What part of Schiff-Head says it's sworn testimony is not clear to you, moron???

It's a verbatim transcript of her testimony.

Schiff-head is a known and proven liar..

You mean like Donald Trump? Well then, he better slow down directly or the GOP goobs, rubes, and suckers will commence to genuflecting at his feet, beg him to become Their Worship, and ditch Donald in favor of Schiff. *laughs*

You only believe him because it's what you WANT to hear..

It's verbatim transcript of Yovanovitch's testimony, and you really have precious little idea regarding anything at all whatsoever... least of all what I WANT to hear.

But, as with yer moronic Russia Collusion delusion, in the end yer proven to be a total luser.. :D

Said the uneducated dipshit who keeps prattling on and on claiming to know a damn thing about legal issues and inventing fake quotes and bullshit statements while claiming to know what everyone is thinking.

Mike, you're that legend in your own mind that got yourself bitch slapped into your trailer swamps in Shithole and has himself and his "legal expertise" to thank for his own pathetic existence. What are you ingesting on Earth II where you are under the delusion that anyone would give two shits about your dumb fucking legal opinions? *laughs*

Think, McFly!

All process crimes that have nothing to do with anything..

If you ever find yourself in a court of law for whatever reason, you would be wise not to fall victim to your own delusions grandeur and the ridiculous nonsensical idea that you possess any legal knowledge whatsoever.

Oh, wait! Too late. *laughs*

Suzuki wasn't at all surprised that Donald Trump just grabbed him by the... wherever. *laughs*

You are a better an/or more persistent Googler than I.

I might have resources that run circles around Google. ;)

That was some pretty "creative paraphrasing from Sage of Idaho.

As Stucki has herein confessed, that narrow mindedness is virtually a feature over in Podunk.

Let me paraphrase Lincoln's most famous address in Stucki Style:

"It's a Great day to be at Gettysburg!"

Heh! The featured speaker at Gettysburg prattled on and on for about two hours before Lincoln stepped up to the podium and basically reminded the audience regarding the purpose of their sacrifice and the importance of national unity in two minutes... reminds me of some of the bozos on this forum too.

I didn't know Parade was still a thing.

Whenever the circus clowns and trained elephants come 'round your neighborhood, a Parade is sure to follow. *laughs*

My lovely wife and I are going to spend a fun filled evening together...

See ya'all in the AM when I can start again, kicking ya'all's asses around Weigantia..

Ya'all are my lil puppies now!!! :D

"Ya see, you are in MY pond now.. And *I* am the big fish here!!"
-Dennis Franz, DIE HARD 2-Die Harder

Get used ta it, people.. :D

What part of Schiff-Head says it's sworn testimony is not clear to you, moron???

Schiff-head is a known and proven liar..

You only believe him because it's what you WANT to hear..

But, as with yer moronic Russia Collusion delusion, in the end yer proven to be a total luser.. :D

Yea... That's Schiff-Head's claim..

No, that's her sworn testimony that is corroborated by the sworn testimony of multiples others.

It would be great if the admitted rubes could at least learn to read in order to avoid the appearance of being inveterate lying asshats.

But he is a PROVEN liar, so we don't really KNOW what was REALLY said...

What part of sworn testimony is confusing at all? Try to keep up, dipshit.

I'm pretty sure I already told you I'm perfectly OK with you not paying any attn to MVS. This is a political blog, narrow minded ain't all that uncommon around here, doesn't bother me in the least.

Nice to see Stucki accepting of his exiguous cranial resources... proving yet again that you really cannot fix stupid, but you can apparently convince yourself not to be the least bit concerned about it like the goobs and the rubes around there in Podunk. :)

I mean, no matter what, President Trump is going to win re-election..

That's the Weigantian majority (of those who have expressed such an opinion) statement...

But Dims nominate Warren!???

It will likely be a 48+ state landslide!!! :D

Stiggy boy blocks me because he is afraid of what I say..

No one on a political forum is afraid of a bullying, self-absorbed dipshit like yourself who thinks everything being discussed is (or should be) about him. The problem with the right-wingnut echo chambers like yourself who repeat the same lame BS over and over is that when you've seen a few of their posts, you've basically seen them all.

Veronica QUOTES what I say so Stiggy boy is FORCED to read it!!

In your repeated and demonstrable exercises in pure dumb rube remedial reading incomprehension, you yet again claimed that a post that had absolutely nothing whatsoever to do with you was ALL about you.

Every now and again, I absolutely will quote your "narcissism for no reason" and the evidence of your pure dumbfucking personality disorder back to Stig.

We're not laughing with the delusional dipshits like you, Mike; we're obviously pointing and laughing at you. :)

* Obstruction of justice
* Witness tampering
* Lying to Congress.

All process crimes that have nothing to do with anything..

Oh wow!! Ya caught the MASTERMIND!!!

BBBBBWWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

Yer a funny lil bit, ain'tcha... :D

Have I mentioned lately that Roger is set to stand trial tomorrow? First charges up for Roger include:

* Obstruction of justice
* Witness tampering
* Lying to Congress.

