Once again.. GOOGLE is Left Wing bias..

OMG, Michale!

Don't you understand that Google is a search engine? That it's not a destination but a way to get to whatever destination you want? That Google will get you to Daily Stormer or InfoWars just as readily as MSNBC or The Young Turks?

Here's a "FACT" that verifies when Obama filed for reelection:

https://www.upi.com/Top_News/US/2011/04/04/Obama-announces-re-election-bid/95081301905800/?dailybrief&ur3=1

Michale you could have looked it up yourself
so that at least your "whataboutism" was factually correct.

What do you read in my post, above, that suggests that I "have a problem" with Trump being the first President to file immediatly?

Plus the fact that you have established that you have a problem with EVERYTHING President Trump does..

Oh, so you are a mind-reader! Otherwise, how can you know what I do and don't like about Trump?

Tone.. Context..

Plus the fact that you have established that you have a problem with EVERYTHING President Trump does..

Once again.. GOOGLE is Left Wing bias..

Trump filed the day he was sworn in - 46 months ahead of time.

And yet, you have NO FACTS to support your claim.

Why is that??

What do you read in my post, above, that suggests that I "have a problem" with Trump being the first President to file immediatly?

Tone.. Context..

MC,

Trump filed to run for reelection the day he was sworn in and there will be no real GOP primary.

Why is it a problem with President Trump??

Michale, re FACTS

I like to be factual, and you can be, too! Here's how to do it: Get yourself on the the interwebs and find this thing called "Google" and ask(!) your smartphone " When did Trump file for reelection?" And it will offer you something called " Wikipedia" and the answers are right there!But I gotta warn you: this could be a rough ride for you, my friend, for this is NOT Fox News! Fox is the unofficial prapoganda network of oligarchs, Christofacists and Racists who's main goal is to get folks to vote against their own wallets. Present company excepted, of course. Ahem.

In contrast, Wikipedia has things like footnotes, references and so-called "links," and all you gotta do is read it. As Don Harris might say, easy as pie!

Again, please be warned that you are about to leave your alternative facts universe and crossing into a universe where, "Facts have a well known Liberal bias."

Obama filed for reelection on 4/7/2011 - 19 months before the election. So you were incorrect about that. Trump filed the day he was sworn in - 46 months ahead of time.

What do you read in my post, above, that suggests that I "have a problem" with Trump being the first President to file immediatly? The point I was making was that once a Party settles on a nominee many people's focus naturally graduates to the Party that hasn't yet. Lighten up, Dude.

"I do not think it means what you think it means."

-Igino Montoya
The Princess Bride

I guess I just worry that it might lead to Democrats needlessly airing their dirty laundry and letting the world know things that would not normally get discussed outside the family.

And, on top of all of that, the average American voter doesn't have the attention span required to understand why Biden voted for the AUMP in Iraq and that, in any case, it wasn't a vote, outright, for war.

There won't be time enough in this debate tonight, either.

I can almost predict how the asinine 'Biden voted for the Iraq war' nonsense will play out later this evening.

Biden should just say, "That's a bunch of malarkey - I didn't vote for war in Iraq. Read the Senate debate transcripts - and that goes for you, the moderators, too ... respectfully."

Actually, there was a surprisingly astute piece in the New York Times about this the other day … surprised the heck out of me, truth be known.

In fact, it was not the skirmishing itself, but the scattershot nature of the hostilities, that marked a new turn in the race. Defined until recently by an infrequent series of one-on-one confrontations, the contest is now becoming a melee.

Just what we need!! An old-fashioned melee!!!! :D

The reluctance to attack is now a vestige of the past. In its place is a spray of bullets in every direction.
https://www.politico.com/news/2020/01/14/january-democratic-debate-doozy-attack-098376

Apparently, I am not the only one who thinks this about tonight's debate.. :D

Although this may be some wish-casting, I think we're gonna see some real fireworks tonight...

Warren and Sanders are gonna be at each other's throats and at Biden's throat.. Biden will stumble worse than he did against Kamala I-SLEPT-MY-WAY-TO-MY-SENATE-SEAT Harris and Buttigig will appear to be the adult in the room and rise above it all..

You heard it here first.. :D

You mean the mid-terms where Democrats had to run as Republican lite to win??

I don't have to tell you that the mid-term is not the general..

