Trump, no doubt at the behest of Erdogan, (who has full access to Cypriot banking records!) has fallen victim again to his past corrupt dealings. Huge amounts of laundered money flowed through Cyprus en-route to Trump's bank account, as court records from litigation proves...So the Kurds go under the bus.

That's fucking bullshit.

Now, thousands of well armed and equally well trained Kurds will be casting about looking for retribution. Thankfully, they know where Trump Tower is.

It's obvious now, given the events of recent days, that Trump is solidly 'hand in glove' with Putin. He's gone out of his way to cede influence over the Middle East to his Russian pimp, he's even conspired with him to take the heat off Russia over election meddling by offering a fait accompli to Ukraine over American support. Why, if Trump truly believed Russia wasn't involved in 2016 election meddling, would he try to concoct a scam to implicate the Ukraine? The answer is simple; Trump is working other people's agenda's. Trump, the traitorous twat, is trying to fool the fools twice, only time will tell, I doubt he'll succeed, I refuse to believe Americans are this stupid (obvious, odious examples notwithstanding).

[82] Michale spams the shit out of this place, he sources dubious material to support his hair-brained conclusions, to no avail. I took full measure of him on day one, he's bound to Trump and the GOP because he's a full-blown racist, he could never accept that Obama succeeded in righting the US economy after a Republican president so completely screwed it up. All Trump apologists land in this bracket, it's the only thing that binds them together, why else would they defend this utter cretin?

LL&P

Scaredy-cat Blotus says he won't cooperate with impeachment - too scared to testify. Coward, crybaby and guilty as sin.

Ridiculous arguments out of his attorneys too. All they'll accomplish is to stall the inevitable. They're basically arguing Congress has no authority over the POTUS. *laughs*

As far as impeachment goes.. I am glad to see President Trump is following my advice..

Mike claims President Trump is following his advice. *laughs*

Shocker, the person lying about being a former LEO does not understand that authority must be granted to exist. Face it, deflection is just you announcing to the world that:
a) you submit!
B) You lost!
C) You cannot lie your way out of the argument!
D) All of the above!

The answer is D!

Does a person who just happens to be President only have the rights that are specifically granted by the constitution? I strongly doubt that there is any constitutional right of a US pres to have blow jobs in the oval office from interns? Where is the pres. granted the right to make ridiculous Twitter posts every day? Which constitutional clause permits golfing?

Are you taking the “Intro to Trolling” course that Michale offers, because you once again are attacking a point that I never made!

Please note that Michale was the one who made this statement:

The President Of The United States has the authority to call up ANY world leader he wishes and ask that leader for ANY information on ANYONE in the world..

I was not talking about an individual’s rights, I asked where the President was given the authority that Michael claims he has been granted! Do you not understand the difference between an individual’s rights and the Constitution authorizing the individual holding the Office of the Presidency the power and permission to act on behalf of the nation.

It’s bad enough that Trump believes being rich grants him the right to sexually assault women, please don’t let him think that as the president, the Constitution grants him the authority to do so as well!

And no law can prevent the President from asking a foreign government to dig up dirt on a citizen for their personal benefit. Free will strikes once again! The law just lets the President know ahead of time that he is breaking the law if he does seek assistance from a foreign government — it serves as a warning that he will face punishment if he chooses to break the law!

Trump was lucky that Mueller’s team determined that Trump and those who worked on his campaign were just far too stupid to realize they were breaking the law to be held accountable. That won’t get him off the hook this time!

President Trump Tells Democrats To Take Their Faux Impeachment Requests And Shove Them Up Their Collective Asses!!!
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/impeachment-inquiry-white-house-not-comply-pelosi

Yea!!! THAT is what I am talking about!!

Kick their asses President Trump!!! :D

OK Back to AMAZING RACE :D

That's another keeper quote.. :D

So you are quoting CRS’s intentional misquote of what Balthy actually said and plan on using it to imply that was what was being argued by Balthy, is that it?

Well, at least that answers my question about your supposed quote from Obama that you conveniently ignored!

