<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Friday Talking Points -- Collusion, Collusion, Collusion!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/09/27/ftp544/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/09/27/ftp544/</link>
	<description>Reality-based political commentary</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2026 12:30:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: ListenWhenYouHear</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/09/27/ftp544/#comment-145844</link>
		<dc:creator>ListenWhenYouHear</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Oct 2019 22:41:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=17460#comment-145844</guid>
		<description>Kick,

Thanks for stepping and correcting the coward.  You are the best!  He does everything in his power to avoid answering the direct question:  

Did you lie to the group when you claimed to have been a commissioned LEO or were you lying to me when you claimed not to have been a LEO, but had been a MP in the military?  

I’m giving him all rope he needs to hang himself and his credibility if he continues to lie, or he can tell the truth and be less humiliated.   He’s just too stupid to realize this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kick,</p>
<p>Thanks for stepping and correcting the coward.  You are the best!  He does everything in his power to avoid answering the direct question:  </p>
<p>Did you lie to the group when you claimed to have been a commissioned LEO or were you lying to me when you claimed not to have been a LEO, but had been a MP in the military?  </p>
<p>I’m giving him all rope he needs to hang himself and his credibility if he continues to lie, or he can tell the truth and be less humiliated.   He’s just too stupid to realize this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kick</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/09/27/ftp544/#comment-145781</link>
		<dc:creator>Kick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Oct 2019 12:36:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=17460#comment-145781</guid>
		<description>Russ

Hi ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Russ</p>
<p>Hi ;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kick</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/09/27/ftp544/#comment-145779</link>
		<dc:creator>Kick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Oct 2019 12:31:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=17460#comment-145779</guid>
		<description>Russ

&lt;blockquote&gt;Aside to JL, if you really want the FACTS and not Russ&#039;s bullshit, google AFSC 81152-A. It&#039;s Law Enforcement Specialist with a K-9 designator. Air Force LEOs do everything that a civilian LEO does. They simply do it on a military base.. Military LEOs have even a bit more training then civilian LEOs.. ~ Mike&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Nope. That code is an obsolete designator used from 1954 through October 1993 and hasn&#039;t been used in over 25 years. Being as that is the case, we&#039;re talking about pretty primitive training compared to LEO training required of today&#039;s technological LEOs. 

As I said, it&#039;s an ancient designator, and as such, I was required to &quot;dig deep&quot; to find the list of requisite duties performed in largely primary order. A quick perusal demonstrates a job that would be referred to in the vernacular as having the primary duties of gate guard, security guard, and paper pusher. 

Pardon the all caps, but it&#039;s an obsolete designator.

&lt;blockquote&gt;


81132/ 
81152 
(N=1,251)

TASKS 

F313 STAND GUARDMOUNT 65 
F305 PREPARE AND ISSUE TRAFFIC TICKETS OR VIOLATION NOTICES 63 
F240 CONDUCT BUILDING SECURITY CHECKS 60 
F308 PROVIDE DIRECTIONS OR INFORMATION TO VISITORS 59
F261 DEPLOY IN RESPONSE TO DURESS OR ALARM ACTIVATIONS 56 
F283 ISSUE VISITOR PASSES 56
E199 MAKE ENTRIES ON C FORMS 75 (VISITOR/VEHICLE PASS) 55
F297 PERFORM ON-BASE MOBILE PATROLS, OTHER THAN WITH PATROL DOGS 55

B78 SUPERVISE LAW ENFORCEMENT SPECIALISTS (81152) 20
E227 TYPE CORRESPONDENCE IN DRAFT FORM 19 
D136 CONDUCT ON-THE-JOB TRAINING (OJT) 24 
F246 CONDUCT INSPECTIONS OF ASSIGNED POSTS 23 
D155 MAINTAIN TRAINING RECORDS, CHARTS, OR GRAPHS 13
F276 EVALUATE SITUATIONS AT INCIDENT SCENES 35 
F245 CONDUCT GUARDMOUNT 16

A20 ESTABLISH ORGANIZATIONAL POLICIES, OFFICE INSTRUCTIONS (01), OR STANDING OPERATING PROCEDURES (SOP) 7
C87 ANALYZE INSPECTION REPORTS 6
Al ADVISE STAFF PERSONNEL ON TRAINING MATTERS 11
C129 WRITE STAFF STUDIES, SURVEYS, OR SPECIAL REPORTS 4
C119 INDORSE AIRMAN PERFORMANCE REPORTS 9 
C89 ANALYZE WORKLOAD REQUIREMENTS 4
B37 CONDUCT STAFF MEETINGS 3  

[Page] 56 

https://apps.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/a149220.pdf
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
And there you have it. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Russ</p>
<blockquote><p>Aside to JL, if you really want the FACTS and not Russ's bullshit, google AFSC 81152-A. It's Law Enforcement Specialist with a K-9 designator. Air Force LEOs do everything that a civilian LEO does. They simply do it on a military base.. Military LEOs have even a bit more training then civilian LEOs.. ~ Mike</p></blockquote>
<p>Nope. That code is an obsolete designator used from 1954 through October 1993 and hasn't been used in over 25 years. Being as that is the case, we're talking about pretty primitive training compared to LEO training required of today's technological LEOs. </p>
<p>As I said, it's an ancient designator, and as such, I was required to "dig deep" to find the list of requisite duties performed in largely primary order. A quick perusal demonstrates a job that would be referred to in the vernacular as having the primary duties of gate guard, security guard, and paper pusher. </p>
<p>Pardon the all caps, but it's an obsolete designator.</p>
<blockquote>
<p>81132/<br />
81152<br />
(N=1,251)</p>
<p>TASKS </p>
<p>F313 STAND GUARDMOUNT 65<br />
F305 PREPARE AND ISSUE TRAFFIC TICKETS OR VIOLATION NOTICES 63<br />
F240 CONDUCT BUILDING SECURITY CHECKS 60<br />
F308 PROVIDE DIRECTIONS OR INFORMATION TO VISITORS 59<br />
F261 DEPLOY IN RESPONSE TO DURESS OR ALARM ACTIVATIONS 56<br />
F283 ISSUE VISITOR PASSES 56<br />
E199 MAKE ENTRIES ON C FORMS 75 (VISITOR/VEHICLE PASS) 55<br />
F297 PERFORM ON-BASE MOBILE PATROLS, OTHER THAN WITH PATROL DOGS 55</p>
<p>B78 SUPERVISE LAW ENFORCEMENT SPECIALISTS (81152) 20<br />
E227 TYPE CORRESPONDENCE IN DRAFT FORM 19<br />
D136 CONDUCT ON-THE-JOB TRAINING (OJT) 24<br />
F246 CONDUCT INSPECTIONS OF ASSIGNED POSTS 23<br />
D155 MAINTAIN TRAINING RECORDS, CHARTS, OR GRAPHS 13<br />
F276 EVALUATE SITUATIONS AT INCIDENT SCENES 35<br />
F245 CONDUCT GUARDMOUNT 16</p>
<p>A20 ESTABLISH ORGANIZATIONAL POLICIES, OFFICE INSTRUCTIONS (01), OR STANDING OPERATING PROCEDURES (SOP) 7<br />
C87 ANALYZE INSPECTION REPORTS 6<br />
Al ADVISE STAFF PERSONNEL ON TRAINING MATTERS 11<br />
C129 WRITE STAFF STUDIES, SURVEYS, OR SPECIAL REPORTS 4<br />
C119 INDORSE AIRMAN PERFORMANCE REPORTS 9<br />
C89 ANALYZE WORKLOAD REQUIREMENTS 4<br />
B37 CONDUCT STAFF MEETINGS 3  </p>
<p>[Page] 56 </p>
<p><a href="https://apps.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/a149220.pdf" rel="nofollow">https://apps.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/a149220.pdf</a>
</p></blockquote>
<p>And there you have it. :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kick</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/09/27/ftp544/#comment-145772</link>
		<dc:creator>Kick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Oct 2019 11:01:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=17460#comment-145772</guid>
		<description>... continued

The majority of law enforcement officers in Texas are certified via commission training by The Texas Commission on Law Enforcement 

http://www.tcole.texas.gov/sites/default/files/Rules%20Handbook%2011_1_2018_0.pdf

Say, Russ: Have you ever heard of a &quot;law enforcement officer&quot; who didn&#039;t know what it meant to be a commissioned law enforcement officer? 

Because I haven&#039;t. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>... continued</p>
<p>The majority of law enforcement officers in Texas are certified via commission training by The Texas Commission on Law Enforcement </p>
<p><a href="http://www.tcole.texas.gov/sites/default/files/Rules%20Handbook%2011_1_2018_0.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://www.tcole.texas.gov/sites/default/files/Rules%20Handbook%2011_1_2018_0.pdf</a></p>
<p>Say, Russ: Have you ever heard of a "law enforcement officer" who didn't know what it meant to be a commissioned law enforcement officer? </p>
<p>Because I haven't. :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kick</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/09/27/ftp544/#comment-145771</link>
		<dc:creator>Kick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Oct 2019 11:01:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=17460#comment-145771</guid>
		<description>Russ
509

&lt;blockquote&gt;First off.. Get your terminology straight..

Police officers are NOT &quot;commissioned&quot;.. Military officers are.. 

Police officers are SWORN.... If you were really married to a cop, you would KNOW that. ~ Mike&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Uh, Russ... you thinking what I&#039;m thinking? 

First off, it is highly likely that just about any &quot;officer&quot; who serves the public in virtually any jurisdiction you can name is &quot;SWORN,&quot; but if they are a &quot;law enforcement officer&quot; of a certain caliber, they are generally commissioned by their state of residence upon completion of curriculum and required training as ascertained by applicable state statute(s), and they are sure shit not &quot;SWORN&quot; unless and until they&#039;ve earned said commission by meeting and/or exceeding a program of predefined standards. 

Secondly, Russ, how do suppose someone who claims &quot;law enforcement bona fides&quot; and lives in Florida doesn&#039;t know that the  majority of law enforcement officers are certified via commission training and the name of the Commissioner of the State of Florida Department of Law Enforcement is Rick Swearingen?

http://www.fdle.state.fl.us/CJSTC/Curriculum/Active-Courses

It&#039;s mind boggling and truly defies all logic that an LEO in the State of Florida wouldn&#039;t know those basic facts, but here we are. 

Now is the part where Mike resorts to name calling because I&#039;ve provided the facts of which he seems so frequently blissfully unaware. 

Narrator: Now do Texas, Kick!

Oh, okay, don&#039;t mind if I do.

continued...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Russ<br />
509</p>
<blockquote><p>First off.. Get your terminology straight..</p>
<p>Police officers are NOT "commissioned".. Military officers are.. </p>
<p>Police officers are SWORN.... If you were really married to a cop, you would KNOW that. ~ Mike</p></blockquote>
<p>Uh, Russ... you thinking what I'm thinking? </p>
<p>First off, it is highly likely that just about any "officer" who serves the public in virtually any jurisdiction you can name is "SWORN," but if they are a "law enforcement officer" of a certain caliber, they are generally commissioned by their state of residence upon completion of curriculum and required training as ascertained by applicable state statute(s), and they are sure shit not "SWORN" unless and until they've earned said commission by meeting and/or exceeding a program of predefined standards. </p>
<p>Secondly, Russ, how do suppose someone who claims "law enforcement bona fides" and lives in Florida doesn't know that the  majority of law enforcement officers are certified via commission training and the name of the Commissioner of the State of Florida Department of Law Enforcement is Rick Swearingen?</p>
<p><a href="http://www.fdle.state.fl.us/CJSTC/Curriculum/Active-Courses" rel="nofollow">http://www.fdle.state.fl.us/CJSTC/Curriculum/Active-Courses</a></p>
<p>It's mind boggling and truly defies all logic that an LEO in the State of Florida wouldn't know those basic facts, but here we are. </p>
<p>Now is the part where Mike resorts to name calling because I've provided the facts of which he seems so frequently blissfully unaware. </p>
<p>Narrator: Now do Texas, Kick!</p>
<p>Oh, okay, don't mind if I do.</p>
<p>continued...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/09/27/ftp544/#comment-145731</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Oct 2019 08:49:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=17460#comment-145731</guid>
		<description>Cockholster,

&lt;I&gt;You have never provided any FACTS to demonstrate that you were a commissioned LEO. None! &lt;/I&gt;

First off.. Get your terminology straight..

Police officers are NOT &quot;commissioned&quot;.. Military officers are..

Police officers are SWORN....  If you were really married to a cop, you would KNOW that.

Secondly, I am NOT REQUIRED to prove ANYTHING..  You made the claim I am lying.. It&#039;s up to YOU to prove YOUR claim..

But you and I and everyone here knows you WON&#039;T prove your case because you are full of shit..

&lt;I&gt;Michael chose to lie about his service as a LEO...either to the group as a whole or to me when he claimed to have only been an MP in the service. &lt;/I&gt;

And yet, you CAN&#039;T PROVE that I ever told you any such thing..

Why is that, cockholster??  Because you KNOW you are full of shit..

&lt;I&gt;MP’s are enlisted members of the military whose service to our country is honorable. But they are basic grunts with no real specialized training.&lt;/I&gt;

Spoken like a true moron who is completely and utterly ignorant of the military AND Law Enforcement..

Aside to JL, if you really want the FACTS and not Russ&#039;s bullshit, google AFSC 81152-A.  It&#039;s Law Enforcement Specialist with a K-9 designator.  Air Force LEOs do everything that a civilian LEO does. They simply do it on a military base..  Military LEOs have even a bit more training then civilian LEOs..  

Further, Russ is totally full of shit when he claims their jurisdiction..  Military police officers have jurisdiction over military personnel ANYWHERE in the world..

Now you know the FACTS and now Russ&#039; bullshit spewage...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cockholster,</p>
<p><i>You have never provided any FACTS to demonstrate that you were a commissioned LEO. None! </i></p>
<p>First off.. Get your terminology straight..</p>
<p>Police officers are NOT "commissioned".. Military officers are..</p>
<p>Police officers are SWORN....  If you were really married to a cop, you would KNOW that.</p>
<p>Secondly, I am NOT REQUIRED to prove ANYTHING..  You made the claim I am lying.. It's up to YOU to prove YOUR claim..</p>
<p>But you and I and everyone here knows you WON'T prove your case because you are full of shit..</p>
<p><i>Michael chose to lie about his service as a LEO...either to the group as a whole or to me when he claimed to have only been an MP in the service. </i></p>
<p>And yet, you CAN'T PROVE that I ever told you any such thing..</p>
<p>Why is that, cockholster??  Because you KNOW you are full of shit..</p>
<p><i>MP’s are enlisted members of the military whose service to our country is honorable. But they are basic grunts with no real specialized training.</i></p>
<p>Spoken like a true moron who is completely and utterly ignorant of the military AND Law Enforcement..</p>
<p>Aside to JL, if you really want the FACTS and not Russ's bullshit, google AFSC 81152-A.  It's Law Enforcement Specialist with a K-9 designator.  Air Force LEOs do everything that a civilian LEO does. They simply do it on a military base..  Military LEOs have even a bit more training then civilian LEOs..  </p>
<p>Further, Russ is totally full of shit when he claims their jurisdiction..  Military police officers have jurisdiction over military personnel ANYWHERE in the world..</p>
<p>Now you know the FACTS and now Russ' bullshit spewage...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ListenWhenYouHear</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/09/27/ftp544/#comment-145730</link>
		<dc:creator>ListenWhenYouHear</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Oct 2019 08:13:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=17460#comment-145730</guid>
		<description>nypoet22,

Fair question.  One of the biggest and most important differences is that MP’s work solely with enlisted personnel and their families on military bases....people who have limited rights compared to non-military personnel.   They are policing individuals who know that they must obey their orders.  Their focus tends to be much more on asset protection and security than crime prevention.  

Civilians have a much broader set of rights that must not be violated by LEO’s.   Each state commissions the law enforcement officers that will serve in that state.  The commissioned officers must be familiar with all the state’s laws, codes, and judicial systems.  Thus the education requirements and training is much more thorough than that given to MP’s.  

The risks associated with the day-to-day job are also much greater for commissioned LEO’s.   There are plenty of other differences, but these are probably the most significant differences.   

MP’s are enlisted members of the military whose service to our country is honorable.  But they are basic grunts with no real specialized training.  