Further, I didn't say minorities were flocking to the GOP.. I said minorities were flocking to President Trump..

And THIS is well-documented..

FACTS.. Not wish-casting.. :D

Obama offered "rhetorical support"...

President Trump laid a bright & clear red line..

You remember red lines, right?? Odumbo was fond of making red lines, but ran like a pussy when they were crossed..

Personally, I prefer DuckDuckGo.com. They don’t collect or sell your data, so I figure they have less incentive to be biased one way or the other.

I knew there was another one besides dogpile.. I just couldn't think of it at the time.. Yea, DDG is also a very good search engine that is not biased politically..

Searching by GOOGLE?? You might as well search at DEMOCRAT.COM :eyeroll:

Black Americans are swarming to President Trump.. Right now, President Trump's support amongst black Americans is in the mid 20s... It's projected to get into the mid 30s, low 40s come election day...

You answered yourself, buddy.

You see, this is EXACTLY what happens when ya'all confuse what you WISH to happen vs the facts that indicate what WILL happen.. Ya'all get egg all over yer faces.. :D

How'd those midterms work out for you? Heh...

-CW

Weekum.. :D

Time will tell. :D

Yeah, keep right on believing that. In fact, Trump's going to do so well in Florida that he won't even need your vote, so you can stay home on Election Day and avoid the lines and hassle.

Lines?? Out here in Podunk, FL?? :D Shirley, you jest..

The only hassle I got last election was when I forgot about the NO CONCEALED WEAPONS at polling places.. They had the signs faced the wrong way.. DUH...

But I just showed my shield and it was all no big deal..

But you would do wise to not underestimate President Trump's appeal to minorities..

The *LOWEST* unemployment ***EVER***..

What have Democrats done for minorities that even comes CLOSE to that??

Hell, it was DEMOCRATS who fought the CIVIL RIGHT legislation...

Democrats are toast with black and hispanic Americans..

But, take heart.. Democrats have locked up the gay transgender pregnant vote... :D

Say what? I must have missed this one. Here's a blast from the past, though:

http://www.chrisweigant.com/2008/06/23/in-honor-of-george-carlin-examining-nipplephobia-and-buttcrackphobia-in-america/

:-)

Oh, and thanks for that link, too.

-CW

So, obviously he didn't say anything of note.

NOTHING compared to President Trump's red line..

Yeah, keep right on believing that. In fact, Trump's going to do so well in Florida that he won't even need your vote, so you can stay home on Election Day and avoid the lines and hassle.

Heh.

-CW

My take is similar to the above article: small potatoes. Overall, I think the whole thing points to someone close to Warren getting desperate, personally. The call sheet leak was from the low level of Bernie's team, but the "can't be president" story had to have come from someone higher up on team Warren.

My bet: they'll both gloss over this tonight, much to the disappointment of the moderators. If Bernie's on top of his game, he'll point out that Biden said something very similar in public recently, and team Warren didn't take much umbrage over it (Biden said he wouldn't have to counter the misogyny Clinton had faced).

These aren't huge ideological differences between Bernie and Warren, after all. They're ginned-up non-scandals. Which is why I think both of them will essentially make nice tonight to each other, and thus defuse the issue entirely.

Oh, that reminds me: no column today until after the debate finishes... just to warn everyone in advance...

-CW

Obama didn’t ignore them. He put out a statement doing exactly what Trump did...he offered words of support,

Prove it..

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/obama-offers-rhetorical-support-to-iran-protesters-is-it-enough

From your favorite site.

DogPile uses results from all the other search engines, so depending on their algorithms, you might be getting even more biased results. I used to use DogPile, and I still do sometimes to find hard to locate websites, but I found that it often did not return easy to find sites. I am guessing that what makes it so good at finding the obscure sites is why it sucked at finding the most obvious ones.

Personally, I prefer DuckDuckGo.com. They don’t collect or sell your data, so I figure they have less incentive to be biased one way or the other.

Trump impeachment trial could start next Tuesday, McConnell says

“We hope to be able to achieve that by consent, which would set us up to begin the actual trial next Tuesday,” McConnell said.
https://www.cnbc.com/2020/01/14/trump-impeachment-trial-could-start-next-tuesday-mcconnell-says.html

I'm betting Pelosi is feeling 10 different kinds of stoopid today!! :D

SO much for the claim that President Trump is costing us ally support...

