This... spot on!

THAT'S the part where it falls apart. Really? Hey, Mr. President, tell us another story...

I am certain he will the next time he opens his orange blowhole.

Putin, like Trump is out for himself, but not above instigating other countries to adopt governments that embrace Nationalism rather than globalism because it suits his goals better. So, for the moment, yeah.

Trump is Putin's Whore... so much so that he's willing to enlist the dictator of a communist adversary in order to conspire to subvert our democracy.

It's funny how Romney's quotes are ONLY notable when they are saying what the Trump/America haters want to hear..

Hypocrisy?? Definitely.. :D

I agree that Trump hates America. I would also wager that Trump himself will find Romney's tweets notable because they are saying what he doesn't want to hear.

Hyprocrisy? No you fucking poon because anybody's tweets can be notable whether or not you agree with what's written in them.

Romney's tweet is notable because he's not in lockstep with the head of his Party, you know, the America Hater Traitor. While multitudes of Americans have given their lives to protect our democracy from communism, the America-Hater-Traitor-In-Chief placed a telephone call to a communist dictator in order to enlist his help in interfering with our democratic elections. #Traitor

Was it because Mueller did not directly state that Trump should be charged for doing so with the Russians that they believed they could fool the public that bought into the “No Collusion” bullshit the first time into believing it again?

And since the DOJ has made it clear that the President will not face criminal charges for crimes committed as long as they are in office, is Trump counting on his public not understanding this, but instead believing that if Trump were truly breaking the law, then the Fed’s would stop him?

Or was it because they knew the Whistleblower’s complaint would eventually get out and they wanted to be able to direct where the main focus of the Democrats’ accusations would be directed so to prevent more damning information from being scrutinized and uncovered?

The “rough transcript” is missing an estimated 10 - 15 minutes worth of conversations between the two presidents based on what was released and the official length of time our government claims the call lasted. It is clear that two of the areas of conversation that were not included were immediately after Trump brings up Crowd Strike and a wealthy businessman in Ukraine. Both of these topics are focused on showing that Russia really did not interfere with our elections in 2016. If this were true, then there would be no reason to continue economically sanctioning Russia.

What I cannot figure out is why Trump believes the Ukrainians would try to clear Russia by pinning the interference into our elections on themselves!?!? If they were successful in doing so, wouldn’t it seem logical that we’d sanction them like we have the Russians?

Russia’s economy is pretty much generated from the export of oil...and that is exactly where our sanctions have focused on. Putin is desperate to get those sanctions removed. And it seems like Trump, for some “unknown” reason, is desperate to clear Russia’s name to get those sanctions removed!

Later. Much later, after he was out of office.

Mueller totally and completely exonerated President Trump

No, to the contrary, he set out 10 articles of Obstruction of Justice. Barr didn't prosecute. We'll see if they make it into the Articles of Impeachment.

Apparently, the GP in Ukraine thought there was.. And THAT is why Joe Biden had him fired.. To fade the heat from Biden's son..

False. And, yet, you were allowed to tap it out.

If there were false, I wouldn't be ALLOWED to type them out.. Think about that..

I don't have to. Sadly, Chris allows you to tap out anything you want - quite obviously - regardless of its veracity or lack thereof.

Trump is guilty of abuse of power, on several counts and on the factual basis of his own words.

Biden, on the other hand, is the epitome of integrity and devotion to country.

The law is actually very loose on this subject, ranging from treason to he “rendered himself obnoxious,” in the words of Benjamin Franklin.

ox News senior judicial analyst Andrew Napolitano slammed Donald Trump's "allusions to violence" and reference to a "civil war," arguing that the president's actions toward Ukraine constituted "impeachable behavior."

"Trump also suggested that his impeachment would produce a second American Civil War. This language is a dog whistle to the deranged," the legal expert, who previously served as a New Jersey Superior Court Judge, added.

As to whether opposition research is a violation of federal election law, it’s the reason why Trump’s former lawyer [Michael Cohen] is now serving time — it's one of the crimes to which he pleaded guilty.

Nope. It's America haters too.. Why else would ya'all be serving the needs of Putin and Russia..

And no, Romney has been quoted many times before.

Not by Trump/America haters.

And not as being in AGREEMENT with Trump/America haters, as is now..

So, once again, yer full of shit..

Lemme know when ya want to be civil, Blathy..

OK.. signing off. :D

"Hasta lasagna, don't get any on ya.."
-Emilio Estevez, MISSION IMPOSSIBLE

Blaaaa blaaaa blaaaa blaaaa

Sorry, son.. you have absolutely NO credibility whatsoever..

Even though my bona fides were WELLL established LONG BEFORE Russ began polluting Weigantia, Russ is going to spew hysterical bullshit about how I was never a cop and blaaa blaaa blaaaa blaaaa in 3.. 2... 1..

