<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Iowa Up For Grabs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.chrisweigant.com/2020/01/28/iowa-up-for-grabs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2020/01/28/iowa-up-for-grabs/</link>
	<description>Reality-based political commentary</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 07:43:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Kick</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2020/01/28/iowa-up-for-grabs/#comment-152723</link>
		<dc:creator>Kick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jan 2020 23:30:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=18010#comment-152723</guid>
		<description>Russ
81

&lt;i&gt;I imagine the Russians have plenty of video from Lindsey’s time in Palm Springs that they’ve used against him. &lt;/i&gt;

Well, Miss Lindsey was informed by the FBI in August 2016 that his email was hacked by Russia in June 2016. Yes, sir.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Russ<br />
81</p>
<p><i>I imagine the Russians have plenty of video from Lindsey’s time in Palm Springs that they’ve used against him. </i></p>
<p>Well, Miss Lindsey was informed by the FBI in August 2016 that his email was hacked by Russia in June 2016. Yes, sir.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kick</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2020/01/28/iowa-up-for-grabs/#comment-152722</link>
		<dc:creator>Kick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jan 2020 23:20:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=18010#comment-152722</guid>
		<description>Russ
80

&lt;i&gt;Not as much as I love you, darling! Devon is starting to get jealous I think. &lt;/i&gt;

No worries, my lovelies; anyone who is a &lt;b&gt;bona fide&lt;/b&gt; crime fighter has all my love too. 

&lt;i&gt;My spirit animal is the Fox from the Masked Singer.&lt;/i&gt;

The costume......... or the fox inside the Fox? ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Russ<br />
80</p>
<p><i>Not as much as I love you, darling! Devon is starting to get jealous I think. </i></p>
<p>No worries, my lovelies; anyone who is a <b>bona fide</b> crime fighter has all my love too. </p>
<p><i>My spirit animal is the Fox from the Masked Singer.</i></p>
<p>The costume......... or the fox inside the Fox? ;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ListenWhenYouHear</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2020/01/28/iowa-up-for-grabs/#comment-152716</link>
		<dc:creator>ListenWhenYouHear</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jan 2020 20:58:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=18010#comment-152716</guid>
		<description>Kick,

&lt;I&gt;Ain&#039;t that the truth; we&#039;re looking at you Miss Lindsey.&lt;/i&gt;

I actually feel sorry for her...I remember how horrible it was living in fear that somebody was going to expose me and my secret.  Granted, at the time I was working for a company that made employees sign a document stating that we would refrain from any homosexual activities (yet they had a male flag dancer perform for the entertainment at one of our conferences — seriously, I swear they were completely oblivious to the irony!).  

I imagine the Russians have plenty of video from Lindsey’s time in Palm Springs that they’ve used against him.  Honesty is the best policy...which is why the Republican Party is perfect for closet cases!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kick,</p>
<p><i>Ain't that the truth; we're looking at you Miss Lindsey.</i></p>
<p>I actually feel sorry for her...I remember how horrible it was living in fear that somebody was going to expose me and my secret.  Granted, at the time I was working for a company that made employees sign a document stating that we would refrain from any homosexual activities (yet they had a male flag dancer perform for the entertainment at one of our conferences — seriously, I swear they were completely oblivious to the irony!).  </p>
<p>I imagine the Russians have plenty of video from Lindsey’s time in Palm Springs that they’ve used against him.  Honesty is the best policy...which is why the Republican Party is perfect for closet cases!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ListenWhenYouHear</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2020/01/28/iowa-up-for-grabs/#comment-152713</link>
		<dc:creator>ListenWhenYouHear</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jan 2020 20:14:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=18010#comment-152713</guid>
		<description>Kick,

&lt;I&gt;*laughs* Have I told you lately that I love you? XOXOXO

My spirit animal is a honey badger.&lt;/i&gt;

Not as much as I love you, darling!   Devon is starting to get jealous I think. 

My spirit animal is the Fox from the Masked Singer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kick,</p>
<p><i>*laughs* Have I told you lately that I love you? XOXOXO</p>
<p>My spirit animal is a honey badger.</i></p>
<p>Not as much as I love you, darling!   Devon is starting to get jealous I think. </p>
<p>My spirit animal is the Fox from the Masked Singer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ListenWhenYouHear</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2020/01/28/iowa-up-for-grabs/#comment-152709</link>
		<dc:creator>ListenWhenYouHear</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jan 2020 19:39:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=18010#comment-152709</guid>
		<description>&lt;B&gt;Senator Biden is not, has never been, and never will be the mirror image of conservatives or their prejudices.&lt;/b&gt;

Not what I was saying.  A mirror can only show the physical similarities, not what is on the inside.  Conservatives are more frightened by the differences in us than anything else. My point was that Biden looks like them, making him the least threatening Democrat to conservatives.  Remember, these are the least informed people in this country.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>Senator Biden is not, has never been, and never will be the mirror image of conservatives or their prejudices.</b></p>
<p>Not what I was saying.  A mirror can only show the physical similarities, not what is on the inside.  Conservatives are more frightened by the differences in us than anything else. My point was that Biden looks like them, making him the least threatening Democrat to conservatives.  Remember, these are the least informed people in this country.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kick</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2020/01/28/iowa-up-for-grabs/#comment-152707</link>
		<dc:creator>Kick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jan 2020 19:34:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=18010#comment-152707</guid>
		<description>Russ
76

&lt;i&gt;And Mayor Pete... well, let’s just point out the obvious — there are too many self-loathing closet-case-cowards in the GOP to ever follow him as president. &lt;/i&gt;

Ain&#039;t that the truth; we&#039;re looking at you Miss Lindsey.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Russ<br />
76</p>
<p><i>And Mayor Pete... well, let’s just point out the obvious — there are too many self-loathing closet-case-cowards in the GOP to ever follow him as president. </i></p>
<p>Ain't that the truth; we're looking at you Miss Lindsey.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elizabeth Miller</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2020/01/28/iowa-up-for-grabs/#comment-152649</link>
		<dc:creator>Elizabeth Miller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jan 2020 04:00:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=18010#comment-152649</guid>
		<description>Russ,

&lt;I&gt;Maybe Joe Biden would be the best candidate for the Democrats to pick because he’s an older, white, heterosexual man. &lt;/I&gt;

That is most decidedly NOT why Biden might be the best candidate.

&lt;I&gt;Seriously, Joe might be the only candidate that has any chance of getting any bipartisan legislation passed.&lt;/I&gt;

You&#039;re getting a bit closer.

&lt;I&gt;I hate to think that this is really where we are in our world today, but conservatives prejudices might just be too powerful for them to accept anything more than their own mirror images.&lt;/I&gt;

Now, you&#039;re way off base, again. 

Senator Biden is not, has never been, and never will be the mirror image of conservatives or their prejudices.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Russ,</p>
<p><i>Maybe Joe Biden would be the best candidate for the Democrats to pick because he’s an older, white, heterosexual man. </i></p>
<p>That is most decidedly NOT why Biden might be the best candidate.</p>
<p><i>Seriously, Joe might be the only candidate that has any chance of getting any bipartisan legislation passed.</i></p>
<p>You're getting a bit closer.</p>
<p><i>I hate to think that this is really where we are in our world today, but conservatives prejudices might just be too powerful for them to accept anything more than their own mirror images.</i></p>
<p>Now, you're way off base, again. </p>
<p>Senator Biden is not, has never been, and never will be the mirror image of conservatives or their prejudices.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ListenWhenYouHear</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2020/01/28/iowa-up-for-grabs/#comment-152644</link>
		<dc:creator>ListenWhenYouHear</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jan 2020 01:18:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=18010#comment-152644</guid>
		<description>Maybe Joe Biden would be the best candidate for the Democrats to pick because he’s an older, white, heterosexual man.  Look at the remaining candidates in the Democrats field and they each have something the Republicans will focus on to claim is the reason that they will not work with him.  
Warren and Klobuchar are women...do you think the Republicans will do anything that would help a female president succeed?  

Obama showed us that the Republicans will not risk someone that isn’t a carbon copy of how they view “real Americans” doing great things in their leadership of our country out of the fear that it would lead to their own base’s acceptance of those the GOP needs their base to fear and hate in order to win re-election.  

Bernie’s long associating as a “socialist” will keep the GOP using out-dated definitions of “socialism” to justify opposing his every move.  

And Mayor Pete... well, let’s just point out the obvious — there are too many self-loathing closet-case-cowards in the GOP to ever follow him as president.   Their acceptance of his openness concerning his sexual orientation would only serve as a constant reminder of their choosing to deny their true selves from ever living their lives honestly and openly.  

And that leaves Joe Biden.  He’s WonderBread white.  He looks like them.  His family looks like their families.  He’s lost the love of his life like some of them have, he’s buried children who died too soon too..

.Joe Biden’s greatest strength might be the fact that he can blend in at any Republican function without their detecting his liberal views.  He can push a liberal agenda that they can feel safe about supporting.   Seriously, Joe might be the only candidate that has any chance of getting any bipartisan legislation passed.

I hate to think that this is really where we are in our world today, but conservatives prejudices might just be too powerful for them  to accept anything more than their own mirror images</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe Joe Biden would be the best candidate for the Democrats to pick because he’s an older, white, heterosexual man.  Look at the remaining candidates in the Democrats field and they each have something the Republicans will focus on to claim is the reason that they will not work with him.<br />
Warren and Klobuchar are women...do you think the Republicans will do anything that would help a female president succeed?  </p>
<p>Obama showed us that the Republicans will not risk someone that isn’t a carbon copy of how they view “real Americans” doing great things in their leadership of our country out of the fear that it would lead to their own base’s acceptance of those the GOP needs their base to fear and hate in order to win re-election.  </p>
<p>Bernie’s long associating as a “socialist” will keep the GOP using out-dated definitions of “socialism” to justify opposing his every move.  </p>
<p>And Mayor Pete... well, let’s just point out the obvious — there are too many self-loathing closet-case-cowards in the GOP to ever follow him as president.   Their acceptance of his openness concerning his sexual orientation would only serve as a constant reminder of their choosing to deny their true selves from ever living their lives honestly and openly.  </p>
<p>And that leaves Joe Biden.  He’s WonderBread white.  He looks like them.  His family looks like their families.  He’s lost the love of his life like some of them have, he’s buried children who died too soon too..</p>
<p>.Joe Biden’s greatest strength might be the fact that he can blend in at any Republican function without their detecting his liberal views.  He can push a liberal agenda that they can feel safe about supporting.   Seriously, Joe might be the only candidate that has any chance of getting any bipartisan legislation passed.</p>
<p>I hate to think that this is really where we are in our world today, but conservatives prejudices might just be too powerful for them  to accept anything more than their own mirror images</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kick</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2020/01/28/iowa-up-for-grabs/#comment-152643</link>
		<dc:creator>Kick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jan 2020 00:14:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=18010#comment-152643</guid>
		<description>MtnCaddy
52

&lt;i&gt;Reaganism® &lt;/i&gt;

You are &lt;b&gt;required&lt;/b&gt; to explain how you did that &quot;thingy&quot; on this website. 

&lt;i&gt;Reaganism&#039;s® &lt;/i&gt; &lt;--- that &quot;thingy&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MtnCaddy<br />
52</p>
<p><i>Reaganism® </i></p>
<p>You are <b>required</b> to explain how you did that "thingy" on this website. </p>
<p><i>Reaganism's® </i> &lt;--- that &quot;thingy&quot;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kick</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2020/01/28/iowa-up-for-grabs/#comment-152642</link>
		<dc:creator>Kick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jan 2020 00:04:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=18010#comment-152642</guid>
		<description>Mike
36

&lt;i&gt;It just gives me a hearty belly laugh when I hear ya&#039;all claim Texas will go blue.. :D &lt;/i&gt;

The dumb asses in the Texas GOP were laughing it up too... until they lost their supermajority and a whole lot of seats at the state representative level and contributed two of the 40 seats to the Blue Wave of 2018 at the federal level. Poor Will Hurd... barely held onto a huge chunk of Texas on the Eastern border... 800 miles... bigly chunk of big Tex. I wouldn&#039;t want to be Will Hurd in 2020... oh, wait! I am being told Will Hurd is retiring... seems a little young for that, but okay. *laughs*

&lt;b&gt;So to recap&lt;/b&gt;: 

The dumb asses in the Texas GOP ain&#039;t laughing no more, their candidates are retiring to spend more time with their families. #Texodus</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mike<br />
36</p>
<p><i>It just gives me a hearty belly laugh when I hear ya'all claim Texas will go blue.. :D </i></p>
<p>The dumb asses in the Texas GOP were laughing it up too... until they lost their supermajority and a whole lot of seats at the state representative level and contributed two of the 40 seats to the Blue Wave of 2018 at the federal level. Poor Will Hurd... barely held onto a huge chunk of Texas on the Eastern border... 800 miles... bigly chunk of big Tex. I wouldn't want to be Will Hurd in 2020... oh, wait! I am being told Will Hurd is retiring... seems a little young for that, but okay. *laughs*</p>
<p><b>So to recap</b>: </p>
<p>The dumb asses in the Texas GOP ain't laughing no more, their candidates are retiring to spend more time with their families. #Texodus</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kick</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2020/01/28/iowa-up-for-grabs/#comment-152641</link>
		<dc:creator>Kick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jan 2020 23:43:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=18010#comment-152641</guid>
		<description>Mike
21&#124;23

&lt;i&gt;Remind me again how Texas is turning Blue?? I seem to have forgotten what with all the FACTS that prove otherwise.. :D &lt;/i&gt;

Sure, no problem; although, you seem to have answered your own question in your quote at 23 where I was discussing the flipping of seats in Texas at the Federal level. Just read it again since you&#039;ve admittedly forgotten: 

&lt;blockquote&gt;Parts of Texas will flip; of that there is zero doubt. Democratic candidates in Texas defeated longtime GOP incumbents in Houston and Dallas in the 2018 midterms, and there are six other Republican House members who won reelection to their districts in 2018 by five points or less. Of those six House members, Reps. Will Hurd, Kenny Marchant and Pete Olson have chosen to retire, and Reps. Michael McCaul, Chip Roy and John Carter will face tough reelections they used to take for granted.