He's wearing a black suit, black tie, and a frown.
Roger could be so much prettier if he'd just smile more. :)

"It's a Great day to be at Gettysburg!"

Wasn't that Joe Biden's saying??

When he was in Idaho?? :D

Yer in my pond, sunshine.. :D Just remember that.. :D

The president and Suzuki shook hands, and then Trump said, "What a job he did. I didn't know that was going to happen."
https://www.usatoday.com/story/sports/mlb/2019/11/04/kurt-suzuki-nationals-maga-hat-white-house-trump/4156375002/

Ooo.. Democrats.. Democrats Democrats..

That's just GOTTA hurt, eh?? :D

hehehehehehehe

You are a better an/or more persistent Googler than I. That was some pretty "creative paraphrasing from Sage of Idaho.

Let me paraphrase Lincoln's most famous address in Stucki Style:

"It's a Great day to be at Gettysburg!"

I didn't know Parade was still a thing.

ANOTHER Democrat cop-hating moron takes a hike!!

NYPD Commissioner James O'Neill expected to resign, reports say
https://www.foxnews.com/us/nypd-commissioner-james-oneill-expected-to-resign

That's what happens when Democrats throw cops under the bus!!

Yea... That's Schiff-Head's claim..

But he is a PROVEN liar, so we don't really KNOW what was REALLY said...

There are NO FACTS to prove ANYTHING you post is factually accurate.

NO FACTS AT ALL..

That's what happens when you have secret Star Chamber hearings with NO independent verification.

Yer only spewing it because it's what you WANT to hear..

Once again..

NO FACTS

Narrow minded not uncommon??

Hell, it's a defining characteristic... :D

But there are a few of us who are the exception...

I'm pretty sure I already told you I'm perfectly OK with you not paying any attn to MVS. This is a political blog, narrow minded ain't all that uncommon around here, doesn't bother me in the least.

Stiggy boy blocks me because he is afraid of what I say..

Veronica QUOTES what I say so Stiggy boy is FORCED to read it!!

BBBWBWHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHA

Q: And what did Mr. Sondland say when you talked to him about this topic?
A: He hadn’t been aware of it, that the story had shifted, and he said, you know, you need to go big or go home. You need to, you know, tweet out there that you support the President, and that all these are lies and everything else. And, you know, so, you know, I mean, obviously, that was advice. It was advice that I did not see how I could implement in my role as an Ambassador, and as a Foreign Service Officer.
…
Q: Did he actually say, “support President Trump”? Was that his advice, that you publicly say something to that effect?
A: Yes. I mean, he may not have used the words “support President Trump,” but he said: You know the President. Well, maybe you don’t know him personally, but you know, you know, the sorts of things that he likes. You know, go out there battling aggressively and, you know, praise him or support him.

http://bit.ly/33fUdM7

I don't know what M said.

I posted it at [123].

Still offering my that space in yer head, eh Stiggy boy?? :D ~ Mike

You're talking about Marilyn vos Savant, and the idiot thinks you're discussing him. *laughs*

So, why should I be interested in what she has to say? Or what you have to say about what you think she said?

I see you also noticed that Stucki was more interested in trolling the group than any discussion about political polling... as per his SOP. :)

if so, it was pretty mild.

You'll get no argument from me there. The trolls on this board generally do suck at doing it. :)

You're obviously just a heartless Republican bastard for inflicting that "BBBWWAHAHAHAH" etc on the poor PTSD syndrome girl. Have you no compassion for the stupid and the self-deceived?? ~ C.R. Stuck-on-Stupid

Guilty as charged..

In your zeal to insult someone, you just admitted to be being a Republican. It's okay, we already know you're a Tea Party rube.

The stoopid and self-deceived Democrats are responsible for more pain and suffering than has been inflicted in the 30 years prior...

And yet you will never see a Democrat with a pointy head and/or tea bags dangling around their ears.

I hope to grow into such tolerance when I get to be yer age.. :D

Oh, why not practice some tolerance now? Also: You better get busy exercising if you're planning on making it to Stucki's age; his brain is quite obviously still living in the 20th century, but his body is hanging on in this one. :)

if so, it was pretty mild.

JL

Still offering my that space in yer head, eh Stiggy boy?? :D

So, why should I be interested in what she has to say? Or what you have to say about what you think she said?

You responded.. So, obviously it DOES interest you..

DUHHHHHHH

You didn't quote, you paraphrased. You didn't provide a link. So,
I don't know what M said. I can look up her credentials. A high IQ does not automatically make you knowledgeable about statistics or political polling. Her academic training is in philosophy. Her Parade answers are one paragraph affairs.. So, why should I be interested in what she has to say? Or what you have to say about what you think she said? If file 93 under lights on, nobody home.

Guilty as charged..

The stoopid and self-deceived Democrats are responsible for more pain and suffering than has been inflicted in the 30 years prior...

Being a NICE guy Republican, I only indulge in mild checkles (although they DO go on and on or hours)!

I hope to grow into such tolerance when I get to be yer age.. :D

You're obviously just a heartless Republican bastard for inflicting that "BBBWWAHAHAHAH" etc on the poor PTSD syndrome girl. Have you no compassion for the stupid and the self-deceived??