Does a person who just happens to be President only have the rights that are specifically granted by the constitution? I strongly doubt that there is any constitutional right of a US pres to have blow jobs in the oval office from interns? Where is the pres. granted the right to make ridiculous Twitter posts every day? Which constitutional clause permits golfing?

You don't have to have a law which specifically permits every conceivable action by a president that is not statutorially forbidden. That's ridiculous.

See ya'all in the morning.. :D

Of course I am not speaking your truth in my posts..

I am speaking FACTS..

Funny how you don't have any rebuttal to the FACTS laid out in the WaPoop article..

Why is that??

Because the facts are dead on ballz accurate..

Where, exactly, is the President denied that authority??

Not saying that it doesn’t grant it, just that you haven’t shown us if it does.

It's common sense...

I know, I know.. In VERY short supply around here..

And there is not a SINGLE SOLITARY LAW that says the President Of The United States CAN'T do that...

Where, exactly, is the President granted that authority? You want us to find a law restricting authority that you’ve never shown the Constitution actually grants! Not saying that it doesn’t grant it, just that you haven’t shown us if it does.

Just FYI, Michale’s link that he offers as proof of Trump being tougher on Russia than Obama is an opinion piece written by a Republican Senator from Alaska.

Once again, when he cannot defend a claim, he deflects or just ignores the question! That is why it is almost pointless to debate him, he isn’t interested in the facts, he is just here to troll.

The only reason to respond is to hopefully prevent his disinformation from being accepted by someone visiting the site who doesn’t realize that he is not speaking the truth in his posts.

Whoops, did it again....(I am typing out my responses in Notepad and cutting/pasting it once I am ready to post, but I keep cutting off the top line of my responses by accident.)

No, I did not see that on PBS, but it sounds like I should!

Did you happen to catch The Spy on PBS recently?

I became interested in the plight of the Kurds after meeting and becoming friends with a Kurdish man who lived in Syria and Iraq before seeking asylum in the US. He is gay and shared some truly horrifying stories of how tough is was growing up being identified as a Kurd in these countries, and how being identified as a homosexual would have meant an even slower, more brutal death than the one he constantly feared. Trust me, nothing makes you realize how little and minor the obstacles you’ve faced in your life truly were than spending an evening with someone who got to this country under our asylum program! Puts things into perspective, to say the least.

Even WaPoop knows this to be factually accurate..

Trump has not been ‘soft’ on Russia. He’s been tougher than Obama.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/trump-has-not-been-soft-on-russia-hes-been-tougher-than-obama/2019/03/28/08e88a04-5194-11e9-88a1-ed346f0ec94f_story.html

There are many additional examples.. But that will get you started..

How so?? What??

How so do we know it's factual??

Or how so do we know that President Trump has been stricter that Obama ever was???

How so, Michale?

Yea.. Because if President Trump was caught saying it, that is EXACTLY what YOU would be saying about it.

Don't bother denying it.. You and I both know it's factually accurate..

Who was it who said this Democrat faux impeachment coup would hurt Biden more than President Trump.

Why, it was me!! :D

Funny how ya'all didn't mind when Obama promised fealty to Putin...
.

So you are claiming that this is a direct quote from President Obama? I can find bits and pieces of this quote being reported, but I have not seen it reported that Obama said this word for word as you have claimed.

And do you honestly believe that saying he will have more flexibility to negotiate means that Obama was swearing his loyalty to Putin?

"The Kurds are a people that do not have their own internationally recognized country, but are forced to live in hostile countries that oppose their presence and contest their claimed borders."

There is a substantial Kurdish diaspora in Israel. The State of Israel has a long history (for a young country) of backing Kurdish national aspirations. Did you happen to catch The Spy on PBS recently? Israeli intelligence makes effective use of its Middle Eastern Jewish diaspora.

Sorry, this was supposed to have been the beginning of the above post, but somehow got clipped:

I agree with you that Russia will not be able to fill our shoes on the global scale, but that’s not what Putin wants anyone to believe! Russia can provide military aid and sell military arms to lots of the smaller countries that border them. This helps Russia look more like the military power it once was when it was running the USSR. Granted, being a country that relies solely on oil to survive, it won’t ever have the real muscle to force its will on others like in the past, but they can still try to delude themselves into believing that they can.