Texas has a lot of transplants from California and other Blue states, and the demographics are changing fast. It&#039;s not a matter of if Texas will flip but when Texas will flip, and regardless of when the GOP will take a whipping and Texas will be flipping, it&#039;s going to take a whole lot of money and an inordinate amount of time to defend her that the GOP is used to spending elsewhere. 

Meanwhile, New York and California show no signs whatsoever of moving even a scintilla so when Texas flips, the GOP as we know it will be gone, and they know it. :) &lt;/blockquote&gt;

&lt;i&gt;And the GOP just kicked the shit out of the Dumbocrat in Houston.. &lt;/i&gt;

Incorrect. Fort Bend is not Houston... however, close. The GOP did just hold onto a Red Texas state seat in Fort Bend... TX House District 28 (which you posted). Good for Gates; although, it did cost him $1.5 million of his personal fortune, as noted in the article you posted. That&#039;s not money they&#039;re used to having to spend to defend those GOP heavily gerrymandered districts they drew up... cha-ching... money that could have been better spent elsewhere in 2020 to defend other seats. I hope Mr. Gates has his checkbook ready for later in the year. 

But enough about Fort Bend; as for Houston, there actually was also a special election yesterday in TX House District 148 (which you didn&#039;t mention at all) which actually is in Houston, and Democrat Anna Eastman won that one by about a 2-1 margin... because Houston is deep-deep Blue with a blueberry on top. Eastman is succeeding Democrat Jessica Farrar who had held that seat in Houston for the past &lt;b&gt;25 years&lt;/b&gt;... because Houston is deep-deep Blue. 

So those seats in those two special elections held yesterday remain Red and Blue, respectively, but as for that reminder you asked for about Texas turning Blue, I reposted the &lt;b&gt;federal&lt;/b&gt; level information in the blockquote above, and as for the Texas &lt;b&gt;state&lt;/b&gt; level information: 

&lt;blockquote&gt;In the Texas state senate, the GOP lost their supermajority status in November 2018 after failing to hold onto the minimum 21 seats necessary to do so. In the Texas state senate, 15 out of the 31 seats were up for election, and the Republican majority was reduced:

21-10
19-12 

One GOP incumbent was defeated in the primary, and two more GOP incumbents were defeated in the general election.

In the Texas state representatives elections, all 150 seats were up for reelection in 2018, where the Republican majority in those elections was reduced:

93-55
83-67 

&lt;/blockquote&gt;

So, as I said, Texas is flipping Blue, and as for Houston, it is Bluer than a blueberry pie with blue sprinkles on top and has been for multiple decades and likely shall remain ever thus. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mike<br />
21|23</p>
<p><i>Remind me again how Texas is turning Blue?? I seem to have forgotten what with all the FACTS that prove otherwise.. :D </i></p>
<p>Sure, no problem; although, you seem to have answered your own question in your quote at 23 where I was discussing the flipping of seats in Texas at the Federal level. Just read it again since you've admittedly forgotten: </p>
<blockquote><p>Parts of Texas will flip; of that there is zero doubt. Democratic candidates in Texas defeated longtime GOP incumbents in Houston and Dallas in the 2018 midterms, and there are six other Republican House members who won reelection to their districts in 2018 by five points or less. Of those six House members, Reps. Will Hurd, Kenny Marchant and Pete Olson have chosen to retire, and Reps. Michael McCaul, Chip Roy and John Carter will face tough reelections they used to take for granted.</p>
<p>Texas has a lot of transplants from California and other Blue states, and the demographics are changing fast. It's not a matter of if Texas will flip but when Texas will flip, and regardless of when the GOP will take a whipping and Texas will be flipping, it's going to take a whole lot of money and an inordinate amount of time to defend her that the GOP is used to spending elsewhere. </p>
<p>Meanwhile, New York and California show no signs whatsoever of moving even a scintilla so when Texas flips, the GOP as we know it will be gone, and they know it. :) </p></blockquote>
<p><i>And the GOP just kicked the shit out of the Dumbocrat in Houston.. </i></p>
<p>Incorrect. Fort Bend is not Houston... however, close. The GOP did just hold onto a Red Texas state seat in Fort Bend... TX House District 28 (which you posted). Good for Gates; although, it did cost him $1.5 million of his personal fortune, as noted in the article you posted. That's not money they're used to having to spend to defend those GOP heavily gerrymandered districts they drew up... cha-ching... money that could have been better spent elsewhere in 2020 to defend other seats. I hope Mr. Gates has his checkbook ready for later in the year. </p>
<p>But enough about Fort Bend; as for Houston, there actually was also a special election yesterday in TX House District 148 (which you didn't mention at all) which actually is in Houston, and Democrat Anna Eastman won that one by about a 2-1 margin... because Houston is deep-deep Blue with a blueberry on top. Eastman is succeeding Democrat Jessica Farrar who had held that seat in Houston for the past <b>25 years</b>... because Houston is deep-deep Blue. </p>
<p>So those seats in those two special elections held yesterday remain Red and Blue, respectively, but as for that reminder you asked for about Texas turning Blue, I reposted the <b>federal</b> level information in the blockquote above, and as for the Texas <b>state</b> level information: </p>
<blockquote><p>In the Texas state senate, the GOP lost their supermajority status in November 2018 after failing to hold onto the minimum 21 seats necessary to do so. In the Texas state senate, 15 out of the 31 seats were up for election, and the Republican majority was reduced:</p>
<p>21-10<br />
19-12 </p>
<p>One GOP incumbent was defeated in the primary, and two more GOP incumbents were defeated in the general election.</p>
<p>In the Texas state representatives elections, all 150 seats were up for reelection in 2018, where the Republican majority in those elections was reduced:</p>
<p>93-55<br />
83-67 </p>
</blockquote>
<p>So, as I said, Texas is flipping Blue, and as for Houston, it is Bluer than a blueberry pie with blue sprinkles on top and has been for multiple decades and likely shall remain ever thus. :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kick</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2020/01/28/iowa-up-for-grabs/#comment-152639</link>
		<dc:creator>Kick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jan 2020 21:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=18010#comment-152639</guid>
		<description>Russ
16

&lt;i&gt;Trump is a narcissistic sociopath, and those don’t exist in the animal world as far as we know. There was that one hamster in Germany, but it just ate its young and didn’t want to have sex with them... so it doesn’t quite fit for Trump’s spirit animal. &lt;/i&gt;

*laughs* Have I told you lately that I love you? XOXOXO

My spirit animal is a honey badger.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4r7wHMg5Yjg</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Russ<br />
16</p>
<p><i>Trump is a narcissistic sociopath, and those don’t exist in the animal world as far as we know. There was that one hamster in Germany, but it just ate its young and didn’t want to have sex with them... so it doesn’t quite fit for Trump’s spirit animal. </i></p>
<p>*laughs* Have I told you lately that I love you? XOXOXO</p>
<p>My spirit animal is a honey badger.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4r7wHMg5Yjg" rel="nofollow">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4r7wHMg5Yjg</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kick</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2020/01/28/iowa-up-for-grabs/#comment-152638</link>
		<dc:creator>Kick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jan 2020 21:01:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=18010#comment-152638</guid>
		<description>MtnCaddy
9

&lt;i&gt;OMG I just pulled a Michale!

&quot;Somebody...stop me!&quot; &lt;/i&gt;

Don&#039;t.
Stop.
Don&#039;t stop. *laughs* Post or don&#039;t post; you decide.

I don&#039;t agree with all that, of course, do agree with some of that, but I just wanted to say I am impressed with the effort. Awesome effort. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MtnCaddy<br />
9</p>
<p><i>OMG I just pulled a Michale!</p>
<p>"Somebody...stop me!" </i></p>
<p>Don't.<br />
Stop.<br />
Don't stop. *laughs* Post or don't post; you decide.</p>
<p>I don't agree with all that, of course, do agree with some of that, but I just wanted to say I am impressed with the effort. Awesome effort. :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kick</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2020/01/28/iowa-up-for-grabs/#comment-152637</link>
		<dc:creator>Kick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jan 2020 20:46:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=18010#comment-152637</guid>
		<description>CW: &lt;i&gt;This might be the test of whether the dustup was real or not in the voters&#039; minds, in fact. If Warren doesn&#039;t make it out of the first voting round, then ideologically Bernie is the obvious choice for her supporters to make. &lt;/i&gt;

We&#039;ve discussed this before, but allow me to reiterate that polling exists on this topic... in fact, &quot;rolling polling&quot; that is released once a week by Morning Consult. 

https://morningconsult.com/2020-democratic-primary/

If their polling is remotely in the ballpark of being in the ballpark [does that make sense?], their data currently shows as follows:

&lt;b&gt;Second Choices:
Warren Supporters&lt;/b&gt;

Bernie Sanders... 32%
Joe Biden............ 23%
Pete Buttigieg/
Amy Klobuchar... 11%

&lt;i&gt;Progressive Warren voters who get disappointed in a first-round loss could easily move over to Bernie&#039;s camp on caucus night -- but this is in no way guaranteed, if the &quot;Warren versus Bernie&quot; thing is more real than I&#039;m giving credit for. &lt;/i&gt;

Also, knowing that Sanders is their primary &quot;progressive&quot; competitor from sea to shining sea, a lot of them might be savvy voters who want to keep their candidate Warren alive and well in order to fight another day -- a day like &quot;Super Tuesday&quot; -- so that the last thing they&#039;ll wish to do is to voluntarily become the &quot;kingmakers&quot; of Bernie Sanders (or any of the other &quot;front-runners&quot; ) in Iowa. 

All these &quot;second choices&quot; and different scenarios are what make the Iowa caucuses hard to predict. Add to that, for 2020, the Iowa state party has approved 87 new additional &quot;satellite caucuses&quot; that follow an identical structure as the regular caucuses but will take place at different times and locations all across the globe so that caucus voters who can&#039;t make it to a &quot;regular&quot; caucus due to work or other facts can now participate. So there are now an added 60 in-state locations in Iowa, and -- get this -- 24 caucuses outside Iowa located in 13 states and Washington, DC and also 3 international sites in (1) Glasgow, Scotland, (2) Paris, France, and (3) Tblisi, Georgia). 

So with all this new &quot;stuff&quot; going on, all this mess is fixing to get real -- real fast -- and what in the world could possibly go wrong? :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CW: <i>This might be the test of whether the dustup was real or not in the voters' minds, in fact. If Warren doesn't make it out of the first voting round, then ideologically Bernie is the obvious choice for her supporters to make. </i></p>
<p>We've discussed this before, but allow me to reiterate that polling exists on this topic... in fact, "rolling polling" that is released once a week by Morning Consult. </p>
<p><a href="https://morningconsult.com/2020-democratic-primary/" rel="nofollow">https://morningconsult.com/2020-democratic-primary/</a></p>
<p>If their polling is remotely in the ballpark of being in the ballpark [does that make sense?], their data currently shows as follows:</p>
<p><b>Second Choices:<br />
Warren Supporters</b></p>
<p>Bernie Sanders... 32%<br />
Joe Biden............ 23%<br />
Pete Buttigieg/<br />
Amy Klobuchar... 11%</p>
<p><i>Progressive Warren voters who get disappointed in a first-round loss could easily move over to Bernie's camp on caucus night -- but this is in no way guaranteed, if the "Warren versus Bernie" thing is more real than I'm giving credit for. </i></p>
<p>Also, knowing that Sanders is their primary "progressive" competitor from sea to shining sea, a lot of them might be savvy voters who want to keep their candidate Warren alive and well in order to fight another day -- a day like "Super Tuesday" -- so that the last thing they'll wish to do is to voluntarily become the "kingmakers" of Bernie Sanders (or any of the other "front-runners" ) in Iowa. </p>
<p>All these "second choices" and different scenarios are what make the Iowa caucuses hard to predict. Add to that, for 2020, the Iowa state party has approved 87 new additional "satellite caucuses" that follow an identical structure as the regular caucuses but will take place at different times and locations all across the globe so that caucus voters who can't make it to a "regular" caucus due to work or other facts can now participate. So there are now an added 60 in-state locations in Iowa, and -- get this -- 24 caucuses outside Iowa located in 13 states and Washington, DC and also 3 international sites in (1) Glasgow, Scotland, (2) Paris, France, and (3) Tblisi, Georgia). </p>
<p>So with all this new "stuff" going on, all this mess is fixing to get real -- real fast -- and what in the world could possibly go wrong? :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2020/01/28/iowa-up-for-grabs/#comment-152636</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jan 2020 20:15:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=18010#comment-152636</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;&quot;Sir , I deeply regret the violence on our behalf by a man that most Americans have never voted for. Avoid power. A sincere man, Michael Moore&quot;&lt;/I&gt;

Yes...  That is an apology...

&lt;I&gt;Okay Michale I caught the &quot;52% of apologize for...&quot; down in the continuation of her Twitter thread, but again what does her opinion have to do with the Democratic Party?&lt;/I&gt;

You asked for quotes from Democrats..

