe we should all wash our hands with jalapeño juice a few times, to train ourselves not to touch our faces. Maybe there's something we can take via inhaler to decrease the chances of catching the virus if we're exposed to it while the chemical is still in our respiratory mucus. Maybe one of the coronaviruses that cause common cold will turn out to be protective, and we can inoculate ourselves with it.

Even if some of these turn out to be useful (or more likely, if some of the other thousands of similarly hare-brained ideas that one can come up with do), we can't reopen until we find and implement them, and have done so on a pilot scale long enough to know they're ok.

Evidence of poor reading and comprehension skills. Improvement is required.

No one knows whether Biden is innocent, except Biden himself. We don't have The Truth. We have the evidence.

I'd have to disagree with that assessment. I have more evidence than most here if not all here. The evidence I have comes from 40+ years of following Biden's career fairly closely. I know he didn't do this or anything like this. I trust him and I believe him.

But, I fully understand why you can't know or say the same.

Heh.

a "metaphorical" gun to your head? like donald threatened to destroy a girl's career and that's why they let him touch them? i'm not saying it doesn't happen, but that doesn't seem to be his thing. donald's probably just so into himself that he can't conceive of a reality in which every woman alive doesn't desperately want to jump into bed with "a star"

Fact is, he knows Biden is innocent

No one knows whether Biden is innocent, except Biden himself. We don't have The Truth. We have the evidence.

[197] of previous thread
nypoet22 wrote:

that's getting consent after the fact

Not even close. Letting someone do something because they've got a gun to your head is the opposite of consent. No matter whether the gun is literal or metaphorical, the significance is the same, as long as it's effective.

The NY Grime would disagree with you...

Every Democrat that called for more transparency from Joe Biden would disagree with you.. :D

ah, now i see what you mean. in that respect the answer depends how one defines "more" - if you mean that reade has found more media traction then yes. if you mean that there is now more substance to the allegation then no.

JL

If you don't want to talk about the FACTS, if you just want to dodge and deflect to further your HATE PRESIDENT TRUMP agenda...

Why are you here???

I'll ask again.. Did ANYONE besides President Trump make any mistakes??? It's a simple YES or NO question..

So, let me get this straight..

Biden doesn't want the American people to know how he dealt with Putin and other enemies of America..

Hmmmmmmm....

And ya'all claim President Trump is a Russian stooge???

The WHO is not immune from making mistakes in its response. As Dr. Ryan has said, the WHO will be reviewing its response in an after action review as it has done will all outbreaks and he is looking forward to that engagement to look and see where they can do better in responding to future epidemics and pandemics.

I'd like to think that the US federal government plans to do the same along with state governments to see how their response can be improved.

Because there is a lot of bad information floating around - and this place is no exception - a recap of a recent WHO press briefing on the subject of respiratory pathogens and their ability to transmit effectively and efficiently at the community level is, once again, in order, as described by Dr. Michael Ryan:

"In the first weeks of January, WHO was very, very clear - they alerted the world on 5 January; countries around the world, including the US, began to activate their incident management systems on 6 January.

"Through the next number of weeks we've produced multiple guidance and updates to countries including briefing multiple governments and scientists around the world on the developing situation and that is what it was - a developing situation. The virus was identified on 7 January and the sequence was shared with the world on 12 January.

"We're dealing with a completely new virus; in the initial reports in which there were no mentions of human-to-human transmission but rather a cluster of atypical pneumonia or pneumonia of unknown origin.

"There are literally millions and millions of cases of atypical pneumonia reported around the world every year. And, in the middle of an influenza season, sometimes it's very difficult to pick out a signal of a cluster of cases. In fact, it's quite remarkable that such a cluster was picked out - 41 confirmed cases ultimately in a cluster in Wuhan.

"There is always a risk with a respiratory pathogen that it can move from person to person. We've seen with MERS, for example, it can spread from person to person but in very particular environments - in an occupational environment and in healthcare environments.