Being a NICE guy Republican, I only indulge in mild checkles (although they DO go on and on or hours)!

yea... You said the same thing when that Obama judge ruled that the Mueller Collusion Delusion report had to be sent unredacted to Congress..

That decision is going to be reversed on appeal..

Yes, you did say that decision would be reversed on appeal... or words to that effect.

What happened??

Nothing yet. It was appealed and a quite regular temporary stay was granted while the case is being considered... as per standard operational procedure that happens every day of the week.

It was reversed on appeal and YOU lost. :D

Wrong. You have quite obviously confused a knee-jerk standard temporary stay with a reversal on appeal. Those two things aren't the same. You should really stop yourself whenever you feel like you're going to explain ANYTHING about legal issues to ANYONE ELSE on this forum... since you generally have no idea what you're talking about.

The SCOTUS will rule in favor of President Trump as they always have..

Wrong again, sunshine. Like I said, whenever you think you need to explain legal issues on this forum:

Better to remain silent and be thought a fool than to speak and remove all doubt.

Little gnat.....

Nor do you get to portray yourself as a victim, when in fact, you were the predator. As the congressional candidate and then a duly elected public official, you were the one with the power and prestige. As the older woman, you were the one with the influence. You held all the cards, dealt a confused young woman a bad hand, and then dare to cry about being the victim?
https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2019/nov/3/katie-hill-open-letter/

See.. I don't agree with this..

Ms Hill IS a victim..

She is a victim of Dumbocrats and their Holier Than Thou vendetta based SOLELY and completely on their partisan anti-American agenda..

Democrats are the evil ones here.. So are Republicans who are attacking Ms Hill..

Ms Hill's **SOLE** transgression is living and loving as she saw fit within the confines of the law...

That's the beginning and end of this...

Which is not to say that Ms Hill didn't make some mistakes.. Sure she did...

But that just means she is human...

Apparently, for Democrats and some Republicans..

That represents a crime for which the person must pay a very VERY steep price..

Just ask Al Franken..

CRS, since I was here first, I'll let you have your space behind Victoria's right ear.. It's quite empty.. :D

Why, yes... there is actually air behind my right ear owing to the fact that I can actually discern what color the sky is without having to speculate.

You know what happens when you assume that everyone has a buttload of packed shit behind each ear like you do, right? You prove my point that your bald pointy head is shoved firmly up inside your hairy ass. Thank you ever so much for doing that.

I keep having to thank both the trolls for proving my posts. :)

yea... You said the same thing when that Obama judge ruled that the Mueller Collusion Delusion report had to be sent unredacted to Congress..

Remember what I said??

That decision is going to be reversed on appeal..

What happened??

It was reversed on appeal and YOU lost. :D

The SCOTUS will rule in favor of President Trump as they always have..

And you will LOSE again.. :D

Winning!

Oooooo Looks like Stucki struck home with Victoria!!

BBBWWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

CRS, since I was here first, I'll let you have your space behind Victoria's right ear.. It's quite empty.. :D

Raises the question, were those 2016 polls "not conducted via telephone" the same ones that guaranteed to Kick that there was no chance for Trump to win, thereby resulting in her massive affliction with PTSD syndrome, from which she has yet to recover?

There are no guarantees in any polling, you "fumducker," and thank you ever so much for coming along and proving the fact that you don't know shit about polling and that your aim here -- as ever -- is trolling.

I'm great, Stucki; however, please keep equating traumatic stress injury with a routine election held every four years; that way no one ever need wonder what a dumb fucking moron you really are. :)

Corn is. And healthcare. And immigration. And this wacky weather. Will someone do something about it?
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2019/nov/04/impeachment-is-not-the-issue-voters-in-iowa-care-about

Hysterical Trump/America haters actually BELIEVE that the American people care about impeachment..

All Dumbocrats are doing is simply PROVING how utterly scared and panicked Democrats are in facing President Trump at the ballot box...

It is UNIVERSALLY agreed here in Weigantia..

They **ONLY** result of this faux impeachment coup is that President Trump remains in office.. :D

Little pipsqueak gnat is buzzing around again...

bbbzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz bbbbbzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

:D

It's PERFECTLY clear why FNC is asking about Hillary!!

And it's a masterful stroke of genius!!!!!

Hillary Clinton leads Trump in a new Fox News poll. Yes, in November 2019.
https://theweek.com/speedreads/876179/hillary-clinton-leads-trump-new-fox-news-poll-yes-november-2019

O M G what an OP President Trump is pulling on Hillary!!

Enticing her... DARING her to run again!!! :D

BRILLIANT!!!!! Nth LEVEL Brilliance!!!!! :D

In other words...

Anything that DOESN'T toe their Party Slavery/Trump-America hating line is "trolling"..

In other words, no one said a word about any Party affiliation or Donald Trump in any of the requisite comments about polling... so any dumb fucking idiot who decided it had anything to do with Donald Trump or Party affiliation as opposed to the names that were hurled at the group as a whole is as fucking ignorant as the day is long.

Nice delusion...

There's nothing "nice" at all about your ever-present and persistent delusion that everything in the world can be explained by Party affiliation.