Yer a waste of skin, Russ.. Live with that..

Isn't that just Trump haters? And no, Romney has been quoted many times before. He was the Republican candidate for President, once upon a time.

In fact, weren't you FOR him, back then?

Which is factually accurate...

You have NO FACTS to support your version of your fantasy law..

His case would surely be helped if there were already just one iota of charge against Hunter Biden.

Apparently, the GP in Ukraine thought there was.. And THAT is why Joe Biden had him fired.. To fade the heat from Biden's son..

How do we know this?? The General Prosecutor in Ukraine swore an affidavit to it..

That's the main problem with the Trump shenanigans - what he's asking Ukraine and China to do is to dig up NEW dirt on Biden

Nope.. As usual, you have NO FACTS to support this bullshit...

So much for your claim that you ALWAYS have facts to support your bullshit.

And now, Pence is undoubtedly a part of it. White House guys have thrown him under a bus that hasn't started to move yet. Guiliani and Barr are in similar trouble, and this is barely even a week old so far.

Any facts to support??

Of course not..

This faux impeachment is falling apart all over the place..

But you stick to the delusion that it's all ending from Trump..

Which is EXACTLY the script you followed during your Russia Collusion delusion phase..

You swore UP AND DOWN AND LEFT AND RIGHT that Trump was going down!! Frog marched from the Oval Office..

You thought that and believed that with all yer hearts..

RIGHT UP TO THE POINT that Mueller totally and completely exonerated President Trump for Russia Collusion...

BBBBWWWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH

Ya should have seen the looks on ya'all's faces when President Trump was COMPLETELY exonerated.. :D

It's gonna be the SAME look when this faux impeachment coup also falls apart..

:D

And *I* am gonna be lovin' it..

Because, even CW agrees.. It's all but GUARANTEED that the end result will be President Trump remaining in office..

BBBBBWWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

Right now, I think they'd be happy just to muddy up the impeachment waters.

And, reports by "Horowitz" and "Dunham" are likely to be long on opinion, but short of facts.

in a world full of all kinds of "corruption," the idea that Donald Trump decided "Hunter Biden" from 2015 was the corruption that needed fighting

THAT'S the part where it falls apart. Really? Hey, Mr. President, tell us another story...

Would we call Putin a conservative?

Putin, like Trump is out for himself, but not above instigating other countries to adopt governments that embrace Nationalism rather than globalism because it suits his goals better. So, for the moment, yeah.

Pence would obviously go out first in the same manner as Spiro Agnew during the Watergate era

If they're smart - President Pelosi is probably too much to consider. Then again, Trump isn't above throwing EVERYONE under the bus just to stay afloat. Stay tuned!

Hypocrisy?? Definitely.. :D

We are not talking about requesting assistance in matters concerning national security. No, this is about...well, Trump hasn’t even bothered to figure out what crime Biden should be found guilty of having committed yet, so just wing it!

Why wait until Biden was clearly running against Trump for the presidency to begin asking countries to investigate him for events that everyone was aware of when they happened years ago?

This story was well reported when it occurred years ago. If the foreign government believed a crime had been committed in their country or against them, wouldn’t it seem likely that they would have already investigated the matter by now?

Spin! Spin! Spin! Gotta keep all the lies spinning so we don’t have to admit that Trump royally screwed the pooch on this one!

Mike is banking his argument on an assertion that has no legal basis - that the President can ask for dirt on his political opponents any time he wants.

Their inability to connect the dots is quite astounding, is it not? Those who keep whining incessantly that President Obama and others will be perp walked straight into jail cells upon the release of a report by "Horowitz" "any day now" while arguing at the same time that the POTUS can have any American investigated by any country on Earth and for any reason need to pick a lane. Is not America a country, and is not Trump an American? The ignorant goobers need to pick a lane.

Oh, and "Any Day Now" should definitely be the motto for the QAnon conspiracy right-wingnut spew. It just fits to a "T".

His case would surely be helped if there were already just one iota of charge against Hunter Biden. But by every account, he was an ideal board member. And who better to keep an eye on a troublesome energy company?

I know, right!? And in a world full of all kinds of "corruption," the idea that Donald Trump decided "Hunter Biden" from 2015 was the corruption that needed fighting is laughable, at best.

That's the main problem with the Trump shenanigans - what he's asking Ukraine and China to do is to dig up NEW dirt on Biden, based on the surety of his conservative friends that something would be found.

Would we call Putin a conservative? ;)

And now, Pence is undoubtedly a part of it. White House guys have thrown him under a bus that hasn't started to move yet. Guiliani and Barr are in similar trouble, and this is barely even a week old so far.