For an MP to say they were a commissioned law enforcement officer is as dishonorable as a LEO falsely claiming to be veteran.   Both serve their country and communities, but in very different ways.   

Michael chose to lie about his service as a LEO...either to the group as a whole or to me when he claimed to have only been an MP in the service.  His lack of understanding of the basics and protocols in law enforcement and how our legal system works were clear indicators that he’d never been a commissioned LEO.  That he claims to be an expert on the subject is an insult to those that truly serve.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>nypoet22,</p>
<p>Fair question.  One of the biggest and most important differences is that MP’s work solely with enlisted personnel and their families on military bases....people who have limited rights compared to non-military personnel.   They are policing individuals who know that they must obey their orders.  Their focus tends to be much more on asset protection and security than crime prevention.  </p>
<p>Civilians have a much broader set of rights that must not be violated by LEO’s.   Each state commissions the law enforcement officers that will serve in that state.  The commissioned officers must be familiar with all the state’s laws, codes, and judicial systems.  Thus the education requirements and training is much more thorough than that given to MP’s.  </p>
<p>The risks associated with the day-to-day job are also much greater for commissioned LEO’s.   There are plenty of other differences, but these are probably the most significant differences.   </p>
<p>MP’s are enlisted members of the military whose service to our country is honorable.  But they are basic grunts with no real specialized training.  </p>
<p>For an MP to say they were a commissioned law enforcement officer is as dishonorable as a LEO falsely claiming to be veteran.   Both serve their country and communities, but in very different ways.   </p>
<p>Michael chose to lie about his service as a LEO...either to the group as a whole or to me when he claimed to have only been an MP in the service.  His lack of understanding of the basics and protocols in law enforcement and how our legal system works were clear indicators that he’d never been a commissioned LEO.  That he claims to be an expert on the subject is an insult to those that truly serve.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MtnCaddy</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/09/27/ftp544/#comment-145729</link>
		<dc:creator>MtnCaddy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Oct 2019 05:03:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=17460#comment-145729</guid>
		<description>Holy Moly! CW I only linked over to you a couple years ago. Is this the longest comment harvest for this fine blog? If not, which one? Was it a FTP or a post-11/9/2016 blog?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Holy Moly! CW I only linked over to you a couple years ago. Is this the longest comment harvest for this fine blog? If not, which one? Was it a FTP or a post-11/9/2016 blog?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nypoet22</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/09/27/ftp544/#comment-145728</link>
		<dc:creator>nypoet22</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Oct 2019 03:45:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=17460#comment-145728</guid>
		<description>@russ,

i admit complete ignorance on the subject, but i don&#039;t really see why there is or ought to be such a dramatic distinction in experience and respect between military and civilian policing. i don&#039;t mean this (or any) specific case, but why wouldn&#039;t MP&#039;s merit the same consideration as civilian police?

JL</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@russ,</p>
<p>i admit complete ignorance on the subject, but i don't really see why there is or ought to be such a dramatic distinction in experience and respect between military and civilian policing. i don't mean this (or any) specific case, but why wouldn't MP's merit the same consideration as civilian police?</p>
<p>JL</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Balthasar</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/09/27/ftp544/#comment-145720</link>
		<dc:creator>Balthasar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Oct 2019 00:55:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=17460#comment-145720</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;There will be no one from the House functioning as prosecutor.&lt;/i&gt;

During the Clinton Impeachment, the House designated prosecutors, who presented the House&#039;s case in the Senate. Then-representative Lindsay Graham was one of them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>There will be no one from the House functioning as prosecutor.</i></p>
<p>During the Clinton Impeachment, the House designated prosecutors, who presented the House's case in the Senate. Then-representative Lindsay Graham was one of them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ListenWhenYouHear</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/09/27/ftp544/#comment-145718</link>
		<dc:creator>ListenWhenYouHear</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Oct 2019 00:32:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=17460#comment-145718</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;“Well-documented” in that you chose to lie to everyone here for years about your LEO/Military/Security “experience”?

And your FACTS to support this???&lt;/i&gt;

You have never provided any FACTS to demonstrate that you were a commissioned LEO.  None!   

&lt;i&gt;Or “well-documented” in that you lied to me when you admitted that you had never actually worked in law enforcement, but had been an MP when you were in the military?

Facts to support??&lt;/i&gt;

Hey, Capt. Whorely, I remember when you found comments I made on another website using Disqus.  You complimented me for a comment I had made regarding the investigations of police involved shootings.  You added your own thoughts, only they were so far from how our laws require actual departments to investigate officer involved shootings that it was clear you did not have the basic understanding of our legal system any police officer would have to know to pass the law enforcement academy.   You explained your lack of knowledge of policing protocols on the fact that you’d never been a commissioned LEO in any state, but had been an MP in the military.

You claimed to still know all about how officer involved shootings are handled because you had been involved in one as an MP.   You told me that you were forced to shoot a woman who had come at you with a knife while you were on a DV call.  You claimed that you killed her in self-defense, which was what the investigation determined and thus you did not face charges in her death.  Do you remember all of this or are you gonna claim that I am just making ALL of this up?

Here’s a question for you...do you remember if we had this discussion on Disqus or did we have it here?   And before you answer, let me just say that I know which platform we used.
&lt;I&gt;
You chose to attack my husband’s work history in law enforcement for asking you a simple question regarding policing — and, shockingly, you never bothered to provide an actual answer.

Only after you claimed he made most stoopidest of comments that no real LEO would EVER MAKE..&lt;/i&gt;

You stated that your guns ensure your family’s safety.  Devon asked if guns ensure your safety, why did he have to wear Kevlar at work.  You chose to attack his honor to deflect from your own stupidity being exposed even further!  
&lt;I&gt;
So why not tell us all the truth instead of continuing to steal the honor of everyone who does risk their lives by serving their communities and country? Seriously, you can put this all to rest just by telling us which is the truth. Why does that scare you so?

&lt;b&gt;I have done so much better than tell you the truth..

I have told you the FACTS..&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/i&gt;

The FACTS are better than the truth in your world, because they allow you to ignore the truth.  

For the rest of us, the FACTS and the truth are generally the same things — not opposing forces!

So let me give you the opportunity to salvage what little self respect you might hope to save with everyone here by admitting which of us is telling the truth.  One shot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>“Well-documented” in that you chose to lie to everyone here for years about your LEO/Military/Security “experience”?</p>
<p>And your FACTS to support this???</i></p>
<p>You have never provided any FACTS to demonstrate that you were a commissioned LEO.  None!   </p>
<p><i>Or “well-documented” in that you lied to me when you admitted that you had never actually worked in law enforcement, but had been an MP when you were in the military?</p>
<p>Facts to support??</i></p>
<p>Hey, Capt. Whorely, I remember when you found comments I made on another website using Disqus.  You complimented me for a comment I had made regarding the investigations of police involved shootings.  You added your own thoughts, only they were so far from how our laws require actual departments to investigate officer involved shootings that it was clear you did not have the basic understanding of our legal system any police officer would have to know to pass the law enforcement academy.   You explained your lack of knowledge of policing protocols on the fact that you’d never been a commissioned LEO in any state, but had been an MP in the military.</p>
<p>You claimed to still know all about how officer involved shootings are handled because you had been involved in one as an MP.   You told me that you were forced to shoot a woman who had come at you with a knife while you were on a DV call.  You claimed that you killed her in self-defense, which was what the investigation determined and thus you did not face charges in her death.  Do you remember all of this or are you gonna claim that I am just making ALL of this up?</p>
<p>Here’s a question for you...do you remember if we had this discussion on Disqus or did we have it here?   And before you answer, let me just say that I know which platform we used.<br />
<i><br />
You chose to attack my husband’s work history in law enforcement for asking you a simple question regarding policing — and, shockingly, you never bothered to provide an actual answer.</p>
<p>Only after you claimed he made most stoopidest of comments that no real LEO would EVER MAKE..</i></p>
<p>You stated that your guns ensure your family’s safety.  Devon asked if guns ensure your safety, why did he have to wear Kevlar at work.  You chose to attack his honor to deflect from your own stupidity being exposed even further!<br />
<i><br />
So why not tell us all the truth instead of continuing to steal the honor of everyone who does risk their lives by serving their communities and country? Seriously, you can put this all to rest just by telling us which is the truth. Why does that scare you so?</p>
<p><b>I have done so much better than tell you the truth..</p>
<p>I have told you the FACTS..</b></i></p>
<p>The FACTS are better than the truth in your world, because they allow you to ignore the truth.  </p>
<p>For the rest of us, the FACTS and the truth are generally the same things — not opposing forces!</p>
<p>So let me give you the opportunity to salvage what little self respect you might hope to save with everyone here by admitting which of us is telling the truth.  One shot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dsws</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/09/27/ftp544/#comment-145717</link>
		<dc:creator>dsws</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Sep 2019 23:53:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=17460#comment-145717</guid>
		<description>[394] Balthasar
&lt;i&gt;dsws: And I was saying that before we knew that Hunter Biden was going to be on trial in the Senate for most of next year.

Not happening. Nothing to charge him with, for starters.&lt;/i&gt;

I thought it was clear that &quot;on trial&quot; here is figurative.  Defense lawyers are routinely described as putting the victim or a witness on trial, when they change the focus of the trial from guilt of the accused to the credibility of the victim or other witness.  

The Senate is run by Moscow Mitch.  If the House votes articles of impeachment, the entire spectacle of the trial phase in the Senate will be focused on digging up dirt about the Bidens.  There will be no one from the House functioning as prosecutor.  Because the trial part of impeachment is a Senate proceeding, and as I said, the Senate is run by Moscow Mitch.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[394] Balthasar<br />
<i>dsws: And I was saying that before we knew that Hunter Biden was going to be on trial in the Senate for most of next year.</p>
<p>Not happening. Nothing to charge him with, for starters.</i></p>
<p>I thought it was clear that "on trial" here is figurative.  Defense lawyers are routinely described as putting the victim or a witness on trial, when they change the focus of the trial from guilt of the accused to the credibility of the victim or other witness.  </p>
<p>The Senate is run by Moscow Mitch.  If the House votes articles of impeachment, the entire spectacle of the trial phase in the Senate will be focused on digging up dirt about the Bidens.  There will be no one from the House functioning as prosecutor.  Because the trial part of impeachment is a Senate proceeding, and as I said, the Senate is run by Moscow Mitch.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paula</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/09/27/ftp544/#comment-145716</link>
		<dc:creator>Paula</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Sep 2019 23:49:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=17460#comment-145716</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m really warming up to the sound of &quot;Interim President Pelosi&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I'm really warming up to the sound of "Interim President Pelosi".</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kick</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/09/27/ftp544/#comment-145715</link>
		<dc:creator>Kick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Sep 2019 23:35:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=17460#comment-145715</guid>
		<description>Mike

&lt;i&gt;And ONCE AGAIN, the HEAD LUSER get&#039;s caught in a bullshit lie!!!! &lt;/i&gt;

You&#039;ve already explained your tiny HEAD, and I agree you&#039;re a liar. Be that as it may, Edward Snowden does not meet the definition of a &quot;whistleblower&quot; because he stole thousands of pages of government owned documents and gave them to the Russian cutout known as WikiLeaks rather than follow the official procedures outlined in federal whistleblower law. Ditto for Manning. They don&#039;t generally file charges of espionage and toss you in prison if you&#039;re a whistleblower as that term is defined by statute.

&lt;i&gt;When previous whistleblowers have leaked sensitive information, such as Chelsea Manning and Edward Snowden, everyone said that they &#039;should have gone through official channels.&#039; 
-Chris Weigant&lt;/i&gt;

While Manning and Snowden are frequently referred to using the colloquial term &quot;whistleblower&quot; and they both certainly insist to this day that that&#039;s what they are, the fact that neither of them chose to go through official channels and rather leaked thousands of pages of documents through WikiLeaks is exactly why neither of them are considered to be whistleblowers as that term is defined by the Whistleblower Protection Act. 

So to recap: Manning was incarcerated for espionage and Snowden is likely to eventually follow. While colloquially referred to as &quot;whistleblowers,&quot; they do not meet that definition as defined statute.

Mike, you&#039;ve claimed a bona fide whistleblower doesn&#039;t meet the definition because you&#039;re hysterical that he didn&#039;t march in lockstep with the GOP-Putin Party and followed federal procedure to report the wrongdoing of Your Lickspittle Worship President Dumbfuckery Putin&#039;s Whore, and then you turned around and insisted Manning and Snowden who didn&#039;t follow procedure are actually whistleblowers... and that right there is why no one has to take your regular bullspew seriously.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mike</p>
<p><i>And ONCE AGAIN, the HEAD LUSER get's caught in a bullshit lie!!!! </i></p>
<p>You've already explained your tiny HEAD, and I agree you're a liar. Be that as it may, Edward Snowden does not meet the definition of a "whistleblower" because he stole thousands of pages of government owned documents and gave them to the Russian cutout known as WikiLeaks rather than follow the official procedures outlined in federal whistleblower law. Ditto for Manning. They don't generally file charges of espionage and toss you in prison if you're a whistleblower as that term is defined by statute.</p>
<p><i>When previous whistleblowers have leaked sensitive information, such as Chelsea Manning and Edward Snowden, everyone said that they 'should have gone through official channels.'<br />
-Chris Weigant</i></p>
<p>While Manning and Snowden are frequently referred to using the colloquial term "whistleblower" and they both certainly insist to this day that that's what they are, the fact that neither of them chose to go through official channels and rather leaked thousands of pages of documents through WikiLeaks is exactly why neither of them are considered to be whistleblowers as that term is defined by the Whistleblower Protection Act. </p>
<p>So to recap: Manning was incarcerated for espionage and Snowden is likely to eventually follow. While colloquially referred to as "whistleblowers," they do not meet that definition as defined statute.</p>
<p>Mike, you've claimed a bona fide whistleblower doesn't meet the definition because you're hysterical that he didn't march in lockstep with the GOP-Putin Party and followed federal procedure to report the wrongdoing of Your Lickspittle Worship President Dumbfuckery Putin's Whore, and then you turned around and insisted Manning and Snowden who didn't follow procedure are actually whistleblowers... and that right there is why no one has to take your regular bullspew seriously.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paula</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/09/27/ftp544/#comment-145714</link>
		<dc:creator>Paula</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Sep 2019 23:20:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=17460#comment-145714</guid>
		<description>Charles Pierce:

&lt;i&gt;It&#039;s become plain at this point that the ongoing &quot;review&quot; of the origins of the investigation into the Russian ratfcking of the 2016 election has as one of its primary purposes developing an alternative narrative to the plain fact that the Russians wanted to help the president* become president*, and that he accepted their help, and that this alternative narrative then will be used to discredit the revelations in the whistleblower&#039;s complaint, and that this project now commands the attention of, at the very least, the office of the president*, the Department of State, and the Department of Justice. The line for the rollercoaster at Depositionland is getting longer by the minute.&lt;/i&gt;

https://www.esquire.com/news-politics/politics/a29310410/william-barr-and-mike-pompeo-are-now-fully-implicated-in-trumps-trainwreck/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Charles Pierce:</p>
<p><i>It's become plain at this point that the ongoing "review" of the origins of the investigation into the Russian ratfcking of the 2016 election has as one of its primary purposes developing an alternative narrative to the plain fact that the Russians wanted to help the president* become president*, and that he accepted their help, and that this alternative narrative then will be used to discredit the revelations in the whistleblower's complaint, and that this project now commands the attention of, at the very least, the office of the president*, the Department of State, and the Department of Justice. The line for the rollercoaster at Depositionland is getting longer by the minute.</i></p>
<p><a href="https://www.esquire.com/news-politics/politics/a29310410/william-barr-and-mike-pompeo-are-now-fully-implicated-in-trumps-trainwreck/" rel="nofollow">https://www.esquire.com/news-politics/politics/a29310410/william-barr-and-mike-pompeo-are-now-fully-implicated-in-trumps-trainwreck/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paula</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/09/27/ftp544/#comment-145713</link>
		<dc:creator>Paula</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Sep 2019 23:14:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=17460#comment-145713</guid>
		<description>Senator Chris Murphy, CT:

&lt;i&gt;It’s not that they all didn’t know about the corruption. 

It’s not that they knew about it did nothing.