Looks like there is no daylight between the USA and the UK... :D

I'm just sayin'... :D

PARIS/LONDON (Reuters) - France, Britain and Germany formally triggered the dispute mechanism in Iran’s nuclear deal on Tuesday, the strongest step the Europeans have taken so far to enforce an agreement that requires Iran to curb its nuclear programme.
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-iran-nuclear/europeans-trigger-dispute-mechanism-in-iran-nuclear-deal-idUSKBN1ZD13A

Looks like the US and the three European countries are on the same page as far as the JCPOA goes..

Thank the gods President Trump had the foresight and prescience to get out of that bad deal...

Yea?? If President Trump "paraphrased" like that, ya'all would call it a lie..

We both know that is factually accurate..

So, either Bernie is lying or Warren is lying..

Spin it all you want, but those are the facts..

So it's the LEFT who are actually the new NAZIs... Who woulda thunked it.. :eyeroll:

What we saw Monday night in the presidential box was refreshing and a snapshot of civility – something both sides should be able to agree on is needed more than ever before.
https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/vince-vaughn-trump-civility-jim-daly

What *IS* it with you Demcorats?? Not only do ya'all have to HATE so deep and so hysterically, ya'all have to viciously attack those who don't hate as much as ya'all do??

Is this a learned trait or does it come naturally to Democrats???

It seems to me that the latest revelation about Bernie's sexism totally negates your efforts in this commentary to claim it's all a media construct..

I mean the facts show that there are really some heavy and hefty blows being traded..

In light of the Bernie Misogyny revelation, do you feel you might have jumped the gun??

As I said before.. Enquiring minds want to know.. :D

Warren, Sanders abandon truce as feud intensifies hours before Iowa debate
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/warren-sanders-abandon-truce-as-feud-intensifies-hours-before-iowa-debate

It was inevitable...

"THERE CAN BE ONLY ONE!!!"
-Highlander

"If Bernie doesn't get nomination Milwaukee will fucking burn"
-Sanders Organizer Kyle Jurek

I seem to have forgotten, what with all the facts to the contrary...

The settlement was significant and should impact outcomes of a variety of other defamation suits that stem from Sandmann and his classmates being swept up in a controversy after a 2019 video clip depicted the "MAGA" hat-wearing student smiling at Native American Nathan Phillips. The man was beating a drum and singing a chant as he was surrounded by Sandmann's peers, who had joined in on the chant in front of the steps of the Lincoln Memorial.
https://www.foxnews.com/media/abc-cbs-nbc-cnn-settlement-covington-sandmann

See what I mean?? Leftist MSM is in the bag for Democrats..

Google is just another propaganda arm of the Trump/America haters..

To get TRULY unbiased search results, I use DogPile..

It's not up to me to search around for facts to validate your claims.. If you have the facts to support your claims, the onus is on you to substantiate them..

Fox news is the propaganda arm of oligarchs and Republicans

Just like WaPoop and NY GRIME is the propaganda arm of the Hysterical Trump/America haters..

What's yer point???

Google, on the other hand, deals with factual knowledge with footnotes and references.

Actually Google is VERY biased in favor of the Trump/America haters.. This is well-documented by tests on their algorithms..

It's only relevant because it immediately scotched the notion that Trump would be only a one term President, and removed most of the newsworthy drama out of the "Republican primary."

No Trump supporter ever had that "notion".. I can only assume ya pulled it outta yer arse... :D

Michale,

Go look up "When did Trump file for reelection?" on this online source called "Google." Now I must warn you about Google: they are NOT Fox News! Fox news is the propaganda arm of oligarchs and Republicans who's paramount objective is to get people to vote against their own wallets. Google, on the other hand, deals with factual knowledge with footnotes and references. It'll be a little jarring for you at first, but it will open your eyes to a whole, new world.

It's only relevant because it immediately scotched the notion that Trump would be only a one term President, and removed most of the newsworthy drama out of the "Republican primary."

House prepares to vote Wednesday to transmit Trump impeachment articles to the Senate

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., faces mounting pressure not only from Republicans, but increasingly from fellow Democrats, to deliver the articles, which would then permit the Senate to begin preparations for a trial.
https://www.cnbc.com/2020/01/14/house-vote-wednesday-to-transmit-trump-impeachment-articles-to-senate.html

Amazing that there are still Weigantians out there who believe Pelosi's boneheaded moronic move was actually GOOD for Democrats.. :eyeroll:

At the top of Disney's MATTERHORN in Anaheim there is a full basketball court..