Thank you, Russ...

Blathy.. Go ahead and deny it again.. :D I double dog dare ya to.. :D

I see what you are doing here, Michale.

You noticed, eh??

I have an arrangement with DSWS.. I'll refrain from posting facts after facts after facts.. I'll just post a couple..

And he, in turn will, if the subject interests him, engage me over those facts.

I have to admit, he is a bit highbrow for me.. Hopefully he can dumb it down..

What did Obama think he'd be more flexible about?

Probably everything.. But only Obama knows what Obama would be... was.. flexible about..

We DO know for a fact that Trump has been a LOT more strict with Putin than Obama ever was..

Hell, Obama didn't even confront Putin on the election until it was too late.. Obama is quoted as saying he didn't want to hurt Hillary in the election by confronting the Russians forcibly..

But, as usual, you miss my point..

My point is, if Trump had been caught in an open mike saying that to Putin (or Putin's lackey, in Obama's case) you people would have gone totally batshit hysterical..

Don't bother to deny it cuz you and I both know it's true..

THAT is my point.. Ya'all's double-standards.. Ya'all's hypocrisy...

This thing with the Kurds is just one more example...

I gotta disagree with you, Obama did screw over the Kurds — even if that was not his intended goal for the choice he made. He was forced to make a decision that would result in one of our allies being happy and the other ally being pissed; regardless of which ally he decided in favor of, the other was not going to be happy! The Kurds are a people that do not have their own internationally recognized country, but are forced to live in hostile countries that oppose their presence and contest their claimed borders. This puts the Kurds at a severe disadvantage when we are forced to decide between helping them or helping our allies that oppose them.

Obama, however, was acting in our county’s best interest when he was forced to choose to take action that hurt the Kurds. Trump — not so much! But it is all the same to the Kurds, no doubt. As I said earlier,

The Kurds have been let down by our government so many times that I doubt they were too surprised by Trump’s screwing them over.

A classified State Department assessment concluded in 2018 that Ukraine’s former Prosecutor General Yuri Lutsenko—who is at the center of the impeachment inquiry of President Trump—had allowed a vital potential witness for Special Counsel Robert Mueller, Konstantin Kilimnik, to escape from Ukraine to Russia, beyond the reach of the United States, after a federal grand jury in the US charged Kilimnik with obstruction of justice.

Had Kilimnik been extradited to the United States, he had the potential to provide invaluable information to investigators that might have shed light on one of the most consequential unresolved questions that the American people deserve an answer to: whether the former chairman to President Trump’s 2016 presidential campaign, Paul Manafort, and perhaps other aides to then presidential candidate Trump, conspired with Russia to aid Russia’s covert operations to intervene in the election to defeat Hillary Clinton and elect Trump. By allowing Kilimnik to escape to Russia, Lutsenko foreclosed any possibility that Kilimnik would ever be questioned by US law enforcement and intelligence agents.

https://www.nybooks.com/daily/2019/10/08/ukraine-continued-the-key-witness-who-was-allowed-escape/

The BAD GUYS (Blotus/Putin) liked the corrupt Ukrainian Prosecutor. Obama, Biden and legit leaders around the world wanted him gone.

I don't even read most of your comments anymore. Because they do nothing to further my understanding of anything. A total waste of my time, in other words.

Do you know what Obama and Medvedev were talking about when Obama asked Medvedev to tell Putin he'd be more flexible after the election, assuming he'd win it, of course? What did Obama think he'd be more flexible about?

"Please relay to Vlad that if he could give me some space to win my election, I can be flexible for him once I am in office for another 4 years"
-Barack Hussein Obama

Funny how ya'all didn't mind when Obama promised fealty to Putin...

:eyeroll:

‘Don’t Tempt Me’: Hillary Clinton Fires Back at Trump Daring Her to Run With Eyebrow-Raising Tweet
https://www.mediaite.com/trump/dont-tempt-me-hillary-clinton-fires-back-at-trump-daring-her-to-run-with-eyebrow-raising-tweet/

Democrats couldn't be THAT stoopid to run Hillary again...