They knew about it - came to the conclusion it was cool to use the the power of the presidency to destroy a political rival - and facilitated it.&lt;/i&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Senator Chris Murphy, CT:</p>
<p><i>It’s not that they all didn’t know about the corruption. </p>
<p>It’s not that they knew about it did nothing.</p>
<p>They knew about it - came to the conclusion it was cool to use the the power of the presidency to destroy a political rival - and facilitated it.</i></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paula</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/09/27/ftp544/#comment-145712</link>
		<dc:creator>Paula</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Sep 2019 23:11:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=17460#comment-145712</guid>
		<description>So Barr&#039;s been running around the world trying to get other countries to try to discredit Mueller and our Intelligence agencies.

Impeachment is too good for Barr. Should be impeached, disbarred and jailed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So Barr's been running around the world trying to get other countries to try to discredit Mueller and our Intelligence agencies.</p>
<p>Impeachment is too good for Barr. Should be impeached, disbarred and jailed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paula</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/09/27/ftp544/#comment-145711</link>
		<dc:creator>Paula</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Sep 2019 23:02:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=17460#comment-145711</guid>
		<description>[485] Listen: Yep!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[485] Listen: Yep!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/09/27/ftp544/#comment-145710</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Sep 2019 21:49:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=17460#comment-145710</guid>
		<description>See ya&#039;all in the Morning...

I can&#039;t see how tomorrow could POSSIBLY be as good as today!!!

:D :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>See ya'all in the Morning...</p>
<p>I can't see how tomorrow could POSSIBLY be as good as today!!!</p>
<p>:D :D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/09/27/ftp544/#comment-145709</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Sep 2019 21:47:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=17460#comment-145709</guid>
		<description>Glad I caught this one before I signed off.. :D

&lt;I&gt;Edward Snowden is not a Whistleblower, and your ignorance is alive and well.&lt;/I&gt;

And ONCE AGAIN, the HEAD LUSER get&#039;s caught in a bullshit lie!!!!

BBBBWWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

Did you EVEN READ this commentary, you MORON..

&lt;B&gt;When previous whistleblowers have leaked sensitive information, such as Chelsea Manning and Edward Snowden, everyone said that they &#039;should have gone through official channels.&#039;&lt;/B&gt;
-Chris Weigant

So, tell me.. LUSER....

WHOSE &quot;IGNORANCE&quot; IS ALIVE AND WELL!!????

BBBWWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHA

Apparently, it&#039;s YOUR&#039;S!!!!  BITCH!!!

BBBWWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH

Once again, Michale bitch slaps DLC Victoria to hell..

&lt;B&gt;&lt;I&gt;DLC VICTORIA attacks my children and grandchildren in 3.... 2.... 1....&lt;/B&gt;&lt;/I&gt;

What an IGNORANT LUSER you are Victoria...

OK.. NOW I am good ta go.. :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Glad I caught this one before I signed off.. :D</p>
<p><i>Edward Snowden is not a Whistleblower, and your ignorance is alive and well.</i></p>
<p>And ONCE AGAIN, the HEAD LUSER get's caught in a bullshit lie!!!!</p>
<p>BBBBWWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA</p>
<p>Did you EVEN READ this commentary, you MORON..</p>
<p><b>When previous whistleblowers have leaked sensitive information, such as Chelsea Manning and Edward Snowden, everyone said that they 'should have gone through official channels.'</b><br />
-Chris Weigant</p>
<p>So, tell me.. LUSER....</p>
<p>WHOSE "IGNORANCE" IS ALIVE AND WELL!!????</p>
<p>BBBWWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHA</p>
<p>Apparently, it's YOUR'S!!!!  BITCH!!!</p>
<p>BBBWWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH</p>
<p>Once again, Michale bitch slaps DLC Victoria to hell..</p>
<p><b><i>DLC VICTORIA attacks my children and grandchildren in 3.... 2.... 1....</i></b></p>
<p>What an IGNORANT LUSER you are Victoria...</p>
<p>OK.. NOW I am good ta go.. :D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/09/27/ftp544/#comment-145708</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Sep 2019 21:42:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=17460#comment-145708</guid>
		<description>OK.. Lovely wife is home and now I am all hers... :D

MtnCaddy...

I am leaving now.. You can slink back, what with yer bullshit claims that you actually served in the military..

Asshole...

See ya&#039;all in the AM... :D

Help me out and push this commentary pass 500... eh?? :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK.. Lovely wife is home and now I am all hers... :D</p>
<p>MtnCaddy...</p>
<p>I am leaving now.. You can slink back, what with yer bullshit claims that you actually served in the military..</p>
<p>Asshole...</p>
<p>See ya'all in the AM... :D</p>
<p>Help me out and push this commentary pass 500... eh?? :D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kick</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/09/27/ftp544/#comment-145707</link>
		<dc:creator>Kick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Sep 2019 21:41:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=17460#comment-145707</guid>
		<description>Russ 
485

Yep!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Russ<br />
485</p>
<p>Yep!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/09/27/ftp544/#comment-145706</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Sep 2019 21:41:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=17460#comment-145706</guid>
		<description>&lt;B&gt;Yet the Democrats want to turn the energy production clock back decades if not centuries. A comment made by a campaign spokesman for Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders, who not long ago tweeted that “fossil fuel executives should be criminally prosecuted for the destruction they have knowingly caused” — that someone who holds such a childish view can be elected to any office in this country is alarming — epitomizes the Democratic field’s closed-minded view on fracking.

“No amount of regulation can make it safe,” the aide aide told the Washington Post. “When (Sanders) is in the White House, he is going to ban fracking nationwide and rapidly move to 100% clean, sustainable energy.”

How will Sanders, or any other Democrat elected president, replace the lost energy? Windmills? Sunshine? Those “sustainable” sources are not up to the task, and likely won’t be for some time, no matter how much their supporters fantasize about renewable prices competing with conventional fuels.&lt;/B&gt;

The Democrat ignorance is ASTOUNDING..

Anyone who VOTES Democrat... THEIR ignorance is astounding!!!

It&#039;s no wonder that Democrats are trying this faux impeachment coup..

They have no other play....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>Yet the Democrats want to turn the energy production clock back decades if not centuries. A comment made by a campaign spokesman for Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders, who not long ago tweeted that “fossil fuel executives should be criminally prosecuted for the destruction they have knowingly caused” — that someone who holds such a childish view can be elected to any office in this country is alarming — epitomizes the Democratic field’s closed-minded view on fracking.</p>
<p>“No amount of regulation can make it safe,” the aide aide told the Washington Post. “When (Sanders) is in the White House, he is going to ban fracking nationwide and rapidly move to 100% clean, sustainable energy.”</p>
<p>How will Sanders, or any other Democrat elected president, replace the lost energy? Windmills? Sunshine? Those “sustainable” sources are not up to the task, and likely won’t be for some time, no matter how much their supporters fantasize about renewable prices competing with conventional fuels.</b></p>
<p>The Democrat ignorance is ASTOUNDING..</p>
<p>Anyone who VOTES Democrat... THEIR ignorance is astounding!!!</p>
<p>It's no wonder that Democrats are trying this faux impeachment coup..</p>
<p>They have no other play....</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kick</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/09/27/ftp544/#comment-145705</link>
		<dc:creator>Kick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Sep 2019 21:38:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=17460#comment-145705</guid>
		<description>Michale
479

&lt;i&gt;Compare and contrast the treatment by Democrats of a REAL whistle blower Edward Snowden..&lt;/i&gt;

Edward Snowden is not a Whistleblower, and your ignorance is alive and well. 

&lt;i&gt;Now, compare the actions of the Democrats to this alleged &quot;whistle blower&quot; who is unlikely to even exist!! &lt;/i&gt;

Enjoy your delusions. Your ignorance and your delusions combine nicely to create a special kind of stupid that&#039;s one in a moron! 

The two different responses are VERY illuminating...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michale<br />
479</p>
<p><i>Compare and contrast the treatment by Democrats of a REAL whistle blower Edward Snowden..</i></p>
<p>Edward Snowden is not a Whistleblower, and your ignorance is alive and well. </p>
<p><i>Now, compare the actions of the Democrats to this alleged "whistle blower" who is unlikely to even exist!! </i></p>
<p>Enjoy your delusions. Your ignorance and your delusions combine nicely to create a special kind of stupid that's one in a moron! </p>
<p>The two different responses are VERY illuminating...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/09/27/ftp544/#comment-145704</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Sep 2019 21:38:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=17460#comment-145704</guid>
		<description>&lt;B&gt;Yet the Democrats want to turn the energy production clock back decades if not centuries. A comment made by a campaign spokesman for Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders, who not long ago tweeted that “fossil fuel executives should be criminally prosecuted for the destruction they have knowingly caused” — that someone who holds such a childish view can be elected to any office in this country is alarming — epitomizes the Democratic field’s closed-minded view on fracking.

“No amount of regulation can make it safe,” the aide aide told the Washington Post. “When (Sanders) is in the White House, he is going to ban fracking nationwide and rapidly move to 100% clean, sustainable energy.”

How will Sanders, or any other Democrat elected president, replace the lost energy? Windmills? Sunshine? Those “sustainable” sources are not up to the task, and likely won’t be for some time, no matter how much their supporters fantasize about renewable prices competing with conventional fuels.&lt;/B&gt;

Once again.. Democrats want to return us to the Dark Ages...

They have STATED as such...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>Yet the Democrats want to turn the energy production clock back decades if not centuries. A comment made by a campaign spokesman for Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders, who not long ago tweeted that “fossil fuel executives should be criminally prosecuted for the destruction they have knowingly caused” — that someone who holds such a childish view can be elected to any office in this country is alarming — epitomizes the Democratic field’s closed-minded view on fracking.</p>
<p>“No amount of regulation can make it safe,” the aide aide told the Washington Post. “When (Sanders) is in the White House, he is going to ban fracking nationwide and rapidly move to 100% clean, sustainable energy.”</p>
<p>How will Sanders, or any other Democrat elected president, replace the lost energy? Windmills? Sunshine? Those “sustainable” sources are not up to the task, and likely won’t be for some time, no matter how much their supporters fantasize about renewable prices competing with conventional fuels.</b></p>
<p>Once again.. Democrats want to return us to the Dark Ages...</p>
<p>They have STATED as such...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/09/27/ftp544/#comment-145703</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Sep 2019 21:37:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=17460#comment-145703</guid>
		<description>&lt;B&gt;Crude production in the U.S. has spiked since 2008, rising from roughly 5 millions barrels a day to almost 11 million barrels in 2018, 17% higher than 2017, says the government’s Energy Information Administration. In December of last year, the country produced 11.96 million barrels per day, an all-time record.

The growth, says the EIA, was “driven mainly by production from tight rock formations using horizontal drilling and hydraulic fracturing. EIA projects that U.S. crude oil production will continue to grow in 2019 and 2020, averaging 12.3 million b/d and 13.0 million b/d, respectively.”

Meanwhile, natural gas production has soared from 18.05 trillion cubic feet in 2005 to 30.44 trillion cubic feet in 2018. The increase has nearly eliminated the need for imports. According to the EIA, the U.S. consumed 29.97 trillion cubic feet in 2018. Again, “most of the production increases since 2005 were the result of horizontal drilling and hydraulic fracturing techniques.”

America is now the fossil fuel king. We are more energy independent, more energy secure, thanks to fracking.&lt;/B&gt;

This is what Dumbocrats want to throw away...

They want this country back into the dark ages of Democrat Rule..

So, they cooked up this faux impeachment coup...

But Independents and NPAs see thru the Democrat BS.. They are coming down DECISIVELY for President Trump.. :D

Once again.. The Dumbocrat Party will lose.. :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>Crude production in the U.S. has spiked since 2008, rising from roughly 5 millions barrels a day to almost 11 million barrels in 2018, 17% higher than 2017, says the government’s Energy Information Administration. In December of last year, the country produced 11.96 million barrels per day, an all-time record.</p>
<p>The growth, says the EIA, was “driven mainly by production from tight rock formations using horizontal drilling and hydraulic fracturing. EIA projects that U.S. crude oil production will continue to grow in 2019 and 2020, averaging 12.3 million b/d and 13.0 million b/d, respectively.”</p>
<p>Meanwhile, natural gas production has soared from 18.05 trillion cubic feet in 2005 to 30.44 trillion cubic feet in 2018. The increase has nearly eliminated the need for imports. According to the EIA, the U.S. consumed 29.97 trillion cubic feet in 2018. Again, “most of the production increases since 2005 were the result of horizontal drilling and hydraulic fracturing techniques.”</p>
<p>America is now the fossil fuel king. We are more energy independent, more energy secure, thanks to fracking.</b></p>
<p>This is what Dumbocrats want to throw away...</p>
<p>They want this country back into the dark ages of Democrat Rule..</p>
<p>So, they cooked up this faux impeachment coup...</p>
<p>But Independents and NPAs see thru the Democrat BS.. They are coming down DECISIVELY for President Trump.. :D</p>
<p>Once again.. The Dumbocrat Party will lose.. :D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/09/27/ftp544/#comment-145702</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Sep 2019 21:34:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=17460#comment-145702</guid>
		<description>&lt;B&gt;Eight of the remaining Democratic presidential candidates say they want to ban fracking. Eleven others would limit the process or “regulate it better,” says the Washington Post. Could these politicians possibly be that ignorant of how ruinous their prohibition lust would be in the real world?

First, let’s get it straight why the political left hates hydraulic fracturing. It’s not because it’s an environmental threat. They know it’s clean process and has been both an ecological and economic boom, in no small part due to the increased production of natural gas, a cleaner alternative to coal for producing electricity.

No, the left loathes fracking because it is so efficient in taking fossil fuel out of the ground.&lt;/B&gt;

Democrats are going to CRIPPLE this country.. Militarily.. Economically... Socially...

It&#039;s NO WONDER Democrats are so hysterically pushing this bullshit faux impeachment coup..

They KNOW they are going to be WIPED OUT at the ballot box!!!  :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>Eight of the remaining Democratic presidential candidates say they want to ban fracking. Eleven others would limit the process or “regulate it better,” says the Washington Post. Could these politicians possibly be that ignorant of how ruinous their prohibition lust would be in the real world?</p>
<p>First, let’s get it straight why the political left hates hydraulic fracturing. It’s not because it’s an environmental threat. They know it’s clean process and has been both an ecological and economic boom, in no small part due to the increased production of natural gas, a cleaner alternative to coal for producing electricity.</p>
<p>No, the left loathes fracking because it is so efficient in taking fossil fuel out of the ground.</b></p>
<p>Democrats are going to CRIPPLE this country.. Militarily.. Economically... Socially...</p>
<p>It's NO WONDER Democrats are so hysterically pushing this bullshit faux impeachment coup..</p>
<p>They KNOW they are going to be WIPED OUT at the ballot box!!!  :D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kick</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/09/27/ftp544/#comment-145701</link>
		<dc:creator>Kick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Sep 2019 21:32:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=17460#comment-145701</guid>
		<description>Mike
474

&lt;i&gt;Then why didn&#039;t these alleged federal employees REPORT the corruption to their chain of command?? &lt;/i&gt;

Well, Mike, the Secretary of State&#039;s chain of command is the President of the United States, and I&#039;m fairly certain he already knew since he was on the phone call where crimes were being committed.

&lt;i&gt;Why did these alleged federal employees yak to some CIA flunky who is not even in the same department!?? &lt;/i&gt;

What department do you think the CIA belongs to, Mike? It seems you are woefully misinformed if you believe the ICIG is in a different department. The Whistleblower followed the rules. Full Stop. 

&lt;i&gt;Why didn&#039;t these alleged federal employees actually REPORT the alleged corruption and put their name to it??&lt;/i&gt;

How do you know they didn&#039;t? News is moving fast.

&lt;i&gt;Because these federal employees do not exist... &lt;/i&gt;

Whatever you have to tell yourself as you stumble blindly through your ignorant stupor daily. 

&lt;i&gt;Once again, the HEAD LUSER is slapped down like the BITCH she is!! &lt;/i&gt;

Mike confesses his HEAD is a LUSER so his BITCH prefers females or Mike confesses that he&#039;s a wife beater... likely both! So Mike has two tiny heads... duly noted. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mike<br />
474</p>
<p><i>Then why didn't these alleged federal employees REPORT the corruption to their chain of command?? </i></p>
<p>Well, Mike, the Secretary of State's chain of command is the President of the United States, and I'm fairly certain he already knew since he was on the phone call where crimes were being committed.</p>
<p><i>Why did these alleged federal employees yak to some CIA flunky who is not even in the same department!?? </i></p>
<p>What department do you think the CIA belongs to, Mike? It seems you are woefully misinformed if you believe the ICIG is in a different department. The Whistleblower followed the rules. Full Stop. </p>
<p><i>Why didn't these alleged federal employees actually REPORT the alleged corruption and put their name to it??</i></p>
<p>How do you know they didn't? News is moving fast.</p>
<p><i>Because these federal employees do not exist... </i></p>
<p>Whatever you have to tell yourself as you stumble blindly through your ignorant stupor daily. </p>
<p><i>Once again, the HEAD LUSER is slapped down like the BITCH she is!! </i></p>
<p>Mike confesses his HEAD is a LUSER so his BITCH prefers females or Mike confesses that he's a wife beater... likely both! So Mike has two tiny heads... duly noted. :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/09/27/ftp544/#comment-145700</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Sep 2019 21:31:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=17460#comment-145700</guid>
		<description>Hay Balthy..

A bit ago, you made a comment on the VERY tenuous nature of President Trump&#039;s lead in battleground states..

Tell me..

&lt;B&gt;Democrats’ Campaign Promise: We’ll Destroy America’s Energy Sector … And Economy&lt;/B&gt;
https://issuesinsights.com/2019/09/30/democrats-campaign-promise-well-destroy-americas-energy-sector-and-economy/

How &quot;tenuous&quot; will President Trump&#039;s lead be, now that Democrat Candidates on running on the campaign of destroying the country&#039;s Energy Sector and decimating our economy???

My guess is President Trump&#039;s lead will not be &quot;tenuous&quot; at all..

Matter of fact, the President&#039;s lead will likely be described as &lt;B&gt;&quot;LANDSLIDE&quot;&lt;/B&gt;..

It&#039;s simply AMAZING to me that **ANYONE** could believe that Democrats.... Running on a BAN FRACKING AND FOSSIL FUELS and DESTROY THE COUNTRY&#039;S ECONOMY could EVER hope to prevail..

No wonder Democrats are SOOO  hysterical about impeachment..

They KNOW they don&#039;t stand a CHANCE at the ballot box...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hay Balthy..</p>
<p>A bit ago, you made a comment on the VERY tenuous nature of President Trump's lead in battleground states..</p>
<p>Tell me..</p>
<p><b>Democrats’ Campaign Promise: We’ll Destroy America’s Energy Sector … And Economy</b><br />
<a href="https://issuesinsights.com/2019/09/30/democrats-campaign-promise-well-destroy-americas-energy-sector-and-economy/" rel="nofollow">https://issuesinsights.com/2019/09/30/democrats-campaign-promise-well-destroy-americas-energy-sector-and-economy/</a></p>
<p>How "tenuous" will President Trump's lead be, now that Democrat Candidates on running on the campaign of destroying the country's Energy Sector and decimating our economy???</p>
<p>My guess is President Trump's lead will not be "tenuous" at all..</p>
<p>Matter of fact, the President's lead will likely be described as <b>"LANDSLIDE"</b>..</p>
<p>It's simply AMAZING to me that **ANYONE** could believe that Democrats.... Running on a BAN FRACKING AND FOSSIL FUELS and DESTROY THE COUNTRY'S ECONOMY could EVER hope to prevail..</p>
<p>No wonder Democrats are SOOO  hysterical about impeachment..</p>
<p>They KNOW they don't stand a CHANCE at the ballot box...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ListenWhenYouHear</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/09/27/ftp544/#comment-145699</link>
		<dc:creator>ListenWhenYouHear</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Sep 2019 21:28:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=17460#comment-145699</guid>
		<description>Paula,
&lt;I&gt;
In keeping with my theory that Blotus will resign to avoid public shame, Newsweek puts out the first trial balloon: DONALD TRUMP WILL RESIGN THE PRESIDENCY IN 2019 IN EXCHANGE FOR IMMUNITY FOR HIM AND HIS FAMILY, FORMER BUSH ADVISER SAYS&lt;/i&gt;

I’ve thought the same thing ever since he made Barr his AG.  Barr has a long history in acquiring Republican criminal’s undeserved  “Get Out of Jail FREE” cards that allow them to escape being held accountable for their crimes against this country.   I have no doubt that Barr’s work history in this area played a part in his being hired.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Paula,<br />
<i><br />
In keeping with my theory that Blotus will resign to avoid public shame, Newsweek puts out the first trial balloon: DONALD TRUMP WILL RESIGN THE PRESIDENCY IN 2019 IN EXCHANGE FOR IMMUNITY FOR HIM AND HIS FAMILY, FORMER BUSH ADVISER SAYS</i></p>
<p>I’ve thought the same thing ever since he made Barr his AG.  Barr has a long history in acquiring Republican criminal’s undeserved  “Get Out of Jail FREE” cards that allow them to escape being held accountable for their crimes against this country.   I have no doubt that Barr’s work history in this area played a part in his being hired.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/09/27/ftp544/#comment-145698</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Sep 2019 21:17:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=17460#comment-145698</guid>
		<description>&lt;B&gt;That may well be the right approach, but the question is, are Democrats giving Republicans a head start and making themselves a juicier target? This experiment suggests the answer might be yes.&lt;/B&gt;

Aren&#039;t ya&#039;all all about SCIENCE???  :D

Hay Blathy.. I seem to have chased you away..

Notice the LINK?? Notice how it&#039;s a LEFT WING rag????

Notice how, once again, I prove you are completely and utterly full of shit!???  :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>That may well be the right approach, but the question is, are Democrats giving Republicans a head start and making themselves a juicier target? This experiment suggests the answer might be yes.</b></p>
<p>Aren't ya'all all about SCIENCE???  :D</p>
<p>Hay Blathy.. I seem to have chased you away..</p>
<p>Notice the LINK?? Notice how it's a LEFT WING rag????</p>
<p>Notice how, once again, I prove you are completely and utterly full of shit!???  :D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/09/27/ftp544/#comment-145697</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Sep 2019 21:16:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=17460#comment-145697</guid>
		<description>&lt;B&gt;At the same time, playing to the Democratic base seems to have its limits, with no evidence suggestive of mobilization potential. Democrats who read about the leftward positions did not indicate they were more motivated to vote and campaign for the eventual nominee than those who hadn’t read about them.

The results suggest a double-edged sword, but with one clearly sharper side: the potential of producing Republican gains among a key swing group.&lt;/B&gt;

Ya&#039;all just have to KNOW how bad ya&#039;all have it when it&#039;s the NY GRIME that is sounding the Democrat Party death knell... :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>At the same time, playing to the Democratic base seems to have its limits, with no evidence suggestive of mobilization potential. Democrats who read about the leftward positions did not indicate they were more motivated to vote and campaign for the eventual nominee than those who hadn’t read about them.</p>
<p>The results suggest a double-edged sword, but with one clearly sharper side: the potential of producing Republican gains among a key swing group.</b></p>
<p>Ya'all just have to KNOW how bad ya'all have it when it's the NY GRIME that is sounding the Democrat Party death knell... :D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/09/27/ftp544/#comment-145696</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Sep 2019 21:15:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=17460#comment-145696</guid>
		<description>&lt;B&gt;When deciding between Mr. Trump and the Democratic nominee, voters in the middle — the independents who could ultimately tilt things in Mr. Trump’s favor — became six percentage points less likely to vote Democratic after reading about the leftward turn compared with the independents who had read the innocuous content.&lt;/B&gt;

The more and more FACTS that are learned...

The more and more it&#039;s obvious that Democrats are gonna get slaughtered....  :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>When deciding between Mr. Trump and the Democratic nominee, voters in the middle — the independents who could ultimately tilt things in Mr. Trump’s favor — became six percentage points less likely to vote Democratic after reading about the leftward turn compared with the independents who had read the innocuous content.</b></p>
<p>The more and more FACTS that are learned...</p>
<p>The more and more it's obvious that Democrats are gonna get slaughtered....  :D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/09/27/ftp544/#comment-145695</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Sep 2019 21:13:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=17460#comment-145695</guid>
		<description>&lt;B&gt;The embrace of progressivism solidifies support among Democratic survey respondents when thinking about the 2020 general election. But it repels independents, with a negative effect that is stronger and clearer than the signs of enthusiasm generated among Democrats.&lt;/B&gt;

As I have said..

Democrats are TOAST in the 2020 election!!!

Even the NY Grime agrees...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>The embrace of progressivism solidifies support among Democratic survey respondents when thinking about the 2020 general election. But it repels independents, with a negative effect that is stronger and clearer than the signs of enthusiasm generated among Democrats.</b></p>
<p>As I have said..</p>
<p>Democrats are TOAST in the 2020 election!!!</p>
<p>Even the NY Grime agrees...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/09/27/ftp544/#comment-145694</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Sep 2019 21:10:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=17460#comment-145694</guid>
		<description>From the BASTION OF LEFT WINGERY....

&lt;B&gt;What Democrats Could Lose With Their Left Turn

A survey experiment shows that some independents are already being turned off.&lt;/B&gt;
https://www.nytimes.com/2019/09/30/upshot/democrats-2020-losing-independents.html?smid=nytcore-ios-share

The New York Grime.....

Democrats are going to lose ANY hope of winning ANY election in 2020 that is not, by region, a sure thing...

In other words...

Democrats are going to have their asses handed to them..  :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From the BASTION OF LEFT WINGERY....</p>
<p><b>What Democrats Could Lose With Their Left Turn</p>
<p>A survey experiment shows that some independents are already being turned off.</b><br />
<a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2019/09/30/upshot/democrats-2020-losing-independents.html?smid=nytcore-ios-share" rel="nofollow">https://www.nytimes.com/2019/09/30/upshot/democrats-2020-losing-independents.html?smid=nytcore-ios-share</a></p>
<p>The New York Grime.....</p>
<p>Democrats are going to lose ANY hope of winning ANY election in 2020 that is not, by region, a sure thing...</p>
<p>In other words...</p>
<p>Democrats are going to have their asses handed to them..  :D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/09/27/ftp544/#comment-145693</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Sep 2019 21:05:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=17460#comment-145693</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s funny..

Compare and contrast the treatment by Democrats of a REAL whistle blower Edward Snowden..

Now, compare the actions of the Democrats to this alleged &quot;whistle blower&quot; who is unlikely to even exist!!


The two different responses are VERY illuminating...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It's funny..</p>
<p>Compare and contrast the treatment by Democrats of a REAL whistle blower Edward Snowden..</p>
<p>Now, compare the actions of the Democrats to this alleged "whistle blower" who is unlikely to even exist!!</p>
<p>The two different responses are VERY illuminating...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/09/27/ftp544/#comment-145692</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Sep 2019 21:00:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=17460#comment-145692</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;Pres. Trump told Ukraine&#039;s president at least five times that he would task William Barr with assisting him in investigating former Vice Pres. Joe Biden, according to the call summary released by the White House.&lt;/I&gt;

And yet.. There is not a SINGLE fact to support that claim...

Funny how that ALWAYS is the case, eh??

&#039;Sides.. You didn&#039;t have a problem with Odumbo&#039;s DOJ investigating the Trump campaign..

Why should THIS bother you???</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Pres. Trump told Ukraine's president at least five times that he would task William Barr with assisting him in investigating former Vice Pres. Joe Biden, according to the call summary released by the White House.</i></p>
<p>And yet.. There is not a SINGLE fact to support that claim...</p>
<p>Funny how that ALWAYS is the case, eh??</p>
<p>'Sides.. You didn't have a problem with Odumbo's DOJ investigating the Trump campaign..</p>
<p>Why should THIS bother you???</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kick</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/09/27/ftp544/#comment-145691</link>
		<dc:creator>Kick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Sep 2019 21:00:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=17460#comment-145691</guid>
		<description>Paula 

So yet another Trump shakedown to enlist the Australian PM... using DOJ resources to try to refute the Mueller Report and clear Russia... in service to Putin... to blame Ukraine.

&lt;b&gt;Appendix D&lt;/b&gt; is alive and well and being robustly investigated by the IC. Otherwise, there&#039;d be no reason to refute it, now would there?

Bill Barr is screwed too. 

Whoever gets to the Intelligence Committee first gets immunity. Y&#039;all don&#039;t fall all over yourselves, now, you hear!? 

Hoo Boy!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Paula </p>
<p>So yet another Trump shakedown to enlist the Australian PM... using DOJ resources to try to refute the Mueller Report and clear Russia... in service to Putin... to blame Ukraine.</p>
<p><b>Appendix D</b> is alive and well and being robustly investigated by the IC. Otherwise, there'd be no reason to refute it, now would there?</p>
<p>Bill Barr is screwed too. </p>
<p>Whoever gets to the Intelligence Committee first gets immunity. Y'all don't fall all over yourselves, now, you hear!? </p>
<p>Hoo Boy!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/09/27/ftp544/#comment-145690</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Sep 2019 20:58:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=17460#comment-145690</guid>
		<description>https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EFQLaTbXkAA8QHU?format=jpg&amp;name=900x900

So factually accurate... It&#039;s SCARY.....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EFQLaTbXkAA8QHU?format=jpg&amp;name=900x900" rel="nofollow">https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EFQLaTbXkAA8QHU?format=jpg&amp;name=900x900</a></p>
<p>So factually accurate... It's SCARY.....</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paula</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/09/27/ftp544/#comment-145689</link>
		<dc:creator>Paula</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Sep 2019 20:54:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=17460#comment-145689</guid>
		<description>ABC News Politics
@ABCPolitics
 · 4m
Pres. Trump told Ukraine&#039;s president at least five times that he would task William Barr with assisting him in investigating former Vice Pres. Joe Biden, according to the call summary released by the White House. https://abcn.ws/2mjEStM

Barr&#039;s got some &#039;splainin to do...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ABC News Politics<br />
@ABCPolitics<br />
 · 4m<br />
Pres. Trump told Ukraine's president at least five times that he would task William Barr with assisting him in investigating former Vice Pres. Joe Biden, according to the call summary released by the White House. <a href="https://abcn.ws/2mjEStM" rel="nofollow">https://abcn.ws/2mjEStM</a></p>
<p>Barr's got some 'splainin to do...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/09/27/ftp544/#comment-145688</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Sep 2019 20:54:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=17460#comment-145688</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;Have I mentioned federal employees are required to report corruption? Because it&#039;s a fact.&lt;/I&gt; 

Then why didn&#039;t these alleged federal employees REPORT the corruption to their chain of command??

Why did these alleged federal employees yak to some CIA flunky who is not even in the same department!??

Why didn&#039;t these alleged federal employees actually REPORT the alleged corruption and put their name to it??

Because these federal employees do not exist...

They are a creation of the Democrat Party to justify a coup...  And you know what happens to people who support a coup against the legal and Constitutional government, right??

Once again, the HEAD LUSER is slapped down like the BITCH she is!!

BBBBBWWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Have I mentioned federal employees are required to report corruption? Because it's a fact.</i> </p>
<p>Then why didn't these alleged federal employees REPORT the corruption to their chain of command??</p>
<p>Why did these alleged federal employees yak to some CIA flunky who is not even in the same department!??</p>
<p>Why didn't these alleged federal employees actually REPORT the alleged corruption and put their name to it??</p>
<p>Because these federal employees do not exist...</p>
<p>They are a creation of the Democrat Party to justify a coup...  And you know what happens to people who support a coup against the legal and Constitutional government, right??</p>
<p>Once again, the HEAD LUSER is slapped down like the BITCH she is!!</p>
<p>BBBBBWWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paula</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/09/27/ftp544/#comment-145687</link>
		<dc:creator>Paula</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Sep 2019 20:52:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=17460#comment-145687</guid>
		<description>[471] Kick: &lt;i&gt;Well, now we&#039;re going to see the dam break. Hoo boy.&lt;/i&gt;

Yep!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[471] Kick: <i>Well, now we're going to see the dam break. Hoo boy.</i></p>
<p>Yep!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/09/27/ftp544/#comment-145686</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Sep 2019 20:50:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=17460#comment-145686</guid>
		<description>&lt;B&gt;Nancy Pelosi suggests that Democrats have to impeach Trump because they desperately want to prevent him from getting re-elected: &quot;He can&#039;t win, that is very serious&quot;&lt;/B&gt;

And THAT is what it is all about..

Like Al Green, Pelosi concedes that President Trump &quot;can&#039;t win&quot;..

And Pelosi knows that President Trump *WILL* win..

So Pelosi is pushing impeachment..

Democrats state it in plain english..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>Nancy Pelosi suggests that Democrats have to impeach Trump because they desperately want to prevent him from getting re-elected: "He can't win, that is very serious"</b></p>
<p>And THAT is what it is all about..</p>
<p>Like Al Green, Pelosi concedes that President Trump "can't win"..</p>
<p>And Pelosi knows that President Trump *WILL* win..</p>
<p>So Pelosi is pushing impeachment..</p>
<p>Democrats state it in plain english..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kick</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/09/27/ftp544/#comment-145685</link>
		<dc:creator>Kick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Sep 2019 20:47:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=17460#comment-145685</guid>
		<description>Paula
464

&lt;i&gt;Secretary of State Mike Pompeo took part in the Trump phone call with Ukraine&#039;s leader, a senior State Department official said.&lt;/i&gt;

A senior State Department official said. Hmmmm. My, oh, my!

It&#039;s not exactly a normal thing to have an employee of the State Department participate on a routine congratulatory conference call to a foreign leader... let alone the United States Secretary of State. 

Have I mentioned federal employees are &lt;b&gt;required&lt;/b&gt; to report corruption? Because it&#039;s a fact. 

https://www.dni.gov/files/documents/icotr/Whistleblower.PDF

Well, now we&#039;re going to see the dam break. Hoo boy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Paula<br />
464</p>
<p><i>Secretary of State Mike Pompeo took part in the Trump phone call with Ukraine's leader, a senior State Department official said.</i></p>
<p>A senior State Department official said. Hmmmm. My, oh, my!</p>
<p>It's not exactly a normal thing to have an employee of the State Department participate on a routine congratulatory conference call to a foreign leader... let alone the United States Secretary of State. </p>
<p>Have I mentioned federal employees are <b>required</b> to report corruption? Because it's a fact. </p>
<p><a href="https://www.dni.gov/files/documents/icotr/Whistleblower.PDF" rel="nofollow">https://www.dni.gov/files/documents/icotr/Whistleblower.PDF</a></p>
<p>Well, now we're going to see the dam break. Hoo boy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/09/27/ftp544/#comment-145684</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Sep 2019 20:44:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=17460#comment-145684</guid>
		<description>&lt;B&gt;&quot;And by the daggers of their own lies, by the bullets of their own deceit, by the shrapnel of their own dishonesty.... So shall they fall!!!&lt;/B&gt;

That&#039;s quite the poetic turn...

If I do say so myself..

And I do!!!  :D

&lt;B&gt;&quot;Mr Tipton.. Would you think it&#039;s fair to say that you got a better shot of them going INTO the store and not so much going out??&quot;
&quot;You could say that.&quot;
&quot;I *DID* say that.. Would YOU say that...&quot;&lt;/B&gt;
-MY COUSIN VINNY

:D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>"And by the daggers of their own lies, by the bullets of their own deceit, by the shrapnel of their own dishonesty.... So shall they fall!!!</b></p>
<p>That's quite the poetic turn...</p>
<p>If I do say so myself..</p>
<p>And I do!!!  :D</p>
<p><b>"Mr Tipton.. Would you think it's fair to say that you got a better shot of them going INTO the store and not so much going out??"<br />
"You could say that."<br />
"I *DID* say that.. Would YOU say that..."</b><br />
-MY COUSIN VINNY</p>
<p>:D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/09/27/ftp544/#comment-145683</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Sep 2019 20:41:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=17460#comment-145683</guid>
		<description>As I have said..

&lt;B&gt;Independents were divided on whether they support the inquiry now underway in the Democrat-controlled House. Forty-nine percent said they approved of the inquiry, with 51 percent disapproving. &lt;/B&gt;

Majority of Independents and NPAs disapprove of the Democrats actions..

Democrats are TOAST in 2020!!  :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As I have said..</p>
<p><b>Independents were divided on whether they support the inquiry now underway in the Democrat-controlled House. Forty-nine percent said they approved of the inquiry, with 51 percent disapproving. </b></p>
<p>Majority of Independents and NPAs disapprove of the Democrats actions..</p>
<p>Democrats are TOAST in 2020!!  :D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/09/27/ftp544/#comment-145682</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Sep 2019 20:38:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=17460#comment-145682</guid>
		<description>&lt;B&gt;Independents torn over Trump impeachment in new poll

The latest poll on the House of Representatives’ impeachment inquiry into President Trump over the Ukrainian controversy reveals that independents are deeply divided on the subject.

The CBS News survey conducted by YouGuv also indicates that a plurality of independents right now say Trump doesn’t deserve to be impeached over the scandal rocking his White House.&lt;/B&gt;

BBBBBWWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHA

&lt;B&gt;&quot;And by the daggers of their own lies, by the bullets of their own deceit, by the shrapnel of their own dishonesty.... So shall they fall!!!&lt;/B&gt;



Democrats are TOAST in 2020!!!  :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>Independents torn over Trump impeachment in new poll</p>
<p>The latest poll on the House of Representatives’ impeachment inquiry into President Trump over the Ukrainian controversy reveals that independents are deeply divided on the subject.</p>
<p>The CBS News survey conducted by YouGuv also indicates that a plurality of independents right now say Trump doesn’t deserve to be impeached over the scandal rocking his White House.</b></p>
<p>BBBBBWWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHA</p>
<p><b>"And by the daggers of their own lies, by the bullets of their own deceit, by the shrapnel of their own dishonesty.... So shall they fall!!!</b></p>
<p>Democrats are TOAST in 2020!!!  :D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kick</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/09/27/ftp544/#comment-145681</link>
		<dc:creator>Kick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Sep 2019 20:37:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=17460#comment-145681</guid>
		<description>Paula
463

&lt;i&gt;@kylegriffin &quot;Breaking via NYT: Trump pushed the Australian prime minister during a recent call to help Attorney General Barr gather information for a Justice Dept. inquiry that Trump hopes will discredit the Mueller investigation, according to two American officials.&quot; &lt;/i&gt;

&lt;b&gt;Cover-Up&lt;/b&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Paula<br />
463</p>
<p><i>@kylegriffin "Breaking via NYT: Trump pushed the Australian prime minister during a recent call to help Attorney General Barr gather information for a Justice Dept. inquiry that Trump hopes will discredit the Mueller investigation, according to two American officials." </i></p>
<p><b>Cover-Up</b></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/09/27/ftp544/#comment-145680</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Sep 2019 20:34:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=17460#comment-145680</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;Secretary of State Mike Pompeo took part in the Trump phone call with Ukraine&#039;s leader, a senior State Department official said https://on.wsj.com/2neDNno&lt;/I&gt;

So??

2 times NOTHING is still NOTHING....

DUH...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Secretary of State Mike Pompeo took part in the Trump phone call with Ukraine's leader, a senior State Department official said <a href="https://on.wsj.com/2neDNno" rel="nofollow">https://on.wsj.com/2neDNno</a></i></p>
<p>So??</p>
<p>2 times NOTHING is still NOTHING....</p>
<p>DUH...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/09/27/ftp544/#comment-145679</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Sep 2019 20:33:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=17460#comment-145679</guid>
		<description>&lt;B&gt;Black Virginia 6th grader who claimed white classmates cut off dreadlocks made story up, family says

A Virginia sixth grader who claimed three of her white male classmates held her down and cut off her dreadlocks is now saying she made up the entire story.

Amari Allen, an African-American 12-year-old who attends Immanuel Christian School in Springfield — a private school where second lady Karen Pence teaches art — reported the alleged incident last week. She told several media outlets that three boys at school pinned her down and cut off her hair, and local police opened an investigation.

&quot;They said my hair was nappy and I was ugly,&quot; she told WRC-TV. &quot;They put their hands over my mouth. They put my hands behind my back. And they started cutting my hair and saying it was ugly.&quot;

But on Monday, her family released a statement saying the accusations made by the 12-year-old girl had been fabricated.

“To those young boys and their parents, we sincerely apologize for the pain and anxiety these allegations have caused,” said a statement from the girl&#039;s grandparents obtained by The Washington Post. “To the administrators and families of Immanuel Christian School, we are sorry for the damage this incident has done to trust within the school family and the undue scorn it has brought to the school. To the broader community, who rallied in such passionate support for our daughter, we apologize for betraying your trust.”&lt;/b&gt;

Where ON EARTH did this little girl learn the lesson that all she has to do is make up shit, blame it on white people and she will be a hero!??

Why, from the Democrat Party, of course..

I wonder if Democrats have the decency to be ashamed..

I am guessing...

NOT...  :eyeroll:</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>Black Virginia 6th grader who claimed white classmates cut off dreadlocks made story up, family says</p>
<p>A Virginia sixth grader who claimed three of her white male classmates held her down and cut off her dreadlocks is now saying she made up the entire story.</p>
<p>Amari Allen, an African-American 12-year-old who attends Immanuel Christian School in Springfield — a private school where second lady Karen Pence teaches art — reported the alleged incident last week. She told several media outlets that three boys at school pinned her down and cut off her hair, and local police opened an investigation.</p>
<p>"They said my hair was nappy and I was ugly," she told WRC-TV. "They put their hands over my mouth. They put my hands behind my back. And they started cutting my hair and saying it was ugly."</p>
<p>But on Monday, her family released a statement saying the accusations made by the 12-year-old girl had been fabricated.</p>
<p>“To those young boys and their parents, we sincerely apologize for the pain and anxiety these allegations have caused,” said a statement from the girl's grandparents obtained by The Washington Post. “To the administrators and families of Immanuel Christian School, we are sorry for the damage this incident has done to trust within the school family and the undue scorn it has brought to the school. To the broader community, who rallied in such passionate support for our daughter, we apologize for betraying your trust.”</b></p>
<p>Where ON EARTH did this little girl learn the lesson that all she has to do is make up shit, blame it on white people and she will be a hero!??</p>
<p>Why, from the Democrat Party, of course..</p>
<p>I wonder if Democrats have the decency to be ashamed..</p>
<p>I am guessing...</p>
<p>NOT...  :eyeroll:</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paula</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/09/27/ftp544/#comment-145678</link>
		<dc:creator>Paula</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Sep 2019 20:31:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=17460#comment-145678</guid>
		<description>Also breaking:

The Wall Street Journal
@WSJ
 · 22m
Secretary of State Mike Pompeo took part in the Trump phone call with Ukraine&#039;s leader, a senior State Department official said https://on.wsj.com/2neDNno</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also breaking:</p>
<p>The Wall Street Journal<br />
@WSJ<br />
 · 22m<br />
Secretary of State Mike Pompeo took part in the Trump phone call with Ukraine's leader, a senior State Department official said <a href="https://on.wsj.com/2neDNno" rel="nofollow">https://on.wsj.com/2neDNno</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paula</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/09/27/ftp544/#comment-145677</link>
		<dc:creator>Paula</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Sep 2019 20:30:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=17460#comment-145677</guid>
		<description>[459] Kick: Yep - Guliani subpeonaed by 3 congressional committees.

Separately, 

Kyle Griffin
@kylegriffin&quot;Breaking via NYT: Trump pushed the Australian prime minister during a recent call to help Attorney General Barr gather information for a Justice Dept. inquiry that Trump hopes will discredit the Mueller investigation, according to two American officials.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[459] Kick: Yep - Guliani subpeonaed by 3 congressional committees.</p>
<p>Separately, </p>
<p>Kyle Griffin<br />
@kylegriffin"Breaking via NYT: Trump pushed the Australian prime minister during a recent call to help Attorney General Barr gather information for a Justice Dept. inquiry that Trump hopes will discredit the Mueller investigation, according to two American officials."</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/09/27/ftp544/#comment-145676</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Sep 2019 20:21:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=17460#comment-145676</guid>
		<description>I GOT IT!!!!

https://storage.googleapis.com/afs-prod/media/aa94d3b098d04edbb465fc7dc137393e/1000.jpeg

I look at Schiff-head and I say, &quot;That guy really looks familiar!!

Then it hit me!!!

Schiff-head is the weaselly crook, coward and bully, President Charles Logan!!!!!

Looks like reality is imitating art!!!  :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I GOT IT!!!!</p>
<p><a href="https://storage.googleapis.com/afs-prod/media/aa94d3b098d04edbb465fc7dc137393e/1000.jpeg" rel="nofollow">https://storage.googleapis.com/afs-prod/media/aa94d3b098d04edbb465fc7dc137393e/1000.jpeg</a></p>
<p>I look at Schiff-head and I say, "That guy really looks familiar!!</p>
<p>Then it hit me!!!</p>
<p>Schiff-head is the weaselly crook, coward and bully, President Charles Logan!!!!!</p>
<p>Looks like reality is imitating art!!!  :D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/09/27/ftp544/#comment-145675</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Sep 2019 20:18:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=17460#comment-145675</guid>
		<description>And the emails are pouring in..

&lt;B&gt;PLEASE!!!  PLEASE!!!  Take it easy on the users of the chrisweigant.com forum!! They can&#039;t handle your onslaught!!  They can&#039;t handle your facts!!! 

PLEASE take it easy on them!!! Show mercy!!!!!&lt;/B&gt;

BBBBWWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And the emails are pouring in..</p>
<p><b>PLEASE!!!  PLEASE!!!  Take it easy on the users of the chrisweigant.com forum!! They can't handle your onslaught!!  They can't handle your facts!!! </p>
<p>PLEASE take it easy on them!!! Show mercy!!!!!</b></p>
<p>BBBBWWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/09/27/ftp544/#comment-145674</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Sep 2019 20:15:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=17460#comment-145674</guid>
		<description>&lt;B&gt;House Democrats subpoena Trump lawyer Rudy Giuliani in impeachment probe&lt;/B&gt;
https://www.cnbc.com/2019/09/30/house-democrats-subpoena-trump-lawyer-rudy-giuliani-in-impeachment-probe.html

Yea..  THAT is going to go as well as the McGann subpoena and the Hope Hicks subpoena and the Trump Tax Returns subpoena and the Mueller Report subpoena has gone..

BBBBWWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHA

Basically, Dumbocrats are just setting themselves up for ANOTHER court loss!!!

BBBBWWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

Until such time as Dumbocrats present the so-called &quot;whistle blower&quot; and the non-existent &quot;whistle blower-ettes&quot;....

Dim subpoenas are not going ANYWHERE...

They will be referred to the SCOTUS where the SCOTUS will rule on the admissibility of the Dumbocrats anonymous 3rd person hearsay...

And Dumbocrats will LOSE...

AGAIN.....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>House Democrats subpoena Trump lawyer Rudy Giuliani in impeachment probe</b><br />
<a href="https://www.cnbc.com/2019/09/30/house-democrats-subpoena-trump-lawyer-rudy-giuliani-in-impeachment-probe.html" rel="nofollow">https://www.cnbc.com/2019/09/30/house-democrats-subpoena-trump-lawyer-rudy-giuliani-in-impeachment-probe.html</a></p>
<p>Yea..  THAT is going to go as well as the McGann subpoena and the Hope Hicks subpoena and the Trump Tax Returns subpoena and the Mueller Report subpoena has gone..</p>
<p>BBBBWWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHA</p>
<p>Basically, Dumbocrats are just setting themselves up for ANOTHER court loss!!!</p>
<p>BBBBWWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA</p>
<p>Until such time as Dumbocrats present the so-called "whistle blower" and the non-existent "whistle blower-ettes"....</p>
<p>Dim subpoenas are not going ANYWHERE...</p>
<p>They will be referred to the SCOTUS where the SCOTUS will rule on the admissibility of the Dumbocrats anonymous 3rd person hearsay...</p>
<p>And Dumbocrats will LOSE...</p>
<p>AGAIN.....</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kick</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/09/27/ftp544/#comment-145673</link>
		<dc:creator>Kick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Sep 2019 20:04:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=17460#comment-145673</guid>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;Subpoena for Rudy Giuliani&lt;/b&gt;

Rudy Giuliani... come on down! You&#039;re the next contestant on the &quot;Price is Indict&quot;!

Popcorn, get your popcorn. Probably ought to get NUTS when they question Rudy. Symbolism! :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>Subpoena for Rudy Giuliani</b></p>
<p>Rudy Giuliani... come on down! You're the next contestant on the "Price is Indict"!</p>
<p>Popcorn, get your popcorn. Probably ought to get NUTS when they question Rudy. Symbolism! :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/09/27/ftp544/#comment-145672</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Sep 2019 19:59:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=17460#comment-145672</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;And he&#039;d know that every single thing that he asked the Ukrainians for was bullshit, and that all that they could do was smile, nod, and try to work around it. What kind of lies could he extract, that fed his hate machine, or exculpated Russia. One wonders.&lt;/I&gt;

Facts to support??

Nope???  

Of course not.. You never do...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>And he'd know that every single thing that he asked the Ukrainians for was bullshit, and that all that they could do was smile, nod, and try to work around it. What kind of lies could he extract, that fed his hate machine, or exculpated Russia. One wonders.</i></p>
<p>Facts to support??</p>
<p>Nope???  </p>
<p>Of course not.. You never do...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/09/27/ftp544/#comment-145671</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Sep 2019 19:58:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=17460#comment-145671</guid>
		<description>Woot!!!  I think we can hit FIVE HUNDRED before I log off to be with my beautiful wife... :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Woot!!!  I think we can hit FIVE HUNDRED before I log off to be with my beautiful wife... :D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Balthasar</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/09/27/ftp544/#comment-145670</link>
		<dc:creator>Balthasar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Sep 2019 19:58:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=17460#comment-145670</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;If he is aware of potential evidence of lawlessness that resides in the hands of a foreign government, he is duty-bound to ask that such evidence be produced.&lt;/i&gt;

And he&#039;d know that every single thing that he asked the Ukrainians for was bullshit, and that all that they could do was smile, nod, and try to work around it. What kind of lies could he extract, that fed his hate machine, or exculpated Russia. One wonders.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>If he is aware of potential evidence of lawlessness that resides in the hands of a foreign government, he is duty-bound to ask that such evidence be produced.</i></p>
<p>And he'd know that every single thing that he asked the Ukrainians for was bullshit, and that all that they could do was smile, nod, and try to work around it. What kind of lies could he extract, that fed his hate machine, or exculpated Russia. One wonders.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/09/27/ftp544/#comment-145669</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Sep 2019 19:58:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=17460#comment-145669</guid>
		<description>MtnCaddy...

Did you finish googling JEEP yet??

Jeesus, yer slow..

You definitely have NEVER served in the US Military...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MtnCaddy...</p>
<p>Did you finish googling JEEP yet??</p>
<p>Jeesus, yer slow..</p>
<p>You definitely have NEVER served in the US Military...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/09/27/ftp544/#comment-145668</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Sep 2019 19:56:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=17460#comment-145668</guid>
		<description>CongressCritter quotes...

&lt;B&gt;“Outside the Beltway, people want this thing to be over. I think they’ve had enough of it. This is one of my concerns about the continued release of materials even before the inquiry itself has begun. And I think the American people have other things they want their government to take care of other than dwell on this.”

“It is time we move forward, and not have the Congress and the American people endure a specter of what could be a yearlong focus on a tawdry but not impeachable affair.”&lt;/B&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CongressCritter quotes...</p>
<p><b>“Outside the Beltway, people want this thing to be over. I think they’ve had enough of it. This is one of my concerns about the continued release of materials even before the inquiry itself has begun. And I think the American people have other things they want their government to take care of other than dwell on this.”</p>
<p>“It is time we move forward, and not have the Congress and the American people endure a specter of what could be a yearlong focus on a tawdry but not impeachable affair.”</b></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/09/27/ftp544/#comment-145667</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Sep 2019 19:54:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=17460#comment-145667</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;Oh, but it does matter.&lt;/I&gt;

That&#039;s NOT what you said before..

You said before it was illegal to solicit, accept or receive..

NOW you are saying the opposite..

You are full of shit..

&lt;I&gt;His father, however, made it a REQUEST of the United States, which pulled the whole affair into another realm. &lt;/I&gt;

You mean, like when Hunter Biden&#039;s father said FIRE THE PROSECUTOR WHO IS INVESTIGATING MY SON OR YOU DON&#039;T GET A BILLION DOLLARS!!!

You mean, like that??

Balthy.. You are full of shit..

I have PROVEN you are full of shit many times over..

Accept the facts gracefully...  lick your wounds..  come back fresh tomorrow...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Oh, but it does matter.</i></p>
<p>That's NOT what you said before..</p>
<p>You said before it was illegal to solicit, accept or receive..</p>
<p>NOW you are saying the opposite..</p>
<p>You are full of shit..</p>
<p><i>His father, however, made it a REQUEST of the United States, which pulled the whole affair into another realm. </i></p>
<p>You mean, like when Hunter Biden's father said FIRE THE PROSECUTOR WHO IS INVESTIGATING MY SON OR YOU DON'T GET A BILLION DOLLARS!!!</p>
<p>You mean, like that??</p>
<p>Balthy.. You are full of shit..</p>
<p>I have PROVEN you are full of shit many times over..</p>
<p>Accept the facts gracefully...  lick your wounds..  come back fresh tomorrow...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kick</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/09/27/ftp544/#comment-145666</link>
		<dc:creator>Kick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Sep 2019 19:52:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=17460#comment-145666</guid>
		<description>Michale
431

&lt;i&gt;&quot;I&#039;ve just collapsed it into about a dozen comments now that I&#039;ve invoked &quot;HIDDEN&quot; and relegated it to its proper place of invisibility. Be gone! And so it is.&quot; &lt;/i&gt;

That&#039;s great, Mike! Yes, that is exactly how the TamperMonkey(TM) works, and I encourage you to post it however many times it takes for it to permeate your single brain cell, although you&#039;ll not convince very many posters regarding your claim of ignoring my posts. The TamperMonkey(TM) script was invented to block you, and any poster on this forum is indeed free to turn it on and off at their choosing.

Post it until you learn it, moron. That way everyone will know just how high you rank on the poon scale.

&lt;i&gt;BITCH IS PWNED!!!! :D &lt;/i&gt;

Give your bisexual bitch our sympathies. I&#039;m sure the posters on the board would prefer not to discuss your wife and family, but you can&#039;t seem stop posting their names and sexual preferences and incessantly whining like a little about them, and that&#039;s not on me anymore you fucking poon... that&#039;s your choice! :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michale<br />
431</p>
<p><i>"I've just collapsed it into about a dozen comments now that I've invoked "HIDDEN" and relegated it to its proper place of invisibility. Be gone! And so it is." </i></p>
<p>That's great, Mike! Yes, that is exactly how the TamperMonkey(TM) works, and I encourage you to post it however many times it takes for it to permeate your single brain cell, although you'll not convince very many posters regarding your claim of ignoring my posts. The TamperMonkey(TM) script was invented to block you, and any poster on this forum is indeed free to turn it on and off at their choosing.</p>
<p>Post it until you learn it, moron. That way everyone will know just how high you rank on the poon scale.</p>
<p><i>BITCH IS PWNED!!!! :D </i></p>
<p>Give your bisexual bitch our sympathies. I'm sure the posters on the board would prefer not to discuss your wife and family, but you can't seem stop posting their names and sexual preferences and incessantly whining like a little about them, and that's not on me anymore you fucking poon... that's your choice! :D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/09/27/ftp544/#comment-145665</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Sep 2019 19:50:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=17460#comment-145665</guid>
		<description>And, once again.. I am a victim of my own success..

I cleared the battlefield....   Ah well...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And, once again.. I am a victim of my own success..</p>
<p>I cleared the battlefield....   Ah well...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Balthasar</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/09/27/ftp544/#comment-145664</link>
		<dc:creator>Balthasar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Sep 2019 19:49:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=17460#comment-145664</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;According to YOUR claim, soliciting or solicited does not matter.&lt;/i&gt;

Oh, but it does matter. If Don Jr. had hung up the phone and called the FBI, you don&#039;t think it would matter? Of course it would.

His father, however, made it a REQUEST of the United States, which pulled the whole affair into another realm. You gotta see that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>According to YOUR claim, soliciting or solicited does not matter.</i></p>
<p>Oh, but it does matter. If Don Jr. had hung up the phone and called the FBI, you don't think it would matter? Of course it would.</p>
<p>His father, however, made it a REQUEST of the United States, which pulled the whole affair into another realm. You gotta see that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/09/27/ftp544/#comment-145663</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Sep 2019 19:49:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=17460#comment-145663</guid>
		<description>I have been battling insomnia the last couple weeks..

Heart and blood pressure related..

So I kinda slept in today til 0800...

Never in my WILDEST dreams would I have known that I was going to slap down and DECIMATE so many Trump/America hating LUSERS today!!!  :D

I wish I could sleep in more often.. :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have been battling insomnia the last couple weeks..</p>
<p>Heart and blood pressure related..</p>
<p>So I kinda slept in today til 0800...</p>
<p>Never in my WILDEST dreams would I have known that I was going to slap down and DECIMATE so many Trump/America hating LUSERS today!!!  :D</p>
<p>I wish I could sleep in more often.. :D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/09/27/ftp544/#comment-145662</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Sep 2019 19:47:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=17460#comment-145662</guid>
		<description>&lt;B&gt;Nowhere in the Trump-Zelensky telephone call was there a threat (like Biden’s), pressure, condition, or demand by Trump.  Impeachment hysteria, if not insanity, has obscured the facts.  Sen. Richard Blumenthal, D-Conn., said of Trump’s conversation with his counterpart, “What this shows is repeated, concerted, premeditated, criminal conduct.”  Columnist Michael Gerson wrote in the Washington Post, “For the first time in American history, the president has pleaded guilty to an impeachable offense.” This is effectively what happened…,” he added. 

It is easy to dismiss such obtuse pronouncements as partisan bloviating. In reality, it represents a fundamental misunderstanding of the law, international agreements, and federal investigations. The president’s words were neither a crime nor an impeachable offense. Article II, Section 3 of the Constitution imposes a duty on the president to “take care that the laws be faithfully executed.” If he is aware of potential evidence of lawlessness that resides in the hands of a foreign government, he is duty-bound to ask that such evidence be produced. 

What is driving the impeachment blather is an overwhelming desire by Democrats and the complicit media to destroy Trump’s presidency, undo the 2016 election, and evict him from office. Talk of impeaching Trump began before he was ever sworn in or unpacked his luggage at the White House.  Every act by the president has been branded “an impeachable offense.” 

At first, it was emoluments, then it was the firing of James Comey as FBI director, then it was the Trump-Russia “collusion” hoax, then it was Trump’s alleged remark about Gen. Michael Flynn, then it was obstruction of justice. Stormy Daniels was supposed to bring down Trump, then it white-nationalism and neo-Nazism, then it was Michael Cohen’s testimony, then it was Trump’s finances. The list extends ad nauseam.

At every turn and with every perceived slight, howls of impeachment have reverberated through the halls of Congress and in liberal newsrooms across America. Trump’s demise is always just around the corner, they insist. Except it isn’t. Not if you consider those pesky things called facts. &lt;/B&gt;

Democrats are SOOO TOAST!!!!!  :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>Nowhere in the Trump-Zelensky telephone call was there a threat (like Biden’s), pressure, condition, or demand by Trump.  Impeachment hysteria, if not insanity, has obscured the facts.  Sen. Richard Blumenthal, D-Conn., said of Trump’s conversation with his counterpart, “What this shows is repeated, concerted, premeditated, criminal conduct.”  Columnist Michael Gerson wrote in the Washington Post, “For the first time in American history, the president has pleaded guilty to an impeachable offense.” This is effectively what happened…,” he added. </p>
<p>It is easy to dismiss such obtuse pronouncements as partisan bloviating. In reality, it represents a fundamental misunderstanding of the law, international agreements, and federal investigations. The president’s words were neither a crime nor an impeachable offense. Article II, Section 3 of the Constitution imposes a duty on the president to “take care that the laws be faithfully executed.” If he is aware of potential evidence of lawlessness that resides in the hands of a foreign government, he is duty-bound to ask that such evidence be produced. </p>
<p>What is driving the impeachment blather is an overwhelming desire by Democrats and the complicit media to destroy Trump’s presidency, undo the 2016 election, and evict him from office. Talk of impeaching Trump began before he was ever sworn in or unpacked his luggage at the White House.  Every act by the president has been branded “an impeachable offense.” </p>
<p>At first, it was emoluments, then it was the firing of James Comey as FBI director, then it was the Trump-Russia “collusion” hoax, then it was Trump’s alleged remark about Gen. Michael Flynn, then it was obstruction of justice. Stormy Daniels was supposed to bring down Trump, then it white-nationalism and neo-Nazism, then it was Michael Cohen’s testimony, then it was Trump’s finances. The list extends ad nauseam.</p>
<p>At every turn and with every perceived slight, howls of impeachment have reverberated through the halls of Congress and in liberal newsrooms across America. Trump’s demise is always just around the corner, they insist. Except it isn’t. Not if you consider those pesky things called facts. </b></p>
<p>Democrats are SOOO TOAST!!!!!  :D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/09/27/ftp544/#comment-145661</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Sep 2019 19:45:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=17460#comment-145661</guid>
		<description>MtnCaddy

If you HURRY up and GOOGLE JEEP, you MIGHT be able to recover some SHRED... some IOTA of credibility..

I doubt it though...

Yer a lost cause, ya asshole..  :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MtnCaddy</p>
<p>If you HURRY up and GOOGLE JEEP, you MIGHT be able to recover some SHRED... some IOTA of credibility..</p>
<p>I doubt it though...</p>
<p>Yer a lost cause, ya asshole..  :D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/09/27/ftp544/#comment-145660</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Sep 2019 19:44:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=17460#comment-145660</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;Trump, on the other hand, was caught SOLICITING the Ukrainians hard for dirt on Biden.&lt;/I&gt;

According to YOUR claim, soliciting or solicited does not matter.

According to YOUR claim, it&#039;s simply ILLEGAL to obtain the info..

NOW you are back-pedaling and claiming a distinction you didn&#039;t claim before..

In other words.. ONCE AGAIN.. You got caught spewing BULLSHIT and you are trying to WEASEL your way out of it...

This is the FOURTH TIME i have caught you spewing bullshit..

THE FOURTH TIME!!!

IN A SINGLE COMMENTARY!!!

Yer scroo&#039;ed Blathy.. Your credibility is ZERO...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Trump, on the other hand, was caught SOLICITING the Ukrainians hard for dirt on Biden.</i></p>
<p>According to YOUR claim, soliciting or solicited does not matter.</p>
<p>According to YOUR claim, it's simply ILLEGAL to obtain the info..</p>
<p>NOW you are back-pedaling and claiming a distinction you didn't claim before..</p>
<p>In other words.. ONCE AGAIN.. You got caught spewing BULLSHIT and you are trying to WEASEL your way out of it...</p>
<p>This is the FOURTH TIME i have caught you spewing bullshit..</p>
<p>THE FOURTH TIME!!!</p>
<p>IN A SINGLE COMMENTARY!!!</p>
<p>Yer scroo'ed Blathy.. Your credibility is ZERO...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/09/27/ftp544/#comment-145659</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Sep 2019 19:40:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=17460#comment-145659</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt; I&#039;m a 60 year old Army Vet&lt;/I&gt;

Yea.. Sure you are..

Stolen valor..

Have you no shame, you commie scumbag!!??

&lt;I&gt;The only JEEP I ever heard of was&lt;/I&gt;

Of course.. Because you are LYING when you claim you are a military veteran...

I was an Army MI Lieutenant.. I was also Air Force OSI, SPI and LEO...

If you don&#039;t know what JEEP is, you are full of shit when you claim to have served..

Stolen Valor.. The lowest of the low...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i> I'm a 60 year old Army Vet</i></p>
<p>Yea.. Sure you are..</p>
<p>Stolen valor..</p>
<p>Have you no shame, you commie scumbag!!??</p>
<p><i>The only JEEP I ever heard of was</i></p>
<p>Of course.. Because you are LYING when you claim you are a military veteran...</p>
<p>I was an Army MI Lieutenant.. I was also Air Force OSI, SPI and LEO...</p>
<p>If you don't know what JEEP is, you are full of shit when you claim to have served..</p>
<p>Stolen Valor.. The lowest of the low...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/09/27/ftp544/#comment-145658</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Sep 2019 19:37:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=17460#comment-145658</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;Almost right. Schiff couldn&#039;t solicit the Ukrainians, but to BE SOLICITED is okay, provided that he calls the FBI afterward. &lt;/I&gt;

That is NOT what you said before!!

Now you are changing your bullshit..

You said before that it&#039;s illegal to receive &quot;anything of value&quot; which YOU claim includes information from a foreign source..

You NEVER made ANY distinction on solicited or soliciting.

What has happened here is once again, YOU got caught in your contradictory bullshit and now you are trying to tab dance your way out of it..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Almost right. Schiff couldn't solicit the Ukrainians, but to BE SOLICITED is okay, provided that he calls the FBI afterward. </i></p>
<p>That is NOT what you said before!!</p>
<p>Now you are changing your bullshit..</p>
<p>You said before that it's illegal to receive "anything of value" which YOU claim includes information from a foreign source..</p>
<p>You NEVER made ANY distinction on solicited or soliciting.</p>
<p>What has happened here is once again, YOU got caught in your contradictory bullshit and now you are trying to tab dance your way out of it..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MtnCaddy</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/09/27/ftp544/#comment-145657</link>
		<dc:creator>MtnCaddy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Sep 2019 19:35:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=17460#comment-145657</guid>
		<description>[423]

Um, what&#039;s a &quot;JEEP?&quot; I&#039;m a 60 year old Army Vet so I&#039;m not hip to some of the newer slang. The only JEEP I ever heard of was from a buddy who owned one and hated his repair bills. He said JEEP stands for
Just
Empty
Every
Pocket</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[423]</p>
<p>Um, what's a "JEEP?" I'm a 60 year old Army Vet so I'm not hip to some of the newer slang. The only JEEP I ever heard of was from a buddy who owned one and hated his repair bills. He said JEEP stands for<br />
Just<br />
Empty<br />
Every<br />
Pocket</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/09/27/ftp544/#comment-145656</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Sep 2019 19:35:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=17460#comment-145656</guid>
		<description>&lt;B&gt;Trump’s reference to former Vice President Joe Biden and the suspicious activities of his son, Hunter Biden, comes later in the conversation:

“There’s a lot of talk about Biden’s son, that Biden stopped the prosecution and a lot of people want to find out about that so whatever you can do with the Attorney General would be great. Biden went around bragging that he stopped the prosecution so if you can look into it… It sounds horrible to me.” 

It is indisputable that Biden is seen and heard on videotape bragging that he engineered the firing of Ukrainian prosecutor, Viktor Shokin, by threatening to withhold $1 billion in U.S. aid to Ukraine. Shokin is on record telling the Washington Post that he was sacked because his investigators were “on his (Hunter Biden’s) tail” in a case of suspected corruption involving $3 million in fees that found their way into the pocket of the VP’s son. Joe Biden has dismissed this as nonsense and the mainstream media have accepted his explanation as gospel.  However, documents newly uncovered by The Hill’s John Solomon belie Biden’s claim. These records appear to show that that Shokin’s account, not Biden’s, was true.

Joe Biden’s boast about his “quid pro quo” with Ukraine is compelling evidence that he may have used his public office to confer a benefit ($1 billion) in exchange for something of value –shutting down an investigation to help his son. This is where the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act comes into play, as well as other federal felony statutes such as bribery, extortion, and honest services fraud. The Justice Department would be justified in investigating Biden to determine whether he took any official action involving taxpayer money as Vice President to benefit his son. 

Once again, President Trump had every right to ask Zelensky to assist the U.S. in any existing or prospective investigation. Biden doesn’t enjoy immunity simply because he is running in the Democratic primary for president. There is no amnesty for a prospective political opponent. Lest we forget, the Obama administration launched an investigation into the nominee of the opposing party during a presidential campaign.&lt;/B&gt;

Joe and Hunter Biden are legitimate investigations..

President Trump&#039;s phone call is not..

It&#039;s REALLY that simple...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>Trump’s reference to former Vice President Joe Biden and the suspicious activities of his son, Hunter Biden, comes later in the conversation:</p>
<p>“There’s a lot of talk about Biden’s son, that Biden stopped the prosecution and a lot of people want to find out about that so whatever you can do with the Attorney General would be great. Biden went around bragging that he stopped the prosecution so if you can look into it… It sounds horrible to me.” </p>
<p>It is indisputable that Biden is seen and heard on videotape bragging that he engineered the firing of Ukrainian prosecutor, Viktor Shokin, by threatening to withhold $1 billion in U.S. aid to Ukraine. Shokin is on record telling the Washington Post that he was sacked because his investigators were “on his (Hunter Biden’s) tail” in a case of suspected corruption involving $3 million in fees that found their way into the pocket of the VP’s son. Joe Biden has dismissed this as nonsense and the mainstream media have accepted his explanation as gospel.  However, documents newly uncovered by The Hill’s John Solomon belie Biden’s claim. These records appear to show that that Shokin’s account, not Biden’s, was true.</p>
<p>Joe Biden’s boast about his “quid pro quo” with Ukraine is compelling evidence that he may have used his public office to confer a benefit ($1 billion) in exchange for something of value –shutting down an investigation to help his son. This is where the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act comes into play, as well as other federal felony statutes such as bribery, extortion, and honest services fraud. The Justice Department would be justified in investigating Biden to determine whether he took any official action involving taxpayer money as Vice President to benefit his son. </p>
<p>Once again, President Trump had every right to ask Zelensky to assist the U.S. in any existing or prospective investigation. Biden doesn’t enjoy immunity simply because he is running in the Democratic primary for president. There is no amnesty for a prospective political opponent. Lest we forget, the Obama administration launched an investigation into the nominee of the opposing party during a presidential campaign.</b></p>
<p>Joe and Hunter Biden are legitimate investigations..</p>
<p>President Trump's phone call is not..</p>
<p>It's REALLY that simple...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Balthasar</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/09/27/ftp544/#comment-145655</link>
		<dc:creator>Balthasar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Sep 2019 19:33:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=17460#comment-145655</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;So some lowly House committee member can solicit or be solicited dirt on a political opponent...

But the PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES cannot!!&lt;/i&gt;

Almost right. Schiff couldn&#039;t solicit the Ukrainians, but to BE SOLICITED is okay, provided that he calls the FBI afterward. In this case he found out right away that they were broadcasters.

Trump, on the other hand, was caught SOLICITING the Ukrainians hard for dirt on Biden. He offered his personal attorney, and the Attorney General.

Nope, can&#039;t do that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>So some lowly House committee member can solicit or be solicited dirt on a political opponent...</p>
<p>But the PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES cannot!!</i></p>
<p>Almost right. Schiff couldn't solicit the Ukrainians, but to BE SOLICITED is okay, provided that he calls the FBI afterward. In this case he found out right away that they were broadcasters.</p>
<p>Trump, on the other hand, was caught SOLICITING the Ukrainians hard for dirt on Biden. He offered his personal attorney, and the Attorney General.</p>
<p>Nope, can't do that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/09/27/ftp544/#comment-145654</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Sep 2019 19:31:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=17460#comment-145654</guid>
		<description>&lt;B&gt;Gregg Jarrett: Ukraine is just the latest ploy in &#039;witch hunt&#039; to drive Trump from White House

It is ludicrous to argue that President Trump’s telephone conversation with Ukraine President Volodymyr Zelensky was an impeachable offense. 

Trump had every right to ask Ukraine to cooperate or assist in an official Department of Justice investigation into the origins of the Russia “collusion” hoax. His request was pursuant to an official probe being conducted by U.S. Attorney John Durham and initiated by Attorney General William Barr. In fact, Ukraine is required to comply under a binding treaty with the U.S.


SCHIFF SAYS AGREEMENT IN PLACE FOR WHISTLEBLOWER TO TESTIFY BEFORE COMMITTEE

The Treaty on Mutual Legal Assistance in Criminal Matters obligates Ukraine to provide, upon request by the U.S., assistance “in connection with the investigation, prosecution, and prevention of offenses, and in proceedings related to criminal matters.” This treaty was negotiated by then-president Bill Clinton more than 20 years ago and approved by the U.S. Senate. Among other things, Ukraine agreed to furnish “documents, records, the taking of testimony or statements of persons” relevant to any U.S. investigation. &lt;/B&gt;
https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/gregg-jarrett-ukraine-is-just-the-latest-ploy-in-witch-hunt-to-drive-trump-from-white-house

Once again...

President Trump rulez...

Democrats droolz  

:D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>Gregg Jarrett: Ukraine is just the latest ploy in 'witch hunt' to drive Trump from White House</p>
<p>It is ludicrous to argue that President Trump’s telephone conversation with Ukraine President Volodymyr Zelensky was an impeachable offense. </p>
<p>Trump had every right to ask Ukraine to cooperate or assist in an official Department of Justice investigation into the origins of the Russia “collusion” hoax. His request was pursuant to an official probe being conducted by U.S. Attorney John Durham and initiated by Attorney General William Barr. In fact, Ukraine is required to comply under a binding treaty with the U.S.</p>
<p>SCHIFF SAYS AGREEMENT IN PLACE FOR WHISTLEBLOWER TO TESTIFY BEFORE COMMITTEE</p>
<p>The Treaty on Mutual Legal Assistance in Criminal Matters obligates Ukraine to provide, upon request by the U.S., assistance “in connection with the investigation, prosecution, and prevention of offenses, and in proceedings related to criminal matters.” This treaty was negotiated by then-president Bill Clinton more than 20 years ago and approved by the U.S. Senate. Among other things, Ukraine agreed to furnish “documents, records, the taking of testimony or statements of persons” relevant to any U.S. investigation. </b><br />
<a href="https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/gregg-jarrett-ukraine-is-just-the-latest-ploy-in-witch-hunt-to-drive-trump-from-white-house" rel="nofollow">https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/gregg-jarrett-ukraine-is-just-the-latest-ploy-in-witch-hunt-to-drive-trump-from-white-house</a></p>
<p>Once again...</p>
<p>President Trump rulez...</p>
<p>Democrats droolz  </p>
<p>:D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/09/27/ftp544/#comment-145653</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Sep 2019 19:29:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=17460#comment-145653</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;You&#039;re the only LUSER here, that can&#039;t stay civil, &lt;/I&gt;

Says the moron who supports the CUNT who attacked my wife and children **AND** GRANDCHILDREN!!

Do you HONESTLY believe I give a SINGLE SHIT about what you think???

Son, you don&#039;t KNOW THE MEANING OF THE WORD &quot;civil&quot;...  

Asshole...

&lt;I&gt;The only feelings we have is PITY for a Trump guy.&lt;/I&gt;

Yea, what you call &quot;pity&quot; is nothing but searing blinding hatred and you are lying to yourself if you think it&#039;s anything else..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>You're the only LUSER here, that can't stay civil, </i></p>
<p>Says the moron who supports the CUNT who attacked my wife and children **AND** GRANDCHILDREN!!</p>
<p>Do you HONESTLY believe I give a SINGLE SHIT about what you think???</p>
<p>Son, you don't KNOW THE MEANING OF THE WORD "civil"...  </p>
<p>Asshole...</p>
<p><i>The only feelings we have is PITY for a Trump guy.</i></p>
<p>Yea, what you call "pity" is nothing but searing blinding hatred and you are lying to yourself if you think it's anything else..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/09/27/ftp544/#comment-145652</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Sep 2019 19:27:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=17460#comment-145652</guid>
		<description>ACK!!!!

&lt;I&gt;Jeesus!!! That&#039;s going to go right up there with JL&#039;s claim that we can &quot;STOP CLIMATE CHANGE!!!!&quot;&lt;/I&gt;

That should be &lt;B&gt;JM&#039;s&lt;/B&gt; claim, NOT JL....

My bust, JL.. You KNOW I would never do that on purpose..

I guess you were just on my mind.. :D  heh</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ACK!!!!</p>
<p><i>Jeesus!!! That's going to go right up there with JL's claim that we can "STOP CLIMATE CHANGE!!!!"</i></p>
<p>That should be <b>JM's</b> claim, NOT JL....</p>
<p>My bust, JL.. You KNOW I would never do that on purpose..</p>
<p>I guess you were just on my mind.. :D  heh</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Balthasar</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/09/27/ftp544/#comment-145651</link>
		<dc:creator>Balthasar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Sep 2019 19:26:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=17460#comment-145651</guid>
		<description>You&#039;re the only LUSER here, that can&#039;t stay civil, and gives no shits for the truth.

The only feelings we have is PITY for a Trump guy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You're the only LUSER here, that can't stay civil, and gives no shits for the truth.</p>
<p>The only feelings we have is PITY for a Trump guy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/09/27/ftp544/#comment-145650</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Sep 2019 19:25:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=17460#comment-145650</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;It doesn&#039;t matter, Mike. Schiff can look at any material he wants.&lt;/I&gt;

Really??

So some lowly House committee member can solicit or be solicited dirt on a political opponent...

But the PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES cannot!!!???


BBBBBBWWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

Did you just REALLY say that stoopid shit!!???

I am DEFINITELY going to save that quote!!

Jeesus!!! That&#039;s going to go right up there with JL&#039;s claim that we can &quot;STOP CLIMATE CHANGE!!!!&quot;

BBBBBWWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>It doesn't matter, Mike. Schiff can look at any material he wants.</i></p>
<p>Really??</p>
<p>So some lowly House committee member can solicit or be solicited dirt on a political opponent...</p>
<p>But the PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES cannot!!!???</p>
<p>BBBBBBWWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA</p>
<p>Did you just REALLY say that stoopid shit!!???</p>
<p>I am DEFINITELY going to save that quote!!</p>
<p>Jeesus!!! That's going to go right up there with JL's claim that we can "STOP CLIMATE CHANGE!!!!"</p>
<p>BBBBBWWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kick</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/09/27/ftp544/#comment-145649</link>
		<dc:creator>Kick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Sep 2019 19:25:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=17460#comment-145649</guid>
		<description>Balthasar
427

Of course, you&#039;re correct. I&#039;m not hearing a vigorous defense of Trump here from any lawmakers. Just pissing on everyone else in the usual fashion. 

Tells you everything you need to know. 

John Bolton... come on down. You&#039;re the next contestant on the &quot;Price is Indict.&quot; :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Balthasar<br />
427</p>
<p>Of course, you're correct. I'm not hearing a vigorous defense of Trump here from any lawmakers. Just pissing on everyone else in the usual fashion. </p>
<p>Tells you everything you need to know. </p>
<p>John Bolton... come on down. You're the next contestant on the "Price is Indict." :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/09/27/ftp544/#comment-145648</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Sep 2019 19:23:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=17460#comment-145648</guid>
		<description>I am betting I am going to be seeing emails soon from my fellow Weigantians, asking me to take it easy on the LUSERS here because I am kicking their asses so bad and hurting their feelings..  :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am betting I am going to be seeing emails soon from my fellow Weigantians, asking me to take it easy on the LUSERS here because I am kicking their asses so bad and hurting their feelings..  :D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Balthasar</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/09/27/ftp544/#comment-145647</link>
		<dc:creator>Balthasar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Sep 2019 19:22:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=17460#comment-145647</guid>
		<description>It doesn&#039;t matter, Mike. Schiff can look at any material he wants. He&#039;s the head of the Intelligence Committee, for christs sake. It&#039;s what he does after that matters. You&#039;re chasing illusions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It doesn't matter, Mike. Schiff can look at any material he wants. He's the head of the Intelligence Committee, for christs sake. It's what he does after that matters. You're chasing illusions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/09/27/ftp544/#comment-145646</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Sep 2019 19:20:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=17460#comment-145646</guid>
		<description>Apparently, my &quot;proper place&quot; is NOT in invisibility, but rather in my rent-free space I enjoy in this LUSER&#039;s head!!!

BBBBBWWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apparently, my "proper place" is NOT in invisibility, but rather in my rent-free space I enjoy in this LUSER's head!!!</p>
<p>BBBBBWWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/09/27/ftp544/#comment-145645</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Sep 2019 19:19:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=17460#comment-145645</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;Kick wrote:
Mike
419&lt;/I&gt;

&lt;B&gt;&quot;I&#039;ve just collapsed it into about a dozen comments now that I&#039;ve invoked &quot;HIDDEN&quot; and relegated it to its proper place of invisibility. Be gone! And so it is.&quot;&lt;/B&gt;


BBBWWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

Once again, the DLC LUSER is caught in another lie!!!  :D

BITCH IS PWNED!!!!   :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Kick wrote:<br />
Mike<br />
419</i></p>
<p><b>"I've just collapsed it into about a dozen comments now that I've invoked "HIDDEN" and relegated it to its proper place of invisibility. Be gone! And so it is."</b></p>
<p>BBBWWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA</p>
<p>Once again, the DLC LUSER is caught in another lie!!!  :D</p>
<p>BITCH IS PWNED!!!!   :D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/09/27/ftp544/#comment-145644</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Sep 2019 19:17:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=17460#comment-145644</guid>
		<description>&lt;B&gt;While Schiff does not appear to question the veracity of the prank callers&#039; assumed identity on the January 2018 call, his office said they did not simply take the pranksters at their word.&lt;/B&gt;

In other words, Schiff-head was completely earnest until he found out he had been had, then tried to back-pedal furiously!!!

BBBBBWWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>While Schiff does not appear to question the veracity of the prank callers' assumed identity on the January 2018 call, his office said they did not simply take the pranksters at their word.</b></p>
<p>In other words, Schiff-head was completely earnest until he found out he had been had, then tried to back-pedal furiously!!!</p>
<p>BBBBBWWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/09/27/ftp544/#comment-145643</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Sep 2019 19:16:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=17460#comment-145643</guid>
		<description>&lt;B&gt;Gaetz accused Schiff of hypocrisy for appearing willing to accept information from the Ukranian government as his committee investigates Trump for advocating that Ukraine pursue an investigation that would have likely been politically beneficial to the president&#039;s reelection campaign.

This comes as Schiff and the House Intelligence Committee take center stage in the impeachment fight as the committee is set to question intelligence community Inspector General Mike Atkinson on Friday. The committee also reached a deal for testimony from the whistleblower whose complaint set off scrutiny on Trump&#039;s call with Ukranian President Volodymyr Zelensky, shortly before which he put a hold on $400 million in military aid to Ukraine. Democrats have said the combination of the withheld aid and the requests for an investigation into the Biden family amounted to a proposed quid-pro-quo by Trump.

It&#039;s unclear when the committee will hear from the whistleblower.&lt;/B&gt;

But!!!!!  But!!!!!

Schiff-head has already arraigned the testimony of the faux &quot;whistle blower&quot;... LUSER here in Weigantian SAID SO!!!!

What gives!!!???

:D

Gods it&#039;s tough bein&#039; factually accurate all the time.. :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>Gaetz accused Schiff of hypocrisy for appearing willing to accept information from the Ukranian government as his committee investigates Trump for advocating that Ukraine pursue an investigation that would have likely been politically beneficial to the president's reelection campaign.</p>
<p>This comes as Schiff and the House Intelligence Committee take center stage in the impeachment fight as the committee is set to question intelligence community Inspector General Mike Atkinson on Friday. The committee also reached a deal for testimony from the whistleblower whose complaint set off scrutiny on Trump's call with Ukranian President Volodymyr Zelensky, shortly before which he put a hold on $400 million in military aid to Ukraine. Democrats have said the combination of the withheld aid and the requests for an investigation into the Biden family amounted to a proposed quid-pro-quo by Trump.</p>
<p>It's unclear when the committee will hear from the whistleblower.</b></p>
<p>But!!!!!  But!!!!!</p>
<p>Schiff-head has already arraigned the testimony of the faux "whistle blower"... LUSER here in Weigantian SAID SO!!!!</p>
<p>What gives!!!???</p>
<p>:D</p>
<p>Gods it's tough bein' factually accurate all the time.. :D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kick</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/09/27/ftp544/#comment-145642</link>
		<dc:creator>Kick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Sep 2019 19:14:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=17460#comment-145642</guid>
		<description>Mike
419

The useful idiots can&#039;t defend Trump so here comes the Fox News propaganda bullshit brigade regurgitation from the bleating sheeple. 

Fox News! *laughs*</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mike<br />
419</p>
<p>The useful idiots can't defend Trump so here comes the Fox News propaganda bullshit brigade regurgitation from the bleating sheeple. </p>
<p>Fox News! *laughs*</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Balthasar</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/09/27/ftp544/#comment-145641</link>
		<dc:creator>Balthasar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Sep 2019 19:13:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=17460#comment-145641</guid>
		<description>Boy, are you ever missing the point: The President can never, ever, pressure the leader of another state about digging up dirt on a political opponent.

The Chairman of a congressional committee, can look at whatever comes his way. As long as he hasn&#039;t solicited the material, it isn&#039;t his. He&#039;d probably report it to justice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Boy, are you ever missing the point: The President can never, ever, pressure the leader of another state about digging up dirt on a political opponent.</p>
<p>The Chairman of a congressional committee, can look at whatever comes his way. As long as he hasn't solicited the material, it isn't his. He'd probably report it to justice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/09/27/ftp544/#comment-145640</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Sep 2019 19:12:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=17460#comment-145640</guid>
		<description>&lt;B&gt;McConnell: Senate must take up impeachment if House approves

WASHINGTON (AP) — Republican Leader Mitch McConnell said Monday that Senate rules would require him to take up any articles of impeachment against President Donald Trump if approved by the House, swatting down talk that that the GOP-controlled chamber could dodge the matter entirely.

“I would have no choice but to take it up,” McConnell said on CNBC. But he cautioned, “How long you’re on it is a whole different matter.”&lt;/B&gt;
https://apnews.com/f1b464aec99348bd9f31c81fd4d80e5d

OK  It looks like the Senate Plan is option #3 of what I posted before...

Take up impeachment, declare the articles flimsy and without fact and then dismiss them...

This presupposes that Democrats will actually be able to pass the Articles Of Impeachment in the House..

That is, by NO MEANS, assured..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>McConnell: Senate must take up impeachment if House approves</p>
<p>WASHINGTON (AP) — Republican Leader Mitch McConnell said Monday that Senate rules would require him to take up any articles of impeachment against President Donald Trump if approved by the House, swatting down talk that that the GOP-controlled chamber could dodge the matter entirely.</p>
<p>“I would have no choice but to take it up,” McConnell said on CNBC. But he cautioned, “How long you’re on it is a whole different matter.”</b><br />
<a href="https://apnews.com/f1b464aec99348bd9f31c81fd4d80e5d" rel="nofollow">https://apnews.com/f1b464aec99348bd9f31c81fd4d80e5d</a></p>
<p>OK  It looks like the Senate Plan is option #3 of what I posted before...</p>
<p>Take up impeachment, declare the articles flimsy and without fact and then dismiss them...</p>
<p>This presupposes that Democrats will actually be able to pass the Articles Of Impeachment in the House..</p>
<p>That is, by NO MEANS, assured..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/09/27/ftp544/#comment-145639</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Sep 2019 19:09:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=17460#comment-145639</guid>
		<description>&lt;B&gt;DOMINATION!!!!!&lt;/B&gt;
-Mortal Kombat

The Alpha Dog romps around his domain..  :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>DOMINATION!!!!!</b><br />
-Mortal Kombat</p>
<p>The Alpha Dog romps around his domain..  :D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/09/27/ftp544/#comment-145638</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Sep 2019 19:09:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=17460#comment-145638</guid>
		<description>&lt;B&gt;&quot;Well obviously we would welcome a chance to get copies of those recordings,&quot; Schiff said later in the call after he and the fake &quot;Parubiy&quot; go on to discuss more details of the bogus allegations.

The Russian radio hosts, Vladimir &quot;Vovan&quot; Kuznetzov and Alexey &quot;Lexus&quot; Stolyarov, who have close ties to the Kremlin, told Schiff that the Kremlin had naked photos of Trump and that &quot;Parubiy&quot; could provide audio of Sobchak and Buzova discussing the photos. They also told Schiff that former Trump national security advisor Michael Flynn had met with another Russian to talk about how to prevent the photos from going public.&lt;/B&gt;

Schiff-head was ALL about getting dirt on Trump from foreign sources...

Now, he&#039;s just a putz and the future winner of the Weigantian MDDOTW award..  :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>"Well obviously we would welcome a chance to get copies of those recordings," Schiff said later in the call after he and the fake "Parubiy" go on to discuss more details of the bogus allegations.</p>
<p>The Russian radio hosts, Vladimir "Vovan" Kuznetzov and Alexey "Lexus" Stolyarov, who have close ties to the Kremlin, told Schiff that the Kremlin had naked photos of Trump and that "Parubiy" could provide audio of Sobchak and Buzova discussing the photos. They also told Schiff that former Trump national security advisor Michael Flynn had met with another Russian to talk about how to prevent the photos from going public.</b></p>
<p>Schiff-head was ALL about getting dirt on Trump from foreign sources...</p>
<p>Now, he's just a putz and the future winner of the Weigantian MDDOTW award..  :D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/09/27/ftp544/#comment-145637</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Sep 2019 19:07:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=17460#comment-145637</guid>
		<description>MynCaddy

&lt;I&gt;Michale you got that right!&lt;/I&gt;

Of course I got it factually accurate..

I am *ALWAYS* factually accurate..

I was dead on ballz factually accurate in 2016, predicting President Trump&#039;s win and even stating the EXACT EC spread..

Of course, that was before your time...

Yer just a JEEP and not worthy....  :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MynCaddy</p>
<p><i>Michale you got that right!</i></p>
<p>Of course I got it factually accurate..</p>
<p>I am *ALWAYS* factually accurate..</p>
<p>I was dead on ballz factually accurate in 2016, predicting President Trump's win and even stating the EXACT EC spread..</p>
<p>Of course, that was before your time...</p>
<p>Yer just a JEEP and not worthy....  :D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MtnCaddy</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/09/27/ftp544/#comment-145636</link>
		<dc:creator>MtnCaddy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Sep 2019 19:06:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=17460#comment-145636</guid>
		<description>[420] 

&quot;...found them to BE highly entertaining.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[420] </p>
<p>"...found them to BE highly entertaining."</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/09/27/ftp544/#comment-145635</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Sep 2019 19:05:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=17460#comment-145635</guid>
		<description>&lt;B&gt;Florida GOP Rep. Matt Gaetz has dug up a nearly two-year-old prank call in which House Intelligence Committee Chairman Rep. Adam Schiff told two Russian radio hosts posing as a Ukranian politician that he would be willing to accept damaging anti-Trump information.

Gaetz on Sunday tweeted an edited clip from the eight-minute-long phone call. It comes as Republicans are pushing back at the House Democratic impeachment inquiry over allegations President Trump pressured the Ukranian president into investigating the family of 2020 rival Joe Biden.


In the clip, Schiff, D-Calif., tells the Russian shock-jocks, who were posing as Andriy Parubiy, the former speaker of Ukraine&#039;s parliament, that he would be willing to accept dirt on Trump from the Ukranian.


&quot;So, you have recordings of both [Russian journalist Ksenia] Sobchak and [Russian model and singer Olga] Buzova where they&#039;re discussing the compromising material on Mr. Trump?&quot; Schiff asked the callers posing as Parubiy.&lt;/B&gt;

Schiff-head is truly a shit-head...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>Florida GOP Rep. Matt Gaetz has dug up a nearly two-year-old prank call in which House Intelligence Committee Chairman Rep. Adam Schiff told two Russian radio hosts posing as a Ukranian politician that he would be willing to accept damaging anti-Trump information.</p>
<p>Gaetz on Sunday tweeted an edited clip from the eight-minute-long phone call. It comes as Republicans are pushing back at the House Democratic impeachment inquiry over allegations President Trump pressured the Ukranian president into investigating the family of 2020 rival Joe Biden.</p>
<p>In the clip, Schiff, D-Calif., tells the Russian shock-jocks, who were posing as Andriy Parubiy, the former speaker of Ukraine's parliament, that he would be willing to accept dirt on Trump from the Ukranian.</p>
<p>"So, you have recordings of both [Russian journalist Ksenia] Sobchak and [Russian model and singer Olga] Buzova where they're discussing the compromising material on Mr. Trump?" Schiff asked the callers posing as Parubiy.</b></p>
<p>Schiff-head is truly a shit-head...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MtnCaddy</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/09/27/ftp544/#comment-145634</link>
		<dc:creator>MtnCaddy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Sep 2019 19:04:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=17460#comment-145634</guid>
		<description>[411]

&lt;b&gt;Michale&lt;/b&gt; you got that right! For the longest time I never read the comments but I&#039;ve found them to highly entertaining. I guess we&#039;ll find out if impeachment is real or faux.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[411]</p>
<p><b>Michale</b> you got that right! For the longest time I never read the comments but I've found them to highly entertaining. I guess we'll find out if impeachment is real or faux.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/09/27/ftp544/#comment-145633</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Sep 2019 19:03:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=17460#comment-145633</guid>
		<description>Apparently, Schiff-head doesn&#039;t mind getting dirt from Ukraine..

&lt;B&gt;GOP lawmaker digs up audio of Schiff telling prank callers he would accept Trump dirt from Ukraine&lt;/B&gt;
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/gop-rep-digs-up-audio-of-schiff-saying-he-would-accept-dirt-on-trump-from-ukrainian-politician-in-prank-call


As long as it&#039;s dirt on President Trump...  :eyeroll:</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apparently, Schiff-head doesn't mind getting dirt from Ukraine..</p>
<p><b>GOP lawmaker digs up audio of Schiff telling prank callers he would accept Trump dirt from Ukraine</b><br />
<a href="https://www.foxnews.com/politics/gop-rep-digs-up-audio-of-schiff-saying-he-would-accept-dirt-on-trump-from-ukrainian-politician-in-prank-call" rel="nofollow">https://www.foxnews.com/politics/gop-rep-digs-up-audio-of-schiff-saying-he-would-accept-dirt-on-trump-from-ukrainian-politician-in-prank-call</a></p>
<p>As long as it's dirt on President Trump...  :eyeroll:</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Balthasar</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/09/27/ftp544/#comment-145632</link>
		<dc:creator>Balthasar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Sep 2019 19:00:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=17460#comment-145632</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;are you a Biden supporter?&lt;/i&gt;

Mike is no Biden supporter. He supports Trump and the wild idea that after Jared and Ivana, and Don Junior, we ought to be giving one little shit about what Hunter Biden was doing in Ukraine. 

This is his plan: to make it sound bigger than it is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>are you a Biden supporter?</i></p>
<p>Mike is no Biden supporter. He supports Trump and the wild idea that after Jared and Ivana, and Don Junior, we ought to be giving one little shit about what Hunter Biden was doing in Ukraine. </p>
<p>This is his plan: to make it sound bigger than it is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michale</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/09/27/ftp544/#comment-145631</link>
		<dc:creator>Michale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Sep 2019 18:58:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=17460#comment-145631</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;And, let that, mercifully, be the last word here.&lt;/I&gt;

Shirley, you jest.. :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>And, let that, mercifully, be the last word here.</i></p>
<p>Shirley, you jest.. :D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kick</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/09/27/ftp544/#comment-145630</link>
		<dc:creator>Kick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Sep 2019 18:57:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=17460#comment-145630</guid>
		<description>Balthasar 

Biden isn&#039;t done just yet. MAGAt Chris Collins, though... definitely done! 

https://twitter.com/NickReisman/status/1178737756702433281

Balthy is absolutely correct that Collins was a &quot;great receiver&quot;... just too damn bad that he turned around and passed that insider info he RECEIVED to his family and got their pictures pasted onto family mugshots. 

Yet another MAGAt breaching the public trust for his own personal gain... if I saw patterns in things. ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Balthasar </p>
<p>Biden isn't done just yet. MAGAt Chris Collins, though... definitely done! </p>
<p><a href="https://twitter.com/NickReisman/status/1178737756702433281" rel="nofollow">https://twitter.com/NickReisman/status/1178737756702433281</a></p>
<p>Balthy is absolutely correct that Collins was a "great receiver"... just too damn bad that he turned around and passed that insider info he RECEIVED to his family and got their pictures pasted onto family mugshots. </p>
<p>Yet another MAGAt breaching the public trust for his own personal gain... if I saw patterns in things. ;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Balthasar</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisweigant.com/2019/09/27/ftp544/#comment-145629</link>
		<dc:creator>Balthasar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Sep 2019 18:54:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisweigant.com/?p=17460#comment-145629</guid>
		<description>Liz:

For &lt;i&gt;&lt;b&gt;my opinion of&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/i&gt; his poor performance - and, that&#039;s putting it mildly - at the DNI hearing.

There. Fixed it for you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Liz:</p>
<p>For <i><b>my opinion of</b></i> his poor performance - and, that's putting it mildly - at the DNI hearing.</p>
<p>There. Fixed it for you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