I gave you quotes from Democrats..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>"Sir , I deeply regret the violence on our behalf by a man that most Americans have never voted for. Avoid power. A sincere man, Michael Moore"</i></p>
<p>Yes...  That is an apology...</p>
<p><i>Okay Michale I caught the "52% of apologize for..." down in the continuation of her Twitter thread, but again what does her opinion have to do with the Democratic Party?</i></p>
<p>You asked for quotes from Democrats..</p>
<p>I gave you quotes from Democrats..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MtnCaddy</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2020/01/28/iowa-up-for-grabs/#comment-152635</link>
		<dc:creator>MtnCaddy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jan 2020 20:06:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=18010#comment-152635</guid>
		<description>I got maybe 3 three hours of sleep this early morning and am not proofreading very well, so I&#039;m gonna take a break from this for a moment. Keep up the good work Weigantians!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I got maybe 3 three hours of sleep this early morning and am not proofreading very well, so I'm gonna take a break from this for a moment. Keep up the good work Weigantians!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MtnCaddy</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2020/01/28/iowa-up-for-grabs/#comment-152634</link>
		<dc:creator>MtnCaddy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jan 2020 20:03:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=18010#comment-152634</guid>
		<description>[63]

Okay Michale I caught the &quot;52% of apologize for...&quot; down in the continuation of her Twitter thread, but again what does her opinion have to do with the Democratic Party? It&#039;s the equivalent of saying &quot;ALL Republicans are Racists because David Duke likes Trump, eh?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[63]</p>
<p>Okay Michale I caught the "52% of apologize for..." down in the continuation of her Twitter thread, but again what does her opinion have to do with the Democratic Party? It's the equivalent of saying "ALL Republicans are Racists because David Duke likes Trump, eh?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MtnCaddy</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2020/01/28/iowa-up-for-grabs/#comment-152632</link>
		<dc:creator>MtnCaddy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jan 2020 19:55:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=18010#comment-152632</guid>
		<description>[56]

Okay, I read the (first) Fox news article titled,

&lt;i&gt;&quot;Michael Moore apologizes to Iran on behalf of the American people for airstrike that killed Soleimani&quot;&lt;/i&gt;

The article said that &quot;according to an automatic Twitter translation&quot; Michael Moore&#039;s Farsi tweet reads,

&lt;i&gt;&quot;Sir , I deeply regret the violence on our behalf by a man that most Americans have never voted for. Avoid power. A sincere man, Michael Moore&quot;&lt;/i&gt;

That&#039;s not an apology but rather a plea for peace, hello? My curiosity aroused, I then copy/pasted &lt;b&gt;the original tweet in Farsi&lt;/b&gt; into Google Translate, which said it reads,

&lt;i&gt;&quot;By a man whom the majority of Americans have never voted for, I want you not to respond violently but to act bravely instead and allow us, the American people, to refrain from power. Man

Honestly
Michael Moore
American citizen&quot;&lt;/i&gt;

That&#039;s even less of an apology and more of a plea for no war. But a casual Fox News consumer looking at that misleading article title likely wouldn&#039;t take the extra step of, ahem, FACT CHECKING the article.

Now if you really think that Google and Google Translate are some kind of Libtard Lie Factory then there&#039;s no helping you. G &amp; GT are search and translation engines that have no political agenda whatsoever. They&#039;ll help a fella find Daily Stormer and even translate Mein Kampf from the original German. Unless you concede, of course, that Colbert was right when he said, &quot;Reality has a well known Liberal bias.&quot; 

Thence to the second article titled,

&lt;i&gt;Rose McGowan apologizes to Iran over US airstrike on general: &#039;Please do not kill us&#039;&lt;/i&gt;

I found Ms. McGowan on Twitter and here &#039;tis:

&lt;i&gt;Ok,  so I freaked out because we may have any impending war. Sometimes it’s okay to freak out on those in power. It’s our right. That is what so many Brave soldiers have fought for. That is democracy. I do not want any more American soldiers killed. That’s it.&lt;/i&gt;

Again, where&#039;s the apology? This gal, like Mr. Moore, doesn&#039;t want to get into yet another Republican hot war in the Middle East.

Interestingly, your the hill.com article continues,

&lt;i&gt;Actress Rose McGowan apologized to Iran after the Pentagon confirmed Thursday night that President Trump ordered an airstrike that killed Qassem Soleimani, one of the country&#039;s most powerful generals. 

“52% of us humbly apologize,&quot; McGowan tweeted late Thursday. &quot;We want peace with your nation. We are being held hostage by a terrorist regime. We do not know how to escape. Please do not kill us. #Soleimani.&quot;

ADVERTISING

Dear #Iran, The USA has disrespected your country, your flag, your people. 52% of us humbly apologize. We want peace with your nation. We are being held hostage by a terrorist regime. We do not know how to escape. Please do not kill us. #Soleimani pic.twitter.com/YE54CqGCdr

— rose mcgowan (@rosemcgowan) January 3, 2020
The strike in Iraq killed Soleimani, the head of Iran&#039;s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps-Quds Force, at Baghdad International Airport alongside Abu Mahdi al-Muhandis, the deputy commander of the Iranian-backed Iraqi militia Popular Mobilization Forces. It sent shockwaves through the region, and Iran&#039;s Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei said that a “harsh retaliation is waiting” for the U.S.

McGowan continued tweeting late Thursday and early Friday, insulting Trump and responding to critics.

Thanks a lot, dickhead @realDonaldTrump

— rose mcgowan (@rosemcgowan) January 3, 2020
I do not side with Iran, but I most definitely do not side with the USA #TeamStayAlive https://t.co/ShWtvgWYqj

— rose mcgowan (@rosemcgowan) January 3, 2020
The frequent Trump critic also said, “I will never vote Republican. I want the Democrats to win because we are less likely to die.&quot;

I will never vote Republican. I want the Democrats to win because we are less likely to die. I am a conscientious objector to the USA, it’s policies, lies, corruption, nationalism, racism, and deep misogyny. It is our right and duty as citizens to dissent.

— rose mcgowan (@rosemcgowan) January 3, 2020
McGowan also tweeted that she is a registered Republican in California, saying “I will not vote Republican, but I cannot vote Democrat.”

I’m a registered Republican in California. I loathe the Clintons. I hate Trump. I will not vote Republican, but I cannot vote Democrat. I’d rather know what evil I’m getting, so I’ll go Republican. This is about WWIII, so none of that shit matters anyway. #TeamStayAlive #RoseArmy&lt;/i&gt;

So I&#039;m confused.Not only is there no apology but is she a Republican who hates Trump? Or does she hate Democrats? And... who the hell is Rose McGowan and why does anyone think that she represents anyone&#039;s view (the Democratic Party) besides her own?

It&#039;s called FACT CHECKING, Tovarishch.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[56]</p>
<p>Okay, I read the (first) Fox news article titled,</p>
<p><i>"Michael Moore apologizes to Iran on behalf of the American people for airstrike that killed Soleimani"</i></p>
<p>The article said that "according to an automatic Twitter translation" Michael Moore's Farsi tweet reads,</p>
<p><i>"Sir , I deeply regret the violence on our behalf by a man that most Americans have never voted for. Avoid power. A sincere man, Michael Moore"</i></p>
<p>That's not an apology but rather a plea for peace, hello? My curiosity aroused, I then copy/pasted <b>the original tweet in Farsi</b> into Google Translate, which said it reads,</p>
<p><i>"By a man whom the majority of Americans have never voted for, I want you not to respond violently but to act bravely instead and allow us, the American people, to refrain from power. Man</p>
<p>Honestly<br />
Michael Moore<br />
American citizen"</i></p>
<p>That's even less of an apology and more of a plea for no war. But a casual Fox News consumer looking at that misleading article title likely wouldn't take the extra step of, ahem, FACT CHECKING the article.</p>
<p>Now if you really think that Google and Google Translate are some kind of Libtard Lie Factory then there's no helping you. G &amp; GT are search and translation engines that have no political agenda whatsoever. They'll help a fella find Daily Stormer and even translate Mein Kampf from the original German. Unless you concede, of course, that Colbert was right when he said, "Reality has a well known Liberal bias." </p>
<p>Thence to the second article titled,</p>
<p><i>Rose McGowan apologizes to Iran over US airstrike on general: 'Please do not kill us'</i></p>
<p>I found Ms. McGowan on Twitter and here 'tis:</p>
<p><i>Ok,  so I freaked out because we may have any impending war. Sometimes it’s okay to freak out on those in power. It’s our right. That is what so many Brave soldiers have fought for. That is democracy. I do not want any more American soldiers killed. That’s it.</i></p>
<p>Again, where's the apology? This gal, like Mr. Moore, doesn't want to get into yet another Republican hot war in the Middle East.</p>
<p>Interestingly, your the hill.com article continues,</p>
<p><i>Actress Rose McGowan apologized to Iran after the Pentagon confirmed Thursday night that President Trump ordered an airstrike that killed Qassem Soleimani, one of the country's most powerful generals. </p>
<p>“52% of us humbly apologize," McGowan tweeted late Thursday. "We want peace with your nation. We are being held hostage by a terrorist regime. We do not know how to escape. Please do not kill us. #Soleimani."</p>
<p>ADVERTISING</p>
<p>Dear #Iran, The USA has disrespected your country, your flag, your people. 52% of us humbly apologize. We want peace with your nation. We are being held hostage by a terrorist regime. We do not know how to escape. Please do not kill us. #Soleimani pic.twitter.com/YE54CqGCdr</p>
<p>— rose mcgowan (@rosemcgowan) January 3, 2020<br />
The strike in Iraq killed Soleimani, the head of Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps-Quds Force, at Baghdad International Airport alongside Abu Mahdi al-Muhandis, the deputy commander of the Iranian-backed Iraqi militia Popular Mobilization Forces. It sent shockwaves through the region, and Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei said that a “harsh retaliation is waiting” for the U.S.</p>
<p>McGowan continued tweeting late Thursday and early Friday, insulting Trump and responding to critics.</p>
<p>Thanks a lot, dickhead @realDonaldTrump</p>
<p>— rose mcgowan (@rosemcgowan) January 3, 2020<br />
I do not side with Iran, but I most definitely do not side with the USA #TeamStayAlive <a href="https://t.co/ShWtvgWYqj" rel="nofollow">https://t.co/ShWtvgWYqj</a></p>
<p>— rose mcgowan (@rosemcgowan) January 3, 2020<br />
The frequent Trump critic also said, “I will never vote Republican. I want the Democrats to win because we are less likely to die."</p>
<p>I will never vote Republican. I want the Democrats to win because we are less likely to die. I am a conscientious objector to the USA, it’s policies, lies, corruption, nationalism, racism, and deep misogyny. It is our right and duty as citizens to dissent.</p>
<p>— rose mcgowan (@rosemcgowan) January 3, 2020<br />
McGowan also tweeted that she is a registered Republican in California, saying “I will not vote Republican, but I cannot vote Democrat.”</p>
<p>I’m a registered Republican in California. I loathe the Clintons. I hate Trump. I will not vote Republican, but I cannot vote Democrat. I’d rather know what evil I’m getting, so I’ll go Republican. This is about WWIII, so none of that shit matters anyway. #TeamStayAlive #RoseArmy</i></p>
<p>So I'm confused.Not only is there no apology but is she a Republican who hates Trump? Or does she hate Democrats? And... who the hell is Rose McGowan and why does anyone think that she represents anyone's view (the Democratic Party) besides her own?</p>
<p>It's called FACT CHECKING, Tovarishch.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nypoet22</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2020/01/28/iowa-up-for-grabs/#comment-152631</link>
		<dc:creator>nypoet22</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jan 2020 18:56:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=18010#comment-152631</guid>
		<description>i am in favor of pie-partisanship</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i am in favor of pie-partisanship</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MtnCaddy</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2020/01/28/iowa-up-for-grabs/#comment-152630</link>
		<dc:creator>MtnCaddy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jan 2020 18:46:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=18010#comment-152630</guid>
		<description>[39]

&lt;b&gt;Don Harris&lt;/b&gt;

For the record I am in agreement with you that &quot;we have the worst system of democracy that money can buy,&quot; as the saying goes. I would love a Constitutional Amendment to roll back &lt;i&gt;Citizens United&lt;/i&gt; - God damn the big money Supreme Court for inflicting this abomination upon us! I like the idea of publicly financed elections and/or small doner financed candidates, but how do we get from here to there? Bernie, Elizabeth and Andy Yang(?) are eschewing big doner meet and greets, which is probably of little more than symbolic value - ain&#039;t no big money going to the Progressives, ya dig? 

Even with public campaign financing how would we choose which 2, 3, 4 or whatever candidates would qualify for said financing. The &quot;primary before the primary&quot; to date has greatly limited the choices available. That&#039;s why Bernie and the true Progressives are such a breath of fresh air. 

Also, I would respectfully suggest that repeatedly bleating &quot;Get Real&quot; at CW is not serving the cause as well as we&#039;d like.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[39]</p>
<p><b>Don Harris</b></p>
<p>For the record I am in agreement with you that "we have the worst system of democracy that money can buy," as the saying goes. I would love a Constitutional Amendment to roll back <i>Citizens United</i> - God damn the big money Supreme Court for inflicting this abomination upon us! I like the idea of publicly financed elections and/or small doner financed candidates, but how do we get from here to there? Bernie, Elizabeth and Andy Yang(?) are eschewing big doner meet and greets, which is probably of little more than symbolic value - ain't no big money going to the Progressives, ya dig? </p>
<p>Even with public campaign financing how would we choose which 2, 3, 4 or whatever candidates would qualify for said financing. The "primary before the primary" to date has greatly limited the choices available. That's why Bernie and the true Progressives are such a breath of fresh air. </p>
<p>Also, I would respectfully suggest that repeatedly bleating "Get Real" at CW is not serving the cause as well as we'd like.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MtnCaddy</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2020/01/28/iowa-up-for-grabs/#comment-152628</link>
		<dc:creator>MtnCaddy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jan 2020 18:30:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=18010#comment-152628</guid>
		<description>[53]

&lt;i&gt;So, yer a Bernie Bro, MC... :D

There is one group that Democrats hate more than Trump Supporters..

That&#039;s Bernie Bros :D&lt;/i&gt;

&lt;b&gt;At last! Something we can (almost) agree on!&lt;/b&gt; While there&#039;s no way even establishment (read &quot;big money&quot; Democrats)  hate us Bernie Bros more than #CorruptDonnieLittleHands it&#039;s probably closer than I&#039;d like to think. Of course you have to include Warren supporters &amp; the Yang Gang in with us Bernie Bros.

For 40 years Repugs have been screwing 90% of America while (enough, at least) establishment Democrats have been going along with it. &quot;Let the fools argue over social issues so long as they don&#039;t notice us racing to the bank.&quot; In my mind this is the main reason that the GOP masses chose outsider-shake-things-up Trump over 16 establishment Repugs, and it&#039;s why Trump even had a chance to beat &quot;more of the same thing&quot; Hillary.