Could they??? :D

"Russia is the biggest winner in all of this"

I agree with that assessment. That said,
Balthasar (3) is correct in stating that Russia is not realistically going to take the place of the US on a global scale. Russian interest in Syria is regional.

Putin has backed the Russian Eastern Orthodox Church in his own country and the Eastern Orthodox Christians have been a prominent component of Syria for centuries. Part of the modern Russian interest in the Eastern Orthodox Church in Syria is sentimental, and part of it is regional power politics. Russia has been a backer of the modern state of Syria from its inception. Russia has military bases in Syria and largely equips the Syrian military. (With all the Russian technicians and military in Syria, a lot Syrian brides end up in Moscow). The port of Tartus give the Russian Navy a presence in the Mediterranean. Russian bases in Syria put also pressure on Israel, a strong US regional ally.

Once again, Trump seems inclined to give Putin what Putin wants. In this case, it's the abandonment of the Syrian Kurdish fighters.

And yet, the Hillary campaign STILL OWES hundreds of thousands of dollars to various vendors and such...

Once again, hysterical hypocrisy rears it's ugly head..

The President Of The United States has the authority to call up ANY world leader he wishes and ask that leader for ANY information on ANYONE in the world..

And there is not a SINGLE SOLITARY LAW that says the President Of The United States CAN'T do that...

This is fact...

Anyone who doesn't understand that fact or doesn't believe that fact is a "grade AAA" class moron..

Or a Party slave...

The Senate Intelligence Committee on Tuesday released volume two of its Russia investigation report, which concluded that Russians sought "to influence the 2016 U.S. presidential election by harming Hillary Clinton’s chances of success and supporting Donald Trump at the direction of the Kremlin," according to a committee press release.

The committee in its report focused on Russia's use of social media to influence the 2016 election, led by the Kremlin-backed Internet Research Agency (IRA).

"The Committee found that IRA social media activity was overtly and almost invariably supportive of then-candidate Trump to the detriment of Secretary Clinton’s campaign," according to the release.

The committee found, among other things, that the IRA activity on social media specifically targeted African American voters and spiked after the 2016 election concluded.

The full report is then attached.

NOTE: this is a SENATE report, which is under Republican control. They (Repubs) evidently couldn't bring themselves to lie. Good.

https://thehill.com/homenews/senate/464854-read-senate-report-finds-russia-tried-to-harm-clinton-boost-trump-in-2016#.XZzaeCG9CoY.twitter

He sees it as his right to stiff people. Good for Mayor of Minneapolis, though better in end if Blotus takes his blood-dripping dirty business elsewhere.

I would love to participate in your discussion.. But remember I am just a knuckle-dragging ground pounder..

Could you dumb it down for me?? :D

But, of course, Clinton asking Tony Blair for the exact same thing is perfectly acceptable.. :eyeroll:

Once again... It's all about the -D vs -R....

And while Trump asking a foreign government to involve themselves in our elections by doing him a personal favor is a crime, I think we aren’t focusing on the bigger issue here:

The President of the United States is the most powerful person in the world. Trump is using that power not to solve any of the countless problems troubling our nation, but is focusing it on a single US citizen in an attempt to harm that individual for Trump’s own benefit! THIS should terrify/disgust every citizen, but strangely those claiming to be the most “patriotic” among us have no problem with this blatant abuse of power. It’s one thing for Trump supporters who are clueless about politics to blindly support him, but for those that follow politics and understand how our government is supposed to function, there is no excuse for supporting such a corrupt and incompetent individual.

Trump using the attention his elected position warrants him for attacking individuals that are critical of him and for airing personal grievances has done serious harm to the integrity associated with the Office of the Presidency. Whether that harm is irreparable or not, only time will tell.

NO COOPERATION until the alleged whistle blower can be questioned and cross examined..

Until such time as that happens, it's obvious to all that the Dims are just on a fishing expedition, like they were with their Russia Collusion delusion..

Trump's won every court case, so this is gonna be tied up in the courts til after the election. Democrats will lose the House and this will all go away... :D

Another Old article. You just have to get up to date.

Are you REALLY that stupid??

Of course it's a older article.. Because Obama stabbed the Kurds in the back when HE was POTUS, several years ago..