One has to wonder what color the sky is in their own little world of make-believe...

You wouldn't have to wonder what color the sky was in our great big world if your bald pointy head wasn't lodged so firmly up inside your admitted elephantine hairy ass cheeks.

Yunno the world.. Where there is President Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump is exiled to Gitmo..

Funny you should say that since right-wingnut conspiracy theory media like Breitbart and Fox News is exactly where they do seem to perpetuate the myth that Hillary Clinton is president, which is news designed and designated right up your "alleyway"... what little space is left up there and not already occupied by your vacuous yet corpulent head.

FUN FACT: "Hillary" is one of those words that triggers the rubes.

Patriotic Americans giving this faux impeachment coup the finger!! :D

Until this so-called "whistle blower" (democrat plant/stooge) comes forward and until ALL full transcripts of Schiff-Head's secret star chamber "hearings" are released..

Schiff-Head, Pelosi and the rest of the Dumbocrats can go pound sand.. :D

All of this brings us back to Thursday’s hyper-partisan vote and the resolution that purports to lay out the framework for the next phase of the “impeachment inquiry” launched by fiat during a news conference last month. This resolution, departing from 150 years of historical precedent, endows the House Intelligence Committee with extraordinary power over the inquiry, codifies Adam Schiff’s closed-door hearings, severely limits the powers of the Republican minority, and violates the president’s right to due process. The Democrats whose districts were won by Trump in 2016 have signed their own political death warrants by voting for this tawdry resolution. Execution day will be November 3, 2020.

Just in time for the 2020 Weigantian Annual Fundraiser!! :D

What a blast I am going to have on THAT fund raiser, eh??

Will make 2016 look like chump change.. :D

Dozens and Dozens of Democrats who promised bi-partisanship and to reach across the aisle only to turn around and do/be the EXACT opposite..

Republicans will easily take back the House in 2020.. The political ads that paint the Democrats as liars and cheats practically write themselves...

Another Dumbocrat who got elected by spewing the bullshit he was against impeachment..

Another Dumbocrat who will be shown the door in 2020...

Another Democrat who promised her constituents one thing, then flip-flopped and gave her constituents the finger..

Her constituents will have the last laugh when they throw her out of office...

Rep. Kendra Horn (D-Okla.): Horn narrowly defeated incumbent Republican Steve Russell in Oklahoma’s 5th Congressional District, a major upset in a state dominated by the GOP. Her margin was painfully thin, and her victory was no doubt facilitated by her alleged opposition to impeachment. As recently as a month ago, she was still trying to have it both ways when talking to her constituents: “While I didn’t support an impeachment inquiry, I certainly know that these are serious allegations that have to be investigated.” Yet when Thursday arrived and she had the opportunity to keep her promise or cave to political pressure, she opted to betray the voters who elected her. Rep. Horn won her seat by a mere 1.4 percent in a district Trump carried by 14 points in 2016. She’ll be history after 2020.

Rep. Max Rose (D-N.Y.): Rose defeated Republican Dan Donovan in 2018 in New York City’s last Republican stronghold, the 11th District. Like Cunningham, he told his constituents he was against impeachment. In fact, he wrote an op-ed that included the following denunciation of any such course of action: “Impeachment will not improve the lives of the hardworking Staten Islanders and South Brooklynites that I fight for every day.” But Congressman Rose had an impeachment epiphany after he arrived in Washington. The president won NY-11 by 10 points in 2016. With Trump at the top of the ticket again in 2020, plus a strong Republican opponent backed by the NRCC, Representative Rose is very likely a goner.

Oooooo SHHNNNNNAAAAPPPP!!!! :D

Rep. Joe Cunningham (D-S.C.): In 2018, Cunningham beat a weak opponent by fewer than 4,000 votes in South Carolina’s 1st District. During his campaign, and until just recently, he spoke of impeachment in the following terms: “I’ve warned members of my own party that a partisan rush to impeach the president would be bad for the country.” Last Tuesday, however, he announced that he would vote for the resolution. Like most of these faux moderates, he will tell his constituents that Thursday’s vote merely affirmed an ongoing investigation. This will not mollify the voters to whom he so brazenly lied. In a district that the president won by 13 points in 2016, Congressman Cunningham is a dead Democrat walking.

Dead Democrat Walking.. I like that.

DDW :D

The Democrats, their bluster about the 2018 “blue wave” notwithstanding, have a particularly tenuous grasp on the House majority. The GOP needs to flip only 19 seats in 2020 to regain control — and the National Republican Congressional Committee (NRCC) has already identified more than twice that number of vulnerable Democrats in districts won by Trump in 2016. Thursday’s vote has imperiled those weak Democrats even further by graphically illustrating that there really is no such thing as a “moderate Democrat.” Below is a list of Democrats who promised their constituents they would rise above the corrupting influence of the Washington establishment and are now likely to lose their House seats.
https://spectator.org/impeachment-vote-will-cost-these-dems-their-seats/

Democrats have insured that the GOP will not only retain the White House, grow their majority in the Senate, but will also take back control of the House... :D

Ya gotta hand it to Democrats..