At the time that the MATTERHORN was constructed, city ordinances prevented ANY structure to be over a certain height...

The only exception was sport's arenas, so Disney put in a basketball court at the very top... :D

Now ya'all know.. :D

"It means you're going to lose," Sanders tweeted back.

That's funny.. Democrats said the EXACT same thing to Trump in the 2016 election...

How'de that work out again?? :D

But if nothing else, Biden is consistent, as you can see from a supercut of his racial gaffes over the years.
https://www.theroot.com/joe-biden-doesn-t-deserve-black-people-1840933963

Black Americans are swarming to President Trump.. Right now, President Trump's support amongst black Americans is in the mid 20s... It's projected to get into the mid 30s, low 40s come election day...

Democrats don't stand a chance...

Heh.... :D

I am still waiting for that "dangerous escalation" ya'all promised in the aftermath of the Sillyman assassination..

You see, this is EXACTLY what happens when ya'all confuse what you WISH to happen vs the facts that indicate what WILL happen.. Ya'all get egg all over yer faces.. :D

It's why ya'all are always wrong... :smirk: :D

DES MOINES, Iowa (AP) — Democrats are preparing for what could be their most contentious debate yet as the leading candidates gather in Iowa on Tuesday looking for a way to break out of the crowded top tier less than three weeks before the state’s caucuses kick-start the presidential nomination process.

But Warren chastised Sanders over the weekend following a report that his campaign instructed volunteers to speak poorly of her to win over undecided voters. The tensions escalated on Monday after CNN reported Sanders told Warren in a private 2018 meeting that he didn’t think a woman could win the election, a charge that Sanders vigorously denied but that Warren confirmed later Monday.
https://apnews.com/f5501656793b95a3bc5c60e898810d74

Explain to me exactly why this is all a "media construct"??

As an aside to Russ..

Turns out Democrats are **NOT** above personal attacks on fellow Democrats, eh? :D

US Supreme Court refuses to 'Free the Nipple' in topless women case
http://news.trust.org/item/20200113140914-x3iun

I think the SCOTUS should have freed the nipple.. :D

Trump impeachment trial fight for Bolton testimony echoes Monica Lewinsky
http://news.trust.org/item/20200113102655-ka82i

Strange how Democrats did **NOT** want witnesses during Clinton's impeachment...

But, **NOW** Democrats are all in about wanting witnesses..

More proof positive that it's all about the -D or -R after a person's name...

Looks like the Sanders/Warren spat is not really the media creation ya'all want it to be.. :D

As I said.. New found respect between the USA and the UK..

Repairing the damage that Obama had wrought...

heheheheh Now THAT is funny.. :D

Repeat after me:

The GOP is in TOTAL and COMPLETE CONTROL of Senate Impeachment proceedings.. PERIOD... FULL STOP...

Democrats, INCLUDING Pelosi, have ABSOLUTELY NO SAY in the matter..

The GOP will be just as fair and just as non-biased as House Democrats were..

Ya'all can't ask for anything more than that..

If Democrats want witnesses, let's have witnesses..

First up should be the alleged "whistleblower"... Find out EXACTLY the relationship between him Schiff-head.. Then, the GOP will get Schiff-head on the stand and watch him squirm..

Then, the GOP will drag Joe Biden off the campaign trail and quiz him on exactly what he knew about his extortion of the Ukraine regime...

And when all THAT fun has settled, then the GOP will drag Hunter Biden in and really turn the screws.. :D

So, hell yea.. Democrats want witnesses.. Let's have witnesses!! :D

"Uh... er.. well.. Never mind.. We don't need witnesses.."
-Democrats

:smirk: :D

“It's about a fair trial," Pelosi said. “The senators who are thinking now about voting for witnesses or not, they will have to be accountable.”

If Dumbocrats wanted witnesses, they should have called them when they had this faux impeachment coup in their control..

They didn't call those witnesses because they knew they would LOSE in the courts...

Today's Democrat Party..