I find it hard to believe you are actually THIS stoopid.. But you have surprised me before..

}}}You just want to beat President Trump over the head with something.. ANYTHING..{{{{

Yep.

Well, glad to hear you have conceded all your arguments are based on nothing but you being a Trump/America hater..

I accept your concession..

And here's a contrasting opinion:

"These laws—like so many laws—are imperfect. But the primary fault here lies not with the law books but with President Trump. Our laws of course could be better, but Trump’s breaking the ones we already have."
https://www.justsecurity.org/65978/blame-trump-not-the-u-s-code-for-his-abuse-of-emergency-authority/

I'm still with basically my original view. I think the author of this page is looking at a much narrower issue than I was talking about. The executive branch is set up with all the staff and processes to evaluate information and set policies, and the authority to put them into effect without legislative action. Congress should have its own bureaucracy full of hired experts to make law at the level we routinely have the executive branch legislate: regulations.

Hell, by this standard, our government could never work with foreign countries to solve any issues because some politician could use that accomplishment to help their re-election campaign! The point is that seeking help from foreign countries on issues focused on benefitting our country is OK, regardless if it has the side benefit of helping someone’s campaign. And to clarify, Clinton did not personally benefit from asking Blair for help; he was not running for re-election.

Trump seeking dirt on Biden is solely about helping his own campaign and nothing else! Even if you did not know that our own country is not investigating Biden, the timing of Trump’s requests to other countries to investigate an opponent is so obvious that even the blind can see it is only for Trump.

For starters, try NOT to punch at Obama. That train left the station a long time ago.

You just want to beat President Trump over the head with something.. ANYTHING..

Yep. And I've got to sympathize with Trump on this one - years and years of mismanagement have led him to this moment. But this - surprise - isn't the answer either. Surely a better solution could have been reached through negotiation.

.... is ya'all's blatant hypocrisy.. Ya'all don't give a shit about the Kurds..

You just want to beat President Trump over the head with something.. ANYTHING...

The Kurds are simply the latest excuse..

#sad

The deal between the US and Turkey which will allow American bombers to use Incirlik airbase while Turkey takes action against Islamic State (Isis) looks stranger and stranger. When first announced over a week ago, US officials spoke triumphantly of the agreement being “a game-changer” in the war against Isis. In fact, the war waged by Turkey in the days since this great American diplomatic success has been almost entirely against the Kurds, at home and abroad.
https://www.independent.co.uk/voices/turkey-kurdish-conflict-obamas-deal-with-ankara-is-a-betrayal-of-syrian-kurds-and-may-not-even-10432524.html

It's not an OPINION that Obama stabbed the Kurds in the back, just as ya'all are accusing Trump of..

It's a BONA FIDE FACT...

By supporting its Kurdish fighters and establishing permanent US bases, McMaster thinks the US can frustrate Russia’s effort to restore Syria’s borders which is one of the primary goals of the mission. The objective of forward deterrence is not to win the war, but to prevent the enemy from winning.

But McMaster is out, and apparently so are the Kurds.

https://www.counterpunch.org/2018/01/19/trumps-plan-b-for-syria-occupation-and-intimidation/

Except the FACTS say otherwise..

I know, I know.. You can't accept any facts that prove how full of shit you are..

But, sadly for you, the facts are STILL the facts, whether you choose to bury your head in the sand or not..

Didn't happen. Just didn't happen.

I concede your points.. :D

WHich has NOTHING to do with the fact that Obama stabbed the Kurds in the back and no one here said ANYTHING against it..

The ONLY logical and rational conclusion is that ya'all don't care about the Kurds.. You just want to use them and their plight to further yer own Party slavery agenda..

You're missing one small point: the Kurds are still there, still working with US servicemen. At what point did Obama stab them in the back (aside from this guy's opinion that he did)?

Yer stupider than usually today....

First off, it's FOUR years old, moron..

Secondly, it's 4 years old because THAT is when Odumbo stabbed the Kurds in the back, dumbass.. four years ago.. :eyeroll"

b) neglects the fact that we did indeed proceed to protect the Kurds.

Right. Obama DID protect the Kurds... Right up to the point Obama sided with Turkey and stabbed the Kurds in the back..