And, when WHO issued its first guidance to countries on 10 January, it was extremely clear that respiratory precautions should be taken in dealing with patients with this disease; that labs needed to be careful in terms of their precautions when taking samples because there was a risk that the disease could spread from person to person in these environments.

"There is a difference between viruses in the potential for human to human transmission. For example, avian influenza H5N1, can spread from person to person but, it doesn't spread efficiently in community settings. It can spread in specific settings like in family, occupational and healthcare environments but it doesn't tend to spread efficiently at the community level.

"The determination was NOT whether human to human transmission was occurring. The determination was whether the virus was spreading efficiently at community level outside those environments. And, that is not an easy determination to make and one has to make that very carefully."

The WHO has provided countries with in-depth guidance throughout this outbreak beginning on 10 January with numerous updates. Up against all of this is a poorly worded tweet - imprecise and not concise - as most tweets are found lacking - bandied about throughout the comments sections of this blog at every opportunity. The WHO social media department has already learned that particular lesson!

That everyone else was perfect and mistake free...

Hmmmmm????

Funny how you only want to concentrate on President Trump's mistakes and ignore the WHO's mistakes, the CDC's mistakes and the Democrat's mistakes.

Which is exactly why you have no credibility and it's obvious that your attacks are SOLELY and COMPLETELY politically and ideologically based...

One concerns when to act.

Dr. Michael Ryan, the executive director of the Health Emergencies Programme at WHO, has already learned the lesson of when to act, as he explained at a recent press briefing as follows.

"In an epidemic or pandemic, if you need to be right before you move, you will never win; perfection is the enemy of the good when it comes to health emergency management. Speed trumps perfection; and, the problem we have in society at the moment is everyone is afraid of making a mistake. Everyone is afraid of the consequences of error.

"But, the greatest error is not to move; the greatest error is to be paralyzed by the fear of failure. That is the single biggest lesson learned by the Ebola responses. What we've learned from the Ebola outbreaks is that we have to move quickly. You need to go after the virus; you have to stop the chains of transmission; you need to engage with communities very deeply; community acceptance is hugely important.

"You need to be coordinated and coherent; you need to look at other sectoral impacts - schools, security, economic - be fast, have no regrets, be the first mover against the virus; the virus will always get you if you don't move fast.

"When speaking of the most vulnerable in our societies - that vulnerability is very important to deal with - but we cannot forget migrants, undocumented workers and prisoner in prisons; we must leave no one behind because the only way we beat this is by not leaving anyone out and working together."

I hope president Trump is listening to these WHO press briefings because they are very informative, especially for political and community leaders who must make sound decisions based on science and past experience.

Then there’s the question of how Biden presents himself. In the controlled environment of his home, Biden has had difficulty stringing together coherent sentences during online interviews and often seems confused. Trump is no great orator either, but the president comes off as Daniel Webster to Biden’s Porky Pig.
https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/biden-biggest-threat-fellow-democrats-cal-thomas

Reade *IS* a Bernie supporter... It would not surprise me if this was a Bernie supporter Op...

Adams has not denied that the complaint might exist or that it could be at the National Archives, as Biden has previously said. She has said that she legally would not be able to release the complaint or acknowledge its existence
-Senate Secretary

Once again.. The FACTS prove that Russ is full of kaa kaa.... :D

In short, she said she can't even confirm if the records exist, and not even those involved in original complaints from the time can see them.
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/biden-records-on-total-lockdown-despite-request-to-unseal-purported-reade-complaint

Russ tried to claim that the Senate stated there were NO RECORDS...

That was a bullshit claim..

While Biden has no authority over the Senate records, he CAN authorize the release of records held by Delaware University..

To date, Biden has refused to fully transparent as he claimed he would..

What is Joe Biden hiding???

It would also be nice to do that to Biden..

But I am not sure that sending another world our rapist would be a way to engender good will for First Contact..

The WHO is a tainted and unreliable source of information..

That was proven beyond ANY doubt when they touted the China company line that there was no evidence of HUMAN TO HUMAN transmission..

The WHO simply cannot be trusted..

Just pretend Trump = WHO and you'll see my point..