I also think Trump winning the Electoral College is the best thing to happen to the Progressive movement. Hillary winning would have led to a lot of complacency to the Left.

For the record I really had to hold my nose to vote for Hillary, just as I&#039;ll have to hold my nose to vote for one of the Democratic Moderates if it comes down to it. Almost voted for Jill Stein, in fact, but I suspected that she was a Russian tool so I just couldn&#039;t go there. Remember, I live in the deep blue People&#039;s Republic of Country-Cali so I knew that my voting decision meant a whole lot more to me than it would to the final result.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[53]</p>
<p><i>So, yer a Bernie Bro, MC... :D</p>
<p>There is one group that Democrats hate more than Trump Supporters..</p>
<p>That's Bernie Bros :D</i></p>
<p><b>At last! Something we can (almost) agree on!</b> While there's no way even establishment (read "big money" Democrats)  hate us Bernie Bros more than #CorruptDonnieLittleHands it's probably closer than I'd like to think. Of course you have to include Warren supporters &amp; the Yang Gang in with us Bernie Bros.</p>
<p>For 40 years Repugs have been screwing 90% of America while (enough, at least) establishment Democrats have been going along with it. "Let the fools argue over social issues so long as they don't notice us racing to the bank." In my mind this is the main reason that the GOP masses chose outsider-shake-things-up Trump over 16 establishment Repugs, and it's why Trump even had a chance to beat "more of the same thing" Hillary.</p>
<p>I also think Trump winning the Electoral College is the best thing to happen to the Progressive movement. Hillary winning would have led to a lot of complacency to the Left.</p>
<p>For the record I really had to hold my nose to vote for Hillary, just as I'll have to hold my nose to vote for one of the Democratic Moderates if it comes down to it. Almost voted for Jill Stein, in fact, but I suspected that she was a Russian tool so I just couldn't go there. Remember, I live in the deep blue People's Republic of Country-Cali so I knew that my voting decision meant a whole lot more to me than it would to the final result.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2020/01/28/iowa-up-for-grabs/#comment-152625</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jan 2020 18:00:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=18010#comment-152625</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;Since you like to abuse the word FACTS please tell the class which Democrats &quot;APOLOGIZE to Iran&quot; or &quot;side with terrorists.&quot;&lt;/I&gt;

&lt;B&gt;Michael Moore apologizes to Iran on behalf of the American people for airstrike that killed Soleimani&lt;/B&gt;
&lt;I&gt;foxnews.com/entertainment/michael-moore-apologizes-iran-us-airstrike-qassem-soleimani-trump&lt;/I&gt;


&lt;B&gt;Rose McGowan apologizes to Iran over US airstrike on general: &#039;Please do not kill us&#039;&lt;/B&gt;
&lt;I&gt;thehill.com/blogs/in-the-know/in-the-know/476655-rose-mcgowan-apologizes-to-iran-over-us-airstrike-on-general&lt;/I&gt;

Will you concede the point?? :D

&lt;I&gt; Saying you saw it on Facist News network or OANN without citing a reality based news source won&#039;t cut it. Please enlighten us with names, dates &amp; quotes.&lt;/i&gt;

I just did...

Your turn... :D

&lt;I&gt;Please enlighten us with specific examples. I&#039;m hungry for learning.&lt;/I&gt;

Do the 60s mean anything to you??

Maybe Michelle Obama who said she was never proud of her country..

The list is endless..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Since you like to abuse the word FACTS please tell the class which Democrats "APOLOGIZE to Iran" or "side with terrorists."</i></p>
<p><b>Michael Moore apologizes to Iran on behalf of the American people for airstrike that killed Soleimani</b><br />
<i>foxnews.com/entertainment/michael-moore-apologizes-iran-us-airstrike-qassem-soleimani-trump</i></p>
<p><b>Rose McGowan apologizes to Iran over US airstrike on general: 'Please do not kill us'</b><br />
<i>thehill.com/blogs/in-the-know/in-the-know/476655-rose-mcgowan-apologizes-to-iran-over-us-airstrike-on-general</i></p>
<p>Will you concede the point?? :D</p>
<p><i> Saying you saw it on Facist News network or OANN without citing a reality based news source won't cut it. Please enlighten us with names, dates &amp; quotes.</i></p>
<p>I just did...</p>
<p>Your turn... :D</p>
<p><i>Please enlighten us with specific examples. I'm hungry for learning.</i></p>
<p>Do the 60s mean anything to you??</p>
<p>Maybe Michelle Obama who said she was never proud of her country..</p>
<p>The list is endless..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2020/01/28/iowa-up-for-grabs/#comment-152624</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jan 2020 18:00:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=18010#comment-152624</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;Since you like to abuse the word FACTS please tell the class which Democrats &quot;APOLOGIZE to Iran&quot; or &quot;side with terrorists.&quot;&lt;/I&gt;

&lt;B&gt;Michael Moore apologizes to Iran on behalf of the American people for airstrike that killed Soleimani&lt;/B&gt;
&lt;I&gt;https://www.foxnews.com/entertainment/michael-moore-apologizes-iran-us-airstrike-qassem-soleimani-trump&lt;/I&gt;


&lt;B&gt;Rose McGowan apologizes to Iran over US airstrike on general: &#039;Please do not kill us&#039;&lt;/B&gt;
&lt;I&gt;https://thehill.com/blogs/in-the-know/in-the-know/476655-rose-mcgowan-apologizes-to-iran-over-us-airstrike-on-general&lt;/I&gt;

Will you concede the point?? :D

&lt;I&gt; Saying you saw it on Facist News network or OANN without citing a reality based news source won&#039;t cut it. Please enlighten us with names, dates &amp; quotes.&lt;/i&gt;

I just did...

Your turn... :D

&lt;I&gt;Please enlighten us with specific examples. I&#039;m hungry for learning.&lt;/I&gt;

Do the 60s mean anything to you??

Maybe Michelle Obama who said she was never proud of her country..

The list is endless..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Since you like to abuse the word FACTS please tell the class which Democrats "APOLOGIZE to Iran" or "side with terrorists."</i></p>
<p><b>Michael Moore apologizes to Iran on behalf of the American people for airstrike that killed Soleimani</b><br />
<i><a href="https://www.foxnews.com/entertainment/michael-moore-apologizes-iran-us-airstrike-qassem-soleimani-trump" rel="nofollow">https://www.foxnews.com/entertainment/michael-moore-apologizes-iran-us-airstrike-qassem-soleimani-trump</a></i></p>
<p><b>Rose McGowan apologizes to Iran over US airstrike on general: 'Please do not kill us'</b><br />
<i><a href="https://thehill.com/blogs/in-the-know/in-the-know/476655-rose-mcgowan-apologizes-to-iran-over-us-airstrike-on-general" rel="nofollow">https://thehill.com/blogs/in-the-know/in-the-know/476655-rose-mcgowan-apologizes-to-iran-over-us-airstrike-on-general</a></i></p>
<p>Will you concede the point?? :D</p>
<p><i> Saying you saw it on Facist News network or OANN without citing a reality based news source won't cut it. Please enlighten us with names, dates &amp; quotes.</i></p>
<p>I just did...</p>
<p>Your turn... :D</p>
<p><i>Please enlighten us with specific examples. I'm hungry for learning.</i></p>
<p>Do the 60s mean anything to you??</p>
<p>Maybe Michelle Obama who said she was never proud of her country..</p>
<p>The list is endless..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MtnCaddy</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2020/01/28/iowa-up-for-grabs/#comment-152623</link>
		<dc:creator>MtnCaddy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jan 2020 17:42:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=18010#comment-152623</guid>
		<description>[28]

&lt;i&gt;I spent over two and a half decades in military, security, FSO and LEO...

Believe me, I have seen the HATE that Americans can have for this country..&lt;/i&gt;

Please enlighten us with specific examples. I&#039;m hungry for learning.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[28]</p>
<p><i>I spent over two and a half decades in military, security, FSO and LEO...</p>
<p>Believe me, I have seen the HATE that Americans can have for this country..</i></p>
<p>Please enlighten us with specific examples. I'm hungry for learning.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MtnCaddy</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2020/01/28/iowa-up-for-grabs/#comment-152622</link>
		<dc:creator>MtnCaddy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jan 2020 17:36:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=18010#comment-152622</guid>
		<description>[28]

&lt;i&gt;Hell, your Democrats APOLOGIZE to Iran because President Trump killed the #1 terrorist in the world...

Howz THAT for America hate???

For Trump/America haters to side with terrorists and terrorist regimes SOLELY because President Trump is against those terrorists and regimes??
&lt;/i&gt;

Since you like to abuse the word FACTS please tell the class which Democrats &quot;APOLOGIZE to Iran&quot; or &quot;side with terrorists.&quot;  Saying you saw it on Facist News network or OANN without citing a reality based news source won&#039;t cut it. Please enlighten us with names, dates &amp; quotes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[28]</p>
<p><i>Hell, your Democrats APOLOGIZE to Iran because President Trump killed the #1 terrorist in the world...</p>
<p>Howz THAT for America hate???</p>
<p>For Trump/America haters to side with terrorists and terrorist regimes SOLELY because President Trump is against those terrorists and regimes??<br />
</i></p>
<p>Since you like to abuse the word FACTS please tell the class which Democrats "APOLOGIZE to Iran" or "side with terrorists."  Saying you saw it on Facist News network or OANN without citing a reality based news source won't cut it. Please enlighten us with names, dates &amp; quotes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2020/01/28/iowa-up-for-grabs/#comment-152621</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jan 2020 17:22:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=18010#comment-152621</guid>
		<description>So, yer a Bernie Bro, MC... :D

There is one group that Democrats hate more than Trump Supporters..

That&#039;s Bernie Bros  :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, yer a Bernie Bro, MC... :D</p>
<p>There is one group that Democrats hate more than Trump Supporters..</p>
<p>That's Bernie Bros  :D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MtnCaddy</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2020/01/28/iowa-up-for-grabs/#comment-152620</link>
		<dc:creator>MtnCaddy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jan 2020 17:13:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=18010#comment-152620</guid>
		<description>[16]

&lt;b&gt;Listen...&lt;/b&gt;

&lt;i&gt;I agreed with most everything until you said that Joe is too old school, and you think that is a fatal flaw for him. I believe that is his greatest strength in battling Trump. Biden is everything that Trump isn’t: kind, able to show sympathy and empathy, warm, willing to admit to his mistakes, generous.... I think you get the picture.

I see Biden as an old golden retriever you’ve had for 8 years — loyal, protective, and sometimes a little goofy.&lt;/i&gt;

Agreed. I should have defined &quot;old school&quot; better.
I personally like Joe Biden and I think Joe&#039;s geniality harkens back to a time before Newt Gingrich&#039;s GOP declared war on bi-partisanship &amp; compromise.  The Repugs seemingly couldn&#039;t stand the fact that a Democrat finally won the Presidency after 12 years of Reagan/Bush the Elder, even though Bill Clinton offered a Reaganism®-lite agenda to the American people (aka &quot;triangulation.&quot;) &lt;b&gt;But bi-partisanship only exists  when &lt;i&gt;both&lt;/i&gt; parties want to play!&lt;/b&gt; After 40 years of Reaganism&#039;s® war against the New Deal/American Dream we need a LION like Bernie Sanders rather than a &quot;go along to get along&quot; guy like Joe and all of the Moderates. You simply don&#039;t compromise with the Devil if you want to keep your soul.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[16]</p>
<p><b>Listen...</b></p>
<p><i>I agreed with most everything until you said that Joe is too old school, and you think that is a fatal flaw for him. I believe that is his greatest strength in battling Trump. Biden is everything that Trump isn’t: kind, able to show sympathy and empathy, warm, willing to admit to his mistakes, generous.... I think you get the picture.</p>
<p>I see Biden as an old golden retriever you’ve had for 8 years — loyal, protective, and sometimes a little goofy.</i></p>
<p>Agreed. I should have defined "old school" better.<br />
I personally like Joe Biden and I think Joe's geniality harkens back to a time before Newt Gingrich's GOP declared war on bi-partisanship &amp; compromise.  The Repugs seemingly couldn't stand the fact that a Democrat finally won the Presidency after 12 years of Reagan/Bush the Elder, even though Bill Clinton offered a Reaganism®-lite agenda to the American people (aka "triangulation.") <b>But bi-partisanship only exists  when <i>both</i> parties want to play!</b> After 40 years of Reaganism's® war against the New Deal/American Dream we need a LION like Bernie Sanders rather than a "go along to get along" guy like Joe and all of the Moderates. You simply don't compromise with the Devil if you want to keep your soul.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2020/01/28/iowa-up-for-grabs/#comment-152619</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jan 2020 16:44:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=18010#comment-152619</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;find the candidate with the best chance of beating Trump.&lt;/I&gt;

None of the Democrat field can beat President Trump..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>find the candidate with the best chance of beating Trump.</i></p>
<p>None of the Democrat field can beat President Trump..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2020/01/28/iowa-up-for-grabs/#comment-152616</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jan 2020 14:44:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=18010#comment-152616</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;Off topic Star Trek news:

Patrick Stewart was on the View today to offer Whoopi a place in Picard season 2!!! This was one of the few times I have seen Whoopi go speechless with joy, and it was beautiful to see. She brought up a good point that I believe few people (including myself) know...Guinan was Gene Roddenberry’s last character that he personally created for the StarTrek universe. And while Whoopi has chosen to go with gray with her braids, skin wise she has barely aged in the last 20 years! Picard looks 18 years older...because he is 18 years older; but Guinan is hundreds, if not thousands of years old.&lt;/I&gt;

Thanx for the update..

I would love to see Q return...  

ANY Q episode of Trek is awesome..