Yes, sir. It sure looks like Pence is being maneuvered under the proverbial bus, and the finger-pointing is just getting started. Trump is signalling to the votes in the Senate that Pence is going down with him. The two "peas" -- Pence and Pompeo -- are not protected from prosecution in the same manner as Trump, of course, so Pence would obviously go out first in the same manner as Spiro Agnew during the Watergate era.

But these people who lost their sanity when Hillary lost the election.

This isn't about the tiny insignificant singular election of 2016, you ignorant fucking poon; it's about the future of our democracy and the sanctity of our United States Constitution and our laws as defined by federal statute.

The need a touchstone to keep them at least within a semblance of sane..

The insanity belongs to the moron brigade of the Trump cult of gullible sheeple who are regularly spoon-fed a diet of propaganda bullshit and regurgitate it back in steady streams of verbal diarrhea like the useful idiots they've been groomed to be.

Paula's touchstone is that Russians elected President Trump. And xanax... LOTS and LOTS of xanax.... :D

Mike's touchstone is Trump's cock. :D

His case would surely be helped if there were already just one iota of charge against Hunter Biden. But by every account, he was an ideal board member. And who better to keep an eye on a troublesome energy company?

That's the main problem with the Trump shenanigans - what he's asking Ukraine and China to do is to dig up NEW dirt on Biden, based on the surety of his conservative friends that something would be found.

And now, Pence is undoubtedly a part of it. White House guys have thrown him under a bus that hasn't started to move yet. Guiliani and Barr are in similar trouble, and this is barely even a week old so far.

You Just Might Be A Traitor(TM)

Allow me to demonstrate:

You Just Might Be A Traitor(TM)

When your idea of "fighting corruption" is the enlistment of a communist nation in order to kneecap your strongest political opponent, you just might be a traitor. ~ Kick

Feel free to submit your ideas alongside ours, please.
_____________________________
Disclaimer: Referring to someone as a "traitor" is in no way whatsoever the equivalent of accusing them of Treason as that term is defined by federal statute. Also: If the shoe fits. :)

Mitt Romney
@MittRomney

When the only American citizen President Trump singles out for China’s investigation is his political opponent in the midst of the Democratic nomination process, it strains credulity to suggest that it is anything other than politically motivated.

11:02 AM · Oct 4, 2019

*

Mitt Romney
@MittRomney

By all appearances, the President’s brazen and unprecedented appeal to China and to Ukraine to investigate Joe Biden is wrong and appalling.

11:02 AM · Oct 4, 2019

And THERE is the crux of it...

But they will not and can not point to an actual law that Trump violated in the conversation.

And THAT is why Democrats will *ALWAYS* lose..

Because they have no law...

All they have is their hate and their bigotry...

And what if both things are true? What if Trump is genuinely concerned about corruption in our foreign affairs, and the fact that Joe Biden might be mixed up in it is a just a bonus? If there are cases, which there certainly are, when it is appropriate and legal for a president to urge foreign leaders to investigate potential wrongdoing by Americans, then the Democrats have to prove why in this case is wasn’t.

Once again.. Democrats are apoplectic because their coup is not working as planned.. :D

Don't fret...

Your opinion IS shared by everyone... At least everyone who has more than 2 brain cells to rub together and is not a Party slave... :D

Perhaps these are just coincidences. Perhaps Hunter Biden possesses some vast expertise in business that he honed while snorting cocaine during his time in the Navy. But it does not seem completely unreasonable to imagine his proximity to the White House might have played a role in his hiring.

As I have said and as has been proven beyond doubt....

Joe and Hunter Biden are suffering much MUCH more than President Trump is...

The blame for the ra*ist-in-chief belongs to the 62,979,636 people who voted for him.

Not exactly completely correct: But for the electoral college system that applies to only one elected official in the entire country, Trump would have lost by approximately the same percentage the polls were predicting on election day.

No one has been surprised by anything he has done in office: the Russians didn't fool people into thinking they were voting for anything but what they really voted for.

You continue to advance the idea that your opinion is shared by everybody... so very Trumpian.

Asked about what he wants Ukrainian President Volomydyr Zelensky to do about Hunter Biden’s business dealings there Trump said, “I would recommend that they start an investigation into the Bidens.” He also suggested that China should open a similar investigation. But what Trump was mostly saying is that he is the president and there is nothing wrong with saying such things to foreign leaders.

And Democrat HEADS explode with apoplexy :D

And it's a HILARIOUS sight to see!!! :D

Yes. Beyond reasonable doubt. Democrats would never pass up such an opportunity to shoot ourselves in the foot.

I would propose a wager, but I get the feeling that sort of thing is beneath you.. :D

The blame for the ra*ist-in-chief belongs to the 62,979,636 people who voted for him. The Russians hacked into voter registration systems, but they didn't purge any registrations. They made a lot of noise on Facebook, but they didn't stuff any ballot boxes. No one has been surprised by anything he has done in office: the Russians didn't fool people into thinking they were voting for anything but what they really voted for.