Here's the right one!
https://preventepidemics.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/BoxItInBriefingDoc.pdf

As lockdowns are eased and fully removed, what is suppressing transmission of the virus.

AS the WHO has repeated advised, the answer is a massive investment in public health architecture - the ability to test, isolate, contact trace and quarantine.

This piece from Dr. Frieden, which most have already seen, lays it out in great detail. I hope president Trump will finally understand what he should do.

https://www.bing.com/videos/search?q=prism+take+me+to+the+kaptin&view=detail&mid=C042EEE24C12301D1EE0C042EEE24C12301D1EE0&FORM=VIRE0&ru=%2fsearch%3fq%3dprism%2btake%2bme%2bto%2bthe%2bkaptin%26form%3dEDGEAR%26qs%3dPF%26cvid%3dfa965cc88dba45c0aea1dd9e925d7289%26cc%3dUS%26setlang%3den-US%26elv%3dAQj93OAhDTi*HzTv1paQdnjdUHuuKXZhE%2521n8RIVJ*cCxZnFoDlJZsJUhaUZkO1aDJTmKP4C4Vs6VI3cRrR1x*OXb6ov5ksdSYBMdaoKUgCbq%26plvar%3d0

Not what I asked..

I asked if Tara Reade became more than just me pushing Liz's buttons.. It obviously has based on all the facts I have laid it..

The NY GRIME would not be calling for Biden to release the Delaware papers if this was just a case of me pushing Liz's buttons..

If it will become MORE from this point that is a question..

But it's undeniable it's moved beyond just me pushing Liz's buttons.

You just HAVE to know that there is another complaint out there waiting to happen..

The only question is, will it come before Biden is the official nominee or afterwards, when Democrats are stuck with Biden..

Wouldn't you agree???

not at the moment. there's always the potential for something more to materialize in the future, but as of right now there's no there there.

JL

Never thought that at all..

But you *ARE* one of the very few people here who can actually be reasoned with.. Who CAN step back and see the logic and rational thought behind a certain course of action..

You demonstrated that when you joined me in calling for full and complete transparency from Joe Biden..

I can say with certainty that I will not be conversing with you anymore, Michale, because you are no longer worth the time or effort.

Hokay... :D

See ya tomorrow.. :D

If my comments were meaningless, they wouldn't get you so uptight... :D

unless some sort of smoking gun shows up, that's just not realistic.

Bernie being the nominee is not realistic, I agree... But not because of any lack of validity of Tara Reade's rape criminal complaint..

But it IS an interesting dynamic to contemplate.. If the DNC/Democrats DO force Joe Biden to step aside because of Tara Reade and does NOT endorse Sanders...???

Bernie Bros will vote Trump en masse... Right MC???

Regardless, it's become apparent that the Tara Reade accusation is far far FAR beyond simply me pushing Liz's buttons..

Wouldn't you agree???

While everyone here knows that I can't stay away from here, I can say with certainty that I will not be conversing with you anymore, Michale, because you are no longer worth the time or effort.

But I'll make a deal with ya..

Ya'all "take a break" from bashing President Trump day in and day out, 24/7....

Ya'all do that and I'll take a break about commenting on the facts about Joe Biden..

Say til the Friday FTP, no Trump bashing, no Biden bashing..

Deal???

Just the facts, ma'am...

Just the facts...

If it weren't for me, we would have no facts here at all.. :D

Ya'all were wrong on the Russia Collusion Delusion.. I was dead on ballz accurate..

Ya'all were wrong on the Faux Impeachment Coup.. I was dead on ballz accurate..

Ya'all were wrong on the Tara Reade going away issue.. I was dead on ballz accurate..

You see the pattern?? :D

There are no other accounts of women accusing Biden of sexual assault. The Senate has no records of anyone filing complaints against him for sexual harassment or sexual assault for all of his time in Congress.

Dance, Russ!!! DANCE!!! :D

First of all, that is not factually accurate.. The SecSenate has stated they cannot release records.. She is NOT saying there are no records of Biden's sexual assaults...

Biden was thoroughly vetted before becoming Obama’s pick to be his VP.