When they scroo da pooch, they don't fool around.. They go full blown SCROOOED!! :D

Anything that DOESN'T toe their Party Slavery/Trump-America hating line is "trolling"..

Nice delusion...

One has to wonder what color the sky is in their own little world of make-believe...

Yunno the world.. Where there is President Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump is exiled to Gitmo..

:eyeroll:

Vos Savant is no authority on the matter of statistically sound polling methods. If she backed up her assertion with some math reasoning, why didn't you cite it?

Vos Savant didn't really even answer the reader's actual stated question.

You are perpetually smug, but I never see anything backing it up. Give it a rest.

Stucki's brain is obviously at rest and likely the motivating factor behind is interest in trolling rather than anything to do with actual polling. :)

@crs,
perhaps i've never said so, but i for one am glad to have your voice in this forum. it's rare that a true conservative is willing to brave the waters of the liberal blogosphere for any purpose other than trolling.

That was him trolling.

Weigantians and other fumduckers who worship at the altar of political polltakers would do wise to figure out a way to gain access to today's "Ask Marilyn" column, still found in many newspapers.

Said the ever-smug geezer who obviously isn't too wise to "do wise" and "figure out a way" to access "Ask Marilyn" beyond directing the very group that he's denigrating to a so-last-century newspaper!

Stucki seems blissfully unaware that the column is available on the Internet and has thereby self-labelled as one of those selfsame "other fumduckers" far too ignorant to recognize his own obvious dumbfucking dipshittery.

She's responding to the question (I paraphrase), "How in the age of cellphones and caller ID, can polltakers possibly hope to get anything right?"

her response (again paraphrased), "They ain't got a prayer!"

Do Pollsters Still Call Phones for Information?

By Marilyn vos Savant

As landlines are slowly becoming obsolete and fewer people are answering their mobile phones unless they know who’s calling, how are pollsters managing to get enough information?

— Joe Rihn, Englewood, Florida

What pollsters call the “response rate” has been plummeting for decades as Americans tire of the novelty of being asked for their opinions. This is now exacerbated by the annoyance of answering such a call while you’re shopping for groceries or doing the laundry. But the difficulty of obtaining enough information isn’t the main problem. The difficulty is knowing which people will respond by either means. Also, whether they will actually vote is uncertain.

https://parade.com/946075/marilynvossavant/do-pollsters-still-call-phones-for-information/

The idiot from Florida (redundant, I know) simply wanted to know how pollsters are managing to get enough information, and the correct response to his question would have been:

In present-day America, polls aren't merely conducted via telephone anymore in the same manner that news isn't only delivered via printed newspaper.

FUN FACT: Average raw IQ decreases with age. :)

In the city of Washington, the political and media elites obsess over the cheap chicanery of Capitol Hill machinations. But in the “city” of America beyond the Beltway, citizens recognize a country growing stronger abroad, safer at home, and wealthier from work.

As stated..

The Democrats' desperation to impeach is directly inversely proportional to their confidence of winning at the ballot box

And Democrats are HUGELY desperate to push this faux impeachment coup..

Ergo...... :smirk: :D

Trump cited the death of Ronil Singh, a policeman, father, and legal immigrant to America who was killed on Christmas Day by a previously convicted illegal migrant in the sanctuary state of California. At a memorial service for Officer Singh, his brother wholeheartedly lauded Trump: “This man over here” -- Reggie Singh gestured at the president -- “the Singh family supports him. Whatever he’s doing for law enforcement, we support him.”

President Trump support waning???

Just wishful thinking on the part of Trump/America haters everywhere...

Somehow, the thoroughly biased media found fault with this unquestionable success. They wailed that the it had happened “in spite” of Trump, rather than at his direction. The obstinance of the liberal establishment press contrasted starkly with conservative media in 2011, which overwhelmingly congratulated President Obama following the great achievement of dispatching bin Laden. For conservatives, killing the 9/11 mastermind superseded partisanship. For mainstream media in 2019, hatred of Trump eclipses even patriotic tendencies to celebrate the elimination of a dangerous threat to our nation. So torn was the Washington Post that the headline on its obituary for this monster described him as an “austere religious scholar.” Reacting to that tone-deaf description, Secretary of State Mike Pompeo highlighted Baghdadi’s personal role in the rape and murder of American aid worker Kayla Mueller and stated: “To suggest that Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi was anything other than a murderous terrorist is truly sick.”
https://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2019/11/04/trumps_week_vs_washingtons_week_its_no_contest_141649.html

President Trump kicks the shit outta Democrats and Trump/America haters (I know... redundant) six ways from Sunday.. :D

This is why rank and file and patriotic service members love their Commander In Chief and political officers hate their Commander In Chief..

There ya go.. 20 comments.. At least 16 or 17 that have current events subjects..

16 or 17 opportunities to show everyone here that you are NOT just here to make childish personal attacks on me or indulge in immature name-calling..

Are ya up to the challenge???