Exactly..

But these people who lost their sanity when Hillary lost the election.

The need a touchstone to keep them at least within a semblance of sane..

Paula's touchstone is that Russians elected President Trump. And xanax... LOTS and LOTS of xanax.... :D

Senate Homeland Security Committee Chairman Ron Johnson (R-Wis.) stepped forward with a disclosure Friday that he apparently thought might help President Trump weather his Ukraine problem.

But what he said was decidedly unhelpful for Trump.

In an interview with the Wall Street Journal, Johnson disclosed that Trump assured him on Aug. 31 that there was no quid pro quo between him and Ukraine. “He said — expletive deleted — No way. I would never do that. Who told you that?” Johnson said.

The more significant part of the conversation, though, is why Johnson even asked Trump in the first place:

Mr. Johnson said he learned of the potential arrangement involving military aid through a phone call with Mr. [Gordon] Sondland that occurred the day before Mr. Johnson spoke to Mr. Trump. Under the arrangement, Mr. Johnson said Mr. Sondland told him, Ukraine would appoint a strong prosecutor general and move to “get to the bottom of what happened in 2016 — if President Trump has that confidence, then he’ll release the military spending,” recounted Mr. Johnson.

“At that suggestion, I winced,” Mr. Johnson said. “My reaction was: Oh, God. I don’t want to see those two things combined.”

Sondland, you might recall, was one of three top U.S. diplomats whose text messages were disclosed to Congress by former Ukraine envoy Kurt Volker on Thursday. In those texts, Sondland twice responds to suggestions of a military aid quid pro quo by suggesting they talk about such things on the phone rather than via text.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2019/10/04/republican-sen-ron-johnson-just-did-trump-no-favors-ukraine/

A quid pro quo is certainly not required, but this sure sounds like a "quid pro Joe" to me, but don't take my word for it, ask Ron Johnson (R).

Oh, and do kindly ask him under penalty of perjury. :)

Too bad Democrats can't listen to their younger selves..

So be it..

The resulting destruction of the Democrat Party is on them...

Yes. Beyond reasonable doubt. Democrats would never pass up such an opportunity to shoot ourselves in the foot.

[145] Paula
He's also well aware he became potus in 2016 due to Russian interference and other cheating

The blame for the ra*ist-in-chief belongs to the 62,979,636 people who voted for him. The Russians hacked into voter registration systems, but they didn't purge any registrations. They made a lot of noise on Facebook, but they didn't stuff any ballot boxes. No one has been surprised by anything he has done in office: the Russians didn't fool people into thinking they were voting for anything but what they really voted for.

Pence is telling Democrats to go frak themselves..

Produce the "whistle blower".. Hold a vote..

Other wise, Democrats get NOTHING..

Yer out of your league, xanax girl... :D

https://oversight.house.gov/sites/democrats.oversight.house.gov/files/documents/2019-10-04.EEC%20Engel%20Schiff%20%20re%20Request%20to%20VP%2010-04-19%20Letter%20and%20Schedule.pdf

Of course, that was only during the impeachment of a guy with a -D after his name..

If the President has a -R after his name, it's COMPLETELY different...

:eyeroll:

Please, aren't there enough conspiracy nonsense out there already without you contributing to it?

Please, Elizabeth. If the aim of your crusade is to stop the conspiracy nonsense "out there," then you're quite obviously missing the Giant Honking Forest for the tiny twig.

Your attempts at censoring Paula are again duly noted, but might I suggest you focus your exertions elsewhere or take your own advice and STFU about her posts?

It's the air coming out of this whole faux impeachment coup....

Democrats are rocked back on their heels... That have been bitch-slapped and don't know how to recover..

We are seeing the beginning of the end of the Democrat Party as a viable Political Party..

And all I can say...

It's about frakin' time!!!!

:D

Michale is one happy camper today...

Today the president reiterated that he wants Ukraine and China to investigate Joe Biden. Democrats have not made clear why that is a crime.
https://thefederalist.com/2019/10/03/its-not-a-crime-for-trump-to-ask-china-and-ukraine-to-investigate-biden/

And Democrats CAN'T make clear why that is a crime, because it's not..

It's really THAT simple...

Ya'all just don't LIKE it because all the nefarious schemes that Democrats have cooked up over the decades are not coming home to roost..

:D

And I, for one... COULDN'T BE HAPPIER!!!! :D

"The problem is," he said. "Just like in China, in the case of Ukraine, he has no background that would warrant him getting this position. He has no background in energy policy, and he certainly has no background and Ukraine."

NO background in the region...

DOESN'T speak the language....

Has NO CLUE about energy whatsoever...

And yet, he nets $1.5 BILLION from China and gets a cushy 50 THOUSAND dollar a MONTH job in Ukraine..