And Kavanaugh was ALSO thoroughly vetted before his ascension to a lesser court..

That didn't stop you from calling for Kavanaugh's lynching..

Face the facts, Russ..

Yer in the wrong here... Just like you ALWAYS have been in the wrong..

But, by all means.. Continue to dance to my tune.. I love it!! :D

In Joe's own words..

He doesn't want his position papers released because they can be used against him in a campaign..

Hmmmmmm

So, Biden himself is confessing to wrong-doing....

"He hasn’t been vetted. People haven’t seen the 2020 version of Joe Biden," McDaniel said.
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/elections/2020/05/03/joe-biden-addresses-tara-reade-assault-allegation-voter-reaction-still-unknown/3064417001/

That interview did much more harm than good.. That nearly 10-second DEER IN THE HEADLIGHTS action totally exposed Joe Biden as a rapist and a liar..

If Joe Biden wants *ANY* chance of making it thru this with his skin intact he will commit to full transparency and release all the Delaware papers..

Failure to do so will be an admission of guilt..

To all the Democratic voters who decided that they couldn’t vote for a woman in the Presidential primaries because other people wouldn’t, may this moment be a reckoning. Elizabeth Warren might have been the presumptive Democratic candidate right now. Moderates might prefer to imagine Amy Klobuchar or Kamala Harris in the role. But none of the women in the race were likely to be accused of sexual harassment. Instead, here we are, having to parse and assess and judge, with inevitably limited knowledge, another allegation of sexual misconduct against another older male politician. Democrats are struggling with the unasked-for moral dilemma of whether it is hypocritical to question the veracity of Joe Biden’s accuser, Tara Reade, when so many of them had fully embraced the #MeToo movement’s (always too simplistic) exhortation to “believe women.” Maybe some of those who couldn’t bring themselves to vote for Bernie Sanders, because they worried that he was too radical for general-election voters, might want to reappraise their choice, too. Medicare for All sounds better than ever in a pandemic that every day exposes the brutal inequities in our health-care system. And Sanders, although he is of the same generation as Biden, never seems to have had his retro pol’s reputation for handsiness and gaffes.
https://www.newyorker.com/news/daily-comment/joe-biden-tara-reade-and-the-democrats-unasked-for-dilemma

Yunno... It's funny..

During the Blasey-Ford bullshit accusations, ALL WOMEN ARE TO BE BELIEVED was sacrosanct.. NO ONE questioned it... It was politically, the supreme law of the land.. EVERYONE, including ya'all here in Weigantia, jumped on the ALL WOMEN ARE TO BE BELIEVED bandwagon.. It was unquestionable...

Now that it's Biden being accused, ALL of the sudden, the mantra is questioned.. suspect... label'ed as too simple... not realistic..

Even here in Weigantia, the complete and utter 180 is palpable...

And yet, it's the EXACT same saying..

ALL WOMEN ARE TO BE BELIEVED...

The saying itself hasn't changed one iota..

Before.... ya'all (and Trump/America haters everywhere) fell all over themselves and issued blood oaths in support of ALL WOMEN ARE TO BE BELIEVED... It was the last thing ya'all intoned to yerselves before ya'all went to bed and it was the first thing ya'all swore to when you woke in the morning..

Now ya'all (and Trump/America haters everywhere) can't distance yerselves FAR enough from it.. NOW, it's toxic and blase and totally false...

I mean, think about it people.. When it comes to integrity and credibility..

Ya'all (and Trump/America haters everywhere) just failed..

Completely.. Utterly... EPIC-LY...

Failed..

I mean, if we're talking credibility here.. Ya'all's taken a HUGE hit...

What blood oath, what absolute truth will ya'all toss away next in the interests of Party agenda???

What's the next belief or principle that will be too inconvenient to adhere to??

Hmmmmm???

:D

You people have your own Trump in Biden now... :D

You come to understand how Americans can support President Trump now...

And you'll support Biden no matter how many nasty crimes he has committed because your Party bigotry is the biggest part of ya'all...