But John DeLancie must be getting on in years...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Off topic Star Trek news:</p>
<p>Patrick Stewart was on the View today to offer Whoopi a place in Picard season 2!!! This was one of the few times I have seen Whoopi go speechless with joy, and it was beautiful to see. She brought up a good point that I believe few people (including myself) know...Guinan was Gene Roddenberry’s last character that he personally created for the StarTrek universe. And while Whoopi has chosen to go with gray with her braids, skin wise she has barely aged in the last 20 years! Picard looks 18 years older...because he is 18 years older; but Guinan is hundreds, if not thousands of years old.</i></p>
<p>Thanx for the update..</p>
<p>I would love to see Q return...  </p>
<p>ANY Q episode of Trek is awesome..</p>
<p>But John DeLancie must be getting on in years...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2020/01/28/iowa-up-for-grabs/#comment-152615</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jan 2020 14:31:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=18010#comment-152615</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;So.....when are we going to see Trump’s tax returns?&lt;/I&gt;

Never..

Because it&#039;s well established that Trump/America haters will illegally use those to attack President Trump..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>So.....when are we going to see Trump’s tax returns?</i></p>
<p>Never..</p>
<p>Because it's well established that Trump/America haters will illegally use those to attack President Trump..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2020/01/28/iowa-up-for-grabs/#comment-152614</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jan 2020 14:30:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=18010#comment-152614</guid>
		<description>DSWS

&lt;I&gt;Biden isn&#039;t picking a VP. He&#039;s picking a running mate.&lt;/I&gt;

Troo Dat...  :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DSWS</p>
<p><i>Biden isn't picking a VP. He's picking a running mate.</i></p>
<p>Troo Dat...  :D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2020/01/28/iowa-up-for-grabs/#comment-152613</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jan 2020 14:00:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=18010#comment-152613</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt; but the results of 2016 will always stand.

Yes it will..

Your candidate got her ass handed to her..&lt;/I&gt;

And THAT is forever  :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i> but the results of 2016 will always stand.</p>
<p>Yes it will..</p>
<p>Your candidate got her ass handed to her..</i></p>
<p>And THAT is forever  :D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2020/01/28/iowa-up-for-grabs/#comment-152612</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jan 2020 13:20:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=18010#comment-152612</guid>
		<description>MC,

&lt;I&gt;Your argument is silly - nothing will ever change the fact that while Trump lost the popular vote by almost 3 million votes, due to the archaic Electoral College Trump was elected President. &lt;/I&gt;

No.. It&#039;s YOUR argument that is silly because the Vanity Vote is completely irrelevant.  Basically, yer bragging that you got the most field goals in a football game, but the winner is determined by the score...

The Vanity Vote is completely irrelevant because President Trump didn&#039;t run the race for the Vanity Vote...

&lt;I&gt;. Yeah, the Rooskies helped him, Comey&#039;s October Surprise helped him yada yada yada, but the results of 2016 will always stand.&lt;/I&gt;

Yes it will..

Your candidate got her ass handed to her..

&lt;I&gt;Trump must be removed before the election because he&#039;s blantly trying to steal it.&lt;/I&gt;

Again, NO FACTS to prove that..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MC,</p>
<p><i>Your argument is silly - nothing will ever change the fact that while Trump lost the popular vote by almost 3 million votes, due to the archaic Electoral College Trump was elected President. </i></p>
<p>No.. It's YOUR argument that is silly because the Vanity Vote is completely irrelevant.  Basically, yer bragging that you got the most field goals in a football game, but the winner is determined by the score...</p>
<p>The Vanity Vote is completely irrelevant because President Trump didn't run the race for the Vanity Vote...</p>
<p><i>. Yeah, the Rooskies helped him, Comey's October Surprise helped him yada yada yada, but the results of 2016 will always stand.</i></p>
<p>Yes it will..</p>
<p>Your candidate got her ass handed to her..</p>
<p><i>Trump must be removed before the election because he's blantly trying to steal it.</i></p>
<p>Again, NO FACTS to prove that..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MtnCaddy</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2020/01/28/iowa-up-for-grabs/#comment-152608</link>
		<dc:creator>MtnCaddy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jan 2020 12:58:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=18010#comment-152608</guid>
		<description>[20]

&lt;i&gt;The FACTS are that the GOP are putting country before Party by supporting the 65 million Americans who VOTED for President Trump.&lt;/i&gt;

For the record Trump received 63 million votes while Hillary got 65.9 million votes.

Your argument is silly - nothing will ever change the fact that while Trump lost the popular vote by almost 3 million votes, due to the archaic Electoral College Trump was elected President. Yeah, the Rooskies helped him, Comey&#039;s October Surprise helped him yada yada yada, but the results of 2016 &lt;b&gt;will always stand.&lt;/b&gt;

Nowhere does our Constitution say that Impeachment in any way &lt;i&gt;invalidates an election.&lt;/i&gt; Rather, our Constitution offers Impeachment as a way to get rid of an official who fails to uphold his oath of office. If Trump isn&#039;t removed for his crimes against America then what future President will be constrainted from illegal behavior?

Trump must be removed before the election because he&#039;s blantly trying to steal it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[20]</p>
<p><i>The FACTS are that the GOP are putting country before Party by supporting the 65 million Americans who VOTED for President Trump.</i></p>
<p>For the record Trump received 63 million votes while Hillary got 65.9 million votes.</p>
<p>Your argument is silly - nothing will ever change the fact that while Trump lost the popular vote by almost 3 million votes, due to the archaic Electoral College Trump was elected President. Yeah, the Rooskies helped him, Comey's October Surprise helped him yada yada yada, but the results of 2016 <b>will always stand.</b></p>
<p>Nowhere does our Constitution say that Impeachment in any way <i>invalidates an election.</i> Rather, our Constitution offers Impeachment as a way to get rid of an official who fails to uphold his oath of office. If Trump isn't removed for his crimes against America then what future President will be constrainted from illegal behavior?</p>
<p>Trump must be removed before the election because he's blantly trying to steal it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MtnCaddy</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2020/01/28/iowa-up-for-grabs/#comment-152606</link>
		<dc:creator>MtnCaddy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jan 2020 12:53:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=18010#comment-152606</guid>
		<description>[20]

&lt;i&gt;The FACTS are that the GOP are putting country before Party by supporting the 65 million Americans who VOTED for President Trump.&lt;/i&gt;

For the record Trump received 63 million votes while Hillary got 65.9 million votes.

Your argument is silly - nothing will ever change the fact that while Trump lost the popular vote by almost 3 million votes, due to the archaic Electoral College Trump was elected President. Yeah, the Rooskies helped him, Comey&#039;s October Surprise helped him yada yada yada, but the results of 2016 &lt;b&gt;will always stand.&lt;/b&gt;

Nowhere does our Constitution say that Impeachment in any way &lt;i&gt;invalidates an election.&lt;/i&gt; Rather, our Constitution offers Impeachment as a way to get rid of an official who fails to uphold his oath of office. If Trump isn&#039;t removed for his crimes against America then what future President will be constrainted from illegal behavior?

Trump must be removed before the election because he&#039;s trying to steal it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[20]</p>
<p><i>The FACTS are that the GOP are putting country before Party by supporting the 65 million Americans who VOTED for President Trump.</i></p>
<p>For the record Trump received 63 million votes while Hillary got 65.9 million votes.</p>
<p>Your argument is silly - nothing will ever change the fact that while Trump lost the popular vote by almost 3 million votes, due to the archaic Electoral College Trump was elected President. Yeah, the Rooskies helped him, Comey's October Surprise helped him yada yada yada, but the results of 2016 <b>will always stand.</b></p>
<p>Nowhere does our Constitution say that Impeachment in any way <i>invalidates an election.</i> Rather, our Constitution offers Impeachment as a way to get rid of an official who fails to uphold his oath of office. If Trump isn't removed for his crimes against America then what future President will be constrainted from illegal behavior?</p>
<p>Trump must be removed before the election because he's trying to steal it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2020/01/28/iowa-up-for-grabs/#comment-152605</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jan 2020 12:49:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=18010#comment-152605</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt; since 90% of the electorate likes pie, &lt;/I&gt;

I would like to see yer substantiation..  :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i> since 90% of the electorate likes pie, </i></p>
<p>I would like to see yer substantiation..  :D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2020/01/28/iowa-up-for-grabs/#comment-152604</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jan 2020 12:49:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=18010#comment-152604</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;Methinks you&#039;re getting nervous about Texas &lt;/I&gt;

And, for the record, I have **NEVER** been nervous about Texas...

It just gives me a hearty belly laugh when I hear ya&#039;all claim Texas will go blue.. :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Methinks you're getting nervous about Texas </i></p>
<p>And, for the record, I have **NEVER** been nervous about Texas...</p>
<p>It just gives me a hearty belly laugh when I hear ya'all claim Texas will go blue.. :D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nypoet22</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2020/01/28/iowa-up-for-grabs/#comment-152603</link>
		<dc:creator>nypoet22</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jan 2020 12:48:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=18010#comment-152603</guid>
		<description>what i want to know is where iowa stands on the issue of pie. since 90% of the electorate likes pie, it stands to reason that taking a firm stance on pie will serve to put one candidate over the top, if only he or she has the courage to do so.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>what i want to know is where iowa stands on the issue of pie. since 90% of the electorate likes pie, it stands to reason that taking a firm stance on pie will serve to put one candidate over the top, if only he or she has the courage to do so.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2020/01/28/iowa-up-for-grabs/#comment-152602</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jan 2020 12:46:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=18010#comment-152602</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;Methinks you&#039;re getting nervous about Texas if you&#039;re celebrating the fact that a Repug held his Texas seat.&lt;/I&gt;

Actually, it was an open seat...  And the Dumbocrat couldn&#039;t win it..

So much for the claim that Texas will turn blue..

&lt;I&gt;So I guess the Blue wave in 2018 was simply a figment of America&#039;s imagination, eh?&lt;/I&gt;

It wasn&#039;t a wave, it was a trickle.. And the ONLY reason Dims won because they ran as GOP Lite...

:D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Methinks you're getting nervous about Texas if you're celebrating the fact that a Repug held his Texas seat.</i></p>
<p>Actually, it was an open seat...  And the Dumbocrat couldn't win it..</p>
<p>So much for the claim that Texas will turn blue..</p>
<p><i>So I guess the Blue wave in 2018 was simply a figment of America's imagination, eh?</i></p>
<p>It wasn't a wave, it was a trickle.. And the ONLY reason Dims won because they ran as GOP Lite...</p>
<p>:D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MtnCaddy</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2020/01/28/iowa-up-for-grabs/#comment-152600</link>
		<dc:creator>MtnCaddy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jan 2020 12:35:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=18010#comment-152600</guid>
		<description>[21]

Methinks you&#039;re getting nervous about Texas if you&#039;re celebrating the fact that a Repug held his &lt;b&gt;Texas&lt;/b&gt; seat. 

So I guess the Blue wave in 2018 was simply a figment of America&#039;s imagination, eh?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[21]</p>
<p>Methinks you're getting nervous about Texas if you're celebrating the fact that a Repug held his <b>Texas</b> seat. </p>
<p>So I guess the Blue wave in 2018 was simply a figment of America's imagination, eh?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2020/01/28/iowa-up-for-grabs/#comment-152599</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jan 2020 12:34:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=18010#comment-152599</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;(2) Accepting any help from foreign countries to influence an election, especially adversaries such as Russia and China is illegal.&lt;/I&gt;

Actually, it&#039;s not..

&lt;I&gt;This was a great concern of our Founding fathers.&lt;/I&gt;

Facts to support??

Now the FACTS prove that the founding fathers were VERY concerned with preventing charges of &#039;maladministration&#039;..  

Fancy word that means policy disagreements..

THAT is why the Constitution says &lt;B&gt;HIGH CRIMES AND MISDEMEANORS&lt;/B&gt;

President Trump hasn&#039;t been charged with ANY &lt;B&gt;HIGH CRIMES AND MISDEMEANORS&lt;/B&gt;..

Ergo, even if you ignore the bi-partisan requirement, this impeachment is STILL illegitimate..

An illegitimate impeachment is an illegal impeachment..

An illegal impeachment is a coup..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>(2) Accepting any help from foreign countries to influence an election, especially adversaries such as Russia and China is illegal.</i></p>
<p>Actually, it's not..</p>
<p><i>This was a great concern of our Founding fathers.</i></p>
<p>Facts to support??</p>
<p>Now the FACTS prove that the founding fathers were VERY concerned with preventing charges of 'maladministration'..  </p>
<p>Fancy word that means policy disagreements..</p>
<p>THAT is why the Constitution says <b>HIGH CRIMES AND MISDEMEANORS</b></p>
<p>President Trump hasn't been charged with ANY <b>HIGH CRIMES AND MISDEMEANORS</b>..</p>
<p>Ergo, even if you ignore the bi-partisan requirement, this impeachment is STILL illegitimate..</p>
<p>An illegitimate impeachment is an illegal impeachment..</p>
<p>An illegal impeachment is a coup..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2020/01/28/iowa-up-for-grabs/#comment-152598</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jan 2020 12:31:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=18010#comment-152598</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;What crimes? Just off the top of my head:&lt;/I&gt;

Then why weren&#039;t ANY of those crimes charged in the Impeachment??

Why MAKE up &quot;crimes&quot;??

I&#039;ll tell you why..

Because the FACTS don&#039;t support what&#039;s off the top of your head....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>What crimes? Just off the top of my head:</i></p>
<p>Then why weren't ANY of those crimes charged in the Impeachment??</p>
<p>Why MAKE up "crimes"??</p>
<p>I'll tell you why..</p>
<p>Because the FACTS don't support what's off the top of your head....</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MtnCaddy</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2020/01/28/iowa-up-for-grabs/#comment-152597</link>
		<dc:creator>MtnCaddy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jan 2020 12:31:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=18010#comment-152597</guid>
		<description>[29]

Whoops...
(2) Accepting any help from foreign countries &lt;b&gt;to influence an election,&lt;/b&gt; especially adversaries such as Russia and China is illegal. This was a great concern of our Founding fathers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[29]</p>
<p>Whoops...<br />
(2) Accepting any help from foreign countries <b>to influence an election,</b> especially adversaries such as Russia and China is illegal. This was a great concern of our Founding fathers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MtnCaddy</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2020/01/28/iowa-up-for-grabs/#comment-152596</link>
		<dc:creator>MtnCaddy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jan 2020 12:27:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=18010#comment-152596</guid>
		<description>[24]

What crimes? Just off the top of my head:

(1) Secretly paying off the various Playmates and porn stars to supress Trump&#039;s extramarital affairs violates campaign finance laws.