And NONE of ya'all see ***ANYTHING*** wrong with that??

Change Biden to Trump..

NOW I bet ya'all would see PLENTY wrong with it..

You people are SO TRANSPARENT in your Party bigotry...

And what is LAUGHABLE is that ya'all don't realize ***HOW*** transparent ya'all are... Of course.. Notable exceptions noted...

It's an anonymous tweet...

Your idea of FACTS is as much bullshit as all your other claims..

You also said you ALWAYS have facts when you made claims..

You don't as I have proven..

Why can't you acknowledge you were full of shit???

"The president’s accusers must go beyond hearsay and innuendo and beyond demands that the president prove his innocence of vague and changing charges. They must provide clear and convincing evidence of specific impeachable conduct."
-Jerrold Nadler

All Democrats have is hearsay and innuendo...

That wasn't good enough with a DEMOCRAT being impeached..

But apparently it's PERFECTLY acceptable when it's a Republican who is being impeached..

OF COURSE it's ONLY about the -D vs the -R....

Nothing else fits the facts..

AOC. https://twitter.com/larouchepac/status/1179933213021626368

Blah, blah, blah. You asked me for a link to prove that right-wingers targeted OAC. I provided that link. It was:

https://twitter.com/larouchepac/status/1179933213021626368

You're welcome.

As news continues to break it's very clear Blotus knew he'd never "win" re-election without massive cheating. He tried to get multiple countries to make up dirt on Joe Biden, and, apparently also dropped Elizabeth Warren in some of his extortion attempts.

It's a global dezinformatsiya campaign right out of Putin's playbook... literally. It's not a coincidence when a country's leader uses his office to stay in power under the guise of fighting corruption. It's also not a coincidence that Donald Trump's idea of fighting corruption is to kneecap his political opponents in order to say in power to further his personal interests.

How gullible does one have to be in order to believe the concept that with corruption all around us wherein Saudi Arabia has killed one of our journalists and -- state the obvious -- Russia continues to hack our elections -- that Donald's idea of fighting corruption involves a disinformation campaign to disparaging his opposition. It does not take all that many firing synapses in the cranium of a thinking person to deduce that Trump is using taxpayers' dollars and the office of the presidency to further his own interests over the interests of the United States.

He's also well aware he became potus in 2016 due to Russian interference and other cheating, hence his hysterical efforts to delegitimize Mueller. PLUS, of course, he's trying to clear Putin of interference charges in an effort to get sanctions removed from Russia. Putin's puppet big time.

Yes, exactly... a modern-day Benedict Arnold who would sell out his country in order to benefit himself personally; I may have mentioned that a time or two.

Meanwhile Jared Kushner gave Saudi Prince MBS a hit list - and Khashoggi was murdered.

I'd say if Donald Trump was suddenly interested in fighting corruption, the murder of an American journalist in Saudi Arabia would have been a perfect avenue to have chosen, but what did America do?

China puts out a statement today declining to interfere in our elections on Blotus' behalf - that's what we've come to.

You don't mean the communist nation that Trump has attempted to strong-arm into his disinformation campaign in suborning American democracy has been an epic fail, do you? Australia has likewise refused.

It appears that Poor Donald's sudden interest in fighting corruption aren't going so well. :)

If Joe Biden was official and not rogue when he helped out his son....

Why hasn't Obama stepped forward and cover Joe Biden's ass???

The ONLY explanation that fits the facts is that Joe Biden was rogue...

OR

Obama doesn't want to put his face on it and is throwing Joe Biden to the wolves...

Either way...

It doesn't bode well for Biden.. Either of them..

Because I just bitch-slapped you and PROVED you were full of shit..

AGAIN... :D

Anytime you want to start the civility, let me know.. :D

If there were false, I wouldn't be ALLOWED to type them out.. Think about that..

By the way, how do you feel about Trump asking China to investigate the Bidens?

The same way ya'all feel about Hillary asking the Ukrainians or working with the Brits or the Russians..

Part and parcel to the process.... It's annoying, but it is how it is..

Non-serious.

For once, I agree with ya.. Not worth even responding to, unless it's with laughter.. :D

Schweizer: Biden's Son Cashed In On VP Being Point Man For Obama In Ukraine And China

"Joe Biden is appointed the point-person to two countries on policy: China and Ukraine. And in both of those countries, they happen to be the epicenters of Hunter Biden's business activities," Schweizer explained.
https://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2019/10/04/schweizer_bidens_son_cashed_in_on_vp_being_point_man_for_obama_in_ukraine_and_china.html

How utterly AMAZING..

Hunter Biden was able to garner BILLION DOLLAR jobs in Ukraine and in China.. Even though he had NO IDEA about the region, the politics of the region or the language or even the BUSINESS that they did..