Biden could rape someone on 5th Ave in broad daylight with 1000 witnesses and ya'all would STILL vote for Biden for President..

THAT is the depth of your hatred and bigotry towards President Trump..

Must be tough looking in a mirror, eh? :D

And THERE is the $64,000 question..

If those Delaware papers will PROVE that Tara Reade is lying, why won't Joe release them???

Joe Biden has the means to end this once and for all..

The fact that he doesn't... The fact that he refuses transparency... The fact that he still hides crucial evidence....

Is de-facto proof he is guilty..

This is indisputable...

For anyone who shares the widespread conviction that ousting Trump from office in November is a political imperative, admitting the credibility of Reade’s claims at this moment is painful and inconvenient indeed. There is nevertheless a moral obligation that we do so. If the Me Too movement means anything, it is that victims must not be swept aside and ignored, impugned, erased, and silenced when their claims are difficult to countenance—most notably, when the person they are accusing is someone we want to believe in.

And that is why the #MeToo movement is meaningless.. As I said at the time, the FIRST time a prominent Democrat is accused, #MeToo will rush to the defense of that prominent Democrat and lead the charge to sweep aside, ignore, impugn, erase and silence the accuser, the victim of rape..

And THAT is what #MeToo... And ya'all have done... Sweep aside... Ignore... Impugn... Erase... and silence the victim of rape..

Once again, I called it dead on ballz accurate...

It's tough being factually accurate all the time..

But it's a bear I must cross....

Yet Maureen Dowd wrote in The New York Times: “I’ve covered Biden my entire political career, and he is known for being sometimes warmly, sometimes inappropriately, hands-on with men and women. What Reade accuses him of is a crime and seems completely out of character.” Such sentiments betray a failure to understand that Biden’s demonstrably “inappropriate” behavior emanates from the same sense of privileged male entitlement that often underlies more serious sexual breaches, including sexual assault of the kind Reade alleges. The reporters for the New York Times article on April 12 first exploring Reade’s allegations in that venue made a similar mistake, when they initially wrote that they “found no pattern of sexual misconduct by Mr. Biden, beyond the hugs, kisses and touching that women previously said made them uncomfortable.” This is sexual misconduct, as was repeatedly pointed out on Twitter. (The paper subsequently deleted the “beyond” addendum—though without issuing a correction notice—leaving the sentence more coherent but less accurate.)

What's really scary about Joe Biden is that this handsy touchy feely, rapey actions extend to little girls as well..

https://cdn-0.reformationcharlotte.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/biden.jpg

Joe Biden will not be President Of The United States... He will likely not even be the Dumbocrat nominee...

You heard it here first...

Joe Biden has a rape criminal complaint hanging over him like the Sword Of Damocles...

There is not a single solitary sexual criminal complaint hanging over President Trump...

Such evidence supplements several other accounts that corroborate elements of Reade’s story—from her brother, two anonymous friends, a former colleague, and footage from Reade’s late mother, who called into Larry King Live a few months after the alleged incident in 1993 to seek advice on behalf of her daughter.
https://www.thenation.com/article/politics/tara-reade-biden-allegations/

How is Joe Biden any different than what accuse Trump of doing??

President Trump talked about it..

Joe Biden DID it...

And yet, it's President Trump is the bad guy...

Tara Reade is your penance for believing Blasey-Ford and Swetnick without so much a a scintilla of fact....

What goes around comes around..

Tara Reade proves beyond ANY doubt that, according to you, Trump and Biden operate at the same end of the spectrum...

Speaking of which...

It's likely a window to how rich men are...

Shall we talk about Bill Clinton???

I am sure he said things much worse of Jeffery Epstein's LOLITA EXPRESS...

Funny how you don't want to talk about THAT, eh??

It's ALL about Trump.. Every Democrat is perfect.. :eyeroll:

The virus is unlikely to go on vacation all summer long just because school is out. The deaths will continue to pile up between now and November, slowly or quickly, and voters will have reason to remember just how badly Trump botched things.