ALWAYS losing.. :D

Pelosi had held up sending the articles of impeachment to the Senate, citing concerns about McConnell’s objectivity and the lack of ability to call witnesses to testify in the trial in hopes of winning concessions from Republicans. But McConnell refused to give in.
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/mcconnell-pelosi-impeachment-gambit

The ONLY thing Pelosi has accomplished with this whole faux impeachment coup is to cement President Trump's re-election...

:D

Cory Booker has dropped out of the 2020 race for president
Booker’s exit means a once-diverse field is getting whiter.
https://www.vox.com/2020/1/13/20887051/cory-booker-drops-out-of-2020-race-for-president

For all the Democrat Party's talk of "diversity"???

They are gonna nominate an old white guy as their champion.. :D

Hypocrisy, thy name is Democrat

"It's an amazing time to be alive when shaking the hand of the president is enough to get you canceled," user Jason Howerton said.

This is ya'all's Democrat Party...

No wonder Dems can't win elections.. They are such jerks and assholes.. :eyeroll:

Ouch.. That's just GOTTA hurt.. :D

Trump signs executive order creating task force on missing and murdered Native Americans
cbsnews.com/news/trump-native-americans-president-to-sign-executive-order-for-task-force-on-missing-murdered-native-americans/?fbclid=IwAR307jJmhg8BYVBchlU8gHE_0aur_hDPsX4mfoZ9cEbajVCu_iq

Wonder why Warren didn't applaud President Trump for this??

I mean, since she is...what was it?? 1/2045 American Indian?? :D

Seriously though, there was a GREAT movie made about this.. WIND RIVER starring Jeremy Renner..

https://www.imdb.com/title/tt5362988/?ref_=fn_al_tt_1

It's a pretty powerful movie made even more so by this at the end..

"While missing person statistics are compiled for every other demographic, none exist for Native American women."

President Trump deserves credit for doing what he did.. That's the reality here..

Trump signs executive order creating task force on missing and murdered Native Americans
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/trump-native-americans-president-to-sign-executive-order-for-task-force-on-missing-murdered-native-americans/?fbclid=IwAR307jJmhg8BYVBchlU8gHE_0aur_hDPsX4mfoZ9cEbajVCu_iq

Wonder why Warren didn't applaud President Trump for this??

I mean, since she is...what was it?? 1/2045 American Indian?? :D

Seriously though, there was a GREAT movie made about this.. WIND RIVER starring Jeremy Renner..

https://www.imdb.com/title/tt5362988/?ref_=fn_al_tt_1

It's a pretty powerful movie made even more so by this at the end..

"While missing person statistics are compiled for every other demographic, none exist for Native American women."

President Trump deserves credit for doing what he did.. That's the reality here..

Except it's not factually accurate..

America is a center-right country, no matter how you wish it otherwise..

Oh yea, sure.. You can cherry pick a poll here or there that would support the claim, but that's just dependent on how the poll questions are phrased..

Democrats had total control of the country and they blew it...

President Trump gets into office and things turn around... Economy is going like gang-busters and America is respected by her allies and feared by her enemies...

There simply isn't ANY WAY that Americans, REAL Americans.. Patriotic Americans are going to want to go back to the dismal and incompetent Democrat way of doing things...

America is back to being top of the food chain.. We're not going back to a government that insists we be at the bottom..

It's really that simple..

There is not a single Dem candidate that could even HOPE to best President Trump in the general election..

With black and hispanic voters running from the Democrat Party by the millions, a rip-roaring economy that's only getting better (not worse, like the Trump/America haters predicted) and Dem's changing what they are all about every day???

Rub all these FACTS together and what do ya get???

A President Trump re-election.. :D

Whoever the Dems nominate, he/she is going to be the Bob Dole of the Democrats.. A placeholder candidate who doesn't stand a chance in hell of winning.. :D

It's gonna be 2016 all over again.. And ya'all remember how much fun I had then, eh!? :D

Note: As you can probably guess, this was written before the NEXT Warren-Sanders "spat" story appeared (the one about Bernie supposedly telling Warren he thought a woman couldn't win). Just to be clear, that's why I didn't include it in the article.

So... What's yer take on the newest Sanders/Warren spat??

Is it a case of the media over-hyping??

Or did Sanders really say something sexist like that??

What do you think the fallout will be to this latest revelation??

Enquiring Minds want to know.. :D

Trump filed to run for reelection the day he was sworn in and there will be no real GOP primary.