1000 quatloos says you can't handle it.. :D

Prove me wrong.. I DOUBLE DOG dare ya... :D

Gas prices of $4 to $5 a gallon -- the result of high taxes, hyper-regulation and green mandates -- add insult to the injury of stalled commuters. Gas tax increases ostensibly intended to fund freeway expansion and repair continue to be diverted to the state's failing high-speed rail project.
https://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2019/10/31/is_california_becoming_premodern_141625.html

As I said.. California is becoming the Venezuela of the USA.... :smirk: :D

If Democrats had their way, a Florida family of three would have been brutally murdered by thugs...

Vote against Democrats.. It could save your life some day...

But it's the transformation from a reality-based forum to a Forget Reality Hate Trump Every Day All Day forum...

Need a BIG indication of this...??

Look no further than the lead-in to this commentary..

Rupublicans? How infair!

Sigh.

A Typo-Lame...

Old Weigantia would NEVER have stooped to ANY kind of Lame, let alone the lamest of Lames, a Typo-Lame...

I mean, seriously...

If the MOST apropos lead-in one can have on the latest HATE ON PRESIDENT TRUMP screed is a Typo-Lame??

Well, that says quite a bit on how lame the HATE ON PRESIDENT TRUMP screeds have become..

I'm just sayin'...

"What has President Trump done for me lately??"

They will look at their larger paychecks, their larger valued homes and their pride in their country..

"What have Democrats done for me lately??"

No legislation, endless investigations, faux impeachment, coups and denigration of this great, this exceptional country..

And Americans will vote accordingly...

https://media.giphy.com/media/3E4g26uDjjqKUMs73y/giphy.gif

In order for Democrats to build off of their political success from one year ago, they need to continue to communicate on issues that the American people will consider when they go to the ballot box, such as how they are working to build an economy that works for everyone, achieving affordable health care and fixing the broken immigration system. If the 2020 election becomes a polarized battle over impeachment, Democrats may very well lose their gains from 2018 and, for the second election in a row, the White House.

Once again, the logic above is sound..

Is there anyone able to challenge the logic??

Silence Gives Assent
-Democrats' Charlottesville Rule

Democrats cannot and should not take their control of the House for granted. Given that several Republicans who lost by narrow margins in 2018, such as Young Kim in California’s 39th District and Maria Salazar in Florida’s 27th District, have already declared their candidacy for 2020, House Democrats must be mindful of how this apparently partisan impeachment inquiry will resonate with these voters.

That is going to be the epitaph on the gravestone of the Democrat Party..

DEMOCRATS HAD MORE TO LOSE THAN TO GAIN

Again, the question must be asked..

WHY??

And the answer is Michael Horowitz and John Durham..

Now, to be fair (as I am wont to do) the Democrats play MIGHT work...

Democrats might find something so horrendous, so catastrophic to President Trump that *ANYTHING* Durham or Horowitz could say would be rendered impotent.

That *IS* possible..

But, given the *FACT* that Mueller spent TWO YEARS and over 35 MILLION DOLLARS and all Mueller could do is (by self and by proxy) EXONERATE President Trump???

Given that *FACT*, the chances that Democrats find something so catastrophic in the next few months to render Horowitz and Durham impotent??

Very, very, VERY, VERY, *VERY* slim... So very slim as to be all but impossible...

So, it's obvious that Democrats view this faux/impeachment coup as the most desperate of desperate Hail Marys...

The Democrat thought process is that, since they are going to be destroyed anyways might as well be pro-active about it rather than passively accepting their demise..

In other words, Democrats choose to NOT go quietly into that good night..

Once again.. Flaw?? Logic?? Ross Perot...

“We could investigate the issues that we’re really concerned about without going further down the impeachment road,” said Jeff Van Drew of New Jersey, one of the Democrats who voted no. “We’ll have the same president and presidential candidate who will be able to say he is exonerated. So, I don’t know how much we really gain from that.”

That is what's so ridiculous about the Democrats actions..

No matter **WHAT** Democrats do, it is all but guaranteed that Democrats will LOSE..

Everyone here agrees... The Senate will NOT convict President Trump.. The Senate will EXONERATE President Trump.. Just as Mueller EXONERATED President Trump..

Democrats have decided on a course of action that will make President Trump STRONGER and immeasurably hurt Democrats..

Their so-called "logic" is abysmal..

The **ONLY** thing that makes sense is Democrats are thinking that, if they don't impeach/coup... If they DON'T try to change the message... Something much worse will happen..

Enter the Horowitz probe and the Durham criminal investigation..

The **ONLY** thing that makes any logical sense is that Democrats fear they will lose MORE by the Horowitz/Durham revelations then Dems will lose by this faux impeachment coup..

If there is a flaw in the logic....

"I am all ears"
-Ross Perot, 1992 Presidential Debates

Bonus points if one can point out the flaws without any personal attacks or immature name-calling..

On Thursday, the House of Representatives voted to formalize the Democratic-led impeachment inquiry and begin the critical public phase of the investigation. The final vote was 232 to 196 — every Republican representative voted no, and only two Democrats defected from the majority.
https://thehill.com/opinion/campaign/468712-partisan-impeachment-process-will-harm-democrats-in-critical-districts

Get that?? They only bi-partisan was on the part of those who OPPOSED the faux impeachment coup..

Kudos to those 2 Democrats who had the courage to give the finger to the Democrat Party and do their JOBS which was to acquiesce to the wishes of their constituents..

Joe Biden says that a partisan impeachment is not legitimate..

Nancy Pelosi says that a partisan impeachment is not legitimate..

Adam Schiff-head says that a partisan impeachment is not legitimate..

An illegitimate impeachment is an illegal impeachment...

An illegal impeachment is a coup.. Or, per Benjamin Franklin, an assassination..

These are the facts as they stand in the here and now..

Once again, I have to marvel at Weigantia Post-HHPTDS to the Weigantia of Pre-HHPTDS.

Pre-HHPTDS, Weigantia would have rose up and resoundingly condemned the actions of Democrats for forcing Katie Hill from office..

Post HHPTDS, Democrats can do no wrong and all we have is a milquetoast "Ehh, she may have deserved it..."

I think that's the saddest change in Weigantia brought about by HHPTDS...

Sure, the flame wars are sad and the personal attacks on my wife and kids and grandkids are very annoying...

But it's the transformation from a reality-based forum to a Forget Reality Hate Trump Every Day All Day forum...

I guess that's what the haters want... :^/

I just find it very saddening..

My most fervent hope is that, once President Trump is re-elected, everyone takes a step back and realizes how far off the reservation they have gone and realize what their hate has made of them..

But then reality seeps in and I realize that everyone here will probably be pushed past the breaking point by HHPTDS that has been dialed up to 20..

Once President Trump secures his second term, I have a feeling that things around here are going to make President Trump's first term look like a pleasant family picnic by comparison..

I see nothing to date that disputes that prediction..

:(

Let’s hope some Democrats and Republicans will earn their way into a sequel to “Profiles in Courage” by standing against the naked power grab of Democrats who wanted to overturn an election and eliminate an “Unacceptable President.”

If Democrats and Trump/America haters had ANY semblance of humanity and decency in them, they would be properly and utterly ashamed of their actions..

But GIVEN their actions, it's clear that they have no semblance of humanity or decency in them..

And that includes most people here..

In other words, Johnson was a boor who had the temerity to speak ill of Congress! This reveals the low bar of impeachment when it is wielded as a weapon and it is an echo of what truly annoys Nancy Pelosi about our lowbrow president. How easy to substitute Donald Trump’s name before the claim that “he did bring into disgrace, ridicule, hatred, contempt and reproach, the Congress of the United States.”

Sound familiar?? :D

This faux impeachment coup is for one thing and one thing only..

Trump/America haters are sore losers......

It's THAT simple...

Yup... :D

And true patriotic Americans are STILL laughing at Congress.. :D

So, tell me..

Where is all the legislative efforts on gun control??

Isn't that important any more??

Where are the bills for a whole host of things Democrats promised??

Down the tubes..

Democrats are going to enter the 2020 election season with NOTHING to show for their efforts but 2 failed coups and NO LEGISLATION...

And ya'all think that 2020 is going to be the election for Democrats??? :D

THAT is hilarious... :D

Of course, I was referring to the ah, comments section(s) which contribute nothing to the endless divisiveness that more than threatens your republic.

I hope you can keep it.

Oh, we can keep it..

Once we get rid of the Democrat Party in it's current form, the United States Of America will be glorious again!! :D

The current iteration of the Democrat Party is the only thing in the way..

Oh.. I see you have met Stig... Yer right. He has no sense..

Why do you always have to make this forum about me??

I have made 60-odd comments here in this thread..

The vast majority of them are about current events..

You could have addressed ANY one of them, if you actually had the balls to take a stand and state a fact or opinion..

But 98% of your comments are simply about me, personally..

Why is that??

Because you have no balls to take a stand on ANYTHING...

You have made 5 comments in this thread.. ONE of them had anything to do with current events.

The rest were just nothing but personal attacks on me, lies about me and discussions of me personally..

While I appreciate the free space you give me in your head (it's so airy and empty) EVERYONE here would be better suited if you just quit worrying about me personally...

But you can't do that...

And that is what makes you sad and pathetic..

Where is your proof? You got none! Zero!

You didn't say anything at the time is my proof..

Mueller didn’t investigate Trump for collusion, so he couldn’t have exonerated Trump.

NOW look who is lying..

YOU and most everyone here in Weigantia screamed COLLUSION COLLUSION COLLUSION for TWO FRAKIN' YEARS!!

And then when ya'all LOST, THEN you tried to say "Oh, no one was ever talking about collusion!!!"

Yer so full of shit your eyes are brown..

So now you are finally directly answering my question....

I have always directly answered your question..

You are a liar.. You are lying.. It's ALWAYS been the same answer.

YOU never addressed the FACT that you are lying..

I guess I was lying about you claiming to be a MP in the service, too?

Yes, you are lying about that as well..

You simply can't stop lying..

But we both know you are lying.

Once again.. You accuse me of what you are doing..

I hope you can keep it.

I merely made a suggestion that the 'pollophiles' around here might find her thoughts/opinions interesting/illuminating If you don't want to bother, I couldn't care less, but there's no sense criticising me for what she wrote or what she omitted without even reading it.