You wanna bet??? I know, I know.. That's how you and the other Democrats WANT it to be.. Ya'all WANT to see Americans suffer and die, just so you can attack President Trump..

How yer able to sleep at night is truly one of life's greatest mysteries..

Both..

They should both be weighed..

The medical data proves that, beyond a small group, the chances of surviving covid-19 are up to 99.03%...

We also know for a fact the devastating effect the shutdowns have on the American economy...

When one balances the two, logically and rationally, the way forward is clear..

However, I readily concede that, when one wants to destroy Americans and their lives and livelihoods out of hate and bigotry, as Democrats want to do.....

The way forward is considerably more murky and unclear..

Democrats have already been waging the war for public opinion on the coronavirus response efforts to date. For the most part, they've been winning this argument.

HA!! :D

"Yea.. In your bra!!"
-Jim Carrey, LIAR LIAR

The American people know what Democrats were doing when President Trump's focus SHOULD have been on this pandemic..

Democrats were trying to nullify a free, fair, legal, duly, democratic and CONSTITUTIONAL election...

Americans won't forget that come Nov...

While this country faced it's most dire threat to date, Democrats were trying to assassinate President Trump..

But when we've already had such an emergency -- indeed, at the start of the election year -- then an incumbent president is going to get graded by the voters on how he handled it. This is pretty much inescapable. Which is why this particular waiting period we find ourselves in now could be crucial come November. If the voters think: "We reopened and it didn't go too badly," then Trump will still have a chance of winning. If, however, the voters are thinking: "Trump reopened too fast, and things got much worse for much longer than was necessary," then he is likely going to lose the election no matter what else happens in the meantime.

We will be past this (except for some Democrat holdouts who LOVE martial law et al) by June.. And President Trump is going to be lauded by patriotic Americans for the awesome job he has done..

Come Nov, he will win re-election...

I will make ANY wager on that anyone has to balls to challenge me with.. :D

That is how sure I am of my facts.. :D

And if anyone does want to challenge me??? Keep in mind.. When it comes to President Trump.. I have **NEVER** been wrong... :D

JL

well it's certainly not the sort of confession that would hold up in criminal court. civil court, possibly...

It's not any sort of confession, period...

but in the court of public opinion

Seems to me that all ya'all care about is the court of public opinion.. When it goes your way.. :D

COPO was against the Russia Collusion delusion..

COPO was against the Faux Impeachment Coup..

:D

But regardless, Trump's boorish locker room braggadocio was not a confession in any way, shape or form...

an ode to the planet …

https://www.bing.com/videos/search?q=prism+take+me+to+the+kaptin&view=detail&mid=C042EEE24C12301D1EE0C042EEE24C12301D1EE0&FORM=VIRE0&ru=%2fsearch%3fq%3dprism%2btake%2bme%2bto%2bthe%2bkaptin%26form%3dEDGEAR%26qs%3dPF%26cvid%3dfa965cc88dba45c0aea1dd9e925d7289%26cc%3dUS%26setlang%3den-US%26elv%3dAQj93OAhDTi*HzTv1paQdnjdUHuuKXZhE%2521n8RIVJ*cCxZnFoDlJZsJUhaUZkO1aDJTmKP4C4Vs6VI3cRrR1x*OXb6ov5ksdSYBMdaoKUgCbq%26plvar%3d0

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hkg-bzTHeAk

I hope this lesson doesn't have to be learned the hard way.

But, while we're waiting, here is some fodder for thought and action:

https://www.nytimes.com/2020/04/10/opinion/trump-coronavirus-emergency-powers.html

Trump shows that he cannot lead this nation and our citizens in mourning those lost to this epidemic. How does Trump respond to former President George W. Bush message of hope and calling on all Americans to unite in this time of hardship? Trump complains that Bush did not defend his actions that led to Trump being impeached... because that is what truly matters to Americans right now!

Trump has tanked our nation’s economy with his mishandling of this pandemic! Trump killed thousands of Americans with his incompetence and his refusal to put the well-being of our country ahead of Trump’s re-election bid.

If only that will have any discernable impact on who wins in November.

We both know stronger forces are work here.