Facts to support?? Any at all??

Even if factually accurate... So???

That's just what Obama did when he first took office.

Why is it a problem with President Trump??

Oh and Democrats would NEVER do that, eh?? :D

Once again, the bigotry shines thru.. :D

Chris, they just reported that McConnell does not have the votes to have a trial without witnesses! Did you See Lawrence Lessig’s article in the WAPost where he said McConnell should not be allowed to take the oath because he will be committing perjury based on his own statements?

Got any FACTS to support that bullshit claim, other than WaPoop??

No??

Of course not..

Face reality, Russ.. Yer gonna lose.. AGAIN...

I guess I just worry that it might lead to Democrats needlessly airing their dirty laundry and letting the world know things that would not normally get discussed outside the family.

And let’s face it, the GOP will take any little non-story event and warp it into a conspiracy theory that gets tons of free media exposure regardless of how baseless it is.

Chris, they just reported that McConnell does not have the votes to have a trial without witnesses! Did you See Lawrence Lessig’s article in the WAPost where he said McConnell should not be allowed to take the oath because he will be committing perjury based on his own statements? He and Lindsey Graham both have made it clear that they will not be impartial. One senator during the Johnson impeachment trial had his oath challenged by a fellow senator, and these two definitely have made it clear that challenging their oath is completely justified.

Another benefit is that the Democrats stay very much on the nation's radar with a robust and provocative primary. There's no equivalent on the GOP side. Trump filed to run for reelection the day he was sworn in and there will be no real GOP primary.

Yeah, I'll admit it's a tough position to take. But I consider it as inoculation. Even before Trump, if a scandal (or a made-up "scandal") cropped up before the primaries, (like, say, Obama's minister), then the candidate could have a chance to react to it in whatever way they chose (strongly deny, brush off, fight back, laugh it off, apologize, call for new direction, whatever...) long before the general election. Democratic candidates likely wouldn't go for the jugular, but instead allow for another candidate's response ("I will take his apology at his word, but voters should remember that I've always been on the right side of the issue").

Later, when it comes up in the general election, the now-nominee can present it as "old news" that has already been addressed. They've been inoculated by its exposure during the primary.

However, if a Dem candidate decided not to use an issue they discovered during oppo research, the odds are pretty good that the GOP candidate will also dig it up, so what happens instead is that the public doesn't even hear about it until the general election fight. That puts the Dem on defensive in a much bigger way. And the Republican will use it as a bludgeon in a way a fellow Democrat probably wouldn't.

I realize there's risk involved with this strategy, but I'm also tired of seeing a candidate become the nominee, and then after there's nothing the Dem voters can do about it, we all learn what their biggest weakness is (something from the dim and distant past, usually). To my mind, there's more risk with that strategy, in the end.

But I realize not everyone's going to feel the same way about it. There's risk either way, and it's always impossible to tell after the fact "how it would have worked out if it came out earlier/later" because it is nothing but speculation.

I thought I had written a whole article about this before, but I may be mistaken. I'll have to look...

-CW

Okay, I have to admit, that was pretty good comment, as it were. :)

He is a pie man, through and through, especially ice cream pie!

I agree with much of what you said regarding the media’s overly dramatic descriptions and habit of making mountains (“they are at war”) out of molehills (“they disagreed on a minor issue”). But I am surprised that you would suggest candidates running “no-holds-barred” campaigns during the primaries against fellow Democrats! Why encourage them to dig up and use as much dirt as they can on each other — dirt that the Republicans might never have discovered otherwise? And given the Republicans habit of turning nothing-burgers into huge scandals, it seems like you are just handing them more fuel to throw on future fires.

Seriously, CW, unless you are suggesting that a Democrat should attempt Trump’s trick of having scandals coming so fast and furious that they never have an opportunity to stick and do any real damage...this sounds like a bad idea. One, Trump is like an idiot-savant when it comes to dodging and avoiding any accountability for new scandals that pop up on an almost daily basis. Second, none of the Democrats running appear to be sociopaths, meaning they would be moved by guilt associated with committing dishonest or even criminal acts. Trump does not seem able to feel such guilt.

Warren and Sanders are running on extremely similar platforms, and seem to share very similar viewpoints. Why risk looking like an ass by going on personal attacks when you can just make strong arguments for why you are the best candidate and deserve the people’s votes?

-CW