(2) Accepting any help from foreign countries, especially adversaries such as Russia and China is illegal.

(3) Holding monies Congress has appropriated to Ukraine and not meeting Zelensky until he ANNOUNCES an investigation into the Bidens and a debunked Russian-launched whacko theory that Ukraine interfered with our election to somehow aid Hillary is illegal. I think it&#039;s a 1974 law called the &quot;Impound Act.&quot;

(4) Emouluments issues all over the place (e.g. Saudis renting scores of rooms at Trump properties and not even using them).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[24]</p>
<p>What crimes? Just off the top of my head:</p>
<p>(1) Secretly paying off the various Playmates and porn stars to supress Trump's extramarital affairs violates campaign finance laws.</p>
<p>(2) Accepting any help from foreign countries, especially adversaries such as Russia and China is illegal.</p>
<p>(3) Holding monies Congress has appropriated to Ukraine and not meeting Zelensky until he ANNOUNCES an investigation into the Bidens and a debunked Russian-launched whacko theory that Ukraine interfered with our election to somehow aid Hillary is illegal. I think it's a 1974 law called the "Impound Act."</p>
<p>(4) Emouluments issues all over the place (e.g. Saudis renting scores of rooms at Trump properties and not even using them).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2020/01/28/iowa-up-for-grabs/#comment-152595</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jan 2020 12:18:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=18010#comment-152595</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;Why do you say &quot;Trump/America haters?&quot; Do you really believe that hating Trump is the same as hating America? &lt;/I&gt;

I really do..

For Trump/America haters to hate on President Trump as much as they do??

For Trump/America haters to side with terrorists and terrorist regimes SOLELY because President Trump is against those terrorists and regimes??

There HAS to be a healthy hate for this country as well as the President..

&lt;I&gt; In fact, do you really believe anybody who lives in America hates America? &lt;/I&gt;

If you don&#039;t, you must have lead a sheltered life..

I spent over two and a half decades in military, security, FSO and LEO...

Believe me, I have seen the HATE that Americans can have for this country..

Hell, your Democrats APOLOGIZE to Iran because President Trump killed the #1 terrorist in the world...

Howz THAT for America hate???

&lt;I&gt;Um, there hasn&#039;t been a vote yet, so nobody is on record yet.&lt;/I&gt;

There is a record of intent..

But continue to split hairs.. :D

&lt;I&gt;What do House Democrat rules have to do with Senate rules?&lt;/I&gt;

Because it&#039;s the same impeachment??

What&#039;s wrong??

You don&#039;t want to use the Democrat rules now?? How come??

Because NOW those rules interfere with the Trump/America hate agenda...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Why do you say "Trump/America haters?" Do you really believe that hating Trump is the same as hating America? </i></p>
<p>I really do..</p>
<p>For Trump/America haters to hate on President Trump as much as they do??</p>
<p>For Trump/America haters to side with terrorists and terrorist regimes SOLELY because President Trump is against those terrorists and regimes??</p>
<p>There HAS to be a healthy hate for this country as well as the President..</p>
<p><i> In fact, do you really believe anybody who lives in America hates America? </i></p>
<p>If you don't, you must have lead a sheltered life..</p>
<p>I spent over two and a half decades in military, security, FSO and LEO...</p>
<p>Believe me, I have seen the HATE that Americans can have for this country..</p>
<p>Hell, your Democrats APOLOGIZE to Iran because President Trump killed the #1 terrorist in the world...</p>
<p>Howz THAT for America hate???</p>
<p><i>Um, there hasn't been a vote yet, so nobody is on record yet.</i></p>
<p>There is a record of intent..</p>
<p>But continue to split hairs.. :D</p>
<p><i>What do House Democrat rules have to do with Senate rules?</i></p>
<p>Because it's the same impeachment??</p>
<p>What's wrong??</p>
<p>You don't want to use the Democrat rules now?? How come??</p>
<p>Because NOW those rules interfere with the Trump/America hate agenda...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MtnCaddy</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2020/01/28/iowa-up-for-grabs/#comment-152594</link>
		<dc:creator>MtnCaddy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jan 2020 12:11:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=18010#comment-152594</guid>
		<description>[15]

&lt;i&gt;According to Democrat House rules, Democrats will only get to call whomever the GOP Senate LETS them call...

How do ya like THAT!!?? :D&lt;/i&gt;

What do House Democrat rules have to do with Senate rules? Don&#039;t forget that your Dear Leader refused to defend himself in the House. The Senate rules are whatever the Senate decides, and we&#039;ve passed the point where Repugs can just sweep Trump&#039;s crimes under the rug.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[15]</p>
<p><i>According to Democrat House rules, Democrats will only get to call whomever the GOP Senate LETS them call...</p>
<p>How do ya like THAT!!?? :D</i></p>
<p>What do House Democrat rules have to do with Senate rules? Don't forget that your Dear Leader refused to defend himself in the House. The Senate rules are whatever the Senate decides, and we've passed the point where Repugs can just sweep Trump's crimes under the rug.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MtnCaddy</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2020/01/28/iowa-up-for-grabs/#comment-152593</link>
		<dc:creator>MtnCaddy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jan 2020 12:05:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=18010#comment-152593</guid>
		<description>[13]

&lt;i&gt;No, MC.. It&#039;s STILL in the IMPOSSIBLE/Trump-America Haters Wet Dream category...

Impossible... Wet Dream....

It&#039;s THAT simple...

The ONLY bi-partisan is in President Trump&#039;s favor.

Think about THAT...&lt;/i&gt;

Why do you say &quot;Trump/America haters?&quot; Do you really believe that hating Trump is the same as hating America? In fact, do you really believe anybody who lives in America hates America? If so, you&#039;ve drank the &quot;Party that used to be Grand&quot; koolaide. The Repugs have done a splendid job of dividing one half of the country against the other so that they can keep giving the economic elites tax breaks that they don&#039;t need to the detriment of the rest of us. So do you think of Trump as your &quot;Dear Leader?&quot; Kinda sounds like you got a little proto-facism thing going on there, partner.

&lt;i&gt;At least 5 Democrats are on record as voting for acquittal... That means that 25 GOP&#039;ers will have to vote GUILTY..&lt;/i&gt;

Um, there hasn&#039;t been a vote yet, so nobody is on record yet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[13]</p>
<p><i>No, MC.. It's STILL in the IMPOSSIBLE/Trump-America Haters Wet Dream category...</p>
<p>Impossible... Wet Dream....</p>
<p>It's THAT simple...</p>
<p>The ONLY bi-partisan is in President Trump's favor.</p>
<p>Think about THAT...</i></p>
<p>Why do you say "Trump/America haters?" Do you really believe that hating Trump is the same as hating America? In fact, do you really believe anybody who lives in America hates America? If so, you've drank the "Party that used to be Grand" koolaide. The Repugs have done a splendid job of dividing one half of the country against the other so that they can keep giving the economic elites tax breaks that they don't need to the detriment of the rest of us. So do you think of Trump as your "Dear Leader?" Kinda sounds like you got a little proto-facism thing going on there, partner.</p>
<p><i>At least 5 Democrats are on record as voting for acquittal... That means that 25 GOP'ers will have to vote GUILTY..</i></p>
<p>Um, there hasn't been a vote yet, so nobody is on record yet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2020/01/28/iowa-up-for-grabs/#comment-152592</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jan 2020 12:01:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=18010#comment-152592</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;The FACT that Democrats can&#039;t charge any crimes, PROVES there are no crimes to charge..&lt;/I&gt;

I mean, honestly.. THINK about it.

You have a DA that allegedly has the FACTS that prove MURDER beyond ANY doubt..

And that DA decides to charge the scumbag with An Overdue Library Book..

What&#039;s the ONLY logical conclusion??

That the DA is full of shit when he claims he has the facts to prove his case..

Try to ignore politics and think RATIONALLY...

It&#039;s an eye-opener...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>The FACT that Democrats can't charge any crimes, PROVES there are no crimes to charge..</i></p>
<p>I mean, honestly.. THINK about it.</p>
<p>You have a DA that allegedly has the FACTS that prove MURDER beyond ANY doubt..</p>
<p>And that DA decides to charge the scumbag with An Overdue Library Book..</p>
<p>What's the ONLY logical conclusion??</p>
<p>That the DA is full of shit when he claims he has the facts to prove his case..</p>
<p>Try to ignore politics and think RATIONALLY...</p>
<p>It's an eye-opener...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2020/01/28/iowa-up-for-grabs/#comment-152591</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jan 2020 11:54:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=18010#comment-152591</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;Not, because half the country wants Trump removed &lt;/I&gt;

So??  Then they can remove President Trump in 10 months, per the Constitutionally mandated process..

&lt;I&gt;and way more than half the country wants a REAL Impeachment trial&lt;/I&gt;

Yer gonna get the REAL impeachment trial that DEMOCRATS created the rules for..

What could be more fair than that??

Regardless, even DEMOCRATS concede that this is not a legitimate impeachment..

&lt;I&gt; It&#039;s no longer politically feasible to sweep Trump&#039;s crimes under the rug.&lt;/I&gt;

Crimes?? WHAT crimes??  Democrats can&#039;t even charge REAL crimes in the Articles Of Impeachment..

What part of THERE ARE NO CRIMES do you not understand???

If Democrats had the FACTS to support actual crimes, then actual crimes would have been the Articles Of Impeachment.

The FACT that Democrats can&#039;t charge any crimes, PROVES there are no crimes to charge..

&lt;B&gt;&quot;Simple logic&quot;&lt;/B&gt;
-Admiral James T Kirk...

I only got 2 hours of sleep last night so I am staying home from work..

&lt;B&gt;&quot;I can do this all day...&quot;&lt;/B&gt;
-Captain America

:D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Not, because half the country wants Trump removed </i></p>
<p>So??  Then they can remove President Trump in 10 months, per the Constitutionally mandated process..</p>
<p><i>and way more than half the country wants a REAL Impeachment trial</i></p>
<p>Yer gonna get the REAL impeachment trial that DEMOCRATS created the rules for..</p>
<p>What could be more fair than that??</p>
<p>Regardless, even DEMOCRATS concede that this is not a legitimate impeachment..</p>
<p><i> It's no longer politically feasible to sweep Trump's crimes under the rug.</i></p>
<p>Crimes?? WHAT crimes??  Democrats can't even charge REAL crimes in the Articles Of Impeachment..</p>
<p>What part of THERE ARE NO CRIMES do you not understand???</p>
<p>If Democrats had the FACTS to support actual crimes, then actual crimes would have been the Articles Of Impeachment.</p>
<p>The FACT that Democrats can't charge any crimes, PROVES there are no crimes to charge..</p>
<p><b>"Simple logic"</b><br />
-Admiral James T Kirk...</p>
<p>I only got 2 hours of sleep last night so I am staying home from work..</p>
<p><b>"I can do this all day..."</b><br />
-Captain America</p>
<p>:D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2020/01/28/iowa-up-for-grabs/#comment-152590</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jan 2020 11:49:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=18010#comment-152590</guid>
		<description>&lt;B&gt;&quot;Parts of Texas will flip; of that there is zero doubt. Democratic candidates in Texas defeated longtime GOP incumbents in Houston and Dallas in the 2018 midterms,&lt;/B&gt;
-Victoria

And the GOP just kicked the shit out of the Dumbocrat in Houston.. 

Kinda deflates your bullshit wet dream, eh?  :D

&lt;B&gt;&quot;Nobody likes you.  Everybody hates you.  You&#039;re gonna lose.. Smile, ya fuck..&quot;&lt;/B&gt;
-Bruce Willis, THE LAST BOYSCOUT

:D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>"Parts of Texas will flip; of that there is zero doubt. Democratic candidates in Texas defeated longtime GOP incumbents in Houston and Dallas in the 2018 midterms,</b><br />
-Victoria</p>
<p>And the GOP just kicked the shit out of the Dumbocrat in Houston.. </p>
<p>Kinda deflates your bullshit wet dream, eh?  :D</p>
<p><b>"Nobody likes you.  Everybody hates you.  You're gonna lose.. Smile, ya fuck.."</b><br />
-Bruce Willis, THE LAST BOYSCOUT</p>
<p>:D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MtnCaddy</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2020/01/28/iowa-up-for-grabs/#comment-152589</link>
		<dc:creator>MtnCaddy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jan 2020 11:48:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=18010#comment-152589</guid>
		<description>[12]

&lt;i&gt;As far as the witnesses go, here is how it will play out..

The Senate will adopt the same witness rules that the House used.. IE the Majority Party has final say on witnesses that the Minority Party wants to call..

Further, the GOP will list it&#039;s witnesses (Bidens, WhistleBlower, Schiff) and the Dems will get ONE witness...

If the Dems don&#039;t want to agree to that, then there are no witnesses and this trial is over.. :D&lt;/i&gt;

Not, because half the country wants Trump removed and way more than half the country wants a REAL Impeachment trial with witnesses and documents. It&#039;s no longer politically feasible to sweep Trump&#039;s crimes under the rug.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[12]</p>
<p><i>As far as the witnesses go, here is how it will play out..</p>
<p>The Senate will adopt the same witness rules that the House used.. IE the Majority Party has final say on witnesses that the Minority Party wants to call..</p>
<p>Further, the GOP will list it's witnesses (Bidens, WhistleBlower, Schiff) and the Dems will get ONE witness...</p>
<p>If the Dems don't want to agree to that, then there are no witnesses and this trial is over.. :D</i></p>
<p>Not, because half the country wants Trump removed and way more than half the country wants a REAL Impeachment trial with witnesses and documents. It's no longer politically feasible to sweep Trump's crimes under the rug.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2020/01/28/iowa-up-for-grabs/#comment-152588</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jan 2020 11:46:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=18010#comment-152588</guid>
		<description>&lt;B&gt;GOP wins closely watched Texas special election

AUSTIN, Texas (AP) — Republicans won handily a closely watched special election Tuesday to keep hold of a suburban Houston district that President Donald Trump won easily four years ago, fending off a national blitz by Democrats in a Texas legislative race.