Hunter Biden was COMPLETELY IGNORANT in every aspect of Ukraine and China...

And yet, he was able to garner billion dollar paychecks..

And the **ONLY** connection that Biden had to Ukraine and China is that Papa Smurf was assigned the point man in BOTH of those countries..

Coincidence???

Anyone who believes it was only a coincidence is either a MORON or a Demcorat Party slave...

Khashoggi wasn't murdered? Kushner & the Saudi prince aren't thick as thieves? Doesn't require big smarts to connect the dots.

Non-serious.

By the way, how do you feel about Trump asking China to investigate the Bidens?

Really??

Like the time you claimed I have no links in my comments??

You had no facts then..

What about the time you claimed all my comments were from Trump supporters, when in FACT many were from Democrats..

You were completely FACT-LESS then..

Of course, there was also that time you claimed Shorokin wasn't planning on investigating Hunter Biden.. Of course the FACT was Shorokin WAS planning on investigating Hunter Biden and there was a signed affadavit attesting to that FACT..

So, you had NO FACTS, but you DID have plenty of bullshit.. Maybe you confuse the two..

THEN there was that time you claimed that it is illegal for an American to solicit, obtain or receive any dirt from foreign sources..

Then when you found out yer butt-buddy Schiff-head was offered dirt on President Trump and jumped at the chance, then you back-pedaled and tried to claim it was illegal ONLY to solicit, but NOT to receive..

So, just in the past few days alone, your bullshit has far out numbered your FACTS (ZERO)

So, when you claim you always have facts to support your claim, that is ALSO a fact-less claimed..

Perhaps you MEANT to say, You always have BULLSHIT to support your claims.. Since yer a Democrat, that makes MUCH MORE sense as far as reality goes..

:eyeroll: moron

Everyone here knows i generally avoid name calling, but Moscow mitch really does seem to fit. Now the focus is off Putin's invasion of Crimea and Ukraine's attempts to defend themselves from further russian empire building.

Yes, sir, and as I've said before, Trump is being led around by the nose by Putin. Putin has a multiple inch thick manual of kompromat -- compromising material -- on Donald Trump, and he's their asset. The object of the exercise has always been for Trump to ease sanctions on Russia.

If anyone thinks it's mere coincidence that sanctions have already been eased by Moscow Mitch and Benedict Donald on Paul Manafort's employer Oleg Deripaska and that Moscow Mitch was thereafter rewarded with a "foil factory" in Kentucky by the Russian oligarch, well then, they've just not been paying very good attention.

Friday pie day! :)

https://twitter.com/larouchepac/status/1179933213021626368

I always have facts to support my opinions.

You're just angry that it isn't true.

Republicans now in the position of having to decide just what remnants of soul/conscience they possess - how far will they back this criminal-nutcase? How much Blotus-lying will they excuse? How much extortion/blackmail/corruption will they enable?

"Amazing. Everything you just said there is wrong.."
-Luke Skywalker

Khashoggi wasn't murdered? Kushner & the Saudi prince aren't thick as thieves? Doesn't require big smarts to connect the dots.

Don't be such an idiot, Blathy.. You do Paula's work for her..

There is absolutely NO DOT between Kushner and the Saudi Prince that involves Koshiggi..

And anyone who thinks there is, is totally and completely brain dead..

Although I don't give you credit for MUCH smarts, I DO think you are smarter than this..

Don't prove me wrong... :eyeroll:

Please, aren't there enough conspiracy nonsense out there already without you contributing to it?

Give valuim girl a break.. She has so little joy left in her life..

There's one Senate vote for our side. heh

Yea??

It's cute that you think it's actually going to GO to a trial.. :D

Yea?? Facts to support?? NO??

Of course.. :eyeroll:

Which doesn't explain why Schiff-head's committee had ACCESS to the complaint and the complainant A MONTH before it was revealed..

AND it doesn't explain why Schiff-head LIED about it.

So, as usual, your "distraction" is bullshit.. It IS the distraction..

Khashoggi wasn't murdered? Kushner & the Saudi prince aren't thick as thieves? Doesn't require big smarts to connect the dots.

Please, aren't there enough conspiracy nonsense out there already without you contributing to it?

There's one Senate vote for our side. heh

LaRouche PAC. Of course.

Sure, until the Senate votes. Then China will step forward - with dirt on Trump. Then what will they say?

Distraction. The Whistleblower had to run whatever he had through the ICIG first anyway. That inspector general had the final say before bringing it to the committee.

Look, your side is just gonna say "isn't true" until the cows come home, but the fact is that this impeachment is (as they say) "in the bag". It's not even close.

The alternative is that, from now on, any candidate can call on friendly countries to smear their political rivals. I could certainly see some Republicant Senators having second thoughts about that.

Given the current splits on Fox News (which you don't watch), I could imagine that you'd be a lot less confident.