Truth is, I don't think..

FINALLY... We agree on something..

Except the FACTS say something completely different..

For Washington, it’s all a question of priorities. While the Kurds have been good friends and steadfast allies, they don’t have a spanking-new air base for launching attacks on Syria. Turkey, on the other hand, has a great base (Incirlik ) that’s much closer to the frontlines and just perfect for launching multiple sorties, drone attacks or routine surveillance fly-overs. The only glitch, of course, is that Washington will have to bite its tongue while a former ally is beaten to a pulp. That’s a price that Obama is more than willing to pay provided he can use the airfield to prosecute his war.
https://www.counterpunch.org/2015/07/29/the-politics-of-betrayal-obama-backstabs-kurds-to-appease-turkey/

You are obviously so delusional you can't acknowledge the FACT that Obama screwed the Kurds and you didn't give 2 shits about it then..

And the Kurds held it ever against him. Not.

The reality is that Obama held the Turks back from invading Syria, and the Kurds were fine - until Trump's surprise.

https://www.counterpunch.org/2018/02/01/turkish-invasion-pits-neocons-against-traditional-imperialists/

Yea.. Cuz that was when Odumbo stabbed the Kurds in the BACK.. DUH....

Something YOU claimed that "Obama did nothing of the sort".

Once again, you got caught in your bullshit lie..

The apparent split between the Pentagon and the White House does not reflect the deeper divisions which will become more apparent as the traditional imperialists in the administration face-off with the neocons in a cage-match that will determine the shape of policy in Syria and beyond. Simply put, the neocons favor an independent Kurdish state (that is opposed by Iran, Iraq, Syria and Turkey) while the traditionalists lean more towards accommodating their NATO ally, Turkey.

Of course, no one in their right mind would call Trump a neo-con. He's just enamored with dictators, and willing to go with the last person that talked to him.

And remind the few...
When ill of us they speak....
That we are all that stands between...
The monsters and the weak...

https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/13839e8d10b9303c8d9aee50576e15b15f4844be91d15073a21097a85b780c50.jpg

The Politics of Betrayal: Obama Backstabs Kurds to Appease Turkey

The Kurdish militias (YPG, PKK) have been Washington’s most effective weapon in the fight against ISIS in Iraq and Syria. But the Obama administration has sold out the Kurds in order to strengthen ties with Turkey and gain access to Turkey’s Incirlik Air Base. The agreement to switch sides was made in phone call between President Obama and Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan less than 48 hours after a terrorist incident in the Turkish town of Suruc killed 32 people and wounded more than 100 others.
https://www.counterpunch.org/2015/07/29/the-politics-of-betrayal-obama-backstabs-kurds-to-appease-turkey/

We DID hear from the Kurds about it.

You just ignored it because you didn't give 2 shits about the Kurds..

You STILL don't give 2 shits about the Kurds...

All you care about is taking down President Trump.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_executive_actions_by_Barack_Obama

The "it" that I was talking about was Congress handing over its power. Passing laws that authorize executive-branch actions, especially presidential actions, on matters that should be the subject of legislation (if we had a legislative branch capable of addressing the needs of a modern society).

JCPOA is the Iran nuclear deal of 2015. It was an exercise of power already delegated to the executive branch. As such, it couldn't create any new law without Senate ratification. It was also within the range of options considered reasonable by the foreign-policy establishment. From Wikipedia:

[A] letter, addressed to Obama, said: "We congratulate you and your team on negotiating a technically sound, stringent and innovative deal that will provide the necessary assurance in the coming decade and more than Iran is not developing nuclear weapons, and provides a basis for further initiatives to raise the barriers to nuclear proliferation in the Middle East and around the globe."... The 29 signatories included "some of the world's most knowledgeable experts in the fields of nuclear weapons and arms control", many of whom have held Q clearances and have been longtime advisers to Congress, the White House, and federal agencies.

[Another] open letter endorsing the agreement signed by 36 retired military generals and admirals ... said the agreement was "the most effective means currently available to prevent Iran from obtaining nuclear weapons"

I don't know enough details to form a well-founded independent judgment of the merits of the deal. But it wasn't a case of a president upending existing policy on the basis of a single phone call, to the consternation of his advisors.