The victory by Republican Gary Gates, who put more than $1.5 million of his own money into his run for state House District 28, is sure to bring a sigh of relief for the GOP in a race that was being tracked far beyond Texas. By the final weeks, the race had escalated into the first big special election of 2020.

In final unofficial results, Gates polled 58% of the vote to 42% for Democrat Eliz Markowitz.

Presidential candidates Joe Biden and Elizabeth Warren had endorsed Markowitz, and outside groups flooded the race with six-figure checks and television ads. Beto O&#039;Rourke practically made the district a second home after ending his own presidential campaign in November, spending weekends knocking on doors in Katy&#039;s affluent neighborhoods.&lt;/B&gt;
https://news.yahoo.com/gop-wins-closely-watched-texas-041946934.html


Remind me again how Texas is turning Blue??  I seem to have forgotten what with all the FACTS that prove otherwise..  :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>GOP wins closely watched Texas special election</p>
<p>AUSTIN, Texas (AP) — Republicans won handily a closely watched special election Tuesday to keep hold of a suburban Houston district that President Donald Trump won easily four years ago, fending off a national blitz by Democrats in a Texas legislative race.</p>
<p>The victory by Republican Gary Gates, who put more than $1.5 million of his own money into his run for state House District 28, is sure to bring a sigh of relief for the GOP in a race that was being tracked far beyond Texas. By the final weeks, the race had escalated into the first big special election of 2020.</p>
<p>In final unofficial results, Gates polled 58% of the vote to 42% for Democrat Eliz Markowitz.</p>
<p>Presidential candidates Joe Biden and Elizabeth Warren had endorsed Markowitz, and outside groups flooded the race with six-figure checks and television ads. Beto O'Rourke practically made the district a second home after ending his own presidential campaign in November, spending weekends knocking on doors in Katy's affluent neighborhoods.</b><br />
<a href="https://news.yahoo.com/gop-wins-closely-watched-texas-041946934.html" rel="nofollow">https://news.yahoo.com/gop-wins-closely-watched-texas-041946934.html</a></p>
<p>Remind me again how Texas is turning Blue??  I seem to have forgotten what with all the FACTS that prove otherwise..  :D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2020/01/28/iowa-up-for-grabs/#comment-152587</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jan 2020 11:42:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=18010#comment-152587</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;&quot;Impossible&quot; means that it CANNOT happen.&lt;/I&gt;

And what you are dreaming about CANNOT happen..

&lt;I&gt;It CAN and WILL happen if the GOP seizes the opportunity to dump Trump, whether &#039;tis to save their own hides or because they finally decided to put country over Party. &lt;/I&gt;

That&#039;s your spin.

The FACTS are that the GOP are putting country before Party by supporting the 65 million Americans who VOTED for President Trump.

Funny how you ignore that point..

&lt;I&gt;In fact, I live in California and have been a dedicated weed smoker for decades. &lt;/I&gt;

THAT explains a lot.. heh  :D

&lt;I&gt; But I always thought my methamphetamine habit was more likely the real problem. Heh.&lt;/I&gt;

Touche&#039;   :D







The point is that Repugs have as much upside to removing Trump as do Democrats.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>"Impossible" means that it CANNOT happen.</i></p>
<p>And what you are dreaming about CANNOT happen..</p>
<p><i>It CAN and WILL happen if the GOP seizes the opportunity to dump Trump, whether 'tis to save their own hides or because they finally decided to put country over Party. </i></p>
<p>That's your spin.</p>
<p>The FACTS are that the GOP are putting country before Party by supporting the 65 million Americans who VOTED for President Trump.</p>
<p>Funny how you ignore that point..</p>
<p><i>In fact, I live in California and have been a dedicated weed smoker for decades. </i></p>
<p>THAT explains a lot.. heh  :D</p>
<p><i> But I always thought my methamphetamine habit was more likely the real problem. Heh.</i></p>
<p>Touche'   :D</p>
<p>The point is that Repugs have as much upside to removing Trump as do Democrats.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MtnCaddy</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2020/01/28/iowa-up-for-grabs/#comment-152586</link>
		<dc:creator>MtnCaddy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jan 2020 11:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=18010#comment-152586</guid>
		<description>[11]

&lt;i&gt;It&#039;s still impossible that the Senate will remove President Trump.

Do you HONESTLY believe that 25 GOP Senators will join with Democrats??

If you do, you must live in a state where marijuana is legal and have been partaking WAY too much..&lt;/i&gt;


&quot;Impossible&quot; means that it CANNOT happen. It CAN and WILL happen if the GOP seizes the opportunity to dump Trump, whether &#039;tis to save their own hides or because they finally decided to &lt;i&gt;put country over Party.&lt;/i&gt; The point is that Repugs have as much upside to removing Trump as do Democrats. 


In fact, I live in California and have been a dedicated weed smoker for decades. But I always thought my methamphetamine habit was more likely the real problem. Heh.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[11]</p>
<p><i>It's still impossible that the Senate will remove President Trump.</p>
<p>Do you HONESTLY believe that 25 GOP Senators will join with Democrats??</p>
<p>If you do, you must live in a state where marijuana is legal and have been partaking WAY too much..</i></p>
<p>"Impossible" means that it CANNOT happen. It CAN and WILL happen if the GOP seizes the opportunity to dump Trump, whether 'tis to save their own hides or because they finally decided to <i>put country over Party.</i> The point is that Repugs have as much upside to removing Trump as do Democrats. </p>
<p>In fact, I live in California and have been a dedicated weed smoker for decades. But I always thought my methamphetamine habit was more likely the real problem. Heh.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2020/01/28/iowa-up-for-grabs/#comment-152585</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jan 2020 11:28:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=18010#comment-152585</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;I see Biden as an old golden retriever you’ve had for 8 years — loyal, protective, and sometimes a little goofy.&lt;/I&gt;

A golden retriever that likes to sniff the crotch of women young enough to be his grandaughters..

Yea.. That&#039;s about your taste..  :eyeroll:</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>I see Biden as an old golden retriever you’ve had for 8 years — loyal, protective, and sometimes a little goofy.</i></p>
<p>A golden retriever that likes to sniff the crotch of women young enough to be his grandaughters..</p>
<p>Yea.. That's about your taste..  :eyeroll:</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2020/01/28/iowa-up-for-grabs/#comment-152584</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jan 2020 11:23:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=18010#comment-152584</guid>
		<description>The GOP will call Hunter Biden, Joe Biden, Barack Obama, Adam Schiff-head and the Whistleblower...

Democrats will be allowed to call the White House janitor that has been on sick-leave for the last 2 years..

Per Democrat Rules, that&#039;s as fair as possibly could be..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The GOP will call Hunter Biden, Joe Biden, Barack Obama, Adam Schiff-head and the Whistleblower...</p>
<p>Democrats will be allowed to call the White House janitor that has been on sick-leave for the last 2 years..</p>
<p>Per Democrat Rules, that's as fair as possibly could be..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ListenWhenYouHear</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2020/01/28/iowa-up-for-grabs/#comment-152583</link>
		<dc:creator>ListenWhenYouHear</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jan 2020 11:16:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=18010#comment-152583</guid>
		<description>MtnCaddy,

&lt;I&gt;If Joe places as I predict he will certainly be viable as we roll into North Carolina, due to his support in the black community. But he is in danger of not performing up to expectations in this, his &quot;firewall state.&quot; Ultimately I feel Joe is too old school, utters too many gaffes and has too much baggage to successfully surf the Progressive wave that has deepened since 2016. I just don&#039;t think he&#039;ll be able to handle Trump in a debate format, and I see him as just as uninspiring as was Hillary.&lt;/i&gt;

Interesting assessment.  I agreed with most everything until you said that Joe is too old school, and you think that is a fatal flaw for him.  I believe that is his greatest strength in battling Trump.  Biden is everything that Trump isn’t:  kind, able to show sympathy and empathy, warm, willing to admit to his mistakes, generous.... I think you get the picture.

I see Biden as an old golden retriever you’ve had for 8 years — loyal, protective, and sometimes a little goofy.  I see Trump as a....well, as just himself.   Trump is a narcissistic sociopath, and those don’t exist in the animal world as far as we know.  There was that one hamster in Germany, but it just ate its young and didn’t want to have sex with them... so it doesn’t quite fit for Trump’s spirit animal.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MtnCaddy,</p>
<p><i>If Joe places as I predict he will certainly be viable as we roll into North Carolina, due to his support in the black community. But he is in danger of not performing up to expectations in this, his "firewall state." Ultimately I feel Joe is too old school, utters too many gaffes and has too much baggage to successfully surf the Progressive wave that has deepened since 2016. I just don't think he'll be able to handle Trump in a debate format, and I see him as just as uninspiring as was Hillary.</i></p>
<p>Interesting assessment.  I agreed with most everything until you said that Joe is too old school, and you think that is a fatal flaw for him.  I believe that is his greatest strength in battling Trump.  Biden is everything that Trump isn’t:  kind, able to show sympathy and empathy, warm, willing to admit to his mistakes, generous.... I think you get the picture.</p>
<p>I see Biden as an old golden retriever you’ve had for 8 years — loyal, protective, and sometimes a little goofy.  I see Trump as a....well, as just himself.   Trump is a narcissistic sociopath, and those don’t exist in the animal world as far as we know.  There was that one hamster in Germany, but it just ate its young and didn’t want to have sex with them... so it doesn’t quite fit for Trump’s spirit animal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2020/01/28/iowa-up-for-grabs/#comment-152582</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jan 2020 11:16:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=18010#comment-152582</guid>
		<description>MC,

&lt;I&gt;If the Pandora&#039;s box of witnesses and documents is opened and the Repugs want to call Hunter Biden I think the Democrats should call Stormy Daniels.&lt;/I&gt;

According to Democrat House rules, Democrats will only get to call whomever the GOP Senate LETS them call...

How do ya like THAT!!??  :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MC,</p>
<p><i>If the Pandora's box of witnesses and documents is opened and the Repugs want to call Hunter Biden I think the Democrats should call Stormy Daniels.</i></p>
<p>According to Democrat House rules, Democrats will only get to call whomever the GOP Senate LETS them call...</p>
<p>How do ya like THAT!!??  :D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2020/01/28/iowa-up-for-grabs/#comment-152581</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jan 2020 11:15:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=18010#comment-152581</guid>
		<description>Liz,

&lt;I&gt;Is Trump going to solve the unsolvable Middle East Peace Process before the first caucuses in Iowa?

I mean, seriously!?&lt;/I&gt;

Of course he is..

The REAL question is, will Trump/America haters give President Trump any credit for it??

Or will they side with terrorists against their own country??

THAT&#039;s the question that needs to be asked and answered..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Liz,</p>
<p><i>Is Trump going to solve the unsolvable Middle East Peace Process before the first caucuses in Iowa?</p>
<p>I mean, seriously!?</i></p>
<p>Of course he is..</p>
<p>The REAL question is, will Trump/America haters give President Trump any credit for it??</p>
<p>Or will they side with terrorists against their own country??</p>
<p>THAT's the question that needs to be asked and answered..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2020/01/28/iowa-up-for-grabs/#comment-152580</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jan 2020 11:10:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=18010#comment-152580</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;Again, this is likely a long shot, but this scenario has moved from the &quot;impossible&quot; category to the &quot;not only possible but it would solve a lot of problems for everybody on both sides of the aisle&quot; category.&lt;/I&gt;

No, MC.. It&#039;s STILL in the IMPOSSIBLE/Trump-America Haters Wet Dream category...

At least 5 Democrats are on record as voting for acquittal... That means that 25 GOP&#039;ers will have to vote GUILTY..

Impossible... Wet Dream....

It&#039;s THAT simple...

The ONLY bi-partisan is in President Trump&#039;s favor.

Think about THAT...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Again, this is likely a long shot, but this scenario has moved from the "impossible" category to the "not only possible but it would solve a lot of problems for everybody on both sides of the aisle" category.</i></p>
<p>No, MC.. It's STILL in the IMPOSSIBLE/Trump-America Haters Wet Dream category...</p>
<p>At least 5 Democrats are on record as voting for acquittal... That means that 25 GOP'ers will have to vote GUILTY..</p>
<p>Impossible... Wet Dream....</p>
<p>It's THAT simple...</p>
<p>The ONLY bi-partisan is in President Trump's favor.</p>
<p>Think about THAT...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2020/01/28/iowa-up-for-grabs/#comment-152579</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jan 2020 11:03:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=18010#comment-152579</guid>
		<description>As far as the witnesses go, here is how it will play out..

The Senate will adopt the same witness rules that the House used..  IE the Majority Party has final say on witnesses that the Minority Party wants to call..

Further, the GOP will list it&#039;s witnesses (Bidens, WhistleBlower, Schiff) and the Dems will get ONE witness...

If the Dems don&#039;t want to agree to that, then there are no witnesses and this trial is over..  :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As far as the witnesses go, here is how it will play out..</p>
<p>The Senate will adopt the same witness rules that the House used..  IE the Majority Party has final say on witnesses that the Minority Party wants to call..</p>
<p>Further, the GOP will list it's witnesses (Bidens, WhistleBlower, Schiff) and the Dems will get ONE witness...</p>
<p>If the Dems don't want to agree to that, then there are no witnesses and this trial is over..  :D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2020/01/28/iowa-up-for-grabs/#comment-152578</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jan 2020 11:01:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=18010#comment-152578</guid>
		<description>MC...

It&#039;s still impossible that the Senate will remove President Trump.

Do you HONESTLY believe that 25 GOP Senators will join with Democrats??