But don't worry. If Trump wins that vote, every Republicant will have to spend next year explaining why.

He's also well aware he became potus in 2016 due to Russian interference and other cheating, hence his hysterical efforts to delegitimize Mueller. PLUS, of course, he's trying to clear Putin of interference charges in an effort to get sanctions removed from Russia. Putin's puppet big time.

Meanwhile Jared Kushner gave Saudi Prince MBS a hit list - and Khashoggi was murdered.

China puts out a statement today declining to interfere in our elections on Blotus' behalf - that's what we've come to.

Republicans now in the position of having to decide just what remnants of soul/conscience they possess - how far will they back this criminal-nutcase? How much Blotus-lying will they excuse? How much extortion/blackmail/corruption will they enable?

Yea.. Schiff-head is a guy we should be trusting, eh??

The same guy who claimed to have absolute PROOF of President Trump's collusion with Russia, but then back down when Mueller exonerated President Trump on Russia Collusion..

THIS is the guy ya'all want to believe??

ONLY because he is saying what ya'all want to hear??

"What are you, cops or door men??"
-Axel Foley, BEVERLY HILLS COP

My favorite part comes a sec later..

"Foul mouthed?? Fuck you!"

:D

heheh

"He basically said over and over in the conversation, 'This is not Trump country, that slogan 'Make America Great' is not favorable, popular, within 1,200 square miles,' that we don’t want Republicans here. I could not believe it,” event organizer Mike Randall, vice president of the Fallen Officers Foundation, said, according to FOX 11.

Democrats are PURE and UNADULTERATED Scumbags!!

Lahren on charity event for slain cop postponed due to Trump-supporting attendees: 'This is disgusting'

The Blue Bowl charity flag football tournament, originally scheduled for this Sunday in Thousand Oaks, California, was organized to honor fallen officer Sgt. Ron Helus and other officers who have fallen in the line of duty, FOX 11 of Los Angeles reported.
https://www.foxnews.com/media/youve-got-to-be-freaking-kidding-me-tomi-lahren-responds-to-postponed-charity-event-due-to-trump-supporting-attendees

They outdo themselves.. :eyeroll:

I guess that Chief bleeds DEMOCRAT Blue and not LEO Blue..

Putin's Democrats is a lot more apropos.. :D

Now the focus is off Putin's invasion of Crimea and Ukraine's attempts to defend themselves

Didn't that happen under Obama's watch???

“They spent the last three years harassing this president and I gather we’re going to get another chapter of that with the impeachment episode. But we need to find other things that actually make a difference for the American people and accomplish as much as we can,” he said.

As I have said and NO ONE has refuted..

The Democrat Party just jettisoned it's entire Party agenda in favor of this lame and doomed-to-fail witch hunt...

“I would have no choice but to take it up. How long you’re on it is a whole different matter,” McConnell said on CNBC Monday.

While I disagree with McConnell that he MUST take up the Articles Of Impeachment.. The power to hold a trial is also the power NOT to hold a trial..

But if he feels honor-bound to actually consider the Articles Of Impeachment, I won't fault him for his honor..

Just dismissing them after consideration is enough for me..

Of course, this presupposes that Democrats actually PASS any Articles Of Impeachment...

Which is extremely unlikely that it will considering it has established ZERO FACTS to support any articles..

McConnell signaling Trump trial to be quick, if it happens
https://thehill.com/homenews/senate/464307-mcconnell-signaling-trump-trial-to-be-quick-if-it-happens

I mean, how long does it take to say, "ARTICLES OF IMPEACHMENT DISMISSED"

And oh ho boy will I laugh my ass off!!

Ya think my gloating was bad after ya'all's Russia Collusion delusion fell apart!??? :D

Ya'all ain't seen NOTHING yet!!! :D

I mean, how long does it take to say, "ARTICLES OF IMPEACHMENT DISMISSED"

Ya'all ain't seen NOTHING yet!!! :D

Do you ever ask yourself if you care too much, or if this is the right place to care so much?

Fair questions..

I honestly believe that, if something is truly important, there is no such thing as caring TOO MUCH..

As to the latter..

Obviously this place is not the best place to be passionate.. Especially over the "wrong" things.. heh :D

But I owe a debt of honor to CW and won't abandon my responsibility here unless and until CW informs me my services are no longer required.. :D

This is a high-risk game Democrats are playing, and they’re going all-in to take out Trump.

It's a forgone conclusion that President Trump will remain in office after this faux impeachment coup...

It's further all but assured that President Trump will easily coast to re-election. They ONLY unknown is how big will President Trump's win be..

The Senate is safely in GOP hands and, given the overreach of the Democrats, it's highly likely that the GOP will increase their majority. Super Majority??? VERY likely...