DACA is "delayed action of childhood arrivals". It was a presidential memorandum: an exercise of executive powers previously granted by Congress, not a new transfer of additional powers to the executive branch by Congress.

Likewise, all executive orders are exercises of existing powers, not grants of additional powers to the executive branch by Congress.

Really? Were you that enamored of what Obama did? Of Course, Obama didn't do anything of the sort, else we'd have heard from the Kurds about it.

All that you care about is to throw a paper Obama up to intercept the inevitable club coming in Trump's direction.

If someone hands you a club, it's STILL illegal to beat him over the head with..

In this case, you are proving that all you are interested is the beating..

Odumbo handed you a club as well.. Funny you didn't care about the Kurds then.

Why is that??

Because ALL that matters to you is the -D or -R behind the persons name..

IE Party slave...

Is he trying to talk Erdogan down from his apparent blood-lust? Obviously not.

Maybe, but Trump handed it to us.

I have already demolished and decimated your Kurds argument..

You don't care about the Kurds one little bit.. You just have a new shiny to beat President Trump over the head with.

As such, ANY argument you make is nothing but a Party slavery agenda at work..

What Clinton did was solicit foreign assistance to influence an American election..

That's perfectly acceptable to you.. Because it's a Democrat doing it..

Thank you for your concession..

It's not everyday that a President throws an entire people under the bus like that.

You've got it! What Clinton did was ordinary intra-country business. What Trump did was anything but ordinary.

That's another keeper quote.. :D

For moronic'ness and utter stoopidity, that's ALMOST as bad as JM's "WE MUST STOP CLIMATE CHANGE!!!"

:D

Which in the hell world do you live in?? You oughtta try the world of REALITY for once!

They have proven beyond ANY doubt that they can't handle reality...

In other words, it was legal for Clinton but not legal for President Trump..

The example you gave has an answer of yes AND no. In the example of Clinton that you give above, the obvious answer is yes - the airline dispute between our country and Blairs was becoming a campaign issue for Gore, but pre-existed the campaign and was mainly an inter-country issue that had to be resolved.

But no, Clinton didn't ask for dirt about George Bush, or threaten to withhold military help from Britain.

"The law says you can't solicit dirt on your opponent during an electioN"!!!???

Which in the hell world do you live in?? You oughtta try the world of REALITY for once!

Is it illegal for an American President to solicit foreign influence in an American election.

Yes or No...

Do you know the difference between a cow and a cabbage? A brick and a bear? How about a polecat and a president?.... This case isn't about murder or mayhem; it's about learning the difference between here and there.
~Amistad

They're talking about a bi-partisan rebuke of Trump in congress. An overwhelming vote that he can't veto.

No, the LAW does not say that...

What you claim is a distinction, not a difference.

Clinton solicited foreign interference in a US election..

You can split hairs and claim it's ONLY if you actually try to get dirt on an opponent, but that is ignoring the forest for a single tree...

Clinton solicited foreign interference in a US Presidential election.

This is fact...

You have no facts to rebut this fact. As is your norm..

It's not me "saying so", the LAW says that you can't solicit dirt on your opponent during an election.

What part of "opponent" don't you get?

You saying it doesn't make it so..

Clinton wanted a political win because it was the political season in the US...

That's foreign influence to win an election. As YOU define it...

But, like your bullshit with solicit and receive, your bullshit has once again caught up with you.

Why not just concede what everyone here already knows..

Foreign influence in an election is perfectly acceptable, as long as it's a DEMOCRAT who benefits...

No, it's not. Not even in the same league, but thanks for playing. Next time think, "opponent".

Go ahead - I dare ya - to find a Republican on capitol hill that wants to delve into deficits.

Well, I'm hoping that you think they ARE bad, because some (conservative) Democrats would agree with you.

The trick is how to pay for it. Republicans right now don't want to think about deficits because it would eat into their donor base.

Liberals would happily revoke the "sugar high" tax break given to the rich last year. (Conservative) Democrats would apply sizable portions of that to debt relief.

you pointing it out endlessly is likely overkill, or at least an exercise in futility, right?