If you do, you must live in a state where marijuana is legal and have been partaking WAY too much..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MC...</p>
<p>It's still impossible that the Senate will remove President Trump.</p>
<p>Do you HONESTLY believe that 25 GOP Senators will join with Democrats??</p>
<p>If you do, you must live in a state where marijuana is legal and have been partaking WAY too much..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MtnCaddy</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2020/01/28/iowa-up-for-grabs/#comment-152577</link>
		<dc:creator>MtnCaddy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jan 2020 10:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=18010#comment-152577</guid>
		<description>If the Pandora&#039;s box of witnesses and documents is opened and the Repugs want to call Hunter Biden I think the Democrats should call Stormy Daniels.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If the Pandora's box of witnesses and documents is opened and the Repugs want to call Hunter Biden I think the Democrats should call Stormy Daniels.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MtnCaddy</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2020/01/28/iowa-up-for-grabs/#comment-152576</link>
		<dc:creator>MtnCaddy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jan 2020 09:34:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=18010#comment-152576</guid>
		<description>OMG I just pulled a &lt;b&gt;Michale!&lt;/b&gt; 

&quot;Somebody...stop me!&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OMG I just pulled a <b>Michale!</b> </p>
<p>"Somebody...stop me!"</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MtnCaddy</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2020/01/28/iowa-up-for-grabs/#comment-152575</link>
		<dc:creator>MtnCaddy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jan 2020 09:31:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=18010#comment-152575</guid>
		<description>[1]

&lt;b&gt;Elizabeth Miller&lt;/b&gt; should Joe or Mayor Pete or any white male besides Bernie prevail, my money is on Kamala Harris as VP. As a whip smart, youngish female person of color she checks a lot of &quot;balance the ticket&quot; boxes and would be reassuring to the Democratic establishment.

Should Bernie or Elizabeth win the nomination I hope s/he picks the other as their running mate. Bernie/Elizabeth or Elizabeth/Bernie, it&#039;s all good.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[1]</p>
<p><b>Elizabeth Miller</b> should Joe or Mayor Pete or any white male besides Bernie prevail, my money is on Kamala Harris as VP. As a whip smart, youngish female person of color she checks a lot of "balance the ticket" boxes and would be reassuring to the Democratic establishment.</p>
<p>Should Bernie or Elizabeth win the nomination I hope s/he picks the other as their running mate. Bernie/Elizabeth or Elizabeth/Bernie, it's all good.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MtnCaddy</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2020/01/28/iowa-up-for-grabs/#comment-152574</link>
		<dc:creator>MtnCaddy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jan 2020 09:15:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=18010#comment-152574</guid>
		<description>And yes, sports fans, &lt;b&gt; MtnCaddy&lt;/b&gt; is bapping this out on a smart phone. With a cracked screen. I guess you really gotta want it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And yes, sports fans, <b> MtnCaddy</b> is bapping this out on a smart phone. With a cracked screen. I guess you really gotta want it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MtnCaddy</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2020/01/28/iowa-up-for-grabs/#comment-152573</link>
		<dc:creator>MtnCaddy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jan 2020 09:10:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=18010#comment-152573</guid>
		<description>[5]

Up until 48 hours ago.I thought there was no chance that the Senate would vote to remove Trump from office. Trump&#039;s defense team obviously thought so as well - they really mailed it in, thinking that the rubes who support our fake President would keep the GOP Senate in line. I think their overconfidence is going to come back to haunt them.

Trump, who has spent his life screwing people over, finally screwed over one guy too many in John Bolton. Bolton just blew up Trump&#039;s &quot;it&#039;s all hearsay&quot; defense and his willingness to testify before the Senate has put enormous pressure on the Senate to allow witnesses and documentary evidence. It&#039;s fair to assume that if said witnesses and documents were of any help to Trump they would already be out there.

This is where Trump&#039;s lack of character is going to kill him: Yeah, sure, the Repugs got yet another tax cut for the oligarchs and are rolling back decades of environmental protections, but everyone knows that Trump has no loyalty to anyone besides himself. He will throw anyone, any Party and/or our entire country under the bus to save his own skin or to fatten his bottom line. As such, I believe that (barely) under the GOP surface smolders an almost universal hatred of Trump &amp; what he&#039;s done to the &quot;Party that used to be Grand.&quot; Therefore Repugs would be perfectly happy to wash their hands of Trump &amp; cut their losses. &lt;i&gt;The one way the Repugs can limit damage to their individual careers and the Party as a whole is to vote unanimously in favor of removal. After all, where are Republican voters going to go if the GOP as a whole dumps Trump?&lt;/i&gt; They&#039;ll take their chances with a &quot;throwaway candidate&quot; in Mike Pence because they know they&#039;re gonna get killed (as Ford was after he pardoned Nixon.) But hey, after Carter&#039;s 4 years the GOP enjoyed 12 years of White House residency, so there&#039;s that comfort.

Again, this is likely a long shot, but this scenario has moved from the &quot;impossible&quot; category to the &quot;not only possible but it would solve a lot of problems for everybody on both sides of the aisle&quot; category.

&lt;i&gt;May we live in interesting times, indeed.&lt;/i&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[5]</p>
<p>Up until 48 hours ago.I thought there was no chance that the Senate would vote to remove Trump from office. Trump's defense team obviously thought so as well - they really mailed it in, thinking that the rubes who support our fake President would keep the GOP Senate in line. I think their overconfidence is going to come back to haunt them.</p>
<p>Trump, who has spent his life screwing people over, finally screwed over one guy too many in John Bolton. Bolton just blew up Trump's "it's all hearsay" defense and his willingness to testify before the Senate has put enormous pressure on the Senate to allow witnesses and documentary evidence. It's fair to assume that if said witnesses and documents were of any help to Trump they would already be out there.</p>
<p>This is where Trump's lack of character is going to kill him: Yeah, sure, the Repugs got yet another tax cut for the oligarchs and are rolling back decades of environmental protections, but everyone knows that Trump has no loyalty to anyone besides himself. He will throw anyone, any Party and/or our entire country under the bus to save his own skin or to fatten his bottom line. As such, I believe that (barely) under the GOP surface smolders an almost universal hatred of Trump &amp; what he's done to the "Party that used to be Grand." Therefore Repugs would be perfectly happy to wash their hands of Trump &amp; cut their losses. <i>The one way the Repugs can limit damage to their individual careers and the Party as a whole is to vote unanimously in favor of removal. After all, where are Republican voters going to go if the GOP as a whole dumps Trump?</i> They'll take their chances with a "throwaway candidate" in Mike Pence because they know they're gonna get killed (as Ford was after he pardoned Nixon.) But hey, after Carter's 4 years the GOP enjoyed 12 years of White House residency, so there's that comfort.</p>
<p>Again, this is likely a long shot, but this scenario has moved from the "impossible" category to the "not only possible but it would solve a lot of problems for everybody on both sides of the aisle" category.</p>
<p><i>May we live in interesting times, indeed.</i></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MtnCaddy</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2020/01/28/iowa-up-for-grabs/#comment-152572</link>
		<dc:creator>MtnCaddy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jan 2020 07:12:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=18010#comment-152572</guid>
		<description>[4]

...the overriding goal of Democrats is to defeat Trump (or Pence - see below) in November. I believe that will influence voters to give more weight to &quot;electability&quot; than usual.

I just don&#039;t see Amy making many waves in Iowa and I don&#039;t think she&#039;ll be viable after New Hampshire. I think the majority of her supporters will migrate to Mayor Pete, because those who support a woman appear more likely to jump over to a young, charismatic Pete over boring Joe Biden - sorry &lt;b&gt;Elizabeth Miller,&lt;/b&gt; but Joe&#039;s time (if ever existed) has passed.

I also believe that this whole &quot;spat&quot; between Elizabeth &amp; Bernie is a big nothing burger, flogged relentlessly by establishment media who appear very afraid of the true Democratic wing of the Democratic party, the Progressives. 

My money is on the following: Bernie will win Iowa &amp; New Hampshire. Biden &amp; Elizabeth will finish second &amp; third, respectively, in both states. I think the YangGang folk will mostly go to either Bernie &amp; Elizabeth. Tom Steyer&#039;s supporters seem more likely to migrate to Bernie &amp; Elizabeth as well, given his Progressive bona fides - Need to Impeach, climate change, etc. Tom has truly put his money where his mouth is. 

As previously stated, there will be no PUMA nonsense this time around.

If Joe places as I predict he will certainly be viable as we roll into North Carolina, due to his support in the black community. But he is in danger of not performing up to expectations in this, his &quot;firewall state.&quot; Ultimately I feel Joe is too old school, utters too many gaffes and has too much baggage to successfully surf the Progressive wave that has deepened since 2016. I just don&#039;t think he&#039;ll be able to handle Trump in a debate format, and I see him as just as uninspiring as was Hillary.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[4]</p>
<p>...the overriding goal of Democrats is to defeat Trump (or Pence - see below) in November. I believe that will influence voters to give more weight to "electability" than usual.</p>
<p>I just don't see Amy making many waves in Iowa and I don't think she'll be viable after New Hampshire. I think the majority of her supporters will migrate to Mayor Pete, because those who support a woman appear more likely to jump over to a young, charismatic Pete over boring Joe Biden - sorry <b>Elizabeth Miller,</b> but Joe's time (if ever existed) has passed.</p>
<p>I also believe that this whole "spat" between Elizabeth &amp; Bernie is a big nothing burger, flogged relentlessly by establishment media who appear very afraid of the true Democratic wing of the Democratic party, the Progressives. </p>
<p>My money is on the following: Bernie will win Iowa &amp; New Hampshire. Biden &amp; Elizabeth will finish second &amp; third, respectively, in both states. I think the YangGang folk will mostly go to either Bernie &amp; Elizabeth. Tom Steyer's supporters seem more likely to migrate to Bernie &amp; Elizabeth as well, given his Progressive bona fides - Need to Impeach, climate change, etc. Tom has truly put his money where his mouth is. </p>
<p>As previously stated, there will be no PUMA nonsense this time around.</p>
<p>If Joe places as I predict he will certainly be viable as we roll into North Carolina, due to his support in the black community. But he is in danger of not performing up to expectations in this, his "firewall state." Ultimately I feel Joe is too old school, utters too many gaffes and has too much baggage to successfully surf the Progressive wave that has deepened since 2016. I just don't think he'll be able to handle Trump in a debate format, and I see him as just as uninspiring as was Hillary.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MtnCaddy</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2020/01/28/iowa-up-for-grabs/#comment-152571</link>
		<dc:creator>MtnCaddy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jan 2020 06:36:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=18010#comment-152571</guid>
		<description>As it seems there are two &quot;lanes&quot; in the Dem primary, the &quot;Moderate&quot; lane with Biden, Mayor Pete &amp; Amy, and the &quot;Progressive&quot; lane with Bernie &amp; Elizabeth. Ideology &amp; style are, of course, important. But the overwhelming top priority of Dems is beating Trump (or Pence - see below) in November.

Whether &#039;tis Moderate or Progressive</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As it seems there are two "lanes" in the Dem primary, the "Moderate" lane with Biden, Mayor Pete &amp; Amy, and the "Progressive" lane with Bernie &amp; Elizabeth. Ideology &amp; style are, of course, important. But the overwhelming top priority of Dems is beating Trump (or Pence - see below) in November.</p>
<p>Whether 'tis Moderate or Progressive</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John M from Ct.</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2020/01/28/iowa-up-for-grabs/#comment-152570</link>
		<dc:creator>John M from Ct.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jan 2020 05:03:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=18010#comment-152570</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ll be curious how much of the press will decide on the morning after that Iowa &quot;doesn&#039;t count&quot; because the Caucus system, and the state itself, is so completely unrepresentative of the current nominating process (primary elections), Democratic electorate (highly diverse and urban), and national election landscape (declining manufacturing states as the battleground between Trump and the Dem. nominee).
As you acknowledged in the latter parts of your analyses, the question of exit tickets seems more applicable to New Hampshire rather than to this faintly comic process in Iowa; but I would hope that Super Tuesday, for all its flaws, would be regarded as the real test of which of these heroes is actually a national-scale contender for the presidency.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I'll be curious how much of the press will decide on the morning after that Iowa "doesn't count" because the Caucus system, and the state itself, is so completely unrepresentative of the current nominating process (primary elections), Democratic electorate (highly diverse and urban), and national election landscape (declining manufacturing states as the battleground between Trump and the Dem. nominee).<br />
As you acknowledged in the latter parts of your analyses, the question of exit tickets seems more applicable to New Hampshire rather than to this faintly comic process in Iowa; but I would hope that Super Tuesday, for all its flaws, would be regarded as the real test of which of these heroes is actually a national-scale contender for the presidency.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elizabeth Miller</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2020/01/28/iowa-up-for-grabs/#comment-152566</link>
		<dc:creator>Elizabeth Miller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jan 2020 01:52:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=18010#comment-152566</guid>
		<description>Is Trump going to solve the unsolvable Middle East Peace Process before the first caucuses in Iowa?

I mean, seriously!?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is Trump going to solve the unsolvable Middle East Peace Process before the first caucuses in Iowa?</p>
<p>I mean, seriously!?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elizabeth Miller</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2020/01/28/iowa-up-for-grabs/#comment-152564</link>
		<dc:creator>Elizabeth Miller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jan 2020 01:36:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=18010#comment-152564</guid>
		<description>So, what question would you like to ask professor Dershowitz? Oh, right … just kidding.

Who should Biden pick as his running mate? Yikes, it&#039;s bit early, I know, not to mention presumptuous. 

Seriously, I could live with a second or third place finish in Iowa. We longtime Biden supporters could dread worse, in Iowa, you know.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, what question would you like to ask professor Dershowitz? Oh, right … just kidding.</p>
<p>Who should Biden pick as his running mate? Yikes, it's bit early, I know, not to mention presumptuous. </p>
<p>Seriously, I could live with a second or third place finish in Iowa. We longtime Biden supporters could dread worse, in Iowa, you know.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