But the House was more or less safe for Democrats until this faux impeachment coup started.. Their decline started with the Kavanaugh debacle and accelerated with the coup..

Now, Democrats will be grossly or obscenely lucky to keep the House..

There is the score-card as of today.. :D

Do you ever ask yourself if you care too much, or if this is the right place to care so much?

What should give the American public and some Democrats great pause is that the process for whistleblowers who wish to have their concerns expedited to Congress might have been altered to allow secondhand and even thirdhand information to suffice. Further, the whistleblower complaint reads more like a premeditated political set-up from a leaker than the misgivings of a concerned citizen worried about potential White House wrongdoings. But the real kicker, if you want to be cynical, is that Democrats are accusing Trump of engaging in the very same activity with Ukraine in which they were involved in 2016 and again in 2018.

Once again, if you DO want to look at quid pro quo, why don't you look at the actions of Democrats in 2016 and 2018??

The answer is because quid pro quo is not the issue..

Nullifying a free, fair, legal, democratic and Constitutional election..

THAT's the issue..

And lets take some Democrat quotes on THAT issue..

"In the case of an impeachment, fair means bipartisan … Once the election is held, our leaders hold office until the next election. It is simply antithetical to our constitutional democracy to use impeachment to overturn an election on partisan grounds. It violates the independence of the presidency and it usurps the people’s voice"
-Senator Joe Biden

"According to Ben Franklin, Impeachment is the legal substitute for ASSASSINATION"
-Jerrold Nadler

"It is our constitutional duty to give the president the benefit of the doubt on the facts"
-Senator Joe Biden

Let's repeat that one for the cheap seats..

*****************************************
"It is our constitutional duty to give the
president the benefit of the doubt on the facts"
********************************************

Are ANY of ya'all giving President Trump the benefit of the doubt, as Joe Biden insists we do???

Anyone??? Anyone?? Buehler???

One could certainly argue that Trump’s July 25 phone call with Ukraine’s President Volodymyr Zelensky was ham-handed and ill-advised — but to claim it’s illegal and thus warrants a fast-tracked impeachment seems like wishful thinking, and is an enormous political gamble.

Yep.. Exactly.

The Democrats' entire case is nothing but wishful thinking...

For the record, if their quotes are not accurate, they should be PROSECUTED...

Your argument for the impeachable offense is the quid pro quo.. NOT the "collusion"..

Do you concede that the "collusion" aspect is a non-starter as far as an impeachable offense goes??

Democrats have to PROVE President Trump's guilt..

And, since **ALL** that Democrats have is hearsay, innuendo and outright BS, Democrats are failing and failing BIG TIME in trying to make their case..

They won't even produce this so-called "whistle blower" to be questioned and cross-examined..

They won't let GOP question they witnesses they ARE calling.

Are these the actions of people who have a slam dunk case??

Nope..

I didn't even see any quotes.. But if they didn't have the actual TXT messages themselves, then it's STILL hearsay

If accurate, the messages prove the president did what the committees suspect he did, hold up military aid and lead the Ukrainian president to believe it was conditional on going after the bidens. If not accurate, they should resign.

Exactly.

We don't KNOW their accurate.. So you cannot claim them as if they were accurate.

Because we have NO WORD but the Democrats who claimed to have seen the TXT messages.

And I am sure you would agree, given all their claims made during their Russia Collusion delusion, their words ain't worth a plug nickle...

Which they didn't..

I am hoping you can come up with a win so I can reward such efforts.. :D

Maybe others would try and make a case as well..

Because, as Biden PROVED beyond any doubt.. Quid Pro Quo is perfectly acceptable within the hallowed hallways of diplomacy...

And is, by ANY stretch of the imagination, NOT an impeachable offense..

You want me to drag up more Democrat quotes?? :D

All that is is an article claiming that Democrats on the various committees HAVE text messages that claims to say what you say they say..

The actual text messages are not displayed..

Considering the TRACK RECORD of those same Democrats who claimed to have absolute undeniable PROOF of Trump colluding with the Russians, yet was never able to actually produce such proof??

I wouldn't believe these Democrats if they said that sky was blue and water was wet...

I am further constrained to point out that Schiff-head hisself has already been caught in a bucket full of lies, so his credibility is worse than anyone eles's..

Unless you have the actual txt messages and they are VERIFIED, then all you have is hearsay...

And, even if you had documented FACTS to say what you claim they say, it wouldn't matter..

Because, as Biden PROVED beyond any doubt.. Quid Pro Quo is perfectly acceptable within the hallowed hallways of diplomacy...

OK.. For you.. :D

Jim Jordan says he hopes Schiff releases Volker transcript on Trump-Ukraine: 'There's no quid pro quo'
https://www.foxnews.com/media/rep-jordan-says-he-hopes-americans-see-the-former-ukraine-envoys-transcript

More facts to support that it's a coup...