Vos Savant is no authority on the matter of statistically sound polling methods. If she backed up her assertion with some math reasoning, why didn't you cite it? Or is this a just another faith based opionion you took a shine to? You are perpetually smug, but I never see anything backing it up. Give it a rest.

Bullshit. Cite facts or shut up..

Iddn't it funny how you didn't give a SHIT about the Kurds when Odumbo stabbed them in the back??

Where is your proof? You got none! Zero!

That old tired line of bullshit died when Mueller totally and utterly EXONERATED President Trump for Russia Collusion..

Mueller didn’t investigate Trump for collusion, so he couldn’t have exonerated Trump.

And then you make these wild statements that are comical at best:

The last 3 years could have gone a thousand different ways.. President Trump could have governed atop an awesome economy (as he has), he could have instituted policies and procedures that cured cancer and brought peace to the Middle East.. He could have exploded NASA and taken the US to Mars... He could have single-handedly fixed the Korea Peninsula issue and peacefully reunited the Koreas..

President Trump could have done ALL of that and tons more..

So why the HELL DIDN’T HE DO THESE THINGS IF HE “COULD HAVE”??? What stopped him?

Says the guy who is constant lying that I told you I was never an LEO..

So now you are finally directly answering my question....you didn’t say that you had never been a LEO for a local police department? I guess I was lying about you claiming to be a MP in the service, too?

Once again, dipshit.. You accuse others of what you yourself does...

When did I lie about being a member of law enforcement?

As for you lying about it, feel free to tell the group which department you retired from, because I am pretty sure that all we would need to do is look up their hiring guidelines and it would be clear that with your documented criminal history, you would never have been hired. Cue the excuses!

We all already know your full name and where you live because you chose to tell us that info...so it’s not like you’d be giving out any relevant personal info. Plus, think about how big of an apology I would be forced to offer you!

But we both know you are lying. The way you’ve avoided directly answering the question for so long was proof enough of that! Your lies caught up to you. This is what happens when you try to bond with people that you’ve been trolling and lying to for so long. You shared the real background for the real Michael, instead of the embellished one you had invented for your online persona, Michale.

It’s a shame you feel compelled to be Michale on here...I liked Michael and think most everyone on here does too whenever he sneaks in.

Democrats simply don't have a case..

Patriotic Americans KNOW they don't have a case..

Man on the street???

'Meet the Press' asked voters in early primary states about impeachment, saw little support

New Hampshire voter Gary Chynoweth said Americans should rely on the country's system of checks and balances to resolve the issue fairly.
https://www.foxnews.com/media/trump-impeachment-democrats-voters-meet-the-press-nbc

You people can point to polls all you want..

But the facts remain that everyday Americans?? Patriotic Americans??

Think Democrats are wasting everyone's time and not doing their jobs..

Democrats will pay for this BIGTIME in 2020...

Turns out the Democrat plant/stooge is still trying to remain anonymous and not have to accept the consequences of their bullshit..

Which basically means that the Democrat plant/stooge has been coached well enough that his handlers think he can stand up to scrutiny...

A new poll from Harvard Harris finds Clinton nipping at the heels of Joe Biden in a hypothetical match up. Hillary, so far, has not declared her candidacy, though she has repeatedly teased the idea.
http://www.theamericanmirror.com/shock-poll-hillary-only-1-point-behind-biden-in-hypothetical-match-up/

Since ya'all like polls so much.. :D

Ya'all just HAVE to know that Hillary is taking a good long look at this pool, eh? :D

(note to @m, this is not necessarily a knock on you,

For the record, I consider this a compliment.. :D

On some things I am conservative, on others I am a liberal..

The fact that you recognize that I am not the dyed-in-the-wool conservative that others of lesser integrity try to paint me as??

Pleases me to no end.. :D

Montgomery County’s police union also criticized Elrich, who is a Democrat, saying that it would be honored to accept the “thin blue line” flag.
https://www.foxnews.com/us/maryland-governor-montgomery-county-executive-for-banning-police-divisive-thin-blue-line-flag

What IS it about Democrats that they hate cops so much???

Disgusting...

They're almost nominating me for sainthood!

It's been my experience with JL (over THIRTEEN YEARS!!!
WOW!!!) that he, unless the transgression is mighty large, rarely joins in other people's battles... :D

It's part of his charm... :D

And that's why I like having you around.. :D more often then not, you see the reality and ignore the propaganda.. Not always.. But enough to make you more or less trustworthy..

Put another way.. If you tell me the sky is blue, I usually won't have to look outside to confirm... :D

your politics are generally more about the person than the principle.

More accurately, I would say my politics are more situationally based on the facts on the ground.. On a specific incident/issue instead of blanket Left or Right...

In other words, I can easily come up with a plausible scenario where I would scream louder than the most devout Left Winger... :D

Thanks for your kind words. I only wish you could be more effusive in your praise for my efforts, perhaps on the order of Kick, Paula, Liz etc.

They're almost nominating me for sainthood!

Is that an industry term?? :D

(note to @m, this is not necessarily a knock on you, but i don't consider you a conservative; your politics are generally more about the person than the principle. yes, often you repeat the talking points of the paleo-cons and john birchers, but only when they agree with your personal views.

JL