Right. We've been sayin' that for years.

Agreed..

Of course our guys are not immune there either - think "budgets deficits are bad".

Oh yes, of course.. Republicans have their own hypocrisy as well.. It's a politician standard

But A- it's not nearly as blatant as with Dims and 2-Republicans don't try to hide it or deny it..

But you pointing it out endlessly is likely overkill, or at least an exercise in futility, right?

As long as their are Weigantians who deny it (see Blathy's lame response) I will continue to point out the facts and reality...

It's my raison d'etre, these last 16 years or so with CW... :D

So - no, that's not it.

Did you READ Clinton's memo??

‘In a political season, it would be big over here to get this open sore resolved. If you could have somebody take a look at it.’

Meaning Clinton knows that if this "open sore" could be resolved, it would help Dem candidate Al Gore..

It's no different and much more blatant than what you accuse President Trump of..

But, of course you would claim it's different.

It always is, right?? :eyeroll:

Yeah, he asked Blair for help with an airline dispute. But then, the airlines weren't a political opponent.

So - no, that's not it.

Yeah, hypocricy and double standards are hallmarks of Dems/Libs, always were and always will be.

Of course our guys are not immune there either - think "budgets deficits are bad".

But you pointing it out endlessly is likely overkill, or at least an exercise in futility, right?

https://a57.foxnews.com/static.foxnews.com/foxnews.com/content/uploads/2019/10/1862/1048/screenshot.png?ve=1&tl=1

Bill Clinton asked UK PM Tony Blair for assistance during the 2000 Presidential Election..

Apparently, asking for assistance in a US election from a foreign leader is perfectly acceptable..

When it's a DEM POTUS doing the asking.. :eyeroll:

Here, let me help ya'all with yer responses..

"Well... er... uh... THAT'S DIFFERENT!!!"

Yea.. SUUURE it is.. :eyeroll:

"If Congress won't give me what I want, I have a phone and a pen"
-Barack Obama

DACA

JCPOA

etc etc etc..

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_executive_actions_by_Barack_Obama

You are correct however.. FDR really ran up the game with over 3000 EOs... :D

Obama didn't even come close to that, it's true..

But I do believe Obama was the most brazen about it.. He stated over and over again that if Congress won't give him what he wants, he'll just do it by executive fiat..

And Democrats support that..

NOW they regret it because President Trump is wielding that power.

the Russian economy is one tenth the size of our economy

Depends on whether you compare them using nominal exchange rates or purchasing power parity.

[11] Michale
Another thing that exploded under Obama (Congress giving power to the POTUS)

As far as I know, it exploded under FDR and then continued to increase at a moderate pace under all subsequent presidents, regardless of which party the president was, or which party was in the majority in either house of Congress. What makes you say it exploded under Obama?

I'm 100% agreement LWYH. This has "Hurt the United States/Benefit Russia" written all over it.

Sincere question here..

Did it have that same "Hurt the United States/Benefit Russia" writing all over it when Obama did it??

Or is that only the case when a REPUBLICAN president does it, as opposed to a DEMOCRAT president who stabs the Kurds in the back and throws them under the bus..

I am sincerely curious...

I am sure Michale will now be whining incessantly about how much of a "genius" Trump now is..

Not at all.. I simply have to point out ya'all's claims are bullshit and nothing but indicators of ya'all's Party slavery.

This is PROVEN as fact by ya'all's blatant, hysterical and HHPTDS induced hypocrisy

Ya'all have absolutely NO credible or moral foundation to condemn President Trump when you gave Obama a pass for doing the EXACT SAME THING..

Given this fact, I see no need to respond to each individual piece of bullshit ya'all spew...

I guess my response in #11 is the response when you brought this subject up in the comments yesterday..

I am willing to continue our little experiment into today, if you are.. :D

The players are the same, the actions are the same and the region is the same..

The ONLY difference is the POTUS has a -D or a -R after their name..

When the -D does it, you people love and support it..

When the -R does it, you people hate and abhor it..

Do you see why your positions and claims have NO credibility??

Because they are SOLELY, COMPLETELY and TOTALLY based on the -D or the -R... :eyeroll: